ArticlePDF Available

Invasive alien plant species in Ethiopia: ecological impacts on biodiversity a review paper

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Ethiopia has great geographic diversity and climatic variability. This has created diverse and suitable ecosystems, which are home to large number of flora, fauna and microbial species. However, there are threats to biodiversity by invasive alien plant species (IAPS). They cause threats to biodiversity, economic and health problems in Ethiopia. This paper addresses the ecological impacts of IAPS on biodiversity in the major types of ecosystems, and discusses the reasons why IAPS in Ethiopia constitute a threat to biodiversity locally and globally, examine the ecological impacts on biodiversity, discuss its use and suggest mitigation measures of the IAPS in Ethiopia. Recently, there are about 35 IAPS in Ethiopia. Some of these species include Prosopis juliflora, Parthenium hysterophorus, Eichhornia crassipes, Lantana camara, and Acacia species, which are the major threats to biodiversity losses. Water bodies, wetlands, disturbed vegetation types (e.g. Acacia-Commiphora vegetation type), agro-ecosystems, road sides, urban green areas, range lands are under threat of IAPS nowadays in the country. To minimize and control such invasions, different strategies are being applied such as eradication by utilization of P. juliflora in Afar Region for example, and mechanical control of P. hysterophorus in different parts of the country. For use of sustainable ecosystem services, strategies such as integrated management strategies, participation of all stockholders and multidisciplinary research approaches within and across countries should be designed to reverse the situations.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Submit Manuscript | http://medcraveonline.com
Introduction
Ethiopia has great geographic diversity, and macro and micro
-climatic variability. However, there are threats its biodiversity by
habitat conversion, invasive species, unsustainable utilization of
biodiversity resources, replacement of local varieties and breeds,
climate change and pollution, demographic change, poverty, and
lack of awareness and coordination.1 Invasive species are either
indigenous or non indigenous species that can heavily colonize a
particular habitat.2 Alien species are non-native or exotic organisms
that occur outside their adaptive ranges and dispersal ranges.3,4 IAS
are all categories of living organisms (plants, mammals and insects)
which comprise the most common types in terrestrial environments.4
They are also widely distributed in all kinds of ecosystems throughout
the world. IAS have the ability to establish themselves, invade, out-
compete natives and take over the new environment.3,5 They are now
affecting every ecosystem types on the planet and they are the second
greatest global threat to biodiversity after habitat destruction.4,6 They
are pausing threats to ecosystems of the earth, and the services that
they provide to humanity are under risk.5 IAS have induce impacts
on native species directly competing for resource such as: food and
breeding sites indirectly by altering habitat and modify hydrology,
nutrient cycling and other ecosystem processes. Their impacts are
on native biodiversity in ecosystems like agricultural and range
lands, national parks, water ways, lakes, rivers, power dams, road
sides and urban green spaces with huge economical as well as
social consequences. These dramatically change the ecosystem both
positively and negatively. Across impact types, the positive impacts
reported by most authors were found to be largely outweighed by
negative impacts.7–9
IAS are creating complex and far-reaching challenges that a threat
to not only biodiversity, but also food security, health and economic
development. The problems of IAS in developing countries are higher
than in developed nations.3,10 According to Lowe et al.,6 in 2004, IUCN
identied 81 IAS in South Africa, 49 in Mauritius, 44 in Swaziland,
37 in Algeria and Madagascar, 37 in Kenya, 28 in Egypt, 26 in Ghana
and Zimbabwe and 22 in Ethiopia.11 Recently, there are more than 35
IAPS identied in Ethiopia. Some of these IAPS include: Mesquites
(Prosopis juliora), Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus),
Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes), Lantana weed (Lantana
camara), Acacia species, and Orobanche and Cuscuta species that
are identied as major plant invaders. Recent surveys found also
emerging plant invaders such as Cryptostegia grand ora, Parkinsonia
aculeate, Mimosa diplorotricha, Mimosa pigra, Agrimonies Mexicana
and Nicotine glauca.1 Therefore this review paper aims to discuss
the reasons why IAPS in Ethiopia constitute a threat to biodiversity
locally and globally, examine the ecological impacts of some IAPS
on biodiversity and take up lessons learned elsewhere or in Ethiopia
and discuss on the use and management of IAPS. Thus, the paper
addresses relevant scientic information’s based on evaluation of data
collected from different journals, manuals and various report works.
Invasive alien plant species
A species is considered an “invasive alien species” when it spreads
beyond its natural area of distribution. According to Richardson et
al.,12 Kueffer et al.,13 and Shine et al.4
Alien plants: plant taxa occurrence in a given area results from
their introduction (intentionally or accidentally) by human activity.
(Synonyms: “exotic plants”).
Weeds: Plants (not necessarily alien) that is undesirable from a human
point of view (synonyms: “pests”).
Invasive plants: Alien plants that recruit reproductive offspring, often
in very large numbers, spread rapidly.
Int J Mol Biol Open Access. 2018;3(4):171178. 171
©2018 Shiferaw et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.
Invasive alien plant species in Ethiopia: ecological
impacts on biodiversity a review paper
Volume 3 Issue 4 - 2018
Wakshum Shiferaw,1 Sebsebe Demissew,2
Tamrat Bekele2
1Arba Minch University, Ethiopia
2Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia
Correspondence: Wakshum Shiferaw, Arba Minch
University, College of Agricultural Sciences, Natural Resources
Management, Ethiopia, Email waaqsh@yahoo.com
Received: June 22, 2018 | Published: July 12, 2018
Abstract
Ethiopia has great geographic diversity and climatic variability. This has created diverse
and suitable ecosystems, which are home to large number of ora, fauna and microbial
species. However, there are threats to biodiversity by invasive alien plant species (IAPS).
They cause threats to biodiversity, economic and health problems in Ethiopia. This paper
addresses the ecological impacts of IAPS on biodiversity in the major types of ecosystems,
and discusses the reasons why IAPS in Ethiopia constitute a threat to biodiversity locally
and globally, examine the ecological impacts on biodiversity, discuss its use and suggest
mitigation measures of the IAPS in Ethiopia. Recently, there are about 35 IAPS in Ethiopia.
Some of these species include Prosopis juliora, Parthenium hysterophorus, Eichhornia
crassipes, Lantana camara, and Acacia species, which are the major threats to biodiversity
losses. Water bodies, wetlands, disturbed vegetation types (e.g. Acacia-Commiphora
vegetation type), agro-ecosystems, road sides, urban green areas, range lands are under
threat of IAPS nowadays in the country. To minimize and control such invasions, different
strategies are being applied such as eradication by utilization of P. juliora in Afar Region
for example, and mechanical control of P. hysterophorus in different parts of the country.
For use of sustainable ecosystem services, strategies such as integrated management
strategies, participation of all stockholders and multidisciplinary research approaches
within and across countries should be designed to reverse the situations.
Keywords: biodiversity, ecosystem, Ethiopia, impact, invasive, plants
International Journal of Molecular Biology: Open Access
Review Article Open Access
Invasive alien plant species in Ethiopia: ecological impacts on biodiversity a review paper 172
Copyright:
©2018 Shiferaw et al.
Citation: Shiferaw W, Demissew S, Bekele T. Invasive alien plant species in Ethiopia: ecological impacts on biodiversity a review paper. Int J Mol Biol Open Access.
2018;3(4):171178. DOI: 10.15406/ijmboa.2018.03.00072
Invasive alien species: an alien species which threatens ecosystems,
habitats or species. (1) Alien species that escape from human control
go beyond the intended physical boundaries and cause environmental
damage (2) Covers alien species that remain under human control but
damage native ecosystems. Such damage is linked to species being
alien, but not to invasiveness.
Native invasive (or) local invasive: species that get into modied
habitats by their own means and then go through population
explosions, loss to biodiversity and economics.
Historical perspectives of invasive alien plants
Plant invasion is a strong threat to the species diversity around the
world during the 21st century after habitat loss. Large number species
of IAP are introduced to native country in the world and few of these
become problematic; they are introduced in to a country either through
human or natural (e.g. winds, birds, animals, water).5,14 Thousands
of plant species have been transported by humans to areas far from
their natural habitats; accidentally or intentionally (e.g. agro-forestry,
horticulture, forestry, and animal husbandry purposes). However,
invasions by IAPS are one of the largest threats to the ecosystems
of the earth, and the services.15 Few aggressive IAPS which are
threatening biodiversity in Ethiopia and elsewhere in the world are
discussed in the following sections.
Prosopis juliora (Sw.) DC. Fabaceae
It is a perennial evergreen multipurpose dry land tree or shrub native
to the Caribbean, North and South America. It Introduced to Africa in
1822 in Senegal; South Africa (1880), Egypt (1900) and Kenya was
in 1973.16 It introduced to Eritrea from the Sudan, probably during
the early 1980s. It introduced in Ethiopia in the late 1970s at Goro
nursery- Dire-Dawa. Prosopis was planted over large areas until 1982,
continued by the Food for Work Programme from 1986 to 1988. This
species is now commonly found in Afar, Oromia, Amhara, Somali,
Dire-Dawa regions and Sothern Nations and Nationalities. Nowadays,
it is repeatedly reported to be one of the invasive and problematic
trees in the Afar Region and progress to Rift Valley of Ethiopia.17
Parthenium hysterophorus, in the family heliantheae:
asteraceae
It is a perennial herb. Parthenium genus has 16 species native
to northern South America, Central America, Mexico, Texas, and
Florida, Mexico. It introduced to Ethiopia accidentally in the 1970s
when drought induced famine triggered a massive multinational
relief effort. It was rst reported from Ethiopia in 1988 at Dire- Dawa
and Harerge, Eastern Ethiopia and subsequently found near Desse,
Northeastern Ethiopia as well.18,19
Eichhornia crassipes, (Mart.) Solms in A. DC.
(Pontederiaceae)
Water hyacinth is native to South America and it is originally from
the Amazon Basin its entry into Africa, Asia, Australia, and North
America was facilitated by human activities and lack of naturally
occurring enemies. It introduced in to Kenya (1957), Lake Victoria
in East Africa, and began to cause problems in 1990.3,4 Zimbabwe
(1937), Mozambique (1946), Ethiopia (1956), Rwanda and Burundi
colonized in the late 1950s, Tanzania were infested in 1955 and 1959,
Zambia (1960s), Uganda (1988-89), Malawi (1996).20 Water hyacinth
has also spread to West Africa and Cameroon (1997-2000), Nigeria
(almost all water bodies).20 Water hyacinth in Ethiopia has also been
marked on a large scale in many water bodies of the Gambella area, in
Blue Nile Watershed, and Lake Tana.21,22
Lantana camara L. (Verbenaceae)
A shrub IAPS introduced to Ethiopia from native Tropical
America and the West Indies. But, no clear year of introduction from
native range has been indicated in literatures regarding this species
in Ethiopia. Lantana has been introduced throughout the tropics
and subtropics as an ornamental, often used as a hedge plant. It is
a cosmopolitan weed and in many countries it has been declared a
noxious weed.
Geographical distribution and sensitive ecosystems
for invasive alien plant species
Geographical distribution: IAS have invaded and affected
native biota in virtually every ecosystem type on Earth. They
have contributed too many hundreds of extinctions, under island
conditions, freshwater ecosystems. All ecosystems can be invaded
potentially; some appear more vulnerable than others. Evolutionarily
and geographically isolated ecosystems, notably oceanic islands are
particularly vulnerable. Because the natural bio-geographical barriers
of oceans, mountains, rivers, and deserts, which provided the isolation
essential for unique species and ecosystems to evolve and have lost
their effectiveness. Habitats such as urban-industrial areas, habitats
suffering from periodic disturbance, harbors, lagoons, estuaries and
the fringes of water bodies are under threats of IAPs.3 Systems with
low diversity, for example some arid ecosystems, are more susceptible
to invasion than species-rich systems with well established species
interactions. However, species rich landscapes can also be susceptible
to a greater range of invaders because of the greater diversity of
habitats typical of such landscapes.3,23 The most obvious and severe
invasion regions of alien plants in Africa are in sensitive wetland and
aquatic ecosystems.21 In Ethiopia; disturbed ecosystems, along road
sides, agricultural lands, and grass lands, in Vegetation ecosystems:
Desert and semi-desert, Acacia-Commiphora woodland and bush
land, freshwater lakes, lake shores, marshes, swamps and ood plain
vegetation, dry Evergreen Afro-montane forest and grassland complex,
and Acacia wooded grassland of the central rift are under threat of
IAPS in Ethiopia.1,24,25 Many evidences prove that disturbances in
the natural ecosystems provide the great opportunities to the alien
invaders to establish themselves (Table 1). The frequency of the alien
herbal plants increased in the areas of human interference such as
forest fragmentation. Moreover, population pressure, over-stocking,
overgrazing and deforestation have facilitated the disturbance of the
Ethiopian ecosystem and enhanced the effect of weed invasion by
threatening biodiversity of the country.19 According to21 and Beilfuss26
the distribution of IAPS in Ethiopia is indicated in different regions
across the country (Table 2).
Causes for invasion of alien plants
As indicated above the causes of introduction are two types: For
example, human (intentional) introduction of P. juliora in Ethiopia
and natural (unintentionally) introduction of P. hysterophorus in
India, Kenya, Ethiopia and other elsewhere. After natural invasion
by some alien plant species, there is a “lag phase” that may range
from decades to centuries before “an exponential phase” of its
fast spread. The species are in a given time may appear to be non-
invasive for a while then may suddenly begin to spread rapidly (E.g.
Invasive alien plant species in Ethiopia: ecological impacts on biodiversity a review paper 173
Copyright:
©2018 Shiferaw et al.
Citation: Shiferaw W, Demissew S, Bekele T. Invasive alien plant species in Ethiopia: ecological impacts on biodiversity a review paper. Int J Mol Biol Open Access.
2018;3(4):171178. DOI: 10.15406/ijmboa.2018.03.00072
P. hysterophorus). Introduction cause is closely linked to the history
of civilization. Colonization in particular led to massive transoceanic
movements and exposed ecological systems, as well as indigenous
communities; to quite new stresses and threats in the world. In the
modern era of globalization, the ‘four Ts’: Trade, Transport, Travel
and Tourism have cause and sharply accelerated the rate of species
movements. Global markets support the increased ow not only of
investment money but also of goods.4 According to Mc Neely et al.,3
there are three steps for invasion of IAS: (1) introduction – intentional
or unintentional, (2) establishment–survives but doesn’t spread,
(3) spread: (3a) Naturalization – becomes part of the ora/fauna
of its new habitat (3b) invasion–expands and impacts on species,
ecosystems, people and development. Species invasions have three
main elements: (1) source population is where the species nds its
natural habitat, where it forms part of the native ecosystem (though
other invaded ecosystems often are a secondary source) and (2)
pathways are the routes by which species move from one political
unit to another, either within a country or between countries. (3)
destinations are where the new species arrives. Climate change also
aggravates IAS to colonize easily and vice versa.27 Climate change
can facilitate IAS as new species, that may become invasive, will
be entering regions due to climate change, species hierarchies in
ecosystems will change leading to new dominants that may have
invasive tendencies, and climate induced stress in an ecosystem will
facilitate invasive pathways. Alternatively, IAS can facilitate climatic
stress by increasing ecosystem susceptibility to climatic perturbation,
through reducing the number of species and their functional types
within the ecosystem.28
Table 1 Identied and prioritised Invasive Alien Species in Ethiopia (Source: GEF, 2002)
Scientic names Common names Scientic names Common names
E. crassipes Water hyacinth P. juliora Mesquite, Prosopis,WoyaneZaf (Amh)
L. camara Lantana, Wefkolo (Amh) P. hysterophorous Parthenium, Congress weed, White top,
Feremsisa (Orm)
P. hysterophorous Parthenium, Congress weed, White top,
Feremsisa (Orm) Striga species Striga
P. juliora Mesquite, Prosopis, Woyanezaf (Amh) E. crassipes Water hyacinth
Striga species Striga L. camara Lantana, Wefkolo (Amh)
Acacia species* Fullsa (Orm) Acacia species* Fullsa (Orm)
Orobanche species Orobanche , Atequrit (Amh) - -
Cuscuta campestris Cuscusta - -
A. mexicana Argemone, Nech Lebash (Amh) - -
Verbesina encelioides Verbesina - -
Opuntia species Opuntia, Qulqual (Amh) - -
* Probably a native species= like A. drepanolobium, Orm=Afaan Oromo, Amh=Amhari
Table 2 Distribution of IAPS across regions in Ethiopia
Oromia Somali Afar Tigray Amhara South Gambela
P.hysterophorus P.hysterophorus P. juliora Striga species Striga species E.crassipes E.crassipes
P. juliora L. camara P.hysterophorus Orobanche species Orobanche species P. juliora -
Striga species P. juliora Acacia species P.hysterophorus P.hysterophorus A. mexicana -
L. camara - - Opuntia species Opuntia species P.hysterophorus -
E. crassipes - - P. juliora P. juliora - -
Orobanche species - - - E. crassipes - -
Acacia species - - - - - -
Argemone mexicana - - - - - -
Mimosa pigra - - - - - -
M. diplotricha - - - - - -
Opuntia species - - - - - -
Invasive alien plant species in Ethiopia: ecological impacts on biodiversity a review paper 174
Copyright:
©2018 Shiferaw et al.
Citation: Shiferaw W, Demissew S, Bekele T. Invasive alien plant species in Ethiopia: ecological impacts on biodiversity a review paper. Int J Mol Biol Open Access.
2018;3(4):171178. DOI: 10.15406/ijmboa.2018.03.00072
Properties of invasive alien plants
IAS is one of the most signicant drivers of environmental change
worldwide. Four key features are associated with invasive plants; (1)
show prolic seeding and early age of rst reproduction, (2) have
unpalatable foliage, (3) can easily establish in degraded environments,
and (4)have an ability to regenerate profusely from direct seeds, stems
or roots. These features make them good competitors amongst other
plant species and allow their survival and abundant establishment.29
Parthenium hysterophorus: A deep tap root and an erect stem that
becomes woody with age. Large plants can produce up to 15,000
seeds on average and 100,000 seeds which can be distributed
by oating on still or ood waters or in mud adhering to animals,
vehicles and machinery. In India, 200,000 seeds per m2 in the soil. In
some areas, more than 340 million Parthenium seeds can be present
per hectare in the surface soil, compared to 120,000 native grass
seeds. Dormant in the soil for several years if conditions favorable.
Allelopatic chemicals have been observed to exhibit an inhibitory
effect both on the germination and growth of a wide variety of crops
including pasture grasses, cereals, vegetables, other weeds and even
tree species.
Prosopis juliora: Have characteristics of rapid biomass accumulation,
nitrogen xing root ability, tolerance of arid conditions and saline
soils, coppicing abilities, ability to stay dormant for longer time in a
media (e.g. soil) and germinate during favorable conditions, number
of seeds/pod is high.30 Allelopatic chemicals are other characteristics
of Prosopis species which are used to adapt to compute with other
neighbor species in harsh conditions.
Lantana camara: Forms extensive, dense and impenetrable thickets
in forestry plantations, orchards, pasture land, waste land and in
natural areas. However, lantana showed less vegetative growth, less
reproductive success and more browsed in the forest. So, L. camara
is less successful in the forest gaps than at the edges of the forests and
hedges. The rapid spread of lantana is associated with human induced
disturbance. Fruits are widely dispersed by many birds including
introduced species. In areas where natural res occur they stimulate
thicker re-growth. It tolerates a wide range of climates. It grows well
on poor soils.31 It produces also allelopatic chemicals from its plant
parts.
Impacts of invasive alien plants on biodiversity
Among the invaders that will have the largest impacts are those that
directly modify ecosystems. They have cascading effects for resident
biota (plants, animals and micro-organisms). Exotics can affect
ecosystems by altering system-level ows, availability or quality
of nutrients, food, and physical resources (e.g. living space, water,
heat or light). Many literatures suggest that introduced ecosystem
engineers either: increase habitat complexity or heterogeneity which
tends to cause abundances and /or species richness to raise or decrease
complexity tends to have the reverse effect on ecosystem services.
Ecosystem services can be categorized into four main services in
general; (1) Provisioning service (e.g. food, freshwater, ber, fuel,
genetic resources, (2) Regulating services (e.g. air quality regulation,
climate regulation, water regulation) (3) Cultural services are non-
material benets, (e.g. aesthetic values, recreation/tourism, spiritual/
religious values, (4) Supporting services. Overarching, indirect,
and occur on large temporal scales (e.g. photosynthesis, primary
production, nutrient cycling.32 IAPS threats to these ecosystem
services; IAPS pose a global threat to the conservation of biodiversity
through: their proliferation and spread, displacing or killing native
ora and fauna and affecting ecosystem services. They are particularly
damaging in geographical or ecological islands, which are rich in
endemic species, Invasive plants smother, outcompete and displace
indigenous species, changing the composition and function of entire
ecosystems.21 IAS and other native invasive plants can affect entire
systems in Ethiopia and elsewhere in the world (Table 3).
Table 3 Invasiveness and ecosystem effect status of top 20 Invasive Plants
Species in Ethiopia (Source: Rezene and Taye, 2014)
Species Ecosystems highly
affected*
Distribution
status
P. hysterophorus 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 High
P. juliora 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 Moderate
Opuntia cus-indica 3,4,5,6, Moderate
O. stricta 3,4,5,6, Moderate
M. diplotricha 1,2,3,4,5,6,8 Moderate
M. pigra 3,4,7 Low
Cryptostegia grandiora 2,3,4,7,8 Low
L .camara 1,2,3,4,5,6,8 High
A. drepanolobium 1,3,4, Moderate
A. saligna 2,3,4,5, Low
Parkinsonia aculeata 2,4,5,6 Low
Nicotiana glauca 1,2,3,4,5,6, Moderate
Argemone ochroleuca 1,2,3,4,5,6, High
Xanthium strumarium 1,2,3,4,5,6, High
X. spinosum 1,2,3,4,5,6, Moderate
Psidium guajava 8 Low
Senna didymobotrya 1.2.3.4.5.6.8 High
S. occidentalis 2,4,5, Moderate
Calotropis procera 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 Moderate
Ricinus communis 2,4,5,6, Moderate
1, Cultivated land; 2, Roadside; 3, Grazing areas; 4, Non-cultivated land; 5, Rural
villages; 6, urban areas; 7, Riverside; 8, Forest areas.
Parthenium hysterophorus: It aggressively colonizes: natural and
manmade ecosystems, disturbed sites and causes major negative
impacts on grassland habitats, open woodlands, riverbanks, ood
plains, wildlife parks, and open eld of settlement areas, bare areas
along road sides, crop elds, and gardens heavily stocked areas around
yards and watering points etc. The allelochemicals released from the
weed or from seed leaching inhibit germination of other plants and
the growth of pasture grasses, legumes, cereals, and vegetables, other
weeds and even trees. Parthenium affects nodulation in legumes due
to inhabitation of activity of nitrogen xing and nitrifying bacteria
Viz., Rhizobium, Actynomycetes, Azotobacter and Azosprillium.
It was reported to cause yield losses of up to 40% in several crops
and is reported to reduce forage production by up to 90% in India.33
Parthenium produces enormous quantity of pollen (on average 624
million/plant), It is carried away at least to short distance in clusters of
600-800 grains and settle on the vegetative and oral parts, including
stigmatic surface inhibiting fruit setting in crops like tomato, beans
Invasive alien plant species in Ethiopia: ecological impacts on biodiversity a review paper 175
Copyright:
©2018 Shiferaw et al.
Citation: Shiferaw W, Demissew S, Bekele T. Invasive alien plant species in Ethiopia: ecological impacts on biodiversity a review paper. Int J Mol Biol Open Access.
2018;3(4):171178. DOI: 10.15406/ijmboa.2018.03.00072
and maize when its pollen grains are deposited on the stigmatic
surfaces.33 In Ethiopia, the yield in Sorghum bicolor grain was reduced
by 40-97% when P. hysterophorus was left uncontrolled throughout
the season.34 The weed poses serious health hazards to livestock and
if eaten can spoil their milk and meat. Some farmers in Ethiopia also
claim that they have lost livestock during dry periods when there was
little available grazing and the animals had eaten Parthenium out of
desperation. Parthenium can also cause severe allergenic reactions in
people who come into contact with the weed on a regular basis.34 It
induces to alter in the physical and chemical properties of soil such as
soil texture, soil pH, soil organic matter, soil nitrogen, soil potassium,
and soil phosphorus.33
Adane18 reported that P. hysterophorus was found to be the most
frequent and dominant species on road sides, grazing land and crop
elds with important value indices of 102%, 77.5% and 74.5%
respectively out of sampled cases in Adami Tulu-Jido Kombolcha
Woreda of Ethiopia. Under crop elds, the responses of wheat and
teff (63.1% for both crops); maize (6.9%) to Parthenium weed were
less than grass weeds, like Cynodon dactylon L. (72.5%) in the study
area. The result showed that some species have greater sociability or
resistance than other species. In Southern Ethiopia at Gedeo Zone, the
impact of P. hysterophorus weed on biodiversity was also assessed.
It showed that in highly infested areas the impact was more visible
than the moderate and low infested areas.19 These samples indicated
lower diversity index (H’) (highly infested area) as compared to other
sites where the calculated Shannon Diversity Index was high (where
invasion was low).
Prosopis juliora: Although there are few quantitative ndings in
the study area. P. juliora are threatening endemic plant species in
Afar Region of Ethiopia, such as A. prasinata, Boswellia ogadensis,
Euphorbia doeloensis, E. ogadensis and Indigofera kelleri.17 These
habitats which harbor threatened plant species also harbor many
globally threatened and vulnerable mammal and bird species. Because
of disruption of ecosystem integrity in the area, these threatened wild
animals are further endangered.
Abyot & Getachew30 reported also that Prosopis replaced the local
biodiversity in several spots in Afar region, mainly rangelands and dry
riversides. In such areas, the grasslands are no more used for grazing
by the livestock. The species also reduced the total biodiversity of the
arid and semiarid regions by reducing their abundance, distribution,
and more importantly by changing the ecosystem function from
rangeland to Prosopis thicket. Consequently, the local Afar pastoralists
who solely depend on natural pasture for their cattle in Ethiopia
moved further from their home and pasture elds aggravating food
and feed shortage in the region.
Prosopis has severely invaded dense Acacia woodlands, riverine
forest and agricultural lands of Amibara Woreda, Afar. It has highly
distributed in Acacia woodland (9.91 km2) and least around the
settlements (0.35 km2) over the 16 years period land use/land cover
changes from 1986 to 2001 in the area.11 The number of coppices was
relatively few around the settlements and higher in Acacia woodlands.
Moreover, the density of the plant was found least in riverine forest
lands (344stems/ha) and highest in Acacia woodlands (1774 stems/
ha). This result depicts that Acacia and other species are under threat
in the area. Prosopis has been blamed for injuring livestock with its
poisonous thorns and causing goat teeth to rot and fall out because
the small seeds get stuck between the teeth. Thousands of goats have
been rendered toothless and died from starvation following teeth loss
which has been decreasing their number and threaten goat breed in the
region.29 The decrease in the number of sheep and goats in the same
period is estimated to be higher than one third.17 Over the ve years
between 2003 and 2008 alone camel ownership in invaded areas of the
Afar Region has dropped by almost one third as a result of prosopis
invasion. The effect of the species on the number of calves and heifer
is even more pronounced where the reduction rate is ve fold.
Eichhornia crassipes: Few studies showed quantitative impacts of
water hyacinth on biodiversity in Ethiopia, In general, according to
UNEP20 threats posed by water hyacinth are: (i) loss of biodiversity,
(ii) oxygen depletion and reduced water quality, (iii) breeding ground
for pests and vectors and (IV) blockage of waterways hampering
agriculture, sheries, recreation and hydropower. Studies to establish
the negative impact of the weed at the Wonji Sugar Estate in Ethiopia
indicated that the weed inicted multifaceted problems such as excess
water loss that is estimated to be 393,660 to 2,945,160 m3, restricting
water ow.35
Lantana camara: It readily invades pastureland outcompeting
palatable species, resulting in a reduction in carrying capacities and
restricted access and movement of animals, humans and vehicles.
It is also unpalatable, and in large doses (approximately 1% of total
body weight) is poisonous, cause skin lesion in sheep particularly to
cattle. Lantana is one of the known allelopathic weed plants in many
parts of the world. For example, experiment conducted in Northern
Ethiopia.36 Consequently, Lantana leaf powder signicantly inhibits
seed germination, speed of germination, shoot and root length, stem
thickness and biomass of wheat and maize.
Uses of invasive alien plants
Introducing species to new locations has had tremendous
contributions to societal development. Human welfare has been
improved due to the introduction of many crops out of their native
range.17 Accidental and deliberate introduction of some species,
however, resulted into unexpected negative outcomes. Some species
turned into invasive species presenting complex and dynamic
problems to society.3
Parthenium hysterophorus: extracts of the species have been
well documented for their insecticidal, nematicidal and herbicidal
properties by many researchers. However, there are few reports of
these characteristic properties being used and any utilization taking
place. The most practical use of Parthenium weed in India so far has
been through the production of compost and in vermin-composting
along with other weeds.33 Composting signicantly reduces
allelopathic inhibitory effects of Parthenium on plant seed emergence
in Ethiopia.37 For example, report by showed lettuce emergence
percentage was greatly reduced by fresh Parthenium (93%). Fresh
and composted of the species reduced lettuce emergence rate by 95
and 33%, respectively. It Radicle length also reduced by 97 and 35%,
respectively and plumule length (93 and 43%, respectively in Jimma
Zone of Ethiopia. Their result clearly showed that composting greatly
reduced allelopathic effects of Parthenium.
Prosopis juliora: Initially, though the benets of Prosopis are not
well realized in Ethiopia, Prosopis provide valuable products such
as timber and charcoal in USA; honey in Mexico; animal feed in
Brazil; gums, fodder and rewood in north-eastern India; charcoal
and human foods in South America, and rewood in Africa.33 It is
used for high quailty furniture, ooring, ber boards, railway cross-
beams etc. In Ethiopia, Prosopis wood can only be used for fuel wood,
Invasive alien plant species in Ethiopia: ecological impacts on biodiversity a review paper 176
Copyright:
©2018 Shiferaw et al.
Citation: Shiferaw W, Demissew S, Bekele T. Invasive alien plant species in Ethiopia: ecological impacts on biodiversity a review paper. Int J Mol Biol Open Access.
2018;3(4):171178. DOI: 10.15406/ijmboa.2018.03.00072
charcoal, and fencing and its crushed pod for animal feed especially
during dry season.17 Flowers of Prosopis are excellent sources of
pollen and nectar and are used to produce high quality honey. The
exudates gums harvested from Prosopis trees are important inputs
in food, pharmaceutical, chemical and manufacturing industries.16,33
Due to its unique tolerance to the harsh environment of dry lands,
Prosopis has become an important source of livelihood for the poor,
hence sometimes referred as ‘the poor man’s tree’.17
Lantana camara: It is used traditionally to treat various ailments
like tetanus, rheumatism, malaria, cough, fevers, cold, rheumatisms,
asthma to mention a few of animal and human diseases. Many
phytochemical investigations have been done on this plant.38,39 The
plant can be also uses as hedges which protects wind erosion in dry
lands. It also used for camel calves as feed because calves cannot
reach to browse like Acacia brevispica during shortage of milk from
their mother in dry season in Eastern Ethiopia.
Management of invasive alien plants
The potential irreversibility of the damage of invasion and the
indecision of the costs they may imply impose countries a preventive
approach to their management.3 Prevention–not allowing a potentially
invasive species to become established in the rst place–is the rst
line of defense. The main management responses after a species
has invaded are mitigation and adaptation. Mitigation can reduce
or eliminate the likelihood that a species will become established
or spread, and decrease or eliminate the presence of an invader.
Adaptation, on the other hand, involves changes in behavior in order
to reduce the impact of an invasive species.
Barriers for management of invasive alien plants
According to,22 in Africa and specically in Ethiopia there are a
number of barriers to effective adoption of this strategy for managing
IAS, (1) the policy environment within which most countries in Africa
are operating is fragmented and weak, (2) the critical information
required by the different stakeholders is not available, (3) the
implementation of prevention and control programmes is slow or
inadequate and capacity is lacking.
Efforts in the Management of invasive alien plants
There are different management strategies of IAPS after invasion:
Strategies are Mechanical, chemical, biological and Fire. The
relatively common control method applied in Ethiopia is the uprooting
of the tree manually.
Parthenium hysterophorus: Like other weeds, control of P.
hysterophorus weed in Ethiopia is entirely based on cultural and
labour intensive practices such as tillage, hand weeding, mowing,
hoeing and slashing. Unlike large-scale farms in developed and
developing countries, small-scale farmers prepare their land using
repeated oxen ploughing and/or hoeing. Some farmers in Ethiopia are
also using chemical eradication methods.18 Zygogramma bicolorata
was found to be safe biological P. hysterophorus.40,41 Another trial was
conducted by Sintu42 there was an evaluation of bio-control agent of
stem-boring weevil (Listronotus setosipennis) on P. hysterophorus in
Ethiopia. L. setosipennis was selective to control P. hysterophorus in
relation to other plant species without affecting the native ones.
Prosopis juliora: The mechanical control of prosopis is, however,
very labor intensive and expensive, and is economically feasible only
for high value lands. Using mechanical control method, Prosopis
plant was recommended to cut at 10 cm for young trees; and 40 cm
for matured trees or shrubs of Prosopis to control coppicing. It can
also serve simply for control of the spread of the species and is not
effective to eradicate it by mobilizing communities. Management of
Prosopis by utilization (e.g. fuel wood, construction, and charcoal
production, feed livestock by crushing pods) is the best management
options.43
Eichhornia crassipes: Mechanical, chemical and biological, re after
water drainage are few strategies to control E. crassipes. Mechanical
eradication of water hyacinth at Lake Tana of Amhara Region and
Awash River irrigation channels are encouraging.1 Mechanical
eradication is labour intensive and costly. Chemical eradication is not
friend environmentally. Release of bio-control agents is also being
considered where these technologies are not feasible.
Lantana camara: Attempts to control L. camara using mechanical,
chemical and biological means have met with limited success.
Lantana is difcult to control, as it will coppice and form denser
thickets if it is simply slashed and left. Management by utilization can
also eradicate L. camara. Lantana inaction can be controlled by using
its biomass before the plant set seeds. The best management option is
an integrated approach is required for management.
Conclusion and recommendation
Ethiopia has diverse ecosystems which are home to large number
of ora, fauna and microbial species. However, there are threats to
ecosystem services and biodiversity loss due to habitat conversion,
invasive species, unsustainable utilization of biodiversity resources,
replacement of local varieties and breeds, and climate change and
pollution. Invasive alien species such as plants are exotic which are
introduced deliberately or unintentionally outside their natural habitat
naturally or through human activities. In new areas, invasive alien
species are colonizing the native ecosystems; have either positive
or negative consequences on the ecosystem services. Invasive alien
species are found in all taxon or organisms and exist all over the world
in all ecosystems. Recently, 35 invasive weed species are identied in
Ethiopia, and they are posing negative impacts on native biodiversity,
agricultural and range lands, national parks, water ways, lakes, rivers,
power dams, road sides and urban green spaces with huge economical
as well as social consequences. Some of these species include:
mesquites (P. juliora), parthenium weed (P. hysterophorus), water
hyacinth (E. crassipes), lantana weed (L. camara), Acacia species,
and other weeds such as Orobanche and Cuscuta species that are
identied as major plant invaders. These IAPS are more aggressive
in disturbed, arid and semiarid vegetation ecosystems like Acacia-
Commiphora woodlands, aquatic, wetlands, agro-ecosystems and
rangelands in Ethiopia.
IAPS have peculiar characteristics of invasiveness and distribution
that overtake the native species such as number seeds they produce,
reproductive outputs and some allelochemicals inhibit other native
species loss. As the result, they have impacts on biodiversity, social
services and health problems both on human and animals in all
ecosystems in the new areas. In order to combat such threats countries
in the world and Ethiopia have their own strategies to control IAPS
in the native ecosystems. But, there are management barriers to
implement such strategies. Mechanical, chemical, re regime for some
invasive species like water hyacinth and biological control methods
Invasive alien plant species in Ethiopia: ecological impacts on biodiversity a review paper 177
Copyright:
©2018 Shiferaw et al.
Citation: Shiferaw W, Demissew S, Bekele T. Invasive alien plant species in Ethiopia: ecological impacts on biodiversity a review paper. Int J Mol Biol Open Access.
2018;3(4):171178. DOI: 10.15406/ijmboa.2018.03.00072
are some methods after invasion of the species. These aforementioned
methods have their own cons and prons to control IAPS. Prevention,
integrated management strategies and management of the species by
utilization as measure used to control P. juliora, P. hysterophorus and
L. camara in Ethiopia, are among the best management of the control
measures.
The following recommendations are suggested to prevent, control
the already invaded ecosystems in Ethiopia and elsewhere in the
world:
a. Sustainable and multidisciplinary approach studies regarding
history, properties of the invasiveness of the species and their
impacts in relation to ecological impacts on ecosystems and
socioeconomic consequences have to be conducted.
b. Create awareness for stakeholders about the history, cause and
impacts IAPS is very important.
c. Institutions should join the efforts to better understand IAS and
devise mechanisms for better prevention and control.
d. Close monitoring and management of all natural and agro-
ecosystems from disturbances to reduce the arrival and
colonization of IAPS. Secure quarantine measures needs to be
introduced in boarder areas where tourism, trade, travels agents
are owing. Countries with IAPS countries share information and
working relationships in order to control the transfer of IAPS from
one to another.
Acknowledgements
None.
Conict of interest
The author declares there is no conict of interest.
References
1. EBI (Ethiopian Biodiversity Institute). Ethiopian’s fth national report to
the conservation biodiversity. 2014.
2. Ngweno CC, Mwasi MS, Kairu KJ. Distribution, density and impact of
invasive plants in Lake Nakuru National Park, Kenya. Journal of Ecology.
2009;48(4):905–913.
3. Mc Neely JA, Mooney HA, Neville LE, et al. A Global Strategy on
Invasive Alien Species. IUCN Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK.
2001; p.3
4. Shine C, Kettunen M, Ten Brink P. Technical support to EU strategy on
invasive species (IAS)–Recommendations on policy options to control
the negative impacts of IAS on biodiversity in Europe and the EU. Final
report for the European Commission; 2009; Brussels, Belgium: 2010.
5. Sebua S Semenya, Milingoni P Tshisikhawe, Martin T Potgieter. Invasive
alien plant species: A case study of their use in the Thulamela Local
Municipality, Limpopo Province, South Africa. Scientic Research and
Essay. 2012;7(27):2363–2369.
6. Lowe S, Browne M, Boudjelas S, De Poorter M. 100 of the world’s
worst invasive alien species a selection from the global, invasive species
database. ISSG. 2000;6:1–11.
7. Crooks JA. Characterizing ecosystem–level consequences biological
invasions: the role of ecosystem engineers. OKIOS. 2002;97(2):153–166.
8. Esther Mwangi, Brent Swallow. Invasion of Prosopis juliora and local
livelihoods: Case study from the lake Baringo area of Kenya.. World
Agroforestry Centre, 2005;3:1–66.
9. Admasu Dubale. Invasive plants and food security: the case of Prosopis
juliora in the Afar Region of Ethiopia, IUCN, 2008;1–12.
10. Tamando Tana and Milberg P. Weed ora in arable elds of eastern
Ethiopia with emphasis on the occurrence of Parthenium hysterophorus
L. Weed Research. 2010;40(6):507–521.
11. Shetie Gatew. The Ecological Distribution and Socio–Economic impacts
of Prosopis juliora (Sw.) DC. in the Amibara Woreda, Afar National
Regional State. 2008.
12. David M Richardson, Pierre Binggeli, Gotz Schroth. Invasive agroforestry
trees: problems and solutions. 2003;15:371–396.
13. Kueffer C, Vos P Lavergne C, Mauremootoo J. Case Studies on the Status
of Invasive Woody Plant Species in the Western Indian Ocean, Synthesis.
Forestry Department, Food and Agriculture Organization. 2004.
14. Moyo HPM, Fatunbi AO. Utilitarian perspective of the invasion of
some South African biomes by Acacia mearnsii. Global Journal of
Environmental Research. 2010;4(1):6–17.
15. Sonya Afrin, Subarna Sharmin, Qazi Azizul Mowla, editors. The
environmental impact of alien invasive plant species in Bangladesh.
Proceedings of International Conference on Environmental Aspects of
Bangladesh; 2010 Sept Japan. ICEAB10; 2010.
16. Jama B and Zeila A. Agro forestry in the drylands of eastern Africa: a call
to action. ICRAF, World Agroforestry Centre. 2005:1–29.
17. Yibekal Abebe. Ecological and economic dimensions of the paradoxical
invasive species– Prosopis juliora and policy challenges in Ethiopia.
Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development. 2012;3(8):2222–
2855.
18. Adane Kebede Gebeyehu. The distributions of parthenium weed
(Parthenium hysterophorus L. Asteraceae) and some of its socio–
economic and ecological impacts in the Central Rift Valley, Adami Tulu–
Jido Kombolcha Woreda; Addis Ababa University; Ethiopia:Thesis; 2008.
19. Talemos Seta, Abreham Assefa, Fisseha Mesn, et al. Distribution status
and the impact of parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus L.) at
Gedeo Zone, Southern Ethiopia. African Journal of Agricultural Research,
2013;8(4):386–397.
20. UNEP (United Nations and Environmental Programme). Water hyacinth
– Can its aggressive invasion be controlled? Global environmental alert
service (GEAS). Taking the pulse of the planet. 2013;1–17.
21. Global Environment Facility (GEF). Removing Barriers to Invasive
Plant Management in Africa. Country Report on National Stakeholders
Workshop on Invasive Alien Species. August 17–18, 2002. Addis Ababa,
Ethiopia. 21
22. Rezene Fessehaie. Status of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes)
in Ethiopia: challenges and response. Inc: Proceedings of the second
national workshop on challenges and opportunities of water resources
management in Tana Basin, Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia, March 26
27, 2012. Blue Nile Water Institute–Bahir Dar University (BNWI–BDU),
pp. 159–166, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
23. Temitope Israel Borokini. Invasive alien plant species in Nigeria and their
effects on biodiversity conservation. Journal of Tropical Conservation
Science, 2011;4(1):103–110.
24. IBC (Institute of Biodiversity Conservation). National biodiversity
strategy and action plan. Retrieved from http://www.ibc.gov.et/
publications/all–publications.2005. 24
Invasive alien plant species in Ethiopia: ecological impacts on biodiversity a review paper 178
Copyright:
©2018 Shiferaw et al.
Citation: Shiferaw W, Demissew S, Bekele T. Invasive alien plant species in Ethiopia: ecological impacts on biodiversity a review paper. Int J Mol Biol Open Access.
2018;3(4):171178. DOI: 10.15406/ijmboa.2018.03.00072
25. Friis I Demissew S, Breugel PV. Atlas of potential vegetation of Ethiopia.
The Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters. Biologiske Skrifter.
2010;58:307.
26. Richard Beilfuss. Adaptive management of the invasive shrub Mimosa
pigra at Gorongosa National Park. Department of Scientic Services.
2007;1–19.
27. Greg Masters and Lindsey Norgrove. Climate change and invasive alien
species, CABI Position Paper. 2010;1–30.
28. Michelle C Mack, Carla MD Antonio. Impacts of biological invasions on
disturbance regimes. Trends Ecol Evol. 1998;13(5):195–198.
29. John F Obiri. Invasive plant species and their disaster–effects in dry
tropical forests and rangelands of Kenya and Tanzania. Journal of Disaster
Risk Studies. 2011;3(2).
30. Abiyot Berhanu, Getachew Tesfaye. The P. juliora dilemma, impact on
dry land biodiversity and some controlling methods. Journal of the Dry
Lands. 2006;1(2):158–164.
31. Pierre Binggeli, John B Hall, John R Healey. An overview of invasive
woody plants in the tropics. School of Agricultural and Forest Sciences.
1998;13.
32. Heather Charles, Jeffrey S Dukes. Impacts of invasive species on
ecosystem services. Ecological Studies, 2007;193:9–15.
33. Gnanavel L. Parthenium hysterophorus L: a major threat to natural and
agro–ecosystems in India. Science International, 2013;1(5):124–131.
34. Tamado Tana Ohlander L, Milberg P. Interference by the weed Parthenium
hysterophorus L. with grain sorghum: inuence of weed density and
duration of competition. International Journal of Pest Management.
2002;48(3):183–188.
35. Rezene Fessehaie, Taye Tessema. Alien plant species invasions in Ethiopia:
challenges and responses. International Workshop on Parthenium Weed in
Ethiopia, Addis Ababa.2014.
36. Abiyu Enyew and Nagappan R. Allelopathic effect of Lantana camara
L. leaf powder on germination and growth behavior of maize, Zea mays
Linn. and wheat, Triticum turgidum Linn. Cultivars. Asian Journal of
Agricultural Science. 2015;7(1):4–10.
37. Wakjira Mulatu, Berecha Gezahegn, Tulu Solomon. Allelopathic effects
of an invasive alien weed Parthenium hysterophorus L. compost on
lettuce germination and growth. African Journal of Agricultural Research.
2009;4(11):1325–1330.
38. Jyothi M, Vamsi J, Satish S. Lantana camara L: a review, International
Journal of Phytotherapy. 2012;2(2):66–73.
39. Shilashi Badasa, Tesfahun Bufebo, Tessema Derbe, et al. Physico–
chemical analysis of essential oil of Lantana camara L. leaf. World Journal
of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2013;3(10):1349–1357.
40. Kassahun Zewide. Host–specicity sytudy on the leaf feeding beetlle,
of Zygograma bicolorata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) for the control
of Parthenium hysterophorus in Ethiopia. International Workshop on
Parthenim Weed in Ethiopia; 2014;, Ethiopia Addis Ababa; 2014.
41. Mersie. Management of the weed Parthenium (Parthenium hysterophorus
L.) in Eastern and Southern Africa using integrated cultural and biological
measures. International Workshop on Parthenim Weed; 2014; Ethiopia;
Addis Ababa, 2014.
42. Sintu Alemayehu. Host–range study on the stem–boring weevil
(Listronotus setosipennis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) for the control of
Parthenium hysterophorus in Ethiopia. Inc: International Workshop on
Parthenium Weed in Ethiopia; 2014; Ethiopia; Addis Ababa, 2014.
43. Getachew Gebru Tegegn. Experiences on Prosopis juliora management:
The case of Afar Region, Ethiopia: Farm Africa; 2008. p. 1–35.
... Alien Invasive Species Invasive Species are native species that have been accidentally or purposely introduced, colonized, or invaded into an area outside of their natural habitats. As a result, they pose a threat to biological diversity, ecosystems, and human health [38] and [49]. Invasive alien plant species provide major challenges to Ethiopia's efforts to preserve its plant genetic resources [50]. ...
... Invasive alien species, which include genetic resources, are the primary cause of biodiversity and the second biggest threat to it after habitat loss [12]. Several well-known invasive plant species in Ethiopia include Prosopis juliflora, Lantana camara, Eichhornia crassipes, Parthenium hysteophorus and several Acacia species [49]. Plant genetic resources are essential for both sustainable agriculture and the world's food security [48]. ...
Article
Full-text available
According to the review, genetic resources are derived from native plant landraces and wild species. Material originating from plants is referred to as genetic resources. These genetic resources are very important for nutrition and the development of agricultural productivity. Cereals, pulses, oilseeds, and cash crops are a group of field crops grown in Ethiopia. The group of forest genetic resources includes plantations, forests, scrub, natural closed forests, and trees on farms. Ethiopia has rich plant genetic resources with its diverse agro-ecological region but faces several threats. In order to conserve plant genetic resources, the Ethiopian Biodiversity Institute uses a diverse strategy that includes gene banks, on-farm conservation, education, and policy lobbying. Genetic resources preserved by ex situ and in situ conservation. This review article was intended to discuss plant genetic resources, utilization, threats, and conservation strategies.
... Alien Invasive Species Invasive Species are native species that have been accidentally or purposely introduced, colonized, or invaded into an area outside of their natural habitats. As a result, they pose a threat to biological diversity, ecosystems, and human health [38] and [49]. Invasive alien plant species provide major challenges to Ethiopia's efforts to preserve its plant genetic resources [50]. ...
... Invasive alien species, which include genetic resources, are the primary cause of biodiversity and the second biggest threat to it after habitat loss [12]. Several well-known invasive plant species in Ethiopia include Prosopis juliflora, Lantana camara, Eichhornia crassipes, Parthenium hysteophorus and several Acacia species [49]. Plant genetic resources are essential for both sustainable agriculture and the world's food security [48]. ...
Article
According to the review, genetic resources are derived from native plant landraces and wild species. Material originating from plants is referred to as genetic resources. These genetic resources are very important for nutrition and the development of agricultural productivity. Cereals, pulses, oilseeds, and cash crops are a group of field crops grown in Ethiopia. The group of forest genetic resources includes plantations, forests, scrub, natural closed forests, and trees on farms. Ethiopia has rich plant genetic resources with its diverse agro-ecological region but faces several threats. In order to conserve plant genetic resources, the Ethiopian Biodiversity Institute uses a diverse strategy that includes gene banks, on-farm conservation, education, and policy lobbying. Genetic resources preserved by ex situ and in situ conservation. This review article was intended to discuss plant genetic resources, utilization, threats, and conservation strategies.
... Alien Invasive Species Invasive Species are native species that have been accidentally or purposely introduced, colonized, or invaded into an area outside of their natural habitats. As a result, they pose a threat to biological diversity, ecosystems, and human health [38] and [49]. Invasive alien plant species provide major challenges to Ethiopia's efforts to preserve its plant genetic resources [50]. ...
... Invasive alien species, which include genetic resources, are the primary cause of biodiversity and the second biggest threat to it after habitat loss [12]. Several well-known invasive plant species in Ethiopia include Prosopis juliflora, Lantana camara, Eichhornia crassipes, Parthenium hysteophorus and several Acacia species [49]. Plant genetic resources are essential for both sustainable agriculture and the world's food security [48]. ...
Article
According to the review, genetic resources are derived from native plant landraces and wild species. Material originating from plants is referred to as genetic resources. These genetic resources are very important for nutrition and the development of agricultural productivity. Cereals, pulses, oilseeds, and cash crops are a group of field crops grown in Ethiopia. The group of forest genetic resources includes plantations, forests, scrub, natural closed forests, and trees on farms. Ethiopia has rich plant genetic resources with its diverse agro-ecological region but faces several threats. In order to conserve plant genetic resources, the Ethiopian Biodiversity Institute uses a diverse strategy that includes gene banks, on-farm conservation, education, and policy lobbying. Genetic resources preserved by ex situ and in situ conservation. This review article was intended to discuss plant genetic resources, utilization, threats, and conservation strategies.
... Invasive Aliens Species (IASs) are of great concern in Ethiopia, posing specific problems on biodiversity of the country with great economic and ecological impacts. The extraordinary rise in the movement of wild species that goes parallel to the globalization of the economy has produced an enhancement of the rate of introduction of new alien species everywhere, with its harmful consequences on native biological diversity [12,15]. ...
... In Ethiopia, several invasive alien plant species are posing negative impacts on native biodiversity, agricultural lands, rangelands, national parks, waterways, lakes, rivers, etc. [9]. Currently, in Ethiopia, [15] [3]. These IAS pose a serious threat to agriculture (crop and livestock), livelihoods and human health at various levels [7]. ...
... In many countries, invasive alien species negatively impact regional floras and faunas, and their spread is attributed to climate change and human factors, especially trade and land use (Montagnani et al. 2022). Among reported impacts are changes in vegetation cover or even ecosystem functioning, causing soil erosion, change in their physical and chemical composition and irreversible desertification (Brooks et al. 2006), and resulting in the reduction of biological diversity Pyšek et al. 2012Pyšek et al. , 2020Shiferaw et al. 2018;IPBES 2023). ...
Article
Full-text available
We present the updated checklist of the alien flora of Mongolia, with information on species status, taxonomy, distribution, habitats, and economic use. In total, we recorded 154 taxa of alien plants, of which 33 are naturalized and 121 are casual. The alien flora belongs to 32 families, with Amaranthaceae, Fabaceae, and Brassicaceae containing most of the naturalized species and Asteraceae and Poaceae being the richest in casuals. Annuals (101 species) and perennials (27 species) are the most common life forms among the alien species of Mongolia, while woody and aquatic are only represented by two species and parasitic by one species. The majority of Mongolian alien plants originate from temperate Asia (81 species), Europe (72 species), and Africa (53 species). Alien species are restricted to a relatively narrow range of habitats, all heavily transformed by humans, with 42.2% of all species recorded in agricultural habitats. Regarding economic use, food plants dominate, while those used as fodder show the greatest naturalization success. The 29 most widespread naturalized alien species were recorded in all 22 provinces. Compared to other countries in temperate Asia, the Mongolian alien flora is relatively poor, which can be attributed to harsh climatic conditions and the country’s isolation in the past. Our study provides the first step toward a science-based approach to plant invasions by policymakers, authorities, and managers in Mongolia.
... The country has 188 ecosystems across various physiographic zones (Bhattacharjee et al. 2017;Paudel et al. 2012). Anthropogenic activities have significantly impacted the global environment, including climate change, habitat loss and fragmentation, unsustainable harvesting of natural resources, pollution, and the introduction of invasive alien plant species (IAP) (Shiferaw et al. 2018). Biological invasion, a well-established ecological concept, is one of the five primary effects of human activity on the global ecosystem (IPBES 2019). ...
Article
Full-text available
Recent research into assessing and combatting maize weeds was reviewed based on scientific and working reports from the year 2011 onwards in Ethiopia. This review paper covered two main topics: assessment of major weed types and their impacts, and research results of weed management in the maize cropping system of the country. More than 80 major weed floras dominated by broad leaved weeds were found infesting maize fields in different localities. By competing, toxifying and/or parasitizing maize plants, they reduce the crop germination, growth and productivity. Several experiments indicated that maize yield loss due to uncontrolled weed growth varied from 35 to 87.5%, indicating that weed management is a critical factor for maize production in the country. Hoeing, hand weeding and pre-emergence herbicides application have been the most frequently used weed control practices to minimize the competition effect of weeds. So far, there has been no effective and sustainable individual weed control method for maize fields. Thus, future research should focus on developing integrated weed management that effectively reduce weed infestation and associated impacts, and improve productivity of the crop considering socio-economic condition of a specific maize producing agro-ecology of the country.
Article
Full-text available
The water hyacinth is categorized among the world’s top ten worst invasive plant species of aquatic ecosystems. This study assessed changes in the spatiotemporal distributions of the water hyacinth in Lake Koka and Ziway of the Upper Awash River basin during the peak growth season of the plant. Household questionnaires and key informant interviews along with Landsat images for 2013, 2017, and 2021 were collected to identify the past, present, and future potential distributions of the invasive plant in the two lakes. Household surveys and key informant interviews were prepared using the Kobo Toolbox which monitors data collection online. A total number of 413 households were sampled and the data were analyzed through descriptive statistics. For Landsat images, a supervised classification technique was applied to classify the land use classes using the maximum likelihood algorithm. The survey results showed increased water hyacinth expansion in the area since the year 2011. The water hyacinth expansion affected 285 households’ livelihoods by invading 69.0% of their farmlands which caused 97.6% food scarcity in the study districts. The results of the Landsat image indicated that the water hyacinth invasion in Lake Koka occupied 1.48% in 2013, and this increased to 7.13% in 2021, while the water body decreased from 75.94 to 69.90%, respectively. However, the area of the other vegetation is nearly identical between the years 2013–2021. Likewise, water hyacinth covered 4.66% of Lake Ziway in 2013, and this was raised to 8.42% in 2021. At Lake Ziway water hyacinth invasion affected the area of other vegetation coverage as it decreased from 16.19 to 10.67% but the area of the water body remained almost the same during the years. Between 2013 and 2025, the amount of water hyacinths increased in both Lake Koka and Lake Ziway. According to LULC data, the water hyacinth's rate of spread was 0.56% in Lake Koka and 0.95% in Lake Ziway. The results of this study revealed the signals of LULC change due to water hyacinth invasion in the Upper Awash Basin which is considered an important aspect for future water resources planning and management.
Article
Full-text available
Ethiopia has diverse vegetation ecosystems and home to large number of flora, fauna and microbial species. These provide suitable ecosystem services for environmental and diverse economic outcomes. However, there are threats to socioeconomic and biodiversity by invasive alien plant species (IPS). They cause threats to biodiversity, economic and health problems in Ethiopia. This paper addresses the ecological impacts of IPS on biodiversity in the major types of ecosystems, examine the impacts on socioeconomic ; discuss mitigation measures of the IPS in Ethiopia. Some of these species include Prosopis juliflora, Parthenium hysterophorus, Eichhornia crassipes, Lantana camara and Acacia species, which are the major threats to biodiversity losses. Water bodies, wetlands, disturbed vegetation types (e.g. Acacia-Commiphora vegetation type), agro-ecosystems, road sides, urban green areas, range lands are under threat of IPS nowadays in the country. Results revealed that under P. juliflora thicket for instance, 96% of woody species were constituted by P. juliflora than the overall 3.9% of woody native plant species. Moreover, it was also found that number of cattle, sheep, goats and camels were reduced by 56.2%, 25.2%, 19.2% and 48.6%, respectively after the invasion of P. juliflora in South Afar region. To minimize and control such invasions, different strategies are being applied such as eradication by utilization of P. juliflora in Afar region for example, and mechanical control of P. hysterophorus in different parts of the country. For use of sustainable ecosystem services, strategies such as integrated management strategies, participation of all stockholders and multidisciplinary research approaches within and across countries should be designed to reverse the situations.
Article
Full-text available
Association (PAs) were purposefully selected along the high way. A total of 140 quadrats (1 m 2 area each) from 14 PAs were selected by using stratified random sampling for herbaceous vegetation data associated with parthenium. The plant species found in each quadrat were counted, recorded and identified. The data collected from farmers' perception on the impact of parthenium weed were analyzed by using descriptive statistics. Shannon Diversity Index, evenness, species richness and Jaccards Similarity Index to determine parthenium impact on species diversity were calculated from the vegetation data. To see correlation of vegetation variables among and between sample PAs, R.2.14.0 Package was used. This study revealed that high infestation level of parthenium weed is confined to Dilla administrative town as supported by 73% of the respondents. A total of 45 plant species under 20 families were recorded from this study. The sampled PAs in Dilla town showed high infestation level with lower diversity index. Thus, it is an urgent task to draw the attention of relevant responsible bodies and public in general for managing and preventing further introduction and dissemination of the weed in this study area.
Article
Full-text available
With very scanty information on invasive alien species (IAS) in Nigeria, this study was conducted to identify the invasive species in the field gene bank of the National Centre for Genetic Resources and Biotechnology (NACGRAB), Ibadan, Nigeria, on the latitude 7° 22' north of the equator and longitude 3° 50' east of the Greenwich Meridian, and also to assess the level of the species' disturbance to the conserved native plants in the protected area. This study involved sampling of the field gene bank and an on-site assessment and identification of the species and their effects on the indigenous plants established in the field for conservation. Twenty-five invasive plant species were identified, across 16 plant families, of which 14 were herbs, followed by vines, shrubs, and trees, all of which are presently estimated to occupy about 18% of the gene bank. The effects of IAS on the indigenous plants conserved in the field gene bank range from competition for space and nutrients and alteration of the tree canopies (thereby affecting the microclimatic conditions in the lower strata) to obstruction of the plants' reception of sunlight (which could thereby reduce the potential yield of the fruit trees in the gene bank. The paper also discusses the effects of IAS on biodiversity conservation in Nigeria. Human disturbance was observed as the major factor responsible for the spread of these IAS in the gene bank. The paper concludes by advocating stricter screening measures before introducing new plants into the country, capacity building on the early detection and management of IAS in protected areas for the technical staff, biological control, and exchange of technical information among concerned countries.
Article
Full-text available
Aim of the present study was to evaluate allelopathic effect of Lantana camara leaf powder on germination and growth behaviour of Zea mays and Triticum turgidum. The pot culture experiments were conducted at Botany laboratory, Tewodros campus, University of Gondar, Ethiopia from November 2012 to April 2013. The experimental design was Completely Randomized Block Design (CRBD) with three treatments and one control. The soil without adding L. camara leaf powder was considered as control (T0) and (T1), (T2) were mixed with 25, 50 and 75 g of L. camara leaf powder, respectively. The percentage of germination, root and shoot length, stem thickness and biomass were recorded from three replicates. Maximum germination percentage of wheat (96.60%) and maize (53.33%) was recorded at T1 and it was minimum (70%) in wheat and maize (43.33%) at 3 compared to control (100%). The germination index of wheat and maize was 5 cm and 1.9 cm, respectively at T1. The shoot and root length variation observed in wheat and maize was statistically significant (p
Article
Full-text available
A study on the impact of Prosopis juliflora, a multipurpose leguminous species introduced to Ethiopia, was carried out at Tendaho State farm, Alidegi and Afambo, North-east Ethiopia. The study focused on the assessment of the uses and negative impacts of Prosopis and the evaluation of mechanical control and prescribed burning. Various PRA (Participatory Rural Appraisal) techniques were employed to collect ethno-botanical information on uses of the species. Mechanical control was evaluated by observation of previously cleared (deforested) grazing areas and farms in Alidegi and Tendaho, respectively. Data on number of stems per plant were collected along two parallel line transects to investigate the coppicing ability of the species. Prescribed burning was evaluated for mature stands (3-4 yrs) and young stands (< 1.5 yr). The result showed that Prosopis is employed for firewood, charcoal, forage, fencing, windbreak and other purposes. Mechanical control (manual clearance and using bulldozers) was found to be effective followed by proper management systems. Besides, it was discovered that the number of stems from the stumped stands was significantly higher (P < 0.05). Prescribed burning was destructive for young stands, whereas mature stands were not killed. Generally, cutting individual plants may aggravate the invasion by Prosopis unless proper management such as repeated clearance is employed. Thus, proper management and control of the species is urgent using the control methods described above in cooperation with the local people. Otherwise, more areas could be invaded and tribal conflict for the remaining few grazing and farm areas free from Prosopis may turn into unexpected political crisis.
Article
Prosopis juliflora, a dry land tree or shrub, introduced in Ethiopia in the 1970's for land reclamation and windbreak has become a serious policy challenge. The species has replaced large areas of pasture lands and has grown to be a noxious weed in Ethiopia. It has had serious repercussions on the biodiversity of the area, and livelihood of pastoralists and agro-pastoralists. Despite the potential of the species for various uses, in Ethiopia Prosopis juliflora is only utilized for animal feed, fencing and charcoal at smaller scale. The conventional control methods are expensive and it could be argued that the utilization of the species is the best option to control the invasion for many invaded areas. There is an urgent need for identification and implementation of optimal strategies in Ethiopia which, however, seems very difficult given the absence of clear national policies and strategies in the management of invasive species.