... No. of commodities/stocks/indices taken as sample for international and Indian studies (see online version for colours) Figure 7 shows the number of commodities/stock/commodity indices considered for each paper as sample data. The results that were drawn from Table 8 are that out of 84 international studies, 73 studies covered the number of commodities that lies between 0-5 (Baklaci et al., 2016;Chan et al., 2004;Zhong et al., 2004) and 6-10 (Bampinas and Panagiotidis, 2015;Cartwright and Riabko, 2015;Cavaliere et al., 2015;Chang et al., 2016;Dhineshni and Dhandayuthapani, 2016;Ganneval, 2016;Kang and Yoon, 2016;Kavussanos and Nomikos, 2003;Khalfaoui et al., 2015;Khoury and Yourongov, 1993;Lyocsa and Molnar, 2016;Mattos and Garcia, 2004;Peri et al., 2013;Todorova et al., 2014;Vasantha and Mallikarjunappa, 2015;Xu and Fung, 2005;Zhang and Wei, 2010) relative frequencies. For the remaining 11 international studies, the number of commodities lie between the 11-15 (Arouri et al., 2012;Azizan et al., 2007;Bhar and Hamori, 2005;Boonyanuphong and Sriboonchitta, 2014;Figuerola-Ferretti and Gonzalo, 2010;Fortenbery and Zapata, 1993;Hernandez et al., 2014;Karbuz and Jumah, 1995;Mensi et al., 2013;Moosa, 2002), 16-20 (Arouri et al., 2012;Azizan et al., 2007;Bhar and Hamori, 2005;Boonyanuphong and Sriboonchitta, 2014;Figuerola-Ferretti and Gonzalo, 2010;Fortenbery and Zapata, 1993;Hernandez et al., 2014;Karbuz and Jumah, 1995;Mensi et al., 2013;Moosa, 2002), 21-25 (Dimpfl et al., 2017;Nazlioglu et al., 2012;Tully and Lucey, 2007), 26-30 (Antonakakis and Kizys, 2015;Belgacem et al., 2015;Jia et al., 2015) and 31-35 (Krehbiel and Adkins, 1993). ...