Content uploaded by Ulugbek Kayumov
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Ulugbek Kayumov on Jan 10, 2023
Content may be subject to copyright.
Available via license: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
How to Cite
Khidoyatova, M. R., Kayumov, U. K., Inoyatova, F. K., Fozilov, K. G., Khamidullaeva, G. A., & Eshpulatov, A. S. (2022).
Clinical status of patients with coronary artery disease post COVID-19. International Journal of Health & Medical
Sciences, 5(1), 137-144. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijhms.v5n1.1858
ISSN 2632-9433
Submitted: 27 December 2021|Revised: 18 January 202| Accepted: 05 February 2022 137
Clinical Status of Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Post
COVID-19
Mukhlisa Rakhmatillaevna Khidoyatova
Ph.D., Associate Professor of the Department of Functional Diagnostics of the Center for the Development of
Professional Qualifications of Medical Workers of the Ministry of Health of Uzbekistan
Corresponding author email: khidoyatova.m@mail.ru
Ulugbek Karimovich Kayumov
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Internal Diseases No. 1, Center for the
Development of Professional Qualifications of Medical Workers of the Ministry of Health of Uzbekistan
Email: kayumov.u@mail.ru
Feruza Khidoyatovna Inoyatova
Doctor of Biological Sciences, Professor of the Department of Medical and Biological Chemistry, Tashkent Medical
Academy
Email: firuza.inoyatova.49@mail.ru
Khurshid Gayratovich Fozilov
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Director of State Institution, Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical
Medical Center for Cardiology
Email: info@cardiocenter.uz
Gulnoz Abdusattarovna Khamidullaeva
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Deputy Director for Science, Head of the Department of Arterial
Hypertension of the Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center for Cardiology
Email: gulnoz0566@mail.ru
Aziz Sagdullaevich Eshpulatov
Head of the Department endovascular surgery of the Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center
for Cardiology
Email: dr.azizbek84@mail.ru
Abstract---The main goal of our study was to identify the activity of cardiac dysfunction based on the analysis of the
main cardiological methods of research, such as ECG, echocardiography, 24-hour ECG monitoring in conjunction
with laboratory parameters in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent mild and moderate
COVID-19, without signs of residual effects of lung tissue damage (fibrotization). 52 patients with coronary artery
disease were examined, which were divided into 2 groups depending on the past infection in history: 1 group without
COVID-19 in history (n=26) (based on history and results of SARS-CoV-2 antibody titer), 2 a group with a history of
COVID-19 (n=26), confirmed by relevant documents (tests), but without oxygen therapy and steroids, in order to
avoid the influence of a serious illness and drug exposure. Conclusions: dynamic monitoring of hemostasis
parameters after the hospital stage in patients with CAD should be carried out in order to prevent adverse
cardiovascular outcomes, even with a history of moderate and mild coronavirus infection. One of the aspects of
therapeutic rehabilitation in the post-COVID period in patients with IHD is the use of vitamin D preparations.
Keywords---artery disease, clinical status, COVID-19, lung tissue damage, SARS-CoV-2
138
Introduction
Data on the long-term results of COVID-19 treatment began to appear in the literature in the form of clinical cases
and in a small sample of patients, however, there is evidence of the development of adverse cardiovascular outcomes
after stopping an acute process in the midst of the COVID-19 clinic and during the rehabilitation period ( Akhmerov
& Marbán, 2020). One of the main reasons for the severe course of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and the
development of complications is also a violation of the hemostasis system (Raxmatillaevna & Karimovich, 2021).
Short and long-term prognosis remains an understudied aspect in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) who
have undergone COVID-19. There are enough studies in the literature that present the role of inflammatory
mediators in the pathogenesis of CVD (Lubrano & Balzan, 2015; Pasceri et al., 2000; Siti et al., 2015). A pro-
inflammatory effect of C-reactive protein (CRP) on the vascular wall has been shown, which increases the formation
of other inflammatory mediators, adhesion molecules on the endothelial surface (Lubrano & Balzan, 2015; Siti et al.,
2015). Under conditions of SARS-CoV-2 infection, the level of CRP closely correlates with the severity of the
course, the volume of affected lung tissue according to computed tomography (CT), progression, and prognosis of
COVID-19 (Chikina et al., 2020). The extent to which these changes are expressed in the post-COVID period in
patients with CVD is also a topical issue.
In patients with CVD, special vigilance should be exercised against the background of COVID-19 infection,
paying equal attention not only to the treatment of the infection but also to the control of risk factors for
cardiovascular disease. CVD patients with COVID-19 are at high risk of destabilization due to a combination of
stressors, systemic infection, and inflammation. Early studies have shown that people with comorbid conditions such
as hypertension, diabetes mellitus suffer increased morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 (Chen et al., 2020;
Wang et al., 2020). At the same time, mortality from COVID-19 increases up to five times in people with CVD (Wu
& McGoogan, 2020). Clinical and laboratory symptoms of heart damage are detected with COVID-19 quite often;
some patients reported chest pain and palpitations even in the absence of typical respiratory symptoms (Shchikota et
al., 2020). All this requires maximum cardiological vigilance in the treatment of patients with COVID-19, long-term
observation, and timely use of various diagnostic methods in order to prevent early and late cardiovascular
complications (CVC).
Materials and Methods
The study was conducted on the basis of the Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Center for Cardiology.
52 patients with coronary artery disease were examined, which were divided into 2 groups depending on the past
infection in history: 1 group without COVID-19 in history (n=26) (based on history and results of SARS-CoV-2
antibody titer), 2 a group with a history of COVID-19 (n=26), confirmed by relevant documents (tests), but without
oxygen therapy and steroids, in order to avoid the influence of a serious illness and drug exposure (Sattar et al., 2020;
Todurov et al., 2021). The main goal of our study was to identify the activity of cardiac dysfunction based on the
analysis of the main cardiological research methods, since electrocardiography (ECG), echocardiography
(ECHOCG), 24-hour ECG monitoring in conjunction with laboratory parameters in patients with coronary artery
disease who underwent mild and moderate COVID-19, without signs of residual effects of lung tissue damage
(fibrotization). The period from the acute period of COVID-19 ranged from 2 weeks to 3 months. All subjects had
anginal pain, accompanied by dynamic ECG changes, and there were no manifestations of respiratory failure. The
exclusion criterion was a history of diabetes mellitus.
In order to identify the features of the course of coronary artery disease in the examined, an analysis of the
clinical status was carried out, including the main indicators of ECG and hemodynamics (Table 1)
Table 1
Clinical status of CAD patients with and without COVID-19 in history
Indicators
1 group (n=26)
2 group (n=26)
p
M
m
M
m
Age, years
60,15
1,64
58,42
1,68
0,464
BMI
27,12
0,60
30,61
0,81
0,001*
Obesity experience (years)
10,94
0,67
12,35
0,99
0,247
AG experience (years)
7,78
0,65
9,70
0,87
0,084
CVD experience (years)
6,32
0,79
7,92
1,03
0,223
139
SpO2, %
96,04
0,26
95,85
0,25
0,596
SBP, mmHg
131,15
4,24
130,77
4,61
0,951
DBP, mmHg
83,08
1,82
82,31
1,50
0,746
HR on ECG
71,27
2,45
73,08
2,74
0,625
P, ms
0,10
0,00
0,10
0,00
1,000
P-Q, ms
0,15
0,00
0,16
0,00
0,611
QTs, ms
0,35
0,01
0,37
0,01
0,005*
Note: *-significance of differences, p<0.05
Abbreviations: BMI-body mass index; AG-arterial hypertension; CVD-cardiovascular disease; SBP-systolic blood
pressure; DBP - diastolic blood pressure, HR - heart rate.
In the age aspect, the patients of the studied groups did not differ. The mean age was 60.15±1.64 & 58.42±1.68 years
in the 1st and 2nd groups, respectively. As can be seen from the table, a significant difference was noted in the body
mass index, which was higher in patients with a history of coronavirus infection. When deciphering the main ECG
parameters, lengthening of the corrected Q-T interval (Q-Tc) was noted in patients of group 2, although the average
values of this interval were within the reference value (Heusch et al., 2014; Mitrani et al., 2020). Cardiological
characteristics of patients are presented in Table 2. In both groups, more than 80% had a history of arterial
hypertension, however, at the time of admission, high levels of SBP and DBP were recorded in single patients. The
average levels of SBP and DBP in the examined groups did not differ (Table 1), although a more detailed analysis
showed that in patients who had a moderate course of COVID-19, the minimum level of SBP was 140 mm Hg.
Table 2
Cardiac characteristics of patients
Parameter n/%
1 group (n=26)
2 group (n=26)
р
AMI / with Q wave/ without Q wave
6 (23,1%) / 2(7,7%) / 4 (15,4%)
1 (3,8%)/-/ 1(3,8%)
0,009*
History of stenting
2 (7,7%)
1 (3,8%)
>0,05*
Cardiac arrhythmias, according to ECG
9 (34,6%)
3 (11,5%)
0,001*
Note: *-significance of differences p<0.05
Abbreviations: AMI-acute myocardial infarction
6 patients (23.1%) who had undergone COVID-19 were hospitalized with the diagnosis of AMI, in group 1 (without
COVID-19) only in one case AMI was registered. When evaluating the main indicators of ECHOCG, no significant
differences were found in the studied groups (Table 3). We can only note a trend towards a decrease in SV in
patients who underwent COVID-19 (n.d.).
Table 3
EchoCG parameters in the studied groups
Parameters
1 group (n=26)
2 group (n=26)
M
m
M
m
p
BSA
1,97
0,03
1,98
0,03
0,904
TPWLV sm
1,00
0,02
0,98
0,02
0,325
TIVS mm
1,02
0,02
1,01
0,02
0,750
MMLV, g
188,57
7,26
187,27
7,63
0,902
IMMLV, g/sm2
95,98
3,71
93,15
3,46
0,579
SV, ml
66,88
2,32
63,26
3,17
0,360
EF, %
59,17
0,77
58,89
1,16
0,840
EDS LV, sm
5,01
0,09
5,05
0,10
0,728
EDV LV, ml
109,50
6,55
109,04
6,77
0,961
IEDV LV
55,30
3,12
54,51
3,04
0,858
ESI LV, sm
3,55
0,11
3,56
0,12
0,959
ESV, ml
45,71
4,12
46,10
4,22
0,947
LA, sm width
3,46
0,09
3,46
0,09
1,000
LA, sm length
4,62
0,09
4,52
0,10
0,479
140
Square
16,13
0,72
15,79
0,74
0,744
Ao, sm
3,10
0,12
3,11
0,12
0,982
RWT LV, unit
0,41
0,01
0,40
0,01
0,517
RV ave.
2,75
0,08
2,73
0,08
0,894
RV base
3,26
0,07
3,25
0,07
0,970
RA sm width
3,18
0,07
3,22
0,07
0,737
RA sm length
4,39
0,07
4,37
0,07
0,831
Wave E [m/s]
0,66
0,03
0,66
0,04
0,963
Wave A [m/s]
0,78
0,03
0,76
0,03
0,724
Е/А
0,87
0,06
0,91
0,06
0,709
SP PA
25,50
1,46
24,31
1,51
0,572
Abbreviations: BSA - body surface area; TPWLV-thickness of the posterior wall of the left ventricle; TIVS-
thickness of the interventricular septum; MMLV - mass of the myocardium of the left ventricle; IMMLV - MMLV
index; SV - stroke volume; EF - ejection fraction; EDS LV- end-diastolic size of the left ventricle; EDV - end-
diastolic volume; IEDV - end-diastolic volume index; ESI – end systolic size index; ESV - end systolic volume; LA -
left atrium; Ao - aorta; RWT - relative wall thickness; RV- right ventricle; RA- right atrium; SP PA - systolic
pressure in the pulmonary artery.
More convincing differences in cardiological parameters between the groups were obtained by us in a detailed
analysis of the data of 24-hour ECG monitoring and heart rate variability. Supraventricular arrhythmias, in the form
of supraventricular extrasystoles and running supraventricular tachycardias, were more frequent manifestations of
arrhythmia in patients with COVID-19 than in patients without a history of COVID-19 (80.7% vs. 46.0%, p<0.05 ),
as well as ventricular arrhythmias, in the form of ventricular extrasystoles in the second group (42.3%) versus 15.3%,
(p<0.05). Analysis of the diurnal dynamics of QTs (Figure 1) showed higher values of the minimum (413 vs. 381 ms,
p<0.01), mean (457 vs. p<0.01) in patients of group 2, compared with group 1. Hourly analysis showed that group 2
patients had consistently longer QTs values than group 1 throughout the day (Thomas et al., 1988; Allen et al.,
1978).
Figure 1. Average QTs parameters in examined patients based on the results of daily ECG monitoring
In patients after coronavirus infection, hyperactivation of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) was observed,
expressed in an increase in LF/HF up to 2.8 rel. units, against the background of a decrease in the activity of the
parasympathetic nervous system (PSNS) (decrease in SDNNi to 38.6 ms, p<0,01) with a persistent disruption of
circadian interactions of these parts of the autonomic nervous system, manifested in an increase in sympathetic
influences on the heart rhythm and an insufficient increase in PSNS activity at night (CI LF/HF 1.1 rel. units) (Table
4). The low circadian index (CI) in the second group may have been due to the fact that patients after coronavirus
infection experienced hyperactivation of the SNS at night (Scoccia et al., 2021; Angeli et al., 2021)
.
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
1 group
2 group
141
Table 4
Indicators of heart rate variability in the examined patients
Parameters
1 group (n=26)
2 group (n=26)
SDNNi, ms
45,2±0,97
38,6±0,85*
LF/HF
2,1
2,8*
CI LF/HF
1,6
1,1*
Note: *- significance of differences p<0.05
Abbreviation: LF/HF - Low Frequency/High Frequency ratio, CI - circadian index
Analysis of hemostasis parameters in the patients with coronary artery disease examined by us revealed a significant
difference in the PTI rate of 93.8% versus 97.5% in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p=0.041) (Table 5).
Table 5
Indicators of the hemostasis system and acute-phase blood proteins
Show
1 group (n=26)
2 group (n=26)
М
m
М
m
р
APTT sec. - [23,4-36,2]
26,94
0,41
26,96
0,38
0,968
INR - [0,85-1,15]
1,04
0,02
1,04
0,01
0,910
Fibrinogen g/l - [1,8-3,5]
2,53
0,08
2,75
0,11
0,124
PTI % - [70-100]
93,78
1,34
97,52
1,17
0,041*
PTR sec. - [13-18]
13,92
0,17
13,89
0,14
0,903
Prothrombin ratio [0,9-1,3]
1,02
0,01
1,02
0,01
0,872
CRP mg/l - [до 5,0-(отр.)]
2,61
0,12
4,08
0,31
0,000*
Note: [norm]; *-significance of differences p<0.05
Abbreviations: APTT-activated partial thrombin time; INR - international normalized ratio; PTI - prothrombin index;
PTR - prothrombin ratio; CRP - C-reactive protein
It should be noted that in patients with increased body weight, a shortening of the PTT by more than 12.7%
correlated with a higher level of functioning of the sympathetic nervous system (LF/HF>2.1 rel.u) according to the
data of daily ECG monitoring. In addition, patients with an increase in daily LF/HF>2.1 relative units had higher (by
15.2%) hematocrit values. An inflammation marker, CRP, showed significant differences between the study groups,
its concentration in group 2 was almost 1.5 times higher than in patients without a history of COVID-19 (p=0.000).
In patients who recovered from COVID-19, indicators of ALT, AST, uric acid (p>0.1, n.d.), glomerular filtration rate
(GFR), and total bilirubin (p>0.1, n.d.) had only an upward trend, but the level of total protein was statistically
significant (p<0.001). Meanwhile, the levels of urea and creatinine in the blood serum also showed a slight
difference between the study groups (p>0.1, n.d.) (Figure 2).
142
Figure 2. Biochemical parameters of the examined groups
*-significance of differences p<0.05
The level of vitamin D was significantly reduced in patients of group 2 (p=0.000). We found an inverse relationship
between the level of vitamin D and the postponed period of COVID-19, i.e. the longer the period from the height of
the disease, the higher the level of vitamin D in the blood, although it would be logical to assume lower levels in the
initial periods of the post-COVID period.
Discussion
The obtained changes in the hemostasis system confirm the concept of the relationship between inflammation and
thrombosis, the so-called “immunothrombosis”, associated with an increase in the activation of the blood coagulation
system, against the background of severe inflammation in the midst of COVID-19 and during the decline in the
activity of the process (Yavelov & Drapkina, 2020). What “dictates” further monitoring of hemostasis parameters in
patients who have undergone COVID-19 in the long-term period. The concentration of CRP in patients with a
history of COVID-19 was almost 1.5 times higher than in patients without a history of COVID-19 (p = 0.000), which
indicates the presence of a persistent long-term residual inflammatory process even with moderate and mild
coronavirus infection.
According to the results of daily ECG monitoring, the low circadian index (CI) in the second group may have
been due to the fact that patients after coronavirus infection experienced hyperactivation of the SNS at night.
COVID-19 leads to changes in hemostasis and contributes to hyperactivation of the SNS, a "vicious circle" is
created, and both processes exacerbate each other. As a result, the thrombotic process and the risk of cardiovascular
events increase. The severity of the process was associated with overweight, which may be the reason for frequent
CVCs in this category of people with COVID-19. The revealed changes in vitamin D values can be explained by low
levels of vitamin D in the acute period of the disease, as a result of infection, and a tendency to increase in the post-
COVID period as a result of the restoration of the immune system. The foregoing dictates the need for the use of
vitamin D preparations during the rehabilitation period (Gupta et al., 2021; Jang et al., 1994; Hussin et al., 2021).
Conclusions
Dynamic monitoring of hemostasis parameters after the hospital stage in patients with CAD should be carried
out in order to prevent adverse cardiovascular outcomes, even with a history of moderate and mild
coronavirus infection.
One of the aspects of therapeutic rehabilitation in the post-COVID period in patients with CAD is the use of
vitamin D preparations.
22.1
21.7
8.1
72,0
6.5
78.7
83.5
27.50
22.00
8.53
46,0*
6.62
79.58
85.43
020 40 60 80 100
ALT, U/l
AST, U/l
total bilirubin, µmol/l
total protein, mmol/l
urea, mmol/l
creatinine, µmol/l
GFR ml/min/1,73 m2
2 group 1 group
143
References
Akhmerov, A., & Marbán, E. (2020). COVID-19 and the heart. Circulation research, 126(10), 1443-1455.
Allen, R. H., Stinson, E. B., Oyer, P. E., & Shumway, N. E. (1978). Predictive variables in reoperation for coronary
artery disease. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 75(2), 186-192.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(19)41285-3
Angeli, F., Marazzato, J., Verdecchia, P., Balestrino, A., Bruschi, C., Ceriana, P., ... & Bachetti, T. (2021). Joint
effect of heart failure and coronary artery disease on the risk of death during hospitalization for COVID-
19. European Journal of Internal Medicine, 89, 81-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2021.04.007
Chen, N., Zhou, M., Dong, X., Qu, J., Gong, F., Han, Y., ... & Zhang, L. (2020). Epidemiological and clinical
characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. The
lancet, 395(10223), 507-513.
Chikina, S. Y., Brovko, M. Y., Royuk, V. V., & Avdeev, S. N. (2020). An unusual course of COVID-19 infection
with late increase in C-reactive protein (clinical case reports). Pulmonologiya, 30(5), 709-714.
Gupta, Y. S., Finkelstein, M., Manna, S., Toussie, D., Bernheim, A., Little, B. P., ... & Hota, P. (2021). Coronary
artery calcification in COVID-19 patients: an imaging biomarker for adverse clinical outcomes. Clinical
imaging, 77, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.02.016
Heusch, G., Libby, P., Gersh, B., Yellon, D., Böhm, M., Lopaschuk, G., & Opie, L. (2014). Cardiovascular
remodelling in coronary artery disease and heart failure. The Lancet, 383(9932), 1933-1943.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60107-0
Hussin, D. A., Samah, M. A. A., Suhaimi, A. A., & Kamarudin, M. K. A. (2021). A study on knowledge, attitude
and practice of COVID-19 pandemic among the residents. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(2), 177-
188. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijhs.v5n2.1378
Jang, Y., Lincoff, A. M., Plow, E. F., & Topol, E. J. (1994). Cell adhesion molecules in coronary artery
disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 24(7), 1591-1601. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-
1097(94)90162-7
Lubrano, V., & Balzan, S. (2015). Consolidated and emerging inflammatory markers in coronary artery
disease. World journal of experimental medicine, 5(1), 21.
Mitrani, R. D., Dabas, N., & Goldberger, J. J. (2020). COVID-19 cardiac injury: Implications for long-term
surveillance and outcomes in survivors. Heart rhythm, 17(11), 1984-1990.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.06.026
Pasceri, V., Willerson, J. T., & Yeh, E. T. (2000). Direct proinflammatory effect of C-reactive protein on human
endothelial cells. Circulation, 102(18), 2165-2168.
Raxmatillaevna, K. M., & Karimovich, K. U. (2021). The Relationship between the Degree of Lung Damage and
Indicators of the Hemostasis System in Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases against the Background of
COVID-19. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 6111-6117.
Sattar, Y., Ullah, W., Rauf, H., Yadav, S., Chowdhury, M., Connerney, M., ... & Alraies, M. C. (2020). COVID-19
cardiovascular epidemiology, cellular pathogenesis, clinical manifestations and management. IJC Heart &
Vasculature, 29, 100589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100589
Scoccia, A., Gallone, G., Cereda, A., Palmisano, A., Vignale, D., Leone, R., ... & Toselli, M. (2021). Impact of
clinical and subclinical coronary artery disease as assessed by coronary artery calcium in COVID-
19. Atherosclerosis, 328, 136-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2021.03.041
Shchikota, A. M., Pogonchenkova, I. V., Turova, E. A., & Rassulova, M. A. (2020). Cardiac rehabilitation during the
COVID-19 pandemic: a review of the literature. Doctor. Ru , 19 (11), 6-11.
Siti, H. N., Kamisah, Y., & Kamsiah, J. J. V. P. (2015). The role of oxidative stress, antioxidants and vascular
inflammation in cardiovascular disease (a review). Vascular pharmacology, 71, 40-56.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vph.2015.03.005
Thomas, E. S., Most, A. S., & Williams, D. O. (1988). Coronary angioplasty for patients with multivessel coronary
artery disease: follow-up clinical status. American Heart Journal, 115(1), 8-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-
8703(88)90511-X
Todurov, B., Bitsadze, A., & Shorikova, D. (2021). Early postoperative complications in patients with acute
myocardial infarction during emergency coronary bypassing. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(3), 550-
564. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5n3.2381
Wang, D., Hu, B., Hu, C., Zhu, F., Liu, X., Zhang, J., ... & Peng, Z. (2020). Clinical characteristics of 138
hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus–infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. Jama, 323(11), 1061-
1069.
144
Wu, Z., & McGoogan, J. M. (2020). Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019
(COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72 314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease
Control and Prevention. jama, 323(13), 1239-1242.
Yavelov, I. S., & Drapkina, O. M. (2020). COVID-19: Hemostatic parameters and specifics of antithrombotic
treatment. Cardiovascular therapy and prevention, 19(3), 2571.