The Urban Form of Indian Cities and Outline of Indian Urbanization: A Multidisciplinary Approach

Abstract

Urban form is the study of human immigration and the process of their creation and revolution. The objective of the study is to figure out the economic structure and complexion of metropolitan cities of India by analyzing the arrangement pattern of its constituent parts and the progression of its development. Study begins with the analysis of substantial populace at diverse scales in addition to patterns of migration, property use, density, possession and livelihood in Indian cities. The study tries to explore the roots of divergence in urban form through assessment with socio-economic growth indicators and ancient forms in many Indian cities. The study is expected to discover the various challenges in urban form and urbanization growth of Indian cities.

Full text

The Urban Form of Indian Cities and Outline
of Indian Urbanization: A Multidisciplinary
Approach
Piyush Sharma1, Sakshi Gupta2
1(Post Graduate Student, Department of Civil Engineering, Amity University, Haryana, India)
2(Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Amity University, Haryana, India)
1E-mail: piyushsharma1015@gmail.com 1Phone: +91-9711037497
ABSTRACT
Urban form is the study of human immigration and the process of their creation and revolution. The objective
of the study is to figure out the economic structure and complexion of metropolitan cities of India by
analyzing the arrangement pattern of its constituent parts and the progression of its development. Study
begins with the analysis of substantial populace at diverse scales in addition to patterns of migration,
property use, density, possession and livelihood in Indian cities. The study tries to explore the roots of
divergence in urban form through assessment with socio-economic growth indicators and ancient forms in
many Indian cities. The study is expected to discover the various challenges in urban form and urbanization
growth of Indian cities.
Keywords: India, Infrastructure, Sustainability, Urban Form, Urbanization.
1. INTRODUCTION
More than 50 % of the world’s populace currently lives in cities, compared with 14% a century before (U.N
Report 2001). This escalating urbanization drastically modifies the natural balance of landscapes. Land-
exploit planning is the prime policy intervention which seeks to influence the substantial figure of towns and
cities [1].
Over the last 2 decades, sustainability has come become ambient target of urban planning [2]. The effects take
in:
Amendment of habitat, such as thrashing and crumbling of natural flora [4]
Formation of new housing types [2, 4]
The variation of resource flows, together with diminution in net major production
Rise in district temperature [2, 5]
Dilapidation of atmosphere and water quality [4, 5]
Change of fracas regimes, with several habitats experiencing more recurrent distraction
The variation of species composition and species multiplicity [4]
As the hasty expansion of world population and its deliberation in cities of the world takes place, urban
development has created a crucial element disturbing the long-term stance of humanity [6]. With the wish to
accomplish urban development that “meets the desires of the current generation without arbitrating the
capability of upcoming generations to meet their desires”, urban development is requisite to curtail risks
from:
Extravagant use of non-renewable resources
To circumvent the uncompensated environmental overheads onto other places [5, 12] and
Controlling the resource base and waste amalgamation capacities to the levels which do not interrupt
vibrant stability of the ecosystem [4, 8]
With the ever-increasing recognition of sustainable development as a governing concept, researchers have
focused improved attention on aspects/factors of urban form (as shown in fig. 1) that leads to the start of the
contemporary planning and urban studies [8, 11]. An emergent body of writing looks to a first-class city form
or sustainable metropolitan form to augment economic liveliness and social impartiality, and decrease the
degradation of the environment.
Latest deliberations of urban sprawl in the U.S and of compact city in France, Turkey evident this rising
obsession [1, 3]. In India, there are few deliberations on sustainable urban form.

As the devastating share of urban growth in the subsequent century will take place in developing nations, the
issue of urban form in these more vibrant settings is particularly forcing the importance for topic [3, 9]. So
far, not only debates about urban form, but perceptible work on indicators, seldom focuses on urban regions.
Even in more urbanized Asian mega cities like Bangalore and Mumbai, subjective application of actions from
U.S and Europe have proved unsuitable for many years due to indecent business relationship between India
and these nations [9].
Fig 1: Effective factors drawn in the structure of urban form
2. URBAN SCENARIO OF INDIA
Indian colossal cities are stepping up to afford superlative infrastructure to hail funds investment. Cities are
considered as driving force of country’s growth; this frequently-used assertion has become a catchphrase for
urban policies in modern times [7, 10].
2.1 Urban Boom
As per the survey of Ministry of Urban Development (MOUD), in India, out of the entire population of
1210.2 million as reported in 2011, around 377 million are in built-up urban areas. The total addition of
population in inner-city areas over the last decade is approx 91 million.
The percentage of town population to the whole population of the country is only 31.6. There has been an
increase of 3.4% in the share of urban population in India during the year 2001-2011.
The momentary results of “Indian Census 2011” concede that there is an augment of 2774 towns comprising
242 constitutional and 2532 ballot towns over the decade. Development rate of populace in urban areas was
around 32% (MOUD Survey).
Furthermore the figure of “Million Plus Cities” or “Urban Cluster” has risen from 35 to 53 from Census 2001
to 2011. Some of the new contender Indian cities along with their states are mentioned here; Srinagar (Jammu
and Kashmir), Chandigarh, Jodhpur and Kota (Rajasthan), Ghaziabad (Uttar Pradesh), Ranchi (Jharkhand),
Gwalior (Madhya Pradesh), Raipur (Chhattisgarh), Vasai Virar and Aurangabad (Maharashtra), Kozhikode,
Thiruvananthapuram, Thrissur, Malappuram, Kollam and Kannur (Kerala), and Tiruchirapalli (Tamil Nadu).
So whilst the State of Jammu & Kashmir and Chhattisgarh, now also have million plus city, Kerala now has 7
Million Plus Cities, a magnifying jump from the condition in 2001 when just Kochi was a Million Plus City
in Kerala (MOUD).
A latest World Bank draft on urban growth in India, catapulted recently in capital, New Delhi, shows India’s
urban areas mounting more rapidly than expected, adding 90 million new inhabitants in the last ten years. By
2030, Indian cities are anticipated to be residence to a further 250 million people. Whilst the population of
FACTORS
ECONOMY
Type of Livelihood
Per Capita Income
Work Power
Management
Govt. Policies and Rules
Sources
Profits
SOCIETY
Historical Background
Science and Art
Philosphy and Ideology
Technology and Knowledge
Mentality
Population
Language and Race
NATURE
Geographical Location
Topography
Ecological and Climatic
Features
Flora and Fauna
Water
Rain
Soil

India’s cities grows up, employment growth remains sluggish. The major metropolitan cities – Delhi (NCR),
Mumbai, Kolkata, Bangalore, Chennai, Hyderabad, and Ahmadabad saw a 16-18% loss in industrialized jobs
from the year 1995 to 2005, while industrialized employment growth in rustic areas (10-50 km from their
urban center) increased by 55 %.
The latest report urge better agility between property use and infrastructure, so infrastructure restores as cities
get condensed. It also addresses the need for steady corporate reforms to help fundamental facility providers,
recuperate costs for facilities or services and reach shoddier neighborhoods and remote areas [13, 14].
2.2 Level of Indian Urbanization
Among all Indian states and union territories, New Delhi and Chandigarh city are most urban and developed
with 97.5% and 97.3% urban population respectively, succeeded by Daman and Diu (75%) and Pondicherry
(68%).
According to MOUD survey, among all states, Goa is at present the most urbanized state with 62% urban
population, a momentous boost since 2001 when urban populace of Goa was only 50%. Another noteworthy
example of swift urbanization is that of Kerala state, its urban population is 2011 around 48%, while in 2001
it was just 26%. Among the North-East India, Mizoram state is most urbanized with 52% urban population,
however in terms of utter contribution to net urban population in the country, Mizoram’s part is just 0.1%.
Likewise Sikkim, which was just 11% urbanized in 2001, became almost 25% urbanized in 2011. Among
other bigger states, Tamil Nadu remains the most urbanized state with 49% of the population existing in
metropolitan areas chased now by Kerala (48%) overshadowed by Maharashtra (45%). The fraction of urban
population sustain to be the lowest in state Himachal Pradesh with 10% pursued by Bihar with 11%, Assam
(14%) and Orissa (17%). In terms of sheer number of people living in metropolitan areas, Maharashtra
continues to be in front with 51 million persons which encompass 13.5% of the whole urban population of the
country. State Uttar Pradesh records 44 million, followed by Tamil Nadu at 35 million (MOUD Survey).
Share of urban population acquired from last ten censuses is shown in fig. 2.
The total figure of towns and cities has greater than before 5161 in 2001 to 7935 in the year 2011 (India
Census 2011).
India’s existing urban population is around 400 million people and this will rise to 800 million by the year
2050. Between 2016 and 2050, the number of countryside/rural residents in India is expected to drop by 50
million. Chennai, Hyderabad, Bangalore and Ahmadabad city with populations between 5 million and 10
million presently are anticipated to become colossal cities in the imminent years. India is projected to have 7
colossal cities by 2030 excluding these four. Kolkata, Pune and Surat will adjoin a total 27-28 million citizens
to their population by 2030. Kolkata, Bangalore, Chennai, Hyderabad is probable to be among the world’s 30
prevalent & largest cities by 2030 (MOUD, Govt. of India). The World Bank report show that in 1990, there
were 10 megacities of 10 million or more residents, habitat to a total 155 million people. In 2014, the world
had 28 megacities, habitat to 455 million people, or about 12% of the world’s total urban population. By
2030, the world is expected to have 40+ colossal cities [7]. These cities will counter great challenges in
satisfying the requirements of shelter, infrastructure, transportation, power and employment, as well as
essential services such as schooling, IT and health services [7, 11].
2.3 Urban Infrastructure
According to the High Powered Connoisseur Committee (HPCC), delegated by the Ministry of Urban
Development, which gave its proposition to the Government in 2011, there is a necessity of speculation in
urban infrastructure up to 650 million dollars over the next 2 decades.
As per the assessment of the HPCC, the uncompleted work in urban road and rail network is very outsized,
44% of this outlay requires to be for urban roads or highways, while irrigation, sewerage, solid ravage
management, storm water management, highway lightening would require another 20% of investment, while
13-14% investment would be requisite for transit and traffic linked infrastructure. Among others, urban
restitution together with retrofitting of slums would need 10% of investment and competence building for
enhanced urban governance 2.5% of investment.
Taking into account the vast anticipated prerequisite of investment, sum amount of these values cannot be
positioned only from the reserved assets of central, state and local governments [15]. Coercion has, therefore,
arises to ingress the financial resources from the marketplace, and motivates the private segment to contribute
in urban development programmes and plan [15, 16].
At the moment, the implementation of the 12th Five Year Plan (FYP) 2012-2017 is under approach.

1901 1911 1921 1931 1941 1951 1961 1971 198 1 1991 2 001 2011
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
10.84 10.29 11 .18 11.99
13.86
17.29 17.97
19.91
23.34
25.71
27.78
31.6
Census Year
Percentage of Urban Populaon to Total Populaon
Fig 2: Percentage of urban population to total population from year 1901-2011(Source: NIC Report)
2.4 Urban Restructuring
India is a constituent of the global movement towards rising urbanization in which more than 50 % of world's
population is alive in cities and towns. Intensifying the efficiency of urban areas is innermost to the policy
proclamation of the Ministry of Urban Development. Cities hold fantastic latent as driving force of monetary
and communal development, producing jobs and generating capital through economy of balance [7]. They
need to be unrelenting and enlarged through the high urban output for country's profitable growth.
Nationalized fiscal growth and poverty reduction efforts will be gradually more determined by the output of
these cities and towns [19]. For Indian cities to become success slanting and industrious, it is indispensable to
accomplish a top-notch urban system [7, 16]. This sequentially depends on earning competence and
impartiality in the deliverance and financing of urban infrastructure.
The 13th Finance Commission of India, for the first time, has brought in an unparallel element of enforcement
based funding in addition to basic funding, in which the responsibility is placed on the state governments to
sanction and build competence in the local bodies through carrying out various notorious reforms.
To conquer restraints and confrontation, the Ministry of Urban Development has commenced corporate, fiscal
and economic amend. The 74th constitutional revision act documented the significance of local governments
in the practice of service liberation in the urban sector. In the year 1996, the central government plan
designated – “urban development plans formulation and implementation” were disseminated to all state
governments for implementation. These course of action apart from other issues, propose pioneering
approaches for financial resource enlistment. In the outlook of the new economic plan in the 1990’s, it was
implied that the conventional system of financial support based on policy and resource allocations be
abridged and eventually introverted due to financial shortfall. Financial aids need to be streamlined and urban
development policy and projects need to be positioned on a profitable format by scheming commercially
feasible urban infrastructure services and region development projects [18, 19]. This was required to be
accomplished by reinstating an appropriate match between functions and source of income by giving
supplementary tax measures. Other ground-breaking resource draft process comprises, using land as source,
rise in the non-property taxes and using public-private partnerships (PPP) in service deliverance [7, 15].

3. GOVERNMENT POLICIES AND PROGRAMS TO PROMOTE URBAN FORM
Government of India has initiated several schemes for the advancement of urbanization in the past 10 years
(as shown in table 1); thus benefitting millions of people.
The aim was to accomplish high and unprejudiced economic growth in the wide-ranging interest while
scrupulous programs and actions helped the underprivileged [14, 19]. India's political leaders also alleged that
urbanization is the key to economic and fiscal development. This principle was all more persuasive in India
because of the country’s large size, significant natural resources and needs to expand its personal defense
manufacturing.
Table 1: Urban development programmes and plans launched by central government of India
Schemes /
Programmes
Advanced Cities
Commission for Revitalization and Urban Transformation
National Urban Restoration Mission
Urban Infrastructure Development Scheme for Cramped and Moderate Towns
North Eastern State Urban Development Programme
National Urban Info Structure
Amplitude Building for Urban Provincial Bodies
Communal Finance Development Capital Scheme
Scheme for Urban Infrastructure Development in Protectorate Towns in Colossal
Cities
Round Sum Stipulation Scheme for North East Residents
Policies
National Urban Hygiene Policy
National Urban Transportation Policy
National Commission on Viable Habitation
Service Grade Criterion Policy
4. MEASURES OF URBAN FORM
To commence the assessment of development blueprint in metropolitan India, some measures of urban form
are presented. To smooth the progress of consequential evaluation, however, the traits to assess the urban
form of “region” are used. Descriptions of each quantify and how it was figure out is given below.
4.1 Road Design and Movement Systems
According to analysis of urban sprawl, present-day housing developments at regional level surround several
zigzag streets and dead ends, generating blocks that are too immense and thus have short of connectivity [1].
According to this standpoint, superior connectivity directs to more public walk, transportation and less
automobile miles traveled, improved air quality and a better sense of neighborhood among inhabitants [5].
Here, evaluation of connectivity engage the no. of nodes and junctions, the gap between points of admittance
into the region, the number and area of blocks, and of dead ends. All constraints measure connectivity within
a neighborhood and between the neighborhoods as depicted below in table 2:

Table 2: Constraints of road design
Inner/Domestic
Connectivity
Number of road junctions divided by total addition of the number of junctions
and the number of dead ends; the higher the proportion, the better the domestic
connectivity
Blocks Outskirts Nucleus perimeter of blocks; the lesser the perimeter, the better the interior
connectedness
Blocks Number of blocks alienated by number of houses; the lesser the blocks the
superior the inner connectivity
Length of Dead Ends Mean length of dead ends; the more concise the dead ends, the better the inner
connectivity
Peripheral Connectivity Mean distance between accesses of two regions; the shorter the access distance,
the better the peripheral/outdoor connectivity
4.2 Compactness
The compact city is an urban planning and urban development concept, which sponsors comparably immense
residential creation with diverse land uses [3, 7]. It is planted on a dynamic communal transport system and
has an urban geography which emboldens promenading, cycling, squat energy dissipation and decreased
pollution.
According to analysis of urban sprawl, present-day urban development is subjugated by nuclear family
housing units on large masses [3]. Some people consider, this squat density development amplifies
automobile reliance, devour ranchland, and elevate the cost of municipal infrastructure. Three dealings of
nuclear family development compactness are presented as: family group size, compactness, and ground space
[1, 3].
The appropriate measures of compactness are shown in table 3 below:
Table 3: Constraints of compactness
Group Size Mean size of nuclear family housings in the region; the minor the group size, the
higher the compactness
Compactness Nuclear family housing units divided by the inhabited area of the region; the higher
the proportion, the higher the compactness
Ground Space Mean ground space of nuclear family housing units in the region; the lesser the
ground space, the higher the compactness
4.3 Land Use
According to analysis of urban sprawl, present-day urban developments are identical and not have a proper
jumble of land exploit. Experts consider that better assimilation of uses aids walking and cycling, lesser
vehicle distance traveled, recovers air quality, and augments urban visuals [9].
Two measures of land utilization are presented: One evaluates the definite mix of non-residential land uses in
the region; the other evaluates the mix of district non-residential land uses [1, 13]. Table 4 shows the
measures of land use:

Table 4: Constraints of land use
Definite Land Use
Mix
Acres of commercial, industrialized and public land uses in the region divided by
the number of shelter units; the higher the ratio, the larger the land exploit mix
District Land Use
Mix
Acres of land district for fundamental, universal, regional, manufacturing
workplace divided by the number of shelter units; the higher the ratio, the
superior the jumble
4.4 Convenience
According to analysis of urban sprawl, present-day urban development is exemplified by surplus partition
between uses; making voyage distances too long [3]. Three assesses of convenience are presented: expanse to
market, expanse to a bus stop, and expanse to a municipal recreational area. Each is deliberated as the mean
distance from the center of every nuclear family in the vicinity to the center of the adjacent market, bus stop,
or municipal recreational area as shown in table 5 below.
Table 5: Constraints of convenience
Market Mean expanse to the adjoining market; the shorter the expanse, the better the ease
of access
Bus Stop Mean expanse to the nearby bus stop; the shorter the expanse, the better the ease of
use
Recreational
Centers
Mean expanse to the adjacent recreational area; the lesser the expanse, the better
the accessibility
5. TROUBLES & CHALLENGES IN INDIAN URBANIZATION
Though India is one of the less urbanized countries of the human race with only 31.6 % of its population
living in urban areas, the country is fronting a solemn catastrophe of urban growth at the current time.
Whereas urbanization has been a tool of fiscal, communal and political development, it has led to somber
socio-economic troubles [1-3].
The utter scale of the urban population, chaotic and ad hoc growth of urban areas, and a fraught lack of
infrastructure are the major causes of such a state of affairs [4, 9]. The swift expansion of urban population
both innate and through relocation, has put serious stress on public utilities like shelter, hygiene,
transportation, water, power, wellbeing, edification and so on [11, 20]. Paucity, redundancy and under pay
among the rustic migrants, robbery, theft and other societal ills are on run riot. Urban sprawl is quickly
intruding the valuable farming land.
The surge in urban population has put remarkable stress on accessible civic utilities and services in the
metropolis. The tribulations have become so severe that a few years ago a separate Ministry of Urban
Development with a breakfront grade minister in command was formed by the Government of India.
Below are the tribulations that need to be emphasized:

Urban Sprawl
Urban sprawl or existent extension of the cities, both in populace and ecological area, of swiftly rising cities
is the origin cause of urban tribulations [1, 3]. In most cities the financial base is incompetent of dealing with
the tribulations created by their unwarranted size. Gigantic migration from bucolic areas as well as from
undersized towns into large cities has taken place almost over and over again; thus adding up to the size of
cities [10].
During 1990-2000, over 20 million people drifted to cities. The maximum stress of the immigrating populace
has been felt in the innermost regions of the city where the refugees assemble with their family before they
hunt for shelter [16]. Population solidity beyond the old city turns down sharply.

Incidentally, many of the best ever growing urban hubs are big cities. This is due to the reality that such big
cities act as crowd-pullers and catch the attention of large number of migrants by indentation of their
employment prospects and contemporary way of life [7]. Such agitated urbanization leads to predictable cities
sizes of which confront imagination. Delhi, Kolkata, Mumbai, Bangalore, Chennai, etc. are models of urban
sprawl due to huge scale resettlement of people from the adjacent regions.
In numerous giant cities rich people are continually moving from the crammed full centers of the cities to the
more pleasurable environs where they can build bigger houses and benefit from the liberty and seclusion
around the house. In some cities, the peripheries are also added by unlawful residents who build temporary
cottages of unexploited land, though they have no authorized right to the land.
In this fashion, towns are endlessly growing and in some areas the environs, a number of adjacent towns may
be so shut together as to form a more or less unremitting urban girdle which is called metropolis.

Over Congestion
Over congestion or overcrowding is a condition in which a lot of people exist in a very small space.
Congestion is a coherent end result of over-population in urban regions [10, 12]. It is logically projected that
cities having a huge size of population compressed in a small space must bear from overcrowding. This is
well demonstrated by nearly all the big cities of India. For instance, Mumbai has 1/6th of an acre open space
per 1000 population although 4 acre is recommended standard by the city authority’s master plan.
Urban cities of India are overfull both in absolute and virtual terms. Absolute in the logic that these cities
have an actual high density of populace and virtual in the logic that even if the compactness is not very high,
the dilemma of providing services and other amenities to the city inhabitants makes it so. New Delhi has a
density of 4,057 persons per sq km (Census 2011) which is the highest in India.
This leads to great demands for infrastructural services like accommodation, energy, water, transportation,
employment [11, 20]. Recent hard work to decongest New Delhi by formulating ring towns has not met with
the obligatory triumph.

Housing
Overcrowding directs to a persistent problem of dearth of dwellings in urban districts [10]. This dilemma is
exclusively more insightful in those urban regions where there is large incursion of unemployed colonists. An
Indian study of 1962 signifies that 44% of urban family, as contrasted to 34% of rustic families engaged one
room or less. In bigger cities the percentage of families occupying one room or less was as lofty as 67%.
Furthermore, the existing tempo of housing construction is very sluggish which makes the problem further
complex. Indian cities need yearly around 2.5 million novel homes but less than 15% of the constraint is
being created.
The recent Indian census accomplished the first ever and the biggest assessment of household facilities and
property which points an extreme outline of trouble concerning to housing in India. The result is both
informative and uproarious. Taking India as intact, there are 179 million built-up houses, i.e., about 6 people
to each residence, 39% of all bridal couples in India do not have a self-sufficient room to themselves. As
many as 35% inner-city families live in one-room houses. 1/3rd of urban Indian family’s house does not
comprise a kitchen, a lavatory and in some cases there is no electricity and water supply. Only 79% urban
families live in stable houses. 67% of the urban dwellings are owned by the family unit while 29% are rented
(India Census, 2011).
Numerous factors are accountable for the above cited poignant status with respect to housing tribulations
countenanced by the urban people. The chief factors are scarcity of building supplies and fiscal resources,
derisory growth of public utilities into inhabited areas, poverty and joblessness of urban migrants, burly class
and family ties and lack of ample transportation to uptown areas where most of the empty land for new
construction is sited [17, 19, 20].

Transportation
With travel blockage and traffic clogging, nearly all cities and towns of India are anguish from severe form of
transportation problem. Transportation troubles amplify and become more multifaceted as the town develops
in size [20]. With its expansion, the town presents diverse and composite functions. As the town grow to be
bigger, even people living within the urban area have to move by car or bus to pass through the town and
interlopers naturally bring their cars or move through civic transport. Wherever, business is imperative,
commercial automobile such as buses and trucks will create traffic quandary denser [20]. Since the majority
of the commercial works of the towns are concerted in the innermost districts, these hubs are areas of utmost
obstruction. Such congestion turns into larger when the centre is urbanized with tall skyscraper chunks whose
workplaces occupy thousands of workers [10]. This puts terrific pressure on communal transport and causes
drives to take much longer time than they usually would. In some towns, the constructions of the roads, which

were built long earlier than the power-driven transport and be deficient in parking conveniences, are the main
root of congestion [10].
A study of traffic crisis in New Delhi will explain us to traffic situation in the rest of urban India. Already
there are more than 9 million vehicles on New Delhi roads which will almost increased by 30% by 2021,
when the next Master Plan will be put into service. The road length, however, has not augmented impartially
(Traffic Survey, New Delhi, 2011). Urban planners say that by 2021, departing in a car will take extended
time than walking. The strategy for New Delhi Master Plan (2021), permit varied land use, multi-storied
constructions and regularization of 24 manufacturing domains will add to the cities.
Planning section of New Delhi Government also states that in spite of roads occupying 21% of the whole area
of the city, the boost of traffic on major roads is resultant in lesser speeds, overcrowding, junction delays and
high contamination level during crest hours. Some liberation is projected with the total completion of metro
rail systems. But specialists alarm that by the time the metro rail plan becomes entirely outfitted, the demand
for transport services will outpace the ability of both highway and rail transportation.
6. CONCLUDING NOTES
Even though curiosity in urban form is not latest, this analysis shows that author has made substantial growth
in emergent and calculating measures of urban morphology. Attention on urban form and urban sprawl is
brawny among authors qualified in multiple disciplines [3]. Further, the matter of apprehension to the various
restraints often states the level of investigations, the explicit phenomenon of awareness, and the source of
statistics.
In this critique, author has presented numerous measures of urban form and computed them for
Indian regions. Further, author found that lots of these dealings enhanced in the early 2000’s.
Particularly, boost in dealings of livelihood, transport services and density principally after 2001 has
been found.
The density and promptness of urban areas in emergent regions normally surpass the levels
throughout urbanized countries. In particular, admittance to services is normally better in denser
urban forms.
Study at the urban scale, mainly by economists, spotlights on city mass and configuration. The data
advises that economic profit proceed to urban mass and multiplicity. Even after regulating for
divergences in the cost of livelihood, revenues tend to be higher in cities that are big and sundry.
These results hold cost-effective growth strategies that errand magnetizing a miscellaneous set of
industries to accessible cities.
Forcing a condensed city strategy on future urban planning is not only foreseeable but also
practicable in India; this study supports this quarrel by the verdict that present population densities of
many Indian cities are less than the critical density level that may exploit the comprehensive
environmental eminence of a city.
As this paper shows, there are many approaches that aspire to attain sustainable urban forms. Diverse
approaches use diverse levels of notions, as well as highlighting some notions over others. In practice, many
confined governments, planning mentors, countryside architects, and so on are struggling much more
exclusively with facets of sustainable urban form through a diversity of planning and design advances and
plans.
However, the study of suitable levels of urban density is found to be quite multifaceted and vague. The study
suggests following recommendations:
More effort needs to be done to settle the managerial and the corporeal lines of urban differentiation.
Additionally, a lack of dependence and constancy of data unconfined in statistical capital in India
may manipulate the accurateness of research results of the study.
More commonly, potential research managing convenience and connected issues of social barring is
broad open in terms of the trends that could be adopted.
Work conferred in this paper has dealt with a restricted division of the land exercise and transportation issues
supporting social barring. The author considers, however, that ideology of urban form must reflect on
countryside, urban and metropolitan design perceptions as well. Only when these ethics are useful at multiple
scales and frameworks; they have authentic worth for communal policy.

7. REFERENCES
[1] Yan Song and Gerrit-Jan Knaap, “Measuring urban form: Is Portland winning the war on urban sprawl? ”
Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 70, pp. 210-225, February 2004.
[2] Dominik Wiedenhofer, Manfred Lenzen and Julia K. Steinberger, “Energy requirements of consumption:
Urban form, climatic and socio-economic factors, rebounds and their policy implications,” Energy
Policy, vol. 63, pp. 696-707, September 2013.
[3] Yu-Hsin Tsai, “Quantifying urban form: Compactness versus sprawl,” Urban Studies, vol. 42, pp. 141-
161, January 2005.
[4] Jamie Tratalos, Richard A. Fuller, Philip H. Warren, Richard G. Davies and Kevin J. Gaston, “Urban
form, biodiversity potential and ecosystem services,” Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 83, pp. 308–
317, July 2007.
[5] Lijian Han, Weiqi Zhou, Weifeng Li and Li Li, “Impact of urbanization level on urban air quality: A case
of fine particles (PM2.5) in Chinese cities,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 194, pp. 163-170, November
2014.
[6] Hillary Angelo and David Wachsmuth, “Urbanizing urban political ecology: A critique of
methodological cityism,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 39, pp. 16-27,
January 2015.
[7] A. Datta, “New urban utopias of postcolonial India: Entrepreneurial urbanization in Dholera smart city,
Gujarat,” Dialogues in Human Geography, vol. 5, pp. 3-22, March 2015.
[8] Yousef Sakieh et al., “Scenario-based evaluation of urban development sustainability: an integrative
modeling approach to compromise between urbanization suitability index and landscape pattern,”
Environment Development and Sustainability, vol. 17, pp. 1343-1365, December 2014.
[9] Hossein Shafizadeh Moghadam and Marco Helbich, “Spatiotemporal urbanization processes in the
megacity of Mumbai, India: A Markov chains-cellular automata urban growth model,” Applied Geology,
vol. 40, pp. 140-149, June 2013.
[10] Jeffrey C. Brinkman, “Congestion, Agglomeration, and the Structure of Cities,” Journal of Urban
Economics, vol. 94, pp. 13-31, July 2006.
[11] Allen J. Scott and Michael Storper, “The nature of cities: The scope and limits of urban theory,”
International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 39, pp. 1-15, January 2015.
[12] B Guneralp and K C Seto, “Futures of global urban expansion: Uncertainties and implications for
biodiversity conservation,” Environmental Research Letters, vol. 8, pp. 1-10, February 2013.
[13] Arshad Amin and Shahab Fazal, “Evaluating Urban Landscape Dynamics over Srinagar City and Its
Environs,” Journal of Geographic Information System, vol. 7, pp. 211-225, April 2015.
[14] Sajal Ghosh and Kakali Kanjilal, “Long-term equilibrium relationship between urbanization, energy
consumption and economic activity: Empirical evidence from India,” Energy, vol. 66, pp. 324-331,
January 2014.
[15] Bulkeley et al., “Low-carbon transitions and the reconfiguration of urban infrastructure,” Urban studies,
vol. 51, pp. 1471-1486, July 2014.
[16] Steve Frolking et al., “A global fingerprint of macro-scale changes in urban structure from 1999 to
2009,” Environmental Research Letters, vol. 8, pp. 1-10, April 2013.
[17] Schäffler, A. and Swilling, M., “Valuing green infrastructure in an urban environment under pressure —
The Johannesburg case,” Ecological Economics, vol. 86, pp. 246-257, February 2013.
[18] Graham Floater and Philipp Rode, “Cities and the new climate economy: The transformative role of
global urban growth,” The New Climate Economy, Paper no. 1. pp. 1-70, November 2014.
[19] Gaurav Datt, Martin Ravallion and Rinku Murgai, “Growth, urbanization and poverty reduction in
India,” National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 21983, February 2016.
[20] Mohammed Aljoufie et al., “Spatial–temporal analysis of urban growth and transportation in Jeddah City,
Saudi Arabia,” Cities, vol. 31, pp. 57-68, April 2013.
[21] United Nations, 2001.World Urbanization Prospects, The 1999 Revision. United Nations, New York.
[22] The 2011 Census Results, India’s Urban Demographic Transition, Ministry of Urban Development,
Government of India.