ArticlePDF Available

Foreword to the Second Volume of the Special Issue on Veteran Community Engagement

Authors:

Abstract

Veteran community engagement is an evolving discipline informed by traditional community-based participatory research, veteran studies, and veterans themselves. This Special Issue suggests that research collaborations including military veterans, soldiers, and their families as co-researchers is a critical next step toward a design thinking perspective in social and healthcare systems for this population. This Special Issue was conceptualized through a veteran community-academic partnership formed over a decade ago. This partnership hosted several Warrior Summit conferences from 2013 to present, with the last of this series calling for academic contributions. The resulting papers drawn from the conference and other authors form this issue, and include a wide range of topics: veteran microdosing and psychedelic self-medication; a historical view of the impact of education exchange between U.S. and South Korean military nurses; strategies for engaging veterans in research of a theater-based intervention for PTSD; interprofessional approaches to addressing veteran identity considerations through collaborations between chaplain service and psychologists in the VA Healthcare System; an international perspective exploring a community collaborative with veterans in Montréal, Canada; efforts to build long-term and sustainable models for veteran engagement in health services research; community-engaged strategies to address veteran homelessness within broader housing stability efforts; and examining the role of veteran peer mentorship programs in alcohol recovery. These projects represent an emerging movement and offer a multidisciplinary roadmap toward honoring veterans voices in research, clinical services, and program development.
https://doi.org/10.1177/00221678231204932
Journal of Humanistic Psychology
1 –9
© The Author(s) 2023
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/00221678231204932
journals.sagepub.com/home/jhp
Introduction
Foreword to the Second
Volume of the Special
Issue on Veteran
Community Engagement
Zeno Franco1,2, Katinka Hooyer1,
Leslie Ruffalo1, Rae Anne Frey-Ho Fung3,
Mark Flower1, and Jeffrey Whittle2
Abstract
Veteran community engagement is an evolving discipline informed by traditional
community-based participatory research, veteran studies, and veterans
themselves. This Special Issue suggests that research collaborations including
military veterans, soldiers, and their families as co-researchers is a critical next
step toward a design thinking perspective in social and healthcare systems
for this population. This Special Issue was conceptualized through a veteran
community-academic partnership formed over a decade ago. This partnership
hosted several Warrior Summit conferences from 2013 to present, with
the last of this series calling for academic contributions. The resulting papers
drawn from the conference and other authors form this issue, and include a
wide range of topics: veteran microdosing and psychedelic self-medication; a
historical view of the impact of education exchange between U.S. and South
Korean military nurses; strategies for engaging veterans in research of a theater-
based intervention for PTSD; interprofessional approaches to addressing
veteran identity considerations through collaborations between chaplain service
and psychologists in the VA Healthcare System; an international perspective
1Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
2Clement J. Zablocki Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI, USA
3Rogers Behavioral Health, Milwaukee, WI, USA
Corresponding Author:
Zeno Franco, PhD, Department of Family & Community Medicine, Medical College of
Wisconsin, 8701 W Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Email: zfranco@mcw.edu
1204932JHPXXX10.1177/00221678231204932Journal of Humanistic PsychologyFranco et al.
research-article2023
2 Journal of Humanistic Psychology 00(0)
exploring a community collaborative with veterans in Montréal, Canada;
efforts to build long-term and sustainable models for veteran engagement in
health services research; community-engaged strategies to address veteran
homelessness within broader housing stability efforts; and examining the role of
veteran peer mentorship programs in alcohol recovery. These projects represent
an emerging movement and offer a multidisciplinary roadmap toward honoring
veterans voices in research, clinical services, and program development.
Keywords
veteran community engagement, veteran studies, veteran engagement in
research, community based participatory research, civilian reintegration,
humanities
Introduction
Humanistic concerns in veteran well-being are present throughout psycho-
logical services and allied health fields, most commonly in Veterans Affairs
Healthcare system settings (Baures, 1996; Eisenhart, 1977; White, 2015), but
also in other clinical and social service contexts (Greenleaf & Roessger,
2017). Over the past 15 years, we have sought to engage with veterans
increasingly in the context of community—that is to say largely outside of
hospitals—working with veterans not as patients, but rather as colleagues and
co-thinkers in the places where they live, work, and play in civilian life
(Franco et al., 2015; Hooyer & Kasza, 2018; Yan et al., 2022). Humanistic
psychology as a discipline suggests a client-centered view and also empha-
sizes the importance of strengths in maximizing human potential (Starcher &
Allen, 2016). Achieving optimal outcomes for veterans requires a transition
toward this more holistic view; one which we believe can be achieved by
integrating veteran perspectives in the design of research and care systems
that serve them at each stage of transition out of military service and into a
productive civilian life.
The call for papers (CFP) for this Special Issue was carefully crafted to
emphasize inclusion of articles that involved:
. . . Research collaborations that deliberately include military veterans, active
duty soldiers, and their families as stakeholders and co-researchers are
increasingly recognized as a critical next step in designing social systems and
clinical care approaches that meet their needs (Semaan et al., 2016). Many
community-driven methods and approaches can be applied to develop
innovative strategies for care and scholarship that are not only rigorous, but
Franco et al. 3
also improve relevance to the populations they are intended to serve and are
designed from their inception to be equitable.
The CFP built on a 2017 Wisconsin Warrior Summit event, extending invita-
tions to academic attendees to that conference and beyond. For readers of this
second volume, we strongly recommend you return to and review the initial
foreword, which can be found here:
Franco, Z., Hooyer, K., Ruffalo, L., & Frey-Ho Fung, R. A. (2021). Veterans
health and well-being—Collaborative research approaches: Toward veteran
community engagement. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 61(3), 287–312.
The resulting articles for the first volume of the Special Issue began to be
published online in 2019. This was, to our knowledge, the first academic
journal special issue dedicated specifically to the topic of Veteran Community
Engagement. The title of the Foreword to the first volume was notably com-
plex and overwrought, reflecting the difficulty in integrating several different
ways of thinking about this work—academic efforts to include veterans as
co-researchers working on scientific studies as a strategy to help researchers
better understand and integrate veteran patient perspectives; more traditional
views of community engagement focused on “street level” outreach and edu-
cation about health and well-being in collaboration with veterans; and com-
munity/academic partnerships with non-profit social service agencies
working with this population.
The initial Foreword summarized some of our work here in Milwaukee
and Wisconsin broadly in veteran community engagement, work that has
influenced conversations with the White House Office of National Drug
Control Policy (Pazdera et al., 2021) and the Veterans Healthcare
Administration’s Office of Community Engagement. Notably, individual vet-
eran partners we worked with over many years – some of whom were initially
quite critical of the VA system – have gone on to provide advisory input to
national VA Health Services Research & Development (HSR&D)-funded
projects. For us, these instances of individual veterans becoming increasingly
involved in research are not just examples of programmatic success, but also
represent personal transformation in veterans who have moved from being
in recovery to now setting policy for recovery programs (Diaz-Laplante,
2007; Pederson, 2021).
Like all moments of academic disciplinary formation, this seems to be a
zeitgeist; the movement toward Veteran Community Engagement is an idea
that simultaneously moved multiple teams across the United States and inter-
nationally toward a different form of work with veterans. As we put the initial
4 Journal of Humanistic Psychology 00(0)
volume together, we encountered several groups trying to make their own
sense of this space. Since the publication of that volume, a number of others
have described work in their own contexts, showing a wide variety of ways in
which veteran community engagement can be conceptualized and practiced
(see, for example, Chavez et al., 2022; Fehling et al., 2023; Knight et al., 2022;
Wendleton et al., 2023)—ranging from traditional Community-Based
Participatory Research (CBPR) strategies to more focal Community
Engagement in Research (CEnR) approaches (Michener et al., 2012). These
efforts have broadened our understanding and the conversation about the
breadth and depth of Veteran Community Engagement as a nascent subdisci-
pline spanning community engagement (Ahmed et al., 2017), veteran studies
(Grohowski, 2016), and health services research (Morgan et al., 2005).
Notably, in trying to be balanced about the authorship of the foreword to
the first issue, we chose not to favor any one veteran group or partner over
another, despite a long history of involving veterans as co-authors. But the
result was an incomplete picture of the work we have engaged in over the last
decade and a half. There were important reasons to do this at that moment in
time; community engagement is a complex and deeply political form of praxis
(Sandy & Holland, 2006). However, as we are at a different place in partner-
ship work, we have added two key thought partners here. First, Mr. Mark
Flower is a U.S. Army veteran and unfailing advocate for veteran community
engagement since our team started working with him over 15 years ago. Mr.
Flower approaches the work from a fundamentally coalition-based perspec-
tive, encouraging social service agencies to find common ground to ensure
that veterans are served comprehensively and “met where they are” in their
process of reintegration into civilian life. In a number of ways, this special
issue is a reflection of Mark’s vision. He has emphasized the importance of
“warm and fuzzy hand-offs” in transitions in care throughout our journey with
him—a piece of advice that all systems that serve veterans can benefit from if
this phrase becomes a philosophy, a meditation, and a path toward action.
Similarly, in the trajectory of personal academic careers, just like in life, it is
common for more junior scholars to want to differentiate themselves. And in so
doing, we omitted another truth, which is that without ongoing, systematic, and
selfless mentorship this work would not have enjoyed the success and accep-
tance that it has. Dr. Jeff Whittle, a physician at the Milwaukee VA Medical
Center and faculty member at the Medical College of Wisconsin, has invested
a tremendous amount in advancing the work of the faculty and veteran partners
from our team, as well as working tirelessly to integrate these ideas into the
Veteran Affairs Healthcare system as a whole. As faculty members who are
now not so new in the ranks, the importance of calling out Dr. Whittle’s role in
allowing this work to flourish has become all the more significant.
Franco et al. 5
Resulting Papers
The second volume of this Special Issue expresses a wide range of veteran com-
munity engagement and collaboration strategies, including (a) an article on vet-
eran microdosing and psychedelic self-medication (Hooyer et al., 2020); (b) a
historical view of the impact of education exchange between U.S. and South
Korean military nurses (Jun et al., 2019); (c) strategies for engaging veterans in
research of a theater-based intervention for PTSD (Ali et al., 2019); (d) interpro-
fessional approaches to addressing veteran identity considerations through col-
laborations between chaplain service and psychologists in a Veterans Affairs
Healthcare system (Antal et al., 2019); (e) an international perspective exploring
a community collaborative with veterans in Montre΄al, Canada (Fewster et al.,
2019); (f) efforts to build long-term and sustainable models for veteran engage-
ment in health services research (Wendleton et al., 2019); (g) community-
engaged strategies to address veteran homelessness within broader housing
stability efforts (Nelson et al., 2019); and (h) examining the role of veteran peer
mentorship programs in alcohol recovery (Hall et al., 2020).
This introduction to the second volume is personal in tone precisely
because community engagement is personal, relational work. It is work that
is being conducted robustly in a few places currently, and the seeds of this
work are growing at many other locations. It is our hope that the papers across
both volumes continue to set a new direction toward a more holistic, inte-
grated, and community-wide approach to ensuring veterans flourish as they
transition out of military service and into new roles as civilians with a special
history that remains an enduring part of their identity.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research,
authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research,
authorship, and/or publication of this article: Much of this work has been supported
by the Advancing a Healthier Wisconsin endowment. Other funders include the
Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, the Patient-Centered Outcomes
Research Institute, and the National Endowment for the Humanities.
References
Ahmed, S. M., Young, S. N., DeFino, M. C., Franco, Z., & Nelson, D. A. (2017). Towards
a practical model for community engagement: Advancing the art and science in aca-
demic health centers. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 1(5), 310–315.
6 Journal of Humanistic Psychology 00(0)
Ali, A., Wolfert, S., & Homer, B. D. (2019). In the service of science: Veteran-led
research in the investigation of a theatre-based posttraumatic stress disorder treat-
ment. Journal of Humanistic Psychology. Advance online publication. https://
doi.org/10.1177/0022167819839907
Antal, C. J., Yeomans, P. D., East, R., Hickey, D. W., Kalkstein, S., Brown, K. M.,
& Kaminstein, D. S. (2019). Transforming veteran identity through community
engagement: A chaplain–psychologist collaboration to address moral injury.
Journal of Humanistic Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.
org/10.1177/0022167819844071
Baures, M. M. (1996). Letting go of bitterness and hate. Journal of Humanistic
Psychology, 36(1), 75–90.
Chavez, M. A., Blevins, K. R., Brown, C., Giles, A. J., Matthieu, M. M., Wester, M.,
Heuer, J., Hahm, B., Lind, J., & Melillo, C. (2022). The future of veteran com-
munity engagement: Perspectives on engaging veterans and other stakeholders in
research agenda setting. Journal of Veterans Studies, 8(2), 21–35.
Diaz-Laplante, J. (2007). Humanistic psychology and social transformation: Building
the path toward a livable today and a just tomorrow. Journal of Humanistic
Psychology, 47(1), 54–72.
Eisenhart, R. W. (1977). Flower of the Dragon: An example of applied humanistic
psychology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 17(1), 3–24.
Fehling, K., Facundo, R., Flower, M., LaChappelle, K., Lane, A., Nearing, K., Stage,
G., Steffensmeier, K., True, G., & Wendleton, L. (2023). Assessing a consult ser-
vice to increase patient centered research in VHA. In US Depatment of Veterans
Affairs (Ed.), 2023 AcademyHealth annual research meeting. https://www.hsrd.
research.va.gov/meetings/2023/abstracts.cfm
Fewster, B., Brais, H., Gregory, S., & Paulin, M. (2019). Working together in Montréal
to improve veterans’ well-being: A Canadian perspective. Journal of Humanistic
Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167819848245
Franco, Z. E., Flower, M., Whittle, J., & Sandy, M. (2015). Professional ethics and virtue
ethics in community-engaged healthcare training. In D. E. Mitchell & R. K. Ream
(Eds.), Professional responsibility: The fundamental issue in education and health
care reform (pp. 211–229). Springer.
Franco, Z. E., Hooyer, K., Ruffalo, L., & Frey-Ho Fung, R. A. (2021). Veterans health
and well-being—Collaborative research approaches: Toward veteran community
engagement. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 61(3), 287–312.
Greenleaf, A. T., & Roessger, K. M. (2017). Effectiveness of care farming on vet-
erans’ life satisfaction, optimism, and perceived loneliness. The Journal of
Humanistic Counseling, 56(2), 86–110.
Grohowski, M. (2016). Masthead and editor’s letter. Journal of Veterans Studies,
1(1), i–viii.
Hall, S., Flower, M., Rein, L., & Franco, Z. (2020). Alcohol use and peer mentor-
ship in veterans. Journal of Humanistic Psychology. Advance online publication.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167820905952
Hooyer, K., Applbaum, K., & Kasza, D. (2020). Altered states of combat: Veteran
trauma and the quest for novel therapeutics in psychedelic substances.
Franco et al. 7
Journal of Humanistic Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.
org/10.1177/0022167820904523
Hooyer, K., & Kasza, D. (2018). The spiritual polishing of a battle fatigued para-
trooper: Collaborative writing and noetics in fieldwork. Practicing Anthropology,
40(3), 8–11.
Jun, M., Kim, H., Dressel, A., Cho, H., Kim, H., & Vandenhouten, C. (2019). The
impact of US army nurses on the development of the nursing profession in South
Korea. Journal of Humanistic Psychology. Advance online publication. https://
doi.org/10.1177/0022167819829243
Knight, S. J., Haibach, J. P., Hamilton, A. B., Whittle, J., Ono, S. S., Butler, J., Flower,
M., Ray, C. D., Pugh, M. J., & Zickmund, S. L. (2022). Veteran engagement
in health services research: A conceptual model. Journal of General Internal
Medicine, 37(Suppl. 1), 94–98.
Michener, L., Cook, M. J., Ahmed, S. M., Yonas, M. A., Coyne-Beasley, T., &
Aguilar-Gaxiola, S. (2012). Aligning the goals of community-engaged research:
Why and how academic health centers can successfully engage with communities
to improve health. Academic Medicine, 87(3), 285–291.
Morgan, R. O., Teal, C. R., Reddy, S. G., Ford, M. E., & Ashton, C. M. (2005).
Measurement in veterans affairs health services research: Veterans as a special
population. Health Services Research, 40(5, p. 2), 1573–1583.
Nelson, D. A., Morzinski, J., & Flower, M. (2019). The Milwaukee Continuum: Older vet-
erans and nonveterans use Housing First to exit homelessness. Journal of Humanistic
Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167819866523
Pazdera, M., Lor, K. B., Winstead, O., Hamberger, L. K., Curry, B., Franco, Z., O’Connor,
S., Gollin-Graves, M., Hurley, R., & Gray, T. (2021). Addressing opioid misuse
among veterans: A peer-delivered opioid prevention curriculum. International Journal
of Research on Service-Learning and Community Engagement, 9(1), 1–19.
Pederson, C. M. D. (2021). Moving beyond transactions: A qualitative look at the
characteristics of transformational relationships leveraged by nonprofit staff in
their work in the community [Dissertation, Cardinal Stritch University].
Sandy, M., & Holland, B. A. (2006). Different worlds and common ground:
Community partner perspectives on campus-community partnerships. Michigan
Journal of Community Service Learning, 13(1), 30–43.
Semaan, B. C., Britton, L. M., & Dosono, B. (2016). Transition resilience with ICTs:
“Identity awareness” in veteran re-integration. In J. Kaye, A. Druin, C. Lampe,
D. Morris & J. P. Hourcade (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on
human factors in computing systems (pp. 2882–2894).
Starcher, D., & Allen, S. L. (2016). A global human potential movement and a rebirth
of humanistic psychology. The Humanistic Psychologist, 44(3), 227–241.
Wendleton, L. R., Hoffmire, C. A., Drop, S., Flower, M., Jones, R., Nolan, J. P.,
Parham, C., & Monteith, L. L. (2023). Veteran engagement in survey research
to prevent suicide. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research,
Education, and Action, 17(1), 129–134.
Wendleton, L. R., Martin, L. A., Stewart Steffensmeier, K. R., LaChappelle, K.,
Fehling, K., Etingen, B., Ray, C., Carnevale, D., Hardie, C., & Grimes, I.
8 Journal of Humanistic Psychology 00(0)
(2019). Building sustainable models of veteran-engaged health services research.
Journal of Humanistic Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.
org/10.1177/0022167819845535
White, J. L. (2015). From reliving to relieving: Using embodied imagination to help
veterans move forward. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 55(2), 247–260.
Yan, A., Hooyer, K., Asan, O., Flower, M., & Whittle, J. (2022). Engaging veteran
stakeholders to identify patient-centred research priorities for optimizing imple-
mentation of lung cancer screening. Health Expectations, 25(1), 408–418.
Author Biographies
Zeno Franco, PhD, is an associate professor in the Department
of Family & Community Medicine at the Medical College of
Wisconsin and a staff clinical psychologist at the Clement J.
Zablocki VA Medical Center. His research focuses on improv-
ing strategies for community-based interventions with U.S.
military veterans and the social psychology of heroics. He is a
long-time member of the Society for Humanistic Psychology
and received the Carmi Harari Early Career Award from the Society in 2019. His cur-
rent work centers on technology-driven strategies to improve crisis response for mili-
tary veterans experiencing psycho-social problems in real time. These approaches
focus on smartphone and sensor-driven systems designed in collaboration with veter-
ans. He is a former US Department of Homeland Security Fellow (2003–2006) and
other aspects of his work have involved applying military command and control sys-
tems to civilian disaster response.
Katinka Hooyer, PhD, MS, is a medical anthropologist and
assistant professor in Family and Community Medicine,
Medical College of Wisconsin. She works with veterans
designing interventions to heal moral injury and educate on
military trauma. Her community engagement focuses on arts-
based research, using the humanities as a pathway to convey
difficult experiences. She is a graduate of the University of
Milwaukee-Wisconsin.
Leslie Ruffalo, PhD, MS, is an associate professor in the
Department of Family and Community Medicine at the Medical
College of Wisconsin. She is a community-engaged health
researcher. Her research often focuses on the development,
implementation, and evaluation of systems-based practices to
improve the health and well-being of our communities. She is
also the co-director of the Division of Medical Student Education
in her department. As an educator, she often incorporates medi-
cal students into her community-engaged projects.
Franco et al. 9
Rae Anne Frey-Ho Fung, PhD, is an Operation Iraqi Freedom
(OIF) Army Veteran and licensed psychologist. She is a board-
certified psychologist specializing in evidence-based treatment for
post-traumatic stress disorder, trauma, and comorbid conditions at
Rogers Behavioral Health. In addition, she has also served as an
instructor at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee School of
Continuing Education, where she co-developed trauma counseling
courses. She also volunteers as a member of the Veterans Health
Coalition, the Veterans’ Suicide Prevention Taskforce, and the
UW-Milwaukee Trauma Conference planning committee.
Mark Flower is a Captain John D. Mason peer-support spe-
cialist affiliated with the Medical College of Wisconsin in
Milwaukee. Mr. Flower served in the US Army and Army
Reserves from 1976 to 1994. He has more than 20 years of
experience working as a community and Veteran partner in
research. He consults with the VA ASCEND study, VA
GROVE, and volunteers for several community organizations
focused on veteran reintegration and recovery. He is active in
the Southeast Wisconsin area Veterans community and served
as an external community partner to the Medical College of
Wisconsin for many years.
Jeffrey Whittle, MD, MPH, is a staff physician at the Clement
J. Zablocki VA Medical Center and professor of medicine in the
Division of General Internal Medicine. He is a national author-
ity on the reasons for racial differences in cardiovascular proce-
dure use. He has developed an innovative community academic
partnership with veteran community organizations including
Vietnam Veterans of America, American Legion, Veterans of
Foreign Wars, and National Association of Black Veterans.
This extends his work on access and quality to community-
based effort to improve the quality of hypertension care for
older individuals by empowering them to take an active role in their own health care.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Veteran communities including veterans, their families, and their caregivers are vital collaborators in the field of veterans studies. Veteran community engaged research (CEnR) generates findings that are impactful and applicable to target populations. Veteran CEnR is a valuable emerging methodological approach. In the two decades since 9/11, clinical and health services researchers have increasingly prioritized participatory veteran research designs. The purpose of this article is to illustrate the important application of veteran CEnR to the development of a US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) research agenda that tackles a nuanced subject—veteran community reintegration. The Enhancing Veteran Community Reintegration Research (ENCORE) project includes a multi-stakeholder partnership (MSP) that engages veterans, families and caregivers, VA program directors, leaders in veteran community reintegration research, and representatives from community based veteran service organizations. Veteran CEnR was used as an approach to co-author this article with MSP research partners. Contributions from MSP volunteer authors are woven throughout the article to illustrate the organization and functioning of the MSP and impact of this type of stakeholder engagement throughout the project.
Article
Full-text available
With 20 million living veterans and millions more immediate family members, and approximately 9 million veterans enrolled in the nationally networked VA healthcare system, representing the interests and needs of veterans in this complex community is a substantial endeavor. Based on the importance of engaging Veterans in research, the VA Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Service convened a Working Group of VA researchers and Veterans to conduct a review of patient engagement models and develop recommendations for an approach to engage Veterans in health research that would incorporate their unique lived experiences and interests, and their perspectives on research priorities. The Working Group considered the specific context for Veteran engagement in research that includes other VA stakeholders from the operational and clinical leadership of the VA Health Administration (VHA). The resulting model identifies the range of potential stakeholders and three domains of relevant constructs—processes expected to facilitate Veteran engagement in research with other stakeholders, individual stakeholder and external factors, and outcomes. The expectation is that Veteran engagement will benefit research to policy and practice translation, including increasing the transparency of research and producing knowledge that is readily accepted and implemented in healthcare.
Article
Full-text available
Opioid use disorder (OUD) disproportionately affects military Veterans, who are more likely than the general population to experience chronic pain. A community–academic partnership launched a community-engaged research (CEnR) project designed to train Veteran peer mentor specialists to prevent and reduce opioid abuse among Veterans. A series of focus groups were conducted to obtain community input for the development of an opioid prevention curriculum to be utilized by peer mentor specialists. The focus group participants’ experiences contributed to nuanced perspectives that fostered appreciation of knowledge and service gaps by using a CEnR approach. The themes that emerged informed a curriculum with key concepts related to opioid abuse and recovery for peer mentor specialists providing peer support for Veterans. Integrating research with community input and partnerships optimizes the opportunity to address aspects of OUD experienced by Veterans and closes a significant gap in this area of study and practice.
Article
Full-text available
Background Patient engagement in research agenda setting is increasingly being seen as a strategy to improve the responsiveness of healthcare to patient priorities. Implementation of low‐dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening for lung cancer is suboptimal, suggesting that research is needed. Objectives This study aimed to describe an approach by which a Veteran patient group worked with other stakeholders to develop a research agenda for LDCT screening and to describe the research questions that they prioritized. Methods We worked with Veterans organizations to identify 12 Veterans or family members at risk for or having experience with lung cancer to form a Patient Advisory Council (PAC). The PAC met repeatedly from June 2018 to December 2020, both independently and jointly, with stakeholders representing clinicians, health administrators and researchers to identify relevant research topics. The PAC prioritized these topics and then identified questions within these areas where research was needed using an iterative process. Finally, they ranked the importance of obtaining answers to these questions. Results PAC members valued the co‐learning generated by interactions with stakeholders, but emphasized the importance of facilitation to avoid stakeholders dominating the discussion. The PAC prioritized three broad research areas—(1) the impact of insurance on uptake of LDCT; (2) how best to inform Veterans about LDCT; and (3) follow‐up and impact of screening results. Using these areas as guides, PAC members identified 20 specific questions, ranking as most important (1) innovative outreach methods, (2) the impact of screening on psychological health, and (3) the impact of outsourcing scans from VA to non‐VA providers on completion of recommended follow‐up of screening results. The latter two were not identified as high priority by the stakeholder group. Conclusions We present an approach that facilitates co‐learning between Veteran patients and providers, researchers and health system administrators to increase patient confidence in their ability to contribute important information to a research agenda. The research questions prioritized by the Veterans who participated in this project illustrate that for this new screening technology, patients are concerned about the practical details of implementation (e.g., follow‐up) and the technology's impact on quality of life. Patient or Public Contribution Veterans and Veteran advocates contributed to our research team throughout the entire research process, including conceiving and co‐authoring this manuscript.
Article
Full-text available
Veteran community engagement is an evolving discipline informed by traditional community-based participatory research, veteran studies, and veterans themselves. This Special Issue suggests that research collaborations including military veterans, soldiers, and their families as co-researchers is a critical next step toward a designing thinking perspective in social and healthcare systems for this population. This Special Issue was conceptualized through a veteran community-academic partnership formed over a decade ago. We briefly describe the activities of this partnership from 2008 to present in order to frame the praxis considerations within this issue. The partnership hosted several Warrior Summit conferences from 2013 to present, with the last of this series calling for academic contributions. The resulting papers drawn from the conference and other authors form this issue, and include a wide range of topics: Arts- and theater-based interventions for PTSD; engaging veteran college students in higher education; combining strengths of the chaplaincy and psychology to address changes in veteran identity after moral injury; multi-sector community coalitions for veteran reintegration in the US and Canada; veteran volunteering as a reintegration strategy; examining experiences of US military nurses; veteran collaboratively designed mindfulness groups in a VA healthcare system; engaging veterans on Community Advisory Boards; using photovoice to highlight veterans issues; collaborative research on veteran homelessness; veteran self-medication with psychedelics; community engaged addictions research; and collaboratively designing veteran peer support curricula. These projects represent an emerging movement and offer a multidisciplinary roadmap toward assisting and honoring veterans in their transition back into the civilian world.
Article
Full-text available
Veterans are at an increased risk of developing alcohol use disorder (AUD) and other comorbid psychiatric disorders, yet they often underutilize professional mental health services. Peer mentorship programs offer an alternative option for those seeking help for mental health problems. The purpose of this study was to examine alcohol use in veterans enrolled in a peer mentorship program, determine the effects of peer mentorship on alcohol use and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, and assess the interaction between AUD risk and PTSD symptoms over time. Veterans were enrolled in a 12-week peer mentorship program at Dryhootch in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Measures of AUD risk (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test) and PTSD symptoms (PTSD Checklist for DSM-5) were collected before and after 12 weeks. Additionally, the participants reported their total drinks consumed each week throughout the program. Results showed that veterans were at an increased risk for AUD compared with civilian populations. The risk of developing AUD was associated with more PTSD symptoms. While PTSD symptoms were significantly lower after 12 weeks in the program, Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test scores and the average number of weekly drinks were not significantly different. Further community work should address alcohol use in veterans to achieve better mental health outcomes in the program.
Article
Full-text available
Engaging veterans in research has gained momentum in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) in recent years. Engagement ensures that health services research is more relevant and tailored to the unique needs of veteran populations. VHA research centers promote engagement through the development of veteran engagement groups (VEGs). Members engage with researchers in organized meetings to review research proposals or projects, and provide individual feedback to improve veteran-centricity. This article shares important lessons learned in implementing VEGs locally from the liaisons who serve as a bridge between researchers and the veterans involved in these groups. Five steps in the VEG formation process are discussed: (1) regulatory considerations (e.g., compliance issues, ethics); (2) recruitment of VEG members (e.g., group size, demographic characteristics); (3) structure and governance (e.g., meeting logistics, participation, and privacy/confidentiality); (4) orientation and training (e.g., orienting veterans and researchers to the engagement process); and (5) evaluation and feedback (e.g., the effectiveness of engagement and tracking the incorporation of veteran feedback in the research). While all VEGs go through identical steps in the formation process, local implementation varies contextually by research center location. To illustrate the diversity in the formation methods, we present a series of case studies throughout this article: Denver, Colorado; Portland, Oregon; Hines, Illinois; West Haven, Connecticut; Iowa City, Iowa; and Houston, Texas. Normalization of veteran engagement in VHA health services research will require a cultural shift to one that embraces veterans’ perspectives and results in a more collaborative partnership between VHA leadership, researchers, and veterans.
Article
Suicide rates among veterans remain high, underscoring the necessity of identifying modifiable suicide risk and protective factors that can be targeted through public health approaches. One way to ensure that survey-based research yields information necessary to translate findings into patient-centered interventions is through veteran engagement. The current manuscript describes perspectives of members of a national Veterans Engagement Board (VEB) in contributing to the Assessing Social and Community Environments with National Data (ASCEND) for Veteran Suicide Prevention project. Contributions have included strengthening communication with potential veteran participants, addressing sensitive survey topics such as firearms and suicide, and ensuring that ASCEND is responsive to current national and global events. Additionally, Veterans Engagement Board members described the personal impact of engagement. These contributions highlight the value of veteran engagement as an integral component of suicide risk and prevention research.
Article
For veterans with moral conflicts brought on by war work, evidence-based approaches designed for posttraumatic stress disorder tend not to attend to resulting spiritual and ethical forms of suffering. These “treatment-resistant” veterans are at high risk for self-harm. While new medical treatments are being developed, it is also clear that veterans themselves are experimenting in collective, ritualistic, and community-based ceremonial uses of psychedelic medicine. This article introduces the concept of altered states of combat (ASCombat) to refer to the specific mind-set soldiers experience in combat. As a preliminary analytical framework, we associate ASCombat to the widely studied altered states of consciousness as a way to advance understanding on the use and effectiveness of psychedelics and collective healing in the veteran population. The notion of ASCombat and typology is grounded in 4 years of veteran-engaged research in community-based healing approaches. The self-report of one case, by the veteran author of this article, provides suggestive materials for analysis, discussion, and future research.
Article
Background: Homelessness is about survival and more than an issue of bricks and mortar. It is not a static dimension and alludes to a troubled age and brokenness of society. Despite dramatic declines in numbers of people presently homeless, the issue continues to be a public health issue. The number of veterans currently homeless continues to be of national concern despite application of resources. More needs to be done to better understand the concerns of veterans, once homeless and now housed. Method: Qualitative research in the form of interviews provided insights from the veterans on their experience around achieving housing. Qualitative methods are often used in evaluations as they speak of the experience of the program being evaluated by capturing and then communicating the narratives of the participants. This study was grounded in community-based participatory research where a member of community was a part of all phases of the research process. Results: Seven interviews with formerly homeless veterans were conducted. Themes included the following: Burnt Brides and Regrets, Survival, Spirituality, Recovery and Stress, Supportive Care, Reunite Family, and Sickness and Health. Discussion: The themes provide insight into the experience of the veterans and a means to better understand the healing process. Understanding of the healing process includes the following: Acknowledging the Courage to go Deep, Time, Veterans Giving Back, and Recovery is Ongoing. Despite what was learned, further research is needed to better understand the long-term implications of people formerly homeless now housed.