Conference PaperPDF Available

Socio-Economic Factors Affecting Individual Household Energy Consumption: A Systematic Review

Authors:

Abstract

Energy consumption in the United States’ residential sector has been marked by a steady growth over the past few decades, in spite of the implementation of several energy efficiency policies. To develop effective energy policies for the residential sector, it is of utmost importance to study the various factors affecting residential energy consumption. Earlier studies have identified and classified various individual factors responsible for the increment in household energy consumption, and have also analyzed the effect of socio-economic factors such as standard-of-living and income on overall household energy consumption. This research study identifies the socio-economic factors affecting household energy consumption. Potential reasons for the variation in residential energy efficiency consumption have been investigated in previous studies that only represent viewpoints of investigators analyzing specific problems. Additionally, a comprehensive review of literature failed to reveal existing research that had systematically explored the interdependencies among the various factors that could possibly affect residential energy consumption to give an overall perspective of these factors. Widely used academic and scholarly scientific databases were employed by two independent investigators to search for original research investigations. A total of more than 200 research studies were found by the investigators, with almost ninety percent agreement between the two investigators. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this research study the authors systematically reviewed 51 prominent research studies to create a comprehensive list of factors affecting residential energy consumption. The results are discussed in this review.
SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS AFFECTING INDIVIDUAL HOUSEHOLD ENERGY
CONSUMPTION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Suchismita Bhattacharjee, Ph.D.
Ball State University,
Muncie, IN, U.S.A.
Georg Reichard, PhD
Myers-Lawson School of Construction
Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, U.S.A.
ABSTRACT
Energy consumption in the United States’ residential sector has
been marked by a steady growth over the past few decades, in
spite of the implementation of several energy efficiency
policies. To develop effective energy policies for the residential
sector, it is of utmost importance to study the various factors
affecting residential energy consumption. Earlier studies have
identified and classified various individual factors responsible
for the increment in household energy consumption, and have
also analyzed the effect of socio-economic factors such as
standard-of-living and income on overall household energy
consumption. This research study identifies the socio-economic
factors affecting household energy consumption.
Potential reasons for the variation in residential energy
efficiency consumption have been investigated in previous
studies that only represent viewpoints of investigators analyzing
specific problems. Additionally, a comprehensive review of
literature failed to reveal existing research that had
systematically explored the interdependencies among the
various factors that could possibly affect residential energy
consumption to give an overall perspective of these factors.
Widely used academic and scholarly scientific databases were
employed by two independent investigators to search for
original research investigations. A total of more than 200
research studies were found by the investigators, with almost
ninety percent agreement between the two investigators. Based
on the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this research study the
authors systematically reviewed 51 prominent research studies
to create a comprehensive list of factors affecting residential
energy consumption. The results are discussed in this review.
1. INTRODUCTION
Energy efficiency refers to a reduction in energy usage in
order to achieve a given level of output. Since the oil crisis of
1973, people have become increasingly aware of the efficient
use of energy. Lovins [1] described in his seminal paper
alternative sources of energy that are available in abundance,
and are renewable and more environmentally friendly than
fossil fuels. The development of the concept of energy
efficiency is found in previous research and is described as
“maintaining or increasing the level of useful output or outcome
delivered, while reducing energy consumption”[2].
Reducing the consumption of individual household energy
by using energy-efficient equipment and better insulation
strategies for households is obviously an energy efficiency
improvement step from the engineering point of view. This
improvement at the micro-level will not be visible at the macro-
level unless a significant mass of homeowners start to consume
energy more efficiently. Sometimes, for example, due to an
extreme increment in fuel prices, consumers decrease their fuel
consumption by changing their day to day activities, such as
driving less, or by adjusting their thermostat. These changes
cannot necessarily be counted as energy efficiency
improvements, as they may be reversed at any time once energy
prices decrease again. The World Energy Council [3] considers
energy efficiency a matter of individual behavior reflecting the
rationale of energy consumers, and of using the appropriate
technology, such as thermal regulation of room temperatures or
automatic standby mode for idle equipment.
Thus, in order to achieve energy efficiency it is important
to understand all factors that affect residential energy
consumption. Potential causes of residential energy
consumption have been investigated in previous studies, which
only represent viewpoints of respective investigators who are
concerned with a specific set of problems. A systematic study of
the various factors affecting residential energy consumption has
never been performed. This study summarizes more than fifty
prominent research articles in this area and delineates a
comprehensive list of factors affecting residential energy
consumption.
The following section describes how the authors analyzed
and summarized the conclusions of previous research studies
Proceedings of the ASME 2011 5th International Conference on Energy Sustainability
ES2011
August 7-10, 2011, Washington, DC, USA
ES2011-54
1
Copyright © 2011 by ASME
and ultimately generated a comprehensive list of factors that
affect residential energy consumption.
2. METHODOLOGY
2.1. Data Sources
The strategy used for this systematic review was an
extensive search of databases such as ‘Academic Search
Premier’, ‘Google Scholar’, ‘ERIC’, ‘Science Direct’, and
‘Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection’. The key
words entered for the search procedure were ‘energy’,
‘efficiency’, ‘residential’, ‘factors’, and ‘consumption’. In this
process various social, environmental, and psychological
journals (e.g., Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of
Environmental Psychology, The Journal of Consumer Affairs,
Energy Policy, etc.) were consulted. Further, reference lists of
all found articles were reviewed to identify additional published
material. This process was repeated till saturation.
2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
The entire search process resulted in more than 200
research studies. In order to be selected for the review, it was
decided that individual studies that refer to energy consumption
factors associated with specific problems will not be included.
Instead, studies that comment on broader perspectives would be
included. Additionally, the selection pool was restricted to
peer-reviewed articles only. The selection pool was further
restricted pertaining to qualitative or quantitative research
published since 1973, when the oil crisis drew the attention of
researchers. Further exclusion criteria employed were: all
articles that were published in languages other than English,
articles that were redundant and duplication of published
research, and articles that only contained discussion about a
single, individual factor associated with residential energy
consumption. There were fifty one studies in total that met these
criteria.
2.3. Data Extraction
After verification of a study’s eligibility for inclusion
within this review, study details such as name of the study,
authors, journal, research design, data collection and data
analysis methods, results, and conclusion were determined
informally by the researchers and are discussed in the text. All
details related to these studies were extracted by two
researchers and reviewed by another researcher before the final
analysis.
2.4. Data Synthesis
Data was synthesized to study qualitative research relevant
to residential energy consumption. The template used for this
synthesis was based on Guidelines for Critical Review Form -
Qualitative Studies developed by the McMaster University
Occupational Therapy Evidence-Based Practice Research
Group [4]. The broader topics of a published study that were
used for creating the data pool were study purpose, literature
review, study design and its appropriateness, data collection,
procedural rigor, data analysis, theoretical connections,
trustworthiness, and conclusions.
3. RESULTS
All the factors identified by the aforementioned literature
search procedures are being listed and described hereby.
3.1. Household Size
Household size simply refers to the number of people per
household. Many researchers argue that occupancy has the
strongest influence on variation in energy consumption [5-19].
To be more specific, Lenzen et. al.[11] indicated a negative
correlation between household size and energy consumption per
capita, which is due to household members simply sharing
consumer items.
3.2. Householders’ Age Structure
Householders’ age in this study refers to the age of the
head of household. It has a strong influence on the residential
energy requirement [11, 13, 14, 18-22]. The results of a
statistical analysis performed by Pachauri [14] indicate that
where the head of the household is in the age range of 25-29
years, the per capita energy requirement is about 7% higher
than where the household head is less than 25 years old. This
percentage increases to 13% when the household head is above
the age of 50 years. Much of the energy used by older people is
based on their health and comfort [23]. Some of the reasons
proposed for an increase in per capita energy consumption with
age are the lack of information and knowledge about energy
conservation and energy usage patterns, inertia to change, and
importance of well-being, which is controlled by health and
comfort.
3.3. Time Spent at Home
Energy consumption has a direct correlation with the
amount of time the dwelling is occupied. The more time a
person spends at home, the more energy he/she will consume
for day to day activities. According to Van Raaji & Verhallen
[19] young households without children and with both partners
working outside the home tend to have a lower level of energy
use when compared to families who either stay at home or work
from home. After the children grow up and move out, the
household energy consumption decreases, but increases again
with the age of the parents [7, 19]. This increase in energy use
in later years is due to a tendency of elderly people to spend
more time at home and an increasing need of higher indoor
temperatures to ensure health and comfort [22].
2
Copyright © 2011 by ASME
3.4. Level of Urbanization
Urbanization is defined by the United Nations as the
movement of people from rural to urban areas with a population
growth equating to urban migration. Rapid urbanization causes
a rise in energy consumption per capita [5, 12, 14, 24-26]. With
an urbanization of lifestyle, the proportion of energy used for
cooking decreases, but the proportion of energy used for
recreation and comfort increases considerably.
3.5. Dwelling Size
Mileham and Brandt [23] have found that the size of a
dwelling is possibly the best predictor of money spent on
energy, since 21% of the variation in energy costs is attributed
to the size of the dwelling. According to Morrison and Gladhart
[21] the number of rooms in a dwelling contributes towards the
total energy consumption of a house. Obviously, the larger the
floor spaceof houses,the more energy is required for space
heating, cooling, and lighting.
3.6. Dwelling Type
Different types of dwellings include single family house,
town house, multi-family house, apartment, or even mobile
home. Single family detached homes are the most energy
intensive type of dwelling, consuming more BTU per household
than any other type [13, 27, 28].
3.7. Age and Characteristics of Dwelling
According to some researchers, an increase of vintage of a
dwelling relates to a considerably increased amount of energy
consumed for space heating or cooling [16, 20, 23]. Older
houses often lack energy efficiency, which would require capital
investment for incorporation of conservation measures, such as
insulation and storm windows. “Dwelling characteristics” refers
to the degree of home insulation, wind exposure, glazing,
efficiency of HVAC system, etc., which have a direct influence
on energy end use [15, 19, 29].
3.8. Education and Knowledge
A householder’s level of education appears to have an
impact on energy conservation beliefs and behaviors [36]. Junk
et. al. [20] observed in their research that higher education
levels of individuals’ resulted in lower energy consumption.
Other studies have also reported formal education as a factor
towards energy conservation [37]. Another study conducted in
1984 proved that people with higher levels of education were
more likely to engage in conservation measures for energy
efficiency [30, 31, 39-41]. This includes knowledge of energy
costs, energy usage, energy conservation behavior, and
consequence of these behaviors [19].
3.9. Inertia to Change
The inherent nature of people to be wary of investing in
the energy efficiency of their dwelling in spite of the probability
of receiving higher returns on investment reflects inertia to
change. Sometimes people fail to recognize the higher return on
investment in energy efficiency initiatives over time and give
way to investment with immediate gain [2].
3.10. Economic Condition
Economic growth has a strong influence on energy
consumption of a country [10]. A healthy economy is essential
to fulfill people’s needs and also to assure efficient distribution
of resources. Due to the increasing involvement of technology
in our day to day life, the economic system now decides the
consumption of technology and in turn affects the consumption
of energy [42].
3.11. Energy Price
Energy prices have an important influence on short term
and long term residential energy use. [9, 10, 15, 16, 43, 44].
Along with reductions in energy use, increased energy prices
also cause a shift in the type of energy used [15, 44].
Dzioubinski and Chipman [24] found that it is difficult to
estimate the effect of energy prices on residential energy
consumption in developing countries. This is because the
majority of energy consumed is via traditional fuels gathered
informally without any monetary expenditure, but mostly time
(e.g., gather fuel wood). Another study performed by Haas et.
al.[45] suggests that “small differences in energy prices do not
always have an impact on residential energy use. Only if the
price exceeds a certain threshold there is a reduction in energy
demand observable”.
3.12. Energy Efficient Equipment Affordability
Energy consumption in the residential sector can be parsed
into five major end uses: space heating, water heating, cooking,
lighting and electric appliances. Appliances can be further
broken down into refrigerators, clothes washers, dryers,
dishwashers and even TV. However, the magnitude of each end
use differs from country to country; for instance, in the United
States it is important to consider air conditioning as another
major end use. Appliance affordability refers to the cost of new
and improved appliances in accordance with the wage level of a
society. Appliance affordability is one of the leading causes for
increases in residential energy demand [8].
3.13. Weather and Climate Zone
In addition to the large number of human factors affecting
residential energy consumption, several studies have illustrated
the influence of weather variables on energy consumption and
on electricity demand in particular [6, 15, 29, 45, 46]. Weather
influences the heating and cooling degree-days, which are
3
Copyright © 2011 by ASME
quantitative indices used by energy analysts when calculating
the impact of outdoor temperature on energy use in buildings
[47]. Every building has a minimum energy use temperature,
i.e. when the building is neither heated nor cooled, which is
called “balance point” for that building. Each degree deviation
from the balance point results in either heating or cooling of the
building. This deviation from the balance point is mainly due to
the atmospheric temperature [47]. Other weather related factors
that influences energy consumption are humidity, wind flow,
and number of sunny days [15].
3.14. Dwelling Microclimate
Microclimate refers to the local temperature around a
dwelling. An important reason for considering the microclimate
in building design is to minimize the building’s energy use [48].
It can be assumed that people living in the same local region
typically share a similar socio-economic and regional climatic
conditions, and also have access to similar technology.
However, differences of energy consumption observed across
similar individual dwellings within a region make it obvious
that a building’s micro climate has an additional influence on
the total amount of energy consumed. Small scale climate
patterns resulting from the influence of topography, urban
forms, water bodies, vegetation, etc. are known as
Microclimates.
3.15. Increased Use of Renewable Energy
The challenges of people who are predominantly residing
in rural areas with restricted access to modern forms of energy
can be ameliorated by the use of renewable energy[49].
Renewable energy technologies can be less expensive in terms
of operating cost when compared with the production and
transportation of conventional energy sources. Examples for
renewable technologies are solar water heating, off-grid
electrification with solar photovoltaic (PV), small-scale biomass
power and heat generation, biofuels, grid-connected and off-
grid wind power, small hydropower, geothermal power, and
methane utilization from urban and industrial waste[50]. The
main guiding factor for renewable energy in this context is
initial equipment and installation cost, mostly driven by
technology and market development.
4. ANALYSIS
The energy consumption factors identified above can be
grouped under four broader categories based on their
prevalence. Some of the factors fall under one of the categories,
while there are considerable numbers that fall under two or even
more. In the following section the four broad categories are
briefly explained.
4.1. Demographics
Existing literature categorizes certain energy consumption
factors like household size, dwelling size, time spent at home,
level of urbanization, householders’ age, dwelling age and
characteristics, and dwelling type as household demographic
characteristics [8, 13, 16]. In a study concerning “300 Families’
Home Energy Use” conducted by Morrison and Gladhart [21],
the most significant determinants of household energy
consumption were: family size, age distribution, the number of
wage-earners in the household, and the occupancy time in the
house, which also falls into household demographic
characteristics.
4.2. Consumer Attitude
Consumer attitude has a profound influence on energy end
use. Just as energy consumption depends on the determinants
such as income, dwelling size, dwelling type, and dwelling
characteristics, attitude, knowledge, positive experience,
culture and social status are also important determinants of
energy use by an individual or a group [18]. The factors like
inertia to change, and education and knowledge, placed under
this category depend on the nature or characteristics of the
particular individual or group.
4.3. Economic Variables
Factors like economic condition, energy price, and energy
efficient equipment affordability are grouped under this
category. According to previous studies the most important
economic variables influencing residential energy consumption
are total household income [8, 51, 52], energy prices [8, 15],
and energy efficiency equipment prices [10].
4.4. Climate
Day-to-day habits and practices of consumers originate to
some extent from the climate they experience in their native
places. Several national level and regional level studies have
been conducted in the United States to determine how energy
use in the residential building stock relates to climate [53-59].
The factors influencing residential energy consumption grouped
under climate category are weather, dwelling microclimate, and
atmospheric temperature.
5. CONCLUSION
This systematic analysis adds a holistic view of the
influence of human behavior as well as some non-human causes
such as weather, energy price etc on energy consumption to the
existing body of knowledge. The research successfully performs
an analysis of identifying factors that have contributed to
residential energy consumption. Based on the aforementioned
discussion, it is clearly implicated that in order to optimize
energy efficiency and to effectively control the use of household
energy, concrete measures are warranted. These measures
4
Copyright © 2011 by ASME
would assume an interdisciplinary approach by addressing a
variety of human and non-human factors that play a vital role in
household energy consumption. Future researchers should
conduct in depth qualitative analyses to quantify the factors that
could possibly affect household energy consumption and could
affect energy efficiency. Policymakers should meticulously
consider various multiple strategies to improve energy
efficiency and alleviate the steady increment in modern
household energy consumption. Leadership is needed by
organizations like American Council for an Energy-Efficient
Economy to help reduce household energy consumption and to
optimize energy efficiency by assisting in the development of
best practices and policies. This can be accomplished by the
maneuvering of a variety of political, social, cultural,
individual, and economic influences on household energy
consumption.
REFERENCES
[1] Lovins, A. B., 1976, "Energy Strategy: The Road Not
Taken," pp.
[2] Acg, 2004, "The Energy Efficiency Gap: Market Failures
and Policy Options," Technical Report No. The Allen
Consulting Group, Australia.
[3] World Energy Council, 2008, "Energy Efficiency Policies
around the World: Review and Evaluation," Technical Report
No. London, UK.
[4] Law, M., Stewart, D., Letts, L., Pollock, N., Bosch, J., and
Westmorland, M., 1998, Guidelines for Critical Review Form -
Qualitative Studies, January 12, http://www-
fhs.mcmaster.ca/rehab/ebp/pdf/qualguidelines.pdf
[5] Bakhtiari, A. M. S., and Shahbudaghlou, F., 2000, "Energy
Consumption in the Islamic Republic of Iran," OPEC Review,
24(3), pp. 211-233.
[6] Bouchelle, M. P., Parker, D. S., and Anello, M. T., 2000,
"Factors Influencing Water Heating Energy Use and Peak
Demand in a Large Scale Residential Monitoring Study," eds.,
San Antonio, Texas, US, pp.
[7] Brown, M. A., and Rollinson, P. A., 1985, "Residential
Energy Consumption in Low-Income and Elderly Households:
How Nondiscretionary Is It," Journal Name: Energy Syst.
Policy; (United States); Journal Volume: 9:3, pp. Medium: X;
Size: Pages: 271-301.
[8] Haas, R., 1997, "Energy Efficiency Indicators in the
Residential Sector : What Do We Know and What Has to Be
Ensured?," Energy Policy, 25(7-9), pp. 789-802.
[9] Halvorsen, B., and Larsen, B. M., 2001, "Norwegian
Residential Electricity Demand--a Microeconomic Assessment
of the Growth from 1976 to 1993," Energy Policy, 29(3), pp.
227-236.
[10] Lam, J. C., 1998, "Climatic and Economic Influences on
Residential Electricity Consumption," Energy Conversion and
Management, 39(pp. 623-629.
[11] Lenzen, M., Dey, C., and Foran, B., 2004, "Energy
Requirements of Sydney Households," Ecological Economics,
49(3), pp. 375-399.
[12] Lenzen, M., Wier, M., Cohen, C., Hayami, H., Pachauri,
S., and Schaeffer, R., 2006, "A Comparative Multivariate
Analysis of Household Energy Requirements in Australia,
Brazil, Denmark, India and Japan," Energy, 31(2-3), pp. 181-
207.
[13] O'neill, B. C., and Chen, B. S., 2002, "Demographic
Determinants of Household Energy Use in the United States,"
Population and Development Review, 28(Supplement:
Population and Environment: Methods of Analysis), pp. 53-88.
[14] Pachauri, S., 2004, "An Analysis of Cross-Sectional
Variations in Total Household Energy Requirements in India
Using Micro Survey Data," Energy Policy, 32(15), pp. 1723-
1735.
[15] Schipper, L., Ketoff, A., and Kahane, A., 1985,
"Explaining Residential Energy Use by International Bottom-up
Comparisons," Annual Review of Energy, 10(1), pp. 341-405.
[16] Tiwari, P., 2000, "Architectural, Demographic, and
Economic Causes of Electricity Consumption in Bombay,"
Journal of Policy Modeling, 22(1), pp. 81-98.
[17] Tso, G. K. F., and Yau, K. K. W., 2003, "A Study of
Domestic Energy Usage Patterns in Hong Kong," Energy,
28(15), pp. 1671-1682.
[18] Uitdenbogerd, D., Egmond, C., Jonkers, R., and Kok, G.,
2007, "Energy-Related Intervention Success Factors: A
Literature Review," eds., Cote d'Azur, France, pp.
[19] Van Raaij, W. F., and Verhallen, T. M. M., 1983, "A
Behavioral Model of Residential Energy Use," Journal of
Economic Psychology, 3(1), pp. 39-63.
[20] Junk, V. W., Junk, W. S., and Jones, J. C., 1987, "Impacts
of Energy Audits on Home Energy Consumption," Journal of
Consumer Studies and Home Economics, 11(pp. 21-38.
[21] Morrison, B. M., and Gladhart, P. M., 1976, "Energy and
Families: The Crisis and the Response," Journal of home
economics 68(1), pp. 15.
[22] Tonn, B., and Eisenberg, J., 2007, "The Aging Us
Population and Residential Energy Demand," Energy Policy,
35(1), pp. 743-745.
[23] Mileham, C. K., and Brandt, J. A., 1990, "Influence of
Income on Energy Beliefs and Behaviors of Urban Elderly,"
Journal of Housing For the Elderly, 6(1), pp. 107 - 124.
[24] Dzioubinski, O., and Chipman, R., 1999, "Trends in
Consumption and Production: Household Energy
Consumption," Technical Report No. ST/ESA/1999/DR.6,
United Nations Department of Economics and Social Affairs,
Washington, DC, US.
[25] Mehrzad, E., Masoud, A., and Mansour, E., 2007,
"Socioeconomic Factors Affecting Household Energy
Consumption in Qom, Iran," Journal of Applied Science, 7(19),
pp. 2876-2880.
[26] Pachauri, S., and Jiang, L., 2008, "The Household Energy
Transition in India and China," Energy Policy, 36(11), pp.
4022-4035.
5
Copyright © 2011 by ASME
[27] Eia, 1995, "Measuring Energy Efficiency in the United
States' Economy: A Beginning " Technical Report No.
DOE/EIA-0555(95)/2, Department of Energy, Washington, DC,
US.
[28] Poortinga, W., Steg, L., and Vlek, C., 2004, "Values,
Environmental Concern, and Environmental Behavior: A Study
into Household Energy Use," Environment and Behavior, 36(1),
pp. 70-93.
[29] Beccali, M., Cellura, M., Lo Brano, V., and Marvuglia, A.,
2008, "Short-Term Prediction of Household Electricity
Consumption: Assessing Weather Sensitivity in a Mediterranean
Area," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12(8), pp.
2040-2065.
[30] Balderjahn, I., 1988, "Personality Variables and
Environmental Attitudes as Predictors of Ecologically
Responsible Consumption Patterns," Journal of Business
Research, 17(1), pp. 51-56.
[31] Liere, K. D. V., and Dunlap, R. E., 1980, "The Social
Bases of Environmental Concern: A Review of Hypotheses,
Explanations and Empirical Evidence," The Public Opinion
Quarterly, 44(2), pp. 181-197.
[32] Webster, F. E., Jr., 1975, "Determining the Characteristics
of the Socially Conscious Consumer," The Journal of Consumer
Research, 2(3), pp. 188-196.
[33] Harry, J., 1971, "Work and Leisure: Situational Attitudes,"
The Pacific Sociological Review, 14(3), pp. 301-309.
[34] Malkis, A., and Grasmick, H. G., 1977, "Support for the
Ideology of the Environmental Movement: Tests of Alternative
Hypotheses," Western Sociological Review, 8(1), pp. 25-47.
[35] Mannheim, K., 1972, Essays on the Sociology of
Knowledge, Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd., London, UK, The
Problem of Generations.
[36] Cunningham, W. H., and Lopreato, S. C., 1977, Energy
Use and Conservation Incentives: A Study of the Southwestern
United States, Praeger Publisher, New York, US.
[37] Yergin, D., 1980, Energy Future Report of the Energy
Project at the Harvard Business School, Ballantine Books, New
York, US, Conservation: The Key Energy Sources.
[38] Junk, V. W., Jones, J. C., and Kessel, E., 1984, "Interest
and Participation in Energy Audit Programs," Journal of
Housing and Society, 11(pp. 39-44.
[39] Berkowitz, L., and Lutterman, K. G., 1968, "The
Traditional Socially Responsible Personality," The Public
Opinion Quarterly, 32(2), pp. 169-185.
[40] Roberts, J. A., 1996, "Green Consumers in the 1990s:
Profile and Implications for Advertising," Journal of Business
Research, 36(3), pp. 217-231.
[41] Tognacci, L. N., Weigel, R. H., Wideen, M. F., and Vernon,
D. T. A., 1972, "Environmental Quality: How Universal Is
Public Concern?," Environment and Behavior, 4(1), pp. 73-86.
[42] Zabel, H.-U., 2005, "A Model of Human Behaviour for
Sustainability," International Journal of Social Economics,
32(8), pp. 717-734.
[43] Archibald, R., and Gillingham, R., 1980, "An Analysis of
the Short-Run Consumer Demand for Gasoline Using
Household Survey Data," The Review of Economics and
Statistics, 62(4), pp. 622-628.
[44] Schipper, L., and Ketoff, A., 1983, "Home Energy Use in
Nine Oecd Countries, 1960-1980," Energy Policy, 11(2), pp.
131-147.
[45] Haas, R., Auer, H., and Biermayr, P., 1998, "The Impact of
Consumer Behavior on Residential Energy Demand for Space
Heating," Energy and Buildings, 27(2), pp. 195-205.
[46] Meyers, S., and Schipper, L., 1984, "Energy in American
Homes: Change and Prospects," Energy, 9(6), pp. 495-504.
[47] Wilbanks, T. J., Bhatt, V., Bilello, D. E., Bull, S. R.,
Ekmann, J., Horak, W. C., Huang, Y. J., Levine, M. D., Sale, M.
J., Schmalzer, D. K., and Scott, M. J., 2008, "Effects of Climate
Change on Energy Production and Use in the United States "
Technical Report No. Department of Energy, Office of
Biological & Environmental Research, Washington, DC, US.
[48] Brown, R. D., and Gillespie, T. J., 1995, Microclimatic
Landscape Design: Creating Thermal Comfort and Energy
Efficiency, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. , New York, US.
[49] Painuly, J. P., 2001, "Barriers to Renewable Energy
Penetration; a Framework for Analysis," Renewable Energy,
24(1), pp. 73-89.
[50] Martinot, E., and Mcdoom, O., 2000, "Promoting Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy," Technical Report No.
Global Environment Facility, Washington, DC, US.
[51] Karlsson, N., Dellgran, P., Klingander, B., and Gärling, T.,
2004, "Household Consumption: Influences of Aspiration
Level, Social Comparison, and Money Management," Journal
of Economic Psychology, 25(6), pp. 753-769.
[52] Vringer, K., Aalbers, T., and Blok, K., 2007, "Household
Energy Requirement and Value Patterns," Energy Policy, 35(1),
pp. 553-566.
[53] Amato, A. D., Ruth, M., Kirshen, P., and Horwitz, J., 2005,
"Regional Energy Demand Responses to Climate Change:
Methodology and Application to the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts " Climate Change, 71(1-2), pp. 175-201.
[54] Huang, Y. J., 2006, "The Impact of Climate Change on the
Energy Use of the U.S. Residential and Commercial Building
Sectors," Technical Report No. LBNL-60754, Lawrence
Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley CA.
[55] Loveland, J. E., and Brown, G. Z., 1990, "Impacts of
Climate Change on the Energy Performance of Buildings in the
United States," Technical Report No. OTA/UW/UO, Contract
J3-4825.0, U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment,
Washington, DC, US.
[56] Mansur, E. T., Mendelsohn, R. O., and Morrison, W.,
2005,
[57] Rosenthal, D. H., and Gruenspecht, H. K., 1995, "Effects
of Global Warming on Energy Use for Space Heating and
Cooling in the United States," Energy Journal, 16(2), pp. 77-96.
[58] Ruth, M., and Lin, A.-C., 2006, "Regional Energy Demand
and Adaptations to Climate Change: Methodology and
Application to the State of Maryland, USA," Energy Policy,
34(17), pp. 2820-2833.
6
Copyright © 2011 by ASME
[59] Scott, M. J., Dirks, J. A., and Cort, K. A., 2005, "The
Adaptive Value of Energy Efficiency Programs in a Warmer
World: Building Energy Efficiency Offsets Effects of Climate
Change," eds., Brooklyn, New York, US, pp.
7
Copyright © 2011 by ASME
APPENDIX
No. Research Title Author Year Study Target Area Factor Identified
1 Factors Affecting Residential
Heating Energy Consumption
J. Donovan,
W. Fischer 1976 Household energy
consumption
Dwelling size, age of dwelling, income,
energy price, eco-consciousness,
technological improvement
2 Energy and Families: The Crisis and
the Response
B. Morrison,
P. Gladhart 1976 Household energy
consumption
Income, householder age, household size,
dwelling size, housing type, equipment
used, eco consciousness
3
Residential Energy Use and
Conservation in Denmark, 1965-
1980
L. Schipper 1983
Residential energy
consumption for heating
home and water in
Denmark
Energy price, income
4 Home Energy Use in Nine OECD
Countries
L. Schipper,
A. Ketoff 1983 Comparison of home
energy consumption
Income, energy price, dwelling size,
weather, dwelling characteristics
5 A Behavioral Model of Residential
Energy Use
W. Van Raaij,
T. Verhallen 1983 Household energy
consumption
Technological improvement, lifestyle,
housing type (S/M), dwelling
characteristics, income, household size, age,
eco-consciousness, weather, urbanization,
energy price
6 An Update on Econometric Studies
of Energy Demand Behavior
D. Bohi,
M. Zimmerman 1984 Energy consumption vs.
energy price Energy price
7 Energy in American Homes: Change
and Prospects
S. Meyers,
L. Schipper 1984 Household energy
consumption Weather, housing type
8 Residential Energy Use and
Conservation in Sweden L. Schipper 1984 Household energy
consumption in Sweden
Energy price, income, dwelling size,
household size, lifestyle (indoor
temperature), equipments used, housing
type (S/M)
9 Personal and Contextual Influences
on Household Energy Adaptations
J. Black,
P. Stern,
J. Elworth
1985 Household energy
consumption
Attitudes, culture, indoor temperature
setting, dwelling characteristics, energy
price
10
Residential Energy Consumption in
Low-Income and Elderly
Households: How Nondiscretionary
Is It
M. Brown,
P. Rollinson 1985
Low income and elderly
household energy
consumption
Household size, eco-consciousness
11
Explaining Residential Energy Use
by International Bottom-Up
Comparisons
L. Schipper,
A. Ketoff,
A. Kahane
1985 Household energy
consumption
Lifestyle, dwelling characteristics,
equipment availability, indoor temperature,
energy price, household size, type of fuels,
dwelling size, technology improvement
12 Impacts of Energy Audits on Home
Energy Consumption
V. Junk,
W. Junk,
J. Jones
1987 Household energy
consumption
Eco-consciousness, income, dwelling
characteristics, type of fuel used, age,
dwelling age, housing type (s/m)
13
Personality Variables and
Environmental Attitudes as
Predictors of Ecologically
Responsible Consumption Patterns
I. Balderjahn 1988 Household energy
consumption
Attitude, education, dwelling
characteristics, household expenditure
14 Linking Lifestyle and Energy Use: A
Matter of Time?
L. Schipper,
S. Bartlett,
D. Hawk,
E. Vine
1989 Household energy
consumption
Income, energy price, dwelling size,
dwelling characteristics, dwelling age,
household size, equipment ownership
15
Influence of Income on Energy
Beliefs and Behaviors of Urban
Elderly
C. Mileham,
J. Brandt 1990 Household energy
consumption of elderly
Income, dwelling size, household size, age
of dwelling
16
The Structure and Intensity of
Energy Use: Trends in Five OECD
Nations
R. Howarth,
L. Schipper,
B. Andersson
1992 Overall energy
consumption Lifestyle, income, technology available
8
Copyright © 2011 by ASME
No. Research Title Author Year Study Target Area Factor Identified
17
Effect of Thermal Improvements in
Housing on Residential Energy
Demand
L. Hsueh,
J. Gerner 1993 Energy savings from
home improvement Weather, income, dwelling size
18
Measuring Energy Efficiency in the
United States' Economy: A
Beginning
DOE 1995 Household energy
consumption in US
Housing type (S/M), dwelling size,
dwelling characteristics, weather
19
The Direct and Indirect Energy
Requirements of Households in the
Netherlands
K. Vringer,
K. Blok 1995
Household energy
consumption in
Netherlands
Income, education, leisure
20
Lifestyle Change and Energy Use in
Japan: Household Equipment and
Energy Consumption
H. Nakagami 1996 Household energy
consumption Income, lifestyle, dwelling size
21
A Cross-Cultural Analysis of
Household Energy Use Behaviour
in Japan and Norway
H. Wilhite,
H. Nakagami,
T. Masuda,
Y. Yamaga,
H. Haneda
1996 Household energy
consumption
Dwelling size, eco-consciousness, lifestyle,
weather, cultural attitudes, income
22
Energy Efficiency Indicators in the
Residential Sector: What Do We
Know and What Has to be Ensured?
R. Haas 1997 Household energy
consumption
Household size, householder age, energy
price, equipment price, income, eco-
consciousness, equipments used, dwelling
size, weather
23 Some Reflections on Barriers to the
Efficient Use of Energy L. Weber 1997 Household energy
consumption Eco-consciousness
24
Rural Household Energy
Consumption: The Effects of Access
to Electricity -Evidence from South
Africa
M. Davis 1998 Rural household energy
consumption Income
25
The Impact of Consumer Behavior
on Residential Energy Demand for
Space Heating
R. Haas,
H. Auer,
P. Biermayr
1998 Household energy
consumption
Availability of fuel, energy price, indoor
temperature, weather
26
Climatic and Economic Influences
on Residential Electricity
Consumption
J. Lam 1998 Household electricity
consumption
Income, household size, weather, energy
price
27
Reducing Household Energy
Consumption: A Qualitative and
Quantitative Field Study
G. Brandon,
A. Lewis 1999 Household energy
consumption
Income, socio-demographics,
environmental attitudes, information
28
Trends in Consumption and
Production: Household Energy
Consumption
O. Dzioubinski,
R. Chipman 1999 Household energy
consumption
Energy price, equipment price, income,
availability of fuel, availability of
equipment
29 Estimating the Electricity Savings
Effect of Ceiling Insulation
E. Mathews,
M. Kleingeld,
P. Taylor
1999 Household energy
consumption Dwelling characteristics
30 Energy Consumption in the Islamic
Republic of Iran
A.Bakhtiari,
F. Shahbudaghlou 2000 Energy consumption in
Iran
Income, household size, urbanization,
energy price
31
Factors Influencing Water Heating
Energy Use and Peak Demand in a
Large Scale Residential Monitoring
Study
M. Bouchelle,
D. Parker,
M. Anello
2000 Household water
heating energy use Weather, household size
2
Architectural, Demographic, and
Economic Causes of Electricity
Consumption in Bombay
P. Tiwari 2000
Household energy
consumption in
Bombay, India
Income, energy price, dwelling size,
dwelling characteristics, dwelling age,
household size
33 The Uses of Energy in the Domestic
Sector J. Andrade 2001 Household energy
consumption
Time spent at home, dwelling
characteristics, information and knowledge,
household size, householders age
9
Copyright © 2011 by ASME
No. Research Title Author Year Study Target Area Factor Identified
34
Norwegian Residential Electricity
Demand -A Microeconomic
Assessment of the Growth from
1976 to 1993
B. Halvorsen,
B. Larsen 2001 Household electricity
consumption in Norway
Household size, equipments used, income,
dwelling size, energy price
35
Behavioral Factors Study of
Residential Users Which Influence
the Energy Consumption
I. Blasco Lucas,
E. Hidalgo,
G. Gomez,
R. Rosés
2001 Household energy
consumption
Household size, householder age, time
spend at home
36
Demographic Determinants of
Household Energy Use in the
United States
B. O'Neill,
B. Chen 2002 Household energy
consumption in US Householder age, household size
37
The Direct and Indirect Energy
Requirement of Households in the
European Union
A. Reinders,
K. Vringer,
K. Blok
2003
Household energy
consumption in EU
countries
Lifestyle, weather, culture, dwelling
characteristics
38 A Study of Domestic Energy Usage
Patterns in Hong Kong
G. Tso,
K. Yau 2003 Household energy
consumption
Weather, dwelling characteristics, dwelling
size, income, household size, equipment
used
39
Household Consumption:
Influences of Aspiration Level,
Social Comparison, and Money
Management
N. Karlsson,
P. Dellgran,
B. Klingander,
T. Gärling
2004 Household energy
consumption Income, eco-consciousness
40 Energy Requirements of Sydney
Households
M. Lenzen,
C. Dey,
B. Foran
2004 Household energy
consumption in Sydney
Household size, income, household age and
urbanization
41
An Analysis of Cross-Sectional
Variation in Total Household
Energy Requirement in India Using
Micro Survey Data
S. Pachauri 2004 Household energy
consumption
Income, weather, urbanization, household
size, lifestyle, householder age
42 Energy Requirements of
Households in Brazil
C. Cohen,
M. Lenzen,
R. Schaeffer
2005 Household energy
consumption in Brazil Income
43
Study on Affecting Factors and
Standard of Rural Household
Energy Consumption in China
W. Xiaohua,
F. Zhenmin 2005 Rural household energy
consumption in China Income, annual temperature
44
The Effects of Household
Characteristics and Energy Use
Consciousness on the Effectiveness
of Real-Time Energy Use Feedback:
A Pilot Study
D. Allen,
K. Janda 2006 Household energy
consumption
Income, energy monitoring system, eco-
consciousness
45
A Comparative Multivariate
Analysis of Household Energy
Requirements in Australia, Brazil,
Denmark, India, and Japan
M. Lenzen,
M. Wier,
C. Cohen,
H. Hayami,
S. Pachauri,
R. Schaeffer
2006 Household energy
consumption
Income, household size, housing type
(S/M), urbanization
46
Socioeconomic Factors Affecting
Household Energy Consumption in
Qom, Iran
E. Mehrzad,
A. Masoud,
E. Mansour
2007 Household energy
consumption in Iran Eco-consciousness, urbanization
47 Household Energy Requirement and
Value Patterns
K. Vringer,
T. Aalbers,
K. Blok
2007 Household energy
consumption Eco-consciousness
48
Energy-Related Intervention
Success Factors: A Literature
Review
D.Uitdenbogerd,
C. Egmond,
R. Jonkers,
G. Kok
2007 Household energy
consumption
Household size, income, householder age,
dwelling characteristics, technological
improvement, eco-consciousness, lifestyle
10
Copyright © 2011 by ASME
No. Research Title Author Year Study Target Area Factor Identified
49
Short-Term Prediction of Household
Electricity Consumption: Assessing
Weather Sensitivity in a
Mediterranean Area
M. Beccali,
M. Cellura,
V. Lo Brano,
A. Marvuglia
2008 Household electricity
consumption Weather
50
Changing of Energy Consumption
Pattern from Rural Households to
Urban Households in China: An
Example from Shaanxi Province,
China
J. Cai,
Z. Jiang 2008
Rural and urban
household energy
consumption
Urbanization
51 The Household Energy Transition in
India and China
S. Pachauri,
L. Jiang 2008
Rural and urban
household energy
consumption
Income, energy price, urbanization
11
Copyright © 2011 by ASME
... Household energy demand is mostly explained by climate and building attributes; however, resident behavior and socio-economic considerations also significantly influence it [3]. Demographics and household characteristics, such as household income, age, household size, residence size, and home time [4,5], and additionally, consumption-related factors like consumer knowledge, the affordability of energy-efficient equipment, positive experiences, and societal status also play a role in determining energy consumption [4]. ...
... Household energy demand is mostly explained by climate and building attributes; however, resident behavior and socio-economic considerations also significantly influence it [3]. Demographics and household characteristics, such as household income, age, household size, residence size, and home time [4,5], and additionally, consumption-related factors like consumer knowledge, the affordability of energy-efficient equipment, positive experiences, and societal status also play a role in determining energy consumption [4]. ...
... The cooling energy consumption is greatly influenced by the socio-economic factors of households, which in turn affect the physical attributes of dwelling units [48]. As energy usage shifts from cooking to recreational activities and comfort improvement, urbanization contributes to an increase in energy consumption per capita [4]. This is further supported by the observation that energy-intensive assets are utilized with greater intensity within these groups. ...
Article
Full-text available
Household energy consumption is influenced by a variety of factors, including climate, demographics, and socio-economic conditions. This study is a review based on clustering analysis of data from the 2019 Household Budget Survey in Turkey, and explores the role of dwelling structure, household habits, and possessions as indicators of energy patterns and preferences within distinct household groups contributing to Sustainable Development Goals 1, 7, and 12. The data analysis identifies three distinct clusters with specific features that set them apart. The Urban Majority cluster represents densely populated urban areas where natural gas is a preferred fuel source, and parquet and ceramic tiles are common flooring materials. The Deprived-like Remote Residents cluster portrays areas with less access to natural gas, where wood and coal are frequently used for heating, and the Urban Comfort-Seekers cluster highlights urban areas with high comfort levels, featuring natural gas, floor heating, and various amenities. These clusters reflect energy consumption patterns and social aspects related to poverty and habits. They indicate that Turkey’s energy preferences are closely linked to accessibility, user-friendliness, and affordability. Urban households prioritize comfort, while rural areas are more resource-constrained, and contextual factors like location and possessions play a vital role in energy preferences.
... Energy efficiency is considered a viable solution to the ubiquitous problem of high energy consumption around the world, consequently leading to a significant increase in carbon footprint, which is ecologically detrimental [1,2]. Based on the global pressing need to decrease energy usage and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission, researchers have recommended energy efficiency as the most cost-effective approach of tackling energy security and economic problems [3,4]. ...
Article
Full-text available
A prerequisite for decreasing the intensification of energy in buildings is to evaluate and understand the influencing factors of building energy performance (BEP). These factors include building envelope features and outdoor climactic conditions, among others. Based on the importance of the influencing factors in the development of the building energy prediction model, various researchers are continuously employing different types of factors based on their popularity in academic literature, without a proper investigation of the most relevant factors, which, in some cases, potentially leads to poor model performance. However, this can be due to the absence of an adequate comprehensive analysis or review of all factors influencing BEP ubiquitously. Therefore, this paper conducts a holistic and comprehensive review of studies that have explored the various factors influencing energy use in residential and commercial buildings. In total, 74 research articles were systematically selected from the Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Institute of Electrical Electronics Engineers (IEEE) databases. Subsequently, by means of a systematic and bibliometric analysis, this paper comprehensively analyzed several important factors influencing BEP. The results reveals the important factors (such as windows and roofs) and engendered or shed light on the application of some energy-efficient strategies such as the utilization of a green roof and photovoltaic (PV) window, among others.
... Over the past years, numerous research studies have been carried out to analyse the actual and future supply and demand energy patterns in the residential sector [31][32][33][34][35][36]. Research works focus on the characterisation of the energy profile of households (apartments and single-houses), consumers' preferences, and impact over the grid management [37][38][39] in order to facilitate utilities´planning activities while benefitting the consumer with a reduction in their energy bills. These studies are mainly concerned with load shape, peak load, and quality of service provided by power companies [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47], using Energy Management Systems capable of communicating with the Grid Management Operator to facilitate automated demand response actions. ...
Article
Full-text available
The main objective is to propose a calculation method for assessing the benefits of individual domestic prosumers in self-consumption and economic savings when managing their own energy resources. The paper applies the demand-side management concept in the residential sector from the individual domestic perspective so that customers can understand the value of their own sustainable energy resources, conducting self-generation and demand management. The novelty lies in allowing the prosumer to manage their own energy resources to their benefit at a reasonable cost, instead of participating in automated large residential demand-side-management programmes that respond to the means of the grid system operator or other energy service companies, such as aggregators. A methodology for calculating the self-consumption rate and the economic benefit for the consumer is proposed, including three different cases: consumer demand is higher than self-generation, and consumer demand is equal to self-generation, and consumer demand is lower than self-generation. The methodology is validated with actual data from a household in Valencia (Spain) during a complete year, obtaining an average reduction in the annual electricity bill of 70% and a demand coverage with the self-renewable system reaching values of 80% throughout the year. The significance of this methodology goes beyond the economic revenue of the individual consumer; it also aims to guide consumers towards efficient practices in the use of their available energy resources and raise awareness on their energy behaviour.
... First, the exploration of influencing factors is a topic that has been extensively covered by scholars (Bhattacharjee and Reichard, 2011;Jiang et al., 2020). Mainly evaluated the influence of social and economic factors on household energy consumption. ...
Article
Full-text available
Households are an important sector in carrying out human development activities, accounting for more than 30% of the total global energy consumption. The continued growth of household energy consumption (HEC) and carbon emissions is threatening economic and environmental sustainability. This review focuses on the research in the field of HEC and conducts a bibliometric analysis of research articles from the Web of Science Core Collection since 2000. The results show that: 1) HEC research has undergone rapid development since 2014, and interdisciplinary fusion and collaborative research have become dominant trends. 2) Keyword co-occurrence analysis clearly identifies the current urgent themes, including energy demand and its determinants, environmental impact factors and assessments, and energy-saving technologies and emission reduction measures. 3) The analysis of citations reveals that economic models, such as input-output models and life cycle assessment, are frequently employed in the field of HEC. Based on a summary of household energy-saving and emissions reduction work, this paper critically discusses the limitations of existing measures such as smart home technology, sustainable energy systems, and behavioral interventions. The main directions for promoting household energy-saving development in the future are identified: including improving the security and customer engagement of smart home technology, focusing on the availability and stability of sustainable energy, and paying more attention to low-income and aging households in behavioral intervention measures. One of the important obstacles facing research is how to reduce energy management efficiency and usage costs through technology and policy.
... Environmental drivers related to the physical characteristics of the building and the immediate surroundings influence the energy conservation behaviour of individuals [40,41]. Other sociodemographic factors have been cited to influence energy conservation behaviour [41][42][43][44]. Using the theory of planned behaviour, Alomari et [45] reported that societal pressure and cultures significantly affect individual intention to engage in energy conservation behaviour. ...
Article
Full-text available
Thermal power generation is the main source of power in the energy mix of the country. Erratic rainfall patterns, the high cost of fossil fuel for thermal generation, and increase electricity demand have contributed to rampant power out-ages in the recent past. This paper examined energy conservation and efficiency awareness practices of households in the Cape Coast Metropolis of Ghana. It assessed the level and variability in energy conservation practices and the level of energy-savings awareness education among households. Three hundred and ninety-six households were randomly selected from nine communities using stratified sampling techniques. Five stakeholders from the electricity sector were purposively sampled for in-depth interviews. The data sets were modeled using the utility maximization framework to econometrically estimate socioeconomic factors influencing the energy conservation behaviour of households. The findings reveal that years spent in school by household heads, income levels, expenditure, age of households, and the number of times electricity power triples off daily were among the key factors influencing individual households' choice of energy-efficient appliances. There was significant variability between existing social strata in terms of income and use of electrical appliances among households that warrants policy direction. Based on the findings, this study recommends a robust energy literacy program to improve households' energy efficiency practices awareness, and to ensure energy cost savings, environmental protection, and climate change mitigation that will enhance the drive towards achieving sustainable development goals seven.
... create home-based businesses, increase household income, and reduce environmental damages (Bhattacharjee & Reichard, 2011;Pickering, et al., 2017;Li, et al., 2019). Most importantly, it saves households' fuel expenditures and helps to enjoy a wider range of energy services to domestic activities (Lloyd, 2017;Hanania, Stenhouse, & Donev, 2018). ...
Article
At present, although electricity is essential for all human beings, it is not equally accessible to all. This paper analyzed the impact of access to and use of electricity on the economic status of informal settlements in Addis Ababa based on 450 households drawn from three sites of Woreda 12, Yeka Sub-City. The respondents were selected using proportional random sampling method and data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Endogenous Switching Regression (ESR) models. The study revealed that non-users of electricity shifted more family labor to domestic activities, baked Injera less frequently per week, owned small number of home-based businesses, and used less alternative fuels than electricusers. However, due to lack of reliable energy supply and food consumption behaviors (FCBs), households do not completely rely on a single energy source. These situations could draw the attention of the government to provide reliable electric supply to non-users of electricity living sporadically mixed with electric-users, close to electric facilities and change households’ energy consumption behaviors using alternative energy sources with the concept of energy stacking.
... A constant theme of works with a sociological approach is the correlation between social inequalities and the manner as well as amount of energy consumption. A general finding of the international literature is that the behaviour patterns of energy consumers are related to the sociodemographic characteristics of households [26]; however, much less research has been performed on whether consumer behaviour is more strongly influenced by the characteristics of an apartment or house or the differences in the sociodemographic compositions of consumer households. Győri et al. (in this Special Issue) [27] analyse Hungarian household energy consumption between 2006 and 2017 on a representative probability sample from 2006, 2012, and 2017. ...
Article
Full-text available
In our paper we analyse the scientific perception of energy use in the social sciences [...]
Article
Full-text available
The global energy crisis, which began in 2021 due to the extraordinary economic recovery after the pandemic and intensified after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, has changed the conditions of energy management, paying more attention to energy efficiency. Natural gas prices have reached record levels and, consequently, so have electricity prices in some markets. Oil prices have reached their highest level since 2008. Higher energy prices have contributed to sharply increased inflation. Households are again becoming interested in buying coal as a source of heat. High energy and gas prices have pushed many families into poverty and forced some factories to cut production or even close. They have also slowed economic growth to the point where some countries are heading for a serious recession. Paradoxically, the negative effects of the energy crisis may accelerate the introduction of cleaner, sustainable, renewable energy such as wind and solar energy. The energy crisis is comparable to the oil crisis of the 1970s, when it contributed to significant advances in energy efficiency. The current crisis has highlighted the importance of investments in renewable energy resources and initiated the process of integrating regional markets, developing energy efficiency and promoting renewable energies. The aim of this article is to comprehensively explore the complex relationship between energy awareness, consumption patterns, and energy efficiency, with a focus on both individual consumers and industries, during the global energy crisis. This paper is based on a literature review, overarching policy documents, energy reports, and other secondary documents. The primary research method was the systematic literature review method, based on which the impact of the global energy crisis on energy efficiency was evaluated. This study emphasizes the diverse influences on energy awareness, ranging from economic factors to consumer preferences and environmental consciousness. The findings of the paper underscore the significant responsibility of industries in contributing to energy-saving efforts and the active role of consumers in the energy market. The responsibility of industries in contributing to energy efficiency is highlighted, with a call for a comprehensive approach that integrates energy-saving criteria into product development and corporate social responsibility.
Thesis
Full-text available
Previous reports on Siaya county energy consumption reveal that woodfuel is the primary energy source. Such heavy dependence at 98% causes poverty and environmental problems in the form of deforestation, biodiversity loss, air pollution, depletion of water sources and land degradation. However, little is known about the energy consumption pattern in Siaya Township ward. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the households' energy consumption patterns and effects on the environment in Siaya Township. It was to precisely determine factors influencing household energy consumption, analyse household energy consumption patterns spatially, and establish environmental effects associated with using wood fuel. The study was a descriptive, analytical, cross-sectional design based on cluster sampling. 411 households were sampled out of 8,043. Primary and secondary data were analysed using SPSS descriptive statistical analysis and Geographical Information Systems (G.I.S.) spatial analysis. The results revealed that socio-economic and geographic factors influence energy consumption in Siaya Township. On the other hand, the direct effects on the environment are a reduction in forest cover, loss of wetlands, biodiversity loss, land degradation and depletion of water sources. The findings call for the county government, in collaboration with all stakeholders, to implement policies to help subsidise the installation cost of green energy sources. Also, to train and build human capacity to install and maintain such sources and put in place a credit facility for households that want to invest. The findings of this study are expected to contribute to the knowledge of energy consumption patterns in contexts like Siaya Township. To this end, it would be interesting for future studies to look at energy choice behaviour in the same context by choice modelling to help bring a deeper understanding of energy consumption for future energy planning.
Book
Full-text available
Cities are widely recognized as risky environments for humans. Risks to health and well-being are measured in three groups of indices: physiological, emotional and cognitive. Environmental factors discussed in studies include physical factors such as noise, heat load and air pollution, and social factors such as feelings of discomfort, crime, transportation and access to health services. Some studies even argue that stress and health risks are intrinsic to urban environments and that restoration is intrinsic to green environments. This Topic aims to discuss what spaces can be greened and the effect this has on urban environments. It also discusses the effect of the size and layout of parks, vegetation on the walls and roofs of houses, and the effects of different types of vegetation, building materials, and energy efficient design. Recent events have challenged the way the built environment is designed, managed and experienced. Droughts, wildfires and a global pandemic have undoubtedly forced the building industry to find ways to cope with unpredictable events and to respond to a broader and more complex set of requirements. Today's environment demands new design processes, construction techniques, occupancy practices, and management strategies to increase the resilience of the built environment to extreme, uncontrollable, and unpredictable events while providing healthy and sustainable environments for people. This Topic invites researchers that address this topic to reflect on what the new concept of sustainability for the built environment should be, and to guide new research directions. The aim of this Topic is to add knowledge to the information on the greening of our cities. We invite the authors to raise awareness of different aspects of the problem or to contribute relevant knowledge on any of the aspects mentioned above.
Article
In our article entitled “The Social Bases of Environmental Concern: A Review of Hypotheses, Explanations and Empirical Evidence” (POQ 44:181–97), two rows of correlations were reversed in Table 1. Under the study by Van Liere and Dunlap, 1978, figures for the environmental funding scale appear where figures for the environmental regulations scale should be, and vice versa. We regret the error and hope it has not caused undue confusion for anyone using these data.
Article
Climate change is expected to have noticeable effects in the United States: a rise in average temperatures in most regions, changes in precipitation amounts and seasonal patterns in many regions, changes in the intensity and pattern of extreme weather events, and sea level rise. Some of these effects have clear implications for energy production and use. For instance, average warming can be expected to increase energy requirements for cooling and reduce energy requirements for warming. Changes in precipitation could affect prospects for hydropower, positively or negatively. Increases in storm intensity could threaten further disruptions of the sorts experienced in 2005 with Hurricane Katrina. Concerns about climate change impacts could change perceptions and valuations of energy technology alternatives. Any or all of these types of effects could have very real meaning for energy policies, decisions, and institutions in the United States, affecting discussions of courses of action and appropriate strategies for risk management. This report summarizes what is currently known about effects of climate change on energy production and use in the United States. It focuses on three questions, which are listed below along with general short answers to each. Generally, it is important to be careful about answering these questions for two reasons. One reason is that the available research literatures on many of the key issues are limited, supporting a discussion of issues but not definite conclusions about answers. A second reason is that, as with many other categories of climate change effects in the U.S., the effects depend on more than climate change alone, such as patterns of economic growth and land use, patterns of population growth and distribution, technological change, and social and cultural trends that could shape policies and actions, individually and institutionally. The report concludes that, based on what we know now, there are reasons to pay close attention to possible climate change impacts on energy production and use and to consider ways to adapt to possible adverse impacts and take advantage of possible positive impacts. Although the report includes considerably more detail, here are the three questions along with a brief summary of the answers: • How might climate change affect energy consumption in the United States? The research evidence is relatively clear that climate warming will mean reductions in total U.S. heating requirements and increases in total cooling requirements for buildings. These changes will vary by region and by season, but they will affect household and business energy costs and their demands on energy supply institutions. In general, the changes imply increased demands for electricity, which supplies virtually all cooling energy services but only some heating services. Other effects on energy consumption are less clear. • How might climate change affect energy production and supply in the United States? The research evidence about effects is not as strong as for energy consumption, but climate change could affect energy production and supply (a) if extreme weather events become more intense, (b) where regions dependent on water supplies for hydropower and/or thermal power plant cooling face reductions in water supplies, (c) where temperature increases decrease overall thermoelectric power generation efficiencies, and (d) where changed conditions affect facility siting decisions. Most effects are likely to be modest except for possible regional effects of extreme weather events and water shortages.
Article
The abstract for this document is available on CSA Illumina.To view the Abstract, click the Abstract button above the document title.
Article
It has above been attempted to determine if there are any transfers of attitudes from the workplace to the leisure situation by looking at individuals whose work and leisure environments seem very similar. Consistent with Dubin's earlier findings, there appears to be no relationship between occupation and leisure attitudes when examining locational preferences for satisfaction of primary sociable motives. Thus, there seems to be two-way independence of workplace and leisure-place. Although occupational type was found to be lacking in effect upon the purely social content of leisure attitudes, there appeared to be some transfer of cultural content. The type of material transferred, however, appears to be relatively specific and technological.