ArticlePDF Available

Assessing Female Dental Students Learning Style Preference randa

Authors:
  • Stirling Public Health

Abstract

Background: Dentistry education requires a great deal of hands-on learning as well as content-based learning. Although each individual has a unique learning style, our group of educators sought to understand the predominant learning style preferences of a cohort of 84 dental students. The aim of this study was to investigate the learning style preferences of first, second and third year Saudi female dental students in the College of Dentistry. Materials and method: The research team invited all students at a large, allfemale university in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia to engage in a cross sectional study. This project assessed learning styles using the Visual, Aural, Read-write, and Kinesthetic (VARK) questionnaire. Results: A total of 84 female dental students (more than 3/4 of the entire dental college cohort) returned the completed the questionnaire. The majority (91.5%) were between the ages of 19-22 years old. Just over half of students (54.7%) preferred multimodal learning style preference, meaning that they had no specific strong preference for a single learning style. Of those who had a strong preference for a specific, Kinesthetic (learning by doing) was the most commonly chosen (20.2%). Conclusion: The majority of the female dental students in this cohort preferred a mixed learning method. For those who had a single, strong preference, learning by doing ranked highest. The results of this study can provide useful information for educators of the learning style preferences of students and facilitate student learning by developing appropriate teaching strategies. Relying less on demonstration and more on hands-on and mixed method teaching may be the most pleasurable and productive strategy for this cohort.
2016
Vol. 2 No. 1: 4
Research Article
DOI: 10.4172/2472-1654.100044
iMedPub Journals
http://www.imedpub.com
1
© Under License of Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License | This article is available in: http://healthcare-communications.imedpub.com/archive.php
Journal of Healthcare Communications
ISSN 2472-1654
Randa Fathi Abidia1,
Bridget Stirling2,
Ambreen Azam3,
Ahmed El-Hejazi4 and
Shaikha Al-Dukhail5
1 CollegeofDenstry,DAU,Riyadh,KSA
2 UniversityofCalgary,Doha,Qatar
3 CollegeofDenstry,PNU,Riyadh,KSA
4 CollegeofDenstry,KSU,Riyadh,KSA
5 CollegeofDenstry,PNU,Riyadh,
Riyadh,KSA
Corresponding author: BridgetSrling
bridget.srling@ucalgary.edu.qa
AssistantProfessor,UniversityofCalgary,
Doha,Qatar.
Citation:AbidiaRF,SrlingB,AzamA,etal.
APreferenceforHands-onLearning:ACross
SeconalStudyAssessingDentalStudents'
PreferredStyleforReceivingCurricula.J
HealthcCommun.2016,2:1.
Received: November23,2016; Accepted: December16,2016;Published: December
26,2016
A Preference for Hands-on Learning: A Cross
Seconal Study Assessing Dental Students'
Preferred Style for Receiving Curricula
Abstract
Background: Denstry educaon requires a great deal of hands-on learning as
well as content-based learning. Although each individual has a unique learning
style, our group of educators sought to understand the predominant learning
style preferences of a cohort of 84 dental students. The aim of this study was
toinvesgatethelearningstylepreferencesofrst,secondandthirdyearSaudi
femaledentalstudentsintheCollegeofDenstry.
Materials and method: The research team invited all students at a large, all-
female university in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia to engage in a cross seconal study.
This project assessed learning styles using the Visual, Aural, Read-write, and
Kinesthec(VARK)quesonnaire.
Results:Atotalof84femaledentalstudents(morethan3/4oftheenredental
collegecohort) returnedthecompleted thequesonnaire.Themajority(91.5%)
were between the ages of 19-22 years old. Just over half of students (54.7%)
preferredmulmodallearningstylepreference,meaningthattheyhadnospecic
strongpreferenceforasinglelearningstyle.Ofthosewhohadastrongpreference
for a specic, Kinesthec (learning by doing) was the most commonly chosen
(20.2%).
Conclusion: Themajorityofthefemaledentalstudentsinthiscohortpreferreda
mixedlearning method.Forthosewho hadasingle, strongpreference,learning
bydoingrankedhighest.Theresultsofthisstudycanprovideusefulinformaon
for educators of the learning style preferences of students and facilitate
student learning by developing appropriate teaching strategies. Relying less on
demonstraonand more on hands-onand mixed method teachingmay be the
mostpleasurableandproducvestrategyforthiscohort.
Keywords: VARK; Learning styles; Denstry; Healthcare; Saudi Arabia; Student;
Teaching
Introducon
Oral health in Saudi Arabia
Accordingtoalarge,naonal surveyinSaudi(1),only11.5% of
Saudi Arabian people visit dental clinics for roune check-ups
orto addressoralhealthissuesonceperyear.Thesame survey
found that approximately 16% of Saudi Arabian people never
brushtheirteethand85%neverosstheirteeth.This,alongwith
other factors likely contributes to the high naonal prevalence
ofdentalcaries.Thiswas borneoutina studythatfoundSaudi
Arabianchildrentohave cariesin80% of primary denonand
70% in their permanent denon [2]. A study of pre-school
childrenin Riyadh,(SaudiArabia’scapitol),revealedthatof388
children aged three to ve years old, 69% of them had dental
caries[3]. Thisishighcomparedtocountriessuch as Indiawith
61%[4] and Norway with 11% of children having caries byage
ve[5].
2016
Vol. 2 No. 1: 4
2This article is available in: http://healthcare-communications.imedpub.com/archive.php
ARCHIVOS DE MEDICINA
ISSN 1698-9465
Journal of Healthcare Communications
ISSN 2472-1654
SaudiArabiahasalonghistoryofdentalcare,andinstruconon
maintainingoralhealth.Somepeopleinthecountryusemiswak,
whichisatwigusedsinceancientGreekmesforcleaningboth
the mouth and teeth [6]. The miswak twig is usually extracted
from bier tree branches such as palm or olive trees or the
roots.
Dental educaon in Saudi Arabia
Dental faculty throughout the world are striving to create
and deliver high-quality, eecve curricula. Faculty members
endeavortoengagestudentsinlearninginthemostresourceful
andenjoyableways.Inordertodoso,facultymustbesensiveto
thelearningstylepreferencesoftheirstudents.Muchischanging
about what and how we teach. Current curricula include
evidence-based pracce, increasingly complex technologies,
andstrategiesforcommunicangwithbeerinformedpaents.
Thereforemoresothanever,itisimportantfordentalfacultyto
knowthelearningstylepreferenceoftheirstudentsandrespond
tomeettheirneeds.
Aer the preparatory year, female students that achieve the
requirementsneededtoenterdenstrywillthenbeacceptedto
connuestudyingintheCollegeofDenstry.CollegeofDenstry
isoneofthemostpopularcollegesandrankshigh on students
preference,secondonlytoMedicine.
The Dental College at a large, all-female university (Princess
Nourah University) in Saudi Arabia was the seng for this
study.The College oersauniquecurriculum, which is a hybrid
between tradional instrucon and problem based learning.
Thesubjectsaretaughtusingmostlyablocksystem,withafew
stream subjects on a yearly basis. Students have lab sessions
accordingtotheirdentalsubjectsandintheirclinicalyearsthey
have'ComprehensivePaentCare'.
Learning style preference
Learning style preferencedescribes an individual’s predilecon
for understanding his or her experiences and transforming
what they understand into knowledge [7]. There are forces
steepedbothinnurtureandnaturethatmakethesameteaching
method eecve for some students and ineecve for others
[7].Therearemanylearningstyleinventories[7-9]. Oneofthe
most common and widely used categorizaons of the various
types of learning styles is Fleming's VARK(Visual, Aural, Read/
Write,Kinesthec)learningstylesinventory[10].Thisinventory
can be found on VARK’s website at hp://vark-learn.com/.
Fleming based his inventory of learning style preference on
the senses, proposing that visual learners have a preference
for seeing, auditory learners learn best through listening, and
tacle/kinestheclearnersprefertolearnvia experience.Some
studentsalsoprefertolearnviareadingandwring(informaon
displayedaswords).TheVARKlearningstyleinventorywastested
forreliabilitycoecients,whichwerefoundtobeadequate[11].
Dental faculty can use the knowledge of learning style
preferences,to vary the way that they deliver informaonand
play to the strengths of their student populaon. Miller [12]
reportedthatwhenstudentsweretaughtintheirpreferredmode
oflearning,theirlearningwasenhanced. Students can alsouse
themodeltoidenfytheirpreferredlearningstyleandmaximize
theireducaonalexperiencebyfocusingonwhatbenetsthem
most[10].
SeveralstudiesusingVARKhavebeenreportedin theliterature.
Thesestudies originate in dierentcountries aroundthe world
using the VARK quesonnaire, including with dental student
populaons.VARKstudies involvingdental studentswerefound
fromIndia [13-18], Romania [19], Pakistan[20-22], Poland[23]
and in the United States of America [24]. These studies from
other countries showed a variety of results of learning style
preferencesamong dental students. In pracce, most students
worldwideprefertolearninseveralways(mul-model).
Toourknowledge,thereareonlytwostudiesdonepreviouslyin
SaudiArabiato determine the learning styles of undergraduate
dentalstudentsusingtheVARKquesonnaire[25,26].Bothwere
doneintheCollegeofDenstryatKingSaudUniversity.Onestudy
[25]measuredlearningstylepreferenceinmaledentalstudents.
Thisstudyincludedabreakdownofndingsbetweenthecohorts
in Years 1 to 5. The researchers concluded that the learning
preferencedidnotdierbetweenundergraduatestudentsfrom
rsttonalyears.Thisstudyreportedthat58.4%and41.6% of
thestudentshadmulmodallearningpreferencesanduni-modal
learning styles, respecvely. This populaon’s learning styles
reectedstrongkinesthecandauralpreferences.
Another study from Saudi [26] using the VARK quesonnaire
invesgatedrstyeardentalstudentsandcomparedstudentsof
bothgenders.This studylookedat the relaonshipofstudents'
learning style preference to grade point average (GPA). The
researcher found that more than half (59%) of students had
mulmodal learning preferences. In this study, students with
unimodallearningstylepreferencesalsohadlowerGPAs.
The aim of this study was to invesgate the learning style
preferencesof rst, second and third year Saudi female dental
studentsintheCollegeofDenstry.Toourknowledge,therehave
beennootherstudiesinvesgangthelearningstylepreferences
comparing dierent years of female dental students in Saudi
Arabia.
Materials and Method
This cross-seconal study was conducted at the end of the
academicyearof2015.TheresearchteamdistributedtheVisual,
Aural,Read/Write,andKinesthec(VARK)quesonnaireversion
7.1[10]in severaldentalclasses.Thisquesonnairewasinthe
English language, which is the language of instrucon at the
College.Studentswereaskedtocompletethequesonnaireand
returnittotheresearchteam.Thestudentswereremindedthat
all parcipaon was voluntary. Instrucons for answering the
quesonnairewereprovidedtothestudentswitha coverleer
that gave the purpose of the study, condenality assurance,
consentandtheemailoftheprincipleinvesgator.
The VARK tool was distributed to the enre undergraduate
student populaon including rst year (n=44), second year
(n=35)and thirdyear(n=31) students.Allstudentswereinvited
toparcipatein thestudy,and most of those present chose to
2016
Vol. 2 No. 1: 4
3
© Under License of Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License
ARCHIVOS DE MEDICINA
ISSN 1698-9465
Journal of Healthcare Communications
ISSN 2472-1654
parcipate(84/111,79%).Thiswasan adequatesample size,as
ouroriginalcalculaonforthiscohortrequiredthatweenrollat
least81parcipantsinordertoreacha5%marginoferroranda
95%condencelevel.
Aer the completed quesonnaires were collected, the
distribuon of VARK preferences were calculated according to
VARK website guidelines [10]. The percentage for each VARK
modality and possible combinaons of modalies according to
thenumber of studentswho preferredeach learning style was
dividedby thetotalnumber of students.Stascalanalysiswas
doneusingSPSSversion21(NewYork,USA).
Ethical Clearance
The study was explained to the dental students, as they were
invitedtobeapartofthestudy.Studentsreadandsignedconsent
formstoindicatethattheyagreedto parcipateinthe study.It
wasexplainedtoeachgroupofstudentsthattheyhad theright
torefusetoparcipateinthestudyatanyme.
Results
Most of the students parcipated in the study, with 84 of a
possible 110 students enrolled in the College of Denstry,
compleng the quesonnaire (76%). There were 31 students
fromrstyear(37%),26studentsfromsecondyear(31%)and27
studentsfromthirdyear(32%).Themajority(91.5%)ofstudents
werebetweentheages of19-22yearsoldandall werefemales
andofSaudinaonality.
Theprevalenceof dierentlearningstylesisdescribedinFigure
1.Studentswhohadnostrongpreferenceforanylearning style
(mulmodal VARK)made up the largest group (21.4%). Slightly
fewerstudents (20.2%) had astrongpreferenceforlearning by
doing(kinesthec).ThiswasfollowedbyunimodalVisual, Aural
(listeningandspeaking)andRead/write(all8.3%).Distribuonof
unimodallearningstylesisshowninFigure2.
Comparisons were made across the cohorts, by year of study.
Prevalenceofunimodalandmulmodallearningstylepreference
amongrst,second and thirdyear dental students is shownin
Figure3.
Prevalenceofmulmodallearningstylepreferencewashigherin
year2(61.5%)andyear3(55.6%)comparedtounimodallearning
style preference (38.5% and 44.4% respecvely). Unimodal
learningstyleprevalencewasonlyslightlyhigherinyear1(51.6%)
comparedtomulmodallearningstyleprevalence(48.4%)Table
1andFigure3.
The current study suggests that this group of female dental
students had varied learning styles with mulmodal VARK and
unimodal kinesthec being the most dominant. There was a
dierencein learning style prevalence among rst, second and
third year female dental students which is a dierent nding
thanwasseeninapreviousstudy[25].Inthe2015VARKstudyof
Saudimaledental students,therewasno dierenceinlearning
stylepreferencebetweentherstandnalyears.Inthecurrent
studyoffemaleSaudiDentalstudents,therstand third years
weremost oenunimodalkinaesthecwhereasfor thesecond
yearstudents,theyweremostoenmulmodalVARK.
Figure4describedthebreakdownofresultsfoundinstudiesfrom
the literature, to compare with the current study on learning
style preferences of Saudi female dental students. Among the
studiesfromSaudiArabia[25,26],theresultsdonotdiergreatly
between the studies that looked atmales versus females. The
unimodal preference for visual learning is higher in all other
culturalgroupsthantheSaudicohorts,exceptinIndia.Ofinterest
tomanycontent-heavycurricula(asindenstry),istheunimodal
preference of reading and wring. While Saudi female dental
studentsweremorelikelytopreferthislearningstylethanmales,
therewerefewin anyof thecohortswhowereunimodalRead/
write.Saudistudentsbothmaleandfemalehadhigherunimodal
preferenceforlearningbydoingthananyoftheothercohortsof
Prevalence of dierent learning styles
25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
0.00%
V
A
R
K
VK VR RK VA AK VAR VRK ARK VAK VARK
Prevalenceofstudentlearningstylepreferences.Figure 1
2016
Vol. 2 No. 1: 4
4This article is available in: http://healthcare-communications.imedpub.com/archive.php
ARCHIVOS DE MEDICINA
ISSN 1698-9465
Journal of Healthcare Communications
ISSN 2472-1654
dentalstudentsinthecomparison.
Discussion
When students enjoy the informaon presentaon or
engagement, they are more producve and likely to learn.
Thisstudyshowedthatthereisawide varietyof learning style
preferences among female dental students in this cohort. The
headoftheMedicalEducaonDepartmentintheDentalCollege
wasgiven theseresultsinorder toencourageawarenessofthe
importanceof teaching styles and student learning preference.
Developing teaching methods that complement a wide range
oflearningstylesappears to be moreeecvethan aempng
to tailor the coursecontent to the individual student [27]. The
currentcurriculumatthisCollegeofDenstryincludesahybridof
ProblemBasedLearningandtradionallecture-basedmethods.
The curriculum engages in most of the ways of encouraging
studentlearningthataresuggestedbytheVARKwebsite.Afocus
onkinesthec learning is dominant asthestudentsengagein a
highproporonoflabandclinicalcourses.
Of the total sample, mulmodal learning style preference was
more prevalent than unimodal. This nding is consistent with
otherstudies(19,24,26,27)thatshowedsimilar results. Other
studies(16, 20, 22) reported that the populaon of dental
studentsthattheymeasuredpreferredunimodallearningstyles.
Oneof the quesonsthathas been askedbyresearchersinthe
literatureisatwhatagelearningstylepreferenceisdevelopedand
ifit canchange(28).Astudy ofSaudiArabianchildreningrades
sevenandeightfoundthat48%weremulmodalandtheothers
wereunimodal(V-12,A-4,R-12andK-24)(29).Thisndingdoes
notvarygreatlyfromthendingsinthecurrentstudy.
When this study sample was divided into year of study, the
unimodal learning style prevalence was only slightly higher
in prevalence for the rst year dental students compared to
mulmodallearning style prevalence. For the second and third
year dental students, the mulmodal learning stylepreference
was much higher than unimodal. This may represent a cohort
eect or perhaps variaons on how students were selected
foraccessto the Dental College. However, arecentstudy from
Australia reported that 45% of students measured before and
aer starng nursing educaon maintained the same learning
stylepreference(accordingtotheVARKquesonnaire)aerone
year of follow-up. About a third of the students in that study
becamemoremulmodal[28].
In this study, the kinesthec learning style was the dominant
unimodallearningstylewhereastheotherlearningstyles(V,A,R)
hadamuchlowerandequalprevalence.Twopreviousstudiesin
Saudidentalstudents[25,26]reportedhighproporonsofboth
kinesthec and aural learning stylepreferences, as did a study
fromthesameSaudiuniversity(PNU),measuringthe VARKin a
populaon of Nursing students [30]. Murphyet al., [24] found
inapopulaonof USdentalstudents;the read/writeand visual
preferencesweremoredominant.Dierenceintheprevalenceof
learningpreferencesbetweenthesestudiesmaybeexplainedby
thedierenceinage,gender, culture and academiclevelofthe
studentsthatparcipatedinthesestudies.
Conclusion
ThiscohortofSaudi Arabianfemaledentalstudentswashighly
mul-modal.Whilecultureandgendermayplayaroleinlearning
style preference, how academic systems select students for
professionalprogramslikedenstrymayheavilybiasthendings.
Alllearningstylesbeingequally preferred(VARK)wasthe most
common preference. This was closely followed by unimodal
kinestheclearningstylepreference.Theresultsofthisstudycan
provideusefulinformaonfordentaleducatorsof the learning
stylepreferencesof their dental students and facilitatestudent
learningbydevelopingappropriateteachingaerstrategiesadd
Some of these strategies are outlined in Table 1. Oral health,
whichaectsgeneralhealthinSaudiArabia,hasbeentradionally
verypoorcomparedtoothercountries.However,newcurricula
and new programs for training naonal densts have a great
opportunity to provide community-based and preventave
dentalservices.Thiscohortof femaleSaudinaonal studentsis
Distribuonofunimodallearningstylepreferences.Figure 2
Distribution of unimodal and multimodal learning
styles among rst, second and third year students
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
First Year
Students
Second Year
Students
Third Year
Students
Multi Uni
Percentage of learning styles in each
year
48.4%
38.5%
Prevalence of unimodal and mulmodal learning
stylesamong1st 2ndand3rdyeardentalstudents.
Figure 3
2016
Vol. 2 No. 1: 4
5
© Under License of Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License
ARCHIVOS DE MEDICINA
ISSN 1698-9465
Journal of Healthcare Communications
ISSN 2472-1654
Types of Teaching Methods that are Eecve with
Dental Students with Dominant Preferences
First Year
Students N=44 Second Year Students N=35 Third Year Students N=31
K Clinicalpracce,OSCES,simulaon 22.6% 15.4% 22.2%
RLecturenotes,readingtextbooksandjournalarcles,
wringpapers 16.1% 7.7% 0.0%
VARK Variaonsonallmethods 16.1% 30.8% 18.5%
AListeningtolecturesonMP3s,guestspeakers,PBL,
smallgroupseminars,readingaloudtootherstudents 9.7% 3.8% 11.1%
VWatchingdemonstraons,videos,diagrams,lookingat
dentalmodels 3.2% 11.5% 11.1%
Table 1:Prevalenceofdierentlearningstylesamong1st,2ndand3rdyeardentalstudents.
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Visual Aurel Read/write Kinesthetic Multi
Haq
(Pakistan)
Shenoy
(India)
Murphy
(US)
Drumitrescu
(Romania,
males)
Drumitrescu
(Romania,
females)
Al-Saud
(Saudi,
mostly
males)
Asiry (Saudi
Males)
Present
study (Saudi
females)
Resultsfromtheliterature:measuringdentalstudentlearningstylespreference,usingVARK.Figure 4
atthe forefrontof the reformaon of the dentalsystemin the
country.Byunderstandingthewaythatthestudentslearn,dental
facultycanimprovethewaythattheyteach.
Students who enjoy learning, will learn more eciently, and
enjoyteachingothers.Inthisway,dentalstudentscanlearnto
teachtheirpaents,whichis an important part of encouraging
oralhealth.
Dental faculty can provide guidance on how to improve the
qualityandtheexperienceofdentaleducaonin SaudiArabia.
Allofus who are responsibleforeducangthe next generaon
ofdenstsmust pay aenontothelearningstylepreferences
of the students that they teach.In the case of this cohort, we
recommend that faculty use a high proporon of learning
acvies that involve movement and experienal learning
techniques.
Acknowledgement
The authors wish to acknowledge the contribuon of all the
students who parcipated in the study from the College of
Denstry,PrincessNourahUniversity.
2016
Vol. 2 No. 1: 4
6This article is available in: http://healthcare-communications.imedpub.com/archive.php
ARCHIVOS DE MEDICINA
ISSN 1698-9465
Journal of Healthcare Communications
ISSN 2472-1654
References
1 El Bcheraoui C, Tuaha M, Daoud, F, Kravitz H, AlMazroa MA, et
al. (2016) Use of dental clinics and oral hygiene pracces in the
KingdomofSaudiArabia,2013.IntDentJ66:99-104.
2 Al-Agili DE (2013) A systemac review of populaon-based dental
cariesstudiesamongchildreninSaudiArabia.SaudiDentJ25:3-11.
3 Al-MeedaniLA,Al-DlaiganYH(2016)Prevalenceofdentalcariesand
associated social risk factors among preschool children in Riyadh,
SaudiArabia.PakJMedSci32:452-456.
4 Singhal DK, Acharya S, Thakur AS (2015) Dental caries experience
among pre-school children of udupi taluk, Karnataka, India. J Oral
HealthCommDent9:5-9.
5 Wigen TI, Espelid I, Skaare AB, Wang NJ (2011) Family characteriscs
andcaries experience in preschool children:alongitudinalstudyfrom
pregnancyto5yearsofage.CommyDentOralEpidemiol39:311-317.
6 TubaishatR,DarbyM,BaumanD,BoxC(2005)Useofmiswakversus
toothbrushes:oralhealthbeliefsandbehavioursamongasampleof
Jordanianadults.IntJDentHyg3:126-136.
7 CuthbertPF(2005)Thestudentlearning process:Learningstylesor
learningapproaches?TeachHigherEduc10:235-249.
8 DunnR,BeaudryJS,KlavasA(1989)Surveyofresearchonlearning
styles.EducLeadership46:50-58.
9 FelderRM,BrentR(2005)Understandingstudentdierences.JEngr
Educ94:57-72.
10 FlemingND(2015)Vark:aguidetolearningstyles.
11 Leite WL, Svinicki M, Shi Y (2010) Aempted validaon of the scores
of the VARK: learning styles inventory with multrait-mulmethod
conrmatoryfactoranalysismodels.EducPsycholMeas70:323-339.
12 MillerJA(1998)Enhancementofachievementandatudesthrough
individualized learning style presentaons of two allied health
courses.JAlliedHealth27:150-156.
13 Saran R, Kumar S, Pentapa KC (2015) Assessment of learning
preferencesamongdentalstudentsusingVisual,Aural,Read-Write,
Kinesthec quesonnaire: An instuonal experience. J Dent Res
Rev2:10-12.
14 AnitaK, Saee D, Jayashree J (2014) Evaluaon oflearningstylesof
dentalstudents:apreliminaryinvesgaon.JETHS1:34-38.
15 Narayana Murthy C, Ramesh VL, Gowramma R (2014) A study on
VARK learning style of SJM Dental College and Hospital students
Chitradurga.JEducResMedTeach2:33-36.
16 Shah K, Ahmed J, Shenoy N, Srikant N (2013) How dierent are
studentsandtheirlearningstyles?IntJMedSci1:212-215.
17 ShenoyN,ShenoyK,RatnakarUP(2013)Theperceptualpreferences
inlearning among dental students in clinical subjects. J ClinDiagn
Res7:1683-1685.
18 Kumar BJ, Sushma S, Naresh K, Kumar BB, Ajay S, et al. (2011)
Dierences in learning style preferences of medical, dental and B
pharmsstudents.IntJMedMedSci1:037-041.
19 Dumitrescu,A,Badita,D(2014)LearningstylesofrstyearRomanian
dentalstudents.ProcPhysiolSoc31:C79.
20 HaqSM,YasmeenS,AliS,GallamFI(2012)Students‟learningstyles
requiresmodiedteachingstrategies.JRawalMedColl16:191-193.
21 KhalidMS,HaroonSQ,MuhammadSK,UmarF(2012)Learningstyle
preferences of dental students in Islamabad Medical and Dental
College.PakOralDentJ32:326-329.
22 Siddiqi KM, Qazi HS, Kurram MS, Farooq U (2012) Learning
preferences of dental students at Islamabad medical and dental
College.PakOralDentJ32:326-329.
23 KaczmarekU,SmulczynskaA,Grzesiak-GasekI(2010)Learningstyles
ofstudents.DentMedProbl47:193-198.
24 MurphyRJ,GraySA,StrajaSR,BogertMC(2004) Student learning
preferencesandteachingimplicaons.JDentEduc68:859-866.
25 AsiryMA(2015)Learningstylesofdentalstudents.SaudiJDentRes
7:13-17.
26 Al-SaudLMS (2013) Learning style preferences of rst year dental
studentsat King Saud University inRiyadh,SaudiArabia:Inuence
ofgenderandGPA.JDentEduc77:1371-1378.
27 HughesJM,FallisDW,PeelJL, MurchisonDF (2009)Learningstyles
oforthodoncresidents.JDentEduc73:319-327.
28 Mitchell EL, James S, D’Amore A (2015) How learning styles and
preferences of rst-year nursing and midwifery students change.
AusJEduc59:158-168.
29 SaadiIA,WaAP,Eldin,ElhassanASEA(2013)Predominantlearning
stylesinSaudipreparatoryschools.JAmSci9:140-152.
30 Srling B, Alguiraini W (2016) Using VARK to assess saudi nursing
students’learningstylepreferences:dotheydierfromotherhealth
professions?JTaibahUnivMedSci.Jan2017(inPress).
View publication statsView publication stats
Article
Background Learning style preference impacts how well groups of students respond to their curricula. Faculty have many choices in the methods for delivering nursing content, as well as assessing students. Objectives The purpose was to develop knowledge around how faculty delivered curricula content, and then considering these findings in the context of the students learning style preference. Design Following an in-service on teaching and learning styles, faculty completed surveys on their methods of teaching and the proportion of time teaching, using each learning style (visual, aural, read/write and kinesthetic). Setting This study took place at the College of Nursing a large all-female university in Saudi Arabia. Participants: 24 female nursing faculty volunteered to participate in the project. Methods: A cross-sectional design was used. Results Faculty reported teaching using mostly methods that were kinesthetic and visual, although lecture was also popular (aural). Students preferred kinesthetic and aural learning methods. Read/write was the least preferred by students and the least used method of teaching by faculty. Conclusions Faculty used visual methods about one third of the time, although they were not preferred by the students. Students' preferred learning style (kinesthetic) was the method most used by faculty.
Article
Full-text available
Aim To determine the dental caries experience of pre-school children attending anganwadi and day care centre in Udupi Taluk. Materials and Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted on 825 pre-school children attending Anganwadi and day care centers in Udupi Taluk. Dental caries was assessed using Dentition status and treatment needs (WHO, 1997). Data was analyzed using SPSS 16.0 with significance level at P value < 0.05. Chi-square test was used to find out the significant differences. Level of significance was taken Results Dental caries experience was significantly higher among anganwadi children (3.74±3.58) as compared to day care children (3.26±3.32). The prevalence of dental caries was 64.2% among anganwadi children and 61.0% among day care children. Girls had slightly higher mean deft score, mean number of decayed teeth, filled teeth and lower missing teeth as compared to boys. Conclusion High caries experience in this study revealed that there is a great need to plan and conduct oral health promotion initiatives and treatment activities for preschool children. The oral health education at initial stages would help in improving preventive dental behavior and attitude which is beneficial for lifelong.
Article
Full-text available
Background and Objectives: Every individual has different learning style. As dental educators, it is necessary to recognize the fact that each dental student may have a preference of acquiring information and skill in one style over another. The objective of this study was to determine the learning style preferences of dental students using the Visual, Aural, Read‑Write, Kinesthetic (VARK) questionnaire. Materials and Methods: The VARK questionnaire was administered to 20 1st year and 40 2nd year dental students of Melaka Manipal Medical College, Manipal University to determine their preferred mode of learning. Completed questionnaires were scored and tabulated to determine the distribution of VARK preferences. Results: Nearly 50% of 1st year students were quadmodal whereas 55% of 2nd year students were unimodal in which kinesthetic preference was dominant. Mean V and A scores were significantly higher for 1st year than 2nd year students. No significant gender difference was seen. Conclusion: The dental students in this study had varied learning preferences. As dental educators, we need to adopt different methods of teaching in order to reach most of the students and make the educational experience more productive.
Article
Full-text available
????? ?????: ???? ??? ??????? ?????? ????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ??????? ?????????? ????? ???? ???? ??? ??? ????? ?????? ???????? ????? ????? ??????. ??? ?????: ???? ??????? ????? ?????? ??? ??? ????? ????? ?????? ????? ????????? ?? ??? ?????. ???????: ??? ???? ?? ??.?? ?? ????????? ?????? ??????. ????? ???? ??.?? ???? ?????? ??????? ?? ??? ???? ????? ??.? ?? ? ?.?? ? ?.?? ?????? ???????? ????????/???????? ??????? ??????? ??? ???????. ??? ??? ?????? ?????? ??????? ??????? ????????? ?????? ????? ?? ??????? ?????? ?????? ?? ?????? ?????? ??????? ???????????? ???? ???? ?????? ??? ?? ???? ?? ????? ?????? ?????? ?? ?????? ???? ?????????. ???? ????? ?????? ?????? ??? ???? ???? ????? ??? ???? ??????? ?????? ???????. ???????????: ???? ?????? ?????? ???????? ??????? ??????? ????????? ???? ?????? ???????? ???? ?? ???????? ?? ?????? ???????? ?????? ????????? ?? ?????? ????? ?????? ?????? ??????.
Article
Full-text available
Objectives: To determine the prevalence of dental caries, and associated social risk factors among preschool children in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Methods: The study consisted of a random sample of 3 to 5 years- old preschool children who were examined in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 388 children (184 boys and 204 girls) were examined from 10 different preschools. Each surface of their teeth was examined for dental caries utilizing modified WHO criteria (WHO, 1997). Data information about age, gender and social factors status were obtained by questionnaires that had been answered by parents. Results: About 69% of children had dental caries with dmft score of 3.4 (± 3.6) and dmfs of 6.9 (± 9.9). There was no statistically significant difference between boys and girls. Less caries was observed among children whose parents worked and it was statistically significant as well as whose mothers had high or low educational level. Increased number of family members appeared to have a high incidence of dental caries which was also statistically significant. There was no significant difference in dental caries prevalence with birth order. Conclusions: Dental caries among preschool children in Saudi Arabia was still very common. Improvement of preventive measure at early age should be emphasized by parents and dental health professionals. More attention is required for Non-working parents telling them about the risk of dental caries affecting their children and the awareness of preventive care of dental health.
Article
Full-text available
Objectives: We conducted a large household survey in 2013 to determine the current status of oral health practices and use of oral health services in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Methods: The Saudi Health Information Survey is a national multistage survey of individuals ≥ 15 years of age. We used a backward elimination multivariate logistic regression model to measure the association between having been to a dental clinic during the last year, and sex, age, marital status, education, time since last routine medical examination, history of diagnosis with a cardiovascular chronic condition, brushing or flossing teeth and use of Miswak (a chewing stick). Results: Between April and June 2013, 10,735 participants completed the survey (89.4% of the households contacted). An estimated 1.5 million (11.5%) and 6.3 million (48.6%) Saudi Arabian people, ≥ 15 years of age, had visited a dental clinic for a routine check-up and for a complaint during the last year, respectively. In total, 16.3%, 85.0% and 52% of Saudi Arabian people never brush their teeth, never floss their teeth or never use Miswak, respectively. The probability of visiting a dental clinic increased with education, among individuals who brushed or flossed their teeth and who used Miswak. Conclusions: Oral hygiene practices are not common among Saudi Arabian people, and use of health care for prevention of oral disease is limited. Hence, the need for oral health promotion is pressing. The KSA Ministry of Health should develop and implement programmes, through its primary health clinics, to increase the awareness of the importance of good oral health.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: Students, like anybody else differ from each other. As students they differ in their preferred mode of learning, i.e. their preferred modes in gathering, organizing and thinking about information. A recent classification proposed by Neil Fleming and associates state that students learning styles can be divided into Visual/graphic, Aural, Read/write and Kinesthetic types, VARK. Aim: The aim of the recent study is to investigate learning styles among dental students in two different dental colleges of India. Method: The VARK-questionnaire contains 15 multiple-choice- questions with four possibilities to select an answer. Each possibility represents one of the four modes of perception. But, one can select more than one answer to each question, which is necessary for the identification of poly modal modes of perception and learning. This is also a psychometric problem when trying to state a measure of the reliability of the questionnaire. The VARK-questionnaire was distributed among 200 students and was collected back. This sample size represents 100% response rate from the students in the class and is markedly above the level required to make conclusions about student preferences for receiving and processing information. The students spent about 10 minutes in an ordinary lesson to fill in the questionnaire. Students register number and name were used in the study and there was no blinding practiced. Study Design: Questionnaire based clinical study Results: The responses from the students in our University where classified into multi-modal (VARK), tri-modal (VRK, VAK, VAR, ARK), bi-modal (VR, VA, VK, RK) and uni-modal (V, A, R.K) categories. Results showed that subjects had a higher preference for multimodal learning. Conclusion: We conclude that students in our set up prefer multimodal and more of Kinesthetic of learning. To meet their needs, a variation in teaching, learning and examination must be implemented. If not, these students with a high kinesthetic preference for perception and learning may be at the losing end. [Int J Res Med Sci 2013; 1(3.000): 212-215]
Article
Full-text available
Aims: This study was conducted to determine the learning styles of dental students at King Saud University. Methods and material: The Arabic version of the VARK questionnaire was administered to undergraduate dental male students in first, second, third, fourth and fifth years to determine their learning style preferences. Descriptive statistics were used to identify the learning styles of students. Results: There were more students who preferred a multimodal learning style (58.4%) than those who preferred a unimodal learning style (41.6%). The quadmodal learning style was the preferred style among multimodal learners in total sample and in each year separately. Of the unimodal learners, 35.1%, 35.1%, 18.1%, and 11.7% of the students were Kinesthetic (K), Aural (A), Visual (V), and Reading/Writing (R) learners, respectively. Conclusions: 58.4% and 41.6% of the students were found to have multimodal learning preferences and unimodal learning styles, respectively. The distribution of students' learning styles reflects strong kinesthetic and aural preferences. The learning preference does not differ between undergraduate male students from first to final years at College of Dentistry, King Saud University.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: The aim of the study was to analyze the learning styles and the difference if any between medical, dental and B Pharmaceutical students. Methods: 112 medical, 110dental and 106 B pharma students were studied in each group. Each of the group completed the VARK (visual, auditory, read-write and kinesthetic) questionnaire and their learning style was analyzed. Then the values of each group were compared to get the result. The goal was to identify the preferred learning pattern and to attempt to improve the teaching methods. Results: statistically one way ANOVA was applied to study the data generated. The results reflect that there is predominance of kinesthetic learners individually though not significant. When multimodal group as a whole compared to unimodal groups there was significant difference seen. Conclusion: This study corroborates the findings of previous studies done on this subject. The study also underlines the need to adopt varied pattern of teaching to cater different groups of learner in different as well as different groups.
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this study was to measure the distribution of learning preferences of 1st and 2nd year dental students at Islamabad Medical & Dental College. Each individual has learning styles in various combinations; as a teacher we need to use all four ourselves recognizing that each student may have a preference of acquiring information and skill in one style over another. As students progress it is important for us to match our teaching methods to their task specific needs. To determine the learning style preferences, the VARK questionnaire was administered. Student questionnaires were scored and tabulated to determine the distribution of VARK preferences. 52% of respondents preferred a single mode of learning, 36% were bimodal, 8% tri modal and 4% were quad modal. Results clearly demonstrate that Dental students’ preferred kinesthetic and aural learning at a higher percentage. Dental students may be more skilled at some tasks and less in others; it is important that our teaching/ coaching methods are matched to their learning preference and to each task.
Article
Background. a learning style or learning preference is the complex manner in which learners most efficiently gain the knowledge, process and store and recall what they learn. Many questionnaires estimating the learning styles have been worked out, and among them VarK questionnaire is often applied. Objectives. The aim of the study was to evaluate the learning styles of dental students. Material and Methods. 78 dental students were involved in the study. all students filled in the polish version of VarK questionnaire anonymously and the data were evaluated with use of available on-line the VarK question- naire. Results. less than half of the subjects showed the unimodal learning style (36/78, 46.2%) and the remaining ones pointed at multimodal, out of which the most often tri-modal (17/78, 21.8%) and next quad-modal (14/78, 17.9% and bi-modal (11/78, 14.1%). among the unimodal learning styles the most often (14/78, 18.0%) and the most seldom was the read/write (1/78, 1.3%) type. There were not statistically significant differences between frequency of unimodal and multimodal learning styles, kinesthetic way as well as between the particular types of multimodal ones. Conclusion. evaluation of learning styles with use of the VarK questionnaire is the useful tool for the analysis of knowledge gathered by the students and the obtained data can be used by academic teacher in education process.