ArticlePDF Available

Application of genetics and genomics towards Capsicum translational research

Authors:
  • Sustainable Development Research Centre
  • North - Eastern Hill University, India, Shillong

Abstract and Figures

Capsicum species commonly known as Chili peppers are economically important group of plants belonging to the Solanaceae family. Of the 38 species reported, only six species namely, Capsicum annuum, C. assamicum, C. baccatum, C. frutescence, C. chinense and C. pubescens are cultivated. They are very important component of the human being as peppers are used as vegetables, spices, and a coloring agent and for medicinal purposes. Based on pungency trait which is due to the presence of a group of compounds known as capsaicinoids, cultivated capsicums are classified into sweet peppers and hot peppers. Although conventional breeding and classical genetic analysis were successful in estimating the number of genes for economically important traits governed by few major genes and their incorporation in the breeding pro-gramme, the advent of molecular markers and recently developed next generation sequencing technologies sup-plemented greatly in dissecting the genetic and molecular basis of economically important traits in the capsicum genome for applied research. Here in this review, we tried to highlight the use of molecular markers, comparative mapping and advanced genomics technologies and their integrated use in the translational research of cultivated Capsicums.
Content may be subject to copyright.
REVIEW ARTICLE
Application of genetics and genomics towards Capsicum
translational research
Nirala Ramchiary Mechuselie Kehie
Vijaya Brahma Suman Kumaria
Pramod Tandon
Received: 10 September 2013 / Accepted: 21 October 2013
ÓKorean Society for Plant Biotechnology and Springer Japan 2013
Abstract Capsicum species commonly known as Chili
peppers are economically important group of plants
belonging to the Solanaceae family. Of the 38 species
reported, only six species namely, Capsicum annuum,C.
assamicum,C. baccatum,C. frutescence,C. chinense and
C. pubescens are cultivated. They are very important
component of the human being as peppers are used as
vegetables, spices, and a coloring agent and for medicinal
purposes. Based on pungency trait which is due to the
presence of a group of compounds known as capsaicinoids,
cultivated capsicums are classified into sweet peppers and
hot peppers. Although conventional breeding and classical
genetic analysis were successful in estimating the number
of genes for economically important traits governed by few
major genes and their incorporation in the breeding pro-
gramme, the advent of molecular markers and recently
developed next generation sequencing technologies sup-
plemented greatly in dissecting the genetic and molecular
basis of economically important traits in the capsicum
genome for applied research. Here in this review, we tried
to highlight the use of molecular markers, comparative
mapping and advanced genomics technologies and their
integrated use in the translational research of cultivated
Capsicums.
Keywords Capsaicinoids Transcriptome
Molecular markers Quantitative traits loci
Introduction
Chili peppers belonging to the Capsicum genus and family
Solanaceae have been a part of the human diet in the
Americas since 7500 BC. The archaeological evidence at
sites located in southwestern Ecuador showed that chili
pepper was domesticated more than 6,000 years ago, and it
is one of the first cultivated crops in the Central and South
Americas (Bosland 1996; Perry et al. 2007). The genus
Capsicum comprises about 38 species (USDA-ARS 2011)
of which only six species (namely Capsicum annuum,C.
baccatum,C. frutescence,C. chinense,C. pubescens and C.
assamicum) are cultivated. The last one was recently
identified as a distinct domesticated species from the North
Eastern part of India (Purkayastha et al. 2012). These
domesticated species are derived from different ancestral
stocks found in three distinct centers of origin: Mexico
being the primary center of origin for C. annuum, the most
widely cultivated species, with Guatemala as a secondary
center; Amazonia for C. chinense and C. frutescens; and
Peru and Bolivia for C. baccatum and C. pubescens.C.
annuum and C. frutescens are widely distributed from
Mexico through Central America and throughout the
Caribbean region (Greenleaf 1986). Of the domesticated
species, C. chinense is the most pungent fruit type. Chili
fruits contain rich metabolites that are beneficial for human
health, such as carotenoids (provitamin A), vitamins (C and
E), flavonoids and capsaicinoids (Maga 1975). These
N. Ramchiary (&)M. Kehie
Translational and Evolutionary Genomics Lab, School of Life
Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110067, India
e-mail: nrudsc@gmail.com
V. Brahma
Laboratory of Comparative and Evolutionary Genomics,
Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto,
25 Willcocks St., Toronto, ON M5S3B2, Canada
S. Kumaria P. Tandon
Department of Botany, North Eastern Hill University,
Shillong 793022, India
123
Plant Biotechnol Rep
DOI 10.1007/s11816-013-0306-z
compounds (apart from functioning as antioxidants and
nutrients) are used in traditional medicine due to their
enormous medicinal properties. Capsaicinoids cause the
spicy flavor (pungency) of chili pepper fruit. Kosuge et al.
(1965) established that the pungent principle of red pepper
consists not only of one chemical but actually of the
unsaturated and saturated amides capsaicin and dihydro-
capsaicin, which were named in combination as capsaici-
noids (Pruthi 1980). Capsicum species are classified as hot
peppers and sweet peppers based on the presence or
absence of pungency traits in the fruits which are due to
capsaicinoids.
Although many classical studies reported genetics of
economically important traits in Capsicum species, the
advent of molecular markers and recently developed next-
generation sequencing (NGS) technologies supplemented
greatly in translating those studies into the applied breeding
of Capsicum species. Here in this review, we tried to
highlight the resources, current status in genetic and
genomics studies and their prospects in translational
research.
Genetic and genomic resources: foundation
for translational research
Germplasm resources
Genetic resources are important for finding beneficial
alleles present in a large number of germplasm and for their
use in breeding programs for improving yield, quality and
biotic and abiotic stress resistances/tolerances. Although
many institutes/organizations are collecting and maintain-
ing important genetic resources in the form of germplasm
of the different Capsicum species for their use in applied
and basic research, few institutes listed in http://www.
thechileman.org/ have a comparatively large collection of
the different capsicum germplasm collections. The Asian
Vegetable Research and Development Center (AVRDC,
Taiwan) has the largest collection with a total of 8,170
accessions belonging to wild and domesticated Capsicum
species from around the world, followed by the United
States Department of Agriculture (USDA) with 6,067
collections. In India, The National Bureau of Plant Genetic
Resources, New Delhi has 2,774 accessions of indigenous
and exotic collections. The other prominent institutes
involved in collection and maintenance of capsicum spe-
cies are: the Chile Pepper Institute (New Mexican State
University), the Centre for Genetic Resources (CGN), the
Netherlands, Banco de Germoplasma de Hortalic¸as (BGH),
Brazil, The German Research Centre for Biotechnology
(CAP), Germany. The capsicum germplasms are being
continuously evaluated for fruit morphology, plant type,
resistance to diseases and pests and abiotic stresses. Many
capsicum germplasms showing resistance against arthro-
pods, nematodes and pathogens are recently reviewed by
Babu et al. (2011).
Molecular markers and genomic resources
Among many, the most important use of molecular markers
in translational research is genome mapping and finding the
genetic loci/quantitative trait loci (QTL) for economically
important traits. Although tomato markers were used in
Capsicum at the beginning, several researchers developed
molecular markers, especially simple sequence repeats
(SSRs) from Capsicum species (Sanwen et al. 2001; Lee
et al. 2004). Apart from the SSRs developed from genomic
sequences, the EST databases provide a new source for
developing SSR markers in a rapid and cost-effective
manner since the number of expressed sequence tags
(ESTs) is increasing considerably in public databases with
the ongoing multinational efforts of transcriptome
sequencing. Yi et al. (2006) by in silico analysis of 10,232
non-redundant ESTs of pepper identified a total of 1,201
SSRs, which corresponded to one SSR in every 3.8 kb of
the ESTs. Of these, 812 primer pairs satisfying all condi-
tions were designed, of which 513 SSRs (63.1 %) were
successfully amplified and 150 of them (29.2 %) showed
polymorphism between C. annuum ‘TF68’ and C. chinense
‘Habanero’. Portis et al. (2007) reported the development
of 783 SSRs form 576 non-redundant EST sequences, of
which 348 SSRs primer pairs were designed. Wu et al.
(2006) developed a set of 2,869 conserved single-copy
orthologolous set of markers (COSII) by aligning ortholo-
gous sequences of multiple plant species, including model
Arabidopsis species which could be used in a broad range
of plant taxa, including those plants lacking any sequence
databases. These markers were widely used to develop
genetic maps and comparative genome analysis between
many species, including peppers, tomato and eggplants
belonging to the Solanaceae family (Wu et al. 2009a,b).
The SOL Genomics Network (SGN; http://sgn.cornell.
edu), a genomics information resource for the Solanaceae
and related families in the Asterid Clade, was developed as
a part of International Solanaceae Project (SOL) formed by
researchers working on Solanaceae plants in many coun-
tries. The aims of SGN are cataloging and maintaining
genetic maps and markers, disseminating sequence infor-
mation especially ESTs as unigenes, cataloging and pub-
lishing phenotypic information of Solanaceae plants and
assembling, analyzing and publishing sequencing data of
Solanaceae plant species such as tomato, potato, peppers
and eggplant (Mueller et al. 2005).
Kim et al. (2008a) first developed chili pepper EST
databases with a total of 122,582 sequenced ESTs from 21
Plant Biotechnol Rep
123
pepper EST libraries. This pepper EST database provided
functional genomic resources which could be used for
identifying unigenes, analyzing tissue specific expressed
genes in different developmental tissues and under condi-
tions of stress, with a comparative analysis of pepper ESTs
with those of other members of the Solanaceae family.
Tecle et al. (2010) developed a new tool, solQTL, which
employs a user-friendly web interface for uploading raw
phenotype and genotype data to the database, with R/QTL
mapping software for QTL analysis. This module contains
algorithms for online visualization and cross-referencing of
QTL to other relevant datasets and tools such as the SGN
Comparative Map Viewer and Genome Browser.
Huan-huan et al. (2011) developed 755 SSR markers
from EST sequences, 210 of which were tested in eight
pepper cultivars; and the PCR result revealed the existence
of polymorphism for 127 SSR primer pairs. Shirasawa
et al. (2013) developed a total of 5,751 SSR primer pairs
from 118,060 publicly available EST sequences of C.
annuum. Nucleotide sequences spanning 2,245 SSRs of C.
annuum markers were successfully mapped onto the
tomato genome, and 96 of these, which spanned the entire
tomato genome, were selected for further analysis. Out of
77 SSRs, 60 produced specific DNA amplicons and were
polymorphic among the 192 Capsicum lines examined.
Sugita et al. (2005) developed non-redundant 2- or 3-base
SSR markers from enriched C. annuum genomic libraries
and from C. annuum cDNA sequences in public databases.
The group obtained 1,736 genomic SSR markers and 1,344
cDNA-derived SSR markers from 6,528 clones and 13,003
sequences, respectively.
Recent advances in high-throughput genomics technol-
ogies such as NGS technologies have opened up new
opportunities to combine conventional breeding through
marker trait association/QTL mapping with the develop-
ment of large-scale genome and transcriptome sequences.
In Capsicum, recently, a few studies adopted transcriptome
sequencing to identify genes that are involved in different
developmental and metabolic biosynthesis pathways.
Go
´ngora-Castillo et al. (2012) sequenced C. annuum
transcriptomes from different tissues and assembled a total
of 32,314 high-quality contigs from 1,324,516 raw reads
and developed a Capsicum transcriptome database (DB,
http://www.bioingenios.ira.cinvestav.mx:81/Joomla/). Nic-
olaı
¨et al. (2012) sequenced the C. annuum cv. ‘Yolo
Wonder’ transcriptome using Roche 454 pyrosequencing
and assembled de novo 23,748 contigs and 60,370 single-
tons. Further they mapped 10,886,425 sequence reads
obtained by the Illumina GA II sequencing of C. annuum
cv. ‘Criollo de Morelos 334’ to the ‘Yolo Wonder’ tran-
scriptome and identified a total of 11,849 reliable SNPs
spread across 5,919 contigs besides detecting a total of 853
single sequence repeats.
Lu et al. (2012) recently reported the transcriptome
analysis of red pepper (Capsicum annuum L. TF68) using
454 GS-FLX pyrosequencing. Approximately 30.63
megabases (Mb) of EST data with a total of 9,818 contigs
and 23,712 singletons with an average length of 375 base
pairs (bp) were obtained. All unigenes showed approxi-
mately equal distribution on chromosomes when aligned
with tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) pseudomolecules.
Furthermore, 1,536 high quality single nucleotide dis-
crepancies were discovered using the Bukang mature fruit
cDNA collection as a reference. A total of 758 SSR motifs
were mined from 614 contigs, from which 572 primer sets
were designed. The SSR motifs corresponded to di- and tri-
nucleotide motifs (27.03 and 61.92 %, respectively). De
novo transcriptome assembly in C. frutescens has been
reported by Liu et al. (2013). The group obtained a total
54,045 high-quality unigenes. Ashrafi et al. (2012)
sequenced the transcriptome of three pepper genotypes,
namely Maor, Early Jalapen
˜o and Criollo de Morelos-334
(CM334) using NGS technology. They assembled two
reference pepper transcriptomes separately. The first
assembly of 31,196 contigs was made using 125,000 San-
ger-EST sequences mainly derived from a Korean F1-
hybrid line, Bukang, wherefrom overlapping probes were
designed to construct a pepper Affymetrix GeneChip
Ò
microarray. They identified a total of 4,236 SNPs and 2,489
SSRs from the assembly. The second transcriptome
assembly was constructed based on more than 200 million
Illumina Genome Analyzer II reads and about 22,000 high-
quality putative SNPs, and 10,398 SSR markers were
identified within the Illumina transcriptome assembly.
Hill et al. (2013) developed the Pepper GeneChip array
from Affymetrix for polymorphism detection and expres-
sion analysis in Capsicum. Probes on the array were
designed from 30,815 unigenes assembled from ESTs.
Hybridization of genomic DNA from 40 diverse C. annu-
um lines and few lines from other cultivated species (C.
frutescens,C. chinense and C. pubescens) detected 33,401
SPP markers within 13,323 unigenes. Among the C. ann-
uum lines, 6,426 SPPs covering 3,818 unigenes were
identified. An estimated threefold reduction in diversity
was detected in non-pungent lines to the pungent lines
besides an observation of 8.7 cM region without poly-
morphism around the Pun1 in non- pungent C. annuum.
This suggests that non pungent traits in different pepper
genotypes might have originated from the same source.
Genetic maps: dissecting Capsicum genome
for translational research
The development of molecular markers in the late 1980s
helped to identify the genomic region harboring important
Plant Biotechnol Rep
123
traits loci and thereby created a foundation for transla-
tional research in crop plants (Tanksley et al. 1988). As a
result, in Capsicum species also several genetic maps
have been constructed and published in the past 20 years
(reviewed by Kumar et al. 2011). The first genetic map in
pepper with 85 RFLP markers was constructed using an
inter-specific cross by Tanksley et al. (1988). Shortly,
thereafter using anonymous markers such as genomic
DNA based restriction fragment length polymorphic
(RFLPs), Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AF-
LPs), Random amplified length polymorphic DNA
(RAPD) and isozyme markers, many intra-specific or
inter-specific pepper genetic maps based on F2, RIL,
doubled haploid or backcross mapping populations were
developed (Livingstone et al. 1999; Kang et al. 2001; Rao
et al. 2003; Lee et al. 2004; Ben-Chaim et al. 2006). The
most comprehensive pepper–tomato comparative map
using AFLP, RFLP and RAPD markers was constructed
by Livingstone et al. (1999). The group reported a genetic
map of Capsicum (pepper) from an interspecific F
2
pop-
ulation consisting of 11 large (76.2–192.3 cM) and two
small (19.1 and 12.5 cM) linkage groups (LGs) that
covered a total of 1,245.7 cM. Ben-Chaim et al. (2006)
used a total of 728 molecular markers including 489
SSRs, 195 AFLP, eight specific PCR-based and 36 RFLP
markers to construct a genetic map in an F
2
population of
C. annuum (NuMex RNaky) 9C. frutescens cross. This
linkage maps includes candidate genes, pAMT,COMT
and Bcat genes that are involved in a proposed model of
capsaicinoid biosynthesis pathway (Blum et al. 2003;
Stewart et al. 2005). The map consists of 12 major and
four small LGs with a total length of 1,358.7 cM. In
addition to these inter-specific maps, several intra-specific
C. annuum maps have been reported.
An integrated molecular linkage map of pepper (C.
annuum L.) was constructed by aligning three intra-
specific linkage maps of C. annuum L. (Lefebvre et al.
2002). The individual maps varied from 685 to
1,668 cM with 16 to 20 LGs. Lee et al. (2009)con-
structed an integrated pepper map using RFLP, SSR,
CAPS, AFLP, WRKY, rRAMP and BAC end sequence-
derived markers. They developed 132 new PCR-based
markers (57 STS from BAC end sequences, 13 STS
from RFLP, and 62 SSRs). This integrated map con-
tained 169 SSR, 354 RFLP, 23 STS from BAC end
sequences, six STS from RFLP, 152 AFLP, 51 WRKY
and 99 rRAMP markers on 12 chromosomes. This
constructed integrated map consisted of 805 markers
(map distance of 1,858 cM) in interspecific populations
and 745 markers (map distance of 1,892 cM) in intra-
specific populations. Lee et al. (2004) developed a
linkage map which contains 46 SSR markers. An inte-
grated genetic map of pepper by combining six indi-
vidual maps was constructed with a total of 2262
marker loci (1528 AFLP, 440 RFLP, 288 RAPD and
known gene sequences, isozymes and morphological
markers). The map covered a total distance of 1832 cM
of capsicum genome (Paran et al. 2004). Minamiyama
et al. (2005) developed 626 unique SSR markers for
Capsicum species by constructing four SSR-enriched
genomic DNA libraries from C. annuum.Theydevel-
oped a pepper genetic linkage map containing 374
markers, including 106 new SSR markers distributed in
13 LGs which covered 1,042 cM of the pepper genome.
Yi et al. (2006) mapped 150 EST SSRs in a population
derived from C. annuum ‘TF68’ and C. chinense ‘Haban-
ero’ in the previously generated pepper linkage map of
inter-specific cross TF68 9Habanero. Some 139 ESTS-
SRs were located on the linkage map, in addition to 41
previous SSRs and 63 RFLP markers, forming 14 LGs and
spanning 2,201.5 cM. Portis et al. (2007) screened a total
of total of 204 EST SSRs for polymorphism between four
C. annuum inbred lines and one C. frutescens accession
parental lines used for developing mapping population. Wu
et al. (2009a) developed first comprehensive pepper genetic
map that contain a total of 587 conserved orthologous set II
markers (COSII) of which 299 were orthologous markers
between the pepper and tomato genomes in 12 LGs of
pepper. Based on synteny analysis between tomato and
pepper, they found that the two genomes shared 35 con-
served syntenic segments (CSSs) within which gene/mar-
ker order is well preserved.
Lu et al. (2012) through comparative transcriptomics
developed 41 SNP markers and integrated those markers
by mapping in previous genetic map of red pepper C.
annuum. Their new map contained a total of 458 molec-
ular markers. Sugita et al. (2013) mapped 597 markers,
including 265 of the newly developed EST SSR markers
by using doubled haploid (DH) lines derived from cross-
ing between two contrasting C. annuum lines. The map,
designated as the KL-DH map, covered a total distance of
2,028 cM pepper genome in 12 LGs. A linkage map of
pepper using a DH population derived from a cross
between two C. annuum genotypes, a bell-type cultivar
‘California Wonder’ and a Malaysian small-fruited culti-
var ‘LS2341’ has been reported by Mimura et al. (2012).
A total of 253 markers (151 SSRs, 90 AFLPs, 10 CAPSs
and two sequence-tagged sites) were mapped, spanning
1,336 cM of the Capsicum genome. This is the first SSR-
based map to consist of 12 LGs, corresponding to the
haploid chromosome number in an intraspecific cross of
C. annuum.
Plant Biotechnol Rep
123
Candidate genes and QTL mapping: finding genetic loci
governing economically important traits
for translational research
The development of molecular markers and genetic maps
help to dissect capsicum genome into many parts and
associate with the economically important traits by QTL
mapping or using the Candidate gene approach. Several
researchers reported mapping and identification of many
QTL/candidate genes in peppers for fruit size, shape and
color, male sterility system and fertility restorer genes and
metabolites such as pungency and disease resistances. Of
the many reported, only few listed in Table 1could be
applied in pepper translational research as they were shown
directly associating with the trait of interest.
Fruit traits
Capsicum species show a large variation in fruit traits such
as fruit size and shape, texture and chemical composition
(Fig. 1). QTL-mapping studies have identified several loci
that control fruit size and shape in pepper (Ben-Chaim
et al. 2001; Rao et al. 2003; Zygier et al. 2005; Barchi et al.
2009; Borovsky and Paran 2011; Tsaballa et al. 2011).
Ben-Chaim et al. (2001) did QTL analysis for 14 traits
including fruit traits in an F
3
population derived from a
cross between two C. annuum genotypes, the bell-type
cultivar Maor and the Indian small-fruited line Perennial. A
total of 55 QTL were detected which included 5, 4, 4, 3, 4,
4 and 6 QTL for fruit weight, fruit diameter, fruit length,
fruit shape, pericarp thickness and 6 for soluble solid
concentration, respectively. The fruit shape QTL detected
on chromosome 3 was a major QTL that explained around
60 % of phenotypic variation. Ben-Chaim et al. (2003a)
mapped an anthocyanin QTL and a major fruit shape QTL
fs10.1on chromosome 10, using a population derived from
C. annum and C. chinense. Rao et al. (2003) studied 10
yield-related traits that included fruit weight, size, shape
and seed weight in BC
2
and BC
2
S
1
generations derived by
a crossing between the cultivated species C. annuum cv.
Maor and the wild C. frutescens BG 2816 accession. A
total of 58 QTLs were detected. Two QTL for yield were
detected, of which one (yld8.1) was also associated with
fruit weight and the other (yld1.1) with flowering and fruit
setting. The major QTL affecting fruit shape was fs3.1. The
same QTL was previously found to be the major QTL
affecting fruit shape in C. annuum which accounted for
more than 60 % of the phenotypic variation (Ben-Chaim
et al. 2001). Zygier et al. (2005) mapped fruit size and
shape QTL using two populations derived from interspe-
cific cross between C. chinense and C. frutescence on
chromosome 2 and chromosome 4. They detected a major
QTL fw2.1 for fruit weight that explained 62 % of phe-
notypic variation on chromosome 2 which was co-mapped
with a minor fruit-shape QTL, fs2.1, and two fruit weight
QTL fw4.1 and fw4.2 on chromosome 4. Major QTL fw2.1
and fw4.2 for fruit-weight QTL were also detected in other
Capsicum mapping populations for fruit-size variations.
Barchi et al. (2009) mapped a total of 76 QTL for 13
traits that included plant morphology and fruit traits. Of the
many QTL reported, only fs10.1 for fruit elongation loca-
ted on chromosome 10 was characterized, which can be
used in breeding programs. Lee et al. (2008) developed
CAPs markers tightly linked to the pendant and erect
fruiting habit of Capsicum. Through a genetics study in F
1
and BC
1
of a cross between erect and pendant types, they
showed that the erect fruiting habit was recessive to the
pendant habit. Further analysis in natural germplasm with
erect versus pendant gave the expected result suggesting
that these markers could be used for marker-assisted
breeding of this trait.
Tsaballa et al. (2011) successfully cloned and charac-
terized Ovate-like genes (designated as CaOvate) from two
pepper cultivars of different fruit shape, cv. ‘Mytilini
Round’ and cv. ‘Piperaki Long’. The CaOvate encodes a
335 amino-acid polypeptide, shares 63 % identity with the
tomato OVATE protein encoding gene and exhibits high
similarity with OVATE sequences from other Solanaceae
species. Analysis showed no significant structural differ-
ences but observed that expression of CaOvate followed a
different developmental profile between the two cultivars,
being higher in cv. ‘Round’. Furthermore, down-regulation
of CaOvate through VIGS in cv. ‘Round’ showed its fruit
had a more oblong form, indicating that CaOvate is
involved in determining fruit shape in pepper. Borovsky
and Paran (2011) constructed near-isogenic lines for fs10.1
and mapped it in a BC
4
F
2
population. In this population,
fs10.1 segregated as a Mendelian locus and mapped 0.3 cM
away from the closest molecular marker. They further
verified the effect of fs10.1 in an F
2
population from an
independent cross between elongated and conical-fruited
parents. Fruit shape mutation was mapped to the fs10.1
region and was determined to be allelic to the QTL. By
measuring the fruit shape of near-isogenic lines for fs10.1
during fruit development, they found that the shape of the
fruit was determined primarily in the first 2 weeks after
anthesis. Lu et al. (2012) detected 23 QTL for 11 traits
which included QTL for Phytophthora resistances in C.
annum. Recently, QTL analyses for plant architectural,
phenological, and fruit traits in a pepper mapping popula-
tion consisting of 92 recombinant inbred lines derived from
a cross between C. frutescens acc. 2814-6 and C. annuum
var. NuMexRNAKY were done and identified a total of 96
QTL for 38 traits, including 12 QTL associated with
capsaicinoid levels (Yarnes et al. 2013).
Plant Biotechnol Rep
123
Table 1 Identified QTL/genes which could be used in Capsicum translational research
Cross/species QTL/gene Trait References
Capsicum sp. fs10.1 Fruit elongation Barchi et al. (2009)
C. annuum CaOvate Fruit shape Tsaballa et al. (2011)
PI 152225 (C. chinense)x
Kelvin, 4751 (C. annuum)
cl,c2,yFruit color Popovsky and Paran (2000)
Capsicum sp. Phytoene synthase (PSy), phytoene
desaturase and capsanthin,
capsorubin synthase (Ccs) genes,
LcyB,CrtZ-2
Fruit color Ha et al. (2007), Rodriguez-Uribe
et al. (2012)
Capsicum sp. Pal,Ca4h,Comt, 3-ketoacyl-ACP
synthase (Kas), putative
aminotransferase (pAmt), Acl,Fat,
SB2-149 and SB1-158 clones
(similarity to pAmt and Kas). SB2-
66, SB2-115, SB2-115
Capsaicinoid biosynthesis Curry et al. (1999), Kim et al.
(2001), Aluru et al. (2003)
NMCA 30036 (C. chinense) Pun 1 (locus C), At3 Capsaicinoid biosynthesis Blum et al. (2002)
Capsicum sp. pun1
2
Capsaicinoid biosynthesis Stewart et al. (2007)
C. annuum CaMF2 Pollen development Chen et al. (2011)
C. annuum Methionine sulfoxide reductase (B2) Plant defense Oh et al. (2010)
C. annuum Ipcr Resistance to P. capsici Reeves et al. (2013)
C. annuum cv ‘Bukang’ Cmr1 (cucumber mosaic resistance 1) Resistance to CMV Kang et al. (2010)
C. annuum CaBtf3 Defense-related genes Huh et al. (2012b)
C. annuum CaWRKYb Resistance gene Lim et al. (2011)
C. annuum and C. chinense Phyto.5.2 P. capsici resistance Quirin et al. (2005)
C. annuum L. CaMi Nematode-resistant gene Chen et al. (2007)
Capsicum sp. Pcpme 1–9 Pme genes Li et al. (2011)
CM33 (C. annuum) CaRGA2 P. capsici resistance Zhang et al. (2013)
Capsicum sp. caWRKY40 Resistance to R. solanacearum Dang et al. (2013)
Capsicum sp. Bs1,Bs4,bs5,bs6,gdr Resistance to Xanthomonas
campestris pv. vesicatoria
Jones et al. (2002,2004), Csillery
et al. (2004)
C. annuum CaPO2 Defense against Xanthomonas
campestris pv. vesicatoria
Choi et al. (2007)
C. annuum CaMLO2 Mildew resistance locus O gene Kim and Hwang (2012)
Capsicum sp. pvr1,pvr21,pvr22,pvr3,pvr4,pvr5,
pvr6,Pvr7
Resistance genes Caranta et al. (1996), Kyle and
Palloix (1997), Grube et al.
(2000)
C. annuum cv ‘Bukang’ Cmr1 Resistance gene Kang et al. (2010)
C. chinense Tsw. Resistance gene Moury et al. (2000)
Capsicum sp. L1,L3,L4 Resistance gene Lefebvre et al. (1995), Ben-Chaim
et al. (2001), Matsunaga et al.
(2003), Tomita et al. (2008)
C. annuum CaWRKYb,CaPR-10,CaPR-1,
CaPR-5
Reduce resistance pathogenesis-
related gene
Lim et al. (2011)
C. annuum Me4,Mech1,Mech2 Root-knot nematode resistance
gene
Djian-Caporalino et al. (2001,
2007)
C. annuum CaSD1 Senescence-delaying Seo et al. (2013)
C. annuum CaMsrB2 Methionine sulfoxide reductase
B2 gene
Oh et al. (2010)
C. annuum orf456 Cytoplasmic male sterility Kim et al. (2007)
C. annuum PmsM1-CAPS Genetic male sterility Lee et al. (2010a)
C. annuum ms1,ms3 Genetic male sterility Lee et al. (2010b,c)
Plant Biotechnol Rep
123
Fruit colors
The white, yellow, orange, red and chocolate color of
Capsicum fruits depends on the intensity and amount of
accumulation of carotenoids pigments and xanthophylls
produced during ripening. More than 30 different pigments
have been identified in the pepper fruits (Bosland and
Votava 2000). The red chili and paprika carotenoids used
by the food industry as natural red colorants also have
immense nutritional value as it contains provitamin A and
antioxidant properties. Improvement of Capsicum for
carotenoid and nutrient content is the goal of several
breeding. Three independent loci have been reported to
control the mature pepper fruit (cl,c2 and y) in different
allelic combination, that is, dominant alleles at these three
loci results in red compared to white color when all alleles
are recessive (Hurtado-Hernandez and Smith 1985).
Genetic linkage analyses showed that c2 and yloci corre-
spond to genes that encode phytoene synthase (Psy) and
capsanthin–capsorubin synthase (Ccs), respectively (Le-
febvre et al. 1998; Popovsky and Paran 2000; Thorup et al.
2000; Huh et al. 2001). The deletion of the Ccs gene is
reported to cause yellow and orange fruit color (Lefebvre
et al. 1998; Lang et al. 2004). Kim et al. (2010b) reported
that a splicing mutation in the gene encoding Psy causes
orange coloration in Habanero pepper fruits.
To further understand the pigmentation process and the
expression of those three genes in different fruit color
capsicum genotypes, Ha et al. (2007) analyzed the levels
and composition of carotenoid accumulation in seven dif-
ferently colored (fully ripe) capsicum varieties at different
stages of ripening and correlated with the expression pat-
terns of the carotenoid biosynthetic genes. They observed
that red peppers accumulate increasing levels of total
carotenoids during ripening compared to non-red peppers.
The gene involved in the carotenoid biosynthesis pathway,
PSy, phytoene desaturase, and Ccs were highly expressed
in peppers with high levels of total carotenoids, whereas
one or two of these genes were not expressed in peppers
with lower levels of total carotenoids. Two structural
mutations in the Ccs gene were observed in two yellow
pepper varieties expressing this gene, suggesting that either
a premature stop codon or a frame-shift mutation might be
the cause for creating yellow phenotypes rather than
deletion of the gene itself.
Rodriguez-Uribe et al. (2012) again did a correlation
analysis of the carotenoid composition and transcript
abundances of four carotenogenic enzymes, Psy,LcyB,
CrtZ-2and Ccs, in seven orange-colored C. annuum cul-
tivars. In the cultivar ‘Fogo’, with premature termination
mutation in the ccs-3 allele, they could not observe the Ccs
protein although the transcript of this gene was found,
Fig. 1 Variability in the fruit morphology of different Capsicum species
Plant Biotechnol Rep
123
thereby preventing the synthesis of capsanthin and cap-
sorubin forms of carotenoids. In ‘Orange Grande’ and
‘Oriole’, both orange-colored cultivars, no red pigments
and Ccs transcript was detected although wild-type alleles
of all four carotenoids biosynthesis genes were there.
While the Ccs protein was not observed in ‘Canary’ cul-
tivar, the transcripts for all four of the wild-type alleles
were detected due to which no red carotenoids were syn-
thesized. This observation suggests that there might be a
non-structural gene which controls color development in
Capsicum fruits.
Apart from carotenoids, anthocyanin also controls pep-
per color and is found to be governed by the incompletely
dominant gene A. Ben-Chaim et al. (2003b) mapped the A
locus onto pepper chromosome 10 in a C. annuum
(5226) 9C. chinense (PI 159234) F
2
population. An
additional locus Fc, for the purple anther filament in an F
2
population from a cross of IL 579, a C. chinense intro-
gression line and its recurrent parent 100/63, was at the
same position as A. These two anthocyanin loci were found
to be linked to a major quantitative trait locus, fs10.1, for
fruit-shape index.
Pungency trait
Pungency, an economically important quality trait in pep-
per fruits, have been studied by many researchers. This trait
is due to the presence of capsaicinoid complex of which
capsaicin followed by dihydrocapsaicin are two major
components. Capsaicin is an amide derivative of vanillyl-
amine and 8-methylnon-trans-6-enoic acid (Bennett and
Kirby 1968). The capsaicin biosynthetic pathway is rela-
tively well characterized. Capsaicin biosynthesis in plants
is defined by two pathways: phenylpropanoid (which
determines phenolic structure) and fatty acid metabolism
(which determines the molecule’s fatty acids; Ochoa-Alejo
and Go
´mez-Peralta 1993). The vanillylamine moiety of
capsaicinoids is derived from phenylalanine and synthe-
sized by the shikimate/arogenate pathway; whereas the
branched fatty acid moiety is derived from valine (Dı
´az
et al. 2004; Fig. 1). It is usually assumed that the vanil-
lylamine moiety is synthesized via the phenylpropanoid
pathway. The phenylpropanoid origin of the vanillylamine
moiety has been supported in the case of Capsicum species,
wherein transcript accumulation has been reported for the
genes Pal,Ca4h and Comt, corresponding to the phenyl-
propanoid pathway (Curry et al. 1999). So far, the most
elusive point in the pathway is capsaicinoid synthase,
which catalyzes the final condensation of vanillylamine
and the branched-chain fatty acid. Curry et al. (1999) iso-
lated Pal,Ca4hand Comt genes from a cDNA library of
Habanero (C.chinense) placenta. The transcript levels of
these three genes were studied throughout development in
six cultivars differing in pungency in fruit tissues and
found that the abundance of transcripts were positively
correlated with the degree of pungency in placental tissues.
Habanero, the most pungent chile fruit, had the highest
transcript levels, CalWonder, a non-pungent fruit, had the
lowest levels. By using tissue-specific expression analysis
in fruits, it was also found that both the 3-ketoacyl-ACP
synthase (Kas) and the putative aminotransferase (pAmt)
sequences were only expressed at significant levels in
placental tissues, where the capsaicinoids were synthe-
sized. Kim et al. (2001) generated a cDNA subtractive
library from C. chinense cv. Habanero utilizing placental
tissues. The group reported that SB2-149 and SB1-158
clones showed a high similarity to the pAmt and Kas genes.
Similarly, the SB2-66 and SB2-115 clones were also
thought to be involved in capsaicinoid biosynthesis.
Aluru et al. (2003) carried out a differential screen of a
Habanero (C. chinense) placenta cDNA library and char-
acterized three candidate genes: Kas,Acl and Fat. Tran-
scription of these three genes was found to be placental-
specific and RNA abundance was positively correlated with
degree of pungency. Kas and Acl were mapped to linkage
group 1 and Fat to linkage group 6. None of the genes was
linked to the pungency locus, C, on linkage group 2. Kas
accumulation was positively correlated with pungency.
Soon after, Stewart et al. (2005) found that the SB2-66
clone, previously isolated by Kim et al. (2001), co-segre-
gated with the pungency trait, and it was mapped to a locus
in close proximity to Pun 1 (locus C), which modifies the
pungency level (Blum et al. 2002). Using genome walking,
the SB2-66 genomic DNA was isolated and compared with
certain sequences from pungent and non-pungent chili
peppers, showing that sequences from non pungent fruits
have a 2.5-kb deletion, encompassing part of the putative
promoter and the first exon. That allele was named pun1,
and because the SB2-66 clone has acyltransferase domains
and labeled as At3. In order to demonstrate that At3 was
related to capsaicinoid production, virus-induced gene
silencing (VIGS) was done to silence the At3 gene. Lee
et al. (2005) also observed perfect co-segregation of
capsaicinoid synthetase (CS) gene with the C locus. The
sequence analysis from four pungent and four non-pungent
pepper lines revealed that the non-pungent peppers had a
2529 bp-deletion in the 50upstream region of CS gene.
They developed four SCAR markers which could be used
for early detection of non-pungent individuals in breeding
programs.
Quantitative trait loci analysis in a F
3
population derived
from an inter-specific cross between a mildly pungent C.
annuum ‘NuMex RNaky’ and the wild, highly pungent C.
frutescens accession BG2814-6 detected a total of six QTL
for three capsaicinoids: capsaicin, dihydrocapsaicin and
Plant Biotechnol Rep
123
nordihydrocapsaicin (Blum et al. 2003). Co-localization of
capsaicinoid biosynthetic pathway genes involved in valine
catabolism, BCAT and 3A2 were found with the detected
QTL for capsaicinoid on chromosomes 3 (cap3.1) and 4
(cap4.1), respectively. Stewart et al. (2007) analyzed the
At3 gene in a non-pungent C. chinense NMCA 30036 chili
pepper. The At3 gene sequence revealed a 4-bp deletion in
the first exon, and this allele was named pun
2
. Due to that
deletion, the AT3 protein was not detected in NMCA 30036
fruits, but low levels of the transcript were detected in 20
and 50 DPA chili pepper fruits.
The more illustrated and updated capsaicinoid bio-
synthesis pathway has been described, where more than
30 putative genes have been placed in the capsaicinoid
biosynthetic pathway (Mazourek et al. 2009;Aza-Gon-
za
´lez et al. 2011). Mazourek et al. (2009) developed a
comprehensive model indicating specific genes in the
capsaicinoid biosynthesis pathway, which is made pub-
licly available within the SolCyc database at the SGN
(http://www.sgn.cornell.edu). Recently, Yarnes et al.
(2013) mapped 12 QTL for capsaicinoids content in
recombinant inbred lines derived from a cross between
Capsicum frutescens acc. 2814-6 and C. annuum var.
NuMexRNAKY.
Male sterility
Male sterility is an important trait required for pepper
hybrid breeding. Identification of stable sterile lines and
fertility restorer genes is important requisite for hybrid
breeding. Wang et al. (2004) performed QTL analysis of
fertility restoration based on the test-cross progeny of
77013A (cytoplasmic-genetic male sterile line) and a
doubled haploid population derived from Yolo wonder
(sterility maintainer line) and Perennial line (a fertility-
restorer line). One major QTL, accounting for 20–69 % of
the phenotypic variation for fertility restoration was map-
ped to chromosome P6. Four additional minor QTL were
also detected on chromosomes P5 and P2 and LGs PY3 and
PY1, explaining about 7–17 % of the phenotypic variation.
SCAR markers for early identification of cytoplasmic male
sterility (CMS) genotype in C. annuum L. were reported by
Kim and Kim (2005). Two CMS-specific SCAR markers
were developed to distinguish N-cytoplasm from S-cyto-
plasm. A novel ORF, termed orf456, was found at the 30
end of the coxll gene which might represent a strong can-
didate gene from among the many CMS-associated mito-
chondrial genes for determining the male-sterile phenotype
of CMS in chili pepper (Kim et al. 2007).
CMS in chili pepper is restored by one major dominant
nuclear gene, restorer of fertility (Rf), together with some
modifier genes and is also affected by temperature (Lee
et al. 2008). Lee et al. (2010a) developed a co dominant
cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS) marker
named PmsM1-CAPS, tightly linked to genetic male ste-
rility (GMS) in paprika and colored pepper, using bulked
segregant analysis (BSA) which could be applied in
Paprika breeding for a GMS system. Further, they devel-
oped a co-dominant SCAR marker and three AFLP
markers which were later converted to CAPS markers
linked to the genic male sterility genes ms1 and ms3,
respectively, in peppers (Lee et al. 2010b,c). Chen et al.
(2011), through a cDNA-AFLP analysis in the genic male
sterile–fertile line 114AB of C. annuum L., identified a
transcript-derived fragment (TDF) which specifically
accumulated in the flower buds of the fertile line but not in
the sterile line. The identified anther-specific gene named
as capsicum male fertile 2 (CaMF2) encodes a lipid
transfer protein with 94 amino acids and VIGS of this gene
showed low pollen germination ability and shrivelled pol-
len grains, suggesting a vital role of CaMF2 in the pollen
development of C. annuum. Ma et al. (2013) studied the
efficiency of maintaining and restoring CMS systems in
pepper (C. annuum L.). An Rf-linked molecular marker
was employed to analyze the interaction between six CMS
lines (A), five maintainers (B) and six restorers (C). They
observed that the six restorers had diverse restoring abili-
ties in individual CMS lines and concluded that the
restorers 208C and 207C can transmit the Rf gene or the Rf-
linked marker to F
1
hybrids.
Trichomes
Trichomes, which are found in most land plants, are known
for protecting against insect herbivores, drought and UV
radiation. The trichome-bearing phenotype is conferred by
the dominant allele of the pepper trichome locus 1 (Ptl1)in
C. annuum. Kim et al. (2010a) fine-mapped the trichomes
trait in Capsicum annuum in an F
2
population derived from
a cross involving CM334 (with trichome) and Chilsungcho
varieties. The trichome locus Ptl1 region screened in BAC
libraries and found in one 80 kb BAC clone, TT1B7, which
further was found to co-localize in chromosome 10 by
fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Two closely
linked markers, one co-dominant (Tco) and one dominant
(Tsca), were successfully developed from the TT1B7 BAC
sequence that could be used for screening the presence of
this trait in segregating population or for markers assisted
breeding. Further study using F
2
population derived from
the parental lines, that is, C. annuum CM334 (trichome-
bearing and PepMoV resistant) and Chilsungcho (glabrous
and Pep-MoV susceptible) detected two major QTL each
for trichome enhancing (Ptel1 and Ptel2) and pepper mottle
virus resistance QTL (pep1 and Pep2 on LG 24 or
Plant Biotechnol Rep
123
chromosome 10; Kim et al. 2011). While Ptel1 on chro-
mosome 10 (LG24) contributed for stem trichome, Ptel2 on
LG 2 showed major QTL for calyx trichome. Pep1 was co-
mapped within the same genetic interval of Ptel1 in the
R-gene cluster (RGC) for potyvirus resistance including
Pvr4, a locus showing broad spectrum resistance to poty-
viruses, thereby suggesting the high-density trichome on
the pepper main stem can be used as a morphological
marker for potyvirus resistance breeding in peppers. Seo
et al. (2013) recently isolated the secreted protein gene
Capsicum annuum senescence-delaying 1 (CaSD1), the
gene family of which is known for multiple roles in plant
development, metabolism and stress response, and trans-
formed in Nicotiana benthamiana. The transformed plants
leaves resulted in delayed senescence of leaves, increasing
the number of trichomes and enlarging the epidermal cells.
Disease resistance
Phytophthora resistance
Phytophthora capsici Leonian is one of the most destruc-
tive pathogen of peppers which attacks all parts of the
plant, causing symptoms such as root rot, crown rot, stem
lesion, fruit rot, damping-off of seedlings and so on.
(Ristaino 1990; Quirin et al. 2005). Resistant sources for
this pathogen have been identified by many researchers,
such as ‘CM334’ from Mexico, ‘AC2258’, ‘PI201232’ and
‘PI201234’ from Central America, among which ‘CM334’
has found to get the highest resistance level (Bosland and
Lindsey 1991; Ortega et al. 1992; Quirin et al. 2005).
Thabuis et al. (2003) mapped QTL for P. capsici resistance
in three C.annuum populations derived from independent
resistance and susceptible parental lines. Of the 18 QTL
detected, one major loci on chromosome 5 was common in
all the three populations, while another locus was common
to two populations and the remaining were cross-specific.
Transfer of the resistance factors from CM334 into a bell
pepper genetic background was reported by Thabuis et al.
(2003). Quirin et al. (2005) screened a large number of C.
annuum and C. chinense with RAPD markers and found
one RAPD marker OpD04 to be tightly linked to highly
resistant lines. After converting this RAPD marker into
SCAR markers, they mapped into capsicum genome and
observed mapping of these markers to previously reported
P. capsici resistant locus Phyto.5.2 on chromosome 5,
suggesting that the Phyto.5.2 QTL was widely distributed
in highly resistant germplasm. The markers developed
could be used for the rapid selection of highly resistant
genotypes in peppers. Ogundiwin et al. (2005) mapped P.
capsici resistance QTL in two populations, one RIL and
another F
2
, derived from resistant and susceptible parental
crosses. A total of 16 chromosomal intervals containing
single or clusters of resistance QTL for root rot and (or)
foliar blight were detected, thereby indicating a complex
set of genetics involved in resistance to P. capsici. Another
five QTL were detected in the F
2
population that conferred
resistant to root rot.
Kim et al. (2008b) mapped four QTL for root rot and
three QTL for damping off in an intraspecific F
2
population
derived from a cross between Mexican resistant landrace C.
annuum ‘CM334’ and a susceptible Korean landrace C.
annuum ‘Chilsungcho’. They developed one single-nucle-
otide amplified polymorphic marker (SNAP) and two
SSRs, and CAPS markers from BAC clones which could
be used for the selection of genotypes resistant to P. cap-
sici. A pepper (C. annuum) methionine sulfoxide reductase
B2 gene (CaMsrB2) was isolated, and its roles in plant
defense were studied (Oh et al. 2010). Measurement of
ROS levels in CaMsrB2-silenced pepper plants revealed
that suppression of CaMsrB2 increased the production of
ROS, which in turn resulted in the acceleration of cell
death via the accumulation of ROS.
Li et al. (2011) identified nine Pme genes (Pcpme 1–9)
from a genomic library of highly virulent P. capsici strain
SD33 and analyzed the expression pattern of nine genes on
three hosts: pepper, tomato and cucumber using qRT-PCR
during all stages of infection. All nine genes were found to
be differentially expressed in three host species in the
course of P. capsici interaction. The expression levels of
the respective genes increased from 1 to 7 dpi in pepper.
Thus, evidence of Pcpme gene expression in different
plants at a range of time points suggests that the late stages
of infection may represent the most critical time for P.
capsici to successfully express or/and secret PMEs. Reeves
et al. (2013) reported a novel disease resistance inhibitor
gene [inhibitor of P. capsici resistance (Ipcr)], found in the
chile pepper (C. annuum) variety ‘New Mexico Capsicum
Accession 10399’ (NMCA10399), which inhibits resis-
tance to Phytophthora capsici but not to other species of
Phytophthora.
Wang et al. (2013) reported the cloning and isolation of
three polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins (PGIPs) from
peppers which play the role of inhibiting fungal endo-
polygalacturonases (PGs). The three PGIPs were up-regu-
lated at different times following stimulation of the pepper
leaves by P. capsici and abiotic stresses. Silencing of these
genes in peppers showed enhanced activity of susceptibil-
ity to P. capsici while the application of purified recom-
binant proteins individually inhibited the activity of PGs
produced by Alternaria alternata and Colletotrichum ni-
cotianae, respectively. The crude protein from the CaP-
GIP1 transgenic tobacco enhanced resistance to the PG
activity of both fungi and a significant reduction in the
number of infection sites, number and average size of
Plant Biotechnol Rep
123
lesions in the leaves, suggesting that CaPGIPs conferred
defense response and play an important role in a plant’s
resistance to diseases. Zhang et al. (2013) isolated and
characterized a P. capsici resistance gene, CaRGA2, from a
high-resistance pepper (C. annuum, CM334). Quantitative
real-time PCR analysis indicated that CaRGA2 was rapidly
induced by P. capsici evidenced by showing very high and
rapid expression in the resistant line compared to the sus-
ceptible cultivars, and when the gene was silenced, the
resistance level was clearly suppressed, suggesting
involvement of CaRGA2 gene in conferring resistance
against P. capsici.
WRKY proteins are a class of zinc finger-containing
transcription factors (TFs) which are involved in regulating
defence against biotic stresses or tolerance of abiotic
stresses in plants (Rushton et al. 2010). WRKY TFs from
Capsicum species are found to positively and negatively
regulate resistance to bacterial disease caused by Ralstonia
solanacearum, a devastating soil-borne bacterium causing
wilting disease in pepper. Overexpression of C. annum
WRKY 40 (caWRKY40) enhanced resistance to R. solan-
acearum and tolerance to heat shock in tobacco, while
silencing of this gene enhanced susceptibility to R. solan-
acearum and impaired thermotolerance in pepper (Dang
et al. 2013). Further analysis found that CaWRKY40 tran-
scripts was induced by signalling mechanisms mediated by
the stress hormones salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA)
and ethylene (ET). Another gene, CaWRKY58, was shown
to negatively regulate the resistance to R. solanacearum
(Wang et al. 2013). The CaWRKY58-overexpressed
tobacco plants showed enhanced susceptibility coupled
with the decreased expression of hypersensitive response
(HR) and defence-associated genes. In contrast, CaW-
RKY58 silenced pepper plants displayed enhanced resis-
tance to the highly virulent R. solanacearum strain
FJC100301 coupled with the enhanced transcripts of
defence-related pepper genes.
Bacterial and fungal spot diseases
Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria (Xcv) causes the
bacterial spot disease in peppers. A total of six genes, four
dominant (Bs1 to Bs4) and three recessive genes (bs5 and
bs6, gdr) were reported conferring resistance to Xcv (Jones
et al. 2002,2004; Csillery et al. 2004). AFLP markers
tightly linked to Bs2 gene conferring resistance to Xan-
thomonas campestris pv vesicatoria was detected and then
subsequently cloned and expressed in tomato (Tai et al.
1999a,b). The identified Bs2 gene encodes motifs char-
acteristic of the nucleotide binding site leucine-rich repeat
class of resistance genes which controls the hypersensitive
response when transiently expressed in susceptible pepper
and tomato lines, and in a non-host species, Nicotiana
benthamiana. Pierre et al. (2000), using BSA of resistant
and susceptible plants, identified AFLP markers linked to
the Bs3 gene conferring resistance to Xanthomonas cam-
pestris pv. vesicatoria which were converted into locus-
specific PCR-based markers and mapped in a linkage map
with a genetic resolution of 0.13 cM. Vallejos et al. (2010)
identified bs5 and bs6 resistance genes in breeding line
ECW12346 showing resistance to race P6 in C. annuum.
The combined effect of these two genes gave full resistance
to race P6 (indicating a positive epistatic interaction) and
allele-specific PCR primers for bs5 were developed to
facilitate the genetic manipulation of this gene.
C. annuum peroxidase (CaPO2), an extracellular gene,
was isolated from pepper (C. annuum) and their role in
defence against Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria
was studied (Choi et al. 2007). CaPO2-silenced pepper
plants were highly susceptible to Xcv infection and showed
compromised hydrogen peroxide (H
2
O
2
) accumulation and
hypersensitive cell death in leaves. The overexpression of
CaPO2 in Arabidopsis conferred enhanced resistance to
Xcv accompanied by cell death, H
2
O
2
accumulation and
PR gene induction, suggesting involvement of this gene in
ROS generation, both locally and systemically, activation
of cell death and PR gene induction during the defense
response to pathogen invasion.
Another pathogen causing bacterial spot is Colletotri-
chum gloeosporioides. Voorrips et al. (2004) mapped QTL
for resistance to this pathogen using F
2
population derived
from a cross involving resistant parent C. chinense and a
susceptible line C. annuum. One major resistant QTL was
identified for the infection frequency, the true lesion
diameter and the overall lesion diameter for C. gloeospo-
rioides apart from detecting three other small effect QTL
for overall lesion and true lesion diameter. Kim and Hwang
(2012) isolated a pepper (C. annuum) mildew resistance
locus O gene (CaMLO2) which is transcriptionally unreg-
ulated by Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria infec-
tion, salicylic acid and abiotic stresses. Silencing of
CaMLO2 in pepper plants confers enhanced resistance
against virulent Xcv accompanied by a compromised sus-
ceptibility cell-death response and reduced bacterial
growth, as well as an accelerated reactive oxygen species
burst. Pathogen infection induced expression of the sali-
cylic acid-dependent defense marker gene CaPR1 in
CaMLO2-silenced leaves while CaMLO2 over-expression
in Arabidopsis enhances susceptibility to Pseudomonas
syringae pv. Tomato (Pst) and Hyaloperonospora arabid-
opsidis. In contrast, leaves of plants over-expressing
CaMLO2 exhibit a susceptibility cell-death response and
high bacterial growth during virulent Pst infection. This
suggests that CaMLO2 is involved in the susceptibility
cell-death response and bacterial and oomycete prolifera-
tion in pepper and Arabidopsis.
Plant Biotechnol Rep
123
Powdery mildew
This disease caused by Leveillula taurica is important
pathogen in pepper. Lefebvre et al. (2003) mapped pow-
dery mildew resistance QTL in a doubled-haploid popu-
lation derived from crossing ‘H3’ (resistant) and ‘Vania’
(susceptible) by phenotyping in both natural field infection
and artificial inoculation tests. A total of seven genomic
regions including additive QTL and epistatic interactions
were detected, of which two genomic regions were com-
monly detected by both the evaluation methods.
Virus diseases
Viruses, the intracellular obligate pathogens, are important
to study as they damage many cultivated Capsicum species
causing huge loss to the crops. Several resistance gene
sources have been identified against tobacco mosaic virus
(TMV), potyviruses, cucumber mosaic viruses (CMVs) and
so on. Some of the resistances are conferred by the plant’s
HR reaction resulting in cell death of the invading cells,
thereby blocking further multiplication and movement of
the viruses in the resistant phenotypes.
Potyviruses
Peppers are found to be infected by potyviruses such as
potato virus Y (PVY), tobacco etch virus (TEV), pepper
mottle virus, pepper veinal mottle virus and chili veinal
mottle virus (Green and Kim 1991). Although many
resistance genes have been reported, Kyle and Palloix
(1997) re-designated them into six resistance genes,
namely pvr1,pvr2
1
,pvr22,pvr3,pvr4 and pvr5, based on
their chronological order of identification. The first iden-
tified and cloned resistance gene against potyvirus was
pvr2 which was analyzed and mapped on chromosome 4
(Murphy et al. 1998; Kang et al. 2005). This recessive
resistance gene against PVY was later found to be
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E; Ruffel
et al. 2002). This gene codes for 228 amino acid and
sequences of resistant lines was found to differ for two
amino acids from the susceptible lines. Further, they sug-
gested that the interaction between the potyvirus genome-
linked protein (VPg) and eIF4E are important for virus
infectivity, and resistance could be due to incompatibility
between the VPg and eIF4E. Another recessive resistance
gene, pvr6, against potyviruses was mapped on chromo-
some 3 (Caranta et al. 1996). Pvr7, a dominant resistant
gene against the pepper mottle potyvirus (PepMoV) from
C. chinense Jacq. ‘PI159236’ was reported to be tightly
linked to the dominant potyvirus resistance gene Pvr4
(Grube et al. 2000). This gene was mapped in pepper
chromosome 10 using an interspecific pepper map. They
reported the first identified dominant resistance gene clus-
ter of Pvr4,Pvr7 and Tsw [a gene conferring resistance to
tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV)] in Capsicum species.
Caranta et al. (1997b) mapped 11 resistant QTL for two
PVY isolates and two potyvirus E in a doubled-haploid
progeny from the hybrid between the Perennial resistance
line and the susceptible Yolo Wonder line. Upon com-
parison, few QTLs were detected in the vicinity of the pvr2
and pvr6 loci. Caranta et al. (1999) developed CAPS
marker tightly linked to the Pvr4 resistance gene in pepper
which confers a complete resistance to the three pathotypes
of PVY and pepper mottle virus (PepMoV). Arnedo-An-
dres et al. (2002) reported the development of SCAR
markers for Pvr4 from a RAPD marker against resistance
to PVY in pepper (C. annuum L.). Rubio et al. (2008)
developed functional markers based on single nucleotide
polymorphisms (SNPs) at the pvr2-eIF4E locus that confer
resistance to several potyviruses. They claimed that the
developed SNP based markers could be used for marker-
assisted selection of virus-resistant paper genotypes in
breeding programme. It has been reported that double and
simultaneous mutations in translation initiation factors
eIF4E (commonly known as pvr2) and eIF (iso) 4E9
(known as pvr6) are required to prevent pepper veinal
mottle virus infection in pepper (Ruffel et al. 2006; Hwang
et al. 2009; Rubio et al. 2009).
Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) is one of the most
destructive viruses in the Solanaceae family. Caranta et al.
(1997b) first reported mapping three QTL for resistance to
CMV using a DH lines derived from crossing between a
partially CMV-resistant C. annuum perennial line and Yolo
Wonder, a CMV-susceptible C.annuum line. The three
QTL were found explaining together a total of 57 % phe-
notypic variation. They also identified a digenic epistasis
interaction between a locus controlling significant trait
variation and a second locus that by itself had no demon-
strable effect on the trait. Ben-Chaim et al. (2001) mapped
four main effect QTL for resistance to CMV using an
intraspecific C. annuum F
3
mapping population from a
cross involving a susceptible bell type cultivar Maor and
the resistant small-fruited Indian perennial line. Two di-
genic interactions were observed and the QTL controlling
the largest percentage (16–33 %) of the observed pheno-
typic variation (cmv11.1) was found linked with the Llocus
conferring resistance to TMV which was reported by
Pochard et al. (1983). Caranta et al. (2002) mapped QTL
using doubled haploid mapping populations derived by
crossing a partial resistance parent ‘Vania’ and a suscep-
tible line ‘H3’. One major and six minor effects QTL were
found to be associated with the partial resistance to long
distance movement of the CMV viruses. Kang et al. (2010)
showed that the C. annuum cultivar ‘Bukang’ contains a
Plant Biotechnol Rep
123
single dominant resistance gene Cucumber mosaic resis-
tance 1 (Cmr1) against CMV (Korean) and CMV (FNY)
strains. Genetic mapping and FISH analysis revealed that
the Cmr1 gene is located at the centromeric region of LG2,
syntenic to the ToMV resistance locus (Tm-1) in tomatoes.
Three SNP markers, one intron-based marker based on
pepper homolog of Tm-1, and two SNP markers using
tomato and pepper BAC sequences mapped near Cmr1.
Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus
Resistance source of TSWV has been reported in C.
chinense (Moury et al. 2000). The resistance to this virus is
govern by single dominant gene, Tsw. Bulk segregant
analysis using RAPD markers in 153 F
2
individual derived
from crossing between a resistant C. chinense and a sus-
ceptible cultivar detected 4 linked RAPD markers. One
tightly linked RAPD marker was converted into a co-
dominant CAPS. The developed tightly linked CAPS
marker to Tsw was used for marker-assisted selection for
resistance traits. Jahn et al. (2000) also mapped Tsw gene in
distal portion of chromosome 10 in C. annuum. However,
recently naturally occurring resistance-breaking (RB)
TSWV strains have been identified. Analysis confirmed
that S RNA, which encodes both the nucleocapsid protein
(N) and a nonstructural protein (NSs), carries the genetic
determinant responsible for Tsw resistance breakdown
(Margaria et al. 2007). Comparative sequence analysis of
full-length S RNA segments or proteins between the wild
type and RB strains gave indirect evidence that the NSs
protein is the avirulence factor in question. Characteriza-
tion of two RB strains carrying deletions in the NSs protein
showed that NSs is important in maintaining TSWV
infection in newly emerging leaves over time, thereby
giving evidence that local necrotic response is not suffi-
cient for resistance in Capsicum spp. carrying the Tsw
gene. Lovato et al. (2008) showed through over-expression
analysis that N protein of TSWV is associated with the
induction of programmed cell death (PCD) in C.chinense
plants by hypersensitive reaction.
Tobacco Mosaic Virus
Genetic analysis of resistance to TMV was reported to be
governed by several alleles of the L gene. Subsequently
L1 gene showing TMV resistant was mapped in chro-
mosome 11 of C.annuum genome (Lefebvre et al. 1995;
Ben-Chaim et al. 2001). Matsunaga et al. (2003) detected
a RAPD marker linked to the pepper mild mottle virus
(PMMoV) resistant locus (L4) and developed a tightly
linked SCAR marker ‘WA31-1500S’ in Capsicum spe-
cies. Amplification of this SCAR marker in a few geno-
types showed specific bands for both the resistant and
susceptible genotypes which they suggested, could be
used for breeding resistant cultivar for PMMoV. Tomita
et al. (2008) fine-mapped the tobamovirus resistance gene
L3 of C. chinense in a 400-kb region of R-like genes
cluster embedded in highly repetitive sequences. Lim
et al. (2011) isolated C. annuum WRKYb (CaWRKYb)
gene, which is rapidly induced during TMV pathotype P
0
infection in hot pepper. They observed that a CaWRKYb-
knockdown plant showed reduce resistance level by
reduction of the number of hypersensitive response local
lesions upon TMV-P
0
infection and exhibited an accu-
mulation of more TMV through decreased expression of
the C. annum pathogenesis-related genes CaPR-10,
CaPR-1and CaPR-5, suggesting that CaWRKYb plays as
a positive transcription factor in defense-related signal
transduction pathways in hot pepper. Huh et al. (2012b)
analyzed the function of C. annuum basic transcription
factor 3 (CaBtf3) through VIGS and found that CaBtf3
was involved in HR cell death against (TMV-P
0
) infection
by inducing a transcriptional change in defense-related
genes. Huh et al. (2012a) characterized C. annuum
WRKY transcription factor d (CaWRKYd) isolated from a
microarray analysis in TMV-P
0
-infected hot pepper
plants. In their experiment they found that CaWRKYd
transcripts were induced by various hormone treatments
and (TMV-P
0
) inoculation. Silencing of this gene affected
TMV-P
0
-mediated HR cell death and the accumulation of
TMV-P
0
coat protein in local and systemic leaves, which
showed a reduction of expression of some pathogenesis-
related (PR) and HR-related genes, suggesting that this
gene regulates HR cell death. Another gene, WRKY
transcription factor b (CaWRKYb) was found to bind the
CaPR-10 promoter and functions as a positive regulator in
innate immunity upon TMV infection by acting as a
positive transcription factor in defense-related signal
transduction pathways in hot pepper (Lim et al. 2011).
Virus-induced gene silencing is based on the sequence-
specific degradation of RNA. Hernan et al. (2013) reported
a gene silencing vector derived from EuMV-YP, named
pEuMV-YP:DAV1, to silence NPR1 genes in both N.
benthamiana and C. annuum. After silencing, the plants’
viral symptoms increased to levels similar to those seen in
wild-type plants. These results suggest that NPR1 plays a
role in the compatible interactions of EuMV-YP N.
benthamiana and EuMV-C. annum var. anaheim. Bento
et al. (2013) investigated inheritance of resistance to Pep-
per yellow mosaic virus (PepYMV) in progenies derived
from a cross involving C. baccatum var. pendulum acces-
sions UENF 1616 (susceptible) and UENF 1732 (resistant)
lines. Genetic analysis showed that the minimum number
of genes that control resistance was seven, thereby sug-
gesting polygenic and complex inheritance of resistance to
this disease.
Plant Biotechnol Rep
123
Root-knot nematode disease
Meloidogyne species, causing root knot diseases are
important pathogens in many crop plants including Cap-
sicum species. Many genes showing resistance to root-knot
nematodes are reported mainly in C. annuum. Thies and
Fery (2000,2002) reported characterization of nematode
resistance gene N. Genes that were stable at high temper-
ature were reported in three distinct genotypes showing
highly resistant phenotypes plants, namely PI 322719, PI
201234 and CM334. The genes Me4,Mech1 and Mech2
were shown to be specific to certain Meloidogyne species
or populations, whereas Me1,Me3 and Me7 were non-
specific and effective against wide range of root knot
pathogen species (Djian-Caporalino et al. 2001,2007).
Djian-Caporalino et al. (2001) reported mapping of Me
3
and Me
4
resistance genes in a segregating population
derived from the cross of resistant parental line PM687
with a susceptible line and found both genes to be linked
together. Recently the six genes mentioned above were
found to be clustered in the P9 chromosome of pepper.
Through allelism tests and fine mapping using the BSA-
AFLP approach, these genes were reported to be different
but linked to form a resistant gene cluster within a 28 cM
interval of P9 chromosome containing other disease resis-
tance genes. Comparative analysis of this P9 region was
found to be co-linear with chromosome T12 of tomato and
chromosome XII of potato containing four other nematode
resistances, suggesting that these nematode resistance
genes are located in orthologous genomic regions in
Solanaceae (Djian-Caporalino et al. 2007). Chen et al.
(2007) isolated a nematode resistant gene CaMi and
expressed in transgenic tomato plants. Transformed plants
carrying CaMi showed significantly improved resistance
against the root-knot nematodes compared to untrans-
formed susceptible plants by triggering a hypersensitive
response around nematodes infection. Recently, Fazari
et al. (2012) found co-localization of N-gene in the Me-
genes cluster on the P9 chromosome on pepper. Based on
their study, they reported that Nwas mapped at 7 cM from
Me1 and 2 cM from Me3 and N gene was found to be
allelic to Me7 through allelism tests. They developed PCR
based markers tightly linked to Me- and N-genes which
could be very useful for the marker-assisted breeding of
nematode resistance in pepper.
Tissue culture and genetic transformation in Capsicum
translational research
In vitro plant regeneration from cells, tissues and organ
cultures is a fundamental process for plant propagation,
plant breeding and the genetic improvement of plants.
Gunay and Rao (1978) for the first time tested different
hormonal regimes for organogenesis in Capsicum. Coty-
ledon and hypocotyl explants of two C. annuum cultivars
(Pimento and California Wonder) and a hybrid of C.
frutescens (Bharath) were cultured on Murashige and
Skoog (1962) medium containing the auxins, indole-3-
acetic acid (IAA), naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), 2,4-
dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and the cytokinins,
benzyladenine (BA), kinetin (KN), Zeatin (Zea), Zeatin
(Zea), 6-benzyl 9-tetra hydropyrane adenine (SD 8339),
adenine and coconut milk. Several other attempts have
been made on in vitro plant regeneration of the genus
Capsicum through different protocols and morphogenic
pathways (Reddy et al. 2002; Venkataiah et al. 2003;
Anilkumar and Nair 2004; Peddaboina et al. 2006; Khan
et al. 2006; Mezghani et al. 2007). An attempt was made by
us to develop an efficient, simple and promising protocol
for in vitro plantlet regeneration of Naga King Chili
belonging to C. chinense from nodal segments and shoots
tips in MS medium containing 18.16 lM thidiazuron
(TDZ; Kehie et al. 2012a). The number of shoots devel-
oped was nearly twofold more than reported earlier (San-
atombi and Sharma 2008; Fig. 2). This protocol may be
applied for a large-scale propagation of individual geno-
types of this species of chili besides using in conservation.
The production of capsaicinoids, the hot principle of
chili pepper fruits, by cells and callus tissues has been
another area of intense research. The biosynthetic capacity
of in vitro cultured cells and tissues to produce capsaici-
noids has been investigated by different researchers
(Lindsey et al. 1983; Mavituna and Park 1985; Ravishankar
et al. 1998; Salgado-Garciglia and Ochoa-Alejo 1990;
Ochoa-Alejo and Salgado-Garciglia 1992; Sudha and
Ravishankar 2002; Nunez-Palenius and Ochoa-Alejo 2005;
Gutie
´rrez-Carbajal et al. 2010; Kehie et al. 2012b). Cell
suspension cultures and immobilized cells can be adopted
for the production of food additives or pharmaceuticals by
biotransformation processes.
Genetic manipulation is an attractive proposition where
it involves recombination of an efficient cell or tissue
culture regeneration system with recombinant DNA tech-
nology, which would transfer specific genes from other
taxa, or the modified expression of specific native genes
(Kothari et al. 2010). In chili pepper, application of genetic
transformation has been limited due to lack of efficient
transformation. Genetic transformation in chili pepper was
first reported by Liu et al. (1990) employing in vitro
seedling explants co-cultured with the wild tumorigenic
strains A281 and C58 of Agrobacterium tumefaciens and
with a disarmed strain bearing the plasmid pGV 3850. Zhu
et al. (1996) obtained transgenic sweet pepper from
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation using Agrobacte-
rium strain GV311-SE harboring cucumber mosaic
Plant Biotechnol Rep
123
cucumovirus coat protein (cms-cp) gene. Kim et al. (1997)
investigated RNA-mediated resistance to cucumber mosaic
virus in progeny of transgenic plants of hot pepper that
expresses RNA. Several workers have attempted to
transform Capsicum species but with less than 0.1 %
transformation efficiency were obtained (Jayashankar
et al. 1997). A highly efficient genetic transformation
system using pepper cotyledons as explants was estab-
lished by Li et al. (2003). A. tumefaciens strain LBA 4404
with the plasmid pBI 121 was employed for transforma-
tion of pepper. Solı
´s-Ramos et al. (2009) described the
Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of
Habanero chili pepper (C. chinense) with the gene
WUSCHEL from Arabidobsis thaliana under the control
of an estradiol inducible promoter as a means of over-
coming the somatic embryogenesis formation recalcitrance
of this species. Several attempts have been made for
regeneration and genetic transformation of Capsicum
species (Liu et al. 1990; Engler et al. 1993; Lee et al.
1993; Zhu et al. 1996; Kim et al. 1997; Jayashankar et al.
1997; Manoharan et al. 1998; Phillips et al. 2000; Delis
et al. 2005; Sharma et al. 2008). Recently, Gururaj et al.
Fig. 2 Development of an
efficient protocol for
regeneration of C. chinense that
could be used in translational
research. aSeed germination of
C. chinense in MS medium (Bar
1 cm) producing explants.
bMultiple shoots induction
from nodal segments of C.
chinense in MS medium
containing 18.16 lM TDZ after
5 weeks culture (Bar 1 cm).
cElongation and root induction
of regenerated shoots in MS
medium containing 5.70 lM
indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) (Bar
1 cm). dRegenerated hardened
plantlet transferred to earthen
pot (Bar 10 cm). eHardened
plantlet bearing normal fruit in
green house (Bar 10 cm).
fField-grown plantlets bearing
fruits
Plant Biotechnol Rep
123
(2012) reported the functional validation of putative ami-
notransferase gene for vanillylamine biosynthesis in het-
erologous system using Agrobacterium mediated genetic
transformation studies in C. frutescens calli cultures. At
present, apart from Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated
genetic transformations, other methods such as particle
gun bombardment, electroporation, etc. are emerging as
the methods of choice for introduction of agronomically
important genes for quality improvement, regulation of
secondary metabolites, and for engineering biotic and
abiotic stress resistances. Increased production of capsa-
icins, carotenoids and vitamins content through genetic
engineering would help in the maximum use in pharma-
ceutical, nutraceutical and food industry.
Comparative mapping: identifying genes/QTL using
information from related species
To date, the most characterized and well studied species
belonging to the Solanaceae family is tomato. In the early
1990s tomato RFLPs markers were used for the develop-
ment of linkage maps in peppers (Tanksley et al. 1988).
Comparative mapping in several studies reported that,
among plant species belonging to the same family, there is
a macro- and micro-level conservation of gene order and
chromosomal structure, although divergence and fractio-
nations of genomes are observed (Livingstone et al. 1999).
Through comparative mapping of pepper genome with
tomato, several syntenic regions were found apart from
observation of 30 breakpoints between the genome of two
species. Thorup et al. (2000) mapped 10 structural genes
from the pepper carotenoid biosynthetic pathway in C.
annuum 9C. chinense F
2
genetic map anchored in Lyc-
opersicon (tomato). The position of these genes in the
pepper map was compared with the position of those genes
in tomato. Mapping results showed that the color-produc-
ing genes C2 and capsanthin–capsorubin synthase (Ccs)
co-segregated with phytoene synthase and Y, respectively,
on chromosome 6. A comparison of map position between
species showed that Ccs in pepper mapped to a homolo-
gous region containing the Blocus for hyperaccumulation
of b-carotene in tomato; the lycopene b-cyclase gene in
pepper mapped to the corresponding region containing
gene lutescent-2mutation in tomato; and the lycopene
cyclase locus in pepper corresponded to the lycopene
cyclase locus y Del mutation for hyperaccumulation of D-
carotene in tomato. Further, co-mapping of structural genes
and quantitative loci for pepper and tomato fruit color were
observed. Their observations suggested that comparative
analyses using candidate genes from one species could be
used to isolate homologs in related species.
A comparative analysis of 13 genes involved in antho-
cyanin pigmentation was done in pepper, tomato, eggplants
and potato, and found conservation of the anthocyanin
producing gene, an2, among those species, suggesting that
a conserved orthologous regulatory locus might have been
subjected to parallel selection in the domestication of many
solanaceous crops. Zygier et al. (2005) using a pepper
population of introgressed lines from C. chinense and C.
frutescence for chromosomes 2 and 4, mapped QTL for
fruit weight and shape, and compared with the tomato QTL
for those traits. A major fruit-weight QTL fw2.1 in chro-
mosome 2 explaining about 62 % phenotypic variation and
a minor fruit shape QTL fs.1 were syntenic to the tomato
chromosomal region containing fruit-shape gene ovate.In
chromosome 4, two fruit-weight QTL (fw.1 and fw4.2), one
of which co-mapped with a fruit-shape QTL were detected,
suggesting the pleiotropy or close linkage of the genes
controlling fruit size and shape. The mapping of QTL for
traits in the homologous region of pepper and tomato
suggests that the pepper and tomato QTL are orthologous.
Ben-Chaim et al. (2006) by comparative mapping between
tomato and pepper showed the conservation of QTL for
fruit weight, pericarp thickness and fruit shape. One major
fruit weight QTL, fw2.1 in chromosome 2 of pepper, was
syntenic to fw2.1 of tomato and another minor QTL fw2.2
of pepper; and these were syntenic to the major QTL fw2.2
of tomato. For fruit shape, fs8.1 was detected in the
orthologous region in tomato and peppers. Their opinion is
that the difference in the degree of QTL conservation
between pepper and tomato for fruit weight might be due to
convergent domestication which resulted into mutations
and selection at common loci in different species (Zygier
et al. 2005; Ben-Chaim et al. 2006).
Comparative mapping studies using common markers
mapped both in tomato and pepper showed that chromo-
somal region containing disease resistance gene clusters
were syntenic to both the species (Thabuis et al. 2003).
Several disease resistance loci have been found to co-map
in the same pepper genomic region. The resistance locus
for P. capsici, a generalist resistance factor, and the Llocus
conferring resistance to TMV, resistance to CMV, pot-
yviruses and TSWV were reported mapping in the same
chromosomal region of the P11 pepper chromosome
((Lefebvre et al. 1995; Caranta et al. 1997a,b; Moury et al.
2007). This chromosomal region which also contains the
‘generalist’ QTL was claimed to be conserved with the R
gene Pto containing the chromosomal region in tomato
chromosome 5. The synteny between the major P. capsici
resistance loci on pepper chromosome P5 and the QTL
involved in partial resistance to Phytophthora infestans in
potato was reported (Leonards-Schippers et al. 1994;
Sandbrik et al. 2000; Thabuis et al. 2003). Pflieger et al.
Plant Biotechnol Rep
123
(2001) reported, in pepper, a co-localization of this con-
served resistance factor with a defense gene (class III
chitinase). The common generalist resistance on P10 was
mapped in the vicinity of R gene ‘cluster’ where two
potyvirus R genes (Pvr4 and Pvr7) and a TSWV resistance
Tsw gene were mapped (Caranta et al. 1999; Grube et al.
2000; Moury et al. 2000; Lefebvre et al. 2002; Thabuis
et al. 2003). This region is shown to be orthologous to a
region of tomato chromosome 1 containing two R genes
(Cf-1 and Cf-4) conferring specific resistance to Clado-
sporium fulvum (Jones et al. 2002). The Phytophthora
resistance locus was mapped in P2 close to an R gene for
nematode resistance (Me3 linked to CT135; Lefebvre et al.
2002), a putative orthologous region in tomato and potato
harboring R genes conferring resistance to nematodes, Mi3
and Gpa2, respectively (Djian-Caporalino et al. 2001).
The recessive resistance locus pvr2 conferred by the
translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) against the PVY in
pepper (C. annuum) was found to be in syntenic region
with the pot-1 region of tomato that conferred recessive
resistance to PVY and TEV. The eIF4E in tomato co-
mapped in the same genomic region as pot-1 and few
polymorphism between the resistance and susceptible line
gene sequences were observed suggesting that the eIF4E
gene is a key component of recessive resistance to pot-
yviruses which is conserved among Solanaceae species
(Ruffel et al. 2006). The observation of co-localization of
resistance gene clusters suggests that there is conservation
at an intraspecific, interspecific and inter-generic level. It is
believed that the gene clusters observed might have
evolved differently to engender various resistance factors
to unrelated pathogens and within the Solanaceae family to
maintain resistance factors to related pathogens such as
Phytophthora (Thabuis et al. 2003).
The observation of conserved synteny of gene/QTL for
similar traits in Solanaceae species gives an ample
opportunity to use sequence information of extensively
characterized species such as tomato for finding the
orthologous genes from other species. Furthermore, the
recently published draft genome sequences of tomato and
potato (The Potato Genome Sequencing Consortium 2011;
The Tomato Genome Consortium 2012) would be very
helpful for finding orthologous genes governing econom-
ically important traits in pepper, such as fruit traits, disease
resistances and other biochemical traits, as orthologous
genes are found to govern the same traits in those species
(Paran and Van Der Knaap 2007). Comparative mapping
and use of sequence information from related species
would accelerate the development of translational
genomics tools in peppers as none of the genome sequence
of Capsicum species is available at present although the
release of draft genome sequence of C. annuum is expected
soon.
Conclusion: integrated use of conventional breeding
and omics technologies should be adopted
for accelerating pepper translational research
As pepper is an important crop species with various uses
from vegetables to medicine, several advances were made
in finding the genetic loci responsible for important traits
such as pungency, fruit size and shape, resistance to dis-
eases and pests. However, only handfuls of gene/QTL loci
(listed in Table 1) were amenable for incorporation in the
translational research of capsicum species.
Out of approximately 30 or more genes reported by
Mazourek et al. (2009) that are involved in the capsaicinoid
biosynthetic pathway, only Pun1 is found to be directly
associated, suggesting that many more genes need to be
discovered and validated in a large number of genotypes
through association mapping and transformation. Similarly,
only Ovate was shown to be directly involved in fruit shape
recently although many QTL were detected (Tsaballa et al.
2011). The conventional QTL mapping and finding the
gene of interest is time-consuming. Therefore, combination
with modern technologies such as high-throughput low-
cost NGS technologies would be a great help towards
accelerating the development of breeding tools that could
be used in pepper translational genomics (Li et al. 2013).
The soon to be released whole genome sequence of C.
annuum would be helpful in finding genes of interest and
their manipulation in breeding programs (Choi et al. 2013).
The genes/QTL identified are mostly for traits which are
govern by few major genes. Therefore, sequencing of a
large-scale number of transcriptomes from various tissues
and developmental stages of phenotypically distinct
germplasm and their association with the phenotypes to
genotypes would help to develop genome-wide SNP
markers from functional genes. Linkage disequilibrium and
haplotype maps could be created by developing high-den-
sity SSR/SNP linkage maps using already developed
genomics resources and additional transcriptomic
sequencing from a large number of diverse germplasm that
would help in association mapping, besides the identifica-
tion of germplasm containing noble beneficial alleles.
Although pungency and carotenoids are the two exten-
sively studied traits, other metabolites and bioactive com-
pounds including whole metabolomics could be studied
and translational genomics tools could be developed.
Genes and genetic network analysis by combining large-
scale phenotyping and expression analysis coupled with
mapping studies would complement and accelerate the
development of pepper translational research tools. Since
many comparative mapping studies reported the conser-
vation of functional QTL/genes governing similar traits
among Solanaceae, candidate gene information from the
sequenced tomato and potato genomes could be used for
Plant Biotechnol Rep
123
the isolation and manipulation of homologous genes in
pepper.
Acknowledgments This work was supported by the Department of
Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Goverment of
India, in the form of prestigious Ramalingaswami Fellowship cum
Project Grant (No. BT/RLF/Re-entry/46/2011) to Nirala Ramchiary.
References
Aluru MR, Mazourek M, Landry LG, Curry J, Jahn M, O’Connell
MA (2003) Differential expression of fatty acid synthase genes,
Acl, Fat and Kas, in Capsicum fruit. J Exp Bot 54:1655–1664
Anilkumar M, Nair AS (2004) Multiple shoot induction in Capsicum
annuum L. cv. Early California Wonder. Plant Cell Biotech Mol
Biol 5:95–100
Arnedo-Andres MS, Gil-Ortega R, Luis-Arteaga M, Hormaza JI
(2002) Development of RAPD and SCAR markers linked to the
Pvr4 locus for resistance to PVY in pepper (Capsicum annuum
L.). Theor Appl Genet 105:1067–1074
Ashrafi H, Hill T, Stoffel K, Kozik A, Yao J, Chin-Wo SR, Deynze
AV (2012) De novo assembly of the pepper transcriptome
(Capsicum annuum): a benchmark for in silico discovery of
SNPs, SSRs and candidate genes. BMC Genomics 13:571
Aza-Gonza
´lez C, Nunez-Palenius HG, Ochoa-Alejo N (2011)
Molecular biology of capsaicinoid biosynthesis in chili pepper
(Capsicum spp.) Plant Cell Rep 30:695–706
Babu BS, Pandravada SR, Prasad Rao RDVJ, Anitha K, Chakrabarty
SK, Varaprasad KS (2011) Global source of pepper genetic
resources against arthropods, nematodes and pathogens. Crop
Prot 30:389–400
Barchi L, Lefebvre V, Sage-Palloix AM, Lanteri S, Palloix A (2009)
QTL analysis of plant development and fruit traits in pepper and
performance of selective phenotyping. Theor Appl Genet
118:1157–1171
Ben-Chaim A, Grube RC, Lapidot M, Jahn M, Paran I (2001)
Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with resistance
to cucumber mosaic virus in Capsicum annuum. Theor Appl
Genet 102:1213–1220
Ben-Chaim A, Borovsky Y, De Jong W, Paran I (2003a) Linkage of
the A locus for the presence of anthocyanin and fs10.1, a major
fruit-shape QTL in pepper. Theor Appl Genet 106:889–894
Ben-Chaim A, Borovsky Y, Rao GU, Tanyolac B, Paran I (2003b)
fs3.1: a major fruit shape QTL conserved in Capsicum. Genome
46:1–9
Ben-Chaim A, Brodsky Y, Falise M, Mazourek M, Kang BC, Paran I,
Jahn M (2006) QTL analysis for capsaicinoid content in
Capsicum. Theor Appl Genet 113:1481–1490
Bennett DJ, Kirby GW (1968) Constitution and biosynthesis of
capsaicin. J Chem Soc C 442–446
Bento CS, Rodrigues R, Gonc¸alves LS, Oliveira HS, Santos MH,
Pontes MC, Sudre
´CP (2013) Inheritance of resistance to Pepper
yellow mosaic virus in Capsicum baccatum var. pendulum.
Genet Mol Res 12:1074–1082
Blum E, Liu K, Mazourek M, Yoo EY, Jahn M, Paran I (2002)
Molecular mapping of the C locus for presence of pungency in
Capsicum. Genome 45:702–705
Blum E, Mazourek M, O’Connell M, Curry J, Thorup T, Liu K, Jahn
M, Paran I (2003) Molecular mapping of capsaicinoid biosyn-
thesis genes and QTL analysis for capsaicinoid content in
Capsicum. Theor Appl Genet 108:79–86
Borovsky Y, Paran I (2011) Characterization of fs10.1, a major QTL
controlling fruit elongation in Capsicum. Theor Appl Genet
123:657–665
Bosland PW (1996) Capsicums: Innovative uses of an ancient crop.
In: Janick J (ed) Progress in new crops. Ashs Press, Arlington,
pp 479–487
Bosland PW, Lindsey DL (1991) A seedling screen for Phytophthora
root rot of pepper, Capsicum annuum. Plant Dis 75:1048–1050
Bosland PW, Votava EJ (2000) Peppers: vegetable and spice
Capsicums. CABI Publishing, New York
Caranta C, Palloix A, Gebre-Selassie K, Lefebvre V, Moury B,
Daube
`ze AM (1996) A complementation of two genes originat-
ing from susceptible Capsicum annuum lines confers a new and
complete resistance to Pepper veinal mottle virus. Phytopathol-
ogy 86:739–743
Caranta C, Lefebvre V, Palloix A (1997a) Polygenic resistance of
pepper to potyviruses consists of a combination of isolate-
specific and broad-spectrum quantitative trait loci. Mol Plant
Microbe Interact 10:872–878
Caranta C, Palloix A, Lefebvre V, Daube ze AM (1997b) QTLs for a
component of partial resistance to cucumber mosaic virus in
pepper: restriction of virus installation in host cells. Theor Appl
Genet 94: 431–438
Caranta C, Thabuis A, Palloix A (1999) Development of a CAPS
marker for the Pvr4 locus: a tool for pyramiding potyvirus
resistance genes in pepper. Genome 42:1111–1116
Caranta C, Pflieger S, Lefebvre V, Daube
`ze AM, Thabuis A, Palloix
A (2002) QTLs involved in the restriction of cucumber mosaic
virus (CMV) long-distance movement in pepper. Theor Appl
Genet 104:586–591
Chen RG, Li HX, Zhang LY, Zhang JH, Xiao JH, Ye ZB (2007)
CaMi, a root-knot nematode resistance gene from hot pepper
(Capsicum annuum L.) confers nematode resistance in tomato.
Plant Cell Rep 26:895–905
Chen C, Chen G, Hao X, Cao B, Chen Q, Liu S, Lei J (2011) CaMF2,
an anther-specific lipid transfer protein (LTP) gene, affects
pollen development in Capsicum annuum L. Plant Sci
181:439–448
Choi HW, Kim YJ, Lee SC, Hong JK, Hwang BK (2007) Hydrogen
peroxide generation by the pepper extracellular peroxidase
CaPO2 activates local and systemic cell death and defense
response to bacterial pathogens. Plant Physiol 145:890–904
Choi D, Kim S, Park M, Yeom S, Seo E, Cheong KC, Kim YM,
Kang BC, Lee YH (2013) The genome sequence of hot
pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Plant and Animal Genome
Asia 2013, March 17–13, Grand Copthorne Waterfront Hotel,
Singapore
Csillery G, Szarka E, Sardi E, Mityko J, Kapitany J, Nagy B, Szarka J
(2004) The unity of plant defense: Genetics, breeding and
physiology. In: Proceedings of the 12th Eucarpia Meeting on
Genetics and Breeding of Capsicum and Egg-plant, Noordwij-
kerhout, The Netherlands, pp 147–153
Curry J, Aluru M, Mendoza M, Nevarez J, Melendrez M, O’Connell
MA (1999) Transcripts for possible capsaicinoid biosynthetic
genes are differentially accumulated in pungent and non-pungent
Capsicum spp. Plant Sci 148:47–57
Dang FF, Wang YN, Yu L, Eulgem T, Lai Y, Liu ZQ, Wang X, Qiu
AL, Zhang TX, Lin J, Chen YS, Guan DY, Cai HY, Mou SL, He
SL (2013) CaWRKY40, a WRKY protein of pepper, plays an
important role in the regulation of tolerance to heat stress and
resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum infection. Plant, Cell
Environ 36:757–774
Delis M, Garbaczewska G, Niemirowicz-Szczytt K (2005) Differen-
tiation of adventitious buds from Capsicum annuum hypocotyls
after co-culture with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Acta Biol Crac
17:193–198
´az J, Pomar F, Bernal A, Merino F (2004) Peroxidases and the
metabolism of capsaicin in Capsicum annuum L. Phytochem
Rev 3:141–157
Plant Biotechnol Rep
123
Djian-Caporalino C, Pijarowski L, Fazari A, Samson M, Gaveau L,
O’Byrne C, Lefebvre V, Caranta C, Palloix A, Abad P (2001)
High-resolution genetic mapping of the pepper (Capsicum
annuum L.) resistance loci Me
3
and Me
4
conferring heat-stable
resistance to root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) Theor
Appl Genet 103:592–600
Djian-Caporalino C, Fazari A, Arguel MJ, Vernie T, VandeCasteele
C, Faure I, Brunoud G, Pijarowski L, Palloix A, Lefebvre V,
Abad P (2007) Root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne spp.) Me
resistance genes in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) are clustered
on the P9 chromosome. Theor Appl Genet 114:473–486
Engler DE, Guri AZ, Lauritis JA, Schloemer LMP (1993) Genetically
transformed pepper plants and methods for their production.
USA Patent 5(262):316
Fazari A, Palloix A, Wang L, Hua YM, Sage-Palloix AM, Zhang BX,
Djian-Caporalino C (2012) The root-knot nematode resistance
N-gene co-localizes in the Me-genes cluster on the pepper
(Capsicum annuum L.) P9 chromosome. Plant Breed
131:665–673
Go
´ngora-Castillo E, Fajardo-Jaime R, Ferna
´ndez-Cortes A, Garfias
AEJ, Lozoya-Gloria E, Martı
´nez O, Ochoa-Alejo N (2012)
Rivera-Bustamante R: the capsicum transcriptome DB: a ‘‘hot’
tool for genomic research. Bioinformation 8:043–047
Green SK, Kim JS (1991) Characteristics and control of viruses
infecting peppers. Technical Bulletin no. 18. Asian Vegetable
Research and Development Centre, Taipei, Taiwan
Greenleaf WH (1986) Pepper Breeding. In: Bassett MJ (ed) Breeding
vegetable crops. AVI Publishing Co., Westport, pp 67–134
Grube RC, Blauth JR, Arnedo MA, Jahn MK (2000) Identification of
a dominant potyvirus resistance gene cluster in Capsicum. Theor
Appl Genet 101:852–859
Gunay AL, Rao PS (1978) In vitro plant regeneration from hypocotyl
and cotyledon explants of red pepper (Capsicum). Plant Sci Lett
11:365–372
Gururaj HB, Padma MN, Giridhar P, Ravishankar GA (2012)
Functional validation of Capsicum frutescens aminotransferase
gene involved in vanillylamine biosynthesis using Agrobacte-
rium mediated genetic transformation studies in Nicotiana
tabacum and Capsicum frutescens calli cultures. Plant Sci
195:96–105
Gutie
´rrez-Carbajal MG, Monforte-Gonza
´lez M, Miranda-Ham ML,
Godoy-Herna
´ndez G, Va
´zquez-Flota F (2010) Induction of
capsaicinoid synthesis in Capsicum chinense cell cultures by
salicylic acid or methyl jasmonate. Biol Plant 54:430–434
Ha SH, Kim JB, Jong-Sug Park JS, Lee SW, Cho KJ (2007) A
comparison of the carotenoid accumulation in Capsicum vari-
eties that show different ripening colours: deletion of the
capsanthin–capsorubin synthase gene is not a prerequisite for the
formation of a yellow pepper. J Exp Bot 58:3135–3144
Hernan VA, Rosa U, Luisa OL, Dominique R, Orlene G, Yereni M,
Oscar M (2013) A new virus-induced gene silencing vector
based on Euphorbia mosaic virus-Yucatan peninsula for NPR1
silencing in Nicotiana benthamiana and Capsicum annuum var.
Anaheim. Biotechnol Lett 35:811
Hill TA, Ashrafi H, Reyes-Chin-Wo S, Yao J, Stoffel K, Truco M,
Kozik A, Michelmore RW, Deynze AV (2013) Characterization
of Capsicum annuum genetic diversity and population structure
based on parallel polymorphism discovery with a 30 K unigene
Pepper GeneChip. PLoS ONE 8:e56200
Huan-huan H, Zhong-hua Z, Zheng-hai Z, Sheng-li M, Li-hao W,
Bao-xi Z (2011) Analysis of SSRs information in Capsicum spp.
from EST database. Agr Sci China 10:1532–1536
Huh J, Kang B, Nahm S, Kim S, Ha K, Lee M, Kim B (2001) A
candidate gene approach identified phytoene synthase as the
locus for mature fruit colour in red pepper (Capsicum spp.).
Theor Appl Genet 102:524–530
Huh SU, Choi LM, Lee GJ, Kim YJ, Paek KH (2012a) Capsicum
annuum WRKY transcription factor d (CaWRKYd) regulates
hypersensitive response and defense response upon Tobacco
mosaic virus infection. Plant Sci 197:50–58
Huh SU, Kim KJ, Paek KH (2012b) Capsicum annuum basic transcrip-
tion factor 3 (CaBtf3) regulates transcription of pathogenesis-
related genes during hypersensitive response upon Tobacco mosaic
virus infection. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 417:910–917
Hurtado-Hernandez H, Smith P (1985) Inheritance of mature fruit
colour in Capsicum annuum L. J Hered 76:211–213
Hwang JN, Li J, Liu WY, An SJ, Cho H, Her NH, Yeam I, Kim D,
Kang B (2009) Double mutations in eIF4E and eIFiso4E confer
recessive resistance to Chilli veinal mottle virus in pepper. Mol
Cells 27:329–336
Jahn M, Paran I, Hoffmann K, Radwanski ER, Livingstone KD,
Grube RC, Aftergoot E, Lapidot M, Moyer JW (2000) Genetic
mapping of the Tsw locus for resistance to the tospovirus tomato
spotted wilt virus in Capsicum spp. and its relationship to the Sw-
5 gene for resistance to the same pathogen in tomato. Mol Plant
Microb Interact 13:673–682
Jayashankar S, Bagga S, Phillips GC (1997) Sweet pepper (Capsicum
annuum) transformation using Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Hort
Sci 32:454
Jones JB, Minsavage GV, Roberts PD, Johnson RR, Kousik CS,
Subramanian S, Stall RE (2002) A non-hypersensitive resistance
in pepper to the bacterial spot pathogen is associated with two
recessive genes. Phytopathology 92:273–277
Jones JB, Lacy GH, Bouzar H, Stall RE, Schaad NW (2004)
Reclassification of the xanthomonads associated with bacterial
spot disease of tomato and pepper. Syst Appl Micro 27:755–762
Kang BC, Nahm SH, Huh JH, Yoo HS, Yu JW, Lee MH, Kim BD
(2001) An interspecific (Capsicum annuum 9C. Chinense)F2
linkage map in pepper using RFLP and AFLP markers. Theor
Appl Genet 102:531–539
Kang BC, Yeam I, Frantz JD, Murphy JF, Jahn MM (2005) The pvr1
locus in Capsicum encodes a translation initiation factor eIF4E
that interacts with tobacco etch virus VPg. Plant J 42:392–405
Kang WH, Hoang NH, Yang HB, Kwon JK, Jo SH, Seo JK, Kim KH,
Choi D, Kang BC (2010) Molecular mapping and characterization
of a single dominant gene controlling CMV resistance in peppers
(Capsicum annuum L.). Theor Appl Genet 120:1587–1596
Kehie M, Kumaria S, Tandon P (2012a) In vitro plantlet regeneration
from nodal segments and shoot tips of Capsicum chinense Jacq.
cv. Naga King Chili. 3 Biotech 2:31–35
Kehie M, Kumaria S, Tandon P (2012b) Osmotic stress induced—
capsaicin production in suspension cultures of Capsicum chin-
ense Jacq.cv. Naga King Chili. Acta Physiol Plant 34:2039–2044
Khan H, Siddique I, Anis M (2006) Thidiazuron induced somatic
embryogenesis and plant regeneration in Capsicum annuum. Biol
Plant 50:789–792
Kim DS, Hwang BK (2012) The pepper MLO gene, CaMLO2, is
involved in the susceptibility cell-death response and bacterial
and oomycete proliferation. Plant J 72:843–855
Kim DH, Kim BD (2005) Development of SCAR markers for early
identification of cytoplasmic male sterility genotype in chili
pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Mol Cells 31:416–422
Kim SJ, Lee SJ, Kim BD, Paek KH (1997) Satellite-RNA-mediated
resistance to cucumber mosaic virus in transgenic plants of hot
pepper (Capsicum annuum cv. Golden Tower). Plant Cell Rep
16:825–830
Kim M, Kim S, Kim S, Kim BD (2001) Isolation of cDNA clones
differentially accumulated in the placenta of pungent pepper by
suppression subtractive hybridization. Mol Cells 11:213–219
Kim DH, Kang JG, Kim BD (2007) Isolation and characterization of
the cytoplasmic male sterility-associated or f456 gene of chili
pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Plant Mol Biol 63:519–532
Plant Biotechnol Rep
123
Kim HJ, Baek KH, Lee SW, Kim JE, Lee BW, Cho HS, Kim WT,
Choi D, Hur CG (2008a) Pepper EST database: comprehensive
in silico tool for analyzing the chili pepper (Capsicum annuum)
transcriptome. BMC Plant Biol 8:101
Kim HJ, Nahm SH, Lee HR, Yoon GB, Kim KT, Kang BC, Choi D,
Kweon OY, Cho MC, Kwon JK, Han JH, Kim JH, Park MK,
Ahn JH, Choi SH, Her NH, Sung JH, Kim BD (2008b) BAC-
derived markers converted from RFLP linked to Phytophthora
capsici resistance in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Theor Appl
Genet 118:15–27
Kim HJ, Han JH, Kwon JK, Park M, Kim BD, Choi D (2010a) Fine
mapping of pepper trichome locus 1 controlling trichome
formation in Capsicum annuum L. CM334. Theor Appl Genet
120:1099–1106
Kim OR, Cho MC, Kim BD, Huh JH (2010b) A splicing mutation in
the gene encoding phytoene synthase causes orange coloration in
Habanero pepper fruits. Mol Cells 30:569–574
Kim HJ, Han JH, Kim S, Lee HR, Shin JS, Kim JH, Cho J, Kim YH,
Lee HJ, Kim BD, Choi D (2011) Trichome density of main stem
is tightly linked to PepMoV resistance in chili pepper (Capsicum
annuum L.). Theor Appl Genet 122:1051–1058
Kosuge S, Inagaki Y, Okumura H (1965) Pungent principles in
Capsicum. Nippon Nogei Kagaki Kaishi 35:540
Kothari SL, Joshi A, Kachhwaha S, Ochoa-Alejo N (2010) A review
on tissue culture and transgenesis. Biotechnol Adv 28:35–48
Kumar R, Dwivedi N, Singh RK, Kumar S, Rai VP, Singh M (2011)
A review on molecular characterization of pepper for capsaicin
and oleoresin. Int J Plant Breed Genet 5:99–110
Kyle MM, Palloix A (1997) Proposed revision of nomenclature for
potyvirus resistance genes in Capsicum. Euphytica 97:183–188
Lang Y, Yanagawa S, Sasanuma T, Sasakuma T (2004) Orange fruit
colour in Capsicum due to deletion of capsanthin–capsorubin
synthesis gene. Breed Sci 54:33–39
Lee SJ, Kim BD, Paek KH (1993) In vitro plant regeneration and
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation from cotyledon
explants of hot pepper (Capsicum annuum cv. Golden Tower).
Korean J Plant Tiss Cult 20:289–294
Lee JM, Nahm SH, Kim YM, Kim BD (2004) Characterization and
molecular genetic mapping of microsatellite loci in pepper.
Theor Appl Genet 108:619–627
Lee CJ, Yoo EY, Shin J, Lee J, Hwang HS, Kim BD (2005)
Nonpungent Capsicum contains a deletion in the capsaicinoid
synthetase gene, which allows early detection of pungency with
SCAR markers. Mol Cells 19:262–267
Lee J, Yoon JB, Park HG (2008) Linkage analysis between the partial
restoration (pr) and the restorer-of-fertility (Rf) loci in pepper
cytoplasmic male sterility. Theor Appl Genet 117:383–389
Lee YH, Jung M, Shin SH, Lee JH, Choi SH, Her NH, Lee JH, Ryu
KH, Paek KY, Harn CH (2009) Transgenic peppers that are
highly tolerant to a new CMV pathotype. Plant Cell Rep
28:223–232
Lee J, Han JH, An CG, Lee WP, Yoon JB (2010a) A CAPS marker
linked to a genic male-sterile gene in the colored sweet pepper,
‘Paprika’ (Capsicum annuum L.). Breed Sci 60:93–98
Lee J, Yoon JB, Han JH, Lee WP, Do JW, Ryu H, Kim SH, Park HG
(2010b) A codominant SCAR marker linked to the genic male
sterility gene (ms1) in chili pepper (Capsicum annuum). Plant
Breed 129:35–38
Lee J, Yoon JB, Han JH, Lee WP, Kim SH, Park HG (2010c) Three
AFLP markers tightly linked to the genic male sterility ms3 gene
in chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) and conversion to a CAPS
marker. Euphytica 173:55–61
Lefebvre V, Palloix A, Caranta C, Pochard E (1995) Construction of
an intra-specific integrated linkage map of pepper using molec-
ular markers and doubled-haploid progenies. Genome
38:112–121
Lefebvre V, Kuntz M, Camara B, Palloix A (1998) The capsanthin–
capsorubin synthase gene: a candidate gene for the ylocus
controlling the red fruit colour in pepper. Plant Mol Biol
36:785–789
Lefebvre V, Pflieger S, Thabuis A, Caranta C, Blattes A, Chauvet JC,
Daubeze AM, Palloix A (2002) Towards the saturation of the
pepper linkage map by alignment of three intraspecific maps
including known-function genes. Genome 45:839–854
Lefebvre V, Daubeze AM, Voort RJ, Peleman J, Bardin M, Palloix A
(2003) QTLs for resistance to powdery mildew in pepper under
natural and artificial infections. Theor Appl Genet 107:661–666
Leonards-Schippers C, Gieffers W, Schafer-Pregl R, Ritter E, Knapp
S, Salamini F, Gebhardt C (1994) Quantitative resistance to
Phytophthora infestans in potato: a case study for QTL mapping
in an allogamous plant species. Genetics 137:67–77
Li D, Zhao K, Xie B, Zhang B, Luo K (2003) Establishment of a
highly efficient transformation system for pepper (Capsicum
annuum L.). Plant Cell Rep 21:785–788
Li P, Feng B, Wang H, Tooley PW, Zhang X (2011) Isolation of nine
Phytophthora capsici pectin methylesterase genes which are
differentially expressed in various plant species. J Basic Micro-
biol 51:61–70
Li X, Ramchiary N, Dhandapani V, Choi SR, Hur Y, Nou IS, Yoon
MK, Lim YP (2013) Quantitative trait loci mapping in brassica
rapa revealed the structural and functional conservation of
genetic loci governing morphological and yield component traits
in the A, B, and C subgenomes of Brassica species. DNA Res
20:1–16
Lim JH, Park CJ, Huh SU, Choi LM, Lee GJ, Kim YJ, Paek KH
(2011) Capsicum annuum WRKYb transcription factor that
binds to the CaPR-10 promoter functions as a positive regulator
in innate immunity upon TMV infection. Biochem Biophys Res
Comm 411:613–619
Lindsey K, Yeoman MM, Black GM, Mavituna F (1983) A novel
method for the immobilization and culture of plant cells. FEBS
Lett 155:143–149
Liu W, Parrott WA, Hildebrand DF, Collins GB, Williams EG (1990)
Agrobacterium induced gall formation in bell pepper (Capsicum
annuum L.) and formation of shoot-like structures expressing
introduced genes. Plant Cell Rep 9:360–364
Liu S, Li W, Wu Y, Chen C, Lei J (2013) De novo transcriptome
assembly in chili pepper (Capsicum frutescens) to identify genes
involved in the biosynthesis of capsaicinoids. PLoS ONE
8:e48156
Livingstone KD, Lackney VK, Blauth J, Wijk VR, Jahn MK (1999)
Genome mapping in Capsicum and the evolution of genome
structure in the Solanaceae. Genetics 152:1183–1202
Lovato FA, Inoue-Nagata AK, Nagata T, de Avila AC, Pereira LA,
Resende RO (2008) The N protein of Tomato spotted wilt virus
(TSWV) is associated with the induction of programmed cell
death (PCD) in Capsicum chinense plants, a hypersensitive host
to TSWV infection. Virus Res 137:245–252
Lu FH, Cho MC, Park YJ (2012) Transcriptome profiling and
molecular marker discovery in red pepper, Capsicum annuum L.
TF68. Mol Biol Rep 39:3327–3335
Ma Y, Huang W, Ji JJ, Gong ZH, Yin CC, Ahmed SS, Zhao ZL
(2013) Maintaining and restoration cytoplasmic male sterility
systems in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Genet Mol Res 4:12
Maga JA (1975) Capsicum. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 6:177–199
Manoharan M, Sree Vidya CS, Lakshmi Sita G (1998) Agrobacte-
rium-mediated genetic transformation in hot chilli (Capsicum
annuum L. var. Pusa jwala). Plant Sci 131:77–83
Margaria P, Ciuffo M, Pacifico D, Turina M (2007) Evidence that the
nonstructural protein of Tomato spotted wilt virus is the
avirulence determinant in the interaction with resistant pepper
carrying the TSW gene. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 20:547–558
Plant Biotechnol Rep
123
Matsunaga H, Saito T, Hirai M, Nunome T, Yoshida T (2003) DNA
markers linked to Pepper mild mottle virus (PMMoV) resistant
locus (L 4) in Capsicum. J Jpn Soc Hort Sci 72:218–220
Mavituna F, Park JM (1985) Growth of immobilised plant cells in
reticulate polyurethane foam matrices. Biotechnol Lett
7:637–640
Mazourek M, Pujar A, Borovsky Y, Paran I, Mueller L, Jahn MM
(2009) A dynamic interface for capsaicinoid systems biology.
Plant Physiol 150:1806–1821
Mezghani N, Jemmali A, Elloumi N, Gargouri-Bouzid R, Kintzios S
(2007) Morphohistological study on shoot bud regeneration in
cotyledon cultures of pepper (Capsicum annuum). Biol Brati-
slava 2:704–710
Mimura Y, Inoue T, Minamiyama Y, Kubo N (2012) An SSR-based
genetic map of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) serves as an
anchor for the alignment of major pepper maps. Breed Sci
62:93–98
Minamiyama Y, Kinoshita S, Inaba K, Inoue M (2005) Development
of a cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS) marker
linked to pungency in pepper. Plant Breed 24:288–291
Moury B, Pflieger S, Blattes A, Lefebvre V, Palloix A (2000) A
CAPS marker to assist selection of Tomato spotted wilt virus
(TSWV) in pepper. Genome 43:943–951
Moury B, Fabre F, Senoussi R (2007) Estimation of the number of
virus particles transmitted by an insect vector. Proc Nat Acad Sci
USA 104:17891–17896
Mueller AL, Solow TH, Taylor N, Skwarecki B, Buels R, Bins J, Lin
C, Wright MH, Ahrens R, Wang Y, Herbst EV, Keyder ER,
Menda N, Zamir D, Tanksley SD (2005) The SOL Genomics
Network (SGN): a comparative resource for Solanaceous
biology and beyond. Plant Physiol 138:1310–1317
Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and
bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497
Murphy JF, Blauth JR, Livingstone KD, Lackney VK, Jahn MK
(1998) Genetic mapping of the pvr1 locus in Capsicum spp. And
evidence that distinct potyvirus resistance loci control responses
that differ at the whole plant and cellular levels. Mol Plant Micro
Inter 11:943–951
Nicolaı
¨M, Pisani C, Bouchet JP, Vuylsteke M, Palloix A (2012)
Discovery of a large set of SNP and SSR genetic markers by
high-throughput sequencing of pepper (Capsicum annuum).
Genet Mol Res 11:2295–2300. doi:10.4238/2012
Nunez-Palenius HG, Ochoa-Alejo N (2005) Effect of phenylalanine
and phenylpropanoids on the accumulation of capsaicinoids and
lignins in cell cultures of chili peppers (Capsicum annum L.).
In Vitro Dev Biol Plant 41:801–805
Ochoa-Alejo N, Go
´mez-Peralta JE (1993) Activity of enzymes
involved in capsaicin biosynthesis in callus tissue and fruits of
chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). J Plant Physiol
141:147–152
Ochoa-Alejo N, Salgado-Garciglia R (1992) Phenylalanine ammonia-
lyase activity and capsaicin-precursor compounds in p-fluor-
ophenylalanine-resistant and sensitive variant cells of chili
pepper (Capsicum annuum). Physiol Plant 85:173–179
Ogundiwin EA, Berke M, Massoudi TF, Black LL, Huestis G, Choi
D, Lee S, Prince JP (2005) Construction of 2 intraspecific
linkage maps and identification of resistance QTLs for Phytoph-
thora capsici root-rot and foliar-blight diseases of pepper
(Capsicum annuum L.). Genome 48:698–711
Oh SK, Baek KH, Seong ES, Joung YH, Choi GJ, Park JM, Cho HS,
Kim EA, Lee S, Choi D (2010) CaMsrB2, pepper methionine
sulfoxide reductase B2, is a novel defense regulator against
oxidative stress and pathogen attack. Plant Physiol 154:245–261
Ortega RG, Espanol CP, Zueco JC (1992) Genetic relationships
among 4 pepper genotypes resistant to Phytophthora capsici.
Plant Breed 108:118–125
Paran I, Van der Knaap E (2007) Genetic and molecular regulation of
fruit and plant domestication traits in tomato and pepper. J Exp
Bot 58:3841–3852
Paran I, Van der Voort JR, Lefebvre V, Jahn M, Landry L, Van
Schriek M, Tanyolac B, Caranta C, Ben Chaim A, Livingstone
K, Palloix A, Peleman J (2004) An integrated genetic linkage
map of pepper (Capsicum spp.). Mol Breed 13:251–261
Peddaboina V, Christopher T, Subhash K (2006) In vitro shoot
multiplication and plant regeneration in four Capsicum species
using thidiazuron. Sci Hort 2:117–122
Perry L, Dickau R, Zarrillo S, Holst I, Pearsal DM, Piperno DR,
Berman MJ, Cooke RG, Rademaker K, Ranere AJ, Raymond JS,
Sandweiss DH, Scaramelli F, Tarble K, Zeidler JA (2007) Starch
fossils and the domestication and dispersal of chili peppers
(Capsicum spp. L.) in the Americas. Science 315:986–988
Pflieger S, Palloix A, Caranta C, Blattes A, Lefebvre V (2001)
Defense response genes co-localize with quantitative disease
resistance loci in pepper. Theor Appl Genet 103:920–929
Phillips GC, Valera-Montero LL, Fan Z, Jayashankar S, Hubstenberger
JF, Watkins DD (2000) Chile improvement through biotechnol-
ogy: in vitro plant regeneration and genetic transformation. New
Mexico Chile Pepper Institute: Chile Conference, Las Cruces
Pierre M, Noel L, Lahaye T, Ballvora A, Veuskens J, Ganal M, Bonas
U (2000) High-resolution genetic mapping of the pepper
resistance locus Bs3 governing recognition of the Xanthomonas
campestris pv vesicatora AvrBs3 protein. Theor Appl Genet
101:255–263
Pochard E, Dumas de Valuix R, Florent A (1983) Linkage between
partial resistance to CMV and susceptibility to TMV in the line
perennial: analysis on androgenetic homozygous lines. Capsi-
cum Eggplant News 2:34–35
Popovsky S, Paran I (2000) Molecular analysis of the Y locus in
pepper: its relation to capsanthin–capsorubin synthase and to
fruit color. Theor Appl Genet 101:86–89
Portis E, Nagy I, Sasva Z, Stagelri A, Barchi L, Lanteri S (2007) The
design of Capsicum spp. SSR assays via analysis of in silico
DNA sequence, and their potential utility for genetic mapping.
Plant Sci 172:640–648
Pruthi JS (1980) Spices and condiments-chemistry, microbiology and
technology. Academic Press Inc., New York, pp 1–450
Purkayastha J, Alam SI, Gogoi HK, Singh L (2012) Capsicum
assamicum sp. nov. Solanaceae, from Assam, Northeastern
India. Ozean J App Sci 5:1
Quirin EA, Ogundiwin EA, Prince JP, Mazourek M, Briggs MO,
Chlanda TS, Kim KT, Falise M, Kang BC, Jahn MM (2005)
Development of sequence characterized amplified region
(SCAR) primers for the detection of Phyto. 5.2, a major QTL
for resistance to Phytophthora capsici Leon. in pepper. Theor
Appl Genet 110:605–612
Rao GU, Chaim AB, Borovsky E, Paran I (2003) Mapping of yield
related QTLs in pepper in an interspecific cross of Capsicum
annuum and C. frutescens. Theor Appl Genet 106:1457–1466
Ravishankar GA, Sarma KS, Venkataraman LV, Kadyan AK (1998)
Effect of nutritional stress on capsaicin production in immobi-
lized cell cultures of Capsicum annuum. Curr Sci 57:381–383L
Reddy OB, Giridhar P, Ravishankar GA (2002) The effect of
triacontanol on micropropagation of Capsicum frutescens and
Decalepis hamiltonii W and A. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult
71:253–258
Reeves G, Monroy-Barbosa A, Bosland PW (2013) A novel
Capsicum gene inhibits host-specific disease resistance to
Phytophthora capsici. Phytopathology 103:472–478. doi:10.
1094/PHYTO-09-12-0242-R
Ristaino JB (1990) Interspecific variation among isolates of Phytoph-
thora capsici from pepper and cucurbit fields in North Carolina.
Phytopathology 80:1253–1259
Plant Biotechnol Rep
123
Rodriguez-Uribe L, Guzman I, Rajapakse W, Richins RD, O’Connell
MA (2012) Carotenoid accumulation in orange-pigmented
Capsicum annuum fruit, regulated at multiple levels. J Exp Bot
63:517–526
Rubio M, Caranta C, Palloix A (2008) Functional markers for
selection of potyvirus resistance alleles at the pvr2-eIF4E locus
in pepper using tetra-primer ARMS-PCR. Genome 51:767–771
Rubio M, Nicolaı
¨M, Caranta C, Palloix A (2009) Allele mining in the
pepper gene pool provided new complementation effects
between pvr2-eIF4E and pvr6-eIF(iso)4E alleles for resistance
to pepper veinal mottle virus. J Gen Virol 90:2808–2814
Ruffel S, Dussault MH, Palloix A, Moury B, Bendahmane A,
Robaglia C, Caranta C (2002) A natural recessive resistance
gene against potato virus Y in pepper corresponds to the
eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E). Plant J 32:1067–1075
Ruffel S, Gallois JL, Moury B, Robaglia C, Palloix A, Caranta C
(2006) Simultaneous mutations in translation initiation factors
eIF4E and eIF(iso)4E are required to prevent pepper veinal
mottle virus infection of pepper. J Gen Virol 87:2089–2098
Rushton PJ, Somssich IE, Ringler P, Shen QJ (2010) WRKY
transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci 15:247–258
Salgado-Garciglia R, Ochoa-Alejo N (1990) Increased capsaicin
content in PFP resistant cells of chili pepper (Capsicum annuum
L.). Plant Cell Rep 8:617–620
Sanatombi K, Sharma GJ (2008) In vitro propagation of Capsicum
chinense Jacq. Biol Plant 52:517–520
Sandbrik JM, Colon LT, Wolters PJCC, Stiekema WJ (2000) Two
related genotypes of Solanum microdontum carry different
segregating alleles for field resistance to Phytophthora infestans.
Mol Breed 6:215–225
Sanwen H, Baoxi Z, Milbourne D, Cardle L, Guimei Y, Jiazhen G
(2001) Development of pepper SSR markers from sequence
databases. Euphytica 117:163–167
Seo EY, Yeom SI, Jo SH, Jeong HJ, Kang BC, Choi DI (2013)
Ectopic expression of Capsicum-specific cell wall protein
Capsicum annuum senescence-delaying 1 (CaSD1) delays
senescence and induces trichome formation in Nicotiana benth-
amiana. Mol Cells 33:415–422
Sharma A, Kumar V, Giridhar P, Ravishankar GA (2008) Induction of
in vitro flowering in Capsicum frutescens under the influence of
silver nitrate and cobalt chloride and pollen transformation.
Electronic J Biotechnol (online) 11(2). doi:10.2225/vol11-
issue2-fulltext-8
Shirasawa K, Ishii K, Kim C, Ban T, Suzuki M, Ito T, Muranaka T,
Kobayashi M, Nagata N, Isobe S, Tabata S (2013) Development
of Capsicum EST–SSR markers for species identification and in
silico mapping onto the tomato genome sequence. Mol Breed
31:101–110
Solı
´s-Ramos LY, Gonza
´lez-Estrada T, Nahuath-Dzib S, Zapata-
Rodriguez LC, Castan
˜o E (2009) Overexpression of WUSCHEL
in C. chinense causes ectopic morphogenesis. Plant Cell Tiss
Organ Cult 96:279–287
Stewart C, Kang BC, Liu K, Mazourek M, Moore SL, Yoo EY, Kim
BD, Paran I, Jahn MM (2005) The Pun1 gene for pungency in
pepper encodes a putative acyltransferase. Plant J 42:675–688
Stewart C, Mazourek M, Stellari GM, O’Connell M, Jahn M (2007)
Genetic control of pungency in Capsicum chinense via the Pun1
locus. J Exp Bot 58:979–991
Sudha G, Ravishankar GA (2002) Influence of calcium channel
modulators in capsaicin production by cell suspension cultures of
Capsicum frutescens Mill. Curr Sci 83:480–484
Sugita T, Kinoshita T, Kawano T, Yuji K, Yamaguchi K, Nagata R,
Shimizu A, Chen L, Kawasaki S, Todoroki A (2005) Rapid
construction of a linkage map using high-efficiency genome
scanning/AFLP and RAPD, based on an intraspecific, doubled-
haploid population of Capsicum annuum. Breed Sci 55:287–295
Sugita T, Semi Y, Sawada H, Utoyama Y, Hosomi Y, Yoshimoto E,
Maehata Y, Fukuoka H, Nagata R, Ohyama A (2013) Develop-
ment of simple sequence repeat markers and construction of a
high-density linkage map of Capsicum annuum. Mol Breed
4:909–920
Tai T, Dahlbeck D, Clark ET, Gajiwala P, Pasion R, Whalen MC,
Stall RE, Staskawicz BJ (1999a) Expression of the Bs2 pepper
gene confers resistance to bacterial spot disease in tomato. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA 96:14153–14158
Tai T, Dahlbeck D, Stall RE, Peleman J, Staskawicz BJ (1999b)
High-resolution genetic and physical mapping of the region
containing the Bs2 resistance gene of pepper. Theor Appl Genet
99:1201–1206
Tanksley SD, Bernatzky R, Lapitan NL, Prince JP (1988) Conser-
vation of gene repertoire but not gene order in pepper and
tomato. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:6419–6423
Tecle IY, Menda N, Buels RM, van der Knaap E, Mueller LA (2010)
solQTL: a tool for QTL analysis, visualization and linking to
genomes at SGN database. BMC Bioinformatics 11:525
Thabuis A, Palloix A, Pflieger S, Daubeze AM, Caranta C, Lefebvre
V (2003) Comparative mapping of Phytophthora resistance loci
in pepper germplasm: evidence for conserved resistance loci
across Solanaceae and for a large genetic diversity. Theor Appl
Genet 106:1473–1485
The Potato Genome Sequencing Consortium (2011) Genome
sequence and analysis of the tuber crop potato. Nature. doi:10.
1038/nature10158
The Tomato Genome Consortium (2012) The tomato genome
sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature
485:635–641
Thies JA, Fery RL (2000) Characterization of resistance conferred by
the N gene to Meloidogyne arenaria races 1 and 2, M. hapla, and
M. javanica in two sets of isogenic lines of Capsicum annuum.
J Am Soc Hort Sci 125:71–75
Thies JA, Fery RL (2002) Heat stability of resistance to southern root-
knot nematode in bell pepper genotypes homozygous and
heterozygous for the N gene. J Am Soc Hort Sci 127(3):371–375
Thorup T, Tanyolac B, Livingstone K, Popovsky S, Paran I, Jahn M
(2000) Candidate gene analysis of organ pigmentation loci in the
Solanaceae. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 97:11192–11197
Tomita R, Murai J, Miura Y, Ishihara H, Liu S, Kubotera Y, Honda A,
Hatta R, Kuroda T, Hamada H, Sakamoto M, Munemura I,
Nunomura O, Ishikawa K, Genda Y, Kawasaki S, Suzuki K,
Meksem K, Kobayashi K (2008) Fine mapping and DNA fiber
FISH analysis locates the tobamovirus resistance gene L3 of
Capsicum chinense in a 400-kb region of R-like genes cluster
embedded in highly repetitive sequences. Theor Appl Genet
117:1107–1118
Tsaballa A, Pasentsis K, Darzentas N, Tsaftaris A (2011) Multiple
evidence for the role of an Ovate-like gene in determining fruit
shape in pepper. BMC Plant Biol 11:46
USDA-ARS (2011) Grin species records of Capsicum. National
Germplasm Resources Laboratory, Beltsville, Maryland
Vallejos CE, Jones V, Stall RE, Jones JB, Minsavage GV, Schultz
DC, Rodrigues R, Olsen LE, Mazourek M (2010) Characteriza-
tion of two recessive genes controlling resistance to all races of
bacterial spot in peppers. Theor Appl Genet 121:37–46
Venkataiah P, Christopher T, Subhash K (2003) Thidiauron induced
high frequency adventitious shoot formation and plant regener-
ation in Capsicum annum L. Plant Biotechnol 5:245–250
Voorrips RE, Finkers R, Sanjaya Lia (2004) QTL mapping of anthrac-
nose (Colletotri-chumspp.) resistance in a cross between. Capsicum
annuum and C. chinense. Theor Appl Genet 109:1275–1282
Wang LH, Zhang BX, Lefebvre V, Huang SW, Daubeze AM, Palloix
A (2004) QTL analysis of fertility restoration in cytoplasmic
male sterile pepper. Theor Appl Genet 109:1058–1063
Plant Biotechnol Rep
123
Wang X, Zhu X, Tooley P, Zhang X (2013) Cloning and functional
analysis of three genes encoding polygalacturonase-inhibiting
proteins from Capsicum annuum and transgenic CaPGIP1 in
tobacco in relation to increased resistance to two fungal
pathogens. Plant Mol Biol 81:379–400
Wu F, Mueller LA, Crouzillat D, Petiard V, Tanksley SD (2006)
Combining bioinformatics and phylogenetics to identify large
sets of single-copy orthologous genes (COSII) for comparative,
evolutionary and systematic studies: a test case in the euasterid
plant clade. Genetics 174:1407–1420
Wu F, Eannetta NT, Xu Y, Durrett R, Mazourek M, Jahn MM,
Tanksley SD (2009a) A COSII genetic map of the pepper
genome provides a detailed picture of synteny with tomato and
new insights into recent chromosome evolution in the genus
Capsicum. Theor Appl Genet 118:1279–1293
Wu F, Eannetta NT, Xu Y, Tanksley SD (2009b) A detailed synteny
map of the eggplant genome based on conserved ortholog set II
(COSII) markers. Theor Appl Genet. doi:10.1007/s00122-008-
0590-9
Yarnes SC, Ashrafi H, Reyes-Chin-Wo S, Hill TA, Stoffel KM, Van
Deynze A (2013) Identification of QTLs for capsaicinoids, fruit
quality, and plant architecture-related traits in an interspecific
Capsicum RIL population. Genome 56(1):61–74
Yi G, Lee J, Lee S, Choi D, Kim B-D (2006) Exploitation of pepper
EST–SSRs and an SSR-based linkage map. Theor Appl Genet
114:113–130
Zhang YL, Jia QL, Li DW, Wang JE, Yin YX, Gong ZH (2013)
Characteristic of the pepper CaRGA2 gene in defense responses
against Phytophthora capsici Leonian. Int J Mol Sci
14:8985–9004
Zhu YX, Ou-Yang WJ, Zhang YF, Chen ZL (1996) Transgenic sweet
pepper plants from Agrobacterium mediated transformation.
Plant Cell Rep 16:71–75
Zygier S, Ben Chaim A, Efrati A, Kaluzky G, Borovsky Y, Paran I
(2005) QTLs mapping for fruit size and shape in chromosomes 2
and 4 in pepper and a comparison of the pepper QTL map with
that of tomato. Theor Appl Genet 111:437–445
Plant Biotechnol Rep
123
... The genus exhibits a huge metabolic, morphological, and genetic diversity (Sarpras et al., 2019;Yumnam et al., 2012). Many genes and Quantitative Trait Loci (QTLs) governing horticulturally important traits such as color, size, shape, weight, and pungency are identified (Chaim et al., 2001;Chunthawodtiporn et al., 2018;Han et al., 2018;Ramchiary et al., 2014;Rao et al., 2003). ...
... Genomic information of the stress responses is crucial for understanding the resistance mechanisms (Jamil et al., 2011). Due to the immense economic, medicinal, and horticultural importance of this crop, it has been widely studied by various crop researchers, especially in the last two decades (Chhapekar et al., 2020;Dubey et al., 2019;Heiser & Smith, 1953;Ramchiary et al., 2014;Sarpras et al., 2019). There is considerable progress in the development of functional genomics tools that make it easy to investigate the individual plant cells, tissues, organs, and whole plants at the genome level, particularly in response to the pathogenic attack (Noman et al., 2020;Oliver et al., 2002). ...
Chapter
Full-text available
The Capsicum L. belonging to the family Solanaceae is an economically important genus of flowering plants. This genus comprises more than 30 species with its unique characteristic feature of pungency in its fruits, which are used as spices, in raw salads and pickles. People also use the species of Capsicum for ethnomedicinal and ethnoveterinary purposes. The fruits of Capsicum contain several metabolites including capsaicinoids (alkaloids responsible for the unique pungent taste), vitamins, flavonoids, carotenoids, mineral elements, and other health beneficial compounds, which have medicinal potential. Pharmacological researches have also demonstrated the role of Capsicum in the treatment of many diseases. However, the cultivated species of Capsicum face biotic and abiotic stresses that affect the normal growth and development of the plant and fruits. These stresses negatively affect yields and incur high economic losses to the farmers and the exchequer. Therefore breeding varieties resistant to these stresses is a desirable strategy to avoid/reduce the loss. The development of improved stress-resistant cultivars of Capsicum requires the knowledge of the genetic, genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic basis of stress responses active inside the plants. The recent advancements in high-throughput genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics technologies enable the understanding, quantification, and analysis of genes, proteomes, and metabolomes in various tissues and their response to different stresses at substantial speed and precision. These tools, en masse, known as omics tools allow comparative investigation of wild and cultivated species of plants; thereby in many of the cases could lead to the identification of the genes or proteins and the elucidation of their functions and assisting in the development of multiple stress-tolerant crop designs. In this chapter an attempt has been made to give an overview of the studies currently available toward understating genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic responses to biotic and abiotic stresses in Capsicum species. It further provides insights into designing resistant cultivars using genome editing and other biotechnological approaches.
... Their roles in regulating fruit length and shape have been validated [33][34][35][36] . The insights gained from tomato studies have been applied to QTL localization in chili peppers, revealing the complex genetic structure controlling these quantitative genetic traits 37,38 . Conducting a multi-trait QTL analysis in chili pepper has identified 40 candidate genes associated with C. annuum traits. ...
Article
Full-text available
Pepper agronomic traits serve as pivotal indicators for characterizing germplasm attributes and correlations. It is important to study differential genotypic variation through phenotypic differences of target traits. Whole genome resequencing was used to sequence the whole genome among different individuals of species with known reference genomes and annotations, and based on this, differential analyses of individuals or populations were carried out to identify SNPs for agronomic traits related to pepper. This study conducted a genome-wide association study encompassing 26 key agronomic traits in 182 upward-growing fruits of C. frutescens and C. annuum. The population structure (phylogenetics, population structure, population principal component analysis, genetic relationship) and linkage disequilibrium analysis were realized to ensure the accuracy and reliability of GWAS results, and the optimal statistical model was determined. A total of 929 SNPs significantly associated with 26 agronomic traits, were identified, alongside the detection of 519 candidate genes within 100 kb region adjacent to these SNPs. Additionally, through gene annotation and expression pattern scrutiny, genes such as GAUT1, COP10, and DDB1 correlated with fruit traits in Capsicum frutescens and Capsicum annuum were validated via qRT-PCR. In the CH20 (Capsicum annuum) and YB-4 (Capsicum frutescens) cultivars, GAUT1 and COP10 were cloned with cDNA lengths of 1065 bp and 561 bp, respectively, exhibiting only a small number of single nucleotide variations and nucleotide deletions. This validation provides a robust reference for molecular marker-assisted breeding of pepper agronomic traits, offering both genetic resources and theoretical foundations for future endeavors in molecular marker-assisted breeding for pepper.
... Furthermore, these findings contribute to an enhanced understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying soilborne disease resistance in diverse plant crops. identify reservoirs of resistance for global seed banks with the intent of facilitating breeding programs that emphasize traits linked to resistance mechanisms against diverse biotic stressors [5,12]. Furthermore, researchers have explored candidate genes responsible for imparting resistance against a spectrum of pathogens and have delved into the mechanisms governing plant defense. ...
Article
Full-text available
Chili (Capsicum annuum L.) is highly susceptible to soilborne diseases, thereby presenting a significant threat that results in considerable yield losses in chili production. The exploration of genes conferring resistance and the underlying defense mechanisms presents a promising strategy for bolstering plant disease control. In this study, we selected two distinct cultivars, the disease-sensitive ‘Hailan 99’ and the disease-tolerant ‘Sanxiaqing’, to elucidate the molecular basis of their responses to soilborne disease intervention. We conducted a comprehensive analysis of root morphological characteristics and transcriptome profiles under stress conditions. Our findings revealed that, when subjected to soilborne disease intervention, these two cultivars exhibited contrasting root system characteristics and responses, reflecting diverse defense strategies. The disease-resistant cultivar demonstrated superior adaptability, possibly owing to its capacity for swift recognition of pathogen effectors, activation of defense responses, and effective containment of infection at localized sites, thus impeding disease progression. Noteworthy genes such as T459_04053, implicated in effector recognition; MSTRG.26158, MSTRG.30886, and T459_22510, associated with secondary metabolite biosynthesis; and T459_05615, partaking in the autophagy pathway, along with other differentially expressed genes linked to effector recognition, immune activation, and modulation of cell death processes, offer valuable insights into enhancing soilborne disease resistance in chili. Furthermore, these findings contribute to an enhanced understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying soilborne disease resistance in diverse plant crops.
... In the past few decades, signi cant progress has been made in the collection and protection of chili germplasm resources in many countries or regions around the world. The Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center (AVRDC), the United States, Hunan Province of China and Russia have collected over 5100, 4700, 3600, and 2300 pepper resources respectively (Ramchiary et al, 2014; https://news.hunau.edu.cn/zhyw/202305/t20230531_378582.html ). The Amombra Horticultural Research Institute (AHRI) in Brazil has collected 1220 chili peppers, of which 654 materials were classi ed according to IPGRI traits. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
155 pepper germplasm from different region are used to conduct diversity analysis on 24 phenotypic traits, aiming to reduce the resource conservation workload, improve resource utilization and breeding efficiency. The best core collection was selected from three levels: the proportion of samples within the group, the overall sample size, and the gradual clustering of samples within the group. Representative evaluation of the phenotypic trait data of the core collection was conducted using indicators such as mean, variance, range, and coefficient of variation, and the core collection was confirmed by principal component analysis. At the same time, the Shannon Weaver diversity index and phenotype Shannon index were used to evaluate the representativeness of SSR molecular marker data of germplasm. The results showed that the pepper core collection constructed based on phenotype data contained 41 materials, which were found to perfectly preserved the genetic diversity of the original pepper germplasm using basic genetic parameters and principal component analysis. 54 polymorphic loci were obtained from 155 germplasm using SSR molecular markers, and core collection containing 32 materials was screened. Integrate phenotype and molecular core collection, the core collection composed of 57 varieties with the 92.55% phenotype retention ratio and 100% polymorphism site retention ratio were determined, and had the most genetic diversity according to a 90% compression ratio, which can fully represent the genetic diversity of the original germplasm.
... Capsicum belongs to the Solanaceae family. Currently, 38 Capsicum species are recognized, including the five important domesticated species: C. annuum, C. baccatum, C. chinense, C. frutescens, and C. pubescens [2,3]. The Capsicum species is diploid (n = 12). ...
Article
Full-text available
Pepper (Capsicum spp.) is an important vegetable crop worldwide with high economic and nutritional value. The Capsicum genus comprises more than 30 species, of which C. annuum, C. chinense, C. baccatum, C. frutescens, and C. pubescens are the five domesticated ones. Anthracnose fruit rot, caused by Colletotrichum spp., is one of the most destructive fungal diseases of pepper. In this review, we compiled up-to-date information from 40 publications on anthracnose resistance in Capsicum species. In total, 375 accessions were described as showing different levels of resistance against Colletotrichum spp. These accessions belonged to different species, including C. annuum (160), C. baccatum (86), C. chacoense (4), C. chinense (90), and C. frutescens (16), as well as 19 accessions of which the species were not reported. High levels of resistance were mainly present in C. baccatum and C. chinense. For some of the resistant accessions, resistance genes or quantitative trait loci (QTL) were reported. Using associated molecular markers, we located 31 QTLs and 17 resistance-related genes in the recently published Capsicum genomes, including C. annuum CM334 version 1.6, C. chinense version 1.2, and C. baccatum version 1.2. Our results could be helpful for making use of some reported accessions in the breeding of pepper cultivars with resistance to anthracnose rot disease.
... Peppers are one of the most important vegetables and originate from the tropical and subtropical regions of Central and South America, where more than thirty closely-related species of the genus Capsicum are found. There are six economically cultivated species: Capsicum chinense, C. annuum, C. frutescens, C. baccatum, C. assamicum, and C. pubescens [1], with different fruit shapes, sizes, spiciness, aromas, and tastes. Pepper fruits are rich in capsaicin, minerals, vitamin C, etc., with properties such as nutritional supplement, antioxidant, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, thrombus dissolution, blood pressure reduction, and cholesterol reduction. ...
Article
Full-text available
Aroma is a crucial attribute affecting the quality of pepper and its processed products, which has significant commercial value. However, little is known about the composition of volatile aroma compounds (VACs) in pepper fruits and their potential molecular regulatory mechanisms. In this study, HS-SPME-GC-MS combined with transcriptome sequencing is used to analyze the composition and formation mechanism of VACs in different kinds and development stages of pepper fruits. The results showed that 149 VACs, such as esters, alcohols, aldehydes, and terpenoids, were identified from 4 varieties and 3 development stages, and there were significant quantitative differences among different samples. Volatile esters were the most important aroma components in pepper fruits. PCA analysis showed that pepper fruits of different developmental stages had significantly different marker aroma compounds, which may be an important provider of pepper’s characteristic aroma. Transcriptome analysis showed that many differential genes (DEGs) were enriched in the metabolic pathways related to the synthesis of VACs, such as fatty acids, amino acids, MVA, and MEP in pepper fruits. In addition, we identified a large number of differential transcription factors (TFs) that may regulate the synthesis of VACs. Combined analysis of differential aroma metabolites and DEGs identified two co-expression network modules highly correlated with the relative content of VACs in pepper fruit. This study confirmed the basic information on the changes of VACs in the fruits of several Chinese spicy peppers at different stages of development, screened out the characteristic aroma components of different varieties, and revealed the molecular mechanism of aroma formation, providing a valuable reference for the quality breeding of pepper.
... (Ahmad et al., 2021b;Sarpras et al., 2016Sarpras et al., , 2019. Further, genetics, genomics, and proteomics studies were undertaken to identify genes governing economically important traits and develop molecular markers to be used in the markers-assisted breeding of these essential traits (Ahmad et al., 2021a;Chhapekar et al., 2018Chhapekar et al., , 2020Chhapekar et al., , 2021Dubey et al., 2019;Islam et al., 2021;Jaiswal et al., 2020Jaiswal et al., , 2022Momo et al., 2022;Ramchiary et al., 2014;Rawoof et al., 2020Rawoof et al., , 2022. However, ZIP transporter genes and their involvement in Zn and Fe transport and other metabolite biosynthesis have not been studied yet in Capsicum. ...
Article
The members of ZRT, IRT-like protein (ZIP) family are involved in the uptake and transportation of several metal ions. Here, we report a comprehensive identification of ZIP transporter genes from Capsicum annuum, C. chinense, and C. baccatum, and their expression analysis under Zn and Fe stress. Changes in root morphology and differential accumulation of several metabolites from sugars, amino acids, carboxylic acids, and fatty acids in root and leaf tissues of plants in the absence of Zn and Fe were observed. Further, metabolites such as L-aspartic acid, 2-ketoglutaric acids, β-L-fucopyranose, quininic acid, chlorogenic acid, and aucubin were significantly upregulated in root and leaf tissues under Zn/Fe deprived conditions. qRT-PCR analysis of 17 CaZIPs in different tissues revealed tissue-specific expression of CaZIP1-2, CaZIP4-8, CaZIP13, and CaZIP16-17 under normal conditions. However, the absence of Zn and Fe significantly induced the expression of CaZIP4-5, CaZIP7-9, and CaZIP14 genes in root and leaf tissues. Additionally, in the absence of Fe, upregulation of CaZIP4-5 and CaZIP8 and increased uptake of mineral elements Cu, Zn, Mg, P, and S were observed in roots, suggesting their potential role in metal-ion uptake in Capsicum. The identified genes provide the basis for future studies of mineral uptake and their biofortification to increase the nutritional values in Capsicum.
Chapter
The species of Capsicum are known to synthesise capsaicin. It has a molecular weight of 305.5 g/mol and the chemical formula C18H27NO3. The IUPAC name of capsaicin is (E)-N-[(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)methyl]-8-methylnon-6-enamide. It is responsible for the unique pungent taste of the Capsicum. It is crystalline, colourless, odourless and lipophilic. This molecule belongs to a special type of alkaloids called capsaicinoids. Capsicum spp. are known to produce several types of capsaicinoids such as capsaicin, homocapsaicin, dihydrocapsaicin, nordihydrocapsaicin, homodihydrocapsaicin and norcapsaicin. Capsaicin and dihydrocapsaicin constitute about 80–90% of capsaicinoids and hence are the major capsaicinoids of the Capsicum. The only genus that has been found to produce and accumulate capsaicinoids is Capsicum. Capsaicin concentration in plants varies and is generally affected by genetic, environmental and various other factors including biotic stresses. The capsaicin finds applications in diverse sectors including flavouring, food, cosmetics, defence sprays, medicine and pharmacy. This book chapter provides a brief overview of the diversity of various capsaicin-producing plants along with their botanical, cytological and distribution details. This chapter is important for those who are interested in botany, taxonomy and diversity of the capsaicin-producing species.
Preprint
Full-text available
Pepper agronomic traits serve as pivotal indicators for characterizing germplasm attributes and correlations. Investigating genotypic disparities through phenotypic variations holds significant scientific merit Whole genome resequencing facilitates comprehensive examination of diverse individuals with known references, enabling subsequent differential analyses to pinpoint single nucleotide polymorphisms(SNPs) linked to pepper agrnomic. This study ,conducted a genome-wide association study(GWAS) encompassing 26 agronomic traits in 182 pepper specimens. Rigorous measures, including phylogenetic analysis, population structure analysis, population principal component analysis, kinship analysis, and linkage disequilibrium analysis, were employed to ensure the precision and reliability of GWAS results. The optimal statistical model. Was determined through these analyses. A total of 929 SNPs significantly associated with 26 agronomic traits, were identified, alongside the detection of 519 candidate genes within 100kb region adjacent to these SNPs. Additionally, through gene annotation and expression pattern scrutiny, genes such as SCPL13, extensin-1-like, and DDB1 correlated with fruit traits in Capsicum frutescens and Capsicum annuum were validated via qRT-PCR. This validation provides a robust reference for molecular marker-assisted breeding of pepper agronomic traits, offering both genetic resources and theoretical foundations for future endeavors in molecular marker-assisted breeding for pepper.
Chapter
Full-text available
In a rapidly changing environment along with the growing population, crop production and improvement are the most sought-after sectors in the world. Pepper (Capsicum spp.) is a highly consumed plant species in the form of spice or whole fruit and is widely popular for its pungent flavour and vibrant colours worldwide. Like other crop plants, pepper is also severely affected by environmental and genetic constraints and reflects a massive loss in yield, quality and production rate. Therefore, it is imperative to immediately change our focus towards the development of stress-resilient and high-yielding Capsicum varieties. This chapter discusses the integrated use of conventional, molecular and multi-omics tools towards meeting the end goal of Capsicum trait improvement. Conventional breeding programmes have utilized natural sources of genes and QTLs attributed to biotic and abiotic stress tolerance and other important horticultural traits in pepper improvement which involve time-consuming multiple and tedious crossing cycles followed by selection. The development of reliable molecular markers like SSRs, SNPs, InDels etc. have enabled genetic and biparental QTL mapping, and genome-wide association studies which all have not only helped in the rapid identification of significant QTLs governing important traits but also marker-assisted selection of desired phenotypes. Several candidate genes for Capsicum plant and fruit morphology, metabolite content, disease resistance and stress tolerance have been identified and are available for introgression via marker-assisted breeding and genetic engineering into elite genetic backgrounds. Further, genome and transcriptome sequencing projects have changed the tides for advancement in Capsicum research and provided new insights into Capsicum genome structure, size, features and function. Other omics approaches like epigenomics, proteomics and metabolomics are rapidly evolving to reveal transcriptional, post-transcriptional and post-translational modifications in Capsicum genes and proteins. In brief, established breeding strategies combined with new technological hues can be successfully exploited for breeding high-quality, better performing, stress-resistant and sturdy Capsicum varieties to meet the needs of the growing human population.Keywords Capsicum Stress resistantGenomicsTranscriptomicsMetabolomicsProteomicsEpigenomics
Article
In vitro genetic transformation of chile pepper, Capsicum annuum var. New Mexico 6-4, was achieved. Seeds of `New Mexico 6-4' were grown aseptically on Murashige and Skoog medium. Seedlings 22 days old were wounded on the hypocotyl region using a sterile hypodermic needle. A. rhizogenes strain K 599 harboring the plasmid p35S GUS Intron was inoculated on the wound site. Three days later the seedlings were transferred onto MS media with antibiotics (Cefotaxime, Carbenicillin, Amoxicillin, Clavulanic acid, and Kanamycin). New roots were seen to initiate from the wound site 15 to 20 days after inoculation. The roots were morphologically identified as “hairy roots.” Glucuronidase ( Gus ) assay performed 40 days after inoculation on randomly chosen roots that had grown into the selection medium, showed that 6/25 (24%) of the inoculated seedlings had roots that showed intense blue coloration. Presence of an intron makes it impossible for the bacteria to express the reporter gene. The seedlings that had transformed roots had a different morphology with wrinkled leaves and short internodes. The pattern of expression of the introduced gene varied greatly. Some positive tissues had the root tips alone being blue; a few had the vascular tissues and the root tips blue; and others had the vascular tissues, the surrounding parenchyma cells, root tips, and the root hairs turn very dark blue. The transformed roots did not need to grow into the selection media to be Gus positive. Isolated roots cultured on MS media supplemented with 0.2 mg/L IAA were maintained for 120 days and continued to express the reporter gene. Currently, methods to regenerate transformed shoots from roots are being tested. The “hairy root” transformation system in pepper could have application in the testing of root-expressible constructs for transgene expression assays.
Article
A rapid and reproducible regeneration protocol has been established in Bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L. cv. Early California wonder) via in vitro shoot multiplication. Multiple shoots were induced from shoot tip explants cultured on MS medium fortified with 1 mg/l Kin and 7 mg/l BA. Addition of 20% coconut milk enhanced the vigour of shoot growth. An optimum of 8.5 shoots was obtained per shoot tip explants after 45 days of culture. Three repeated subcultures up to 120 days produced a maximum of 22 shoots per explant. Rooting was achieved from the shoots of 2-3cm long placed on MS basal medium augmented with 2% sucrose. The in vitro regenerated plantlets were hardened in vermiculite and subsequently planted in the soil and 90% survival rate was observed.
Article
Historically, capsicum has provided potent and characteristic sensory properties to foods. This review summarizes the progress made to date in understanding this unique product. Areas included are horticultural considerations, physiological effects, sensory properties, methods of analysis, and chemical properties.