ThesisPDF Available

Mortgage Stress and the Impact of the Irish Property Crash

Authors:

Abstract

Starting in the mid-1990s, for almost a decade Ireland experienced one of the one of the most pronounced residential property booms in Europe. The price of an average house rose by over 400% over the decade and by 2006 housing supply was the highest per capita in the European Union. Driven, in large part, by Ireland’s neoliberal reforms in the sectors of housing, planning and banking, owner occupation was expanded to as great an extent as possible. Liberalisation within banking served to massively expand the mortgage market and extend mortgage credit into sectors of the population previously excluded from home ownership; namely lower income households with less secure employment statuses and weaker credit histories. Borrowers were allowed to borrow ever increasing multiples of their incomes on more highly leveraged terms. Banks and property developers profited enormously as Ireland’s economy became increasingly reliant on a speculative, bank-led property bubble, but the substantial increase of risk in the mortgage market was to have dramatic consequences for individuals, the banking sector and wider society. As the international financial climate became increasingly turbulent from 2007, initially triggered by the US subprime crash which led to a wider financial ‘credit-crunch,’ the Irish property market entered a precipitous decline. House prices have fallen by an average of 50% between March 2007 and April 2013, with sectors such as the apartment market declining by over 60%. Substantial over-supply has kept prices depressed, while many mortgage lenders have left the market. The property market collapse has been the proximate cause of the more general economic collapse. Massive over lending by the Irish banks to the property sector led to a banking crisis and in late 2008 the Irish government guaranteed all bank deposits in an attempt to prevent a collapse in the banking system. By effectively moving the debts of the private banks to the government balance sheet, Ireland then faced a crisis of its public finances and in late 2010 needed a ‘bailout’ from the troika of the IMF, ECB and European Union. While Ireland has been subject to what could be termed a combined economic, political and social crisis, this thesis examines in detail one of the most pronounced social consequences of the crash, namely the mortgage crisis. Unemployment increased from 3.8% to 13.7% between Q4 2000 and Q1 2013, while incomes have fallen by a fifth on average and mortgage arrears have increased dramatically as a consequence. The focus of this thesis is therefore to examine the impacts of the property crash on households, with a particular emphasis on mortgage related difficulties. Firstly, the thesis assesses the extent of mortgage stress by using national data as well as a new large scale survey of owner occupiers in suburban Dublin. Secondly, the drivers of mortgage difficulty, as well as the impacts and experiences of mortgage stress for households are examined. Thirdly, households responses to mortgage stress are explored, particularly the coping strategies that households employ. Fourthly, the thesis examines the responses of successive Governments’ toward managing the crisis, with a particular emphasis on the policy of forbearance, and the likely effects of future government policy with respect to mortgage arrears. The thesis concludes by questioning the liberalised model of housing provision followed over the last two decades and questions how attitudes to ownership are changing in light of the crisis.
A preview of the PDF is not available
... Yet, there is a small, but growing literature on the financialization of housing which has demonstrated how housing is a central aspect of financialization. Authors have focused on financialization through overpriced and overextended loans (Langley, 2008;Newman, 2009;Waldron, 2014;Walks, 2013), mortgage securitization (Aalbers, 2008;Gotham, 2009;Wainwright, 2009), credit scoring of (potential) homeowners (Aalbers, 2008;Hall, 2012), land use planning (Coq--Huelva, 2013;Kaika and Ruggiero, 2014;Savini and Aalbers, in press), housing rights (Rolnik, 2013), private serviced residences (Trouillard, 2013), and subsidized housing (Heeg, 2013;Fields and Uffer, 2014). Despite these varied analyses of the financialization of housing and the importance of housing to financialization, the relations between housing and financialization remain under-researched and under--theorized. ...
Article
Full-text available
In the literature, one finds various explanations for the rise of financialized capitalism. In the different strands of financialization literature, housing either plays a minor role or is simply seen as one of the bearers of financialization. The relations between housing and financialization are under-researched and under-theorized. This article, first, looks at the rise of housing finance as an integral part of macro-economic policy, and second, at the role of financial globalization in the rise of housing finance. Housing is seen as an absorber of a ‘wall of money’, but the absorption of finance by housing is a very uneven process. Four trajectories of national institutional structures are suggested, and it is discussed how capital flows are absorbed in each of these trajectories. Finally, it is discussed what this tells about the geographies of financialized capitalism, and its relations to debt, housing, mortgage markets and the spatial fix.
Article
The global financial crisis has ushered in a major housing crisis in many European countries. The paper seeks to shed light on why, despite massive housing crises, there are few policy efforts at tackling it. Probing into the policy paradigms that have informed housing policies, the paper demonstrates a shift towards housing as an asset before the crisis. Increasingly, housing policies have become interwoven with financial markets. This has led to a major policy mismatch after the crisis: while the return of the ‘housing question’ would have required renewed efforts at establishing housing as a social right, de facto policy makers sought to stabilise financial markets. The result is a paradoxical outcome, where neoliberal market-driven programmes are embedded in increased dependence on family wealth. The article demonstrates the shift from housing as asset to housing as patrimony in three different varieties of residential regimes, represented by Ireland, Denmark and Hungary.
Article
There is a small but growing literature on the financialization of housing that demonstrates how housing is a central aspect of financialization. Despite the varied analyses of the financialization of housing and the importance of housing to financialization, the relations between housing and financialization remain under-researched and under-theorized. The financialization of housing is not really a specific form of financialization, transcending as it does a number of different forms of financialization. Housing systems, in particular, vary widely across the globe, which implies that housing financialization will be inherently variegated, path-dependent and uneven. In this introduction to the symposium, I will discuss how the articles to follow contribute to the literature on the financialization of housing. Housing has entered a post-Fordist, neoliberal and financialized regime. Increasingly, both mortgaged homeownership and subsidized rental housing are there to keep financial markets going, rather than being facilitated by those markets. There is little evidence that the global financial crisis has resulted in any de-financialization of housing. There are common trajectories within uneven and variegated financialization, rather than radically different and completely unrelated forms of housing financialization.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.