Content uploaded by Soren Ventegodt
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Soren Ventegodt
Content may be subject to copyright.
Int J Adolesc Med Health 2003;15(1):89-91. ©Freund Publishing House Ltd.
The life mission theory: A theory for a consciousness-based
medicine
Søren Ventegodt, MD
Quality-of-Life Research Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark
Abstract: Genetic factors, external stress and the human factor are influential to the health and well-
being of every person. Several studies have shown that the human being have many internal powers
that can promote health and increase quality of life. A theory on the human meaning of life is put
forward and how it relates to health, disease and quality of life in the context of holistic medicine.
Keywords: Quality of life, etiology, life mission, holistic medicine, Denmark
Correspondence: Søren Ventegodt, MD, Medical Director, Forskningscenter for Livskvalitet,
Teglgårdstræde 4, DK-1452 Copenhagen K, Denmark. Tel: (+45) 33 14 11 13. Telefax: (+45) 33 14
11 23. E-mail: ventegodt@livskvalitet.org
Submitted: January 05, 2003. Revised: February 05, 2003. Accepted: February 18, 2003.
INTRODUCTION
The basic factors that influence health and
disease can be divided into three categories:
genetic factors, external stressors and
traumas, as well as positive factors such as
social network and medical treatment, and
finally the purely “human” factor con-
cerned with lifestyles, free will, philosophy
of life and the quality of their lives. Studies
of the role of this “human” factor (1,2)
indicated that many patients have major and
unexplained powers to promote their own
health. This short communication sketches
a possible explanation that draws on
classical psychodynamic and psycho-
somatic theory.
THE THEORY
The phases listed below chart the life and
disease history of an individual (II-VII). At
the outset, let us assume that a human being
begins his or her existence with a plan or an
ambition for a good and healthy life. We
may put this assumption of a primordial
plan in quite abstract terms (I):
I. Life Mission. Let us assume that at the
moment of conception all the joy, energy
and wisdom that our lives are capable of
supporting are expressed in a “decision” as
to the purpose of our lives. This first
“decision” is quite abstract and all-en-
compassing and holds the intentions of the
entire life for that individual. It may be
called the personal mission or the life
mission. This mission is the meaning of life
for that individual. It is always constructive
and sides with life itself.
II. Life pain. The greatest and most
fundamental pain in our lives derives from
the frustrations encountered, when we try to
achieve our personal mission, be they
frustrated attempts to satisfy basic needs or
the failure to obtain desired psychological
states.
III. Denial. When the pain becomes
intolerable we can deny our life mission by
making a counter-decision, which is then
lodged in the body and the mind, partially
or entirely cancelling the life mission.
IV. Repair. One or several new life
intentions, more specific than the original
life mission, may now be chosen relative to
2 THE LIFE MISSION THEORY
what is possible henceforth. They replace
the original life mission and enable the
person to move forward again. They can, in
turn, be modified, when they encounter new
pains experienced as unbearable. (Example:
Mission #1: “I am good.” Denial #1: “I am
not good enough.” Mission #2: “I will
become good,” which implies I am not).
V. Repression and loss of responsibility.
The new life intention, which corresponds
to a new perspective on life at a lower level
of responsibility, is based on an effective
repression of both the old life mission and
the counter-decision that antagonises and
denies it. Such a repression causes the
person to split in a conscious and one or
more unconscious/subconscious parts. The
end result is that we deny and repress parts
of ourselves. Our new life intention must
always be consistent with what is left
undenied.
VI. Loss of physical health. Human
consciousness is coupled to the wholeness
of the organism through the information
systems that bind all the cells of the body
into a unity. Disturbances in consciousness
may thus disturb the organism's information
systems, resulting in the cells being less
perfectly informed as to what they are to do
where.
Disruptions in the necessary flow of
information to the cells of the organism and
tissues hamper the ability of the cells to
function properly. Loss of cellular function-
ality may eventually result in disease and
suffering.
VII. Loss of quality of life and mental
health. In psychological and spiritual
terms, people who deny their personal
mission gradually lose their fundamental
sense that life has meaning, direction and
coherence. They may find that their joy of
life, energy to do important things and
intuitive wisdom are slowly petering out.
The quality of their lives is diminished and
their mental health impaired.
IIX. Loss of functionality. When we
decide against our life mission we
invalidate our very existence. This shows
up as reduced self-worth and self-
confidence. Thus, the counter-decisions
compromise not only our health and quality
of life, but also our basic powers to function
physically, psychologically, socially, at
work, sexually, etc.
APPLYING THE THEORY
Spiegel et al (1) asked women with
metastatic breast cancer to talk to each
other in group sessions about their illness.
As described in the article, the women
made an effort to improve the quality of
their lives. Survival improved radically,
relative to a control group. This may be
accounted for as follows. When people
confront and deal with still more of their
destructive cognitions or attitudes to life,
then the counter-decisions recorded in their
bodies and minds results in the repressed
pain to resurface in consciousness to be
dealt with and the fragmentation of the
person slowly ceases. We heal and we
become whole. Since the fragmentation is
one of the causes of the disease resulting in
decreased quality of life and ability to
function, the internal repair will enable the
person to become more healthy, happy and
functional. The inner qualities of joy,
energy and wisdom re-express themselves.
Other things being equal, there will be
prophylactic effects on new outbreaks of
disease, accidents and loss of functionality.
Ornish et al (2) induced patients with
coronary arteries severely constricted from
atherosclerosis to adopt lifestyle changes
and deal with the quality of their lives. This
had beneficial effects on the arterial
constrictions, as compared with a control
group.
The life mission theory may explain this
S. VENTEGODT 3
by reference to the systematic efforts
exerted by the patients to modify their
behaviours and the attitudes that go along
with them. This means that people work to
relinquish destructive attitudes to life that
deny the life mission. As this denial
recedes, the person more or less returns to
his or her natural state of health, quality of
life and ability to function.
The theory predicts that, for example,
that when a person is helped along by a
family physician conducting a conversation
(clinical interview or consultation) about
the quality of life of that person, she can
reestablish her life mission. The person can
then recognize it as the proper purpose in
her life. She can rearrange her life
accordingly and achieve her truest sense of
humanity, a human being in full agreement
with herself and life. This person can draw
on her resources and potentials to the fullest
degree. In her natural state, a human being
is maximally valuable to herself and the
world around her.
A consciousness-oriented (holistic)
medicine based on this theory will help
people become valuable not only to
themselves, but also to each other.
REFERENCES
1. Spiegel D, Bloom JR, Kraemer HC,
Gottheil E. Effect of psychosocial
treatment on survival of patients with
metastatic breast cancer. Lancet 1989;
2(8668):888-91.
2. Ornish D, Brown SE, Scherwitz LW,
Billings JH, Armstrong WR, Ports TA,
Kirkeeide RL, Brand RJ, Gould KL.
Can lifestyle changes reverse coronary
heart disease? The Lifestyle Heart Trial.
Lancet 1990;336(8708):129-33.
