Recent fire accidents and terrorist events have highlighted that further work can be done to improve the safety of buildings during fire evacuations. To date, several evacuation models and tools have been developed to predict the safety of a building by comparing the time necessary to evacuate it and the time at which the conditions of the given environment become unacceptable. However, despite the increasing availability of new models and tools, many “crude” assumptions are still made to represent human behaviour in fire. Another limitation acknowledged by several authors regards the modelling of evacuees’ decision-making. In fact, many crucial decisions affecting the evacuation time – such as the decision to start investigating and evacuating, the route choice, etc. – are often inputs rather than outputs of evacuation models.
This work is an attempt to fill the gaps in the existing evacuation models by investigating the use of Random Utility Theory to develop new evacuees’ decision-making models. Random Utility Theory has been developed over the last century to model discrete choices combining a utility based structure and the paradigm of rational decision-makers. This theory has been used in many different fields– economics, transportation, marketing, etc. – to investigate and predict several discrete choices. This work aims at investigating if this theory can be used to model human behaviour in fire, comparing the assumptions underpinning the theory and the existing knowledge on evacuees’ decision-making. Then, a general data-based methodology is introduced in this work to use Random Utility Theory to estimate new evacuees’ decision-making models. This methodology combines existing understanding on how evacuees make decisions and existing or new behavioural data. This work analyses all the different combinations of techniques and research methods (i.e. research strategies) that can be used to collect behavioural data aimed at calibrating evacuees’ decision-making. This analysis identifies the pros and cons of each type of behavioural data in terms of several criteria, such as internal, external and ecological validity, experimental control, ethical issues, etc.
The general methodology introduced in this work is finally used to investigate three evacuees’ decisions: (1) the decision to start investigating and evacuating; (2) exit choice; (3) local movement choices.
The first decision is investigated using observations (Revealed Preferences) of evacuees participating in unannounced evacuation drills in a cinema theatre. This dataset includes five unannounced evacuation trials carried out in a cinema theatre in Sweden involving 571 participants.
The second decision is studied using an online questionnaire and hypothetical scenario experiments (Stated Preferences). This dataset includes Stated Preferences from 1,503 respondents from all over the world for 12 hypothetical evacuation scenarios illustrating a metro station with two available exits. The survey administered the hypothetical evacuation scenarios using pre-recorded videos and was distributed using the Internet (i.e. non-immersive Virtual Reality).
The third decision is investigated using observations (Revealed Preferences) of participants in an immersive Virtual Reality experiment. The dataset includes the trajectories of 96 participants, who were asked to evacuate from a road tunnel interacting with the physical virtual environment using a joypad.
The methodology introduced in this work represents a useful tool to identify all the factors affecting evacuees’ decision-making and the impact of each factor on the choices. The application of this methodology for the three selected choices has made it possible to identify the pros and cons of the adopted research strategies. Moreover, this work highlights the need for more advanced research strategies to develop future decision-making models.
Figures - uploaded by
Ruggiero LovreglioAuthor contentAll figure content in this area was uploaded by Ruggiero Lovreglio
Content may be subject to copyright.