ArticlePDF Available

An updated list and some comments on the occurrence of intraspecific nest parasitism in birds

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

This paper presents a list, compiled from the literature, of bird species in which intraspecific nest parasitism (INP) occurs. INP was reported in 234 species: one Struthioniformes, two Tinamiformes, two Procellariiformes, six Podicipediiformes, five Ciconiiformes, one Phoenicopteriformes, 74 Anseriformes, one Falconiformes, 32 Galliformes, eight Gruiformes, 19 Charadriiformes, nine Columbiformes, five Cuculiformes, two Apodiformes, one Coraciiformes and 66 Passeriformes. Hence, INP is very common among precocial species, and less so among altricials. Irrespective of this, most INP birds are colonial.
Content may be subject to copyright.
lbis
(2001
)
143,
133-1
43
An updated
list
and some comments on the occurrence
of
intraspecific nest parasitism in birds
YORAM
YOM-TOV
Department
of
Zoology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv
69978,
Israel
This paper presents a list, compiled from
the
literature, of bird species in which intraspecific
nest parasitism (INP) occurs.
INP
was reported in
234
species: one Struthioniformes, two
Tinamiformes, two Procellariiformes, six Podicipediiformes, five Ciconiiformes, one
Phoenicopteriformes,
74
Anseriformes, one Falconiformes,
32
Galliformes, eight Gruiformes,
1
9
Charadriiformes, nine Columbiformes, five Cuculiformes, two Apodiformes, one
Coraciiformes and
66
Passeriformes. Hence,
INP
is very common among precocial species,
and less
so
among altricials. Irrespective of this, most INP birds are colonial.
Intraspecific nest parasitism (INP) in birds was consid-
ered to be rare compared with interspecific parasitism
(Payne 1977), and in 1980 was reported for only 53
species (Yom-Tov 1980a). The growing awareness of the
diversity of breeding strategies increased the list consid-
erably, and by 1989 it more than doubled (MacWhirter
1989, Rohwer
&
Freeman 1989), exceedmg the number
of interspecific parasite species (about
80;
Payne 1977).
A high rate of INP is expected when host nests are
available for extended periods of time or in a limited
space. Hence, high INP rates are expected in precocial
species, because: (1) most lay larger clutches than do
similarly sized altricial species (Ar
&
Yom-Tov 1978);
(2) they start incubating mostly after the last or penul-
timate egg is laid, thus the nest is left without
protection for most of the laying period; (3) parasitic
eggs and young among precocial birds require a smaller
increase in parental care from hosts than in altricial
birds (Sorenson 1992).
High INP rates are expected when nests are crowded
in
a
small space, i.e. in colonial species or in high nesting
density, and when nesting sites are a limiting factor,
as
they are among non-excavating hole nesters (Yom-Tov
1980a, Anderson 1982, Rohwer
&
Freeman 1989).
The aim of this paper is to provide an up-to-date list
of
all
species for which
I
found data on INP, and briefly
comment on two factors associated with this phenom-
enon, namely mode of reproduction and coloniality.
METHODS
Data on INP were gathered from the ornithological
literature, including reviews (Yom-Tov 1980a, Rohwer
&
Freeman 19893, research papers, books on regional
avifaunas (Ali
&
Ripley 1968-1974, Brown
et
al.
1982,
Harrison 1975, Maclean 1993, Urban
et
al.
1986) and
books dealing with
a
particular group of birds where
INP is known to be common (Goodwin 1977, 1982,
Johnsgard 1978, 1986, 1988, Summers-Smith 1988).
A
species was considered to have INP if the above
sources described it as such, or if it is stated
that
more
than one female laid in one nest but only one female
cared for the young, or if abnormal clutch size was
found (larger than twice mean clutch size; Yom-Tov
1980a). These data were complemented with data on
nest type (cavity or other), and nesting coloniality
(Cramp
&
Simmons 1977, 1980, Cramp
&
Perrins
1994, Hoyo
et
al.
1992, 1994a, 1994b).
A
species was
defined as colonial even
if
it only sometimes breeds
colonially, and as
a
cavity nester even if it sometimes
lays in the open.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Intraspecific nest parasitism was reported in 234
species
of
birds: one Struthioniformes, two Tinami-
formes,
two
Procellariiformes, six Podicipediformes,
five Ciconiiformes, one Phoenicopteriformes, 74 Anseri-
formes, one Falconiformes, 32 Galliformes, eight
Gruiformes, 19 Charadriiformes, nine Columbiformes,
five Cuculiformes,
two
Apodiformes, one Coracii-
formes and 66 Passeriformes.
INP
and
mode
of
reproduction
As
expected, INP rate was highest among precocial
Email:
yomtov@post.tau.ac.il
@
2001
British Ornithologists' Union
134
Y
Yom-Tov
birds, and was reported for most precocial orders.
Among the
161
species of Anseriformes (number of
species per order from Gill
19943,
INP
was reported in
74
species
(46%).
These INP rates are probably under-
estimates, as can be deduced from the following facts.
Reported rates
of
INP are higher in areas where most
ornithologists work: INP was reported in
46
species
(70%)
of the
66
species breeding in the western
Palearctic and North America (USA and Canada), and
in
16
species
(70%)
of the
23
species breeding in
Australia and New Zealand. Hence, it is logical
to
expect that
INP
will
be reported for yet more species
of Anseriformes, as predicted by Sayler
(1992).
High
rates
of
INP (but much lower than for Anseriformes)
were reported for other precocial orders, including
the Podicipediformes
(29"L)),
Galliformes
(1
2%),
Charadriiformes
(5%)
and Gruiformes
(4%).
On the
other hand,
low
INP
rates were reported for altricial
birds:
5%
Ciconiiformes,
1
Yo
among Passeriformes and
even less among other orders. For some altricial orders
it
was not reported at all. For example, there are
no reports of
INP
among the
358
Psittaciformes
and
178
Strigiformes, only two species with INP in the
Apodiformes
(422
species), and one each of Falconi-
formes
(3
1 1
species) and Coraciiformes
(21 8
species).
INP
and
coloniality
Only about
13%
of bird species are colonial breeders
(Hoyo
et
al.
1992)
but out of
the
232
species in Table
1,
134 (57.5%)
are colonial breeders. Among altricials
exhibiting
INP,
70%
of those that are Passeriformes,
all
that are Ciconiiformes, the two species that are
Procellariiformes, and the single species of
Coraciiformes and Falconiformes are colonial. Among
the precocial and semi-precocial Anseriformes
(74
species; Table
l),
Charadriiformes
(1
9
species) and
Podicipediformes (six species),
44 (59"/0), 15 (79'Yo)
Table
1. The occurrence of intraspecific nest parasitism in 234 species of birds. The list is organized by order and family (following
Voous 1985) and within each family by the alphabetical order of the genera. Coloniality is expressed as y (yes) or n (no), mode of repro-
duction as altricial (A), precocial (P) or semi-precocial (SP), nest type as open, closed and cavity. For most species only one reference
is
given (preferably the earliest report), although for some there are several. All studies apart from Victoria (1972) are field studies.
Species
Struthio camelus Ostrich
Nothura maculosa Spotted Tinamou
Nothura darwinii Darwin's Tinarnou
Diomedea nigripes Black-footed Albatross
Diomedea immutabilis Laysan Albatross
Aechmophorus
clarkii
Clark's Grebe
Aechmophorus occidentalis Western Grebe
fodiceps cristatus Great-crested Grebe
Podiceps grisegena Red-necked Grebe
fodiceps nigricollis Eared Grebe
Podiceps occipitalis Silvery Grebe
Ardea purpurea Purple Heron
Ardeola ralloides Squacco Heron
Egretta rufescens Reddish Egret
Ciconia
maguan Maguari Stork
Eudocimus
albus
White Ibis
Phoenicopterus ruber Greater Flamingo
Aix galericulata Mandarin Duck
Aix sponsa Wood Duck
Alopochen aegyptiacus Egyptian Goose
Altriciali
Family Colonial Precocial
~~ ~
Struthionidae
n
P
Tinamidae
n
P
Tinamidae n
P
Diomedeidae
Y
A
Diomedeidae
v
A
Podicipedidae y
P
Podicipedidae y P
Podicipedidae yin P
Podicipedidae y/n P
Podicipedidae y P
Podicipedidae y P
Ardeidae
Y
A
Ardeidae
Y
A
Ardeidae
Y
A
Ciconiidae
Y
A
Threskiornithidae y
A
Phoenicopteridae y P
Anatidae
n
P
Anatidae
n
P
Anatidae n
P
Nest type Reference
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Cavity
Cavity
Cavity
Bertram 1979
Bump
&
Bump 1969
Bump
&
Bump 1969
Tickell
&
Pinder 1966
Tickell
&
Pinder 1966
Storer
&
Nuechterlein 1992
Storer
&
Nuechterlein 1992
Cramp
&
Simmons 1977
Cramp
&
Simmons 1977
Lyon
&
Everding 1996
Nuechterlein in Rohwer
&
Freeman 1989
Gonzalez-Martin
&
Ruiz 1996
Gonzalez-Martin
&
Ruiz 1996
Paul in Rohwer
&
Freeman
Thomas 1984
Frederick
8,
Shields
1986
1989
Brown 1958
Davies
&
Baggott 1989
Leopold 1951, Semel
&
Pitrnan 1965
Sherman 1992
continued
0
2001
British Ornithologists'
Union,
lba.
143,
133-143
lntraspecific nest parasitism 1 35
Table
1
continued.
Species
Altriciall
Family Colonial Precocial
-
Anas castanea Chestnut Teal
Anas clypeata Northern Shoveler
Anas fulvigula Mottled Duck
Anas gracilis Grey Teal
Anas penelope Wigeon
Anas plafyrhynchos Mallard
Anas querquedula Garganey
Anas rubripes American Black Duck
Anas strepera Gadwall
Anas superciliosa Grey Duck
Anser anser Greylag Goose
Anser canagica Emperor Goose
Anser caerulescens Snow Goose
Anser erythropus Lesser White-fronted Goose
Anser indicus Bar-headed Goose
Anser rossi
Ross
Goose
Anseranas semipalamata Magpie Goose
Aythya affinis Lesser Scaup
Aythya americana Redhead
Aythya australis Australian White-eye
Aythya ferina Pochard
Aythya fuligula Tufted Duck
Aythya marila Scaup
Aythya nyroca Ferruginous White-eye
Aythya valisineria Canvasback
Biziura lobata Musk Duck
Branta bernicla Brant Goose
Branta canadensis Canada Goose
Branta leucopsis Barnacle Goose
Bucephala albeola Bufflehead
Bucephala clangula Goldeneye
Bucephala islandica Barrow's Goldeneye
Cairina moschata Muscovy Duck
Chenonetta jubata Maned Goose
Clangula hyemalis Long-tailed Duck
Cygnus atratus Black Swan
Dendrocygna autumnalis Black-bellied
Dendrocygna bicolor Fu lvous Whist
I
i
ng -d uck
Dendrocygna eytoni Plumed Whistling-duck
Dendrocygna javanica Lesser Whistling-duck
Dendrocygna viduata White-faced Whistling-duck
Histrionicus histrionicus Harlequin Duck
Lophodytes cucullatus Hooded Merganser
Malacorhynchus membranaceus Pink-eared Duck
Marmaronetta angustirostris Marbled Teal
Melanitta fusca White-winged Scoter
Melanitta nigra Black Scoter
Mergus albellus Smew
Mergus merganser Goosander
Whistling-duck
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Nest type Reference
Openlcavity
Open
Open
Openlcavity
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Cavity
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Cavity
Cavity
Openlcavity
Cavity
Cavity
Open
Open
Cavity
Cavity
Cavity
Cavity
Cavity
Open
Cavity
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Openlcavity
Frith 1967
Dementiev et a/. 1967
Johnson etal. 1996
Frith 1967
Bengston 1972b
Cramp
&
Simmons 1977,
Evans
&
Williams 1987
Dementiev et
a/.
1967
Stotts
&
Davis 1960
Duebbert 1966
Attiwill etal. 1981
Cramp
&
Simmons 1977
Eisenhauer
&
Kirkpatrick 1977
Barry 1960, Quinn et
a/.
1987
Tegelstrom
&
Vonessen 1996
Weigmann
&
Lamprecht 1990
Bellrose 1976
Whitehead
&
Tschirner 1991
Bent 1902
Joyner 1983, Weller 1959
Frith 1967
Cramp
&
Simmons 1977
Newton
&
Campbell 1975
Bengston 1972b
Dementiev et
a/.
1967
Sorenson 1993
Attiwill etal. 1981
Barry 1960
Kossack 1950
Choudhury etal. 1993,
Phillips 1923-1 926
Brestwer 1900, Dow
&
Fredga 1984
Bengston 1972b
Philips 1922-1926
Briggs 1991
Dementiev etal. 1967,
Frith 1967
Bolen 1967
Forslund
&
Larsson 1995
Alison 1975
Meanley
&
Meanley 1959,
Barnhart 1901
Frith 1967
Johnsgard 1978
Clark 1976
Bengston 1972a
Morse
&
Wight 1969
Frith 1967
Hawkes 1970
Verneer 1968
Bengston 1972a
Cramp
&
Simmons 1977
Cramp
&
Simmons 1977
continued
@
2001
British Ornithologists' Union,
Ibis,
143,
133-143
136
Y.
Yom-Tov
Table
1
continued.
Species
Mergus serrator
Red-breasted Merganser
Neffa erythropthalma
Southern Pochard
Netta peposaca
Rosybill
Neffa rufina
Red-crested Pochard
Nettapus coromandehanus
Cotton Pygmy Goose
Oxyura australis
Australian Blue-billed Duck
Oxyura dominica
Masked Duck
Oxyura jamarcensis
Ruddy Duck
Oxyura leucocephala
White-headed Duck
Oxyura maccoa
Maccoa Duck
Oxyura vittata
Argentine Blue-billed Duck
Plectopterus gambensis
Spur-winged Goose
Sark/diornis melanotos
Comb Duck
Somateria moll/ssima
Eider
~
Somateria spectabilis
King Eider
Sfictoneffa naevosa
Freckled Duck
Tadorna ferruginea
Ruddy Shelduck
Tadorna radjah
Radjah Shelduck
Tadorna fadorna
Shelduck
Tadorna tadornoides
Australian Shelduck
Tadorna variegata
New Zealand Duck
Thalassornis leuconofus
White-backed Duck
Falco naumanni
Lesser Kestrel
Orfalis vetula
Plain Chachalaca
Numida meleagris
Crowned Guineafowl
Perdix perdix
Gray Partridge
Francolinus africanus
Greywing Francolin
Francolinus capensis
Cape Francolin
Callipepla californica
California Quail
Callipepla douglasii
Elegant Quail
Colinus virginianus
Bobwhite Quail
Oreortyx pictus
Mountain Quail
Alectoris barbara
Barbary Partridge
Alectoris chukar
Chukar Partridge
Alectoris graeca
Rock Partridge
Ammoperdix griseogularis
See-see Partridge
Amrnoperdix heyi
Sand Partridge
Coturnix corornandelica
Black-breasted Quail
Coturnix coturnix
Eurasian Quail
Coturnix delegorguei
Harlequin Quai
I
Dendrortyx macroura
Long-tailed Wood Partridge
Francolinus leucoscepus
Yellow-necked Francolin
Francolinus natalensis
Natal Francolin
Francolinus schlegelii
Schlegel's Francolin
Guffera edouardi
Crested Guineafowl
Lophura edwardsi
Edward's Pheasant
Meleagris gallopavo
Wild Turkey
Phasianus colchicus
Ring-necked Pheasant
Tetraogallus caucasicus
Caucasian Snowcock
Tympanuchus phasianellus
Sharp-tailed Grouse
Lagopus lagopus
Willow Ptarmigan
Family Colonial
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Anatidae
Falconidae
Cracidae
Numididae
Numididae
Numididae
Numididae
Odontophoridae
Odontophoridae
Odontophoridae
Odontophoridae
Phasianidae
Phasianidae
Phasianidae
Phasianidae
Phasianidae
Phasianidae
Phasianidae
Phasianidae
Phasianidae
Phasianidae
Phasianidae
Phasianidae
Phasianidae
Phasianidae
Phasianidae
Phasianidae
Phasianidae
Phasianidae
Tetraonidae
~-
Yln
n
Y/n
Y/n
n
n
n
n
n
Y/n
Y/n
n
Yln
Y
n
n
Y/n
n
Y
n
n
Y/n
Y
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
Altriciali
Precocial
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
A
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Nest type
Open
Open
Open
Open
Cavity
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Openkavity
Openkavit
y
Open
Open
Open
Open
Cavity
Openlcavity
Openkavity
Cavity
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Reference
Young
&
Titman 1987
Clancey 1967
Gibson 1920
Hellebrekers
&
Voous
1964
Ah
&
Ripley 1968-1974
Serventy
&
Whittell 1967
Bond 1961
Low 1941, Joyner 1983
Dementiev
et a/
1967
Clark 1964
Gibson 1920
Pitman 1965
Pitman 1965
Erikstad
ef
a/
1998,
Robertson 1998
Cramp
&
Simmons 1977
Rogers 1990
Cramp
&
Simmons 1977
O'Brien 1990
Hori 1964, 1969
Frith 1967
Williams 1979
Clancey 1967
~______
~~
Negro
et a/.
1996
Fleetwood
&
Bolen 1965
Clancey 1967
Knott
etal.
1943
Clancey 1967
Clancey 1967
Tyler 1913
Johnsgard 1988
Klimstra
&
Roseberry 1975
Grinnell
etal.
191 8
Urban
eta/.
1986
Mackie
&
Buechner 1963
Johnsgard 1988
Cramp
&
Simmons 1980
Yom-Tov 1980a
Johnsgard 1988
Cramp
&
Simmons 1980
Urban
eta/.
1986
Johnsgard 1988
Urban
et
a/.
1986
Urban
et a/.
1986
Johnsgard 1988
Clancey 1967
Schorger 1966
Johnsgard 1986
Knott
etal.
1943
Dementiev
et a/.
1967
Graison 1989
Martin 1984, Freeland
ef a/.
1995
continued
@
2001
British
Ornithologists' Union,
Ibis,
143,
133-143
lntraspecific nest parasitism
137
Table
1
continued.
Species
Lagopus leucurus
White-tailed Ptarmigan
Dendrogapus canadensis
Spruce Grouse
Dendrogapus obscurus
Blue Grouse
Tetra0 tetrix
Capercaillie
Grus canadensis
Sandhill Crane
Amaurornis flavirostris
Black Crake
Crex crex
Corn Crake
Fulica americana
American Coot
Fulica atra
Eurasian Coot
Fulica cristata
Crested Coot
Gallinula chloropus
Moorhen
Porphyrio porphyrio
Green-backed Gallinule
Charadrius melodus
Piping Plover
Charadrius montanus
Mountain Plover
Limosa fedoa
Marbled Godwit
Limosa
limosa
Black-tailed Godwit
Phalaropus fulicaria
Red Phalarope
Phalaropus tricolor
Wilson’s Phalarope
Vanellus vanellus
Northern Lapwing
Larus argentatus
Herring Gull
Larus delawarensis
Ring-billed Gull
Larus minutus
Little Gull
Sterna caspia
Caspian Tern
Sterna dougallii
Roseate Tern
Sterna hirundo
Common Tern
Rynchops niger
Black Skimmer
Catoptrophorys semipalmatus
Western Willet
Recurvirostra americana
American Avocet
Scolopax minor
American Woodcock
Scolopax rusticola
Eurasian Woodcock
Catharacta lonnbergi
Brown Skua
Columba livia
Rock Dove
Columba palurnbus
Wood Pigeon
Columba oenas
Stock Dove
Streptopelia risoria
Ringed Turtle Dove
Streptopelia senegalensis
Palm Dove
Streptopelia turtur
Turtle Dove
Streptopelia capiola
Ring-necked Dove
Oena capensis
Namaqua Dove
Zenaida macroura
Mourning Dove
Coccyzus americanus
Yellow-billed Cuckoo
Coccyzus eryfhrophthalmus
Black- bi
I
led Cuckoo
Coccyzus melacoryphus
Dark-billed Cuckoo
Coccyzus
pumilus
Dwarf Cuckoo
Geococcyx californianus
Roadrunner
Glaucis hirsufa
Rufous-breasted Hermit
Family Colonial
-
Tetraonidae
Tetraonidae
Tetraonidae
Tetraonidae
Gruidae
Rallidae
Rallidae
Rallidae
Rallidae
Rallidae
Rallidae
Rallidae
Charadriidae
Charadriidae
Charadriidae
Charadriidae
Charadriidae
Charadriidae
Charadriidae
Laridae
Laridae
Laridae
Laridae
Laridae
Laridae
Rhynchopidae
Scolopacidae
Scolopacidae
Scolopacidae
Scolopacidae
Stercoraiidae
Columbidae
Columbidae
Columbidae
Columbidae
Columbidae
Columbidae
Columbidae
Columbidae
Columbidae
Coccyzidae
Coccyzidae
Coccyzidae
Coccyzidae
Crotophagidae
Trochilidae
~
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
yln
Y/n
n
Y/n
Y
Y/n
n
Y
Y/n
yln
n
Yln
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
n
n
Y
Y
n
n
n
y/n Y/n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
Altriciall
Precocial
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
SP
SP
SP
SP
SP
SP
SP
SP
SP
SP
SP
SP
SP
SP
SP
SP
SP
SP
SP
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
Nest type
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Reference
Choate 1963
Rand 1947
Redfield 1973
Cramp
&
Simmons 1980
Littlefield 1981
Urban
et
a/.
1986
Brown 1938
Arnold 1987, Lyon 1993
Horsfall 1984
Urban
et
a/.
1986
Gibbons 1986,
McRae 1996
Craig 1980
Hussell
&
Woodford 1965
Hamas
&
Graul 1985
Colwell 1986
Haverschmidt 1963
Kistchinski 1975
Colwell 1986
Spencer 1953
Burger in Rohwer
&
Freeman 1989
Conover
et
a/.
1979
Haverschmidt 1946
Cuthbert
in
Rohwer
&
Freeman 1989
Shealer
&
Zurovchak 1995
Nisbet in Rohwer
&
Freeman 1989
Erwin 1977
Colwell 1986
Giroux 1985
Lincoln 1951
Alexander 1946
Millar
eta/.
1994
Goodwin 1977
Murton 1965
Campbell in Cramp 1985
Goodwin 1977
Shoham 1975
Shoham 1975
Urban
et
a/.
1986
Urban
et
a/.
1986
Weeks 1980
Nolan
&
Thompson 1975,
Fleischer
et
a/.
1985
Baicich
&
Harrison 1997
Sick 1993
Ralph 1975
Miller 1946
Haverschmidt 1968
~~ ~
continued
@
2001
British Ornithologists’ Union,
lbrs,
143,
133-143
138
Y
Yom-Tov
Table
1
continued.
Species
Threnetes rucken
Band-tailed Barbthroat
~~~~~~ ~
Merops bullockoides
White-f ronted Bee-eater
Calocifta formosa
White-throated Magpie-jay
Gymnorhynus cyanocephalus
Piiion Jay
Pica
pica
Black-billed Magpie
Passerculus sandwichensis
Savannah Sparrow
Spizella passerina
Chipping Sparrow
Spizella
pusilla Field Sparrow
Amandava amandava
Red Munia
Es
trilda paludicola
Fawn
-
b reasted Wax bi
I I
Lonchura
bicolor
Blue-billed Mannikin
Lonchura cantans
African Silverbill
Lonchura kelaarfi
Hill Munia
Lonchura malabarica
White-throated Munia
Lonchura puncfulafa
Spice Finch
Taeniopygia guffata
Zebra Finch
Carduelis chloris
European Greenfinch
Carduelis
tristis
American Goldfinch
Hirundo pyrrhonota
Cliff Swallow
Hirundo
rustica
Barn Swallow
Hirundo spilodera
South African Cliff Swallow
Pefrochelidon ariel
Fairy Martin
Progne subis
Purple Martin
Riparia riparia
Bank Swallow
Tachycineta bicolor
Tree Swallow
Agelaius phoeniceus
Red-winged Blackbird
Agelaius tricolor
Tricolored Blackbird
Dolichonyx oryzivorus
Bobolink
Euphagus cyanocephalus
Brewer's Blackbird
Quiscalus
quiscula
Common Grackle
Xanthocephalus xanthocephalus
Mimus polyglottos
Northern Mockingbird
Anthus spinoleffa
Alpine Water Pipit
Ficedula hypoleuca
Pied Flycatcher
Yellow-headed Blackbird
Nectarinia osea
Orange-tufted Sunbird
Parus major
Great
Tit
Parus monfanus
Willow Tit
Dendroica petechia
Yellow Warbler
Passer domesficus
House Sparrow
Passer melanurus
Cape Sparrow
Family Colonial
~~
Trochilidae
Meropidae
Corvidae
Corvidae
Corvidae
Emberizidae
Ernberizidae
Ernberizidae
Estrildidae
Estrildidae
Estrildidae
Estrildidae
Estrildidae
Estrildidae
Estrildidae
Estrildidae
Fringillidae
Fringillidae
Hirundinidae
Hirundinidae
Hirundinidae
Hirundinidae
Hirundinidae
Hirundinidae
Hirundinidae
lcteridae
lcteridae
lcteridae
lcteridae
lcteridae
lcteridae
Mirnidae
Motacillidae
Muscicapidae
Nectarinidae
Paridae
Paridae
Parulidae
Passeridae
Passeridae
~
n
Y
n
Y
Y
yJn
n
n
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
yln
n
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
yJn
Y
n
Y
Y
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
Y
Y
Altriciall
Precocial
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
Nest type
Open
Cavity
Open
Open
Closed
Open
open
open
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closedkavity
closed
open
Open
Open
Closed
Open
Closed
Closed
closed
cavity
Cavity
Open
Open
Open
Open
closed
Open
Closed
Open
Cavity
Closed
Cavity
Cavity
Open
Closedlcavity
Closed
Reference
~~
Skutch 1973
Ernlen
&
Wrege 1986,
Wrege
&
Ernlen 1987
Langen1996
Trost
&
Webb 1986
Trost
&
Webb 1986
Weatherhead
&
Robertson 1978
Middleton in Rohwer
&
Freeman 1989
Petter
et
a/.
1990
Goodwin 1982
Goodwin 1982
Goodwin 1982
Goodwin 1982
Goodwin 1982
Dhindsa 1983b
Goodwin 1982
Birkhead
et a/.
1990
Monk 1954
Middleton in Rohwer
&
Freeman 1989
Brown
&
Brown 1988,
Smyth
etal.
1993
M~ller 1987
Earle 1986
Manwell
&
Baker 1975
Morton
etal.
1990
Hoogland
&
Sherman 1976
Lombard0 1988,
Lifjeld
eta/.
1993
Orians in Rohwer
&
Freeman 1989
Emlen 1941
Gavin
&
Bollinger 1985
Orians in Rohwer
&
Freeman 1989
Howe in Rohwer
&
Freeman 1989
Harms
et
a/.
1991,
Lyon
et
a/.
1992
Derrickson in Rohwer
&
Freeman 1989
Reyer
ef a/.
1997
G. Hogstedt in Haland 1986,
Gelter
&
Tegelstrom 1992
Zilberman
eta/.
1999
Verboven
&
Mateman 1997
Orell
etal.
1997
Sealy
etal.
1989
Burke
&
Bruford 1987,
Wetton
eta/.
1987
Earle 1986
continued
@
ZOO1
British Ornithologists' Union,
Ibis,
143,
133-143
lntraspecific nest parasitism 139
Table
1
continued
Species
Altriciall
Family Colonial Precocial Nest type Reference
Passer moabificus Dead Sea Sparrow
Passer monfanus Tree Sparrow
Euplecfes afer Golden Bishop
Euplecfes axillaris Red-shouldered Widow
Euplecfes capensis Yellow-rumped Bishop
Euplecfes orix Red Bishop
Ploceus baglafecht Baglafecht Weaver
Ploceus benghalensis Indian Weaverbird
Ploceus bojeri Golden Palm Weaver
Ploceus cucullafus Village Weaver
Ploceus intermedius Lesser-masked Weaver
Ploceus manyar Striated Weaver
Ploceus nigerrimus Vieillot's Black Weaver
Ploceus ocularis Spectacled Weaver
Ploceus philippinus Baya Weaverbird
Ploceus rubiginosus Chestnut Weaver
Ploceus faeniopferus Northern-masked Weaver
Ploceus velafus Southern-masked Weaver
Ploceus xanfhops Holub's Golden Weaver
Sturnus cineraceus Grey Starling
Sfurnus roseus Rose-coloured Starling
Sfurnus unicolor Spotless Starling
Sfurnus vulgaris European Starling
Jroglodytes aedon House Wren
Siala sialis Eastern Bluebird
Jurdus grayi Clay-colored Robin
Turdus migraforius American Robin
Jurdus pilaris Fieldfare
Passeridae
Passeridae
Ploceidae
Ploceidae
Ploceidae
Ploceidae
Ploceidae
Ploceidae
Ploceidae
Ploceidae
Ploceidae
Ploceidae
Ploceidae
Ploceidae
Ploceidae
Ploceidae
Ploceidae
Ploceidae
Ploceidae
Sturnidae
Sturnidae
Sturnidae
Sturnidae
Troglodytidae
Turdidae
Turdidae
Turdidae
Turdidae
Y
A
Y
A
Y
A
Y
A
Y
A
Y
A
Y
A
Y
A
Y
A
Y
A
Y
A
Y
A
Y
A
Y
A
Y
A
Y
A
Y
A
Y
A
Y
A
Y/n A
Y
A
Y
A
y/n A
n A
n A
n A
n A
n A
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Cavity
Cavity
Cavity
Cavity
cavity
cavity
Open
Open
Open
Yom-Tov 1980b
Summers-Smith 1988
Maclean 1993
Maclean 1993
Maclean 1993
Maclean 1993
Freeman 1988
Dhindsa 1983a
Freeman 1988
Victoria 1972
Freeman 1988
Dhindsa 1983a
Freeman 1988
Freeman 1988
Dhindsa 1990
Freeman 1988
Jackson 1992
Freeman 1988
Freeman 1988
Yamaguchi
&
Saitou 1997
Cramp
&
Perrins 1994
Cramp
&
Perrins 1994
Yom-Tov ef a/. 1974,
Evans 1988,
Romagnano et a/. 1990
Picman
&
Belles-Isles 1988
Gowaty
&
Karlin 1984
Dryrez 1983
Gowaty
&
Davies 1986
Haland 1986
and
6
(100%)
species, respectively, are colonial.
Evidently, INP is closely related to coloniality. In
contrast, none of the Galliformes is colonial, hence
there is a relatively low rate
of
INP
(12%)
in this
precocial order.
In summary, high rates of INP exist among precocial
birds and are associated with coloniality, as reported
earlier (Yom-Tov 1980a, Andersson 1982, Rohwer
&
Freeman 1989).
NOTE
ADDED
IN
PROOF
After the acceptance
of
this paper, intraspecific nest
parasitism was reported in
two
more avian species: the
Pied Avocet
Recuwirostru
uvosettu
(Hotker 2000) and
the Emu
Drornaius
novaehollandiue
(Taylor
et
al.
2000).
These additions raise the number of species for
which INP
is
reported
to
236.
I
am grateful to Jon Wright for encouragement and hospitality,
to Robert Payne, Harry Power and an anonymous referee
for their comments, to Arieh Landsman for his help
with compiling the data from the literature and to Mary
Fox
and Dorothy Vincent for careful editing. This work was sup-
ported by the Israel Cohen Chair for Environmental
Zoology.
REFERENCES
Alexander, M.A. 1946. The Woodcock of the British Isles
II.
Some
aspects of the breeding biology of the Woodcock. Ibis
88:
1-24.
Ali,
S.
&
Ripley,
S.D.
1968-1974. Handbook
of
the Birds
of
lndia
and
Pakistan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alison,
R.M.
1975. Breeding biology and behaviour
of
the oldsquaw
(Clangula hyemalis L.). Ornithol. Monogr.
No.
18.
Andersson,
M.B.
1982. Brood parasitism within species. In
Barnard, C.J. (ed.) Producers and Scroungers: Strategies
of
Exploitation and Parasitism: 195-228. London: Croom Helm.
Ar, A.
&
Yom-Tov,
Y.
1978. The evolution of parental care in birds.
Evolution
32:
655-669.
Arnold,
T.W.
1987. Conspecific egg discrimination in American
Coots. Condor
89:
975-676.
Attiwill, A.R., Bourne,
J.M.
&
Parker, S.A. 1981. Possible nest par-
asitism in the Australian stiff-tailed ducks (Anatidae: Oxyurini).
Emuel: 4142.
Baicich,
P.J.
&
Harrison,
C.J.O.
1997.
A
Guide
to
the
Nests,
Eggs,
0
2001
British Ornithologists' Union,
Ibis,
143,
133-143
140
Y
Yom-Tov
and Nestlings of North American Birds. San Diego: Academic
Press.
Barnhart, F.S.
1901. Evolution in the breeding of the fulvous tree
Barry, T.W.
1960. Breeding biology of the Atlantic brant (Branta ber-
nicla hrota). MSc thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Bellrose, F.C.
1976. Ducks, Geese, and Swans of North America.
Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole Books.
Bengston, S.A.
1972a. Breeding biology of the Harlequin Duck,
Histrionicus histrionicus in Iceland.
Ornis
Scand.
3:
1-1
9.
Bengston, S.A.
1972b. Reproduction and fluctuation in size of duck
populations at Lake Myvatn, Iceland. Oikos
23:
35-58.
Bent, A.C.
1902. Nesting habits of the Anatidae in North Dakota.
Bertram, B.C.R.
1979. Ostriches recognise their own eggs and dis-
card others. Nature
279:
233-234.
Birkhead,
T.R.,
Burke,
T.,
Zann,
R.,
Hunter, F.M.
&
Kurpa, A.P.
1990. Extra-pair paternity and intraspecific brood parasitism in
wild zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata, revealed by DNA finger-
printing. Behav.
Ecol.
Sociobiol.
27:
315-324.
Bolen, E.G.
1967. Nesting boxes for black-bellied tree ducks.
J.
Wild. Manage.
31
:
794-797.
Bond, J.
1961. Sixth supplement to the check-list of birds of the
West lndies (1956). Philadelphia, PA: Academy of Natural Sci-
ence.
Brestwer, W.
1900. Notes on the breeding habits of the North Amer-
ican Golden-eye Duck or Whistler (Clangula clangula
americana). Auk
17:
207-216.
Briggs, S.V.
1991. lntraspecific nest parasitism in the maned duck
Chenoneffa
jubata.
mu
91:
230-235.
Brown, R.H.
1938. Notes on the land-rail.
Br.
Birds
32:
13-1
6.
Brown, L.H.
1958. The breeding of the greater flamingo Phoeni-
copterus ruber at Lake Elmenteita, Kenya Colony.
lbis
100:
388-420.
Brown, C.R.
&
Brown, M.B.
1988. A new form of reproductive par-
asitism in cliff swallows. Nature
331:
66-68.
Brown, L.H., Urban, E.K. and Newman,
K.
1982. The Birds of
Africa,
Vol.
1.
London: Academic Press.
Bump, G.
&
Bump, J.W.
1969. A study of the spotted tinamou and
the pale spotted tinamou of Argentina.
US
Fish and Wildlife Ser-
vice, Special Publication Rep. Wildlife
No.
120.
Burke, T.
&
Bruford, M.W.
1987. DNA fingerprinting in birds. Nature
327:
149-1 52.
Choate,
T.S.
1963. Habitat and population dynamics of the white-
tailed ptarmigan in Montana.
J.
Wild/.
Manage.
27:
684499.
Choudhury, S., Jones,
C.S.,
Black, J.M.
&
Prop, J.
1993. Adoption
of young and intraspecific nest parasitism in Barnacle Geese.
Condor
95:
860-868.
Clancey, P.A.
1967. Game Birds of Southern Africa. New York:
American Elsevier Publishing Go.
Clark, A.
1964. The Maccoa Duck (Oxyura maccoa (Eyton)). Ostrich
Clark, A.
1976. Observations on the whistling ducks in southern
Africa. Ostrich
47:
59-64.
Colwell,
M.A.
1986. lntraspecific brood parasitism in three species
of prairie-breeding shore birds. Wilson
Bull.
98:
473475.
Conover, M.R., Miller, D.E.
&
Hunt, G.L.
1979. Female-female
pairs and other unusual reproductive associations in Ring-Billed
and California Gulls. Auk
96:
6-9.
Craig, J.L.
1980. Pair and group breeding behaviour of a communal
gallinule, the pukeko, Porphyrio
p.
melanotus. Anim. Behav.
28:
593-603.
duck.
Evol~tion
32:
655-663.
AUkl9:
165-174.
35:
264-276.
Cramp,
S.
(ed.)
1985. The
Birds
of the Western Palearctic,
Vol.
4.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cramp,
S.
&
Simmons, K.E.L. (eds)
1977. The Birds of the West-
ern Palearctic,
Vol.
1.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cramp,
S.
&
Simmons, K.E.L. (eds)
1980. The Birds of the West-
ern Palearctic,
Vol.
2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cramp,
S.
&
Perrins, C.M. (eds)
1994. The Birds of the Western
Palearctic,
Vol.
8. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Davies, A.K.
&
Baggott, G.K.
1989. Egg laying, incubation and
intraspecific nest parasitism by the Mandarin Duck Aix galericu-
lata.
Bird
Study
36:
1
15-1 22
Dementiev, G.P., Gladkov, N.A., Isakov, Y.A., Kartashev, N.N.,
Kirikov, A.V., Mikheev, A.V.
&
Ptushenko, E.S.
1967. Birds
of
the Soviet Union,
Vol.
4. (Translated from the 1952 Russian book
by Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem).
Dhindsa, M.S.
1983a. lntraspecific nest parasitism in two species of
Indian weaverbirds Ploceus benghalensis and
P
manyar. lbis
125:
243-245.
Dhindsa, M.S.
1983b. lntraspecific nest parasitism in the White-
throated Munia. Notornis
30:
87-90.
Dhindsa,
M.S.
1990. lntraspecific brood parasitism in the Baya
Weaverbird Ploceus philippinus.
Bird
Behav.
8:
11
1-1
13.
Dow,
H.
&
Fredga,
S.
1984. Factors affecting the reproductive
out-
put of the goldeneye duck Bucephala clangula.
J.
Anim.
Ecol.
53:
679492.
Dryrez, A.
1983. Breeding ecology of the Clay-colored Robin
Turdus
grayi in lowland Panama. lbis
125:
287-304.
Duebbert, H.F.
1966. Island nesting of the Gadwall in North Dako-
ta. Wilson
Bull.
78:
12-25.
Earle, R.A.
1986. The breeding biology of the South African Cliff
Swallow. Ostrich
57:
138-1 56.
Eisenhauer, D.I.
&
Kirkpatrick, C.M.
1977. Ecology of the emperor
goose in Alaska.
Wild/.
Monogr. No. 57.
Emlen, J.T. Jr
1941. An experimental analysis of the breeding cycle
of the tricolored red-wing. Condor
43:
209-21 9.
Emlen, S.T.
&
Wrege, P.H.
1986. Forced copulations and intraspe-
cific parasitism: two costs of social living in white-throated
bee-eaters. Ethology
71
:
2-29.
Erikstad, K. E., Tveraa,
T.
&
Bustnes, J.O.
1998. Significance of
intraclutch egg-size variation in Common Eider: the role of egg
size and quality of ducklings.
J.
Avian
Biol.
29:
3-9.
Erwin, R.M.
1977. Black Skimmer breeding ecology and behaviour.
Evans, P.G.H.
1988. lntraspecific nest parasitism in the European
starling Sturnus vulgaris. Anim. Behav.
36:
1282-1 294.
Evans,
S.
&Williams,
C.J.
1987. Multiple paternity in
a
wild popu-
lation of mallards. Auk
104:
597-602.
Fleetwood, R.J.
&
Bolen, E.G.
1965. Compound clutch of the
Chachalaca. Condor
67:
84-85.
Fleischer, R.C., Murphy,
M.T.
&
Hunt, L.
1985. Clutch size
increase and intraspecific brood parasitism in the Yellow-billed
Forslund, P.
&
Larsson, K.
1995. lntraspecific nest parasitism in
the barnacle goose
-
behavioural tactics of parasites and hosts.
Anim. Behav.
50:
509-51 7.
Frederick,
P.C.
&
Shields, M.A.
1986. Suspected intraspecific egg-
dumping in the White lbis
(Eudocimus
albus).
Wilson
Bull.
98:
476478.
Freeland, J.R., Hannon, S.J., Dobush, G.
&
Boag, P.T.
1995
Extra-pair paternity in willow ptarmigan broods
~
measuring
costs of polygyny
to
males. Behav.
Ecol.
Sociobiol.
5:
349-355.
Freeman,
S.
1988. Egg variability and conspecific nest parasitism in
Auk
94:
709-717.
Cuckoo.
Wilson
Bull.
97:
125-1 27.
@
2001 British Ornithologists' Union, bs,
143,
133-143
lntraspecific nest parasitism
141
Ploceus
weaverbirds.
Ostrich
59:
49-53.
Frith, H.J.
1967.
Waterfowl in Australia.
Honolulu, HI: East-West
Center Press.
Gavin, T.A.
&
Bollinger, E.K.
1985.
Multiple paternity in a territorial
passerine: the Bobolink.
Auk
102:
550-555.
Gibbons, D.W.
1986.
Brood parasitism and cooperative nesting in
the moorhen,
Gallinula chloropus. Behav.
Ecol.
Sociobiol.
19:
Gibson,
E.
1920.
Further ornithological notes from the neighbour-
hood of Cape San Antonio, Province of Buenos Ayres. Part
111.
Phoenicopterida-Rheidae.
lbis
11:
1-97.
Gill, F.B.
1994.
Ornithology
Freeman, New York:
Giroux, J.F.
1985.
Nest sites and superclutches of American avo-
cets on artificial islands.
Can.
J.
Zool.
63:
1302-1 305.
Gleter, H.P.
&
Tegelstrom, H.
1992.
High frequency of extra-pair
paternity in Swedish pied flycatcher revealed by allozyme elec-
trophoresis and DNA fingerprinting.
Behav.
Ecol.
Sociobiol.
Gonzalez-Martin, M.
&
Ruiz,
X.
1996.
Brood parasitism in herons.
Colonial Waterbirds
19:
31 -38.
Goodwin, D.
1977.
Pigeons and Doves of the World.
London: British
Museum
.
Goodwin, D.
1982.
Estrildid Finches of the World.
London: British
Museum (Natural History).
Gowaty, P.A.
&
Davies, J.C.
1986.
Uncertain maternity in American
robins. In Drickamer, L.C. (ed.)
Behavioral Ecology and Popula-
tion Biology:
65-70.
Toulouse: Privat, I.E.C.
Gowaty, P.A.
&
Karlin, A.A.
1984.
Multiple paternity and paternity
in single broods of apparently monogamous eastern blue-birds
(Sialia
sialis).
Behav.
Ecol.
Sociobiol.
15:
91-95.
Graison, M.W.
1989.
lntraspecific nest parasitism by Sharp-tailed
Grouse.
Wilson Bull.
101:
126127.
Grinnell, J., Bryant, H.C.
&
Storer, T.I.
1918.
The Game Birds of
California.
Berkeley: University
of
California Press.
Haland, A.
1986.
lntraspecific brood parasitism in fieldfares
Turdus
pilaris
and other passerine birds.
Fauna Norv. Ser.
C.
9:
91-95.
Hamas, M.J.
&
Graul, W.D.
1985.
A four-egg clutch of the Mountain
Plover.
Wilson Bull.
97:
388-389.
Harms, K.E., Beletsky, L. D.
&
Orians, G.H.
1991.
Conspecific nest
parasitism in three species of New World blackbirds.
Condor
93:
Harrison, C.
1975.
A
Field Guide to the Nests, Eggs, and Nestlings
Haverschmidt, F.
1946.
Notes on the breeding biology of the Little
Haverschmidt, F.
1963.
The Black-tailed Godwit.
Leiden: E.J. Brill.
Haverschmidt, F.
1968.
A nest of the Rufous-breasted Hermit with
Hawkes, B.
1970.
The Marbled Teal.
Wildfowl
21
:
87-88.
Hellebrekers, W.P.J.
&
Voous, K.H.
1964.
Nest parasitisme van de
Krooneend.
Limosa
37:
5-1
1.
Hoogland, J.L.
&
Sherman, P.W.
1976.
Advantages and disadvan-
tages of bank swallow
(Riparia riparia)
coloniality. Ecol.
Monogr.
46:
33-58.
Hori, J.
1964.
Breeding biology of the Shelduck
Tadorna tadorna.
Ibis
106:
333-360.
Hori, J.
1969.
Social and population studies in the Shelduck.
Wild-
Horsfall, J.A.
1984.
Food supply and egg mass variation in the
Hotker, H.
2000.
Conspecific nest parasitism in the Pied Avocet
221 -232.
31:
1-7.
967-974.
of European Birds.
London: Collins.
Gull.
Br. Birds
39:
14-18.
three eggs.
Auk
85:
693.
fowl
20:
5-22.
European coot.
Ecology65:
89-95.
Recurvirostra avosefta. lbis
142:
28C288.
Hoyo, J. del, Elliot, A.
&
Sargatal, J.
1992.
Handbook of the Birds
of the World,
Vol.
1.
Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.
Hoyo, J. del, Elliot, A.
&
Sargatal, J.
1994a.
Handbook of the Birds
of the World,
Vol.
2.
Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.
Hoyo, J. del, Elliot, A.
&
Sargatal, J.
1994b.
Handbook of the Birds
of the World,
Vol.
3.
Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.
Hussell, D.J.T.
&
Woodford, J.K.
1965.
Piping Plover's nest con-
taining eight eggs.
Wilson Bull.
77:
294.
Jackson, W.M.
1992.
Estimating conspecific nest parasitism in the
Northern Masked Weaver based on within-female variability in
egg appearance.
Auk
109:
435-443.
Johnsgard, P.A.
1978.
Ducks, Geese and Swans of the World.
Lin-
coln: University of Nebraska Press.
Johnsgard, P.A.
1986.
The Pheasants of the World.
Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Johnsgard, P.A.
1988.
The
Quails,
Partridges, and Francolins of the
World.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Johnson, W.P., Rowher, F.C.
&
Carloss, M.
1996.
Evidence of nest
parasitism in Mottled Ducks.
Wilson Bull.
108:
187-189.
Joyner, D.E.
1983.
Parasitic egg laying in Redheads and Ruddy
Ducks in Utah: incidence and success.
Auk100:
717-725.
Kistchinski, A.A.
1975.
Breeding biology and behaviour
of
the Grey
Phalarope
fhalaropus fulicarius
in East Siberia.
lbis
117:
Klimstra, W.D.
&
Roseberry, J. L.
1975.
Nesting biology of the bob-
white in southern Illinois.
Wildl. Monogr.
No.
41.
Knott, N.P., Ball, C.C.
&
Yocom, C.F.
1943.
Nesting of the Hungar-
ian partridge and ring-necked pheasant in Whitman County,
Washington.
J.
Wildl. Manage.
7:
283-291.
Kossack, C.W.
1950.
Breeding habits of Canada geese under
refuge conditions.
Am. Midl. Nat.
43:
627449.
Langen, T.A.
1996.
The mating system of the White-throated Mag-
pie-jay
Calocitfa formosa
and Greenwood's hypothesis for
sex-biased dispersal. lbis
138:
506-51 3.
Leopold, F.
1951.
A study
of
nesting Wood Ducks in Iowa.
Condor
Lifjeld, J.T., Dunn, P.O.
&
Robertson, R.J.
1993.
Extra-pair pater-
Lincoln, F.C.
1951.
A set of twelve eggs of the Woodcock.
Auk
68:
Littlefield, C.D.
1981.
A probable record of intraspecific egg dump-
Lombardo, M.P.
1988.
Evidence for intraspecific brood parasitism in
Low, J.B.
1941.
Nesting of Ruddy Ducks in Iowa.
Auk58:
506-517.
Lyon, B.E.
1993.
Conspecific brood parasitism as a flexible female
reproductive tactic in American coot.
Anim. Behav.
46:
91 1-928.
Lyon, B.E.
&
Everding,
S.
1996.
High frequency of conspecific
brood parasitism in a colonial waterbird, the Eared Grebe
Podi-
ceps nigricollis.
J.
Avian Biol.
27:
238-244.
Lyon, B.E., Hamilton, L.D.
&
Magrath, M.
1992.
The frequency of
conspecific brood parasitism and the pattern of laying determi-
nancy in Yellow-headed Blackbirds.
Condor
94:
590-597.
Maclean, G.L.
1993.
Roberts' Birds of Southern Africa.
Cape Town:
The John Voelcker Book Fund.
Mackie, R.J.
&
Buechner, H.K.
1963.
The reproductive cycle of the
chukar.
J.
Wildl. Manage.
27:
246260.
MacWhirter, R.B.
1989.
On the rarity of intraspecific brood para-
sitism.
Condor
91:
485-492.
Manwell, C.L.
&
Baker, M.A.
1975.
Molecular genetics of avian pro-
teins.
XIII.
Protein polymorphism in three species of Australian
passerines.
Aust.
J.
Biol.
Sci.
28:
545-557.
285-300.
53:
209-220.
nity in monogamous tree swallows.
Anim. Behav.
45:
213-229.
376.
ing for Sandhill Cranes.
Auk
98:
631,
Tree Swallows.
Wilson
Bull.
100:
126-128.
@
2001
British Ornithologists' Union,
Ibis,
143,
133-143
142
Y
Yorn-Tov
Martin, K.
1984.
lntraspecific nest parasitism in Willow Ptarmigan.
J.
Field
Ornithol.
55:
250-251
McRae, S.B.
1996.
Brood parasitism in the Moorhen: brief encoun-
ters between parasites and hosts and the significance of an
evening laying hour. J.
Avian
Biol.
27:
31 1-320.
Meanley, B.
&
Meanley, A.G.
1959.
Observations of the Fulvous
Tree Duck in Louisiana.
Wilson
Bull.
71:
3345.
Millar, C.D., Anthony,
I.,
Lambert, D.M., Stapleton, P.M.,
Bergmann, C.C., Bellamy,
A.R.
&
Young, E.C.
1994.
Patterns
of reproductive success determined by DNA fingerprinting in
communally breeding oceanic bird.
Biol.
J.
Linn. SOC.
52:
31-48.
Miller, A.H.
1946.
Social parasites among birds.
Sci. Monthly
42:
Msller, A.P.
1987.
lntraspecific nest parasitism and anti-parasitic
behaviour in swallows,
Hirundo rustica.
Anim.
Behav.
35:
Monk, J.F.
1954.
The breeding biology of the Greenfinch.
BirdStudy
Morse, T.E.
&
Wight, H.M.
1969.
Dump nesting and its effect on
production in wood ducks.
J.
Wildl. Manage.
33:
284-293.
Morton,
E.S.,
Forman,
L.
&
Braun,
M.
1990.
Extrapair fertilizations
and the evolution of colonial breeding in Purple Martins.
Auk
107:
275-283.
238-246.
247-254.
1:
2-14.
Murton, R.K.
1965.
The Wood Pigeon.
London: Collins.
Myers, J.P.
&
Oring, L.W.
1985.
A four-egg clutch of the Mountain
Plover.
Wilson
Bull.
97:
388-389.
Negro, J.J., Villarroel, M., Tella, J.L., Kuhnlein,
U.,
Hiraldo, F.,
Donazar, J.A.
&
Bird, D.M.
1996.
DNA fingerprinting reveals a
low incidence of extra-pair fertilizations in the lesser kestrel.
Anim. Behav.
51:
935-943.
Newton,
1.
&
Campbell, C.R.G.
1975.
Breeding of ducks at Loch
Leven, Kinross.
Wildfowl
26:
83-1 02.
Nolan, V. Jr.
&
Thompson, C.F.
1975.
The occurrence and signifi-
cance of anomalous reproductive activities in two North
American non-parasitic cuckoos
Coccyzus
sp.
lbis
117:
O'Brien, R.M.
1990.
Tadorna
radjah
Radjah Shelduck. In Marchant,
S.
&
Higgins, PJ. (co-ordinators)
Handbook of Australian, New
Zealand and Antarctic Birds:
121 8-1 222.
Melbourne: Oxford
University Press.
Orell, M., Rytkonen,
S.,
Launonen, V., Welling, P., Koivula, K.,
Kumpulainen, K.
&
Bachmann,
R.
1997.
Low frequency of
extra-pair paternity in the Willow Tit
Parus
montanus
as revealed
by DNA fingerprinting.
lbis
139:
562-566.
Payne, R.B.
1977.
The ecology
of
brood parasitism in birds.
Annu.
Rev. Ecol. Syst.
8:
1-28.
Petter, S.C., Miles, D.B.
&
White, M.W.
1990.
Genetic evidence of
mixed reproductive strategy in a monogamous bird.
Condor
92:
Philips, J.C.
1923-1 926.
A Natural History of
the
Ducks.
Boston
&
New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Picman, J.
&
Belles-Isles, J.-C.
1988.
Evidence for intraspecific
brood parasitism in the House Wren.
Condor90:
513-514.
Pitman, C.R.S.
1965.
The nesting and some other habits
of
Alopochen, Nettapus, Plectropterus
and
Sarkidiornis. Wildfowl
16:
115-121.
Quinn, T.W., Quinn, J.S., Cooke, F.
&
White, B.N.
1987.
DNA
marker analysis detects multiple maternity and paternity in sin-
gle broods
of
the Lesser Snow Goose.
Nature
326:
392-394.
Ralph, C.P.
1975.
Life style of
Coccyzus
pumilus,
a tropical cuckoo.
Condor
77:
60-72.
Rand, A.L.
1947.
Clutch size in the spruce grouse and theoretical
496-503.
702-707.
considerations of some factors affecting clutch size.
Can. Field
Nat.
61:
127-130.
Redfield, J.A.
1973.
The use of incomplete family data in the analy-
sis of genetics and selection at the Ng locus in blue grouse
(Dendrogapus abscurus). Heredity
31
:
35-42.
Reyer,
H.U.,
Bollmann, K., Schlapfer,
A.R.,
Schymainda, A.
&
Klecack, G.
1997.
Ecological determinants
of
extrapair fertiliza-
tions and egg dumping in Alpine water pipits
(Anthus spinoletta).
Behav.
Ecol.
5:
534-543.
Robertson, G.J.
1998.
Egg adoption can explain joint egg-laying in
common eiders. Behav.
Ecol. Sociob/ol.
43:
289-296.
Rogers, D.I.
1990.
Stictonetta naevosa
Freckled Duck. In Marchant,
S.
&
Higgins.
PJ.
(co-ordinators)
Handbook of
Australian,
New
Zealand and
Antarctic
Birds:
1
160-1 173.
Melbourne: Oxford
University Press.
Rohwer, F.C.
&
Freeman,
S.
1989.
The distribution of intraspecific
nest parasitism in birds.
Can.
J.
Zool.
67:
239-253.
Romagnano, L.C., McGuire, T.R.
&
Power, H.W.
1990.
Pitfalls and
improved techniques in avian parentage studies.
Auk
106:
Sayler, R.D.
1992.
Ecology and evolution of brood parasitism in
waterfowl. In Batt, D.J.
et
a/.
(eds)
Ecology and Management of
Breeding Waterfowl:
290-322.
Minneapolis: University of Min-
nesota Press.
Schorger, A.W.
1966.
The Wild Turkey
Norman: University of Okla-
homa Press.
Sealy, S.G, Hobson, K.A.
&
Briskie, J.V.
1989.
Responses of yel-
low warblers
to
experimental intraspecific brood parasitism. J.
Field
Ornithol.
60:
224-229
Semel, B.
&
Sherman, P.W.
1992.
Use of clutch size to infer brood
parasitism in wood ducks. J.
Wildl. Manage.
56:
495499.
Serventy, D.L.
&
Whittell, H.M.
1967.
Birds
of
Western Australia.
Perth: Lamb.
Shealer, D.A.
&
Zurovchak, J.G.
1995.
Extremely large clutches
of
roseate tern eggs in the Caribbean.
Colonial
Waterbirds
18:
Shoham, D.
1975.
The breeding biology of two species of doves,
genus
Streptopelia
MSc thesis, Tel Aviv University, Israel. (in
Hebrew)
Sick, H.
1993.
Birds of Brazil.
Princeton: Princeton Univeristy Press.
Skutch, A.F.
1973.
The Life of the Hummingbird.
New York: Crown
Publishers.
Smyth, A.P., Orr, B.K.
&
Fleischer, R.C.
1993.
Electrophoretic vari-
ants of egg white transferrin indicate a low rate of intraspecific
brood parasitism in colonial cliff swallows in the Sierra Nevada.
California.
Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.
32:
79-84.
Sorenson, M.D.
1992.
Comment: why is conspecific nest parasitism
more frequent in waterfowl than in other birds?
Can.
J
Zool.
70:
Sorenson, M.D.
1993.
Parasitic egg laying in Canvasbacks
-
fre-
quency, success, and individual behaviour.
Auk
110:
57-69.
Spencer, K.G.
1953.
The Lapwing
in
Britain.
London: A. Brown
&
Sons.
Stoddard, H.L.
1931.
The Bobwhite
Quail:
its
Habifs, Preservabon,
and Increase.
New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
Storer, R.W.
&
Nuechterlein, G.L.
1992.
Western Grebe and
Clark's Grebe.
The Birds of North America
26:
1-24.
Stotts, V.D.
&
Davis, D.E.
1960.
The black duck in the Chesapeake
Bay of Maryland: breeding behavior and biology.
Chesapeake
129-1 36.
105-1 07.
1856-1 858.
Sci.
1:
127-154.
Summers-Smith, J.D.
1988.
The
Sparrows.
Calton: Poyser.
Taylor, E.L., Blanche, D., Groth,
D.,
Wetherall, J.D.
&
Martin, G.B.
@
2001
British Ornithologists' Union,
Ibis,
143,
133-143
lntraspecific nest parasitism
143
2000.
Genetic evidence for mixed parentage in nests of the Emu
(Dromaius novaehollandiae). Behav.
Ecol.
Sociobiol. 47:
Tegelstrom, H.
&
Vonessen,
1.
1996.
DNA-fingerprinting of captive
breeding pairs of lesser white-fronted geese
(Anser eryfhropus)
with unknown pedigrees.
Biochem. Genet.
34:
287-296.
Thomas, B.T.
1984.
Maguari Stork nesting: juvenile growth and
behavior.
Auk
101:
812-823.
Tickell, W.L.N.
&
Pinder,
R.
1966.
Two-egg clutches in albatrosses.
lbis
108:
126-129.
Trost, C.H.
&
Webb, C.L.
1986.
Egg moving in
two
species of
corvid.
Anim. Behav. 34:
294-295.
Tyler, J.G.
1913.
Some birds of the Fresno district, California.
Pacif-
ic
Coast Avifauna 9:
114.
Urban, E.K., Fry, C.H.
&
Keith, S.
1986.
The Birds ofAfrica,
Vol.
2.
London: Academic Press.
Verboven,
N.
&
Mateman, A.C.
1997.
Low frequency of extra-pair
fertilizations in the Great Tit
Parus major
revealed by DNA fin-
gerprinting.
J.
Avian
Biol.
28:
231-239.
Verneer, K.
1968.
Ecological aspects of ducks nesting in high den-
sity among larids.
Wilson
Bull.
80:
78-83.
Victoria, J.K.
1972.
Clutch characteristics and egg discriminative
ability of the African Village Weaverbird Ploceus cucullatus.
lbis
Voous, K.H.
1985.
Note on the classification followed. In Campbell,
B.
&
Lack, E. (eds)
A
Dictionary of Birds:
x-xvii. Calton: T.
&
A.D.
Poyser.
Weatherhead, P.J.
&
Robertson, R.J.
1978.
lntraspecific nest par-
asitism
in
the Savannah Sparrow.
Auk95:
744-745.
Weeks, H.P. Jr
1980.
Unusual egg deposition in Mourning Doves.
Wilson
Bull.
92:
258-259.
Weigmann, C.
&
Lamprecht, J.
1990.
lntraspecific nest parasitism
in bar-headed geese,
Anser
indicus.
Anim. Behav. 41:
677488.
359-364.
11
4:
367-376.
Weller, M.W.
1959.
Parasitic egg laying in the redhead
Ayfhya amer-
icana
and other North American Anatidae.
Ecol.
Monogr.
29:
Wetton, J.H., Carter, R.E., Parkin, D.T.
&
Walters, D.
1987.
Demo-
graphic study of wild house sparrow population by DNA
fingerprinting.
Nature
327:
147-149.
Whitehead, P.J.
&
Tschirner,
K.
1991.
Patterns of egg-laying and
variation in egg size in the Magpie Goose
Anseranas semi-
palmata
-
evidence for intra-specific nest parasitism.
Emu 91:
Williams,
M.
1979.
The social structure, breeding and population
dynamics of paradise shelduck in the Gisborne
-
East Coast dis-
trict. Notornis
26:
213-272.
Wrege, P.H.
&
Emlen,
S.T.
1987.
Biochemical determination of
parental uncertainty in white-fronted bee-eaters.
Behav.
Ecol.
Sociobiol.
20:
153-1 60.
Yamaguchi, Y.
&
Saitou,
T.
1997.
lntraspecific nest parasitism in
the grey starling
(Sturnus cineraceus).
Ecol.
Res.
12:
21 1-221.
Yom-Tov, Y.
1980a.
lntraspecific nest parasitism in birds.
Biol.
Rev.
55:
93-108.
Yom-Tov, Y.
1980b.
lntraspecific nest parasitism in the Dead Sea
Sparrow,
Passer moabiticus. lbis
122:
234-237.
Yom-Tov, Y., Dunnet, G.M.
&
Anderson,
A.
1974.
lntraspecific nest
parasitism in the Starling
Sturnus
vulgaris. lbis
116:
87-90.
Young, A.D.
&
Titman, R.D.
1987.
lntraspecific nest parasitism in
red-breasted mergansers.
Can.
J.
Zool.
66:
2454-2458.
Zilberman,
R.,
Moav,
B.
&
Yom-Tov, Y.
1999.
Extra-pair paternity in
the socially monogamous orange-tufted sunbird
(Nectarinia
osea
osea).
lsrael
J.
Zool.
45
407-421,
333-365.
26-31.
Received 5
August
1999;
revision accepted 25 February 2000
0
2001
British Ornithologists’ Union,
Ibis,
143,
13S143
... In birds, conspecific or intraspecific brood parasitism results from females laying eggs in the nests of conspecifics without subsequently incubating the eggs or caring for hatchlings (Yom-Tov 1980). It occurs across a wide taxonomic spectrum, including at least 256 species of 44 genera (Yom-Tov 2001;Yom-Tov and Geffen 2017), and is especially likely to occur among colonially breeding species with precocial offspring because they tend to lay larger clutches than species with altricial offspring, initiation of incubation is often delayed until most or all of the eggs are laid (which may leave the nest unguarded for several days), and the costs of raising parasitic offspring are lower than for species with altricial offspring that require more time to develop (Petrie and Møller 1991;Sorenson 1992;Johnsgard 1997;Yom-Tov 2001;Yom-Tov and Geffen 2017). Some species engage in an extreme form of conspecific brood parasitism, referred to as dump nesting (Mackie and Buechner 1963), pre-hatch brood amalgamation (Eadie et al. 1988), or egg dumping (Yom-Tov 1980), in which multiple females lay large numbers of eggs in a single unattended nest. ...
... In birds, conspecific or intraspecific brood parasitism results from females laying eggs in the nests of conspecifics without subsequently incubating the eggs or caring for hatchlings (Yom-Tov 1980). It occurs across a wide taxonomic spectrum, including at least 256 species of 44 genera (Yom-Tov 2001;Yom-Tov and Geffen 2017), and is especially likely to occur among colonially breeding species with precocial offspring because they tend to lay larger clutches than species with altricial offspring, initiation of incubation is often delayed until most or all of the eggs are laid (which may leave the nest unguarded for several days), and the costs of raising parasitic offspring are lower than for species with altricial offspring that require more time to develop (Petrie and Møller 1991;Sorenson 1992;Johnsgard 1997;Yom-Tov 2001;Yom-Tov and Geffen 2017). Some species engage in an extreme form of conspecific brood parasitism, referred to as dump nesting (Mackie and Buechner 1963), pre-hatch brood amalgamation (Eadie et al. 1988), or egg dumping (Yom-Tov 1980), in which multiple females lay large numbers of eggs in a single unattended nest. ...
... Many species of grebes (Podicipedidae) breed colonially and all have precocial offspring (Fjeldså 2004). Conspecific brood parasitism has been reported in at least six of the 23 species of grebes (Yom-Tov 2001): the Red-necked Grebe (Podiceps grisegena), Great Crested Grebe (P. cristatus), Eared Grebe (P. ...
Article
Full-text available
Conspecific brood parasitism occurs in many species of birds, especially colonially breeding species with precocial offspring. During 2010-2019 we monitored nesting colonies of the Western Grebe (Aechmophorus occidentalis) and Clark's Grebe (Aechmophorus clarkii) at Clear Lake, California. Maximum mean clutch size in three large colonies ranged from 2.29-3.12 eggs/nest (range, 1-14). Brood parasitism in 33 marked nests with 1-4 eggs occurred at a rate of 0.04-0.17 egg/nest/d and in 2.6-10.4% of nests/d. Nests with up to 10 eggs were usually incubated in well-maintained nests. We encountered 51 nests with unusually large clutches of 11-31 eggs, presumably laid by multiple females, representing 0.16% of all nests encountered. All were disintegrating nests unattended by grebes, except for one well-maintained nest with 18 eggs incubated by a mixed pair of grebes. Brood parasitism in three of these nests occurred at a rate of 0.0-4.0 eggs/nest/d. Such communal egg dumps occurred only in larger colonies with a minimum of 134 nests. The number of nests and number of communal egg dumps in a colony were positively correlated. Conspecific and interspecific brood parasitism by females of the two species is more extensive than previously realized and appears to be a common and potentially adaptive reproductive strategy.
... Such a result is not surprising, considering that egg-dumping has been found mostly in precocial species with large clutch sizes, and often associated with coloniality or cavity nesting (Yom-Tov 2001; Yom-Tov & Geffen 2017). Intraspecific brood parasitism has been described in only 1% of passerine species, and its levels were usually low (Yom-Tov 2001). In many investigated passerines, egg-dumping has not been found at all (Arnold & Owens 2002). ...
... In some species that provide parental care for a brood, offspring are occasionally cared for by a conspecific female that is not the genetic parent (Yom-Tov, 2001). These offspring often result from intraspecific brood parasitism. ...
Article
The provision of care to offspring is a costly endeavour that can be hijacked by others—known as brood parasitism. Females can choose to lay eggs in the nest of a conspecific female, resulting in extra‐pair maternity (EPM). Burying beetles of the genus Nicrophorus use small vertebrate carcasses for reproduction and provide biparental care to their offspring. Carcasses are a rare resource; thus, competition often occurs among adults of the same sex. A previous study examined the outcomes of competition and subsequent parental care of Nicrophorus vespilloides using laboratory experiments. Larvae of losing females were sometimes cared for by the winning females, which is generally an evidence of EPM. However, the presence of EPM in burying beetles under natural conditions has not yet been well established. Here, we focused on the reproduction of N. quadripunctatus in the field. To examine the presence of EPM, maternity analysis was performed on 149 offspring and their caring females in 10 broods, using 8 microsatellite DNA loci. Seven larvae originating from three broods were unrelated to their caring females. There were one to three unrelated larvae in each of the three broods. Thus, EPM occurs in N. quadripunctatus reproduction under natural conditions.
... Storch and Segelbacher [21], based on the analysis genetic material from unhatched eggs, post hatched eggshells and feathers found an example of nest site adoption, where nest was abandoned and later taken by another individual. When two or more females started to lay eggs in one nest, usually the explanation is intraspecific nest parasitism [53][54][55] or egg adoption [56,57]. Several evidences of egg and chick adoptions were made in Ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbellus) [58] species like Capercaillie (subfamily Tetraoninae) and living in a similar habitat and climate zone. ...
Article
Full-text available
Simple Summary: The Capercaillie is one of the most endangered bird species in many European countries. To prevent further population decline, breeding centers where birds are bred and later released into the wild were established. However, in many Capercaillie breeding stations, reproductive success is limited due to low fertility and problems with incubation behavior by females. Reasons for these problems are usually multidimensional, including misunderstanding Capercaillie behavior in the breeding environment. Research was conducted in Capercaillie breeding centers where birds were monitored 24 h/day by cameras. We observed that females preferred to mate with males with a longer tooting activity, but when males became too insistent and started to chase the females, they avoided contact. Even when the density of females was only one bird per 132 m 2 , nesting site competition occurred. In 67% of the nests, female intruder's presence could be observed. Interactions between females were mainly antagonistic, and while none of the birds were harmed, this caused egg damage and nest abandonment. Nesting site competition in captive Capercaillie is high and may lead to antagonistic interaction between females, consequently lowering breeding success. Our research showed also that mate preference of males by females could be predicted by observing the male's tooting activity. Abstract: Capercaillie behavior, both in the wild and in captivity, is poorly known due to this species' secretive way of life. Female-male and female-female social organization and interactions are especially poorly documented. The research was conducted in Capercaillie Breeding Center in Wisła Forestry District where a breeding flock is kept throughout the year. Thanks to video monitoring, we were able to observe mate choice, and then later, female-female interactions during laying and incubation period. Male individual variation in tooting latency and duration were recorded. Females' interest in males was related to males' tooting activity, but when males became too insistent and started to chase the females, the females avoided contact with them. There was a significant relationship between calendar date and when tooting starts, and between the tooting duration the female spent with a male. Two incidents of female-male aggression caused by competition for food were observed. Female intruder presence and competition for nesting place was observed in 66.67% nests. Most female-female interactions were limited to threat posturing, but fights and attempts to push out the intruder from the nest occurred as well. Such interactions may lead to nest abandonment and egg destruction, lowering the breeding success.
... This widespread strategy is especially common among waterbirds, including species such as mallards, moorhens, and coots. It allows parasites to take advantage of parental care by unwitting host species (Yom-Tov 2001). ...
Article
We report the first breeding occurrence of Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) in the northern Algerian Sahara, focusing on nesting ecology in the Kef Doukhane wetland. We analyzed the influence of different environmental factors on nesting outcomes and breeding success. Our results indicate that the timing of egg laying is a critical factor influencing both breeding outcomes and the number of fledged chicks. Specifically, our results indicate that nest outcomes become less favorable as the season progresses, with later clutches having a lower probability of success. In addition, the number of successfully fledged chicks is significantly lower for later clutches. Interspecific parasitism was documented in five mixed clutches, involving Ferruginous Duck (Aythya nyroca) in four cases and Moorhen (Gallinula chloropus) in one case. Our study highlights the challenges that the hyperarid environment of the Sahara poses for breeding waterbirds. It also highlights the selection pressures exerted by both biotic factors and environmental factors, with temperature, solar radiation, and the presence of protective vegetation playing important roles. Comparative analyzes show that the timing of egg laying has similar effects in other regions, as observed at Lake Tonga further north, where Mallard breeding performance declines as the season progresses. This research not only contributes to our understanding of the nesting ecology of mallards in this unique Saharan wetland but also underscores the urgency of conservation action, especially in the face of ongoing environmental change. It also improves our understanding of waterbird breeding dynamics in the region and highlights the challenges faced by these bird populations in a demanding, arid environment.
Article
Ecological and social factors shape individual reproductive strategies. Climate change has wide‐ranging effects on the timing of reproduction and availability of nesting sites for many birds. Ecological factors such as season length or predation rate could in turn affect the relative success rates of alternative reproductive tactics (ARTs). A new article by Pöysä (2024) featuring a long‐term study of common goldeneyes Bucephala clangula highlights the role of climate change in altering rates of conspecific brood parasitism (CBP) by affecting nest initiation dates and season length. While some authors have emphasized the effects of spatial and temporal aggregation of nests in promoting tactics of reproductive interference, few studies have addressed the effects of environmental variables on rates of CBP and other ARTs. I review some of the evidence for a relationship between population‐level nest predation rate and rates of CBP, principally in ducks and rails, and suggest a role for high rates of nest loss from all sources in the evolution of CBP and host responses. There is a need for further studies that examine environmental correlates of ARTs. Long‐term studies have the highest potential to reveal how shifts in phenology and life history variables may respond to environmental perturbations. Comparative studies of similar species in remote geographic locations can add perspective of how different ecological variables affect the prevalence of ARTs.
Article
Sex allocation theory predicts that mothers should bias investment in offspring toward the sex that yields higher fitness returns; one such bias may be a skewed offspring sex ratio. Sex allocation is well-studied in birds with cooperative breeding systems, with theory on local resource enhancement and production of helpers at the nest, but little theoretical or empirical work has focused on birds with brood parasitic breeding systems. Wood ducks (Aix sponsa) are a conspecific brood parasite, and rates of parasitism appear to increase with density. Because female wood ducks show high natal philopatry and nest sites are often limiting, local resource competition (LRC) theory predicts that females should overproduce male offspring—the dispersing sex—when competition (density) is high. However, the unique features of conspecific brood parasitism generate alternative predictions from other sex allocation theory, which we develop and test here. We experimentally manipulated nesting density of female wood ducks in 4 populations from 2013 to 2016, and analyzed the resulting sex allocation of >2000 ducklings. In contrast to predictions we did not find overproduction of male offspring by females in high-density populations, females in better condition, or parasitic females; modest support for LRC was found in overproduction of only female parasitic offspring with higher nest box availability. The lack of evidence for sex ratio biases, as expected for LRC and some aspects of brood parasitism, could reflect conflicting selection pressures from nest competition and brood parasitism, or that mechanisms of adaptive sex ratio bias are not possible.
Article
Hosts and brood parasites are a classic example of conflict. Parasites typically provide no offspring care after laying eggs, imposing costs on hosts. Female subsocial wasps (Ammophila pubescens) alternate between initiating their own nests and using an "intruder" tactic of replacing eggs in nests of unrelated conspecifics. Hosts can respond by substituting new eggs of their own, with up to eight reciprocal replacements. Remarkably, intruders usually provision offspring in host nests, often alongside hosts. We used field data to investigate why intruders provision and to understand the basis of interactions. We found that intruders could not increase their fitness payoffs by using the typical brood parasite tactic of not provisioning offspring. Intruders using the typical tactic would benefit when hosts provisioned in their stead, but their offspring would starve when hosts failed to provision. Although some hosts obtained positive payoffs when intruders mistakenly provisioned their offspring, on average utilizing a conspecific nest represents parasitism: hosts pay costs while intruders benefit. Hosts and intruders used the same tactic of egg replacement, but intruders more often laid the final egg. Selection should favor better discrimination of offspring, which could lead to repeated cycles of costly egg replacement.
Article
Evidence is described indicating intraspecific nest parasitism in White-throated Munia (Lonchura malabarica). The munias seem to prefer breeding in abandoned nests of weaverbirds (Ploceus spp.) and have little tendency to make their nests in the open. The scarcity of deserted weaverbird nests suitable for occupation by munias seems to be the main reason for the development of this intraspecific nest parasitism. The possibility of the White-throated Munia becoming a nest parasite of weaverbirds is also discussed.
Article
North American Ruddy Ducks (Oxyura jamaicensis) and Redheads (Aythya americana) lay eggs parasitically in other waterfowl nests. Interspecific egg parasitism at Farmington Bay Waterfowl Management Area (WMA), Utah during 1972-1974 affected 290 (36%) of 809 duck nests. Redheads deposited 812 eggs into 264 nests of other species, whereas Ruddy Ducks deposited 146 eggs into 62 nests. Of 620 Redhead eggs deposited interspecifically and for which success rates were known, 21% hatched, compared with 24% of 146 Ruddy Duck eggs. Forty-three percent of the Redheads and 7% of the Ruddy Ducks produced on the study site hatched from eggs deposited interspecifically. An unknown number of Redhead and Ruddy ducklings hatched from eggs deposited intraspecifically. Rates of egg parasitism in Redheads and Ruddy Ducks did not increase in response to severe fluctuations in water levels affecting habitat used by nesting waterfowl, nor was a lack of suitable nesting cover associated with Redhead or Ruddy Duck parasitism. These results counter the contention that parasitic tendencies in the Redhead, and perhaps the Ruddy Duck, are environmentally induced.