ArticlePDF Available

Catalogue of invasive flora of India

Authors:

Abstract

The present study deals with comprehensive list of invasive alien species in the flora of India with background information on family, habit and nativity. Total 173 invasive alien species belonging to 117 genera under 44 families were documented. It was prepared based on history, species origin, species behavior and field observations. Literature and websites were consulted extensively for relevant publications. Almost 80% of the species were introduced from neotropics. Tropical America (74%) and Tropical Africa (11%) contribute maximum proportion to the invasive alien flora of India. Habit wise analysis shows herbaceous species share 151 species, followed by shrubs (14), climbers (5) and trees (3). A better planning is needed for early detection and reporting of infestations of spread of new and naturalized weeds to monitor and control. [Life Science Journal. 2008; 5(2): 84 – 89] (ISSN: 1097 – 8135).
Reddy, Catalogue of invasive alien ora of India
Catalogue of invasive alien ora of India
C. Sudhakar Reddy*
Forestry and Ecology Division, National Remote Sensing Agency, Balanagar, Hyderabad 500037, India
Received March 6, 2008
Abstract
The present study deals with comprehensive list of invasive alien species in the ora of India with background informa-
tion on family, habit and nativity. Total 173 invasive alien species belonging to 117 genera under 44 families were docu-
mented. It was prepared based on history, species origin, species behavior and eld observations. Literature and websites
were consulted extensively for relevant publications. Almost 80% of the species were introduced from neotropics. Tropi-
cal America (74%) and Tropical Africa (11%) contribute maximum proportion to the invasive alien ora of India. Habit
wise analysis shows herbaceous species share 151 species, followed by shrubs (14), climbers (5) and trees (3). A better
planning is needed for early detection and reporting of infestations of spread of new and naturalized weeds to monitor and
control. [Life Science Journal. 2008; 5(2): 84 – 89] (ISSN: 1097 – 8135).
Keywords: invasion; alien; nativity; list; India
1 Introduction
Convention for Biological Diversity (1992) visualize
“biological invasion of alien species as the second worst
threat after habitat destruction”. Biological invasions may
be considered as a form of biological pollution and sig-
nicant component on human-caused global environmen-
tal change and one of the major causes of species extinc-
tion. The opportunity of accidental introductions will may
become more with rapidly increasing global commerce
(Mooney and Drake, 1987; Drake et al, 1989).
Despite the recent recognition of the impacts caused by
invasive plants worldwide (Mooney and Hobbs, 2000),
there are still many regions in the world where basic
information on naturalized plant taxa and plant inva-
sions is only anecdotal or completely lacking, e.g. Asia
and neighboring regions (Corlett, 1988; Enmoto, 1999;
Meyer, 2000). Establishment of a database of naturalized
species is the rst step in the development of invasion bi-
ology, and will also serve as a stepping-stone for further
detailed studies on the biology and impact of individual
species (Wu et al, 2004).
Naturalization has been recognized as the rst phase of
biological invasions. A naturalized species is dened as
an introduced (non-native, exotic, alien) species, that can
consistently reproduce and sustain populations over many
generations without (or despite) direct intervention by hu-
mans (Richardson et al, 2000; Pyšek et al, 2002). After
successful local establishment, some naturalized species
disperse and produce viable offspring in areas distant
from the sites of introduction. Such naturalized species
are called invasive (Richardson et al, 2000). Many inva-
sive plant species cause economic and/or environmental
damage, and referred to as alien pests or weeds (Richard-
son et al, 2000).
2 Materials and Methods
India has a characteristic geographic location at the
junction of the three major biogeographic realms, namely
the Indo-Malayan, the Eurasian and the Afro-tropical (6º
45' to 37º 6' latitude and 68º 7' to 97º 25' E longitude)
with a land frontier of about 15,200 km and a coastline
of 7,516 km. It is the seventh largest country in the world
and the second largest in Asia. It is considered to be one
of the twelve centers of origin and diversity of several
plant species in the world. India is an important center of
*Corresponding author. Tel: 040-23884219; Email: csreddy_nrsa@rediff-
mail.com; drsudhakarreddy@gmail.com
84
Reddy, Catalogue of invasive alien ora of India
agri-biodiversity having contributed 167 species to the
world agriculture and homeland for 320 species of wild
relatives of crops. India accounts for 8 % of the global
biodiversity existing in only 2.4% land area of the world.
The number of angiospermous species of India are 17000
(Hajra & Mudgal, 1997).
The ora of India shows close afnity with the ora
of Indo-Malayan and Indo-Chinese region. At present
5400 (32%) species are endemic to India. 35% of Indian
flora has south-east Asian and Malayan, 8% temperate,
1% steppe, 2% African, and 5% Mediterranean-Iranian
elements (Nayar, 1977). Still there is information gap on
exact number of naturalized alien/exotic species in India.
The number of such species may be around 2000.
In India, comprehensive studies on invasive species
and plant invasions are still missing. In view of this, the
present study attempted to focus on the invasive alien
species in the flora of India. This first list of invasive
exotic species in India will serve as a base for future re-
search on biological invasions in this country.
The present study was conducted during 2003 – 2007,
to compile a comprehensive list of invasive alien plant
species. The challenge is recognizing which introduced
species incur ecological and economic costs and which
simply becomes part of India’s tropical/subtropical/tem-
perate landscape and cause no real harm. It is very dif-
cult to choose exotic species, from all over the country,
that really are invasive or worse than any others.
After an extensive review of literature on global in-
vasive species (Mooney and Drake, 1987; Heywood,
1989; Cox, 1999; Cox, 2004; Cracraft and Francesca,
1999; D'Antonio and Vitousek, 1992; Drake et al, 1989;
Randall et al, 1997; Huxel, 1999; Jenkins, 1999; Londs-
dale, 1999; Mooney, 1999; Elton, 2000; Mooney and
Hobbs, 2000; Almeilla and Freitas, 2001; Cowie, 2001;
McNeely et al, 2001) and of India and their spread based
on history, species origin, species behavior and eld ob-
servations, a list of 173 species of invasive aliens was
prepared. The websites were also examined extensively
for background information.
The nativity of the species is provided based on Mat-
thew, 1969; Maheswari and Paul, 1975; Nayar, 1977;
Sharma, 1984; Hajra and Das, 1982; Saxena, 1991; Pan-
dey and Parmar, 1994; Reddy et al, 2000; Reddy & Raju,
2002; Reddy & Reddy, 2004; Murthy et al, 2007; Negi
and Hajra, 2007.
3 Results
The study brought to light catalogue of invasive alien
species in India. Total 173 species in 117 genera and un-
der 44 families were documented as invasive alien plant
species, representing 1% of the Indian ora. The 173 in-
vasive alien species were shown along with family name,
habit and nativity in Table 1.
Tropical America (with 128 species) region contribute
the greatest to the number (74%) followed by tropical Af-
rica (11%). The other regions, which contribute minority,
are Afghanistan, Australia, Brazil, East Indies, Europe,
Madagascar, Mascarene Islands, Mediterranean, Mexico,
Peru, Temperate South America, Trop. West Asia, West
Indies and Western Europe.
Habit wise analysis shows that herbs with 151 species
(87.3%) predominate followed by shrubs (14), climbers
(5) and trees (3). Of the 44 families, Asteraceae is the
most dominant family with 33 species followed by Pa-
pilionaceae (15), Convolvulaceae (10), Caesalpiniaceae
(9), Solanaceae (9), Amaranthaceae (8), Poaceae (8), Eu-
phorbiaceae (7), Mimosacceae (6) and Tiliaceae (5). The
top ten families contribute 110 species with proportion
of 63.6%. The 17 families represent one species each,
i.e. Apocynaceae, Araceae, Arecaceae, Balsaminaceae,
Cactaceae, Liliaceae, Melastomataceae, Nyctaginaceae,
Oxalidaceae, Papaveraceae, Passifloraceae, Piperaceae,
Polygonaceae, Rubiaceae, Salviniaceae, Typhaceae and
Urticaceae.
4 Discussion
While a number of lists of invasive plant species are
in worldwide circulation, criteria used in these listings
often are not documented clearly. Surveys have shown
that more than half of exotic plant species currently
spreading naturally were intentionally introduced, and
that most of the exotic species that endanger India’s na-
tive ecosystems were first introduced for horticultural
purposes. Thus reducing the intentional use of high-risk
exotic plants could reduce the spread and impact of inva-
sive plants in the country.
All these species reported here, were reported as
weeds in other countries or invasive alien plants in most
of the regions. Almost 80% of the invasive alien plant
species were introduced from Neotropics.
The invasive alien species are ready colonizers in
disturbed areas and cause considerable ecological dam-
age to India’s natural areas, speed the disappearance
of threatened and endemic species, reduce the carrying
capacity of pastures, increase the maintenance costs of
croplands, and interfere with our enjoyment of the out-
doors. Of these, some species may have invaded only a
85
Life Science Journal, Vol 5, No 2, 2008 http://lsj.zzu.edu.cn
86
Sl.
no. Species Family Habit Nativity
1Acacia farnesiana
(L.) Willd.
Mimosacceae Tree Trop. South
America
2Acacia mearnsii De
Wild.
Mimosacceae Tree South east
Australia
3Acanthospermum
hispidum DC.
Asteraceae Herb Brazil
4Aerva javanica
(Burm.f.) Juss.ex
Schult.
Amaranthaceae Herb Trop. America
5Aeschynomene
americana L.
Papilionaceae Herb Trop. America
6Ageratina
adenophora (Spreng.)
King & Robinson
Asteraceae Herb Trop. America
7Ageratum conyzoides
L.
Asteraceae Herb Trop. America
8Ageratum
houstonianum Mill.
Asteraceae Herb Trop. America
9Alternanthera
paronychioides A. St.
Hil
Amaranthaceae Herb Trop. America
10 Alternanthera
philoxeroides (Mart.)
Griseb.
Amaranthaceae Herb Trop. America
11 Alternanthera
pungens Kunth
Amaranthaceae Herb Trop. America
12 Alternanthera tenella
Colla
Amaranthaceae Herb Trop. America
13 Antigonon leptopus
Hook. & Arn.
Polygonaceae Climber Trop. America
14 Argemone mexicana
L.
Papaveraceae Herb Trop. Central &
South America
15 Asclepias curassavica
L.
Asclepiadaceae Herb Trop. America
16 Asphodelus
tenuifolius Cav.
Liliaceae Herb Trop. America
17 Bidens pilosa L. Asteraceae Herb Trop. America
18 Blainvillea acmella
(L.) Philipson
Asteraceae Herb Trop. America
19 Blumea erianthaDC. Asteraceae Herb Trop. America
20 Blumea lacera (Burm.
f.) DC.
Asteraceae Herb Trop. America
21 Blumea obliqua (L.)
Druce
Asteraceae Herb Trop. America
22 Borassus abellifer L. Arecaceae Tree Trop. Africa
23 Calotropis gigantea
(L.) R.Br.
Asclepiadaceae Shrub Trop. Africa
24 Calotropis procera
(Ait.) R. Br.
Asclepiadaceae Shrub Trop. Africa
25 Cardamine hirsuta L. Brassicaceae Herb Trop. America
26 Cardamine
trichocarpa Hochst.
ex A. Rich.
Brassicaceae Herb Trop. America
27 Cassia absus L. Caesalpiniaceae Herb Trop. America
28 Cassia alata L. Caesalpiniaceae Shrub West Indies
29 Cassia hirsuta L. Caesalpiniaceae Herb Trop. America
30 Cassia obtusifolia L. Caesalpiniaceae Herb Trop. America
Sl.
no. Species Family Habit Nativity
31 Cassia occidentalis L. Caesalpiniaceae Herb Trop. South
America
32 Cassia pumila Lam. Caesalpiniaceae Herb Trop. America
33 Cassia rotundifolia
Pers.
Caesalpiniaceae Herb Trop. South
America
34 Cassia tora L. Caesalpiniaceae Herb Trop. South
America
35 Cassia uniora Mill. Caesalpiniaceae Herb Trop. South
America
36 Catharanthus pusillus
(Murray) Don
Apocynaceae Herb Trop. America
37 Celosia argentea L. Amaranthaceae Herb Trop. Africa
38 Chamaesyce hirta
(L.) Millsp.
Euphorbiaceae Herb Trop. America
39 Chamaesyce indica
(Lam.) Croizat
Euphorbiaceae Herb Trop. South
America
40 Chloris barbata Sw. Poaceae Herb Trop. America
41 Chromolaena odorata
(L.) King & Robinson
Asteraceae Herb Trop. America
42 Chrozophora rottleri
(Geis.) Spreng.
Euphorbiaceae Herb Trop. Africa
43 Cleome gynandra L. Cleomaceae Herb Trop. America
44 Cleome monophylla
L.
Cleomaceae Herb Trop. Africa
45 Cleome rutidosperma
DC.
Cleomaceae Herb Trop. America
46 Cleome viscosa L. Cleomaceae Herb Trop. America
47 Clidemia hirta (L.) D.
Don
Melastomataceae Herb Trop. America
48 Conyza bipinnatida
Wall.
Asteraceae Herb Trop. America
49 Corchorus aestuans
L.
Tiliaceae Herb Trop. America
50 Corchorus
fascicularis Lam.
Tiliaceae Herb Trop. America
51 Corchorus tridens L. Tiliaceae Herb Trop. Africa
52 Corchorus
trilocularis L.
Tiliaceae Herb Trop. Africa
53 Crassocephalum
crepidioides (Benth.)
Moore
Asteraceae Herb Trop. America
54 Crotalaria pallida
Dryand
Papilionaceae Herb Trop. America
55 Crotalaria retusa L. Papilionaceae Herb Trop. America
56 Croton
bonplandianum Boil.
Euphorbiaceae Herb Temperate
South America
57 Cryptostegia
grandiora R.Br.
Asclepiadaceae Herb Madagascar
58 Cuscuta chinensis
Lam.
Cuscutaceae Herb Mediterranean
59 Cuscuta reexa Roxb. Cuscutaceae Herb Mediterranean
60 Cyperus difformis L. Cyperaceae Herb Trop. America
61 Cyperus iria L. Cyperaceae Herb Trop. America
62 Cytisus scoparius (L.)
Link
Papilionaceae Herb Europe
63 Datura innoxia Mill. Solanaceae Shrub Trop. America
64 Datura metel L. Solanaceae Shrub Trop. America
Table 1. List of invasive alien plant species in India
Reddy, Catalogue of invasive alien ora of India
Sl.
no. Species Family Habit Nativity
65 Dicoma tomentosa
Cass.
Asteraceae Herb Trop. Africa
66 Digera muricata (L.)
Mart.
Amaranthaceae Herb SW Asia
67 Dinebra retroexa
(Vahl) Panz.
Poaceae Herb Trop. America
68 Echinochloa colona
(L.) Link
Poaceae Herb Trop. South
America
69 Echinochloa crusgalli
(L.) Beauv.
Poaceae Herb Trop. South
America
70 Echinops echinatus
Roxb.
Asteraceae Herb Afghanistan
71 Eclipta prostrata (L.)
Mant.
Asteraceae Herb Trop. America
72 Eichhornia crassipes
(C. Martius) Solms-
Loub.
Pontederiaceae Herb Trop. America
73 Emilia sonchifolia
(L.) DC.
Asteraceae Herb Trop. America
74 Euphorbia
cyathophora Murray
Euphorbiaceae Herb Trop. America
75 Euphorbia
heterophylla L.
Convolvulaceae Herb Trop. America
76 Evolvulus
nummularius (L.) L.
Convolvulaceae Herb Trop. America
77 Flaveria trinervia
(Spreng.) C. Mohr.
Asteraceae Herb Trop. Central
America
78 Fuirena ciliaris (L.)
Roxb.
Cyperaceae Herb Trop. America
79 Galinosoga parviora
Cav.
Asteraceae Herb Trop. America
80 Glossocardia
bosvallea (L.f.) DC.
Asteraceae Herb East Indies
81 Gnaphalium
coarctatum Willd.
Asteraceae Herb Trop. America
82 Gnaphalium
pensylvanicum Willd.
Asteraceae Herb Trop. America
83 Gnaphalium
polycaulon Pers.
Asteraceae Herb Trop. America
84 Gomphrena serrata
L.
Amaranthaceae Herb Trop. America
85 Grangea
maderaspatana (L.)
Poir.
Asteraceae Herb Trop. South
America
86 Hyptis suaveolens
(L.) Poit.
Lamiaceae Herb Trop. America
87 Impatiens balsamina
L.
Balsaminaceae Herb Trop. America
88 Imperata cylindrica
(L.) Raensch.
Poaceae Herb Trop. America
89 Indigofera
astragalina DC.
Papilionaceae Herb Trop. America
90 Indigofera glandulosa
Roxb. ex Willd.
Papilionaceae Herb Trop. America
91 Indigofera linifolia
(L.f.) Retz.
Papilionaceae Herb Trop. South
America
92 Indigofera linnaei Ali Papilionaceae Herb Trop. Africa
93 Indigofera trita L.f. Papilionaceae Shrub Trop. Africa
94 Ipomoea carnea Jacq. Convolvulaceae Shrub Trop. America
95 Ipomoea eriocarpa
R.Br.
Convolvulaceae Herb Trop. Africa
Sl.
no. Species Family Habit Nativity
96 Ipomoea hederifolia
L.
Convolvulaceae Herb Trop. America
97 Ipomoea obscura (L.)
Ker.-Gawl.
Convolvulaceae Herb Trop. Africa
98 Ipomoea pes-tigridis
L.
Convolvulaceae Herb Trop. East
Africa
99 Ipomoea quamoclit L. Convolvulaceae Herb Trop. America
100 Ipomoea staphylina
Roem. & Schult.
Convolvulaceae Herb Trop. Africa
101 Lagascea mollis Cav. Asteraceae Herb Trop. Central
America
102 Lantana camara L. Verbenaceae Herb Trop. America
103 Leonotis nepetiifolia
(L.) R.Br.
Lamiaceae Herb Trop. Africa
104 Leucaena
leucocephala (Lam.)
de Wit
Mimosacceae Herb Trop. America
105 Ludwigia adscendens
(L.) Hara
Onagraceae Herb Trop. America
106 Ludwigia octovalvis
(Jacq.) Raven
Onagraceae Herb Trop. Africa
107 Ludwigia perennis L. Onagraceae Herb Trop. Africa
108 Macroptilium
atropupureum (DC.)
Urban
Papilionaceae Climber Trop. America
109 Macroptilium
lathyroides (L.)
Urban
Papilionaceae Climber Trop. Central
America
110 Malachra capitata
(L.) L.
Malvaceae Herb Trop. America
111 Malvastrum
coromandelianum
(L.) Garcke
Malvaceae Herb Trop. America
112 Martynia annua
(Houstoun in Martyn)
L.
Pedaliaceae Herb Trop. America
113 Mecardonia
procumbens (Mill.)
Small
Scrophulariaceae Herb Trop. North
America
114 Melilotus alba Desv. Papilionaceae Herb Europe
115 Melochia
corchorifolia L.
Sterculiaceae Herb Trop. America
116 Merremia aegyptia
(L.) Urban.
Convolvulaceae Herb Trop. America
117 Mikania micrantha
Kunth
Asteraceae Climber Trop. America
118 Mimosa pigra L. Mimosacceae Shrub Trop. North
America
119 Mimosa pudica L. Mimosacceae Herb Brazil
120 Mirabilis jalapa L. Nyctaginaceae Herb Peru
121 Monochoria vaginalis
(Burm.f.) C. Presl.
Pontederiaceae Herb Trop. America
122 Nicotiana
plumbaginifolia Viv.
Solanaceae Herb Trop. America
123 Ocimum americanum
L.
Lamiaceae Herb Trop. America
124 Opuntia stricta
(Haw.) Haw.
Cactaceae Herb Trop. America
125 Oxalis corniculata L. Oxalidaceae Herb Europe
87
Continued
Life Science Journal, Vol 5, No 2, 2008 http://lsj.zzu.edu.cn
Sl.
no. Species Family Habit Nativity
126 Parthenium
hysterophorus L.
Asteraceae Herb Trop. North
America
127 Passiora foetida L. Passioraceae Herb Trop. South
America
128 Pedalium murex L. Pedaliaceae Herb Trop. America
129 Pennisetum
purpureum Schum.
Poaceae Herb Trop. America
130 Peperomia pellucida
(L.) Kunth
Piperaceae Herb Trop. South
America
131 Peristrophe
paniculata (Forssk.)
Brummitt
Acanthaceae Herb Trop. America
132 Phyllanthus tenellus
Roxb.
Euphorbiaceae Herb Mascarene
Islands
133 Physalis angulata L. Solanaceae Herb Trop. America
134 Physalis pruinosa L. Solanaceae Herb Trop. America
135 Pilea microphylla (L.)
Liebm.
Urticaceae Herb Trop. South
America
136 Pistia stratiotes L. Araceae Herb Trop. America
137 Portulaca oleracea L. Portulacaceae Herb Trop. South
America
138 Portulaca quadrida
L.
Portulacaceae Herb Trop. America
139 Prosopis juliora
(Sw.) DC.
Mimosacceae Shrub Mexico
140 Rhynchelytrum repens
(Willd.) C.E. Hubb.
Poaceae Herb Trop. America
141 Rorippa dubia (Pers.)
Hara
Brassicaceae Herb Trop. America
142 Ruellia tuberosa L. Acanthaceae Herb Trop. America
143 Saccharum
spontaneum L.
Poaceae Herb Trop. West
Asia
144 Salvinia molesta D. S.
Mitch.
Salviniaceae Herb Brazil
145 Scoparia dulcis L. Scrophulariaceae Herb Trop. America
146 Sesbania bispinosa
(Jacq.) Wight
Papilionaceae Shrub Trop. America
147 Sida acuta Burm.f. Malvaceae Herb Trop. America
148 Solanum americanum
Mill.
Solanaceae Herb Trop. America
149 Solanum seafor-
thianum Andrews
Solanaceae Climber Brazil
Sl.
no. Species Family Habit Nativity
150 Solanum torvum Sw. Solanaceae Shrub West Indies
151 Solanum viarum
Dunal
Solanaceae Herb Trop. America
152 Sonchus asper Hill Asteraceae Herb Mediterranean
153 Sonchus oleraceus L. Asteraceae Herb Mediterranean
154 Spermacoce hispida
L.
Rubiaceae Herb Trop. America
155 Spilanthes radicans
Jacq.
Asteraceae Herb Trop. South
America
156 Stachytarpheta
jamaicensis (L.) Vahl
Verbenaceae Herb Trop. America
157 Stachytarpheta
urticaefolia
(Salisb.)Sims
Verbenaceae Herb Trop. America
158 Stylosanthes hamata
(L.) Taub.
Papilionaceae Herb Trop. America
159 Synadenium grantii
Hook. f.
Euphorbiaceae Shrub Trop. America
160 Synedrella nodiora
(L.) Gaertn.
Asteraceae Herb West Indies
161 Torenia fournieri
Linden ex E. Fournier
Scrophulariaceae Herb Australia
162 Tribulus lanuginosus
L.
Zygophyllaceae Herb Trop. America
163 Tribulus terrestris L. Zygophyllaceae Herb Trop. America
164 Tridax procumbens L. Asteraceae Herb Trop. Central
America
165 Triumfetta
rhomboidea Jacq.
Tiliaceae Herb Trop. America
166 Turnera subulata J.E.
Smith
Turneraceae Herb Trop. America
167 Turnera ulmifolia L. Turneraceae Herb Trop. America
168 Typha angustata
Bory. & Choub.
Typhaceae Herb Trop. America
169 Ulex europaeus L. Papilionaceae Shrub Western
Europe
170 Urena lobata L. Malvaceae Shrub Trop. Africa
171 Waltheria indica L. Sterculiaceae Herb Trop. America
172 Xanthium strumarium
L.
Asteraceae Herb Trop. America
173 Youngia japonica (L.)
DC.
Asteraceae Herb Trop. South
America
88
restricted region, but have a huge probability of expand-
ing, and causing great damage. Other species may al-
ready be globally widespread and causing cumulative but
less visible damage.
Among the 173 species, majority are generalists found
in all kinds of systems like forests, crop lands, waste
lands, plantations, gardens and road sides. The 33 species
are invaders of wetlands, i.e. Aerva javanica, Aeschyn-
omene americana, Alternanthera paronychioides, Alter-
nanthera philoxeroides, Asclepias curassavica, Cassia
alata, Corchorus trilocularis, Cyperus difformis, Cy-
perus iria, Echinochloa colona, Echinochloa crusgalli,
Eclipta prostrata, Eichhornia crassipes, Fuirena ciliaris,
Gnaphalium coarctatum, Gnaphalium pensylvanicum,
Gnaphalium polycaulon, Grangea maderaspatana, Ipo-
moea carnea, Ludwigia adscendens, Ludwigia octoval-
vis, Ludwigia perennis, Mecardonia procumbens, Mono-
choria vaginalis, Pistia stratiotes, Portulaca quadrida,
Rorippa dubia, Saccharum spontaneum, Salvinia mo-
lesta, Sesbania bispinosa, Sonchus asper, Sonchus olera-
ceus and Typha angustata.
The predominance of Asteraceae species in invasive
category shows the high impact of neotropical flora on
Indian region.
Continued
Reddy, Catalogue of invasive alien ora of India
89
5 Conclusion
According to the available information, there are about
173 alien species of invasive nature are found in India.
Monitoring of invasion can be done through qualitative
approach like species inventory (seasonally) and quan-
titative approach using phytosociological methods and
mapping using ground-based methods (via map overlays
or GPS), remotely-sensed images (aerial photos, high
resolution multi-spectral digital data).
A better planning is needed for early detection and
reporting of infestations of spread of new and naturalized
weeds by creation of plant detection network in each
State by establishing communication links between tax-
onomists, ecologists and land managers to monitor and
control.
Achnowledgments
I am thankful to Dr. PS Roy, Deputy Director, Dr.
MSR Murthy, Head, Forestry and Ecology Division,
National Remote Sensing Agency, Hyderabad, Prof. VS
Raju, Kakatiya University, Warangal and Prof. G Bag-
yanarayana, Osmania University, Hyderabad for encour-
agement and criticism.
References
Almeilla ID, Freitas H. The exotic and invasive ora of Portugal. Bot
Complutensis 2001: 25: 317 – 27.
Corlett RT. The naturalized flora of Singapore. Journal of
Biogeography 1988: 15: 657 – 63.
Cowie R. Does the public care about species loss? A glimpse into the
public’s thinking. Conservation Biology in Practice 2001: 2(3): 28
9.
Cox GW. Alien Species in North America and Hawaii: Impacts on
Natural Ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, D.C. 1999.
Cox GW. Alien Species and Evolution: The Evolutionary Ecology
of Exotic Plants, Animals, Microbes, and Interacting Native Species.
Island Press, Washington, D.C. 2004.
Cracraft J, Francesca T. The Living Planet in Crisis. Columbia
University Press, New York. 1999.
D'Antonio CM, Vitousek PM. Biological invasions by exotic grasses:
the grass/fire cycle and global change. Annual Review of Ecology
and Systematics 1992; 23: 63 – 87.
Drake JA, Mooney HA, di Castri F, Groves R, Kruger F, Rejmanek
M, Williamson M. Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective. John
Wiley and Sons, New York. 1989.
El to n CS. The Eco logy of Inv as ions by Anim al s an d Plant s.
University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 2000.
Enmoto T. Naturalized weeds from foreign countries into Japan.
In: Yano, et al (eds). Biological invasions of ecosystem by pests
and benecial organisms. National Institute of Agro-Environmental
Science, Tsukuba, Japan. 1999; 1 – 14.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Hajra PK, Das BK. Vegetation of Gangtok with special reference to
exotic plants. Indian For 1982; 107: 554 – 66.
Hajra PK, Mudgal V. Plant diversity hotspots in India – An overview.
BSI India 1997.
Heywood V. Patterns, Extents, and Modes of Invasions by Terrestrial
Plants. In: Drake J, et al (eds.), Biological Invasions: A Global
Perspective, Wiley, NY. 1989; 31 – 60.
Huxel GR. Rapid displacement of native species by invasive species:
effects of hybridization. Biological Conservation 1999: 89:143 – 52.
Jenkins PT. Trade and exotic species introductions. In: Sandlund OT,
Schei P. Invasive Species and Biodiversity Management. Kluwer
Academic Publishers, The Netherlands. 1999; 24: 229 – 35.
Londsdale WM. Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of
invasibility. Ecology 1999; 80: 1522 – 36.
Maheswari JK, Paul SR. The exotic ora of Ranchi. J Bombay Nat
Hist Soc 1975; 72(1): 158 – 88.
Matthew KM. Exotic flora of Kodaikanal and Palni hills. Rec Bot
Surv India 1969; 20(1): 1 – 241.
McNeely JA, Mooney HA, Neville LE, Schei P, Waage JK. A Global
Strategy on Invasive Alien Species. IUCN Gland, Switzerland, and
Cambridge, U.K., in collaboration with the Global Invasive Species
Programme. 2001.
Meyer JY. Preliminary review of the invasive plants in the Pacific
islands. In: Sherley G (ed.). Invasive Species in the Pacific: A
Tech ni cal Revi ew and Dra ft Re gi on al St ra te gy. Sou th Pa ci fi c
Regional Environmental Programme, Samoa. 2000; 85 – 114.
Mooney HA, Drake JA. The ecology of biological invasions.
Environment 1987; 29(5): 12.
Mooney HA. A global strategy for dealing with alien invasive
species. Invasive species and Biodiversity management (ed. Sandlund
OT, Schei PJ, Viken A). Kluwer Academic Publishers, London. 1999;
24.
Mooney HA, Hobbs RJ. Invasive Species in a Changing World.
Island Press, Washington, D.C. 2000.
Murthy EN, Raju VS, Reddy CS. Occurrence of exotic Hyptis
suaveolens. Curr Sci 2007; 93(9): 1203.
Nayar MP. Changing patterns of the Indian Flora. Bull Bot Surv India
1977; 19: 145 – 55.
Negi PS, Hajra PK. Alien ora of Doon valley, Northwest Himalaya.
Curr Sci 2007; 92(7): 968 – 78.
Pandey RP, Parmar PJ. The exotic ora of Rajasthan. J Econ Tax Bot
1994; 18(1): 105 – 21.
Pyšek P, Sádlo J, Mandák B. Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech
Republic. Preslia 2002; 74: 97 – 186.
Randall JM, Marinelli J. Invasive Plants: Weeds of the Global
Garden. Brooklyn Botanic Garden, Brooklyn, New York. 1997.
Reddy CS, Bhanja MR, Raju VS. Cassia uniflora Miller: a new
record for Andhra Pradesh, India. Indian J Forestry 2000; 23(3): 324
– 5.
Reddy CS, Raju VS. Additions to the weed ora of Andhra Pradesh,
India. J Econ Taxon Bot 2002; 26: 195 – 8.
Reddy CS, Reddy KN. Cassia rotundifolia Pers. (Caesalpiniaceae): a
new record for India. J Econ Tax Bot 2004; 28: 73 – 4.
Richardson DM, Bond WJ, Dean WRJ. et al. Invasive alien species
and global change: a South African perspective. In: Mooney HA,
Hobbs RJ (eds). Invasive Species in a Changing World. Washington,
DC: Island. 2000; 303 – 49.
Saxena KG. Biological invasion in the Indian sub-continent: review
of invasion by plants. In: Ecology of Biological Invasion in the
Tropics 1991; 53 – 73.
Sharma BD. Exotic Flora of Allahabad, Botanical Survey of India,
Dehra Dun. 1984.
Wu SH, Hsieh CF, Rejmánek M. Catalogue of the naturalized ora of
Taiwan. Taiwania 2004; 49(1): 16 – 31.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
... From an Indian perspective, most of the studies have been conducted on a small number of invasive alien plant species and nearly half of these studies are focused on Lantana camara L., Parthenium hysterophorus L., Mikania micrantha L., Ageratum conizoides L., and Eichornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms (water hyacinth) etc., and only limited research has been done on the invasion ecology and environmental, and socio-economic implications of T. diversifolia (REDDY, 2008). To better understand and elucidate the ecology of T. diversifolia, an initial, and urgent, research in the biodiversity rich traditional state of Mizoram was conducted. ...
Article
Full-text available
Tithonia diversifolia (Hemsl.) A. Gray is an emerging and little studied plant invader in North East India, an Indo-Burma biodiversity hotspot. Identifying the impacts of its invasiveness in terms of both harmful and economically beneficial facets is required for the formulation and implementation of sustainable management options. An environmental and socio-economic implication survey through the pragmatic questionnaire method is a useful approach to explicitly elucidate the holistic influence of T. diversifolia on ecosystem resilience. The interaction of T. diversifolia with the local people of Mizoram was assessed in this study in terms of its effects on their livelihoods, socio-economic, and ecological factors. Results of the survey in relation to agricultural implications revealed that 42.68% of the respondents opined that the dried litter of T. diversifolia can improve soil fertility. Also, 63.41% people during their interview perceived T. diversifolia as an effective tool to prevent. However, 70.73% of rural people did not consider T. diversifolia to be a good source of livelihood for income generation or socio-economic status. Since, the respondents were not aware of chemical and biological control measures to regulate the spread of invasive alien plant species, physical methods such as slashing (46.34%), burning (13.41%), chopping and burning (29.27%) were widely applied for the control and management of invaded areas of T. diversifolia at selected study sites. Thus, the survey gave a brief idea to the other local people, farmers, and agriculturists of Mizoram to control the invasive spread of T. diversifolia in forestry and agroforestry systems. Also, other Himalayan landscapes infested with T. diversifolia can generate awareness and identify the sustainable strategy for their management to conserve the indigenous biodiversity.
... India. The species has drastically spread over the natural and maintained vegetation in the invaded area (Reddy, 2008 (Sankaran, et.al., 2001). ...
Technical Report
Full-text available
Wildlife Institute of India (WII), Dehradun, conducted a “Workshop on Human-Wildlife Interactions and Management of Invasive Species”, at WII, Dehradun on 23rd & 24th July 2014. A total of 110 participants actively discussed these issues over the two days of the workshop. Objective of this workshop was to bring together, scientist, forest official, researchers, and representative of leading NGOs dealing with these issues for a better knowledge about the current state of the problem and to find out a way forward. Workshop was conducted under five major themes 1) Human – Carnivore interaction, 2) Human – Herbivore interaction, 3) Invasive species management, 4) law and policy and 5) Human-macaque interactions. Human – carnivore conflict is perceived as one of the most negative interactions in wildlife and humans, owing to the direct loss of human life associated with the presence of carnivore. Tiger, lion, leopard, snow leopard, wolf, dhole and bear are the most conflict related species. Studies on conflict related to tiger, lion, snow leopard and leopard are available while that for wolf, dhole and bear are rarely conducted. Owing to the conservation value of tiger and lion, guidelines and policies have been centered to the conflict related to these flagship species. In almost all the cases, management system has guaranteed economic compensation. Standard operating protocol (SOP) is developed for identifying and removing an individual that has repeatedly reported in conflict with humans. As few of these carnivores need healthy habitat and ample prey species for their sustenance, co-existence with increasing human pressure seems distinct from the present facts. Thus, in order to minimize the negative interaction, it is essential to relocate human settlement from the protected areas inhabited by these species. Attack by leopard on humans is amongst the major conflict cases. As leopard and snow leopard also inhabit in areas dominated by humans, it is of immense importance to amplify the social carrying capacity through awareness camps and increasing the vigilance during peak activity time of a species in the shared area. Frequency of conflicts associated to leopard in human dominated areas has triggered concern about the sustenance of these species, as shown by recent series of studies invested on subject. Results of these studies were adapted to form guidelines in order to avoid and mitigate the conflict issue and the SOP is being developed for conflict scenario management. In all the cases of carnivore conflict, economic compensation has helped to elevate the social carrying capacity. Hence, timely facilitating the desired amount of compensation can reduce the negative perception associated with conflict case. In case of snow leopard, the medical and life insurance policy has helped in building positive perception towards snow leopard conservation. However, such solutions are possible by joint efforts from multiple sectors and active participation of governmental agencies; and hence should be considered for managing conflict of other species as well. Human - Herbivore conflicts are mainly centered towards the loss of agricultural crops. These losses are high if the crop fields are present around Protected Areas or in the forest used by herbivores involved in conflict. Nilgai, Wild pig, Elephant and Black buck are ranked as species with highest conflict records owing to their vast distribution across India and habitat overlap with human settlements. While conflict caused by Rhino and Wild ass though restricted in few parts of the country, is similar conflict case. Particularly, in case of elephants, agricultural fields are used as corridors for colonizing or moving across adjacent protected forests. Conflicts with herbivores are speculated to be caused due to habitat degradation, absence of predator, absence of quality forage in the forest, etc. However, these speculations are not tested in field. Nevertheless, looking at increased individual and group raiding on the crops, it is essential to put a control on the reproductive rate of these individuals to avoid long-term conflict. Reproductive control needs an understanding of optimal demographic age and sex ratios to be maintained for sustenance of species. Hence, it should be practiced only in addition to the ecological population monitoring. Techniques used in reproductive control are new to the country and should be executed by expert research team. In case of a species like wild pig that can cause repeated conflict, provision of declaring such species as vermin for a particular area is available. In case of managing the on-going crop raiding, bio-fencing around the crop fields, night vigilance, alarm alerts and barricades should be used. Elevating the social carrying capacity by forming a self-help group in the conflict prone villages that includes people from various sectors can provide immediate and economical solutions. Human - Non-human primate conflict is one of most serious issue in the negative interactions in human and wildlife. Though Rhesus macaques, Bonnet macaques and Hanuman Langur carry cultural respect from the dominant society, their increasing population in human settlements is increasingly resulting in negative interactions. Devotees and animal lovers feel gratified in feeding monkeys in temples, highways or roof tops and consider it a religious deed. Apart from many monkeys getting diseased and killed due to these habits, they have become habitual of snatching food from people and attacking them. Macaque troops involved in conflict are often translocated to the forests or enclosures in many parts of the country. Often these empty habitats are re-colonized by the surrounding macaque troops, and the conflict continues. Reproductive control is the most convenient and long term solution for controlling the negative interactions, but should be carried with regular population monitoring to keep the densities at optimal low levels. Methods such as oral administrative contraceptives, intra-uterine devices, and blockade of tubal patency following transcervical administration of polidocanol foam should be used for female monkey sterilization. Removal of specific macaque individuals that show persistent aggressive behavior or learnt raiding behavior should be implemented. Additionally social awareness about Solid waste management and proper disposal of rural organic waste as well as prohibition on feeding of monkeys in public places is of immense importance; as most of these troops colonize the area due to readily available food. Management of prioritized invasive species by 2020 is India’s 4th target of Fifth National Report to the Convention of Biological diversity. In total, 21 species were identified as high concern invasive species for 4 different ecosystems of India viz., terrestrial ecosystem (Lantana species complex, Prosopis juliflora, parthenium hysterophorus, Mikania micrantha, Chromolaena odorata, Ageratina adenophora, Ageratum conyzoides, Xanthium strumarium, Mimosa diplotricha, Hyptis suaveolens, Senna tora and Great African Snail (Achatina fulica)) island ecosystem (Axis axis and Hoplobatrachus tigerinus), freshwater ecosystem (Oreochromis mossambicus, Salmo trutta fario, Clarias gariepinus, Cyprinus carpio, Ipomoea carnea and Eichhornia crassipes) and marine ecosystem (Kappaphycus alvarezii). As a response to the impacts of these species, many regional managerial interventions are carried to remove the species. Most of these management practices are guided by the umbrella legislation of Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 and National Biodiversity Action Plan, 2008. It was also concluded during the workshop, that restoration of the native ecosystem should be the focus of management in the terrestrial ecosystem and hence the removal of any species should be followed by active/passive restoration of native ecosystem. The major gap that was observed was in the information about distribution and magnitude of invasion across country for any invasive species; and in the studies of restoration techniques in terrestrial ecosystem. The repeated introduction of fishes via aquaculture and escape through the controlled culture are the main invasion pathways in freshwater ecosystem. It should be addressed by enhancing the present quarantine techniques to identify the fry of these species during the import, and safeguarding the outlets of culture discharge (particularly in the floods).
... It has been reported that forest of Indian flora has 173 alien invasive species (L. camara, Hyptis suaveolens, Ageratum conyzoides, Parthenium hystrophorus, C. odorata) having potential to perturb native forest biodiversity (Reddy 2008;Padalia et al. 2014). C. odorata is investigated in the Himalaya hotspot by Mandal and Joshi (2014) while H. suaveolens was ecologically mapped and modeled by Padalia et al. (2013Padalia et al. ( , 2014. ...
Article
Full-text available
A cascade of reviews and growing body of literature exists on forest invasion ecology, its mechanism or causes; however, no review addressed the sustainable management of invasive plants of forest in totality. Henceforth, the present paper aims to provide a critical review on the management of invasive species particularly in the context of forest plants. Plant invasion in forest is now increasingly being recognized as a global problem, and various continents are adversely affected, although to a differential scale. Quest for the ecological mechanism lying behind the success of invasive species over native species of forest has drawn the attention of researches worldwide particularly in the context of diversity-stability relationship. Transport, colonization, establishment, and landscape spread may be different steps in success of invasive plants in forest, and each and every step is checked through several ecological attributes. Further, several ecological attribute and hypothesis (enemy release, novel weapon, empty niche, evolution of increased competitive ability, etc.) were proposed pertaining to success of invasive plant species in forest ecosystems. However, a single theory will not be able to account for invasion success among all environments as it may vary spatially and temporally. Therefore, in order to formulate a sustainable management plan for invasive plants of forest, it is necessary to develop a synoptic view of the dynamic processes involved in the invasion process. Moreover, invasive species of forest can act synergistically with other elements of global change, including land-use change, climate change, increased concentrations of atmospheric carbon dioxide, and nitrogen deposition. Henceforth, a unified framework for biological invasions that reconciles and integrates the key features of the most commonly used invasion frameworks into a single conceptual model that can be applied to all human-mediated invasions.
Article
Full-text available
Alien flora of the Czech Republic is presented. In Appendix 1, 1378 alien taxa (33.4% of the total flora) are listed with information on the taxonomic position, origin, invasive status (casual, naturalized, invasive; a new category post-invasive is introduced), time of immigration (archaeophytes vs. neophytes), habitat type invaded (natural, seminatural, human-made), vegetation invaded (expressed as occurence in phytosociological alliances), mode of introduction into the country (accidental, deliberate), and date of the first record. Number of phytogeographical as well as biological and ecological attributes were compiled for each species in the database; its structure is presented in Appendix 2 as a suggestion for similar work elsewhere. Czech alien flora consists of 24.1% of taxa which arrived before 1500 (archaeophytes) and 75.9% neophytes. There are 891 casuals, 397 naturalized and 90 invasive species. Of introduced neophytes, 21.9% became naturalized, and 6.6% invasive. Hybrids contribute with 13.3% to the total number of aliens, and the hybridization is more frequent in archaeophytes (18.7%) than in neophytes (11.7%). If the 184 hybrids are excluded from the total number of aliens, there are 270 archaeophytes and 924 neophytes in the Czech flora, i.e. total of 1195 taxa. Accidental arrivals account for 53.4% of all taxa and deliberate introduction for 46.6%; the ratio is reversed for neophytes considered separately (45.5 vs. 54.5%). Majority of aliens (62.8%) are confined to human-made habitats, 11.0% were recorded exclusively in natural or seminatural habitats, and 26.2% occur in both types of habitat. Archaeophytes and neophytes occur in 66 and 83 alliances, respectively, of the phytosociological system. Flora is further analysed with respect to origin, life histories, life forms and strategies. Only 310 species (22.4% of the total number of all alien taxa) are common or locally abundant; others are rare, based on a single locality or no longer present. The following 19 taxa are reported as new for the Czech alien flora: Agrostis scabra, Alhagi pseudalhagi, Allium atropurpureum, Bromus hordeaceus subsp. pseudothominii, Carduus tenuiflorus, Centaurea xgerstlaueri, Centaurea nigra x phrygia, Cerastium xmaureri, Gilia capitata, Helianthus strumosus, Hieracium pannosum, Hordeum leporinum, Oenothera coronifera, Papaver atlanticum subsp. mesatlanticum, Parietaria pennsylvanica, Polypogon fugax, Rodgersia aesculifolia, Sedum pallidum var. bithynicum, Sedum stoloniferum; these represent results of our own field research as well as of herbaria search, and unpublished data from colleagues. Other 44 taxa are reported as escaping from cultivation for the first time. Twenty two archaeophytes are listed in the Red List of the Czech flora.
Article
Analysis of ecophysiology and strategy analysis of herbaceous communities in the NE hilly region of India show that strategy attributes and environmental responses of invaders differ from those of native species. -from Author
Article
At least 136 exotic species of vacular plant have become naturalized in Singapore. Fabaceae, Asteraceae and Poaceae account for >40%, but an additional 39 Angiosperm families are represented as well as 3 fern species. Of those species for which the origin is known, 65% are from tropical America, 11% from Africa and 22% from Asia. At least 70% were present in Singapore by 1920. Most species are herbs and most are confined to well-lit, nutrient-rich situations. No species invades undisturbed primary or secondary forest. Naturalized exotics are usually dominant in areas kept open by human activity but are eliminated during succession. There have been major changes in the relative abundances of naturalized species on wasteland over the last century. -Author