Content uploaded by Xiancan Zhu
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Xiancan Zhu on Nov 13, 2018
Content may be subject to copyright.
163© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017
Q.-S. Wu (ed.), Arbuscular Mycorrhizas and Stress Tolerance of Plants,
DOI10.1007/978-981-10-4115-0_8
Chapter 8
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi andTolerance
ofTemperature Stress inPlants
XiancanZhu, FengbinSong, andFulaiLiu
Abstract Temperature is one of the most important environmental factors that
determine the growth and productivity of plants across the globe. Many physiologi-
cal and biochemical processes and functions are affected by low and high tempera-
ture stresses. Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis has been shown to improve
tolerance to temperature stress in plants. This chapter addresses the effect of AM
symbiosis on plant growth and biomass production, water relations (water potential,
stomatal conductance, and aquaporins), photosynthesis (photosynthetic rate, chloro-
phyll, and chlorophyll uorescence), plasma membrane permeability (malondial-
dehyde and ATPase), reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antioxidants, osmotic
adjustment, carbohydrate metabolism, nutrient acquisition, and secondary metabo-
lism under low or high temperature stress. The possible mechanisms of AM symbio-
sis improving temperature stress tolerance of the host plants via enhancing water
and nutrient uptake, improving photosynthetic capacity and efciency, protecting
plant against oxidative damage, and increasing accumulation of osmolytes are dis-
cussed. This chapter also provides some future perspectives for better understand-
ing the mechanisms of AM plant tolerance against temperature stress.
Keywords Mycorrhiza • Plasma membrane permeability • Secondary metabolism
• Temperature
X. Zhu (*) • F. Song
Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Changchun 130102, People’s Republic of China
e-mail: zhuxiancan@neigae.ac.cn
F. Liu
Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science,
University of Copenhagen, Taastrup DK-2630, Denmark
164
8.1 Introduction
Plants often encounter a wide range of environmental perturbations including
abiotic and biotic stresses (Kaplan et al. 2004). Temperature is one of the most
important environmental factors that determine the growth and productivity of
plants across the globe (Zhu et al. 2011). In recent years, extreme temperature
events have become more frequent along with global climate change. In Northeast
China, for example, crops often suffer from the damage of low temperature during
early spring, causing signicant losses in grain yield.
Temperature stress includes both low temperature and high temperature events
occurring during the growth season of the crops. In general, low but not freezing
temperatures (i.e., 0–15 °C) is considered as low temperature stress (Theocharis etal.
2012), and the elevation in temperature beyond a threshold level (i.e., 10–15 °C
above ambient) is considered as high temperature stress (Wahid etal. 2007). When
plant is exposed to low or high temperature stress, many physiological and bio-
chemical processes and functions will be disturbed. The injuries include damage of
cell membrane structure and lipid composition, cellular leakage of electrolytes and
amino acids, peroxidation of membrane lipids, a diversion of electron ow to alter-
nate pathways, denaturation and aggregation of proteins, redistribution of intracel-
lular calcium ions, inactivation of enzymes in chloroplast and mitochondria, and
production of toxic compounds and reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Wahid etal.
2007; Ruelland and Zachowski 2010; Matteucci etal. 2011; Theocharis etal. 2012).
To overcome the temperature stress, plants have evolved some adaptive strate-
gies and triggered a cascade of events that cause changes in the expression of a large
number of temperature-induced genes and the production of various protein types,
and induce biochemical and physiological modications (Theocharis etal. 2012;
Janmohammadi etal. 2015; Sharma and Laxmi 2016). The tolerance mechanisms
involved in modication of plant cell membrane, accumulation of cytosolic calcium
ion, acclimation of photosynthesis, activation of ROS scavenger systems, accumu-
lation of compatible solutes such as proline and sugars, and induction of cold-related
gene expression (Wahid et al. 2007; Theocharis et al. 2012). For example, in
Arabidopsis, ICE-DREB1/CBF regulon plays a key role in tolerance to low tem-
perature stress. ICE1 is a MYC-type transcription factor that positively regulates
and activates CBF/DREB1 genes, and CBF/DREB1 induces and regulates COR
genes leading to tolerance to low temperature stress (Chinnusamy et al. 2007;
Thomashow 2010).
It is well accepted that arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis is an effective
strategy to improve tolerance to temperature stress in plants (Duhamel and
Vandenkoornhuyse 2013). AM symbioses are common in nature and have been
demonstrated to be benecial for a sustainable agricultural ecosystem due to their
functions in improving plant growth, enhancing nutrient uptake, increasing soil sta-
bility, and alleviating abiotic and biotic stress (Gianinazzi etal. 2010; Berta etal.
2014; Zhu etal. 2015). AM symbiosis can alter plant physiology to allow it to cope
with stress conditions (Miransari etal. 2008). Thus, in this chapter, the effects of
X. Zhu et al.
165
AM on plants under low and high temperature stress are discussed, and the aim is to
identify the underlying mechanisms contributing to plant tolerance to temperature
stress.
8.2 Effect ofTemperature Stress onAMFungi
Environmental conditions affect the community and development of AM fungi and
the formation of mycorrhizae (Liu etal. 2004). Using traditional morphological and
molecular methods, numerous studies have investigated the diversity of AM fungi at
varied environmental conditions (Lumini etal. 2011; Camenzind etal. 2014; Botnen
etal. 2015). However, as far as we are aware, little information is available about the
effect of temperature on AM community structure. Heinemeyer et al. (2003)
reported that an increase of temperature by 3 °C above ambient results in no signi-
cant changes in the AM fungal community in a native grassland community.
Gutknecht etal. (2012) quantied the response of soil microbial biomass and com-
munity structure from 2001 to 2006 to simulated global change at the Jasper Ridge
Global Change Experiment. These authors found that AM fungi biomarker biomass
was lower under elevated temperature (by 1 °C) only in 2006, and there was no
signicant difference in another 5 years. In addition, several studies have reported
the effect of seasonal and climate changes including temperature uctuations on
AM fungal community structure (Dumbrell et al. 2011; Torrecillas et al. 2013;
Bainard etal. 2014); however, until now there is no consensus about how AM fungal
community structure and function respond to temperature stress.
Temperature altered mycelium growth, growth pattern, and phenology of intrara-
dical and extraradical colonization of AM fungi (Gavito etal. 2005; Compant etal.
2010). Gavito etal. (2005) suggested that temperature optima for AM fungi devel-
opment were between 18 and 30 °C.But the temperature optima were depending on
the species of AM fungus. Soil warming stimulated external hyphal production and
extraradical hyphal network growth in temperate conditions (Staddon etal. 2004;
Hawkes etal. 2008). Low and high temperatures reduced AM fungal growth, inhib-
ited extraradical hyphal network structure formation and AM fungal activity,
although AM fungi response to temperature stress exist difference. Liu etal. (2004)
reported that sporulation of Glomus intraradices was reduced at 15 °C, while spore
metabolic activity was not reduced until an even lower temperature (10 °C) was
reached. Schenck etal. (1975) found the germination of spores of Glomus coral-
loidea and Glomus heterogama were reduced above 34 °C.
Root colonization was also changed by low and high temperatures. Some
researchers have reported that AM colonization of crop plants was strongly reduced
at 15 °C compared with ambient temperature, and almost completely inhibited at 10
or 5 °C (Zhang etal. 1995; Liu etal. 2004; Zhu et al. 2010a). In contrast, some
scientists found that AM colonization was unaffected by low temperature (Hayman
1974; Karasawa etal. 2012). At high temperature conditions, AM colonization was
also affected. Haugen and Smith (1992) showed that colonization of cashew
8 Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi andTolerance ofTemperature Stress inPlants
166
(Anacardium occidentale) roots by Glomus intraradices was reduced at 38 °C
compared to 22 °C; whereas Martin and Stutz (2004) reported that colonization of
pepper (Capsicum annuum) roots by Glomus AZ112 was increased at 32.1–38 °C
compared to 20.7–25.4 °C. Zhu etal. (2011) found that there was no signicant
change in colonization of maize (Zea mays) roots by Glomus etunicatum at 35 and
40 °C.The discrepancy of the results could be due to different AM fungi and plant
materials as well as experimental conditions among the different studies.
8.3 AM andTolerance ofTemperature Stress inPlants
In the past three decades, several studies have investigated the effect of AM fungi on
plant growth and physiology under low and high temperature stresses. Table8.1
lists the published works of AM effect on the host plants exposed to low and high
temperature stresses from 1976. Below, the AM plants’ response to temperature
stress and possible role of AM in tolerance of temperature stress are discussed.
8.3.1 Plant Growth andBiomass
Under low or high temperature stress, plant morphological features were affected
and plant growth and biomass production could be inhibited. AM symbiosis has
been shown to increase the tness of the host plants via enhancing its growth and
biomass production. It has been reported that AM plants grown better than non-AM
plants under low or high temperature stress, which partly attributed to the enhanced
photosynthesis and nutrient uptake, especially for P nutrition. Several researches
have reported that shoot and root dry weights of AM plants were higher than the
non-AM plants at low or high temperature conditions (Haugen and Smith 1992;
Martin and Stutz 2004; Zhu etal. 2010b; Abdel Latef and Chaoxing 2011; Liu etal.
2014a). Matsubara etal. (2004) found AM fungi increased leaf and root number,
crown diameter, and leaf area of strawberry (Fragaria ananassa) plants under high
temperature stress. Bunn etal. (2009) observed AM Dichanthelium lanuginosum
plants had higher root length and root diameter compared with the non-AM plants
when exposed to high temperature. Hu etal. (2015) reported increased seed number
and plant biomass of Medicago truncatula plants colonized by Rhizophagus irregu-
laris when ambient night temperature increased by 1.53 °C.
In contrast, several studies have shown that AM symbiosis had no or negative
effect on plant growth and biomass production under low and high temperature
stress. Zhu etal. (2011, 2015) reported AM-inoculated maize had a similar shoot
and root dry weights with the non-AM plants under high and low temperature stress.
Maya and Matsubara (2013) found root and tuber dry weights of AM cyclamen
(Cyclamen persicum) were lower than those of the non-AM plants under high
X. Zhu et al.
167
Table 8.1 AM effects on host plant parameters under temperature stress in reported paper since 1986
AM fungi Host plants Temperature
Length
of stress Parameters AM effect References
Glomus intraradices Gossypium hirsutum 30 and 36 °C 60 Plant growth; %P, Cu, Zn,
and Mn contents
Positive Smith and Roncadori
(1986)
Gl. ambisporum
Gigaspora margarita
Gl. intraradices Gossypium hirsutum 18 °C 60 Zn and Mn contents Positive Smith and Roncadori
(1986)
Gl. ambisporum Plant growth; %P and Cu
contents
No
Gl. margarita Gossypium hirsutum 18 °C 60 Plant growth; %P, Cu, Zn,
and Mn contents
No Smith and Roncadori
(1986)
Gl. etunicatum Fraxinus pennsylvanica 12, 16, and 20 °C 30 Leaf area growth rate;
relative leaf area growth rate;
leaf area; plant weight; leaf
weight ratio (16 °C); mean
leaf size
Positive Andersen etal.
(1987)
Stem, leaf, and root weight
ratio; root- shoot ratio; mean
leaf size (12 °C)
No
Stem weight ratio (20 °C);
root weight ratio (16 °C);
root-shoot ratio (16 °C)
Negative
AMF Hordeum vulgare 12, 16, and 20 °C Shoot mass Positive Volkmar and
Woodbury (1989)
Root mass and length No
Gl. fasciculatum Sorghum bicolor 20 °C 48 Dry weight; root length;
content of P, N, S, K, Ca,
Mg, Mn, Zn, Fe, and Cu
Positive Raju etal. (1990)
Gl. intraradices
Gl. macrocarpum
(continued)
8 Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi andTolerance ofTemperature Stress inPlants
168
Table 8.1 (continued)
AM fungi Host plants Temperature
Length
of stress Parameters AM effect References
Gl. fasciculatum Sorghum bicolor 30 °C 48 Dry weight; root length;
content of P, N, S, K, Ca,
Mg, Mn, Zn, Fe, and Cu
Positive Raju etal. (1990)
Gl. macrocarpum
Gl. intraradices Sorghum bicolor 30 °C 48 Dry weight; root length;
content of P, N, S, K, Ca,
Mg, Mn, Zn, Fe, and Cu
Negative Raju etal. (1990)
Gl. intraradices Vigna radiata 30 and 38 °C 14 and
42
Plant growth Positive Haugen and Smith
(1992)
Gl. mosseae Zea mays 10 °C 7 Shoot mass; sugars; protein
of Pride 5; starch of Pioneer
3902
Positive Charest etal. (1993)
Chlorophyll concentration;
protein of Pioneer 3902;
starch of Pride 5
Negative
Gl. intraradices Hordeum vulgare 15 and 10 °C 48 Specic P uptake Positive Baon etal. (1994)
P concentration; PUE No
Plant biomass; P content Negative
Gl. mosseae Triticum aestivum
Glenlea
5 °C 7 Chlorophyll content Positive Paradis etal. (1995)
Plant growth; content of total
sugars, reducing sugars, and
proteins
No
Nonreducing sugar content Negative
Gl. mosseae Triticum aestivum AC
Ron
5 °C 7 Plant growth; content of
chlorophyll, total sugars,
nonreducing sugar, reducing
sugars, and proteins
No Paradis etal. (1995)
X. Zhu et al.
169
AM fungi Host plants Temperature
Length
of stress Parameters AM effect References
Gl. versiforme Glycine max 15 °C Nodule weight; N
concentration and content;
root weight
Positive Zhang etal. (1995)
Nodule number Negative
Gl. versiforme Glycine max 18.2 °C N concentration and content;
root weight
Positive Zhang etal. (1995)
Nodule number and weight Negative
Gl. versiforme Glycine max 21.6 °C Nodule number and weight;
N content; root weight
Positive Zhang etal. (1995)
N concentration Negative
Gl. intraradices Phaseolus vulgaris 4 °C 6 Leaf water potential Positive EI-Tohamy etal.
(1999)
Electrolyte leakage No
Gl. margarita Asparagus ofcinalis 15 and 30 °C 28 Plant height; number of
shoots and crowns; dry
weight; P concentration
Positive Matsubara etal.
(2000)
Gl. intraradices Allium porrum 15 and 0 °C 7 and 14 32P activity (15 °C for 14 d) Positive Wang etal. (2002)
32P activity No
Gl. intraradices Sorghum bicolor 15 and 10 °C 35, 70,
and 105
Root length and fresh
weight; shoot dry weight
No Liu etal. (2004)
Root fresh weight (15 °C for
35 d)
Negative
Gl. intraradices Capsicum annuum 32.1–38 °C 56 Plant growth; root
respiration
Positive Martin and Stutz
(2004)
Leaf P content Negative
Gl. margarita, Gl.
fasciculatum, Gl.
mosseae, Gl.
aggregatum
Fragaria ananassa ~35 °C Number of leaves and roots;
diameter of crown; leaf area;
dry weight
Positive Matsubara etal.
(2004)
P content Negative
(continued)
8 Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi andTolerance ofTemperature Stress inPlants
170
Table 8.1 (continued)
AM fungi Host plants Temperature
Length
of stress Parameters AM effect References
Gl. claroideum Gnaphalium
norvegicum
15 °C 30 Plant growth; N content; Pn;
PNUE;
Positive Ruotsalainen and
Kytöviita (2004)
gemination; SLA No
N concentration Negative
Gl. claroideum Gnaphalium
norvegicum
8 °C 37 Gemination; plant growth; N
content; Pn; PNUE; SLA
No Ruotsalainen and
Kytöviita (2004)
N concentration Negative
Gl. intraradices Phaseolus vulgaris 4 °C 2 Expression of PvPIP1;3;
abundance of PIP protein
Positive Aroca etal. (2007)
RWC; Tr; osmotic root
hydraulic properties;
expression of PvPIP1;1,
PvPIP2;1 and PvPIP1;2;
No
Gl. claroideum Potentilla crantzii 17 °C 56 PPUE; P concentration Positive Kytöviita and
Ruotsalainen (2007)
Ranunculus acris 49 Pn; plant growth; PPUE; N
concentration; N and P
content
No
Gl. hoi Plantago lanceolata 7 °C 10 Proportion of respiratory
capacity of roots;
cytochrome c oxidase
activity
No Atkin etal. (2009)
Abundance of cytochrome c
oxidase subunit II and
alternative oxidase
Negative
X. Zhu et al.
171
AM fungi Host plants Temperature
Length
of stress Parameters AM effect References
AMF mixture Agrostis scabra, From 30 to 50 °C
at the surface to
base of the pot
70 and
60
Total biomass; root length
and diameter
No Bunn etal. (2009)
Mimulus guttatus
AMF mixture Dichanthelium From 30 to 50 °C
at the surface to
base of the pot
80 Total biomass; root length
and diameter
Positive Bunn etal. (2009)
lanuginosum
Gl. mosseae Citrus tangerine 15 °C 55 Root length; Ca content Positive Wu and Zou (2010)
Plant growth; Pn, Tr, gs; root
area, diameter, and volume;
content of P, K, Mg, Fe, Cu,
Mn, and Zn
No
Gl. etunicatum Zea mays 15 and 5 °C 7 Root dry weight; WUE;
chlorophyll content; Fm;
Fv/Fm; Fv/Fo; Pn; Tr; gs
Positive Zhu etal. (2010a)
Shoot dry weight; RWC;
WSD; Fo
No
Ci Negative
Gl. etunicatum Zea mays 5, 15, 35, and
40 °C
7 Plant growth; root proline
content (5 and 15 °C); root
soluble sugar content;
activity of SOD and CAT
and root POD
Positive Zhu etal. (2010b)
Leaf soluble sugar content;
root proline content (35 and
40 °C); leaf POD activity
No
Membrane relative
permeability; MDA; leaf
proline content
Negative
(continued)
8 Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi andTolerance ofTemperature Stress inPlants
172
Table 8.1 (continued)
AM fungi Host plants Temperature
Length
of stress Parameters AM effect References
Gl. mosseae Lycopersicon
esculentum
8 °C 7 Plant growth; content of
chlorophyll and soluble
sugar; activity of SOD, POD,
and APX
Positive Abdel Latef and
Chaoxing (2011)
Content of total sugar and
soluble protein; CAT activity
No
Content of insoluble sugar,
proline, and MDA
Negative
Gl. hoi Plantago lanceolata 12 °C N and 15N content Positive Barrett etal. (2011)
Gl. etunicatum Zea mays 35 and 40 °C 7 Pn; Tr; gs; Fm; Fv/Fm;
Fv/Fo; chlorophyll and
carotenoid contents; RWC;
WUE
Positive Zhu etal. (2011)
Plant growth; Fo;
chlorophyll a/b
No
Ci Negative
Gl. margarita Poa pratensis Ambient +3 °C Community plant biomass
and P stock
Positive Büscher etal. (2012)
Gl. intraradices Lolium perenne Community N stock No
Medicago lupulina
Lotus corniculatus
Rumex acetosa
Plantago
lanceolata
X. Zhu et al.
173
AM fungi Host plants Temperature
Length
of stress Parameters AM effect References
Gl. mosseae Plantago lanceolata Ambient +2.7 °C 16 P content Positive Karasawa etal.
(2012)
Plant growth; content of 13C,
N, K, Ca, Mg, and Zn; plant
CO2 uptake
No
Gl. versiforme Tectona grandis 6, 3, and 0 °C 0.5 Content of chlorophyll,
soluble protein; activity of
SOD and POD
Positive Zhou etal. (2012)
MDA Negative
Funneliformis
mosseae
Cucumis sativus 15 °C 25 Plant growth; content of
phenols, avonoids, lignin,
and phenolic acids; activity
of DPPH, G6PDH, SKDH,
PAL, CAD, PPO, and POD;
expression of PR-1,
CCOMT, G6PDH, CAD,
LPO, PAL, WRKY30,
and C4H
Positive Chen etal. (2013)
H2O2 content Negative
Gl. mosseae Oryza sativa 15 °C 10 Root length; fresh weight; N
and P content; NUE; soluble
sugar content; activity of
NR, GS, SPS, and SS; JA
and NO contents
Positive Liu etal. (2013)
Dry weight No
(continued)
8 Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi andTolerance ofTemperature Stress inPlants
174
Table 8.1 (continued)
AM fungi Host plants Temperature
Length
of stress Parameters AM effect References
Gl. fasciculatum Cyclamen persicum 30 °C 28 Shoot dry weight; activity of
leaf and tuber SOD, APX
and DPPH and root SOD
and DPPH; leaf, root, and
tuber ascorbic acid and
polyphenol contents
Positive Maya and Matsubara
(2013)
Root and tuber dry weight;
activity of root APX
No
Acaulospora
scrobiculata
Zea mays 15 °C 7 Leaf soluble sugar and
proline content; CAT and
POD activities
Positive Chen etal. (2014)
Gl. tortuosum
Plant growth; MDA content;
SOD activity
No
Gl. etunicatum Zea mays 15 °C 7 Leaf soluble sugar, proline,
and MDA content; CAT and
POD activities
Positive Chen etal. (2014)
Plant growth; SOD activity No
Gl. intraradices Zea mays 15 °C 7 Leaf soluble sugar, proline,
and MDA content; CAT
activity
Positive Chen etal. (2014)
Plant growth; SOD activity No
POD activity Negative
X. Zhu et al.
175
AM fungi Host plants Temperature
Length
of stress Parameters AM effect References
Funneliformis
mosseae
Cucumis sativus 15 °C 39 Plant growth; root activity;
ATPase activity and
concentration; plasma
membrane protein content;
expression of proton pump
and calcium-transporting
ATPase-related genes
Positive Liu etal. (2014a)
Water content No
H2O2 content; NADPH
oxidase activity
Negative
Gl. intraradices Oryza sativa 15 °C 7 RWC; root length;
expression of PIP1;1,
PIP1;3, PIP2;1, PIP2;5,
TPS1, TPS2, and TPP1
Positive Liu etal. (2014b)
Expression of PIP1;1 and
PIP2;3
No
Rhizophagus
irregularis
Medicago truncatula Ambient night
temperature +
1.53 °C
58 Seed number; plant weight;
shoot Zn, root P, Ca, glucose,
and fructose concentration;
expression of MtSucS2
Positive Hu etal. (2015)
Flower number; shoot P and
K, root K and Zn, leaf
sucrose, glucose, and
fructose, and stem sucrose,
glucose and fructose
concentration; expression of
MtSucS3 and MtSucS5
No
Shoot Ca, and root sucrose
concentration; expression of
MtSucS1 and MtSucS4
Negative
(continued)
8 Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi andTolerance ofTemperature Stress inPlants
176
Table 8.1 (continued)
AM fungi Host plants Temperature
Length
of stress Parameters AM effect References
Gl. tortuosum Zea mays 15 °C 14 Root dry weight; content of
N, leaf soluble sugar and
reducing sugar, root reducing
sugar, sucrose, and fructose;
activity of GS, GOT, GPT,
SPS, and AMS; Pn
Positive Zhu etal. (2015)
Plant height; shoot dry
weight; SS activity
No
Content of leaf sucrose and
fructose, root soluble sugar
Negative
AMF mixture: R.
irregularis (isolate
Triticum aestivum 35 °C 7 Number of grains;
concentration of Tiller K and
Ca and spike C; spike
biomass
Positive Cabral etal. (2016)
Grain weight; concentration
of Tiller C, N, Mg, B and
Mn, spike N, grain C, P, and
K; tiller biomass; light-use
efciency
No
BEG140), R. irregularis,
Funneliformis mosseae
(isolate BEG95), F.
geosporum,
Claroideoglomus
claroideum Concentration of Tiller P, K/
Ca, Cu, Zn, and Fe, grain N
Negative
X. Zhu et al.
177
AM fungi Host plants Temperature
Length
of stress Parameters AM effect References
Gl. tortuosum Zea mays 15 °C 14 Concentration of shoot N,
NO3
−-N, NH4+-N, P, K, Cu,
and root N, P, Ca, Zn; NR
activity
Positive Liu etal. 2016
Plant growth; concentration
of shoot Ca, S, Mg, Na, Al,
Fe, Mn, Zn, and root K, S,
Mg, Na, Al, Fe, Mn, Cu
No
Gl. tortuosum Zea mays 15 °C 14 Concentration of Thr, Gly,
His, Lys, total amino acid,
and leaf Ile, Leu, Phe, Agr,
and root Val
Positive Zhu etal. (2016)
No
Plant growth; concentration
of Asp, Ser, Glu, Ala, Met,
Tyr, Pro, and leaf Val and
root Ile, Leu, Phe, Arg
AMS amylase, APX ascorbate peroxidase, CAD cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase, CAT catalase, Ci intercellular CO2 concentration, Fm maximal uorescence,
Fo primary uorescence, Fv/Fm maximum quantum efciency of photosystem II primary photochemistry, Fv/Fo potential photochemical efciency, G6PDH
glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, Gi Gigaspora, Gl Glomus, GOT glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase, GPT glutamate pyruvate transaminase, gs stomatal
conductance, GS glutamine synthetase, H2O2 hydrogen peroxide, JA jasmonic acid, MDA malondialdehyde, NR nitrate reductase, NUE nitrogen use efciency,
PAL phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, PIP plasma membrane intrinsic protein, Pn net photosynthetic rate, PNUE photosynthetic nitrogen use efciency, POD
peroxidase, PPO polyphenol oxidase, PPUE photosynthetic phosphorus use efciency, RWC relative water content, SKDH shikimate dehydrogenase, SLA
specic leaf area, SOD superoxide dismutase, SPS sucrose phosphate synthase, SS sucrose synthase, Tr transpiration rate, WSD water saturation decit, WUE
water use efciency
8 Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi andTolerance ofTemperature Stress inPlants
178
temperature stress. These results could be attributed to the high carbon cost-benet
ratio of AM fungi with the host plants or AM fungi failed to deliver P and other
nutrition to the host plants (Martin and Stutz 2004; Chen etal. 2014).
8.3.2 Water Relations
Water status plays a great role in growth and physiological processes of plants. Plant
water status is an important variable under changing ambient temperatures (Mazorra
etal. 2002). AM and non-AM plants also often display different water status (Augé
2001). Under temperature stress, AM maize plants had higher water conservation,
water holding capacity, and relative water content (Zhu etal. 2010a, 2011; Liu etal.
2014b). EI-Tohamy etal. (1999) reported that AM bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) plants
had higher leaf water potential during chilling stress. These studies suggested that
AM symbiosis could improve plant water status at low or high temperature stress,
although several authors found water content in AM plants was similar to the non-
AM plants under low temperature stress (Aroca etal. 2007; Liu etal. 2014a).
Under low or high temperature stress, the ability of roots to take up water was
reduced. Root water uptake depends on root hydraulic conductivity. AM plants are
found to have better water status which could be due to the enhanced water extrac-
tion by the external hyphae (Faber etal. 1991) and higher activity and hydraulic
conductivity of the roots (Augé and Stodola 1990). Moreover, AM symbiosis was
benecial for stomatal opening in leaves and water ow through the plants to the
evaporating surfaces in the leaves (Nelsen and Sar 1982). Zhu etal. (2010a, 2011)
found that stomatal conductance and transpiration rate of AM maize plants were
higher than the corresponding non-AM plants under low and high temperature
stress, indicating that AM colonization could improve the gas exchange capacity
through maintaining opened stomata, decreased stomatal resistances, and increased
transpiration rates.
Water uptake and hydraulic conductance of roots are governed by aquaporins
(Luu and Maurel 2005). Aquaporins belong to membrane intrinsic protein family
that facilitating the passive water ow through membranes (Kruse et al. 2006).
Plasma membrane intrinsic proteins (PIPs) have been shown to regulate the whole
water transport through plant tissues (Aroca etal. 2007). Liu etal. (2014b) demon-
strated that AM fungi not only transport more water to the host plant by regulating
their own aquaporin activities but also regulate the expression of plant aquaporin
genes to improve water transport of the host. Under low temperature stress,
PvPIP1;3 gene expression and PIP protein abundance were increased in AM plants
(Aroca et al. 2007). Liu et al. (2014b) also found PIP1;1, PIP1;3, PIP2;1, and
PIP2;5 gene expression were upregulated in AM rice (Oryza sativa) plants. All
these improved plant water status facilitated by AM colonization enable plants to
use water more efciently (Evelin etal. 2009; Zhu etal. 2010b, 2011).
X. Zhu et al.
179
8.3.3 Photosynthesis
It is well documented that photosynthesis is one of the most sensitive processes to
temperature stress and can be depressed before other symptoms of the stress are
detected (Berry and Björkman 1980). Any constraint in photosynthesis can limit
plant growth at low or high temperatures (Wahid etal. 2007). AM plants often show
different photosynthetic performances from the non-AM plants (Augé 2001). It has
been reported that AM plants had higher net photosynthetic rate (Pn) than the non-
AM plants under temperature stress (Ruotsalainen and Kytöviita 2004; Zhu etal.
2010a, 2011, 2015). Higher Pn implied greater CO2 assimilation capacity in plants.
Thus, AM colonization usually stimulated plant growth, although AM fungi cost
excess carbon for its own growth. However, Wu and Zou (2010) observed AM inoc-
ulation did not affect Pn of citrus (Citrus tangerine) seedlings under low tempera-
ture stress.
Adverse temperature stress causes a decrease in chlorophyll concentration indi-
cating a suppression of chlorophyll biosynthesis or higher rate of chlorophyll deg-
radation. Several authors reported AM plants had higher chlorophyll concentration
compared with the non-AM plants at suboptimal temperatures (Paradis etal. 1995;
Zhu etal. 2010a, 2011). The results suggest that temperature stress interferes less
with chlorophyll synthesis and light harvesting in AM than in non-AM plants, and
AM symbiosis alleviates the damage of the mesophyll chloroplasts, thereby improv-
ing photosynthetic efciency (Evelin etal. 2009). In contrast, Charest etal. (1993)
found that chlorophyll concentration of AM maize plants was lower than the non-
AM plants. Furthermore, carotenoid acts as accessory light harvesting pigments and
plays an essential role in the photoprotection of photosynthetic apparatus (Young
1991). Zhu etal. (2011) reported AM maize plants had higher carotenoid concentra-
tion than the non-AM plants implying AM colonization stabilizes the lipid phase of
the thylakoid membranes and provide photoprotection to cellular structures and
photosynthetic apparatus (Karim etal. 1999; Wahid etal. 2007).
Photosystems, mainly photosystem II (PSII) with its oxygen-evolving complex
is one of three primary site of injury to the photosynthetic machinery at low and
high temperature stresses (Allakhverdiev etal. 2008). PSII photochemical reactions
in thylakoid lamellae would inevitably be affected by temperature stress. Chlorophyll
uorescence has been used in physiological and ecophysiological studies to probe
and elucidate the changes in the function of PSII and to reect the primary photo-
synthetic processes under abiotic stress (Maxwell and Johnson 2000; Baker 2008;
Hajiboland etal. 2010). The ratio of Fv/Fm (maximum quantum efciency of PSII
primary photochemistry) and of Fv/Fo (potential photochemical efciency of PSII)
is useful relative measurements of the capacity of primary photochemistry of PSII,
which are reliable diagnostic indicators of damage caused by environmental stresses
(Krause and Weis 1991; Maxwell and Johnson 2000). It has been shown that Fv/Fm
and Fv/Fo of AM maize plants was signicantly higher than that of the non-AM
plants under low and high temperature stresses (Zhu et al. 2010a, 2011). This
implies that AM symbiosis mitigates the toxic inuence of temperature stress on the
8 Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi andTolerance ofTemperature Stress inPlants
180
PSII reaction center and the structural and functional disruption of photosynthetic
apparatus. An increase in Fv/Fm may be due to the decrease in primary uorescence
(Fo) or increase in maximal uorescence (Fm). Zhu etal. (2010a, 2011) found that
AM maize plants had higher Fm and lower Fo compared with the non-AM plants
when subjected to temperature stress. Temperature stress could destroy the PSII
reaction center, reduce the number of open PSII units, inactive the PSII photochemi-
cal reaction, and disrupt electron transport in photosynthetic apparatus (Camejo
etal. 2005; Baker 2008). This detrimental effect of temperature stress on PSII reac-
tion center could be alleviated by AM symbiosis, consequently improving the PSII
photochemistry efciency and photosynthetic performance of AM plants. However,
a recent study by Cabral etal. (2016) showed that there was no inuence of AM on
the effective quantum yield, electron transfer rate, and non-photochemical quench-
ing in wheat (Triticum aestivum) plants under high temperature stress.
8.3.4 Plasma Membrane Permeability
The plasma membrane is considered to be the primary site of injury when plant
subjected to temperature stress. There are many alterations in the composition,
structure, and function of plasma membrane responding to temperature stress
(Uemura etal. 2006). Such alterations increase the membrane permeability, as evi-
dent from increased loss of electrolytes (Wahid etal. 2007). Studies have shown that
AM plants maintain higher electrolyte concentration than non-AM plants by keep-
ing improved integrity and stability of the membrane (Evelin etal. 2009). EI-Tohamy
etal. (1999) found no signicant effects on electrolyte leakage in AM and non-AM
bean plants under low temperature stress. However, Zhu etal. (2010b) opined that
the membrane relative permeability in the leaves and roots of AM maize plants was
lower than non-AM plants under low and high temperature stresses, which suggests
AM symbiosis can decrease membrane electrolyte permeability and alleviate the
adverse effects of temperature stress on cell membrane.
The plasma membrane lipids seem to be responsible for the fate of plasma mem-
brane at temperature stresses (Uemura etal. 2006). Temperature stress causes the
peroxidation of membrane lipids. The level of malondialdehyde (MDA) reects the
degree of membrane lipid peroxidation (Ali etal. 2005). Several studies have dem-
onstrated that MDA content in AM plants was lower than that in the non-AM plants
(Zhu etal. 2010b; Abdel Latef and Chaoxing 2011; Zhou etal. 2012; Chen etal.
2014), which indicates that AM symbiosis could alleviate the peroxidation of mem-
brane lipids and maintain the uidity of membrane.
Under low temperature stress, AM colonization induced plasma membrane
ATPase activities and ATP accumulation in cucumber (Cucumis sativus) plants (Liu
etal. 2014a). ATPase can regulate intracellular pH and generate an electrochemical
gradient for secondary active transport (Kim etal. 2013). H+-ATPase is active in the
plant membrane around arbuscules in arbuscular mycorrhizae and plays a crucial
role in plant-fungal interactions at the symbiotic interface (Gianinazzi-Pearson
X. Zhu et al.
181
etal. 1995; Liu etal. 2014a). Liu etal. (2014a) also observed that the expression of
proton pump and calcium-transporting ATPase-related genes (CsHA2, CsHA3,
CsHA4, CsHA8, CsHA9, CsHA10, CA1, and CA9) in cucumber roots was signi-
cantly upregulated by AM inoculation under low temperature stress.
8.3.5 ROS andAntioxidants
When plants are exposed to low or high temperature stress, a variety of ROS such
as superoxide anion radical (O2
∙−), hydroxyl radicals (OH∙), and hydrogen peroxide
(H2O2) are induced, causing unbalance between production and detoxication in the
cell or organism (Apel and Hirt 2004; Lenoir et al. 2016). The oxidative stress
caused by ROS is one of the main damaging factors in plants (Wahid etal. 2007).
An excess of ROS can react with DNA, lipids, and proteins, resulting in damage of
cell structure and function, such as DNA/RNA nicking, membrane lipid peroxida-
tion, protein denaturation, and enzyme inhibition (Maya and Matsubara 2013).
A large number of studies have investigated the effect of AM inoculation on ROS in
unstressed and stressed conditions. However, little information is known about the
relation between AM and ROS under temperature stress. Only Chen etal. (2013)
and Liu etal. (2014a) found AM colonization signicantly reduced H2O2 content in
cucumber leaves under low temperature stress. It is assumed that reduction in H2O2
is one of the mechanisms by which AM fungi protect host plants against tempera-
ture stress (Zhang etal. 2013). Low level of H2O2 induced by AM symbiosis may be
acts as a signaling molecule in defense and adaptive responses (Chen etal. 2013).
Moreover, Liu etal. (2014a) reported NADPH oxidase activity in AM cucumber
plants was lower than the non-AM plants. The O2
∙− produced by NADPH oxidase
can be converted to H2O2 by superoxide dismutase (SOD) in the plant apoplast. AM
symbiosis could lessen H2O2 accumulation and enhance temperature tolerance via
suppression of NADPH oxidase activity (Liu etal. 2014a).
To alleviate or prevent temperature stress induced oxidative injury, plant has
evolved a cellular defense mechanism to scavenge these ROS by antioxidant sys-
tems (Zhou etal. 2012). The antioxidant systems involving antioxidative enzymes,
such as SOD, ascorbate peroxidase (APX), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT),
dehydroascorbate reductase or glutathione reductase, and low molecular weight
antioxidant, such as ascorbic acid, glutathione, tocopherols, or polyphenols (Evelin
etal. 2009; Zhu etal. 2010b; Maya and Matsubara 2013). For example, SOD will
help detoxify O2
− to H2O2, and the H2O2 produced will be detoxied by CAT, POD,
or APX.The increased glutathione reductase will serve plant to minimize the pro-
duction of O2
− (Evelin et al. 2009). Several studies have demonstrated that AM
fungi could assist host plant to alleviate temperature stress by increasing the activi-
ties of antioxidant enzymes. Zhu etal. (2010b) found that AM maize plants had
higher SOD and CAT activities than the non-AM plants under low and high tem-
perature stresses. Abdel Latef and Chaoxing (2011) reported the activities of SOD,
POD, and APX in AM tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) plants were higher than
8 Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi andTolerance ofTemperature Stress inPlants
182
the non-AM plants under low temperature stress. Zhou etal. (2012) showed that
AM colonization increased SOD and POD activity of teak (Tectona grandis) seed-
lings under low temperature stress. Maya and Matsubara (2013) observed activities
of SOD and APX in leaf and tuber of cyclamen plants which were greater compared
with those of the non-AM plants under high temperature stress. However, zero or
negative effects of AM symbiosis on some enzymatic activities also were observed
under temperature stress (Zhu etal. 2010b; Abdel Latef and Chaoxing 2011; Maya
and Matsubara 2013; Chen etal. 2014). The aforementioned results suggest that
AM plants possess higher antioxidant enzyme activities, but the response of the
individual enzymes varies with respect to the AM fungal and the host plant species
(Evelin etal. 2009). This variation may also be due to some enzymes such as SOD,
CAT, and APX which are metalloenzymes whose activities can be determined by
the availability of the metals they utilize (Evelin etal. 2009).
In addition to these enzymatic systems, AM symbiosis can induce accumulation
of nonenzymatic antioxidant components to scavenge ROS. Chen et al. (2013)
showed that production of phenols and avonoids was enhanced in AM cucumber
plants compared with that in the non-AM plants under low temperature stress. Maya
and Matsubara (2013) also reported AM cyclamen plants had higher ascorbic acid
and polyphenol contents than the non-AM plants under high temperature stress.
8.3.6 Osmotic Adjustment
Osmotic adjustment is considered a key tolerance mechanism in higher plants grown
under low and high temperature stresses. In response to temperature stress, plants
accumulate a variety of certain organic compounds of low molecular solutes, gener-
ally referred to as compatible osmolytes, such as sugars, proline, polyamines, beta-
ines, and acylatedsterols (Wahid etal. 2007; Theocharis etal. 2012). The accumulation
of these solutes could lower the osmotic potential in the cytosol, hereby maintaining
positive turgor pressure of the cells.
Proline is known to accumulate in many plants as a nontoxic and protective
osmolyte to maintain osmotic balance under temperature and osmotic stresses.
Proline also serves as a sink for energy to regulate redox potentials, as a hydroxyl
radical scavenger, as a solute that protects macromolecules against denaturation,
and as a means of reducing acidity in the cell (Kishor etal. 2005; Sharma and Dietz
2006; Theocharis etal. 2012). Proline accumulation has been shown to increase
when plant is colonized by AM fungi. Under low temperature stress, AM maize
plants were found to have higher root proline content than the non-AM plants (Zhu
etal. 2010b). Chen et al. (2014) also reported proline content in the AM maize
leaves was higher compared with that in the non-AM plants at low temperature
condition. However, Zhu et al. (2010b) reported proline content was lower in
the AM maize leaves than that in the non-AM plants under low and high tempera-
ture stresses, and no signicant difference between the AM and the non-AM maize
roots was found under high temperature stress. Abdel Latef and Chaoxing (2011)
X. Zhu et al.
183
also found AM tomato plants accumulated less proline than the non-AM plants
under low temperature stress. Zhu etal. (2010b) suggested that the change of leaf
proline level reects the degree of injury of mycorrhizal plants by the stress, and if
the stress was moderate, there was no need to synthesize more proline for osmotic
adjustment protection.
Soluble sugars have been reported to have multiple roles in temperature toler-
ance and contributed to the preservation of water within plant cells as typical com-
patible osmolytes (Theocharis et al. 2012). It is well documented that plant
accumulates soluble sugars to adjust the osmotic potential during temperature stress
(Evelin etal. 2009). Many studies have reported that plants inoculated with AM
fungi had higher levels of soluble sugars than the non-AM plants under unstressed
and stressed conditions (Paradis et al. 1995; Zhu et al. 2010b, Abdel Latef and
Chaoxing 2011; Liu et al. 2013; Chen et al. 2014). Moreover, increased soluble
protein is also often associated with temperature tolerance. An alternation of protein
content in AM plants under low temperature stress has been observed by Charest
etal. (1993), Abdel Latef and Chaoxing (2011), and Zhou etal. (2012).
8.3.7 Carbohydrate Metabolism
In addition to acting as osmolytes, sugars may have a role as cryoprotectants to
protect plant cell membrane, replacing water molecules in establishing hydrogen
bonds with lipid molecules. They also serve as scavengers of ROS and contribute to
increased membrane stabilization. As signaling molecules, they contribute to the
regulation of growth and development and stress responses in plants associated with
hormone signaling (Uemura etal. 2006; Zeng etal. 2011; Theocharis etal. 2012).
Both AM inoculation and temperature stress could inuence the accumulation of
sugars in plants. Charest etal. (1993) reported that AM symbiosis increased sugar
contents of maize plants under low temperature stress. Zhu etal. (2010b) found the
root soluble sugar content in AM maize plants was higher than that in the non-AM
plants. However, some authors also reported zero or even negative effect of AM
inoculation on sugar accumulation in host plants under temperature stress (Paradis
etal. 1995; Zhu etal. 2010b, 2015). The different alternations of the contents of
reducing sugars, nonreducing sugars, glucose, fructose, and sucrose of plants inocu-
lated with AM fungi under low or high temperature stress were also observed
(Paradis etal. 1995; Hu etal. 2015; Zhu etal. 2015). Depending on the AM fungal
and the host plant species, various forms of sugars are found to be involved in physi-
ological reactions to temperature stress. Koide and Schreiner (1992) stressed that
control over the activity of AM fungi by the host could occur via a regulation of
carbohydrate transfer, one way being by the regulation of arbuscule number. The
changes of carbohydrate contents could refer to carbohydrate sink-source relation-
ship of AM fungi and plants. AM fungi are able to facilitate sugar transport and
metabolism between source and sink organs via an increased exchange of carbohy-
drates and nutrients (Dodd and Perez-Alfocea 2012). Heinemeyer et al. (2006)
8 Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi andTolerance ofTemperature Stress inPlants
184
found that AM fungi can consume up to 20% photosynthates of the host plant.
Photosynthates are transported via the phloem to the root and, subsequently, into the
intraradical and extraradical mycelium, as well as in the spores of AM fungi.
Temperature stress may activate and enhance expression of genes encoding
specic enzymes involved in the sink-source transition and sucrose metabolism in
plants, such as sucrose synthase (SS) and sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS)
(Li etal. 2008). Generally, SS plays an important role in sucrose hydrolysis rather
than synthesis in sink tissues (Verma etal. 2011). In AM plants, sucrose is usually
hydrolyzed to monosaccharide by SS or invertase prior to utilizing by AM fungi (Hu
etal. 2015). Liu etal. (2013) reported AM rice plants had higher SS activity than the
non-AM plants under low temperature stress. Hu etal. (2015) also found AM colo-
nization enhanced expression of gene encoding SS, MtSucS2 of M. truncatula
plants grown at night warming condition. However, Zhu etal. (2015) showed that
the SS activity was unaffected by low temperature stress and AM colonization. Hu
etal. (2015) also reported that no or even negative AM effect on four genes encod-
ing SS expression of M. truncatula plants under night warming. Hawkes et al.
(2008) speculated that AM fungi consumed more sucrose and the resulting decrease
in sucrose ultimately led to lower SS and downregulated the expression of gene
encoding SS.Moreover, SPS, a key enzyme for sucrose synthesis, controls the ux
of photosynthetic carbon into sucrose (Verma etal. 2011). Under low temperature
stress, SPS activity was enhanced by AM fungi in rice and maize plants as reported
by Liu etal. (2013) and Zhu etal. (2015), indicating that AM symbiosis enhanced
sucrose metabolism under low temperature stress.
It is worth mentioning that trehalose is the main storage carbohydrate in AM
fungi and plays an important role in stress tolerance by stabilizing dehydrated
enzymes and membranes and protecting biological structures from desiccation
damage (Evelin etal. 2009). In response to temperature stress, fungal cells react by
activating transcriptionally and/or posttranscriptionally the trehalose metabolism
enzymes, which results in trehalose accumulation (Lenoir etal. 2016). Liu et al.
(2014b) reported that rice plants colonized by AM fungi had higher trehalose phos-
phate synthase (TPS) and trehalose phosphate phosphatase (TPP) transcript levels
compared with the non-AM plants under low temperature stress. The increase in the
expression of OsTPS1, OsTPS2, and OsTPP1 could result in an increased trehalose
biosynthesis and higher trehalose concentration in the AM rice plants under low
temperature stress (Liu etal. 2014b). The nding suggests that AM symbiosis could
enhance plant tolerance against temperature stress. Increases in trehalose concentra-
tion may also be involved in starch accumulation (Fernandez etal. 2010).
Starch accumulation is affected by AM symbiosis and temperature stress. Charest
etal. (1993) reported that AM colonization altered starch content in maize plants
under low temperature stress. Zhu etal. (2015) found that the activity of amylase
was higher in AM maize than that in the non-AM plants under low temperature
stress. Amylase is able to catalyze the hydrolysis of starch into sugars. The result
suggests that AM roots require more carbohydrates by AM fungi and/or synthesize
more sugar to cope with low temperature stress via the breakdown of leaf starch.
X. Zhu et al.
185
8.3.8 Nutrient Uptake
Improved nutrient uptake is one of the most important functions in AM symbiosis.
AM symbioses are generally recognized to be involved in bidirectional nutrient
exchange: AM fungi receive organic carbon from the plants, and in return, the hosts
obtain a nutritional benet from AM fungi by taking up P, N, and other macro- and
micronutrients from the soil (Smith and Read 2008). Nutrients are mobilized and
transported to the plants via direct pathway from the rhizosphere by root epidermal
cells and root hairs and AM uptake pathway by the huge intraradical and extraradi-
cal mycorrhizal network (Smith and Smith 2012). It is well documented that the
acquisition of soil nutrients by plant is suppressed by temperature stress, and several
studies have indicated that AM symbiosis could improve nutrient uptake of the host
plant under low and high temperature stresses.
N is one of the major limiting macronutrients for plant growth and development.
It serves as a constituent of many plant cell components and the synthesis of pro-
teins, nucleic acids, coenzymes, and many products and by-products of secondary
metabolism (Evelin etal. 2009). Several studies have demonstrated that AM fungi
can take up and transfer signicant amounts of N (accounting for 20 to 50% of the
total root N) to the host plant (Govindarajulu et al. 2005; Ngwene et al. 2013).
A large body of evidence indicates that AM fungi have a potential to improve plant
N acquisition under low or high temperature stress (Raju etal. 1990; Zhang etal.
1995; Ruotsalainen and Kytöviita 2004; Barrett etal. 2011; Liu etal. 2013, 2016
Zhu etal. 2015). On the contrary, some studies have reported that the N uptake was
not enhanced by AM symbiosis under temperature stress (Raju etal. 1990; Kytöviita
and Ruotsalainen 2007; Büscher etal. 2012; Karasawa etal. 2012). The differential
AM effect on N uptake has been reported to be specic to the combination of geno-
types of AM fungi and host plants, which may explain the different contributions of
the symbiosis (Cabral etal. 2016).
The extraradical mycelium of AM fungi has been shown to take up and assimi-
late organic and inorganic N resources from the soil and to transfer N to the host
plants (Govindarajulu etal. 2005). For both AM fungi and plants, the readily avail-
able inorganic N are NO3
− and NH4+, and NO3
− is the predominant form of N avail-
able in most agricultural soils (He etal. 2003). Under low temperature stress, AM
maize plants had higher NO3
−-N and NH4+-N contents compared with the non-AM
plants (Liu etal. 2016). NO3
− reduction, the most important stage of N assimilation
in plants, is rst catalyzed by nitrate reductase (NR). Low temperature stress acti-
vated NR in wheat leaves via protein dephosphorylation (Yaneva etal. 2002). NR
activity was found to be higher in AM rice and maize plants than in the non-AM
plants under low temperature stress (Liu etal. 2013, 2016), indicating that an spe-
cial capability of AM symbiosis to take up N and to reduce and assimilate NO3
−.
Arginine is synthesized in the extraradical mycelium of AM fungi and is trans-
ported to the intraradical mycelium, where it is broken down to release N for trans-
fer to the host plant (Govindarajulu etal. 2005). In plant, N metabolism involved in
different pathways, such as glutamine synthetase (GS) and glutamate synthase
8 Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi andTolerance ofTemperature Stress inPlants
186
cycles (Javaid 2009). Genetic and molecular approaches have demonstrated that GS
plays a key role in N metabolism, which is essential for plant N uptake and use
efciency (Martin etal. 2006). Liu etal. (2013) reported AM rice plants had higher
GS activity compared with the non-AM plants grown at low temperature condition.
Zhu etal. (2015) also found the GS activity in AM maize plants was greater than the
non-AM plants under low temperature stress. Furthermore, Zhu etal. (2015) showed
that AM symbiosis increased glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase and glutamate
pyruvate transaminase activities of maize plants under low temperature stress.
These transaminases are involved in amino acid metabolism and are linked to the
ornithine cycle. Increased amino acid content in maize plants inoculated AM fungus
under low temperature stress was observed by Zhu etal. (2016), which indicates
that the AM fungi facilitated the uptake and synthesis of amino acids.
P is an essential macronutrient for plant growth and crop production: forms an
integral component of the key structure element in nucleic acids, phospholipids,
and enzymes; and is also involved in the metabolism of matter and energy and
signal transduction cascades (Karandashov and Bucher 2005). Plant P uptake,
translocation, and metabolism are inhibited by temperature stress. However, AM
symbiosis is able to sustain plant P acquisition by the hyphal network of AM fun-
gus and the increased surface of plant roots (Karasawa etal. 2012). AM symbiosis
can increase the inorganic P gradient from root to leaves because AM plants
enhance the conversion of P from inorganic to organic forms in the leaves, conse-
quently increasing the P sink and then enhancing P uptake (Javaid 2009). AM
hyphae also can store larger amounts of absorbed P than the roots, facilitating the
continued movement of P into the hyphae. The kinetics of P uptake into hyphae
differ from those of roots because of its higher afnity for P ions or lower threshold
concentration for uptake (Evelin etal. 2009). To date, most of studies have reported
that AM plants had higher P content compared with the non-AM plant under low
or high temperature stress (Smith and Roncadori 1986; Matsubara et al. 2000;
Wang etal. 2002; Büscher etal. 2012; Karasawa etal. 2012; Liu etal. 2013, 2016;
Hu etal. 2015), suggesting that AM symbiosis enhanced the availability and uptake
of P under adverse conditions. However, some studies have demonstrated that the
contribution of AM symbiosis to P uptake maybe small because the P content in
AM plants was lower than the non- AM plants (Baon etal. 1994; Matsubara etal.
2004; Kytöviita and Ruotsalainen 2007).
In addition to N and P, other nutrients also play a key role in plant growth and
development and are involved in all physiological metabolic processes and cellular
functions. Plants show different needs for these nutrients (Hänsch and Mendel
2009). Several studies have reported the effect of AM symbiosis on these nutrients
under low or high temperature stress, though the effect varies among different nutri-
ents. Wu and Zou (2010) found only Ca content in AM citrus plants was higher than
the non-AM plants, whereas no effect of AM on the content of K, Mg, Fe, Cu, Mn,
and Zn was noticed under low temperature stress. Karasawa etal. (2012) reported
contents of K, Ca, Mg, and Zn in AM Plantago lanceolata plants that were similar
with those of the non-AM plants under lowered soil temperature. AM inoculation
increased shoot Zn and root Ca contents, decreased shoot Ca content, and has no
X. Zhu et al.
187
effect on K and root Zn content in M. truncatula plants under increased night tem-
perature (Hu etal. 2015). AM wheat plants had higher tiller K and Ca; lower tiller
Cu, Zn, and Fe concentrations; and similar tiller Mg, B and Mn, and grain K com-
pared with the non-AM plants under high temperature stress (Cabral etal. 2016).
Liu etal. (2016) also observed AM colonization had a positive effect on the concen-
trations of shoot K and Cu and root Ca and Zn, but no effect on the concentrations
of shoot Ca, S, Mg, Na, Al, Fe, Mn and Zn and root K, S, Mg, Na, Al, Fe, Mn, and
Cu of maize plants under low temperature stress. Moreover, the nutrient uptake of
the host plants has been shown to vary with the isolates of AM fungi. Smith and
Roncadori (1986) reported that contents of Cu, Zn, and Mn were not signicantly
changed in cotton plants inoculated with Gigaspora margarita, contents of Zn and
Mn were increased when plants were inoculated with Glomus intraradices and
Glomus ambisporum mixtures under low temperature stress, and the contents of Cu,
Zn, and Mn were both increased when plants were inoculated with these three AM
fungal mixtures under high temperature stress. Raju etal. (1990) also found that
sorghum plants colonized by Glomus intraradices had lower S, K, Ca, Mg, Mn, Zn,
Fe, and Cu contents than the non-AM plants under high temperature stress, but
when sorghum plants were colonized by Glomus fasciculatum and Glomus macro-
carpum mixtures, the contents of S, K, Ca, Mg, Mn, Zn, Fe, and Cu were increased.
The different effects of AM on nutrient uptake in these studies may be due to the
variations of experimental design and biological materials.
8.3.9 Secondary Metabolism
Plant secondary metabolism produces a large number of specialized compounds
that are required for the interaction of plant with its environment, for example, in
defense reactions against herbivores and microbial pathogens as well as in mutual-
istic symbiotic associations, such as with AM (Strack and Fester 2006). There is an
increasing evidence that plant secondary metabolites play an important role in the
development and functional regulation of AM symbiosis, such as avonoids and
strigolactones involved in spore germination and hyphal branching in AM fungi
(Akiyama 2007). AM fungi have also been shown to increase secondary metabolites
contents in the host plants, such as phenolics, triterpenoids, and spermine (Evelin
etal. 2009; Chen etal. 2013). However, the information about AM symbiosis inu-
ence on secondary metabolism under environmental stress is limited. Under low
temperature stress, only Chen etal. (2013) reported that AM inoculation induced
the accumulation of phenolics, avonoids, and lignin in cucumber leaves. They also
observed that activities of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH), shikimate
dehydrogenase, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), cinnamyl alcohol dehydroge-
nase (CAD), polyphenol oxidase, guaiacol peroxidase, caffeic acid peroxidase, and
chlorogenic acid peroxidase of AM cucumber plants were greater than the non- AM
plants under low temperature stress. These enzymes are involved in secondary
metabolism and are the key enzymes of the pentose phosphate pathway, the
8 Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi andTolerance ofTemperature Stress inPlants
188
phenylpropanoid pathway, and the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites. In addi-
tion, Chen etal. (2013) also reported AM cucumber seedlings had higher expression
levels of WRKY30, PR-1, C4H, CCOMT, CAD, G6PDH, PAL , LPO, and POD
encoding genes compared with the non-AM plants grown in low temperature. These
genes related to the regulation of the phenylpropanoid pathway and plant defense.
The activation of these secondary metabolism genes is important for successful
plant growth under low temperature stress (Chen etal. 2013). Thus, accumulation
of secondary metabolites and activation of secondary metabolism related enzymes
are linked to plant antioxidants system and defence system which inferred that AM
symbiosis enhanced plant tolerance to temperature stress.
8.4 Conclusions andFuture Perspectives
Based on the described above, the possible mechanism of AM symbiosis in improv-
ing plant tolerance to temperature stress includes enhancing water and nutrient
uptake, improving photosynthetic capacity and efciency, protecting plant against
oxidative damage, and increasing accumulation of osmolytes (Fig.8.1). To date,
however, knowledge about AM plants’ response to temperature stress is not suf-
cient. Most of the aforementioned studies have investigated the effect of AM fungi
on plant growth under temperature stress; little attention is paid on the physiologi-
cal, biochemical, and molecular effects. For example, it remains largely unknown
about the effect of AM on plant endogenous hormones and AM plants’ responses to
application of exogenous hormones under temperature stress. Also, the ultrastruc-
tural changes in AM plants under temperature stress have not been addressed by far.
Thus, the underlying physiological mechanisms of AM symbiosis that protect plant
against temperature stress remain yet to be elucidated.
Our knowledge of the molecular mechanisms involved in AM plants’ responses
to temperature stress is very rare. The roles of temperature-tolerant related genes
with respect to AM symbiosis and AM-induced signaling and symbiotic genes by
temperature stress need to be explored. Applications of genomics, transcriptomics,
SOIL
Water
Temperature stress
Temperature tolerance
Nutrient
FUNGI PLANT
Y, gs, RWC, PIPs
Pn, chlorophyll
fluorescence
ROS
Water status
Photosynthesis
Antioxidants
Osmoregulation
Nutrient uptake
Proline, sugars
protein
N, P
Fig. 8.1 Possible mechanisms of AM fungi improving plant tolerance to temperature stress
X. Zhu et al.
189
and proteomics approaches to a better understanding of the molecular basic of AM
plant response to temperature stress and AM plant tolerance against temperature
stress are imperative.
Although AM fungi are widespread in nature and are not specic to its host
plants, the effectiveness of AM symbiosis is different in adverse temperature-
stressed conditions. Thus, it is of great important to screen indigenous and presum-
ably temperature-stressed-tolerant AM fungi isolates for the inoculation of plants
adapted to temperature stress in future research.
Global climate change scenarios reveal temperature will increase and extremes
of temperature will be occurring more frequently, so the chance of crops being
exposed to adverse temperatures will be more likely. AM symbiosis has been shown
to provide a superior road in the adaption of adverse environmental conditions in the
future agriculture. However, numerous challenges of AM application in agriculture
remain to be met, such as large-scale cultivation of AM fungi, and hypercompetition
from other organisms in the complex soil environment.
Acknowledgements We are very grateful for the support by the “One-Three-Five” Strategic
Planning Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (IGA-135-04), the Science Foundation of
Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB15030103), and the National Natural Science Foundation of
China (31370144; 41571255).
References
Abdel Latef AA, Chaoxing H (2011) Arbuscular mycorrhizal inuence on growth, photosynthetic
pigments, osmotic adjustment and oxidative stress in tomato plants subjected to low tempera-
ture stress. Acta Physiol Plant 33:1217–1225
Akiyama K (2007) Chemical identication and functional analysis of apocarotenoids involved in
the development of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem
71(6):1405–1414
Ali MB, Hahn E, Paek K (2005) Effects of temperature on oxidative stress defense systems, lipid
peroxidation and lipoxygenase activity in Phalaenopsis. Plant Physiol Biochem 43:213–223
Allakhverdiev SI, Kreslavski VD, Klimov VV etal (2008) Heat stress: an overview of molecular
responses in photosynthesis. Photosynth Res 98:541–550
Andersen CP, Sucoff EI, Dixon RK (1987) The inuence of low soil temperature on the growth of
vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal Fraxinus pennsylvanica. Can JFor Res 17:951–956
Apel K, Hirt H (2004) Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduc-
tion. Annu Rev Plant Biol 55:373–399
Aroca R, Porcel R, Ruiz-Lozano JM (2007) How does arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis regulate
root hydraulic properties and plasma membrane aquaporins in Phaseolus vulgaris under
drought, cold or salinity stresses? New Phytol 173:808–816
Atkin OK, Sherlock D, Fitter AH etal (2009) Temperature dependence of respiration in roots colo-
nized by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 182:188–199
Augé RM (2001) Water relations, drought and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis.
Mycorrhiza 11:3–42
Augé RM, Stodola JW (1990) An apparent increase in symplastic water contributes to greater
turgor in mycorrhizal roots of droughted Rosa plants. New Phytol 115:285–295
8 Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi andTolerance ofTemperature Stress inPlants
190
Bainard LD, Bainard JD, Hamel C et al (2014) Spatial and temporal structuring of arbuscular
mycorrhizal communities is differentially inuenced by abiotic factors and host crop in a semi-
arid prairie agroecosysten. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 88:333–344
Baker NR (2008) Chlorophyll uorescence: a probe of photosynthesis invivo. Annu Rev Plant
Biol 59:89–113
Baon JB, Smith SE, Alston AM (1994) Phosphorus uptake and growth of barley as affected by soil
temperature and mycorrhizal infection. JPlant Nutr 17:479–492
Barrett G, Campbell CD, Fitter AH etal (2011) The arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus hoi can
capture and transfer nitrogen from organic patches to its associated host plant at low tempera-
ture. Appl Soil Ecol 48:102–105
Berry J, Björkman O (1980) Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in high plants.
Annu Rev Plant Physiol 31:491–543
Berta G, Copetta A, Gamalero E etal (2014) Maize development and grain quality are differen-
tially affected by mycorrhizal fungi and a growth-promoting pseudomonad in the eld.
Mycorrhiza 24:161–170
Botnen S, Kauserud H, Carlsen T etal (2015) Mycorrhizal fungal communities in coastal sand
dunes and heaths investigated by pyrosequencing analyses. Mycorrhiza 25(6):447–456
Bunn R, Lekberg Y, Zabinski C (2009) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi ameliorate temperature stress
in thermophilic plants. Ecology 90(5):1378–1388
Büscher M, Zavalloni C, de Boulois HD etal (2012) Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on
grassland productivity are altered by future climate and below-ground resource availability.
Environ Exp Bot 81:62–71
Cabral C, Ravnskov S, Tringovska I et al (2016) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi modify nutrient
allocation and composition in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) subjected to heat-stress. Plant Soil
408(1):385–399
Camejo D, Rodríguez P, Morales MA et al (2005) High temperature effects on photosynthetic
activity of two tomato cultivars with different heat susceptibility. JPlant Physiol 162:281–289
Camenzind T, Hempel S, Homeier Jetal (2014) Nitrogen and phosphorus additions impact arbus-
cular mycorrhizal abundance and molecular diversity in a tropical montane forest. Global
Change Biol 20(12):3646–3659
Charest C, Dalpé Y, Brown A (1993) The effect of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae and chilling
on two hybrids of Zea mays L.Mycorrhiza 4:89–92
Chen S, Jin W, Liu A etal (2013) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) increase growth and sec-
ondary metabolism in cucumber subjected to low temperature stress. Sci Hortic 160:222–229
Chen XY, Song FB, Liu FL etal (2014) Effect of different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth
and physiology of maize at ambient and low temperature regimes. Sci World J2014:956141
Chinnusamy V, Zhu J, Zhu JK (2007) Cold stress regulation of gene expression in plants. Trends
Plant Sci 12:444–451
Compant S, van der Heijden MGA, Sessitsch A (2010) Climate change effects on benecial plant-
microorganism interactions. FEMS Microbial Ecol 73:197–214
Dodd IC, Perez-Alfocea F (2012) Microbial amelioration of crop salinity stress. J Exp Bot
63:3415–3428
Duhamel M, Vandenkoornhuyse P (2013) Sustainable agriculture: possible trajectories from mutu-
alistic symbiosis and plant neodomestication. Trends Plant Sci 18:597–600
Dumbrell AJ, Ashton PD, Aziz N etal (2011) Distinct seasonal assemblages of arbuscular mycor-
rhizal fungi revealed by massively parallel pyrosequencing. New Phytol 190:794–804
EI-Tohamy W, Schnitzler WH, EI-Behairy U etal (1999) Effect of VA mycorrhiza on improving
drought and chilling tolerance of bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris). JAppl Bot 73:178–183
Evelin H, Kapoor R, Giri B (2009) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in alleviation of salt stress: a
review. Ann Bot 104:1263–1280
Faber BA, Zasoski RJ, Munns DN etal (1991) A method for measuring hyphal nutrient and water
uptake in mycorrhizal plants. Can JBot 69:87–94
Fernandez O, Bethencourt L, Quero A etal (2010) Trehalose and plant stress responses: friend or
foe? Trends Plant Sci 15:409–417
X. Zhu et al.
191
Gavito ME, Olsson PA, Rouhier H etal (2005) Temperature constraints on the growth and func-
tioning of root organ cultures with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 168:179–188
Gianinazzi-Pearson V, Gollotte A, Tisserant B etal (1995) Cellular and molecular approaches in
the characterization of symbiotic events in functional arbuscular mycorrhizal associations. Can
JBot 73:526–532
Gianinazzi S, Gollotte A, Binet M etal (2010) Agroecology: the key role of arbuscular mycorrhi-
zas in ecosystem services. Mycorrhiza 20:519–530
Govindarajulu M, Pfeffer PE, Jin HR etal (2005) Nitrogen transfer in the arbuscular mycorrhizal
symbiosis. Nature 435:819–823
Gutknecht JLM, Field CB, Balser TC (2012) Microbial communities and their responses to simu-
lated global change uctuate greatly over multiple years. Global Change Biol 18:2256–2269
Hajiboland R, Aliasgharzadeh N, Laiegh SF etal (2010) Colonization with arbuscular mycorrhizal
fungi improves salinity tolerance of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants. Plant Soil
331:313–327
Hänsch R, Mendel RR (2009) Physiological functions of mineral micronutrients (Cu, Zn, Mn, Fe,
Ni, Mo, B, Cl). Curr Opin Plant Biol 12:259–266
Haugen LM, Smith SE (1992) The effect of high temperature and fallow period on infection of
mung bean and cashew roots by the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intrara-
dices. Plant Soil 145:71–80
Hawkes CV, Hartley IP, Ineson P et al (2008) Soil temperature affects carbon allocation within
arbuscular mycorrhizal networks and carbon transport from plant to fungus. Global Change
Biol 14:1181–1190
Hayman DS (1974) Plant growth responses to vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza. VI.Effect of light
and temperature. New Phytol 73:71–80
He XH, Critchley C, Bledsoe C (2003) Nitrogen transfer within and between plants through com-
mon mycorrhizal networks (CMNs). Crit Rev Plant Sci 22:531–567
Heinemeyer A, Ridgway KP, Edwards EJ etal (2003) Impact of soil warming and shading on colo-
nization and community structure of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in roots of a native grassland
community. Global Change Biol 10:52–64
Heinemeyer A, Ineson P, Ostle N etal (2006) Respiration of the external mycelium in the arbuscu-
lar mycorrhizal symbiosis shows strong dependence on recent photosynthates and acclimation
to temperature. New Phytol 171:159–170
Hu Y, Wu S, Sun Y etal (2015) Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis can mitigate the negative effects
of night warming on physiological traits of Medicago truncatula L. Mycorrhiza
25(2):131–142
Janmohammadi M, Zolla L, Rinalducci S (2015) Low temperature tolerance in plants: changes at
the protein level. Phytochemistry 117:76–89
Javaid A (2009) Arbuscular mycorrhizal mediated nutrition in plant. J Plant Nutr 32:1595–1618
Kaplan F, Kopka J, Haskell DW et al (2004) Exploring the temperature-stress metabolome of
Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 136:4159–4168
Karandashov V, Bucher M (2005) Symbiotic phosphate transport in arbuscular mycorrhizas.
Trends Plant Sci 10:22–29
Karasawa T, Hodge A, Fitter AH (2012) Growth, respiration and nutrient acquisition by the arbus-
cular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae and its host plant Plantago lanceolata in cooled
soil. Plant Cell Environ 35:819–828
Karim MA, Fracheboud Y, Stamp P (1999) Photosynthetic activity of developing leaves of Zea
mays is less affected by heat stress than that of developed leaves. Physiol Plant 105:685–693
Kim HS, Oh JM, Luan S etal (2013) Cold stress causes rapid but differential changes in properties
of plasma membrane H+-ATPase of camelina and rapeseed. JPlant Physiol 170:828–837
Kishor PBK, Sangama S, Amrutha RN etal (2005) Regulation of proline biosynthesis degradation,
uptake and transport in higher plants: its implications in plant growth and abiotic stress toler-
ance. Curr Sci 88:424–438
Koide RT, Schreiner RP (1992) Regulation of the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis.
Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 43:557–581
8 Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi andTolerance ofTemperature Stress inPlants
192
Krause G, Weis E (1991) Chlorophyll uorescence and photosynthesis: the basics. Annu Rev Plant
Physiol Plant Mol Biol 42:313–349
Kruse E, Uehlein N, Kaldenhoff R (2006) The aquaporins. Genome Biol 7:206
Kytöviita M, Ruotsalainen AL (2007) Mycorrhizal benet in two low arctic herbs increases with
increasing temperature. Am JBot 94(8):1309–1315
Lenoir I, Fontaine J, Sahraoui AL (2016) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal responses to abiotic
stresses: a review. Phytochemistry 123:4–15
Li JY, Liu XH, Cai QS etal (2008) Effects of elevated CO2 on growth, carbon assimilation, photo-
synthate accumulation and related enzymes in rice leaves during sink-source transition. JIntegr
Plant Biol 50:723–732
Liu A, Wang B, Hamel C (2004) Arbuscular mycorrhiza colonization and development at subopti-
mal root zone temperature. Mycorrhiza 14:93–101
Liu ZL, Li YJ, Hou HY etal (2013) Differences in the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi-improved rice
resistance to low temperature at two N levels: aspects of N and C metabolism on the plant side.
Plant Physiol Biochem 71:87–95
Liu A, Chen S, Chang R etal (2014a) Arbuscular mycorrhizae improve low temperature tolerance
in cucumber via alterations in H2O2 accumulation and ATPase activity. J Plant Res
127:775–785
Liu ZL, Ma LN, He XY et al (2014b) Water strategy of mycorrhizal rice at low temperature
through the regulation of PIP aquaporins with the involvement of trehalose. Appl Soil Ecol
84:185–191
Liu N, Chen X, Song F etal (2016) Effects of arbuscular mycorrhiza on growth and nutrition of
maize plants under low temperature stress. Philipp Agric Sci 99(3):246–252
Lumini E, Vallino M, Alguacil MM etal (2011) Different farming and water regimes in Italian rice
elds affect arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal soil communities. Ecol Appl 21(5):1696–1707
Luu DT, Maurel C (2005) Aquaporins in a challenging environment: molecular gears for adjusting
plant water status. Plant Cell Environ 28:85–96
Martin CA, Stutz JC (2004) Interactive effects of temperature and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on
growth, P uptake and root respiration of Capsicum annuum L.Mycorrhiza 14:241–244
Martin A, Lee J, Kichey T etal (2006) Two cytosolic glutamine synthetase isoforms of maize (Zea
mays L.) are specically involved in the control of grain production. Plant Cell 18:3252–3274
Matsubara Y, Kayukawa Y, Fukui H (2000) Temperature-stress tolerance of asparagus seedling
through symbiosis with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. JJapan Soc Hort Sci 69(5):570–575
Matsubara Y, Hirano I, Sassa D etal (2004) Alleviation of high temperature stress in strawberry
plants infected with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Environ Control Biol 42(2):105–111
Matteucci M, D’Angeli S, Errico S etal (2011) Cold affects the transcription of fatty acid desatu-
rases and oil quality in the fruit of Olea europaea L, genotypes with different cold hardiness.
JExp Bot 62:3403–3420
Maxwell K, Johnson GN (2000) Chlorophyll uorescence-a practical guide. J Exp Bot
51:659–668
Maya MA, Matsubara Y (2013) Inuence of arbuscular mycorrhiza on the growth and antioxida-
tive activity in cyclamen under heat stress. Mycorrhiza 23:381–390
Mazorra LM, Nunez M, Echerarria E etal (2002) Inuence of brassinosteriods and antioxidant
enzymes activity in tomato under different temperatures. Plant Biol 45:593–596
Miransari M, Bahrami HA, Rejali F etal (2008) Using arbuscular mycorrhiza to alleviate the stress
of soil compaction on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) growth. Soil Biol Biochem 40:1197–1206
Nelsen CE, Sar GR (1982) The water relations of well-watered, mycorrhizal and non- mycorrhizal
onion plants. JAm Soc Hortic Sci 107:271–274
Ngwene B, Gabriel E, George E (2013) Inuence of different mineral nitrogen sources (NO3
−-N
vs. NH4+-N) on arbuscular mycorrhiza development and N transfer in a Glomus intraradices-
cowpea symbiosis. Mycorrhiza 23:107–117
Paradis R, Dalpé Y, Charest C (1995) The combined effect of arbuscular mycorrhizas and short-
term cold exposure on wheat. New Phytol 129:637–642
X. Zhu et al.
193
Raju PS, Clark RB, Ellis JR etal (1990) Effects of species of VA-mycorrhizal fungi on growth and
mineral uptake of sorghum at different temperatures. Plant Soil 121:165–170
Ruelland E, Zachowski A (2010) How plants sense temperature. Environ Exp Bot 69:225–232
Ruotsalainen AL, Kytöviita M (2004) Mycorrhiza does not alter low temperature impact on
Gnaphalium norvegicum. Oecologia 140:226–233
Schenck NC, Graham SO, Green NE (1975) Temperature and light effects on contamination and
spore germination of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Mycologia 67:1189–1192
Sharma SS, Dietz KJ (2006) The signicance of amino acids and amino-acid derived molecules in
plant responses and adaptation to heavy metal stress. JExp Bot 57:711–726
Sharma M, Laxmi A (2016) Jasmonates: emerging players in controlling temperature stress toler-
ance. Front Plant Sci 6:1129
Smith SE, Read DJ (2008) Mycorrhizal symbiosis, 3rd edn. Academic, London
Smith GS, Roncadori RW (1986) Responses of three vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi at
four soil temperatures and their effects on cotton growth. New Phytol 104:89–95
Smith SE, Smith FA (2012) Fresh perspectives on the roles of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in
plant nutrition and growth. Mycologia 104(1):1–13
Staddon PL, Gregersen R, Jakobsen I (2004) The response of two Glomus mycorrhizal fungi and
a ne endophyte to elevated atmospheric CO2, soil warming and drought. Global Change Biol
10:1909–1921
Strack D, Fester T (2006) Isoprenoid metabolism and plastid reorganization in arbuscular mycor-
rhizal roots. New Phytol 172:22–34
Theocharis A, Clement C, Barka EA (2012) Physiological and molecular changes in plants grown
at low temperatures. Planta 235:1091–1105
Thomashow MF (2010) Molecular basis of plant cold acclimation: insights gained from studying
the CBF cold response pathway. Plant Physiol 154:571–577
Torrecillas E, Torres P, Alguacil MM etal (2013) Inuence of habitat and climate variables on
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus community distribution, as revealed by a case study of faculta-
tive plant epiphytism under semiarid conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 79(23):7203–7209
Uemura M, Tominaga Y, Nakagawara C etal (2006) Responses of the plasma membrane to low
temperatures. Physiol Plant 126:81–89
Verma AK, Upadhyay SK, Verma PC et al (2011) Functional analysis of sucrose phosphate syn-
thase (SPS) and sucrose synthase (SS) in sugarcane (Saccharum) cultivars. Plant Biol
13:325–332
Volkmar KM, Woodbury W (1989) Effects of soil temperature and depth on colonization and root
and shoot growth of barley inoculated with vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae indigenous to
Canadian prairie soil. Can JBot 67:1702–1707
Wahid A, Gelani S, Ashraf M etal (2007) Heat tolerance in plants: an overview. Environ Exp Bot
61:199–223
Wang B, Funakoshi DM, Dalpé Y etal (2002) Phosphorus-32 absorption and translocation to host
plants by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi at low root-zone temperature. Mycorrhiza 12:93–96
Wu QS, Zou YN (2010) Benecial roles of arbuscular mycorrhizas in citrus seedlings at tempera-
ture stress. Sci Hortic 125:289–293
Yaneva IA, Hoffmann GW, Tischner R (2002) Nitrate reductase from winter wheat leaves is
activated at low temperature via protein dephosphorylation. Physiol Plant 114:65–72
Young A (1991) The photoprotective role of carotenoids in higher plants. Physiol Plant
83:702–708
Zeng Y, Yu J, Cang Jetal (2011) Detection of sugar accumulation and expression levels of correla-
tive key enzymes in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) at low temperatures. Biosci Biotechnol
Biochem 75:681–687
Zhang F, Hamel C, Kianmehr H etal (1995) Root-zone temperature and soybean [Glycine max.
(L.) Merr.] vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae: development and interactions with the nitrogen
xing symbiosis. Environ Exp Bot 35:287–298
8 Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi andTolerance ofTemperature Stress inPlants
194
Zhang RQ, Zhu HH, Zhao HQ etal (2013) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inoculation increases
phenolic synthesis in clover roots via hydrogen peroxide, salicylic acid and nitric oxide signal-
ing pathways. JPlant Physiol 170:74–79
Zhou Z, Ma H, Liang K etal (2012) Improved tolerance of teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) seedlings to
low-temperature stress by the combined effect of arbuscular mycorrhiza and paclobutrazol.
JPlant Growth Regul 31:427–435
Zhu XC, Song FB, Xu HW (2010a) Arbuscular mycorrhizae improves low temperature stress in
maize via alterations in host water status and photosynthesis. Plant Soil 331:129–137
Zhu XC, Song FB, Xu HW (2010b) Inuence of arbuscular mycorrhizae on lipid peroxidation and
antioxidant enzyme activity of maize plants under temperature stress. Mycorrhiza
20:325–332
Zhu XC, Song FB, Liu SQ etal (2011) Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus on photosynthesis
and water status of maize under high temperature stress. Plant Soil 346:189–199
Zhu XC, Song FB, Liu FL etal (2015) Carbon and nitrogen metabolism in arbuscular mycorrhizal
maize plants under low-temperature stress. Crop Pasture Sci 66(1):62–70
Zhu XC, Song FB, Liu FL (2016) Altered amino acid prole of arbuscular mycorrhizal maize
plants under low temperature stress. JPlant Nutr Soil Sci 179:186–189
X. Zhu et al.