ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

The Use and Impact of Cognitive Enhancers among University Students: A Systematic Review

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Introduction: Cognitive enhancers (CEs), also known as "smart drugs", "study aids" or "nootropics" are a cause of concern. Recent research studies investigated the use of CEs being taken as study aids by university students. This manuscript provides an overview of popular CEs, focusing on a range of drugs/substances (e.g., prescription CEs including amphetamine salt mixtures, methylphenidate, modafinil and piracetam; and non-prescription CEs including caffeine, cobalamin (vitamin B12), guarana, pyridoxine (vitamin B6) and vinpocetine) that have emerged as being misused. The diverted non-prescription use of these molecules and the related potential for dependence and/or addiction is being reported. It has been demonstrated that healthy students (i.e., those without any diagnosed mental disorders) are increasingly using drugs such as methylphenidate, a mixture of dextroamphetamine/amphetamine, and modafinil, for the purpose of increasing their alertness, concentration or memory. Aim: To investigate the level of knowledge, perception and impact of the use of a range of CEs within Higher Education Institutions. Methodology: A systematic review was conducted in adherence with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Whilst 1400 studies were identified within this study through a variety of electronic databases (e.g., 520 through PubMed, 490 through Science Direct and 390 through Scopus), 48 papers were deemed relevant and were included in this review. Results: The most popular molecules identified here included the stimulant CEs, e.g., methylphenidate, modafinil, amphetamine salt mixtures and caffeine-related compounds; stimulant CEs' intake was more prevalent among males than females; drugs were largely obtained from friends and family, as well as via the Internet. It is therefore suggested that CEs are increasingly being used among healthy individuals, mainly students without any diagnosed cognitive disorders, to increase their alertness, concentration, or memory, in the belief that these CEs will improve their performance during examinations or when studying. The impact of stimulant CEs may include tolerance, dependence and/or somatic (e.g., cardiovascular; neurological) complications. Discussion: The availability of CEs for non-medical indications in different countries is influenced by a range of factors including legal, social and ethical factors. Considering the risk factors and motivations that encourage university students to use CE drugs, it is essential to raise awareness about CE-related harms, counteract myths regarding "safe" CE use and address cognitive enhancement in an early stage during education as a preventative public health measure.
Content may be subject to copyright.
BrainSci.2021,11,355.https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11030355www.mdpi.com/journal/brainsci
SystematicReview
TheUseandImpactofCognitiveEnhancersamongUniversity
Students:ASystematicReview
SafiaSharif
1
,AmiraGuirguis
1,2,
*,SuzanneFergus
1,
*andFabrizioSchifano
1
1
Psychopharmacology,SubstanceMisuseandNovelPsychoactiveSubstancesResearchUnit,
SchoolofLifeandMedicalSciences,UniversityofHertfordshire,HatfieldAL109AB,UK;
s.sharif2@herts.ac.uk(S.S.);f.schifano@herts.ac.uk(F.S.)
2
InstituteofLifeSciences2,SwanseaUniversity,SwanseaSA28PP,Wales,UK
*Correspondence:amira.guirguis@swansea.ac.uk(A.G.);S.Fergus@herts.ac.uk(S.F.)
Abstract:Introduction:Cognitiveenhancers(CEs),alsoknownas“smartdrugs”,“studyaids”or
“nootropics”areacauseofconcern.RecentresearchstudiesinvestigatedtheuseofCEsbeingtaken
asstudyaidsbyuniversitystudents.ThismanuscriptprovidesanoverviewofpopularCEs,focusingon
arangeofdrugs/substances(e.g.,prescriptionCEsincludingamphetaminesaltmixtures,methylpheni
date,modafinilandpiracetam;andnonprescriptionCEsincludingcaffeine,cobalamin(vitamin
B12),guarana,pyridoxine(vitaminB6)andvinpocetine)thathaveemergedasbeingmisused.Thedi
vertednonprescriptionuseofthesemoleculesandtherelatedpotentialfordependenceand/orad
dictionisbeingreported.Ithasbeendemonstratedthathealthystudents(i.e.,thosewithoutany
diagnosedmentaldisorders)areincreasinglyusingdrugssuchasmethylphenidate,amixtureof
dextroamphetamine/amphetamine,andmodafinil,forthepurposeofincreasingtheiralertness,
concentrationormemory.Aim:Toinvestigatethelevelofknowledge,perceptionandimpactofthe
useofarangeofCEswithinHigherEducationInstitutions.Methodology:Asystematicreviewwas
conductedinadherencewiththePreferredReportingItemsforSystematicReviewsandMetaAnal
yses(PRISMA)guidelines.Whilst1400studieswereidentifiedwithinthisstudythroughavariety
ofelectronicdatabases(e.g.,520throughPubMed,490throughScienceDirectand390throughSco
pus),48papersweredeemedrelevantandwereincludedinthisreview.Results:Themostpopular
moleculesidentifiedhereincludedthestimulantCEs,e.g.,methylphenidate,modafinil,ampheta
minesaltmixturesandcaffeinerelatedcompounds;stimulantCEs’intakewasmoreprevalent
amongmalesthanfemales;drugswerelargelyobtainedfromfriendsandfamily,aswellasviathe
Internet.ItisthereforesuggestedthatCEsareincreasinglybeingusedamonghealthyindividuals,
mainlystudentswithoutanydiagnosedcognitivedisorders,toincreasetheiralertness,concentra
tion,ormemory,inthebeliefthattheseCEswillimprovetheirperformanceduringexaminations
orwhenstudying.TheimpactofstimulantCEsmayincludetolerance,dependenceand/orsomatic
(e.g.,cardiovascular;neurological)complications.Discussion:TheavailabilityofCEsfornonmed
icalindicationsindifferentcountriesisinfluencedbyarangeoffactorsincludinglegal,socialand
ethicalfactors.Consideringtheriskfactorsandmotivationsthatencourageuniversitystudentsto
useCEdrugs,itisessentialtoraiseawarenessaboutCErelatedharms,counteractmythsregarding
“safe”CEuseandaddresscognitiveenhancementinanearlystageduringeducationasapreven
tativepublichealthmeasure.
Keywords:neuroenhancement;cognitiveenhancement;drugabuse;universitystudents;study
drugs;nonmedicaldruguse;smartdrugs
1.Introduction
Cognitiveenhancementisdefinedasan“amplificationorextensionofcorecapacity
ofthemindbyimprovingtheinternalandexternalinformationprocessingsystems”[1].
Cognitiveenhancementcanbeachievedintwoways,e.g.,“pharmacologically”,bytaking
Citation:Sharif,S.;Guirguis,A.;
Fergus,S.;Schifano,F.TheUseand
ImpactofCognitiveEnhancers
amongUniversityStudents:A
SystematicReview.BrainSci.2021,
11,355.https://doi.org/10.3390/
b
rainsci11030355
AcademicEditor:BasavarajS.
Balapal
Received:16February2021
Accepted:3March2021
Published:10March2021
Publisher’sNote:MDPIstaysneu
tralwithregardtojurisdictional
claimsinpublishedmapsandinsti
tutionalaffiliations.
Copyright:©2021bytheauthors.
LicenseeMDPI,Basel,Switzerland.
Thisarticleisanopenaccessarticle
distributedunderthetermsand
conditionsoftheCreativeCommons
Attribution(CCBY)license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses
/by/4.0/).
BrainSci.2021,11,3552of38
cognitiveenhancer(CE)drugs/substances;or“nonpharmacologically”,bymaintaininga
healthylifestyle,whichincludesbeingphysically,mentallyandsociallyactive;eatinga
healthy,balanceddiet;drinkingalcoholonlyinmoderation;andmaintaininggoodsleep
habits[2].CEs,alsoknownas“smartdrugs”or“nootropics”,areaheterogeneousgroup
ofchemicalsubstancesthatareusedtoimprovecognitivefunction[3],particularly
memory,alertness,attention,learningperformance,creativityandmotivation[4].CEsare
typicallybeingobtained,andattimesbyhealthyindividuals[5,6],onprescription,over
thecounter,online,orthroughothersourcessuchasfamilyorfriends[7].Theclinical
impactofCEs’ingestioncanbesignificant,withthesemoleculesbeingabletoaffectvari
ousneurotransmitterpathwaysinthebrain,includingthecholinergic,dopaminergic,nor
adrenergicandserotonergicpathways[8].Whilsttheirmechanismofactionisnotfully
understood[3],mostpopularCEs(e.g.,methylphenidate,modafinilandamphetamine
saltmixtures)arestimulants[9].Methylphenidateincreasesthelevelsofnoradrenaline
(NA)anddopamine(DA)inboththeprefrontalcortexandthecortical/subcorticalre
gions,andthiseffectmaybeassociatedwithlevelsofimprovedattentioninAttention
DeficitHyperactivityDisorder(ADHD)[10].Conversely,withmodafinil—amedicinebe
ingusedtotreatnarcolepsy—stimulantactionsareassociatedwithanimpactonNA,glu
tamate(NMDAorNmethylDaspartate)andDA[11].Inparticular,modafinilincreases
DAlevelsinthecaudateandnucleusaccumbens(Nac),whilstblockingDAtransporters
inahealthyindividual’sbrain[12].Outofthesemolecules,modafinilmaybebettertoler
ated,inducinglessadversedrugreactions,whilstnotbeingassociatedwithahighriskof
dependence[13].Theamphetaminesaltmixtures(e.g.,inthebrandedproductAdderall)
blockthereuptakeofbothNAandDAintothepresynapticneuron,andincreasetheir
releaseaswellfromthepresynapticneuron,henceincreasingtheirconcentrationsinthe
synapticcleft[14].
Indeed,sincethe1940s,bothmodafinilandamphetamine(e.g.,“gopills”)CEcate
gorieshavebeenthesubjectofmilitaryresearch,tohelpsoldiersstayalertwhilstattenu
atingtheeffectsofsleepdeprivation[15,16].However,thesedrugsareincreasinglybeing
usedbyhealthyindividuals,includingstudentsandnightshiftworkers,toimprovetheir
cognitiveandmotivationalfunctions[17].AssociationsbetweenCEsanddrugsinsports
havebeeninvestigated[18].CEsanddrugsinsportssharemanyaspectswithrespectto
“enhancement”and“doping”.Theformermaybemoresociallyacceptable,whilstthe
latterisconsideredillegalandisheavilymonitoredbyorganisationssuchasTheWorld
AntiDopingAgency(WADA).TheuseoffreelyavailableCEs,suchascaffeinatedprod
uctsandvitamins,havebeeninvestigatedinathletesas“gateway”and“predictor”of
physicalenhancersuse.ThenonmonitoredCEswerefoundtobehighlyusedamongathletes
withorwithoutphysicalenhanceruse[19].Studiesalsoshowedthatusersoferogonomicaids
suchascaffeinemayfavourdopingdueto“biasedreasoningpatterns”[19].
ItisimportanttonotethatstudentsusingCEsdonotonlyaimtoachieveacognitive
enhancement,butalsoamotivationalenhancementandanoverflowofenergy.Theymay
useacombinationofCEsaswellasalcohol,and/orrecreationalsedatives,inanattempt
toachieveagoodqualitysleep,reducenervousnessandimproveoverallperformancein
examsandstudyrelatedassessments[20,21].
ThelifetimeprevalencerateofprescribedCEs’intakefornonmedicalreasons,asa
selfattempttoincreasecognitiveperformances,amonguniversitystudentsintheUKand
Irelandhasbeenestimatedtobearound10%[22].However,theselevelsofintakemaybe
underestimated[23]andthetrendhasattractedaconsiderableinterest[22],relatingtoits
social,ethicalandlegalimplications[24–26].Whilstmoststudieshavefocusedonthe
prevalenceofalimitedrangeofafewCEs(e.g.,amphetaminesaltmixtures,methylpheni
dateandmodafinil),focusingonintakebystudentsinHigherEducationInstitutions
(HEIs),astudybyNapoletanoetal.(2020)identifiedatotalof142uniqueCEs.These
moleculeswerethensubgroupedinto10categories,accordingtorecentlyproposedclas
sifications[27]including:prescribeddrugs,plants/herbs/products,psychostimulants;im
age‐ andperformanceenhancingdrugs(IPEDs),miscellaneous,GABAergic(gamma‐
BrainSci.2021,11,3553of38
aminobutyricacidergic)drugs,phenethylamines,cannabimimetics,tryptaminederiva
tives,andpiperazinederivatives.Inparallelwiththecontinuousemergenceofnew/novel
psychoactivesubstances(NPS),whichhasenrichedtherepertoireofillicitdruguse[28],
thismanuscriptaimstoprovideanupdatedoverviewoftheuseofCEsamonguniversity
students.
2.Methods
ThecurrentsystematicliteraturereviewwasperformedinadherencewiththePre
ferredReportingItemsforSystematicReviewsandMetaAnalyses(PRISMA)guidelines
[29],toestimateCEs’prevalenceofintake;andassessknowledge,awarenessandimpact
ofCEs’useamonguniversitystudents.
2.1.LiteratureSearch(InclusionandExclusionCriteria)
ThefocusherewasonquantitativeandqualitativestudiesrelatingtoCEs’useamong
Universitystudents:Theliteraturesearchwasperformedusingarangeofkeyword
strings,e.g.,cognitiveenhancersANDneuroenhancement,prescriptiondrugmisuseOR
prescriptiondrugabuseamonghealthyindividualsANDenhancement.Inparticular,the
searchstrategywasconductedfromthreedatabasesScopus,PubMedandSciencedirect.
Finally,amanualsearchwasalsocarriedoutusingGoogleScholarinordertoensurenone
ofthekeyarticlesandstudiesweremissed.
Inclusioncriteriawerequantitative(surveys)andqualitative(interviews)studies
havingbeencarriedoutamonghealthystudentsaged18yearsandolderinHEIs.Articles
wereincludediftheyrelatedtoarangeofnineCEs(prescriptionCEsincludingamphet
aminesaltmixtures,methylphenidate,modafinilandpiracetam;andnonprescription
CEsincludingcaffeine,cobalamin(vitaminB12),guarana,pyridoxine(vitaminB6)and
vinpocetine),whichwereselectedherebecauseoftheirpopularityamonguniversitystu
dents[4,7,22,26,30].StudieswritteninEnglish,fromtheyear2000(i.e.,fromaroundthe
timewhenNPSstartedtoemergeindrugscenarios)to2020wereincludedinthestudy
search.Regional/worlddrugreports(e.g.,fromtheEuropeanMonitoringCentrefor
DrugsandDrugAddiction/EMCDDAandtheUnitedNationsOfficeforDrugand
Crime/UNODC)wereincludedhereaswell.Conversely,studiesfocussingonunderage
children,onpreclinicalexperimentsorstudentswithmedicaldiagnosesusingtheselected
drugs/substancesformedicalreasonswereexcludedfromthestudy.NonEnglisharticles
werealsoexcluded.
2.2.QualityAssessment
Basedontheinclusioncriteria,theselectedarticleswereappraisedforqualityusing
PRISMAchecklists[29].SearchresultswereexportedtoMendeley,afreereferenceman
agerandacademicsocialnetwork.Thistoolwasusedtodeterminethestructureofthe
indexstudymethodology[29].
3.Results
3.1.SummaryoftheLiteratureSearch
Theliteraturesearchidentifiedatotalof1400studieshere(e.g.,520throughPubMed,
490throughScienceDirectand390throughScopus)(Figure1).Fortyeightstudieswere
excludedastheywereduplicates,1294studieswerescreenedandwereexcludedbased
ontheirtitleandabstract,10didnotmeettheinclusioncriteria,and48weredeemedrel
evantandwereincludedinthisreview(Table1).
BrainSci.2021,11,35524of38
Table1.SummaryoftheliteraturereviewfocusingonCognitiveEnhancer(CE)drug(s)/substance(s)beingconsideredforthestudy(e.g.,methylphenidate,am
phetamine,modafinilandpiracetam,caffeinepills,guarana,cobalamin(vitaminB12),vinpocetineandpyridoxine(vitaminB6).
ReferenceCountryPrescription
CE
NonPre
scription
CE
StudySampleMethodology
Used
Results/LifetimePrevalenceof
CENotes/Limitations
[30]UK
Ritalin,Dex
troampheta
mine/am
phetamine,
Modafinil
andAr
modafinil
‐
Survey=506partici
pants.
Interview=15partic
ipants
Onlinesurvey
andInterview.
Outof506participants,45.5%
(n=230)reportedthattheyhad
usedarangeofCEdrugsinthe
previous12monthsforthe
purposeofstudy.Maleusage
wasreportedasbeingmore
thantwoandahalftimes
higherthanfemaleusage.
ThemotivationalfactorsbehindCEuse
wereinvestigatedwithgreaterunder
standingofthefactorsinfluencingtheir
use.Universitiesneedtodevelopa
greaterawarenessoftheprevalenceof
CEuseamongsttheirstudentsandcon
sidertakinganactiveapproachinreduc
ingtheiruse.
[7]Brazil
Modafinil
Methylpheni
date
Piracetam
‐ 1865participants.Onlinesurvey.
Outof1865respondents,4.2%
hadusedCEsintheprevious
12months,andtheprevalence
amongLawstudentsreached
14.3%.Themostcommonly
usedsmartdrugwas
methylphenidate.Thedrug
wasmostlyobtainedthrougha
friend.
Thelimitationwasthequestionnaireit
self.Itispossiblethattherewasa
memorybiasandomissionofresponse,
underestimatingtheprevalencefound.
However,thelimitationwasreducedas
thequestionnairewasselfadministered
andanonymous.
BrainSci.2021,11,35525of38
[31]UK
Modafinil
Ampheta
mine
Methylpheni
date
BetaBlockers
‐
612participantsfrom
RussellGroupuni
versities.
Onlinesurvey.17%reportedhavingused
smartdrugspreviously.
Thelimitationofthisstudywasthatit
wasopentoallUKfulltimeundergrad
uatestudents,althoughthemajorityof
theparticipantswerefromRussell
Groupuniversities.However,theydid
notcollectadditionaldataondiscipline
oruniversityand,therefore,cannotbe
surehowrepresentativethesampleis
fortheUKuniversitypopulationasa
wholeorthepopulationatthehostuni
versity.Thismeansthatfactorssuchas
competitivenesscannotbeextracted
fromthedata.
[32]UKModafinil‐
15undergraduate
studentsatRussell
Groupuniversities.
Interview.
AlluserstookModafinil,with
somealsohavingtriedDextro
amphetamine/amphetamine
andRitalinforthepurposeof
study.Byrecruitingbothusers
andnonusers,allnonusers
werefoundtobefemale.
Allintervieweesreportedimprovingac
ademicstudyastheprimarypurposesof
druguse,particularlyvaluingimproved
focus,increasedefficiencyandreduced
procrastination.Theseeffectswere
judgedtobehighlydesirableinthecon
textoftimeconstraintsandfatiguewhen
approachingexamsanddeadlines.
BrainSci.2021,11,35526of38
[33]Iran
Modafinil,
Methylpheni
date,Am
phetamine,
Piracetam
Vinpocetine
Vinpoce
tine.
Crosssectional
studywasper
formedbyanalysing
atotalsampleof579
studentsintheone
UniversityofMedi
calSciencesstudents
from1stto5thyear.
Papersurvey.
Some44(17.6%)ofthere
spondentsansweredthatthey
hadusedCEsatleastoncein
theirlife,toincreaseconcentra
tion.
Therewasasignificantrela
tionshipbetweenCEuseand
theageofrespondents(p<
0.05).Accordingtologisticre
gressionanalysis,therewasa
significantrelationshipbe
tweenknowingsomeonewho
hadused,stresslevelandCE
use(p<0.05).
Samplecollectionwasoneofthemain
limitations.Forexample,thefemale
samplewaslargerthanthemalesam
ple.Studentsenteredthestudywithout
priornoticeofit,whichmeansthata
factormayplayarole,aswellas
memorybias,especiallywhenstudents
arebeingaskedtorecordnonpharma
ceuticaluse.Finally,itisrecommended
thatastudyshouldbeconductedinall
universitiesofIranandtheirresults
compared.Therefore,althoughitisob
viousthattheuseofthesedrugsforin
creasingcognitionwasinvestigated
moreamongstudentpopulations,itis
notpossibletogeneralisetootherpopu
lations.
[34]Pakistan Methylpheni
date ‐
Acrosssectional
studywascon
ductedinMedical
collegesinPakistan,
usingaselfcon
structed,validated
questionnaire.The
samplesize(400)
wascalculatedusing
opensourceStatis
ticsforEpidemio
logical
Healthsoftware.
Papersurvey.
Some27participantsadmitted
theuseofMethylphenidateto
improveconcentration.Peer
pressurewasfoundtobeama
jorfactorinitsmisuse.
Thestudydeterminedtheprevalenceof
nontherapeuticuseofmethylphenidate
aswellasascertaininganybenefits,side
effects,andotherfactorsassociatedwith
thisuse.Thisisacrosssectionalstudy
and,apartfromachisquaretest,no
otherstatisticalanalysiscouldbeper
formed.Thestudyonlyincludestwocit
iesinPakistanandmustbeexpandedto
includeotherregionsaswell,especially
theregionslabelledashighriskfordrug
misuse.Thisstudydoesnotextensively
explorethereasonsforaparticipantopt
ingfordrugabuse,regardlessofaca
demicperformanceorenvironment.
BrainSci.2021,11,35527of38
[35]BrazilMethylpheni
date ‐
Simplerandomsam
pleofstudentsofthe
UniversidadFederal
deMinasGerais(n=
438),invitedtoan
sweranonlineques
tionnaireaboutthe
useofmethylpheni
date
Onlinesurvey.
Outof378studentsincluded,
5.8%(n=22)reportedusing
methylphenidateforCE;of
them,41%(9/22)inthe4weeks
priortothesurvey.
Thestudyestimatestheprevalenceof,
andfactorsassociatedwith,theuseof
methylphenidateforcognitiveenhance
mentamongundergraduatestudents.
[36]Belgium
Methylpheni
date,Am
phetamine,
Modafinil
‐
Acrosssectional
studyof3159Medi
calstudents.
Papersurvey
andonlinesur
vey.
Approximately8.7%ofthestu
dentsreportedthattheyused
CEtoimprovetheiracademic
performanceduringexamtime.
Thestudyinvestigatedtheprevalenceof
thenonmedicaluseofmethylphenidate
andknowledgeofthisdrugamongUn
dergraduateMedicalstudentsofthe
UniversityoftheFreeState.
[37]Canada
Methylpheni
date,Am
phetamine,
Modafinil
Caffeine
11focusgroups,3–7
participantsper
group.
Focusgroupin
terview.
Approximately5%to30%of
studentsreportedtheuseof
CE.
Thestudyhascertainlimitations.Firstly,
forconfidentialityreasons,theydidnot
askparticipantsabouttheirownhistory
ofusingCEs.Thisprecludedthemfrom
knowingwhenparticipantsweretruly
referringtoafriendintheirnarratives,
orwhentheywerefollowingtheinter
viewer’sinstructionstomasktheirown
illicitactivities.Second,theydidnotdi
rectlyquestionparticipantsonhowthey
knewabouttheeffectsofCEs,asthis
wasanunexpectedlineofinquiry.
[38]Italy
Coffee,
Ginkgobi
loba,Caf
feine,Am
phetamine,
Modafinil,
Methylpheni
date
Ginkgobi
loba,Caf
feine,En
ergydrinks
433medicalstu
dents.Papersurvey.
Approximately74.7%ofthe
studentssaidtheyhaveused
CEtoimprovecognitivefunc
tions.Theremainingstudents
wereawareofconcernsabout
safetyandsideeffects.
Thestudyexploredtheuseandattitudes
towardtheuseofCEinItalianMedical
students.Onlyoneuniversitywasin
volved;therefore,thegeneralizabilityof
theirfindingstothewholeItalianstu
dentpopulationislimited.
BrainSci.2021,11,35528of38
[39]Iran
Ampheta
mine,
Methylpheni
date
‐
Crosssectionalstudy
wasconducted
among560Medical
studentsandclinical
residentsofBabol
UniversityofMedi
calSciencesduring
theacademicyear
2014–2015.
Papersurvey.
Some444students(79.3%)
filledoutthequestionnaires.49
(11%)individualsreportedam
phetamineandmethylpheni
date(Ritalin)use.Themean
ageofthestimulantdrugusers
was24.6±4.8years.Themain
initiatingfactorwastoimprove
concentration(29persons;
59.2%).
Thestudywastoevaluatethecurrent
situationofstimulantuseamongMedi
calstudentsandresidentsofBabolUni
versityofMedicalSciences.
Thesurveywasconductedinclassbe
forethelecturestarted,sothestudents
mayhavebeeninarushtofinishthe
questionnaires.
[40]
UK,
France,
Austria,
Belgium,
Brazil,
Canada,
German,
Hungary,
Ireland,
NewZea
land,Aus
tralia,
USA,
Portugal,
Switzer
landand
theNeth
erlands
Methylpheni
date,
Modafinil,
Ampheta
mine,Canna
bis
‐ (2015)n=79,640
(2017)n=29.758
Onlinesurvey.
Nonprobability
sample.
TheGlobal
DrugSurveyis
anannuallycon
ductedanony
mouswebsur
veyonsubstance
use.Twodata
setsfromthe
maleandfemale
GlobalDrug
Survey(GDS).
TheGlobalDrugSurvey(GDS)
isthelargeststudyonCEs
drugsthathaseverbeencon
ducted.Acrossbothyears,
thereweremoremalethanfe
malerespondents.
Accordingtoresponsesfrom
bothyears,themainsourceof
supplyforCEdrugspartici
pantswasthecircleoffriends
(47.8%).Oneintenindicated
thattheInternetwastheirmain
source(11.8%).
Familymemberswithapre
scription(6.1%)andphysicians
(3.8%)werelesscommon
sourcesforstimulantdrugs
usedforCEs.Overall,4.9%and
13.7%oftheglobalsamplere
portedtheuseofCEdrugsto
improveperformanceatwork
orwhilestudying.
Severallimitationswereconsidered:The
firsttwoandmostimportantlimitations
ofthestudyaretheselfselectionofGDS
surveyparticipantsandtheuseofself
reporteddata.Sincethesampleisself
selectedandthesubstanceuseforCE
drugsconsistsofselfreporteddata,the
actualextentofCEdrugsinthepartici
patingcountriesisnotaccurately
known.
Thesampleshouldnotbeconsidered
representativeofanycountry’sgeneral
population.
Athirdlimitationisthattheimpactof
recallbiasordeliberatemisreportingon
resultsmustbeconsidered.
Finally,duetotheanonymouswebsur
veyinstrument,thesameindividual
mighthavecompletedtheGDS2015
multipletimes.However,<1%ofthe
sampleprovidedidenticalresponsesets
acrossdemographicsandkeyvariables
usedintheseanalyses.
BrainSci.2021,11,35529of38
[41]Australia
Methylpheni
date,
Modafinil,
Ampheta
mine
‐ 1136Australianstu
dents.Onlinesurvey.
6.5%reportedthattheyused
CEtoimproveacademicper
formance.
Thestudyfoundthattheprevalenceof
nonmedicalprescriptionstimulantuse,
toimproveacademicperformance,is
lowamonguniversitystudentsinAus
tralia.Thecrosssectionaldesignmeans
thatitisnotpossibletoinfercausalrela
tionshipsbetweentheuseofprescrip
tionstimulantsandotherfactors.The
useofselfreportingmeasuresmayhave
introducedrecallandsocialdesirability
biases.
[42]Austria ‐ Caffeine
pills2284students.Papersurvey.14.9%ofparticipantsreported
theuseofCaffeinepills.
(I)Toinvestigatewhetherincludingcaf
feinetabletsinthedefinitionofpharma
cologicalneuroenhancement(PN)
withinaquestionnaireincreasesthePN
prevalenceestimate(framingeffect),
(II)Toinvestigatewhetherthehealthre
latedriskattitudeisincreasedinstu
dentswhousePN.
BrainSci.2021,11,35530of38
[43]Australia
Methylpheni
date,
Modafinil,
Ampheta
mine
‐ 642students.Onlinesurvey.
6.32%ofindividualsreported
lifetimeuseofoneormorepre
scriptionCEdrugs,listedfor
thepurposesofstudyrelated
enhancement.
Eventhoughthisstudyprovidessome
insightsintotheCEdrugusethatoccurs
atAustralianuniversities,therearesome
limitationstoconsider.Resultsshould
beinterpretedinthelightoftheconven
ienceandcrosssectionalsamplingmeth
odsused.ParticipantsstudyingScience
degrees,womenandundergraduates
werealsooversampled.Asaresult,the
distributionofthestudentsinthecur
rentstudymaynotbeanaccuraterepre
sentationoftheentirestudentpopula
tionatAustralianuniversities.Thenum
berofillicitCEsdruguserswasalsoso
lowthatstatisticalanalyseswere
deemedinappropriateforthisgroup.
Therefore,cautionshouldbeexercised
ininterpretingtheresults,giventhecon
straintsofthesample.Asperprevious
work,futurestudiesmayconsiderexam
iningtheacademicoutcomesofAustral
ianstudentsthatuseCEdrugs,particu
larlycontextualisedregardingcoping.
BrainSci.2021,11,35531of38
[44]UK
Methylpheni
date,Dextro
ampheta
mine/am
phetamine,
Modafinil
CaffeineAllLevel1andLevel
4M.Pharm.
Papersurvey.
Convenience
sample.
Theresponserateswere89.3%
(Level1)and89.0%(Level4)
with48.0%ofrespondentsre
portingtheywereCEusers
(largelycaffeine).Additionally,
42.4%thoughtusingpharma
ceuticalCEsforimprovingaca
demicgradesbreachedtheir
CodeofConduct.
Thestudycouldbedoneforother
Schools,suchasotherhealthcaredisci
plines.However,theopinionswerecap
turedatonepointintime,datawere
selfreported,andthefindingsarenot
generalisable.Perhaps,ifthestudyhad
beenconductedimmediatelybeforethe
writtenexaminations,prevalenceofCE
usewouldhavebeenhigher.Manually
distributingpaperbasedquestionnaires
tostudentsinacompulsoryclassandan
onlinedistributionwouldenhancethe
responserate.Otherwaystomaximise
theresponserateincludedhavingarela
tivelyshortquestionnairewithquestions
largelyasclosedquestions.Educational
workshopscouldfurtherexploreethical
issues.
[45]Greece
Ampheta
mine,
methylpheni
date,
Cannabis
‐ 591Medicalstu
dents.Onlinesurvey.
About1in10medicalstudents
misusedprescriptiondrugs,
mostlyforselftreatment
purposesandabout1in4used
illicitdrugs,mostlyfor
recreationalpurposes,with
cannabisbeingthemost
frequentlyused.
Toanalysetheprevalenceoflifetimeand
currentuseofillicitdrugsamong
Medicalstudentsworldwide.
ConsideringthatCEuseduringmedical
schoolaffectsstudents’personaland
professionallives,furtherinternational
studiesareneededtoelucidatethe
prevalenceandthemotivationofthat
useamongmedicalstudents.
BrainSci.2021,11,35532of38
[46]NewZea
land
Methylpheni
date,amphet
amine,
Modafinil
‐
449Pharmacy,Medi
cine,Nursingand
LawStudents.
Papersurvey.
Responseratewas88.6%
(442/499).
PrevalencerateofCEwas6.6%
intheuniversityenvironment
sampledTherewerenosignifi
cantdifferencesinstudentmo
tivationandlearningstrategies
betweenusersofCEandnon
users.
Toinvestigatewhatfactorsexplainthe
decisiontouseCEsamongtertiarystu
dentsinNewZealand,usingtheTheory
ofPlanedBehaviour.
Thisresearchsupportsthenotionthat
thedecisiontouseCEsisnotjustanau
tonomouschoicethatoccursinisolation.
Attitudesontheethicalandsocialac
ceptabilityofCEuseweremorelikelyto
drivethedecisiontouseCEs.
[47]Greece
Methylpheni
date,
Modafinil
ginseng,
taurine,caf
feine,Vita
minBcom
plex
450universitystu
dents. Papersurvey.
Thefindingsshowthatuniver
sitystudentsmayengagein
pharmacologicalcognitiveen
hancers’(PCE)useindepend
entoftheirstudentexperi
ences.Rather,achemicallyas
sistedperformanceenhance
mentmindsetseemstodiffer
entiateusersfromnonusersof
PCEs.
Thestudydidnotaddresswhethersuch
achievementmotivationsunderliethe
decisionmakingprocessestousePCEs
amonguniversitystudents.
[48]SouthAf
rica
Methylpheni
date‐
Year5Undergradu
ateMedicalstudents
(541students).
Papersurvey.
Some11%reportedtheuseof
methylphenidateforstudyen
hancementpurposes.
Therearefewlimitationsinthisstudy.
Thesurveywasselfadministered,and
thequestionnairewasconductedinclass
beforethelecturestarted,sothestudents
mayhavebeeninarushtofinishit.The
questionnairewasnotstructuredinsuch
awaytodeterminewhetherparticipants
withAttentionDeficitHyperactivity
Disorder(ADHD)wereusing
methylphenidateasprescribedormisus
ingitforreasonsnotrelatedtotheir
ADHD.
BrainSci.2021,11,35533of38
[49]UK
Methylpheni
date,Am
phetamine,
Modafinil
‐
66participantsfrom
RussellGroupuni
versities.
Focusgroupin
terview.
Some58/66studentsthought
thatitisagoodchoicetouse
CEs.
Thisstudywasconductedtocompare
theacuteeffectsofmethylpheni
date/MPH,modafinil,and3,4meth
ylenedioxymethamphetamineonthe
neuralmechanismsunderlyingre
sponse.Notabletodisentangleneural
activationinresponsetosuccessfulvs.
failedinhibitionsinthepresentstudy
duetothemodestnumberofnogotri
als.Thesmallnumberofinhibitiontrials
(i.e.,nogotrials)alsolimitedthefunc
tionalrelevanceofthebehaviouralre
sults,albeitMPHandmodafinilsignifi
cantlyincreasedtheprobabilityofinhi
bition.
[50]Australia
Methylpheni
date,Am
phetamine,
Modafinil
‐ 38students.Interview.n=5hadusedCEs.
CEsusersreportedhigherlevelsof
stressandlowerlevelsofabilitytocope
thanthesampleaverage.
[51]
United
Arabof
Emirates
‐ Caffeine
175universitystu
dentsinoneuniver
sityonly:
Year1toyear4.
TheSchoolsof:Art
andCreativeEnter
prises.
BusinessSciences,
Communicationand
MediaSciences.
SchoolofEducation
andSchoolofSus
tainability
Sciences
Papersurvey.
Convenience
sample.
Eightysixpercentofthe175
participants,bothmalesandfe
males,atZayedUniversity,
Dubaiconsumedcaffeinated
beverageswithanaveragein
takeof249.7±235.9mg.Thein
takeamongthe150caffeine
consumersvariedfrom4.2
mg/dayto932.2mg/day.
Thestudywastodeterminethepreva
lenceofcaffeinatedbeverageconsump
tionamonguniversitystudentsandthe
perceivedbenefits.Inadditiontothees
timationofdailycaffeineconsumption,
thestudywasundertakeninoneuniver
sityonly.
IntheUAE,thelimitedstudiesthatwere
doneregardingthisconcernshowedthe
hightendencyofuniversitystudentsto
wardstheconsumptionofcaffeinated
drinks,mainlyenergydrinks.
BrainSci.2021,11,35534of38
[52]Iceland
Methylpheni
date,Dextro
ampheta
mine/am
phetamine,
Modafinil
‐ n=521.Onlinesurvey.
Approximately11%usedCE
withoutprescription,42%had
aprescription.Thereasonfor
themisusewastoimprove
theiracademicperformance.
Toreviewhistoricalinformationcon
cerningprescriptionstimulantsandto
summarisetheliteraturewithrespectto
misuseamongadults,particularlycol
legestudents,includingriskfactors,me
diatorsandmoderators,andmotivations
forprescriptionstimulantmisuse.Lack
ofunderstandinginvariabilityaccord
ingtodoselevelandindividualvariabil
ityisaclearlimitationacrossmoststud
iesexaminingthepotentialforneu
rocognitiveenhancementfromprescrip
tiondrugs.
[53]France
Methylpheni
date,
Modafinil,
3,4Methyl
enedioxy
methamphet
amine
(MDMAor
ecstasy),pi
racetam,am
phetamine.
‐
1718Medicalstu
dentsandphysi
cians.
Onlinesurvey.
Approximately33%reported
theuseofCE,mainlytoin
creaseacademicperformances
andtostayawakeduringexam
preparations.
Toestimatetheprevalenceofpsychost
imulantuseintheFrenchmedicalcom
munityandtheirmotives.Lackofdirect
informationontheperiodofstimulant
use.Itwasachoicetokeepthequestion
naireshorttomaximizetheresponse
rate.Thislimitwaspartiallyaddressed
bytheageatthefirstpsychostimulant
use,whichwasconsideredintheanal
yses.
BrainSci.2021,11,35535of38
[54]Lithuania
Modafinil,
Methylpheni
date,Am
phetamine
‐
Acrosssectionalsur
veystudywasper
formedbyanalysing
aconveniencesam
pleofn=579inthe
twouniversitiesof
feringMedicaledu
cationinLithuania.
Papersurvey.
Approximately8.1%reported
thattheyhadusedCEintheir
lifetime.
Toanalysetheuseofcognitiveenhanc
ersamongmedicalstudentsinLithua
nia,todeterminethereasonsforusage
andevaluatethecontributingfactors,
suchassociodemographiccharacteris
tics,stresslevels,sleepqualityand
knowingsomebodywhohasuseda
neuroenhancingdrug.Studentspartici
patedinthestudywithoutanyprevious
knowledgeaboutit,whichmeansthata
surprisefactormayhaveplayedarole
andmemoriescouldbebiased.
[55]
Lithuania
andthe
Nether
lands
Racetam
groupsub
stancesBen
zodiazepines
Modafinil,
Methylpheni
date,Am
phetamine
Caffeine
pills
Interviewn=35
Surveyn=113
Onlinesurvey
andInterview
From113respondentsinthe
survey,24(21%)reportedhav
ingtriedCEs.
Mostofparticipantsturnedto
CEstoenhancetheirconcentra
tionforthepurposeofstudy
andtimemanagement.
Futureresearchneedstotakeintoac
countthegreatvarietyofdrugs/sub
stancesthatstudentsuseasCEsinreal
lifesettings.
[56] TheNeth
erlands
Methylpheni
date,
Modafinil,
Rivastigmine,
BetaBlockers
‐ 1572students.Onlinesurvey.
Noresponsewasreportedon
theuseofModafinilandRi
vastigmine.52studentsre
portedtheuseofmethylpheni
date.36%hadusedBetaBlock
ersatleastonceintheirlife
time.
Conveniencesamplingconstitutedonly
anapproximaterepresentationofthe
studentpopulationintheNetherlands.
Women,forexample,wereover
sampled.Inaddition,thesamplewas
notequallydistributedfordifferentuni
versities,aswellasnotdistributedbeing
inlinewiththeabsolutedifferencein
numberofstudentsofthe14DutchGov
ernmentsupporteduniversities.
BrainSci.2021,11,35536of38
[57]Iran Methylpheni
date Alcohol16,000medicalstu
dents. Papersurvey.
Theprevalenceofprescription
drugmisuse,alcoholuseinthe
previousyear,andeveryillicit
substanceusewas4.9%,6.9%,
and2.9%,respectively.
Thereislimitedinformationaboutillicit
druguseandassociatedfactorsin
hookahsmokersinIran.So,theaimof
thisstudywastoassessthestatusofil
licitdruguseandassociatedfactors
amonghookahsmokersofKhalilAbad
cityin2015.
[21] Switzer
land
Methylpheni
date,
Modafinil
‐
Studentsatthree
Swissuniversities
wereinvitedby
emailtoparticipate
inawebbasedsur
vey.Ofthe29,282
studentswhowere
contacted,3056par
ticipated.
Onlinesurvey.
Approximately22%usedCEto
improvecognitiveperfor
manceswhilestudying.
Investigatestudents’attitudestoward
PCE.Theresponserateforthepresent
surveywas10%.Thestudysamplemay
nothavebeennecessarilyrepresentative
ofallSwissstudents.Althoughallstu
dentsfromUniBasandETHZ(ETH
richUniversity)wereinvited,only5000
ofatotalof26,000studentswhowere
currentlyenrolledatUniversityof
rich(UZH),whohadpreviouslyagreed
tobecontactedforparticipationinvari
ousstudies,couldbeinvited.
[22]UKand
Ireland
Modafinil,
Methylpheni
date,Dextro
ampheta
mine/am
phetamine
‐ 877studentsin104
universities.
Papersurveyofa
convenience
sampleof877
studentsmeas
uredPCEpreva
lence,attitudes,
sources,pur
posesandethics.
Only2%reportedthatthey
haveusedCE.
Resultsfromtheconveniencesample
surveymaybebiased,duetopartici
pants’selfselection.Theyonlyusedan
onlinesurvey,whichwasconsideredtoo
costlyandunfeasibleduetoaccessbarri
ers.
BrainSci.2021,11,35537of38
[58]
Northern
Ireland,
Wales
andEng
land
Cannabis,Ec
stasy,am
phetamines
‐
3706studentsfrom7
universitiesacross
NorthernIreland,
WalesandEngland.
England(Gloucester
shiren=908,Bath
Span=462,Oxford
Brookesn=203,
Chestern=883,
Plymouthn=167);
Wales(Swansean=
398);andtheRepub
licofNorthernIre
land(Ulstern=463).
Eachparticipating
institutionprovided
ethicalapproval.
Papersurvey.
Convenience
sample.
Some5%reportedthatthey
hadregularuseofCE,and25%
usedCEoccasionally,and70%
never.
Thestudycouldbecarriedoutatother
schools,suchasotherinhealthcaredis
ciplines.However,theopinionswere
capturedatonepointintime,datawere
selfreported,andthefindingsarenot
generalisable.
Perhapsifthestudyhadbeenconducted
immediatelybeforethewrittenexamina
tions,prevalenceofCEusewouldhave
beenhigher.Manuallydistributingpa
perbasedquestionnairestostudentsina
compulsoryclassandanonlinedistribu
tionwouldenhancetheresponserate.
Otherwaystomaximisetheresponse
rateincludedhavingarelativelyshort
questionnairewithquestionslargelyas
closedquestions.
[59]Switzer
land
Methylpheni
date,Dextro
ampheta
mine/am
phetamine,
Modafinil
‐ 1765students.Onlineandpa
persurvey.
4.7%hadusedCEforthepur
poseofstudying.
Thefindingsfromthissurveycanlead
toabetterunderstandingofwhysome
studentsarealreadyusingCEandcan
alsoaddtothediscussiononsocial
normsandvaluesinthecontextoflegal
izingorprohibitingsuchproducts.
BrainSci.2021,11,35538of38
[60]France
Methylpheni
date
Modafinil,
ampheta
mines,Pi
racetam
‐ 206students.
Onlinesurvey
senttoaFrench
sampleofMedi
cineandPhar
macologystu
dentsusing
email.
Among206undergraduatestu
dents,139students(67.4%)de
claredtohaveconsumedat
leastonecognitiveenhancerin
thepast12months.Twelvestu
dents(8.6%ofcognitiveen
hancersusersand5.8%ofour
totalsample)usedillicitphar
maceuticalneuroenhancers.
Assessprevalenceandmotivationsfor
licit(useinsidemedicalindication)and
illicitpharmaceuticalneuroenhancer
consumption(tabletform)inanonse
lectedFrenchsampleofMedicineand
Pharmacologystudents.Aprevalenceof
5.8%forsmartdrugsconsumptionin
PharmacologyandMedicalstudents,
mostlyinordertoenhanceacademic
performancesandvigilancewasrec
orded.Methylphenidatewasthemost
frequentlyconsumedmolecule.
[61]USA
Methylpheni
date,Dextro
ampheta
mine/am
phetamine
‐ 4yearsrepeated
study.Onlinesurvey.
1in5studentsreportedtheuse
ofCEatleastonceintheirlife
time.
Examinedstimulants’cognitive
enhancementeffectsandthe
psychologicalprofileofnonmedical
stimulantusers.Adoubleblind,
placebocontrolledexperimentfoundno
enhancingeffectofmixedamphetamine
salts(Adderall)onhealthyparticipants’
inhibitorycontrol,workingmemory,
episodicmemory,convergentcreativity,
perceptualintelligenceanda
standardizedachievementtest.No
moderatingeffectsofbaseline
performanceorCatecholO
methyltransferase(COMT)genotype
weredetected.
BrainSci.2021,11,35539of38
[62]Germany
Ampheta
mine,
Methylpheni
date,Ecstasy,
Cocaine
‐ 18participants. Interview.
Amongallparticipants(n=18
=100%),77.8%(n=14)had
usedillicitstimulants(AMPH)
and38.9%(n=8)prescription
stimulants(MPH).22.2%(n=4)
hadusedprescriptionaswell
asillicitstimulantsforaca
demicperformanceenhance
ment.
Severallimitationswerereported.One
ofthemisthelimitednumberofinter
views:Only18interviewsweretaken
intoconsideration.Inspiteofthefact
thattheUniversitypopulationwas
36,000registeredstudentswhohadthe
possibilitytonoticetheadvertisingplac
ardsofthisinterviewstudythroughout
thecampus,only30studentscontacted
them,andonly22werewillingtopartic
ipate.GivenCEprevalenceratesof3–
20%,thereshouldhavebeenamuch
highernumberofpotentialparticipants
forthisstudy.Theyhypothesizethatthe
stigmatizingsubjectofthisstudyisthe
reasonforthelowparticipationrate,
notwithstandingthefactthatanonymity
wasguaranteedandthatparticipants
wereremuneratedfortheirtimeandef
fortwith30Euros.
[63]USA
Methylpheni
date,Am
phetamine
‐
1115medicalstu
dentsamultiinstitu
tionalcensususinga
31–48itemonline
surveyregardinguse
ofprescriptionpsy
chostimulants
Onlinesurvey.
Approximately18%hadre
portedthattheyusedCEat
leastonceintheirlifetime.
Giventhatstudents’responsesareself
reported,andthatnonmedicallypre
scribedstimulantuseisillegal,misre
portingisapotentialconcerninthis
survey.However,thesurveydidnot
distinguishbetweengivingaway(ille
gal)orselling(criminal)thesedrugs.
Previousstudieshaveindicatedthat
anonymousselfreportedsurveyshave
lowmisreportingrates.
BrainSci.2021,11,35540of38
[64]USA
Dextroam
pheta
mine/am
phetamine
(Adderall)
‐ 213,633tweets.Onlinesurvey.
Approximately12.9%tweets
concernedtheuseofAdderall
forstudyingpurposes.
First,noteveryAdderalltweetwasre
latedtoactualuse.Forexample,they
observedsonglyricsthatimpactthese
counts,suchasthetwooftenquoted
lines“Collegehoeslovealcoholand
poppingAdderall”and“I’vebeenup
for3days…Adderallandredbull.”In
oursample,therewere4275tweetsthat
havethewords“collegehoeslove”and
894thathavethewords“beenupfor
three3days”.Thesenumbersprobably
inflatethenumberofmatchesfor“col
lege”,“alcohol”,and“redbull”above
thenumberofpeopletweetingabout
usingthesesubstances.
[65]Germany
Dextroam
pheta
mine/am
phetamine,
Modafinil,
Methylpheni
date
‐ 2569students. Papersurvey.
Anestimated12monthpreva
lenceofusingcognitiveen
hancingdrugswas20%.Preva
lencevariedbysex(male
23.7%,female17.0%),fieldof
study(highestinstudentsstud
yingSportsrelatedfields,
25.4%),andsemester(firstse
mester24.3%,beyondfirstse
mester16.7%).
Asaresultofthestudyfindings,drug
preventionmodelsneedtobeestab
lishedatalluniversitiesinGermany.
[66]USA
Dextroam
pheta
mine/am
phetamine,
Methylpheni
date,
Modafinil
‐
372Medical,Phar
macyandRespira
toryTherapystu
dents.
Onlinesurvey.
Approximately10.9%Medi
cine,9.7%Pharmacyand26.3%
Respiratorythestudentsre
portedtheuseofCEtoenhance
alertnessandimproveaca
demicperformance.
Theincidenceofpsychosisorwith
drawalassociateddepressionisnot
knownforprescriptiondrugs.
BrainSci.2021,11,35541of38
[67]Canada
Methylpheni
date,
Modafinil
Caffeine
pills
647Medicalstudents
acrossallfouryears.Onlinesurvey.
Approximately8%oftheSen
iorsreporttheuseofCEvs.2%
ofJuniorstudentsusingCEfor
cognitiveenhancement.
Itwascarriedoutatasingleinstitution;
however,wehavenoreasontobelieve
thattheresultsarenotgeneralizableto
studentsstudyingelsewhere.Whileself
selectionmayhaveledtoapositivere
sponsebias,itisequallyplausiblethat
nonrespondentsdidnotwishtodis
closeuseofcognitiveenhancers.
[68]UKMethylpheni
date
Caffeine
pills1614students.Onlinesurvey.
Approximately33%hadused
drugswithoutprescriptionof
which0.5%usedstimulantsfor
astudyingreason.6%usedcaf
feinepills.
Thelimitationinthisstudyisthatthere
sponseratesarequitelowandalsothe
studyisexposedtothelimitationsofall
selfreportedsurveys.
[69]Italy
Modafinil,
Methylpheni
date,Dextro
ampheta
mine/am
phetamine
‐ 77Undergraduate
students.Papersurvey.Approximately16%reported
theyhadtakenCEinthepast.
Thelimitationinthisstudyistheques
tiononCEusewhichdidnotspecify
whatexactlythestudentstook;theirbe
haviourriskisdifficulttoassessandas
sumesthatthetrulyproblematicbehav
iouristotakeCEdrugswithouthaving
aprescription.
[70]Iran Methylpheni
date‐ GroupofMedical
students Papersurvey.
Approximately8.7%reported
theuseofmethylphenidateat
leastonceintheirlifetime.
Thefirstlimitationisthevalidityofself
reportedmethylphenidateuseamong
respondentswhichdependsontheir
willingnesstoreplytruthfullytothesur
vey.Second,thesampleinthestudywas
fromoneuniversity,therebynecessitat
ingthatsimilarstudiesbeconductedin
othermedicalschoolsforcomparison.
Third,thestudydidnotexplicitlyad
dressdurationorfrequencyof
methylphenidateuse.Therefore,itisun
knownwhethernonprescriptionusers
tookmethylphenidateregularlyoronly
occasionally.
BrainSci.2021,11,35542of38
[71] Germany
Methylpheni
date,Dextro
ampheta
mine/am
phetamine,
Modafinil,
MDMA
‐
1035studentsofpu
pilsfrom(Vocational
andGrammar
Schools)and512stu
dentsfromMedicine,
PharmacyandEco
nomicsSchools.
Papersurvey.
Approximately1.55%ofpupils
fromVocationalandGrammar
Schoolvs.0.78%amongstu
dentsinMedical,Pharmacy
andEconomicsreportedalife
timeprovenanceforCEuse.
2.42%ofpupilsvs.2.93%of
studentsreportedlifetimeuse
ofCEforcognitiveenhance
ment.
Datasamplingwasnonrandom,partici
pantswerenotabletorefuseparticipa
tioninadiscreteway.Atleastinthestu
dentpopulation,inwhichapproxi
mately30%didnotfillinthequestion
naires;itcannotbeexcludedthatstimu
lantuseisunderreportedsinceespe
ciallystudentswith“negativebehav
iours”didnotfillinthequestionnaires,
leadingtounderreportingofstimulant
use.
[72] USA
Dextroam
pheta
mine/am
phetamine,
Methylpheni
date
‐ 4580students.Onlinesurvey.
Approximately75.8%reported
thattheyhaveusedampheta
mine(Adderall)inthepast
year,24.5%usedmethylpheni
date(Ritalin).
Sampleconsistedofstudentsfromasin
gleuniversity,whichmaylimitthegen
eralizabilityoftheresults.However,the
prevalenceratesofillicituseofprescrip
tionstimulantsinthissingleinstitution
studywerecomparabletothosefound
innationalsurveysofcollegestudents.
[73]USA
Dextroam
pheta
mine/am
phetamine,
Methylpheni
date
‐ 9161students.Papersurvey.
Approximately8.1%reported
lifetimeuseofCE,5.4%re
portedpastyearuseofCEto
increasealertnessandconcen
tratebetter.
The2001CollegeAlcoholSurvey(CAS)
didnotmeasurelegitimatemedicaluse
ofprescriptionstimulantsordiagnosis,
soitwasnotpossibletoassesshow
manystudentswithlegitimateprescrip
tionsforstimulantsmayhavemisused
theirownorsomeoneelse’sstimulant
medication.Asthedatawerecrosssec
tional,inferencesaboutcausalityare
limitedandtheycouldnotassess
whethercertainfactorsprecededinitia
tionofnonmedicaluseofprescription
stimulants.Longitudinaldataare
neededtofurtherexaminethedirection
alityoftheseassociations.
BrainSci.2021,11,35543of38
[74]USA
Methylpheni
date,Dextro
ampheta
mine/am
phetamine,
MDMA
‐ 150students.Papersurvey.
Approximately35.3%reported
theyhadmisusedAmpheta
mineonceintheirlifetime,10%
abuseditmonthlyand8%
weekly.
Reportsofstimulantusearehighinthe
research;itmaybethatarelativelysmall
samplewasnotrepresentativeofcollege
studentsingeneral,despiteattemptsto
avoidselectionbias.Asignificantpro
portionofstudentscamefromUnder
graduatePsychologyclassesandthese
studentsmaydifferfromthoseinother
Majors.Alternatively,itispossiblethat
small,competitivecollegesattractstu
dentswhohavebeenexposedtostimu
lantuse,orwhoarewillingtoexperi
mentwithAmphetaminestoenhance
academicperformance.
BrainSci.2021,11,35527of38
Figure1.Cognitiveenhancers’intakebyuniversitystudents:PreferredReportingItemsforSys
tematicReviewsandMetaAnalyses(PRISMA)FlowDiagram.
Table1showsthesummaryoffindingsfromtheliteraturereviewontheprevalence
ofCEsamonguniversitystudents.
NinestudieswereconductedintheUK(i.e.,sixsurveystudies,twointerviewsand
onemixedmethodsstudy).Theremainingstudiesincludedsurveystudiesthatwerecon
ductedintheUSA(n=8)andIran(n=4).InAustralia,threesurveysandoneinterview,
inCanada,twosurveysandonefocusgroupinterview,inGermany,threesurveysand
oneinterviewwereconducted.Threesurveystudieswerecarriedoutineachofthefol
lowingcountries:Brazil,France,ItalyandSwitzerland.Twosurveystudieswerecarried
outineachofthefollowingcountries:Austria,Belgium,Greece,NewZeelandandthe
Netherlands;andonesurveystudywascarriedoutineachofthefollowingcountries:
Hungary,Iceland,Ireland,Lithuania,Pakistan,Portugal,SouthAfricaandUAE.Finally,
onemixedmethodsstudywascarriedoutinbothLithuaniaandtheNetherlands.Partic
ipantswerestudentsfromarangeofdisciplines,includingMedicine,Pharmacy,Engi
neering,Law,ComputerScience,Business,Education,PsychologyandSocialSciences.
Thesamplesizeofthedifferentstudiesrangedbetween77and80,000participantseach.
Anoverviewofthedemographicvariables,prevalenceofuse,technicalknowledge
ofCEs,motivationsforuse,sourceofCEs’acquisitionandpositive/negativesubjective
effectsissummarisedhere.
1. Demographics’variables
MaleswerehereidentifiedasthemosttypicalCEmisusers
[7,22,30,31,41,51,52,63,66,70,71,73–75],withsomestudiesreportingamale:femaleratioof
3:1[54].Incontrastwiththis,aWelshstudyreportedthatfemalerepresentationwas
slightlymorethanmales[68].
Records identified through data
b
ase searching
(n= 1400)
Pub Med (n= 520)
Science direct (n= 490)
Scopus (n= 390)
ScreeningIncludedEligibilityIden
t
i
f
ica
t
ion
Records screening after dupl icates
removed (n= 1352)
A
r
ticles
excluded
(titles/abstract)
(n =1294)
Full-text articles assessed
for eligibility
(n =58)
Full-text a
r
ticles
excluded, with
reasons
(n = 10)
Animal study (n=7).
Participants under 18
years old (n=1).
Non-English articles
(n=2)
Studies included in
quantitative synthesis
(n = 48)
A
r
ticles
removed due
to duplicate
(n=48)
BrainSci.2021,11,35528of38
2. PrevalenceofCEs’use
AgrowthofCEs’intakeoverthepastfewyearshasbeenreported,includingfrom
bothhighrankinguniversitiesandhighlycompetitivecoursessuchasMedicineand
Pharmacy[41].IntheUK,findingsshowedthat33%oftheparticipantsusedCEswhich
werenotprescribedtothemforthepurposeofstudy[68].Inasurveyconductedamong
UKandIrelanduniversitystudents,itwasfoundthatthelifetimeprevalenceoftheuse
ofmodafinil,methylphenidateandamphetaminewere,respectively,6.2%,5.9%,and2%
[22].Conversely,thelifetimeprevalenceofCEs’intakeamongUniversitystudentsinthe
USwasestimatedtorangebetween5%and43%[76].Moreprecisely,ametaanalysisfrom
theUSestimatedthatthemisuseofCEsamonguniversitystudentswas17%[75].Com
paredtotheUS,mostBritishuniversitystudentsmaybemorecautiousinusingprescrip
tiondrugsasCEs[49].
ArecentstudyinBrazilreportedthat,outof1865studentsfromdifferentacademic
disciplines,4.2%reportedtohavinghadusedCEsinthelast12months,withthemost
popularmoleculehavingbeenmethylphenidatewhichwasnotassociatedwithanADHD
diagnosis.Withrespecttowhatisbeingdescribedinlesscompetitivestudyfields[77],
MedicineandPharmacyhavebeenidentifiedasbeingbothstressfulandhighlycompeti
tiveacademiccoursesworldwide[44,45].Inthisrespect,astudythatwasconducted
amongmedicalstudentsinIran(2000–2007)showedthatmethylphenidateusers’mean
knowledgescorewashigherthanthatofnonusers(p=0.008),withage(range18–28
years),sex(male92.5%)and26%fourthschoolyearhavingbeenpositivelycorrelated
withknowledgescore(p<0.05).Some8.7%ofparticipantshadtakenmethylphenidateat
leastonceintheirlifetime[70].Similarly,astudycarriedoutinLithuaniareportedthat
thepointprevalenceofCEs(modafinil,methylphenidateandamphetamine)amongmed
icalstudentswas8.1%[77].
Finally,caffeineuseasaCEhasgrowninpopularityworldwide[78].Astudyinthe
UAEassessedtheprevalenceandperceivedbenefitsofcaffeinatedbeverageconsumption
amonguniversitystudents[51].Morethan98.5%ofthestudyparticipantswereshownto
becaffeineconsumers,with31%havingreportedbeingaddictedtocaffeine;heavycaf
feineconsumptionwassignificantlyassociatedwithheartproblems[51].
Despitetheglobalpopularityofthenonprescriptioncaffeine,mostresearcharticles
reporttheuseofprescriptionCEsamonguniversitystudents.Therefore,thetruepreva
lenceofprescriptionvs.nonprescriptionCEsamonguniversitystudentsisnotfullyun
derstoodand,hence,moreresearchisneeded.
3.2.CEs’KnowledgeandReportedPositive/NegativeEffects
Universitystudentsmaybeattractedbystimulantdrugsforseveralreasons,e.g.,to
increaseawaketime,enhancecognitiveperformance,improveprofessionalandacademic
achievement[41],butalsotohelpwithsocialisingandgettinghigh[79].Indeed,themain
motivationsformisusingmethylphenidatemayrelatetoimprovingconcentration
(65.2%),helpingwithstudying(59.8%)andincreasingwakefulness(47.5%)[73].Other
studieshaveassociatedmethylphenidatemisusewiththeneedtohelpwithconcentration,
stayalert,havemoreenergyandimproveselfconfidencelevels[17,34,70].A2019UK
qualitativestudywithBiomedicalScienceundergraduatestudentsexaminedtheirunder
standingoftherisksofnonprescribeddrugs,andparticularlymodafinil,misuse.Drivers
ofusewererelatedtouniversitypressuresanddesirestoincreaseproductivity;thecus
tomisationofthesleep–wakecyclewasdescribedasakeybenefitof‘studydrug’use[32].
Increasingthelevelsofcognitiveperformancemayindeedpotentiallyallowstudents
tostudyformorehours,and/orincreaseworkingmemoryperformance[80].According
toGreelyetal.(2008),modafinilmaybechosenasaCEbecauseofitshighonlineaccessi
bilityandavailability.Conversely,whilststudiesintheUKsuggestedthatCEdrugssuch
asmodafinilcanenhancethinkingskills[81],overconfidencewasreportedasoneofthe
CE’ssideeffects,togetherwithahighriskofdependence[2].
BrainSci.2021,11,35529of38
ThepopularityofcaffeineandrelatedproductsasCEsmayberelatedtotheneedto
boostenergy,stayawake,improvemood,increaseconcentrationandsocialise[51].Inthe
UAE,themeanlevelofknowledgeaboutcaffeinewasdescribedaslessthan33%.Younger
participants(p=0.008)andthosewhoworkedinhealthcareandeducation(p<0.001)were
significantlymoreknowledgeableaboutitsnegativeeffects,includinganxiety,insomnia,
tachycardia,irritabilityandmuscletremors[51].Arecentsystematicreviewfocussingon
theeffectsofthecaffeinecontainingplantPaulliniacupana(“guarana”)oncognitionin
young,healthyadultsfoundimprovedlevelsinbothreactiontimeandaccuracyperfor
mance[82].Guaranahasalsobeendescribedtoimprovememoryperformanceandin
creasealertnesslevels[83].Longtermuseofhighdoseofguaranacan,however,resultin
aseriesofadverseeffects,includingirritability,palpitationandanxiety[2,84].
Despitethelegalrestrictionsthatcontrolthepossessionandsupplyofcontrolled
CEs,studentsoftenobtainthemduetotheirdesiredpharmacologicaleffects.Table2sum
marisesthedesiredeffectsofCEs,theirneuromodulatoryeffectsandtheirlegalclassifi
cation.
MixturesofCEsubstances/drugsusedbyhealthystudentstoimprovecognitionis
ontheriseandisbeingconsideredasatypeof“academicdoping”[85].PolyCEusehas
beendocumentedinpreviousstudies[86].InSwitzerland,usersreportedingesting
methylphenidateinadditiontootherCEs.Othersreportedusingbothmodafinilinaddi
tiontoAlzheimer’sdiseasedrugs.Othersingestedantidepressantsincombinationwith
Parkinson’sdiseasedrugs[86].Studieshaveshownthatmethylphenidateuserswere
morelikelytouseillicitsubstancesaswelle.g.,marijuanaandecstasy(MDMAor3,4
methylenedioxymethamphetamine)ascomparedtootherprescriptionCEus
ers[9].
PolyCEusewithpsychostimulantandothereffectsoffersbothsynergisticandad
ditiveeffectsbasedonusedsubstances,hencepotentiallycombiningcognitiveeffectswith
wakefulness;emotionaland/ormotivationaleffects;mood,performance,andexecutive
functioningenhancingandeuphoriceffects[87,88],withriskstohealththatmayrange
frommildtoseriousrisksincludingdependence,toleranceandneurological,psychologi
calandcardiovasculardisorders,withariskofoverdosepotentiallyleadingtodeath.
The2015WesternAustralianStimulantRegulatorySchemeshowedthatstudents
mayuseCEtocopewithstudyrelatedstress[89].TheyalsofoundthatCEusersarealso
regularillicitpsychostimulantusers,yettherelationshipbetweenCEandotherpsychost
imulantsuchasMDMA(ecstasy)couse/consumptionistobedetermined[90].
BrainSci.2021,11,35530of38
Table2.StudiessummarisingCognitiveEnhancers(CEs)’legalclassification,desiredeffectsandneuromodulatorymechanisms.
Drug/Sub
stance
Brand
Name
Misuseof
Drugs
Regulation
(2001)(UK)
Misuseof
DrugsAct
1971(UK)
CurrentlyRecommendedClinicalUseandNeuroModulatoryMechanism
Ampheta
minesaltsAdderallSchedule2ClassB
AmphetaminesareaclassofpharmaceuticalsthatincludeAdderall,dextroamphetamine,and
lisdexapmhetamine(Llysinedamphetamine)[91].Thesedrugsweredevelopedtotreatatten
tiondeficithyperactivitydisorder(ADHD)inadultsandchildren[4].Thesemoleculesareclassi
fiedasScheduleIIaccordingtotheMisuseofDrugsRegulation(2001)andClassBaccordingto
theMisuseofDrugsAct1971,duetotheirhighabusepotential.Eventhoughtheriskofdevelop
ingdependenceonthesedrugsisbelievedtobelowforindividualstakingthemforADHD,the
ScheduleIIclassificationindicatesthatthereisahighpotentialforabuseandseveredependence
[4].Thesedrugswerealsodemonstratedtoimproveepisodicmemory,workingmemory,and
someaspectsofattentioningeneralpopulation[92].Thetherapeuticeffectofbothamphetamine
andmethylphenidateinADHDisconsistentwiththefindingoftheabnormalitiesinthecate
cholaminesysteminindividualswithADHD[93,94].
Caffeine Genius
Caffeine
Overthe
counter
(OTC)
‐
Theusageofcaffeineisincreasingworldwide[95].Theunderlyingmotivationsaremainly
memoryandconcentrationenhancementandphysicalperformanceimprovement.Coffeeand
caffeinecontainingproductsaffectthecentralnervoussystem,withtheirlocomotoractivity
stimulationandanxiogeniclikeeffects[78].Caffeinealsoimpactsonotherneurotransmitters,in
cludingdopamine,noradrenaline,serotonin,glutamate,acetylcholineandgammaaminobutyric
acid[96].CaffeineconsumptionisveryprevalentamongtheUK[97]andUAE[51]population.
Healthyconsumptionneedstobepromoted[51].Althoughcaffeineisalsoastimulant,itisnot
illegaltousewithoutaprescription[66].
Cyanocobala
min(vitamin
B12)
AthleteOTC‐
Itmayhelppatientsonlongtermmedicationsandthosewithneurologicaldisorders[98].Cogni
tiveperformancecanbeimproved,andtheriskofbrainatrophyreduced,byVitaminB12[99].
BrainSci.2021,11,35531of38
Guarana
(Paullinia
cupana)
NRGOTC‐
PaulliniacupanaisaplantnativetotheAmazonbasinwhichisespeciallycommoninBrazil[100].
AreviewstudyontheeffectofGuaranaamonghealthyindividualsreportedanimprovementin
reactiontimeandaccuracyofperformanceatcognitivetasks[82].Guaranaseedsarepopular
worldwidefortheircognitive,stimulantandbehaviouraleffects[82].
Methylpheni
date RitalinSchedule2ClassB
ItisastimulantdrugusedtotreatADHDandnarcolepsy.IthasbeencontrolledasScheduleII
accordingtotheMisuseofDrugsRegulation(2001)andClassBaccordingtotheMisuseofDrugs
Act1971duetoitshighabusepotential.Volkowandcolleagues(2004)showedtheeffectsof
methylphenidateonmotivation,whichcanaffectacademicperformancewhilstincreasingcogni
tiveabilityandimprovingstudents’selfratedinterestinarelativelydullmathematicaltask.A
studyreportedthatmethylphenidatehasoneofthehighestprescriptionsrates,associatedwith
anabundanceofwebsitesofferingtosellandsupplythedrugwithoutaprescriptiontoUKusers
[30].Universitystudentsmightbeattractedtomethylphenidatebecauseofitsallegedincreasein
attentionandfocusinglevels[101].Amonguniversitystudents,theselfreportedmisusingrates
werefrom1.5to31%dependingonthedifferentsurveysconsidered,withthemostnationally
(Germanwhitemales,affiliatedwithaformallyorganisedfraternity)representativestudyesti
matinganannualillicitmethylphenidateusageofabout4%[101].
ModafinilProvigil
Prescrip
tiononly
medicine
(POM)
‐
Wakefulnesspromotingagentssuchasmodafinilandarmodafinilarestimulantdrugswhichare
usedinthetreatmentofnarcolepsyandshiftworkerssleepdisorders[30].Themechanismofac
tionofmodafinilispoorlyexplainedintheliterature.Ithasbeenreportedthatmodafinilaffects
GABAergicanddopaminergicpathwaysintheprefrontalcortexandhaseffectsonneurotrans
mittersystems(e.g.,noradrenalineanddopamine)[80].Modafinilispraisedforitsabilitytoim
provereactiontime,logicalreasoningandproblemsolving[77].
PiracetamNootropilPOM‐
Compoundsfromtheracetamfamilyincludepiracetam,oxiracetam,etc[102].Piracetambelongs
tothenootropicdrugs’groupwhichincludesthebraincellmetabolismandenergyenhancement
[103].AlthoughPiracetamisofficiallyrecognizedasanootropic,itsenhancingeffectsinthe
healthyindividual’sbrainaremoderate[104,54].Theracetammoleculesarebeingusedacrossa
rangeofbraindisorders,includingAlzheimer’sdisease,narcolepsy,ADHD,Parkinson’sdisease
andbrainaging[105,106].
BrainSci.2021,11,35532of38
Pyridoxine
(vitaminB6)NestrexOTC‐
Pyridoxine,oneofthemostcommonformsofVitaminB6[107],issaidtosignificantlyimprove
verbalmemoryandexecutivefunction[108].Itcanaidinthesynthesisofneurotransmittersand
aminoacids.Someoftheseneurotransmittersarenorepinephrine,serotonin,GABAanddopa
mine[108].ThereisnoevidencethatVitaminB6shorttermuse(e.g.,for5–12weeks)improves
cognitivefunctionormood[109].MoreevidenceisneededtodeterminewhetherVitaminB6
supplementsmightimprovecognitioninhealthypeople.
Vinpocetine
(Vincaminor)CavintonOTC‐
Isanalkaloidoftheperiwinkleplant(Vincaminor)[110]
,
whichhasbeenshowntoexertabrain
neuroprotectiveeffectbyacombinedactiononbrainmetabolism,cerebralcirculationandrheo
logicalpropertiesoftheblood.Thismayboostthecerebralmetabolismthusenhancingbothoxy
genandglucoseutilizationwhilstconsequentlyimprovingcerebralfunctionsandprovidingpro
tectioneveninconditionsofhypoxiaandischaemia[111].Itiscommonlyusedasanootropic
thatpromotesmemoryformation[106].
BrainSci.2021,11,35533of38
3.3.SourcesofCEs’Acquisition
SourcesofCEacquisitionmayrelatetofriendsandfamily[7,59].Studentsdiagnosed
withADHD,butnottakingtheirmethylphenidatemedicationregularly,havebeenre
portedasthemainsourceforfellowstudents[4].Inanotherstudy,75.5%ofmethylpheni
datewasidentifiedashavingbeenpurchasedfromfriendsatauniversitycampuswhilst
64.3%ofmodafinilwasobtainedonline[22].Accessingthewebfordrugacquisitionac
tivitiesisareasonforconcern[30],withyoungpeople(18–25yearsold)beingathighrisk
becausethereisnowaytoknowwhattheactualingredientsofthedrugs/substancesare
inthoseproducts[30],theyareextensiveusersoftheInternet[112];itwasfoundthatover
athirdofthewebsitessellingmodafinilspecificallyrecommendeduseofthedrugtoaid
studying[30].
4.Discussion
Thecurrentsystematicreviewprovidedanindepthandupdatedunderstandingon
CEs’prevalenceofuse;levelsofknowledge;andtheirimpactonHEIuniversitystudents,
whichisclearlyacriticalpublichealthissue.Thepastfewyearshaveseenincreasinglev
elsofconcernabouttheuseofpharmaceuticalcognitiveenhancementamonguniversity
studentsworldwide,withthelifetimeprevalenceofCEsmisuseamongthesesubjects
rangingfrom6%to20%,dependingonthestudysubject[67].Ofparticularconcern,how
ever,isCE’suseinHealthSciences/Biomedicalstudents
[34,36,38,39,45,48,54,57,63,67,70,71].MostdatainitiallyemergedfromtheUnitedStates
[61,75,113],eventuallyfollowedbyreportsfromtheUnitedKingdom[22],Australia
[46,50];andEurope,namelyfromFrance[53,60],andItaly[38,69].
ThemostpopularprescriptionCEsamongtheselectedonesinthisstudywere
modafinil,methylphenidateandamphetaminesaltmixtures[71],withmethylphenidate
beingthemostpopularamongstudents[9].Conversely,themostpopularfreelyavailable
CEwasCaffeine[78].Althoughnotconfirmedbysomestudies[113,114],maleswereiden
tifiedhereasmorelikelytouseCEdrugsthanfemales[31,52,63,71,75,77].Somestudies
alsoshowedthat,despitethatthenumberoffemaleparticipantswashigherthantheir
malecounterparts,therateofCEusewasmuchhigherthaninfemalestudents[77].
Althoughnodifferencesbetweengendersinfavouringmethylphenidateasthemost
popularCEorinthepreferentialchoiceofanyCEwererecorded,thereweregenderdif
ferencesinmotivationforuse[33].Femalestudents’motivationforCEuseweretoin
creaseconcentration,memory,alertnessandacademicperformance,andbecause“friends
useit”.Incontrast,malestudents’motivationsforCEuseweremainlytoincreasestudy
timeandexperiment[33].
Ingeneral,withregardtoillicitsubstanceuse,DrAdamWinstock(CEOoftheGlobal
drugSurvey)pointedoutthegenderdifferences,explainingitaspossiblyresultingfrom
societalstigma,shameandculturalexpectationsaroundwomentakingdrugs.Additional
factorsthatinfluencewomen’sdecisionsinusingdrugsincludepregnancyandmother
hood.Economicstatusandthelowerrateofcriminalactivityamongstwomenalsoreduce
femaledruguseandexposuretoillicitdrugsascomparedtomales[115].
Indeed,severalsocialfactorshavebeenidentifiedheretoinfluenceCEs’usepractices
amonguniversitystudents[56].Theseincluded:peerpressure,competition,performance
demandsandpriordruguse[85],butalsorecreation[79].
TheavailabilityofCEsfornonmedicalindicationsinthedifferentcountriesisaf
fectedbyarangeoffactors,includinglegal,social,andethicalfactors[33,40,116].Indeed,
someCEsarebeingopenlymadeavailableonline[30,117],wheretheyaremarketedas
“smartdrugs”,“studydrugs”,“plantfood”,“researchchemicals”and“designerdrugs”
aswell[30,112].Theunregulatedonlineaccess,andespeciallysoformodafiniland
methylphenidate,islikelytobeassociatedwithanincreaseinCEs’nonmedicaluseand
subsequentharm[30].Indeed,highlevelsofmodafinilmayhavereportedlybeensold
andshippedtostudentsathighranking/topUKuniversities,mostlyduringthe
BrainSci.2021,11,35534of38
examinationperiod[118].Conversely,asCEs’legalalternativetoeitherprescribingor
illicitdrugsofabuse,guaranawasfoundheretobepopular,withaffordableonlineprices
encouragingyoungusers/studentstobuygreaterquantitiesinordertoreceivediscounts
andfreeshipping[30,119].
Sahakianetal.(2008)openedadebateonthepositiveimpactonimprovingcognitive
functions,suggestingthatbenefitsofCEsshouldbemaximised,andtheirharmmini
mised[25].Insomestudies,CEdrugshavebeenshowntomoderatelyenhancecognitive
performanceinhealthyindividuals[120].Accordingly,CEtoolsincludingpharmacolog
icalcognitiveenhancementcouldimprovethequalityoflifeofbothbusyworkersand
exhaustedstudentstoextendtheirwork/academicproductivitylevels[121],hencebene
fittingboththeindividualandsociety[25].Therehavebeenextensivereportsfocussing
onCEs’intaketoaidconcentrationandmemoryamonghealthyindividuals,including
students,academics,shiftworkers,andevenchessplayerstoimprovetheircognitiveper
formance[122].AstudybySmithandFarah(2011a)suggestedthattheeffectsofboth
methylphenidateandamphetaminesaltmixturesoncognitiveperformancesinhealthy
participantsshowedpositivelyconsistenteffectsinlearning,butespeciallysoindelayed
recallandrecognitiontesting,pointingtoaneffectonmemoryconsolidation[4].Anad
ditionalstudybySchelleetal.(2015)showedapositiveeffectofmethylphenidateon
memoryandplanningperformanceinhealthyindividuals.However,othershavesug
gestedthatevidenceregardingtheclinicalbenefitsofCEsinhealthyindividualsisstill
inconclusive[123].A2010systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpublishedrandomised
controlledtrialsoftheeffectofbothmodafinilandmethylphenidateinhealthyindividu
alsshowedthattheanticipatedeffectsofthesetwoagentsascognitiveenhancersex
ceededtheiractualeffect[80].Hence,ithasbeensuggestedthattheabilityofampheta
minetypesubstancemixturestoenhanceacademicperformanceamongstudentscould
beattributedtotheireffectonenergy,confidenceandmotivationlevelsratherthantoa
directeffectoncognitiveperformances[124].Infact,individualsmaybebiasedinpre
dictingtheirownperformance,e.g.,theyeitherunderestimateoroverestimatetheiraca
demiccompetence[125].Moreover,cognitiveimprovementseemstovaryconsiderably
fromoneagenttoanother,andSmithetal.(2011)reportedthatonethirdofstudiesfrom
pastliteraturereviewsshowednullresults.Onecouldthenarguethattherearemoreun
publishedstudiesintheliteraturewithnullresults,duetopublicationbiasfavouringpos
itiveresults[4].
Ontheotherhand,useofstimulantCEsmaybeassociatedwithnegativeacademic
performancesintermsoftheeuphoricstateinduced,withabnormalmoodelationpre
ventingthestudentfromspendingenoughtimeinpreparationforanexam[17,57].Fur
thermore,methylphenidateisreportedtopresentwithadependencepotential[126],and
modafinildependencecaseshavebeenidentifiedaswell[127].Itisalsoworthnotingthe
amphetaminetypesubstancerelateddependence;withdrawal;andpsychosisissues[28].
UntowardeffectsrelatingtotheindexCEmayindeedinfluencestudentschoices,with
thembeingkeentoconsidermodafinilasopposedtomethylphenidateandamphetamine
saltmixtures.Indeed,StewardandPickersgill(2019)foundthatalltheirCEusershad
ingestedmodafinil,withonlysomealsohavingtriedmethylphenidateandamphetamine
saltmixturesforthepurposeofstudy.Infact,studentsdescribedhowtheuseof
methylphenidateandamphetaminesaltmixturescouldresultindependenceandhence
thesewereapproachedmorecautiously[32].Overall,however,theuseofmethylpheni
datehassignificantlyincreased,withitsconsumption,indefineddailydoses,havingin
creasedtoapproximately2.4billionworldwide[35].IntheUK,bothmethylphenidateand
amphetaminecompoundsareClassBcontrolleddrugs[128].Thismeanstheycanbepro
videdviaprescription,butthemaximumquantityissuedshouldnotexceed30days(un
lessjustifiedbytheprescriber)andapersonalimport/exportlicenceisrequiredto
transportthedruginoroutoftheUKiftheamountexceedsa3monthsupply[30].
ModafinilisaprescriptiononlymedicineintheUK,butitisnotcontrolledunderthe
MisuseofDrugsAct1971orsubjecttoschedulingundertheMisuseofDrugsRegulations
BrainSci.2021,11,35535of38
2001;hence,itisillegaltosupplyitwithoutaprescription,butitisnotillegaltopossess
thedrugforpersonaluse[128].Tocopewiththeserestrictions,CEs’sellingwebsitespro
vidediscreetpackaging;offerfreereshipmentifthepackageisseized;andencourage
thirdparty,difficulttotrack,paymentmethods[30].Thisoutcomesuggestsrunningcam
paignsthatmitigateharmandraiseawarenessamongstudentswhouseCEdrugs.Fi
nally,althoughcaffeineisalsoastimulant,itsuseisnotassociatedwitheitheracquisition,
affordability,availability,orlegalityissues[42,66].However,withcaffeinehighdosage
intakearangeofmedicalandpsychiatriceffectscanbeobserved,mosttypicallyincluding
anxiety,panicattacks,sleepingdisordersandcardiovascularissues[129].
ACochranereviewfoundnoevidencethatshorttermintakeofvitaminsB6andB12
supplementsimprovecognitivefunctionormood.Thereviewdidfindsomeevidence
thatdailyvitaminB6andB12supplementscanaffectbiochemicalindicesofvitaminB6
andB12statusinhealthyindividuals,butthesechangeshadnooverallimpactoncogni
tion[107].
Accordingtothereviewoftheliterature,thedrugsselectedwerechosenbasedon
theirpopularityamonghealthyuniversitystudents,butthedrugsmostusedamongstu
dentswere(modafinil,methylphenidateandAdderall)and,intermsofsubstances,caf
feinewasthemostpopularamonguniversitystudents.However,astudybyCarlier,J
(2019)reportedthatmethylphenidateisoneofthemostpopularCEsandseveralana
loguesappearedonthedrugmarketduringthelastyears.However,littleornoscientific
dataonthesenewanaloguesareavailable.
AssportsorganisationssuchasWADAareoverviewingandprohibitingtheuseof
physicalenhancers,nosuchcontrolexistsinschoolsanduniversities.Therefore,inorder
todecreasethelongtermdeleteriouseffectsofCEsinindividualswhousethem,govern
mentlevelinterventionsareurgentlyrequired.
Aharmreductionprogrammeisalsorecommendedtoreducethenegative,legaland
societalimpactofsubstanceuse[125].Theprogrammeshouldconsidersupportingindi
vidualswithproblematicsubstanceuseandtheirfamilieswithcompassionandappropri
ateadviceandinterventions,whilstsafeguardingtheirdignity[125].Thesefindingssug
gesttheimportanceofraisingawarenessoftheharmsofCEuse,provideaccurate
knowledge,counteractmythsregarding“safe”CEuseandaddresscognitiveenhance
mentinanearlystageduringeducationasapreventativepublichealthmeasure.
5.Limitations
Thereareafewlimitationsthatwereconsideredinthismanuscript.Thefirstlimita
tionisrelatedheretothesolefocusonEnglishlanguagestudieshavingbeenincludedin
thesearch;futurestudiesshouldconsiderfurtherlanguages.Thesecondlimitationrelates
tothemethodsusedbythedifferentstudies,typicallyinvolvingselfreportingsurveys
whichcouldhaveintroducedbiases.Finally,thecurrentstudyfocusedonlyonunder
graduatestudents;however,postgraduatestudents,academicstaff,andremainingwork
ersshouldbeconsideredbyfuturestudies.
6.Conclusions
AnumberofstudentsworldwidemaybewillingtoconsiderCEs’ingestiontoim
provetheiracademicperformances.TheattitudeofuniversitystudentsaboutCEsand
theirpossiblebenefitsis,however,basedonanecdotal,andarguablybiased,information
obtainedfromthemedia,theweb,andfriends[130].Overall,itseemsfromthisreview
thatthetopicisnotbeingsufficientlycoveredinthecurriculumofmodernuniversities.
Conversely,thisissueshouldbediscussed,asaninterprofessionalorinterdisciplinary
learningopportunity,fromapublichealthperspective[7,44].CEs’usemayarguablybe
reducedifstudents’levelsofawarenesswereraised,emphasisingthatCEs’intakemay
posearisktosafety,andespeciallysoinvulnerableindividuals[31].Indeed,impactsof
CEdrugs’intakemayincludetolerance,dependence,withdrawal,cardiovascularand
neurologicaldisorderswitharelatedriskofdeathduetooverdose[28,117,131].The
BrainSci.2021,11,35536of38
implementationofaharmreductioncampaign,inordertobringtheoverallconsumption
down,hasbeenproposedaswell[41,91].
Finally,Shaw(2014)suggestedthatoneofthemostfascinatingissuesintheemerging
fieldofneuroethicsispharmaceuticalcognitiveenhancement.Medicaldebate[21,132]has
largelyfocusedontheCEs’potentialtohelpthosewhoarecognitivelyimpaired.Hence,
itisheresuggestedthatCEs’usebyuniversitystudents,seemstoraisetheissueof“cos
metic”neuropsychopharmacology[133,134].
AuthorContributions:AlltheAuthorsequallycontributedtotheinitialplanningofthedatacol
lection;S.S.draftedthepaperitself.A.G.,S.F.,andF.S.criticallyreviewedthefinaldraftpriorto
submission.Allauthorshavereadandagreedtothepublishedversionofthemanuscript.
Funding:Thisresearchreceivednoexternalfunding.
Acknowledgments:ThisarticleispartofS.S.’sPhDresearch.
ConflictsofInterest:F.S.wasaprevious(2011–2019)memberoftheACMDUK;heiscurrentlya
memberoftheEuropeanMedicinesAgency(EMA)PsychiatryAdvisoryBoard.S.S.,A.G.andS.F.
havenoconflictsofinteresttodeclare.
References
1. Bostrom,N.;Sandberg,A.CognitiveEnhancement:Methods,Ethics,RegulatoryChallenges.Sci.Eng.Ethic2009,15,311–341,
doi:10.1007/s1194800991425.
2. Wesnes,K.A.;Zangara,A.;Scholey,A.;Kennedy,D.NaturalProductsasCognitionEnhancingAgents.InCognitiveEnhancing
Drugs;Birkhäuser:Basel,Switzerland,2004;pp.151–178.
3. Froestl,W.;Muhs,A.;Pfeifer,A.CognitiveEnhancers(Nootropics).Part1:DrugsInteractingwithReceptors.J.Alzheimer’sDis.
2012,32,793–887,doi:10.3233/jad2012121186.
4. Smith,M.E.;Farah,M.J.Areprescriptionstimulants“smartpills”?Theepidemiologyandcognitiveneuroscienceofprescription
stimulantusebynormalhealthyindividuals.Psychol.Bull.2011,137,717–741,doi:10.1037/a0023825.
5. Advokat,C.Whatarethecognitiveeffectsofstimulantmedications?Emphasisonadultswithattentiondeficit/hyperactivity
disorder(ADHD).Neurosci.Biobehav.Rev.2010,34,1256–1266,doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.03.006.
6. Davis,M.S.NationalInstituteonDrugAbuse(NIDA)2012.TheConciseDictionaryofCrimeandJustice;NationalInstituteon
DrugAbuse(NIDA):NorthBethesda,MD,USA,2012Availableonline:http://sk.sagepub.com/reference/theconcisediction
aryofcrimeandjustice(accessedon7March2021).
7. Preta,B.D.O.C.;Miranda,V.I.A.;Bertoldi,A.D.PsychostimulantUseforNeuroenhancement(SmartDrugs)amongCollege
StudentsinBrazil.Subst.UseMisuse2019,55,613–621,doi:10.1080/10826084.2019.1691597.
8. Rasetti,R.;Mattay,V.S.;Stankevich,B.;Skjei,K.;Blasi,G.;Sambataro,F.;ArrillagaRomany,I.C.;Goldberg,T.E.;Callicott,J.H.;
Apud,J.A.;etal.ModulatoryEffectsofModafinilonNeuralCircuitsRegulatingEmotionandCognition.Neuropsychopharmacol.
2010,35,2101–2109,doi:10.1038/npp.2010.83.
9. Carlier,J.;Giorgetti,R.;Varì,M.R.;Pirani,F.;Ricci,G.;Busardò,F.P.Useofcognitiveenhancers:Methylphenidateandanalogs.
Eur.Rev.Med.Pharmacol.Sci.2019,23,3–15.
10. Bisagno,V.;González,B.;Urbano,F.J.Cognitiveenhancersversusaddictivepsychostimulants:Thegoodandbadsideofdo
pamineonprefrontalcorticalcircuits.Pharmacol.Res.2016,109,108–118,doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2016.01.013.
11. Steffenhagen,N.;Regenthal,R.;Bublak,P.Effectsofmodafinilonworkingmemoryprocessesinhumans.Psychopharmacology
2004,177,161–169,doi:10.1007/s0021300419263.
12. Volkow,N.D.;Fowler,J.S.;Logan,J.;Alexoff,D.;Zhu,W.;Telang,F.;Wang,G.J.;Jayne,M.;Hooker,J.M.;Wong,C.;etal.
EffectsofModafinilonDopamineandDopamineTransportersintheMaleHumanBrain.JAMA2009,301,1148–1154,
doi:10.1001/jama.2009.351.
13. Schmitt,K.C.;Reith,M.E.A.TheAtypicalStimulantandNootropicModafinilInteractswiththeDopamineTransporterina
DifferentMannerthanClassicalCocaineLikeInhibitors.PLoSONE2011,6,e25790,doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025790.
14. FDA(USFoodandDrugAdministration)AdderallXR.HighlightsofPrescribingInformation;ShireUSInc.:Wayne,PA,USA,1998;
Volume50,pp.1–25.Availableonline:https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2013/021303s026lbl.pdf(ac
cessedon7March2021).
15. Caldwell,J.A.;Smythe,N.K.;Hall,K.K.;Norman,D.N.;Prazinko,B.F.;Estrada,A.;Johnson,P.A.;Crowley,J.S.;Brock,M.E.The
EffectsofModafinilonAviatorPerformanceduring40HoursofContinuousWakefulness:AUH60HelicopterSimulatorStudy;USAARL
ReportNo.9917;ArmyAeromedicalResearchUnit:FortRucker,AL,USA;ArmyAeromedicalResearchLaboratory:Fort
Rucker,AL,USA,1999.Availableonline:https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA365558.pdf(accessedon7March2021).
16. Hall,S.S.TheQuestforaSmartPill.Sci.Am.2003,289,54–65,doi:10.1038/scientificamerican090354.
17. Batistela,S.;Bueno,O.F.A.;Vaz,L.J.;Galduróz,J.C.F.Methylphenidateasacognitiveenhancerinhealthyyoungpeople.De
ment.Neuropsychol.2016,10,134–142,doi:10.1590/s198057642016dn1002009.
BrainSci.2021,11,35537of38
18. Dietz,P.;Ulrich,R.;Dalaker,R.;Striegel,H.;Franke,A.G.;Lieb,K.;Simon,P.AssociationsbetweenPhysicalandCognitive
Doping—ACrossSectionalStudyin2.997Triathletes.PLoSONE2013,8,e78702,doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078702.
19. Barkoukis,V.;Lazuras,L.;Lucidi,F.;Tsorbatzoudis,H.Nutritionalsupplementanddopinguseinsport:Possibleunderlying
socialcognitiveprocesses.Scand.J.Med.Sci.Sports2015,25,e582–e588,doi:10.1111/sms.12377.
20. Maier,L.J.;Liechti,M.E.;Herzig,F.;Schaub,M.P.ToDopeorNottoDope:NeuroenhancementwithPrescriptionDrugsand
DrugsofAbuseamongSwissUniversityStudents.PLoSONE2013,8,e77967,doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077967.
21. Maier,L.J.;Liakoni,E.;Schildmann,J.;Schaub,M.P.;Liechti,M.E.SwissUniversityStudents’AttitudestowardPharmacological
CognitiveEnhancement.PLoSONE2015,10,e0144402,doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144402.
22. Singh,I.;Bard,I.;Jackson,J.RobustResilienceandSubstantialInterest:ASurveyofPharmacologicalCognitiveEnhancement
amongUniversityStudentsintheUKandIreland.PLoSONE2014,9,e105969,doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0105969.
23. HermanStahl,M.A.;Krebs,C.P.;Kroutil,L.A.;Heller,D.C.Riskandprotectivefactorsformethamphetamineuseandnonmed
icaluseofprescriptionstimulantsamongyoungadultsaged18to25.Addict.Behav.2007,32,1003–1015,
doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.07.010.
24. Fowler,T.InDefenceofStateDirectedEnhancement.J.Appl.Philos.2015,32,67–81,doi:10.1111/japp.12068.
25. Greely,H.;Sahakian,B.;Harris,J.;Kessler,R.C.;Gazzaniga,M.;Campbell,P.;Farah,M.J.Towardsresponsibleuseofcognitive
enhancingdrugsbythehealthy.Nature2008,456,702705.
26. Begley,E.;McVeigh,J.;Hope,V.LifelineProjectImageandPerformanceEnhancingDrugs(IPEDs).Lit.Rev.2016,23.Available
online:https://www.drugsandalcohol.ie/26484/1/LifelineIPEDsReportNovember2016.pdf(accessedon7March2021).
27. Schifano,F.;Napoletano,F.;Chiappini,S.;Guirguis,A.;Corkery,J.M.;Bonaccorso,S.;Ricciardi,A.;Scherbaum,N.;Vento,A.
New/emergingpsychoactivesubstancesandassociatedpsychopathologicalconsequences.Psychol.Med.2021,51,30–42,
doi:10.1017/s0033291719001727.
28. Schifano,F.;Orsolini,L.;Papanti,G.D.;Corkery,J.M.Novelpsychoactivesubstancesofinterestforpsychiatry.WorldPsychiatry
2015,14,15–26,doi:10.1002/wps.20174.
29. Moher,D.;Liberati,A.;Tetzlaff,J.;Altman,D.G.;ThePRISMAGroup.Preferredreportingitemsforsystematicreviewsand
metaanalyses:ThePRISMAstatement.PLoSMed.2009,6,e1000097,doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
30. McDermott,H.;Lane,H.;Alonso,M.Workingsmart:Theuseof‘cognitiveenhancers’byUKuniversitystudents.J.Further
HigherEduc.2020,1–14.doi:10.1080/0309877X.2020.1753179.
31. Champagne,J.;Gardner,B.;Dommett,E.J.ModellingpredictorsofUKundergraduates’attitudestowardssmartdrugs.Trends
Neurosci.Educ.2019,14,33–39,doi:10.1016/j.tine.2019.02.001.
32. Steward,A.;Pickersgill,M.Developingexpertise,customisingsleep,enhancingstudypractices:Exploringthelegitimisationof
modafinilusewithintheaccountsofUKundergraduatestudents.DrugsEduc.Prev.Policy2019,26,347–355,
doi:10.1080/09687637.2018.1555231.
33. Mousavi,F.;Shojaei,P.;Markeh,H.P.TheUseofCognitiveEnhancersAmongMedicalStudents.Int.J.HighRiskBehav.Addict.
2019,8,doi:10.5812/ijhrba.92377.
34. Javed,N.;Ahmed,F.;Saeed,S.;Amir,R.;Khan,H.Y.;Iqbal,S.P.PrevalenceofMethylphenidateMisuseinMedicalCollegesin
Pakistan:ACrosssectionalStudy.Cureus2019,11,doi:10.7759/cureus.5879.
35. Cândido,R.C.F.;Perini,E.;DePádua,C.M.;Junqueira,D.R.Prevalenceofandfactorsassociatedwiththeuseofmethylpheni
dateforcognitiveenhancementamonguniversitystudents.Einstein(SãoPaulo)2019,18,eAO4745,doi:10.31744/einstein_jour
nal/2020AO4745.
36. DeBruyn,S.;Wouters,E.;Ponnet,K.;VanHal,G.Poppingsmartpillsinmedicalschool:Arecompetitionandstressassociated
withthemisuseofprescriptionstimulantsamongstudents?Subst.UseMisuse2019,54,1191–1202,
doi:10.1080/10826084.2019.1572190.
37. LondonNadeau,K.;Chan,P.;Wood,S.BuildingConceptionsofCognitiveEnhancement:UniversityStudents’Viewsonthe
EffectsofPharmacologicalCognitiveEnhancers.Subst.UseMisuse2019,54,908–920,doi:10.1080/10826084.2018.1552297.
38. Pighi,M.;Pontoni,G.;Sinisi,A.;Ferrari,S.;Mattei,G.;Pingani,L.;Simoni,E.;Galeazzi,G.M.UseandPropensitytoUseSub
stancesasCognitiveEnhancersinItalianMedicalStudents.BrainSci.2018,8,197,doi:10.3390/brainsci8110197.
39. Fallah,G.;Moudi,S.;Hamidia,A.;Bijani,A.Stimulantuseinmedicalstudentsandresidentsrequiresmorecarefulattention.
Casp.J.Int.Med.2018,9,87–91,doi.org/10.22088/cjim.9.1.87
40. Maier,L.J.;Ferris,J.A.;Winstock,A.R.PharmacologicalcognitiveenhancementamongnonADHDindividuals—Acrosssec
tionalstudyin15countries.Int.J.DrugPolicy2018,58,104–112,doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.05.009.
41. Lucke,J.;Jensen,C.;Dunn,M.;Chan,G.;Forlini,C.;Kaye,S.;Partridge,B.;Farrell,M.;Racine,E.;Hall,W.Nonmedicalpre
scriptionstimulantusetoimproveacademicperformanceamongAustralianuniversitystudents:Prevalenceandcorrelatesof
use.BMCPublicHealth2018,18,1270,doi:10.1186/s1288901862120.
42. Dietz,P.;Iberl,B.;Schuett,E.;VanPoppel,M.;Ulrich,R.;Sattler,M.C.PrevalenceEstimatesforPharmacologicalNeuroen
hancementinAustrianUniversityStudents:ItsRelationtoHealthRelatedRiskAttitudeandtheFramingEffectofCaffeine
Tablets.Front.Pharmacol.2018,9,494,doi:10.3389/fphar.2018.00494.
43. Riddell,C.;Jensen,C.;Carter,O.CognitiveEnhancementandCopinginanAustralianUniversityStudentSample.J.Cogn.
Enhanc.2017,2,63–69,doi:10.1007/s414650170046z.
44. Hanna,L.;Rainey,J.;Hall,M.AQuestionnaireStudyInvestigatingFuturePharmacists’Useof,andViewsonCognitiveEn
hancers.Pharm.Educ.2018,18,76–84.
BrainSci.2021,11,35538of38
45. Papazisis,G.;Tsakiridis,I.;Siafis,S.NonmedicalUseofPrescriptionDrugsamongMedicalStudentsandtheRelationshipwith
IllicitDrug,Tobacco,andAlcoholUse.Subst.Abus.Res.Treat.2018,12,1178221818802298,doi:10.1177/1178221818802298.
46. Ram,S.;Hussainy,S.;Henning,M.;Stewart,K.;Jensen,M.;Russell,B.AttitudesTowardCognitiveEnhancerUseAmongNew
ZealandTertiaryStudents.Subst.UseMisuse2017,52,1387–1392,doi:10.1080/10826084.2017.1281313.
47. Lazuras,L.;Ypsilanti,A.;Lamprou,E.;Kontogiorgis,C.PharmaceuticalCognitiveEnhancementinGreekUniversityStudents:
DifferencesBetweenUsersandNonUsersinSocialCognitiveVariables,Burnout,andEngagement.Subst.UseMisuse2017,52,
1–9,doi:10.1080/10826084.2016.1267223.
48. Jain,R.;Chang,C.C.;Koto,M.;Geldenhuys,A.;Nichol,R.;Joubert,G.Nonmedicaluseofmethylphenidateamongmedical
studentsoftheUniversityoftheFreeState.S.Afr.J.Psychiatry2017,23,1006,doi:10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v23.1006.
49. Vagwala,M.K.;Bicquelet,A.;Didziokaite,G.;Coomber,R.;Corrigan,O.;Singh,I.TowardsaMoralEcologyofPharmacological
CognitiveEnhancementinBritishUniversities.Neuroethics2017,10,389–403,doi:10.1007/s1215201793365.
50. Jensen,C.;Forlini,C.;Partridge,B.;Hall,W.Australianuniversitystudents’copingstrategiesanduseofpharmaceuticalstim
ulantsascognitiveenhancers.Front.Psychol.2016,7,277.
51. AlGhali,R.M.;AlShaibi,H.;AlMajed,H.;Haroun,D.CaffeineConsumptionamongZayedUniversityStudentsinDubai,
UnitedArabEmirates:ACrossSectionalStudy.Arab.J.Nutr.Exerc.(AJNE)2017,1,131,doi:10.18502/ajne.v1i3.1230.
52. Gudmundsdottir,B.G.;Weyandt,L.;Ernudottir,G.B.PrescriptionStimulantMisuseandADHDSymptomatologyAmongCol
legeStudentsinIceland.J.Atten.Disord.2016,24,384–401,doi:10.1177/1087054716684379.
53. Fond,G.;Gavaret,M.;Vidal,C.;Brunel,L.;Riveline,J.P.;MicoulaudFranchi,J.A.;Domenech,P.(Mis)useofPrescribedStim
ulantsintheMedicalStudentCommunity.Medicine.2016,95,e3366,doi:10.1097/md.0000000000003366.
54. Lengvenytė,A.;Strumila,R.Domedicalstudentsusecognitiveenhancerstostudy?PrevalenceandcorrelatesfromLithuanian
medicalstudentssample.Eur.Psychiatry2016,33,S304,doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.01.1041.
55. Hupli,A.;Didžiokaitė,G.;Ydema,M.TowardtheSmarterUseofSmartDrugs.Contemp.DrugProbl.2016,43,242–257,
doi:10.1177/0091450916660143.
56. Schelle,K.J.;Olthof,B.M.J.;Reintjes,W.;Bundt,C.;GusmanVermeer,J.;VanMil,A.C.C.M.Asurveyofsubstanceusefor
cognitiveenhancementbyuniversitystudentsintheNetherlands.Front.Syst.Neurosci.2015,9,10,doi:10.3389/fnsys.2015.00010.
57. AbbasiGhahramanloo,A.;Fotouhi,A.;Zeraati,H.;RahimiMovaghar,A.PrescriptionDrugs,Alcohol,andIllicitSubstanceUse
andTheirCorrelationsAmongMedicalSciencesStudentsinIran.Int.J.HighRiskBehav.Addict.2015,4,21945,
doi:10.5812/ijhrba.21945.
58. Vargo,E.J.;James,R.A.;Agyeman,K.;MacPhee,T.;McIntyre,R.;Ronca,F.;Petróczi,A.Perceptionsofassistedcognitiveand
sportperformanceenhancementamonguniversitystudentsinEngland.Perform.Enhanc.Health2014,3,66–77,
doi:10.1016/j.peh.2015.02.001.
59. Ott,R.;BillerAndorno,N.NeuroenhancementamongSwissStudents—AComparisonofUsersandNonUsers.Pharmacopsy
chiatry2013,47,22–28,doi:10.1055/s00331358682.
60. MicoulaudFranchi,J.A.;MacGregor,A.;Fond,G.Apreliminarystudyoncognitiveenhancerconsumptionbehaviorsand
motivesofFrenchMedicineandPharmacologystudents.Eur.Rev.MedPharmacol.Sci.2014,18,1875–1878.
61. McCabe,S.E.;West,B.T.;Teter,C.J.;Boyd,C.J.Trendsinmedicaluse,diversion,andnonmedicaluseofprescriptionmedications
amongcollegestudentsfrom2003to2013:Connectingthedots.Addict.Behav.2014,39,11761182.
62. Hildt,E.;Lieb,K.;Franke,A.G.Lifecontextofpharmacologicalacademicperformanceenhancementamonguniversitystu
dents—Aqualitativeapproach.BMCMedEthic2014,15,23,doi:10.1186/147269391523.
63. Emanuel,R.M.;Frellsen,S.L.;Kashima,K.J.;Sanguino,S.M.;Sierles,F.S.;Lazarus,C.J.CognitiveEnhancementDrugUse
AmongFuturePhysicians:FindingsfromaMultiInstitutionalCensusofMedicalStudents.J.Gen.Intern.Med.2013,28,1028–
1034,doi:10.1007/s1160601222494.
64. Hanson,C.L.;Burton,S.H.;GiraudCarrier,C.;West,J.H.;Barnes,M.D.;Hansen,B.TweakingandTweeting:ExploringTwitter
forNonmedicalUseofaPsychostimulantDrug(Adderall)AmongCollegeStudents.J.MedInternetRes.2013,15,e62,
doi:10.2196/jmir.2503.
65. Dietz,P.;Striegel,H.;Franke,A.G.;Lieb,K.;Simon,P.;Ulrich,R.RandomizedResponseEstimatesforthe12MonthPrevalence
ofCognitiveEnhancingDrugUseinUniversityStudents.Pharmacother.J.Hum.Pharmacol.DrugTher.2013,33,44–50,
doi:10.1002/phar.1166.
66. Bossaer,J.B.;Gray,J.A.;Miller,S.E.;Enck,G.;Gaddipati,V.C.;Enck,R.E.TheUseandMisuseofPrescriptionStimulantsas
“CognitiveEnhancers”byStudentsatOneAcademicHealthSciencesCentre.Acad.Med.2013,88,967–971,
doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e318294fc7b.
67. Kudlow,P.A.;B.Sc.,K.T.N.;Xie,B.;McIntyre,R.S.CognitiveEnhancementinCanadianMedicalStudents.J.Psychoact.Drugs
2013,45,360–365,doi:10.1080/02791072.2013.825033.
68. Holloway,K.;Bennett,T.Prescriptiondrugmisuseamonguniversitystaffandstudents:Asurveyofmotives,natureandextent.
Drugs:Educ.Prev.Policy2011,19,137–144,doi:10.3109/09687637.2011.594114.
69. Castaldi,S.;Gelatti,U.;Orizio,G.;Hartung,U.;MorenoLondono,A.M.;Nobile,M.;Schulz,P.J.UseofCognitiveEnhancement
MedicationAmongNorthernItalianUniversityStudents.J.Addict.Med.2012,6,112–117,doi:10.1097/adm.0b013e3182479584.
70. Ghabili,K.;Habibzadeh,A.;Alizadeh,M.;Malek,A.;Maghbooli,L.;Shoja,M.M.IllicitmethylphenidateuseamongIranian
medicalstudents:Prevalenceandknowledge.DrugDes.Dev.Ther.2011,5,71–76,doi:10.2147/DDDT.S13818.
BrainSci.2021,11,35539of38
71. Franke,A.G.;Bonertz,C.;Christmann,M.;Huss,M.;Fellgiebel,A.;Hildt,E.;Lieb,K.NonMedicalUseofPrescriptionStimu
lantsandIllicitUseofStimulantsforCognitiveEnhancementinPupilsandStudentsinGermany.Pharmacopsychiatry2010,44,
60–66,doi:10.1055/s00301268417.
72. Teter,C.J.;McCabe,S.E.;Lagrange,K.;Cranford,J.A.;Boyd,C.J.IllicitUseofSpecificPrescriptionStimulantsAmongCollege
Students:Prevalence,Motives,andRoutesofAdministration.Pharmacother.J.Hum.Pharmacol.DrugTher.2006,26,1501–1510,
doi:10.1592/phco.26.10.1501.
73. Teter,C.J.;McCabe,S.E.;Cranford,J.A.;Boyd,C.J.;Guthrie,S.K.PrevalenceandMotivesforIllicitUseofPrescriptionStimu
lantsinanUndergraduateStudentSample.J.Am.Coll.Health2005,53,253–62,doi:10.3200/jach.53.6.253262.
74. Low,K.G.;Gendaszek,A.E.Illicituseofpsychostimulantsamongcollegestudents:Apreliminarystudy.Psychol.Heal.Med.
2002,7,283–287,doi:10.1080/13548500220139386.
75. Benson,K.;Flory,K.;Humphreys,K.L.;Lee,S.S.MisuseofStimulantMedicationAmongCollegeStudents:AComprehensive
ReviewandMetaanalysis.Clin.ChildFam.Psychol.Rev.2015,18,50–76,doi:10.1007/s105670140177z.
76. Weyandt,L.L.;Marraccini,M.E.;Gudmundsdottir,B.G.;Zavras,B.M.;Turcotte,K.D.;Munro,B.A.;Amoroso,A.J.Misuseof
prescriptionstimulantsamongcollegestudents:Areviewoftheliteratureandimplicationsformorphologicalandcognitive
effectsonbrainfunctioning.Exp.Clin.Psychopharmacol.2013,21,385–407,doi:10.1037/a0034013.
77. Lengvenyte,A.;Strumila,R.;Grikiniene,J.UseofcognitiveenhancersamongmedicalstudentsinLithuania.Nord.Stud.Alcohol
Drugs2016,33,173–188,doi:10.1515/nsad20160014.
78. Cappelletti,S.;Daria,P.;Sani,G.;Aromatario,M.Caffeine:CognitiveandPhysicalPerformanceEnhancerorPsychoactive
Drug?Curr.Neuropharmacol.2015,13,71–88,doi:10.2174/1570159x13666141210215655.
79. Schleim,S.NeuroenhancementasInstrumentalDrugUse:PuttingtheDebateinaDifferentFrame.Front.Psychiatry2020,11,
doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.567497.
80. Repantis,D.;Schlattmann,P.;Laisney,O.;Heuser,I.Modafinilandmethylphenidateforneuroenhancementinhealthyindi
viduals:Asystematicreview.Pharmacol.Res.2010,62,187–206,doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2010.04.002.
81. Sharp,C.Cognitiveenhancers—performanceorproblem?Occup.Med.2016,66,88–89,doi:10.1093/occmed/kqv190.
82. Konstantinos,F.;Heun,R.TheeffectsofGuarana(Paulliniacupana)supplementationonthecognitiveperformanceofyoung
healthyadults—ASystematicReview.Glob.Psychiatry2019,2,171–182,doi:10.2478/gp20190015.
83. Haskell,C.F.;Kennedy,D.O.;Wesnes,K.A.;Milne,A.L.;Scholey,A.B.Adoubleblind,placebocontrolled,multidoseevalua
tionoftheacutebehaviouraleffectsofguaranainhumans.J.Psychopharmacol.2006,21,65–70,doi:10.1177/0269881106063815.
84. Marques,L.L.M.;Ferreira,E.D.F.;DePaula,M.N.;Klein,T.;DeMello,J.C.P.Paulliniacupana:Amultipurposeplant—Areview.
Rev.Bras.Farm.2019,29,77–110,doi:10.1016/j.bjp.2018.08.007.
85. Garasic,M.D.;Lavazza,A.Moralandsocialreasonstoacknowledgetheuseofcognitiveenhancersincompetitiveselective
contexts.BMCMedEthic2016,17,18,doi:10.1186/s1291001601028.
86. Deline,S.;Baggio,S.;Studer,J.;N’Goran,A.A.;Dupuis,M.;Henchoz,Y.;MohlerKuo,M.;Daeppen,J.B.;Gmel,G.Useof
NeuroenhancementDrugs:Prevalence,FrequencyandUseExpectationsinSwitzerland.Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2014,
11,3032–3045,doi:10.3390/ijerph110303032.
87. Sparrow,R.EnhancementandObsolescence:Avoidingan“EnhancedRatRace.”KennedyInst.Ethic‐ J.2015,25,231–260,
doi:10.1353/ken.2015.0015.
88. Spencer,R.C.;Devilbiss,D.M.;Berridge,C.W.TheCognitionEnhancingEffectsofPsychostimulantsInvolveDirectActionin
thePrefrontalCortex.Biol.Psychiatry2015,77,940–950,doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.09.013.
89. DepartmentofHealthWesternAustralianStimulantRegulatoryScheme.2014AnnualReport,PharmaceuticalServicesBranch;
DepartmentofHealthWesternAustralianStimulantRegulatoryScheme:Perth,WA,Australia,2014.
90. Nelson,A.M.;Lenton,S.DrugTrendsBulletinEcstasyAndRelatedDrugs.IllicitUseofPrescriptionCognitiveEnhancing(CE)
DrugsamongRegularPsychostimulantUsers.2017.Availableonline:http://unsworks.unsw.edu.au/fapi/datastream/un
sworks:60268/SOURCE01?view=true(accessedon7March2021).
91. Abelman,D.D.Mitigatingrisksofstudentsuseofstudydrugsthroughunderstandingmotivationsforuseandapplyingharm
reductiontheory:Aliteraturereview.HarmReduct.J.2017,14,68,doi:10.1186/s1295401701946.
92. Ilieva,I.P.;Hook,C.J.;Farah,M.J.Prescriptionstimulantsʹeffectsonhealthyinhibitorycontrol,workingmemory,andepisodic
memory:ametaanalysis.J.Cogn.Neurosci.2015,27,10691089.
93. Volkow,N.D.;Fowler,J.S.;Wang,G.J.;Telang,F.;Logan,J.;Wong,C.;Ma,J.;Pradhan,K.;Benveniste,H.;Swanson,J.M.
MethylphenidateDecreasedtheAmountofGlucoseNeededbytheBraintoPerformaCognitiveTask.PLoSONE2008,3,e2017,
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002017.
94. Volkow,N.D.;Insel,T.R.Whatarethelongtermeffectsofmethylphenidatetreatment?Biol.Psychiatry2003,54,1307–1309,
doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2003.10.019.
95. Franke,A.G.;Bagusat,C.Chapter80—UseofCaffeineforCognitiveEnhancement;Preedy,V.R.B.T.C.H.,Prevention,D.,Eds.;Ac
ademicPress:SanDiego,CA,USA,2015;pp.721–727,ISBN9780124095175.
96. Ruxton,C.H.S.Theimpactofcaffeineonmood,cognitivefunction,performanceandhydration:Areviewofbenefitsandrisks.
Nutr.Bull.2008,33,15–25,doi:10.1111/j.14673010.2007.00665.x.
97. Brunton,G.;Khouja,C.;Aine,G.;Stansfield,C.;Kwan,I.;Sowden,A.;Sutcliie,K.;Thomas,J.CaffeinatedEnergyDrinkUseand
ReportedEffectsinYoungPeople:ARapidOverviewofSystematicReviews;EPPICentre,SocialScienceResearchUnit,UCLInstitute
ofEducation,UniversityCollegeLondon:London,UK,2019;ISBN9781911605102.
BrainSci.2021,11,35540of38
98. Ontario,H.Q.VitaminB12andCognitiveFunction:AnEvidenceBasedAnalysis.Ont.HealthTechnol.Assess.Ser.2013,13,1–
45.
99. Gröber,U.;Kisters,K.;Schmidt,J.NeuroenhancementwithVitaminB12—UnderestimatedNeurologicalSignificance.Nutrients
2013,5,5031–5045,doi:10.3390/nu5125031.
100. Kennedy,D.;Haskell,C.;Wesnes,K.;Scholey,A.Improvedcognitiveperformanceinhumanvolunteersfollowingadministra
tionofguarana(Paulliniacupana)extract:ComparisonandinteractionwithPanaxginseng.Pharmacol.Biochem.Behav.2004,79,
401–411,doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2004.07.014.
101. Bogle,K.;Smith,B.IllicitMethylphenidateUse:AReviewofPrevalence,Availability,Pharmacology,andConsequences.Curr.
DrugAbus.Rev.2009,2,157–176,doi:10.2174/1874473710902020157.
102. Giurgea,C.;Salama,M.Nootropicdrugs.Prog.NeuroPsychopharmacol.1977,1,235–247,doi:10.1016/03647722(77)900467.
103. Robbins,T.W.Specialissueoncognitiveenhancers.Psychopharmacology2008,202,1–2,doi:10.1007/s002130081389z.
104. Wilms,W.;WoźniakKarczewska,M.;Corvini,P.F.X.;Chrzanowski,Ł.Nootropicdrugs:Methylphenidate,modafinilandpi
racetam—Populationusetrends,occurrenceintheenvironment,ecotoxicityandremovalmethods—Areview.Chemosphere
2019,233,771–785,doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.06.016.
105. Husain,M.;Mehta,M.A.Cognitiveenhancementbydrugsinhealthanddisease.TrendsCogn.Sci.2011,15,28–36,
doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.11.002.
106. AboElmatty,D.M.;Elshazly,S.M.;Zaitone,S.A.PiracetamandvinpocetineamelioraterotenoneinducedParkinsonisminrats.
IndianJ.Pharmacol.2012,44,774–9,doi:10.4103/02537613.103300.
107. Ford,A.H.;Almeida,O.P.EffectofVitaminBSupplementationonCognitiveFunctionintheElderly:ASystematicReviewand
MetaAnalysis.DrugsAging2019,36,419–434,doi:10.1007/s4026601900649w.
108. Solomon,T.M.;Leech,J.;Murphy,C.;Debros,G.;Budson,A.;Solomon,P.Arandomized,doubleblind,placebocontrolled,
parallelgroup,efficacystudyofalphaBRAIN®administeredorally.J.Int.Soc.SportsNutr.2015,12,P54,doi:10.1186/15502783
12s1p54.
109. Malouf,R.;Evans,J.G.VitaminB6forcognition.CochraneDatabaseSyst.Rev.2003,93,CD004393,doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004393.
110. SenecaCHAPTER2—AlkaloidChemistry;Elsevier:Amsterdam,TheNetherlands,2007;pp.61–139;ISBN9780444527363.
111. Ogunrin,A.Effectofvinpocetine(cognitol™)oncognitiveperformancesofaNigerianpopulation.Ann.Med.HealthSci.Res.
2014,4,654–61,doi:10.4103/21419248.139368.
112. Morton,F.;Tighe,B.Prevalenceof,andfactorsinfluencing,bingedrinkinginyoungadultuniversityundergraduatestudents.
J.Hum.Nutr.Diet.2011,24,296–267,doi:10.1111/j.1365277x.2011.01175_25.x.
113. McNiel,A.D.;Muzzin,K.B.;Dewald,J.P.;McCann,A.L.;Schneiderman,E.D.;Scofield,J.;Campbell,P.R.TheNonmedicalUse
ofPrescriptionStimulantsamongDentalandDentalHygieneStudents.J.Dent.Educ.2011,75,365–376,doi:10.1002/j.0022
0337.2011.75.3.tb05050.x.
114. DuPaul,G.J.;Weyandt,L.L.;O’Dell,S.M.;Varejao,M.CollegestudentswithADHD:Currentstatusandfuturedirections.J.
Atten.Disord.2009,13,234–250.
115. Shiers,J.MenandDrugs—TheFacts;UKAddictionTreatmentCentres:Borehamwood,UK,2018.Availableonline:
https://www.ukat.co.uk/drugs/menanddrugsthefacts/(accessedon7March2021)
116. Maher,B.Pollresults:Lookwho’sdoping.Nat.CellBiol.2008,452,674–675,doi:10.1038/452674a.
117. Napoletano,F.;Schifano,F.;Corkery,J.M.;Guirguis,A.;Arillotta,D.;Zangani,C.;Vento,A.ThePsychonauts’WorldofCog
nitiveEnhancers.Front.PsychiatryAddict.Disord.2020,11,doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.546796.
118. Marsh,S.UniversitiesMustdoMoretoTackleUseofSmartDrugs,SayExperts,2017.Availableonline:https://www.theguard
ian.com/education/2017/may/10/universitiesdomoretacklesmartdrugssayexpertsukexams/(accessedon10March2021).
119. Dennehy,C.E.;Tsourounis,C.;Miller,A.E.EvaluationofHerbalDietarySupplementsMarketedontheInternetforRecreational
Use.Ann.Pharmacother.2005,39,1634–1639,doi:10.1345/aph.1g185.
120. D’Angelo,L.S.C.;Savulich,G.;Sahakian,B.J.Lifestyleuseofdrugsbyhealthypeopleforenhancingcognition,creativity,mo
tivationandpleasure.Br.J.Pharmacol.2017,174,3257–3267,doi:10.1111/bph.13813.
121. Beddington,J.;Cooper,C.L.;Field,J.;Goswami,U.;Huppert,F.A.;Jenkins,R.;Jones,H.S.;Kirkwood,T.B.L.;Sahakian,B.J.;
Thomas,S.M.Thementalwealthofnations.Nat.CellBiol.2008,455,1057–1060,doi:10.1038/4551057a.
122. Franke,A.G.;Dietz,P.;Ranft,K.;Balló,H.;Simon,P.;Lieb,K.TheUseofPharmacologicCognitiveEnhancersinCompetitive
Chess.Epidemiology2017,28,e57–e58,doi:10.1097/ede.0000000000000737.
123. Maslen,H.;Faulmã¼LlerN.;Savulescu,J.;Faulmüller,N.Pharmacologicalcognitiveenhancementhowneuroscientificresearch
couldadvanceethicaldebate.Front.Syst.Neurosci.2014,8,107,doi:10.3389/fnsys.2014.00107.
124. Vrecko,S.JustHowCognitiveIs“CognitiveEnhancement”?OntheSignificanceofEmotionsinUniversityStudents’Experi
enceswithStudyDrugs.AJOBNeurosci.2013,4,4–12,doi:10.1080/21507740.2012.740141.
125. Dunning,D.Chapterfive—TheDunning–KrugerEffect:OnBeingIgnorantofOne’sOwnIgnorance.InAdvancesinExperimental
SocialPsychology;Olson,J.M.,Zanna,M.P.,Eds.;ElsevierAcademicPressInc.:Cambridge,MA,USA,2011,Volume44,pp.247–
296,doi:10.1016/B9780123855220.000056,ISBN00652601.
126. Morton,W.A.;Stockton,G.G.MethylphenidateAbuseandPsychiatricSideEffects.Prim.CareCompanionJ.Clin.Psychiatry2000,
2,159–164,doi:10.4088/pcc.v02n0502.
127. Chary,K.V.;Krishnan,R.Ararecasemodafinildependence.J.Pharmacol.Pharmacother.2015,6,49–50,doi:10.4103/0976
500x.149149.
BrainSci.2021,11,35541of38
128. HomeOffice.ReviewofthePsychoactiveSubstancesAct2016;HomeOffice:London,UK,2016;ISBN9781528608633.
129. Lane,J.D.;Pieper,C.F.;PhillipsBute,B.G.;Bryant,J.E.;Kuhn,C.M.CaffeineAffectsCardiovascularandNeuroendocrineActi
vationatWorkandHome.Psychosom.Med.2002,64,595–603,doi:10.1097/01.psy.0000021946.90613.db.
130. Finger,G.;DaSilva,E.R.;Falavigna,A.Useofmethylphenidateamongmedicalstudents:Asystematicreview.RevistadaAsso
ciaçãoMédicaBrasileira2013,59,285–289,doi:10.1016/j.ramb.2012.10.007.
131. Schifano,F.AnalyzingtheOpen/DeepWebtoBetterUnderstandtheNew/NovelPsychoactiveSubstances(NPS)Scenarios:
SuggestionsfromCASSANDRAandNPS.FinderResearchProjects.BrainSci.2020,10,146,doi:10.3390/brainsci10030146.
132. Schelle,K.J.;Faulmüller,N.;Caviola,L.;Hewstone,M.Attitudestowardpharmacologicalcognitiveenhancement—Areview.
Front.Syst.Neurosci.2014,8,53.
133. Shaw,D.M.Neuroenhancingpublichealth.J.Med.Ethic2013,40,389–391,doi:10.1136/medethics2012101300.
134. Zaami,S.;Tagliabracci,A.;Berretta,P.;Busardò,F.P.;Marinelli,E.UseofMethylphenidateAnaloguesasCognitiveEnhancers:
ThePreludetoCosmeticNeurologyandanEthicalIssue.Front.Psychiatry2020,10,doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.01006
... 14 Stimulant use is known to carry the risk of dependence, withdrawal, use of other illicit substances, engaging in risky behaviors, and even death. [15][16][17] As for Jordan, there is a scarcity of knowledge regarding stimulant NMU among high school seniors and university undergraduates, a group deemed susceptible to stimulant use as they face academic challenges and intense stress. 18 Reviewed literature in Jordan only mentioned the prevalence of stimulant use in the context of overall substance use. ...
... 18 Despite the popularized myth that stimulants enhance academic performance, largely promoted as "study aids," 32 the growing body of literature started to question their alleged cognitive enhancement. 17 Studies showed that moderate and high doses of stimulants are associated with cognitive impairment, 33 and that stimulant NMU is seen as a red flag for low academic achievement. 34 We found that students with lower GPAs had almost 1 and a half times the odds of misusing stimulants, this is in concordance with previous studies conducted in Jordan on substance use in general including stimulants. ...
Article
Objectives Nonmedical use (NMU) of stimulants is an increasingly common phenomenon worldwide. Motivated by enhancing academic performance, peer pressure, and seeking pleasure, students in the Middle East are thought to be a high-risk population. This is especially important in times when the political instability in the region facilitates the production and trafficking of such substances. This study aimed to unveil the burden of NMU of stimulants and examine associated correlates among senior high school and university students in Jordan. Methods We describe a cross-sectional study of senior high school and university students in Jordan assessing NMU of stimulants. Data were collected between January and April of 2022 through a survey, which was distributed online leading to a google forms page. The survey queried sociodemographic characteristics, history of NMU of stimulants, use of other illicit substances, attitudes toward NMU of stimulants, as well as a mental health assessment. Results A total of 8739 students completed the survey (mean age of 20.40 ± 2.45 years), of which 5.1% reported a lifetime NMU of stimulants. Fenethylline (Captagon) was the most widely reported stimulant (2.6%). Living in the southern region, being diagnosed with a personality disorder, and using concomitant illicit substances were associated with the NMU of stimulants. Conclusions The NMU of CNS stimulants, especially fenethylline, is prevalent in Jordan. More surveillance ought to be heeded toward the southern borders of Jordan. Students who use stimulants for academic reasons must be made aware of the potential consequences of the NMU of stimulants.
... Finally, participants in Our smaller sample generally achieved higher levels of education (68% attained a post-graduate degree) compared to the general public (22.9%). It is possible that individuals with higher educational attainment may be more trusting of science and optimistic about neurotechnology [63,64] or are more likely to have engaged in emerging forms of cognitive enhancement (e.g., pharmacological [65,66]). ...
Article
Full-text available
Neurotechnological cognitive enhancement has become an area of intense scientific, policy, and ethical interest. However, while work has increasingly focused on ethical views of the general public, less studied are those with personal connections to cognitive impairment. Using a mixed-methods design, we surveyed attitudes regarding implantable neurotechnological cognitive enhancement in individuals who self-identified as having increased likelihood of developing dementia (n = 25; ‘Our Study’), compared to a nationally representative sample of Americans (n = 4726; ‘Pew Study’). Participants in Our Study were additionally shown four videos showcasing hypothetical neurotechnological devices designed to enhance different cognitive abilities and were interviewed for more in-depth responses. Both groups expressed comparable degrees of worry and acknowledgement of potential ethical ramifications (all ps > 0.05). Compared to the Pew Study, participants in Our Study expressed slightly higher desire (p < 0.01), as well as higher acknowledgment for potential impacts on productivity (p < 0.05). Ultimately, participants in Our Study were more likely to deem the device morally acceptable (56%; compared to Pew Study, 25.2%; p = 0.0001). Interviews conducted in Our Study allowed participants to supply additional nuance and reasoning to survey responses, such as giving examples for increased productivity, perceived downsides of memory enhancement, or concerns regarding potentially resulting inequality. This study builds upon and adds to the growing focus on potential ethical issues surrounding neurotechnological cognitive enhancement by centering stakeholder perspectives, highlighting the need for inclusive research and consideration of diverse perspectives and lived experiences to ensure inclusive dialogue that best informs ethical and policy discussions in this rapidly advancing field.
... O TDAH é um transtorno neurológico que geralmente se manifesta ainda na infância e acompanha o indivíduo pelo resto da vida (Andrade et. al., 2018 (Sharif et. al., 2021) (Silva, et. al., 2022). ...
Article
Full-text available
Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar o uso da medicação Metilfenidato (Ritalina®) em acadêmicos da área da saúde, bem como os efeitos que essa medicação pode causar no sistema nervoso central. Essa pesquisa tem o intuito de mostrar a importância do uso correto da medicação e mostrar as reais consequências frente ao uso indevido. Foi realizado um estudo de revisão de literatura integratva, por meio das bases de dados, SCIELO (Scientific Eletronic Library On-line), PUBMED e Google Acâdemico, com artigos referentes aos ano de 2018 à 2023 e revistas com qualis capes superior à A3 a partir das Palavras-chaves: "Estudantes Universitarios"; "Ritalina"; "Metilfenidato"; "Pílula da inteligência"; “Automedicação”, relacionados aos temas e pesquisadas de forma isolada e agrupadas entre si. As consequências do uso do metilfenidato são de abuso e dependência, mascaramento de doenças evolutivas, principalmente as de saúde mental como ansiedade e síndrome do pânico, diminuição do apetite e diminuição do sono. Podem surgir problemas cardiovasculares pontuais e transitórios, como aumento da pressão sistólica, frequência cardíaca e respiratória, além de óbito, caso o usuário tenha problemas cardíacos pré-existentes. O uso da Ritalina® por tempo indeterminado e indiscriminado, também pode gerar consequências neurológicas, físicas e mentais, o que nos leva a repensar sobre a ingesta e venda dessa medicação para públicos como universitários. Além de que a receita e o acompanhamento médico correto são indispensáveis na manutenção da segurança dos consumidores dessa medicação.
... This is because a learning environment equipped with technology provides space and opportunities for students to enhance their selfregulated learning abilities (Cheung et al., 2021;Fahnoe & Mishra, 2013). In addition, integrating technology into education, such as blended learning, is an appropriate method for the intellectual and cognitive development of Generation Z in their learning process (Sharif et al., 2021;Szymkowiak et al., 2021;Luttrell & McGrath, 2021). In addition, the integrated learning implemented in religious-based schools, such as the TMUA curriculum, might enhance students' interest in the teaching and learning process, hence improving their academic performance (Manan & Hanafi, 2020). ...
Article
Full-text available
The integration of technology into blended learning has demonstrated remarkable effectiveness as an example of the 21st century learning success. Therefore, it is crucial to prioritize and implement a blended learning approach in the Tahfiz Model Ulul Albab (TMUA) curriculum to generate professional Muslims in various professions who are capable of contributing to holistic individual development. The objective of this study is to assess the relationship between self-regulated learning, mindset, and 21st century skills with blended learning in the TMUA curriculum. A total of 200 students from the Northern Region of Malaysia who are enrolled in the TMUA curriculum at Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Agama (SMKA) or National Islamic Secondary School, participated in this study. The relationship between self-regulated learning, mindset, and 21st century skills in blended learning is determined by Pearson correlation analysis using IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 29.0. The findings of the study indicate a strong and significant correlation between 21st century skills and blended learning in the TMUA curriculum among SMKA students. The objective of 21st century learning, which is blended learning in the TMUA curriculum, may be achieved with the support of the school community. It is possible that this will ensure the students' continued success in the future.
Preprint
Full-text available
Background: Cognitive Enhancers (CE) are central nervous system stimulant medications. These substances are known to improve cognitive functions. Due to high-perceived stress and academic pressure, CEs are becoming increasingly popular among university students, especially medical students. As a result, they are more likely to misuse these substances. Existing data in this area is limited, particularly in Egypt, Sudan, and Jordan. Objectives: This study aims to estimate the prevalence of CE consumption, compare the prevalence between countries and genders, and identify characteristics associated with CE consumption among students at medical schools in Egypt, Sudan, and Jordan. Methods: A population-based survey study was conducted among medical students from Egypt, Sudan, and Jordan. An online self-reported questionnaire was used to collect data. Frequencies and percentages were calculated to represent participant distribution across categories. Chi-square was used for categorical variables comparisons. All tests were two-tailed, considering p < 0.05 statistically significant. Demographic characteristics, reasons for use, types of CE used, frequency, and irregularity of sleep were compared by country and gender. Results: The questionnaire was filled out by 1399 medical students, most of whom were females 824 (58.9%). Overall, 1236 (88.3%) were CE consumers, and 163 (11.7%) were non-consumers. Of the respondents who used CE, 814 (58.2%) reported using them daily. There was a statistically significant difference between the consumption of CE and the source of acquisition, Nationality, and residence status in terms of gender. Ginkgo Biloba was more consumed by males(P<0.001), while Omega 3 and vitamin B12 (P=0.023) were typically taken by females. Most consumers were in their second year and fourth year. The most reported Side effects were headache and anxiety (P<0.001). Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that CE use is increasing among medical students in Egypt, Sudan, and Jordan. Efficient support, stress management programs, and awareness symposia may help reduce the misuse of these substances.
Article
Objective: Estimate the association between single (i.e., exclusive) use of a range of substances and sleep outcomes. Participants: College students participated in the 2015-2019 American College-Health Association-National College-Health Assessment survey. Methods: Multivariable logistic and linear regressions were used. Results: Single users of sedative, opioid, tobacco, and stimulant drugs were more likely to report a diagnosis of insomnia and other sleep disorder and indicated more days per week of negative sleep health outcomes compared not only to non-users of these substances but also polysubstance users. Single users of alcohol were significantly less likely to report a diagnosis of sleep disorder and indicated having had more days per week of positive sleep health outcomes compared to non-alcohol users and polysubstance users. However, those results are reversed for binge drinking. Conclusions: Support of programs addressing behaviors to reduce the high prevalence of psychoactive substance use and sleep disturbances in college youth is needed.
Article
Full-text available
The use of performance-enhancing drugs to study or work better is often called “cognitive enhancement” or “neuroenhancement” and sparked a debate between scholars from many disciplines. I argue that such behavior can better be subsumed under the more general category of “instrumental drug use”. This broader perspective allows understanding neuroenhancement better from the perspective of addiction medicine and public health and supports a more consistent drug policy. I also summarize the most important systematic reviews and individual surveys of nonmedical substance use to study or work better. Different definitions and methodologies limit the comparability of these studies. The unified approach of drug instrumentalization would partially solve such problems. Finally, prevalence studies from the 1960s to 1980s as well as anecdotal evidence since the late 19th century show that instrumental drug use is and has been for a long time a common phenomenon. It should thus also be investigated and treated accordingly.
Article
Full-text available
Background There is growing availability of novel psychoactive substances (NPS), including cognitive enhancers (CEs) which can be used in the treatment of certain mental health disorders. While treating cognitive deficit symptoms in neuropsychiatric or neurodegenerative disorders using CEs might have significant benefits for patients, the increasing recreational use of these substances by healthy individuals raises many clinical, medico-legal, and ethical issues. Moreover, it has become very challenging for clinicians to keep up-to-date with CEs currently available as comprehensive official lists do not exist. Methods Using a web crawler (NPSfinder®), the present study aimed at assessing psychonaut fora/platforms to better understand the online situation regarding CEs. We compared NPSfinder® entries with those from the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) and from the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) NPS databases up to spring 2019. Any substance that was identified by NPSfinder® was considered a CE if it was either described as having nootropic abilities by psychonauts or if it was listed among the known CEs by Froestl and colleagues. Results A total of 142 unique CEs were identified by NPSfinder®. They were divided into 10 categories, including plants/herbs/products (29%), prescribed drugs (17%), image and performance enhancing drugs (IPEDs) (15%), psychostimulants (15%), miscellaneous (8%), Phenethylamines (6%), GABAergic drugs (5%), cannabimimetic (4%), tryptamines derivatives (0.5%), and piperazine derivatives (0.5%). A total of 105 chemically different substances were uniquely identified by NPSfinder®. Only one CE was uniquely identified by the EMCDDA; no CE was uniquely identified by the UNODC. Conclusions These results show that NPSfinder® is helpful as part of an Early Warning System, which could update clinicians with the growing numbers and types of nootropics in the increasingly difficult-to-follow internet world. Improving clinicians’ knowledge of NPS could promote more effective prevention and harm reduction measures in clinical settings.
Article
Full-text available
New/novel psychoactive substances (NPS) are defined as new narcotic/psychotropic drugs which are not controlled by the United Nations’ 1961 Narcotic Drugs/1971 Psychotropic Substances conventions, but which may pose a public health threat [...]
Article
Full-text available
Background: College students are susceptible to using cognitive enhancement drugs, also known as smart drugs. Objectives: estimate the prevalence of smart drug use and investigate the factors related to access and use among undergraduate students. Methods: cross-sectional study performed among all students who entered the university in 2017 using an anonymous, self-administered questionnaire. Smart drug usage was defined as taking methylphenidate, modafinil or piracetam at any point in life and in the preceding 12 months. We characterized the means of obtaining smart drugs, reasons for using and students’ residential situation. We asked students who did not use any medication if they were interested in taking it and the reasons for not using. Results: Out of 1865 respondents, 4.2% had used smart drugs in the last 12 months, and the prevalence among law students reached 14.3%. The most commonly used smart drug was methylphenidate. Among the students who did not present ADD diagnosis, the drug was obtained mostly through a friend. More than 300 students reported a desire to use some smart drug, but they did not, mainly due to the fear of side effects. Conclusions: The current study has found a variety of frequency of smart drug use among college students and has also showed that many students are willing to take some kind of cognitive enhancement drug. Therefore, it is important to discuss this issue from a public health perspective.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: To estimate the prevalence of and factors associated with the use of methylphenidate for cognitive enhancement among undergraduate students. Methods: Simple random sample of students of the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (n=438), invited to answer an online questionnaire about the use of methylphenidate. Data collection occurred from September 2014 to January 2015. The sample was described by means of proportions, means and standard deviations. A multivariate analysis was performed using the Classification and Regression Tree algorithm to classify the cases of use of methylphenidate for cognitive enhancement in groups, based on the exposure variables. Results: Out of 378 students included, 5.8% (n=22) reported using methylphenidate for cognitive enhancement; in that, 41% (9/22) in the 4 weeks prior to the survey. The housing situation was the variable most often associated with the use of methylphenidate for cognitive enhancement. Eleven students reported using methylphenidate for cognitive enhancement and other purposes 4 weeks prior to the survey, 27% of whom had no medical prescription to purchase it. Conclusion: The use of methylphenidate for cognitive enhancement is frequent among Brazilian undergraduate students and should be considered a serious public health problem, especially due to risks of harm and adverse effects associated with its use.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: To determine the prevalence of nontherapeutic use of methylphenidate as well as to ascertain any benefits, side effects, and other factors associated with this use. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in medical colleges in Pakistan using a self-constructed, validated questionnaire. The sample size was calculated using Open Source Statistics for Epidemiological Health software (OpenEpi web-based open-source program, MIT license), and it was determined to be 400. The type of sampling was cluster sampling. Cronbach's alpha was used to assess the internal consistency of the questionnaire, and it was found to be 0.80. Results: Out of the 400 participants, 197 (49%) were male and 203 (51%) were female. The mean age of the participants was 21.02 (±1.54) years. Most of the participants (84%) reported they usually studied 1-3 hours a day, and 149 participants (37%) reported a score ranging from 70 to 80% in exams. Methylphenidate was admitted to be used by 37 participants. Out of these 37 participants, only 10 participants believed they had attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Participants revealed they used the drug to either cope with the anxiety related to their scores or merely as a personal, recreational choice. Methylphenidate was mostly acquired from peers (68%), and peer pressure was found to be a major factor in its misuse. Conclusions: Most of the methylphenidate misuse is linked to student underperformance in examinations and an underlying dissatisfaction. The problem is more aggravated when the social influence exerted by other students is taken into account. The side effects of drug usage are found to outweigh the benefits that have been reported.
Article
Full-text available
Objectives Guarana (Paullinia cupana) from the Sapindaceae family, native to the Amazon basin, is a natural stimulant herb that can be found in popular energy drinks, pharmaceutical shops or local herb shops. With the use of natural health products increasing, guarana has gained a fair amount of popularity in the past years. In this systematic review, we examined the effects of guarana supplementation on cognitive performance. A secondary objective was to compare guarana with caffeine on cognitive performance. Methods Searches were made in PubMed using the terms ‘Guarana’ or ‘Paullinia cupana’. Filters focused on Controlled Clinical trials. Inclusion criteria were met by studies using interventions with guarana, while focusing on guarana’s effects on cognition. Participants needed to be young, healthy adults. Studies not published in English or Greek were excluded. The last date of our search was March 7, 2019. Results A total of 29 studies were identified and screened. After screening, 17 studies were excluded. The remaining 12 studies were found eligible for data extraction. After reading the full text of the 12 studies, 3 studies were excluded. In the end, 9 studies were found eligible for our systematic review (n = 369 participants). In these studies, guarana showed to improve reaction time and accuracy of performance at cognitive tasks. No significant differences were found when comparing guarana with caffeine. Conclusion Guarana seems to improve reaction time and accuracy of performance at tasks, but no significant effects were found when compared with caffeine. High quality randomized controlled clinical trials with a low risk of bias are needed to further study the herb.
Article
Cognitive enhancers include a wide range of substances including prescription medication for attentional deficient disorders and pharmacological substances for cognitive augmentation. Students have recently been identified as the largest cohort of users. Most research on student use of cognitive enhancers has been undertaken in the United States. This study utilised a mixed methods sequential explanatory approach to investigate cognitive enhancer use among UK university students specifically to aid study. A bespoke online survey was distributed throughout the UK. The findings informed the development of a qualitative interview study comprising 15 participants. In total, 506 responses to the online survey were received from 54 UK institutions. Forty-six per cent of respondents reported using recreational drugs and 19% reported having used cognitive enhancers. Males were two and a half times more likely to use cognitive enhancers than females. Participants reported various motives for using cognitive enhancers, the most frequent being to meet the demands of coursework, to improve focus or maintain wakefulness. The qualitative findings revealed that cognitive enhancers are widely accessible and are used to enhance performance in terms of motivation, concentration and meeting academic deadlines. The findings of this study will be of interest to a wide range of services within Universities across the UK.