Conference PaperPDF Available

Development of the Electrically-Controlled Regenerative Braking System for Electrified Passenger Vehicle

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

As one of the key technologies of electrified vehicles, regenerative braking offers the capability of fuel saving by converting the kinetic energy of the moving vehicle into electric energy during deceleration. To coordinate the regenerative brake and friction brake, improving regeneration efficiency and guaranteeing brake performance and brake safety, development of special brake systems for electrified vehicles is needed. This paper presents a new type of electrically-controlled regenerative braking system (EABS) that has been developed for electrified passenger vehicles, which has the potential to be brought into production in China. By utilizing as much as possible mature components, integrating cooperative regeneration with ABS/TCS functions, EABS can achieve high regeneration efficiency and brake safety while providing system reliability, low development cost and development risk. This article describes the layout of the newly developed regenerative braking system. The operation modes and control methods of the system are introduced. Road test data from a commercialized electric vehicle prove the good performance of this system. The energy consumption of vehicle reduced by EABS developed is over 25% under ECE driving cycle.
Content may be subject to copyright.
ABSTRACT
As one of the key technologies of electrified vehicles,
regenerative braking offers the capability of fuel saving by
converting the kinetic energy of the moving vehicle into
electric energy during deceleration. To coordinate the
regenerative brake and friction brake, improving regeneration
efficiency and guaranteeing brake performance and brake
safety, development of special brake systems for electrified
vehicles is needed.
This paper presents a new type of electrically-controlled
regenerative braking system (EABS) that has been developed
for electrified passenger vehicles, which has the potential to
be brought into production in China. By utilizing as much as
possible mature components, integrating cooperative
regeneration with ABS/TCS functions, EABS can achieve
high regeneration efficiency and brake safety while providing
system reliability, low development cost and development
risk. This article describes the layout of the newly developed
regenerative braking system. The operation modes and
control methods of the system are introduced. Road test data
from a commercialized electric vehicle prove the good
performance of this system. The energy consumption of
vehicle reduced by EABS developed is over 25% under ECE
driving cycle.
INTRODUCTION
As social needs for the global environment conservation and
energy-saving growing rapidly, various types of environment
friendly vehicles such as hybrid and plug-in hybrid vehicles,
fuel-cell vehicles and electric vehicles have become the
research focus. As one of the key technologies of electrified
vehicles, regenerative braking can improve fuel economy by
converting the kinetic energy of the moving vehicle into
electric energy during deceleration.
To extend driving range, improving energy efficiency
effectively, most of the electrified vehicles now are equipped
with regenerative braking systems. However, as the
capability of regenerative braking is limited by the states of
the motor and the battery, it is not enough to meet all the
braking demand under various operating conditions.
Therefore an additional friction braking mechanism is
needed, i.e. the regenerative brake cooperates with the
friction brake to meet the total braking demand of electrified
vehicle.
The regenerative braking systems can be generally classified
into two types, namely the parallel type and serial type. In
parallel systems, the brake pressure is coupled to the brake
pedal, and the regenerative braking is added directly to the
friction brake operated by brake pedal, which results in a low
regeneration efficiency and poor brake comfort. With serial
type a blending between friction brake and regenerative brake
can be obtained, leading to the vehicle deceleration
corresponding to the driver's braking demand. This type
offers a high regeneration efficiency and good braking feel,
but requests several modifications in the hydraulic brake line
to mechanically decouple the connection between the brake
pedal and the brake pressure.
Development of the Electrically-Controlled
Regenerative Braking System for Electrified
Passenger Vehicle
2013-01-1463
Published
04/08/2013
Junzhi Zhang, Chen Lv, Xiaowei Yue and Mingzhe Qiu
Dept. of Automotive Eng, Tsinghua Univ
Jinfang Gou and Chengkun He
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Copyright © 2013 SAE International
doi:10.4271/2013-01-1463
Since the serial type regenerative braking systems are much
more advantageous over the parallel ones respecting to the
regeneration efficiency and the braking feel, automotive
makers and component suppliers worldwide have proposed
serial-type solutions respectively for electrified vehicles.
Toyota, TRW and Honda have developed EHB (Electro
Hydraulic Brake) systems [2,3,4], which have been brought
into series production and implemented successfully in
commercialized HEVs, such as Toyota Prius, Ford Escape,
and Honda Insight. EHB systems, decoupling the brake pedal
with brake pressure by using stroke simulators and adjusting
the brake pressure provided by an additionally set pressure-
supply unit via valves control, can achieve the by-wire brake
function. The regenerative braking system adopted by
Continental Teves, using a pedal feel simulator and its cut-off
device, and modulating the brake pressure by controlling a
active booster, can realize the pedal-decoupled concept [5].
The Electrically-Driven intelligent Brake (EDiB) system
developed by Hitachi has been employed successfully in the
Leaf electric vehicle. In the EDiB system, which based on a
newly developed master cylinder without using the
conventional vacuum booster, the brake pressure is adjusted
by an electrically driven motor through a ball screw, and the
pedal feel is also adjustable by using a pressure-generating
mechanism and a pedal-force compensator [6].
However, the configurations of those regenerative braking
systems introduced above are complicated with several newly
developed components added, and many modifications of
hydraulic brake line are also required, which results in an
increase of system price, mounting difficult and development
risk.
The present authors have been dedicated to the research and
development of regenerative braking for a long period and
made some progress [7,8,9,10,11]. In order to further
improve the regeneration performance while reducing the
system cost and development risk, a new type of electrically-
controlled regenerative braking system EABS, which is based
on the proven ABS technique, has been developed and will
be soon brought into series production in China. Adding two
pedal stroke simulators and high-speed solenoid valves on the
layout of conventional 4-channel hydraulic ABS modulator,
this new solution can realize a high efficiency cooperative
control of regenerative and hydraulic brakes with good pedal
feel.
The EABS composition, control method, braking
performance and regeneration effect from test results of an
electric vehicle equipped with the EABS developed are
discussed in this paper.
EABS SYSTEM CONFIGURATION
System Outline
The overall structure of the regenerative braking system is
shown in figure 1. The main component of this newly
developed regenerative braking system is the EABS control
unit, which is mounted easily in the brake line between
master cylinder and wheel cylinders, replacing the position of
ABS control unit in the ordinary hydraulic braking system.
The brake pedal force is still assisted by the vacuum booster
to build up the brake pressure, without a pressure-supply unit
set additionally, unlike the EHB. An electric control unit in
the EABS communicates with VCU (Vehicle Control Unit)
via CAN bus and adjusts the brake pressure rapidly and
accurately as demand. The modulated wheel cylinder
pressure cooperates with the regenerative braking torque of
electric motor, realizing the cooperative regeneration.
Figure 1. Overall structure of the regenerative braking
system
EABS Control Unit
Figure 2. EABS control unit
As the key component of the newly developed regenerative
braking system, the EABS control unit is comprised of two
parts: the electric braking control unit (BCU) and the
hydraulic pressure modulator, as figure 2 shows.
Downloaded from SAE International by Tsinghua University, Wednesday, June 24, 2015
The EABS hydraulic pressure modulator is set as X-split
type, as shown in the dotted box in figure 3. Taking the front-
wheel-drive vehicle as example, since the brake blending can
only be carried out in the front axle, the two rear wheel brake
lines, namely LR (Left Rear) and RR (Right Rear), are
connected directly to the master cylinder, i.e. the rear wheel
pressure keep the same value with master cylinder all the
time.
Figure 3. Layout of EABS hydraulic pressure modulator
Without using a high-pressure accumulator, which is the
hydraulic pressure supply unit in EHB, the brake pressure in
EABS is still generated in master cylinder via brake pedal
depressing.
The EABS hydraulic pressure modulator is comprised of
high-speed valves, hydraulic pump, hydraulic pressure
sensors and pedal stroke simulators. Among the fourteen
valves in total, four NO (Normally Open) valves and four NC
(Normally Closed) valves in the downstream of the brake line
are used for ABS/TCS control, which is the same layout with
that of the conventional ABS/TCS. Above the eight valves in
downstream, another six valves, namely two NO valves in the
main routes (MV1,MV2), two NC valves in the bypass routes
(BV1,BV2) and two NC valves for regeneration control
(RV1,RV2), are added for the cooperative regen brake
control in the front wheel brake lines. The two main routes
valves (MV1,MV2) and the two bypass valves (BV1,BV2)
are on-off controlled, while the eight ABS/TCS valves and
the two valves for regeneration control are pulse width
modulated (PWM).
Two pedal stroke simulators with structure of piston-spring,
are set in the LF and RF brake lines respectively, providing
the feedback force to guarantee driver's good pedal feel
during brake blending. One hydraulic pressure sensor for
driver's braking request detecting is mounted at the inlet port
of the hydraulic modulator, while another two sensors
monitoring the front wheel cylinder pressures are set at the
outlet port of LF and RF brake lines of the hydraulic
modulator. The electric control unit BCU is integrated with
the hydraulic pressure modulator. This enables the brake line
pressure to be controlled as demanded.
The development of EABS utilizes the existing available
resources, adding few proven components to the layout of
conventional ABS, reducing the development cost and
development risk significantly mounting ease equal to that of
conventional brake systems.
OPERATION MODES OF EABS
EABS can realize various brake functions of hydraulic brake,
cooperative regenerative brake and ABS/TCS, and also offers
the fail-safe mode.
Hydraulic Brake
Under the normal hydraulic state, all of the components of
EABS hydraulic pressure modulator are not energized. The
brake lines connections are the same with the conventional
hydraulic brake system. The hydraulic fluid from master
cylinder, passing through the EABS modulator, directly
enters the wheel cylinders to build up the wheel pressures
without adjusted.
Cooperative Regenerative Brake
The total braking demand of vehicle is provided by
regenerative braking force and friction braking force under
cooperative regeneration mode. With the two main route
valves and the two bypass valves energized, the connections
between master cylinder and the two front wheel cylinders
are cut off, and the fluid in the two front wheel brake lines are
led into the corresponding pedal stroke simulators
respectively, which enables the mechanism decoupling of
brake pedal and front wheel cylinders, as figure 4 (a) shows.
Meanwhile, the regenerative braking torque is applied on the
front axle, recovering the kinetic energy of the vehicle.
As the regenerative capability of electric motor has
limitation, when the motor's regenerative brake torque cannot
meet the brake request of front wheels, the hydraulic brake
force is need to be exerted. As shown in figure 4 (b), the main
route valves and the bypass valves keep being energized,
while the two regeneration control valves (RV1,RV2) are
PWM controlled, leading the fluid stored in the pedal stroke
simulators and master cylinder entering the front wheel
cylinders to supplement the rest part of the braking demand.
At this situation, compared with EHB systems, whose brake
pedal is always decoupled with brake pressure, the brake
pedal and the front wheel cylinders in EABS are non-
decoupled again via bypass brake lines.
ABS / TCS Control
When BCU detecting the wheel speed a locked tendency
during deceleration procedure, the ABS control mode would
be activated. At that moment, the six valves in the upstream
are not energized. According to the motion state of each
wheel, BCU controls the four inlet valves and four outlet
valves in downstream to realize the pressure increase,
decrease and hold control of each wheel cylinder
individually.
When driver depresses the accelerator pedal fiercely on a
low-adhesion road, the drive wheels may slip, which would
make the TCS function activated. Taking the front-wheel-
drive vehicle as example, once the TCS control enabled, the
regenerative braking torque of electric motor will be
removed. The BCU controls the six valves in the upstream of
the hydraulic pressure modulator to be energized, cutting off
the main route and connecting the bypass route. With the
same logic of the conventional TCS control, the fluid of the
master cylinder is pumped into the front wheel cylinders by
pump motor via bypass route. And by controlling the on-off
state of the inlet and outlet valves of the slip wheel, the slip
ratio could be controlled decreasing to the target level.
Fail Safe Mode
To guarantee the brake safety of vehicle in the maximum
extent, EABS offers two levels of the fail-safe mode based on
system control and structure.
On the system control level, once a malfunction of the
electric driving system occurring during regenerative braking,
the BCU would remove the regenerative brake torque of the
electric motor and cut off power supply of all the components
in the EABS modulator instantly, recovering the hydraulic
brake.
On the structure level, as the two rear brake lines are not
decoupled to the brake pedal, the rear wheel hydraulic brake
always exists when the driver operates the brake pedal. This
means that the rear braking will remain consistent with the
driver's pedal input regard less of the amount of regenerative
braking being carried out on the front axle. Therefore, when
driver depresses the brake pedal, even if the front wheel
brake fails, the rear wheel brake can still provide a
deceleration of approximately 0.2g, covering the normal
deceleration demand.
COOPERATIVE REGENERATIVE
BRAKING CONTROL STRATEGY
AND ALGORITHM
Braking Force Distribution Strategy
As shown in figure 5, during deceleration process, brake
forces of the vehicle are divided into two parts: the brake
force imitating the engine brake of the conventional vehicle
and the brake force generated by operating the brake pedal.
Figure 5. Distribution between regenerative brake and
hydraulic brake
The brake force imitating the engine brake is provided by the
regenerative brake torque of electric motor. And its amount is
determined by the vehicle speed and accelerator pedal
operation. The application of this part of brake force is to
provide driver of the electrified vehicle a good driving feel
similar with the conventional one and also to further exploit
Figure 4. Regenerative braking mode of EABS
the regeneration potential. The brake force generated by
operating brake pedal is supplied by regenerative and friction
brakes during cooperative regeneration, equaling to the brake
amount required by the driver.
Front and Rear Braking Force Allocation
Usually in an ordinary vehicle, the front-rear brake force
distribution (BFD) is a fixed value, which is determined by
parameters of the installed brake devices. However, for an
electrified vehicle, as the regenerative brake is introduced, the
front-rear brake force distribution needs to be reconsidered to
guarantee the brake safety and regeneration efficiency.
Since no additional power-supply unit used in EHB is set in
the EABS and pedal stroke simulators are only set in front
wheel brake lines and rear brakes are not decoupled with
brake pedal, the adjustment of the front-rear brake force
distribution would lead to the fluctuation of the brake pedal.
In order to ensure the good pedal feel, a fixed front-rear brake
force distribution is adopted in EABS. The brake blending of
regenerative and hydraulic brakes is carried out only on front
axle, and hydraulic brake is always applied on rear axle
which can guarantee the brake stability and avoid issues of
steering-loss. Finally the fixed front-rear brake force
distribution is implemented, as figure 6 shows.
Figure 6. Front and Rear braking force allocation
Regenerative and Hydraulic Brakes
Distribution
To improve the regeneration efficiency as much as possible,
the maximum regeneration principle is applied for brake
blending on front wheels. As shown in figure 5, only
regenerative brake is exerted on front axle at first, and the
front wheel hydraulic brake is supplemented once the
regenerative brake cannot meet the braking demand of front
axle while rear wheel hydraulic brake is always applied
during deceleration process. The total brake force of the
regenerative and hydraulic brakes keeps consistent with the
driver's braking intention.
Cooperative Regenerative Braking
Algorithm
Figure 7 illustrates the control block diagram of the EABS.
Driver operating the brake pedal, the driver's total brake
demand (Ttotal) is detected via pressure sensor at the master
cylinder. Then the command value of regenerative brake
torque (Tregen_cmd) calculated by BCU with regard to the
vehicle's information based on the regenerative braking
control strategy is sent to the MCU (motor control unit) and
implemented by the drive motor. Meanwhile, according to the
actual motor torque, the target wheel cylinder pressure
(pw_tgt) is calculated. A PID controller takes control of the
difference (e) between the target wheel pressure (pw_tgt) and
the actual value (pw_act) detected by the wheel pressure
sensor, calculating the actuation commands of the valves
(Valve_cmd) in the EABS modulator, realizing the closed-
loop control of the wheel cylinder pressures. Thus, the
regenerative brake and hydraulic brake are applied together to
meet the total deceleration requirement of the vehicle.
Figure 7. Cooperative regenerative braking algorithm
VEHICLE TEST
Normal Deceleration Process Test
Performance of cooperative control of regenerative and
hydraulic brakes is tested on an electric vehicle under normal
braking process, as figure 8 shows. With the driver's foot off
the accelerator at 0s, the master cylinder pressure remains
about 0Mpa until 0.8s, indicating that no brake operation is
taken. Meanwhile, a slight regenerative brake torque is
applied to imitate the engine brake of a conventional ICE
vehicle during coasting. From 0.8s-1.0s, the master cylinder
keeps at a relatively low level, corresponding to a small
Downloaded from SAE International by Tsinghua University, Wednesday, June 24, 2015
braking demand of driver. During this period, with no
hydraulic brake applied, the regenerative brake employed
alone can fully meet the brake request of the front wheels.
Later, the braking demand increases with the growth of the
master cylinder pressure. As the capability of regeneration is
limited by the relatively high motor speed, the hydraulic
brake is exerted in the front wheel cylinders to supplement
the rest part of the braking demand, leading to the rise of
deceleration consistent with the driver's brake intention. As
the motor's regeneration capability grows up with vehicle
slowing down, regenerative brake torque increases gradually
with the wheel hydraulic pressure decreasing
correspondingly, and the deceleration remains stable. When
vehicle speed decreases to a relatively low level after 4.5s,
the capability of regeneration drops rapidly, and the hydraulic
braking pressure builds up quickly, taking over all the
braking demand.
Figure 8. Test results of normal braking process
Normal deceleration vehicle test results show that:
1. EABS, with simple configuration, distinguished from the
mainstream brake-by-wire system EHB, can achieve the
cooperative control of regenerative and hydraulic brakes with
a good brake pedal feel, demonstrating the feasibility of the
system layout.
2. Hydraulic braking force adjusted rapidly and accurately by
EABS modulator, cooperates with the regenerative braking
torque, providing a total brake force corresponding to driver's
brake demand, leading to the good brake performance
obtained, which validates the control strategy and algorithm
developed.
3. The regeneration capability offered by electric motor is
utilized completely, converting the kinetic energy of vehicle
into electric energy effectively, achieving the high efficiency
of regenerative braking, improving the vehicle energy
efficiency remarkably.
ECE Driving Cycle Test
Indicating the operating conditions in urban areas of a
vehicle, the ECE driving cycle is adopted to carry out the
road test for studying the fuel economy improvement of an
electric vehicle equipped with EABS, which is of practical
significance. During test, four continuous ECE driving
cycles, taken as operating target, are carried out. Figure 9
shows the situations of the road test.
Figure 9. Road test under the ECE driving cycle
To evaluate the improvement in fuel economy of the electric
vehicle enhanced by EABS, the contribution rate δ is adopted
as an evaluation parameter [11], which can be expressed as
(1)
where Ereg is the regenerated energy at the DC bus of the
whole driving cycle, Edrive is the consumed energy at the DC
bus of the whole driving cycle, ηcharge is the charge
efficiency of the battery, taken to be 0.95 and ηdischarge is the
discharge efficiency of the battery, taken to be 0.95.
Table 1. Test results of the ECE driving cycle
The road test results under ECE driving cycle are shown in
Table 1. According to equation (1), with cooperative
regenerative braking by EABS, during the four ECE driving
cycles, the maximum value of the fuel economy contribution
rates is 25.70%, the minimum value is 24.57%, and the
average value is 25.08%, i.e. the ability of vehicle's range
extending offered by EABS is above 25% under ECE driving
cycle.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
Based on the conventional hydraulic ABS techniques, by
utilizing as much as possible known and proven components,
a new type of electrically-controlled regenerative braking
system EABS, distinguished from the layout of the
mainstream EHB system, has been developed and will be
soon brought into production in China. Integrating
cooperative regenerative braking with ABS/TCS functions,
this brake system achieves a high regeneration efficiency and
brake safety while providing system reliability, low
development cost and vehicle mounting ease equal to that of
conventional brake systems.
Cooperative regenerative braking control strategy and
algorithm have been developed. The hydraulic braking force,
which is closed-loop controlled, cooperates with the
regenerative braking torque, realizing the brake blending
consistent with driver's brake demand, which results in the
good brake performance and high regeneration efficiency
achieved.
Road tests under normal braking process and the ECE driving
cycle were carried out in an electric vehicle equipped with the
developed EABS. The normal deceleration test results show
the good cooperative regenerative braking control effect
offered by EABS, validating the control strategy and
algorithm developed. And the test results of the ECE driving
cycle also demonstrates that the fuel economy of the electric
vehicle improved by EABS is above 25%.
REFERENCES
1. Gao, Y. and Ehsani, M., “Electronic Braking System of
EV And HEV---Integration of Regenerative Braking,
Automatic Braking Force Control and ABS,” SAE Technical
Paper 2001-01-2478, 2001, doi: 10.4271/2001-01-2478.
2. Nakamura, E., Soga, M., Sakai, A., Otomo, A. et al.,
“Development of Electronically Controlled Brake System for
Hybrid Vehicle,” SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-0300, 2002,
doi: 10.4271/2002-01-0300.
3. Blaise, G., and Ann, A., “Slip Control Boost Control
System”, US Patent Application, 20090077963A1, 2009.
4. Aoki, Y., Suzuki, K., Nakano, H., Akamine, K. et al.,
“Development of Hydraulic Servo Brake System for
Cooperative Control with Regenerative Brake,” SAE
Technical Paper 2007-01-0868, 2007, doi:
10.4271/2007-01-0868.
5. von Albrichsfeld, C. and Karner, J., “Brake System for
Hybrid and Electric Vehicles,” SAE Technical Paper
2009-01-1217, 2009, doi: 10.4271/2009-01-1217.
6. Ohtani, Y., Innami, T., Obata, T., Yamaguchi, T. et al.,
“Development of an Electrically-Driven Intelligent Brake
Unit,” SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-0572, 2011, doi:
10.4271/2011-01-0572.
7. Zhang, J.Z., Lu, X., Zhang, P.J. and Chen, X., “Road test
of hybrid electric bus with regenerative braking system”,
Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2009; 45(2): 25-30.
8. Zhang, B., Zhang J.Z. and Li S.B., “Regenerative braking
system based on ESP pressure modulator”, Journal of
Tsinghua University (Science and Technology) 2011; 51(5):
710-714.
9. Zhang, J.Z., Chen, X. and Zhang, P.J., “Integrated control
of braking energy regeneration and pneumatic anti-lock
braking”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical
Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering 2011;
224(5): 587-610.
10. Zhang, J.Z., Kong, D.C., Lv, C. and Chen, X.,
“Optimization of control strategy for regenerative braking of
electrified bus equipped with ABS”, Proceedings of the
Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of
Automobile Engineering 2012; 226(4): 494-506.
11. Zhang, J.Z., Lv, C., Gou, J.F. and Kong, D.C.,
“Cooperative control of regenerative braking and hydraulic
braking of an electrified passenger car”, Proceedings of the
Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of
Automobile Engineering 2012; 226(10): 1289-1302.
CONTACT INFORMATION
Prof. Zhang Junzhi
State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy
Tsinghua University
Beijing
China
jzhzhang@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn
Dr. Lv Chen
State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy
Tsinghua University
Beijing
China
henrylvchen@163.com
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This article is supported by the Natural Science Foundation
of China [project no. 51075225] and National High Tech
Project “863” [project no. 2011AA11A243].
The Engineering Meetings Board has approved this paper for publication. It has
successfully completed SAE's peer review process under the supervision of the session
organizer. This process requires a minimum of three (3) reviews by industry experts.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a
retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical,
photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SAE.
ISSN 0148-7191
Positions and opinions advanced in this paper are those of the author(s) and not
necessarily those of SAE. The author is solely responsible for the content of the paper.
SAE Customer Service:
Tel: 877-606-7323 (inside USA and Canada)
Tel: 724-776-4970 (outside USA)
Fax: 724-776-0790
Email: CustomerService@sae.org
SAE Web Address: http://www.sae.org
Printed in USA
... The growing concern about the environmental friendliness and energy-saving requires vehicles to be more efficient and cleaner considerably [1][2]. With the rapid development of advanced electric vehicle technology to deal with non-renewable fossil fuels consumption and serious environment pollution, regenerative braking system (RBS) has been actively studied and applied to improve energy efficiency in various types vehicles, including battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) [3]. In the braking process of energy management, braking style also plays a vital role in the energy recovery efficiency and braking safety in addition to the braking distribution strategy [4][5]. ...
... After system modeling, a multi-objective optimal energy management strategy considering energy recovery efficiency, braking dynamic performance and the battery life can be formulated. 3) Three different scenarios are tested to verify the performance of the EV equipped with different BFD strategies. The rest of this paper proceeds as follows. ...
... The comfort level of a vehicle, also known as drivability, can be assessed by vehicle's jerk j . So the objective function 3 J is added to ensure the driving comfort of the electric vehicle, which is expressed as: (19) jv = && (20) While aggressive drivers may enjoy intense vehicle's jerk, the ride comfort are important features for those who prefer conservative or moderate driving style. In this article, the jerk is used to capture the comfort level of the vehicle. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
With the development of intelligent transportation system, intelligent network technology has been studied on a large scale in vehicle field. Electrification of vehicles and drive-by-wire chassis provide possibilities for the application of connected autonomous electrified vehicles. Regenerative braking control is an important field among drive-by-wire chassis control technologies. Regenerative braking control is a multi-objective optimization problem, which has the aim of improving regenerative energy efficiency, brake performance, and brake comfort. Therefore, a model predictive control (MPC) is proposed to solve the problem with consideration of different brake styles, such as aggressive, moderate and conservative. Then, the models of the main components associated with the regenerative braking system are designed and built up in a typical deceleration process for simulation and analysis. The simulation results show that the aggressive style mode is the best brake performance, which cause issues on brake comfort as well. The conservative style mode makes full use of motor braking and has advantage of the brake comfort and regenerative energy efficiency. But, it is not good at rapid braking performance of low brake intensity. The moderate style mode is suitable for most drivers, which is balanced of the above characteristics. Finally, experimental tests under ECE driving cycle are also carried out to further verify the characteristics of proposed three brake modes.
... If the regenerative braking torque is not sufficient (at a certain brake pedal position), the conventional braking system is engaged. The road tests were replicated also in the ECE driving cycle [8]. ...
... The energy consumed when driving in second gear varied from 353. 8 In real city driving conditions, the experimental electric car could achieve a regenerative braking efficiency of 24.7% in second gear at a 100% setting. In practice, a recommended setting should not exceed 80%, resulting in a regenerative braking efficiency of 22.8% in second gear and 14.2% in third gear; • When making regenerative braking settings in an electric car, it is necessary to consider the maximum settings and have the stop lights lit up in case of fast decelerations to ensure traffic safety on the road. ...
Article
Full-text available
As the use of fossil energy sources in transport declines, new technologies, e.g., electric vehicles, are being introduced. One of the advantages of electric vehicles in urban driving is the possibility to charge their batteries with regenerative energy during braking. For this reason, electric cars usually have a longer range per charge in urban driving than in non-urban driving. This research experimentally examined the regenerative braking of a converted Renault Clio electric car at different regenerative braking settings in the range of 0–100%. An original research methodology was developed for road tests in urban driving. The driving cycle included aggressive driving with rapid acceleration and braking. The road test was conducted in second and third gears, which are the usual gears for driving an electric car in a city. The highest regenerative braking efficiencies were achieved at a 100% setting, which in some replications reached 24% of the total electrical energy consumed; however, the 100% setting was too high from the perspective of comfortable driving of the electric car and contributed to a too significant increase in the braking force at the initial stages of braking.
... Where T total demand is the total braking demand of the vehicle, T regenerative is the regenerative braking torque and T friction is the friction braking torque provided by the hydraulic braking system. 169 During the deceleration, the regenerative brake and the frictional brake work effectively together and the braking deceleration very gradually, ensuring the vehicle's efficient braking performance. In this section the discussion includes outputs of RB controller (regenerative and hydraulic braking torque) is sent to motor and hydraulic control systems in the vehicle. ...
Article
Full-text available
Vehicle technology advances and the world shifts towards E‐mobility, improving the performance of electric vehicles (EVs) and HEVs, which are becoming the prominent focus. One of the prime topics of EV development is increasing the driving range, which is the fundamental requirement. Apart from increasing the battery capacity, retrieving the wasted energy during conventional braking, also called as regenerative braking, is a hot topic. In this context, numerous control architectures and major braking approaches are considered to examine in this study in order to create an efficient regenerative braking system (RBS). This review article intends to provide an overview of major subsystems in the RBS such as motor control system and hydraulic braking system and how it affects the braking performance is also well discussed. Additionally, it complies with some of the recent research applications and systematically reviews the several braking control strategies implied. The prominent ones are fuzzy logic control, neural network, MPC, sliding mode, and adaptive control modelling approaches. These control strategies are used to enhance energy regeneration without affecting vehicle performance. Further, this article discusses the RBS design process and its calibration variables, such as speed of the vehicle and brake force estimation, which can be used to improve braking performance. Moreover, challenges on RBS improvements are effectively addressed, coupled with brief suggestions and discussions for the growth of future RBS development. Finally, this article will hopefully help the reader to critically analyse the working of RBS and encourage to design of an efficient RBS for electro‐mobility application. A holistic overview of the RBS control system architecture and its various control systems is reviewed. Various brake energy control strategies like Fuzzy, MPC, NN, SMC, Adaptive and learning‐based controls are critically evaluated. The discussion of necessary calibration process and its associated parameters are elucidated. Representation of real‐time design and development process of an efficient RBS in EV. Some of the prominent challenges faced during design and development of RBS and scope of future improvement is suggested. This review article intends to provide an overview of control system architecture and major subsystems in the RBS such as motor control system and hydraulic braking system. Additionally, it complies some of the recent research applications and systematically reviews the several braking control strategies implied. The prominent ones are FLC, NN, MPC, sliding mode, and adaptive control modeling approaches. Further, this article discusses the RBS design process and its calibration parameters, which can be used to improve braking performance. Moreover, challenges on RBS improvements are effectively addressed, coupled with brief suggestions and discussions for the growth of future RBS development.
... Experiments with regenerative braking have also been conducted to record data on the vehicle speed, deceleration and regenerative current. The conventional braking system is activated when the regenerative braking torque is not sufficient to provide the required braking force [9]. ...
... Reasonable control of regenerative braking and mechanical braking is based on braking requirements, improving the efficiency of regenerative braking braking comfort, and broad application prospects. 1,2 The main research content of the electric vehicle (EV) braking control strategy is to comprehensively consider vehicle braking demand, energy recovery efficiency, and driving comfort and reasonably allocate mechanical braking and regenerative braking. 3 There are currently four main control strategies for the regenerative braking control of new energy vehicles, namely the optimal braking energy recovery control strategy, ideal braking force distribution control strategy, braking force fixed-ratio distribution control strategy, and parallel braking energy recovery control strategy. ...
Article
Full-text available
To improve the mileage capacity of electric vehicles (EVs), a dual-motor front-wheel-drive EV is considered as the research object. Through experiments with actual vehicles, data from four typical working conditions are collected; a C4.5 decision tree algorithm is developed to train a working condition recognition model. The long short termmemory neural network is used to train four deep-learning working condition prediction models, and the particleswarm algorithm is used to optimize their structural parameters. The braking strength, demand torque, and demand speed are determined based on the predicted working conditions. Based on four common braking energy recovery control strategies, front- and rear-wheel braking force distribution strategies are formulated according to the changes in braking strength. The maximum regenerative braking torque and remaining mechanical braking torque provided by the front wheels are optimized. The Seagull Optimization Algorithm is used to optimize the torque distribution of the dual motors on the front wheels and improve the working efficiency of the motors. In the experimental conditions, the recovered energy at 100 km is 2.6 kWh; the energy recovery rate is 19.1%, and the power consumption ratio is reduced by 15.8%, improving the EV cruising range.
... With the rapid development of various types of electric vehicles to save fossil energy and protect the environment, regenerative braking system (RBS) has been essential for electric vehicles, which could make drive motor work as a generator to recover kinetic energy during the deceleration process [1]- [5]. In this process, to guarantee the vehicle's deceleration performance and energy recovery efficiency for different braking requirements, the mechanical friction brake system also need to be equipped and controlled by wire, which works collaboratively with the electric brake system. ...
Article
Full-text available
Since the control of brake pressure has a significant impact on regenerative braking performance of electric vehicles, a novel combined brake pressure control algorithm based on two high-speed on-off valves is developed to improve the precision and timeliness of pressure tracking for regenerative braking system of electric commercial trucks in this paper. Firstly, a comprehensive mathematical model of the valve control system is built up which is composed by several sub-models and verified by experiments. Secondly, a PID controller with Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) and a fuzzy controller with cooperative PWM are separately adopted in the proposed combined control algorithm to substitute for the traditional PWM approach. Moreover, through numerical simulation studies, a better control performance is obtained in MATLAB/Simulink on the basis of the built models. Finally, the experimental tests under various typical braking pressure input signals are carried out to verify the simulation results. The comparison between simulation and experimental results fully demonstrates that the proposed control algorithm is feasible and the dynamic performance of this combined valve control algorithm is considerably improved compared with conventional PID control algorithm.
Article
The rapid growth of the automotive sector has been associated with numerous benefits; however, it has also brought about significant environmental deterioration of our planet. Consequently, attention on minimizing the impacts of this industry have led to the development of kinetic energy recovery systems known as regenerative braking systems (RBS). RBSs facilitate kinetic energy recuperation through vehicle braking processes, thus avoiding the usual dissipation of energy (heat) due to friction-based brake pads. This literature review aims to provide a concise and holistic discussion of RBS fundamentals: history, competing technologies, types, characteristics and limitations, applications, vehicle dynamics, and RBS evaluation factors.
Article
Full-text available
With the aims of regeneration efficiency and brake comfort, three different control strategies, namely the maximum-regeneration-efficiency strategy, the good-pedal-feel strategy and the coordination strategy for regenerative braking of an electrified passenger car are researched in this paper. The models of the main components related to the regenerative brake and the frictional blending brake of the electric passenger car are built in MATLAB/Simulink. The control effects and regeneration efficiencies of the control strategies in a typical deceleration process are simulated and analysed. Road tests under normal deceleration braking and an ECE driving cycle are carried out. The simulation and road test results show that the maximum-regeneration-efficiency strategy, which causes issues on brake comfort and safety, could hardly be utilized in the regenerative braking system adopted. The good-pedal-feel strategy and coordination strategy are advantageous over the first strategy with respect to the brake comfort and regeneration efficiency. The fuel economy enhanced by the regenerative braking system developed is more than 25% under the ECE driving cycle.
Article
Full-text available
This paper mainly focuses on the regenerative braking control of an electrified bus equipped with an anti-lock braking system (ABS). The regenerative braking works simultaneously with a pneumatic ABS, thus liberating the remaining energy of the vehicle while its wheels tend to lock under an extreme brake circumstance. Based on one representative pneumatic ABS strategy and optimum control theory, the optimization for regenerative braking control is proposed, in which the frictional and regenerative brake forces are controlled integrally to obtain maximal available adhesion. The simulation results indicate that brake stability and performance on different roads profit from the optimization. Hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) tests are accomplished on the pneumatic braking system of an electrified bus. HIL tests validate the results of simulation and guarantee the advantage and reliability of the optimization. The adaptability of optimization to hardware and software of the brake controller is also ensured. The field in which further research could be carried out is proposed.
Article
The hydraulic braking system energy regeneration efficiency was improved by a regenerative braking system based on an ESP pressure modulator. This paper describes the working principle, hardware design and the regenerative brake system test bed. Tests of the regenerative braking system verify the smoothness and braking efficiency.
Article
This paper mainly focuses on integrated control of the brake system of a hybrid electric vehicle, i.e. the integration of friction braking and regenerative braking during anti-lock braking control and series brake blending during normal deceleration. Based on a series regenerative braking system, the structure of an integrated brake system is proposed. The models of each part of a hybrid electric bus are built in MATLABÆ Simulink, taking authorized articles as references. A test bench with the original pneumatic brake system of a bus is also built to carry out hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) tests of the integrated brake system and to study the characteristics of the system better. The integrated control strategy is proposed on the basis of a pneumatic anti-lock braking strategy. Simulation results show that the participation of regenerative braking in the anti-lock braking control can be beneficial to both the ride comfort and the braking performance of the vehicle. HIL test results validate the results of the simulations. An integrated brake controller is designed and made to carry out the control strategies on board. A field in which further research could be carried out is also proposed.
Development of an Electrically-Driven Intelligent Brake Unit
  • Y Ohtani
  • T Innami
  • T Obata
  • T Yamaguchi
Ohtani, Y., Innami, T., Obata, T., Yamaguchi, T. et al., "Development of an Electrically-Driven Intelligent Brake Unit," SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-0572, 2011, doi: 10.4271/2011-01-0572.