Content uploaded by Satyendra Pratap Singh
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Satyendra Pratap Singh on Apr 25, 2024
Content may be subject to copyright.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Evaluation of antagonistic and plant growth promoting
activities of chitinolytic endophytic actinomycetes
associated with medicinal plants against Sclerotium rolfsii
in chickpea
S.P. Singh
1
and R. Gaur
1,2
1 Department of Microbiology, Mewar University, Gangrar, Chittorgarh, India
2 Department of Microbiology, Dr R. M. L. Avadh University, Faizabad, India
Keywords
Actinomycete, antifungal, chitinase, Cicer
arietinum L., endophyte, Sclerotium rolfsii.
Correspondence
Rajeev Gaur, Department of Microbiology,
Mewar University, Gangrar, Chittorgarh,
Rajasthan-312901, India.
E-mails: rajeevagaur@gmail.com;
singhsatyendra349@gmail.com
2016/0054: received 8 January 2016, revised
30 March 2016 and accepted 3 May 2016
doi:10.1111/jam.13176
Abstract
Aims: To evaluate the potential of chitinolytic endophytic Actinomycetes
isolated from medicinal plants in order to diminish the collar rot infestation
induced by Sclerotium rolfsii in chickpea.
Methods and Results: Sixty-eight chitinolytic endophytic Actinomycetes were
recovered from various medicinal plants and evaluated for their chitinase
activity. Among these isolates, 12 were screened for their plant growth
promoting abilities and antagonistic potential against Sc. rolfsii. Further, these
isolates were validated in vivo for their ability to protect chickpea against
Sc. rolfsii infestation under greenhouse conditions. The isolates significantly
(P<005) increased the biomass (12–20 fold) and reduced plant mortality
(42–75%) of chickpea. On the basis of 16S rDNA profiling, the selected
antagonistic strains were identified as Streptomyces diastaticus,Streptomyces
fradiae,Streptomyces olivochromogenes,Streptomyces collinus,Streptomyces
ossamyceticus and Streptomyces griseus.
Conclusion: This study is the first report of the isolation of endophytic
Actinomycetes from various medicinal plants having antagonistic and plant
growth promoting abilities. The isolated species showed potential for
controlling collar rot disease on chickpea and could be useful in integrated
control against diverse soil borne plant pathogens.
Significance and Impact of the Study: Our investigation suggests that
endophytic Actinomycetes associated with medicinal plants can be used as
bioinoculants for developing safe, efficacious and environment-friendly
biocontrol strategies in the near future.
Introduction
Actinomycetes, a group of Gram-positive filamentous
bacteria with high G +C ratio have been shown to be
attractive sources of natural compounds for the pharma-
ceutical and other industries. Recently endophytes have
attracted a lot of attention which is evident from the
increasing reports of beneficial isolates from a wide range
of crops (Zhou et al. 2014; Golinska et al. 2015; Mingma
et al. 2015). Endophytic Actinomycetes have been
demonstrated to improve the plant growth as well as to
reduce infestation caused by phytopathogens through var-
ious mechanisms, including the production of bioactive
secondary metabolites, alteration in plant physiology, and
the stimulation of systemic acquired resistance in host
plants (Govindasamy et al. 2014). However, despite ever
increasing reports about endophytic microbes associated
with different plants, measures to understand their func-
tional role inside the host plant is limited. Most endo-
phytic Actinomycetes isolated to date generally belong to
the genus Streptomyces (Goodfellow and Simpson 1987)
which is responsible for the production of around 80%
Journal of Applied Microbiology 121, 506--518 ©2016 The Society for Applied Microbiology506
Journal of Applied Microbiology ISSN 1364-5072
of the biologically active compounds. A recent report
suggested a possibility that Actinomycetes can protect
various plants by inhibiting the growth of potential
fungal pathogens via enzymes and antifungal compounds
(Goodfellow and Williams 1983). Among the various cat-
egories of enzymes, actinobacterial chitinases have been
widely demonstrated as inhibitors of fungal growth
(Taechowisan et al. 2003). Thus, because of the presence
of beneficial traits, endophytic Actinomycetes have been
cited as promising biocontrol agents which act either
directly on fungal cell walls or are reported to initiate
increased plant responses against pathogen (Quecine
et al. 2008). Additionally, Actinomycetes are also reported
to promote plant growth by producing siderophores, sol-
ublization of insoluble phosphates, decomposition of
organic materials, such as cellulose, lignocellulose, starch
and chitin in soil as well as by production of growth pro-
moters such as indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and gibberellic
acid (Taechowisan et al. 2005).
Sclerotium rolfsii is a plant pathogen known to cause
extensive damage to various agricultural and horticultural
crops (Harlton et al. 1995). Once the pathogen penetrates
the plant tissue, it produces a considerable mass of myce-
lium on the host surface. The disease symptoms, usually
undetectable, are dark-brown lesions on the root surface
and the first visible symptoms are progressive yellowing
and wilting of leaves. This will eventually lead to the
plant death (Nene et al. 1991). The complete eradication
of Sc. rolfsii is nearly impossible due to the prolific
growth and ability to produce large numbers of sclerotia
that persist in the soil for many years (Punja 1988). The
use of resistant cultivars and application of synthetic
chemicals are primary strategies for disease management,
but yield losses persist with numerous plants. The routine
usage of synthetic pesticides and fertilizers in agricultural
practices has drastically improved the crop yields, but on
the other hand has also caused an adverse effect on the
environment and human health. Thus, application of
chitinolytic endophytic Actinomycetes for inhibiting
Sc. rolfsii by these microbes could provide additional
opportunities for ecofriendly and sustainable disease
management. Efforts in this area by various researchers
have resulted in development of commercial biocontrol
preparations which have been reported to act against fun-
gal pathogens (Shimizu 2011). However, further studies
are needed to identify additional antagonistic Actino-
mycetes which can reduce disease caused by the notori-
ous phytopathogens including Sc. rolfsii. Considering this
aspect, application of chitinolytic endophytic Actino-
mycetes in agricultural might prove to be effective alter-
native against fungal pathogen, Sc. rolfsii.
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is one of the major food
legumes grown worldwide, and is an important
component of human and animal diet. The plant plays
an important role in maintenance of soil fertility in semi-
arid and arid zones of the world (Saxena 1990). However,
the successful cultivation of chickpea faces a serious
threat from the infestation of the fungal pathogen,
Sc. rolfsii (Nagamani et al. 2013; Sarkar et al. 2014). To
curb the losses, there is thus an urgency to develop/iso-
late endophytic Actinomycetes which can provide an
alternative for the successful management of Sc. rolfsii
infection in chickpea. Hence, the overall aims of this
investigation were to (i) selectively isolate chitinolytic
endophytic actinobacteria associated with the medicinal
plants, (ii) study their activity against Sc. rolfsii and other
fungal phytopathogens, (iii) determine their in vitro pro-
duction of active compounds related to plant growth
promotion and (iv) conduct an in vivo evaluation of the
efficacy of potential antagonistic isolates as biological
control agents against Sc. rolfsii on chickpea.
Materials and methods
Sample collection
Healthy medicinal plants were collected from CSIR-
National Botanical Research Institute (Banthara) (26°550
N, 80°590E), Lucknow, India during June, 2013. The
selection of each plant for endophytic isolation was based
on its local ethnobotanical properties, including its
antibacterial, insecticidal, antitumor and wound-healing
and other medicinal properties (Jain 1994). Healthy root,
stem and leaf samples of each plant were placed in sterile
plastic bags and subjected to isolation procedures within
48 h. The representative plants selected for the study were
Rauvolfia serpentine,Gymnema sylvestre,Stevia crenata,
Bacopa monnieri,Andrographis paniculata and Withania
somnifera.
Enrichment and selective isolation of chitinolytic
endophytic Actinomycetes
Samples were air-dried for 6 h at room temperature and
then washed with an ultrasonic step (160 W, 15 min) to
remove the surface soils and adherent epiphytes com-
pletely. After drying, the samples were subjected to sur-
face sterilization procedure: 5 min wash in 4% sodium
hypochlorite (NaOCl), followed by 10 min wash in 2%
Na
2
S
2
O
3
, a 5 min wash in 75% ethanol, a wash in sterile
water, and a final rinse in 8% NaHCO
3
for 10 min. After
thoroughly drying under sterile conditions, the surface-
sterilized tissues were crushed in saline with autoclaved
mortar and pestle and subjected to suspensions contain-
ing 1% colloidal chitin in saline (085% w/v) in 1 : 10
ratio (Berger and Reynolds 1958). The suspensions were
Journal of Applied Microbiology 121, 506--518 ©2016 The Society for Applied Microbiology 507
S.P. Singh and R. Gaur Endophytic Actinomycetes against Sc. rolfsii
13652672, 2016, 2, Downloaded from https://enviromicro-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jam.13176 by Agricultural Research Organiza, Wiley Online Library on [25/04/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
incubated on a shaker at 28 2°C, 100 rev min
1
for
8–10 days for enrichment of chitinolytic Actinomycetes.
After incubation, 1 ml of six fold dilutions of individual
plant material suspensions were spread onto colloidal
chitin agar (CCA), consisting of the following con-
stituents (g l
1
): K
2
HPO
4
,07; KH
2
PO
4
,03; NH
4
Cl, 10;
NaCl, 05; MgSO
4
5H
2
O, 05; FeSO
4
7H
2
O, 001; ZnSO
4
,
0001; MnCl
2
,0001; CaCl
2
2H
2
O, 0001; yeast extract,
005; CaCO
3
,0001; Bacto agar, 2% and colloidal chitin
1% (w/v) and incubated at 28 2°C for 1–2 weeks. Also
the noncrushed surface-sterilized tissues were dried in a
laminar airflow chamber and by using sterile scalpel,
outer tissues were removed. For the isolation of acti-
nobacteria, 05cm
3
of inner tissue size was carefully dis-
sected and placed directly over the surface of colloidal
chitin agar (CCA) media. The media was amended with
nystatin (50 lgml
1
) and cycloheximide (50 lgml
1
)
along with nalidixic acid (15 lgml
1
) and K
2
Cr
2
O
7
(01%) (to inhibit fast growing bacteria) in a final con-
centration of 60 lgml
1
. The colonies appearing on the
plates were observed and selected carefully according to
their characteristics. After 10 days of incubation, the
colonies showing a clearing zone were selected as chiti-
nolytic Actinomycetes (Hoster et al. 2005). Actinobacte-
rial colonies growing out of the plated tissue segments
were transferred onto ISP2 media slants and repeatedly
subcultured until pure cultures were obtained.
Efficiency of surface sterilization
Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the efficacy
of the surface sterilization procedures. Firstly, autoclaved
distilled water used in the last step of washing was used
to check the sterility of plant tissues (Schulz et al. 1993).
Secondly, surface-sterilized small segments (1–3 cm) of
plant tissues were also imprinted onto ISP 2 agar to con-
firm the effectiveness of the surface sterilization proce-
dures (Qin et al. 2009).
Quantification of chitinase activity
Chitinase activity of isolates was quantified according to
the protocol of Gupta et al. (1995). The unit (U) activity
is defined as the amount of enzyme releasing 1 lmol
N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) per minute.
In vitro antagonistic bioassay
The isolates were evaluated for their biocontrol activity
towards four plant pathogenic fungi: Sclerotium rolfsii,
Rhizoctonia solani,Fusarium oxysporum and Alternaria
solani using dual culture in vitro assay (Singh et al.
2015b). The growth inhibition (%) was calculated by
comparing colony radius with the control plates. All the
experiments were conducted thrice with three replicates
each. The antagonistic activities of isolates were also
examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of
7-day-old cultures grown on dual culture plates con-
tained potato dextrose agar (PDA) and glucose yeast malt
extract (GYM) agar (1 : 1).
Plant growth promoting activities
Phosphate solubilization activity of isolates was deter-
mined according to the methodology described by Mehta
and Nautiyal (2001). For quantitative estimation of
P-solubilization activity, isolates were used to estimate
the released phosphate concentration using the Fiske and
Subbarow method (1925). The phosphate solubilization
activity was expressed as equivalent phosphate (lgml
1
).
Catechol type and hydroxamate siderophores were esti-
mated by Arnow’s method (Arnow 1937) and Csaky test
(Csaky 1948) respectively. The amount of IAA produced
by Actinomycetes isolates was determined using GYM
broth supplemented with different concentration of
L-tryptophan (Basal, 0, 2 and 5 mg ml
1
) and incubated
at 30°C with shaking at 125 rev min
1
for 7 days
(Gordon and Weber 1951). Appearance of a pink colour
indicated IAA production. The level of IAA produced
was estimated by comparison with an IAA standard. Gib-
berellic acid (GA
3
) production was determined according
to Borrow et al. (1955). The absorbance was recorded at
254 nm using UV spectrophotometer and calibrated the
amount of GA in lgml
1
by comparison with a stan-
dard of gibberellic acid solutions of known concentration.
All the in vitro experiments were performed thrice with
three replicates.
In vivo biocontrol and plant growth promotion assay
Preparation of microbial inoculums
The pure Actinomycetes isolates were individually inocu-
lated in GYM broth and incubated at 30 2°C for
7–10 days under shaking conditions. The culture was cen-
trifuged at 8000 gfor 5 min. The cell pellet was suspended
in 085% saline and the cell density was adjusted to
10910
8
CFU ml
1
using spectrophotometer at 610 nm
(Singh et al. 2015a). The pathogen Sc. rolfsii was isolated
by collecting sclerotia produced on infected collar region
of chickpea plants. Surface sterilization of sclerotia was
done by dipping them in 1% (v/v) NaOCl for 5 s followed
by washing thrice with sterilized distilled water. The sclero-
tia were then placed onto PDA plates and incubated at
28°C for 7 days. The cultures were purified by picking a
single sclerotium and transferred into a fresh PDA plate.
Pathogen inoculum was prepared by growing Sc. rolfsii in
Journal of Applied Microbiology 121, 506--518 ©2016 The Society for Applied Microbiology508
Endophytic Actinomycetes against Sc. rolfsii S.P. Singh and R. Gaur
13652672, 2016, 2, Downloaded from https://enviromicro-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jam.13176 by Agricultural Research Organiza, Wiley Online Library on [25/04/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
sterile cornmeal sand (240 g of clean quartz sand, 60gof
yellow cornmeal, and 75 ml of SDW; moisture level 50%)
for 2 weeks at 25°C in the dark with proper mixing at reg-
ular intervals for uniform distribution of fungal mycelia
(Abeygunawardena and Wood 1957).
Seed priming with endophytic Actinomycetes isolates
The surface sterilization of chickpea (cv. Radhey) seeds
was carried out with 2% NaOCl solution for 1 min, fol-
lowed by washing with sterile water to remove traces of
NaOCl. Plastic pots (15 910 cm) were used for sterile
soil assay and 15 kg of the potting mixture was filled in
each pot. For seed treatment, chickpea seeds were coated
with Actinomycetes isolates cell suspensions prepared in
10% (w/v) carboxyl methyl cellulose, CMC (HiMedia,
Mumbai, India) which was used as an adhesive. The
coated seeds were air-dried under a stream of sterile air
for 2–3 h. The coated seeds were then planted in pots
with an average of four germinated seeds per pot at a
depth of approx. 15 cm. The following treatments were
examined: (i) Control: neither inoculated with pathogen
(Sc. rolfsii) nor with biocontrol isolate; (ii) Con-
trol +Sc. rolfsii: inoculated with pathogen (Sc. rolfsii) but
not with biocontrol isolate; (iii-xiv) pathogen (Sc. rolf-
sii)+biocontrol agents (CC1, CC4, CC12, CC20, CC23,
CC29, CC31, CC38, CC41, CC42, CC52 and CC53). The
inoculum of Sc. rolfsii was applied in the soil of the pots
adhering in to the plants in all treatments at the rate of
50 g per pot after plants were of 3 weeks old. The experi-
ment was conducted in a greenhouse in controlled condi-
tions of 10 h dark, 14 h light and temperature of
23 2°C at experimental area of CSIR-NBRI from
November to January 2013–2014. The pots were arranged
in a complete randomized design (CRD) in a set of seven
replicates for each treatment and the experiment was
repeated twice. Data from the repeated experiments were
pooled for analysis. After 3 weeks of pathogen inocula-
tion the experiment was terminated to record yield
related attributes viz. plant weight, fruiting, flowering,
nodulation and plant mortality.
In vivo gas exchange measurements
The gas exchange parameters of net photosynthesis rate,
stomatal conductance and transpiration rate were moni-
tored in fully expanded chickpea leaves at flowering stage
with Li-Cor 6400 gas exchange portable photosynthesis
system (Li-Cor, Lincoln, NE) (Singh et al. 2014).
Molecular identification and presence of biosynthetic
genes
The isolates were subjected to 16S rRNA gene sequence
analysis for precise genus and species identification. The
16S rRNA genes from pure cultures were amplified using
the universal primer pair (Qin et al. 2009). The PCR
products were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis,
purified using QIAquick gel extraction kits (Qiagen, Hil-
den, Germany), and sequenced on an ABI Prism 3730
sequencer. The 16S rRNA gene sequences determined was
compared with the GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ databases
using the BLASTN search program. A phylogenetic tree was
constructed by the neighbour-joining method using the
MEGA 5 software package, after pairwise alignments using
the CLUSTAL X 1.8 program (Tamura et al. 2011). The sta-
bility of relationships was assessed by performing boot-
strap analyses of the neighbour-joining data based on
1500 re-samplings. Detection of biosynthetic genes was
also done using three sets of degenerate primers for the
amplification of genes encoding polyketide synthases I
and II (PKS I and PKS II) and nonribosomal peptide
synthetases (NRPS) from the isolates tested positive for
biocontrol ability according to Qin et al. (2009).
Data analysis
To study the level of significance, analysis of variance
(ANOVA) using SPSS package (SPSS ver. 16.0, SPSS Inc., Chi-
cago, IL) for randomized complete block design. Signifi-
cant differences among treatments were based on the
Tukey’s multiple range test at P<005.
Results
Isolation and screening of endophytic Actinomycetes for
characteristic traits
A total of 68 Actinomycetes isolates were isolated from
endophytic regions of healthy medicinal plants (Fig. S1).
Of the 68 isolates, the majority (n=27, 3970%) were
isolated from roots followed by leaf (n=24, 3529%),
and stem (n=17, 25%) (Table S1). Among these iso-
lates, only 12 isolates showed better chitinolytic poten-
tials, depicting more than 25 mm clearing zone (Hi-
antibiotic zone scale, HiMedia). The isolates depicting
chitinase activity were further validated by quantification
of chitinase enzyme. An ascending trend in enzyme pro-
duction was recorded between 2nd to 6th day of incuba-
tion (Table S2), after which a gradual decline in the
enzyme activity was observed in most of the isolates. The
results indicated a positive correlation between growth
and enzyme activity. The 12 isolates exhibited potent
chitinase activity (047–109 U ml
1
) with CC53 showing
the highest chitinase activity (109 002 U ml
1
) fol-
lowed by CC4 (096 001 U ml
1
) at 6th day of incu-
bation. All these isolates were therefore selected for
antagonistic activity against four major fungal pathogens.
Journal of Applied Microbiology 121, 506--518 ©2016 The Society for Applied Microbiology 509
S.P. Singh and R. Gaur Endophytic Actinomycetes against Sc. rolfsii
13652672, 2016, 2, Downloaded from https://enviromicro-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jam.13176 by Agricultural Research Organiza, Wiley Online Library on [25/04/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
Test for antagonism
Twelve Actinomycetes isolates namely CC1, CC4, CC12,
CC20, CC23, CC29, CC31, CC38, CC41, CC42, CC52
and CC53 revealed a completely antagonistic nature
against all the four fungal pathogens viz., Sc. rolfsii,
R. solani,F. oxysporum,A. solani after 5 days of incuba-
tion. Among the positive isolates, the greatest inhibition
of fungal colony growth was noticed with CC53 (703%),
CC38 (692%) and CC52 (678%) which was more than
60% against Sc. rolfsii. The isolates CC4 (615 and
664%) and CC53 (630 and 676%) showed maximum
inhibition against R. solani and F. oxysporum respectively.
The isolates CC38, CC41 and CC53 showed >600% inhi-
bition against A. solani (Table S3). The biocontrol activ-
ity against all the four fungal pathogens was exhibited by
isolates CC23 and CC53 (Fig. 1). Among these four iso-
lates, the maximum antagonistic activity was shown by
CC53. Moreover, the isolate CC53 inhibited Sc. rolfsii
growth up to 703% in the dual culture plate assay
(Table S3; Fig. 1b1). The mycoparasitic activity of CC53
was confirmed by the SEM observation at the interaction
zone of CC53 and Sc. rolfsii (Fig. 2a–f). Microscopic
observations revealed complete destruction of Sc. rolfsii
mycelia by the coiling and spore proliferation of CC53
(Fig. 2d–f).
Plant growth promoting traits of endophytic
Actinomycetes
The isolates were screened for plant growth promoting
traits and our results indicated that all the 12 isolates were
able to solubilize phosphate and produced siderophore,
IAA and GA
3
. Phosphate solublization ranged from 339
to 663lgml
1
at 7 days after inoculation. The maxi-
mum phosphate solubilization activity was found in CC53
(663lgml
1
) followed by CC4 (654lgml
1
) and
CC42 (618lgml
1
) (Table S4). These isolates were also
analysed for siderophore production. Siderophore pro-
duction ranged from 67to279lgml
1
(for catechols)
and 120–971lgml
1
(for hydroxymate) at the 7th day
after inoculation (Table S4). The greatest levels of hydrox-
amate type siderophore were produced by CC53
(5358 lgml
1
) and CC4 (4187 lgml
1
). Table S4 also
depicts the other plant growth promoting activities of the
selected 12 isolates such as IAA and GA
3
production. Fur-
thermore, these isolates were screened for their ability to
produce IAA, with different concentrations of tryptophan
(0, 2 and 5 mg l
1
). The IAA production without trypto-
phan was in the range of 32–159lgml
1
. The incre-
ment in IAA production was observed with the increasing
concentration of tryptophan i.e. for 2 mg l
1
tryptophan,
the concentration ranged from 117to394lgml
1
and
for 5 mg l
1
the concentration ranged from 201to
646lgml
1
(Table S4). Three isolates (CC53, CC4 and
CC42) showed more than 60 lgml
1
IAA production
while least activity was found with CC31 (202lgml
1
)
in 5 mg l
1
of tryptophan concentration. Similarly, the
production of GA
3
ranged from 30to813 lgml
1
in all
the 12 isolates at the 7th day after inoculation (Table S4).
Total Biomass of chickpea after endophytic
Actinomycetes priming
We further analysed the potential of our isolates to see
their effect on biomass production in control
(untreated uninoculated control), control +pathogen
Sc. rolfsii (untreated pathogen inoculated control) as
well as pathogen +biocontrol agents (Actinomycetes
primed inoculated with pathogen) treatments. All the
endophytic Actinomycete isolates showed significant dif-
ference (P<005) in terms of plant growth parameters
compared to the untreated Sc. rolfsii inoculated and
control plants (Fig. 3). The growth parameters inclusive
of fresh and dry biomass yield were significantly
(P<005) enhanced in all the Actinomycetes treat-
ments as compared to the control and con-
trol +Sc. rolfsii (Table 1). The maximum increase in
shoot and root length by 18 and 22 fold, respectively,
was observed in CC53 treated plants followed by CC42
(17 and 19 fold respectively) (Table S5). However, the
degree of growth promotion in terms of flowering
(15–25 fold), branches (12–22 fold) and nodulation
(12–22 fold) varied with various endophytic Actino-
mycete treatments (Table S5). Among the treatments,
maximum plant biomass was achieved with CC53 and
CC23 which showed increments of 19 and 20 fold
followed by CC42 with a 17 and 19 fold enhancement
in fresh and dry biomass respectively when compared
with the Sc. rolfsii inoculated control (Table 1). The
maximum number of fruiting bodies were also observed
in treatments with CC53 and CC4 (23 fold) followed
by CC23 (22 fold) and CC38 (20 fold) with respect
to Sc. rolfsii inoculated control. After 3 weeks of
Sc. rolfsii inoculation, symptoms developed in con-
trol +Sc. rolfsii plants. The plants treated with endo-
phytic Actinomycetes showed their efficacy against
Sc. rolfsii by drastically reducing the plant mortality
3 weeks after inoculation (Table 1). The most efficient
reduction of Sc. rolfsii infection was shown by CC53
which significantly (P<005) reduced the plant mortal-
ity (25%), followed by CC23 and CC42 which demon-
strated 31% against the control +Sc. rolfsii (Table 1).
The maximum mortality (more than 60%) was
observed in CC29, CC1 and CC4 treatments. A signifi-
cant increase in colonization was observed in plants
Journal of Applied Microbiology 121, 506--518 ©2016 The Society for Applied Microbiology510
Endophytic Actinomycetes against Sc. rolfsii S.P. Singh and R. Gaur
13652672, 2016, 2, Downloaded from https://enviromicro-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jam.13176 by Agricultural Research Organiza, Wiley Online Library on [25/04/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
treated with endophytic Actinomycetes CC53, CC23
and CC42 followed by CC4 and CC38 (Table 1).
In vivo gas exchange measurements
We further estimated the gas exchange parameters in
control +pathogen and biocontrol treated chickpea
leaves. Our data showed marked reduced net photosyn-
thetic rate in chickpea leaves in pathogen inoculated leaf,
whereas application of endophytic Actinomycetes
increased the photosynthetic rate from 14to21 fold
(Fig. S2). Similarly, the transpiration rate (11–21 fold)
and stomatal conductance (13–22 fold) were signifi-
cantly increased in endophytic Actinomycetes treated
(a1)
(a2)
(a3)
(a4)
(b1)
(b2)
(b3)
(b4)
CC23
CC23
CC23
CC23
CC 53
CC 53
CC 53
CC 53
Streptomyces
olivochromogenes
Streptomyces griseus
S.rolfsii
R.solani
F.oxysporum F.oxysporum
A. solani A. solani
R.solani
S.rolfsii
Figure 1 In vitro evaluation of antifungal activity. Chitinolytic Actinomycetes were tested in a dual culture assay against pathogenic fungi; Strep-
tomyces olivochromogenes and Streptomyces griseus against (a1; b1) Sclerotium rolfsii, (a2; b2) Rhizoctonia solani, (a3; b3) Fusarium oxysporum,
and (a4; b4) Alternaria solani.
Journal of Applied Microbiology 121, 506--518 ©2016 The Society for Applied Microbiology 511
S.P. Singh and R. Gaur Endophytic Actinomycetes against Sc. rolfsii
13652672, 2016, 2, Downloaded from https://enviromicro-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jam.13176 by Agricultural Research Organiza, Wiley Online Library on [25/04/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
chickpea plants with respect to control + Sc. rolfsii plants
(Fig. S2).
Molecular identification and detection of biosynthetic
genes
On the basis of their ability to colonize chickpea roots
and promote plant growth under greenhouse conditions,
six potent Actinomycete isolates were selected for
molecular identification. PCR amplification was done
with specific primer for the 16S-rRNA region generated
bands ranging from 1450 to 1500 bp. These fragments
were sequenced separately, and the sequence data were
deposited in the GenBank of the National Center for
Biotechnology Information (NCBI) with accession num-
ber KT962908-13. Homology search and Blast analysis
revealed that the isolated strains CC4,CC20, CC23,
CC38, CC42 and CC53 belonged to genus Streptomyces
(a) (b) (c)
(d) (e) (f)
S.rolfsii
S.rolfsii
S.rolfsii S.rolfsii
S.rolfsii
S.rolfii
CC53
CC53
Streptomyces
griseus
CC53
CC53
7/8/2014 HV HFW mag
10 000 ×
dwell
10·00 kV14·9 µm
5 µm
label3 µs5:34:38 PM
7/8/2014 HV HFW mag
5 000 ×
dwell
10·00 kV 29·8 µm
10 µm
label3 µs5:35:52 PM
7/8/2014 HV HFW mag
2 000 ×
dwell
10·00 kV 74·6 µm
30 µm
label3 µs5:36:18 PM
7/7/2014 HV HFW mag
10 000 ×
dwell
10·00 kV14·9 µm
5 µm
label3 µs
5:02:34 PM
7/8/2014 HV HFW mag
5 000 ×
dwell
10·00 kV 29·8 µm
10 µm
label3 µs
5:16:56 PM
7/8/2014 HV HFW mag
2 000 ×
dwell
10·00 kV 74·6 µm
30 µm
label
3 µs5:17:44 PM
Figure 2 Scanning electron micrographs of isolate CC53 (S.s griseus SP12); (a, b, c) mycelia structure of Sclerotium rolfsii; (d, e) arrows showing
mycoparasitic activity of CC53 against Sc. rolfsii in dual culture assay and (e) complete destruction of Sc. rolfsii mycelia.
Control Control
+S. rolfsii CC1 CC4 CC12 CC20 CC23 CC29 CC31 CC38 CC41 CC42 CC52 CC53
Figure 3 Effect of various endophytic Actinomycetes with respect to control on growth of chickpea.
Journal of Applied Microbiology 121, 506--518 ©2016 The Society for Applied Microbiology512
Endophytic Actinomycetes against Sc. rolfsii S.P. Singh and R. Gaur
13652672, 2016, 2, Downloaded from https://enviromicro-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jam.13176 by Agricultural Research Organiza, Wiley Online Library on [25/04/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
diastaticus SP2, Streptomyces fradiae SP4, Streptomyces
olivochromogenes SP5, Streptomyces collinus SP8, Strepto-
myces ossamyceticus SP10 and Streptomyces griseus SP12
respectively. Phylogenetic analyses of the isolates based
on 16S- rRNA gene sequence has been shown in Fig. 4.
We further investigated the potential of endophytic
Actinomycetes to synthesize bioactive compounds, as
indicated by the presence of NRPS and PKS genes. The
presence of the genes encoding PKS I, PKS II and NRPS
were detected in six potent Actinomycetes using three
sets of degenerate primers. Only strain, S. griseus SP12
showed positive amplification products with the PKS I,
PKS II and NRPS primers (Table S6). Streptomyces
diastaticus SP2, S. fradiae SP4, S. collinus SP8 and S. os-
samyceticus SP10 showed positive amplification products
with the PKSI and NRPS primers while S. olivochromoge-
nes SP5 showed only positive amplification products with
NRPS (Table S6).
Discussion
Endophytic micro-organisms can play a significant role as
biocontrol agents and are considered to beneficial for
plant disease management (Shimizu 2011). It has been
observed that among the various microbial inoculants,
endophytic micro-organisms are the most promising
group for their beneficial exploitation in the field of agri-
culture and pharmaceutics (Kunoh 2002). However, in-
spite of the significant work done earlier, there is still a
paucity of knowledge on the actual endohpytic Actino-
mycetes possessing biocontrol activity. Endophytic Acti-
nomycetes from different medicinal plants are reported as
major source of natural products with potential
antifungal activity (Golinska et al. 2015; Passari et al.
2015). These findings encouraged us to explore tradi-
tional medicinal plants for understanding the endophytic
Actinomycetes community and their potential as biocon-
trol agents and plant growth promoters. In this study, we
isolated 68 different chitinolytic endophytic Actinomycete
strains from different parts of the medicinal plants using
enrichment method. The maximum numbers of Actino-
mycete isolates were recovered from R. serpentina. The
isolation of endophytic actinobacteria is a critically
important procedure in the present study. Although Acti-
nomycetes were isolated from different tissues, isolate
ratios were highest in root tissues indicating that endo-
phytic Actinomycetes are most dominant in the root
parts. Our results are consistent with the findings of
Taechowisan et al. (2003) and Verma et al. (2009) who
stated that roots represent a good territory for endophytic
Actinomycetes. This may be owing to the fact that soil
Actinomycetes can move along the plant roots very easily.
Also, Actinomycetes can colonize roots by entering via
cracks at the lateral root junctions (Coombs and Franco
2003).
Importance of chitinolytic endophytic Actinomycetes
in control of disease caused by fungal pathogens has also
been recognized. Besides many factors, chitinase enzyme
action on fungal pathogen cell wall seems to play an
active role in antagonism (Nagpure et al. 2014). Out of
68 strains, only 12 strains exhibited strong chitinolytic
activity as determined by degradation of colloidal chitin
on CCA plates. In the present investigation, the isolates
showed significant antifungal activity against all the four
pathogens, that is, Sc. rolfsii,R. solani,F. oxysporum and
A. solani. Possibility exists that apart from the production
Table 1 Effect of endophytic isolates in chickpea for promotion of plant health parameters and plant mortality inoculated with Sclerotium rolfsii
Treatments Fresh Weight (g pot
1
) Dry Weight (g pot
1
) Fruiting (no.) Plant mortality (%) CFU (log
10
CFU g
1
)
Control 2346 089
efg
569 055
abc
1600 089
d
000 000
g
–
Control +Sc. rolfsi 1878 213
h
419 086
c
1400 155
d
9000 288
a
–
CC1 2799 134
d
699 069
abc
1600 196
d
6400 346
b
161 008
e
CC4 3094 140
bc
774 079
ab
3183 198
a
3800 231
e
336 0013
ab
CC12 2147 128
fgh
537 076
bc
1700 146
d
5400 231
bc
265 026
abc
CC20 2852 113
cd
713 073
ab
2700 178
ab
3800 173
e
266 015
abc
CC23 3567 151
a
825 160
ab
3000 229
a
3100 231
ef
341 054
ab
CC29 2470 124
e
617 074
abc
2400 175
bc
6800 173
bc
167 027
de
CC31 2375 122
ef
677 103
abc
2367 214
bc
5100 058
cd
148 005
e
CC38 2944 119
cd
736 075
ab
2867 214
ab
3400 231
ef
296 030
abc
CC41 2094 123
gh
590 076
abc
1633 059
d
6100 173
bc
205 021
cde
CC42 3247 119
b
811 173
ab
2700 096
ab
3100 173
ef
338 025
ab
CC52 3043 114
bcd
761 103
ab
1967 139
cd
4100 115
de
257 044
bcd
CC53 3634 227
a
857 115
a
3217 165
a
2500 288
f
352 058
a
Values are mean of six replicates with standard error (SE) are indicated. Means followed by the same letter(s) within the column are not
significantly different according to Tukey’s multiple comparison test (P<005).
Journal of Applied Microbiology 121, 506--518 ©2016 The Society for Applied Microbiology 513
S.P. Singh and R. Gaur Endophytic Actinomycetes against Sc. rolfsii
13652672, 2016, 2, Downloaded from https://enviromicro-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jam.13176 by Agricultural Research Organiza, Wiley Online Library on [25/04/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
and excretion of chitinolytic enzymes production of sec-
ondary metabolites might have played a key role in the
antagonistic action of the positive Actinomycete isolates.
The findings of our study are parallel to some of the pre-
vious studies where endophytic Actinomycetes are
reported as potential antifungal agents (Strobel 2003;
Verma et al. 2009; Shimizu 2011). Further as depicted in
our study, antagonistic behaviours of endophytic Actino-
mycetes against fungal pathogens through several mecha-
nisms such as mycoparasitism have been explained using
scanning electron microscopic studies. As evident from
the SEM images, we can interpretate the S. griseus SP12
intertwines around the fungal pathogen mycelia and per-
forates it, leading to its death due to cytoplasmic extru-
sion. Similar results were observed with chitinolytic
Actinomycete Streptomyces toxytricini against R. solani
(Patil et al. 2010) under SEM observation with the excep-
tion of hyperparasitism of antagonistic isolates.
All these isolates were found positive for phosphate
solubilization, production of siderophores and
Streptomyces diastaticus JX524717
69
67
86
66
66
89
51
45
99
59
82
68
67
100
54
97
38
53
58
97
68
63
Streptomyces diastaticus strain SP2 KT962908
Streptomyces fradiae JF682780
Streptomyces coelicoflavus KJ573027
Streptomyces ambofaciens FJ486314
Streptomyces lienomycini NR 112464
Streptomyces tendae KF454844
Streptomyces collinus subsp. albescens KC119160
Streptomyces griseorubens EU570500
Streptomyces griseus AB030571
Streptomyces griseus strain SP12 KT962913
Streptomyces griseus subsp. griseus NR 074787
Streptomyces caviscabies NR 114493
Streptomyces globisporus NR 044145
Streptomyces albiflavescens KC771426
Streptomyces olivochromogenes EU589442
Streptomyces olivochromogenes strain SP5 KT962910
Streptomyces neyagawaenis AB026219
Streptomyces torulosus NR112472
Streptomyces sp. EF608465
Streptomyces hygroscopicus subsp. ossamyceticus AY999876
Streptomyces ossamyceticus strain SP10 KT962912
Streptomyces flavoviridis EU570674
Streptomyces collinus strain SP8 KT962911
Streptomyces avidinii FJ481066
Streptomycetes aurantiogriseus NR 115385
Streptomyces fradiae strain SP4 KT962909
Actinomycetales bacterium AY944250
Figure 4 Neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree analysis of 16S rRNA of endophytic Actinomycetes. The numbers at the nodes indicate the levels
of bootstrap support (%) based on 1500 re-sampled data sets. The scale bar corresponds to 002 substitutions per nucleotide position. Numbers
in parentheses indicate accession numbers in Genbank.
Journal of Applied Microbiology 121, 506--518 ©2016 The Society for Applied Microbiology514
Endophytic Actinomycetes against Sc. rolfsii S.P. Singh and R. Gaur
13652672, 2016, 2, Downloaded from https://enviromicro-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jam.13176 by Agricultural Research Organiza, Wiley Online Library on [25/04/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
phytohormones (IAA and GA
3
). The result obtained by
this study is consistent with our findings in which all iso-
lates were identified as phosphate solubilizers. This may
be either due to the acidification of medium by produc-
tion of low molecular weight organic acids (Hamdali
et al. 2008). The endophytic Actinomycetes present inside
plant tissues are known to produce growth hormones
that may play an important role in plant development.
Among the various kinds of growth promoters, Actino-
mycetes are well known for the production of hydroxam-
ate and catecholate type siderophores, which can inhibit
the growth of the phytopathogen by competing for iron
in the environment (Khamna et al. 2009). Singh et al.
2015b suggested that the production of siderophore is an
important factor for phytopathogen antagonism and
growth of the plant. Similarly, Verma et al. (2009) also
showed that endophytic Actinomycetes isolated from
Azadirachta indica exhibited high amount of siderophore
and IAA production. It is also suggested that phosphate
solubilization, production of phytohormones, and other
related compounds by the Actinomycetes will interact
with the plants as part of its colonization, leading to
growth promotion, induced resistance, and modulation
of plant defence mechanisms (Goudjal et al. 2014; Singh
et al. 2015a,b).
In our study, the selected active endophytic Actino-
mycetes demonstrated a significant role in plant growth
activity and reduced in vivo collar rot of chickpea caused
by Sc. rolfsii plant pathogen under greenhouse experi-
ment. Endophytic Actinomycetes treated plants displayed
maximum increase in physiological parameters such as
plant biomass, plant length, fruiting, flowering, branches
and nodulation of the chickpea plant. The results indi-
cated that the plant growth related activities and antago-
nism is likely to be a major mechanism employed by
these Actinomycetes to control Sc. rolfsii in the chickpea.
The production of antibiotics by Actinomycetes may play
an important role in the biocontrol of pathogens and
contribute to the enhancement of plant growth (Pala-
niyandi et al. 2013; Goudjal et al. 2014). The isolate
S. griseus SP12 (CC53), in addition to its capacity to
reduce the disease severity of Sc. rolfsii, also increased
the total biomass of the chickpea. The gas exchange
parameters such as net photosynthesis, stomatal conduc-
tance and transpiration rate were also significantly
increased in endophytic Actinomycetes treated chickpea
plants. Many reports have shown that endophytic Acti-
nomycetes can increase growth in different crops (Misk
and Franco 2011; Bhattacharyya and Jha 2012), such an
increase may confer advantages to the host plant with
respect to health and overall plant development. The
findings are in line with the previous studies (El-Tarabily
et al. 2009; Pattanapipitpaisal and Kamlandharn 2012)
where the authors demonstrated that application of chiti-
nolytic endophytic Actinomycetes in plant seedlings pro-
duced a significant increase in biomass along with the
disease reduction. It can also be hypothesized that the
application of endophytic Actinomycetes might have per-
formed as a strong sensor for the generation of phyto-
defence responses against fungal phytopathogens (Kunoh
2002).
In soil systems, a positive correlation was observed
between degradation of chitin hydrolysis by chitinolytic
microbes and microbial abundance (Quecine et al. 2008;
Kielak et al. 2013). In the present study, root colonization
showed a significant growth in Actinomycetes treated
plants, possibly because of higher chitin hydrolysis and
antagonism activity. There is also added possibility that
the chitinolytic endophytic Actinomycetes might have
actually multiplied to a sufficient extent under the experi-
mental conditions because of the presence of fungal myce-
lium which is utilized as a rich source of chitin. Also, role
of chitinolytic Actinomycetes cannot be ignored as our
assumption is in agreement with the findings of the earlier
research, which have also showed positive relationship
between microbial diversity and chitinase activity (Beier
and Bertilsson 2013). Furthermore, viability and coloniza-
tion of the chitinolytic Actinomycetes in soil was
enhanced, which might have provided persistent protec-
tion to the plants from Sc. rolfsii.
In this study, diverse group of endophytic Actino-
mycetes belonging to genus S. diastaticus SP2, S. fradiae
SP4, S. olivochromogenes SP5, S. collinus SP8, S. os-
samyceticus SP10 and S. griseus SP12 were identified as
potent chitinase producers. This is the first report of
S. diastaticus SP2, S. fradiae SP4, S. olivochromogenes SP5,
S. collinus SP8, S. ossamyceticus SP10 and S. griseus SP12
isolated as endophytes from the medicinal plants namely
B. monnieri,W. somnifera, A. paniculata, Stevia crenata,
G. sylvestre and R. serpentine respectively.
To test the biosynthetic potential of these isolates,
presence of genes encoding PKS and NRPS, responsible
for the synthesis of most biologically active compounds
in Actinomycetes was investigated (Qin et al. 2009;
Passari et al. 2015). However, the true antifungal activity
of the endophytic Actinomycetes may only be assessed by
screening of biocontrol potential against desired patho-
gens. In this study, most of the isolates showed the pres-
ence of genes that encoded PKS I, PKS II and NRPS
enzymes, which also showed antifungal activity against
most of the tested phytopathogens. However, five isolates
(S. diastaticus SP2, S. fradiae SP4, S. olivochromogenes
SP5, S. collinus SP8 and S. ossamyceticus SP10) that were
positive for PKS I and NPRS but negative for PKS II, also
demonstrated significant antifungal potential. Only one
of the isolates (S. griseus SP12) possesaaaased all three
Journal of Applied Microbiology 121, 506--518 ©2016 The Society for Applied Microbiology 515
S.P. Singh and R. Gaur Endophytic Actinomycetes against Sc. rolfsii
13652672, 2016, 2, Downloaded from https://enviromicro-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jam.13176 by Agricultural Research Organiza, Wiley Online Library on [25/04/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
genes (PKS I, PKS II and NRPS). This isolate showed
maximum antifungal activity. These results indicate that
the isolates possessed biosynthetic genes that are associ-
ated with antagonism against the pathogens tested. Lack
of amplification of PKS I and PKS II in some of the iso-
lates may be due to absence of these genes (Ayuso-Sacido
and Genilloud 2005). Moreover, the NRPS genes involved
in the secondary metabolites production are known to
play a role in antagonistic behaviour of the micro-organ-
ism possessing them. The results in the present study are
in agreement with a previous study (Ayuso-Sacido and
Genilloud 2005) where the authors illustrated that pres-
ence of functional genes in endophytic Actinomycetes
was associated with antagonistic behaviour. The pre-
screening of isolates with degenerate primers targeting
functional genes of bioactive compounds is thus an effec-
tive approach for detecting novel and useful secondary
metabolites (Weber et al. 2015).
The current investigation thus indicates that microbial
residents of the plant tissues represent a potential reser-
voir of antagonism that is capable of challenging the fun-
gal pathogens. These strains showed maximum
production of chitinase with effective suppression of phy-
topathogens. To our knowledge, this is the first study
where endophytic actinobacteria were successfully isolated
on the basis of chitinase activity from different medicinal
plants. These species also enhanced the growth of plants
by solubilizing inorganic phosphorous and producing
siderophores and phytohormones (IAA; GA
3
). The plant
growth promoting traits of isolated Actinomycetes and its
biocontrol activity against Sc. rolfsii can be further uti-
lized for increasing the yield abilities in chickpea. These
findings provide persuasive evidence that the chitinolytic
endophytic Actinomycetes residing in the healthy plants
tissues offer options for sustainable agriculture. Develop-
ment of such prospective and viable technology is thus
the need of the hour which can not only act as a key for
better agronomic cultivations but also be useful for
improved biomass and better management of the fungal
pathogens. The study also suggests that augmenting these
populations of crops would make a great addition of an
integrated management plan that employs server disease
management strategies increasing the sustainability of the
crop production in the near future.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the Director, CSIR-National
Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow, India, for provid-
ing financial support and necessary facilities during the
course of investigation. Help extended by Dr. Aradhana
Mishra for encouragement is greatly appreciated.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that there exists no potential conflict
of interest among them.
References
Abeygunawardena, D. and Wood, R.K.S. (1957) Effect of
certain fungicides on Sclerotium rolfsii in the soil.
Phytopathology 47, 607–609.
Arnow, L.E. (1937) Colorimetric determination of the
components of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine-tyrosine
mixtures. J Biol Chem 118, 531–537.
Ayuso-Sacido, A. and Genilloud, O. (2005) New PCR primers
for the screening of NRPS and PKS-I systems in
actinomycetes: detection and distribution of these
biosynthetic gene sequences in major taxonomic groups.
Microb Ecol 49,10–24.
Beier, S. and Bertilsson, S. (2013) Bacterial chitin degradation
—mechanisms and ecophysiological strategies. Front
Microbiol 4, 149.
Berger, L.R. and Reynolds, D.M. (1958) The chitinase system
of a strain of Streptomyces griseus.Biochim Biophys Acta
29, 522–534.
Bhattacharyya, P.N. and Jha, D.K. (2012) Plant growth-
promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in
agriculture. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 28, 1327–1350.
Borrow, A., Brain, P.W., Chester, U.E., Curtis, P.J., Hemming,
H.G., Jeffereys, E.C., Lloyd, R.B., Nixon, I.S. et al. (1955)
Gibberellic acids a metabolic product of the fungus
Gibberella fujikuroi some observations on its production
and isolation. J Sci Food Agric 6, 340–348.
Coombs, J.T. and Franco, C.M. (2003) Isolation and
identification of actinobacteria from surface-sterilized
wheat roots. Appl Environ Microbiol 69, 5603–5608.
Csaky, T.Z. (1948) On the estimation of bound hydroxylamine
in biological materials. Acta Chem Scand 2, 450–454.
El-Tarabily, K.A., Nassar, A.H., Hardy, G.S.J. and
Sivasithamparam, K. (2009) Plant growth promotion and
biological control of Pythium aphanidermatum, a pathogen
of cucumber, by endophytic actinomycetes. J Appl
Microbiol 106,13–26.
Fiske, C.H. and Subbarow, Y. (1925) A colorimetric
determination of phosphorus. J Biol Chem 66, 375–400.
Golinska, P., Wypij, M., Agarkar, G., Rathod, D., Dahm, H.
and Rai, M. (2015) Endophytic actinobacteria of
medicinal plants: diversity and bioactivity. Ant Van
Leeuwen 108, 267–289.
Goodfellow, M. and Simpson, K.E. (1987) Ecology of
streptomycetes. Front Appl Microbiol 2,97–125.
Goodfellow, M. and Williams, S.T. (1983) Ecology of
actinomycetes. Annu Rev Microbiol 37, 189–216.
Gordon, S.A. and Weber, R.P. (1951) Colorimetric estimation
of indoleacetic acid. Plant Physiol 26, 192.
Journal of Applied Microbiology 121, 506--518 ©2016 The Society for Applied Microbiology516
Endophytic Actinomycetes against Sc. rolfsii S.P. Singh and R. Gaur
13652672, 2016, 2, Downloaded from https://enviromicro-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jam.13176 by Agricultural Research Organiza, Wiley Online Library on [25/04/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
Goudjal, Y., Toumatia, O., Yekkour, A., Sabaou, N., Mathieu,
F. and Zitouni, A. (2014) Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani
damping-off and promotion of tomato plant growth by
endophytic actinomycetes isolated from native plants of
Algerian Sahara. Microbiol Res 169,59–65.
Govindasamy, V., Franco, C.M. and Gupta, V.V. (2014)
Endophytic actinobacteria: diversity and ecology. In Adv
End Res. ed. Verma, V.C. and Gange, A.C. pp. 27–59. New
Delhi, India: Springer India.
Gupta, R., Saxena, R.K., Chaturvedi, P. and Virdi, J.S. (1995)
Chitinase production by Streptomyces viridificans: its
potential in fungal cell wall lysis. J Appl Bacteriol 78, 378–
383.
Hamdali, H., Hafidi, M., Virolle, M.J. and Ouhdouch, Y.
(2008) Rock phosphate-solubilizing Actinomycetes:
screening for plant growth-promoting activities. World J
Microbiol Biotechnol 2, 2565–2575.
Harlton, C.E., Levesque, C.A. and Punja, Z.K. (1995) Genetic
diversity in Sclerotium (Athelia) rolfsii and related species.
Phytopathology 85, 1269–1281.
Hoster, F., Schmitz, J.E. and Daniel, R. (2005) Enrichment of
chitinolytic microorganisms: isolation and characterization
of a chitinase exhibiting antifungal activity against
phytopathogenic fungi from a novel Streptomyces strain.
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 66, 434–442.
Jain, S.K. (1994) Ethnobotany and research in medicinal plants
in India. Ethnobot Search New Drugs 185, 153–168.
Khamna, S., Yokota, A. and Lumyong, S. (2009)
Actinomycetes isolated from medicinal plant rhizosphere
soils: diversity and screening of antifungal compounds,
indole-3-acetic acid and siderophore production. World J
Microbiol Biotechnol 25, 649–655.
Kielak, A.M., Cretoiu, M.S., Semenov, A.V., Sørensen, S.J. and
Van Elsas, J.D. (2013) Bacterial chitinolytic communities
respond to chitin and pH alteration in soil. Appl Environ
Microbiol 79, 263–272.
Kunoh, H. (2002) Endophytic actinomycetes: attractive
biocontrol agents. J Gen Plant Pathol 68, 249–252.
Mehta, S. and Nautiyal, C.S. (2001) An efficient method for
qualitative screening of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria.
Curr Microbiol 43,51–56.
Mingma, R., Duangmal, K., Thamchaipenet, A.,
Trakulnaleamsai, S., Matsumoto, A. and Takahashi, Y.
(2015) Streptomyces oryzae sp. nov., an endophytic
actinomycete isolated from stems of rice plant. J Antibiot
(Tokyo) 68, 368–372.
Misk, A. and Franco, C. (2011) Biocontrol of chickpea root
rot using endophytic actinobacteria. Biocontrol 56, 811–
822.
Nagamani, P., Viswanath, K. and Reddy, G.N. (2013)
Management of Sclerotium rolfsii causing collar rot in
chick pea. Ann Plant Prot Sci 21, 114–117.
Nagpure, A., Choudhary, B., Kumar, S. and Gupta, R.K.
(2014) Isolation and characterization of chitinolytic
Streptomyces sp. MT7 and its antagonism towards wood-
rotting fungi. Ann Microbiol 64, 531–541.
Nene, Y.L., Reddy, M.V., Haware, M.P., Ghanekar, A.M.,
Amin, K.S. (1991) Field Diagnosis of Chickpea Diseases
and their Control. In Information Bulletin Volume. 28.
Patancheru, India: International Crops Research Institute
for the Semi-Arid Tropics.
Palaniyandi, S.A., Yang, S.H., Zhang, L. and Suh, J.W. (2013)
Effects of actinobacteria on plant disease suppression and
growth promotion. App Microbiol Biotechnol 97, 9621–
9636.
Passari, A.K., Mishra, V.K., Saikia, R., Gupta, V.K. and Singh,
B.P. (2015) Isolation, abundance and phylogenetic
affiliation of endophytic actinomycetes associated with
medicinal plants and screening for their in vitro
antimicrobial biosynthetic potential. Front Microbiol 6,
273.
Patil, H.J., Srivastava, A.K., Kumar, S., Chaudhari, B.L. and
Arora, D.K. (2010) Selective isolation, evaluation and
characterization of antagonistic actinomycetes against
Rhizoctonia solani.World J Microbiol Biotechnol 26, 2163–
2170.
Pattanapipitpaisal, P. and Kamlandharn, R. (2012) Screening
of chitinolytic actinomycetes for biological control of
Sclerotium rolfsii stem rot disease of chilli. Songklanakarin
J Sci Technol 34, 387–393.
Punja, Z.K. (1988) Sclerotium (Athelia) rolfsii, a pathogen of
many plant species. Adv Plant Pathol 6, 523–534.
Qin, S., Li, J., Chen, H.H., Zhao, G.Z., Zhu, W.Y., Jiang, C.L.,
Xu, L.H. and Li, W.J. (2009) Isolation, diversity, and
antimicrobial activity of rare actinobacteria from
medicinal plants of tropical rain forests in Xishuangbanna,
China. Appl Environ Microbiol 75, 6176–6186.
Quecine, M.C., Araujo, W.L., Marcon, J., Gai, C.S., Azevedo,
J.L. and Pizzirani-Kleiner, A.A. (2008) Chitinolytic activity
of endophytic Streptomyces and potential for biocontrol.
Lett Appl Microbiol 47, 486–491.
Sarkar, A., Patel, J.S., Yadav, S., Sarma, B.K., Srivastava, J.S.
and Singh, H.B. (2014) Studies on rhizosphere-bacteria
mediated biotic and abiotic stress tolerance in Chickpea
(Cicer arietinum L.). Vegetos 27, 158–169.
Saxena, M.C. (1990) Problems and potential of chickpea
production in the nineties. In Chickpea in the Nineties,
Proceedings 2nd International Workshop Chickpea
Improvement ed. Van Rheenen, H.A. and Saxena, M.C. pp.
13–25. Patancheru, India: ICRISAT.
Schulz, B., Wanke, U., Draeger, S. and Aust, H.J. (1993)
Endophytes from herbaceous plants and shrubs:
effectiveness of surface sterilization methods. Mycol Res 97,
1447–1450.
Shimizu, M. (2011) Endophytic actinomycetes: biocontrol
agents and growth promoters. In Bacteria in Agrobiology:
Plant Growth Responses ed. Maheshawari, D.K. pp. 201–220.
Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Journal of Applied Microbiology 121, 506--518 ©2016 The Society for Applied Microbiology 517
S.P. Singh and R. Gaur Endophytic Actinomycetes against Sc. rolfsii
13652672, 2016, 2, Downloaded from https://enviromicro-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jam.13176 by Agricultural Research Organiza, Wiley Online Library on [25/04/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
Singh, R., Pandey, N., Naskar, J. and Shirke, P.A. (2014)
Physiological performance and differential expression
profiling of genes associated with drought tolerance in
contrasting varieties of two Gossypium species.Protoplasma
252, 423–438.
Singh, S.P., Gupta, R., Gaur, R. and Srivastava, A.K. (2015a)
Streptomyces spp. alleviate Rhizoctonia solani-mediated
oxidative stress in Solanum lycopersicon.Ann Appl Biol
168, 232–242.
Singh, S.P., Gupta, R., Gaur, R. and Srivastava, A.K. (2015b)
Antagonistic actinomycetes mediated resistance in
Solanum lycopersicon Mill. against Rhizoctonia solani K€
uhn.
Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect B Biol Sci, doi: 10.1007/
s40011-015-0651-5.
Strobel, G.A. (2003) Endophytes as sources of bioactive
products. Microbes Infect 5, 535–544.
Taechowisan, T., Peberdy, J.F. and Lumyong, S. (2003)
Isolation of endophytic actinomycetes from selected plants
and their antifungal activity. World J Microbiol Biotechnol
19, 381–385.
Taechowisan, T., Lu, C., Shen, Y. and Lumyong, S. (2005)
Secondary metabolites from endophytic Streptomyces
aureofaciens CMUAc130 and their antifungal activity.
Microbiology 151, 1691–1695.
Tamura, K., Peterson, D., Peterson, N., Stecher, G., Nei, M.
and Kumar, S. (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary
genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary
distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol
Evol 28, 2731–2739.
Verma, V.C., Gond, S.K., Kumar, A., Mishra, A., Kharwar,
R.N. and Gange, A.C. (2009) Endophytic actinomycetes
from Azadirachta indica A. Juss.: isolation, diversity, and
anti-microbial activity. Microb Ecol 57, 749–756.
Weber, T., Charusanti, P., Musiol-Kroll, E.M., Jiang, X., Tong,
Y., Kim, H.U. and Lee, S.Y. (2015) Metabolic engineering
of antibiotic factories: new tools for antibiotic production
in actinomycetes. Trends Biotechnol 33,15–26.
Zhou, H., Yang, Y., Peng, T., Li, W., Zhao, L., Xu, L. and
Ding, Z. (2014) Metabolites of Streptomyces sp., an
endophytic actinomycete from Alpinia oxyphylla.Nat Prod
Res 28, 265–267.
Supporting Information
Additional Supporting Information may be found in the
online version of this article:
Figure S1 Selective isolation of chitinolytic endophytic
Actinomycetes.
Figure S2 Effect of endophytic Actinomycetes on net
photosynthesis (a) stomatal conductance, (b) transpira-
tion rate and (c) of chickpea.
Table S1 Percentage recovery of endophytic Actino-
mycetes isolated from different tissues of medicinal
plants.
Table S2 Quantification of chitinolytic activity
(U ml
1
) of selected endophytic Actinomycetes isolates.
Table S3 In vitro screening of endophytic Actino-
mycetes for antifungal activity (diameter of inhibition
zone %).
Table S4 In vitro screening of endophytic Actino-
mycetes for beneficial characteristic traits.
Table S5 Effect of endophytic Actinomycetes in chick-
pea for promotion of plant growth parameters inoculated
with Sclerotium rolfsii.
Table S6 Presence of polyketide synthases (PKS I and
II) and nonribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPS) genes
of endophytic Actinomycetes isolated from medicinal
plants.
Journal of Applied Microbiology 121, 506--518 ©2016 The Society for Applied Microbiology518
Endophytic Actinomycetes against Sc. rolfsii S.P. Singh and R. Gaur
13652672, 2016, 2, Downloaded from https://enviromicro-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jam.13176 by Agricultural Research Organiza, Wiley Online Library on [25/04/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License