ArticlePDF Available

Spatial susceptibility analysis of vector-borne diseases in KMC using geospatial technique and MCDM approach

Authors:
  • The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Abstract and Figures

The prevalence of vector-borne diseases (VBDs) like malaria and dengue claims many parts of the capital city Kolkata. Although the frequency of affects has been declining, still several cases are still reported from different parts of Kolkata Municipal Corporation. The present study aimed to apply multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approach along with geospatial technique to map susceptible areas of vector-borne diseases. For growing vectors and transmitting diseases, there are always many factors responsible instead of a single factor. Hence, the present work was carried out in multiple stages. Initially different susceptible factors to vector-borne diseases like environment, demography, epidemic and related to suitable breeding sites were selected. Analytic hierarchy process as a technique of MCDM was considered and pair-wise comparison matrix (PCM) was established for each selected factor. Synergistically, weight-based single layer of susceptible zonation was developed and finally, GIS integration was performed for susceptible map of VBDs. The decision-making process was judged by consistency measurement and result shows that the consistency ratio of each selected factor ranged between 0.02 and 0.07, i.e. < 0.1 which is acceptable. Geospatial technique offers space to apply statistical method and analytical technique to acquire information. With the help of remote sensing data and spatial information, GIS tool was utilised to analyse spatial susceptibility of vector-borne diseases. The study revealed that spatial location of water bodies is the most responsible factor with highest weight among all selected factors and concomitantly, moisture content, surface temperature, proximity to waste storage bins, and reported dengue and malaria cases also share influential contributions in prevalence of vector-borne diseases. The present result shows the high applicability of geospatial technique in epidemic diseases’ zonation which may considered helpful for applying in different fields of research.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Vol.:(0123456789)
1 3
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-019-00586-y
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Spatial susceptibility analysis ofvector-borne diseases inKMC using
geospatial technique andMCDM approach
SkAjimAli1 · AteequeAhmad1
Received: 4 November 2018 / Accepted: 21 March 2019
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019
Abstract
The prevalence of vector-borne diseases (VBDs) like malaria and dengue claims many parts of the capital city Kolkata.
Although the frequency of affects has been declining, still several cases are still reported from different parts of Kolkata
Municipal Corporation. The present study aimed to apply multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approach along with
geospatial technique to map susceptible areas of vector-borne diseases. For growing vectors and transmitting diseases, there
are always many factors responsible instead of a single factor. Hence, the present work was carried out in multiple stages.
Initially different susceptible factors to vector-borne diseases like environment, demography, epidemic and related to suitable
breeding sites were selected. Analytic hierarchy process as a technique of MCDM was considered and pair-wise comparison
matrix (PCM) was established for each selected factor. Synergistically, weight-based single layer of susceptible zonation
was developed and finally, GIS integration was performed for susceptible map of VBDs. The decision-making process was
judged by consistency measurement and result shows that the consistency ratio of each selected factor ranged between 0.02
and 0.07, i.e. <0.1 which is acceptable. Geospatial technique offers space to apply statistical method and analytical technique
to acquire information. With the help of remote sensing data and spatial information, GIS tool was utilised to analyse spatial
susceptibility of vector-borne diseases. The study revealed that spatial location of water bodies is the most responsible fac-
tor with highest weight among all selected factors and concomitantly, moisture content, surface temperature, proximity to
waste storage bins, and reported dengue and malaria cases also share influential contributions in prevalence of vector-borne
diseases. The present result shows the high applicability of geospatial technique in epidemic diseases’ zonation which may
considered helpful for applying in different fields of research.
Keywords Vector-borne diseases· Kolkata Municipal Corporation· Multi-criteria decision-making approach· Geospatial
analysis· Susceptibility analysis
Introduction
Growth and development of vectors are the main causes of
transmission of vector-borne diseases. It is always consid-
ered that suitable breeding sites for vector carrying insects
is the main factor in transmission of such type of diseases.
Hence, it is essential to know what is vector and how dis-
eases are transmitted. Vectors are living organisms that can
spread infectious diseases between individuals or from ani-
mals to humans, i.e. transfer virus and pathogens from one
infected person or animal to another, causing serious health
problems in human populations. These vectors may be
bloodsucking insects like mosquitoes, which swig disease-
generating microbes and virus during a blood meal from
an infected host, i.e. animal or human and later inject this
infected blood into a new host during their subsequent blood
meal (WHO 2017). Therefore, vector-borne diseases are not
possible till it is transmitted by any vector from an infected
host to another. Excluding mosquitoes, others vectors are
ticks, sand-flies, flies, fleas, triatomine bugs and some fresh-
water aquatic insects. Chikungunya, dengue fever and den-
gue haemorrhagic fever, Japanese encephalitis, Kala-azar,
filariasis, and malaria are considered as the main vector-
borne diseases.
The spatial distribution of vector-borne diseases is
determined by different dynamic factors like demography,
environment and social factors. Unexpected urbanization,
* Sk Ajim Ali
skajimali.saa@gmail.com; skajimali@myamu.ac.in
1 Department ofGeography, Faculty ofScience, Aligarh
Muslim University, Aligarh, UttarPradesh202002, India
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment
1 3
urban growth and climatic factors including climate change,
variation in temperature and rainfall, variation in moisture
contents can influence vector breeding and growth (Morin
etal. 2013; Hii etal. 2016). Moreover, various environmen-
tal factors such as changes in local land use, local sanitation
conditions, drainage facility and improper management of
generated waste in and around households can also affect the
transmission of vector-borne diseases due to availability of
suitable sites for breeding and can render large populations
in towns and cities at risk of viral disease spread by mosqui-
toes (Rattanarithikul etal. 1995; Mushinzimana etal. 2006;
Ayele etal. 2012).
As far as Kolkata Municipal Corporation is considered,
malaria and dengue are found as major vector-borne dis-
eases. The proportion of Chikungunya and filariasis is lim-
ited and found in a little frequency. Japanese encephalitis
and Kala-azar are rarely found here (Chatterjee 2017). The
prevalence of malaria is much more in comparison to dengue
(Sharma etal. 2014). Although the degree of malaria cases
has been reducing from 96,909 in 2010 to 4769 in 2017 with
no more deaths from 2011, the cases of dengue have also
fallen down from 3546 in 2005 to 662 in 2017 although the
deaths in dengue cases reoccur year after year. Malaria and
dengue are an ever-seen and common public health prob-
lem in Kolkata. Anopheles stephensi is the chief source of
malaria transmission in Kolkata and dengue is transmitted
by Aedes aegypti (Aedes albopictus).
Recently, KMC has launched different initiatives to
reduce vector-borne diseases from the capital city includ-
ing establishment of mosquito research laboratory, estab-
lishment of dengue detection centre, dissemination of
dengue report through SMS Alert, disease surveillance
system strengthening, plying of speedboats along canals
for destruction of mosquito larvae, larvicidal spray along
canals using rowing-boats as transport, formation of 21
rapid-action teams for vector control, efficient non-medi-
cal staff assigned with vector control responsibilities etc.
Along with such type of initiatives some micro-level ini-
tiatives are also taken including localised vector detection
centres, multilingual leaflets, multi-coloured flex-banners,
multi-coloured hoardings, awareness meeting, comprehen-
sive booklet, documentary film, auto-miking and house visit
etc. for awakening the residents to lessen the extent of risk
of vector-borne diseases.
But the best prevention method of vector-borne disease
is to detect and destruct considerable suitable breeding site
of vector-carrying parasites. Recently, remote sensing (RS)
and geographical information system (GIS) prove their effi-
ciency in detecting and recognising the suitable breeding
sites of vector-carrying parasites, susceptible risk zones
and area under prone to risk using geospatial technique and
spatial analyst tool (Nazri etal. 2012; Ahmad etal. 2017;
Ali and Ahmad 2018, 2019). The use of spatial tools in GIS
for public health is a significant technique to find spatial
association and integration (Richardson etal. 2013). Remote
sensing and geographical information system provides up-
to-date information on environmental parameters of a par-
ticular region or location that influence the vector-borne
disease transmissions (Nazri etal. 2009). Instead of con-
sidering one single factor, the result becomes weighted on
considering multiple factors (Wondim etal. 2017; Ali and
Ahmad 2018). Hence, the present study punctuates multi-
criteria decision making (MCDM) tool for considering the
parameters and making decision towards susceptibility of
vector-borne diseases and mapping of risk zonation. The
fundamental functioning principle of any MCDM process
is same: selection of weighted criteria, selection of alterna-
tives or sub-criteria, selection of aggregation, methods, and
ultimately rank of alternatives based on weights or outrank-
ing (Majumder 2015). Decision making is based on various
data relating to the study problem. It has been suggested that
80% of data used by decision makers are geographical, i.e.
spatial in nature (Rikalovic etal. 2014). Decision problems
that involve geographical data are denoted as geographical
or spatial decision problems (Malczewski 2004).
Several research works have been carried out using RS
and GIS in malaria susceptibility, dengue risk zonation and
analysis of other vector-borne diseases over time (Nazri et at.
2012; Sarfraz etal. 2014; Tu etal. 2014; Ahmad etal. 2017;
Wondim etal. 2017; Ali and Ahmad 2018). Digital elevation
model, satellite data and location of GPS superior spatial
analysis were utilised for current environment strategy in
urban areas (Dongus etal. 2009). Geospatial technology
was applied to identify and demarcate malaria-susceptible
areas (Delgado etal. 2011). Satellite images with various
resolutions, i.e. IRS LISS I, LISS II and WiFS were utilised
to recognise suitable vector habitats and susceptible areas
(Sharma etal. 1996; Palaniyandi 2004; Palaniyandi and
Mariappan 2012). It is always required to rely on authentic
and accurate data sets for vector-borne diseases’ control and
management to predict susceptible areas and project risk
mapping (Robert etal. 2003; Palaniyandi 2013). Mosquito-
producing fields were identified in California through cor-
relating Anopheles larva density with reflectance of canopy
growth in early season using Landsat TM imagery and
GIS technique (Wood etal. 1992). Detection of many vec-
tor diseases is directly not possible through field visit and
observations, thus Multi-criteria analysis (MCA) along with
GIS and AHP technique was applied by integrating various
thematic layers for malaria risk mapping West Singhbhum
district of the Jharkhand, India (Ahmad etal. 2017). Vari-
ous socio-economic, geographic and epidemiological factors
were integrated to familiar with malarial hotspots (Qayum
etal. 2015). Moreover, there are different studies in differ-
ent geographical locations of earth which have shown the
capability of RS and GIS technique in detecting vector-borne
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment
1 3
diseases (Nakhapakorn and Tripathi 2005; Rochon etal.
2010; Hongoh etal. 2011; Khormi and Kumar 2011; Yadav
etal. 2012; Walker etal. 2013; Nazri etal. 2016; Ali and
Ahmad 2018, 2019).
The present study also highlights the application of RS
data and GIS technique along with analytic hierarchy pro-
cess as a multi-criteria decision-making tool for identifying
susceptible areas and hotspot mapping of vector-borne dis-
ease. Thus, present study aimed to use GIS tools and other
primary and secondary data for measuring the weight of
various environmental, demographic and epidemic factors
to make interrelationships towards vector-borne disease
and to map susceptible areas. Such mapping of VBDs can
provide assistance to health authorities to understand spa-
tial distribution under risk as well as temporal outbreak of
such diseases. Risk maps have prepared for public health
and decision making because this will help in preventing
measure and also provide guideline for implementing control
programs and preparing health facilities based on spatial
information of area under risk.
Study area
Kolkata is the capital of the Indian state of West Bengal
which is located on the east bank of River Hooghly. As a
typical riverine city, Kolkata in earlier days was surrounded
by marshes, tidal creeks, mangroves, swamps, and wetlands.
But now all these have changed with time. Kolkata Munici-
pal corporation (KMC) is the largest urban agglomeration
of West Bengal which is located in UTM Zone 45°N with
geographical extension of 22°28ʹ 00ʹʹN–22°37ʹ30ʹʹN and
88°14ʹ30ʹʹE–88°25ʹ30ʹʹE (Fig.1). The KMC has an area of
205.07Km2 which is divided into 16 administrative Bor-
oughs and, respectively, 144 wards. The mean elevation of
the city is 1.5m–16m above MSL. Many parts of the city
were originally wetlands which were reclaimed over the time
to house the bourgeoning population. The annual mean tem-
perature over Kolkata Municipal Corporation is 26.8°C or
80.24°F. Monthly mean temperature ranges between 19 and
32°C. Summers are hot and humid with temperature 34°C,
during May and June the temperatures often exceed 40°C.
Fig. 1 Location of the study area
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment
1 3
Winter or mild winter lasts for highly 2 and half month with
lowest temperature between 9 and 11°C in December and
January. The annual average rainfall is near about 1600mm
and highest rainfall occurs during the month of August.
According to latest population data (DSH 2014-15) the city
has a population of 4,496,694 and 1,024,928 households.
The population density of KMC is about 24,306 persons
per km2 where, household density ranges between 755 and
23,237 households per km2 by making KMC as India’s third
largest metropolitan city as well as the world’s eighth largest
urban agglomeration.
Materials andmethod
Data sources
Different types of satellite data were collected looking
towards requirement of the study. Landsat 8 OLI and TIRS
data were used for deriving Land Surface Temperature
(LST) which is an important factor for growing disease-
carrying mosquitoes. The Landsat OLI and TIRS, 30m
resolution data with UTM projection by default (Path:
Row 138/44) were collected from United States Geo-
logical Survey (USGS) earth explorer portal and thermal
bands were obtained looking towards purpose of use. The
Sentinel-L2A data were utilised for preparing Land Use
Land Cover (LULC), Normalized Difference Vegetation
Index (NDVI) and Normalized Difference Moisture Index
(NDMI). Sentinel-L2A data (45QXE & 45QXF) with 10m
and 20m spatial resolution along with WGS 1984 projection
by default were collected from Sentinel Hub EO browser
(Table1).
Excluding satellite data, GPS field location, information
from Google Earth, demographic data and epidemic data
were also used in this study. The demographic data includ-
ing population, household and literacy were collected from
District Statistical Handbook, Kolkata 2015. The densities
were calculated by dividing with respective area. To con-
sider suitable breeding sites for vector-borne transmitting
agents, GPS locations were collected which were further
processed and accuracy measured in Google Earth. These
locations include waste bins, open vats of waste, compactor
stations and water bodies. These locations were used for
proximate analysis. Furthermore, spatial epidemic data were
collected from KMC and interpolation was run to determine
area under high and low risk. Finally, all these input layers
were processed in GIS environment with equal projections
and cell size for further processing and analysis.
Study plan
Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) is considered in
present study to analyse susceptibility of vector-borne dis-
eases. The multi-criteria decision making or multi-criteria
decision analysis is a decision-making method that helps
in structuring, measuring, and judging a decision prob-
lem. As a part of MCDA, it is always required to select
multi-criteria and prefer more weightage criteria through
different techniques. Analytical hierarchy process (AHP)
is a widely used MCDA method. Hence, AHP was used
Table 1 Sources of data collection and their use in mapping of vector-borne diseases
Data set Date Source Uses in VBDs suscep-
tibility
Data type Method used
Landsat-8 (OLI and
TIRS)
14/04/2017 USGS-earth explorer
portal
LST Raster Raster calculator: convert
into TOA, reflectance
value and brightness
temperature
Sentinel-L2A 11/03/2018;
17/10/2017
Sentinel Hub EO
browser
LULC, NDMI and
NDVI
Raster Supervised classification;
standard equation for
moisture and vegetation
index
Demographic data 2015 District Statistical
Handbook, Kolkata
Population density,
household density,
and literate population
Vector; converted to
Raster
Data-based classification
using Choropleth
Suitable breeding sites 2018 Field visit and GPS Proximate analysis Vector; converted to
Raster
Multiple ring buffers
Epidemic data 2013–2017 KMC, Govt. of West
Bengal
Mapping of malaria and
dengue prevalence
Vector; converted to
Raster
IDW interpolation
Base map 2011 The Kolkata Gazette,
Govt. of W.B
Georeference; delinea-
tion of outer bound-
ary, ward and borough
map
Vector Simple digitization
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment
1 3
in present study. It is a multi-step plan including selection
of relevant criteria/factors, data inputs, data processing,
analysis, and making accurate decision. Kolkata Municipal
Corporation was chosen to carry out such type of study,
because the prevalence of vector-borne diseases like den-
gue and malaria is seen every year from early August to
late October and claims many lives year after year. Thus,
proper susceptibility zonation of VBDs can enhance better
surveillance to reduce the impacts.
The methodology to carry out the study is presented
in the following figure (Fig.2). The important factors
(considered as decision criteria) that associated to VBDs
occurrence were chosen looking towards the aim of the
study. First of all, 13 associated factors were chosen and
included them into three categories, i.e. environmental
factors, demographic, and epidemic factors and factors
related to suitable breeding site. To cheek the decision
accuracy, Consistency Ratio (CR) of each selected deci-
sion factor was calculated using Saaty’s method. For spa-
tial analysis, the spatial database of each factor was cre-
ated in GIS Environment. GIS integration was run using
weighted linear combination (WLC) to prepare spatial
susceptibility map of VBDs.
Determination ofdecision criteria: data
selection andpreparation
Environmental factors
Land use land cover (LULC)
Different type of land cover has significant role in provid-
ing sites for suitable breeding environment. The incidence
of vector-borne disease like chikungunya and malaria is
related with water bodies and land under low area (Sheela
etal. 2017). Alterations of land-use type including impound-
ments, dams, irrigation and draining systems that create
shelters for the carrying agents have potential effect in
transmitting vector-borne diseases like malaria, dengue, and
filariasis (Norris 2004). Thus, preparation of LULC map is
crucial to classify major area under different land cover and
their uses to understand those areas susceptible to mosqui-
toes’ breeding site.
The LULC map was prepared using Sentinel-2 dataset. Pri-
marily band combination was performed with Near Infrared
(Band 8), Red (Band 4), and Green (Band 3) to make false
color composite (FCC) infrared. Secondly, object-based
Fig. 2 Chart showing the
methodology used for analys-
ing VBD-susceptible zonation
in KMC
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment
1 3
signature file was created to run supervised classification and
finally, the entire area was classified into five major land-use
types and susceptible risk was considered based on classified
category (Fig.3a).
Normalized dierence moisture index (NDMI)
The Moisture Index was calculated using NIR and SWIR
Bands of Sentinel-2. Many variables are interrelated and cor-
related with each other. Like the wet areas have high moisture
content and concomitantly high vegetation. NIR is useful for
classifying the vegetation and SWIR is good for measuring the
moisture content of soil and vegetation, i.e. the reflectance in
the NIR band is influenced by the leaf’s internal structure and
the SWIR reflects the changes in vegetation water content. In
SWIR, a darker area highlights higher water content. The fol-
lowing equation was used to estimate moisture content;
NDMI =(NIR SWIR)(NIR +SWIR),
where NIR is for the Near infrared (Band 8A) and SWIR
is the Short-Wave Infrared (Band 11). For Sentinel-2 data,
these bands are with 20m spatial resolution. NDMI have
a values ranging from − 1 to + 1, where − 1 indicates very
bad moisture level and + 1 indicates very high moisture level
(Fig.3b).
Normalized dierence vegetation index (NDVI)
Mosquito-borne diseases were found in highest proportion
in areas with low land and lowest forest cover (Sheela etal.
2017). Many researchers emphasized that NDVI is a signifi-
cant factor for analysing mosquito-borne diseases. Moreo-
ver, in present day deforestation seems to be associated with
the growth of mosquito and rise in mosquito-borne disease
transmission (Norris 2004). Vegetation indices, specially
based on the NDVI, the habitat suitability for different spe-
cies of mosquitoes can be described (Kleinschmidt etal.
2000; Brown etal. 2008; Lourenço etal. 2011). The mos-
quito population is positively correlated with Normalized
Fig. 3 Maps of four selected environmental factors which were taken as decision criteria in susceptibility analysis of VBDs; a land use land
cover, b normalized difference moisture index, c normalized difference vegetation index and d land surface temperature
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment
1 3
Difference Vegetation Index (Gemperli etal. 2006). The
amount of precipitation can also be linked with vegetation
index. The green vegetation is related with higher amounts
of precipitation and is considered as suitable environment
for mosquito habitats (Brown etal. 2008).
To know the vegetation index (VI) of KMC, NDVI was
calculated (Fig.3c). It was used for quantifying the green
vegetation. NDVI normalizes the green leaf scattering in
the near-infrared wavelength and chlorophyll absorption in
the red wavelength. Hence, near-infrared and Red bands are
required. Band 8 and Band 4 of Sentinel-2 dataset were used
for this purpose and NDVI was calculated using the follow-
ing equation;
where NIR is Band 8 and RED is the Band 4. As per Senti-
nel-2 EO products guideline, the value of NDVI ranges from
1 to 1. Negative values (values approaching − 1) repre-
sent water bodies. Values close to zero (i.e. − 0.1 to + 0.1)
mostly represent barren areas of rock, sand, or snow. Low
but positive values represent shrub and grassland (mostly
it ranges from 0.2 to 0.4) and high positive values indicate
dense forest.
Land surface temperature (LST)
Land surface and air temperature affect the feeding behav-
iour of the mosquito and play an important role in the growth
of mosquito larva (Sandru 2014). The survival and the life
cycle of vectors are also effected by land surface tempera-
ture. Sandru (2014) found that mosquito survival is low at
extreme temperatures, i.e. very high or very low temperature
is harmful for mosquito’s growth. The optimum temperature
in which mosquito can grow and survive is found between
28°C and 32°C and temperatures < 5°C and or > 40°C are
deadly for the mosquitoes.
The land surface temperature of KMC was derived from
TIRS 1 (Band 10) of Landsat 8 dataset (Fig.3d). To calcu-
late LST using thermal infrared sensor data, first, the conver-
sion of digital number to TOA (Top of Atmosphere) radi-
ance is required. OLI and TIRS datasets can be converted
to TOA spectral radiance using the radiance rescaling factor
which is provided in metadata file of Landsat dataset. Thus
following equation was used:
where Lλ=TOA spectral radiance (Watts/(m2*srad*µm)),
ML= band-specific multiplicative rescaling factor taken
from metadata (RADIANCE_MULT_BAND_x, x is the
thermal band), Qcal=quantized and calibrated standard
product pixel value and AL=band-specific additive rescaling
factor taken from metadata (RADIANCE_ADD_BAND_x,
x is the thermal band).
NDVI =(NIR RED)(NIR +RED),
L𝜆=ML×Qcal +AL
Now, the top of atmospheric brightness temperature has
to calculate from the reflectance value using the equation:
where BT = atmospheric brightness temperature in Kel-
vin, which is further subtracted by 273.15 to calculate the
degree Celsius, K2 = band-specific thermal conversion con-
stant (K2_CONSTANT_BAND_x, x is the band number),
K1 = band-specific thermal conversion constant (K1_CON-
STANT_BAND_x, x is the band number), Lλ=TOA spec-
tral radiance.
Finally, brightness temperature was converted to land sur-
face temperature using the following equation:
where BT = brightness temperature, λ = wavelength of
emitted radiance, c2 = h × c/s = 1.4388 × 102mK = 14,388
µm (h, c, and s are constant), e = emissivity which was cal-
culated from near-infrared and Red band of the same dataset.
Demographic andepidemic factors
A densely populated area creates a higher chance of experi-
encing an epidemiological outbreak even if the vector house
index is low in that area. The respective vector does not
have to travel far to search for its victims (Sandru 2014).
High human population density and poor water supply are
regarded as major contributors to dengue epidemics (Gubler
2004; Barreto and Teixeira 2008). An unexpected range of
human population densities between 3000 and 7000 per-
son/km2 in rural villages is prone to high dengue outbreaks
(Schmidt etal. 2011). The risk of contracting West Nile
disease is increased by living in low-density housing in the
presence of vegetation (Sandru 2014). Household density,
housing types and surrounding built-up environment have
offered vital insights into the epidemiology of dengue fever
and potential risk (Braga etal. 2010).
Literacy is highly related with human awareness about
diseases transmission. High literate population may be well
aware about the precautions and consequences of transmis-
sible diseases and hence have low risk in contrast with low
literate population. Research showed that people well con-
scious about the cause of malaria and found that awareness
increased with the increasing literacy status and knowledge
about mosquito-borne diseases were also significantly bet-
ter among literate than illiterate population (Rasania etal.
2002).
Based on literature survey, the above three demographic
factors (population density, household density and literacy
BT
=
K2
In
(
K1
L𝜆+1
)
273.15,
LST
=
BT
(1+(
𝜆
×BTc2)
×Ln(e
)
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment
1 3
Fig. 4 Selected factors related
with demographic and epidemic
factors; a population density,
b household density, c literate
population, d reported dengue
cases and e reported malaria
cases
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment
1 3
Fig. 4 (continued)
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment
1 3
rate) were chosen in susceptibility analysis of VBDs. Data
on population and literacy were collected from Bureau of
Applied Economics & Statistics, Department of Statistics
& Programme Implementation, Govt. of West Bengal. First
of all, area of each respective wards of KMC was calculated
using spatial statistical tool in GIS environment. The total
number of population and household of each ward were then
divided with respective area and density of population and
household was calculated. The following formula was used
to calculate population and household density;
where Dx is the density of population or Household, Nx is
the total residing population or households and Ax is the
area of respective ward in Km2. Choropleth is technically
a thematic areal map in which areas are shaded in color or
patterned in proportion. Choropleth technique was used to
prepare the literacy, population and household density map
in five categories from very low to very high using natural
break in GIS environment (Fig.4a–c).
Epidemiology is the analysis of the distribution of dis-
ease conditions and public health. Dengue and malaria are
considered as an endemic disease instead of pandemic as
these are confined in certain places of the earth, i.e. tropical
region due to availability of temperature and moisture which
offers best breeding sites for the disease-carrying host. For
Dx
=
Nx
Ax
the epidemic parameters, cases of dengue and malaria for
the year of 2012–2015 were collected for spatial analysis.
Dengue and malaria are main vector-borne diseases in KMC,
other VBDs including West Nile Virus, Lyme disease, Japa-
nese Encephalitis, Chikungunya etc. are not seen here. Only
2 cases of Japanese Encephalitis (JE) were found during
2014. Thus, only malaria and dengue cases were consid-
ered for present work. For spatial distribution of dengue and
malaria cases, spatial interpolation was used based on given
inputs on recorded dengue and malaria cases (Fig.4d, e).
Factors related tosuitable breeding sites
Places with garbage and waste accumulation, stagnant
sources of water, drains, stagnant canal with garbage accu-
mulation, in and around community waste bins and open
waste dumping vats are considered as the most appropri-
ate breeding sites for mosquitoes. Improper handling and
management of waste and their unscientific disposal cause
adverse impact on all components of the environment and
human health. Unscientific disposal of wastes here and there
and constructing built-up areas can be the reason for creating
suitable sites for breeding. Disposal of garbage and dump-
ing these into drains can also be causes of breeding grounds
for mosquitoes. Hence much attention is to be paid to pro-
vide appropriate treatment and disposal of waste generated
in the built-up area. In an evolving urban policy, priority is
Fig. 4 (continued)
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment
1 3
to be given to the installation of safe treatment and disposal
facility of waste especially, sewage, sullage, and solid waste
(Sheela etal. 2017).
Wastes tend to accumulate near settlements, offers breed-
ing sites to vectors like rodents, insects and animals (Coin-
treau 2006). Dumping of wastes and poorly managed land-
fills affect the health, quality of life and impact on local
environment and livelihood. The storage of waste inside the
house, kitchen, room and nearby waste bins and delay of
refuse trucks to collect such waste can create disease-car-
rying pathogens such as vector, rodent and vermin having
high risk of disease spread like malaria, dengue and other
viral diseases (Abdellah and Balla 2013). The vector-borne
disease transmission is strongly connected with location of
breeding site (Carter etal. 2000). Transmissible diseases
Fig. 5 Selected factors relating with suitable breeding sites responsible for vectors’ growth and diseases’ transmission; a proximity to waste bins,
b proximity to open vats, c proximity to compactor stations and d proximity to water bodies
Table 2 Ranking scale of analytic hierarchy process adopted from
Saaty to establish PCM
AHP scale of importance for PCM Numeric
rank
Reciprocal
rank (deci-
mal)
Extremely importance 9 0.11
Very strong to extremely importance 8 0.12
Very strongly importance 7 0.14
Strongly to very strongly impotence 6 0.17
Strongly importance 5 0.20
Moderately to strongly importance 4 0.25
Moderately importance 3 0.33
Equally to moderately importance 2 0.50
Equally importance 1 1.00
Table 3 Standard value of random index (RI) given by Saaty to measure consistency in judgement
N2345678910
RI 0 0.58 0.9 1.12 1.24 1.32 1.41 1.45 1.49
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment
1 3
like malaria and dengue are known to be highly prevalent
around specific mosquito breeding sites and they can nor-
mally be transmitted only within certain distances from the
breeding sites. The range of dispersal is typically between
a few hundred meters and a kilometre, but rarely exceeds
2–3km (Kobbe etal. 2006). Land disposal facilities add
to global warming and subsequently vector-borne disease
abundance and pathogen survival. Proximity with landfills
blurs the lines between occupational impacts on scavengers
and environmental health impacts on surrounding communi-
ties (Sabesan etal. 2001; Cointreau 2006).
Keeping in mind these circumstances, four factors were
chosen which are associated for providing suitable breed-
ing sites. These factors including distance from waste bins,
distance from open vats, distance from compactor stations
and distance from water bodies were selected for proximity
analysis. This operation was performed in two steps, i.e.
GPS-based record of such locations throughout the study
area was gathered during a 45days field survey and these
points were plotted in Google earth to export and create
point shape files. Finally, multiple ring buffers of waste bins,
distance from open vats, distance from compactor stations
and distance from water bodies were created with a common
interval of either 200m or 300m based on their extension
for proximity analysis (Fig.5a–d).
Multi‑criteria decision approach
Decision-making approaches are gaining much importance
as a potential tool for assessment of multifaceted real prob-
lems due to their innate ability to judge different options.
Decisions about susceptibility analysis of VBDs typically
involved the assessment of multiple criteria according to
study objectives (Carver 1991; Eldin and Sui 2003; Mal-
czewski 2004). Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is one
of the more commonly applied MCDM approach (Lootsma
and Schuijt 1997). AHP allows decision makers to struc-
ture their decision criteria into a hierarchy of sub-criteria or
alternatives which can then be analysed individually. Thus,
in first step, the aim was defined to identify susceptible
areas of vector-borne diseases. In second step, the hierarchy
was constructed by the main criteria to reach the defined
aim. In the present study, 13 criteria were selected looking
towards their importance in VBDs susceptibility. Then in
third step, selected criteria were divided into alternatives
for further analysis. Then, pair-comparison matrix (PCM)
was established and weights were calculated subsequently
in next steps.
AHP is essentially based on pair-wise comparisons
matrix of the defined criteria which are used to establish the
weight to calculate the importance or performance scores
for selected criteria and alternatives (Syamsuddin and
Hwang 2009). PCM is a relative ranking-based matrix table
used to calculate the weight value of all sub-criteria under
a selected criterion in decision making process. As all the
selected criteria will not have the same significance for a
particular instance, hence, the significance rank of all alter-
natives is complimentary and divides the same alternatives
in the matrix (Saaty 1990; Saaty and Vargees 2001). The
AHP employs an underlying scale with values from 1 to 9 to
rank the relative importance for two criteria or alternatives
(Table2). Here, extreme significance is indicated by nine
and equal significance by one between criteria of the matrix
(Saaty 1990; Malczewski 1999). The pair-wise comparison
matrix mainly has the criteria of reciprocity which is arith-
metically denoted as 1/RC, R rank of C criteria in pairwise
comparison matrix (Saaty 2012). PCM gives the weights
of each criterion with comparison to all others. Once the
comparison rank is fitted, the weightage has to be calculated
for each respective alternative to judge the consistency for
considering into decision. After constructing the pairwise
matrix, relative weights/eigenvectors are calculated using
following equation;
Ax =𝜆maxX
Table 4 Intensity of importance and respective risk value of selected
environmental factors
Factors Class Impor-
tance
given
Susceptibil-
ity category
Risk value
LULC Water bodies 1 Very high 5
Fallow land 0.33 Very low 1
Open space 0.25 Medium 3
Vegetation cover 1 Low 2
Built-up area 0.5 High 4
NDMI 0.3439 to 0.0117 1 Very low 1
0.0118–0.1044 2 Low 2
0.1045–0.2044 3 Medium 3
0.2045–0.3267 5 High 4
0.3268–0.6009 7 Very high 5
NDVI − 0.2355 to 0.0959 1 Very low 1
0.0960–0.1943 2 Low 2
0.1944–0.3072 3 Medium 3
0.3073–0.4311 4 High 4
0.4312–0.6934 5 Very high 5
LST 25.9021–28.9500 1 Medium 3
28.9600–30.7402 3 High 4
30.7502–32.0464 6 Very high 5
32.0564–33.3901 3 Low 2
33.4001–37.0101 1 Very low 1
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment
1 3
where A is the comparison matrix of n criteria (i.e. priority
matrix), X is the Eigenvector of n criteria (i.e. priority vec-
tor) and λmax is the Eigenvalue.
Calculated through,
where w1wn are the weights of alternatives, Ci1Cin
are the ranks of alternatives and λmax is the Eigenvalue.
(
w
1
×Ci
1)
+
(
w
2
×Ci
2)
+…
(
w
n
×Ci
n)
Once the weights are calculated it is essential to check the
consistency in result. As the numeric ranks are derived from
the subjective preferences of individuals, it is highly possible
to have some personal bias in making the final matrix of judg-
ments. For this purpose, AHP always offers a measure of the
consistency of PCM by calculating the consistency ratio (CR).
Saaty (1980) provides the calculated RI value for matrices of
different sizes of alternatives as given here (Table3). The ratio
is designed in such a way that if the value of the ratio exceeds
0.10, it will be considered as inconsistent for judgments and
value 0 as perfectly consistent, while values 0 or close to 0 (i.e.
Table 5 Pairwise comparison
matrix along with consistency
ratio of four environmental
factors
a CI = 0.0664, CR = 0.0503
b CI = 0.0351, CR = 0.0313
c CI = 0.0170, CR = 0.0152
d CI = 0.0420, CR = 0.0375
12345wAx λmax
LULCa
Water bodies 1 3 4 1 2 0.3176 1.6924 5.3283
Fallow land 0.33 1 0.5 0.25 0.2 0.0643 0.3320 5.1672
Open space 0.25 2 1 0.33 0.33 0.0913 0.4748 5.2001
Vegetation cover 1 4 3 1 0.5 0.2388 1.2314 5.1573
Built-up area 0.5 5 3 2 1 0.2880 1.5196 5.2758
NDMI 1 2 3 4 5 w Ax λmax
0.3439 to 0.0117 1 0.5 0.33 0.2 0.14 0.0499 0.2539 5.0923
0.0118–0.1044 2 1 0.5 0.25 0.2 0.0808 0.4059 5.0259
0.1045–0.2044 3 2 1 0.33 0.25 0.1279 0.6463 5.0546
0.2045–0.3267 5 4 3 1 0.33 0.2639 1.3790 5.2255
0.3268–0.6009 7 5 4 3 1 0.4776 2.5336 5.3047
NDVIc
0.2355 to 0.0959 1 0.5 0.33 0.25 0.2 0.0624 0.3140 5.0345
0.0960–0.1943 2 1 0.5 0.33 0.25 0.0986 0.4952 5.0234
0.1944–0.3072 3 2 1 0.5 0.33 0.1611 0.8150 5.0603
0.3073–0.4311 4 3 2 1 0.5 0.2618 1.3372 5.1080
0.4312–0.6934 5 4 3 2 1 0.4162 2.1291 5.1154
LSTd
25.9021–28.9500 1 0.33 0.16 0.33 1 0.0723 0.3715 5.1412
28.9600–30.7402 3 1 0.33 0.33 2 0.1503 0.7700 5.1235
30.7502–32.0464 6 3 1 2 3 0.4052 2.1230 5.2391
32.0564–33.3901 3 3 0.5 1 4 0.2860 1.5013 5.2500
33.4001–37.0101 1 0.5 0.33 0.25 1 0.0863 0.4389 5.0870
Table 6 Calculation of weight
value of environmental factors
for overlay analysis
CI = 0.0147, CR = 0.0164
Environmental
parameters
1 2 3 4 Weight Ax Weight (%)
LULC 1 0.2 0.33 0.2 0.0687 0.2753 6.8674
NDMI 5 1 3 1 0.3897 1.5854 38.9665
NDVI 3 0.33 1 0.33 0.1530 0.6172 15.3025
LST 5 1 3 1 0.3886 1.5807 38.8636
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment
1 3
0.01 or 0.03) are highly acceptable. Consistency ratio (CR)
was calculated through the help of CI and RI. Mathematically,
CR is expressed as;
CI was calculated by putting the value from above estima-
tion by applying the following simple equation;
CI = consistency index, λmax = average of ΣW1Wn. RI
depends on the number of elements being compared (i.e.
number of alternatives in PCM) and if the value ranges from
0 to 0.09, the matrix will be considered as reasonably con-
sistent and may continue the process of decision making
using AHP.
Many researchers successfully used AHP as a multi-cri-
teria decision making approach in different fields of study.
Analytic hierarchy process was utilised to assess the vari-
ous non-monetary criteria (Velasquez and Hester 2013).
The combination of multi-criteria decision analysis and
cost-benefit analysis was used for risk analysis in trans-
port infrastructure appraisals (Ambrasaite etal. 2011). The
Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach and GIS
were used for siting landfill in south Texas (Chang etal.
2008). The MCDM approach was used in combination
CR =CIRI
CI
=
𝜆
max
n
n1
with GIS to define risk zones of malaria epidemic in the
central highlands of Madagascar (Rakotomanana etal.
2007). MCDM based analytic hierarchy process was
applied for analysing criteria weight sensitivity to the
study of spatial sensitivity in suitability evaluation (Chen
etal. 2010). Several more studies applied analytic hier-
archy process for analysing susceptibility, susceptibility,
sensitivity and suitability (Syamsuddin and Hwang 2009;
Tavares etal. 2011; Gorsevski etal. 2012; Rikalovic etal.
2014; Tu etal. 2014; Qayum etal. 2015; Eskandari etal.
2016; Nazri etal. 2016; Guler and Omralıoglu 2017; Ali
and Ahmad 2018, 2019).
Susceptibility analysis ofVBDs using weighted
overlay analysis
Susceptibility analysis for vector-borne diseases was esti-
mated using weighted overlay analysis (WOA). It is consid-
ered as an effective technique to resolve spatial complex-
ity for susceptibility analysis (Kuria etal. 2011). AHP was
applied to decide the more significant factors in the selected
hierarchy of different inputs (Parimala and Lopez 2012).
Thus, the selected thematic layers were integrated in GIS
environment using linear weighted combination (Girvan
etal. 2003). Susceptibility analysis of VBDs was determined
Fig. 6 Susceptibility analysis
of VBDs based on selected
environmental factors
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment
1 3
based on weight calculated through AHP. All selected causa-
tive raster layers were defined with same cell size and put
respective weight to combine into a single susceptibility
index. The following equation was considered;
where Wj is the weight value of decision factors j, Xj is the
selected raster input and n is the number of selected deci-
sion criteria.
Results anddiscussion
The prevalence of vector-borne diseases in Kolkata
Municipal Corporation is seen year after year, although
the frequencies of occurrence and numbers of death have
reduced. Thus, effort was made to carry out a spatial
SA
=
n
j=1
(WjXj
)
analysis on susceptibility zonation of such vectors and
vector-borne diseases. In this regard, a complex decision-
making process was carried out through multi-criteria
selecting, rating, weighting, and analysing. A total 13
factors were selected which were pre-categorised into
three decision parameters. These factors are environmen-
tal parameter, demographic and epidemic parameter and
parameter related to suitable breeding site. Thus, the hier-
archy was constructed with three decision parameters, 13
factors and 65 alternatives or sub-factors. Primarily, after
calculating the weight value of each factors and sub-fac-
tors by AHP, single layer of susceptibility map was created
for each of three parameters and finally VBDs susceptible
map of KMC was created using overlay of each of this
single layer in GIS environment.
Table 7 Intensity of importance
and respective risk value of
demographic and epidemic
factors
Factors Class Importance
given
Susceptibility
category
Risk value
Population density 0–13,698 1 Very low 1
13,699–28,412 2 Low 2
28,413–51,243 4 Medium 3
51,244–81,685 5 High 4
81,686–129,377 7 Very high 5
Household density 0–3281 1 Very low 1
3282–6676 2 Low 2
6677–10,071 4 Medium 3
10,072–16,069 5 High 4
16,070–28,857 7 Very high 5
Literate population 0–5888 1 Very high 5
5889–22,167 0.5 High 4
22,168–30,753 0.33 Medium 3
30,754–43,290 0.2 Low 2
43,291–70,021 0.14 Very low 1
Spatial distribution of dengue cases ≤ 8.23 1 Very low 1
8.23–18.42 2 Low 2
18.42–33.70 4 Medium 3
33.70–58.00 6 High 4
≥ 58.00 8 Very high 5
Spatial distribution of malaria cases ≤ 173 1 Very low 1
174–407 3 Low 2
408–704 5 Medium 3
705–1133 7 High 4
≥ 1134 9 Very high 5
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment
1 3
Table 8 Pairwise comparison
matrix along with consistency
ratio of five demographic and
epidemic factors
a CI = 0.0283, CR = 0.0241
b CI = 0.0248, CR = 0.0221
c CI = 0.0117, CR = 0.0104
d CI = 0.0308, CR = 0.0275
e CI = 0.0358, CR = 0.0320
12345WAx λmax
Population densitya
0–13,698 1 0.5 0.25 0.2 0.14 0.0489 0.2463 5.0331
13,699–28,412 2 1 0.5 0.33 0.2 0.0862 0.4357 5.0531
28,413–51,243 4 2 1 0.33 0.25 0.1409 0.7128 5.0597
51,244–81,685 5 3 3 1 0.5 0.2729 1.4244 5.2198
81,686–129,377 7 5 4 2 1 0.4511 2.3340 5.1743
Household densityb
0–3281 1 0.5 0.25 0.2 0.14 0.0480 0.2418 5.0364
3282–6676 2 1 0.33 0.25 0.16 0.0725 0.3633 5.0126
6677–10,071 4 3 1 0.5 0.25 0.1595 0.8139 5.1044
10,072–16,069 5 4 2 1 0.5 0.2597 1.3388 5.1544
16,070–28,857 7 6 4 2 1 0.4603 2.3886 5.1891
Literate populationc
0–5888 1 2 3 5 7 0.4349 2.2143 5.0913
5889–22,167 0.5 1 2 4 6 0.2788 1.4148 5.0738
22,168–30,753 0.33 0.5 1 2 4 0.1574 0.7919 5.0320
30,754–43,290 0.2 0.25 0.5 1 2 0.0819 0.4112 5.0197
43,291–70,021 0.14 0.17 0.25 0.5 1 0.0469 0.2355 5.0179
Spatial distribution of dengue casesd
≤ 8.23 1 0.5 0.25 0.16 0.12 0.0425 0.2149 5.0535
8.23–18.42 2 1 0.33 0.2 0.14 0.0636 0.3188 5.0113
18.42–33.70 4 3 1 0.5 0.25 0.1484 0.7576 5.1056
33.70–58.00 6 5 2 1 0.33 0.2476 1.2836 5.1841
≥ 58.00 8 7 4 3 1 0.4979 2.6198 5.2621
Spatial distribution of malaria casese
≤ 173 1 0.33 0.2 0.14 0.11 0.0356 0.1793 5.0331
174–407 3 1 0.5 0.2 0.14 0.0729 0.3683 5.0554
408–704 5 2 1 0.33 0.2 0.1253 0.6408 5.1139
705–1133 7 5 3 1 0.5 0.2887 1.5170 5.2553
≥ 1134 9 7 5 2 1 0.4776 2.5120 5.2600
Table 9 Calculation of weight
value of demographic and
epidemic parameters for overlay
analysis
CI = 0.0337, CR = 0.0300
Demographic and
epidemic parameters
1 2 3 4 5 Weight Ax Max Weight (%)
PD 1 1 2 0.33 0.33 0.1378 0.7040 5.1071 13.7856
HD 1 1 1 0.33 0.33 0.1128 0.5819 5.1561 11.2856
NLP 0.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.1221 0.6175 5.0554 12.2144
RDCs 3 3 2 1 1 0.3135 1.6235 5.1776 31.3570
RMCs 3 3 2 1 1 0.3135 1.6235 5.1776 31.3570
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment
1 3
VBDs susceptible zones based onenvironmental
factor
Environmental factor is related with surrounding envi-
ronmental and physical conditions. Four indicators were
selected as environmental factor, including land use land
cover (LULC), normalized difference moisture index
(NDMI), normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)
and land surface temperature (LST). Thus, a total 20 alter-
natives were given risk value in a scale from 1 to 5, (5
defines very high susceptible zones and 1 defines very
low susceptible zones toward VBDs) based on the scale
of importance adopted after Saaty which ranges from 1
to 9. Table4 shows 20 alternatives which were attributed
by different importance from 1 (equal important towards
VBDs outbreak) to 9 (Extremely important towards VBDs
outbreak) and subsequently risk values were arranged to
define which alternatives has greater susceptibility to
VBDs (Table4).
The main function of AHP is pairwise comparison
based on their relative importance which helps in meas-
uring quantitative judgment in new fields (Saaty 1980).
Thus, choice-based intensity of importance was given to
particular alternatives looking for their association towards
vector-borne diseases and pairwise comparison matrix
were formed to obtain the weightage value, to check the
result and error of decision making and empirical bias
while assigning ranks in respective field, the Consistency
Index (CI) and Consistency Ratio (CR) were considered.
The weights of all 20 alternatives along with CI and CR
are summarized here (Table5). Saaty suggested that if the
ratio of consistency and index for the resultant random
matrix is found > 0.1, the decision-making process and
selection of rank will considered as inconsistent (Saaty
and Vargas 2012). The result shows that the CR of all
selected factors was always calculated < 0.1 (0.0503 for
LULC, 0.0313 for NDMI, 0.0152 for NDVI and 0.0375
for LST). Thus, it is may considered that the selection
of rank was always in acceptable choice when pairwise
comparison matrix was established. Now, to derive final
output layer in GIS environment, the comparison matrix of
selected four factors was established (Table6). Finally, the
VBDs’ susceptible zones were extracted through weight-
based overlay of the chosen environmental factors using
the GIS tool (Fig.6). The result shows that the proportion
of very high and very low susceptible zones-to-VBDs is
limited and maximum area comes under moderate sus-
ceptible zones.
Fig. 7 Susceptibility analysis of
VBDs based on demographic
and epidemic parameter
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment
1 3
VBDs’ susceptible zones based ondemographic
andepidemic factor
Demographic factor is related with population, household,
level of education, etc. for vector-borne diseases assessment
and susceptible zonation. Demographic factors are important
because humans have high potential for transmission of such
kind of diseases. In this regards, three causative indicators
were taken as demographic parameters based on availability
of data, including population density (PD), household den-
sity (HD) and number of literate population (NLP). Along
with demographic parameter, previous epidemic records
were also considered. The frequency of malaria outbreak
was much greater than dengue cases during last year. Here,
two more indicators were taken, i.e. reported malaria cases
(RMCs) and reported dengue cases (RDCs). Thus, a total
25 alternatives were given risk value in a scale from 1 to 5,
based on the scale of importance of intensity which ranges
from 1 to 9. Table7 shows 25 alternatives which were rated
by different importance from 1 to 9 and subsequently risk
values were put to define which sub-factor has more suscep-
tibility to VBDs (Table7).
The choice-based intensity of importance was given to
particular alternative looking at their connection towards
VBDs. The pairwise comparison matrix was constructed to
obtain the weight value and to check the result and error of
decision making and empirical bias while assigning ranks in
respective field. The weights of all 25 alternatives along with
their CI and CR are summarized (Table8). The result reveals
that consistency ratio of all selected indicators was found
between 0.01 and 0.03 (0.0241, 0.0221, 0.0104, 0.0275 and
0.0320 for PD, HP, NLP, RDCs and RMCs, respectively).
Each alternative was arranged with risk scale on the basis
of weight calculated from PCM. Now, to derive final output
Fig. 8 Some considerable areas of suitable sites for growing vector-
borne disease transmitting parasites which were identified during
field visit (a) and b unclean drain in Diamond harbar Road, c stagnant
water in drain near Nabapally, d drain in residential areas at Garden
Reach filled with waste water and other solid waste from households,
e dumped areas in Talata near Sealdah, f stagnant water body dumped
with mixed waste in Tollygunge (the plastic carry bags, bottle and
other such type container provides suitable places for growing dis-
eases carrying parasites) and f author during discussion with a local
respondent in Makaltala village near Dhapa dump site
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment
1 3
layer, the comparison matrix of selected five factors was
prepared (Table9). GIS integration was created to design
susceptible zones of VBDs based on demographic and epi-
demic parameter (Fig.7).
VBDs’ susceptible zones based onsuitable breeding
sites
The growth of vectors is associated with garbage damping.
Wet and watery places near waste bins and open vats are
highly suitable places for breeding sites (Fig.8). Thus, prox-
imity to spatial location of waste bins and open vats was
taken and proximity to nearer locations was considered as
very high to high susceptible to VBDs and vice versa. Along
with these factors, proximity to compactor station was also
taken into consideration because it was found during field
visit that the liquid excreta is gathered into the drain after the
waste compaction process which was left uncovered and this
may offer suitable breeding sites for mosquitoes. One more
factor, i.e. proximity to water bodies was also considered
based on field visit. Thus, total of four indicators were taken
as factors related to suitable breeding sites, including prox-
imity to waste bins (PWBs), proximity to open vats (POVs),
proximity to compactor stations (PCSs) and proximity to
water bodies (PWTBs). Thus, a total 20 alternatives were
given risk value based on same scale as used with other
factors (Table10).
After assigning choice-based intensity of importance
to particular alternatives towards VBDs, PCM was con-
structed to obtain the weight value for checking the result.
The weights of all 4 indicators along with their CI and CR
are summarized below (Table11). The result reveals that
the CR values of all selected factors, i.e. PWBs, POVs,
PCSs and PWTBs were calculated as 0.0511, 0.0371,
0.0508, and 0.0311, respectively. It was found that the
CR was always < 0.1 for all the selected factors. Finally,
same as the other factors, the VBDs’ susceptible zone
was designed through constructing comparison matrix
of selected four indicators (Table12). The weight-based
overlay of the chosen factors related to suitable breeding
sites was derived using the spatial tool (Fig.9). The result
shows that areas circulating nearest to waste bins, open
vats, compactor stations and water bodies come under
more susceptible zones and areas farer to these locations
are come under least-risk zones.
Spatial susceptibility analysis ofVBDs
After preparing individual layers based on selected factors,
the final VBDs hotspot zone was created using weighted
linear combination (WLC) of these individual layers in
GIS environment. The weight of each parameter was
assigned using AHP for integrated mapping. For creating
Table 10 Intensity of
importance and respective risk
value of selected factors related
to suitable breeding sites
Factors Class Importance
given
Susceptibility
category
Risk value
Proximity to waste bins ≤ 200 1 Very high 5
200–400 0.5 High 4
400–600 0.25 Medium 3
600–800 0.2 Low 2
≥ 800 0.17 Very low 1
Proximity to open vats ≤ 300 1 Very high 5
300–600 0.5 High 4
600–900 0.2 Medium 3
900–1200 0.17 Low 2
≥ 1200 0.14 Very low 1
Proximity to compactor stations ≤ 300 1 Very high 5
300–600 0.33 High 4
600–900 0.25 Medium 3
900–1200 0.17 Low 2
≥ 1200 0.14 Very low 1
Proximity to Water bodies ≤ 200 1 Very high 5
200–400 0.5 High 4
400–600 0.33 Medium 3
600–800 0.2 Low 2
≥ 800 0.14 Very low 1
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment
1 3
spatial susceptibility to VBDs, the following equation was
used (Qayum etal. 2015):
where VBDsH = vector-borne diseases hotspot; Henvp=hot-
spot identified based on environmental factors; Hdemp=hot-
spot identified based on demographic and epidemic factors;
Hsbs=hotspot identified based on factors related to suitable
breeding sites.
VBDsH =Henvp ×Hdemp ×Hsbs
The final VBDs raster layer was created and reclassi-
fied according to the susceptible risk zone into 5 class, i.e.
Very high (VH), high (H), moderate (M), low (L) and very
low (VL) areas (Fig.10). The areal proportion of suscep-
tible zones to VBDs was estimated that 0.75%, 18.107%,
48.21%, 32.36% and 0.55% area were found under VH,
H, M, L and VL susceptible zones to VBDs, respectively.
The result of the study shows that about 81% area comes
under moderate to low susceptible zones, whereas about
19% area comes under high to very high susceptible zones.
Table 11 Pairwise comparison
matrix along with consistency
ratio of four parameters related
to suitable breeding sites
a CI = 0.0573, CR = 0.0511
b CI = 0.0415, CR = 0.0371
c CI = 0.0569, CR = 0.0508
d CI 0.0348, CR 0.0311
12345WAx λmax
Proximity to waste binsa
≤ 200 1 2 4 5 6 0.4358 2.3438 5.3784
200–400 0.5 1 2 4 5 0.2610 1.3961 5.3485
400–600 0.25 0.5 1 3 5 0.1710 0.9025 5.2764
600–800 0.2 0.25 0.33 1 3 0.0857 0.4353 5.0800
≥ 800 0.17 0.2 0.2 0.33 1 0.0465 0.2352 5.0632
Proximity to open vatsb
≤ 300 1 2 5 6 7 0.4671 2.5119 5.3778
300–600 0.5 1 2 4 6 0.2581 1.3493 5.2266
600–900 0.2 0.5 1 3 5 0.1618 0.8335 5.1515
900–1200 0.17 0.25 0.3 1 2 0.0693 0.3491 5.0337
≥ 1200 0.14 0.17 0.2 0.5 1 0.0436 0.2199 5.0422
Proximity to compactor stationsc
≤ 300 1 3 4 6 7 0.4838 2.6063 5.3868
300–600 0.33 1 2 4 5 0.2316 1.2460 5.3802
600–900 0.25 0.5 1 3 5 0.1629 0.8516 5.2286
900–1200 0.17 0.25 0.33 1 3 0.0795 0.4014 5.0510
≥ 1200 0.14 0.2 0.2 0.33 1 0.0422 0.2151 5.0923
Proximity to water bodiesd
≤ 200 1 2 3 5 7 0.4262 2.2217 5.2128
200–400 0.5 1 2 4 6 0.2713 1.4186 5.2290
400–600 0.33 0.5 1 3 5 0.1771 0.9155 5.1687
600–800 0.2 0.25 0.33 1 3 0.0837 0.4215 5.0362
≥ 800 0.14 0.17 0.2 0.33 1 0.0417 0.2105 5.0505
Table 12 Calculation of weight
value of parameters related
to suitable breeding sites for
overlay analysis
CI = 0.0034, CR = 0.0038
Parameters related to suitable breeding sites 1 2 3 4 Weight Ax Weight (%)
Proximity to waste bins 1 0.5 1 0.33 0.1411 0.5653 14.11
Proximity to open vats 2 1 2 0.5 0.2630 1.0549 26.30
Proximity to compactor stations 1 0.5 1 0.33 0.1411 0.5653 14.11
Proximity to water bodies 3 2 3 1 0.4546 1.8276 45.46
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment
1 3
Fig. 9 Susceptibility analysis
of VBDs based on parameters
related to suitable breeding sites
Fig. 10 Mapping of vector-
borne diseases hotspot
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment
1 3
Fig. 11 Map showing assess-
ment of accuracy (a) places
with reported VBDs during last
year (b) multi-criteria-based
susceptible map of VBDs using
geospatial technique
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment
1 3
For the out breaking of diseases like water-borne, vector-
borne or mosquito-borne are not due to any single factor.
Many related factors are responsible for such. The present
study tried to use such associated multi-criteria for spatial
susceptibility analysis of VBDs. The result revealed that
based on environmental factor, areas with water bodies,
moisture content index in air > 0.33, vegetation index > 0.43
and surface temperature ranges between 30 and 32°C has
greater susceptibility to VBDs. Based on demographic and
epidemic factor, areas with population density > 81,686,
household density > 16,070, literate population < 5888, high
reported cases of dengue and malaria has more prone to
VBDs. Among suitable breeding sites, areas 200m from
waste bins, ≤ 300m from open vats, ≤ 300m from compac-
tor stations and ≤ 200m from water bodies has high sus-
ceptibility to VBDs. Out of total 13 selected criteria in this
study, it was found that moisture index, land surface tem-
perature, water bodies and nearness to open waste dumping
vats have greater role in outbreak of vector-borne diseases.
Accuracy measurement
It is a very crucial task in spatial analysis, to evaluate the result
with actual ground. As per KMC report in last year from Janu-
ary to October more than 600 dengue and more than 2000
malaria cases were reported in KMC out of which 6 were
death in dengue. So, a field survey was carried out during
June and July of 2018 in different wards of each 16 Borough
of KMC. Looking towards surrounding settings and respond-
ent’s response on structured questions, different GPS locations
were recorded. These locations were further verified in Google
Earth open software and export as point locations. After sam-
pled categorization, result found that in many areas of south-
ern, south-eastern and western part has very low prevalence
of MBDs, some areas found with no cases of such diseases,
while some areas of northern and central parts has high to
moderate prevalence of MBDs. Thus, some areas with very
high prevalence of such diseases were plotted to merge with
susceptibility analysis of MBDs (Fig.11). The result shows
that these reported areas are much uniform with final layer
and constantly merged with very high to high zones as derived
from spatial susceptibility analysis using geospatial technique
and MCDM approach.
Conclusion
Disease-susceptibility analysis and assessment are
required for better surveillance and strategy making to
prevent such issues from public health. Susceptibility
zonation and mapping are gaining great significant for
this requirement. Materials and methods are considered
as the base for logical and accepted result for this type of
study. Thus looking towards research problem and main
objective, geospatial technique and multi-criteria decision-
making approach were used for analysing spatial suscepti-
bility of vector-borne diseases in Kolkata Municipal Cor-
poration. Analytic hierarchy process, as a decision-making
tool of MCDM approach was selected for ranking and
weighting the spatial information. AHP in combination
with geographic information system offers useful result for
the identification of vulnerable zones. The great advantage
of AHP is the pairwise comparison matrix which helps in
developing rank-based decision to judge decision crite-
ria. Hence, wrong selection of rank or judgement of any
chosen factor will offer consistency ratio of > 0.1, which
is not acceptable and make decision process inconsistent.
The consistency measurement of present study showed
that it was always between the range of 0.01–0.07, it sig-
nifies acceptance for decision making based on intensity
of importance. So, final overlay was carried out using
derived weight of selected factors. The result revealed
that maximum portion of study area belongs to moderate
susceptible zones followed by low and high, i.e. covering
about 48.21% (99.10km2) area under moderate, 32.36%
(66.3km2) under low and 18.10% (37.6km2) under high
susceptible zones to vector-borne diseases. While very lit-
tle portion was found under very high and very low with
areal extension of 0.75% (1.50km2) and 0.55% (1.13km2),
respectively. The study result also revealed that out of all
selected criteria in this study, moisture index, land sur-
face temperature, water bodies and nearness to open waste
dumping vats have greater importance in outbreak of vec-
tor-borne diseases.
Finally, the study result was evaluated through loca-
tions of previously vector-borne disease-affected areas. The
assessment found that highest malaria and dengue recorded
areas of previous year are closely associating with high and
very high susceptible zones derived from spatial suscepti-
bility analysis. To seek more accurate and precise result,
the present research also recommends to highlight on more
ground-level information, long and extensive GPS-based
field study and comprehensive studies of breeding sites of
mosquitoes and vectors. The present study also suggests to
use very high resolution satellite data including IKONOS
(1m), QuickBird (60cm), GeoEye-1 (50cm), WorldView-1
(50cm) and WorldView-4 (30cm) which will provide
more accurate result in identification of susceptible areas.
Acknowledgements We thankfully acknowledge the anonymous
reviewers and the editor for their valuable time, productive comments
and suggestions for improving the overall quality of the manuscript.
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment
1 3
References
Abdellah AM, Balla QI (2013) Domestic solid waste management and
its impacts on human health and the environment in Sharg El Neel
locality, Khartoum State, Sudan. Pak J Biol Sci 16:1538–1544.
https ://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2013.1538.1544
Ahmad F, Goparaju L, Qayum A (2017) Studying malaria epidemic
for susceptibility zones: multi-criteria approach of geospatial
tools. J Geosci Environ Prot 5:30–53. https ://doi.org/10.4236/
gep.2017.55003
Ali SA, Ahmad A (2018) Using analytic hierarchy process with GIS
for Dengue risk mapping in Kolkata Municipal Corporation,
West Bengal, India. Spat Inf Res 26(4):449–469. https ://doi.
org/10.1007/s4132 4-018-0187-x
Ali SA, Ahmad A (2019) Mapping of mosquito-borne diseases in Kol-
kata Municipal Corporation using GIS and AHP based decision
making approach. Spat Inf Res. https ://doi.org/10.1007/s4132
4-019-00242 -8
Ambrasaite I, Barfod M, Salling K (2011) MCDA and risk analysis
in transport infrastructure appraisals: The Rail Baltica case. Proc
Soc Behav Sci 20:944–953
Ayele DG, Temesgen TZ GM, Henry (2012) Prevalence and risk factor
of malaria in Ethiopia. Malar J 11:195
Barreto ML, Teixeira MG (2008) Dengue fever: a call for local,
national, and international action. Lancet 372:200–205
Braga C, Luna CF, Martelli CM, de Souza WV, Cordeiro MT etal
(2010) Seroprevalence and risk factors for dengue infection in
socio-economically distinct areas of Recife, Brazil. Acta Trop
113:234–240
Brown H, Diuk-Wasser M, Andreadis T, Fish D (2008) Remotely-
sensed vegetation indices identify mosquito clusters of west Nile
virus vectors in an urban landscape in the Northeastern United
States. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 8:197–206
Carter R, Mendis KN, Roberts D (2000) Spatial targeting of interven-
tions against malaria. Bull World Health Organ 78(12):1401–1411
Carver SJ (1991) Integrating Multi-Criteria Evaluation with Geo-
graphical Information Systems. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 5(3):321–339
Chang HC, Dimlich DN, Yokokura T, Mukherjee A, Kankel MW,
Sen A, Sridhar V, Fulga TA, Hart AC, Van Vactor D, Artavanis-
Tsakonas S (2008) Modeling spinal muscular atrophy in Dros-
ophila. PLoS ONE 3(9):e3209. https ://doi.org/10.1371/journ
al.pone.00032 09
Chatterjee S (2017) Budget statement. Kolkata Municipal Corpora-
tion 2017–2018. https ://www.kmcgo v.in/KMCPo rtal/downl oads/
KMC_Budge t_Engli sh_2017_2018.pdf. 18 Sep 2018
Chen Y, Yua J, Khan S (2010) Spatial sensitivity analysis of multi-
criteria weights in GIS-based land suitability evaluation. Environ
Model Softw 25:1582–1591
Cointreau S (2006) Occupational and Environmental Health Issues
of Solid Waste Management. Washington DC World Bank Jul.
Available from http://siter esour ces.world bank.org/INTUS WM/
Resou rces/up-2.pdf. 13 Oct 2018
Delgado L, Camardiel A, Aguilar V, Martinez N, Codova K, Ramos S
(2011) Geospatial tools for the identification of a Malaria Corridor
in Estado Sucre, a Venezuelan North Eastern State. Geosp Health
5:169–176. https ://doi.org/10.4081/gh.2011.168
Dongus S etal (2009) Urban agriculture and anopheles habitats in
Dar es Sa-laam, Tanzania. Geosp Health 3:189–210. https ://doi.
org/10.4081/gh.2009.220
Eldin N, Sui D (2003) A COM-based spatial decision support system
for industrial site selection. J Geogr Inf Decis Anal 7(2):72–92
Eskandari M, Homaee M, Falamaki A (2016) Landfill site selection
for municipal solid wastes in mountainous areas with landslide
susceptibility. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(12):12423–12434.
https ://doi.org/10.1007/s1135 6-016-6459-x
Gemperli A, Sogoba N, Fondjo E, Mabaso M, Bagayoko M, Briët
OJT, Anderegg D, Liebe J, Smith T, Vounatsou P (2006) Map-
ping malaria transmission in West and Central Africa. Trop Med
Int Health 11(7):1032–1046
Girvan MS, Bullimore J, Pretty JN, Osborn AM, Ball AS (2003) Soil
type is the primary determinant of the composition of the total
and active bacterial communities in arable soils. Appl Environ
Microbiol 69:1800–1809
Gorsevski PV, Donevska KR, Mitrovski CD, Frizado JP (2012) Inte-
grating multi-criteria evaluation techniques with geographic
information systems for landfill site selection: a case study using
ordered weighted average. Waste Manag 32:287–296. https ://
doi.org/10.1016/j.wasma n.2011.09.023
Gubler DJ (2004) Cities spawn epidemic dengue viruses. Nat Med
10:129–130
Guler D, Omralıoglu T (2017) Alternative suitable landfill site selec-
tion using analytic hierarchy process and geographic infor-
mation systems: a case study in Istanbul. Environ Earth Sci
76(20):678. https ://doi.org/10.1007/s1266 5-017-7039-1
Hii YL, Zaki RA, Aghamohammadi N, Rocklov J (2016) Research
on climate and dengue in Malaysia: a systematic review. Cur
Environ Health Rep 3(1):81–90
Hongoh V, Anne H, Gatewood Hoen A, Cécile W, Jean-Philippe B,
Denise M, Pascal (2011) Spatially explicit multi-criteria deci-
sion analysis for managing vector-borne diseases. Int J Health
Geogr 10:70.
Khormi HM, Kumar L (2011) Modelling dengue fever risk based
on socioeconomic parameters, nationality and age groups:
GIS and remote sensing based case study. Sci Total Environ
409(22):4713–4719
Kleinschmidt I, Bagayoko M, Clarke GPY, Craig M, Sueur DL (2000)
A spatial statistical approach to malaria mapping. Int J Epidemiol
29:355–361
Kobbe R etal (2006) Seasonal variation and high multiplicity of first
Plasmodium falciparum infections in children from a holoendemic
area in Ghana, West Africa. Trop Med Int Health 11(5):613–619
Kuria D, Ngari D, Withaka E (2011) Using geographic information
systems (GIS) to determine land suitability for rice crop growing
in the Tana delta. J Geogr Reg Plan 4(9):525–532
Lootsma FA, Schuijt H (1997) The multiplicative AHP, SMART and
ELECTRE in a common context. J Multi Criteria Decis Anal
6:185–196
Lourenço PM, Sousa CA, Seixas J, Lopes P, Novo MT, Almeida APG
(2011) Anopheles atroparvus density modeling using MODIS
NDVI in a former malarious area in Portugal. J Vector Ecol
36:279–291
Majumder M (2015) Impact of urbanization on water shortage in face
of climatic aberrations. Springer Briefs Water Sci Technol 35–47.
https ://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-73-3_2
Malczewski J (1999) GIS and multi criteria decision analysis. Wiley,
Canada
Malczewski J (2004) GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: a critical
overview. Prog Plan 62(1):3–16
Morin CW, Comrie AC, Ernst K (2013) Climate and dengue trans-
mission: evidence and implications. Environ Health Perspect
121:1264–1272
Mushinzimana E, Munga S, Minakawa N, Li L, Feng CC, Bian L,
Kitron U, Schmidt C, Beck L, Zhou G, Githeko AK, Yan G (2006)
Landscape determinants and remote sensing of anopheline mos-
quito larval habitats in the western Kenya highlands. Malaria jour-
nal 5:13. https ://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-5-13
Nakhapakorn K, Tripathi NK (2005) An information value based
analysis of physical and climatic factors affecting dengue fever
and dengue haemorrhagic fever incidence. Int J Health Geogr
4:1–13
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment
1 3
Nazri CD, Rodziah I, Hashim A (2009) Distribution pattern of a den-
gue fever outbreak using GIS. J Environ Health Res 9(2):89–95
Nazri CD, Ahmad AH, Latif ZA, Ismail R, Pradhan B (2012) Cou-
pling of remote sensing data and environmental-related param-
eters for dengue transmission risk assessment in Subang Jaya,
Malaysia. Geocarto Int 1–15
Nazri CD, Ahmad AH, Latif ZA, Ismail R (2016) Application of
GIS-based analytical hierarchy process as a tool for dengue risk
assessment. Asian Pacific J Trop Dis 6(12):930–937
Norris DE (2004) Mosquito-borne diseases as a consequence of
land use change. EcoHealth. https ://doi.org/10.1007/s1039
3-004-0008-7
Palaniyandi M (2004) The impact of national river water projects on
regional climatic changes and vector borne disease outbreaks in
India. Paper presented at the National Conference on Climate
Change and Its Impact on Water Resources in India, School of
Earth and Atmospheric Sciences
Palaniyandi M (2013) GIS mapping of vector breeding habitats. Geosp
World Wkly 9:1–4
Palaniyandi M, Mariappan T (2012) Containing the spread of malaria
with geospatial technology—a case study with Vizag City, India.
Geospatial World 8:1–9
Parimala M, Lopez D (2012) Decision making in agriculture based on
land suitability-spatial data analysis approach. J Theor Appl Inf
Technol 46(1):17–23
Qayum A, Arya R, Kumar P, Lynn AM (2015) Socio-economic, epi-
demiological and geographic features based on GIS integrated
mapping to identify Malarial hotspots. Malar J 14:192. https ://
doi.org/10.1186/s1293 6-015-0685-4
Rakotomanana F, Randremanana R, Rabarijaona L, Duchemin J,
Ratovonjato J, Ariey F, Jeanne I (2007) Determining areas that
require indoor insecticide spraying using Multi Criteria Evalu-
ation, a decision-support tool for malaria vector control pro-
grammes in the Central Highlands of Madagascar. Int J Health
Geogr 6(1):1–11
Rasania SK, Bhanot A, Sachdev TR (2002) Awareness and practices
regarding Malaria of catchment population of a primary Health
Centre in Delhi. J Commun Dis 34:78–84
Rattanarithikul R etal (1995) Larval habitats of malaria vectors and
other anopheles mosquitoes around a transmission focus in North-
western Thailand. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 11:428–433
Richardson DB, Volkow ND, Kwan MP, Kaplan RM, Goodchild
MF, Croyle RT (2013) Spatial turn in health research. Science
339(6126):1390–1392
Rikalovic A, Cosic I, Lazarevic D (2014) GIS based multi-criteria
analysis for industrial site selection. Proc Eng 69:1054–1063
Robert V, Macintyre K, Keating J, Trape JF, Duchemin JB, Warren M
(2003) Malaria transmission in urban sub-Saharan Africa. Am J
Trop Med Hyg 68:169–176
Rochon GL, Quansah JE, Fall S, Araya B, Biehl LL, Thiam T, Ghani
S (2010) Remote sensing, public health & disaster mitigation.
Geosp Technol Environ Manag 3:187–209
Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority
setting, resource allocation. McGraw Hill International, New York
Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy pro-
cess. Eur J Oper Res 48:9–26
Saaty TL (2012) Decision making for leaders: the analytic hierarchy
process for decisions in a complex world. RWS Publication,
Pittsburgh
Saaty TL, Vargas LG (2001) Models, methods, concepts and applica-
tions of the analytic hierarchy process. Kluwer Academic Publish-
ers, Norwell https ://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1665-1
Saaty TL, Vargas LG (2012) Models, methods, concepts and applica-
tions of the analytic hierarchy process. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Sabesan S, Vanamail P, Raju KHK, Raju P (2010) Lymphatic filaria-
sis in India: epidemiology and control measures. J Postgrad Med
56(3):232. https ://doi.org/10.4103/0022-3859.68650
Sandru MIV (2014) Promoting spatial data synthesis for vector-borne
disease assessment in Romania. Rom Rev Reg Stud (2):75–86
Sarfraz MS, Tripathi NK, Faruque FS, Bajwa UI, Kitamoto A, Souris
M (2014) Mapping urban and peri-urban breeding habitats of
Aedes mosquitoes using a fuzzy analytical hierarchical process
based on climatic and physical parameters. Geospat Health
8(3):S685–S697
Schmidt WP, Suzuki M, Thiem VD, White RG, Tsuzuki A, Yoshida
LM, Yanai H, Haque U, Tho LH, Anh DD, Ariyoshi K (2011)
Population density, water supply, and the risk of dengue fever in
Vietnam: cohort study and spatial analysis. Interdiscip Res Collect
PLOS. https ://doi.org/10.1371/journ al.pmed.10010 82
Sharma VP etal (1996) Study on feasibility of delivering mosquito
genic conditions in and around Delhi using IRS data. Indian J
Malariol 33:107–125
Sharma SN, Ghosh D, Srivastava PK, Sonal GS, Dhariwal AC (2014)
Vector-borne diseases in Kolkata Municipal Corporation (KMC):
achievements and challenges. J Commun Dis 46(2):68–76
Sheela AM, Ghermandi A, Vineetha P, Sheeja RV, Justus J, Ajay-
akrishna K (2017) Assessment of relation of land use characteris-
tics with vector-borne diseases in tropical areas. Land Use Policy
63:369–380. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.landu sepol .2017.01.047
Syamsuddin I, Hwang J (2009) The application of AHP to evaluate
information security policy decision making. J Simul Syst Sci
Technol 10(5):33–37
Tavares G, Zsigraiova Z, Semiao V (2011) Multi-criteria GIS-based
siting of an incineration plant for municipal solid waste. Waste
Manag 31(9–10):1960–1972. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasma
n.2011.04.013
Tu C, Fang Y, Huang Z, Tan R (2014) Application of the analytic
hierarchy process to a risk assessment of emerging infectious
diseases in Shaoxing city in southern China. Jpn J Infect Dis
67(6):417–422
Velasquez M, Hester PT (2013) An analysis of multi-criteria decision
making methods. Int J Oper Res 10(2):56–66
Walker M etal (2013) Temporal and micro spatial heteroge-
neity in the distribution of anopheles vectors of malaria
along the Kenyan Coast. Parasit Vectors 6:311. https ://doi.
org/10.1186/1756-3305-6-311
WHO (2017) World Malaria report. World Health Organization,
Geneva. https ://www.who.int/malar ia/publi catio ns/world -malar
ia-repor t-2017/en/. Accessed 23 Sept 2018
Wondim YK, Alemayehu EB, Abebe WB (2017) Malaria hazard and
risk mapping using gis based spatial multicriteria evaluation tech-
nique (SMCET) in Tekeze Basin Development Corridor, Amhara
Region, Ethiopia. J Environ Earth Sci 7(5):76–87
Wood BL, Beck LR, Washino RK, Hibbard KA, Salute JS (1992)
Estimating high mosquito-producing rice fields using spectral
and spatial data. Int J Remote Sens 13:2813–2826. https ://doi.
org/10.1080/01431 16920 89040 83
Yadav K, Nath MJ, Talukdar PK, Saikia PK, Baruah I, Singh L
(2012) Malaria risk areas of Udalguri District of Assam, India:
a GIS-based study. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 26:123–131. https ://doi.
org/10.1080/13658 816.2011.57667 8
Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to
jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
... This phenomenon causes an undesirable increase in waste accumulated in unsuitable places, such as waterways or green areas. In addition to the effects on the environment, low bin utilization also affects the population in more indirect ways through, e.g., dissemination of vector-borne diseases such as malaria or dengue (Ali and Ahmad, 2019;Gupta et al., 2019), or increase in public charges for expenses to remove improperly disposed waste, to reincorporate it into the formal MSW system (Parrot et al., 2009). There is also evidence that a correct arrangement of bins in the urban area can encourage the community to correctly classify the waste at source, which usually is closely associated with the success of recycling programs (Kao et al., 2013;Leeabai et al., 2019Leeabai et al., , 2021. ...
... In turn, decision-makers should avoid locating waste bins near water streams or certain public places, such as schools, hospitals, and religious buildings (Ahmed et al., 2006;Ugwuishiwu et al., 2020). This consideration is not only related to the fact that bins may contribute to visual pollution of an urban area, which can even affect the commercial selling price of the nearby buildings (Di Felice, 2014b), but also an contribute to the dissemination of vector-borne diseases (Ali and Ahmad, 2019;Gupta et al., 2019). In this regard, Nesmachnow et al. (2018) aimed at providing a frequent collection service to those waste bins located near busy places, i.e., assigning them a higher priority in the collection schedule, so they are unlikely to be overflowed. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Municipal Solid Waste systems have important economic, social, and environmental impacts for society. Within the diverse stages of the Municipal Solid Waste reverse logistic chain, the waste bin location problem consists in properly locating bins in the corresponding urban area to store waste produced by the citizens. This stage has a large impact in the overall efficiency of the whole system. Thus, several researchers have addressed the location problem considering different optimization criteria and approaches. This article presents a comprehensive review of recent advances on the Waste Bins Location Problem, with the main goal of serving as a reference point for decision-makers in this area. The main findings indicate that several optimization criteria and resolution approaches have been applied, but few proposals have simultaneously optimized bins location and waste collection, or considered uncertainty of the model parameters and integrated approaches.
... This phenomenon causes an undesirable increase in waste accumulated in unsuitable places, such as waterways or green areas. In addition to the effects on the environment, low bin utilization also affects the population in more indirect ways through, e.g., dissemination of vector-borne diseases such as malaria or dengue (Ali and Ahmad, 2019;Gupta et al., 2019), or increase in public charges for expenses to remove improperly disposed waste, to reincorporate it into the formal MSW system (Parrot et al., 2009). There is also evidence that a correct arrangement of bins in the urban area can encourage the community to correctly classify the waste at source, which usually is closely associated with the success of recycling programs (Kao et al., 2013;Leeabai et al., 2019Leeabai et al., , 2021. ...
... In turn, decision-makers should avoid locating waste bins near water streams or certain public places, such as schools, hospitals, and religious buildings (Ahmed et al., 2006;Ugwuishiwu et al., 2020). This consideration is not only related to the fact that bins may contribute to visual pollution of an urban area, which can even affect the commercial selling price of the nearby buildings (Di Felice, 2014b), but also an contribute to the dissemination of vector-borne diseases (Ali and Ahmad, 2019;Gupta et al., 2019). In this regard, Nesmachnow et al. (2018) aimed at providing a frequent collection service to those waste bins located near busy places, i.e., assigning them a higher priority in the collection schedule, so they are unlikely to be overflowed. ...
Article
Municipal Solid Waste systems have important economic, social, and environmental impacts for society. Within the diverse stages of the Municipal Solid Waste reverse logistic chain, the waste bin location problem consists in properly locating bins in the corresponding urban area to store waste produced by the citizens. This stage has a large impact in the overall efficiency of the whole system. Thus, several researchers have addressed the location problem considering different optimization criteria and approaches. This article presents a comprehensive review of recent advances on the Waste Bins Location Problem, with the main goal of serving as a reference point for decision-makers in this area. The main findings indicate that several optimization criteria and resolution approachas have been applied, but few proposals have simultaneously optimized bins location and waste collection, or considered uncertainty of the model parameters and integrated approaches.
... The major goal of this work was to use chemical characteristics in groundwater, water quality index, and a spatial database of waterborne diseases to find a link between water quality index and waterborne diseases [68]. Thus, using map algebra, the chemical parameter maps were merged into a single raster layer and classified into three categories for drinking purposes: acceptable, moderately acceptable, poorly acceptable. ...
Article
Full-text available
Health effects are related globally to water quality. The residents of Aligarh city are solely rely on groundwater for drinking and domestic purposes. The aim of the study was to find out association between ground water quality and water borne diseases. For this purpose, the present study evaluated physicochemical quality of drinking water. The water quality was evaluated for both pre-monsoon (PRM) and post-monsoon (POM) seasons based on samples collected from 19 stations. To find the potential health risk and waterborne diseases vulnerability, questionnaires-based survey was carried out. Although most of the samples range slightly above the Bureau of Indian Standard's (BIS) permissible limit, the results revealed the sign of contamination from the surface of the earth. According to result of water quality index, the city is classified as having well to moderate water quality throughout the year. The correlation, HCA, and Trilinary plot demonstrate that natural pollution sources, human activities, and geographical factors affecting water quality in the study area. During PRM, 84.21% area falls under slight to moderate sodium hazard category where as the result gets better during POM where 68.42% area falls under the same category. Overall, the water was fit to be used for irrigation purposes. The accuracy of WBD's susceptibility maps was assessed by RMSE. During PRM, chemical parameters in groundwater, WQI and WBD's RMSE were found to be 0.1483, 0.3157 and 0.212 whereas during POM the results were 0.1822, 0.3172 and 0.1966, respectively. The results obtained from susceptibility assessment shows that drinking water will not have any major waterborne diseases. However, the result revealed that POM season is more vulnerable to some waterborne diseases than the PRM season.
... April was considered because the sky is almost cloud-free in this month, and there was no cloud on this date. The band 10 of Landsat 8 Thermal Infrared Sensor (TIRS) data and the radiative transfer equation (RTE)-based method were utilized to compute the LST because it offered more accuracy than band 11 (Ali and Ahmad 2018, 2019a, 2019b. Similar to previous studies, areas surrounding lower temperatures were considered more suitable than higher temperature areas (Fig. 4c). ...
Article
Full-text available
Disposal of waste without treatment is the least preferable way of sustainable solid waste management (SWM). But most cities in developing nations still use open dumps, causing negative impacts on the environment and human health. This study offered a novel approach for selecting landfill sites and sustainable SWM in Aligarh city, India. This was done through data collection, selecting models for criterion weighting, and validation. In order to prepare a landfill site suitability map, a geographic information system (GIS)–based ensemble fuzzy analytic hierarchy process-support vector machine (FAHP-SVM) and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process-random forest (FAHP-RF) models were implemented. Considering the previous studies and the study area characteristics, eighteen thematic layers were selected. The result revealed that land value; distance from residential roads, hospitals and clinics, and waste bins; and normalized difference built-up index (NDBI) have a fuzzy weight greater than 0.10, indicating significant factors. In contrast, land elevation, land slope, surface temperature, soil moisture index, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and urban classification have a zero fuzzy weight, indicating these criteria have no importance. The result further revealed that FAHP-RF with an area under curve (AUC) value of 0.91 is the more accurate model than FAHP-SVM. According to the final weight-based overlay result, seven potential landfill sites were identified, out of which three were determined as most suitable by considering current land cover, public opinions, and environmental and economic concerns. This research proposed a zonal division model based on landfill sites location for sustainable SWM in Aligarh city. However, the findings may provide a guideline to the decision-makers and planners for optimal landfill site selection in other cities of developing countries.
... Lopez et al. [44] have proposed a fuzzy VIKOR based approach, which presents a selection of alternatives based on people, space, and time for the prevention and safety of dengue fever in India. Another study [45] applied the AHP approach along with geospatial technique to map vector-borne diseases in Kolkata, India. ...
Article
The world is reeling in the midst of the novel coronavirus pandemic with fear of rising toll due to the deadly virus. Decision making during a pandemic outbreak has numerous challenges. Covid19 has become a challenging problem for organizations, countries and the world at large. It is even more complicated when governments and medical care communities are changing their priorities based on the growing challenges and level of effectiveness of measures taken in other countries. In this study, a potential application of a well-known MCDM method called the Group Best Worst Method is presented to overcome such challenges and draw the strategies to handle COVID19 outbreak. The methodology is applied to rank the 10 identified strategies based on their relative importance provided by multiple groups of stakeholder. These strategies focus on social distancing, medical care, essential commodities, financial support to poor people, public awareness, overall impact of COVID19, digital surveillance of infected or doubtful people, maintaining the economy of the country, and an effect on industries. Furthermore, the local and global weights along with ranking order of strategies are obtained. A sensitivity analysis also done to show the change in global weights and order of strategies.
... Furthermore, infectious disease modelling is a multifactorial problem, and modelling its incidence and magnitude is a complex process due to the interplay of various ecological, social, and demographic factors on the vector and host (Zhu et al., 2019) ( Figure 1b). This necessitates the need to develop a unified framework that can combine the advantages of advanced spatial modelling techniques along with the decision support system of MCDA (Boroushaki, 2017;Ali & Ahmad, 2019;Scavuzzo et al., 2018;Zhu et al., 2019). ...
Article
Modelling infectious diseases is a complex and multi‐disciplinary problem that necessitates the combined use of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) and machine learning (ML) in a spatial framework. This research attempts to demonstrate the extensive applications of MCDA in the field of public health and to illustrate its utility with the combined use of spatial models and machine learning. The study investigates the risk factors for communicable diseases with a focus on vector‐borne infectious diseases, such as West Nile Virus (WNV), malaria, dengue, etc. It aims to quantify vector‐borne disease risk by examining the geographic contextual effects of socio‐economic, climatic, and environmental factors using the objective‐weighting technique adopted from MCDA and machine learning in a geographic information systems (GIS) framework. The authors attempted to minimize subjective bias from the decision space by utilizing an objective‐weighted technique to quantify the risk. The study adopted Shannon's entropy to derive weights for each factor and its classes. The derived weighted layers are fed to an artificial neural network to obtain a final map of risk susceptibility. This final risk map allows policymakers to examine vulnerable areas and identify the factors pivotal to the contribution of risk. Findings show the traffic volume as the most influential variable, and terrain slope as the least one in the disease spread for the study area. The risk appears to be concentrated and distributed along vegetation, wetlands, and around water bodies. The results produced by ensemble learning show great promise with more than 94% accuracy. The accuracy of the results was determined by the confusion matrix and the kappa index of agreement (KIA). The vector control programmes need to adapt to better manage the dynamic changes in patterns involving vector‐borne infectious diseases.
Article
Full-text available
The problem of groundwater depletion has arisen as havoc in countries like India due to expanding intensive agriculture, growing population, and burgeoning urban centres. Delhi is one of the greatest urban agglomerations in the country facing severe groundwater depletion, but the robust methods for modelling the groundwater have not yet been adopted for examining the conditions of the groundwater. In such scenarios, accurate modelling of groundwater resources using appropriate techniques and tools is essential. The present study aimed to investigate groundwater level using GIS tools and machine learning algorithms and find the best models for application. The previous studies conducted are purely based on GIS methods without the possibility of accuracy determination of the results. Thus, in this study, boosted regression tree, generalized linear model (GLM), and neural net multi-layer perceptron (NNET-MLP) were applied for modelling the groundwater table in the capital city of India (i.e. Delhi). Anthropogenic, physiographic, meteorological, and hydrological factors like LULC, geology, elevation, slope, aspect, curvature, soil permeability, LST, precipitation, stream power index, and topographic wetness index are supplied as conditioning factors. The performances of the models were compared using area under curve (AUC) plot and correlation (COR). The AUC plot appears well above the diagonal line, showing acceptable results for all the models. The COR is maximum for the NNET-MLP, i.e. 0.93, while minimum value is for GLM, i.e. 0.60. The modelled rasters represented variable groundwater depths, and the mean of each district of Delhi is calculated. This is one of the first studies where GIS and machine learning are integrated to model the groundwater level of Delhi and hence open new prospects for research focussing on the capital of the country.
Article
Full-text available
The public health policy depends on the management, quality, and coverage aspects. However, the assessment analysis of spatial patterns and distribution of public health services is still a challenge. This paper attempts to analyze the availability and accessibility of public health facilities in the Muktsar district of Punjab at the village level. Spatial and attribute data for public health facilities have been used within the GIS platform to produce accurate measures of accessibility. The average nearest neighbor tool has been used for spatial patterns of services in the district. Near analysis tool has been used to calculate distances from demand points (populations) to providers (facilities). Apart from these, the ratios of public health facilities to population were calculated for the identification of underserved and over-served areas. The study advocates that the spatial pattern of public health facilities is significantly clustered (p value 0.000) with a Z-score of − 5.18. It has been found that urban areas of the Muktsar district were identified as having a higher density of health facilities, whereas villages located in the marginal parts have the lowest density of health facilities. When looking at the average distance from village centroids to health facilities, it varies considerably from village to village. Considerably less than 60 percent of the population living in 108 villages has access to public health facilities. Apart from these, 40 percent of the population living in 126 villages has the greatest increase in the distance while accessing these facilities.
Preprint
Full-text available
Disposal of collected waste is the least preferable way of sustainable solid waste management. But most of the cities in developing nations prefer to use open dumping in an inappropriate and non-scientific way, causing negative impacts on the environment as well as human health. This study offers a novel approach for scientific landfill site selection and sustainable waste management in Aligarh city, India. This could be possible through relevant data collection, selection of suitable models for criterion weighting, and model validation. In order to prepare a suitable landfill site selection map, a GIS-based ensemble FAHP-SVM and FAHP-RF model was implemented. Considering the previous studies and the characteristics and the study area, a total of eighteen thematic layers (decision criteria) were selected. The result reveals that land value, nearness to residential roads, nearness to hospitals and clinics, distance from waste bins, and NDBI having a fuzzy weight of > 0.10, indicates significant factors; whereas land elevation, land slope, surface temperature, soil moisture index, NDVI and urban classification having a fuzzy weight of 0, indicates these criteria have no importance for the present study. The result further reveals that FAHP-RF with an AUC value of 0.9182 is the more accurate model in comparison to FAHP-SVM. According to the final result of weight-based overlay, a total of seven potential landfill sites were identified, out of which three sites were determined as most suitable by considering current land cover, environmental and economic concerns, and public opinions. This study proposed a zonal division model based on the location of suitable landfill sites for sustainable waste management in the study area. The findings of this study may provide a guideline to the decision-makers and planners for optimal landfill site selection in other cities of developing countries.
Article
A guide pin is important for a production system because it can force the workpiece to be in the correct position in a manufacturing process but the selection of guide pin is based on a multiple criteria decision-making problem due to involving a large number of criteria and alternatives. Therefore, the objective of this study was to select the most appropriate guide pin for an automotive manufacturing process. The research was started by collecting decision criteria from various studies and interviewing experts with more than 10 years of working experience and responsibility in the manufacturing process. Next, a questionnaire based-item-objective congruence (IOC) was designed to identify the decision criteria for selecting the guide pin. It found that decision criteria include quantitative and qualitative decision criteria: cost, durability, quality, and shape. Then, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was employed to select the guide pin. The result showed that the most appropriate guide pin is a ceramic guide pin with the weight at 0.564, followed by Polyurethane and KCF guide pins with the weights at 0.259 and 0.177, respectively. The ceramic guide pin has been used for six months, it was found that such a guide pin can decrease total production costs and increase productivity simultaneously since the number of guide pins used in the manufacturing processes, the costs of guide pins, and the number of defects are reduced at 89.19, 50.00 and 97.25 percent.
Article
Full-text available
Tekeze Bain Development Corridor (TBDC) is a major river basin that has malaria problems in Ethiopia. Given that malaria is an environmental disease and spatial phenomenon, the application of GIS based Spatial Multicriteria Evaluation Technique (SMCET) are essential to the malaria hazard/risk management process. Malaria hazard and risk map are effective tools to reduce the spread of malaria. The purpose of this study was to assess malaria hazard and risk of TBDC using GIS based SMECT. Malaria causative factors such as distance from water bodies, temperature, drainage, slope and elevation were developed in the GIS environment. The computed Eigen vector was used as a coefficient for the respective factor maps to be combined in weighted overlay in the Arc GIS environment. A model builder in Arc GIS was used to facilitate the overall malaria hazard assessment by combining all impact factors. Malaria risk assessment was done using the malaria hazard layer and the elements at risk/socio-economic factors that determine the level of risk, namely population density, land use, health services and road access. The major finding of the malaria hazard map of TBDC indicated that 397,333.1ha (14%), 1,689,179.68ha (58%), 743,988.96 ha (26%) and 59, 849.41ha (2%) of the area considered in TBDC were subjected respectively to low, moderate, high and very high malaria hazards.
Article
Full-text available
Mosquito-borne diseases are those which transmitted through the bite of an infected mosquito. Stagnant water bodies are often preferable for breeding sites of mosquitos. But from breeding eggs to final stage, there are many factors responsible for its incubation, maturation and growth enough to bite and transmit diseases. The main aim of present study is to focus on associated environmental factors that provide suitable breeding sites and susceptibility mapping of mosquito-borne-diseases through geospatial technique and decision making approach. Analytic hierarchy process as a decision making approach was integrated with geographic information system to map of mosquito-borne diseases in Kolkata Municipal Corporation. Choice based various ranking was used to decide the weights of selected factors through establishing pairwise comparison matrix. Initially, 10 relevant environmental factors were chosen to determine their weight through pairwise comparison matrix. Concomitantly, weight of each causative factor was used as geo-database to support overlay analysis. Consistency ratio was calculated to check the decision process and significance measurement. The consistency ratio of decision factors was calculated as 0.0470, which is < 0.1 and considered as consistent and acceptable. The study analysis shows that proximity to water bodies is a major responsible factor and subsequently moisture content, water index, availability of shadow area and presence of vegetation are also influential factors in prevalence of mosquito-borne diseases. The present result shows the high applicability of satellite data and spatial technique in epidemic diseases zonation.
Article
Full-text available
Detecting and mapping of Dengue risk areas is a complex, tiring, multifaceted and protracted task requiring evaluation of many criteria. It is not sure that always one single factor is liable for Dengue Fever transmission in all areas, but it differs with changing geographical location. This paper presents the application of analytic hierarchy process alongside with geospatial analysis for detecting Dengue risk areas in Kolkata Municipal Corporation by integrating environmental parameters. It employs two stage analyses synergistically to form a Spatial Decision Support System. The first stage analysis makes use of the thematic layers in Geographical Information System in combination with environmental factors leading to support the second stage analysis using the analytic hierarchy process as a tool. Moreover, weighted overlay analysis was used for detecting potential risk areas. The research result shows that the calculated weights of criteria are within the range of Consistency Ratio being > 0.1. The chosen decision criteria are consistent because the calculated Consistency Ratio is 0.0551 which is < 0.1 and considered as acceptable for decision making. The most influential factors are found the Household Density, Water Logged Areas, Land Surface Temperature, Population Density, Land Elevation and Land Use Land Cover. The present study shows that the spatial relationship can help in understanding the pattern and distribution of dengue outbreak and zonation of potential risk areas.
Article
Full-text available
Solid waste management is an important environmental event for developed and developing countries. One of the most sensitive issues in waste management is the selection of a suitable location for the landfill site. This paper presents geographic information systems and analytic hierarchy process approach for selecting the alternative for landfill site selection in Istanbul, Turkey. Totally, eleven factors were used, and two main classification groups were set up in the study which is environmental and economic. Environmental factors are land use, geology, settlement areas, surface waters, population density, airports, and protected areas. Economic factors are slope, solid waste transfer stations, land values, and highways. The identified factors are separated by sub-criteria according to the appropriateness of solid waste landfill. One of the studies that has been made is the discussion of the creation of a dynamic model for the location selection of the solid waste dumping site. In light of legal restrictions, 80% of the study area is classified as unauthorized area. As a result of the study, 1% of the region is unsuitable, 4% is less suitable, 13% is suitable and 2% is very suitable and the digital map bases leading the decision makers were created.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: Despite serious interventions worldwide, malaria remains a significant cause of global morbidity and mortality. Malaria endemic zones are predominant in the poorest tropical regions of the world, especially in continental Africa and South-Asia. Major Indian population reside in malaria endemic zones which are tribal dominated and inaccessible. Lack of suitable data, reporting and medical facilities in malaria vulnerable regions handicaps the decision makers in taking adequate steps. Natural resources were mapped to establish their possible linkage with malaria incidence and to delineate malaria hotspots using geo-spatial tools. Methods: Remote sensing data along with various ancillary data such as socio-economic (population in general, child population, tribal population, literacy), epidemiology (Malaria API and Pf cases) and environmental parameters (wetness, forest cover, rainfall, aspect, elevation, slope, drainage buffer, and breeding sites) were integrated on GIS platform using a designed weight matrix. Multi criteria evaluation was done to generate hotspot for effective monitoring of malaria incidences. Results: Various thematic layers were utilized for integrated mapping, and the final map depicted 59.1% of the study area is vulnerable to high to very high risk of malaria occurrence. Manoharpur Administrative Block consisted of 89% of its area under high to very high probability of malaria incidence and it needs to be prioritized first for preventing epidemic outbreak. Various village pockets were revealed for prioritizing it for focused intervention of malaria control measures. Conclusions: Geospatial technology can be potentially used to map in the field of vector-borne diseases including malaria. The maps produced enable easy update of information both spatially and temporally provide effortless accessibility of geo-referenced data to the policy makers to produce cost-effective measures for malaria control in the endemic regions.
Article
Full-text available
Given the continually human interaction with the environment, the present paper reveals the spatial data integration of environmental factors such as topography, vegetation and surface temperature with epidemiological statistical data for assessing vector-borne diseases in Romania, monitored between 2009 and 2011. This study is a small piece of a big puzzle, part of an extended research that evaluates the contribution of geospatial and ground observation data to public health assessment. It is intended to implement a useful and innovative system for Romania's public health, which provides information on various aspects such as the prevalence of diseases, facilities that are available in order to take decisions on, either for creating infrastructure facilities or for taking immediate actions to handle situations.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: To highlight the use of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in geographical information system that incorporates environmental indices to generate dengue risk zonation area. Methods: The medical database considered for the study was referenced to the environmental data layers. Factors related to the risk of dengue fever (DF) were selected throughout previous research and were arranged in a hierarchical structure. The relative weights of factors were calculated, which were within acceptable range with the consistency ratio being less than 0.1. The outcomes from AHP based DF risk zonation area produced useful information on different levels of risks. Results: As a result, factor weights used in AHP were evaluated and found to be acceptable as the consistency ratio of 0.05, which was < 0.1. The most influential factors were found to be housing types, population density, land-use and elevation. Findings from this study provided valuable insights that could potentially enhance public health initiatives. The geographical information system and spatial analytical method could be applied to augment surveillance strategies of DF and other communicable diseases in an effort to promote actions of prevention and control. The disease surveillance data obtained could be integrated with environmental database in a synergistic way, which will in turn provide additional input towards the development of epidemic forecasting models. Conclusions: This attempt, if successful, will have significant implications that could strengthen public health interventions and offers priorities in designing the most optimum and sustainable control program to combat dengue in Malaysia.
Article
Land use and land cover changes play an important role in the occurrence of vector-borne diseases. It is highly essential to identify the prominent changes responsible for its occurrence so that suitable measures can be adopted. An attempt was made to identify the prominent land use and land cover changes responsible for the spread of chikungunya, malaria, and dengue fever in the State of Kerala, India, using hierarchical cluster analysis and multiple regression analysis. Large extent of water bodies, low land and agricultural land played a significant role on the incidence of chikungunya and malaria. High population density, built-up area and agricultural area favoured dengue fever. Vector-borne diseases were found to be the lowest in places where there is no low land and with higher forest area. Inappropriate disposal of wastes generated in the built-up area might be the reason for the spread of dengue fever. Freshwater in drains of these areas is polluted and form breeding grounds for mosquitoes. Hence much attention is to be paid to provide appropriate treatment and disposal of wastes generated in the built-up area of the State In an evolving urban policy, priority is to be given to the installation of safe treatment and disposal facility of wastes especially, sewage, sullage, and solid waste. The protection of forest land also plays an important role. Economic policy instruments such as Payment for Environment Services (PES) schemes, may constitute a useful tool to encourage an improved land use management through appropriate price signals, such as, for instance, for the preservation of forested areas especially in proximity of highly populated urban environments.
Chapter
The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a problem solving framework. It is a systematic procedure for representing the elements of any problem. It organizes the basic rationality by breaking down a problem into its smaller constituent parts and then calls for only simple pairwise comparison judgments, to develop priorities in each hierarchy.