Content uploaded by Soumik Chatterjee
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Soumik Chatterjee on Apr 09, 2024
Content may be subject to copyright.
VOL15, ISSUE 2, 2024
ISSN:0975 -3583,0976-2833
1700
Original research article
A NOVEL INFLAMMATORY MARKER OF DIAGNOSTIC
IMPORTANCE IN DIABETIC SENSORY-MOTOR
NEUROPATHY: SYSTEMIC IMMUNE INFLAMMATION
INDEX
1Soumik Chatterjee, 2Papiya Majumdar
1Post Graduate Resident, KPC Medical College and Hospital, Jadavpur, Kolkata, West
Bengal, India
2Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, KPC Medical College and Hospital,
Jadavpur, Kolkata,
West Bengal, India
Corresponding Author:
Soumik Chatterjee
Abstract
Diabetic sensory-motor neuropathy (DSMN) is a prevalent complication of diabetes
mellitus characterized by nerve damage leading to sensory deficits, motor dysfunction,
and neuropathic pain. This abstract examines the clinical and diagnostic significance
of the Systemic Immune Inflammation Index (SII) in DSMN. Recent research has
highlighted the association between systemic inflammation and the pathogenesis of
DSMN. The SII, calculated based on peripheral blood cell counts, serves as a
composite marker reflecting the balance between systemic immune responses and
inflammatory status. Clinical studies have demonstrated a positive correlation between
elevated SII levels of DSMN. Patients with higher SII values exhibit more pronounced
neuropathy symptoms and impaired nerve conduction velocities, indicating a potential
link between inflammation-mediated processes and neuropathic damage. Furthermore,
the SII has emerged as a valuable diagnostic tool for predicting DSMN related
inflammatory sequel and monitoring disease progression. Its non-invasive nature and
cost-effectiveness make it a promising biomarker for identifying individuals at risk of
developing neuropathic complications in diabetes. This abstract underscores the
clinical relevance of the SII in enhancing our understanding of the inflammatory
mechanisms underlying DSMN and its potential utility in early detection and
management strategies. Further investigation into the predictive value and therapeutic
implications of the SII in DSMN is warranted to optimize patient care and outcomes.
The present study aims to evaluate the potential role of SII in predicting inflammation
in patients with Diabetic Sensory-motor Neuropathy.
Keywords: Diabetes Mellitus, Inflammation, Systemic Immune Inflammation Index,
Neuropathy
VOL15, ISSUE 2, 2024
ISSN:0975 -3583,0976-2833
1701
Introduction
India's struggle with diabetes is an imperative and inescapable global health crisis. With
one of the highest rates in the world, it's time to take action and address this issue head-
on. Peripheral neuropathy is one of the major microvascular consequences of type 2
diabetes mellitus (T2DM) It is more common than nephropathy or retinopathy
secondary to T2DM, and is the leading cause of lower limb amputation in Western
countries [1-3]. Diabetic sensory-motor neuropathy (DSMN) may have variable
manifestations based on the nervous system involved, resulting in a complicated
spectrum of symptoms. However, peripheral neuropathy is the most frequent feature
and, as clearly outlined by recent guidelines, it might affect almost half of patients with
T2DM during their lifetime [1, 4].
DSMN can present in various forms such as symmetric sensory-motor axonal
neuropathy, proximal asymmetric painful motor neuropathy, mononeuropathy, or
autonomic neuropathy. The latter occurs mainly due to the involvement of small fibers
[1]. The pathogenesis is characterized by inflammatory damage to the peripheral
neurons that transmit motor and sensory impulses [1, 5]. This damage is mostly seen in
the longest nerve fibers, hence known as "length-dependent" neuropathy [1, 6].
The Systemic Immune Inflammation Index (SII) is a measure used to assess the balance
of host inflammatory and immunological status. It was initially designed to predict the
outcome in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma [7]. However, recent studies have
shown that it can also be used as a prognostic factor for various malignancies and
inflammatory conditions [8-11]. Some researchers believe that the increasing rates of
diabetes can be partly attributed to low-grade chronic inflammation and the resulting
insulin resistance [12]. SII is an effective and non-invasive biochemical marker that can
be readily obtained through routine blood work, making it an economical alternative to
other markers.
Various health conditions, including malignancies, cardiovascular diseases, and hepatic
steatosis, have been linked to the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII). Despite
being a common complication of diabetes, the link between SII and DSMN is still not
well comprehended and has not been methodically studied. We need to be involved in
more research to explore this relationship and gain a better understanding of this
debilitating condition. Studies are insufficient on this topic from the eastern region of
the country at present. The objective of our is to explore the potential of SII as a novel
indicator of inflammation in Diabetes Mellitus. We aim to gain a better understanding
of how this marker can be of assistance in diagnosing and managing the disease more
effectively.
Materials & Methods
A study was conducted for a year on 100 patients with T2DM in a city hospital located
in eastern part of India. The study included individuals aged between 18 to 80 years,
who were diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes as per the 1999 World Health Organization
Diagnostic Standards for Diabetes Patients. Only those individuals who voluntarily
agreed to participate were included in the study. However, patients with acute diabetic
complications or undergoing acute stress states, patients with non-healing diabetic foot
ulcers, patients with severe cardiac, liver, or renal insufficiency, and patients diagnosed
with cancer, recent infections, immune system disorders, or blood system diseases were
VOL15, ISSUE 2, 2024
ISSN:0975 -3583,0976-2833
1702
excluded from the study.
All patients underwent a Nerve Conduction Study (NCS) examination. The NCS was
performed in the unilateral upper and lower extremities. Motor NCS was performed in
the nerves of the upper extremities including median and ulnar. They were also done in
the peroneal and tibial nerves of the lower extremities. For each nerve, the F-waves
were recorded. Sensory NCS were attained from the median, ulnar, and sural nerves. H-
reflex studies were also completed. Based on the NCS report, the patients were
subsequently categorized into two groups the diabetic neuropathy group (n=50) and the
diabetic non-neuropathy group (n=50).
A Sysmex XN 100 analyzer was used to conduct a Comprehensive Blood Count
(CBC), which measured the total count of white blood cells, platelets, neutrophils, and
lymphocytes. Subsequently, the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) was
calculated by multiplying the total platelet count by the total neutrophil count and
dividing the result by the total lymphocyte count.
Statistical scrutiny of the compiled data was accomplished by using SPSS 24.0
software. The measurement data that trailed a normal distribution were represented in
terms of measures of central tendency. Group contrasts were achieved using two
independent samples t-tests. When analyzing non-normally distributed measurement
data and expressing it as the median and quantile spacing, it becomes a reliable
approach. To perform group comparisons, the Mann-Whitney U-test is a proven and
effective method. Trusting these methods one can ensure accurate and meaningful
insights from the data analysis.
The Mantel-Haenszel analysis was used for the chi-square trend test, for observing the
drift of the study. We used restrictive cubic spline analysis to investigate the non-linear
relationships between the risk of DSMN in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and
systemic immune-inflammation index (SII). Additionally, we evaluated the diagnostic
value of SII for DSMN in T2DM patients by analyzing the Receiver Operating
Characteristic (ROC) curve, including the calculation of the area under the curve
(AUC). We considered statistical significance at P < 0.05 for all analyses.
Results
Among all T2DM patients, patients with DSMN exhibited significantly higher SII
levels, when compared to non-DSMN patients (P<0.001). The incidence of DSMN was
higher among male patients compared to the non-DSMN group (P=0.025). DSMN
patients had a significantly longer duration of diabetes compared to non-DSMN
patients (p=0.025).
We categorized patients into four groups based on quartile intervals of the SII quartile
spacing level (I, II, III & IV) to convert SII into ordered multi-classification variables
and each group comprised 25 patients. The SII intervals were Group I (SII<311), group
II (311<SII<428), group III (428<SII<555), and Group IV (SII>555).
We performed a Mantel-Haenszel chi-square trend test on the four patient groups.
Upon grouping, a linear trend was evident between SII and the occurrence of DSMN
(P<0.001). A moderate positive correlation was found between SII and DSMN, with a
correlation coefficient of 0.3 and a P-value of less than 0.001. The incidence of DSMN
demonstrated an escalating pattern with increasing SII quartile levels with rates of
27.8%, 44.8%, 61.2%, and 74.2% in Groups I, II, III, and IV, respectively (Table 1).
VOL15, ISSUE 2, 2024
ISSN:0975 -3583,0976-2833
1703
Table 1: Mantel-Haenszel Chi-Square Trend
Mantel-Haenszel Chi-Square Trend
Groups
I
II
III
IV
DSMN %
27.8
44.8
61.2
74.2
For SII, a significant linear relationship with the incidence of DSMN was observed (P
total trend <0.001, P nonlinear = 0.06). DSMN incidence significantly increased when
SII > 428, and it increased linearly with higher SII values. The ROC curve analysis
revealed that SII exhibited the highest accuracy in evaluating DSMN, with an AUC of
0.80, a sensitivity of 76.1%, and a specificity of 71.6%.
Discussion
This study represents the first assessment of the association between SII and Diabetic
sensory-motor neuropathy in a cohort of Indian adults. When examining the cohort as a
whole, we found a positive relationship between SII and DSMN.
In recent times, SII and system inflammation response index (SIRI) have emerged as
novel markers of inflammation. Studies have indicated that SII and SIRI encompass
platelets and various inflammatory cells present within white blood cells, including
diverse immune regulatory pathways in the body. In comparison to individual white
blood cells and platelets, these indices are less affected by the physiological and
pathological states of the body, thereby offering a more consistent reflection of the
overall inflammatory condition [13, 14]. It is noteworthy that the calculation methods for
SII and SIRI are simple and affordable, requiring only common blood routine
parameters. It's important to note that the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII)
can be used to evaluate diabetic patients who have limited mobility or cognitive
disorders because it doesn't require their active involvement.
Research shows that there is a strong connection between SII, SIRI, and diabetes. SII
can also be used to predict and assess conditions like diabetic nephropathy and
depression [14, 15]. Our findings are consistent with previous studies that have identified
a positive correlation between SII and diabetes or its complications. For example, a
study by Nie Y et al. found that SII was positively associated with diabetes [16]. Another
study by Ozer Balin S et al. found a moderately positive relationship between the SII
index and Diabetic Foot Infection [17].
However, it's important to acknowledge the limitations of this study. Our investigation
was limited to a specific community and included a relatively small number of
participants. Therefore, it's not possible to generalize these findings to a wider
population of patients. Further correlation studies, including extensive clinical trials,
are necessary to validate the associations between SII, SIRI, and individuals with
DSMN.
VOL15, ISSUE 2, 2024
ISSN:0975 -3583,0976-2833
1704
Conclusion
Our study concluded that there is a positive correlation between the Systemic Immune
Inflammation Index and diabetic sensory-motor neuropathy. To our knowledge, this
study is the first to utilize prospective cohort data in examining the correlation between
sensory-motor neuropathy in T2DM patients and SII levels. The study was conducted
among adults in a city-based hospital in Eastern India, and the findings suggest that SII
may act as an independent and early marker of inflammation factor for sensory-motor
neuropathy. Higher levels of SII may hold promise as useful indicators of this condition
in T2DM patients.
References
1. Galiero R, Caturano A, Vetrano E, Beccia D, Brin C, Alfano M, et al. Peripheral
Neuropathy in Diabetes Mellitus: Pathogenetic Mechanisms and Diagnostic
Options. Int. J Mol. Sci. 2023;24:35-54.
2. Pop-Busui R, Ang L, Boulton AJM, Feldman EL, Marcus RL, Mizokami-Stout K,
et al. Diagnosis and Treatment of Painful Diabetic Perpheral Neuropathy. ADA
CIM. Commend, 2022, pp. 1-32.
3. Selvaraiah D, Kar D, Khunti K, Davies M, Scott AR, Walker I, et al. Diabetic
verioheral neuropathv: Advances in diagnosis and strategies for screening and early
intervention. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7:938-948.
4. Sasso FC, Carbonara O, Persico M, Iafusco D, Salvatore T, D'Ambrosio R, et al.
Irbesartan reduces the albumin excretion rate in microalbuminuric type 2 diabetic
patients independently ot hypertension: A randomized double-blind placebo-
controlled crossover study. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:1909-1913.
5. Malik RA, Tesfaye S, Thompson SD, Veves A, Sharma AK, Boulton AJ, et al.
Endoneurial localisation of microvascular damage in human diabetic neuropathy.
Diabetologia. 1993;36:454-459.
6. Ziegler D, Papanas N, Schnell O, Nguyen BDT, Nguyen KT, Kulkantrakorn K, et
al. Current concepts in the management of diabetic polyneuropathy. J Diabetes
Investig. 2021;12:464-475.
7. Hu B, Yang XR, Xu Y, Sun YF, Sun C, Guo W, et al. Systemic immune-
inflammation index predicts prognosis of patients after curative resection for
hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:6212-22.
8. Li YX, Chang JY, He MY, Wang HR, Luo DQ, Li FH, et al. Neutrophil-to-
lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) predict clinical
outcome in patients with stage IIB cervical Cancer. J Oncol, 2021, pp. 293-9162.
9. Deng Y, Zhao Y, Qin J, Huang X, Wu R, Zhou C, et al. Prognostic value of the C-
reactive protein/albumin ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index for
patients with colorectal liver metastasis undergoing curative resection. Pathol Oncol
Res. 2021;27:633-480.
10. Zhang D, Wang T, Dong X, Sun L, Wu Q, Liu J, et al. Systemic immune-
inflammation index for predicting the prognosis of critically ill patients with acute
pancreatitis. Int J Gen Med. 2021;14:4491-8.
11. Agus HZ, Kahraman S, Arslan C, Yildirim C, Erturk M, Kalkan AK, et al.
Systemic immune- inflammation index predicts mortality in infective endocarditis.
J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2020;32:58-64.
VOL15, ISSUE 2, 2024
ISSN:0975 -3583,0976-2833
1705
12. Lontchi-Yimagou E, Sobngwi E, Matsha TE, Kengne AP. Diabetes mellitus and
inflammation. Curr. Diabetes Rep. 2013;13:435-444.
13. Li X, Gu L, Chen Y, et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index is a promising
non-invasive biomarker for predicting the survival of urinary system cancers: a
systematic review and meta- analysis. Ann Med. 2021;53(1):1827-1838.
14. Wang S, Pan X, Jia B, Chen S. Exploring the Correlation Between the Systemic
Immune Inflammation Index (SII), Systemic Inflammatory Response Index (SIRI)
and Type 2 Diabetic Retinopathy. DMSO. 2023;16:3827-3836.
15. Wang J, Zhou D, Dai Z, Li X. Association between systemic immune-inflammation
index and diabetic depression. Clin Interv Aging. 2021;16:97-105.
16. Nie Y, Zhou H, Wang J, Kan H. Association between systemic immune-
inflammation index and diabetes: a population-based study from the NHANES.
Front. Endocrinol. 2023;14:124-5199.
17. Ozer Balin S, Ozcan EC, Uğur K. A New Inflammatory Marker of Clinical and
Diagnostic Importance in Diabetic Foot Infection: Systemic Immune-Inflammation
Index. The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds, 2022, 0(0).
18.