Content uploaded by Shinya Toyokuni
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Shinya Toyokuni on Jun 10, 2020
Content may be subject to copyright.
Oxidative stress as an iceberg in carcinogenesis and cancer biology
Shinya Toyokuni
Department of Pathology and Biological Responses, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550,
Japan
article info
Article history:
Received 5 June 2015
Received in revised form
6 June 2015
Accepted 14 September 2015
Keywords:
Iron
Carcinogenesis
Renal cell carcinoma
Mesothelioma
abstract
After the conquest of numerous infectious diseases, the average life span for humans has been enor-
mously prolonged, reaching more than 80 years in many developed countries. However, cancer is one of
the top causes of death, and its incidence continues to increase in many countries, including Japan. I was
deeply influenced during my career as a cancer researcher by the concept of oxidative stress, which was
established by Helmut Sies in 1985. I have no doubt that oxidative stress is a major cause of carcino-
genesis in humans but that other factors and chemicals modify it. Notably, established cancer cells are
more oxidatively stressed than their non-tumorous counterparts are, and this stress may be associated
with selection under oxidative stress and, thus, faster proliferation compared with non-tumorous cells.
For cancer prevention, both avoidance of specific risks that are associated with genetic susceptibility and
decreasing oxidative stress in general should delay carcinogenesis. For cancer therapy, individualization
and precision medicine require further research in the future. In addition to the currently burgeoning
array of humanized antibodies and protein kinase inhibitors, novel methods to increase oxidative stress
only in cancer cells would be helpful.
©2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The concept of oxidative stress was established by Helmut Sies
in 1985 [1], which is when I graduated from the medical school of
Kyoto University. When I reflect on all of my present publications, I
recognize how deeply I have been influenced by the concept of
oxidative stress, and I am satisfied that what we have been heading
is still true (Fig. 1).
When I was a medical student, I belonged to the Department of
Pathology, under the guidance of Shigeru Okada (assistant profes-
sor) and Osamu Midorikawa (professor) as my mentors. At that
time, they were very excited to find that an iron chelate, ferric
nitrilotriacetate (Fe-NTA), could induce renal carcinogenesis in rats
[2,3] and mice [4]. Basically, iron is insoluble in water at neutral pH.
However, Fe-NTA as a chelated iron is soluble at neutral pH [5,6]
and is present in this form at least for a few hours in vivo [7]. Fe-
NTA has been used to load iron to transferrin [8]. Michiyasu Awai
of Okayama University noticed that intraperitoneal injections of Fe-
NTA into rats loaded iron in various parenchymal cells, which was
not possible by other means. He proposed this as a model of he-
mochromatosis and revealed the iron deposition in hepatocytes
and
b
-cells in pancreatic islets [7]. The point is that Shigeru Okada's
finding of renal cell carcinoma after repeated Fe-NTA administra-
tion was serendipitous because he did not euthanize the rats after
the subchrionic repeated treatment of Fe-NTA for a few months.
Then, Okada and Midorikawa found a high incidence of renal cell
carcinoma, and this model was first reported in Japan in 1982 [2].At
that time, the exact molecular mechanisms of renal cell carcino-
genesis were not known.
2. Role of iron in oxidative stress
Helmut Sies edited and published a book on the concept of
oxidative stress in 1985, which was fortunately translated into the
Japanese language by Masayasu Inoue [1]. Then, after reading the
book and the many subsequent discussions, Prof. Okada's research
team members and I became interested in oxidative stress associ-
ated with the Fe-NTA model.
Iron is a catalyst for the famous Fenton reaction:
Fe(II) þH
2
O
2
->Fe(III) þOH$þOH
[9]. However, this is a
chemical reaction in the tubes. Few people at that time believed
that this reaction could occur in vivo. Indeed, hydroxyl radical is
the most reactive chemical species in the biological system
[10,11]. In 1979, Prof. Kunio Yagi established a method to measure
lipid peroxidation using thiobartiburic acid [12]. Shuji Hamazaki
E-mail address: toyokuni@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp.
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/yabbi
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2015.11.025
0003-9861/©2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 595 (2016) 46e49
in Okada's laboratory used this method and showed a renal in-
crease in lipid peroxidation in an acute phase of Fe-NTA treat-
ment [13].
In 1987, I officially entered the project as a graduate student
under Shigeru Okada. Thereafter, morphological methods became
available through the use of frozen sections [14], and we could
show the localization of lipid peroxidation catalyzed by iron in the
renal proximal tubules [15], which are the target cells for carcino-
genesis in this model. Then, we developed monoclonal antibodies
to detect oxidative stress using 8-hydroxy-2
0
-deoxyguanosine (8-
OHdG) [16]- and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (HNE) [17]-modified
keyhole limpet hemocyanin as antigens. This was based on the fact
that hydroxyl radicals could produce such products with a most
prominent increase [18,19] and that the levels of 8-OHdG and HNE-
modified proteins are the sum of production and the repair [20].
Using these monoclonal antibodies, it became possible for the first
time to localize oxidative stress in paraffin-embedded sections; this
is a routine method for pathologic diagnosis in medicine, and the
paraffin blocks for sections can be stored at room temperature for
decades. Currently, these antibodies are commercially available and
popular among researchers [11].
3. Role of iron in carcinogenesis and cancer as evolution
Then, we realized that the iron-induced oxidative stress of
chronic nature is indeed able to cause cancer in mammals. In 1996, I
summarized the strong association between iron overload and
carcinogenesis with a great deal of evidence [10]. The rodent renal
carcinogenesis model by Fe-NTA was the first to demonstrate iron
carcinogenicity, with an anatomical location other than the iron
injection site as the target. Thereafter, the evidence based on hu-
man epidemiology and animal experiments greatly increased to
support the role of iron-induced oxidative stress [21,22]. The paper
that appealed most strongly to me was one demonstrating that
phlebotomy twice a year for 5 years (500 ml each) significantly
reduced both cancer risk and cancer occurrence in the US [23].Itis
known that there is no active pathway to excrete iron to outside the
body once it is absorbed into the blood. Only hemorrhage/phle-
botomy or iron chelation therapy can decrease the total body iron
stores.
With the development of next-generation sequencing, it is now
established that the genomic alterations in cancer cells are similar
to the evolution from apes to Homo Sapiens, as suggested by
Charles Darwin [24]. Specifically, advanced or metastasized cancer
cells have obtained new mutations in addition to the original
genomic alterations found in the primary tumor [25]. I have been
long interested in the issue of whether there are any target genes in
oxidative stress-induced carcinogenesis. In the 1990s, we used F1
rats from two genetically distant inbred strains and microsatellite
analysis in Fe-NTA-induced renal carcinogenesis to determine that
p16/p15 tumor suppressor genes are the major targets for deletion
[26]. In 2012, we used a more sophisticated method (array-based
comparative genomic hybridization) to confirm the p16/p15 results
and, further, to find c-Met amplification in a large proportion of
tumors [27]. Thus, there are definitely target genes in iron-
mediated oxidative stress-induced carcinogenesis. Of note, these
genomic alterations at the chromosomal level were similar in
pattern to those of human cancers, which have not been observed
in other rodent models. Therefore, we hypothesized that iron-
induced oxidative stress is a major cause, i.e., an iceberg, of hu-
man cancer (Fig. 2). A recent finding that cell-of-origin chromatin
organization shapes the mutational landscape of cancer [28]
strongly supports our hypothesis by suggesting the presence of a
common endogenous mechanism to induce mutation in all types of
cells.
Asbestos is a natural fibrous mineral that has been commonly
used over the last century worldwide because of its resistance to
heat, acid and friction with economical merits. However, it now
presents a burden to society because of the unexpected occurrence
of malignant mesothelioma (MM), which has an extremely long
incubation period of 30e40 years after exposure. The expected
peak year for asbestos-induced MM is 2025 in Japan [29,30]. Given
this situation, my laboratory is focused on elucidating the molec-
ular carcinogenic mechanisms of asbestos-induced mesothelial
carcinogenesis using rodents. During this process, we found that
iron overload in the nearby mesothelium is an important pathology
in a rat model. Notably, asbestos-induced rat MM showed similar
genetic alterations to Fe-NTA-induced rat renal carcinogenesis,
including the homozygous deletion of p16/p15 tumor suppressor
genes, which is also a frequent observation in human MM [31,32].
Based on these observations, we tested iron chelation therapy with
deferasirox as a preventive strategy after asbestos exposure in the
rat model. We observed a fractional change in histology from highly
aggressive sarcomatoid subtype to epithelioid subtype that shows a
more favorable prognosis [33].
Fig. 1. Helmut Sies, Yuji Naito (left) and myself (right) at the 17th Biennial Meeting of
the Society for Free Radical Research International held in Kyoto on March 24e27,
2014. Yuji Naito and I were co-chairmen of the meeting, and Helmut Sies gave a Trevor
Slater award lecture.
Fig. 2. Oxidative stress as an iceberg in carcinogenesis.
S. Toyokuni / Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 595 (2016) 46e49 47
Recently, we extended these observations to the risk assessment
of a synthetic fibrous nanomaterial called carbon nanotubes [34].
These products are already in use in our lives and are included in
various common products, such as liquid crystal sheets and batte-
ries for cell phones [35,36]. Multi-wall carbon nanotubes
(MWCNT), particularly those with a diameter of 50 nm, showed a
similar carcinogenicity for mesothelial cells as asbestos did [37].
The genetic alterations observed in MWCNT-induced MM were
similar to those of asbestos and were thus similar to those of Fe-
NTA-induced renal carcinogenesis [38]. Other findings also sug-
gested the involvement of local iron overload in pathogenesis. In
2014, the International Agency for Research on Cancer reported the
classification of cancer risk on MWCNT (diameter ~50 nm; range
40e170 nm) as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B) based
on rodent studies, including ours [39]. Thus, these observations
suggest that fibrous foreign material-induced carcinogenesis is
induced by the oxidative stress associated with local iron overload.
The innate ability of mesothelial cells to engulf anything to clear the
somatic cavity [40,41] appears to be another reason why meso-
thelial cells are the target cells in fiber-induced carcinogenesis.
4. Persistent oxidative stress in cancer and antioxidant
enzymes
Here, I change the topic from carcinogenesis to tumor biology.
Carcinogenesis is a process in which a single cell commences pro-
liferation without regulation, occupies a certain anatomic location
and further invades/metastasizes based on both genetic and non-
genetic alterations. The process usually takes years to decades.
Alternatively, established cancer cells, which are basically mono-
clonal in nature, are in a steady state metabolically. In the 1990s, we
found that cancer cells are more oxidatively stressed than their
non-tumorous counterparts are, based on the measurement of 8-
OHdG [20,42]. This was accompanied by the overexpression of
repair enzymes for 8-OHdG, including MutT [43]. The steady level
of oxidative stress in cancer was set at a relatively low level, which
primarily allows for reversible conversion between eSH and eS-S-
[44]. Thus, cancer cells are resistant to oxidative stress (resistance
to chemotherapy and radiotherapy) and are prone to genetic
instability a priori [42] (Fig. 3).
Helmut Sies contributed tremendously to selenoproteins [45].A
variety of antioxidative enzymes, including thioredoxin reductase
and glutathione peroxidase, contain selenocysteine, which is
encoded by a termination codon TGA. Selenoprotein P was purified
from rat and human plasma [46]. Notably, selenoprotein P is
depleted in rat renal cell carcinoma induced by Fe-NTA [47]. The
depleted expression of selenoprotein P in Fe-NTA-induced renal
cell carcinoma may be responsible, at least partially, for the greater
amount of oxidative stress occurring in the neoplastic tissue
compared with the non-tumorous counterparts. There is much
discussion concerning whether supplementary selenium works for
cancer prevention in humans [48].
5. Conclusion: Toward ultimate cancer prevention
Helmut Sies established the concept of oxidative stress in 1985.
In my career as a cancer researcher, I have been deeply influenced
by this concept. Recently, with the help of new technology,
particularly next-generation sequencing, many targetable mole-
cules have been discovered as novel cancer therapies. Humanized
monoclonal antibodies [49] and small molecule tyrosine kinase
inhibitors [50] are the drugs that are currently in fashion as indi-
vidualized therapy, and these are designed to block the critical
signaling pathways in cancer that support its persistent prolifera-
tion. These molecules are either increased products by genome
amplification or novel products by gene fusion. A variety of DNA
modifications/damage can occur with the free radical reactions,
including base modifications [51], strand breaks and cross-links
[52] with other molecules [53]. It is highly possible that these re-
actions are responsible for the above-mentioned genomic
alterations.
As long as we live, we use oxygen, which causes oxidative stress.
The levels of oxidative stress are much increased in pathologic
conditions such as inflammation, radiation- and ultraviolet-
exposure, iron overload and intake of a variety of carcinogenic
chemicals [54]. Thus, oxidative stress can be the iceberg of carci-
nogenesis. Cancer cells are in general under more oxidative stress
compared with their non-tumorous counterparts. Accordingly,
cancer cells are accustomed to higher oxidative stress [42].
The most important triad of our life is oxygen, iron and food.
These three are interacting, and we cannot live without any of
them. Calorie restriction is a popular topic studied for its impact on
longevity [55]. It is usually difficult to change one's oxygen con-
centration unless you can live in a high altitude. I personally believe
that modulating iron stores to avoid its overload could be the ul-
timate cancer prevention (Fig. 4). Phlebotomy or a 400-ml blood
donation results in a ~4% decrease in the iron stores of our body.
Because an iron secretory pathway out of our body does not nor-
mally exist and because iron excess occurs in men and in women
after menopause [54], iron removal could work to melt the iceberg.
Blood donation in the Japanese system [56] thus has three merits
Fig. 3. Persistent oxidative stress in tumor biology. Fig. 4. Oxygen, iron and food as triad of our life.
S. Toyokuni / Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 595 (2016) 46e4948
for the donors: it is good for other people, it can serve as a health
check and it may possibly prevent cancer.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by the National Cancer Center
Research and Development Fund (25-A-5), a grant-in-aid for
research from the sMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science
and Technology (MEXT) of Japan (24390094; 221S0001-04;
24108001) and the Yasuda Medical Foundation.
References
[1] H. Sies, Oxidative Stress, Academic Press, New York, 1985.
[2] S. Okada, O. Midorikawa, Jpn. Arch. Intern. Med. 29 (1982) 485e491.
[3] Y. Ebina, S. Okada, S. Hamazaki, F. Ogino, J.L. Li, O. Midorikawa, J. Natl. Cancer
Inst. 76 (1986) 107e113.
[4] J.L. Li, S. Okada, S. Hamazaki, Y. Ebina, O. Midorikawa, Cancer Res. 47 (1987)
1867e1869.
[5] S. Toyokuni, J.L. Sagripanti, J. Inorg. Biochem. 47 (1992) 241e248.
[6] S. Toyokuni, J.-L. Sagripanti, Carcinogenesis 14 (1993) 223e227.
[7] M. Awai, M. Narasaki, Y. Yamanoi, S. Seno, Am. J. Pathol. 95 (1979) 663e674.
[8] G.W. Bates, M.R. Schlabach, J. Biol. Chem. 248 (1973) 3228e3232.
[9] H.J.H. Fenton, J. Chem. Soc. 65 (1894) 899e910.
[10] S. Toyokuni, Free Radic. Biol. Med. 20 (1996) 553e566.
[11] S. Toyokuni, Pathol. Int. 49 (1999) 91e102.
[12] H. Ohkawa, N. Ohishi, K. Yagi, Anal. Biochem. 95 (1979) 351e358.
[13] S. Hamazaki, S. Okada, Y. Ebina, O. Midorikawa, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 77
(1985) 267e274.
[14] A. Pompella, E. Maellaro, A.F. Casini, M. Comporti, Am. J. Pathol. 129 (1987)
295e301.
[15] S. Toyokuni, S. Okada, S. Hamazaki, Y. Minamiyama, Y. Yamada, P. Liang,
Y. Fukunaga, O. Midorikawa, Cancer Res. 50 (1990) 5574e5580.
[16] S. Toyokuni, T. Tanaka, Y. Hattori, Y. Nishiyama, H. Ochi, H. Hiai, K. Uchida,
T. Osawa, Lab. Invest. 76 (1997) 365e374.
[17] S. Toyokuni, N. Miyake, H. Hiai, M. Hagiwara, S. Kawakishi, T. Osawa,
K. Uchida, FEBS Lett. 359 (1995) 189e191.
[18] S. Toyokuni, T. Mori, M. Dizdaroglu, Int. J. Cancer 57 (1994) 123e128.
[19] S. Toyokuni, X.P. Luo, T. Tanaka, K. Uchida, H. Hiai, D.C. Lehotay, Free Radic.
Biol. Med. 22 (1997) 1019e1027.
[20] K. Okamoto, S. Toyokuni, K. Uchida, O. Ogawa, J. Takenewa, Y. Kakehi,
H. Kinoshita, Y. Hattori-Nakakuki, H. Hiai, O. Yoshida, Int. J. Cancer 58 (1994)
825e829.
[21] S. Toyokuni, IUBMB Life 60 (2008) 441e447.
[22] S. Toyokuni, Cancer Sci. 100 (2009) 9e16.
[23] L. Zacharski, B. Chow, P. Howes, G. Shamayeva, J. Baron, R. Dalman,
D. Malenka, C. Ozaki, P. Levori, J. Natl, Cancer Inst. 100 (2008) 996e1002.
[24] C. Darwin, London, Murray, 1859.
[25] M. Gerlinger, A.J. Rowan, S. Horswell, J. Larkin, D. Endesfelder, E. Gronroos,
P. Martinez, N. Matthews, A. Stewart, P. Tarpey, N. Engl. J. Med. 366 (2012)
883e892.
[26] T. Tanaka, Y. Iwasa, S. Kondo, H. Hiai, S. Toyokuni, Oncogene 18 (1999)
3793e3797.
[27] S. Akatsuka, Y. Yamashita, H. Ohara, Y.T. Liu, M. Izumiya, K. Abe, M. Ochiai,
L. Jiang, H. Nagai, Y. Okazaki, H. Murakami, Y. Sekido, E. Arai, Y. Kanai, O. Hino,
T. Takahashi, H. Nakagama, S. Toyokuni, PLoS One 7 (2012) e43403.
[28] P. Polak, R. Karli
c, A. Koren, R. Thurman, R. Sandstrom, M.S. Lawrence,
A. Reynolds, E. Rynes, K. Vlahovi
cek, J.A. Stamatoyannopoulos, Nature 518
(2015) 360e364.
[29] B. Robinson, R. Lake, N. Engl. J. Med. 353 (2005) p1591e1603.
[30] S. Toyokuni, Nagoya J. Med. Sci. 71 (2009) 1e10.
[31] L. Jiang, S. Akatsuka, H. Nagai, S.H. Chew, H. Ohara, Y. Okazaki, Y. Yamashita,
Y. Yoshikawa, H. Yasui, K. Ikuta, K. Sasaki, Y. Kohgo, S. Hirano, Y. Shinohara,
N. Kohyama, T. Takahashi, S. Toyokuni, J. Pathol. 228 (2012) 366e377.
[32] S. Toyokuni, Redox Rep. 19 (2013) 1e7.
[33] H. Nagai, Y. Okazaki, S.H. Chew, N. Misawa, H. Yasui, S. Toyokuni, Cancer Prec.
Res. (2013) 1222e1230.
[34] S. Iijima, Nature 354 (1991) 56e58.
[35] M. Endo, M.S. Strano, P.M. Ajayan, Carbon Nanotubes, Springer, 2008, pp.
13e62.
[36] J. Lee, S. Mahendra, P.J.J. Alvarez, ACS Nano 4 (2010) 3580e3590.
[37] H. Nagai, Y. Okazaki, S. Chew, N. Misawa, Y. Yamashita, S. Akatsuka,
K. Yamashita, T. Ishihara, Y. Yoshikawa, L. Jiang, H. Ohara, T. Takahashi,
G. Ichihara, K. Kostarelos, Y. Miyata, H. Shinohara, S. Toyokuni, Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108 (2011) E1330eE1338.
[38] S. Toyokuni, J. Clin, Biochem. Nutr. 48 (2011) 46e49.
[39] Y. Grosse, D. Loomis, K.Z. Guyton, B. Lauby-Secretan, F. El Ghissassi,
V. Bouvard, L. Benbrahim-Tallaa, N. Guha, C. Scoccianti, H. Mattock, Lancet
Oncol. 15 (2014) 1427e1428.
[40] H. Nagai, S. Toyokuni, Cancer Sci. 103 (2012) 1378e1390.
[41] H. Nagai, S. Chew, Y. Okazaki, S. Funahashi, T. Namba, T. Kato, A. Enomoto,
L. Jiang, S. Akatsuka, S. Toyokuni, Sci. Rep. 3 (2013) 1144.
[42] S. Toyokuni, K. Okamoto, J. Yodoi, H. Hiai, FEBS Lett. 358 (1995) 1e3.
[43] K. Okamoto, S. Toyokuni, W.J. Kim, O. Ogawa, Y. Kakehi, S. Arao, H. Hiai,
O. Yoshida, Int. J. Cancer 65 (1996) 437e441.
[44] S. Toyokuni, S. Akatsuka, Pathol. Int. 57 (2007) 461e473.
[45] H. Steinbrenner, H. Sies, Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA General Subj. 1790 (2009)
1478e1485.
[46] R.F. Burk, K.E. Hill, J. Nutr. 124 (1994) 1891e1897.
[47] T. Tanaka, S. Kondo, Y. Iwasa, H. Hiai, S. Toyokuni, Am. J. Pathol. 156 (2000)
p2149e2157.
[48] H. Steinbrenner, B. Speckmann, H. Sies, Antioxid. Redox Signal 19 (2013)
181e191.
[49] G.P. Adams, L.M. Weiner, Nat. Biotechnol. 23 (2005) 1147e1157.
[50] M.A. Fabian, W.H. Biggs, D.K. Treiber, C.E. Atteridge, M.D. Azimioara,
M.G. Benedetti, T.A. Carter, P. Ciceri, P.T. Edeen, M. Floyd, Nat. Biotechnol. 23
(2005) 329e336.
[51] M. Dizdaroglu, Free Radic. Biol. Med. 10 (1991) 225e242.
[52] S. Toyokuni, T. Mori, H. Hiai, M. Dizdaroglu, Int. J. Cancer 62 (1995) 309e313.
[53] E. Friedberg, G. Walker, W. Siede, R. Wood, R. Schultz, T. Ellenberger, DNA
Repair and Mutagenesis, second ed., ASM Press, Washington, D.C, 2006.
[54] S. Toyokuni, Free Radic. Res. 45 (2011) 906e917.
[55] J.A. Mattison, G.S. Roth, T.M. Beasley, E.M. Tilmont, A.M. Handy, R.L. Herbert,
D.L. Longo, D.B. Allison, J.E. Young, M. Bryant, Nature 489 (2012) 318e321.
[56] Blood Programm in Japan, 2014. Document on the internet from, http://www.
bpro.or.jp/english/pdf_annual/BPRO2014.pdf.
S. Toyokuni / Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 595 (2016) 46e49 49