Content uploaded by Prince Anandarajah
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Prince Anandarajah on Dec 19, 2018
Content may be subject to copyright.
Optimum Optical Frequency Combs for
Telecommunications and Data Centre Networks
P. M. Anandarajah 1 Senior Member IEEE, P. Landais 1, Senior Member IEEE, M. Deseada Gutierrez 2, L. P.
Barry1, Senior Member IEEE, and A. Kaszubowska-Anandarajah 3, Senior Member IEEE
1 School of Electronic Engineering, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland
2 Pilot Photonics, Invent Centre, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland
3 Connect Centre, Trinity College Dublin, Dunlop/Oriel House, Dublin, Ireland Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland
Author e-mail address: prince.anandarajah@dcu.ie
ABSTRACT
Optical frequency combs (OFCs) were well documented by early reports in the 60’s and 70’s [1] including the Nobel
lecture by Hansch [2] and Hall [3]. During the last decade, there has been an immense amount of research activity
focused on OFCs and their wide range of applications. These range from molecular spectroscopy [4], astronomy [5]
to RF photonics [6], optical clocks [7], arbitrary waveform generation [8] and high speed optical communications [9].
An OFC can be defined, as a series of equally spaced discrete spectral lines [10]. There are various parameters that
could be used to characterise an OFC, including frequency and amplitude stability, occupied bandwidth, free spectral
range (repetition rate), spectral flatness, phase noise, phase correlation etc. However, the choice of optimum OFC
parameters depends on the nature of the application. This work focuses on the parameter requirements for OFCs
employed in next generation optical communication systems.
Emerging broadband applications and bandwidth hungry services are driving the evolution of optical networks. Next
generation short and long reach communication networks would be required to provide data rates of multiple Tb/s.
Such high line rates are not feasible using a single wavelength channel, as the bandwidth of electronics will act as a
bottleneck. However, the multi-Tb/s transmission capacity can be achieved by utilising highly parallel wavelength
division multiplexing (WDM), with tens or hundreds of channels, in combination with spectrally efficient advanced
modulation formats. Through such an approach, symbol rates can be maintained at levels that are compliant with the
electrical bandwidth of energy-efficient CMOS driver circuitry [11].
One of the factors that has been attracting a lot of attention, with the move to higher line-rates, is maximizing the
information spectral density (ISD) achieved at the transmitter. With the available spectral bandwidth becoming an
extremely precious commodity, enhancing the ISD beyond what is achievable through the employment of the
advanced modulation formats, becomes of paramount importance. Current optical WDM systems, using a large array
of laser transmitters, require inter-channel guard bands to avoid cross channel interference/cater for the wavelength
drift of the free running lasers. However, OFCs portray precise frequency spacing thereby making them an invaluable
asset to densely packed communication systems. Hence, the use of OFCs for advanced multicarrier transmission
techniques, like Nyquist wavelength division multiplexing (NWDM) [12], coherent optical orthogonal frequency
division multiplexing (CO-OFDM) [13, 14] or time frequency packing (TFP) [15], have been investigated to realize
terabit transponders.
The authors will present the major benefits and shortcomings of the most commonly used techniques [16-22] that are
available for the generation of OFCs. Focus will be placed on the inherent advantageous properties exhibited by the
different techniques, while attention will also be paid to ways of overcoming some of the shortcomings [23-25].
Keywords: Optical frequency combs, gain switching, external injection, linewidth, advanced modulation formats.
Acknowledgments: This work was supported in part by the Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) Career Development
Award 15/CDA/3640 and 13/RC/2077, the Higher Education Authority PRTLI 4 and 5 INSPIRE Programs.
References:
[1] J. L. Hall, “Optical frequency measurement: 40 years of technology revolutions,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics
in Quantum Electronics, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 1136–1144, Nov. 2000.
[2] T. W. Hansch, “Nobel lecture: Passion for precision,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 78, pp. 1297–1309, Nov.
2006.
[3] J. L. Hall, “Nobel lecture: Defining and measuring optical frequencies,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 78, pp.
1279–1295, Nov. 2006.
[4] R. Holzwarth, T. Udem, T. W. Hänsch, J. C. Knight, W. J. Wadsworth, and P. S. J. Russell, “Optical frequency
synthesizer for precision spectroscopy,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 85, pp. 2264–2267, Sept. 2000.
[5] T. Steinmetz, T. Wilken, C. Araujo-Hauck, R. Holzwarth, T. W. Hänsch, L. Pasquini, A. Manescau, S. D’Odorico,
M. T. Murphy, T. Kentischer, W. Schmidt, and T. Udem, “Laser frequency combs for astronomical observations,”
Science, vol. 321, no. 5894, pp. 1335–1337, 2008.
[6] V. R. Supradeepa, C. M. Long, and A. M. Weiner, “Comb-based radio frequency photonic filters with rapid
tunability and high selectivity,” Nature Photonics, vol. 6, pp. 186–194, 2012.
[7] C. W. Chou, D. B. Hume, T. Rosenband, and D. J. Wineland, “Optical clocks and relativity,” Science, vol. 329,
no. 5999, pp. 1630–1633, 2010.
[8] N. R. Newbury, “Searching for applications with a fine-tooth comb,” Nature Photonics, vol. 5, pp. 186–188, 2011.
[9] K. Nosu, “Advanced coherent lightwave technologies,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 15 –
21, Feb. 1988.
[10] V. Torres-Company and A. M. Weiner, “Optical frequency comb technology for ultra-broadband radio-frequency
photonics,” Laser & Photonics Reviews, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 368–393, 2014.
[11] D. Miller, “Device requirements for optical interconnects to silicon chips,” Proc. IEEE vol. 97, no. 7, pp. 1166–
1185, 2009.
[12] G. Bosco, V. Curri, A. Carena, P. Poggiolini, and F. Forghieri, “On the performance of Nyquist-WDM Terabit
Superchannels Based on PMBPSK, PM-QPSK, PM-8QAM or PM-16QAM Subcarriers,” Journal of Lightwave
Technology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 53–61, Jan. 2011.
[13] W. Shieh and C. Athaudage, “Coherent optical orthogonal frequency division multiplexing,” Electronics Letters,
vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 587– 589, May 2006.
[14] X. Ouyang, O. A. Dobre, and J. Zhao, “Unbiased Channel Estimation Based on the Discrete Fresnel Transform
for CO-OFDM Systems,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 691–694, Apr. 2017.
[15] M. Secondini, T. Foggi, F. Fresi, G. Meloni, F. Cavaliere, G. Colavolpe, E. Forestieri, L. Poti, R. Sabella, and G.
Prati, “Optical Time-Frequency Packing: Principles, Design, Implementation, and Experimental Demonstration,”
Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 33, no. 17, pp. 3558–3570, Sept. 2015.
[16] P. M. Anandarajah, R. Maher, Y. Q. Xu, S. Latkowski, J. O’Carroll, S. G. Murdoch, R. Phelan, J. O’Gorman,
and L. P. Barry, “Generation of Coherent Multi-carrier Signals by Gain Switching of Discrete Mode Lasers,” IEEE
Photonics Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, pp 111 – 122, February 2011.
[17] R. Maher, L. P. Barry and P. M. Anandarajah, “Cost efficient directly modulated DPSK downstream transmitter
and colourless upstream remodulation for full-duplex WDM-PONs” Optical Fibre Communication Conference (OFC)
2010, JThA29, San Diego, 21st-25th March 2010.
[18] T. Sakamoto, T. Kawanishi and M. Izutsu, “19x10-GHz Electro-Optic Ultra-Flat Frequency Comb Generation
Only Using Single Conventional Mach-Zehnder Modulator”, in Proc. CLEO, 2006, CMAA5.
[19] T. Sakamoto, T. Yamamoto, K. Kurokawa and S. Tomita, “DWDM transmission in O-band over 24 km PCF
using optical frequency comb based multicarrier source”, IET Electron. Lett., vol. 45, no. 16, pp 850-851, July 2009.
[20] I. Gheorma and G. Gopalakrishnan, “Flat Frequency Comb Generation with an Integrated Dual-Parallel
Modulator”, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. vol., 19, no. 13, 1011-1013, July 2007.
[21] A. Akrout, A. Shen, R. Brenot, F. Van Dijk, O. Legouezigou, F. Pommereau, F. Lelarge, A. Ramdane and G-H.
Duan, “Error-free transmission of 8 WDM channels at 10 Gbit/s using comb generation in a quantum dash based
mode-locked laser,” in Proc. ECOC, 2008, Th3.D.4.
[22] R. Maldonado-Basilio, J. Parra-Cetina, S. Latkowski, N. Calabretta, and P. Landais, “Experimental Investigation
of the Optical Injection Locking Dynamics in Single-Section Quantum-Dash Fabry-Pérot Laser Diode for Packet-
Based Clock Recovery” IEEE Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 860 – 865, (2013). March 2013.
[23] R. Zhou, T. N. Huynh, V. Vujicic, P. M. Anandarajah, and L. P. Barry, “Phase noise analysis of injected gain
switched comb source for coherent communications,” OSA Optics Express, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 8120–8125, March
2014.
[24] A. Jain, P. K. Krishnamurthy, P. Landais and P. M. Anandarajah, “EKF for Joint Mitigation of Phase Noise,
Frequency Offset and Nonlinearity in 400 Gbps PM-16-QAM and 200 Gbps PM-QPSK Systems,” IEEE Photonics
Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1-10, Feb. 2017.
[25] Joerg Pfeifle, Regan Watts, Igor Shkarban, Stefan Wolf, Vidak Vujicic, Pascal Landais, Nicolas Chimot,
Siddharth Joshi, Kamel Merghem, Cosimo Calò, Marc Weber, Abderrahim Ramdane, Francois Lelarge, Liam Barry,
Wolfgang Freude, Christian Koo,”Simultaneous Phase Noise Reduction of 30 Comb Lines from a Quantum-Dash
Mode-Locked Laser Diode Enabling Coherent Tbit/s Data Transmission” Tu3I.5,OFC2015, March 2015