Conference PaperPDF Available

Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic-Ray Hotspot Observed with the Telescope Array Surface Detectors

Authors:
PoS(ICRC2015)276
Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic-Ray Hotspot Observed
with the Telescope Array Surface Detectors
K. Kawataa, M. Fukushimaa,b, D. Ikedaa, D. Ivanovc, E. Kidoa, J. N. Matthewsc,
S. Nagatakid, T. Nonakaa, T. Okudae, G. Rubtsovf, H. Sagawaa, N. Sakuraig,
B. T. Stokesc, M. Takedaa, R. Takeishia, A. Taketah, G. B. Thomsonc, P. Tinyakovf,i,
I. Tkachevf, H. Tokunoafor the Telescope Array Collaboration
aInstitute for Cosmic Ray Research, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
bKavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (WPI), Todai Institutes for
Advanced Study, the University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
cHigh Energy Astrophysics Institute and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of
Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
dAstrophysical Big Bang Laboratory, RIKEN, Wako, Saitama, Japan
eDepartment of Physical Sciences, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan
fInstitute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
gGraduate School of Science, Osaka City University, Osaka, Osaka, Japan
hEarthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
iService de Physique Th´
eorique, Universit´
eLibre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
E-mail: kawata@icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp
The Telescope Array (TA) collaboration has reported on an indication of the excess flux of ultra-
high energy cosmic rays (UHECRs) with E>57 EeV, located near the Ursa Major cluster [1].
Corresponding sky region was called the “hotspot”. In the present work we test this result using
the latest data collected by the TA SD array. As a result, the number of events in the hotspot
increases to 24, while expected background is 6.88 with the first 5-year and the additional 2-year
data. The statistical significance of the hotspot for the seven year dataset remains at the same level
of 3.4
σ
as for 5 year initial sample.
The 34th International Cosmic Ray Conference,
30 July- 6 August, 2015
The Hague, The Netherlands
Speaker.
For full author list see http://www.telescopearray.org/images/papers/ICRC2015-authorlist.pdf
c
Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence. http://pos.sissa.it/
PoS(ICRC2015)276
UHECR Hotspot Observed with the TA SD K. Kawata
1. Introduction
The origin of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays (UHECRs), which reach energy 1020 eV, remains
the mysteries in modern astrophysics. The main obstacles in identifying the origin of UHECRs
are low statistics of observed events and the loss of directional information induced by bending in
magnetic fields, since the cosmic rays are charged particles. The deflection angle for a 60 EeV
proton from a source at a distance of 50 Mpc is estimated to be a few degrees assuming intergalac-
tic magnetic field (IGMF) strength of 1 nG. In addition, the estimated deflection by the Galactic
magnetic field (GMF) ranges from a few to 10 degrees.
Until recently the UHECR distribution in arrival directions observed by many experiments
seemed to be isotropic, with the significance of any anisotropy being less than 3
σ
. The TA col-
laboration has reported a cluster of UHECRs, with E>57 EeV, called “hotspot”, in the 5-year
observation period from 2008 May to 20013 May [1]. This hotspot is centered near the Ursa Major
cluster, and extends to >10angular scale. The chance probability of this hotspot in an isotropic
cosmic-ray sky was calculated to be 3.7×104(3.4
σ
). In this paper, we will update this result by
adding the latest data collected by the TA SD array.
2. Analysis
The Telescope Array (TA) is the largest cosmic-ray detector in the northern hemisphere. It
consists of a scintillator surface detector (SD) array [2] and three fluorescence detector (FD) sta-
tions [3]. The TA SD array consists of 507 plastic scintillation detectors, 3 m2each, and located
on a 1.2 km square grid. The array has an area of 700 km2, which is seven times larger than the
AGASA experiment.
We analyzed the SD data recorded between 2008 May 11 and 2015 May 11. The total number
of observed events (Ntot) is 109, with cuts in energy E>57 EeV and the zenith angle
θ
<55.
The event distributions for E>57 EeV is shown in Figure 1 in the horizontal coordinate system.
Figure 1: Azimuthal angle (a) and zenith angle (b) distributions of UHECR with E>57 EeV observed by
the TA SD array for 7 years. The closed circles and the solid histograms show the experimental data and the
isotropic MC simulation, respectively, assuming the TA geometrical exposure.
2
PoS(ICRC2015)276
UHECR Hotspot Observed with the TA SD K. Kawata
The observed azimuthal angle and zenith angle distributions above 57 EeV are in good agreement
with the isotropic MC simulations assuming geometrical exposure. The anisotropy analysis follows
exactly the procedure adopted in Ref. [1]. Namely, for each point in the sky map grid, the cosmic
ray events are summed over a 20-radius circle. This gives the number of “signal” events, Non,
for this point. To estimate corresponding background, Nbg, we generate 100,000 Monte Carlo
events assuming isotropic flux and TA SD geometrical exposure. The generated MC events are
also summed over a 20-radius circle producing Noff, and Noff is normalized to the total number of
observed events, i.e. Nbg = (109/100,000)Noff. Then, we calculate the statistical significance of
the excess of events at each grid point using Li-Ma equation [4].
3. Results
Figure 2 (a) shows a sky map of arrival directions of the 109 cosmic-ray events with E>
57 EeV in equatorial coordinates. The blue and red points show the directions of the UHECRs for
the 5-year and the latest 2-year observation periods, respectively. Figure 2 (b) shows corresponding
significance map of the excess. The maximum excess in our FoV appears centered at R.A. (
α
)
=148.5, Dec. (
δ
)=44.6with a statistical significance of SMAX =5.1
σ
(Non =24,Nbg =6.88).
This is 1.5away from the center position found in the previous search.
As a next step, we estimate the probability of such a hotspot appearing by chance anywhere
in the isotropic sky in exactly the same way as in the previous report [1]. We generated 1 million
MC data sets, each having 109 events within our FoV (i.e., we reproduced the statistics of the
experimental data), assuming a uniform distribution over the TA SD exposure. The maximum of
the significances (SMAX) was calculated for each MC dataset in the same way as for the data using
20oversampling radius.
We found that there were 134 instances of SMAX >5.1
σ
. This yields a chance probability
of the observed hotspot in the isotropic cosmic-ray sky of 1.3×104, equivalent to a one-sided
probability of 3.6
σ
. When we adopted the 20oversampling radius, we knew that it would ap-
proximately fit the hotspot. To correct for this knowledge we recalculate the chance probability
using five oversampling radii, 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35 degrees. Then the chance probability becomes
3.7×104, equivalent to 3.4
σ
, which is the same level as the previous estimation [1].
As an alternative approach, we searched for UHECRs excess using only 6-th and 7-th year
data. This time we can use 20circle centered at (
α
,
δ
) = (146.7,43.2), which is the maximum
significance position determined by first 5-year data. As a result, we found four events against 2.31
expected background. The probability of this marginal excess in the isotropic sky is estimated to
be 20%.
4. Discussion
The TA UHECR energy spectrum above 1018.2eV shows a steepening around 5.7×1019 eV
[5], which is consistent with theoretical expectation from the Greisen-Zatsepin-Kuzmin (GZK)
cutoff [6, 7]. If UHECRs are protons and we observe genuine GZK-effect, the sources of observed
events should be in the local universe, within sphere of 100 Mpc. The angular distance between
the hotspot center and the supergalactic plane in the vicinity of the Ursa Major cluster is 17. It
3
PoS(ICRC2015)276
UHECR Hotspot Observed with the TA SD K. Kawata
Figure 2: Aitoff projection of the UHECR maps in equatorial coordinates. The solid curves indicate the
galactic plane (GP) and supergalactic plane (SGP). (a) The blue points show the directions of the UHECRs
with E>57 EeV for the first 5-year observation. The red diamonds show the directions of the UHECRs
for the latest 6-th and 7-th year observation period. The red open diamond shows an event at
δ
<10
that was not included in this analysis. The closed and open stars indicate the Galactic center (GC) and the
anti-Galactic center (Anti-GC), respectively; (b) Significance map for the 7-year observation using the 20
oversampling radius. The maximum significance is 5.1
σ
.
is possible that the hotspot direction is physically associated with a filament of the local large scale
structure connecting us and Virgo [8]. The several prominent sources around the hotspot, such
as the blazar Mrk 421, Mrk 180 and starburst galaxy M82 have been suggested as the candidates
of its origin [9, 10]. In either case, the mass composition of UHECRs and the magnetic bending
by the IGMF and GMF play very important role in the identification of the hotspot origin. The
Xmax distribution for events with E>10 EeV measured by the TA FD suggests largely proton
composition [11]. However, the statistics of the UHECRs with E>57 EeV measured by the TA
FD is still very low. The current TA aperture is obviously not adequate, if we want to resolve the
UHECR anisotropy firmly. In order to collect data at a faster rate, we are now planning to build
the TA extension, which will increase the area of the TA SD array by a factor of 4, and also add
additional FD stations.
4
PoS(ICRC2015)276
UHECR Hotspot Observed with the TA SD K. Kawata
5. Summary
The TA collaboration reported on an indication of the UHECR hotspot near the Ursa Major
cluster using 5-year data [1]. In this paper, we tested this indication using the latest additional two
years of data collected by the TA SD array. Our observations are summarized in Table 1. Using
the data up to 2015 May 11, the number of events in the hotspot increases to 24 events against an
expected background 6.88. The chance probability calculated in the same way as in the previous
report remains the same, 3.4
σ
. As an alternative approach, we searched for UHECR excess using
only the latest 2-year data, within the 20-radius circle centered at (
α
,
δ
) = (146.7,43.2), which
is the maximum significance position determined by first 5-year data. As a result, we found four
events against 2.31 background. The probability of this excess in the isotropic sky is estimated to
be 20%. The TA will continuously observe UHECRs to verify the TA hotspot. Besides, we will
promote the TA×4 project [12], which will extend the size of the TA SD by a factor of 4, to collect
data faster.
Date Ntot Non Nbg SMAX Position Chance Ref.
(YYYY.MM.DD) (
σ
)(
α
,
δ
)Prob. (
σ
)
2008.05.11 - 2013.05.04 72 19 4.49 5.1 146.7, 43.23.4 [1]
2008.05.11 - 2014.05.11 87 23 5.49 5.5 148.4, 44.64.0 This work
2008.05.11 - 2015.05.11 109 24 6.88 5.1 148.4, 44.63.4 This work
Table 1: Summary of the hotspot observation by the TA SD array.
Acknowledgments
The Telescope Array experiment is supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Sci-
ence through Grants-in-Aids for Scientific Research on Specially Promoted Research (21000002)
“Extreme Phenomena in the Universe Explored by Highest Energy Cosmic Rays” and for Scien-
tific Research (19104006), and the Inter-University Research Program of the Institute for Cosmic
Ray Research; by the U.S. National Science Foundation awards PHY-0307098, PHY-0601915,
PHY-0649681, PHY-0703893, PHY-0758342, PHY-0848320, PHY-1069280, PHY-1069286, PHY-
1404495 and PHY-1404502; by the National Research Foundation of Korea (2007-0093860, R32-
10130, 2012R1A1A2008381, 2013004883); by the Russian Academy of Sciences, RFBR grants
11-02-01528a and 13-02-01311a (INR), IISN project No. 4.4502.13 and Belgian Science Policy
under IUAP VII/37 (ULB). The foundations of Dr. Ezekiel R. and Edna Wattis Dumke, Willard L.
Eccles and the George S. and Dolores Dore Eccles all helped with generous donations. The State of
Utah supported the project through its Economic Development Board, and the University of Utah
through the Office of the Vice President for Research. The experimental site became available
through the cooperation of the Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration (SITLA),
U.S. Bureau of Land Management, and the U.S. Air Force. We also wish to thank the people and
the officials of Millard County, Utah for their steadfast and warm support. We gratefully acknowl-
edge the contributions from the technical staffs of our home institutions. An allocation of computer
5
PoS(ICRC2015)276
UHECR Hotspot Observed with the TA SD K. Kawata
time from the Center for High Performance Computing at the University of Utah is gratefully ac-
knowledged.
References
[1] R. U. Abbasi, et al., ApJL, 790, L21 (2014)
[2] T. Abu-Zayyad, et al., NIM-A, 689, 87 (2012)
[3] H. Tokuno, Y. Tameda, M. Takeda, et al., NIM-A, 676, 54 (2012)
[4] T.-P. Li, and Y.-Q. Ma, ApJ, 272, 317 (1983)
[5] T. Abu-Zayyad, et al., ApJL, 768, L1 (2013)
[6] K. Greisen, PRL, 16, 748 (1966)
[7] G. T. Zatsepin, and V. A. Kuz’min, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. Lett., 4, 78 (1966)
[8] K. Dolag, D. Grasso, V. Springel, and I. Tkachev, JCAP 0501, 009 (2005)
[9] K. Fang, T. Fujii, T. Linden, and A. V. Olinto, ApJ, 794, 126 (2014)
[10] H.-N. He, et al., arXiv:1411.5273 (2014)
[11] R. U. Abbasi, et al., Astropart. Phys., 64, 49 (2015)
[12] H. Sagawa, et al., “Telescope Array extension: TA×4”, these proceedings (2015)
6
... The corresponding value ved from the Auger data, computed as the integral of the parameterisation given by eq. (3.1) the parameters reported in Table 2, is E 1/2 = (2.47 ± 0.01 +0.82 0.34 (sys))⇥10 19 eV. This result, for ance, differs at the level of 3.4 s from the value of ⇡ 5.3⇥10 19 eV predicted in [17] under the mption that the sources of UHECRs are uniformly distributed over the universe and that they elerate protons only. ...
... The mean value of ln A and its variance s 2 (ln A), determined from Equations (1.1) and (1.2), 5 Figure 3. xX max y as a function of energy as measured by the Pierre Auger Observatory (combining HeCo and standard datasets) as a function of energy compared to air-shower simulations for proton and iron primaries [13]. Figure 6: (a) Evolution of the average X max with energy from dat simulation results (lines) for two particle species (proton, iron) and box region shows the systematic uncertainty on X max , 19 g/cm 2 , for X max compared with results reported by HiRes [18] and Auger [19]. mixture of both using the best matched model of QGSJetII-03 parison between observed X max and expected X max estimated by systematic uncertainty on <X max > is 19 g/cm 2 for the monocula in this figure. ...
... The total number of events is 109, taken from 2008 May 11 to 2015 May 11. The chance probability of such a hotspot appearing by chance anywhere in the sky is 3.7ˆ10´4, equivalent to a one-sided probability of 3.4σ [19]. A few powerful celestial objects around the hotspot, such as blazars Mrk 421, Mrk 180 and starburst galaxy M82 have been suggested as the candidates of its origin [20,21]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Ultra-high energy cosmic rays (UHECRs) are the highest energy messengers of the present universe, with energies up to $10^{20}$ eV. Studies of astrophysical particles (nuclei, electrons, neutrinos and photons) at their highest observed energies have implications for fundamental physics as well as astrophysics. The primary particles interact in the atmosphere and generate extensive air showers. Analysis of those showers enables one not only to estimate the energy, direction and most probable mass of the primary cosmic particles, but also to obtain information about the properties of their hadronic interactions at an energy more than one order of magnitude above that accessible with the current highest energy human-made accelerator. In this contribution we will review the state-of-the-art in UHECRs detection. We will present the leading experiments Pierre Auger Observatory and Telescope Array and discuss the cosmic ray energy spectrum, searches for directional anisotropy, studies of mass composition, the determination of the number of shower muons (which is sensitive to the shower hadronic interactions) and the proton-air cross section.
... Blue points indicate the 5-year data, and red diamonds indicate events observed during the 6th and 7th years of data collection. Right: significance map for the 7-year data smoothed in angular windows of 20 • radius (Kawata et al. 2015) 10 years of operation by Auger. The dipole amplitude was found to be (6.5 ± 1.9)% with a chance probability 5 × 10 −3 , pointing to (93 • ± 24 • ) in right ascension and (−46 • ± 18 • ) in declination. ...
... The (post-trial) statistical significance of such a hotspot appearing by chance was estimated to be 3.4σ . Two more years of observations confirmed the existence of the hotspot, but did not increase the statistical significance of the departure from the expected isotropic background; with 24 events making the hotspot, the estimated number of background events equals 6.88 (Kawata et al. 2015), and this gives the same significance as before. Figure 6 illustrates the latest result. ...
Article
Full-text available
The “Lomonosov” space project is lead by Lomonosov Moscow State University in collaboration with the following key partners: Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Russia, University of California, Los Angeles (USA), University of Pueblo (Mexico), Sungkyunkwan University (Republic of Korea) and with Russian space industry organizations to study some of extreme phenomena in space related to astrophysics, astroparticle physics, space physics, and space biology. The primary goals of this experiment are to study: Ultra-high energy cosmic rays (UHECR) in the energy range of the Greizen-Zatsepin-Kuzmin (GZK) cutoff; Ultraviolet (UV) transient luminous events in the upper atmosphere; Multi-wavelength study of gamma-ray bursts in visible, UV, gamma, and X-rays; Energetic trapped and precipitated radiation (electrons and protons) at low-Earth orbit (LEO) in connection with global geomagnetic disturbances; Multicomponent radiation doses along the orbit of spacecraft under different geomagnetic conditions and testing of space segments of optical observations of space-debris and other space objects; Instrumental vestibular-sensor conflict of zero-gravity phenomena during space flight. This paper is directed towards the general description of both scientific goals of the project and scientific equipment on board the satellite. The following papers of this issue are devoted to detailed descriptions of scientific instruments.
... The hotspot had a Li-Ma significance of 5.1σ. He et al. (2016) identified Mrk 180 as a possible source of UHECRs in the context of explaining the origin of the TA hotspot (Abbasi et al. 2014;Kawata et al. 2015Kawata et al. , 2019. Motivated by the earlier studies, we carry out a comprehensive study of Mrk 180 to ascertain the underlying mechanism of high-energy γ-ray emission and whether it can be the source of UHECRs beyond 57 EeV contributing to the TA hotspot. ...
Article
Full-text available
Markarian (Mrk) 180 is a BL Lacertae object located at a redshift of 0.045 and is a potential candidate for high-energy cosmic-ray acceleration. We have analyzed the Fermi Large Area Telescope (Fermi-LAT) γ -ray data of Mrk 180 collected over a period of 12.8 yr and found no significant enhancement in the flux from the long-term γ -ray light curve. We have also analyzed Swift X-ray, ultraviolet, and optical, and X-ray Multi-Mirror Mission (XMM-Newton) data to construct the multiwavelength spectral energy distribution (SED). The SED has been modeled with one-zone pure leptonic and lepto-hadronic scenarios to explain the underlying physics of multiwavelength emission. The pure leptonic model and the two lepto-hadronic models, viz., (i) line-of-sight interactions of ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays (UHECRs; E ≳ 10 ¹⁷ eV) with the cosmic background radiation and (ii) the interactions of relativistic protons with the cold protons in the jet, have been compared in our work. Moreover, an earlier study has associated Mrk 180 with the Telescope Array (TA) hotspot of UHECRs at E > 57 EeV. This speculation motivates us to check whether ultrahigh-energy protons and iron nuclei can reach the Earth from Mrk 180. After comparing the results of our simulation with the current observational data, we find that Mrk 180 is unlikely to be a source of the UHECR events contributing to the TA hotspot for conservative strengths of extragalactic magnetic fields.
... The hotspot had a Li-Ma significance of 5.1σ. He et al. (2016) identified Mrk 180 as a possible source of UHE-CRs in the context of explaining the origin of the TA hotspot (Abbasi et al. 2014;Kawata et al. 2015Kawata et al. , 2019. Motivated by the earlier studies, we carry out a comprehensive study of Mrk 180 to ascertain the underlying mechanism of highenergy γ-ray emission and whether it can be the source of ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays beyond 57 EeV contributing to the TA hotspot. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Markarian (Mrk) 180 is a BL Lacertae (BL Lac) object located at a redshift of 0.045 and a potential candidate for high-energy cosmic ray acceleration. We have analyzed the Fermi Large Area Telescope (\textit{Fermi}-LAT) $\gamma$-ray data of Mrk 180 collected over a period of 12.8 years and found no significant enhancement in the flux from the long-term $\gamma$-ray light curve. We have also analyzed Swift X-ray, ultraviolet \& optical, and X-ray Multi-Mirror Mission (XMM-Newton) data to construct the multi-wavelength spectral energy distribution (SED). The SED has been modeled with one-zone pure leptonic and lepto-hadronic scenarios to find the best fit to the multi-wavelength data and explain the underlying physics of multi-wavelength emission. The pure leptonic model and the two lepto-hadronic models involving line-of-sight interactions of ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays (UHECR; $E\gtrsim0.1$ EeV) with the cosmic radiation backgrounds and the interactions of relativistic protons with the cold protons in the jet have been compared in our work to explain the observational data points. Moreover, an earlier study has associated Mrk 180 with the Telescope Array (TA) hotspot of UHECRs at $E>57$ EeV. This speculation motivates us to check whether ultrahigh energy protons and iron nuclei can reach the earth from Mrk 180. We find that Mrk 180 is unlikely to be a source of the UHECR events contributing to the TA hotspot for conservative strengths of extragalactic magnetic fields.
... However, the statistical significance of this excess is ∼ 3.1σ. The Telescope Array Collaboration has also found an excess above 10 19.75 eV in a direction of the sky which is contained in the supergalactic plane [9,10]. The statistical significance of this excess is ∼ 3.4σ. ...
Article
Full-text available
The origin of the ultra high energy cosmic rays (UHECRs, E>10¹⁸ eV) is still uncertain. However, great progress has been achieved due to the data taken by The Pierre Auger and Telescope Array observatories. The UHECR flux presents two main features, a hardening of the spectrum known as the ankle and a suppression at higher energies. The experimental data suggest that above the ankle the UHECRs flux is dominated by an extragalactic component of astrophysical origin. However, a minority component of exotic origin that dominates the flux beyond the suppression is still compatible with current data. Therefore, there exist the possibility that part of the UHECR flux originates from the decay of super-heavy dark matter particles clustered in the halos of the galaxies. In these scenarios the main contribution comes from the halo of our galaxy. In this article the possibility of identifying these scenarios in the context of the future very large exposure cosmic rays observatories is studied. It is worth mentioning that the contribution of the extragalactic halos located in the nearby universe is also included in these studies.
... On a separate track, the Telescope Array Collaboration has reported an intriguing excess of UHECRs (E > 10 10.76 GeV) above the isotropic background-only expectation, with a chance probability of 3.7 × 10 −4 , corresponding to 3.4σ [9,10]. This hot spot spans a ∼ 20 • region of the sky, and the starburst galaxy M82 is close to the best-fit source position [11]. ...
Article
The sources of ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays (UHECRs) have been stubbornly elusive. However, the latest report of the Pierre Auger Observatory provides a compelling indication for a possible correlation between the arrival directions of UHECRs and nearby starburst galaxies. We argue that if starbursts are sources of UHECRs, then particle acceleration in the large-scale terminal shock of the superwind that flows from the starburst engine represents the best known concept model in the market. We investigate new constraints on the model and readjust free parameters accordingly. We show that UHECR acceleration above about 10^{11} GeV remains consistent with observation. We also show that the model could accommodate hard source spectra as required by Auger data.
... This is colloquially referred to as the "TA hot spot." The chance probability of this hot spot in an isotropic CR sky was calculated to be p TA = 3.7 × 10 −4 (3.4σ) [18]. The absence of a concentration of nearby sources in this region of the sky corroborates other experimental evidence for heavy nuclei, in that a few local sources within the GZK sphere can produce the hot spot through significant deflection and translation (proportional to Z) in the extragalactic and Galactic magnetic fields. ...
Article
We argue that if ultrahigh-energy (E > 10^10 GeV) cosmic rays are heavy nuclei (as indicated by existing data), then the pointing of cosmic rays to their nearest extragalactic sources at highest energies is expected. This is because the bending of the cosmic ray decreases as 1/E, so that pointing to nearby sources becomes possible at highest energies. In addition, for a nucleus of charge Ze and baryon number A, the maximum energy of acceleration capability of the sources grows linearly in Z, while the energy loss per distance traveled decreases with increasing A. Each of these two points tend to favor heavy nuclei at the highest energies. A single dimensional analysis may not be capable of incorporating the relative importance of these phenomena. In this paper we propose a multidimensional reconstruction of the individual emission spectra (in E, direction, and cross-correlation with nearby putative sources) to study the hypothesis that primaries are heavy nuclei subject to GZK photo-disintegration, and to determine the nature of the extragalactic sources. We also show that metal-rich starburst galaxies are highly-plausible candidate sources, and we use them as an explicit example of our proposed multidimensional analysis.
Article
Full-text available
The Probe Of Extreme Multi-Messenger Astrophysics (POEMMA) is designed to accurately observe ultra-high-energy cosmic rays (UHECRs) and cosmic neutrinos from space with sensitivity over the full celestial sky. POEMMA will observe the air fluorescence produced by extensive air showers (EASs) from UHECRs and potentially UHE neutrinos above 20 EeV. Additionally, POEMMA has the ability to observe the Cherenkov signal from upward-moving EASs induced by Earth-interacting tau neutrinos above 20 PeV. The POEMMA spacecraft are designed to quickly re-orientate to follow up transient neutrino sources and obtain currently unparalleled neutrino flux sensitivity. Developed as a NASA Astrophysics Probe-class mission, POEMMA consists of two identical satellites flying in loose formation in 525 km altitude orbits. Each POEMMA instrument incorporates a wide field-of-view (45°) Schmidt telescope with an optical collecting area of over 6 m2. The hybrid focal surface of each telescope includes a fast (1 μs) near-ultraviolet camera for EAS fluorescence observations and an ultrafast (10 ns) optical camera for Cherenkov EAS observations. In a 5-year mission, POEMMA will provide measurements that open new multi-messenger windows onto the most energetic events in the universe, enabling the study of new astrophysics and particle physics at these extreme energies.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
  • R U Abbasi
R. U. Abbasi, et al., ApJL, 790, L21 (2014)
  • T Abu-Zayyad
T. Abu-Zayyad, et al., NIM-A, 689, 87 (2012)
  • H Tokuno
  • Y Tameda
  • M Takeda
H. Tokuno, Y. Tameda, M. Takeda, et al., NIM-A, 676, 54 (2012)
  • T.-P Li
  • Y.-Q Ma
T.-P. Li, and Y.-Q. Ma, ApJ, 272, 317 (1983)
  • T Abu-Zayyad
T. Abu-Zayyad, et al., ApJL, 768, L1 (2013)
  • K Greisen
K. Greisen, PRL, 16, 748 (1966)
  • G T Zatsepin
  • V A Kuz'min
G. T. Zatsepin, and V. A. Kuz'min, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. Lett., 4, 78 (1966)
  • K Dolag
  • D Grasso
  • V Springel
  • I Tkachev
K. Dolag, D. Grasso, V. Springel, and I. Tkachev, JCAP 0501, 009 (2005)