ArticlePDF Available

COVID-19 pandemic, global advisories and the imperatives of strengthening the public healthcare system: Nigeria in context

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Purpose Given the efficacy of a robust public healthcare system in handling public health emergencies, the rapid rate of COVID-19 pandemic infection in early-hit (advanced) countries with competent healthcare system is intriguing. The popular public health argument supports the strengthening of the healthcare system as a significant response strategy to minimize infection. Hence, this paper examines the catalysts that exacerbated the pandemic’s rapid spread in these countries despite the sound state of their healthcare system. Also, it assesses the condition of Nigerian public healthcare system in the lights of the novel COVID-19 pandemic and suggests the need for improvement and effective functioning. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses a documentary approach to establish the authors’ opinion on the subject matter under investigation. Findings Factors such as climate, temperature, and humidity levels played a key role in infection in the winter of 2020. These factors facilitated for the pandemic’s rapid spread in advanced countries. In peripheral countries like Nigeria, the public healthcare system is burdened by a lack of funding, an insufficiency in welfare and training for healthcare staff and facilities and other operational challenges. Hence, the effective management of COVID-19 outbreak in Nigeria relative to advanced countries was hindered by the inadequacies mentioned above. Originality/value This paper provides an understanding on the condition of public healthcare system in peripheral nations in relation to the healthcare system advisories from the World Health Organization (WHO) in the context of handling the pandemic outbreak. Also, it explains the catalysts that heightened the pandemic’s rapid spread in advanced countries despite the higher capacity of their healthcare system to manage health emergencies.
Content may be subject to copyright.
COVID-19 pandemic, global
advisories and the imperatives
of strengthening the public
healthcare system: Nigeria
in context
Aliu Oladimeji Shodunke
Department of Criminology and Security Studies, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria
Sodiq Abiodun Oladipupo
Department of Economics, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA
Oluwadamisi Toluwalase Tayo-Ladega
School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
Adebusayo Joel Alowolodu
Department of Psychology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria, and
Yusuf Olalekan Adebayo
Department of Criminology and Security Studies, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria
Abstract
Purpose Given the efficacy of a robust public healthcare system in handling public health emergencies, the
rapid rate of COVID-19 pandemic infection in early-hit (advanced) countries with competent healthcare system
is intriguing. The popular public health argument supports the strengthening of the healthcare system as a
significant response strategy to minimize infection. Hence, this paper examines the catalysts that exacerbated
the pandemics rapid spread in these countries despite the sound state of their healthcare system. Also, it
assesses the condition of Nigerian public healthcare system in the lights of the novel COVID-19 pandemic and
suggests the need for improvement and effective functioning.
Design/methodology/approach This paper uses a documentary approach to establish the authors
opinion on the subject matter under investigation.
Findings Factors such as climate, temperature, and humidity levels played a key role in infection in the
winter of 2020. These factors facilitated for the pandemics rapid spread in advanced countries. In peripheral
countries like Nigeria, the public healthcare system is burdened by a lack of funding, an insufficiency in welfare
and training for healthcare staff and facilities and other operational challenges. Hence, the effective
management of COVID-19 outbreak in Nigeria relative to advanced countries was hindered by the
inadequacies mentioned above.
Originality/value This paper provides an understanding on the condition of public healthcare system in
peripheral nations in relation to the healthcare system advisories from the World Health Organization (WHO)
in the context of handling the pandemic outbreak. Also, it explains the catalysts that heightened the pandemics
rapid spread in advanced countries despite the higher capacity of their healthcare system to manage health
emergencies.
Keywords COVID-19, Climate, Public health, Nigeria, World health organization
Paper type Research paper
Introduction
Manifesting in the form ofmild and self-limiting respiratory tract illness,acute pneumonia and
multiple organ failure, theoutbreak and global spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
COVID-19 and
Nigerian
healthcare
system
Declaration of Funding: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the
public, commercial, or not-for-profit sector.
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at:
https://www.emerald.com/insight/2059-4631.htm
Received 12 June 2022
Revised 18 July 2022
Accepted 24 July 2022
International Journal of Health
Governance
© Emerald Publishing Limited
2059-4631
DOI 10.1108/IJHG-06-2022-0053
(SARS-CoV-2) known as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has the potential of
causing human body malfunctioning, burdening public health and overpowering the public
healthcare system. The viruss incubation period ranges from one to fourteen days, and the
disease can be transmitted by direct contact with a contaminated surface or an infected
person. Droplets produced by coughing and sneezing are also responsible for the transmission
of the disease. As of early June 2022, most mortality cases occurred in the US, Brazil, France,
Germany, UK, Italy, Russia, etc. (see Figure 1). Societies are being shaped by COVID-19
pandemic, an unprecedented public health emergency. Nigerian first index case was
recorded on February 27, 2020, with the arrival of an Italian national into the country. The
countrys number of confirmed cases has now snowballed to more than 250,000 as of early
June, 2022.
Thus, the Emergency Committee of the WHO met on January 30, 2020, under the 2005
International Health Regulations and issued public health advisories on the response,
mitigation and containment of the pandemic; reduction of international travel, the practice of
basic hygiene, the use a facemask while among other people, avoidance of touching ones face
with unwashed hands, and maintenance of a social distance while in a crowd (Shodunke,
2022). Furthermore, the WHO essentially advised African countries with a weak healthcare
system to focus more on strengthening the healthcare system, increasing testing and tracing
rates, and focusing on other health interventions to catalyze the potential of stringent
lockdown as an effective non-therapeutic measure. However, advanced countries with
improved healthcare facilities, such as the US, UK, China, Italy, Australia, and France,
experienced a surge in the pandemics infection and casualty (Pachetti et al., 2020), thereby
raising a question on the effectiveness of an improved healthcare system to manage a
pandemic as catastrophic as COVID-19. Hence, this paper explains why an improved
healthcare system could not reduce the surge of infection in the advanced nations but is
necessary for infection containment in peripheral countries with a focus on Nigeria.
Figure 1.
Total cases of
COVID-19-induced
deaths
IJHG
The COVID-19 in advanced countries and climate
In advanced countries, climatic and weather conditions such as temperature, air quality and
humidity levels engineered the virality of the pandemic. Interestingly, the first few regions
where COVID-19 spread quickly; Italy, Iran, South Korea, and the United States (New York
and Washington, DC), had a climate similar to the origin of SARS-CoV-2 hotspots (Hubei and
Wuhan), with average temperatures ranging from 3 to 10 8C(Bukhari and Jameel, 2020).
Fontal et al. (2021) examined 162 countries spanning five continents on the global and
country-level role of temperature in COVID-19 infection.
The study established that in the 20 days after the first 20 cases in countries of the
Northern Hemisphere experienced a significant uptick in cases in the summer of 2021, a
cooler indoor microclimate during these months could accommodate transmission. The
Northern Hemisphere consists of advanced nations mostly. There was an early spread of
infection in 8 cities (Wuhan, China; Tokyo, Japan; Daegu, South Korea; Qom, Iran; Milan, Italy;
Paris, France; Seattle, US; and Madrid, Spain) in a latitudinal band between 308N and 508N,
with low humidity levels and temperatures between 5 8C and 11 8C(Sajadi et al., 2020). These
cities experienced a higher risk of substantial community spread of the pandemic.
In China, the pandemics origin, there was a significant correlation between weather and
infection of the pandemic (Byass, 2020). The two most critical environmental elements
contributing to the pandemic transmission in the early-hit countries are temperature and
humidity. Even throughout the period when the pandemic snowballed from a nascent disease
to a designated pandemic of international concern, locations with higher temperatures
(>20 8C) continued to have a smaller amount of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 cases compared to
those with reduced temperatures. According to Bukhari and Jameel (2020), during the month
of February and March of 2020, temperatures ranging from 3 degrees Celsius to 17 degrees
Celsius were responsible for 90% of SARS-CoV-2 transmissions. The pandemic trend tends to
be influenced by temperature; thus, it is seasonal.
COVID-19 and healthcare system in peripheral nations: Nigeria
Over time, African nations continue to experience weakness in the public healthcare system,
particularly in the increasing outbreaks of epidemics such as Ebola, polio, coronavirus and
monkeypox. As a result of the shortage in the necessary medical supplies in the African
health system, it was projected that between 9 and 11% of infected patients in Africa would
require intensive care (Remuzzi and Remuzzi, 2020). According to Ayebale et al. (2020), Africa
has fewer than one acute care bed for every 100,000 residents. Healthcare across the continent
is underfunded, with fewer hospital beds, critical care units and health professionals.
The current COVID-19 was expected to severely impact Africa, which has the most
vulnerable people to infectious illnesses. According to the 2016 Infectious Disease
Vulnerability Index (IDVI), 22 of the 25 most-susceptible nations to infectious diseases are
in Africa. Twenty-six million people in Africa are infected with HIV, 2.5 million with
Tuberculosis, 71 million with hepatitis B or C, and 213 million with malaria (Lone and Ahmad,
2020). However, in handling COVID-19 cases in (the peripheral nations) Africa, the challenges
have been more of the incapacity of the public healthcare system. Beyond disease profile, the
constrained testing capacity, a scarcity of trained personnel for diagnostics and intensive
care units (ICU), insufficient ventilators and ICU facilities (necessary in extreme COVID-19
cases), a lack of personal protective equipment (PPE) for healthcare workers, and a shortage
of funds for the health sector are some of the continents core healthcare issues, making it
more vulnerable to the COVID-19 pandemic.
In Nigeria, the present national health system cannot effectively manage the expanding
demands of vulnerable people and patients who are already infected and require admission
into critical care units to treat COVID-19: isolation facilities and obtainability of diagnostic
COVID-19 and
Nigerian
healthcare
system
supplies (Ohia et al., 2020). The existing facilities are burdened with the vulnerable
populations common health conditions such as diabetes, cancer, high blood pressure,
meningitis, stroke and tuberculosis, and cardiovascular ailments. According to the World
Health Organisation, Tuberculosis remains a major health issue in Nigeria, ranking 5th
among the 22 excessive tuberculosis-ravaged nations. Additionally, the countrys cases of
death from meningitis, stroke and diabetes reached 2.95%, 3.90% and 1.52%, respectively, in
2020. A projected 72,000 mortalities occur yearly and 102,000 new cases are diagnosed
(Fatiregun et al., 2020). The facilities and equipment (including ventilators and personal
protective equipment) are inadequate to deal with the health emergencies caused by
COVID-19.
As reported by the health authorities, bed spaces for COVID-19 patients are in shortage
while the confirmed cases keep increasing, thus necessitating the use of home care. Although
the number of isolation facilities and intensive care unit (ICU) capacity in the country is
increasing, several states were still struggling to build isolation and treatment facilities
around May 2020. Furthermore, in rural regions, where more than 60% of Nigerians live,
health facilities and staff are in shortage (Amzat and Razum, 2017). Public health
departments are ill-equipped to deal with the COVID-19 epidemic because of inadequate
preparation and funding constraints.
Amidst the surge of COVID-19 confirmed cases, the government attempted to slash the
healthcare budgetary allocation, which could further emasculate the response efforts and
weaken the health system. According to Adebisi et al. (2020), the recent fiscal allocation
showed that only 372.70 billion and 463.80 representing 4.22% and 4.38% of the nations
budget in 2019 (8.8 trillion) and 2020 (10.5 trillion), respectively (see Figure 2) as against the
15% minimum target set by the African Union in Abuja in 2001 (The Abuja Declaration).
Even in 2021, the year following the pandemic-hit year when the pandemic should have
triggered the government to invest more in the healthcare system, a budgetary allocation of
592.16 billion (4.52% of the total budget) was still below the Unions standard. This situation
further amplifies the lack of political leadership to improve the system satisfactorily.
Figure 2.
The annual budgetary
allocation for health
from 2014 to 2020
IJHG
In terms of disease control and prevention (IPC), healthcare workers are not well equipped
with the necessary training and protective tools. There is an inadequacy in personal
protective equipment (PPE), IPC management systems, trauma care and patientshazard
evaluation actions, low employee morale due to shortage in hazard allowances and
deteriorating infrastructure in health facilities. In addition to IPC, Nigeria still lags due to the
lack of funds to put in place testing facilities. In a country of over 200 million citizens, only
2,180,444 diagnostic tests had been done by the Nigeria Center for Diseases Control (NCDC) as
of June 10 2021, 15 months after recording the national index case (Nigeria Centre for Disease
Control, 2021), thus lending credence to the incapability of the healthcare system to treat the
infected patients.
Furthermore, access to health insurance by Nigerians is another issue facing the
healthcare section. Health insurance is available to just 2.3% of the national population;
private insurance is the most common type for this portion (Barasa et al., 2021). Most
Nigerians pay for their medical treatment, including doctor visits, testing in the lab, and
prescription drugs. There is a 72% out-of-pocket payment component to Nigerias overall
healthcare costs (United Nations, 2020). More than 70% of Nigerias population comprises
lower-class residents who cannot afford comprehensive healthcare, which hinders their
healthcare-seeking behaviors (Asakitikpi, 2019).
However, the government and relevant health authorities have deployed the resources to
contain and prevent the epidemic. The NCDC, on January 7, 2020, issued a new viral alert,
following reports of coronavirus infection in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 as part of the
countrys preparedness. Additionally, on January 26, 2020, the NCDC instituted the National
Coronavirus Preparedness Group (NCPG) to coordinate the countrys preparedness measures
better. By utilizing and optimizing three existing NCDC molecular laboratory networks, the
NCPG was able to increase in-country diagnostic capacity for the testing of COVID-19, as well
as analyze existing infectious disease treatment centers to identify gaps and establish case
management strategies.
Following the confirmation of the first COVID-19 case in the country on February 27, 2020,
the NCPG transitioned to a national multisectoral Emergency Operations Centre (EOC) at the
NCDC. The EOC was activated at level three, the highest level of response in the country
intended for public health emergencies requiring national coordination and use of all
available resources for the response. The EOC comprises multiple pillars: coordination,
surveillance and epidemiology, case management, laboratory, points of entry (PoE), IPC, risk
communication, logistics, and research. To assist in financially equipping the NCDC and its
facilities, the government intended to set up a 500 billion-naira ($1.39 billion) coronavirus
fund (Africanews, 2020).
In addition, the Tertiary Education Trust Fund, the NCDC and other relevant authorities
instituted the National COVID-19 Research Consortium, which consists of academics and
researchers to research effective prevention and control of the pandemic (Etteh et al., 2020).
From the private sector and international community, Coalition Against COVID-19
(CACOVID) funded the governments response and containment efforts with $70 million
for establishing isolation centers, providing medical facilities and providing relief materials
to the citizens (Elebesunu et al., 2021). The European Union contributed an amount of 50
million euros. To boost available medical facilities, the WHO supplied 26 ventilators and
3,560 fingertip oxygen pulse oximeters to help Nigeria prepare for the third wave of
COVID-19, which is being triggered by the Delta variant (ReliefWeb, 2021). The World Bank
also donated a credit facility of $400 million to the Nigerian government to facilitate upfront
financing of the procurement and deployment of COVID-19 vaccine (World Bank, 2020). The
NCDC is at the forefront of coordinating the national response to disease outbreaks. As such,
it works with its international partners to enhance capacity building to respond to the disease
outbreak, including rapid case detection and diagnosis and adopting innovative techniques
COVID-19 and
Nigerian
healthcare
system
to educate and sensitize the country. Meanwhile, the WHO, Nigerian governments, health
authorities, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and the academic community are
needed to find a solution.
Conclusion
Given the virulence and sophistication of the pandemic, which weakened the health system in
advanced and peripheral nations, it becomes imperative to illuminate on the exogenous
factors that worsened infection speed and containment efforts. Previous global and country-
wide studies observed that climate, temperature and humidity levels played a crucial role in
spreading the virus in advanced countries. The air compartment is substantially
instrumental in the transmission of COVID-19 in those developed nations located between
latitudes between 308N and 508N, particularly in terms of climatic parameters, including
weather conditions, temperature, humidity, and air pollution.
Hence, those indices were considered necessary when designing management measures.
However, the public health system inadequacies are responsible for the ineffectiveness of
managing COVID-19 cases in peripheral nations such as Nigeria relative to advanced
countries. These arguments should then serve as a basis for understanding the WHOs
discourse on the public healthcare system and COVID-19 management. The burden of
managing the epidemic in the public healthcare sector in peripheral nations; Nigeria, includes
a lack of funds and political leadership, lack of coordination in infection prevention and
control, poor health insurance, insufficient welfare and training for healthcare employees,
inadequate healthcare personnel to manage the patients, scarcity in medical resources
(personal protective equipment [PPE], diagnostic kits and ventilators), inadequate facilities
and treatment centers, among others. Nigerias relatively weak healthcare system and profile
of previous diseases necessitated the WHO to categorize the country as one of the 13 high-risk
African countries concerning the spread of COVID-19. A countrys ability to handle a disease
outbreak depends on the capacity of its healthcare system.
Although Nigeria maintained a case fatality rate of 1.3%, which is less than half the
regional average, since the past two waves were contained, much needs to be done to address
the deficits in the health sectors. Therefore, strengthening the system remains a significant
preparation for managing, containing and preventing an epidemic. Interestingly, the
automation of COVID-19 management helped the pandemic origin, China, to manage the
response and containment efforts. The epidemic serves as a wake-up call for the Nigerian
government to invest massively and satisfactorily in the healthcare system and address
public health vulnerability drivers. Due to an epidemics global dimension, response and
prevention efforts should be international if the reoccurrence of such an epidemic like
COVID-19 is to be avoided. Investment efforts should include a partnership with the private
sector and international bodies such as Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention
(Africa CDC) United States Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (US, CDC) and the
WHO to strengthen the health system through information sharing, training and research.
Nationally, the government should focus more on adequate funding, equipment of medical
facilities, digitalization of the health service, national health coverage, surveillance and
provision of medication. There should be measures on strengthening institutional capacity
for detection, prevention, and control, as well as providing crucial infrastructure to enable
heightened monitoring and early identification of suspected cases and provision of facilities
for adequate medical care. In addition, cooperative approaches, high-quality laboratory
systems, and affordable diagnostic services should be priorities as they are essential to
achieving standard healthcare for the citizens. At the same time, the health authorities should
intensify on enlightening the citizenry on the need to obey social distancing regulations,
proper hygienic practices and adherence to other public health safety protocols.
IJHG
References
Adebisi, Y.A., Umah, J.O., Olaoye, O.C., Alaran, A.J., Sina-Odunsi, A.B. and Lucero-Prisno III, D.E.
(2020), Assessment of health budgetary allocation and expenditure toward achieving universal
health coverage in Nigeria,International Journal of Health and Life Sciences,Vol.6No.2,
doi: 10.5812/ijhls.102552.
Africanews (2020), Nigeria to set up $1.39 billion fund to fight covid-19, available at: https://www.
africanews.com/2020/04/05/nigeria-to-set-up-139-billion-fund-to-fight-covid-19/ (accessed 30
May 2022).
Amzat, J. and Razum, O. (2017), Towards a Sociology of Health Discourse in Africa, Springer,
International Publishing.
Asakitikpi, A.E. (2019), Healthcare Coverage and Affordability in Nigeria: An Alternative Model to
Equitable Healthcare Delivery, Universal Health Coverage, p. 45.
Ayebale, E.T., Roche, A.M., Kassebaum, N.J. and Biccard, B.M. (2020), Africas critical care capacity
before COVID-19,Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia, Vol. 26 No. 3,
pp. 162-164, available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-1d759b8c72.
Barasa, E., Kazungu, J., Nguhiu, P. and Ravishankar, N. (2021), Examining the level and inequality in
health insurance coverage in 36 sub-Saharan African countries,BMJ Global Health, Vol. 6
No. 4, e004712, doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004712.
Bukhari, Q. and Jameel, Y. (2020), Will coronavirus pandemic diminish by summer?, available at:
SSRN 3556998.
Byass, P. (2020), Eco-epidemiological assessment of the COVID-19 epidemic in China, january
february 2020,Global Health Action, Vol. 13 No. 1, 1760490, doi: 10.1080/16549716.2020.
1760490.
Elebesunu, E.E., Oke, G.I., Adebisi, Y.A. and Nsofor, I.M. (2021), COVID-19 calls for health systems
strengthening in Africa: a case of Nigeria,The International Journal of Health Planning and
Management, Vol. 36 No. 6, pp. 2035-2043, doi: 10.1002/hpm.3296.
Etteh, C.C., Adoga, M.P. and Ogbaga, C.C. (2020), COVID-19 response in Nigeria: health system
preparedness and lessons for future epidemics in Africa,Ethics, Medicine and Public Health,
Vol. 15, 100580, doi: 10.1016/j.jemep.2020.100580.
Fatiregun, O.A., Bakare, O., Ayeni, S., Oyerinde, A., Sowunmi, A.C., Popoola, A., Salako, O., Alabi, A.
and Joseph, A. (2020), 10-Year mortality pattern among cancer patients in Lagos state
university teaching hospital, Ikeja, Lagos,Frontiers in Oncology, p. 2431, doi: 10.3389/fonc.
2020.573036.
Fontal, A., Bouma, M.J., San-Jos
e, A., L
opez, L., Pascual, M. and Rod
o, X. (2021), Climatic signatures in
the different COVID-19 pandemic waves across both hemispheres,Nature Computational
Science, Vol. 1 No. 10, pp. 655-665, doi: 10.1038/s43588-021-00136-6.
Lone, S.A. and Ahmad, A. (2020), COVID-19 pandemican African perspective,Emerging Microbes
and Infections, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 1300-1308, doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1775132.
Nigeria Centre for Disease Control (2021), Coronavirus disease update, available at: https://covid19.
ncdc.gov.ng/ (accessed 5 June 2022).
Ohia, C., Bakarey, A.S. and Ahmad, T. (2020), COVID-19 and Nigeria: putting the realities in context,
International Journal of Infectious Diseases, Vol. 95, pp. 279-281, doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.04.062.
Pachetti, M., Marini, B., Giudici, F., Benedetti, F., Angeletti, S., Ciccozzi, M., Masciovecchio, C.,
Ippodrino, R. and Zella, D. (2020), Impact of lockdown on Covid-19 case fatality rate and viral
mutations spread in 7 countries in Europe and North America,Journal of Translational
Medicine, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 1-7, doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02501-x.
ReliefWeb (2021), COVID-19 - WHO boosts Nigerias response to COVID-19, donates 26 ventilators
and 3560 pulse oximeters, available at: https://reliefweb.int/report/nigeria/covid-19-who-
boosts-nigeria-s-response-covid-19-donates-26-ventilators-and-3560-pulse (accessed 1
June 2022).
COVID-19 and
Nigerian
healthcare
system
Remuzzi, A. and Remuzzi, G. (2020), COVID-19 and Italy: what next?,The Lancet, Vol. 395 No. 10231,
pp. 1225-1228, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30627-9.
Sajadi, M.M., Habibzadeh, P., Vintzileos, A., Shokouhi, S., Miralles-Wilhelm, F. and Amoroso, A. (2020),
Temperature, humidity, and latitude analysis to estimate potential spread and seasonality of
coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID 19),JAMA Network Open, Vol. 3 No. 6, e2011834-e2011834,
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11834.
Shodunke, A.O. (2022), Enforcement of COVID-19 pandemic lockdown orders in Nigeria: evidence of
public (Non) compliance and police illegalities,International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction,
103082, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103082.
United Nations (2020), Its time to rethink medical insurance, available at: https://www.un.org/
africarenewal/magazine/december-2016-march-2017/it%E2%80%99s-time-rethink-medical-
insurance (accessed 30 May 2022).
World Bank (2020), Nigeria scales up its COVID-19 vaccination with new funding for vaccine
purchase and deployment, available at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/
2021/09/30/nigeria-scales-up-its-covid-19-vaccination-with-new-funding-for-vaccine-purchase-
and-deployment (accessed 30 May 2022).
Corresponding author
Aliu Oladimeji Shodunke can be contacted at: oa.shodunke@gmail.com
For instructions on how to order reprints of this article, please visit our website:
www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/licensing/reprints.htm
Or contact us for further details: permissions@emeraldinsight.com
IJHG
... Read the article before making your mind up. Shodunke et al. (2022) write about the urgent imperative of strengthening health systems particularly in low and middle income countries (LMIC) to prepare for health crises such as the recent COVID-19 pandemic. They also ask the intriguing question of why poorly resourced countries such as Nigeria had much lower COVID-19 death rates than countries in the more affluent Global North. ...
... This review is based on Shodunke AO, Oladipupo SA, Tayo-Ladega OT, Alowolodu AJ, Adebayo YO (2022) -COVID-19 pandemic, global advisories and the imperatives of strengthening the public healthcare system: Nigeria in context. Shodunke et al. (2022) ask a question that has intrigued medical personnel and epidemiologists around the world: Why have death rates from COVID-19 been higher in the global North where countries are richer and have well-resourced and managed healthcare systems? They examine this question in relation to the structure and function of the Nigerian healthcare system and ask what improvements will be required to prepare Nigeria's health service for the next global pandemic. ...
... Mukherjee reports that in the case of COVID-19 deaths in poor countries are low, giving the example of Nigeria where the COVID-19 death rate was 1/100th that of the USA. Shodunke et al. (2022) suggest that climate, weather conditions and air pollution levels may have an impact on COVID-19 transmission rates. However, the fact that out of all Sub-Saharan African countries, South Africa had COVID-19 death rates approaching that of countries in the global North somewhat negates this hypothesis (Mukherjee, 2021). ...
Article
The bulk of scholarship on police intervention in enforcing COVID-19 pandemic-imposed restrictions focuses on police misconduct, securitisation, human rights, police preparedness, and legitimacy, but empirical research on police corruption during the restriction in Nigeria is sparse despite reports of pervasive police extortion and bribery. Thus, this study fills the academic gap by examining the dynamics of police predation and corruption during the enforcement in Nigeria. With interview data, I uniquely examined the intervention from the purview of predatory policing – an aspect of policing that is understudied in the context of COVID-19 policing despite its relevance in contemporary discourse on social control. Evidence indicates that, as COVID-19 policing characterised predation in Nigeria, the embedded problems of police corruption revolve around unresolved police institutional challenges and police-public connivance that results from moral decadence, thereby portending gloomy implications for law enforcement and society. Therefore, advancing and implementing police reforms, addressing moral corruption, and resolving widespread socioeconomic problems are very critical in the effective policing and containment of future public health crises.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose This study investigates the effect of user fees on access and waiting time in Nigeria. For access, the effect of user fees on both preventive and curative care; and the effect of user fees on waiting time at public healthcare facilities were examined. User fees are vital for the fiscal sustainability of healthcare provision for most African economies. Its imposition could debar healthcare access by the poor while its removal can reduce quality of care and induce longer waiting time. Design/methodology/approach The wave 3 of the Nigerian General Household Survey (2015/16) data was used for users of public health facilities. Access to healthcare was modelled using utilization data in a logistic regression model while waiting time was through the Negative Binomial Regression Model (NBRM). Findings The analyses showed significant effects of user fees on access to both preventive and curative care and on time spent waiting to make use of healthcare services. Individuals were able to access healthcare services regardless of amounts paid. Also, there was a non-negative effect of user fee imposition on waiting time. Practical implications Nigeria should improve healthcare facilities to address the enormous demand for healthcare services when designing policy for health sector. Originality/value This paper shows that even with the imposition of user fees, healthcare facilities could still not cater for the rising healthcare needs of the populace but cautioned that its abolition may not be a preferred option.
Article
Full-text available
The roles of climate and true seasonal signatures in the epidemiology of emergent pathogens, and that of SARS-CoV-2 in particular, remain poorly understood. With a statistical method designed to detect transitory associations, we show, for COVID-19 cases, strong consistent negative effects of both temperature and absolute humidity at large spatial scales. At finer spatial resolutions, we substantiate these connections during the seasonal rise and fall of COVID-19. Strong disease responses are identified in the first two waves, suggesting clear ranges for temperature and absolute humidity that are similar to those formerly described for seasonal influenza. For COVID-19, in all studied regions and pandemic waves, a process-based model that incorporates a temperature-dependent transmission rate outperforms baseline formulations with no driver or a sinusoidal seasonality. Our results, so far, classify COVID-19 as a seasonal low-temperature infection and suggest an important contribution of the airborne pathway in the transmission of SARS-CoV-2, with implications for the control measures we discuss.
Article
Full-text available
The COVID-19 pandemic has proven the need for countries worldwide to implement strategies that promote health systems strengthening and ensure epidemic preparedness. Many African countries are burdened by fragile healthcare systems, hence, this paper emphasises the need for African policymakers to improve healthcare quality in their countries. Through a brief review of various online literatures concerning health systems strengthening in Africa, this paper focuses on the nature of healthcare in Nigeria amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. The major stress areas include COVID-19 testing capacity, health workforce, infection prevention and control, health information and surveillance systems, health insurance, public-private partnerships, and governance. The COVID-19 pandemic has amplified several challenges ravaging Africa's already fragile healthcare systems , leaving the health sectors of most African countries ill-prepared to deal with the pandemic. If Nigeria and many other African countries had invested sufficiently in strengthening their healthcare systems prior to COVID-19, their pandemic response efforts would have been more effective. Health systems strengthening is necessary to ensure steady progress toward universal health coverage and global health security. Through health systems strengthening, Nigeria and other African countries can greatly improve their infection prevention and control measures.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: Low/middle-income countries (LMICs) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) are increasingly turning to public contributory health insurance as a mechanism for removing financial barriers to access and extending financial risk protection to the population. Against this backdrop, we assessed the level and inequality of population coverage of existing health insurance schemes in 36 SSA countries. Methods: Using secondary data from the most recent Demographic and Health Surveys, we computed mean population coverage for any type of health insurance, and for specific forms of health insurance schemes, by country. We developed concentration curves, computed concentration indices, and rich-poor differences and ratios to examine inequality in health insurance coverage. We decomposed the concentration index using a generalised linear model to examine the contribution of household and individual-level factors to the inequality in health insurance coverage. Results: Only four countries had coverage levels with any type of health insurance of above 20% (Rwanda-78.7% (95% CI 77.5% to 79.9%), Ghana-58.2% (95% CI 56.2% to 60.1%), Gabon-40.8% (95% CI 38.2% to 43.5%), and Burundi 22.0% (95% CI 20.7% to 23.2%)). Overall, health insurance coverage was low (7.9% (95% CI 7.8% to 7.9%)) and pro-rich; concentration index=0.4 (95% CI 0.3 to 0.4, p<0.001). Exposure to media made the greatest contribution to the pro-rich distribution of health insurance coverage (50.3%), followed by socioeconomic status (44.3%) and the level of education (41.6%). Conclusion: Coverage of health insurance in SSA is low and pro-rich. The four countries that had health insurance coverage levels greater than 20% were all characterised by substantial funding from tax revenues. The other study countries featured predominantly voluntary mechanisms. In a context of high informality of labour markets, SSA and other LMICs should rethink the role of voluntary contributory health insurance and instead embrace tax funding as a sustainable and feasible mechanism for mobilising resources for the health sector.
Article
Full-text available
Background Globally, cancer is a major leading health problem with an estimated 10 million incidences and 6 million cancer deaths annually. In Nigeria, an estimated 72,000 cancer deaths occur annually, and 102,000 new cases are diagnosed from its population of 200 million people. These are, however, estimates, it is necessary to document the yearly trends and patterns of cancer mortality with regards to the different regions in the country. Methodology we conducted this study at the Lagos State University Teaching hospital (LASUTH), Ikeja, Lagos to document mortality patterns from 2009 to 2018. Data extracted included those from the patient’s case notes, admission and death registers, and death certificates. we also had records from the hospital records department and medical wards. We then documented cancer mortality over the study period. Results A total number of 6,592 deaths were recorded over ten years, and 1,133 cases were cancer-related deaths. This number puts the percentage of cancer-related deaths at 17.2%. Male patients accounted for 54.0%, and female patients are 46.0%. Breast cancer accounted for the highest mortality, followed by prostate cancer. The highest number of deaths were recorded in 2010 at 821, followed by 2011 at 799, 2015 at 780, and the least in 2017 at 513. There is also a significant general increase in odds of mortality with an increase in decades of life. Conclusion This study shows that about one in five deaths, over the last ten years, from this tertiary institution, is related to a cancer diagnosis. Even though a yearly decline in the number of cancer deaths was noticed, probably due to increased awareness and governmental intervention, the percentage still remains high.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome CoV-2 (SARS-CoV-2) caused the first coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China and has become a public health emergency of international concern. SARS-CoV-2 outbreak has been declared a pandemic by WHO on March 11th, 2020 and the same month several Countries put in place different lockdown restrictions and testing strategies in order to contain the spread of the virus. Methods: The calculation of the Case Fatality Rate of SARS-CoV-2 in the Countries selected was made by using the data available at https://github.com/owid/covi-19-data/tree/master/public/data . Case fatality rate was calculated as the ratio between the death cases due to COVID-19, over the total number of SARS-CoV-2 reported cases 14 days before. Standard Case Fatality Rate values were normalized by the Country-specific ρ factor, i.e. the number of PCR tests/1 million inhabitants over the number of reported cases/1 million inhabitants. Case-fatality rates between Countries were compared using proportion test. Post-hoc analysis in the case of more than two groups was performed using pairwise comparison of proportions and p value was adjusted using Holm method. We also analyzed 487 genomic sequences from the GISAID database derived from patients infected by SARS-CoV-2 from January 2020 to April 2020 in Italy, Spain, Germany, France, Sweden, UK and USA. SARS-CoV-2 reference genome was obtained from the GenBank database (NC_045512.2). Genomes alignment was performed using Muscle and Jalview software. We, then, calculated the Case Fatality Rate of SARS-CoV-2 in the Countries selected. Results: In this study we analyse how different lockdown strategies and PCR testing capability adopted by Italy, France, Germany, Spain, Sweden, UK and USA have influenced the Case Fatality Rate and the viral mutations spread. We calculated case fatality rates by dividing the death number of a specific day by the number of patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection observed 14 days before and normalized by a ρ factor which takes into account the diagnostic PCR testing capability of each Country and the number of positive cases detected. We notice the stabilization of a clear pattern of mutations at sites nt241, nt3037, nt14408 and nt23403. A novel nonsynonymous SARS-CoV-2 mutation in the spike protein (nt24368) has been found in genomes sequenced in Sweden, which enacted a soft lockdown strategy. Conclusions: Strict lockdown strategies together with a wide diagnostic PCR testing of the population were correlated with a relevant decline of the case fatality rate in different Countries. The emergence of specific patterns of mutations concomitant with the decline in case fatality rate needs further confirmation and their biological significance remains unclear.
Article
Full-text available
Context: The implementation of the Universal Health Coverage (UHC) promotes access to quality health care delivery through cost-effective initiatives to ensure good health and wellbeing without discrimination. This study examines government finance, budgetary allocation, and expenditure as key health development indicators towards achieving the UHC in Nigeria. Evidence Acquisition: Data analyzed in the study were gotten from journal articles, reports and other secondary sources. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, and WHO Library Database with predetermined search terms. Further publications were identified through snowballing of citations and references. We reviewed only papers written in English with no date restrictions placed on searches. Results: Within the period of analysis, the annual national health budgetary allocation in Nigeria has been below the 2001 Abuja declaration of allocating 15% of the national budget to health. Our analysis also revealed that if the Abuja declaration was implemented , additional allocations of NGN 4.99 trillion should have been injected into the health sector between 2014 and 2020. In addition, Nigeria also lags behind relative to some other low-and middle-income countries in terms of government expenditure to the health sector in achieving the UHC. Conclusions: The inadequate budgetary allocation in Nigeria to healthcare has significantly influenced recurrent and capital health expenditure. It is worthy to note that the insufficient allocation will continue to significantly affect capital expenditure which is a large determinant of the development of any health system. With the current state of healthcare budget allocation in Nigeria, efforts need to be intensified to ensure the achievement of UHC. In the face of achieving UHC, reviewing the system of healthcare financing and ensuring prudent allocation of resources while shifting the focus from out-of-pocket payments for health is essential. We also recommend increase in political commitment towards improving the health of the populace so as to ensure health systems goals of efficiency, equity, quality of care, sustainability, financial risk protection for all citizens are achievable.
Article
Full-text available
Importance Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection has resulted in a global crisis. Investigating the potential association of climate and seasonality with the spread of this infection could aid in preventive and surveillance strategies. Objective To examine the association of climate with the spread of COVID-19 infection. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study examined climate data from 50 cities worldwide with and without substantial community spread of COVID-19. Eight cities with substantial spread of COVID-19 (Wuhan, China; Tokyo, Japan; Daegu, South Korea; Qom, Iran; Milan, Italy; Paris, France; Seattle, US; and Madrid, Spain) were compared with 42 cities that have not been affected or did not have substantial community spread. Data were collected from January to March 10, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures Substantial community transmission was defined as at least 10 reported deaths in a country as of March 10, 2020. Climate data (latitude, mean 2-m temperature, mean specific humidity, and mean relative humidity) were obtained from ERA-5 reanalysis. Results The 8 cities with substantial community spread as of March 10, 2020, were located on a narrow band, roughly on the 30° N to 50° N corridor. They had consistently similar weather patterns, consisting of mean temperatures of between 5 and 11 °C, combined with low specific humidity (3-6 g/kg) and low absolute humidity (4-7 g/m³). There was a lack of substantial community establishment in expected locations based on proximity. For example, while Wuhan, China (30.8° N) had 3136 deaths and 80 757 cases, Moscow, Russia (56.0° N), had 0 deaths and 10 cases and Hanoi, Vietnam (21.2° N), had 0 deaths and 31 cases. Conclusions and Relevance In this study, the distribution of substantial community outbreaks of COVID-19 along restricted latitude, temperature, and humidity measurements was consistent with the behavior of a seasonal respiratory virus. Using weather modeling, it may be possible to estimate the regions most likely to be at a higher risk of substantial community spread of COVID-19 in the upcoming weeks, allowing for concentration of public health efforts on surveillance and containment.
Article
Full-text available
Critical care capabilities in affluent countries have been overwhelmed by the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Data from the African Surgical Outcomes Study (ASOS)1 suggests that this critical care crisis will be significantly worse in Africa.
Article
Given the public resentment that trailed the unprecedented lockdown order enforced as a public health emergency control strategy to contain the spread of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic, this study explored citizens' compliance with the order and how its enforcement occasioned illegal police practices in Nigeria. With a qualitative approach, this study recruited 90 participants from Ilorin, Nigeria, with varieties of sampling methods to understand public behaviour and police conduct in the enforcement of the order. From the insights gathered with a semi-structured interview and analysed with the thematic analysis method, the study observed that economic hardship, unavoidable matters from the citizens' end and mistrust of authorities fueled non-compliance. Such mistrust amplified misinformation during the pandemic. Although there was a reasonable level of compliance, the pre-existing police illegalities (extortion and bribery) facilitated the cases of non-compliance in Nigeria. Also, hostility ensued between police personnel and citizens during the enforcement of the lockdown. Therefore, this study advised the government and stakeholders on the imperatives of adequate socio-economic preparations, emphasising public trust and the provision of relief materials. Additionally, it suggested to the police authorities reform ideas to better equip, monitor, and manage police resources for effective handling of future pandemics.
Article
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) will continue to have a significant impact on the way we live for at least the next few years until the scale-up of production and administration of an effective vaccine. Unfortunately, this will not be the last pandemic of infectious diseases the world will experience, and the next one may have more devastating consequences in Africa than COVID-19, unless critical lessons for the future are learnt now for more rapid and robust containment measures. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the viral cause of COVID-19, is thought to have been introduced into the continent by returning travellers from hotspots in Asia, Europe and America. In a pandemic with Africa having relatively lower morbidity and mortality, it is alarming that in about five months since confirmation of the continent’s first case of COVID-19 in Egypt on February 14th, 2020, the infection rate remains at an exponential phase with forty-seven African countries reporting a total of 766,803 cases, 13,191 deaths and 486,925 recoveries as at 31st July, 2020; out of which Nigeria reported 42,689 cases, 878 deaths and 19,290 recoveries, with Lagos State accounting for close to half of all cases in Nigeria. Importantly, lessons learnt during the Ebola epidemic have had a significant impact on Nigeria’s COVID-19 response. In this article, we discuss Nigeria’s response, health system preparedness and the lessons that are critical for containment of future outbreaks, epidemics or pandemics of any infectious disease in Africa.