ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

Toward Cultural Competency in Health Care: A Scoping Review of the Diversity and Inclusion Education Literature

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Purpose: To explore best practices for increasing cultural competency and reducing health disparities, the authors conducted a scoping review of the existing literature. Method: The review was guided by two questions: (1) Are health care professionals and medical students learning about implicit bias, health disparities, advocacy, and the needs of diverse patient populations? (2) What educational strategies are being used to increase student and educator cultural competency? In August 2016 and July 2018, the authors searched 10 databases (including Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus) and MedEdPORTAL, respectively, using keywords related to multiple health professions and cultural competency or diversity and inclusion education and training. Publications from 2005 to August 2016 were included. Results were screened using a two-phase process (title and abstract review followed by full-text review) to determine if articles met the inclusion or exclusion criteria. Results: The search identified 89 articles that specifically related to cultural competency or diversity and inclusion education and training within health care. Interventions ranged from single-day workshops to a 10-year curriculum. Eleven educational strategies used to teach cultural competency and about health disparities were identified. Many studies recommended using multiple educational strategies to develop knowledge, awareness, attitudes, and skills. Less than half of the studies reported favorable outcomes. Multiple studies highlighted the difficulty of implementing curricula without trained and knowledgeable faculty. Conclusions: For the field to progress in supporting a culturally diverse patient population, comprehensive training of trainers, longitudinal evaluations of interventions, and the identification and establishment of best practices will be imperative.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC1y0abggQZXdtwnfKZBYtws= on 01/27/2022
Downloadedfromhttp://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC1y0abggQZXdtwnfKZBYtws= on 01/27/2022
Copyright © by the Association of American Medical Colleges. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Academic Medicine, Vol. 95, No. 5 / May 2020 803
Review
Abstract
Purpose
To explore best practices for increasing
cultural competency and reducing
health disparities, the authors
conducted a scoping review of the
existing literature.
Method
The review was guided by 2 questions:
(1) Are health care professionals and
medical students learning about implicit
bias, health disparities, advocacy, and the
needs of diverse patient populations?
(2) What educational strategies are
being used to increase student and
educator cultural competency? In
August 2016 and July 2018, the authors
searched 10 databases (including Ovid
MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus) and
MedEdPORTAL, respectively, using
keywords related to multiple health
professions and cultural competency
or diversity and inclusion education
and training. Publications from 2005 to
August 2016 were included. Results were
screened using a 2-phase process (title
and abstract review followed by full-text
review) to determine if articles met the
inclusion or exclusion criteria.
Results
The search identified 89 articles
that specifically related to cultural
competency or diversity and inclusion
education and training within health
care. Interventions ranged from single-
day workshops to a 10-year curriculum.
Eleven educational strategies used to
teach cultural competency and about
health disparities were identified. Many
studies recommended using multiple
educational strategies to develop
knowledge, awareness, attitudes, and
skills. Less than half of the studies
reported favorable outcomes. Multiple
studies highlighted the difficulty of
implementing curricula without trained
and knowledgeable faculty.
Conclusions
For the field to progress in
supporting a culturally diverse patient
population, comprehensive training
of trainers, longitudinal evaluations of
interventions, and the identification and
establishment of best practices will be
imperative.
By 2050, 50% of the U.S. population
will be of non-European origins.1–3
Additionally, more than 10 million
Americans identify as lesbian, gay,
bisexual, transgender/transexual, queer/
questioning (LGBTQ), and the middle
class has shrunk from 57% in 1970 to 45%
in 2018.4 Within this context of shifting
demographics, our health care system
must strive to provide treatment and
services that are culturally appropriate
and effective. Providers cannot deliver
health care without taking into account
differences in ethnicity, religion, gender,
age, sexual orientation, socioeconomic
status, language, education, ability, and
geographic background.
In addition to these sometimes
overlapping identities, every patient
possesses a distinct worldview, influenced
by their cultures. Though culture is
difficult to define,5 Leininger describes it
as “the learned, shared, and transmitted
values, beliefs, norms, and lifeways of a
particular [group of individuals] that
guides thinking, decisions, and actions
in patterned ways [that are also often
intergenerational].6(p10) Patients view
health promotion and treatment through
the lens of their cultures, which in turn
impacts their overall health.7 Culture
can influence everything from how
people view Western medicine to their
comfort with a doctor of the opposite
gender. We assert that one’s culture has an
inextricable and meaningful relationship
with health needs, care, and outcomes.
Groups from different cultures have
varying levels of health and wellness in
the United States. Health care disparities
refer to differences in access to or
availability of facilities and services.
Health status disparities are the varied
rates of disease and disability that exist
between socioeconomic, racial/ethnic,
geographically defined, and other
groups.8 Health disparities encompasses
both health care disparities and health
status disparities as well as the process for
connecting various types of disparities,
leading to the health outcomes a person
experiences. Both types of health
disparities are largely the result of
historic systemic inequalities. Without
understanding the impact of the political,
socioeconomic, and geographic factors
that led to these inequalities, it is nearly
impossible to address them. Regardless of
a health care provider’s good intentions,
a lack of cultural understanding can lead
to decreased patient compliance and
poor health outcomes.9 Thus, to this day,
health disparities have continued or even
worsened.
Research suggests that one way to
address health disparities and increase
positive health outcomes is to provide
Supplemental digital content for this article is
available at http://links.lww.com/ACADMED/A748,
http://links.lww.com/ACADMED/A749, and http://
links.lww.com/ACADMED/A750.
Toward Cultural Competency in Health Care:
A Scoping Review of the Diversity and Inclusion
Education Literature
Melissa R. Brottman, OTR/L, OTD, Douglas M. Char, MD, MA, Robin A. Hattori, MA,
Rachel Heeb, OTR/L, OTD, and Steven D. Taff, PhD, OTR/L
Please see the end of this article for information
about the authors.
Correspondence should be addressed to Douglas M.
Char, Division of Emergency Medicine, Campus Box
#8072, Washington University School of Medicine
in St. Louis, 660 South Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO
63110; telephone: (314) 362-4346; email: chard@
wustl.edu.
Copyright © 2019 by the Association of American
Medical Colleges
Acad Med. 2020;95:803–813.
First published online September 17, 2019
doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002995
XXX
Copyright © by the Association of American Medical Colleges. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Review
Academic Medicine, Vol. 95, No. 5 / May 2020
804
culturally appropriate care.10–13 The
Accreditation Council for Graduate
Medical Education, Liaison Committee
on Medical Education, World Health
Organization, and Institute of Medicine
all endorse training health professionals
and students in this area,14–20 as education
that helps providers understand the
cultural differences—and health beliefs
and practices—of diverse groups makes a
difference.21
But there are ongoing challenges to
implementing diversity and inclusion
training that enables students and
professionals to deliver health care
effectively to diverse populations or
to garner cultural competence. The
term cultural competence itself is
contentious as it can be interpreted as
suggesting that there is a theoretically
finite body of knowledge that can
be mastered to become culturally
competent.22 Other terms, often used
interchangeably, include culturally
compatible, culturally appropriate,
culturally congruent, culturally sensitive,
cross-cultural, culturally informed,
and culturally responsive.23,24 Tervalon
and Murray-García25 propose that
cultural humility—which incorporates
commitments to lifelong self-evaluation
and learning, to redressing power
imbalances in the patient–physician
dynamic, and to developing mutually
beneficial and nonpaternalistic clinical
and advocacy partnerships with
communities—is a more suitable goal
than cultural competence. However,
cultural competence remains the most
widely used term in the literature
and thus is used in this paper with an
acknowledgment of its shortcomings.
Many educators agree on the 4 major
tenets of cultural competence noted
by the Liaison Committee on Medical
Education: awareness, attitudes,
knowledge, and skills.16 Each tenet25
(see Table 1) describes concepts that
health care providers need to be sensitive
toward people of differing backgrounds.
However, there is a dearth of guidelines
for imparting the 4 tenets effectually.15
Many educators feel less prepared to
teach about diversity than science-related
subject contents. They may provide
basic knowledge on the influence of
race or gender specific to patient care
and health outcomes, for example, but
disregard political, socioeconomic,
and geographical impacts on health.
The assumption is that students can
extrapolate material and generalize
concepts to approach various situations
specific to diversity and inclusion, but, in
the end, this can lead to students not fully
appreciating the complex, interdependent
nature of the issues, which can actually be
counterproductive.26
Surveys show that health care
professionals still remain unaware of
the actual impact of health disparities
nationwide.15,27 Developing and teaching
a comprehensive curriculum that
includes the entire scope of cultural
competency is a recognized challenge.
Reliance on a biomedical model of
education is problematic, as many health
care providers postulate that health
care as an institution shoulders some
responsibility for the persistence of health
disparities.28
Exploring the approaches used to teach
cultural competency has the potential
to enhance learning and application
of culturally appropriate care. This
analysis may lead to curricular changes
that have the potential to increase
awareness, reduce bias, increase
health care accessibility, and provide
effective health services for people from
diverse backgrounds. To explore best
educational practices for increasing
cultural competency and reducing
health disparities, we conducted a
comprehensive scoping review of the
existing literature. The use of a scoping
review provides a cumulative map of the
existing literature to assist in identifying
knowledge gaps within a given topic. The
use of a scoping review does not assess
the quality of the literature; however,
it provides a comprehensive approach
to investigating a topic from multiple
disciplines and varying study designs.
Method
Research questions
We focused our scoping review on
answering the following questions:
(1) Are health care professionals and
medical students learning about implicit
bias, health disparities, advocacy, and the
needs of diverse patient populations?
(2) What educational strategies are being
used to increase student and educator
cultural competency (i.e., awareness,
attitudes, knowledge, and skills in
providing culturally appropriate care)?
Search strategy
Designed by a medical librarian (A.
Hardi, MLS), our search strategy
focused on multiple health professions,
including medicine, nursing, audiology,
pharmacy, occupational therapy, and
physical therapy, plus concepts of
cultural competency or diversity and
inclusion education and training. We
did not look at specific groups (e.g.,
LGBTQ, certain ethnicities), as we
sought to explore the larger global issue
of cultural competency and health
disparities. We used a combination of
standardized terms and keywords that
were implemented in Ovid MEDLINE,
Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane
Database of Systematic Reviews,
Cochrane Central Register of Controlled
Trials, Database of Abstracts of Reviews
of Effects, ERIC, ProQuest Dissertations
Table 1
Definitions of the Four Major Tenets of Cultural Competencya
Tenet Definition
Awareness Awareness or insight into your own biases and reactions to various cultures that
are different from your own.
Attitudes Noting the “difference between just being aware of cultural differences” and
“analyzing your own internal belief systems.”
Knowledge Tervalon and Murray-García25 found that regardless of an individual’s morals,
beliefs, and values, how they think may not align with how they act causing
increased prejudice when interacting with those from a different culture. By noting
this gap, focusing on improving understanding or knowledge is key to improving
one’s own cultural competence.
Skills “Taking practices of cultural competency” and working to integrate them as
a part of one’s daily actions. A typical skill one needs to work on is effective
communication with a focus on both verbal and gestural communication.
a Definitions derived from Tervalon M, Murray-García J. Cultural humility versus cultural competence: A critical
distinction in defining physician training outcomes in multicultural education. J Health Care Poor Underserved.
1998;9:117–125.25
Copyright © by the Association of American Medical Colleges. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Review
Academic Medicine, Vol. 95, No. 5 / May 2020 805
and Theses, and Clinicaltrials.gov. Our
initial search was conducted on August
5, 2016. In July 2018, we conducted a
secondary search of MedEdPORTAL.
For all searches, we applied database-
supplied language limits and confined
results to English publications from 2005
to August 2016. We exported results to
EndNote and removed 2,989 duplicates
for a remainder of 4,267 unique citations.
See Supplemental Digital Appendix 1 (at
http://links.lww.com/ACADMED/A748)
for the full search strategies.
Inclusion criteria
The research lead (M.R.B.) screened
the literature with specific inclusion
and exclusion criteria. D.M.C. and
S.D.T. modified the inclusion criteria
throughout the study selection process to
narrow the focus of the selected articles.
In phase 1 (title and abstract review), the
initial 4,267 articles were reviewed and
included if their abstracts had specific
terminology that focused on health
care professionals or students, followed
an American or European school
system, and discussed or explained an
educational curriculum and instruction.
Articles did not have to be peer reviewed
to be included.
A full-text review conducted by M.R.B.,
R.H., and an undergraduate assistant
(I. Chen) confirmed that 717 articles
met all of the aforementioned criteria.
Because there was still an overabundance
of literature, we added the following
criterion during phase 2 (full-text review):
articles must discuss culturally relevant
education, educational strategies, and
instruction. The final screening process
identified a total of 89 articles that met all
of the inclusion criteria. A flow diagram
(Figure 1) was adapted from the PRISMA
(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic
Reviews and Meta-Analyses)29 guidelines
and used during the screening process.
Starting with purposefully general criteria
minimized the risk of potential bias. Any
disagreements were resolved by D.M.C.
and S.D.T.
Data organization and extraction
M.R.B. and R.H. used the Guideline
for Reporting Evidence-Based Practice
Education Interventions and Teaching
(GREET)30 checklist to organize our
results. Educational intervention can be
complicated to assess in scoping reviews
due to educators frequently modifying
lessons and curricula. Therefore, we
used a modified GREET checklist to
provide information on each educational
intervention.30 The modified checklist
combined 17 categories into 7. This
merging of items allowed us to analyze
each article without having to separate
details into constrictive subcategories.
For instance, the full GREET checklist
divides intervention outcomes into the
categories of how well, planned changes,
and unplanned changes, whereas the
modified checklist incorporated all 3 of
these categories into the single category
of intervention outcomes.
Three reviewers (M.R.B., R.H., and
I. Chen) extracted data regarding
study design in the following GREET
categories: participants; theory, model,
or framework; learning objectives;
educational strategies; delivery personnel;
intervention schedule and/or length; and
intervention outcomes. Coding occurred
in 3 distinct phases: coding, sorting, and
synthesizing. First, codes were assigned
to track common trends and patterns
throughout multiple categories based
on each reviewer’s interpretation of
the literature (e.g., use of simulators,
role-play, standardized patients).31 The
reviewers collaborated to generate a
single list of codes to decrease individual
bias. After the initial cycle of coding, they
sorted each coded list into categories
based on similarities and underlying
meaning. From there, the reviewers
generated themes encompassing all of
the initial codes and the categories into
which they were sorted. For instance, one
intervention used objective structured
clinical examination (OSCE), which
was coded as simulation. From there,
the intervention was categorized with
similar intervention approaches (such
as use of OSCE and role-play) and
Figure 1 Adapted PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-
Analyses)29 flow diagram for an August 2016 scoping review exploring best educational practices
for increasing cultural competency and reducing health disparities. A secondary search of
MedEdPORTAL was conducted in July 2018. All numbers reported in the figure include articles
from both searches.
Copyright © by the Association of American Medical Colleges. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Review
Academic Medicine, Vol. 95, No. 5 / May 2020
806
placed into broader code families (such
as simulation). Finally, we placed all
simulation codes under the larger theme
of educational strategies.
Results
Included studies
Our searches identified 4,267 studies after
duplicates were removed, of which 89
articles related to cultural competency
or diversity and inclusion education and
training within health care.2,3,7,11,12,15,18–20,23,
24,32–109 Detailed information on the included
studies can be found in Supplemental
Digital Appendix 2 (at http://links.lww.com/
ACADMED/A749). Due to the diverse,
inconsistent, and unstructured nature
of education-based articles, we did not
develop comparisons to rate papers or draw
conclusions regarding specific outcomes.
Study characteristics
Interventions ranged from single-day
workshops3,11,32–43 to a 10-year effort
to integrate cultural competence
throughout a curriculum.44 Table 2
displays participant characteristics. Of
89 studies, 78 (87.6%) were conducted
with graduate and undergraduate
students; the remaining articles focused
on health care professionals12,15,45–51
and educators.15,23,42,49,78,85,100,108,109 The
maximum number of participants in a
single intervention was 562.19 Nursing
and medicine comprised the primary
professions providing diversity and
inclusion education and training.
Many of the studies were descriptive in
nature and did not provide enough detail to
draw comparisons, demonstrate outcomes,
or evaluate the efficacy of interventions.
Studies noted sequential outcomes of
acquiring knowledge, awareness, attitudes,
and skills. Of the 89 studies, 19 (21.3%)
described an increase in students’ cultural
knowledge.2,19,20,36,38,50,52,53,55,57–59,61–65,70,77
Twenty-two (24.7%) studies observed
changes in students’ attitudes and level of
cultural awareness.2,11,19,24,35,37,48,50–52,58,61,62,67–74,92
Fourteen (15.7%) studies noted a general
increase in students’ perceived level of
applicable skills.3,18,19,34,36,38,43,52,53,72–74,77,78 Only
2 (2.2%) studies tracked outcomes to find
that students developed new skills specific
to culturally competent care, in addition
to increased knowledge and awareness.19,52
Thirty-eight (42.7%) studies tracked at least
one outcome, while over half of the articles
did not report any specific outcomes.
The review revealed 5 themes—theories,
models, and frameworks; teaching
strategies; assessments; curriculum and
course design; and educator training—
which are discussed in more detail below.
Theories, models, and frameworks.
Various tools are used to organize
different concepts and information
within a specific context. Theories
are tested knowledge that informs
aspects of human behavior, models are
visual representations that describe
relationships among concepts, and
frameworks are structures of concepts
used to communicate ideas and values.110
This review found that 53/89 (59.6%)
studies used at least one theory, model,
or framework to guide the development
of their educational intervention, while
37/89 (41.6%) did not.
The most frequently referenced model
was Campinha-Bacote’s111 Process of
Cultural Competence in the Delivery of
Healthcare Services.2,23,48,49,51,55,64,70,72,79–82
This model identifies the development
of cultural competence as a process
embedded within 5 constructs:
cultural awareness, knowledge, skills,
encounters, and desires.2,23,64 Other cited
models were Giger and Davidhizar’s9
Transcultural Assessment Model,23,51,65,81
Purnell’s112 Model for Cultural
Competence,23,44,51,65 and Berlin and
Fowkes’s113 LEARN (Listen, Explain,
Acknowledge, Recommend, Negotiate)
Communication Model.2,62,68,71,83,84
Teaching strategies. Almost all studies
(80/88, 90.9%) cited mixed teaching
strategies (outlined in Supplemental
Digital Appendix 3 at http://links.
lww.com/ACADMED/A750). One of
89 (1.1%) studies did not mention
any teaching strategies used during
their intervention, so it was not
analyzed for teaching strategies.109
Many studies recommended using
multiple methodologies, such as
lectures, discussion groups, and, less
frequently, presentations and papers
to develop knowledge, awareness,
attitudes, and skills. Seventy-nine of
Table 2
Participant Characteristics Among the Studies Included in an August 2016 Scoping
Review Exploring Best Educational Practices for Increasing Cultural Competency
and Reducing Health Disparitiesa
Participant characteristic No. (%) of studies
Health profession
Medicineb30 (33.7)
Nursing 28 (31.5)
Pharmacy 10 (11.2)
Dental 4 (4.5)
Physical therapy 4 (4.5)
Emergency medicine 2 (2.2)
Family medicine 2 (2.2)
Occupational therapy 2 (2.2)
Public health 2 (2.2)
Audiology 1 (1.1)
Radiology 1 (1.1)
Social work 1 (1.1)
Role
Graduate or undergraduate student 78 (87.6)
Health care professional 9 (10.1)
Educatorc9 (10.1)
Residents/clerkshipsd8 (9.0)
aA secondary search of MedEdPORTAL was conducted in July 2018. For some studies, data on the specific target
population were not available for extraction. One study could include more than one health profession or role,
so percentages may exceed 100. The total number of included studies was 89.
bThe overall category medicine was used when no specific type of practice was identified and includes both pre-
and post-doctoral students.
cSpecific to the articles that focused interventions on faculty members.
dPre- and postdoctoral students.
Copyright © by the Association of American Medical Colleges. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Review
Academic Medicine, Vol. 95, No. 5 / May 2020 807
88 (89.8%) studies used more than
one educational strategy; 36 of these
79 (45.6%) studies reported favorable
outcomes.2,3,11,18–20,34,36–38,48,51–55,57,58,60–66,
68,70–75,77,82,86,87 However, only 2/79 (2.5%)
studies reported that the intervention
improved participants’ skills (beyond
awareness, attitudes, and knowledge).19,52
Nine of 88 (10.2%) studies used only one
educational strategy. Of those 9 studies, 5
(55.6%) cited favorable outcomes50,56,67,69,88
and 3 (33.3%) reported no significant
change.89–91
We identified 11 educational strategies,
which are described in more detail below,
used to teach cultural competency and
about health disparities: immersion
experiences, simulation, discussion
groups, lectures, reflection, educational
technology, case-based learning, papers,
presentations, readings, and videos
(Table 3 shows the distribution of these
across the included studies).
Immersion experiences. Immersion
experiences were employed in 30/88
(34.1%) studies. Of these 30, there
were 12 (40.0%) studies that used
clinical rotations to acquire cultural
knowledge24,44,49,52,62,69,74,78,83,87,92,104 and
1 (3.3%) that provided 2 clinical
placements to enhance the application
of culturally competent care.70 Another
program provided an immersive
international experience that increased
students’ awareness and ability to
understand a variety of environmental
and sociocultural factors impacting
health.78 While promising, the program
proved costly and was limited based on
follow-up discussions.
Simulation. Simulation was incorporated
in 40/88 (45.5%) studies. Twenty-
eight of those 40 (70.0%) studies used
role-play with students or standardized
patients.33,34,37,40,45, 46,48,51–55,59,61,63,66,71,73,79,85–88,
93–97 Vyas and Caligiuri71 indicated
that student-led role-play negatively
influenced outcomes due to inaccurate
simulation. In contrast, Mihalic and
colleagues53 found their student role-
play intervention increased cultural
knowledge and skills. Of the 40
studies, 6 (15.0%) used standardized
patients,39,42,43,76,78,94 3 (7.5%) used an
OSCE,61,85,98 and 4 (10.0%) combined
standardized patients and an
OSCE.34,46,77,80 OSCEs proved an especially
effective approach to increasing cultural
knowledge according to self-reported
measures61 and further facilitated tracking
of performance over time.34
Discussion groups. Discussion groups
were cited in 52/88 (59.1%) studies as a
means of cultural competency education.
In 10 of these 52 (19.2%) studies,
discussions occurred within small-group
settings of 8–15 students.11,41,43,47,75,85,93,
95,99,100 Additional formats included
panel, large-group, activity-based, and
faculty-facilitated discussions. Smith and
colleagues15 found that the use of smaller
cohorts promoted a safe environment for
students, enhancing self-reflection and
evaluation. Discussion groups were not
only employed with students but were
also cited as a tool to train educators to
facilitate meaningful dialogue.33
Lectures. Lectures were used as a
method of disseminating foundational
information about health disparities in
50/88 (56.8%) studies. Lectures ranged
from 15 minutes73 to 2 hours56,58 and
were conducted by various individuals
including, but not limited to, community
members and guest lecturers (without
specification of expertise),37,45,54,75 experts
within the field,48,53,54,90 and faculty.20,35,
38,46,56,58,61, 68,85,96,97,101 The effectiveness of
lectures varied; 2/49 (4.1%) studies found
that lectures proved less beneficial than
active learning activities.11,101 Combining
lectures with other educational
strategies (such as role-playing, group
discussions, etc.) generally led to more
positive outcomes in terms of increasing
knowledge and awareness, implying
that lectures alone are not a sufficiently
robust tool for educating individuals on
the topics of cultural competency and
diversity and inclusion.
Reflection. Reflection was included as an
educational strategy in 36/88 (40.9%)
studies. For example, students at one
institution used Blackboard to develop a
reflection portfolio.2 The use of reflection
positively influenced students’ cultural
knowledge, awareness, and skills.64,70,74
However, 1/36 (2.8%) studies reported
needing more time for reflection
due to minimal changes in behaviors
and attitudes.11 Another 2/36 (5.6%)
studies paired reflection with activities
like hands-on experiences and group
discussions and found greater synthesis
of the information previously learned.57,80
Finally, the benefits of reflection double
as both a teaching tool and a means
of appraising changes in students’
knowledge and awareness.23,66
Educational technology. Educational
technology was used as an educational
strategy in 15/88 (17.0%) studies in the
forms of web conferencing64; Internet
training36,52,67,81,82,89; online forums102;
e-lectures76; distance learning103;
Table 3
Distribution of Educational Strategies Across the Included Studies in an August
2016 Scoping Review Exploring Best Educational Practices for Increasing Cultural
Competency and Reducing Health Disparitiesa
Educational
strategy No. (%) of
studies Studies
Immersion experiences 30 (34.1) 12,19,20,23,24,36,38,44,46,47,49,52,55,57,62,68–72,74,78,79,83,87,92,93,97,103,104
Simulation 40 (45.5) 7,23,33,34,37,39,40,42,43,45,46,48,51–55,59,61,63,66,71,73,76-82,85–88,93–98
Discussion groups 52 (59.1) 3,11,15,19,20,32–41,43,44,46–49,51–55,57–60,62,64,66,71,72,75,79,82,84–87,92,93,95,
99–102,106–108
Lectures 50 (56.8) 3,11,12,15,18–20,32–41,45,46,48–50,53,54,56,58,61–65,68,70,71,73–75,77,81,82,85,86,87,
90,93,96,97,99,101,104
Reflection 36 (40.9) 2,3,11,15,18,23,24,32,36,38,40,44,47–49,57,62,64–66,70–72,74,78,80,82–84,91,94,96–98,
103,105
Educational technology 15 (17.0) 7,36,40,41,52,54,64,67,76,81,82,89,92,102,103
Case-based learning 28 (31.8) 2,3,15,34,38,40,44,45,53,58,60,61,66,71,77,80–82,84,85,92,93,95,99–101,103,105
Papers 5 (5.7) 23,47,49,57,71
Presentations 5 (5.7) 20,23,81,83,85
Readings 17 (19.3) 2,12,20,35,40,46,51,52,54,64–66,75,80,100,103,108
Videos 24 (27.3) 2,3,34,40,45,51,54,58,62,63,65,66,71,72,80,84,92,97,101–103,106–108
aA secondary search of MedEdPORTAL was conducted in July 2018. Out of a total of 88 studies; 1 study was
not included here because it did not mention teaching strategies used during the intervention, so it was not
analyzed for teaching strategies.109
Copyright © by the Association of American Medical Colleges. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Review
Academic Medicine, Vol. 95, No. 5 / May 2020
808
online self-, pre-, and postassessment
tools40,41,54,92; and high-fidelity simulators.7
Outcomes depended on the type of
technology used. Two of these 15 (13.3%)
studies concluded that the use of skill-
based online modules and audiovisual
tools did not change physicians’ scores
on cultural competency assessments or
meet learning objectives.67,89 Another
2/15 (13.3%) studies found that using a
combination of technology and reflection
increased knowledge,64 attitudes,52 and
skills.52 The majority of educational
technology interventions were not
fully described, making replication
challenging.
Case-based learning (CBL). CBL
was cited in 28/88 (31.8%) studies.
CBL focuses on developing student
skills through real-life and clinical
scenarios.114 Among other things, studies
integrated CBL through simulation,38,82
vignettes,40,53,71 case-based reflections,84
small-group problem-based cases,101 and
case-based discussions.34,61,66,81,101 Two
of these 28 (7.1%) studies made use of
simulation games—BaFa’ BaFa’ cultural
simulation66 and the Clown Culture82—to
educate students on culturally competent
care, but neither reported clear outcomes.
Educators also used CBL in fieldwork
experiences through discussing and
applying cultural knowledge in role-plays
of real cases.61 Sixteen of the 28 (57.1%)
studies mentioned that they used CBL
within their educational interventions
without explaining how,2,3,15,44,45,58,60,77,80,81,85,
93,95,99,103,105 making it difficult to fully
articulate how this educational strategy
works in practice.
Papers. Papers were incorporated in 5/88
(5.7%) studies. Martinez and colleagues47
used essays as assessment and application
tools in evaluating behaviors through
case-based questions. In most studies,
papers were used in conjunction with
other educational strategies. The majority
of studies did not provide details on how
papers were structured or formatted.
Presentations. Presentations were used
in 5/88 (5.7%) studies, including both
oral23,83,85 and poster presentations.20,81
Vela and colleagues20 had students
present posters to illustrate a health
disparities topic as part of a 5-day
elective experience for health professions
students. Similar to papers, presentations
were used in conjunction with other
educational strategies with little
description on the format or structure
used.
Readings. Readings appeared in
17/88 (19.3%) studies as an optional
assignment,20,40 a preparatory tool,2,12,51,54,64,
66, 75,80,100,103,108 and/or the focus of class
discussion and reflections.35,46,52,65,66,103
Resources such as The Spirit Catches You
and You Fall Down115 and La Doctora116
provided students with an understanding
of culture within health care systems.66
Poirier and colleagues2 assigned readings
before class to build foundational
knowledge on cultural issues, then used
class time to apply the information. They
reported that their students demonstrated
increased awareness and knowledge.
Two of these 17 (11.8%) studies
found that readings presenting real-
life encounters increased participants’
cultural awareness.35,66 For instance, one
intervention used letters and factual
accounts of individuals living in poverty
to stimulate discussions about how these
circumstances might compromise one’s
health.35
Videos. Videos were incorporated in
24/88 (27.3%) studies in the form of
clips, movies, documentaries, television
shows, and training videos. Four of the
24 (16.7%) studies mentioned specific
videos2,62,66,103 like If These Walls Could
Talk117 and Patient Diversity: Beyond
the Vital Signs.118 The most commonly
cited film was Worlds Apart,119 about a
Muslim man who refused chemotherapy
due to cultural beliefs. Pilcher and
colleagues62 used the facilitator’s guide
for this film120 to assist in discussions that
promoted reflection and introduced new
perspectives. Studies combining videos
with other educational strategies reported
an increase in knowledge,2,58,62,65,97
awareness,2,51,62,71,72,97,106 and skills.97
Assessments. Assessments evaluate
the level of changed behaviors and
acquired knowledge and skills related
to an educational intervention. This
review found many programs used
papers, projects, and reflections to assess
learning. Eight of 89 (9.0%) studies used
a pre- and post-test method to assess
learning20,48,50,52,60,66,69,87 and 1 (1.1%)
study conducted a follow-up 30 days
post intervention.87 The 2 assessments
most frequently cited were the Cultural
Self-Efficacy Scale121 and the Inventory
for Assessing the Process of Cultural
Competency Among Healthcare
Professionals,122 which were each cited by
5/89 (5.6%) studies.2,51,87,103,105
Curriculum and course design. The
studies reviewed did not discuss how
they developed or arrived at their
interventions. There was great variance
in the design of cultural competency
training; examples ranged from a
20-minute intervention34 to 600 hours
of training embedded throughout a
curriculum.83 The interventions included
workshops, curricula, courses, clinical
rotations, and remote education. Fifteen
of 89 (16.9%) studies used a single-day
workshop varying in length and in the
amount of information covered.3,11,32–43,76
Related to the theme of assessment,
a large portion of short courses and
workshops only measured immediate
outcomes to determine the level of
knowledge, skills, and behavior changes;
no study established its format as a best
practice for overall curriculum or course
design.
Educator training. Studies have noted
that successful implementation of a
cultural competency curriculum begins
with those delivering it: the faculty
and teaching staff.23,44,61,97 Twenty of 89
(22.5%) studies noted the importance of
effectively training those who are educating
others about diversity and inclusion to
the successful implementation of such
curricula.15,23,33,40,42–44,46,49,56,61, 78,85,91,93,97,100,
103,108,109 Two of these 20 (10.0%) studies
mentioned that a majority of educators
teaching cultural competence have
interest in the topic but lack extensive
training.23,78 Seven of the 20 (35.0%)
studies endorsed training faculty and
teaching staff to deliver health disparity
information15,23,42,49,78,85,100; however, only
2 of these 7 (28.6%) described how to
train them.15,100 Kumagai and Lypson33
recommended group discussions,
reflections, and simulation activities. Even
with such training, however, students
found that educators could not facilitate a
thorough conversation.42
Discussion
Health care educators acknowledge
that cultural appropriateness grows
increasingly critical in the face of
changing demographics and widening
health disparities, but it is clear that we
need to do more work to identify best
practices. For example, none of the
studies included in our review declared
Copyright © by the Association of American Medical Colleges. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Review
Academic Medicine, Vol. 95, No. 5 / May 2020 809
their approach to be a best practice for
teaching cultural competency in health
care.
Both the University of Rochester37 and
St. John Fisher College59 used the Deaf
Strong Hospital program developed at
the University of Rochester School of
Medicine and Dentistry. Although these
institutions used the same program
guide as the basis for their training,
one incorporated a longitudinal self-
assessment survey and the other included
a reflective writing assignment. This
shows how cultural competency training
can be altered beyond the initial design
and thus vary in content, delivery, and
outcomes.
Within the literature, we note a scarcity
of evidence citing the effectiveness
of educational approaches72 with the
majority of studies hesitant to state a
clear positive outcome. Many articles
used various models, theories, and/
or frameworks to support their cross-
cultural education interventions;
however, none of them were reported
as producing more favorable outcomes
than the others. It may be that the choice
of model, theory, and/or framework is
not as critical as the existence of one to
guide a curriculum or training. Beyond
the general formatting for the curriculum
or course, the approaches for assessing
outcomes were vague. Many assessment
tools followed a self-report format, which
cannot always accurately determine
changes in skills related to cultural
competence. Unfortunately, many of the
studies did not explain their process or
appear to have an assessment process at
all. This was one area where many studies
fell short.
This scoping review reveals that educators
seek resources and ways to combine
educational strategies to increase the
cultural awareness, attitudes, knowledge,
and skills of their students. Considering
the range of models, theories,
frameworks, and educational strategies
identified, education specific to diversity
and inclusion and cultural competence
seems to have been embraced by the
health professions and will likely continue
to proliferate.
Several barriers to progress in efforts to
increase cultural competency and health
disparities education and training are
noteworthy. First, education for those
who are doing the educating has not
been sufficiently addressed. Educators
are being trained with a narrow focus
that does not adequately prepare them to
teach future health professionals about
the complex topics of culture, bias, and
health disparities. Many studies thus
recommend relying on and training
faculty to become experts within the
field to most effectively deliver education
based on diversity and inclusion and
cultural competence.15,56,109 To implement
programs with a diverse cultural focus
into health professions education
effectively, faculty and teaching staff
need to have a level of comfort and
proficiency with a variety of topics
(i.e., understanding of various models,
theories, and frameworks associated with
culture; therapeutic use of self-concepts
associated with effective communication;
etc.). While methods used to teach
students can also be effective for
other audiences, there is no universal
standard for training educators. Garet
and colleagues123 explored the factors
that make professional development
effective and found that a focus on
content knowledge, opportunities for
active learning, and connection to
other learning activities all increased
educator’s knowledge and skills and
improved classroom practices. Regular
training of faculty and teaching staff
using these strategies will lead to a more
knowledgeable and skilled cadre of
educators who can handle the breadth
and depth of issues related to cultural
competence.
This barrier may also resolve in time as
health care students and professionals
who have benefitted from cultural
competency training and who have
actively incorporated those lessons into
their practice go on to become the next
generation of educators. Until that time,
the question remains how to fill the gap.
Many programs make use of external
experts, but they are scarce and in high
demand. A train-the-trainer124 model may
be more productive.
This scoping review also shows that an
assessment of what works the best in
the short term and/or longitudinally
has yet to be completed. Many of the
studies indicated positive changes in
student awareness or knowledge. But
these were largely based on self-reported
indicators, which may be biased and
are unreliable for predicting future
behavior or long-term effectiveness. Our
review of the literature found only a
few assessment scales that were used in
the included studies. Other tools need
to be explored and validated so that the
myriad of models, theories, frameworks,
educational strategies, and interventions
used can be accurately evaluated. As it
stands, many health care professionals
and students can claim that they have
had some exposure to training in cultural
competency. However, it is not evident
that these efforts change behavior or lead
to more culturally sensitive services that
decrease health disparities.
The lack of assessment in cultural
competency training explains why there
is no consensus as to the most effective
methodologies. Educators often employ
a multimodal curricular approach,
incorporating lectures, discussion groups,
educational technology, and CBL. No
particular approach is all-encompassing,
nor is that necessarily feasible. There is
no right way to address the complex,
dynamic, and sometimes emotionally
charged subject matter that is cultural
competency training. The very nature
of diversity and inclusion education
implies that training can never be
complete; rather, it is a lifelong process.
It is impossible for a student to become
proficient after a single educational
session or even a year of training,
and individuals will absorb and apply
information differently, even if they share
similar backgrounds. Both educators and
students in health care must embrace this
nuanced process as an essential aspect of
their career-long endeavors to improve
cultural competency within health care.
A potential solution lies in introducing
cultural competency training at the
start of professional health studies and
embedding these concepts throughout
curricula and clinical experiences.
Including cultural competence in
accreditation standards and as part of
continuing professional education can
enhance the longitudinal presence and
congruency necessary to fortify these
efforts.
Health professions programs
acknowledge that gaining knowledge,
awareness, and skills are necessary for
attitude and behavior changes but rarely
measure outcomes to determine if those
objectives are being met. A next step
toward successful training might be
future investigation into the effectiveness
Copyright © by the Association of American Medical Colleges. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Review
Academic Medicine, Vol. 95, No. 5 / May 2020
810
of a variety of efforts undertaken at 3
partner institutions including 7 health
professions programs: general medicine,
occupational therapy, physical therapy,
nursing, pharmacy, audiology, and deaf
education. Washington University in St.
Louis, the St. Louis College of Pharmacy,
and the Goldfarb School of Nursing at
Barnes-Jewiss College offer programs
such as a week-long immersive didactic
and experiential initiative that focuses
on health care disparities and their
myriad causes, an interactive poverty
simulation, an implicit bias workshop,
and group discussions focused on
providing culturally appropriate
care. Educational institutions need
to take a closer look into the design
and assessment of programs like these
to ensure educators are creating the
necessary outcomes related to the 4
major tenets of cultural competency:
skills, knowledge, attitudes, and
awareness.
Future research has the potential to
determine best practices for teaching
cultural competency and about health
disparities. Only when we can pinpoint
what works, how, and why, can we
inculcate cultural competency as an
essential value for health care providers
and begin to dismantle health disparities.
Limitations
Our review was limited to English
titles and focused on educational
practices rather than clinical studies.
We only focused on school systems in
the United States or Europe. Though it
was as comprehensive as possible, our
scoping review is likely an incomplete
snapshot. Many health professions
programs may be implementing cultural
competency training without reporting it.
Additionally, the programs that reported
about their efforts may have since
modified their approaches.
Conclusions
A wealth of examples in the area
of cultural competency and health
disparities education training for
health professions exist. These varied
interventions are acknowledged
as important and provide critical
opportunities for students to learn,
empathize, and reflect. For the field
to progress in supporting a culturally
diverse patient population, however,
comprehensive training of trainers,
longitudinal evaluations of interventions,
and the identification and establishment
of best practices will be imperative.
Funding/Support: This study was funded by
the Faculty Fellows and Emerging Scholar-
Professional Grant Program, Center for Diversity
and Inclusion, Washington University in St.
Louis.
Other disclosures: None reported.
Ethical approval: Reported as not applicable.
Previous presentations: The principal investigators
presented the preliminary results of this scoping
literature review orally at the iTeach Symposium
at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis,
Missouri, in January 2018. Preliminary results
were presented as a poster at the National
Academies of Practice Annual Meeting & Forum
in Atlanta, Georgia, in April 2018.
M.R. Brottman is currently occupational therapist,
Schwab Rehabilitation Hospital, Chicago, Illinois.
At the time of writing, she was a third-year clinical
doctorate student, Program in Occupational Therapy,
Washington University School of Medicine in St.
Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
D.M. Char is professor of emergency medicine
and director of faculty development for emergency
medicine, Washington University School of Medicine
in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
R.A. Hattori is senior project manager, Program in
Occupational Therapy, Washington University School
of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
R. Heeb was a third-year clinical doctorate student,
Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington
University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St.
Louis, Missouri, at the time of writing. She is
currently a rehabilitation and participation science
doctoral student, Program in Occupational Therapy,
Washington University School of Medicine in St.
Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
S.D. Taff is associate professor of occupational
therapy and medicine and director, Division of
Professional Education, Program in Occupational
Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine
in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
References
1 Day JC. Population projections of the United
States by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin:
1995 to 2050. Current Population Reports,
P25–1130. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of
the Census; 1996. https://www.census.gov/
prod/1/pop/p25-1130/p251130.pdf. Accessed
July 25, 2019.
2 Poirier TI, Butler LM, Devraj R, Gupchup
GV, Santanello C, Lynch JC. A cultural
competency course for pharmacy students.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2009;73:81.
3 Rust G, Kondwani K, Martinez R, et al. A
crash-course in cultural competence. Ethn
Dis. 2006;16(2 suppl 3):S3-29-36.
4 Sharp M. The shrinking middle class is
having a huge impact on housing. Business
Insider. Published May 6, 2018. https://
www.businessinsider.com/the-shrinking-
middle-class-is-having-a-huge-impact-on-
housing-2018-5. Accessed July 25, 2019.
5 Iwama MK. Revisiting culture in
occupational therapy: A meaningful
endeavor. Occup Participation Health.
2004;24:2–3.
6 Leininger MM. Culture care diversity and
universality theory and evolution of the
ethnonursing method. In: Leininger MM,
McFarland MR, eds. Culture Care Diversity
and Universality: A Worldwide Nursing
Theory. 2nd ed. Sudbury, MA: Jones and
Bartlett; 2006:1–34.
7 Roberts SG, Warda M, Garbutt S, Curry
K. The use of high-fidelity simulation to
teach cultural competence in the nursing
curriculum. J Prof Nurs. 2014;30:259–265.
8 National Quality Forum. A roadmap for
promoting health equity and eliminating
disparities: The four I’s for health equity.
Published September 2017. http://www.
qualityforum.org/Publications/2017/09/A_
Roadmap_for_Promoting_Health_Equity_
and_Eliminating_Disparities__The_
Four_I_s_for_Health_Equity.aspx. Accessed
July 25, 2019.
9 Giger JN, Davidhizar R. The Giger and
Davidhizar transcultural assessment model. J
Transcult Nurs. 2002;13:185–188.
10 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
2017 National Healthcare Quality and
Disparities Report. Published July 2018.
https://www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/
wysiwyg/research/findings/nhqrdr/2017qdr.
pdf. Accessed August 27, 2019.
11 Macdonald ME, Carnevale FA, Razack S.
Understanding what residents want and
what residents need: The challenge of
cultural training in pediatrics. Med Teach.
2007;29:444–451.
12 Riner ME. Globally engaged nursing
education with local immigrant populations.
Public Health Nurs. 2013;30:246–253.
13 Schilder AJ, Kennedy C, Goldstone IL, Ogden
RD, Hogg RS, O’Shaughnessy MV. “Being
dealt with as a whole person.” Care seeking and
adherence: The benefits of culturally competent
care. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52:1643–1659.
14 Groman R, Ginsburg J; American College of
Physicians. Racial and ethnic disparities in
health care: A position paper of the American
College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med.
2004;141:226–232.
15 Smith WR, Betancourt JR, Wynia MK, et al.
Recommendations for teaching about racial
and ethnic disparities in health and health
care. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:654–665.
16 Liaison Committee on Medical Education.
Functions and structure of a medical school:
Standards for accreditation of medical
education programs leading to the MD degree.
https://med.virginia.edu/ume-curriculum/wp-
content/uploads/sites/216/2016/07/2017-18_
Functions-and-Structure_2016-03-24.pdf.
Accessed July 25, 2019.
17 Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR; Committee
on Understanding and Eliminating Racial and
Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Unequal
Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic
Disparities in Health Care. Washington, DC:
National Academies Press; 2003.
18 Powell Sears K. Improving cultural
competence education: The utility of an
intersectional framework. Med Educ.
2012;46:545–551.
19 Swanberg SM, Abuelroos D, Dabaja E, et al.
Partnership for diversity: A multidisciplinary
Copyright © by the Association of American Medical Colleges. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Review
Academic Medicine, Vol. 95, No. 5 / May 2020 811
approach to nurturing cultural competence
at an emerging medical school. Med Ref Serv
Q. 2015;34:451–460.
20 Vela MB, Kim KE, Tang H, Chin MH.
Innovative health care disparities curriculum
for incoming medical students. J Gen Intern
Med. 2008;23:1028–1032.
21 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration. A Treatment Improvement
Protocol: Improving Cultural Competence.
TIP 59. HHS Publication No. (SMA) 14-
4849. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Services Administration; 2014.
https://store.samhsa.gov/system/files/sma14-
4849.pdf. Accessed July 25, 2019.
22 Engebretson J, Mahoney J, Carlson ED.
Cultural competence in the era of evidence-
based practice. J Prof Nurs. 2008;24:172–178.
23 Lipson JG, DeSantis LA. Current approaches
to integrating elements of cultural
competence in nursing education. J Transcult
Nurs. 2007;18(suppl 1):10S–20S.
24 Schuessler JB, Wilder B, Byrd LW. Reflective
journaling and development of cultural
humility in students. Nurs Educ Perspect.
2012;33:96–99.
25 Tervalon M, Murray-García J. Cultural
humility versus cultural competence: A
critical distinction in defining physician
training outcomes in multicultural
education. J Health Care Poor Underserved.
1998;9:117–125.
26 Jernigan VB, Hearod JB, Tran K, Norris
KC, Buchwald D. An examination of
cultural competence training in US medical
education guided by the tool for assessing
cultural competence training. J Health Dispar
Res Pract. 2016;9:150–167.
27 Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. National
Survey of Physicians part I: Doctors on
disparities in medical care. Published March
1, 2002. http://kff.org/uninsured/national-
survey-of-physicians-part-i-doctors. Accessed
July 25, 2019.
28 Gollust SE, Cunningham BA, Bokhour
BG, et al. What causes racial health care
disparities? A mixed-methods study reveals
variability in how health care providers
perceive causal attributions. Inquiry.
2018;55:46958018762840.
29 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman
DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting
items for systematic reviews and meta-
analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ.
2009;339:b2535.
30 Phillips AC, Lewis LK, McEvoy MP, et al.
Development and validation of the guideline
for reporting evidence-based practice
educational interventions and teaching
(GREET). BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:237.
31 Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldaña J.
Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods
Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2013.
32 Stone J, Moskowitz GB. Non-conscious bias in
medical decision making: What can be done
to reduce it? Med Educ. 2011;45:768–776.
33 Kumagai AK, Lypson ML. Beyond cultural
competence: Critical consciousness, social
justice, and multicultural education. Acad
Med. 2009;84:782–787.
34 Lamba S, Tyrie LS, Bryczkowski S, Nagurka
R. Teaching surgery residents the skills to
communicate difficult news to patient and
family members: A literature review. J Palliat
Med. 2016;19:101–107.
35 Norris P. Teaching pharmacy students about
links between socio-economic status and
health. Pharm Educ. 2007;7:197–198.
36 Pottie K, Hostland S. Health advocacy
for refugees: Medical student primer for
competence in cultural matters and global
health. Can Fam Physician. 2007;53:1923–1926.
37 Thew D, Smith SR, Chang C, Starr M. The
Deaf Strong Hospital program: A model of
diversity and inclusion training for first-year
medical students. Acad Med. 2012;87:
1496–1500.
38 Trentham B, Cockburn L, Cameron D,
Iwama M. Diversity and inclusion within
an occupational therapy curriculum. Aust
Occup Ther J. 2007;54(suppl 1):S49–S57.
39 West C, Veronin M, Landry K, et al. Tools to
investigate how interprofessional education
activities link to competencies. Med Educ
Online. 2015;20:28627.
40 Agness-Whittaker CF, Macedo L. Aging,
culture, and health communication:
Exploring personal cultural health beliefs
and strategies to facilitate cross-cultural
communication with older adults.
MedEdPORTAL. April 4, 2016. https://
www.mededportal.org/publication/10374.
Accessed July 25, 2019.
41 Rogers JM, Morris MA, Hook CC, Havyer
RD. Introduction to disability and health for
preclinical medical students: Didactic and
disability panel discussion. MedEdPORTAL.
July 21, 2016. https://www.mededportal.org/
publication/10429. Accessed July 25, 2019.
42 Lee R, Loeb D, Butterfield A. Sexual
history taking curriculum: Lecture and
standardized patient cases. MedEdPORTAL.
July 30, 2014. https://www.mededportal.org/
publication/9856. Accessed July 25, 2019.
43 Underman K, Giffort D, Hyderi A, Hirshfield
LE. Transgender health: A standardized
patient case for advanced clerkship students.
MedEdPORTAL. December 23, 2016. https://
www.mededportal.org/publication/10518.
Accessed July 25, 2019.
44 Romanello ML. Integration of cultural
competence in physical therapist education. J
Phys Ther Educ. 2007;21:33–39.
45 Cuellar NG, Brennan AMW, Vito K, de
Leon Siantz ML. Cultural competence in
the undergraduate nursing curriculum.
Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y
Traumatologia. 2008;52:143–149.
46 Leflore A, Sawning S, Hobgood C. Culturally
sensitive care: A review of models and
educational methods. In: Martin ML,
Heron SL, Moreno-Walton L, Walker Jones
A, eds. Diversity and Inclusion in Quality
Patient Care. Cham, Switzerland: Springer;
2015:39–53.
47 Martinez IL, Artze-Vega I, Wells AL, Mora
JC, Gillis M. Twelve tips for teaching social
determinants of health in medicine. Med
Teach. 2015;37:647–652.
48 Sanner S, Baldwin D, Cannella KA, Charles
J, Parker L. The impact of cultural diversity
forum on students’ openness to diversity. J
Cult Divers. 2010;17:56–61.
49 Sargent SE, Sedlak CA, Martsolf DS. Cultural
competence among nursing students and
faculty. Nurse Educ Today. 2005;25:214–221.
50 Strong KL, Folse VN. Assessing
undergraduate nursing students’ knowledge,
attitudes, and cultural competence in caring
for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender
patients. J Nurs Educ. 2015;54:45–49.
51 Vandenberg H, Kalischuk RG.
Conceptualizations of culture and cultural
care among undergraduate nursing students:
An exploration and critique of cultural
education. J Cult Divers. 2014;21:99–107.
52 Cox ED, Koscik RL, Olson CA, et al. Caring
for the underserved: Blending service
learning and a web-based curriculum. Am J
Prev Med. 2006;31:342–349.
53 Mihalic AP, Morrow JB, Long RB, Dobbie AE.
A validated cultural competence curriculum
for US pediatric clerkships. Patient Educ
Couns. 2010;79:77–82.
54 Bakhai N, Shields R, Barone M, Sanders R,
Fields E. An active learning module teaching
advanced communication skills to care for
sexual minority youth in clinical medical
education. MedEdPORTAL. September
1, 2016. https://www.mededportal.org/
publication/10449. Accessed July 25, 2019.
55 Dewald RJ. Teaching Strategies and Practices
That Promote a Culturally Sensitive
Nursing Education: A Delphi Study [PhD
dissertation]. Minneapolis, MN: Capella
University; 2010.
56 Krajewski A, Rader C, Voytovich A, Longo
WE, Kozol RA, Chandawarkar RY. Improving
surgical residents’ performance on written
assessments of cultural competency. J Surg
Educ. 2008;65:263–269.
57 Lie D, Shapiro J, Cohn F, Najm W. Reflective
practice enriches clerkship students’ cross-
cultural experiences. J Gen Intern Med.
2010;(25 suppl 2):S119–S125.
58 Lim RF, Wegelin J, Hua LL, Kramer EJ,
Servis ME. Evaluating a lecture on cultural
competence in the medical school preclinical
curriculum. Acad Psychiatry. 2008;32:327–331.
59 Mathews JL, Parkhill AL, Schlehofer DA,
Starr MJ, Barnett S. Role-reversal exercise
with Deaf Strong Hospital to teach
communication competency and cultural
awareness. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011;75:53.
60 Northam HL, Hercelinskyj G, Grealish
L, Mak AS. Developing graduate student
competency in providing culturally
sensitive end of life care in critical care
environments—A pilot study of a teaching
innovation. Aust Crit Care. 2015;28:189–195.
61 Paul CR, Devries J, Fliegel J, Van Cleave J,
Kish J. Evaluation of a culturally effective
health care curriculum integrated into a
core pediatric clerkship. Ambul Pediatr.
2008;8:195–199.
62 Pilcher ES, Charles LT, Lancaster CJ.
Development and assessment of a cultural
competency curriculum. J Dent Educ.
2008;72:1020–1028.
63 Rosenthal M, Morales E, Levin S, Murphy LF.
Building a team to fight diabetes: Pharmacy
students’ perceptions about serving as
patient navigators. Curr Pharm Teach Learn.
2014;6:595–604.
64 Spalla TL. Building the ARC in Nursing
Education: Cross-Cultural Experiential
Learning Enabled by the Technology of Video
or Web Conferencing [PhD dissertation].
Columbus, OH: Ohio State University; 2012.
65 Underwood SM. Culture, diversity,
and health: Responding to the queries
of inquisitive minds. J Nurs Educ.
2006;45:281–286.
66 Westberg SM, Bumgardner MA, Lind PR.
Enhancing cultural competency in a college
Copyright © by the Association of American Medical Colleges. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Review
Academic Medicine, Vol. 95, No. 5 / May 2020
812
of pharmacy curriculum. Am J Pharm Educ.
2005;69:82.
67 Kutob RM, Bormanis J, Crago M, Harris JM
Jr, Senf J, Shisslak CM. Cultural competence
education for practicing physicians: Lessons
in cultural humility, nonjudgmental
behaviors, and health beliefs elicitation. J
Contin Educ Health Prof. 2013;33:164–173.
68 Muzumdar JM, Holiday-Goodman M,
Black C, Powers M. Cultural competence
knowledge and confidence after classroom
activities. Am J Pharm Educ. 2010;74:150.
69 Ritten A, Waldrop J, Wink D. Nurse
practitioner students learning from
the medically underserved: Impact on
attitude toward poverty. J Nurs Educ.
2015;54:389–393.
70 Victoroff KZ, Williams KA, Lalumandier
J. Dental students’ reflections on their
experiences with a diverse patient
population. J Dent Educ. 2013;77:982–989.
71 Vyas D, Caligiuri FJ. Reinforcing cultural
competency concepts during introductory
pharmacy practice experiences. Am J Pharm
Educ. 2010;74:129.
72 Lonneman W. Teaching strategies to increase
cultural awareness in nursing students. Nurse
Educ. 2015;40:285–288.
73 Matsuda SJ, Miller M. Impact of cultural
contact on intercultural competency
of occupational therapy students and
international graduate students. J Allied
Health. 2007;36:e30–e46.
74 Powers CA, Zapka J, Biello KB, O’Donnell
J, Prout M, Geller A. Cultural competency
and tobacco control training in US medical
schools: Many but missed opportunities. J
Cancer Educ. 2010;25:290–296.
75 Kutscher E, Boutin-Foster C. Community
perspectives in medicine: Elective for first-
year medical students. MedEdPORTAL.
November 11, 2016. https://www.
mededportal.org/publication/10501.
Accessed July 25, 2019.
76 Bakhai N, Ramos J, Gorfinkle N, et al.
Introductory learning of inclusive sexual
history taking: An e-lecture, standardized
patient case, and facilitated debrief.
MedEdPORTAL. December 28, 2016. https://
www.mededportal.org/publication/10520.
Accessed July 25, 2019.
77 Ndiwane A, Koul O, Theroux R.
Implementing standardized patients to teach
cultural competency to graduate nursing
students. Clin Simul Nurs. 2014;10:e87–e94.
78 Waite R, Calamaro CJ. Cultural competence:
A systemic challenge to nursing education,
knowledge exchange, and the knowledge
development process. Perspect Psychiatr
Care. 2010;46:74–80.
79 Koskinen L, Kelly HT, Bergknut E, et al.
European higher health care education
curriculum: Development of a cultural
framework. J Transcult Nurs. 2012;23:313–319.
80 Panzarella KJ. Beginning with the end in
mind: Evaluating outcomes of cultural
competence instruction in a doctor of
physical therapy programme. Disabil Rehabil.
2009;31:1144–1152.
81 Mancuso L. A customized, integrated
approach to cultural competence education. J
Nurses Staff Dev. 2011;27:170–180.
82 Delgado DA, Ness S, Ferguson K, Engstrom
PL, Gannon TM, Gillett C. Cultural
competence training for clinical staff:
Measuring the effect of a one-hour class
on cultural competence. J Transcult Nurs.
2013;24:204–213.
83 Ciesielka DJ, Schumacher G, Conway A,
Penrose J. Implementing and evaluating
a culturally-focused curriculum in a
collaborative graduate nursing program. Int J
Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2005;2:Article 6.
84 Liu M, Poirier T, Butler L, Comrie R, Pailden
J. Design and evaluation of interprofessional
cross-cultural communication sessions. J
Interprof Care. 2015;29:622–627.
85 Saleh L, Kuthy RA, Chalkley Y, Mescher KM.
An assessment of cross-cultural education
in U.S. dental schools. J Dent Educ.
2006;70:610–623.
86 Chudley S, Skelton J, Wall D, Jones E.
Teaching cross-cultural consultation skills:
A course for UK and internationally trained
general practice registrars. Educ Primary
Care. 2007;18:602–615.
87 Shellman J. The effects of a reminiscence
education program on baccalaureate nursing
students’ cultural self-efficacy in caring for
elders. Nurse Educ Today. 2007;27:43–51.
88 Kutob RM, Bormanis J, Crago M, Gordon P,
Shisslak CM. Using standardized patients to
teach cross-cultural communication skills.
Med Teach. 2012;34:594.
89 Chircop A, Edgecombe N, Hayward K,
Ducey-Gilbert C, Sheppard-Lemoine D.
Evaluating the integration of cultural
competence skills into health and physical
assessment tools: A survey of Canadian
schools of nursing. J Transcult Nurs.
2013;24:195–203.
90 de Leon Siantz ML. Leading change in
diversity and cultural competence. J Prof
Nurs. 2008;24:167–171.
91 Paul D, Ewen SC, Jones R. Cultural
competence in medical education: Aligning
the formal, informal and hidden curricula.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract.
2014;19:751–758.
92 Cross D, Brennan AM, Cotter VT, Watts
RJ. Cultural competence in the master’s
curriculum—A course exemplar. J Prof Nurs.
2008;24:150–154.
93 Ross PT, Wiley Cené C, Bussey-Jones J, et al.
A strategy for improving health disparities
education in medicine. J Gen Intern Med.
2010;(25 suppl 2):S160–S163.
94 Kripalani S, Bussey-Jones J, Katz MG, Genao
I. A prescription for cultural competence
in medical education. J Gen Intern Med.
2006;21:1116–1120.
95 Lubimir KT, Wen AB. Towards cultural
competency in end-of-life communication
training. Hawaii Med J. 2011;70:239–241.
96 Nazar M, Kendall K, Day L, Nazar H.
Decolonising medical curricula through
diversity education: Lessons from students.
Med Teach. 2015;37:385–393.
97 Ring JM. Psychology and medical education:
Collaborations for culturally responsive care.
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2009;16:120–126.
98 Miller E, Green AR. Student reflections
on learning cross-cultural skills through a
‘cultural competence’ OSCE. Med Teach.
2007;29:e76–e84.
99 O’Shaughnessy DF, Tilki M. Cultural
competency in physiotherapy: A model for
training. Physiotherapy. 2007;93:69–77.
100 Brooks KC, Rougas S, George P. When
race matters on the wards: Talking about
racial health disparities and racism in the
clinical setting. MedEdPORTAL. December
28, 2016. https://www.mededportal.org/
publication/10523. Accessed July 25, 2019.
101 Nuyen BA, Scholz R, Hernandez RA, Graff N.
LGBT health issues immersion day: Measuring
the impact of an LGBT health education
intervention. J Invest Med. 2015;63:106.
102 Lee EKO, Brown M, Bertera EM. The use of
an online diversity forum to facilitate social
work students’ dialogue on sensitive issues: A
quasi-experimental design. J Teach Soc Work.
2010;30:272–287.
103 Tuck I, Moon MW, Allocca PN. An
integrative approach to cultural competence
education for advanced practice nurses. J
Transcult Nurs. 2010;21:402–409.
104 Sheu LC, Toy BC, Kwahk E, Yu A, Adler J,
Lai CJ. A model for interprofessional health
disparities education: Student-led curriculum
on chronic hepatitis B infection. J Gen Intern
Med. 2010;(25 suppl 2):S140–S145.
105 Seeleman C, Hermans J, Lamkaddem M,
Suurmond J, Stronks K, Essink-Bot ML. A
students’ survey of cultural competence as
a basis for identifying gaps in the medical
curriculum. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:216.
106 Lim RF, Diamond RJ, Chang JB, Primm
AB, Lu FG. Using non-feature films to teach
diversity, cultural competence, and the DSM-
IV-TR outline for cultural formulation. Acad
Psychiatry. 2008;32:291–298.
107 Cushman LF, Delva M, Franks CL, et al.
Cultural competency training for public
health students: Integrating self, social, and
global awareness into a master of public
health curriculum. Am J Public Health.
2015;(105 suppl 1):S132–S140.
108 Parcells C, Baernholdt M. Developing a
global curriculum in a school of nursing. J
Nurs Educ. 2014;53:692–695.
109 Ramalanjaona G, Martin ML. Culturally
competent faculty. In: Martin ML, Heron
SL, Moreno-Walton L, Walker Jones A, eds.
Diversity and Inclusion in Quality Patient Care.
Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2015:31–38.
110 Baum CM, Bass JD, Christiansen CH. Theory,
models, frameworks, and classifications. In:
Christiansen CH, Baum CM, Bass JD, eds.
Occupational Performance, Participation,
and Well-Being. 4th ed. Thorofare, NJ:
SLACK Incorporated; 2015:23–47.
111 Campinha-Bacote J. The process of cultural
competence in the delivery of healthcare
services: A model of care. J Transcult Nurs.
2002;13:181–184.
112 Purnell L. The Purnell model for cultural
competence. J Transcult Nurs. 2002;13:193–196.
113 Berlin EA, Fowkes WC Jr. A teaching
framework for cross-cultural health care—
Application in family practice. West J Med.
1983;139:934–938.
114 Center for Research on Learning and
Teaching. Case-based teaching and problem-
based learning. http://www.crlt.umich.edu/
tstrategies/tscbt. Accessed July 25, 2019.
115 Fadiman A. The Spirit Catches You and You
Fall Down: A Hmong Child, Her American
Doctors, and the Collision of Two Cultures.
New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux;
1997.
116 Smith L. La Doctora: An American Doctor in
the Amazon. Minneapolis, MN: University of
Minnesota Press; 2002.
117 Savoca N, Cher, Moore D, et al. If These Walls
Could Talk [DVD video]. New York, NY:
Home Box Office; 2010.
Copyright © by the Association of American Medical Colleges. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
813
Academic Medicine, Vol. 95, No. 5 / May 2020
Review
118 CRM Learning. Patient diversity: Beyond the
vital signs. http://www.crmlearning.com/
patient-diversity-beyond-the-vital-signs.
Accessed July 25, 2019.
119 Grainger-Monsen M; Fanlight Productions.
Worlds Apart: A Four-Part Series on Cross-
Cultural Healthcare [DVD video]. Boston,
MA: Fanlight Productions; 2003.
120 Green A, Betancourt J, Carrillo JE. Worlds
Apart: Facilitator’s Guide: A Four-Part
Series on Cross-Cultural Health Care.
Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Center
for Biomedical Ethics; 2003. https://
workforcesummit.ucsf.edu/sites/g/files/
tkssra1166/f/Green_worlds_apart_guide_
ll.pdf. Accessed July 25, 2019.
121 Briones E, Tabernero C, Tramontano C, Caprara
GV, Arenas A. Development of a cultural self-
efficacy scale for adolescents (CSES-A). Int J
Intercult Relat. 2009;33:301–312.
122 Campinha-Bacote J. Inventory for Assessing
the Process of Cultural Competence
Among Healthcare Professionals—Revised
(IAPCC–R). http://transculturalcare.net/
iapcc-r. Accessed July 25, 2019.
123 Garet MS, Porter AC, Desimone L, Birman
BF, Yoon KS. What makes professional
development effective? Results from a
national sample of teachers. Am Educ Res J.
2001;38:915–945.
124 Assemi M, Mutha S, Hudmon KS. Evaluation
of a train-the-trainer program for cultural
competence. Am J Pharm Educ. 2007;71:110.
“I buy a pack on Sundays and we eat one
every night.
My patient, a 63-year-old woman seeking
treatment for diabetes and hypertension,
sat across from me shifting in her seat.
She looked down at her hands and
waited.
Five minutes before, we had reviewed
her blood pressure readings from the
past few clinics. Today it was 165/100.
We had discussed whether or not she
was taking her medications, all 3 of her
antihypertensives, as prescribed. She
was, she told me, taking them all. We had
started talking about her fingersticks,
given that her A1c was elevated at 9.8%.
I had asked her what she had eaten for
dinner the night before and she had
responded, “Hot dogs.” I asked, “Why hot
dogs?” and she looked at me and said,
“Well, my grandson lives with me and he
likes hot dogs. It’s what I can afford, and
he likes it, so on Sundays I buy a pack and
we each eat one every night until they are
gone.
She paused just for a moment before
saying almost to herself, “It’s what I can
afford.” Then she waited, looking at her
hands nervously.
In that moment, I saw all my years of
education, training, certifications, and
exams. My diplomas on the wall. My
congratulatory letters for passing my
internal medicine and then my endocrine
boards. They meant nothing then because
I had no response that would help my
patient. After 9 years of training, and now
2 years into professional life, all I knew
how to do was change her medications.
But I realized it wasn’t the best thing to
do.
That seminal moment forever changed
my understanding of what it meant to be
an educated physician. The curricula at
medical schools continue to change, but
there remain some persistent holes and
silos of information that never connect,
often to our patients’ detriment. For
decades medical education has lagged
in providing nutrition instruction for
students; I was one of many trainees who
was not taught this critical information.
The topic of the social determinants of
health has now made its way into many
a medical school curriculum but most
often in the form of singular lectures
or seminars scattered among the years
of training. My own medical school
education had included topics such as
poverty, literacy, and domestic violence.
However, they seemed like islands by
themselves, and on the wards the task
of addressing pertinent social issues was
quickly handed off to the social worker
assigned to our floor.
The intersection of nutrition and the
social determinants is where my patient
stood all those years ago, and I had no
compass to direct me on how best to help
her. I did not know what food insecurity
was or how it affected my patient. I had
no knowledge of the resources in my
community that could have provided
assistance. I didn’t know how to guide
her to better food choices when she had
limited resources. In this patient, I saw
that I was unable as a mature provider to
address all of her needs through simply
identifying and discussing them. I could
change her medications, or add more, but
I could not address what was wrong.
In the years since, I have sought to fill
my own holes in knowledge and taught
my students how to bridge those gaps in
patient care so they are better prepared
than I was at the end of training. I
encourage robust appreciation for and
connection with community agencies that
address people’s nonmedical needs, such
as food insecurity and domestic violence.
Today I am as prepared to recommend
healthy food options on a budget as I am
to add another antihypertensive. That
intersection of addressing medical and
nonmedical needs is always my target
now that I have a compass of my own.
Anita Ramsetty, MD
A. Ramsetty is assistant professor, Department
of Family Medicine, Medical University of South
Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; email:
ramsetty@musc.edu.
An Academic Medicine Podcast episode featuring this
article is available wherever you get your podcasts.
Teaching and Learning Moments
Stranded at the Intersection
... In response to the evolving diversity of the workplace, medical education has called for greater diversity across specialties, extending from undergraduate to graduate medical education and into faculty development [1][2][3][4]. Notably, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), and other national professional associations emphasize essential topics such as communication, healthcare disparities, and cross-cultural humility. For example, ACGME's common program requirements state: "Programs must understand the social determinants of health and incorporate them in the design and implementation program curriculum, with the ultimate goal of addressing these needs, and health disparities" [5]. ...
... Healthcare disparities encompass differences in access to health services, including consultations, treatments, and primary care, as well as epidemiological variances in disease rates among different demographic groups, which can impact outcomes [1]. In addition to accrediting bodies, numerous medical societies stress the importance of addressing social determinants of health and healthcare disparities as integral components of healthcare professionalism. ...
... In order to effectively create and implement curricula for our learners on health disparities, teaching faculty must first have the knowledge and skills to deliver content, and yet the teaching faculty might not fully understand these concepts, or how to teach them effectively [1]. Faculty need more than basic facts of varied cultures and contexts, and a list of disparities. ...
Article
Full-text available
Medical education acknowledges our need to teach our physicians about “social determinants of health” and “health care disparities”. However, educators often lack actionable training to address this need. We describe a faculty development activity, a health disparities journal club, using the jigsaw strategy with the intent of increasing awareness, encouraging self-directed learning, and inspiring future teaching of the subject to health professional learners. We completed six workshops at six individual hospitals, with 95 total attendees in medicine and numerous other health professions. Our evaluation asked trainees to: report the number of journal articles about health disparities they had read, excluding the assigned journal club articles, in the past 12 months, and to predict future plans for reading about health disparities. In total, 28.9% responded they had “never read” a prior article on health or healthcare disparities, while 54.2% responded “1–5 articles”. Many (60%) reported they would continue to investigate this topic. Our experience has demonstrated the utility and positive impact of a “flipped classroom” jigsaw method, showing it can be used successfully in Inter-Professional (IPE) Faculty Development to increase active exposure and discussion of the content. Additionally, this method promotes individual reflection and enhances continued collective engagement.
... Research indicates that the informal or "hidden" curriculum, where students encounter a variety of patient populations and learn through direct observation, immersion, and interaction with these diverse groups, plays a crucial role in developing their cultural competence. This unintentional learning process is essential in enhancing their ability to effectively work across different cultural contexts [19]. This suggests that schools should offer and encourage elective opportunities or volunteering placements within diverse communities, as they are a rich source of cross-cultural education. ...
... A cultural humility approach has been shown to be beneficial, which incorporates self-reflection in cross-cultural training [12]. A scoping review by Brottman et al. [19], revealed eleven cross-cultural educational methods to cultivate cultural competence, whilst Liu et al. [20], demonstrated the ways in which the hidden curriculum can influence cross-cultural competence. From these studies, multiple methods of cultivating cross-cultural competence can be utilised, and there is no method has been proven superior to another [19]. ...
... A scoping review by Brottman et al. [19], revealed eleven cross-cultural educational methods to cultivate cultural competence, whilst Liu et al. [20], demonstrated the ways in which the hidden curriculum can influence cross-cultural competence. From these studies, multiple methods of cultivating cross-cultural competence can be utilised, and there is no method has been proven superior to another [19]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Migration is increasing globally, and societies are becoming more diverse and multi-ethnic. Medical school curricula should prepare students to provide high-quality care to all individuals in the communities they serve. Previous research from North America and Asia has assessed the effectiveness of medical cultural competency training, and student preparedness for delivery of cross-cultural care. However, student preparedness has not been explored in the European context. The aim of this study was to investigate how prepared final-year medical students in the Republic of Ireland (ROI) feel to provide care to patients from other countries, cultures, and ethnicities. In addition, this study aims to explore students’ experiences and perceptions of cross-cultural care. Methods Final-year medical students attending all six medical schools within the ROI were invited to participate in this study. A modified version of the Harvard Cross-Cultural Care Survey (CCCS) was used to assess their preparedness, skill, training/education, and attitudes. The data were analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics 28.0, and Fisher’s Exact Test was employed to compare differences within self-identified ethnicity groups and gender. Results Whilst most respondents felt prepared to care for patients in general (80.5%), many felt unprepared to care for specific ethnic patient cohorts, including patients from a minority ethnic background (50.7%) and the Irish Traveller Community (46.8%). Only 20.8% of final-year students felt they had received training in cross-cultural care during their time in medical school. Most respondents agreed that they should be assessed specifically on skills in cultural competence whilst in medical school (83.2%). Conclusions A large proportion of final-year medical students surveyed in Ireland feel inadequately prepared to care for ethnically diverse patients. Similarly, they report feeling unskilled in core areas of cross-cultural care, and a majority agree that they should be assessed on aspects of cultural competency. This study explores shortcomings in cultural competency training and confidence amongst Irish medical students. These findings have implications for future research and curricular change, with opportunities for the development of relevant educational initiatives in Irish medical schools.
... Perkins et al. (2023) and Al-Shakarshi et al. (2019) reviewed education around concepts of colonialism and equity within global health education respectively. Various concepts around anti-racism, equity, and cultural safety or competency have been the focus in health professional or interprofessional education at various levels in different geographies, some specific to Australia or Canada, others more broadly regional or global (Brottman et al., 2020;Brumpton et al., 2022;Dowell et al., 2022;Guerra & Kurtz, 2017;Jongen et al., 2018;MacLean et al., 2023). Anti-racist education is discussed in several reviews in disciplines such as nursing (Červený et al., 2022;Gradellini et al., 2021;Oikarainen et al., 2019), midwifery (Capper et al., 2022), or rehabilitation professionals (Grandpierre et al., 2018). ...
Article
Full-text available
Since 2020, brought to the forefront by movements such as Black Lives Matter and Idle No More, it has been widely acknowledged that systemic racism contributes to racially differentiated health outcomes. Health professional educators have been called to address such disparities within healthcare, policy, and practice. To tackle structural racism within healthcare, one avenue that has emerged is the creation of medical education interventions within postgraduate residency medical programming. The objective of this scoping review is to examine the current literature on anti-racist educational interventions, that integrate a systemic or structural view of racism, within postgraduate medical education. Through the identification and analysis of 23 papers, this review identified three major components of interest across medical interventions, including (a) conceptualization, (b) pedagogical issues, and (c) outcomes & evaluation. There were overlapping points of discussion and analysis within each of these components. Conceptualization addressed how researchers conceptualized racism in different ways, the range of curricular content educators chose to challenge racism, and the absence of community’s role in curricular development. Pedagogical issues addressed knowledge vs. skills-based teaching, and tensions between one-time workshops and integrative curriculum. Outcomes and evaluation highlighted self-reported Likert scales as dominant types of evaluation, self-evaluation in educational interventions, and misalignments between intervention outcomes and learning objectives. The findings are unique in their in-depth exploration of anti-racist medical interventions within postgraduate medical education programming, specifically in relation to efforts to address systemic and structural racism. The findings contribute a meaningful review of the current state of the field of medical education and generate new conversations about future possibilities for a broader anti-racist health professions curriculum.
... Working students were observed to have higher scores for self-awareness, intercultural competence, and global knowledge. Similarly, previous research has shown that immersion in various work settings improves cultural competence among allied health students (Brottman et al., 2020). ...
Article
Full-text available
The digitalization of everyday life among young people exposed them to knowledge and cultures from societies outside their own. Digital citizenship, characterized by online respect and civic engagement, can facilitate students’ positive interactions within the global community and enhance their global competencies, including self-awareness, intercultural communication, and global knowledge. However, empirical studies linking digital citizenship and global competence are limited. Drawing from an online survey sample of 698 Filipino undergraduate students, this cross-sectional study examines the relationship between digital citizenship and global competence. Findings indicate that online civic engagement and being a working student positively predict all domains of global competence. Online respect positively correlated with intercultural communication. Certain demographic and education- related variables were significant predictors of at least one domain of global competence (p < 0.05). The findings underscore the importance of educational institutions fostering online social participation to cultivate globally competent students.
... This may involve team-building exercises, group projects, leadership simulations, and peer mentoring opportunities to develop youths' ability to work effectively in teams, delegate tasks, resolve conflicts, and inspire others to achieve common goals. Cultural competency and diversity awareness are integrated into the curriculum to promote inclusivity, equity, and cultural sensitivity among youths (Brottman et al., 2020). This may include discussions on social identity, privilege, power dynamics, unconscious bias, and intercultural communication to help youths recognize and appreciate diversity, challenge stereotypes, and foster inclusive environments. ...
Article
In contemporary society, addressing the evolving needs of youth is paramount for fostering resilient, empowered, and capable leaders of tomorrow. The process begins with a comprehensive needs assessment, which serves as the cornerstone for developing effective curriculum tailored to their unique requirements. This review delves into the intricate process of conducting a needs assessment for youths and subsequently crafting a curriculum for leadership development initiatives. A needs assessment for youths entails a multifaceted approach that encompasses various dimensions of their lives. It involves understanding their socio-economic background, educational aspirations, career goals, interpersonal skills, and community involvement. By employing qualitative and quantitative research methods such as surveys, interviews, focus groups, and observation, stakeholders gain insights into the diverse needs, challenges, and aspirations of youths within their specific context. Upon completion of the needs assessment, the gathered data serve as the foundation for designing a targeted curriculum for youth leadership development. The curriculum aims to address identified gaps and empower youths with essential skills, knowledge, and attitudes necessary for leadership roles. It integrates elements such as communication skills, critical thinking, problem-solving, emotional intelligence, teamwork, and cultural competency, tailored to the developmental stage and cultural background of the target audience. The curriculum development process involves collaboration among educators, youth advocates, community leaders, and relevant stakeholders to ensure its relevance, effectiveness, and sustainability. It follows a systematic approach, including curriculum design, implementation strategies, resource identification, and evaluation methods. The curriculum is designed to be interactive, experiential, and engaging, fostering active participation and ownership among youths. Key components of the curriculum include leadership theories, self-awareness exercises, goal setting, conflict resolution techniques, ethical decision-making, community engagement projects, and mentorship opportunities. It embraces a holistic approach that nurtures youths' personal, academic, and professional growth while instilling values of social responsibility and civic engagement. The curriculum is adaptable and responsive to the evolving needs and dynamics of youths and their communities. Regular assessments and feedback mechanisms enable continuous improvement and refinement, ensuring its relevance and effectiveness over time, the curriculum is designed to be inclusive, accommodating the diverse backgrounds, abilities, and perspectives of all participants. Working on needs assessment for youths and subsequently developing a curriculum for leadership development initiatives is a multifaceted and dynamic process. It requires a deep understanding of youths' aspirations, challenges, and contexts, coupled with collaboration, innovation, and adaptability. By empowering youths with the necessary skills and opportunities, such initiatives contribute to building a generation of capable, empathetic, and visionary leaders poised to address the challenges of the future.
... Even in these contexts, despite decades of attention to culture, CH training hasn't been widely adopted or practiced [3,5, 6,17]. In some studies, in which a unit of learning is described, there seems to be a fragmented view of looking at experiences, so that the focus mainly is on pedagogy or at addressing speci c obstacles during care for marginalised groups [5, 8, 18,19]. Pedagogy, for example, focuses at times on speci c aspects or on selected actors; for instance, Student-centred learning promotes equity between teacher and student [20,21], problem/case-based approaches consider patient contexts [22], role play examines caregiver-patient dynamics, socio-drama and art explores con icting worldviews [23,24] service and inter-professional learning observe real-life disparities of patients [8,25, 26]. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Introduction: Cultural humility (CH) is a vital journey for addressing diversity, but its application remains elusive. While existing literature covers cultural humility’s why and what mainly in the context of western countries, the holistic development of its parts during medical training remains underexplored. Given the foundational role of interactions in cultural humility, this study explores its development during various interactions with peers, teachers, patients and researchers across a diversity of education and clinical health care settings marked by inherent power imbalance and inequity. Methods: An interpretivist qualitative case study approach was employed, involving purposive sampling of diverse medical students from one medical school in a country with one of the highest inequity coefficients in the world. Data collection was through semi-structured interviews and analysed using thematic analysis. Ethical clearance and participant consent was obtained. Results: Interactions between actors unfolded in multiple dimensions and layers. Findings were classified into four themes i.e. journeying from feeling like an outsider to embracing interactions, from absolute truth to questioning perceptions, journeying within power imbalance; and embracing future roles through introspection. For participants two fundamental dilemmas remained, i.e. whether to navigate social relations and how to navigate intergroup conflict. Discussion: This study argues that the development of CH is context based and dynamic; however, it’s development should not be assumed but should be considered as multifaceted and layered, where the individual process is significantly influenced by past contexts as well as enhancing interactions with peers, teachers, patients and researchers both formally and informally.
Article
Full-text available
Objectives Despite numerous published concept analyses of nursing competency, the specific understanding of trauma nursing competency in emergency departments remains limited, with no clear definition. This study aimed to clarify the definitions and attributes of trauma nursing competencies in emergency departments. Design Walker and Avant’s method was used to clarify the concept of trauma nursing competency in emergency departments. Data sources PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and RISS were searched from inception to 23 April 2023. Eligibility criteria Relevant studies that included combinations of the terms ‘nurse’, ‘nursing’, ‘emergency’, ‘trauma’, ‘competency’, ‘capability’ and ‘skill’ were selected. We restricted the literature search to English and Korean full-text publications, with no limit on the publication period; grey literature was excluded. Data extraction and synthesis This study uses defining attributes, antecedents and consequences extracted through data analysis. To aid comprehension of the model, related and contrary cases of the concept were created, and empirical referents were defined. Results After excluding duplicates, irrelevant studies, incomplete texts and articles unrelated to the context and study population, 15 of the initial 927 studies were included. Five additional studies were added after a manual search of the references. The final concept analysis therefore included 20 studies. The attributes of trauma nursing competency for emergency nurses included ‘rapid initial assessments considering injury mechanisms’, ‘priority determinations based on degrees of urgency and severity’, ‘clinical knowledge of trauma nursing’, ‘skills of trauma nursing’, ‘interprofessional teamwork’ and ‘emotional care’. Conclusions The concept analysis revealed that it is possible to promote the enhancement and development of trauma nursing competency in emergency departments across various contexts, such as clinical practice, education, research and organisational settings. This could ultimately improve trauma nursing quality and treatment outcomes.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Clinician implicit racial bias (IB) may lead to lower quality care and adverse health outcomes for Black patients. Educational efforts to train clinicians to mitigate IB vary widely and have insufficient evidence of impact. We developed and pilot-tested an evidence-based clinician IB curriculum, “REACHing Equity.” Methods To assess acceptability and feasibility, we conducted an uncontrolled one-arm pilot trial with post-intervention assessments. REACHing Equity is designed for clinicians to: (1) acquire knowledge about IB and its impact on healthcare, (2) increase awareness of one's own capacity for IB, and (3) develop skills to mitigate IB in the clinical encounter. We delivered REACHing Equity virtually in three facilitated, interactive sessions over 7–9 weeks. Participants were health care providers who completed baseline and end-of-study evaluation surveys. Results Of approximately 1,592 clinicians invited, 37 participated, of whom 29 self-identified as women and 24 as non-Hispanic White. Attendance averaged 90% per session; 78% attended all 3 sessions. Response rate for evaluation surveys was 67%. Most respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the curriculum objectives were met, and that REACHing Equity equipped them to mitigate the impact of implicit bias in clinical care. Participants consistently reported higher self-efficacy for mitigating IB after compared to before completing the curriculum. Conclusions Despite apparent barriers to clinician participation, we demonstrated feasibility and acceptability of the REACHing Equity intervention. Further research is needed to develop objective measures of uptake and clinician skill, test the impact of REACHing Equity on clinically relevant outcomes, and refine the curriculum for uptake and dissemination. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03415308.
Article
Full-text available
Progress to address health care equity requires health care providers’ commitment, but their engagement may depend on their perceptions of the factors contributing to inequity. To understand providers’ perceptions of causes of racial health care disparities, a short survey was delivered to health care providers who work at 3 Veterans Health Administration sites, followed by qualitative interviews (N = 53). Survey data indicated that providers attributed the causes of disparities to social and economic conditions more than to patients’ or providers’ behaviors. Qualitative analysis revealed differences in the meaning that participants ascribed to these causal factors. Participants who believed providers contribute to disparities discussed race and racism more readily, identified the mechanisms through which disparities emerge, and contextualized patient-level factors more than those who believed providers contributed less to disparities. Differences in provider understanding of the underlying causal factors suggest a multidimensional approach to engage providers in health equity efforts.
Article
Full-text available
In the United States, medical students must demonstrate a standard level of "cultural competence," upon graduation. Cultural competence is most often defined as a set of congruent behaviors, attitudes, and policies that come together in a system, organization, or among professionals that enables effective work in cross-cultural situations. The Association of American Medical Colleges developed the Tool for Assessing Cultural Competence Training (TACCT) to assist schools in developing and evaluating cultural competence curricula to meet these requirements. This review uses the TACCT as a guideline to describe and assess pedagogical approaches to cultural competence training in US medical education and identify content gaps and opportunities for curriculum improvement. A total of 18 programs are assessed. Findings support previous research that cultural competence training can improve the knowledge, attitudes, and skills of medical trainees. However, wide variation in the conceptualization, implementation, and evaluation of cultural competence training programs exists, leading to differences in training quality and outcomes. More research is needed to establish optimal approaches to implementing and evaluating cultural competence training that incorporate cultural humility, the social determinants of health, and broader structural competency within the medical system.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Expert recommendations state that all physicians caring for youth should be trained in providing competent and nonjudgmental care for sexual and gender minority (SGM) youth. Despite those recommendations, there is insufficient training to prepare clinicians to provide culturally competent care for SGM youth. We created a 2-hour session to address communication skills critical to caring for SGM youth. The goals of the session were for third- and fourth-year medical learners to affirm, validate, and assess the mental health status of their patient, collaborate with a school counselor, support families in acceptance of SGM children, and provide them with relevant resources. Methods The session utilized multiple active learning modalities including flipped classroom, small-group learning, and peer-to-peer instruction. Learners completed anonymous pre- and postsurveys that aimed to measure their comfort, self-efficacy, and self-reported preparedness in counseling adolescents questioning their sexual orientation. Results Of the 42 learners who participated in the course over two academic terms, 40 (95%) completed the presurvey, and 39 (93%) completed the postsurvey. Learners demonstrated a significant improvement in self-reported knowledge, comfort, and sense of preparedness on all skill-based objectives and reported growth in their comfort and sense of preparedness for counseling adolescents questioning their sexual orientation after participating in the session (p < .001). Discussion This session supports the development of key communication skills needed to provide competent and nonjudgmental care for SGM youth. It can be easily replicated at other health professional schools looking to improve the cultural competency of future clinicians around care for SGM patients.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction This student-driven curriculum intervention, implemented with first-year medical students, was guided by the Association of American Medical Colleges’ standards for medical education on health care for sexual and gender minorities. Its goals are to describe the spectrum of sexual orientation and gender identity and sensitively and effectively elicit relevant information from patients about their sexual orientation and gender identity through inclusive sexual history taking. Methods Developed through student-faculty collaboration, this three-part module includes a 14-minute e-lecture on taking an inclusive sexual history, a 35-minute formative standardized patient encounter in which students take a sexual history and receive feedback, and a 20-minute facilitated group debrief on the standardized patient activity. Results Students completed a postmodule evaluation anonymously; the majority of respondents (92%) agreed that they felt more prepared to take a sexual history inclusive of sexual and gender minority patients. Most were more comfortable discussing sexual orientation (91%) and gender identity (83%) with patients after the module. Content analysis revealed an improved confidence in creating a safe space for sexual and gender minority patients and an increased awareness of biases about sexual and gender minority patients. Discussion This curriculum serves as an early foundation for students to understand sexual and gender minority identities and develop confidence in their inclusive sexual history taking skills before they provide care for patients. In addition, the student-driven curriculum development process used can serve as a template for students at other institutions hoping to collaborate with faculty to develop comprehensive sexual and gender minority curricula.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Transgender patients experience poor health outcomes and often avoid seeking medical care because of negative encounters with providers. Despite growing awareness of the health disparities transgender patients face, there is very little curricular time in medical schools to improve medical students’ knowledge and skills for caring for transgender patients. This standardized patient (SP) case was developed for use in a communication challenges workshop for advanced clerkship students in order to address working with transgender patients. Methods This formative SP encounter takes place in a classroom as part of a half-day workshop on communication challenges with patients. We developed the case to focus specifically on skills related to obtaining patients’ preferred names and pronouns, as well as taking an appropriate patient history. Materials for SP recruitment, SP training, and case implementation are included within this publication. Results In preliminary uses of the case, 80% of students (N = 64) agreed or strongly agreed that it had increased their skills for working with transgender patients. Observational data from the debrief discussions also revealed that medical students perceived gaps in their medical training regarding LGBT health and expressed interest in their program incorporating more information on transgender health. Discussion This case adds to a growing number of curricular interventions to address medical students’ knowledge and skills with regard to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) patients and, as a result, aims to address health disparities in LGBT patient populations.
Article
Full-text available
There is a growing body of literature illustrating the negative impact of racial bias on clinical care. Despite the growing evidence, medical schools have been slow to make necessary curricular changes. Most attempts to educate on racial health disparities focus on transferring knowledge and do not foster the development of skills to understand one’s own bias or address bias and racism in the clinical setting. To address this, we developed a small-group case-based curriculum for rising third-year medical students. This session was designed to be delivered in concurrently run, 1-hour small-group sessions, with each small group ideally comprising no more than 10 students and one facilitator. The curriculum was integrated into an existing 3-week clerkship preparation course for 122 students during the 2015-2016 academic year. The session materials include a facilitator’s guide and three cases for discussion. The session was evaluated using a 6-point Likert scale (1 = Poor, 6 = Exceptional). Students rated this session overall a 4.28 out of 6 (N = 79). Qualitative feedback varied, with the most common theme focusing on the need for more time to discuss this topic. Though one session before starting clinical clerkships is not enough to maintain the practice of sustained critical thinking regarding bias and racism in clinical medicine, this session is a starting point for curriculum developers looking to use an evidence-based approach to racial bias in clinical care. Citation Brooks KC, Rougas S, George P. When race matters on the wards: talking about racial health disparities and racism in the clinical setting. MedEdPORTAL Publications. 2016;12:10523. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10523
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Recently, stories depicting social injustices and inequities have gripped the US, leading to protests and other demonstrations of student activism. In response to current events, students at Weill Cornell Medical College identified the need for more diversity inclusion components in the newly developed medical school curriculum. Thus, we developed a student-initiated, student-run elective, Community Perspectives in Medicine, which provides a forum for first-year medical students to interact, and have open discussions, with members of communities most impacted by social and health inequities. Methods During five weekly 2-hour sessions, representatives of different community-based organizations (CBOs) speak with 15 first-year medical students. Invited CBOs represent diverse populations, including LGBT, chronic illness, disabilities, religion, and immigrant health. For each session's first hour, a second-year student facilitates a semistructured interview of the CBO guests focusing on health disparities within their community, challenges experienced with the medical system, and what they wish doctors did differently. Students are encouraged to ask questions, often resulting in a rich dialogue. The session's second part is a debriefing by the student facilitator over a relaxed dinner (without CBO guests). Results Fourteen of the16 enrolled students attended all five sessions and completed the course evaluation. Satisfaction with the course was high, as 93% of students enrolled rated the course as excellent. The course format, content, and diversity of speakers were rated as excellent by 79%, 86%, and 93%, respectively. Similarly, 71% of students believed there to be excellent applicability to medical practice, and 100% of students thought the timing during first year was excellent. Discussion We emphasize the importance of a partnership between CBOs and medical students, thus increasing students’ cultural awareness as well as formally involving traditionally disenfranchised communities in medical education. Our project's unique format of safe-space discussion forums and session debriefings enhances critical thinking. Though used with multiple CBOs as an elective, our model can be easily adapted for one session on a specific health disparity.
Article
Full-text available
Background The majority of reporting guidelines assist researchers to report consistent information concerning study design, however, they contain limited information for describing study interventions. Using a three-stage development process, the Guideline for Reporting Evidence-based practice Educational interventions and Teaching (GREET) checklist and accompanying explanatory paper were developed to provide guidance for the reporting of educational interventions for evidence-based practice (EBP). The aim of this study was to complete the final development for the GREET checklist, incorporating psychometric testing to determine inter-rater reliability and criterion validity. Methods The final development for the GREET checklist incorporated the results of a prior systematic review and Delphi survey. Thirty-nine items, including all items from the prior systematic review, were proposed for inclusion in the GREET checklist. These 39 items were considered over a series of consensus discussions to determine the inclusion of items in the GREET checklist. The GREET checklist and explanatory paper were then developed and underwent psychometric testing with tertiary health professional students who evaluated the completeness of the reporting in a published study using the GREET checklist. For each GREET checklist item, consistency (%) of agreement both between participants and the consensus criterion reference measure were calculated. Criterion validity and inter-rater reliability were analysed using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). ResultsThree consensus discussions were undertaken, with 14 items identified for inclusion in the GREET checklist. Following further expert review by the Delphi panelists, three items were added and minor wording changes were completed, resulting in 17 checklist items. Psychometric testing for the updated GREET checklist was completed by 31 participants (n = 11 undergraduate, n = 20 postgraduate). The consistency of agreement between the participant ratings for completeness of reporting with the consensus criterion ratings ranged from 19 % for item 4 Steps of EBP, to 94 % for item 16 Planned delivery. The overall consistency of agreement, for criterion validity (ICC 0.73) and inter-rater reliability (ICC 0.96), was good to almost perfect. Conclusion The final GREET checklist comprises 17 items which are recommended for reporting EBP educational interventions. Further validation of the GREET checklist with experts in EBP research and education is recommended.