Content uploaded by Wing C Chan
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Wing C Chan on Apr 26, 2016
Content may be subject to copyright.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY
Editorial
Hodgkin's Disease
Lineage and Clonality
WING C. CHAN AND JAN DELABIE
The cell lineage and clonality of the presumed neoplastic
cells of Hodgkin's disease (HD), the diagnostic Reed-
Sternberg cells and their variants (H/RS cells), have not
yet been clarified since the first description of HD by
Thomas Hodgkin more than 150 years ago.1
The demonstration of clonal cytogenetic abnormali-
ties in cell cultures of Hodgkin's tumor has been taken
as evidence for the neoplastic nature of HD. However,
satisfactory karyotyping is only obtainable in a minority
of cases and no specific cytogenetic abnormalities have
been detected after decades of observation.2
With the advent of immunohistochemistry and the
availability of a rapidly increasing number of mono-
clonal antibodies against a variety of leukocyte-associ-
ated antigens, it was anticipated that the question on the
cell lineage and clonality of
the
H/RS cells would be re-
solved. In the nodular type of lymphocytic predomi-
nance HD (N-LPHD), immunophenotyping has yielded
strong evidence that the H/RS cells belong to the B-cell
lineage, but controversy continues for the other subtypes
of
HD.
3
"
5
Although
CD
15,
CD74, CD30, MHC class II
and several other activation-associated molecules can be
demonstrated on the H/RS cells of
the
majority ofnon-
LPHD, more lineage-restricted markers are inconsis-
tently expressed.5-7 Even when such a marker
is
detected
on the H/RS cells of a case, it is frequently present on
only a subpopulation of the
cells.
In assigning
cell
lineage
based on immunohistochemical findings, it is important
to have a proper perspective of the specificity of the "cell
lineage marker" and the possibility of aberrant expres-
sion of the marker.8 In addition, the detection of a mole-
cule on or in a cell does not necessarily imply that the
molecule is synthesized by the cell as adsorption and/
or passive or active uptake from the surrounding may
account for the findings.9
The cloning of the immunoglobulin
(Ig)
and T-cell an-
tigen receptor (TCAR) genes has opened another avenue
to study the lineage and clonality of H/RS cells. South-
ern blot hybridization
has
been employed and in general,
clonal
Ig
gene rearrangement has been detected in some
cases of HD, but clonal TCAR gene rearrangement is
rarely detectable with the exception of Greisser's
study.10" The latter study may be an overestimation be-
cause the interpretation of clonal TCAR-gamma
gene
re-
arrangement by Southern blotting is difficult because of
the presence of pseudoclonal bands derived from normal
T-lymphocytes.12 The limitations of Southern blot anal-
ysis are its low sensitivity and the inability to determine
which cell population gives rise to a clonal band. To
overcome the sensitivity problem, a limited number of
cases
with large numbers of H/RS
cells,
as well
as
in
vitro-
enriched H/RS cell populations have been studied and
the incidence of clonal IgH rearrangement appeared to
be higher.1314 However, the signal strength is often not
commensurate with the proportion of H/RS cells present
in these
cases.
These observations suggest that the H/RS
cells gave rise to the rearranged bands, but the clonal re-
arrangements may not be present in the entire popula-
tion.
The development of the polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) offers a new and powerful approach to the study
of HD and it has been applied by several groups to study
the presence of clonal IgH gene rearrangement in Hodg-
kin's tumors. From these studies, it is quite clear that
cell populations with clonally rearranged IgH gene are
present in a proportion of LPHD as well as in other sub-
types of HD including cases where the H/RS cells
showed the classic immunophenotype, lacking CD20
staining."15"17 However, the percentages of cases where
clonality is demonstrated are quite variable in the differ-
ent reports.'' ' 5~'8 This discrepancy
is
probably the result
of differences in methodology and interpretation, as well
as bias in case selection. The correlation between the
presence of clonal IgH gene rearrangement and the im-
munophenotype of the H/RS cells is complicated be-
cause there is no clear consensus as to what constitute a
B-
or T-cell phenotype in non-LPHD. Aside from the
above considerations, there are a number of interesting
issues raised by these studies:
Why is the incidence of clonal IgH rearrangement in
some reports so much higher in PCR versus Southern
blotting analysis? The PCR assays used in these studies
may not be more sensitive in detecting a clonal IgH re-
arrangement because of the background smear caused
368
by guest on March 20, 2016http://ajcp.oxfordjournals.org/Downloaded from
CHAN AND DELABIE 369
Hodgkin
's
Disease:
by the coexisting polyclonal B-cell population. Several
possibilities to explain the increased rate of detection of
clonal populations by PCR were mentioned by Orazi
and colleagues," but the exact reason remains to be de-
termined. Because the size range of the VDJ amplifica-
tion products is rather narrow, apparent clonal bands
may be observed on occasions when the products are an-
alyzed in gels with low resolution. Such false-positive re-
sults may be avoided by performing the analysis in more
discriminating electrophoresis systems.
Is the clonal rearrangement derived from the H/RS
cells or from other cell populations in the tumor? Al-
though H/RS
cells
are the most likely source of the clonal
rearrangements detected, direct evidence is still lacking.
Several approaches to address this issue have been at-
tempted. This includes the study of Ig light chain restric-
tion in H/RS cells of LPHD by immunohistochemistry
and in situ hybridization. Unfortunately, the results are
controversial and the fact that light chain restriction al-
most always involves the kappa light chain remains to be
explained.1920 More convincing evidence that the H/RS
cells are the clonal population has come from the obser-
vation of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection of the H/
RS cells and the simultaneous demonstration of mono-
clonality of the viral population by Southern hybridiza-
tion.21 The other approach to resolve the issue of lineage
and clonality is to study isolated H/RS cells by PCR. To
date,
only a few studies on a limited number of cases
have been performed and the findings have not been
consistent.22"24 One reason for the discrepancies is likely
because of the methodologic differences and/or case se-
lection bias in the various studies. For instance, neigh-
boring H/RS cells may be derived from a common pro-
genitor and identical IgH sequences would be obtained if
they were picked by micromanipulation out of a histo-
logic section,23 whereas the chance of picking two
closeby cells after tissue disaggregation is unlikely.2224
Resolution of the disparate findings will have to await
the careful study of
a
larger number of
cases
taking into
consideration the techniques used and the various char-
acteristics of the cases studied. However, one of the stud-
ies has already raised the intriguing possibility that
LPHD begins as a polyclonal B-cell proliferation24 and
that this may also
be
true in at least some
cases
of nodular
sclerosis type of HD expressing CD20.25 The emerging
evidence that some cases of HD contain polyclonal H/
RS cells, whereas others contain a clonal population
raises the possibility of clonal evolution in HD.
Is
it likely
that many cases of HD initiate as a polyclonal prolifera-
tion of H/RS cells that may develop into a monoclonal
lesion later in the course of
the
disease? Indeed, there is
some evidence that such clonal evolution may occur in
Vol.
I
eage and Clonality
LPHD,26 and it would be highly interesting to study se-
quential biopsies of other types of HD to examine this
possibility.
Finally, what does antigen-receptor gene rearrangement
tell us concerning the lineage of H/RS cells? While
B-
or T
antigen-receptor gene rearrangement is an important step
in the commitment of a cell toward the B or T lineage, it
may not
be
absolute,
especially in an abnormal
cell,
and we
can only regard it as a useful and additional "marker" of
differentiation. This finding has to be interpreted in the
context of other evidence of lineage commitment.27"30
With the currently available techniques, many of the
hypotheses concerning
the
lineage and clonality of HD can
be
vigorously
tested.
It
is
hoped that carefully planned stud-
ies in the future
will
provide new insights that would clarify
the pathobiology of this enigmatic disease.
REFERENCES
1.
Hodgkin T. On some morbid appearances of the absorbant glands
and spleen. Med Clin Trans 1832; 17:68-114.
2.
Thangavelu M, LeBeau MM. Chromosomal abnormalities in
Hodgkin's disease. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 1989,3:221-
236.
3.
Timens W, Visser L, Poppema S. Nodular lymphocyte predomi-
nance type of Hodgkin's disease is a germinal center lymphoma.
Lab Invest 1986;54:457-461.
4.
Kuzu 1, Delsol G, Jones M, Gatter KC, Mason DY. Expression
of the Ig-associated heterodimer (mb-1 and B29) in Hodgkin's
disease. Histopathology 1993;22:141-144.
5.
Hugh J, Poppema S. Immunophenotype of Reed-Sternberg cells.
Jnt Rev Exp Pathol 1992;33:81-114.
6. Agnarsson BA, Kadin ME. The immunophenotype of Reed-Stern-
berg cells: A study of 50 cases of Hodgkin's disease using fixed
frozen tissues. Cancer 1989;63:2083-2087.
7.
Casey TT, Olson SJ, Cousar JB, Collins RD. Immunophenotypes
of Reed-Sternberg
cells:
A study of 19 cases of Hodgkin's disease
in plastic-embedded sections. Blood 1989;74:2624-2628.
8. Hsu SM, Hsu PL. Aberrant expression of T cell and
B
cell markers
in myelocyte/monocyte/histiocyte-derived lymphoma and leu-
kemia cells: Is the infrequent expression of T/B cell markers
sufficient to establish a lymphoid origin for Hodgkin's Reed-
Sternberg cells? Am J Pathol 1989; 134:203-212.
9. Kadin ME, Sites DP, Levy R, Warnke R. Exogenous origin of im-
munoglobulin in Reed-Sternberg cells of Hodgkin's disease.
TV
Engl J Med 1978;299:1208-1214.
10.
Greisser H, Feller AC, Mak TW, Lennert K. Clonal re-
arrangements of T-cell receptor and immunoglobulin genes and
immunphenotypic antigen expression in different subclasses of
Hodgkin's disease, lnt J Cancer 1987;40:157-160.
11.
Orazi A, Jiang B, Lee H-H, English GW, et al. Correlation between
presence of clonal rearrangements of immunoglobulin heavy
chain genes and B-cell antigen expression in Hodgkin's disease.
Am J Clin Pathol 1994; 104:000-000.
12.
Uppenkamp M, Andrade R, Sundeen J, et al. Diagnostic inter-
pretation of
TT
gene rearrangement: Effect of polyclonal T cells.
Hematol Pathol
1988;
2:15-24.
13.
Weiss LM, Strickler JG, Hu E, Warnke RA, Sklar J. Immunoglob-
ulin gene rearrangements in Hodgkin's diseases. Hum Pathol
1986;17:1009-1014.
14.
Sundeen J, Lipford E, Uppenkamp M, et al. Rearranged antigen
receptor genes in Hodgkin's disease. Blood 1987;70:96-103.
by guest on March 20, 2016http://ajcp.oxfordjournals.org/Downloaded from
370 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY
Editorial
15.
Tamaru J-I, Hummel M, Zemlin M, Kalvelage
B,
Stein H. Hodg-
kin's disease with a B-cell phenotype often shows a VJD re-
arrangement and somatic mutations in the VH genes. Blood
1994;84:708-715.
16.
Kamel OW, Chang PP, Hsu FJ, et al. Clonal VDJ recombination
of the immunoglobulin heavy chain gene by PCR in classical
Hodgkin's
disease.
Am J
Clin Pathol
1995;
104:419-423.
17.
Manzanal A, Santon A, Oliva H, Bellas C. Evaluation of clonal
immunoglobulin heavy chain rearrangements in Hodgkin's dis-
ease using the
polymerase chain reaction
(PCR).
Histopathology
1995;27:21-25.
18.
Angel CA, Pringle JH, Primrose L, Lauder I. Detection of immu-
noglobulin heavy chain gene rearrangements in Hodgkin's dis-
ease using PCR. J
Clin Pathol
1993;46:940-942.
19.
Schmid C, Sargent C, Isaacson PG. L and H cells of nodular
lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin's disease show immuno-
globulin light chain restriction. Am J Pathol
1991;
139:1281 —
1289.
20.
Stoler MH, Nichols
GE,
Symbula M, Weiss
LM.
Lymphocyte pre-
dominance Hodgkin's
disease:
Evidence for a K light chain-re-
stricted monotypic B-cell neoplasm. Am J Pathol
1995;
146:
812-818.
21.
Weiss LM, Movahed LA, Warnke RA, Sklar J. Detection of Ep-
stein-Barr viral genomes in Reed-Sternberg cells of Hodgkin's
disease. N EnglJ Med 1989;320:502-506.
22.
Roth J, Daus H, Trumper L, et al. Detection of immunoglobulin
heavy-chain gene rearrangement at the single-cell level in malig-
nant lymphomas: No rearrangement is found in Hodgkin and
Reed-Sternberg
cells.
InlJ
Cancer
1994;57;799-804.
23.
Kupper
R,
Rajewski K, Zhao M, et
al.
Hodgkin's disease: Hodgkin
and Reed-Sternberg
cells
picked from histological sections show
clonal immunoglobulin gene rearrangements and appear to be
derived from
B cells
at various stages of development.
Proc Natl
AcadSci
USA
1994;91:10962-10966.
24.
Delabie J, Tierens A, Wu G, Weisenburger DD, Chan WC. Lym-
phocyte predominance Hodgkin's disease: Lineage and clon-
ality determination using a single-cell assay. Blood
1994;
84:
3291-3298.
25.
Delabie J, Tierens A, Weisenburger DD, Chan WC. Nodular scle-
rosis Hodgkin's disease: Lineage and clonality analysis using a
single-cell assay. FASEB 1995;9:A272.
26.
Wickert
RS,
Weisenburger
DD,
Tierens
A,
Greiner
TC,
Chan WC.
Clonal relationship between lymphocytic predominance Hodg-
kin's disease and concurrent or subsequent large cell lymphoma
of B-lineage. Blood(m press).
27.
Greaves MF, Furley AJW, Chan LC, Ford AM, Molgaard HV.
Inappropriate rearrangement of immunoglobulin and T-cell re-
ceptor
genes.
Immunol Today
1987;
8:115-116.
28.
Norton JD, Pattinson J, Hoffbrand AV, et al. Rearrangement and
expression of T-cell antigen receptor genes in B-cell chronic
lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 1988;71:178-185.
29.
Robinson MA, Kindt TJ. B lymphoblastoid cell lines with re-
arranged T cell receptor B-chain genes retain conventional B-
cell surface antigen and
Ig
expression. J Immunol 1998;4:1327-
1334.
30.
Lutz CT, Galles ME, Kemp
JD,
Goeken JA, Dick FR. Kappa im-
munoglobulin light chain gene rearrangement in a T-lineage
chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Am J
Clin Pathol
1990;93:702-
705.
A.J.C.P.-October 1995
by guest on March 20, 2016http://ajcp.oxfordjournals.org/Downloaded from