Content uploaded by Vasudeva Iyer
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Vasudeva Iyer on Jun 22, 2021
Content may be subject to copyright.
Review Article
Volume 15 Issue 2 - May 2021
DOI: 10.19080/OAJNN.2021.15.555910
Open Access J Neurol Neurosurg
Copyright © All rights are reserved by Jonathan Wong Kee Chi
Role of Ultrasound in the EMG Lab
Vasudeva G Iyer*
Neurodiagnostic Center, Louisville, KY, USA
Submission: April 14, 2021; Published: May 20, 2021
*Corresponding author: Vasudeva G Iyer, Neurodiagnostic Center, Louisville, KY, USA
Open Access J Neurol Neurosurg 15(2): OAJNN.MS.ID.555910 (2021) 001
Review
During the past 10-15 years the use of ultrasound (US)
accelerated. Traditional Electrodiagnostic Tests (EDX) provide
insight into the location and pathophysiology of neuromuscular
disorders. However, EDX may not provide clues to the underlying
structural cause, which is more readily uncovered by imaging
studies like ultrasound and MR neurography. The advantages of
US are low cost, being painless and readily available at the point
of care. There have been suggestions that US can replace EDX
tunnel syndrome [1]. However, currently available US technology
cannot provide adequate information regarding the underlying
pathophysiology: demyelination, axon loss or both. EDX and US
complement each other effectively in providing comprehensive
data to respond to the practical question: Is the problem surgical
or non-surgical?.
While it is desirable to do US in every patient undergoing
EDX, in a busy clinical EDX facility, the amount of time the
electromyographer can devote to any given patient is not
unlimited; hence it may not be feasible to do US in every patient
undergoing EDX. This brings up the question as to how to identify
situations where EDX has to be complemented with US. We have
plays a crucial role in providing valuable information for diagnosis
and management. We will not be discussing the role of US in
nerve block, locating nerve/muscle for biopsy, and therapeutic
procedures like botulinum toxin injections in this review, but
concentrate upon the role of US in complementing EDX for more
precise diagnosis.
Situations where EDX fail to provide accurate
localization:
a.
action potential (CMAP) and Sensory Nerve Action Potentials
(SNAP) Typical examples are severe entrapment of median nerve
at the carpal tunnel and ulnar nerve at the elbow. Documentation
of increased Cross-Sectional Area (CSA) of median nerve at the
carpal tunnel inlet/outlet and normal CSA at the forearm serve
as reliable criteria to localize median neuropathy to the carpal
tunnel [2]. A typical feature is the hour glass appearance in long
axis views (Figures 1 A, 1 B). Similarly, severe ulnar neuropathies
increased CSA proximal to the site of entrapment (Figure 2 A, 2 B).
Extensor Digitorum Brevis (EDB) and tibialis anterior / peroneus
longus pose a similar challenge and US may provide the answer.
Figure 1 A: Right thenar atrophy (Arrow). No CMAP over APB or 2nd Lumbrical. No SNAP.
How to cite this article: Iyer VG. Role of Ultrasound in the EMG Lab. Open Access J Neurol Neurosurg 2021; 15(2): 555910.
DOI: 10.19080/OAJNN.2021.15.555910
002
Open Access Journal of Neurology & Neurosurgery
b. In cases of longstanding entrapment, in addition to
focal demyelination, there may be retrograde [4] and anterograde
demyelination leading to diffuse slowing of conduction; precise
localization may not be possible in such cases with EDX alone.
US is of great value in these situations by providing accurate
localization.
c. In cases of demyelinating polyneuropathy with diffuse
typical of entrapment can be helpful. Most common situation
is patients with diabetic polyneuropathy in whom additional
presence of carpal/cubital tunnel syndrome is suspected.
Figure 1B: Long axis view of R. Median nerve across the carpal tunnel showing hour glass constriction.
Figure 2 A: Short axis view at the elbow showing increase in CSA (29 mm2) of the R Ulnar nerve. No CMAP over FDI or ADM; no SNAP.
Figure 2 B: Short axis view at the elbow showing enlarged ulnar nerve (single arrow) and an adjacent cyst (double arrow). No CMAP over
FDI or ADM; no SNAP.
How to cite this article: Iyer VG. Role of Ultrasound in the EMG Lab. Open Access J Neurol Neurosurg 2021; 15(2): 555910.
DOI: 10.19080/OAJNN.2021.15.555910
003
Open Access Journal of Neurology & Neurosurgery
Figure 3: Long axis view mid forearm showing neurotmesis of ulnar nerve. The hypoechoic area is neuroma at the proximal stump of the
nerve. There is no fascicular continuity; the hyperechoic areas represent scar tissue. Laceration injury resulting in clawing of ngers; no
CMAP over the FDI or ADM with denervation of both muscles.
Negative EDX in patients with typical clinical picture of
carpal/cubital tunnel syndrome:
a. Patients with symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome
rarely show normal nerve conduction studies. There are a number
of publications which suggest that high frequency ultrasonography
may show abnormalities in such patients [5,6].
b. US has also been reported to be positive in patients with
ulnar neuropathy at the elbow, when EDX is negative [7].
Nerve injuries: EDX does not distinguish neurotmesis
from axonotmesis
Distinction between axonotmesis and neurotmesis is a crucial
piece of information for planning the ideal time for surgical
intervention is indicated. US can provide such information by
revealing area of discontinuity of the nerve in neurotmesis (Figure
3).
polyneuropathy (CIDP) from other polyneuropathies
This is highly important for prompt initiation of treatment
with intravenous immunoglobulin in patients with CIDP. Recent
studies have shown that sonographic enlargement of proximal
median nerve segments in the arms and brachial plexus is a
differentiating feature of CIDP [8]. In Charcot Marie Tooth (CMT)
disease, the nerve enlargement is more diffuse along the entire
Differentiation of multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN)
from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with predominant
lower motor neuron disease (ALS/LMND)
This distinction is important from prognostic and therapeutic
points of view; US can be more sensitive than EDX [10]. showing
multifocal ulnar and median nerve enlargement. There is also
a recent report of US detecting treatment-responsive chronic
neuropathies without EDX features of demyelination [11].
Role in neuralgic amyotrophy
(Parsonage Turner syndrome), MR neurography and US have
shown enlargement of peripheral nerve/fascicles and features of
nerve torsion or fascicular entwinement. In one study nerves with
complete constriction and rotational phenomena failed to show
an indication for surgical intervention [12].
Detection fasciculations
The needle electrode can pick up fasciculations from only
a limitedl area around it; also, it can be painful to have needle
inserted into structures like the tongue. US has the advantage
of visualizing fasciculations from a much wider area without
the pain involved in multiple needle insertions. Recent studies
have documented that US is much superior to EDX in detecting
fasciculations in patients with ALS [13].
Lesions in the proximity of nerves
The main question for preoperative planning are whether the
lesion is actually arising from the nerve and if not, anatomically
how close is it to the nerve. US provides immediate answers; it can
and also alert the surgeon to the potential for perioperative nerve
injury while removing lesions in close proximity to the nerve.
Muscle disorders
a. Distinction between muscular dystrophies and
substantiated using US [14].
How to cite this article: Iyer VG. Role of Ultrasound in the EMG Lab. Open Access J Neurol Neurosurg 2021; 15(2): 555910.
DOI: 10.19080/OAJNN.2021.15.555910
004
Open Access Journal of Neurology & Neurosurgery
b. While EDX suggests a myopathic disorder, US can point
to a more precise diagnosis, based on the topography of muscle
involvement. The classical example is sporadic inclusion body
There are many more situations where US can
contribute substantially to diagnosis
a. Dynamic US is useful to document mobility of median
nerve within the carpal tunnel and to document subluxation of the
ulnar nerve at the elbow.
b. Another major use is imaging of diaphragm for diagnosis
of phrenic nerve palsy; measurement of diaphragm thickness is
being used increasingly in ALS and myopathies [17].
c. Rarely the patient may not be able to tolerate electric
stimulation and needle study. This may particularly apply to
pediatric patients. US may provide an alternate route to reach the
diagnosis.
While it is ideal to perform ultrasound evaluation in every
patient referred for EDX studies, it may not be feasible in a busy
clinical EDX lab due to time constraints. It is important to have
guidelines that identify situations where additional use of US
can provide vital information that will help in the diagnosis and
management of patients. It is likely that in the future an increasing
percentage of patients seen for EDX will also undergo US, as the
disorders increase and as US technology advances with more
automated measurements.
References
1. Drakapoulos D, Mitsiokapa E, Karamanis E, Vasilios K, Andreas FM
(2019) Ultrasonography provides a diagnosis similar to that of nerve
conduction studies for carpal tunnel syndrome. Orthopedics 42(5):
e460-e464.
2. Iyer V (2019) Role of ultrasonography in severe distal median nerve
neuropathy. J Clin Neurophysiol 36(4): 312-315.
3. Iyer V (2021) Ultrasonography in distal ulnar nerve neuropathy:
Findings in 33 patients. J Clin Neurophysiol 38(2): 156-159.
4. Uchida Y, Sugioka Y (1992) Electrodiagnosis of retrograde changes
in carpal tunnel syndrome. Electromyography and Clinical
Neurophysiology 33(1): 55-58.
5. Williams J, Cartwright M (2016) Neuromuscular ultrasound in carpal
tunnel syndrome with normal nerve conduction studies P4.081.
Neurology 86 (16).
6. Roghani RS, Holisaz MT, Norouzi AAS, Ahmad Delbari, Faeze Gohari, et
al. (2018) Sensitivity of high-resolution ultrasonography in clinically
diagnosed carpal tunnel syndrome patients with hand pain and normal
nerve conduction studies. J Pain Res 11: 1319-1325.
7. Yoon JS, Walker FO, Cartwright M (2010) Ulnar neuropathy with
normal electrodiagnosis and abnormal nerve ultrasound. Arch Phys
Med Rehabil 91(2): 318-320.
8. Goede HS, Pol WL, Asseldonk JH, Franssen H, Nicolette CN, et al.
(2017) Diagnostic value of sonography in treatment-naïve chronic
9. Zanette G, Fabrizi GM, Taioli F, Matteo FL, Andrea B, et al. (2018) Nerve
1A from other demyelinating CMTs. Clin Neurophysiol 129(11): 2259-
2267.
10. Loewenbruck KF, Liesenberg J, Dittrich M, Jochen Schäfer, Beate
Patzner, et al. (2016) Nerve ultrasound in the differentiation of
multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
with predominant lower motor neuron disease (ALS/LMND). J Neurol
263(1): 35-44.
11. Goedee HS, HerraetsIJT, Visser LH, Hessel Franssen, Jan-Thies HA, et
al. (2019) Nerve ultrasound can identify treatment-responsive chronic
neuropathies without electrodiagnostic features of demyelination.
Muscle Nerve 60(4): 415-419.
12. ArAnyi Z, Csillik A, DeVay K, Maja Rosero, PéTer Barsi, etal. (2017)
Ultrasonography in neuralgic amyotrophy: Sensitivity, spectrum of
13. Duarte ML, Lared W, Oliveria ASB, Lucas Ribeiro Dos Santos, Maria
Stella Peccin, et al. (2020) Ultrasound versus electromyography for the
detection of fasciculation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: systematic
review and meta-analysis. Radiol Bras 53(2):116-121.
14. Albayda J, van Alfen N (2020) Diagnostic value of muscle ultrasound
for myopathies and myositis. Curr Rheumatol Rep 22(11): 82.
15. Noto Y, Shiga K, Tsuji Y, Masaki Kondo, Takahiko Tokuda, et al. (2014)
ulnaris: a diagnostic ultrasound pattern in sporadic inclusion body
myositis. Muscle Nerve 49(5): 745-748.
16. Leeuwenberg KE, van Alfen N, Stine LC, Julie J Paik, Eleni Tiniakou, et
al. (2020) Ultrasound can differentiate inclusion body myositis from
disease mimics. Muscle Nerve 61(6): 783-788.
17. Fayssoil A, Behin A, Ogna A, Dominique Mompoint, Helge Amthor, et
al. (2018) Diaphragm: Pathophysiology and ultrasound imaging in
neuromuscular disorders. J Neuromuscular Dis 5(1): 1-10.
How to cite this article: Iyer VG. Role of Ultrasound in the EMG Lab. Open Access J Neurol Neurosurg 2021; 15(2): 555910.
DOI: 10.19080/OAJNN.2021.15.555910
005
Open Access Journal of Neurology & Neurosurgery
Your next submission with Juniper Publishers
will reach you the below assets
• Quality Editorial service
• Swift Peer Review
• Reprints availability
• E-prints Service
• Manuscript Podcast for convenient understanding
• Global attainment for your research
• Manuscript accessibility in different formats
( Pdf, E-pub, Full Text, Audio)
• Unceasing customer service
Track the below URL for one-step submission
https://juniperpublishers.com/online-submission.php
This work is licensed under Creative
Commons Attribution 4.0 Licens
DOI: 10.19080/OAJNN.2021.15.555910