ArticlePDF Available

Abdominal cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES)

Authors:
  • Faculty Of Health Care Sciences Eastern University Sri Lanka

Abstract and Figures

Abdominal cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome is caused by entrapment of an intercostal nerve in a fibrous ring in the rectus abdominis muscle and causes neuropathic pain. It remains an overlooked cause of chronic abdominal wall pain. Carnett’s test is useful to make a diagnosis. An injection of local anaesthetic and corticosteroid combination relieves pain and it is both diagnostic and treatment. This review article describes its pathophysiology, clinical diagnosis and its management. The databases Medline, and Google Scholar were searched using the terms chronic abdominal pain in general, surgical and gynaecological practice. Database were merged and duplicates were removed. The aim of the review is to update the knowledge on this topic in day to day clinical practice.
Content may be subject to copyright.
- 22 - Jana Medical Journal
Review Article
Abstract
Abdominal cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome
is caused by entrapment of an intercostal nerve in
a brous ring in the rectus abdominis muscle and
causes neuropathic pain. It remains an overlooked
cause of chronic abdominal wall pain. Carnett’s
test is useful to make a diagnosis. An injection of
local anaesthetic and corticosteroid combination
relieves pain and it is both diagnostic and treatment.
This review article describes its pathophysiology,
clinical diagnosis and its management. The
databases Medline, and Google Scholar were
searched using the terms chronic abdominal pain
in general, surgical and gynaecological practice.
Database were merged and duplicates were
removed. The aim of the review is to update the
knowledge on this topic in day to day clinical
practice
Introduction
The chronic abdominal pain gives anxiety and
loss of work and economy to both to patients and
health care system. Therefore, it demands several
investigations and management modalities. The
dierential diagnoses of chronic abdominal pain
are intra-abdominal disorders such as irritable
bowel syndrome, spastic colon, and gastritis. When
a correct diagnosis is not arrived, they are given
a psychiatric diagnosis such as psychoneurosis,
depression, anxiety, hysteria and malingering.
There is an under recognized and underappreciated
cause of chronic abdominal pain, called abdominal
cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES).
If a patient presents with chronic abdominal pain
and no diagnosis is arrived, ACNES should be
considered as a most probable diagnosis. (1, 2)
Epidemiology
It is estimated that incidence of ACNES is 1 in
1800. Further, it is seen in up to 30% of the patients
with chronic abdominal pain who had negative
results of prior diagnostic work up. (2)
The peak incidence of the condition is seen among
the age group of 30-50 years and it is reported
in 12% of pediatric outpatients with chronic
abdominal pain.
Pathophysiology of ACNES
The anterior abdominal wall receives its sensory
supply via the anterior and lateral cutaneous
branches of the anterior rami of the 7th–12th
thoracic nerves.
The infrasternal area is supplied by the T7; the
umbilicus is by T10; the suprapubic are by T12 and
L1 by the iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal nerve
(Figure 1).
Figure 1: The anterior abdominal wall
ABDOMINAL CUTANEOUS NERVE ENTRAPMENT SYNDROME (ACNES)
Markandu Thirukumar1; Thambawita H.R 2
1 Department of clinical sciences, FHCS, Eastern University
2Teaching Hospital Batticaloa
Corresponding Author : Markandu Thirukumar, dr.thiru10@yahoo.com, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8499-7175
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author and source are credited
DOI: http://doi.org/10.4038/jmj.v31i1.62
Vol.31, No.1, July 2019 - 2 3 -
The cutaneous sensory nerves and vascular bundles
lie in the plane between the internal oblique
and transverses abdominis muscles [figure 2].
They supply the skin after passing towards the
posterior wall of the rectus sheath and through the
neurovascular channel in the rectus muscle.
Figure 2: Anatomy of thoraco abdominal nerves.
These neurovascular channels freely mobile
within a brous ring in the rectus muscle [gure
3]. Entrapment and mechanical irritation occur
when they change the direction to enter a brous or
osseo-brous tunnel or when passes over a brous
or muscular band. (3)
Figure 3: The course of the sensory nerves of the
anterior abdominal wall.
Fibrous ring is the most susceptible for entrapment
and a site of nerve compression and ischaemia
which produces the symptoms of ACNES. Nerve
traction and compression is also caused by rectus
muscle contraction.
Localised swelling due to the irritation may
directly injure the nerve or compromise the nerve’s
circulation. Valleix phenomenon explains that the
tenderness of the main nerve trunk may be found
proximally or distally to the affected portion.
Proximal tenderness may result from vascular
spasm or from unnatural traction on the nerve trunk
against the point of entrapment. In ACNES, all
these mechanisms can be at work. (4)
Clinical presentation
Patients often present with abdominal wall pain
mainly at the right side lateral edge of the rectus
abdominis muscle, but can be in multiple locations.
Also the pain radiates to the aected dermatome.
It is sharply localized to a small (<2cm) area of that
is always felt in the same place and is usually dull
or stabbing type. There are features of neuropathic
pain such as retrograde radiation (Valleix
phenomenon) due to entrapment neuropathy.
The pain gets aggravated when the patient lies on
the aected side or sits. Tight clothing, sneezing,
coughing, laughing, and physical exercise are other
aggravating factors. Even though patients often do
not feel “sick,” their quality of life can be impaired.
Pain is felt horizontally in the upper abdomen and
more oblique in the lower abdomen due to the course
of nerves responsible for ACNES in these regions.
When the radiation occurs only with movement, it
suggests the entrapment within the muscle. When
the cutaneous nerve branches entrapped in scar
tissue following abdominal surgeries, the direction
of pain radiation shows the dermatomal distribution
of the particular nerve entrapped.
There are recognized risk factors for ACNES; such
as previous laparotomy and laparoscopic surgery
and rectus muscle strengthening exercises. In
addition, obesity, pregnancy and oral contraceptive
use are also other risk factors for ACNES.
Physical examination
The physical examination is performed when the
patient is in supine position and it is important to
arrive at a diagnosis of ACNES. Pain is exactly
localized with a ngertip at the linea semilunaris,
i.e., the lateral border of the rectus abdominis
muscle in most of the patients.
- 24 - Jana Medical Journal
Carnett’s test
When pressing on the point of greatest pain with the
nger tip, the pain gets worsened when the anterior
abdominal wall is being contracted (Positive
Carnett’s test). But pain does not always become
worse during the examination.
When the pain originates from the abdominal
viscera, pain is less marked during the examination
(Negative Carnett’s test). Adequate voluntary
contraction of the anterior abdominal musculature
is essential for the proper examination.
Neurovascular channel is constricted when the
rectus muscle contracts and worsens the symptoms
of neuropathy. Abdominal hernias, abdominal wall
haematomas, and rib tip syndrome also produce
positive Carnett’s sign on examination. (5)
Pressure over the nerve at the anterior openings in
the rectus sheath will cause pain (Positive Hover
sign).
Hypaesthesia, hyperalgesia, or allodynia around
the area of pain also supports a diagnosis of ACNES
and it has been reported by 75% of the patients with
ACNES. (6)
The “pinch test” is useful if the origin of the site of
the pain is not identied. This test is picking up the
patient’s skin with the subcutaneous fat between
the thumb and index nger, rst on one side of the
midline of the abdomen and then on the other side.
The patient will state whether one side hurts more
than the other. Cotton and pinprick technique can
be used to check for hypoesthesia or hyperesthesia
around the pain site. (7)
Management
Health education about ACNES and the rectus
muscle stretching exercises should be given to
all patients. Though the ecacies of non-specic
pharmacological therapies are unclear, heat or cold
application, abdominal binders and transcutaneous
electrical nerve stimulation are useful.
For instance, paracetamol, non-steroid anti-
inammatory, anti-convulsant, anti-depressants,
topical treatments such as 5% lidocaine plasters,
and capsaicin cream and opioids.
Recommended Treatment for ACNES
First line therapy is generally injection of local
anaesthetic and corticosteroid combination
which relieves pain and reduce the herniation
of neurovascular bundle through the ring. A
local injection of an anesthetic agent completely
relieves the pain. The combine injection is the most
commonly used one to treat ACNES. And it is both
diagnostic and treatment.
0.5 to 1 ml of 2% Lidocaine is used and the length
of needle varies according to the thickness of
subcutaneous tissue. Usually 21 G or 22 G is used.
Spinal may be needed sometimes to reach the
injection point. (8)
Technique for inserting the needle
There are many techniques to identify the
landmark for injection. Palpation with fingers,
nerve stimulator to identify the nerve and ultra
sound guided injection. Ultrasound-guided local
anaesthetic injection is increasingly recommended
nowadays in the literature and it gives the median
duration of pain relief of 12 weeks. (9)
There are palpable depressions on the lateral
edge of the rectus muscle and this is the point of
injection where the needle is introduced through
skin, subcutaneous tissue, aponeurosis and to the
fatty plug surrounds the neurovascular bundle when
emerging from the brous channel.
When passing through the tissues, aponeurosis and
the fatty plug produce resistant to the needle and the
needle should not be inserted deeper than this level
as this will further increase the pressure within the
bro muscular channel.
The tip of the needle should be placed in front of
the brous ring just beneath the aponeurosis, and
the examiner should make sure the position of the
needle before the injection by pulling out the needle
into the subcutaneous tissue to insert again.
The injection is best given in patient standing and
Vol.31, No.1, July 2019 - 2 5 -
bearing down position. But can be given in lying
position if the patient is comfortable.
Position the needle with middle nger of one hand
in the aponeurotic opening and use the other hand
for cleaning the area with alcohol and inserting the
needle above the tip of the nger. The other hand
should not be taken o until the needle is being
situated in correct position and use the same hand
to stabilize the needle while injecting the drugs.
Patient should be explained not to breathe during
the injection.
Neuromodulation using pulse radiofrequency
lesion has been attempted prolong the pain relief.
There is an inflicting a second nerve injury
resulting with these injection procedures a small
but signicant risk. Surgical options are available
for ACNES. Suggest surgical neurectomy for
ACNES, but the long-term outcome is yet to be
known. (10, 11)
1. References
1. Suleiman S, Johnston DE. The abdominal
wall: an overlooked source of pain. Am Fam
Physician 2001 Aug1;64(3):431-8.
2. ApplegateWV. Abdominal cutaneous
nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES): a
commonly overlooked cause of abdominal
pain. Perm J 2002; 6: 20–7.
3. Kopell HP, ThompsonWA. Peripheral
Entrapment Neuropathies. Malabar,
FL:Robert E. Kreiger Publishing, 1976;
1–7, 85–8.
4. Srinivasan R, Greenbaum DS. Chronic
abdominal wall pain: a frequently
overlooked problem. Practical approach
to diagnosis and management. Am J
Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 824–30.
5. Hershfield NB. The abdominal wall. A
frequently overlooked source of abdominal
pain. J Clin Gastroenterol 1992; 14: 199–
202.
6. Boelens OBA, Scheltinga MR, Houterman
S, Roumen RM. Randomised clinical trial
of trigger point inltration with lidocaine
to diagnose anterior cutaneous nerve
entrapment syndrome. Br J Surg 2013;
100:217–21.
7. Knockaert DC, Boonen AL, Bruyninckx FL,
Bobbaers HJ.Electromyographic ndings
in ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve
8. Koop H, Koprdova S, Schürmann C:
Chronic abdominal wall pain—a poorly
recognized clinical problem. Dtsch Arztebl
Int 2016; 113: 51–7. DOI: 10.3238/
arztebl.2016.0051.
9. Kanakarajan S, High K, Nagaraja R. Chronic
abdominal wall pain and ultrasound-guided
abdominal cutaneous nerve inltration: a
case series.
Pain Med 2011; 12: 382–6.
10. Boelens OBA, van Assen T, Houterman
S, Scheltinga MR, Roumen RM. A double-
blind, randomized, controlled trial on
surgery for chronic abdominal pain due to
anterior.
11. Zganjer M, Bojic D, Bumci I. Surgery for
abdominal wall pain caused by cutaneous
nerve entrapment in children—a single
institution experience in the last 5 years.
Iran Red Crescent Med J 2013; 15: 157–
60.
Article
We investigated the diagnostic value of electromyographic (EMG) examination of the anterior abdominal wall muscles (AWMS) in thoracic radiculopathy and compared it with examination of thoracic paraspinal muscles (TPSM). Technically, examination of AWMS was much easier compared to TPSM. In eight patients with thoracic diabetic radiculopathy at the level of T7-T12, AWMS was abnormal in all and was considered to be diagnostic, whereas AWMS was normal in diabetic lumbar radiculopathy, patients with diabetes mellitus without radiculopathy, patients with unspecified gastrointestinal pain, and patients with musculoskeletal-type back pain. We conclude that EMG evaluation for possible thoracic radiculopathy should include examination of AWMS, and if abnormal, would be of great diagnostic help in patients with unspecified gastrointestinal symptoms.
Article
The long‐term effects of a locally applied depot form of a corticosteroid on the electrical properties and structure of nerves were investigated in an animal experimental model. The conduction in electrically stimulated A‐fibres of the plantar nerve was monitored by a bipolar volley recording of the sciatic nerve whereas the conduction in C‐fibres of the plantar nerve was measured through a C‐fibre evoked segmental flexion reflex in the anaesthetized rat. Droplets of either methylprednisolone acetate or vehicle were placed under direct observation on the plantar nerve. Saline was used as a control on the contralateral side. One to two weeks after the application both the A‐fibre volley of the sciatic nerve and the C‐fibre evoked reflex discharge of flexor motoneurons were recorded. No difference was found between the nerves treated with corticosteroid, constituent vehicle or saline. Light and electron microscopic analysis of the nerves showed no changes in the nerve fibres or in the intraneural connective tissue in either the corticosteroid treated or the control nerves. It is concluded that locally applied corticosteroids in limited amounts have no long‐term effects on the electrical and structural properties of peripheral nerves.
Article
Perineural administration of corticosteroids is frequently applied in the treatment of a variety of chronic pain conditions. Methylprednisolone selectively inhibits the transmission of nerve impulses in C-fibers whereas A-fiber activity is unaffected. In the present study the effect of a mixture of 0.05 ml of methyprednisolone (40 mg/ml) and 0.05 ml of bupivacaine (5 mg/ml) was compared to that of 0.05 ml bupivacaine (5 mg/ml) using a plantar nerve block model in the rat. The conduction of impulses in electrically stimulated A-fibers of the plantar nerve was monitored by a bipolar volley recording from the sciatic nerve. Impulse conduction in electrically stimulated C-fibers was studied through a C-fiber evoked segmental flexion reflex. The function of both the A-fibers and the C-fibers exposed to the methylprednisolone-bupivacaine mixture showed a less profound block with signs of earlier recovery than those exposed to plain bupivacaine. The A-fibers recovered somewhat faster than the C-fibers. It is postulated that methylprednisolone adjuvant to bupivacaine affects the intra-axonal uptake of bupivacaine in C-fibers but not in A-fibers by some unknown mechanism. The effect seems to be longer lasting in C-fibers than in A-fibers.
Article
Full-text available
Chronic abdominal pain (CAP) is a serious medical condition which needs to be approached with great attention. Chronic abdominal pain may be caused by entrapment of cutaneous branches of intercostal nerves (ACNES). The aim of this study is the surgery for abdominal wall pain which caused by cutaneous nerve entrapment in children during last 5 years. In all children with ACNES, we tried conservative treatment with anesthetic and steroid injections. In children who were refractory to conservative treatment, we received surgical procedure like sectioning the entrapped nerve to obtain relief. In 12 pediatric patients with chronic abdominal pain, we diagnosed ACNES. Each presented with abdominal pain and a positive Carnett sign. Local nerve blocks using anesthetic and steroid injections are the treatment. In all patients, we tried with local nerve block. In 3 patients, pain improvement occurs in the few minutes, and they were without pain after 5 days. In other 4 patients required a reinjection for pain recurrence. In one patients pain was gone. The maximum reinjection was 3. In other 5 patients, we did operative treatment like sectioning the entrapped nerve. Some children with CAP have ACNES. In all children with ACNES, we recommended local nerve blocks. If the local block in 3 times is not helping, neurectomy of the peripheral nerve is method of choice.
Article
Background: Chronic abdominal wall pain is a poorly recognized clinical problem despite being an important element in the differential diagnosis of abdominal pain. Methods: This review is based on pertinent articles that were retrieved by a selective search in PubMed and EMBASE employing the terms "abdominal wall pain" and "cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome," as well as on the authors' clinical experience. Results: In 2% to 3% of patients with chronic abdominal pain, the pain arises from the abdominal wall; in patients with previously diagnosed chronic abdominal pain who have no demonstrable pathological abnormality, this likelihood can rise as high as 30% . There have only been a small number of clinical trials of treatment for this condition. The diagnosis is made on clinical grounds, with the aid of Carnett's test. The characteristic clinical feature is strictly localized pain in the anterior abdominal wall, which is often mischaracterized as a "functional" complaint. In one study, injection of local anesthesia combined with steroids into the painful area was found to relieve pain for 4 weeks in 95% of patients. The injection of lidocaine alone brought about improvement in 83-91% of patients. Long-term pain relief ensued after a single lidocaine injection in 20-30% of patients, after repeated injections in 40-50% , and after combined lidocaine and steroid injections in up to 80% . Pain that persists despite these treatments can be treated with surgery (neurectomy). Conclusion: Chronic abdominal wall pain is easily diagnosed on physical examination and can often be rapidly treated. Any physician treating patients with abdominal pain should be aware of this condition. Further comparative treatment trials will be needed before a validated treatment algorithm can be established.
Article
Objective: To clarify the role of a surgical neurectomy on pain in refractory patients after conservatively treated anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES). Background: ACNES is hardly ever considered in the differential diagnosis of chronic abdominal pain. Treatment is usually conservative. However, symptoms are often recalcitrant. Methods: Patients older than 18 years with a diagnosis of ACNES were randomized to undergo a neurectomy or a sham procedure via an open surgical procedure in day care. Both the patient and the principal investigator were blinded to the nature of surgery. Pain was recorded using a visual analog scale (1-100 mm) and a verbal rating scale (score 0-5; 0 = no pain, 5 = severe pain) before surgery and 6 weeks postoperatively. A reduction of at least 50% in the visual analog scale score and/or 2 points on the verbal rating scale was considered a "successful response." Results: Forty-four patients were randomized between August 2008 and December 2010 (39 women, median age = 42 years; both groups, n = 22). In the neurectomy group, 16 patients reported a successful pain response. In contrast, significant pain reduction was obtained in 4 patients in the sham group (P = 0.001). Complications associated with surgery were hematoma (n = 5, conservative treatment), infection (antibiotic and drainage, n = 1), and worsened pain (n = 1). Conclusions: Neurectomy of the intercostal nerve endings at the level of the abdominal wall is an effective surgical procedure for pain reduction in ACNES patients who failed to respond to a conservative regimen.
Article
Background: Anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES) is hardly considered in the differential diagnosis of chronic abdominal pain. Some even doubt the existence of such a syndrome and attribute reported successful treatment results to a placebo effect. The objective was to clarify the role of local anaesthetic injection in diagnosing ACNES. The hypothesis was that pain attenuation following lidocaine injection would be greater than that after saline injection. Methods: Patients aged over 18 years with suspected ACNES were randomized to receive an injection of 10 ml 1 per cent lidocaine or saline into the point of maximal abdominal wall pain just beneath the anterior fascia of the rectus abdominis muscle. Pain was recorded using a visual analogue scale (VAS; 1-100 mm) and a verbal rating scale (VRS; 0, no pain; 4, severe pain) during physical examination just before and 15-20 min after injection. A reduction of at least 50 per cent on the VAS and/or 2 points on the VRS was considered a successful response. Results: Between August 2008 and December 2010, 48 patients were randomized equally (7 men and 41 women, median age 47 years). Four patients in the saline group reported a successful response compared with 13 in the lidocaine group (P = 0·007). Conclusion: Entrapped branches of intercostal nerves may contribute to the clinical picture in some patients with chronic abdominal pain. Pain reduction following local infiltration in these patients was based on an anaesthetic mechanism and not on a placebo or a mechanical (volume) effect. Registration number: NTR2016 (Nederlands Trial Register; http://www.trialregister.nl).
Article
Chronic abdominal wall pain occurs in about 10-30% of patients presenting with chronic abdominal pain. Entrapment of abdominal cutaneous nerves at the lateral border of the rectus abdominis muscle has been attributed as a cause of abdominal wall pain. We report our experience of treating such patients using ultrasound-guided abdominal cutaneous nerve infiltration. We conducted a retrospective audit of abdominal cutaneous nerve infiltration performed in the period between September 2008 to August 2009 in our center. All patients had received local anesthetic and steroid injection under ultrasound guidance. The response to the infiltration was evaluated in the post-procedure telephone review as well as in the follow-up clinic. Brief pain inventory (BPI) and numerical rating scale pain scores were collated from two points: the initial outpatient clinic and the follow up clinic up to 5 months following the injection. Nine patients had abdominal cutaneous nerve injections under ultrasound guidance in the period under review. Six patients reported 50% pain relief or more (responders) while three patients did not. Pain and BPI scores showed a decreasing trend in responders. The median duration of follow-up was 12 weeks. Ultrasound can reliably be used for infiltration of the abdominal cutaneous nerves. This will improve the safety as well as diagnostic utility of the procedure.
Article
Here, I review various conditions from my practice as a consultant gastroenterologist that present with abdominal pain in which the cause of the pain is the result of abdominal wall conditions, or disorders that affect the nerves to the abdominal wall. The diagnosis of abdominal wall pain can be made by careful history and physical examination, thus eliminating numerous unnecessary and sometimes dangerous invasive procedures and tests.
Article
The ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve entrapment syndrome is a recognised cause of, usually chronic, lower abdominal pain. Diagnosis is based upon a typical clinical triad and relief of pain by injection of a local anaesthetic. In the present study we assessed the value of abdominal muscle electromyography in 41 patients with a clinical syndrome suggestive of ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve entrapment. Electromyographic abnormalities were detected in 15 of 25 cases (60%) with definite diagnosis and in 6 of 16 (37%) of those with probable diagnosis of ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve entrapment syndrome. The rather low sensitivity and the clinical value of this technique are discussed.
Article
When abdominal pain is chronic and unremitting, with minimal or no relationship to eating or bowel function but often a relationship to posture (i.e., lying, sitting, standing), the abdominal wall should be suspected as the source of pain. Frequently, a localized, tender trigger point can be identified, although the pain may radiate over a diffuse area of the abdomen. If tenderness is unchanged or increased when abdominal muscles are tensed (positive Carnett's sign), the abdominal wall is the likely origin of pain. Most commonly, abdominal wall pain is related to cutaneous nerve root irritation or myofascial irritation. The pain can also result from structural conditions, such as localized endometriosis or rectus sheath hematoma, or from incisional or other abdominal wall hernias. If hernia or structural disease is excluded, injection of a local anesthetic with or without a corticosteroid into the pain trigger point can be diagnostic and therapeutic.