Content uploaded by Safia Sharif
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Safia Sharif on Mar 10, 2021
Content may be subject to copyright.
BrainSci.2021,11,355.https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11030355www.mdpi.com/journal/brainsci
SystematicReview
TheUseandImpactofCognitiveEnhancersamongUniversity
Students:ASystematicReview
SafiaSharif
1
,AmiraGuirguis
1,2,
*,SuzanneFergus
1,
*andFabrizioSchifano
1
1
Psychopharmacology,SubstanceMisuseandNovelPsychoactiveSubstancesResearchUnit,
SchoolofLifeandMedicalSciences,UniversityofHertfordshire,HatfieldAL109AB,UK;
s.sharif2@herts.ac.uk(S.S.);f.schifano@herts.ac.uk(F.S.)
2
InstituteofLifeSciences2,SwanseaUniversity,SwanseaSA28PP,Wales,UK
*Correspondence:amira.guirguis@swansea.ac.uk(A.G.);S.Fergus@herts.ac.uk(S.F.)
Abstract:Introduction:Cognitiveenhancers(CEs),alsoknownas“smartdrugs”,“studyaids”or
“nootropics”areacauseofconcern.RecentresearchstudiesinvestigatedtheuseofCEsbeingtaken
asstudyaidsbyuniversitystudents.ThismanuscriptprovidesanoverviewofpopularCEs,focusingon
arangeofdrugs/substances(e.g.,prescriptionCEsincludingamphetaminesaltmixtures,methylpheni‐
date,modafinilandpiracetam;andnon‐prescriptionCEsincludingcaffeine,cobalamin(vitamin
B12),guarana,pyridoxine(vitaminB6)andvinpocetine)thathaveemergedasbeingmisused.Thedi‐
vertednon‐prescriptionuseofthesemoleculesandtherelatedpotentialfordependenceand/orad‐
dictionisbeingreported.Ithasbeendemonstratedthathealthystudents(i.e.,thosewithoutany
diagnosedmentaldisorders)areincreasinglyusingdrugssuchasmethylphenidate,amixtureof
dextroamphetamine/amphetamine,andmodafinil,forthepurposeofincreasingtheiralertness,
concentrationormemory.Aim:Toinvestigatethelevelofknowledge,perceptionandimpactofthe
useofarangeofCEswithinHigherEducationInstitutions.Methodology:Asystematicreviewwas
conductedinadherencewiththePreferredReportingItemsforSystematicReviewsandMeta‐Anal‐
yses(PRISMA)guidelines.Whilst1400studieswereidentifiedwithinthisstudythroughavariety
ofelectronicdatabases(e.g.,520throughPubMed,490throughScienceDirectand390throughSco‐
pus),48papersweredeemedrelevantandwereincludedinthisreview.Results:Themostpopular
moleculesidentifiedhereincludedthestimulantCEs,e.g.,methylphenidate,modafinil,ampheta‐
minesaltmixturesandcaffeine‐relatedcompounds;stimulantCEs’intakewasmoreprevalent
amongmalesthanfemales;drugswerelargelyobtainedfromfriendsandfamily,aswellasviathe
Internet.ItisthereforesuggestedthatCEsareincreasinglybeingusedamonghealthyindividuals,
mainlystudentswithoutanydiagnosedcognitivedisorders,toincreasetheiralertness,concentra‐
tion,ormemory,inthebeliefthattheseCEswillimprovetheirperformanceduringexaminations
orwhenstudying.TheimpactofstimulantCEsmayincludetolerance,dependenceand/orsomatic
(e.g.,cardiovascular;neurological)complications.Discussion:TheavailabilityofCEsfornon‐med‐
icalindicationsindifferentcountriesisinfluencedbyarangeoffactorsincludinglegal,socialand
ethicalfactors.Consideringtheriskfactorsandmotivationsthatencourageuniversitystudentsto
useCEdrugs,itisessentialtoraiseawarenessaboutCE‐relatedharms,counteractmythsregarding
“safe”CEuseandaddresscognitiveenhancementinanearlystageduringeducationasapreven‐
tativepublichealthmeasure.
Keywords:neuroenhancement;cognitiveenhancement;drugabuse;universitystudents;study
drugs;non‐medicaldruguse;smartdrugs
1.Introduction
Cognitiveenhancementisdefinedasan“amplificationorextensionofcorecapacity
ofthemindbyimprovingtheinternalandexternalinformationprocessingsystems”[1].
Cognitiveenhancementcanbeachievedintwoways,e.g.,“pharmacologically”,bytaking
Citation:Sharif,S.;Guirguis,A.;
Fergus,S.;Schifano,F.TheUseand
ImpactofCognitiveEnhancers
amongUniversityStudents:A
SystematicReview.BrainSci.2021,
11,355.https://doi.org/10.3390/
b
rainsci11030355
AcademicEditor:BasavarajS.
Balapal
Received:16February2021
Accepted:3March2021
Published:10March2021
Publisher’sNote:MDPIstaysneu‐
tralwithregardtojurisdictional
claimsinpublishedmapsandinsti‐
tutionalaffiliations.
Copyright:©2021bytheauthors.
LicenseeMDPI,Basel,Switzerland.
Thisarticleisanopenaccessarticle
distributedunderthetermsand
conditionsoftheCreativeCommons
Attribution(CCBY)license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses
/by/4.0/).
BrainSci.2021,11,3552of38
cognitiveenhancer(CE)drugs/substances;or“non‐pharmacologically”,bymaintaininga
healthylifestyle,whichincludesbeingphysically,mentallyandsociallyactive;eatinga
healthy,balanceddiet;drinkingalcoholonlyinmoderation;andmaintaininggoodsleep
habits[2].CEs,alsoknownas“smartdrugs”or“nootropics”,areaheterogeneousgroup
ofchemicalsubstancesthatareusedtoimprovecognitivefunction[3],particularly
memory,alertness,attention,learningperformance,creativityandmotivation[4].CEsare
typicallybeingobtained,andattimesbyhealthyindividuals[5,6],onprescription,over‐
the‐counter,online,orthroughothersourcessuchasfamilyorfriends[7].Theclinical
impactofCEs’ingestioncanbesignificant,withthesemoleculesbeingabletoaffectvari‐
ousneurotransmitterpathwaysinthebrain,includingthecholinergic,dopaminergic,nor‐
adrenergicandserotonergicpathways[8].Whilsttheirmechanismofactionisnotfully
understood[3],mostpopularCEs(e.g.,methylphenidate,modafinilandamphetamine
saltmixtures)arestimulants[9].Methylphenidateincreasesthelevelsofnoradrenaline
(NA)anddopamine(DA)inboththeprefrontalcortexandthecortical/subcorticalre‐
gions,andthiseffectmaybeassociatedwithlevelsofimprovedattentioninAttention
DeficitHyperactivityDisorder(ADHD)[10].Conversely,withmodafinil—amedicinebe‐
ingusedtotreatnarcolepsy—stimulantactionsareassociatedwithanimpactonNA,glu‐
tamate(NMDAorN‐methyl‐D‐aspartate)andDA[11].Inparticular,modafinilincreases
DAlevelsinthecaudateandnucleusaccumbens(Nac),whilstblockingDAtransporters
inahealthyindividual’sbrain[12].Outofthesemolecules,modafinilmaybebettertoler‐
ated,inducinglessadversedrugreactions,whilstnotbeingassociatedwithahighriskof
dependence[13].Theamphetaminesaltmixtures(e.g.,inthebrandedproductAdderall)
blockthere‐uptakeofbothNAandDAintothepre‐synapticneuron,andincreasetheir
releaseaswellfromthepre‐synapticneuron,henceincreasingtheirconcentrationsinthe
synapticcleft[14].
Indeed,sincethe1940s,bothmodafinilandamphetamine(e.g.,“gopills”)CEcate‐
gorieshavebeenthesubjectofmilitaryresearch,tohelpsoldiersstayalertwhilstattenu‐
atingtheeffectsofsleepdeprivation[15,16].However,thesedrugsareincreasinglybeing
usedbyhealthyindividuals,includingstudentsandnightshiftworkers,toimprovetheir
cognitiveandmotivationalfunctions[17].AssociationsbetweenCEsanddrugsinsports
havebeeninvestigated[18].CEsanddrugsinsportssharemanyaspectswithrespectto
“enhancement”and“doping”.Theformermaybemoresociallyacceptable,whilstthe
latterisconsideredillegalandisheavilymonitoredbyorganisationssuchasTheWorld
Anti‐DopingAgency(WADA).TheuseoffreelyavailableCEs,suchascaffeinatedprod‐
uctsandvitamins,havebeeninvestigatedinathletesas“gateway”and“predictor”of
physicalenhancersuse.Thenon‐monitoredCEswerefoundtobehighlyusedamongathletes
withorwithoutphysicalenhanceruse[19].Studiesalsoshowedthatusersoferogonomicaids
suchascaffeinemayfavourdopingdueto“biasedreasoningpatterns”[19].
ItisimportanttonotethatstudentsusingCEsdonotonlyaimtoachieveacognitive
enhancement,butalsoamotivationalenhancementandanoverflowofenergy.Theymay
useacombinationofCEsaswellasalcohol,and/orrecreationalsedatives,inanattempt
toachieveagoodqualitysleep,reducenervousnessandimproveoverallperformancein
examsandstudy‐relatedassessments[20,21].
ThelifetimeprevalencerateofprescribedCEs’intakefornon‐medicalreasons,asa
self‐attempttoincreasecognitiveperformances,amonguniversitystudentsintheUKand
Irelandhasbeenestimatedtobearound10%[22].However,theselevelsofintakemaybe
underestimated[23]andthetrendhasattractedaconsiderableinterest[22],relatingtoits
social,ethicalandlegalimplications[24–26].Whilstmoststudieshavefocusedonthe
prevalenceofalimitedrangeofafewCEs(e.g.,amphetaminesaltmixtures,methylpheni‐
dateandmodafinil),focusingonintakebystudentsinHigherEducationInstitutions
(HEIs),astudybyNapoletanoetal.(2020)identifiedatotalof142uniqueCEs.These
moleculeswerethensub‐groupedinto10categories,accordingtorecentlyproposedclas‐
sifications[27]including:prescribeddrugs,plants/herbs/products,psychostimulants;im‐
age‐ andperformance‐enhancingdrugs(IPEDs),miscellaneous,GABAergic(gamma‐
BrainSci.2021,11,3553of38
aminobutyricacid‐ergic)drugs,phenethylamines,cannabimimetics,tryptaminederiva‐
tives,andpiperazinederivatives.Inparallelwiththecontinuousemergenceofnew/novel
psychoactivesubstances(NPS),whichhasenrichedtherepertoireofillicitdruguse[28],
thismanuscriptaimstoprovideanupdatedoverviewoftheuseofCEsamonguniversity
students.
2.Methods
ThecurrentsystematicliteraturereviewwasperformedinadherencewiththePre‐
ferredReportingItemsforSystematicReviewsandMeta‐Analyses(PRISMA)guidelines
[29],toestimateCEs’prevalenceofintake;andassessknowledge,awarenessandimpact
ofCEs’useamonguniversitystudents.
2.1.LiteratureSearch(InclusionandExclusionCriteria)
ThefocusherewasonquantitativeandqualitativestudiesrelatingtoCEs’useamong
Universitystudents:Theliteraturesearchwasperformedusingarangeofkeyword
strings,e.g.,cognitiveenhancersANDneuroenhancement,prescriptiondrugmisuseOR
prescriptiondrugabuseamonghealthyindividualsANDenhancement.Inparticular,the
searchstrategywasconductedfromthreedatabasesScopus,PubMedandSciencedirect.
Finally,amanualsearchwasalsocarriedoutusingGoogleScholarinordertoensurenone
ofthekeyarticlesandstudiesweremissed.
Inclusioncriteriawerequantitative(surveys)andqualitative(interviews)studies
havingbeencarriedoutamonghealthystudentsaged18yearsandolderinHEIs.Articles
wereincludediftheyrelatedtoarangeofnineCEs(prescriptionCEsincludingamphet‐
aminesaltmixtures,methylphenidate,modafinilandpiracetam;andnon‐prescription
CEsincludingcaffeine,cobalamin(vitaminB12),guarana,pyridoxine(vitaminB6)and
vinpocetine),whichwereselectedherebecauseoftheirpopularityamonguniversitystu‐
dents[4,7,22,26,30].StudieswritteninEnglish,fromtheyear2000(i.e.,fromaroundthe
timewhenNPSstartedtoemergeindrugscenarios)to2020wereincludedinthestudy
search.Regional/worlddrugreports(e.g.,fromtheEuropeanMonitoringCentrefor
DrugsandDrugAddiction/EMCDDAandtheUnitedNationsOfficeforDrugand
Crime/UNODC)wereincludedhereaswell.Conversely,studiesfocussingonunderage
children,onpreclinicalexperimentsorstudentswithmedicaldiagnosesusingtheselected
drugs/substancesformedicalreasonswereexcludedfromthestudy.Non‐Englisharticles
werealsoexcluded.
2.2.QualityAssessment
Basedontheinclusioncriteria,theselectedarticleswereappraisedforqualityusing
PRISMAchecklists[29].SearchresultswereexportedtoMendeley,afreereferenceman‐
agerandacademicsocialnetwork.Thistoolwasusedtodeterminethestructureofthe
indexstudymethodology[29].
3.Results
3.1.SummaryoftheLiteratureSearch
Theliteraturesearchidentifiedatotalof1400studieshere(e.g.,520throughPubMed,
490throughScienceDirectand390throughScopus)(Figure1).Forty‐eightstudieswere
excludedastheywereduplicates,1294studieswerescreenedandwereexcludedbased
ontheirtitleandabstract,10didnotmeettheinclusioncriteria,and48weredeemedrel‐
evantandwereincludedinthisreview(Table1).
BrainSci.2021,11,35524of38
Table1.SummaryoftheliteraturereviewfocusingonCognitiveEnhancer(CE)drug(s)/substance(s)beingconsideredforthestudy(e.g.,methylphenidate,am‐
phetamine,modafinilandpiracetam,caffeinepills,guarana,cobalamin(vitaminB12),vinpocetineandpyridoxine(vitaminB6).
ReferenceCountryPrescription
CE
Non‐Pre‐
scription
CE
StudySampleMethodology
Used
Results/LifetimePrevalenceof
CENotes/Limitations
[30]UK
Ritalin,Dex‐
troampheta‐
mine/am‐
phetamine,
Modafinil
andAr‐
modafinil
‐
Survey=506partici‐
pants.
Interview=15partic‐
ipants
Onlinesurvey
andInterview.
Outof506participants,45.5%
(n=230)reportedthattheyhad
usedarangeofCEdrugsinthe
previous12monthsforthe
purposeofstudy.Maleusage
wasreportedasbeingmore
thantwoandahalftimes
higherthanfemaleusage.
ThemotivationalfactorsbehindCEuse
wereinvestigatedwithgreaterunder‐
standingofthefactorsinfluencingtheir
use.Universitiesneedtodevelopa
greaterawarenessoftheprevalenceof
CEuseamongsttheirstudentsandcon‐
sidertakinganactiveapproachinreduc‐
ingtheiruse.
[7]Brazil
Modafinil
Methylpheni‐
date
Piracetam
‐ 1865participants.Onlinesurvey.
Outof1865respondents,4.2%
hadusedCEsintheprevious
12 months,andtheprevalence
amongLawstudentsreached
14.3%.Themostcommonly
usedsmartdrugwas
methylphenidate.Thedrug
wasmostlyobtainedthrougha
friend.
Thelimitationwasthequestionnaireit‐
self.Itispossiblethattherewasa
memorybiasandomissionofresponse,
underestimatingtheprevalencefound.
However,thelimitationwasreducedas
thequestionnairewasself‐administered
andanonymous.
BrainSci.2021,11,35525of38
[31]UK
Modafinil
Ampheta‐
mine
Methylpheni‐
date
BetaBlockers
‐
612participantsfrom
RussellGroupuni‐
versities.
Onlinesurvey.17%reportedhavingused
smartdrugspreviously.
Thelimitationofthisstudywasthatit
wasopentoallUKfull‐timeundergrad‐
uatestudents,althoughthemajorityof
theparticipantswerefromRussell
Groupuniversities.However,theydid
notcollectadditionaldataondiscipline
oruniversityand,therefore,cannotbe
surehowrepresentativethesampleis
fortheUKuniversitypopulationasa
wholeorthepopulationatthehostuni‐
versity.Thismeansthatfactorssuchas
competitivenesscannotbeextracted
fromthedata.
[32]UKModafinil‐
15undergraduate
studentsatRussell
Groupuniversities.
Interview.
AlluserstookModafinil,with
somealsohavingtriedDextro‐
amphetamine/amphetamine
andRitalinforthepurposeof
study.Byrecruitingbothusers
andnon‐users,allnon‐users
werefoundtobefemale.
Allintervieweesreportedimprovingac‐
ademicstudyastheprimarypurposesof
druguse,particularlyvaluingimproved
focus,increasedefficiencyandreduced
procrastination.Theseeffectswere
judgedtobehighlydesirableinthecon‐
textoftimeconstraintsandfatiguewhen
approachingexamsanddeadlines.
BrainSci.2021,11,35526of38
[33]Iran
Modafinil,
Methylpheni‐
date,Am‐
phetamine,
Piracetam
Vinpocetine
Vinpoce‐
tine.
Cross‐sectional
studywasper‐
formedbyanalysing
atotalsampleof579
studentsintheone
UniversityofMedi‐
calSciencesstudents
from1stto5thyear.
Papersurvey.
Some44(17.6%)ofthere‐
spondentsansweredthatthey
hadusedCEsatleastoncein
theirlife,toincreaseconcentra‐
tion.
Therewasasignificantrela‐
tionshipbetweenCEuseand
theageofrespondents(p<
0.05).Accordingtologisticre‐
gressionanalysis,therewasa
significantrelationshipbe‐
tweenknowingsomeonewho
hadused,stresslevelandCE
use(p<0.05).
Samplecollectionwasoneofthemain
limitations.Forexample,thefemale
samplewaslargerthanthemalesam‐
ple.Studentsenteredthestudywithout
priornoticeofit,whichmeansthata
factormayplayarole,aswellas
memorybias,especiallywhenstudents
arebeingaskedtorecordnon‐pharma‐
ceuticaluse.Finally,itisrecommended
thatastudyshouldbeconductedinall
universitiesofIranandtheirresults
compared.Therefore,althoughitisob‐
viousthattheuseofthesedrugsforin‐
creasingcognitionwasinvestigated
moreamongstudentpopulations,itis
notpossibletogeneralisetootherpopu‐
lations.
[34]Pakistan Methylpheni‐
date ‐
Across‐sectional
studywascon‐
ductedinMedical
collegesinPakistan,
usingaself‐con‐
structed,validated
questionnaire.The
samplesize(400)
wascalculatedusing
open‐sourceStatis‐
ticsforEpidemio‐
logical
Healthsoftware.
Papersurvey.
Some27participantsadmitted
theuseofMethylphenidateto
improveconcentration.Peer
pressurewasfoundtobeama‐
jorfactorinitsmisuse.
Thestudydeterminedtheprevalenceof
non‐therapeuticuseofmethylphenidate
aswellasascertaininganybenefits,side
effects,andotherfactorsassociatedwith
thisuse.Thisisacross‐sectionalstudy
and,apartfromachi‐squaretest,no
otherstatisticalanalysiscouldbeper‐
formed.Thestudyonlyincludestwocit‐
iesinPakistanandmustbeexpandedto
includeotherregionsaswell,especially
theregionslabelledashighriskfordrug
misuse.Thisstudydoesnotextensively
explorethereasonsforaparticipantopt‐
ingfordrugabuse,regardlessofaca‐
demicperformanceorenvironment.
BrainSci.2021,11,35527of38
[35]BrazilMethylpheni‐
date ‐
Simplerandomsam‐
pleofstudentsofthe
UniversidadFederal
deMinasGerais(n=
438),invitedtoan‐
sweranonlineques‐
tionnaireaboutthe
useofmethylpheni‐
date
Onlinesurvey.
Outof378studentsincluded,
5.8%(n=22)reportedusing
methylphenidateforCE;of
them,41%(9/22)inthe4weeks
priortothesurvey.
Thestudyestimatestheprevalenceof,
andfactorsassociatedwith,theuseof
methylphenidateforcognitiveenhance‐
mentamongundergraduatestudents.
[36]Belgium
Methylpheni‐
date,Am‐
phetamine,
Modafinil
‐
Across‐sectional
studyof3159Medi‐
calstudents.
Papersurvey
andonlinesur‐
vey.
Approximately8.7%ofthestu‐
dentsreportedthattheyused
CEtoimprovetheiracademic
performanceduringexamtime.
Thestudyinvestigatedtheprevalenceof
thenon‐medicaluseofmethylphenidate
andknowledgeofthisdrugamongUn‐
dergraduateMedicalstudentsofthe
UniversityoftheFreeState.
[37]Canada
Methylpheni‐
date,Am‐
phetamine,
Modafinil
Caffeine
11focusgroups,3–7
participantsper
group.
Focusgroupin‐
terview.
Approximately5%to30%of
studentsreportedtheuseof
CE.
Thestudyhascertainlimitations.Firstly,
forconfidentialityreasons,theydidnot
askparticipantsabouttheirownhistory
ofusingCEs.Thisprecludedthemfrom
knowingwhenparticipantsweretruly
referringtoafriendintheirnarratives,
orwhentheywerefollowingtheinter‐
viewer’sinstructionstomasktheirown
illicitactivities.Second,theydidnotdi‐
rectlyquestionparticipantsonhowthey
knewabouttheeffectsofCEs,asthis
wasanunexpectedlineofinquiry.
[38]Italy
Coffee,
Ginkgo‐bi‐
loba,Caf‐
feine,Am‐
phetamine,
Modafinil,
Methylpheni‐
date
Ginkgobi‐
loba,Caf‐
feine,En‐
ergydrinks
433medicalstu‐
dents.Papersurvey.
Approximately74.7%ofthe
studentssaidtheyhaveused
CEtoimprovecognitivefunc‐
tions.Theremainingstudents
wereawareofconcernsabout
safetyandsideeffects.
Thestudyexploredtheuseandattitudes
towardtheuseofCEinItalianMedical
students.Onlyoneuniversitywasin‐
volved;therefore,thegeneralizabilityof
theirfindingstothewholeItalianstu‐
dentpopulationislimited.
BrainSci.2021,11,35528of38
[39]Iran
Ampheta‐
mine,
Methylpheni‐
date
‐
Cross‐sectionalstudy
wasconducted
among560Medical
studentsandclinical
residentsofBabol
UniversityofMedi‐
calSciencesduring
theacademicyear
2014–2015.
Papersurvey.
Some444students(79.3%)
filledoutthequestionnaires.49
(11%)individualsreportedam‐
phetamineandmethylpheni‐
date(Ritalin)use.Themean
ageofthestimulantdrugusers
was24.6±4.8years.Themain
initiatingfactorwastoimprove
concentration(29persons;
59.2%).
Thestudywastoevaluatethecurrent
situationofstimulantuseamongMedi‐
calstudentsandresidentsofBabolUni‐
versityofMedicalSciences.
Thesurveywasconductedinclassbe‐
forethelecturestarted,sothestudents
mayhavebeeninarushtofinishthe
questionnaires.
[40]
UK,
France,
Austria,
Belgium,
Brazil,
Canada,
German,
Hungary,
Ireland,
NewZea‐
land,Aus‐
tralia,
USA,
Portugal,
Switzer‐
landand
theNeth‐
erlands
Methylpheni‐
date,
Modafinil,
Ampheta‐
mine,Canna‐
bis
‐ (2015)n=79,640
(2017)n=29.758
Onlinesurvey.
Non‐probability
sample.
TheGlobal
DrugSurveyis
anannuallycon‐
ductedanony‐
mouswebsur‐
veyonsubstance
use.Twodata
setsfromthe
maleandfemale
GlobalDrug
Survey(GDS).
TheGlobalDrugSurvey(GDS)
isthelargeststudyonCEs
drugsthathaseverbeencon‐
ducted.Acrossbothyears,
thereweremoremalethanfe‐
malerespondents.
Accordingtoresponsesfrom
bothyears,themainsourceof
supplyforCEdrugspartici‐
pantswasthecircleoffriends
(47.8%).Oneintenindicated
thattheInternetwastheirmain
source(11.8%).
Familymemberswithapre‐
scription(6.1%)andphysicians
(3.8%)werelesscommon
sourcesforstimulantdrugs
usedforCEs.Overall,4.9%and
13.7%oftheglobalsamplere‐
portedtheuseofCEdrugsto
improveperformanceatwork
orwhilestudying.
Severallimitationswereconsidered:The
firsttwoandmostimportantlimitations
ofthestudyaretheself‐selectionofGDS
surveyparticipantsandtheuseofself‐
reporteddata.Sincethesampleisself‐
selectedandthesubstanceuseforCE
drugsconsistsofself‐reporteddata,the
actualextentofCEdrugsinthepartici‐
patingcountriesisnotaccurately
known.
Thesampleshouldnotbeconsidered
representativeofanycountry’sgeneral
population.
Athirdlimitationisthattheimpactof
recallbiasordeliberatemisreportingon
resultsmustbeconsidered.
Finally,duetotheanonymouswebsur‐
veyinstrument,thesameindividual
mighthavecompletedtheGDS2015
multipletimes.However,<1%ofthe
sampleprovidedidenticalresponsesets
acrossdemographicsandkeyvariables
usedintheseanalyses.
BrainSci.2021,11,35529of38
[41]Australia
Methylpheni‐
date,
Modafinil,
Ampheta‐
mine
‐ 1136Australianstu‐
dents.Onlinesurvey.
6.5%reportedthattheyused
CEtoimproveacademicper‐
formance.
Thestudyfoundthattheprevalenceof
non‐medicalprescriptionstimulantuse,
toimproveacademicperformance,is
lowamonguniversitystudentsinAus‐
tralia.Thecross‐sectionaldesignmeans
thatitisnotpossibletoinfercausalrela‐
tionshipsbetweentheuseofprescrip‐
tionstimulantsandotherfactors.The
useofself‐reportingmeasuresmayhave
introducedrecallandsocialdesirability
biases.
[42]Austria ‐ Caffeine
pills2284students.Papersurvey.14.9%ofparticipantsreported
theuseofCaffeinepills.
(I)Toinvestigatewhetherincludingcaf‐
feinetabletsinthedefinitionofpharma‐
cologicalneuroenhancement(PN)
withinaquestionnaireincreasesthePN
prevalenceestimate(framingeffect),
(II)Toinvestigatewhetherthehealth‐re‐
latedriskattitudeisincreasedinstu‐
dentswhousePN.
BrainSci.2021,11,35530of38
[43]Australia
Methylpheni‐
date,
Modafinil,
Ampheta‐
mine
‐ 642students.Onlinesurvey.
6.32%ofindividualsreported
lifetimeuseofoneormorepre‐
scriptionCEdrugs,listedfor
thepurposesofstudy‐related
enhancement.
Eventhoughthisstudyprovidessome
insightsintotheCEdrugusethatoccurs
atAustralianuniversities,therearesome
limitationstoconsider.Resultsshould
beinterpretedinthelightoftheconven‐
ienceandcross‐sectionalsamplingmeth‐
odsused.ParticipantsstudyingScience
degrees,womenandundergraduates
werealsooversampled.Asaresult,the
distributionofthestudentsinthecur‐
rentstudymaynotbeanaccuraterepre‐
sentationoftheentirestudentpopula‐
tionatAustralianuniversities.Thenum‐
berofillicitCEsdruguserswasalsoso
lowthatstatisticalanalyseswere
deemedinappropriateforthisgroup.
Therefore,cautionshouldbeexercised
ininterpretingtheresults,giventhecon‐
straintsofthesample.Asperprevious
work,futurestudiesmayconsiderexam‐
iningtheacademicoutcomesofAustral‐
ianstudentsthatuseCEdrugs,particu‐
larlycontextualisedregardingcoping.
BrainSci.2021,11,35531of38
[44]UK
Methylpheni‐
date,Dextro‐
ampheta‐
mine/am‐
phetamine,
Modafinil
CaffeineAllLevel1andLevel
4M.Pharm.
Papersurvey.
Convenience
sample.
Theresponserateswere89.3%
(Level1)and89.0%(Level4)
with48.0%ofrespondentsre‐
portingtheywereCEusers
(largelycaffeine).Additionally,
42.4%thoughtusingpharma‐
ceuticalCEsforimprovingaca‐
demicgradesbreachedtheir
CodeofConduct.
Thestudycouldbedoneforother
Schools,suchasotherhealthcaredisci‐
plines.However,theopinionswerecap‐
turedatonepointintime,datawere
self‐reported,andthefindingsarenot
generalisable.Perhaps,ifthestudyhad
beenconductedimmediatelybeforethe
writtenexaminations,prevalenceofCE
usewouldhavebeenhigher.Manually
distributingpaper‐basedquestionnaires
tostudentsinacompulsoryclassandan
onlinedistributionwouldenhancethe
responserate.Otherwaystomaximise
theresponserateincludedhavingarela‐
tivelyshortquestionnairewithquestions
largelyasclosedquestions.Educational
workshopscouldfurtherexploreethical
issues.
[45]Greece
Ampheta‐
mine,
methylpheni‐
date,
Cannabis
‐ 591Medicalstu‐
dents.Onlinesurvey.
About1in10medicalstudents
misusedprescriptiondrugs,
mostlyforself‐treatment
purposesandabout1in4used
illicitdrugs,mostlyfor
recreationalpurposes,with
cannabisbeingthemost
frequentlyused.
Toanalysetheprevalenceoflifetimeand
currentuseofillicitdrugsamong
Medicalstudentsworldwide.
ConsideringthatCEuseduringmedical
schoolaffectsstudents’personaland
professionallives,furtherinternational
studiesareneededtoelucidatethe
prevalenceandthemotivationofthat
useamongmedicalstudents.
BrainSci.2021,11,35532of38
[46]NewZea‐
land
Methylpheni‐
date,amphet‐
amine,
Modafinil
‐
449Pharmacy,Medi‐
cine,Nursingand
LawStudents.
Papersurvey.
Responseratewas88.6%
(442/499).
PrevalencerateofCEwas6.6%
intheuniversityenvironment
sampledTherewerenosignifi‐
cantdifferencesinstudentmo‐
tivationandlearningstrategies
betweenusersofCEandnon‐
users.
Toinvestigatewhatfactorsexplainthe
decisiontouseCEsamongtertiarystu‐
dentsinNewZealand,usingtheTheory
ofPlanedBehaviour.
Thisresearchsupportsthenotionthat
thedecisiontouseCEsisnotjustanau‐
tonomouschoicethatoccursinisolation.
Attitudesontheethicalandsocialac‐
ceptabilityofCEuseweremorelikelyto
drivethedecisiontouseCEs.
[47]Greece
Methylpheni‐
date,
Modafinil
ginseng,
taurine,caf‐
feine,Vita‐
minBcom‐
plex
450universitystu‐
dents. Papersurvey.
Thefindingsshowthatuniver‐
sitystudentsmayengagein
pharmacologicalcognitiveen‐
hancers’(PCE)useindepend‐
entoftheirstudentexperi‐
ences.Rather,achemicallyas‐
sistedperformanceenhance‐
mentmindsetseemstodiffer‐
entiateusersfromnon‐usersof
PCEs.
Thestudydidnotaddresswhethersuch
achievementmotivationsunderliethe
decision‐makingprocessestousePCEs
amonguniversitystudents.
[48]SouthAf‐
rica
Methylpheni‐
date‐
Year5Undergradu‐
ateMedicalstudents
(541students).
Papersurvey.
Some11%reportedtheuseof
methylphenidateforstudyen‐
hancementpurposes.
Therearefewlimitationsinthisstudy.
Thesurveywasself‐administered,and
thequestionnairewasconductedinclass
beforethelecturestarted,sothestudents
mayhavebeeninarushtofinishit.The
questionnairewasnotstructuredinsuch
awaytodeterminewhetherparticipants
withAttentionDeficitHyperactivity
Disorder(ADHD)wereusing
methylphenidateasprescribedormisus‐
ingitforreasonsnotrelatedtotheir
ADHD.
BrainSci.2021,11,35533of38
[49]UK
Methylpheni‐
date,Am‐
phetamine,
Modafinil
‐
66participantsfrom
RussellGroupuni‐
versities.
Focusgroupin‐
terview.
Some58/66studentsthought
thatitisagoodchoicetouse
CEs.
Thisstudywasconductedtocompare
theacuteeffectsofmethylpheni‐
date/MPH,modafinil,and3,4‐meth‐
ylenedioxymethamphetamineonthe
neuralmechanismsunderlyingre‐
sponse.Notabletodisentangleneural
activationinresponsetosuccessfulvs.
failedinhibitionsinthepresentstudy
duetothemodestnumberofno‐gotri‐
als.Thesmallnumberofinhibitiontrials
(i.e.,no‐gotrials)alsolimitedthefunc‐
tionalrelevanceofthebehaviouralre‐
sults,albeitMPHandmodafinilsignifi‐
cantlyincreasedtheprobabilityofinhi‐
bition.
[50]Australia
Methylpheni‐
date,Am‐
phetamine,
Modafinil
‐ 38students.Interview.n=5hadusedCEs.
CEsusersreportedhigherlevelsof
stressandlowerlevelsofabilitytocope
thanthesampleaverage.
[51]
United
Arabof
Emirates
‐ Caffeine
175universitystu‐
dentsinoneuniver‐
sityonly:
Year1toyear4.
TheSchoolsof:Art
andCreativeEnter‐
prises.
BusinessSciences,
Communicationand
MediaSciences.
SchoolofEducation
andSchoolofSus‐
tainability
Sciences
Papersurvey.
Convenience
sample.
Eighty‐sixpercentofthe175
participants,bothmalesandfe‐
males,atZayedUniversity,
Dubaiconsumedcaffeinated
beverageswithanaveragein‐
takeof249.7±235.9mg.Thein‐
takeamongthe150caffeine
consumersvariedfrom4.2
mg/dayto932.2mg/day.
Thestudywastodeterminethepreva‐
lenceofcaffeinatedbeverageconsump‐
tionamonguniversitystudentsandthe
perceivedbenefits.Inadditiontothees‐
timationofdailycaffeineconsumption,
thestudywasundertakeninoneuniver‐
sityonly.
IntheUAE,thelimitedstudiesthatwere
doneregardingthisconcernshowedthe
hightendencyofuniversitystudentsto‐
wardstheconsumptionofcaffeinated
drinks,mainlyenergydrinks.
BrainSci.2021,11,35534of38
[52]Iceland
Methylpheni‐
date,Dextro‐
ampheta‐
mine/am‐
phetamine,
Modafinil
‐ n=521.Onlinesurvey.
Approximately11%usedCE
withoutprescription,42%had
aprescription.Thereasonfor
themisusewastoimprove
theiracademicperformance.
Toreviewhistoricalinformationcon‐
cerningprescriptionstimulantsandto
summarisetheliteraturewithrespectto
misuseamongadults,particularlycol‐
legestudents,includingriskfactors,me‐
diatorsandmoderators,andmotivations
forprescriptionstimulantmisuse.Lack
ofunderstandinginvariabilityaccord‐
ingtodoselevelandindividualvariabil‐
ityisaclearlimitationacrossmoststud‐
iesexaminingthepotentialforneu‐
rocognitiveenhancementfromprescrip‐
tiondrugs.
[53]France
Methylpheni‐
date,
Modafinil,
3,4‐Methyl
enedioxy
methamphet‐
amine
(MDMAor
ecstasy),pi‐
racetam,am‐
phetamine.
‐
1718Medicalstu‐
dentsandphysi‐
cians.
Onlinesurvey.
Approximately33%reported
theuseofCE,mainlytoin‐
creaseacademicperformances
andtostayawakeduringexam
preparations.
Toestimatetheprevalenceofpsychost‐
imulantuseintheFrenchmedicalcom‐
munityandtheirmotives.Lackofdirect
informationontheperiodofstimulant
use.Itwasachoicetokeepthequestion‐
naireshorttomaximizetheresponse
rate.Thislimitwaspartiallyaddressed
bytheageatthefirstpsychostimulant
use,whichwasconsideredintheanal‐
yses.
BrainSci.2021,11,35535of38
[54]Lithuania
Modafinil,
Methylpheni‐
date,Am‐
phetamine
‐
Across‐sectionalsur‐
veystudywasper‐
formedbyanalysing
aconveniencesam‐
pleofn=579inthe
twouniversitiesof‐
feringMedicaledu‐
cationinLithuania.
Papersurvey.
Approximately8.1%reported
thattheyhadusedCEintheir
lifetime.
Toanalysetheuseofcognitiveenhanc‐
ersamongmedicalstudentsinLithua‐
nia,todeterminethereasonsforusage
andevaluatethecontributingfactors,
suchassociodemographiccharacteris‐
tics,stresslevels,sleepqualityand
knowingsomebodywhohasuseda
neuro‐enhancingdrug.Studentspartici‐
patedinthestudywithoutanyprevious
knowledgeaboutit,whichmeansthata
surprisefactormayhaveplayedarole
andmemoriescouldbebiased.
[55]
Lithuania
andthe
Nether‐
lands
Racetam
groupsub‐
stancesBen‐
zodiazepines
Modafinil,
Methylpheni‐
date,Am‐
phetamine
Caffeine
pills
Interviewn=35
Surveyn=113
Onlinesurvey
andInterview
From113respondentsinthe
survey,24(21%)reportedhav‐
ingtriedCEs.
Mostofparticipantsturnedto
CEstoenhancetheirconcentra‐
tionforthepurposeofstudy
andtimemanagement.
Futureresearchneedstotakeintoac‐
countthegreatvarietyofdrugs/sub‐
stancesthatstudentsuseasCEsinreal‐
lifesettings.
[56] TheNeth‐
erlands
Methylpheni‐
date,
Modafinil,
Rivastigmine,
BetaBlockers
‐ 1572students.Onlinesurvey.
Noresponsewasreportedon
theuseofModafinilandRi‐
vastigmine.52studentsre‐
portedtheuseofmethylpheni‐
date.36%hadusedBetaBlock‐
ersatleastonceintheirlife‐
time.
Conveniencesamplingconstitutedonly
anapproximaterepresentationofthe
studentpopulationintheNetherlands.
Women,forexample,wereover‐
sampled.Inaddition,thesamplewas
notequallydistributedfordifferentuni‐
versities,aswellasnotdistributedbeing
inlinewiththeabsolutedifferencein
numberofstudentsofthe14DutchGov‐
ernmentsupporteduniversities.
BrainSci.2021,11,35536of38
[57]Iran Methylpheni‐
date Alcohol16,000medicalstu‐
dents. Papersurvey.
Theprevalenceofprescription
drugmisuse,alcoholuseinthe
previousyear,andeveryillicit
substanceusewas4.9%,6.9%,
and2.9%,respectively.
Thereislimitedinformationaboutillicit
druguseandassociatedfactorsin
hookahsmokersinIran.So,theaimof
thisstudywastoassessthestatusofil‐
licitdruguseandassociatedfactors
amonghookahsmokersofKhalilAbad
cityin2015.
[21] Switzer‐
land
Methylpheni‐
date,
Modafinil
‐
Studentsatthree
Swissuniversities
wereinvitedby
emailtoparticipate
inaweb‐basedsur‐
vey.Ofthe29,282
studentswhowere
contacted,3056par‐
ticipated.
Onlinesurvey.
Approximately22%usedCEto
improvecognitiveperfor‐
manceswhilestudying.
Investigatestudents’attitudestoward
PCE.Theresponserateforthepresent
surveywas10%.Thestudysamplemay
nothavebeennecessarilyrepresentative
ofallSwissstudents.Althoughallstu‐
dentsfromUniBasandETHZ(ETHZü‐
richUniversity)wereinvited,only5000
ofatotalof26,000studentswhowere
currentlyenrolledatUniversityofZü‐
rich(UZH),whohadpreviouslyagreed
tobecontactedforparticipationinvari‐
ousstudies,couldbeinvited.
[22]UKand
Ireland
Modafinil,
Methylpheni‐
date,Dextro‐
ampheta‐
mine/am‐
phetamine
‐ 877studentsin104
universities.
Papersurveyofa
convenience
sampleof877
studentsmeas‐
uredPCEpreva‐
lence,attitudes,
sources,pur‐
posesandethics.
Only2%reportedthatthey
haveusedCE.
Resultsfromtheconveniencesample
surveymaybebiased,duetopartici‐
pants’self‐selection.Theyonlyusedan
onlinesurvey,whichwasconsideredtoo
costlyandunfeasibleduetoaccessbarri‐
ers.
BrainSci.2021,11,35537of38
[58]
Northern
Ireland,
Wales
andEng‐
land
Cannabis,Ec‐
stasy,am‐
phetamines
‐
3706studentsfrom7
universitiesacross
NorthernIreland,
WalesandEngland.
England(Gloucester‐
shiren=908,Bath
Span=462,Oxford
Brookesn=203,
Chestern=883,
Plymouthn=167);
Wales(Swansean=
398);andtheRepub‐
licofNorthernIre‐
land(Ulstern=463).
Eachparticipating
institutionprovided
ethicalapproval.
Papersurvey.
Convenience
sample.
Some5%reportedthatthey
hadregularuseofCE,and25%
usedCEoccasionally,and70%
never.
Thestudycouldbecarriedoutatother
schools,suchasotherinhealthcaredis‐
ciplines.However,theopinionswere
capturedatonepointintime,datawere
self‐reported,andthefindingsarenot
generalisable.
Perhapsifthestudyhadbeenconducted
immediatelybeforethewrittenexamina‐
tions,prevalenceofCEusewouldhave
beenhigher.Manuallydistributingpa‐
per‐basedquestionnairestostudentsina
compulsoryclassandanonlinedistribu‐
tionwouldenhancetheresponserate.
Otherwaystomaximisetheresponse
rateincludedhavingarelativelyshort
questionnairewithquestionslargelyas
closedquestions.
[59]Switzer‐
land
Methylpheni‐
date,Dextro‐
ampheta‐
mine/am‐
phetamine,
Modafinil
‐ 1765students.Onlineandpa‐
persurvey.
4.7%hadusedCEforthepur‐
poseofstudying.
Thefindingsfromthissurveycanlead
toabetterunderstandingofwhysome
studentsarealreadyusingCEandcan
alsoaddtothediscussiononsocial
normsandvaluesinthecontextoflegal‐
izingorprohibitingsuchproducts.
BrainSci.2021,11,35538of38
[60]France
Methylpheni‐
date
Modafinil,
ampheta‐
mines,Pi‐
racetam
‐ 206students.
Onlinesurvey
senttoaFrench
sampleofMedi‐
cineandPhar‐
macologystu‐
dentsusing
email.
Among206undergraduatestu‐
dents,139students(67.4%)de‐
claredtohaveconsumedat
leastonecognitiveenhancerin
thepast12months.Twelvestu‐
dents(8.6%ofcognitiveen‐
hancersusersand5.8%ofour
totalsample)usedillicitphar‐
maceuticalneuroenhancers.
Assessprevalenceandmotivationsfor
licit(useinsidemedicalindication)and
illicitpharmaceuticalneuroenhancer
consumption(tabletform)inanon‐se‐
lectedFrenchsampleofMedicineand
Pharmacologystudents.Aprevalenceof
5.8%forsmartdrugsconsumptionin
PharmacologyandMedicalstudents,
mostlyinordertoenhanceacademic
performancesandvigilancewasrec‐
orded.Methylphenidatewasthemost
frequentlyconsumedmolecule.
[61]USA
Methylpheni‐
date,Dextro‐
ampheta‐
mine/am‐
phetamine
‐ 4yearsrepeated
study.Onlinesurvey.
1in5studentsreportedtheuse
ofCEatleastonceintheirlife‐
time.
Examinedstimulants’cognitive
enhancementeffectsandthe
psychologicalprofileofnon‐medical
stimulantusers.Adouble‐blind,
placebo‐controlledexperimentfoundno
enhancingeffectofmixedamphetamine
salts(Adderall)onhealthyparticipants’
inhibitorycontrol,workingmemory,
episodicmemory,convergentcreativity,
perceptualintelligenceanda
standardizedachievementtest.No
moderatingeffectsofbaseline
performanceorCatechol‐O‐
methyltransferase(COMT)genotype
weredetected.
BrainSci.2021,11,35539of38
[62]Germany
Ampheta‐
mine,
Methylpheni‐
date,Ecstasy,
Cocaine
‐ 18participants. Interview.
Amongallparticipants(n=18
=100%),77.8%(n=14)had
usedillicitstimulants(AMPH)
and38.9%(n=8)prescription
stimulants(MPH).22.2%(n=4)
hadusedprescriptionaswell
asillicitstimulantsforaca‐
demicperformanceenhance‐
ment.
Severallimitationswerereported.One
ofthemisthelimitednumberofinter‐
views:Only18interviewsweretaken
intoconsideration.Inspiteofthefact
thattheUniversitypopulationwas
36,000registeredstudentswhohadthe
possibilitytonoticetheadvertisingplac‐
ardsofthisinterviewstudythroughout
thecampus,only30studentscontacted
them,andonly22werewillingtopartic‐
ipate.GivenCEprevalenceratesof3–
20%,thereshouldhavebeenamuch
highernumberofpotentialparticipants
forthisstudy.Theyhypothesizethatthe
stigmatizingsubjectofthisstudyisthe
reasonforthelowparticipationrate,
notwithstandingthefactthatanonymity
wasguaranteedandthatparticipants
wereremuneratedfortheirtimeandef‐
fortwith30Euros.
[63]USA
Methylpheni‐
date,Am‐
phetamine
‐
1115medicalstu‐
dentsamulti‐institu‐
tionalcensususinga
31–48itemonline
surveyregardinguse
ofprescriptionpsy‐
chostimulants
Onlinesurvey.
Approximately18%hadre‐
portedthattheyusedCEat
leastonceintheirlifetime.
Giventhatstudents’responsesareself‐
reported,andthatnon‐medicallypre‐
scribedstimulantuseisillegal,misre‐
portingisapotentialconcerninthis
survey.However,thesurveydidnot
distinguishbetweengivingaway(ille‐
gal)orselling(criminal)thesedrugs.
Previousstudieshaveindicatedthat
anonymousself‐reportedsurveyshave
lowmisreportingrates.
BrainSci.2021,11,35540of38
[64]USA
Dextroam‐
pheta‐
mine/am‐
phetamine
(Adderall)
‐ 213,633tweets.Onlinesurvey.
Approximately12.9%tweets
concernedtheuseofAdderall
forstudyingpurposes.
First,noteveryAdderalltweetwasre‐
latedtoactualuse.Forexample,they
observedsonglyricsthatimpactthese
counts,suchasthetwooftenquoted
lines“Collegehoeslovealcoholand
poppingAdderall”and“I’vebeenup
for3days…Adderallandredbull.”In
oursample,therewere4275tweetsthat
havethewords“collegehoeslove”and
894thathavethewords“beenupfor
three3days”.Thesenumbersprobably
inflatethenumberofmatchesfor“col‐
lege”,“alcohol”,and“redbull”above
thenumberofpeopletweetingabout
usingthesesubstances.
[65]Germany
Dextroam‐
pheta‐
mine/am‐
phetamine,
Modafinil,
Methylpheni‐
date
‐ 2569students. Papersurvey.
Anestimated12‐monthpreva‐
lenceofusingcognitiveen‐
hancingdrugswas20%.Preva‐
lencevariedbysex(male
23.7%,female17.0%),fieldof
study(highestinstudentsstud‐
yingSports‐relatedfields,
25.4%),andsemester(firstse‐
mester24.3%,beyondfirstse‐
mester16.7%).
Asaresultofthestudyfindings,drug
preventionmodelsneedtobeestab‐
lishedatalluniversitiesinGermany.
[66]USA
Dextroam‐
pheta‐
mine/am‐
phetamine,
Methylpheni‐
date,
Modafinil
‐
372Medical,Phar‐
macyandRespira‐
toryTherapystu‐
dents.
Onlinesurvey.
Approximately10.9%Medi‐
cine,9.7%Pharmacyand26.3%
Respiratorythestudentsre‐
portedtheuseofCEtoenhance
alertnessandimproveaca‐
demicperformance.
Theincidenceofpsychosisorwith‐
drawalassociateddepressionisnot
knownforprescriptiondrugs.
BrainSci.2021,11,35541of38
[67]Canada
Methylpheni‐
date,
Modafinil
Caffeine
pills
647Medicalstudents
acrossallfouryears.Onlinesurvey.
Approximately8%oftheSen‐
iorsreporttheuseofCEvs.2%
ofJuniorstudentsusingCEfor
cognitiveenhancement.
Itwascarriedoutatasingleinstitution;
however,wehavenoreasontobelieve
thattheresultsarenotgeneralizableto
studentsstudyingelsewhere.Whileself‐
selectionmayhaveledtoapositivere‐
sponsebias,itisequallyplausiblethat
nonrespondentsdidnotwishtodis‐
closeuseofcognitiveenhancers.
[68]UKMethylpheni‐
date
Caffeine
pills1614students.Onlinesurvey.
Approximately33%hadused
drugswithoutprescriptionof
which0.5%usedstimulantsfor
astudyingreason.6%usedcaf‐
feinepills.
Thelimitationinthisstudyisthatthere‐
sponseratesarequitelowandalsothe
studyisexposedtothelimitationsofall
self‐reportedsurveys.
[69]Italy
Modafinil,
Methylpheni‐
date,Dextro‐
ampheta‐
mine/am‐
phetamine
‐ 77Undergraduate
students.Papersurvey.Approximately16%reported
theyhadtakenCEinthepast.
Thelimitationinthisstudyistheques‐
tiononCEusewhichdidnotspecify
whatexactlythestudentstook;theirbe‐
haviourriskisdifficulttoassessandas‐
sumesthatthetrulyproblematicbehav‐
iouristotakeCEdrugswithouthaving
aprescription.
[70]Iran Methylpheni‐
date‐ GroupofMedical
students Papersurvey.
Approximately8.7%reported
theuseofmethylphenidateat
leastonceintheirlifetime.
Thefirstlimitationisthevalidityofself‐
reportedmethylphenidateuseamong
respondentswhichdependsontheir
willingnesstoreplytruthfullytothesur‐
vey.Second,thesampleinthestudywas
fromoneuniversity,therebynecessitat‐
ingthatsimilarstudiesbeconductedin
othermedicalschoolsforcomparison.
Third,thestudydidnotexplicitlyad‐
dressdurationorfrequencyof
methylphenidateuse.Therefore,itisun‐
knownwhethernon‐prescriptionusers
tookmethylphenidateregularlyoronly
occasionally.
BrainSci.2021,11,35542of38
[71] Germany
Methylpheni‐
date,Dextro‐
ampheta‐
mine/am‐
phetamine,
Modafinil,
MDMA
‐
1035studentsofpu‐
pilsfrom(Vocational
andGrammar
Schools)and512stu‐
dentsfromMedicine,
PharmacyandEco‐
nomicsSchools.
Papersurvey.
Approximately1.55%ofpupils
fromVocationalandGrammar
Schoolvs.0.78%amongstu‐
dentsinMedical,Pharmacy
andEconomicsreportedalife‐
timeprovenanceforCEuse.
2.42%ofpupilsvs.2.93%of
studentsreportedlifetimeuse
ofCEforcognitiveenhance‐
ment.
Datasamplingwasnon‐random,partici‐
pantswerenotabletorefuseparticipa‐
tioninadiscreteway.Atleastinthestu‐
dentpopulation,inwhichapproxi‐
mately30%didnotfillinthequestion‐
naires;itcannotbeexcludedthatstimu‐
lantuseisunderreportedsinceespe‐
ciallystudentswith“negativebehav‐
iours”didnotfillinthequestionnaires,
leadingtounderreportingofstimulant
use.
[72] USA
Dextroam‐
pheta‐
mine/am‐
phetamine,
Methylpheni‐
date
‐ 4580students.Onlinesurvey.
Approximately75.8%reported
thattheyhaveusedampheta‐
mine(Adderall)inthepast
year,24.5%usedmethylpheni‐
date(Ritalin).
Sampleconsistedofstudentsfromasin‐
gleuniversity,whichmaylimitthegen‐
eralizabilityoftheresults.However,the
prevalenceratesofillicituseofprescrip‐
tionstimulantsinthissingleinstitution
studywerecomparabletothosefound
innationalsurveysofcollegestudents.
[73]USA
Dextroam‐
pheta‐
mine/am‐
phetamine,
Methylpheni‐
date
‐ 9161students.Papersurvey.
Approximately8.1%reported
lifetimeuseofCE,5.4%re‐
portedpastyearuseofCEto
increasealertnessandconcen‐
tratebetter.
The2001CollegeAlcoholSurvey(CAS)
didnotmeasurelegitimatemedicaluse
ofprescriptionstimulantsordiagnosis,
soitwasnotpossibletoassesshow
manystudentswithlegitimateprescrip‐
tionsforstimulantsmayhavemisused
theirownorsomeoneelse’sstimulant
medication.Asthedatawerecross‐sec‐
tional,inferencesaboutcausalityare
limitedandtheycouldnotassess
whethercertainfactorsprecededinitia‐
tionofnon‐medicaluseofprescription
stimulants.Longitudinaldataare
neededtofurtherexaminethedirection‐
alityoftheseassociations.
BrainSci.2021,11,35543of38
[74]USA
Methylpheni‐
date,Dextro‐
ampheta‐
mine/am‐
phetamine,
MDMA
‐ 150students.Papersurvey.
Approximately35.3%reported
theyhadmisusedAmpheta‐
mineonceintheirlifetime,10%
abuseditmonthlyand8%
weekly.
Reportsofstimulantusearehighinthe
research;itmaybethatarelativelysmall
samplewasnotrepresentativeofcollege
studentsingeneral,despiteattemptsto
avoidselectionbias.Asignificantpro‐
portionofstudentscamefromUnder‐
graduatePsychologyclassesandthese
studentsmaydifferfromthoseinother
Majors.Alternatively,itispossiblethat
small,competitivecollegesattractstu‐
dentswhohavebeenexposedtostimu‐
lantuse,orwhoarewillingtoexperi‐
mentwithAmphetaminestoenhance
academicperformance.
BrainSci.2021,11,35527of38
Figure1.Cognitiveenhancers’intakebyuniversitystudents:PreferredReportingItemsforSys‐
tematicReviewsandMeta‐Analyses(PRISMA)FlowDiagram.
Table1showsthesummaryoffindingsfromtheliteraturereviewontheprevalence
ofCEsamonguniversitystudents.
NinestudieswereconductedintheUK(i.e.,sixsurveystudies,twointerviewsand
onemixedmethodsstudy).Theremainingstudiesincludedsurveystudiesthatwerecon‐
ductedintheUSA(n=8)andIran(n=4).InAustralia,threesurveysandoneinterview,
inCanada,twosurveysandonefocusgroupinterview,inGermany,threesurveysand
oneinterviewwereconducted.Threesurveystudieswerecarriedoutineachofthefol‐
lowingcountries:Brazil,France,ItalyandSwitzerland.Twosurveystudieswerecarried
outineachofthefollowingcountries:Austria,Belgium,Greece,NewZeelandandthe
Netherlands;andonesurveystudywascarriedoutineachofthefollowingcountries:
Hungary,Iceland,Ireland,Lithuania,Pakistan,Portugal,SouthAfricaandUAE.Finally,
onemixed‐methodsstudywascarriedoutinbothLithuaniaandtheNetherlands.Partic‐
ipantswerestudentsfromarangeofdisciplines,includingMedicine,Pharmacy,Engi‐
neering,Law,ComputerScience,Business,Education,PsychologyandSocialSciences.
Thesamplesizeofthedifferentstudiesrangedbetween77and80,000participantseach.
Anoverviewofthedemographicvariables,prevalenceofuse,technicalknowledge
ofCEs,motivationsforuse,sourceofCEs’acquisitionandpositive/negativesubjective
effectsissummarisedhere.
1. Demographics’variables
MaleswerehereidentifiedasthemosttypicalCEmisusers
[7,22,30,31,41,51,52,63,66,70,71,73–75],withsomestudiesreportingamale:femaleratioof
3:1[54].Incontrastwiththis,aWelshstudyreportedthatfemalerepresentationwas
slightlymorethanmales[68].
Records identified through data
b
ase searching
(n= 1400)
Pub Med (n= 520)
Science direct (n= 490)
Scopus (n= 390)
ScreeningIncludedEligibilityIden
t
i
f
ica
t
ion
Records screening after dupl icates
removed (n= 1352)
A
r
ticles
excluded
(titles/abstract)
(n =1294)
Full-text articles assessed
for eligibility
(n =58)
Full-text a
r
ticles
excluded, with
reasons
(n = 10)
Animal study (n=7).
Participants under 18
years old (n=1).
Non-English articles
(n=2)
Studies included in
quantitative synthesis
(n = 48)
A
r
ticles
removed due
to duplicate
(n=48)
BrainSci.2021,11,35528of38
2. PrevalenceofCEs’use
AgrowthofCEs’intakeoverthepastfewyearshasbeenreported,includingfrom
bothhigh‐rankinguniversitiesandhighlycompetitivecoursessuchasMedicineand
Pharmacy[41].IntheUK,findingsshowedthat33%oftheparticipantsusedCEswhich
werenotprescribedtothemforthepurposeofstudy[68].Inasurveyconductedamong
UKandIrelanduniversitystudents,itwasfoundthatthelifetimeprevalenceoftheuse
ofmodafinil,methylphenidateandamphetaminewere,respectively,6.2%,5.9%,and2%
[22].Conversely,thelifetimeprevalenceofCEs’intakeamongUniversitystudentsinthe
USwasestimatedtorangebetween5%and43%[76].Moreprecisely,ameta‐analysisfrom
theUSestimatedthatthemisuseofCEsamonguniversitystudentswas17%[75].Com‐
paredtotheUS,mostBritishuniversitystudentsmaybemorecautiousinusingprescrip‐
tiondrugsasCEs[49].
ArecentstudyinBrazilreportedthat,outof1865studentsfromdifferentacademic
disciplines,4.2%reportedtohavinghadusedCEsinthelast12 months,withthemost
popularmoleculehavingbeenmethylphenidatewhichwasnotassociatedwithanADHD
diagnosis.Withrespecttowhatisbeingdescribedinlesscompetitivestudyfields[77],
MedicineandPharmacyhavebeenidentifiedasbeingbothstressfulandhighlycompeti‐
tiveacademiccoursesworldwide[44,45].Inthisrespect,astudythatwasconducted
amongmedicalstudentsinIran(2000–2007)showedthatmethylphenidateusers’mean
knowledgescorewashigherthanthatofnon‐users(p=0.008),withage(range18–28
years),sex(male92.5%)and26%fourthschoolyearhavingbeenpositivelycorrelated
withknowledgescore(p<0.05).Some8.7%ofparticipantshadtakenmethylphenidateat
leastonceintheirlifetime[70].Similarly,astudycarriedoutinLithuaniareportedthat
thepointprevalenceofCEs(modafinil,methylphenidateandamphetamine)amongmed‐
icalstudentswas8.1%[77].
Finally,caffeineuseasaCEhasgrowninpopularityworldwide[78].Astudyinthe
UAEassessedtheprevalenceandperceivedbenefitsofcaffeinatedbeverageconsumption
amonguniversitystudents[51].Morethan98.5%ofthestudyparticipantswereshownto
becaffeineconsumers,with31%havingreportedbeingaddictedtocaffeine;heavycaf‐
feineconsumptionwassignificantlyassociatedwithheartproblems[51].
Despitetheglobalpopularityofthenon‐prescriptioncaffeine,mostresearcharticles
reporttheuseofprescriptionCEsamonguniversitystudents.Therefore,thetruepreva‐
lenceofprescriptionvs.non‐prescriptionCEsamonguniversitystudentsisnotfullyun‐
derstoodand,hence,moreresearchisneeded.
3.2.CEs’KnowledgeandReportedPositive/NegativeEffects
Universitystudentsmaybeattractedbystimulantdrugsforseveralreasons,e.g.,to
increaseawaketime,enhancecognitiveperformance,improveprofessionalandacademic
achievement[41],butalsotohelpwithsocialisingandgettinghigh[79].Indeed,themain
motivationsformisusingmethylphenidatemayrelatetoimprovingconcentration
(65.2%),helpingwithstudying(59.8%)andincreasingwakefulness(47.5%)[73].Other
studieshaveassociatedmethylphenidatemisusewiththeneedtohelpwithconcentration,
stayalert,havemoreenergyandimproveself‐confidencelevels[17,34,70].A2019UK
qualitativestudywithBiomedicalScienceundergraduatestudentsexaminedtheirunder‐
standingoftherisksofnon‐prescribeddrugs,andparticularlymodafinil,misuse.Drivers
ofusewererelatedtouniversitypressuresanddesirestoincreaseproductivity;thecus‐
tomisationofthesleep–wakecyclewasdescribedasakeybenefitof‘studydrug’use[32].
Increasingthelevelsofcognitiveperformancemayindeedpotentiallyallowstudents
tostudyformorehours,and/orincreaseworkingmemoryperformance[80].According
toGreelyetal.(2008),modafinilmaybechosenasaCEbecauseofitshighonlineaccessi‐
bilityandavailability.Conversely,whilststudiesintheUKsuggestedthatCEdrugssuch
asmodafinilcanenhancethinkingskills[81],over‐confidencewasreportedasoneofthe
CE’ssideeffects,togetherwithahighriskofdependence[2].
BrainSci.2021,11,35529of38
ThepopularityofcaffeineandrelatedproductsasCEsmayberelatedtotheneedto
boostenergy,stayawake,improvemood,increaseconcentrationandsocialise[51].Inthe
UAE,themeanlevelofknowledgeaboutcaffeinewasdescribedaslessthan33%.Younger
participants(p=0.008)andthosewhoworkedinhealthcareandeducation(p<0.001)were
significantlymoreknowledgeableaboutitsnegativeeffects,includinganxiety,insomnia,
tachycardia,irritabilityandmuscletremors[51].Arecentsystematicreviewfocussingon
theeffectsofthecaffeine‐containingplantPaulliniacupana(“guarana”)oncognitionin
young,healthyadultsfoundimprovedlevelsinbothreactiontimeandaccuracyperfor‐
mance[82].Guaranahasalsobeendescribedtoimprovememoryperformanceandin‐
creasealertnesslevels[83].Long‐termuseofhighdoseofguaranacan,however,resultin
aseriesofadverseeffects,includingirritability,palpitationandanxiety[2,84].
Despitethelegalrestrictionsthatcontrolthepossessionandsupplyofcontrolled
CEs,studentsoftenobtainthemduetotheirdesiredpharmacologicaleffects.Table2sum‐
marisesthedesiredeffectsofCEs,theirneuro‐modulatoryeffectsandtheirlegalclassifi‐
cation.
MixturesofCEsubstances/drugsusedbyhealthystudentstoimprovecognitionis
ontheriseandisbeingconsideredasatypeof“academicdoping”[85].Poly‐CEusehas
beendocumentedinpreviousstudies[86].InSwitzerland,usersreportedingesting
methylphenidateinadditiontootherCEs.Othersreportedusingbothmodafinilinaddi‐
tiontoAlzheimer’sdiseasedrugs.Othersingestedantidepressantsincombinationwith
Parkinson’sdiseasedrugs[86].Studieshaveshownthatmethylphenidateuserswere
morelikelytouseillicitsubstancesaswelle.g.,marijuanaandecstasy(MDMAor3,4‐
methylenedioxymethamphetamine)ascomparedtootherprescriptionCEus‐
ers[9].
Poly‐CEusewithpsychostimulantandothereffectsoffersbothsynergisticandad‐
ditiveeffectsbasedonusedsubstances,hencepotentiallycombiningcognitiveeffectswith
wakefulness;emotionaland/ormotivationaleffects;mood‐,performance‐,andexecutive
functioning‐enhancingandeuphoriceffects[87,88],withriskstohealththatmayrange
frommildtoseriousrisksincludingdependence,toleranceandneurological,psychologi‐
calandcardiovasculardisorders,withariskofoverdosepotentiallyleadingtodeath.
The2015WesternAustralianStimulantRegulatorySchemeshowedthatstudents
mayuseCEtocopewithstudy‐relatedstress[89].TheyalsofoundthatCEusersarealso
regularillicitpsychostimulantusers,yettherelationshipbetweenCEandotherpsychost‐
imulantsuchasMDMA(ecstasy)co‐use/consumptionistobedetermined[90].
BrainSci.2021,11,35530of38
Table2.StudiessummarisingCognitiveEnhancers(CEs)’legalclassification,desiredeffectsandneuro‐modulatorymechanisms.
Drug/Sub‐
stance
Brand
Name
Misuseof
Drugs
Regulation
(2001)(UK)
Misuseof
DrugsAct
1971(UK)
CurrentlyRecommendedClinicalUseandNeuro‐ModulatoryMechanism
Ampheta‐
minesaltsAdderallSchedule2ClassB
AmphetaminesareaclassofpharmaceuticalsthatincludeAdderall,dextroamphetamine,and
lisdexapmhetamine(L‐lysine‐d‐amphetamine)[91].Thesedrugsweredevelopedtotreatatten‐
tiondeficithyperactivitydisorder(ADHD)inadultsandchildren[4].Thesemoleculesareclassi‐
fiedasScheduleIIaccordingtotheMisuseofDrugsRegulation(2001)andClassBaccordingto
theMisuseofDrugsAct1971,duetotheirhighabusepotential.Eventhoughtheriskofdevelop‐
ingdependenceonthesedrugsisbelievedtobelowforindividualstakingthemforADHD,the
ScheduleIIclassificationindicatesthatthereisahighpotentialforabuseandseveredependence
[4].Thesedrugswerealsodemonstratedtoimproveepisodicmemory,workingmemory,and
someaspectsofattentioningeneralpopulation[92].Thetherapeuticeffectofbothamphetamine
andmethylphenidateinADHDisconsistentwiththefindingoftheabnormalitiesinthecate‐
cholaminesysteminindividualswithADHD[93,94].
Caffeine Genius
Caffeine
Over‐the
counter
(OTC)
‐
Theusageofcaffeineisincreasingworldwide[95].Theunderlyingmotivationsaremainly
memoryandconcentrationenhancementandphysicalperformanceimprovement.Coffeeand
caffeine‐containingproductsaffectthecentralnervoussystem,withtheirlocomotoractivity
stimulationandanxiogenic‐likeeffects[78].Caffeinealsoimpactsonotherneurotransmitters,in‐
cludingdopamine,noradrenaline,serotonin,glutamate,acetylcholineandgamma‐aminobutyric
acid[96].CaffeineconsumptionisveryprevalentamongtheUK[97]andUAE[51]population.
Healthyconsumptionneedstobepromoted[51].Althoughcaffeineisalsoastimulant,itisnot
illegaltousewithoutaprescription[66].
Cyanocobala‐
min(vitamin
B12)
AthleteOTC‐
Itmayhelppatientsonlong‐termmedicationsandthosewithneurologicaldisorders[98].Cogni‐
tiveperformancecanbeimproved,andtheriskofbrainatrophyreduced,byVitaminB12[99].
BrainSci.2021,11,35531of38
Guarana
(Paullinia
cupana)
N‐R‐GOTC‐
PaulliniacupanaisaplantnativetotheAmazonbasinwhichisespeciallycommoninBrazil[100].
AreviewstudyontheeffectofGuaranaamonghealthyindividualsreportedanimprovementin
reactiontimeandaccuracyofperformanceatcognitivetasks[82].Guaranaseedsarepopular
worldwidefortheircognitive,stimulantandbehaviouraleffects[82].
Methylpheni‐
date RitalinSchedule2ClassB
ItisastimulantdrugusedtotreatADHDandnarcolepsy.IthasbeencontrolledasScheduleII
accordingtotheMisuseofDrugsRegulation(2001)andClassBaccordingtotheMisuseofDrugs
Act1971duetoitshighabusepotential.Volkowandcolleagues(2004)showedtheeffectsof
methylphenidateonmotivation,whichcanaffectacademicperformancewhilstincreasingcogni‐
tiveabilityandimprovingstudents’self‐ratedinterestinarelativelydullmathematicaltask.A
studyreportedthatmethylphenidatehasoneofthehighestprescriptionsrates,associatedwith
anabundanceofwebsitesofferingtosellandsupplythedrugwithoutaprescriptiontoUKusers
[30].Universitystudentsmightbeattractedtomethylphenidatebecauseofitsallegedincreasein
attentionandfocusinglevels[101].Amonguniversitystudents,theself‐reportedmisusingrates
werefrom1.5to31%dependingonthedifferentsurveysconsidered,withthemostnationally
(Germanwhitemales,affiliatedwithaformallyorganisedfraternity)representativestudyesti‐
matinganannualillicitmethylphenidateusageofabout4%[101].
ModafinilProvigil
Prescrip‐
tion‐only‐
medicine
(POM)
‐
Wakefulness‐promotingagentssuchasmodafinilandarmodafinilarestimulantdrugswhichare
usedinthetreatmentofnarcolepsyandshiftworkerssleepdisorders[30].Themechanismofac‐
tionofmodafinilispoorlyexplainedintheliterature.Ithasbeenreportedthatmodafinilaffects
GABAergicanddopaminergicpathwaysintheprefrontalcortexandhaseffectsonneurotrans‐
mittersystems(e.g.,noradrenalineanddopamine)[80].Modafinilispraisedforitsabilitytoim‐
provereactiontime,logicalreasoningandproblemsolving[77].
PiracetamNootropilPOM‐
Compoundsfromtheracetamfamilyincludepiracetam,oxiracetam,etc[102].Piracetambelongs
tothenootropicdrugs’groupwhichincludesthebraincellmetabolismandenergyenhancement
[103].AlthoughPiracetamisofficiallyrecognizedasanootropic,itsenhancingeffectsinthe
healthyindividual’sbrainaremoderate[104,54].Theracetammoleculesarebeingusedacrossa
rangeofbraindisorders,includingAlzheimer’sdisease,narcolepsy,ADHD,Parkinson’sdisease
andbrainaging[105,106].
BrainSci.2021,11,35532of38
Pyridoxine
(vitaminB6)NestrexOTC‐
Pyridoxine,oneofthemostcommonformsofVitaminB6[107],issaidtosignificantlyimprove
verbalmemoryandexecutivefunction[108].Itcanaidinthesynthesisofneurotransmittersand
aminoacids.Someoftheseneurotransmittersarenorepinephrine,serotonin,GABAanddopa‐
mine[108].ThereisnoevidencethatVitaminB6short‐termuse(e.g.,for5–12weeks)improves
cognitivefunctionormood[109].MoreevidenceisneededtodeterminewhetherVitaminB6
supplementsmightimprovecognitioninhealthypeople.
Vinpocetine
(Vincaminor)CavintonOTC‐
Isanalkaloidoftheperiwinkleplant(Vincaminor)[110]
,
whichhasbeenshowntoexertabrain
neuroprotectiveeffectbyacombinedactiononbrainmetabolism,cerebralcirculationandrheo‐
logicalpropertiesoftheblood.Thismayboostthecerebralmetabolismthusenhancingbothoxy‐
genandglucoseutilizationwhilstconsequentlyimprovingcerebralfunctionsandprovidingpro‐
tectioneveninconditionsofhypoxiaandischaemia[111].Itiscommonlyusedasanootropic
thatpromotesmemoryformation[106].
BrainSci.2021,11,35533of38
3.3.SourcesofCEs’Acquisition
SourcesofCEacquisitionmayrelatetofriendsandfamily[7,59].Studentsdiagnosed
withADHD,butnottakingtheirmethylphenidatemedicationregularly,havebeenre‐
portedasthemainsourceforfellowstudents[4].Inanotherstudy,75.5%ofmethylpheni‐
datewasidentifiedashavingbeenpurchasedfromfriendsatauniversitycampuswhilst
64.3%ofmodafinilwasobtainedonline[22].Accessingthewebfordrugacquisitionac‐
tivitiesisareasonforconcern[30],withyoungpeople(18–25yearsold)beingathighrisk
becausethereisnowaytoknowwhattheactualingredientsofthedrugs/substancesare
inthoseproducts[30],theyareextensiveusersoftheInternet[112];itwasfoundthatover
athirdofthewebsitessellingmodafinilspecificallyrecommendeduseofthedrugtoaid
studying[30].
4.Discussion
Thecurrentsystematicreviewprovidedanin‐depthandupdatedunderstandingon
CEs’prevalenceofuse;levelsofknowledge;andtheirimpactonHEIuniversitystudents,
whichisclearlyacriticalpublichealthissue.Thepastfewyearshaveseenincreasinglev‐
elsofconcernabouttheuseofpharmaceuticalcognitiveenhancementamonguniversity
studentsworldwide,withthelifetimeprevalenceofCEsmisuseamongthesesubjects
rangingfrom6%to20%,dependingonthestudysubject[67].Ofparticularconcern,how‐
ever,isCE’suseinHealthSciences/Biomedicalstudents
[34,36,38,39,45,48,54,57,63,67,70,71].MostdatainitiallyemergedfromtheUnitedStates
[61,75,113],eventuallyfollowedbyreportsfromtheUnitedKingdom[22],Australia
[46,50];andEurope,namelyfromFrance[53,60],andItaly[38,69].
ThemostpopularprescriptionCEsamongtheselectedonesinthisstudywere
modafinil,methylphenidateandamphetaminesaltmixtures[71],withmethylphenidate
beingthemostpopularamongstudents[9].Conversely,themostpopularfreelyavailable
CEwasCaffeine[78].Althoughnotconfirmedbysomestudies[113,114],maleswereiden‐
tifiedhereasmorelikelytouseCEdrugsthanfemales[31,52,63,71,75,77].Somestudies
alsoshowedthat,despitethatthenumberoffemaleparticipantswashigherthantheir
malecounterparts,therateofCEusewasmuchhigherthaninfemalestudents[77].
Althoughnodifferencesbetweengendersinfavouringmethylphenidateasthemost
popularCEorinthepreferentialchoiceofanyCEwererecorded,thereweregenderdif‐
ferencesinmotivationforuse[33].Femalestudents’motivationforCEuseweretoin‐
creaseconcentration,memory,alertnessandacademicperformance,andbecause“friends
useit”.Incontrast,malestudents’motivationsforCEuseweremainlytoincreasestudy
timeandexperiment[33].
Ingeneral,withregardtoillicitsubstanceuse,DrAdamWinstock(CEOoftheGlobal
drugSurvey)pointedoutthegenderdifferences,explainingitaspossiblyresultingfrom
societalstigma,shameandculturalexpectationsaroundwomentakingdrugs.Additional
factorsthatinfluencewomen’sdecisionsinusingdrugsincludepregnancyandmother‐
hood.Economicstatusandthelowerrateofcriminalactivityamongstwomenalsoreduce
femaledruguseandexposuretoillicitdrugsascomparedtomales[115].
Indeed,severalsocialfactorshavebeenidentifiedheretoinfluenceCEs’usepractices
amonguniversitystudents[56].Theseincluded:peer‐pressure,competition,performance
demandsandpriordruguse[85],butalsorecreation[79].
TheavailabilityofCEsfornon‐medicalindicationsinthedifferentcountriesisaf‐
fectedbyarangeoffactors,includinglegal,social,andethicalfactors[33,40,116].Indeed,
someCEsarebeingopenlymadeavailableonline[30,117],wheretheyaremarketedas
“smartdrugs”,“studydrugs”,“plantfood”,“researchchemicals”and“designerdrugs”
aswell[30,112].Theunregulatedonlineaccess,andespeciallysoformodafiniland
methylphenidate,islikelytobeassociatedwithanincreaseinCEs’non‐medicaluseand
subsequentharm[30].Indeed,highlevelsofmodafinilmayhavereportedlybeensold
andshippedtostudentsathigh‐ranking/topUKuniversities,mostlyduringthe
BrainSci.2021,11,35534of38
examinationperiod[118].Conversely,asCEs’legalalternativetoeitherprescribingor
illicitdrugsofabuse,guaranawasfoundheretobepopular,withaffordableonlineprices
encouragingyoungusers/studentstobuygreaterquantitiesinordertoreceivediscounts
andfreeshipping[30,119].
Sahakianetal.(2008)openedadebateonthepositiveimpactonimprovingcognitive
functions,suggestingthatbenefitsofCEsshouldbemaximised,andtheirharmmini‐
mised[25].Insomestudies,CEdrugshavebeenshowntomoderatelyenhancecognitive
performanceinhealthyindividuals[120].Accordingly,CEtoolsincludingpharmacolog‐
icalcognitiveenhancementcouldimprovethequalityoflifeofbothbusyworkersand
exhaustedstudentstoextendtheirwork/academicproductivitylevels[121],hencebene‐
fittingboththeindividualandsociety[25].Therehavebeenextensivereportsfocussing
onCEs’intaketoaidconcentrationandmemoryamonghealthyindividuals,including
students,academics,shiftworkers,andevenchessplayerstoimprovetheircognitiveper‐
formance[122].AstudybySmithandFarah(2011a)suggestedthattheeffectsofboth
methylphenidateandamphetaminesaltmixturesoncognitiveperformancesinhealthy
participantsshowedpositivelyconsistenteffectsinlearning,butespeciallysoindelayed
recallandrecognitiontesting,pointingtoaneffectonmemoryconsolidation[4].Anad‐
ditionalstudybySchelleetal.(2015)showedapositiveeffectofmethylphenidateon
memoryandplanningperformanceinhealthyindividuals.However,othershavesug‐
gestedthatevidenceregardingtheclinicalbenefitsofCEsinhealthyindividualsisstill
inconclusive[123].A2010systematicreviewandmeta‐analysisofpublishedrandomised
controlledtrialsoftheeffectofbothmodafinilandmethylphenidateinhealthyindividu‐
alsshowedthattheanticipatedeffectsofthesetwoagentsascognitiveenhancersex‐
ceededtheiractualeffect[80].Hence,ithasbeensuggestedthattheabilityofampheta‐
mine‐typesubstancemixturestoenhanceacademicperformanceamongstudentscould
beattributedtotheireffectonenergy,confidenceandmotivationlevelsratherthantoa
directeffectoncognitiveperformances[124].Infact,individualsmaybebiasedinpre‐
dictingtheirownperformance,e.g.,theyeitherunderestimateoroverestimatetheiraca‐
demiccompetence[125].Moreover,cognitiveimprovementseemstovaryconsiderably
fromoneagenttoanother,andSmithetal.(2011)reportedthatonethirdofstudiesfrom
pastliteraturereviewsshowednullresults.Onecouldthenarguethattherearemoreun‐
publishedstudiesintheliteraturewithnullresults,duetopublicationbiasfavouringpos‐
itiveresults[4].
Ontheotherhand,useofstimulantCEsmaybeassociatedwithnegativeacademic
performancesintermsoftheeuphoricstateinduced,withabnormalmoodelationpre‐
ventingthestudentfromspendingenoughtimeinpreparationforanexam[17,57].Fur‐
thermore,methylphenidateisreportedtopresentwithadependencepotential[126],and
modafinildependencecaseshavebeenidentifiedaswell[127].Itisalsoworthnotingthe
amphetamine‐typesubstance‐relateddependence;withdrawal;andpsychosisissues[28].
UntowardeffectsrelatingtotheindexCEmayindeedinfluencestudents’choices,with
thembeingkeentoconsidermodafinilasopposedtomethylphenidateandamphetamine
saltmixtures.Indeed,StewardandPickersgill(2019)foundthatalltheirCEusershad
ingestedmodafinil,withonlysomealsohavingtriedmethylphenidateandamphetamine
saltmixturesforthepurposeofstudy.Infact,studentsdescribedhowtheuseof
methylphenidateandamphetaminesaltmixturescouldresultindependenceandhence
thesewereapproachedmorecautiously[32].Overall,however,theuseofmethylpheni‐
datehassignificantlyincreased,withitsconsumption,indefineddailydoses,havingin‐
creasedtoapproximately2.4billionworldwide[35].IntheUK,bothmethylphenidateand
amphetaminecompoundsareClassBcontrolleddrugs[128].Thismeanstheycanbepro‐
videdviaprescription,butthemaximumquantityissuedshouldnotexceed30days(un‐
lessjustifiedbytheprescriber)andapersonalimport/exportlicenceisrequiredto
transportthedruginoroutoftheUKiftheamountexceedsa3‐monthsupply[30].
Modafinilisaprescription‐onlymedicineintheUK,butitisnotcontrolledunderthe
MisuseofDrugsAct1971orsubjecttoschedulingundertheMisuseofDrugsRegulations
BrainSci.2021,11,35535of38
2001;hence,itisillegaltosupplyitwithoutaprescription,butitisnotillegaltopossess
thedrugforpersonaluse[128].Tocopewiththeserestrictions,CEs’sellingwebsitespro‐
vidediscreetpackaging;offerfreereshipmentifthepackageisseized;andencourage
third‐party,difficulttotrack,paymentmethods[30].Thisoutcomesuggestsrunningcam‐
paignsthatmitigateharmandraiseawarenessamongstudentswhouseCEdrugs.Fi‐
nally,althoughcaffeineisalsoastimulant,itsuseisnotassociatedwitheitheracquisition,
affordability,availability,orlegalityissues[42,66].However,withcaffeinehigh‐dosage
intakearangeofmedicalandpsychiatriceffectscanbeobserved,mosttypicallyincluding
anxiety,panicattacks,sleepingdisordersandcardiovascularissues[129].
ACochranereviewfoundnoevidencethatshort‐termintakeofvitaminsB6andB12
supplementsimprovecognitivefunctionormood.Thereviewdidfindsomeevidence
thatdailyvitaminB6andB12supplementscanaffectbiochemicalindicesofvitaminB6
andB12statusinhealthyindividuals,butthesechangeshadnooverallimpactoncogni‐
tion[107].
Accordingtothereviewoftheliterature,thedrugsselectedwerechosenbasedon
theirpopularityamonghealthyuniversitystudents,butthedrugsmostusedamongstu‐
dentswere(modafinil,methylphenidateandAdderall)and,intermsofsubstances,caf‐
feinewasthemostpopularamonguniversitystudents.However,astudybyCarlier,J
(2019)reportedthatmethylphenidateisoneofthemostpopularCEsandseveralana‐
loguesappearedonthedrugmarketduringthelastyears.However,littleornoscientific
dataonthesenewanaloguesareavailable.
AssportsorganisationssuchasWADAareoverviewingandprohibitingtheuseof
physicalenhancers,nosuchcontrolexistsinschoolsanduniversities.Therefore,inorder
todecreasethelong‐termdeleteriouseffectsofCEsinindividualswhousethem,govern‐
ment‐levelinterventionsareurgentlyrequired.
Aharmreductionprogrammeisalsorecommendedtoreducethenegative,legaland
societalimpactofsubstanceuse[125].Theprogrammeshouldconsidersupportingindi‐
vidualswithproblematicsubstanceuseandtheirfamilieswithcompassionandappropri‐
ateadviceandinterventions,whilstsafeguardingtheirdignity[125].Thesefindingssug‐
gesttheimportanceofraisingawarenessoftheharmsofCEuse,provideaccurate
knowledge,counteractmythsregarding“safe”CEuseandaddresscognitiveenhance‐
mentinanearlystageduringeducationasapreventativepublichealthmeasure.
5.Limitations
Thereareafewlimitationsthatwereconsideredinthismanuscript.Thefirstlimita‐
tionisrelatedheretothesolefocusonEnglishlanguagestudieshavingbeenincludedin
thesearch;futurestudiesshouldconsiderfurtherlanguages.Thesecondlimitationrelates
tothemethodsusedbythedifferentstudies,typicallyinvolvingself‐reportingsurveys
whichcouldhaveintroducedbiases.Finally,thecurrentstudyfocusedonlyonunder‐
graduatestudents;however,postgraduatestudents,academicstaff,andremainingwork‐
ersshouldbeconsideredbyfuturestudies.
6.Conclusions
AnumberofstudentsworldwidemaybewillingtoconsiderCEs’ingestiontoim‐
provetheiracademicperformances.TheattitudeofuniversitystudentsaboutCEsand
theirpossiblebenefitsis,however,basedonanecdotal,andarguablybiased,information
obtainedfromthemedia,theweb,andfriends[130].Overall,itseemsfromthisreview
thatthetopicisnotbeingsufficientlycoveredinthecurriculumofmodernuniversities.
Conversely,thisissueshouldbediscussed,asaninter‐professionalorinter‐disciplinary
learningopportunity,fromapublichealthperspective[7,44].CEs’usemayarguablybe
reducedifstudents’levelsofawarenesswereraised,emphasisingthatCEs’intakemay
posearisktosafety,andespeciallysoinvulnerableindividuals[31].Indeed,impactsof
CEdrugs’intakemayincludetolerance,dependence,withdrawal,cardiovascularand
neurologicaldisorderswitharelatedriskofdeathduetooverdose[28,117,131].The
BrainSci.2021,11,35536of38
implementationofaharmreductioncampaign,inordertobringtheoverallconsumption
down,hasbeenproposedaswell[41,91].
Finally,Shaw(2014)suggestedthatoneofthemostfascinatingissuesintheemerging
fieldofneuroethicsispharmaceuticalcognitiveenhancement.Medicaldebate[21,132]has
largelyfocusedontheCEs’potentialtohelpthosewhoarecognitivelyimpaired.Hence,
itisheresuggestedthatCEs’usebyuniversitystudents,seemstoraisetheissueof“cos‐
metic”neuropsychopharmacology[133,134].
AuthorContributions:AlltheAuthorsequallycontributedtotheinitialplanningofthedatacol‐
lection;S.S.draftedthepaperitself.A.G.,S.F.,andF.S.criticallyreviewedthefinaldraftpriorto
submission.Allauthorshavereadandagreedtothepublishedversionofthemanuscript.
Funding:Thisresearchreceivednoexternalfunding.
Acknowledgments:ThisarticleispartofS.S.’sPhDresearch.
ConflictsofInterest:F.S.wasaprevious(2011–2019)memberoftheACMDUK;heiscurrentlya
memberoftheEuropeanMedicinesAgency(EMA)PsychiatryAdvisoryBoard.S.S.,A.G.andS.F.
havenoconflictsofinteresttodeclare.
References
1. Bostrom,N.;Sandberg,A.CognitiveEnhancement:Methods,Ethics,RegulatoryChallenges.Sci.Eng.Ethic2009,15,311–341,
doi:10.1007/s11948‐009‐9142‐5.
2. Wesnes,K.A.;Zangara,A.;Scholey,A.;Kennedy,D.NaturalProductsasCognitionEnhancingAgents.InCognitiveEnhancing
Drugs;Birkhäuser:Basel,Switzerland,2004;pp.151–178.
3. Froestl,W.;Muhs,A.;Pfeifer,A.CognitiveEnhancers(Nootropics).Part1:DrugsInteractingwithReceptors.J.Alzheimer’sDis.
2012,32,793–887,doi:10.3233/jad‐2012‐121186.
4. Smith,M.E.;Farah,M.J.Areprescriptionstimulants“smartpills”?Theepidemiologyandcognitiveneuroscienceofprescription
stimulantusebynormalhealthyindividuals.Psychol.Bull.2011,137,717–741,doi:10.1037/a0023825.
5. Advokat,C.Whatarethecognitiveeffectsofstimulantmedications?Emphasisonadultswithattention‐deficit/hyperactivity
disorder(ADHD).Neurosci.Biobehav.Rev.2010,34,1256–1266,doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.03.006.
6. Davis,M.S.NationalInstituteonDrugAbuse(NIDA)2012.TheConciseDictionaryofCrimeandJustice;NationalInstituteon
DrugAbuse(NIDA):NorthBethesda,MD,USA,2012Availableonline:http://sk.sagepub.com/reference/the‐concise‐diction‐
ary‐of‐crime‐and‐justice(accessedon7March2021).
7. Preta,B.D.O.C.;Miranda,V.I.A.;Bertoldi,A.D.PsychostimulantUseforNeuroenhancement(SmartDrugs)amongCollege
StudentsinBrazil.Subst.UseMisuse2019,55,613–621,doi:10.1080/10826084.2019.1691597.
8. Rasetti,R.;Mattay,V.S.;Stankevich,B.;Skjei,K.;Blasi,G.;Sambataro,F.;Arrillaga‐Romany,I.C.;Goldberg,T.E.;Callicott,J.H.;
Apud,J.A.;etal.ModulatoryEffectsofModafinilonNeuralCircuitsRegulatingEmotionandCognition.Neuropsychopharmacol.
2010,35,2101–2109,doi:10.1038/npp.2010.83.
9. Carlier,J.;Giorgetti,R.;Varì,M.R.;Pirani,F.;Ricci,G.;Busardò,F.P.Useofcognitiveenhancers:Methylphenidateandanalogs.
Eur.Rev.Med.Pharmacol.Sci.2019,23,3–15.
10. Bisagno,V.;González,B.;Urbano,F.J.Cognitiveenhancersversusaddictivepsychostimulants:Thegoodandbadsideofdo‐
pamineonprefrontalcorticalcircuits.Pharmacol.Res.2016,109,108–118,doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2016.01.013.
11. Steffenhagen,N.;Regenthal,R.;Bublak,P.Effectsofmodafinilonworkingmemoryprocessesinhumans.Psychopharmacology
2004,177,161–169,doi:10.1007/s00213‐004‐1926‐3.
12. Volkow,N.D.;Fowler,J.S.;Logan,J.;Alexoff,D.;Zhu,W.;Telang,F.;Wang,G.‐J.;Jayne,M.;Hooker,J.M.;Wong,C.;etal.
EffectsofModafinilonDopamineandDopamineTransportersintheMaleHumanBrain.JAMA2009,301,1148–1154,
doi:10.1001/jama.2009.351.
13. Schmitt,K.C.;Reith,M.E.A.TheAtypicalStimulantandNootropicModafinilInteractswiththeDopamineTransporterina
DifferentMannerthanClassicalCocaine‐LikeInhibitors.PLoSONE2011,6,e25790,doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025790.
14. FDA(USFoodandDrugAdministration)AdderallXR.HighlightsofPrescribingInformation;ShireUSInc.:Wayne,PA,USA,1998;
Volume50,pp.1–25.Availableonline:https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2013/021303s026lbl.pdf(ac‐
cessedon7March2021).
15. Caldwell,J.A.;Smythe,N.K.;Hall,K.K.;Norman,D.N.;Prazinko,B.F.;Estrada,A.;Johnson,P.A.;Crowley,J.S.;Brock,M.E.The
EffectsofModafinilonAviatorPerformanceduring40HoursofContinuousWakefulness:AUH‐60HelicopterSimulatorStudy;USAARL
ReportNo.99‐17;ArmyAeromedicalResearchUnit:FortRucker,AL,USA;ArmyAeromedicalResearchLaboratory:Fort
Rucker,AL,USA,1999.Availableonline:https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA365558.pdf(accessedon7March2021).
16. Hall,S.S.TheQuestforaSmartPill.Sci.Am.2003,289,54–65,doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0903‐54.
17. Batistela,S.;Bueno,O.F.A.;Vaz,L.J.;Galduróz,J.C.F.Methylphenidateasacognitiveenhancerinhealthyyoungpeople.De‐
ment.Neuropsychol.2016,10,134–142,doi:10.1590/s1980‐5764‐2016dn1002009.
BrainSci.2021,11,35537of38
18. Dietz,P.;Ulrich,R.;Dalaker,R.;Striegel,H.;Franke,A.G.;Lieb,K.;Simon,P.AssociationsbetweenPhysicalandCognitive
Doping—ACross‐SectionalStudyin2.997Triathletes.PLoSONE2013,8,e78702,doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078702.
19. Barkoukis,V.;Lazuras,L.;Lucidi,F.;Tsorbatzoudis,H.Nutritionalsupplementanddopinguseinsport:Possibleunderlying
socialcognitiveprocesses.Scand.J.Med.Sci.Sports2015,25,e582–e588,doi:10.1111/sms.12377.
20. Maier,L.J.;Liechti,M.E.;Herzig,F.;Schaub,M.P.ToDopeorNottoDope:NeuroenhancementwithPrescriptionDrugsand
DrugsofAbuseamongSwissUniversityStudents.PLoSONE2013,8,e77967,doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077967.
21. Maier,L.J.;Liakoni,E.;Schildmann,J.;Schaub,M.P.;Liechti,M.E.SwissUniversityStudents’AttitudestowardPharmacological
CognitiveEnhancement.PLoSONE2015,10,e0144402,doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144402.
22. Singh,I.;Bard,I.;Jackson,J.RobustResilienceandSubstantialInterest:ASurveyofPharmacologicalCognitiveEnhancement
amongUniversityStudentsintheUKandIreland.PLoSONE2014,9,e105969,doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0105969.
23. Herman‐Stahl,M.A.;Krebs,C.P.;Kroutil,L.A.;Heller,D.C.Riskandprotectivefactorsformethamphetamineuseandnonmed‐
icaluseofprescriptionstimulantsamongyoungadultsaged18to25.Addict.Behav.2007,32,1003–1015,
doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.07.010.
24. Fowler,T.InDefenceofStateDirectedEnhancement.J.Appl.Philos.2015,32,67–81,doi:10.1111/japp.12068.
25. Greely,H.;Sahakian,B.;Harris,J.;Kessler,R.C.;Gazzaniga,M.;Campbell,P.;Farah,M.J.Towardsresponsibleuseofcognitive‐
enhancingdrugsbythehealthy.Nature2008,456,702‐705.
26. Begley,E.;McVeigh,J.;Hope,V.LifelineProjectImageandPerformanceEnhancingDrugs(IPEDs).Lit.Rev.2016,23.Available
online:https://www.drugsandalcohol.ie/26484/1/Lifeline‐IPEDsReport‐November2016.pdf(accessedon7March2021).
27. Schifano,F.;Napoletano,F.;Chiappini,S.;Guirguis,A.;Corkery,J.M.;Bonaccorso,S.;Ricciardi,A.;Scherbaum,N.;Vento,A.
New/emergingpsychoactivesubstancesandassociatedpsychopathologicalconsequences.Psychol.Med.2021,51,30–42,
doi:10.1017/s0033291719001727.
28. Schifano,F.;Orsolini,L.;Papanti,G.D.;Corkery,J.M.Novelpsychoactivesubstancesofinterestforpsychiatry.WorldPsychiatry
2015,14,15–26,doi:10.1002/wps.20174.
29. Moher,D.;Liberati,A.;Tetzlaff,J.;Altman,D.G.;ThePRISMAGroup.Preferredreportingitemsforsystematicreviewsand
meta‐analyses:ThePRISMAstatement.PLoSMed.2009,6,e1000097,doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
30. McDermott,H.;Lane,H.;Alonso,M.Workingsmart:Theuseof‘cognitiveenhancers’byUKuniversitystudents.J.Further
HigherEduc.2020,1–14.doi:10.1080/0309877X.2020.1753179.
31. Champagne,J.;Gardner,B.;Dommett,E.J.ModellingpredictorsofUKundergraduates’attitudestowardssmartdrugs.Trends
Neurosci.Educ.2019,14,33–39,doi:10.1016/j.tine.2019.02.001.
32. Steward,A.;Pickersgill,M.Developingexpertise,customisingsleep,enhancingstudypractices:Exploringthelegitimisationof
modafinilusewithintheaccountsofUKundergraduatestudents.DrugsEduc.Prev.Policy2019,26,347–355,
doi:10.1080/09687637.2018.1555231.
33. Mousavi,F.;Shojaei,P.;Markeh,H.P.TheUseofCognitiveEnhancersAmongMedicalStudents.Int.J.HighRiskBehav.Addict.
2019,8,doi:10.5812/ijhrba.92377.
34. Javed,N.;Ahmed,F.;Saeed,S.;Amir,R.;Khan,H.Y.;Iqbal,S.P.PrevalenceofMethylphenidateMisuseinMedicalCollegesin
Pakistan:ACross‐sectionalStudy.Cureus2019,11,doi:10.7759/cureus.5879.
35. Cândido,R.C.F.;Perini,E.;DePádua,C.M.;Junqueira,D.R.Prevalenceofandfactorsassociatedwiththeuseofmethylpheni‐
dateforcognitiveenhancementamonguniversitystudents.Einstein(SãoPaulo)2019,18,eAO4745,doi:10.31744/einstein_jour‐
nal/2020AO4745.
36. DeBruyn,S.;Wouters,E.;Ponnet,K.;VanHal,G.Poppingsmartpillsinmedicalschool:Arecompetitionandstressassociated
withthemisuseofprescriptionstimulantsamongstudents?Subst.UseMisuse2019,54,1191–1202,
doi:10.1080/10826084.2019.1572190.
37. London‐Nadeau,K.;Chan,P.;Wood,S.BuildingConceptionsofCognitiveEnhancement:UniversityStudents’Viewsonthe
EffectsofPharmacologicalCognitiveEnhancers.Subst.UseMisuse2019,54,908–920,doi:10.1080/10826084.2018.1552297.
38. Pighi,M.;Pontoni,G.;Sinisi,A.;Ferrari,S.;Mattei,G.;Pingani,L.;Simoni,E.;Galeazzi,G.M.UseandPropensitytoUseSub‐
stancesasCognitiveEnhancersinItalianMedicalStudents.BrainSci.2018,8,197,doi:10.3390/brainsci8110197.
39. Fallah,G.;Moudi,S.;Hamidia,A.;Bijani,A.Stimulantuseinmedicalstudentsandresidentsrequiresmorecarefulattention.
Casp.J.Int.Med.2018,9,87–91,doi.org/10.22088/cjim.9.1.87
40. Maier,L.J.;Ferris,J.A.;Winstock,A.R.Pharmacologicalcognitiveenhancementamongnon‐ADHDindividuals—Across‐sec‐
tionalstudyin15countries.Int.J.DrugPolicy2018,58,104–112,doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.05.009.
41. Lucke,J.;Jensen,C.;Dunn,M.;Chan,G.;Forlini,C.;Kaye,S.;Partridge,B.;Farrell,M.;Racine,E.;Hall,W.Non‐medicalpre‐
scriptionstimulantusetoimproveacademicperformanceamongAustralianuniversitystudents:Prevalenceandcorrelatesof
use.BMCPublicHealth2018,18,1270,doi:10.1186/s12889‐018‐6212‐0.
42. Dietz,P.;Iberl,B.;Schuett,E.;VanPoppel,M.;Ulrich,R.;Sattler,M.C.PrevalenceEstimatesforPharmacologicalNeuroen‐
hancementinAustrianUniversityStudents:ItsRelationtoHealth‐RelatedRiskAttitudeandtheFramingEffectofCaffeine
Tablets.Front.Pharmacol.2018,9,494,doi:10.3389/fphar.2018.00494.
43. Riddell,C.;Jensen,C.;Carter,O.CognitiveEnhancementandCopinginanAustralianUniversityStudentSample.J.Cogn.
Enhanc.2017,2,63–69,doi:10.1007/s41465‐017‐0046‐z.
44. Hanna,L.;Rainey,J.;Hall,M.AQuestionnaireStudyInvestigatingFuturePharmacists’Useof,andViewsonCognitiveEn‐
hancers.Pharm.Educ.2018,18,76–84.
BrainSci.2021,11,35538of38
45. Papazisis,G.;Tsakiridis,I.;Siafis,S.NonmedicalUseofPrescriptionDrugsamongMedicalStudentsandtheRelationshipwith
IllicitDrug,Tobacco,andAlcoholUse.Subst.Abus.Res.Treat.2018,12,1178221818802298,doi:10.1177/1178221818802298.
46. Ram,S.;Hussainy,S.;Henning,M.;Stewart,K.;Jensen,M.;Russell,B.AttitudesTowardCognitiveEnhancerUseAmongNew
ZealandTertiaryStudents.Subst.UseMisuse2017,52,1387–1392,doi:10.1080/10826084.2017.1281313.
47. Lazuras,L.;Ypsilanti,A.;Lamprou,E.;Kontogiorgis,C.PharmaceuticalCognitiveEnhancementinGreekUniversityStudents:
DifferencesBetweenUsersandNon‐UsersinSocialCognitiveVariables,Burnout,andEngagement.Subst.UseMisuse2017,52,
1–9,doi:10.1080/10826084.2016.1267223.
48. Jain,R.;Chang,C.C.;Koto,M.;Geldenhuys,A.;Nichol,R.;Joubert,G.Non‐medicaluseofmethylphenidateamongmedical
studentsoftheUniversityoftheFreeState.S.Afr.J.Psychiatry2017,23,1006,doi:10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v23.1006.
49. Vagwala,M.K.;Bicquelet,A.;Didziokaite,G.;Coomber,R.;Corrigan,O.;Singh,I.TowardsaMoralEcologyofPharmacological
CognitiveEnhancementinBritishUniversities.Neuroethics2017,10,389–403,doi:10.1007/s12152‐017‐9336‐5.
50. Jensen,C.;Forlini,C.;Partridge,B.;Hall,W.Australianuniversitystudents’copingstrategiesanduseofpharmaceuticalstim‐
ulantsascognitiveenhancers.Front.Psychol.2016,7,277.
51. AlGhali,R.M.;AlShaibi,H.;AlMajed,H.;Haroun,D.CaffeineConsumptionamongZayedUniversityStudentsinDubai,
UnitedArabEmirates:ACross‐SectionalStudy.Arab.J.Nutr.Exerc.(AJNE)2017,1,131,doi:10.18502/ajne.v1i3.1230.
52. Gudmundsdottir,B.G.;Weyandt,L.;Ernudottir,G.B.PrescriptionStimulantMisuseandADHDSymptomatologyAmongCol‐
legeStudentsinIceland.J.Atten.Disord.2016,24,384–401,doi:10.1177/1087054716684379.
53. Fond,G.;Gavaret,M.;Vidal,C.;Brunel,L.;Riveline,J.‐P.;Micoulaud‐Franchi,J.‐A.;Domenech,P.(Mis)useofPrescribedStim‐
ulantsintheMedicalStudentCommunity.Medicine.2016,95,e3366,doi:10.1097/md.0000000000003366.
54. Lengvenytė,A.;Strumila,R.Domedicalstudentsusecognitiveenhancerstostudy?PrevalenceandcorrelatesfromLithuanian
medicalstudentssample.Eur.Psychiatry2016,33,S304,doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.01.1041.
55. Hupli,A.;Didžiokaitė,G.;Ydema,M.TowardtheSmarterUseofSmartDrugs.Contemp.DrugProbl.2016,43,242–257,
doi:10.1177/0091450916660143.
56. Schelle,K.J.;Olthof,B.M.J.;Reintjes,W.;Bundt,C.;Gusman‐Vermeer,J.;VanMil,A.C.C.M.Asurveyofsubstanceusefor
cognitiveenhancementbyuniversitystudentsintheNetherlands.Front.Syst.Neurosci.2015,9,10,doi:10.3389/fnsys.2015.00010.
57. Abbasi‐Ghahramanloo,A.;Fotouhi,A.;Zeraati,H.;Rahimi‐Movaghar,A.PrescriptionDrugs,Alcohol,andIllicitSubstanceUse
andTheirCorrelationsAmongMedicalSciencesStudentsinIran.Int.J.HighRiskBehav.Addict.2015,4,21945‐,
doi:10.5812/ijhrba.21945.
58. Vargo,E.J.;James,R.A.;Agyeman,K.;MacPhee,T.;McIntyre,R.;Ronca,F.;Petróczi,A.Perceptionsofassistedcognitiveand
sportperformanceenhancementamonguniversitystudentsinEngland.Perform.Enhanc.Health2014,3,66–77,
doi:10.1016/j.peh.2015.02.001.
59. Ott,R.;Biller‐Andorno,N.NeuroenhancementamongSwissStudents—AComparisonofUsersandNon‐Users.Pharmacopsy‐
chiatry2013,47,22–28,doi:10.1055/s‐0033‐1358682.
60. Micoulaud‐Franchi,J.‐A.;MacGregor,A.;Fond,G.Apreliminarystudyoncognitiveenhancerconsumptionbehaviorsand
motivesofFrenchMedicineandPharmacologystudents.Eur.Rev.MedPharmacol.Sci.2014,18,1875–1878.
61. McCabe,S.E.;West,B.T.;Teter,C.J.;Boyd,C.J.Trendsinmedicaluse,diversion,andnonmedicaluseofprescriptionmedications
amongcollegestudentsfrom2003to2013:Connectingthedots.Addict.Behav.2014,39,1176‐1182.
62. Hildt,E.;Lieb,K.;Franke,A.G.Lifecontextofpharmacologicalacademicperformanceenhancementamonguniversitystu‐
dents—Aqualitativeapproach.BMCMedEthic2014,15,23,doi:10.1186/1472‐6939‐15‐23.
63. Emanuel,R.M.;Frellsen,S.L.;Kashima,K.J.;Sanguino,S.M.;Sierles,F.S.;Lazarus,C.J.CognitiveEnhancementDrugUse
AmongFuturePhysicians:FindingsfromaMulti‐InstitutionalCensusofMedicalStudents.J.Gen.Intern.Med.2013,28,1028–
1034,doi:10.1007/s11606‐012‐2249‐4.
64. Hanson,C.L.;Burton,S.H.;Giraud‐Carrier,C.;West,J.H.;Barnes,M.D.;Hansen,B.TweakingandTweeting:ExploringTwitter
forNonmedicalUseofaPsychostimulantDrug(Adderall)AmongCollegeStudents.J.MedInternetRes.2013,15,e62,
doi:10.2196/jmir.2503.
65. Dietz,P.;Striegel,H.;Franke,A.G.;Lieb,K.;Simon,P.;Ulrich,R.RandomizedResponseEstimatesforthe12‐MonthPrevalence
ofCognitive‐EnhancingDrugUseinUniversityStudents.Pharmacother.J.Hum.Pharmacol.DrugTher.2013,33,44–50,
doi:10.1002/phar.1166.
66. Bossaer,J.B.;Gray,J.A.;Miller,S.E.;Enck,G.;Gaddipati,V.C.;Enck,R.E.TheUseandMisuseofPrescriptionStimulantsas
“CognitiveEnhancers”byStudentsatOneAcademicHealthSciencesCentre.Acad.Med.2013,88,967–971,
doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e318294fc7b.
67. Kudlow,P.A.;B.Sc.,K.T.N.;Xie,B.;McIntyre,R.S.CognitiveEnhancementinCanadianMedicalStudents.J.Psychoact.Drugs
2013,45,360–365,doi:10.1080/02791072.2013.825033.
68. Holloway,K.;Bennett,T.Prescriptiondrugmisuseamonguniversitystaffandstudents:Asurveyofmotives,natureandextent.
Drugs:Educ.Prev.Policy2011,19,137–144,doi:10.3109/09687637.2011.594114.
69. Castaldi,S.;Gelatti,U.;Orizio,G.;Hartung,U.;Moreno‐Londono,A.M.;Nobile,M.;Schulz,P.J.UseofCognitiveEnhancement
MedicationAmongNorthernItalianUniversityStudents.J.Addict.Med.2012,6,112–117,doi:10.1097/adm.0b013e3182479584.
70. Ghabili,K.;Habibzadeh,A.;Alizadeh,M.;Malek,A.;Maghbooli,L.;Shoja,M.M.IllicitmethylphenidateuseamongIranian
medicalstudents:Prevalenceandknowledge.DrugDes.Dev.Ther.2011,5,71–76,doi:10.2147/DDDT.S13818.
BrainSci.2021,11,35539of38
71. Franke,A.G.;Bonertz,C.;Christmann,M.;Huss,M.;Fellgiebel,A.;Hildt,E.;Lieb,K.Non‐MedicalUseofPrescriptionStimu‐
lantsandIllicitUseofStimulantsforCognitiveEnhancementinPupilsandStudentsinGermany.Pharmacopsychiatry2010,44,
60–66,doi:10.1055/s‐0030‐1268417.
72. Teter,C.J.;McCabe,S.E.;Lagrange,K.;Cranford,J.A.;Boyd,C.J.IllicitUseofSpecificPrescriptionStimulantsAmongCollege
Students:Prevalence,Motives,andRoutesofAdministration.Pharmacother.J.Hum.Pharmacol.DrugTher.2006,26,1501–1510,
doi:10.1592/phco.26.10.1501.
73. Teter,C.J.;McCabe,S.E.;Cranford,J.A.;Boyd,C.J.;Guthrie,S.K.PrevalenceandMotivesforIllicitUseofPrescriptionStimu‐
lantsinanUndergraduateStudentSample.J.Am.Coll.Health2005,53,253–62,doi:10.3200/jach.53.6.253‐262.
74. Low,K.G.;Gendaszek,A.E.Illicituseofpsychostimulantsamongcollegestudents:Apreliminarystudy.Psychol.Heal.Med.
2002,7,283–287,doi:10.1080/13548500220139386.
75. Benson,K.;Flory,K.;Humphreys,K.L.;Lee,S.S.MisuseofStimulantMedicationAmongCollegeStudents:AComprehensive
ReviewandMeta‐analysis.Clin.ChildFam.Psychol.Rev.2015,18,50–76,doi:10.1007/s10567‐014‐0177‐z.
76. Weyandt,L.L.;Marraccini,M.E.;Gudmundsdottir,B.G.;Zavras,B.M.;Turcotte,K.D.;Munro,B.A.;Amoroso,A.J.Misuseof
prescriptionstimulantsamongcollegestudents:Areviewoftheliteratureandimplicationsformorphologicalandcognitive
effectsonbrainfunctioning.Exp.Clin.Psychopharmacol.2013,21,385–407,doi:10.1037/a0034013.
77. Lengvenyte,A.;Strumila,R.;Grikiniene,J.UseofcognitiveenhancersamongmedicalstudentsinLithuania.Nord.Stud.Alcohol
Drugs2016,33,173–188,doi:10.1515/nsad‐2016‐0014.
78. Cappelletti,S.;Daria,P.;Sani,G.;Aromatario,M.Caffeine:CognitiveandPhysicalPerformanceEnhancerorPsychoactive
Drug?Curr.Neuropharmacol.2015,13,71–88,doi:10.2174/1570159x13666141210215655.
79. Schleim,S.NeuroenhancementasInstrumentalDrugUse:PuttingtheDebateinaDifferentFrame.Front.Psychiatry2020,11,
doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.567497.
80. Repantis,D.;Schlattmann,P.;Laisney,O.;Heuser,I.Modafinilandmethylphenidateforneuroenhancementinhealthyindi‐
viduals:Asystematicreview.Pharmacol.Res.2010,62,187–206,doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2010.04.002.
81. Sharp,C.Cognitiveenhancers—performanceorproblem?Occup.Med.2016,66,88–89,doi:10.1093/occmed/kqv190.
82. Konstantinos,F.;Heun,R.TheeffectsofGuarana(Paulliniacupana)supplementationonthecognitiveperformanceofyoung
healthyadults—ASystematicReview.Glob.Psychiatry2019,2,171–182,doi:10.2478/gp‐2019‐0015.
83. Haskell,C.F.;Kennedy,D.O.;Wesnes,K.A.;Milne,A.L.;Scholey,A.B.Adouble‐blind,placebo‐controlled,multi‐doseevalua‐
tionoftheacutebehaviouraleffectsofguaranainhumans.J.Psychopharmacol.2006,21,65–70,doi:10.1177/0269881106063815.
84. Marques,L.L.M.;Ferreira,E.D.F.;DePaula,M.N.;Klein,T.;DeMello,J.C.P.Paulliniacupana:Amultipurposeplant—Areview.
Rev.Bras.Farm.2019,29,77–110,doi:10.1016/j.bjp.2018.08.007.
85. Garasic,M.D.;Lavazza,A.Moralandsocialreasonstoacknowledgetheuseofcognitiveenhancersincompetitive‐selective
contexts.BMCMedEthic2016,17,18,doi:10.1186/s12910‐016‐0102‐8.
86. Deline,S.;Baggio,S.;Studer,J.;N’Goran,A.A.;Dupuis,M.;Henchoz,Y.;Mohler‐Kuo,M.;Daeppen,J.‐B.;Gmel,G.Useof
NeuroenhancementDrugs:Prevalence,FrequencyandUseExpectationsinSwitzerland.Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2014,
11,3032–3045,doi:10.3390/ijerph110303032.
87. Sparrow,R.EnhancementandObsolescence:Avoidingan“EnhancedRatRace.”KennedyInst.Ethic‐ J.2015,25,231–260,
doi:10.1353/ken.2015.0015.
88. Spencer,R.C.;Devilbiss,D.M.;Berridge,C.W.TheCognition‐EnhancingEffectsofPsychostimulantsInvolveDirectActionin
thePrefrontalCortex.Biol.Psychiatry2015,77,940–950,doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.09.013.
89. DepartmentofHealthWesternAustralianStimulantRegulatoryScheme.2014AnnualReport,PharmaceuticalServicesBranch;
DepartmentofHealthWesternAustralianStimulantRegulatoryScheme:Perth,WA,Australia,2014.
90. Nelson,A.M.;Lenton,S.DrugTrendsBulletinEcstasyAndRelatedDrugs.IllicitUseofPrescriptionCognitiveEnhancing(CE)
DrugsamongRegularPsychostimulantUsers.2017.Availableonline:http://unsworks.unsw.edu.au/fapi/datastream/un‐
sworks:60268/SOURCE01?view=true(accessedon7March2021).
91. Abelman,D.D.Mitigatingrisksofstudentsuseofstudydrugsthroughunderstandingmotivationsforuseandapplyingharm
reductiontheory:Aliteraturereview.HarmReduct.J.2017,14,68,doi:10.1186/s12954‐017‐0194‐6.
92. Ilieva,I.P.;Hook,C.J.;Farah,M.J.Prescriptionstimulantsʹeffectsonhealthyinhibitorycontrol,workingmemory,andepisodic
memory:ameta‐analysis.J.Cogn.Neurosci.2015,27,1069‐1089.
93. Volkow,N.D.;Fowler,J.S.;Wang,G.‐J.;Telang,F.;Logan,J.;Wong,C.;Ma,J.;Pradhan,K.;Benveniste,H.;Swanson,J.M.
MethylphenidateDecreasedtheAmountofGlucoseNeededbytheBraintoPerformaCognitiveTask.PLoSONE2008,3,e2017,
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002017.
94. Volkow,N.D.;Insel,T.R.Whatarethelong‐termeffectsofmethylphenidatetreatment?Biol.Psychiatry2003,54,1307–1309,
doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2003.10.019.
95. Franke,A.G.;Bagusat,C.Chapter80—UseofCaffeineforCognitiveEnhancement;Preedy,V.R.B.T.‐C.H.,Prevention,D.,Eds.;Ac‐
ademicPress:SanDiego,CA,USA,2015;pp.721–727,ISBN978‐0‐12‐409517‐5.
96. Ruxton,C.H.S.Theimpactofcaffeineonmood,cognitivefunction,performanceandhydration:Areviewofbenefitsandrisks.
Nutr.Bull.2008,33,15–25,doi:10.1111/j.1467‐3010.2007.00665.x.
97. Brunton,G.;Khouja,C.;Aine,G.;Stansfield,C.;Kwan,I.;Sowden,A.;Sutcliie,K.;Thomas,J.CaffeinatedEnergyDrinkUseand
ReportedEffectsinYoungPeople:ARapidOverviewofSystematicReviews;EPPI‐Centre,SocialScienceResearchUnit,UCLInstitute
ofEducation,UniversityCollegeLondon:London,UK,2019;ISBN978‐1‐911605‐10‐2.
BrainSci.2021,11,35540of38
98. Ontario,H.Q.VitaminB12andCognitiveFunction:AnEvidence‐BasedAnalysis.Ont.HealthTechnol.Assess.Ser.2013,13,1–
45.
99. Gröber,U.;Kisters,K.;Schmidt,J.NeuroenhancementwithVitaminB12—UnderestimatedNeurologicalSignificance.Nutrients
2013,5,5031–5045,doi:10.3390/nu5125031.
100. Kennedy,D.;Haskell,C.;Wesnes,K.;Scholey,A.Improvedcognitiveperformanceinhumanvolunteersfollowingadministra‐
tionofguarana(Paulliniacupana)extract:ComparisonandinteractionwithPanaxginseng.Pharmacol.Biochem.Behav.2004,79,
401–411,doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2004.07.014.
101. Bogle,K.;Smith,B.IllicitMethylphenidateUse:AReviewofPrevalence,Availability,Pharmacology,andConsequences.Curr.
DrugAbus.Rev.2009,2,157–176,doi:10.2174/1874473710902020157.
102. Giurgea,C.;Salama,M.Nootropicdrugs.Prog.Neuro‐Psychopharmacol.1977,1,235–247,doi:10.1016/0364‐7722(77)90046‐7.
103. Robbins,T.W.Specialissueoncognitiveenhancers.Psychopharmacology2008,202,1–2,doi:10.1007/s00213‐008‐1389‐z.
104. Wilms,W.;Woźniak‐Karczewska,M.;Corvini,P.F.‐X.;Chrzanowski,Ł.Nootropicdrugs:Methylphenidate,modafinilandpi‐
racetam—Populationusetrends,occurrenceintheenvironment,ecotoxicityandremovalmethods—Areview.Chemosphere
2019,233,771–785,doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.06.016.
105. Husain,M.;Mehta,M.A.Cognitiveenhancementbydrugsinhealthanddisease.TrendsCogn.Sci.2011,15,28–36,
doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.11.002.
106. Abo‐Elmatty,D.M.;Elshazly,S.M.;Zaitone,S.A.Piracetamandvinpocetineamelioraterotenone‐inducedParkinsonisminrats.
IndianJ.Pharmacol.2012,44,774–9,doi:10.4103/0253‐7613.103300.
107. Ford,A.H.;Almeida,O.P.EffectofVitaminBSupplementationonCognitiveFunctionintheElderly:ASystematicReviewand
Meta‐Analysis.DrugsAging2019,36,419–434,doi:10.1007/s40266‐019‐00649‐w.
108. Solomon,T.M.;Leech,J.;Murphy,C.;Debros,G.;Budson,A.;Solomon,P.Arandomized,double‐blind,placebocontrolled,
parallelgroup,efficacystudyofalphaBRAIN®administeredorally.J.Int.Soc.SportsNutr.2015,12,P54,doi:10.1186/1550‐2783‐
12‐s1‐p54.
109. Malouf,R.;Evans,J.G.VitaminB6forcognition.CochraneDatabaseSyst.Rev.2003,93,CD004393,doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004393.
110. SenecaCHAPTER2—AlkaloidChemistry;Elsevier:Amsterdam,TheNetherlands,2007;pp.61–139;ISBN978‐0‐444‐52736‐3.
111. Ogunrin,A.Effectofvinpocetine(cognitol™)oncognitiveperformancesofaNigerianpopulation.Ann.Med.HealthSci.Res.
2014,4,654–61,doi:10.4103/2141‐9248.139368.
112. Morton,F.;Tighe,B.Prevalenceof,andfactorsinfluencing,bingedrinkinginyoungadultuniversityunder‐graduatestudents.
J.Hum.Nutr.Diet.2011,24,296–267,doi:10.1111/j.1365‐277x.2011.01175_25.x.
113. McNiel,A.D.;Muzzin,K.B.;Dewald,J.P.;McCann,A.L.;Schneiderman,E.D.;Scofield,J.;Campbell,P.R.TheNonmedicalUse
ofPrescriptionStimulantsamongDentalandDentalHygieneStudents.J.Dent.Educ.2011,75,365–376,doi:10.1002/j.0022‐
0337.2011.75.3.tb05050.x.
114. DuPaul,G.J.;Weyandt,L.L.;O’Dell,S.M.;Varejao,M.CollegestudentswithADHD:Currentstatusandfuturedirections.J.
Atten.Disord.2009,13,234–250.
115. Shiers,J.MenandDrugs—TheFacts;UKAddictionTreatmentCentres:Borehamwood,UK,2018.Availableonline:
https://www.ukat.co.uk/drugs/men‐and‐drugs‐the‐facts/(accessedon7March2021)
116. Maher,B.Pollresults:Lookwho’sdoping.Nat.CellBiol.2008,452,674–675,doi:10.1038/452674a.
117. Napoletano,F.;Schifano,F.;Corkery,J.M.;Guirguis,A.;Arillotta,D.;Zangani,C.;Vento,A.ThePsychonauts’WorldofCog‐
nitiveEnhancers.Front.PsychiatryAddict.Disord.2020,11,doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.546796.
118. Marsh,S.UniversitiesMustdoMoretoTackleUseofSmartDrugs,SayExperts,2017.Availableonline:https://www.theguard‐
ian.com/education/2017/may/10/universities‐do‐more‐tackle‐smart‐drugs‐say‐experts‐uk‐exams/(accessedon10March2021).
119. Dennehy,C.E.;Tsourounis,C.;Miller,A.E.EvaluationofHerbalDietarySupplementsMarketedontheInternetforRecreational
Use.Ann.Pharmacother.2005,39,1634–1639,doi:10.1345/aph.1g185.
120. D’Angelo,L.‐S.C.;Savulich,G.;Sahakian,B.J.Lifestyleuseofdrugsbyhealthypeopleforenhancingcognition,creativity,mo‐
tivationandpleasure.Br.J.Pharmacol.2017,174,3257–3267,doi:10.1111/bph.13813.
121. Beddington,J.;Cooper,C.L.;Field,J.;Goswami,U.;Huppert,F.A.;Jenkins,R.;Jones,H.S.;Kirkwood,T.B.L.;Sahakian,B.J.;
Thomas,S.M.Thementalwealthofnations.Nat.CellBiol.2008,455,1057–1060,doi:10.1038/4551057a.
122. Franke,A.G.;Dietz,P.;Ranft,K.;Balló,H.;Simon,P.;Lieb,K.TheUseofPharmacologicCognitiveEnhancersinCompetitive
Chess.Epidemiology2017,28,e57–e58,doi:10.1097/ede.0000000000000737.
123. Maslen,H.;Faulmã¼LlerN.;Savulescu,J.;Faulmüller,N.Pharmacologicalcognitiveenhancementhowneuroscientificresearch
couldadvanceethicaldebate.Front.Syst.Neurosci.2014,8,107,doi:10.3389/fnsys.2014.00107.
124. Vrecko,S.JustHowCognitiveIs“CognitiveEnhancement”?OntheSignificanceofEmotionsinUniversityStudents’Experi‐
enceswithStudyDrugs.AJOBNeurosci.2013,4,4–12,doi:10.1080/21507740.2012.740141.
125. Dunning,D.Chapterfive—TheDunning–KrugerEffect:OnBeingIgnorantofOne’sOwnIgnorance.InAdvancesinExperimental
SocialPsychology;Olson,J.M.,Zanna,M.P.,Eds.;ElsevierAcademicPressInc.:Cambridge,MA,USA,2011,Volume44,pp.247–
296,doi:10.1016/B978‐0‐12‐385522‐0.00005‐6,ISBN0065‐2601.
126. Morton,W.A.;Stockton,G.G.MethylphenidateAbuseandPsychiatricSideEffects.Prim.CareCompanionJ.Clin.Psychiatry2000,
2,159–164,doi:10.4088/pcc.v02n0502.
127. Chary,K.V.;Krishnan,R.Ararecasemodafinildependence.J.Pharmacol.Pharmacother.2015,6,49–50,doi:10.4103/0976‐
500x.149149.
BrainSci.2021,11,35541of38
128. HomeOffice.ReviewofthePsychoactiveSubstancesAct2016;HomeOffice:London,UK,2016;ISBN978‐1‐5286‐0863‐3.
129. Lane,J.D.;Pieper,C.F.;Phillips‐Bute,B.G.;Bryant,J.E.;Kuhn,C.M.CaffeineAffectsCardiovascularandNeuroendocrineActi‐
vationatWorkandHome.Psychosom.Med.2002,64,595–603,doi:10.1097/01.psy.0000021946.90613.db.
130. Finger,G.;DaSilva,E.R.;Falavigna,A.Useofmethylphenidateamongmedicalstudents:Asystematicreview.RevistadaAsso‐
ciaçãoMédicaBrasileira2013,59,285–289,doi:10.1016/j.ramb.2012.10.007.
131. Schifano,F.AnalyzingtheOpen/DeepWebtoBetterUnderstandtheNew/NovelPsychoactiveSubstances(NPS)Scenarios:
SuggestionsfromCASSANDRAandNPS.FinderResearchProjects.BrainSci.2020,10,146,doi:10.3390/brainsci10030146.
132. Schelle,K.J.;Faulmüller,N.;Caviola,L.;Hewstone,M.Attitudestowardpharmacologicalcognitiveenhancement—Areview.
Front.Syst.Neurosci.2014,8,53.
133. Shaw,D.M.Neuroenhancingpublichealth.J.Med.Ethic2013,40,389–391,doi:10.1136/medethics‐2012‐101300.
134. Zaami,S.;Tagliabracci,A.;Berretta,P.;Busardò,F.P.;Marinelli,E.UseofMethylphenidateAnaloguesasCognitiveEnhancers:
ThePreludetoCosmeticNeurologyandanEthicalIssue.Front.Psychiatry2020,10,doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.01006