ArticlePDF Available

U.S. Food and Drug Administration Approval: Obinutuzumab in Combination with Chlorambucil for the Treatment of Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

On November 1, 2013, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved obinutuzumab (GAZYVA; Genentech, Inc.), a CD20-directed cytolytic antibody, for use in combination with chlorambucil for the treatment of patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In stage 1 of the trial supporting approval, patients with previously untreated CD20-positive CLL were randomly allocated (2:2:1) to obinutuzumab+chlorambucil (GClb, n=238), rituximab+chlorambucil (RClb, n=233), or chlorambucil alone (Clb, n=118). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR). Only the comparison of GClb to Clb was relevant to this approval and is described here. There was a clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in PFS with medians of 23.0 months and 11.1 months in the GClb and Clb arms, respectively [HR=0.16 (95% CI: 0.11, 0.24), p-value <0.0001 log-rank test]. The ORR was 75.9% and 32.1% in the GClb and Clb arms, respectively, and the complete response rate was 27.8% and 0.9% in the GClb and Clb arms, respectively. The most common adverse reactions (≥ 10%) reported in the GClb arm were infusion reactions, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, pyrexia, cough, and musculoskeletal disorders. Obinutuzumab was the first Breakthrough Therapy designated drug to receive FDA approval.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Published OnlineFirst May 13, 2014.Clin Cancer Res
Hyon-Zu Lee, Barry W. Miller, Virginia E. Kwitkowski, et al.
Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Combination with Chlorambucil for the Treatment of Previously
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Approval: Obinutuzumab in
Updated version
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0516doi:
Access the most recent version of this article at:
Manuscript
Author edited.
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been
E-mail alerts related to this article or journal.Sign up to receive free email-alerts
Subscriptions
Reprints and
.pubs@aacr.orgDepartment at
To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications
Permissions
.permissions@aacr.orgDepartment at
To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, contact the AACR Publications
Research.
on May 19, 2014. © 2014 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on May 13, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0516
Research.
on May 19, 2014. © 2014 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on May 13, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0516
1
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Approval: Obinutuzumab in Combination with
Chlorambucil for the Treatment of Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Hyon-Zu Lee1, Barry W. Miller1, Virginia E. Kwitkowski1, Stacey Ricci1, Pedro DelValle1,
Haleh Saber1, Joseph Grillo2, Julie Bullock2, Jeffry Florian2, Nitin Mehrotra2, Chia-Wen Ko3, Lei
Nie3,Marjorie Shapiro4, Mate Tolnay4, Robert C. Kane1, Edvardas Kaminskas1, Robert Justice1,
Ann T. Farrell1, and Richard Pazdur1.
Author Affiliations: 1Office of Hematology and Oncology Products, Office of New Drugs;
2Office of Clinical Pharmacology, 3Office of Biostatistics, 4Office of Biotechnology Products,
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring,
Maryland.
Running Title: FDA Approval of Obinutuzumab for CLL
Corresponding Author: Hyon-Zu Lee, Division of Hematology Products, U.S. Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring MD 20993. Phone: 301-796-
2192; Fax 301-796-9849; E-mail: Hyon.Lee@fda.hhs.gov
Note: This is a U.S. Government work. There are no restrictions on its use.
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Research.
on May 19, 2014. © 2014 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on May 13, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0516
2
Abstract
On November 1, 2013, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved obinutuzumab
(GAZYVA™; Genentech, Inc.), a CD20-directed cytolytic antibody, for use in combination with
chlorambucil for the treatment of patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic
leukemia (CLL). In stage 1 of the trial supporting approval, patients with previously untreated
CD20-positive CLL were randomly allocated (2:2:1) to obinutuzumab+chlorambucil (GClb,
n=238), rituximab+chlorambucil (RClb, n=233), or chlorambucil alone (Clb, n=118). The
primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and secondary endpoints included overall
response rate (ORR). Only the comparison of GClb to Clb was relevant to this approval and is
described here. There was a clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in
PFS with medians of 23.0 months and 11.1 months in the GClb and Clb arms, respectively
[HR=0.16 (95% CI: 0.11, 0.24), p-value <0.0001log-rank test]. The ORR was 75.9% and 32.1%
in the GClb and Clb arms, respectively, and the complete response rate was 27.8% and 0.9% in
the GClb and Clb arms, respectively. The most common adverse reactions ( 10%) reported in
the GClb arm were infusion reactions, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, pyrexia, cough,
and musculoskeletal disorders. Obinutuzumab was the first Breakthrough Therapy designated
drug to receive FDA approval.
Research.
on May 19, 2014. © 2014 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on May 13, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0516
3
Introduction
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common leukemia in Western countries (1). It
is estimated that there will be 15,720 new cases of CLL and 4,600 deaths due to CLL in 2014 in
the U.S (2). CLL is predominant in older individuals with a median age at diagnosis of 71 years.
CLL has a variable natural history with a 5-year relative survival rate of approximately 82% (3).
CLL is characterized by increasing levels of clonal lymphocytes in the blood, bone
marrow, and lymphatic tissues (4). The diagnosis of CLL requires at least 5 x 109 B
lymphocytes/L (5000/µL) in the peripheral blood and confirmation of clonality by flow
cytometry. CLL cells co-express the T-cell antigen CD5 and B-cell surface antigens CD19,
CD20, and CD23 (5).
Approved therapies for CLL include chlorambucil, cyclophosphamide, fludarabine,
alemtuzumab, bendamustine, ofatumumab, and rituximab. For previously untreated patients with
progressive CLL, recommended treatment regimens primarily consist of
chemoimmunotherapies. However, in patients with coexisting medical conditions, often
including the elderly, aggressive treatment regimens are poorly tolerated (6). Allogeneic stem-
cell transplantation is the only potentially curative treatment for CLL (7).
This report summarizes the FDA review of the Biologics License Application (BLA) for
obinutuzumab used in combination with chlorambucil for the initial therapy of patients with
chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Chemistry
Obinutuzumab is an Fc-glycoengineered humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody of the IgG1
subclass with a molecular mass of approximately 150 kDa (8). It recognizes the type II epitope
of the CD20 antigen rather than the type I epitope recognized by rituximab. Obinutuzumab is a
Research.
on May 19, 2014. © 2014 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on May 13, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0516
4
sterile, clear, colorless to slightly brown, preservative-free liquid concentrate for intravenous
administration and is supplied at a concentration of 25 mg/mL in 1000 mg single use vials.
Pharmacology and Toxicology
Obinutuzumab binds to CD20 expressed on the surface of pre-B and mature B lymphocytes (B-
cells). Upon binding to CD20, obinutuzumab mediates B-cell lysis (i) through antibody-
dependent cellular cytotoxicity and phagocytosis; (ii) by directly activating internal cell death
signaling pathways; and (iii) by antibody activation of complement-dependent cytotoxicity.
Toxicology studies were conducted using cynomolgus monkeys. Obinutuzumab binds human
and cynomolgus monkey CD20 with similar affinity. Repeat-dose toxicology studies of up to 26
weeks duration using IV administration of obinutuzumab or four weeks duration using
subcutaneous administration were conducted. Toxicities observed from repeat-dose studies were
consistent with the intended pharmacology of obinutuzumab or were the apparent result of cross-
species immunogenicity effects. The primary effects of obinutuzumab included hypersensitivity
reactions, marked decreases in circulating B-cells, with corresponding lymphoid tissue B-cell
depletion in the spleen and lymph nodes. Transient natural killer cell reductions were also
observed, as were opportunistic infections secondary to immunosuppression.
Administration of obinutuzumab to pregnant monkeys during gestation was associated
with complete depletion of B lymphocytes in infants. Obinutuzumab did not affect embryo-fetal
development, parturition, postnatal survival, or the growth and development of infants.
Obinutuzumab crosses the blood-placental barrier and is secreted in the milk of pregnant
monkeys. Because of the depletion of B-cells and possible opportunistic infections, use of
obinutuzumab during pregnancy is not recommended.
Clinical Pharmacology
Research.
on May 19, 2014. © 2014 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on May 13, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0516
5
The steady state pharmacokinetic parameters for obinutuzumab were derived using a population
based pharmacokinetic (pop-PK) analysis. The geometric mean (CV%) volume of distribution of
obinutuzumab is approximately 3.8 (23%) L. The elimination of obinutuzumab is comprised of a
linear clearance pathway and a time-dependent non-linear clearance pathway. As obinutuzumab
treatment progresses, the impact of the time-dependent pathway diminishes in a manner
suggesting target-mediated drug disposition. The geometric mean (CV%) terminal obinutuzumab
clearance and half-life are approximately 0.09 (46%) L/day and 28.4 (43%) days, respectively.
Body weight, disease type, and tumor size were associated with changes in obinutuzumab
exposures, but the impact of these factors on obinutuzumab exposure did not warrant a dose
modification at this time. Mild or moderate renal impairment (i.e., baseline creatinine clearance
(CLcr) > 30 mL/min) did not affect obinutuzumab exposure. There are insufficient data available
to determine the effect of severe renal impairment (CLcr < 30 mL/min) or any degree of hepatic
impairment on obinutuzumab exposure. No treatment modifications are recommended in these
populations because these elimination pathways are not expected to be a major factor affecting
exposure as monoclonal antibodies are generally catabolized by ubiquitous proteolytic enzymes.
Clinical Trial
Design
Study CLL11 was an open-label, three-arm, randomized, multicenter, two-stage, phase 3 trial in
patients with previously untreated CLL. Randomization was stratified by Binet stage and
country/region. The trial was conducted at 155 centers in 24 countries and in collaboration with
the German CLL Study Group. In stage 1 of the trial, patients were randomly allocated (2:2:1) to
obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil (GClb), rituximab plus chlorambucil (RClb), or chlorambucil
Research.
on May 19, 2014. © 2014 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on May 13, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0516
6
(Clb) alone. In Stage 2, the randomization continued between GClb and RClb (1:1). Stage 2
results were not available at the time of the BLA review.
Key eligibility criteria were age 18 years or older, previously untreated documented
CD20-positive CLL requiring treatment, and coexisting medical conditions or creatinine
clearance (CrCl) < 70 mL/min or both. Exclusion criteria included CrCl < 30 mL/min, active
infections, positive hepatitis B (HBsAg or anti-HBc positive, patients positive for anti-HBc could
be included if hepatitis B viral DNA was not detectable) and hepatitis C serology, and
immunization with live virus vaccine within 28 days prior to randomization.
For the purpose of analysis, stage 1of the clinical trial was further divided into stages 1a
(GClb vs. Clb) and 1b (RClb vs. Clb). In the stage 1a analysis, 356 patients were randomly
allocated to GClb (n=238) or to Clb (n=118). The stage 1b analysis is not relevant to this
approval and will not be described further. Patients in the Clb arm with disease progression
during or within 6 months of end of treatment could cross-over to GClb but only 19% had done
so at the time of analysis cutoff date.
The trial began with patients on the GClb arm receiving obinutuzumab 1000 mg by
intravenous infusion on days 1, 8 and 15 of the first treatment cycle and on the first day of cycles
2-6. Later in the trial, due to infusion reactions, the protocol was amended to split the first dose
in the first cycle only between day 1 (100 mg) and day 2 (900 mg), and this regimen was
administered to 45 (19%) patients. Patients on both arms received chlorambucil 0.5 mg/kg orally
on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle for a maximum of 6 cycles. After the last treatment, patients
were followed until disease progression, next leukemia treatment, and death.
Dose modification of obinutuzumab was not allowed. Dose reductions for chlorambucil
were allowed, and once reduced the dose could not be re-escalated. Patients who experienced a
Research.
on May 19, 2014. © 2014 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on May 13, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0516
7
grade 4 infusion reaction or a grade 3 infusion reaction at re-challenge were permanently
discontinued from the study treatment and patients with an infection, grade 3 or 4 cytopenia or a
grade 2 or higher non-hematologic toxicity had their study treatment temporarily interrupted
until resolution.
To reduce infusion reactions, premedication with an intravenous glucocorticoid,
acetaminophen and an antihistamine prior to the first infusion became mandatory during the trial.
Subsequent pre-medications could be reduced in the absence of an infusion reaction.
Consideration was given to holding antihypertensive agents before and throughout the infusion
because infusion reactions sometimes included hypotension. Infusion reactions were managed by
interrupting or reducing the infusion rate and administering concomitant medications such as
steroids and antihistamines. Upon resolution of symptoms, the infusion was resumed at one-half
the previous rate. Obinutuzumab was to be administered at a location with immediately available
emergency resuscitation equipment.
Patients with a high tumor burden (WBC 25 x109/L or bulky lymphadenopathy) were
to receive adequate hydration and anti-hyperuricemics prior to the initiation of treatment for
prophylaxis of tumor lysis syndrome.
Disease assessment was performed at baseline, after 3 cycles, 28 days after the last trial
treatment, 3 months after the end of treatment, and then every 3 months until 3 years from last
treatment. Further follow-up visits were scheduled every 6 months until 5 years and then,
annually for 8 years after the last patient entered the trial. A CT scan was performed in patients
who had achieved a CR or PR 2-3 months after end of treatment. In patients who had a CR (or
cytopenic CR), a bone marrow aspirate and biopsy was obtained. A CT scan was also performed
when progression of disease was detected by physical examination.
Research.
on May 19, 2014. © 2014 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on May 13, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0516
8
The primary efficacy endpoint was PFS based on investigator’s assessment. However, the
regulatory decision was based on independent review committee (IRC)-assessed PFS. The IRC
was composed of a panel of CLL experts (each patient reviewed by two reviewers and one
adjudicator if required) who assessed response and progression based on peripheral blood counts,
bone marrow biopsy results, reports of physical examination, and radiology reports. Secondary
efficacy endpoints included best overall response, event-free survival, duration of response,
disease-free survival, time to new anti-leukemic therapy and overall survival. Response was
determined using the NCI/International Workshop on CLL (IWCLL) guideline (5). End of trial
was defined as 8 years after the last patient was enrolled.
Results
Demographics
Patient demographics and disease characteristics, including CLL prognostic factors were
balanced at baseline between treatment arms (Table 1). The median age was 73 years, 76% of
patients had multiple coexisting medical conditions and 68% had a CrCl <70 mL/min.
Efficacy
The IRC-assessed median PFS was 23.0 months in the GClb arm versus 11.1 months in the Clb
arm [HR=0.16 (95% CI: 0.11, 0.24), p-value <0.0001 stratified log-rank test] (Fig. 1). The
investigator-assessed median PFS was 23.0 months in the GClb arm and 10.9 months in the Clb
arm [HR= 0.14 (95% CI: 0.09, 0.21), p-value <0.0001 stratified log-rank test]. The results of the
secondary endpoints were supportive of the primary endpoint; however, there was no
multiplicity adjustment plan for testing the secondary endpoints. Table 2 lists the results of the
primary and key secondary endpoints. The overall survival (OS) data were not mature at the
analysis cutoff date. The median observation time was 14.2 months and median number of
Research.
on May 19, 2014. © 2014 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on May 13, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0516
9
treatment cycles was six. Eighty-one percent and 67% of patients in the GClb and Clb arms,
respectively, received all 6 treatment cycles.
Safety
The safety dataset included 240 patients who received one or more doses of obinutuzumab with
Clb and 116 patients who received Clb only. Although Clb dose modifications/delays occurred
twice as often in the GClb arm (32% vs. 15%), the median cumulative dose was comparable in
the two arms (370 vs. 384 mg). The most frequently reported adverse reactions with an incidence
of 5% or greater and occurring at least 2% more frequently in the GClb arm were infusion-
related reactions, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, pyrexia, cough, leukopenia, and
musculoskeletal pains (Table 3). The most common serious adverse reaction was infusion-related
reaction (11%). Grade 3-4 neutropenia was more common in the GClb arm (34%) than in the Clb
arm (16%). The incidence of infections was not higher in the GClb arm, but 32% of patients in
the GClb arm received G-CSF compared to 14% in the Clb arm. Growth factors were allowed
for neutropenia per investigator or institutional guidelines. Tumor lysis syndrome occurred in 4%
of patients in the GClb arm.
The incidence of infusion reactions was 69% with the first infusion of obinutuzumab, and
the incidence of reactions with subsequent infusions was 3% with the second 1000 mg and < 1%
thereafter. Symptoms of infusion-related reactions occurring in greater than 20% of patients
included hypotension, nausea, chills and pyrexia. Changes to the administration of obinutuzumab
during the trial (including glucocorticoid, analgesic and antihistamine treatment, omission of
antihypertensive medications in the morning of the first infusion, and administration of the Cycle
1 Day 1 dose over 2 days) appeared to reduce the incidence of infusion reactions.
Research.
on May 19, 2014. © 2014 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on May 13, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0516
10
Late-occurring neutropenia ( 28 days after treatment) was seen in 16% of patients on the
GClb arm and 12% of patients on the Clb arm. While there were no instances of hepatitis B
reactivation or progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in the randomized trial, there were
rare cases of each on other trials using obinutuzumab.
Discussion
The regular approval (licensing) of obinutuzumab for use in combination with chlorambucil for
the treatment of patients with previously untreated CLL was based on the demonstration of a
clinically meaningful and statistically robust improvement in PFS in a single randomized trial.
For diseases such as CLL, PFS may be considered an acceptable endpoint for regular approval as
it takes considerable time to reach the OS endpoint and additional subsequent therapies may
confound an OS analysis (9). However, a recent update of study CLL11, including an analysis of
Stage 2, reported significant improvements in OS for the GClb arm compared to the Clb arm and
in PFS for the GClb arm compared to the RClb arm (10). These data have not been reviewed by
the Agency.
The main adverse reactions that occurred in the GClb arm were infusion reactions and
myelosuppression. Other important toxicities included in the labeling were the risks of hepatitis
B virus reactivation and JC virus infection resulting in progressive multifocal
leukoencephalopathy which were observed in patients treated with obinutuzumab in other
clinical trials. The FDA review of the randomized trial comparison of GClb to Clb concluded
that there was a favorable benefit-risk outcome for the treatment of patients with previously
untreated CLL.
CLL largely affects older patients who often have multiple comorbidities. However, this
population is not sufficiently enrolled in most pivotal clinical trials (6). In the CLL11 trial, the
Research.
on May 19, 2014. © 2014 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on May 13, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0516
11
median age was 73 years and 81% of the patients were 65 years or older, thus this was one of the
few randomized trials that adequately represented the typical age of the CLL population. The
results of trial CLL11 indicate that the combination of obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil is more
effective than chlorambucil alone, has an acceptable safety profile, and is an appropriate regimen
for elderly patients with previously untreated CLL and comorbidities.Because aggressive
treatments for older patients with comorbidities are poorly tolerated, chlorambucil was
considered an acceptable active control for this trial. However, in future trials in this patient
population the GClb regimen would be an appropriate control.
In July 2012, the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA)
was signed to provide designation of a drug as a Breakthrough Therapy for serious or life-
threatening diseases. This designation is intended to expedite the development of new drugs with
preliminary clinical evidence that indicates the drug may offer a substantial improvement over
available therapies (11). Obinutuzumab was the first Breakthrough Therapy product to receive
FDA approval. Because the Breakthrough Therapy designation request for obinutuzumab was
received close to the time of BLA submission, the development plan could not receive the full
benefits of the program. Drugs that receive Breakthrough Therapy designation earlier in their
development are eligible to receive intensive interaction and guidance from the FDA.
Obinutuzumab is the third CD20-directed cytolytic antibody (after ofatumumab and
rituximab) to receive FDA approval and provides a major advance in the treatment of patients
with CLL.
Acknowledgment
Research.
on May 19, 2014. © 2014 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on May 13, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0516
12
The authors thank Beatrice Kallungal for her assistance in coordinating the review of this
Biologics License Application.
References
1. Siegel R, DeSantis C, Virgo K, Stein K, Mariotto A, Smith T, et al. Cancer treatment and
survivorship statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2012;62:220–41.
2. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CACancerJClin;64:9-29.
3. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2013 [Internet]. Atlanta: American
Cancer Society; 2013 [cited 2014 Jan 31]. Available from:
http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@epidemiologysurveilance/documents/docum
ent/acspc-036845.pdf.
4. Dighiero G, Hamblin TJ. Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Lancet 2008;371:1017-29.
5. Hallek M, Cheson BD, Catovsky D, Caligaris-Cappio F, Dighiero G, Döhner H, et al.
Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a report
from the international workshop on chronic lymphocytic leukemia updating the National
Cancer Institute-Working Group 1996 guidelines. Blood 2008;111:5446-56.
6. Eichhorst B, Goede V, Hallek M. Treatment of elderly patients with chronic lymphocytic
leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma 2009;50:171-8.
7. Fischer K, Cramer P, Busch R, Böttcher S, Bahlo J, Schubert J, et al. Bendamustine in
combination with rituximab for previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic
leukemia: A multicenter phase II trial of the German Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:3209-16.
Research.
on May 19, 2014. © 2014 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on May 13, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0516
13
8. Mössner E, Brünker P, Moser S, Püntener U, Schmidt C, Herter S, et al. Increasing the
efficacy of CD20 antibody therapy through the engineering of a new type II anti-CD20
antibody with enhanced direct and immune effector cell-mediated B-cell cytotoxicity.
Blood 2010;115:4393-402.
9. Chakravarty A, Sridhara R. Use of progression-free survival as surrogate marker in
oncology trials: some regulatory issues. Stat Methods Med Res 2008;17:515-18.
10. Goede V, Fischer K, Busch R, Engelke A, Eichhorst B, Wendtner C, et al. Obinutuzumab
plus chlorambucil in patients with CLL and coexisting conditions. N Engl J Med
2014;370:1101-10.
11. Guidance for Industry: Expedited programs for serious conditions-drugs and biologics.
FDA. June 2013 [cited 2014 Jan 31]. Available from:
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidanc
es/ucm358301.pdf.
Research.
on May 19, 2014. © 2014 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on May 13, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0516
14
Table 1. Baseline Demographics and Disease Characteristics (CLL11, stage 1a)
Category Parameter GClb Clb Total
Gender n 238 118 356
Female 98 (41%) 43 (36%) 141 (40%)
Male 140 (59%) 75 (64%) 215 (60%)
Age (years) n 238 118 356
75 107 (45%) 44 (37%) 151 (42%)
65 196 (82%) 92 (78%) 288 (81%)
Median 74.0 72.0 73.0
Range 39-88 43-87 39-88
Race n 238 118 356
Caucasian 229 (96%) 108 (92%) 337 (95%)
ECOG PS n 238 118 356
0 to 1 211 (89%) 105 (89%) 316 (89%)
Binet stage n 238 118 356
A 55 (23%) 24 (20%) 79 (22%)
B 98 (41%) 50 (42%) 148 (42%)
C 85 (36%) 44 (37%) 129 (36%)
IgVH n 210 99 309
Unmutated 129 (61%) 58 (59%) 187 (61%)
Mutated 76 (36%) 36 (36%) 112 (36%)
Chromosomal
abnormalities
n 203 96 299
17p- 16 (8%) 10 (10%) 26 (9%)
11q- 33 (16%) 14 (15%) 47 (16%)
+12 33 (16%) 16 (17%) 49 (16%)
13q- 58 (29%) 32 (33%) 90 (30%)
ZAP-70
expression
n 189 97 286
Positive 83 (44%) 48 (49%) 131 (46%)
Negative 106 (56%) 49 (51%) 155 (54%)
Research.
on May 19, 2014. © 2014 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on May 13, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0516
15
Table 2. Summary of Efficacy Results (CLL11, stage 1a)
Endpoints GClb Clb
Median PFS by IRC (months) 23.0 11.1
HR, p-value (stratified log-rank test a) 0.16 (0.11, 0.24), <0.0001
Median PFS by investigator (months) 23.0 10.9
HR, p-value (stratified log-rank test a) 0.14 (0.09, 0.21), <0.0001
Best overall response rate 75.9% 32.1%
Complete response 27.8% 0.9%
Median duration of response (months)
b
15.2 3.5
a Stratified by Binet stage at baseline.
b Among patients who had response.
Research.
on May 19, 2014. © 2014 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on May 13, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0516
16
Table 3. Treatment-Emergent Adverse Reactions with 5% Incidence and 2%
Difference between the Two Arms (CLL11, stage 1a)
Adverse Event
Obinutuzumab +
Chlorambucil
n=240
Chlorambucil
n=116
Grades
1-4
Grades
3&4
Grades
1-4
Grades
3&4
n % n % n % n %
Injury, Poisoning and Procedural
Complications
Infusion-Related Reaction 165 69 50 21 0 0 0 0
Blood and Lymphatic System
Disorders
Neutropenia 96 40 82 34 21 18 18 16
Thrombocytopenia 36 15 26 11 8 7 4 3
Anemia 29 12 9 4 12 10 6 5
Leukopenia 16 7 13 5 0 0 0 0
Respiratory, Thoracic and Mediastinal
Disorders
Cough 23 10 0 0 8 7 1 <1
General Disorders and Administration
Site Conditions
Pyrexia 25 10 1 <1 8 7 0 0
Musculoskeletal and Connective
Tissue Disorders
Arthralgias (a) 13 5 2 1 3 3 1 1
Musculoskeletal Pains (b) 23 10 2 1 8 7 0 0
(a) Includes the Preferred Terms: Arthralgia, Gouty Arthritis, Arthritis, Osteoarthritis
(b) Includes the Preferred Terms: Musculoskeletal Pain, Musculoskeletal Chest Pain, Bone Pain, Myalgia
Intercostal, Neck Pain, Pain In Extremity, Back Pain
Research.
on May 19, 2014. © 2014 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on May 13, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0516
17
Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier Estimates of IRC-Assessed PFS (CLL11, stage 1a)
Clb: Chlorambucil; GClb: Obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil
Research.
on May 19, 2014. © 2014 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on May 13, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0516
© 2014 American Association for Cancer Research
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0369121518212427
Study month
Progression-free survival (%)
Clb
Clb
118
GClb
GClb
238
91
208
76
201
46
146
21
111
6
69
2
39
0
16
0
2
0
0
Figure 1:
Research.
on May 19, 2014. © 2014 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on May 13, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0516
... Both, thrombocytopenia and anemia were also commonly reported in previous clinical trials [12,42]. Infusion-related allergic reactions, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, pyrexia, cough and musculoskeletal disorders were among the most commonly observed adverse reactions when obinutuzumab was combined with chlorambucil in CLL [45]. In our observational study one patient with CLL experienced an infusion-related allergic reaction at the first cycle. ...
... Goede et al. observed that infusion-related reactions occurred in approximately 20% of patients during the first infusion of obinutuzumab [12]. Because of this high rate of infusion-related reactions, the first dose of obinutuzumab should be split between day 1 (100 mg) and day 2 (900 mg) when applied to CLL patients [45]. We strictly applied that protocol also for our FL patients, which may be one factor, why our rate of infusion-related reactions was that low. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background & Aim In randomised clinical trials, the type II anti-CD20 antibody obinutuzumab has been shown to be more effective than rituximab for therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and follicular lymphoma (FL). However, this enhanced efficacy was linked with elevated rates of high-grade adverse events. The aim of this study was to assess the tolerability and toxicity profile of obinutuzumab treatment in routine patients with CLL and FL, of whom the majority had experienced toxicity or resistance to rituximab. Methods This retrospective cohort study investigated fifteen obinutuzumab-treated patients, eight with CLL and seven with FL. The course of the disease, comorbidities and treatment-related toxicities were recorded. All patients with CLL and all but three FL patients had any form of pre-treatment with rituximab. Results Between October 2014 and August 2017, 15 patients were treated with obinutuzumab at the University Hospital Krems. In the CLL-cohort, 1 patient (12,5%) developed pneumonia, 2 (25%) febrile neutropenia, 6 (75%) anemia and 7 (87,5%) thrombocytopenia, respectively. One patient exhibited an infusion-related allergic reaction. In the FL-cohort, 6 patients (85,7%) presented with thrombocytopenia, 3 (42,9%) with anemia and one patient with neutropenia. No sepsis or consecutive solid tumors were seen in any of the patients. Conclusion Obinutuzumab was mostly well tolerated in mild to heavily pre-treated patients with CLL and therapy-naïve or pre-treated patients with FL. The frequency and profile of adverse events and toxicity was comparable to data from previous clinical studies and could be managed adequately in the setting of a University Clinic.
... Although a glycanengineered patent-expired mAb could fall under a narrow definition of a biosimilar, its enhanced therapeutic index could render clinical equivalence comparison with the reference mAb obsolete. The nearest example to date is that of obinituzumab, a variant of anti-CD20 with Fc engineered defucosylation, considered a novel product by the FDA (and later the EMA) when licensed for treating patients with chronic Llymphocytic leukemia after demonstrating superior phase 3 RCT efficacy compared to ritixumab (Lee et al. 2014). Nevertheless, obinituzumab has also been humanized and recognizes a different, albeit overlapping, epitope within CD20 than ritixumab, making it difficult to know if its enhanced efficacy is entirely due to hypofucosyaltion or not. ...
Article
Since the turn of the century, cancer therapy has undergone a transformation in terms of new treatment modalities and renewed optimism in achieving long-lived tumor control and even cure. This is, in large part, thanks to the widespread incorporation of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) into standard treatment regimens. These new therapies have, across many settings, significantly contributed to improved clinical responses, patient quality of life and survival. Moreover, the flexibility of the antibody platform has led to the development of a wide range of innovative and combinatorial therapies that continue to augment the clinician's armory. Despite these successes, there is a growing awareness that in many cases mAb therapy remains suboptimal, primarily due to inherent limitations imposed by the immune system's own homeostatic controls and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Here, we discuss the principal barriers that act to constrain the tumor-killing activity of antibody-based therapeutics, particularly those involving antibody glycans, using illustrative examples from both pre-clinical and market approved mAbs. We also discuss strategies that have been, or are in development to overcome these obstacles. Finally, we outline how the growing understanding of the biological terrain in which mAbs function is shaping innovation and regulation in cancer therapeutics.
... As with fit patients, testing for TP53 deletions and mutations should be standard practice. Two major randomised clinical trials, CLL11 by the German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG) and COMPLEMENT-1, included older patients and patients with significant co-morbidities and led to approval of combinations of chlorambucil (Clb) with obinutuzumab (Obin) or ofatumumab (Ofa), respectively (Goede et al, 2014b;Lee et al, 2014;Hillmen et al, 2015). In addition to demonstrating the superiority of Clb-R over Clb alone, the CLL11 study confirmed a significant PFS and time-to-next treatment (TTNT) benefit with Clb-Obin over Clb-R and an OS benefit compared to Clb. ...
Article
Despite the advances in cancer treatment achieved, for example, by the CD20 antibody rituximab, an urgent medical need remains to optimize the capacity of such antibodies to induce antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) that determines therapeutic efficacy. The cytokine IL-15 stimulates proliferation, activation, and cytolytic capacity of NK cells, but broad clinical use is prevented by short half-life, poor accumulation at the tumor site, and severe toxicity due to unspecific immune activation. We here report modified immunocytokines consisting of Fc-optimized CD19 and CD20 antibodies fused to an IL-15 moiety comprising an L45E-E46K double mutation (MIC ⁺ format). The E46K mutation abrogated binding to IL-15Rα, thereby enabling substitution of physiological trans-presentation by target binding and thus conditional IL-15Rβγ stimulation, whereas the L45E mutation optimized IL-15Rβγ agonism and producibility. In vitro analysis of NK activation, anti-leukemia reactivity, and toxicity using autologous and allogeneic B cells confirmed target-dependent function of MIC ⁺ constructs. Compared with Fc-optimized CD19 and CD20 antibodies, MIC ⁺ constructs mediated superior target cell killing and NK cell proliferation. Mouse models using luciferase-expressing human NALM-6 lymphoma cells, patient acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cells, and murine EL-4 lymphoma cells transduced with human CD19/CD20 as targets and human and murine NK cells as effectors, respectively, confirmed superior and target-dependent anti-leukemic activity. In summary, MIC ⁺ constructs combine the benefits of Fc-optimized antibodies and IL-15 cytokine activity and mediate superior NK cell immunity with potentially reduced side effects. They thus constitute a promising new immunotherapeutic approach shown here for B cell malignancies.
Article
Annually, a significant number of individuals succumb to cancer, an anomalous cellular condition characterized by uncontrolled cellular proliferation and the emergence of highly perilous tumors. Identifying underlying molecular mechanism(s) driving disease progression has led to various inventive therapeutic approaches, many of which are presently under pre-clinical and/or clinical trials. Over the recent years, numerous alternative strategies for addressing cancer have also been proposed and put into practice. This article delineates the modern therapeutic drugs employed in cancer treatment and their associated toxicity. Due to inherent drug toxicity associated with most modern treatments, demand rises for alternative therapies and phytochemicals with minimal side effects and proven efficacy against cancer. Analogs of taxol, Vinca alkaloids like vincristine and vinblastine, and podophyllotoxin represent a few illustrative examples in this context. The phytochemicals often work by modifying the activity of molecular pathways that are thought to be involved in the onset and progression of cancer. The principal objective of this study is to provide an overview of our current understanding regarding the pharmacologic effects and molecular targets of the active compounds found in natural products for cancer treatment and collate information about the recent advancements in this realm. The authors' interest in advancing the field of phytochemical research stems from both the potential of these compounds for use as drugs as well as their scientific validity. Accordingly, the significance of herbal formulations is underscored, shedding light on anticancer phytochemicals that are sought after at both preclinical and clinical levels, with discussion on the opportunities and challenges in pre-clinical and clinical cancer studies.
Article
Drug‐Free Macromolecular Therapeutics (DFMT) utilizes modified monoclonal antibodies (or antibody fragments) to generate antigen‐crosslinking induced apoptosis in target cells. DFMT is a two‐component system containing a morpholino oligonucleotide (MORF1) modified antibody ( Ab ‐MORF1) and human serum albumin conjugated with multiple copies of complementary morpholino oligonucleotide (MORF2), (HSA‐(MORF2) x ). The two components recognize each other via Watson‐Crick base pairing complementation of their respective MORFs. One HSA‐(MORF2) x molecule can hybridize with multiple Ab ‐MORF1 molecules on the cell surface, thus serving as the therapeutic crosslink‐inducing mechanism of action. Herein, we examined various anti‐neoplastic agents in combination with the anti‐CD20 Obinutuzumab (OBN)‐based DFMT system. We examined three different classes of chemotherapies: DNA alkylating agents; proliferation pathway inhibitors; and DNA replication inhibitors. We utilized Chou‐Talalay combination index mathematics to determine which drugs engaged synergistically with OBN‐based DFMT. We determined that OBN‐based DFMT synergizes with topoisomerase inhibitors and DNA nucleotide analogues but is antagonistic with proliferation pathway inhibitors. We performed cell mechanism experiments to analyze points of synergism or antagonism by investigating Ca ²⁺ influx, mitochondrial health, lysosomal stability, and cell cycle arrest. Finally, we demonstrated the synergistic drug combinatorial effects of OBN‐based DFMT with etoposide in vivo using a human xenograft non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma mouse model. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
Article
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression has been demonstrated in a variety of cancers. Targeted therapy with anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) has been approved as a therapeutic modality. Despite the efficacy of mAbs in tumor treatment, many patients do not benefit from this therapeutic platform. Fragment crystallizable (Fc) engineering is a common approach to improve the efficacy of therapeutic mAbs. Five Fc-engineered mAbs have so far been approved by FDA. We have recently developed an anti-HER2 bispecific mAb, BiHT, constructed from variable domains of trastuzumab, and our novel humanized anti-HER2 mAb, hersintuzumab. BiHT displayed promising antitumor activity as potently as the combination of the parental mAbs. Here, we aimed to modify the Fc of BiHT to improve its therapeutic efficacy. The Fc-engineered BiHT (MBiHT) bound to recombinant HER2 and its subdomains with an affinity similar to BiHT. It also recognized native HER2 on different cell lines, inhibited their proliferation, downregulated HER2 expression, and suppressed downstream signaling pathways similar to BiHT. Compared with BiHT, MBiHT displayed enhanced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity activity against various tumor cell lines. It also inhibited the growth of ovarian xenograft tumors in nude mice more potently than BiHT. Our findings suggest that MBiHT could be a potent therapeutic candidate for the treatment of HER2-overexpressing cancer types.
Article
Full-text available
The treatment landscape of hematological malignancies has been evolving at an extremely fast pace. Hematological malignancies are diverse and distinct from solid tumors. These constitute challenges, which are also unique opportunities for immunotherapy. The five categories of immunotherapies that have found success in the management of hematological malignancies are allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant, monoclonal antibodies and innovative designs, immune checkpoint inhibitors, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, and B cell targeting small immunomodulatory molecules. Allogeneic stem cell transplant rightly called our bluntest weapon is the oldest form of successful immunotherapy. Alternate donor transplants and improvement in supportive care have improved the scope of this immunotherapy option. Among monoclonal antibodies, rituximab forms the prototype on which over a dozen other antibodies have been developed. The bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) blinatumomab engages cytotoxic CD3 T cells with CD19 acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cells, which is an effective treatment method for relapsed refractory ALL. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have established their role in hematological malignancies with high PD-L1 expression, including relapsed refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma and primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma (BCL). Small immunomodulatory drugs targeting the B cell receptor downstream signaling through BTK inhibitors, SYK inhibitors, PI3K inhibitors (idelalisib), and BCL-2 inhibitors (venetoclax), and immunomodulatory imide drugs (lenalidomide) have also emerged as exciting therapeutic avenues in immunotherapy. CAR T cells are one of the most exciting and promising forms of adoptive immunotherapy. CAR T cells are rightly called living drugs or serial killers to keep patients alive. CAR T cells are genetically engineered, autologous T cells that combine the cytotoxicity of T cells with the antigen-binding specificity of CARs. CARs are antigen-specific but major histocompatibility complex/human leukocyte antigen-independent. There are five approved CAR T cell products for the management of relapsed refractory leukemias, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma. The past and present of immunotherapy have been really exciting and the future looks incredibly promising. The challenges include widening the availability and affordability beyond specialized centers, identification of potentially predictive biomarkers of response, and experience in the management of complications of these novel agents. The combinational approach of multiple immunotherapies might be the way forward to complement the treatment strategies to harness the immune system and to improve survival with good quality of life.
Article
Full-text available
Cancer is an abnormal state of cells where they undergo uncontrolled proliferation and produce aggressive malignancies that cause millions of deaths every year. With the new understanding of the molecular mechanism(s) of disease progression, our knowledge about the disease is snowballing, leading to the evolution of many new therapeutic regimes and their successive trials. In the past few decades, various combinations of therapies have been proposed and are presently employed in the treatment of diverse cancers. Targeted drug therapy, immunotherapy, and personalized medicines are now largely being employed, which were not common a few years back. The field of cancer discoveries and therapeutics are evolving fast as cancer type-specific biomarkers are progressively being identified and several types of cancers are nowadays undergoing systematic therapies, extending patients' disease-free survival thereafter. Although growing evidence shows that a systematic and targeted approach could be the future of cancer medicine, chemotherapy remains a largely opted therapeutic option despite its known side effects on the patient's physical and psychological health. Chemotherapeutic agents/pharmaceuticals served a great purpose over the past few decades and have remained the frontline choice for advanced-stage malignancies where surgery and/or radiation therapy cannot be prescribed due to specific reasons. The present report succinctly reviews the existing and contemporary advancements in chemotherapy and assesses the status of the enrolled drugs/pharmaceuticals; it also comprehensively discusses the emerging role of specific/targeted therapeutic strategies that are presently being employed to achieve better clinical success/survival rate in cancer patients.
Article
Advances in understanding the ways in which the immune system fails to control tumor growth or prevent autoimmunity have led to the development of powerful therapeutic strategies to treat these diseases. In contrast to conventional therapies that have a broadly suppressive effect, immunotherapies are more akin to targeted therapies because they are mechanistically driven and are typically developed with the goal of “drugging” a specific underlying pathway or phenotype. This means that their effects and toxicities are, at least in theory, more straightforward to anticipate. The development of functionalized antibodies, genetically engineered T cells, and immune checkpoint inhibitors continues to accelerate, illuminating new biology and bringing new treatment to patients. In the following sections, we provide an overview of immunotherapeutic concepts, highlight recent advances in the field of immunotherapies, and discuss controversies and future directions, particularly as these pertain to hematologic oncology or blood-related diseases. We conclude by illustrating how original research published in this journal fits into and contributes to the overall framework of advances in immunotherapy.
Article
Full-text available
Background: The monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody rituximab, combined with chemotherapeutic agents, has been shown to prolong overall survival in physically fit patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) but not in those with coexisting conditions. We investigated the benefit of the type 2, glycoengineered antibody obinutuzumab (also known as GA101) as compared with that of rituximab, each combined with chlorambucil, in patients with previously untreated CLL and coexisting conditions. Methods: We randomly assigned 781 patients with previously untreated CLL and a score higher than 6 on the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) (range, 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating worse health status) or an estimated creatinine clearance of 30 to 69 ml per minute to receive chlorambucil, obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil, or rituximab plus chlorambucil. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Results: The patients had a median age of 73 years, creatinine clearance of 62 ml per minute, and CIRS score of 8 at baseline. Treatment with obinutuzumab-chlorambucil or rituximab-chlorambucil, as compared with chlorambucil monotherapy, increased response rates and prolonged progression-free survival (median progression-free survival, 26.7 months with obinutuzumab-chlorambucil vs. 11.1 months with chlorambucil alone; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13 to 0.24; P<0.001; and 16.3 months with rituximab-chlorambucil vs. 11.1 months with chlorambucil alone; hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.57; P<0.001). Treatment with obinutuzumab-chlorambucil, as compared with chlorambucil alone, prolonged overall survival (hazard ratio for death, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.74; P=0.002). Treatment with obinutuzumab-chlorambucil, as compared with rituximab-chlorambucil, resulted in prolongation of progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.49; P<0.001) and higher rates of complete response (20.7% vs. 7.0%) and molecular response. Infusion-related reactions and neutropenia were more common with obinutuzumab-chlorambucil than with rituximab-chlorambucil, but the risk of infection was not increased. Conclusions: Combining an anti-CD20 antibody with chemotherapy improved outcomes in patients with CLL and coexisting conditions. In this patient population, obinutuzumab was superior to rituximab when each was combined with chlorambucil. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01010061.).
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: We investigated the safety and efficacy of bendamustine and rituximab (BR) in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Patients and methods: In all, 117 patients, age 34 to 78 years, 46.2% of patients at Binet stage C, and 25.6% of patients age 70 years or older received BR chemoimmunotherapy for first-line treatment of CLL. Bendamustine was administered at a dose of 90 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2 combined with 375 mg/m(2) rituximab on day 0 of the first course and 500 mg/m(2) on day 1 during subsequent courses for up to six courses. Results: Overall response rate was 88.0% (95% CI, 80.7% to 100.0%) with a complete response rate of 23.1% and a partial response rate of 64.9%. Ninety percent of patients with del(11q), 94.7% with trisomy 12, 37.5% with del(17p), and 89.4% with unmutated IGHV status responded to treatment. After a median observation time of 27.0 months, median event-free survival was 33.9 months, and 90.5% of patients were alive. Grade 3 or 4 severe infections occurred in 7.7% of patients. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events for neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia were documented in 19.7%, 22.2%, and 19.7% of patients, respectively. Conclusion: Chemoimmunotherapy with BR is effective and safe in patients with previously untreated CLL.
Article
Full-text available
CD20 is an important target for the treatment of B-cell malignancies, including non-Hodgkin lymphoma as well as autoimmune disorders. B-cell depletion therapy using monoclonal antibodies against CD20, such as rituximab, has revolutionized the treatment of these disorders, greatly improving overall survival in patients. Here, we report the development of GA101 as the first Fc-engineered, type II humanized IgG1 antibody against CD20. Relative to rituximab, GA101 has increased direct and immune effector cell-mediated cytotoxicity and exhibits superior activity in cellular assays and whole blood B-cell depletion assays. In human lymphoma xenograft models, GA101 exhibits superior antitumor activity, resulting in the induction of complete tumor remission and increased overall survival. In nonhuman primates, GA101 demonstrates superior B cell-depleting activity in lymphoid tissue, including in lymph nodes and spleen. Taken together, these results provide compelling evidence for the development of GA101 as a promising new therapy for the treatment of B-cell disorders.
Article
The number of cancer survivors continues to increase due to the aging and growth of the population and improvements in early detection and treatment. In order for the public health community to better serve these survivors, the American Cancer Society and the National Cancer Institute collaborated to estimate the number of current and future cancer survivors using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program registries. In addition, current treatment patterns for the most common cancer types are described based on information in the National Cancer Data Base and the SEER and SEER-Medicare linked databases; treatment-related side effects are also briefly described. Nearly 14.5 million Americans with a history of cancer were alive on January 1, 2014; by January 1, 2024, that number will increase to nearly 19 million. The 3 most common prevalent cancers among males are prostate cancer (43%), colorectal cancer (9%), and melanoma (8%), and those among females are cancers of the breast (41%), uterine corpus (8%), and colon and rectum (8%). The age distribution of survivors varies substantially by cancer type. For example, the majority of prostate cancer survivors (62%) are aged 70 years or older, whereas less than one-third (32%) of melanoma survivors are in this older age group. It is important for clinicians to understand the unique medical and psychosocial needs of cancer survivors and to proactively assess and manage these issues. There are a growing number of resources that can assist patients, caregivers, and health care providers in navigating the various phases of cancer survivorship. CA Cancer J Clin 2014. © 2014 American Cancer Society.
Article
Each year, the American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths that will occur in the United States in the current year and compiles the most recent data on cancer incidence, mortality, and survival. Incidence data were collected by the National Cancer Institute, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries and mortality data were collected by the National Center for Health Statistics. A total of 1,665,540 new cancer cases and 585,720 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the United States in 2014. During the most recent 5 years for which there are data (2006-2010), delay-adjusted cancer incidence rates declined slightly in men (by 0.6% per year) and were stable in women, while cancer death rates decreased by 1.8% per year in men and by 1.4% per year in women. The combined cancer death rate (deaths per 100,000 population) has been continuously declining for 2 decades, from a peak of 215.1 in 1991 to 171.8 in 2010. This 20% decline translates to the avoidance of approximately 1,340,400 cancer deaths (952,700 among men and 387,700 among women) during this time period. The magnitude of the decline in cancer death rates from 1991 to 2010 varies substantially by age, race, and sex, ranging from no decline among white women aged 80 years and older to a 55% decline among black men aged 40 years to 49 years. Notably, black men experienced the largest drop within every 10-year age group. Further progress can be accelerated by applying existing cancer control knowledge across all segments of the population. CA Cancer J Clin 2014. (©) 2014 American Cancer Society, Inc.
Article
Although there has been considerable progress in reducing cancer incidence in the United States, the number of cancer survivors continues to increase due to the aging and growth of the population and improvements in survival rates. As a result, it is increasingly important to understand the unique medical and psychosocial needs of survivors and be aware of resources that can assist patients, caregivers, and health care providers in navigating the various phases of cancer survivorship. To highlight the challenges and opportunities to serve these survivors, the American Cancer Society and the National Cancer Institute estimated the prevalence of cancer survivors on January 1, 2012 and January 1, 2022, by cancer site. Data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries were used to describe median age and stage at diagnosis and survival; data from the National Cancer Data Base and the SEER-Medicare Database were used to describe patterns of cancer treatment. An estimated 13.7 million Americans with a history of cancer were alive on January 1, 2012, and by January 1, 2022, that number will increase to nearly 18 million. The 3 most prevalent cancers among males are prostate (43%), colorectal (9%), and melanoma of the skin (7%), and those among females are breast (41%), uterine corpus (8%), and colorectal (8%). This article summarizes common cancer treatments, survival rates, and posttreatment concerns and introduces the new National Cancer Survivorship Resource Center, which has engaged more than 100 volunteer survivorship experts nationwide to develop tools for cancer survivors, caregivers, health care professionals, advocates, and policy makers.
Article
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is dramatically increased in patients above the age of 65 years up to an incidence rate of 22-30/100 000. Although elderly patients represent the largest group of CLL patients they are clearly underrepresented in clinical trials. One important prognostic factor in the elderly is the burden of comorbidity. Survival is significantly impaired in CLL patients with multiple comorbidities (>or=2) or with severe comorbidity (Charlson score >or=2). Therefore, not only age but also the incidence and burden of comorbidity should influence the choice of treatment strategy for every patient individually. A reliable tool for measuring comorbidity is the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale. The German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG) has used this tool within their clinical trials to distinguish between physically fit and non-fit patients. Although chlorambucil is still the standard treatment of choice in non-fit patients, dose-reduced purine analogue-based combination therapies with or without immunotherapy are currently investigated within clinical trials. Because full-dosed combination treatment might cause increased toxicity rates in relapse situation, dose-reduced combination therapies should be considered in this situation. An adequate supportive treatment is necessary for the prevention of toxicities as well as for the improvement of health-related quality of life. In summary, the treatment decision in elderly CLL patients is carefully to be made in each patient individually considering not only the stage and risk factors of the disease but also the patients' physical condition and social environment.
Article