ArticlePDF Available

Counting the Toll of Smoking-Attributable Hospitalisations

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Aim In Ireland, 20% of adults smoke. Many current and ex-smokers live with ill-health and disability as a result of smoking, and this study aimed to quantify the extent of smoking-related hospitalisations in Irish publicly-funded hospitals. Methods A population attributable fractions approach was used in this analysis utilising smoking prevalence data from the Healthy Ireland Survey and combining this with internationally-recognised relative-risks for current and past smoking, and hospitalisation data and hospital base costs data sourced from HIPE, for the years 2011-2016. Results In 2016, there were 21,486 day case admissions, 33,615 inpatient hospital admissions consuming 309,117 bed days, attributable to smoking and exposure to second-hand smoke, with an estimated cost of €172 million in publicly funded hospitals. This represents 2% of day case admissions, 5% of inpatient admissions, and 8% of inpatient bed days for that year. Conclusion Smoking continues to cause a considerable impact on hospital services in Ireland.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Issue: Ir Med J; Vol 113; No. 1; P8
Counting the Toll of Smoking-Attributable Hospitalisations
A. Sheridan1, K.I. Quintyne2, P. Kavanagh3
On Behalf of the HSE Tobacco Free Ireland Programme
1. Tobacco Free Ireland Programme, Strategic Planning & Transformation, HSE
2. Department of Public Health, HSE North-East, Strategic Planning & Transformation, HSE
3. Health Intelligence Unit, Strategic Planning & Transformation, HSE
Abstract
Aim
In Ireland, 20% of adults smoke. Many current and ex-smokers live with ill-health and disability as a result of
smoking, and this study aimed to quantify the extent of smoking-related hospitalisations in Irish publicly-funded
hospitals.
Methods
A population attributable fractions approach was used in this analysis utilising smoking prevalence data from the
Healthy Ireland Survey and combining this with internationally-recognised relative-risks for current and past
smoking, and hospitalisation data and hospital base costs data sourced from HIPE, for the years 2011-2016.
Results
In 2016, there were 21,486 day case admissions, 33,615 inpatient hospital admissions consuming 309,117 bed days,
attributable to smoking and exposure to second-hand smoke, with an estimated cost of €172 million in publicly
funded hospitals. This represents 2% of day case admissions, 5% of inpatient admissions, and 8% of inpatient bed
days for that year.
Conclusion
Smoking continues to cause a considerable impact on hospital services in Ireland.
Introduction
Despite progress, tobacco consumption continues to cause a global epidemic of disability, ill-health and premature
death. Latest figures from the World Health Organization (WHO) report that 7 million people die each year as a
result of tobacco; more than 6 million of these deaths are as a direct result of smoking, with approximately 900,000
deaths among non-smokers as a result of exposure to second-hand smoke (SHS).1 In Ireland, in 2016, it is estimated
that almost 5,950 people died as a direct result of smoking with an additional 100 deaths estimated to be as a result
of exposure to SHS.2
In 2018, 20% of Irish adults (aged 15+ years) currently smoke, with slightly higher smoking rates reported among
males (22%) than females (17%).3 While there has been a reduction in smoking prevalence in recent years, continued
progress is required since Tobacco-Free Ireland, government policy on tobacco control, sets an ambitious target for
Ireland to be tobacco-free (smoking prevalence <5%) by 2025.4
It is over 50 years now, since the first studies detailing the causal relationships between smoking and ill-health were
published.5,6 Since then, this body of evidence on the health effects of smoking and exposure to second-hand smoke
has grown substantially with a causal relationship now established between smoking and nearly all organs of the
human body, and to foetal harm. 7 Population Attributable Fraction (PAF) methods, which assess public health
impact relative to the risk associated with the exposure and the prevalence of exposure in the population, can be
useful for reporting the burden of ill-health due to modifiable risk factors, such as smoking.8 In England, for example,
National Health Service (NHS) Digital and Public Health England (PHE) regularly report on national and local smoking
attributable hospitalisations to support health policy and planning.9,10
This study aimed to estimate hospitalisations and associated direct costs for conditions attributed to smoking and
exposure to SHS in Irish publicly funded hospitals in 2016, as well as some comparisons over a six-year period to
2011.
Methods
Standard epidemiological procedures for PAF estimation are well-described and were applied in this study,11, 12 and
are similar to previously published studies of smoking attributable burden in Ireland.13
Firstly, disease-specific Irish PAFs for smoking were calculated using the formula below:
a = smoking population attributable fraction
Pcur = proportion of current smokers Pex = proportion of ex-smokers
Rcur = relative risk for current smokers Rex = relative risk for ex-smokers
The data sources were age- and gender-specific prevalence of current- and ex-smoking sourced from the Healthy
Ireland Survey14, combined with international gender-specific relative risks for current and ex-smokers for health
conditions where a causal relationship with smoking has been established, see Table 1.7, 15
Secondly, the PAF for exposure to SHS for never smokers was derived using 2-step formula below:
B = Exposure to SHS PAF for each disease
Pshs = Proportion of non-smoking population exposed to SHS
Rshs = Relative risk for people exposed to SHS
NSB =Burden to non-smokers
T = Total number
The data source for exposure of SHS in the home (18%) was sourced from the Healthy Ireland Survey 2016 16 and
combined with internationally-recognised relative risks for non-smokers for health conditions where a causal
relationship with exposure to SHS.7
Table 1: Relative risk ratios for diseases for current and ex-smokers by gender
Health conditions with a causal relationship with smoking
Condition
ICD-10 Code
Age
Relative Risks
Source
Females
Current
Ex-smoker
Current
Ex-smoker
CANCERS
Trachea, Bronchus, Lung
C33-C34
35+
23.26
8.70
12.69
4.53
Ref: 15
Oral and upper respiratory
C00-C14
35+
10.89
3.40
5.08
2.29
Ref: 15
Oesophageal
C15
35+
6.76
4.46
7.75
2.79
Ref: 15
Larynx
C32
35+
14.60
6.34
13.02
5.16
Ref: 15
Stomach
C16
35+
1.96
1.47
1.36
1.32
Ref: 15
Kidney
C64-C66
35+
2.50
1.70
1.40
1.10
Ref: 15
Cervical
C53
35+
-
-
1.59
1.14
Ref: 15
Bladder
C67
35+
3.27
2.09
2.22
1.89
Ref: 15
Pancreatic
C25
35+
2.31
1.15
2.25
1.55
Ref: 15
Leukaemia
C91-C96
35+
1.80
1.40
1.20
1.30
Ref: 15
Liver
C22
35+
1.70
1.40
1.70
1.40
Ref: 7
Colorectal
C18-C20
35+
2.14
1.47
2.14
1.47
Ref: 7
Unspecified area
C80
35+
4.40
2.50
2.20
1.30
Ref: 15
CARDIOVASCULAR
CONDITIONS
Coronary heart disease (CHD)
I20-I25
35-54
4.2
2.0
5.3
2.6
Ref: 15
55-64
2.5
1.6
2.8
1.1
Ref: 15
65-74
1.8
1.3
2.1
1.2
Ref: 15
75+
1.4
1.1
1.4
1.2
Ref: 15
Cerebrovascular Disease
I60-I69
35-54
4.4
1.1
5.4
1.3
Ref: 15
55-64
3.1
1.1
3.7
1.3
Ref: 15
65-74
2.2
1.1
2.6
1.3
Ref: 15
75+
1.6
1.1
1.3
1.0
Ref: 15
Aortic Aneurysm
I71
35+
6.21
3.07
7.07
2.07
Ref: 15
Atherosclerosis
I70
35+
2.44
1.33
1.83
1.00
Ref: 15
Other Arterial Disease
I72-I78
35+
2.07
1.01
2.17
1.12
Ref: 15
Other Heart disease
I00-I09, I26-I51
35+
1.78
1.22
1.49
1.14
Ref: 15
RESPIRATORY
CONDITIONS
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
J40-43, J47
35+
17.10
15.64
12.04
11.77
Ref: 15
Chronic airway obstruction
J44
35+
10.58
6.80
13.08
6.78
Ref: 15
Pneumonia
J12-J18
35-64
2.50
1.40
4.30
1.10
Ref: 15
65+
2.00
1.40
2.20
1.10
Ref: 15
Influenza
J10-J11
35-64
2.50
1.40
4.30
1.10
Ref: 15
65+
2.00
1.40
2.20
1.10
Ref: 15
Mycobacterium Tuberculosis
A15-A19
35+
2.30
-
2.30
-
Ref: 7
REPRODUCTIVE
CONDITIONS
Foetal death and stillbirths
P95, Z37.1, Z37.3,
Z37.4, Z37.6,
Z37.7
All Ages
-
-
1.47
-
Ref: 7
Ectopic pregnancy
O00
All Ages
-
-
1.91
-
Ref: 7
Erectile dysfunction
F52.2, N48.4
20+
1.7
1.6
-
-
Ref: 7
Oral clefts
Q35-Q37
<1 yr
-
-
1.28
-
Ref: 7
Perinatal effects
P00.0 - P77
(selection)
All Ages
-
-
1.50
-
Ref: 7
Low birth weight
P07
<1 yr
-
-
1.40
-
Ref: 7
OTHER
CONDITIONS
Cataract
H25
45+
1.54
1.11
1.54
1.11
Ref: 15
Macular degeneration
H35.3
45+
2.97
1.88
2.97
1.88
Ref: 7
Hip #
S72.0-S72.2
55-64
1.17
1.02
1.17
1.02
Ref: 15
65-74
1.41
1.08
1.41
1.08
Ref: 15
75+
1.76
1.14
1.85
1.22
Ref: 15
Peptic ulcer disease
K25-K28
35+
5.40
1.80
5.50
1.40
Ref: 15
Periodonitis
K05.2-K05.6
35+
3.97
1.68
3.97
1.68
Ref: 15
Diabetes (Type 2)
E11
35+
1.37
1.14
1.37
1.14
Ref: 7
Rheumatoid arthritis
M05-M06
35+
1.89
1.25
1.75
1.25
Ref: 7
Dental caries
K02
ALL
1.76
1.39
1.76
1.39
Ref: 7
Crohn's disease
K50
35+
2.10
1.0
2.10
1.0
Ref: 15
Low bone density
M80-M83
45+
-
-
1.25
-
Ref: 7
Health conditions with a causal relationship with exposure to second-hand smoke
Condition
ICD-10 Code
Age
Source
Lung (SHS)
C34
20+
Ref: 7
CHD (exposure to SHS)
I20-I25
20+
Ref: 7
Stroke (exposure to SHS)
I63
20+
Ref: 7
SIDS
R95
<1
Ref: 7
Middle ear disease (exposure to SHS)
H65-H75
0-10
Ref: 7
Low Birth weight (exposure to SHS)
P07
-
Ref: 7
The smoking PAFs were then applied to observed numbers of in-patients, day cases and associated bed days, by
condition, with a primary diagnosis of conditions which can be caused by smoking for the years 2011 to 2016
sourced from the Hospital In-Patient Enquiry System (HIPE).17 While, the PAF for exposure to SHS for each condition
was applied to the non-smoking health burden to estimate the number of hospitalisations due to exposure to SHS.
Finally, the average base costs for inpatient and day case admissions for 2016, were sourced from the Healthcare
Pricing Office (HPO) through personal communication. These unit costs (inpatient admission = €4,602 and day case
admission = €765) were then applied to the estimated numbers of smoking and SHS-attributable hospitalisations and
totalled for the year 2016.
All calculations were carried out using Microsoft Excel 2007.
Results
The PAF for all conditions included in this analysis by gender and by disease group, in an Irish setting, are displayed in
Figure 1. By individual condition, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was the condition with the highest
PAF for both males (90.1%) and females (84.3%). Two other conditions had a PAF greater than 80% in males; cancer
of the lung, trachea & bronchus (88.8%), and cancer of the larynx (83.5%). There were no additional conditions with
a PAF greater than 80% among females. Males had higher PAFs than females for most conditions, with the exception
of: Coronary heart disease (35-54 year olds); Cerebrovascular diseases (<75 year olds); Pneumonia (<65 year olds),
Influenza (<65 year olds), and pancreatic cancer (35+ year olds). See Figure 1 (Next page)..
Figure 1: Irish Population Attributable Fractions for smoking & exposure to SHS, 2015
Sources: HPO and HSE calculations
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Low bone density_age45+
Crohn's disease_age35+
Dental caries_all ages
Rheumatoid arthritis_age35+
Diabetes (type 2)_age35+
Periodonitis_age35+
Peptic ulcer disease_age35+
Hip#_age75+
Hip#_age65-74
Hip#_age55-64
Macular degeneration_age45+
Cataract_age45+
Low birth weight_<1year
Perinatal effects_all ages
Oral clefts_<1year
Erectile dysfunction_age20+
Ectopic pregnancy_all ages
Foetal death & stillbirths_all ages
Mycobacterium Tuberculosis_age35+
Influenza_age65+
Influenza_age35-64
Pneumonia_age65+
Pneumonia_age35-64
Chronic airway obstrutive disease_age35+
COPD_age35+
Other heart disease_age35+
Other arterial disease_age35+
Atherosclerosis_age35+
Aortic Aneurysm_age35+
Cerebrovascular disease_age75+
Cerebrovascular disease_age65-74
Cerebrovascular disease_age55-64
Cerebrovascular disease_age35-54
Coronary heart disease_age75+
Coronary heart disease_age65-74
Coronary heart disease_age55-64
Coronary heart disease_age35-54
Unspecified area_age35+
Colorectal_age35+
Liver_age35+
Leukaemia_age35+
Pancreatic_age35+
Bladder_age35+
Cervical_age35+
Kidney_age35+
Stomach_age35+
Larynx_age35+
Oesophageal_age35+
Oral and upper respiratory_age35+
Lung, Trachea & Bronchus_age35+
Other Effects
Reproductive
Conditions Respiratory Diseases Cardiovascular Disease Cancers
Population Attributable Fraction (PAF)
Female
Male
Applying these PAFs to Irish hospital activity data in 2016, there were an estimated 33,615 inpatient hospital
admissions and 21,486 day case admissions attributable to smoking and exposure to SHS in 2016. See Table 2 Across
all hospital activity in these hospitals in 2016, this represents 5% of inpatient admissions and 2% of day case
admissions, and resulted in 309,117 bed days (8% of all inpatient bed days in 2016).
Table 2: Hospital activity 2016 for those with a primary diagnosis of diseases which can be caused by smoking and exposure to
SHS
Conditions caused by
smoking
Inpatient admissions
Day cases
Bed days
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Cancers
3,713
1,898
5,226
2,614
48,147
23,895
Cardiovascular conditions
6,979
2,749
2,234
815
54,105
23,238
Respiratory conditions
8,105
7,563
585
668
68,086
61,767
Reproductive conditions
<5
849
27
12
11
10,937
Other conditions
682
692
4,432
4,661
6,997
8,267
Total (Smoking)
19,481
13,751
12,504
8,770
177,346
128,104
Conditions caused by
exposure to SHS
Inpatient admissions
Day cases
Bed days
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Lung Cancer
4
7
4
10
41
79
Coronary heart disease
150
73
71
37
776
395
Stroke
40
39
0
0
671
708
Middle ear disease
13
10
54
36
24
19
Low birth weight
0
49
0
0
0
955
Total (SHS)
207
178
129
83
1,512
2,156
TOTAL (Smoking & SHS)
Inpatient admissions
Day cases
Bed days
33,615
21,486
309,117
Sources: HPO and HSE calculations
Table 2 details these smoking and SHS-related hospitalisations in 2016 by gender and disease group. Almost 60% of
both these inpatient admissions (n=19,688) and day case admissions (n=12,633) were by males. Overall, the burden
of smoking and SHS-related hospitalisation is greater for males than females, with 7% of all hospitalisations among
males estimated to be smoking or SHS-related, compared to 4% among females.
Further analysis of these hospitalisations revealed that respiratory conditions (47%, n=15,668) were the most
common reason for smoking-related inpatient hospitalisation in 2016 followed by cardiovascular conditions (29%,
n=9,728) and cancers (17%, n=5,611). Other conditions’ (43%, n=9,093) were the main reason for smoking-related
day case admission, followed by cancers (37%, n=7,840) and cardiovascular conditions (14%, n=3,049). Coronary
heart disease was the most common reason for SHS-related inpatient hospitalisation (58%, n=223) and SHS-related
day case admission (51%, n=108). Using the estimates in Table 2, almost one-in-five inpatient admissions for all
respiratory diseases, circulatory diseases and cancers in 2016, were estimated to be attributable to smoking and
SHS.
Figure 2 displays the trend in inpatient and day case admissions attributable to smoking and exposure to SHS from
2011-2016; the number of these admissions increased by 13% (9% increase in all inpatient activity) and 22% (20%
across all day case activity), respectively, as displayed in Figure 2. However, tests for trends revealed that these
increases were not significantly different to increases in overall hospital activity for the same period. Compared to
2011, the number of smoking-related inpatient bed days decreased marginally by <1% in 2016.
Figure 2: Estimated number of hospital admissions with a primary diagnosis of diseases which can be attributable to smoking
and exposure to SHS, 2011-2016.
Sources: HPO, HSE
Finally, using the average base costs in 2016, the estimated direct cost of smoking & SHS-related hospitalisations
detailed in this analysis was €171.5 million in 2016.
Discussion
This study presents an up-to-date estimate of the burden of smoking and SHS-related hospitalisations in Ireland to
2016; the number of hospitalisations increased yearly, as did all hospital activity, and in 2016 there were an
estimated 33,600 inpatient admissions and 21,500 day case admissions at a total cost (direct) of approximately
€171.5 million. It must be noted that this is an under-estimate due to the exclusion of outpatient clinic attendances
or emergency department presentations, and this analysis also only documents those admissions with a primary
diagnosis of the disease; many of these patients are on a long journey to recovery, for example, cancer patients, and
will have several more hospital encounters for treatment etc, however for comparison reasons, this analysis detailed
primary diagnosis only. Nevertheless, for a health system that is currently experiencing many challenges regarding
capacity, waiting times and waiting lists, the fact that this many hospitalisations are potentially preventable is
certainly food for thought!
In 2018, 20% of Irish adults smoke, with high smoking rates among young people; this compares favourably to a
smoking prevalence of 29% in 2007 3,18. And, while smoking prevalence is falling and will continue to, in the attempt
to achieve a smoke-free Ireland by 2025, many people will continue to live with the health effects of their smoking
into the future. A recent Irish study detailed the impact of smoking on the health of older Irish adults: those who
smoked self-reported poorer physical and mental health, and considered their own health to be worse than their
peers; In addition, the prevalence of self-reported smoking-related chronic diseases was highest among ex-smokers,
and the extent of this ill-health was related to the amount smoked.19 Quitting smoking results in many physical and
mental health gains; specifically, reduced risk of death from cardiovascular disease and COPD, and stopping smoking
before age 40 reverts life expectancy close to that of non-smokers.20 So, in order to maximise the benefits of
quitting smoking, smokers must quit at a younger age.
An interesting finding of this study is the greater burden of smoking-related disease for males, with almost 50% more
hospitalisations by males compared to females. The recent State of Tobacco Control in Ireland report detailed how
the impact of tobacco in Ireland is different for males in Ireland, with differences in smoking behaviour, the use of
smoking cessation services, and the burden of smoking-related disease and death.2 Irish males smoke more than Irish
females (22% versus 17%), however, quitting intentionality, and the proportion of quit attempts among males is
similar to female rates.3
Successfully quitting smoking is difficult, and currently the majority of smokers attempting to quit choose to use no
supports (42%), or use e-cigarettes (41%) in their quit attempt.3 Research indicates that smokers are twice as likely
to quit if they engage with a smoking cessation service, such as the HSE QUIT service (a team of advisors available to
17,587
19,642 20,068 20,561 20,723 21,486
30,122 31,859 32,119 32,210 32,510 33,615
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Number
Day Case Admissions Inpatient Admissions
smokers over the phone, by email, online, or in person), and they are four times more likely to quit if they also use
smoking cessation medications, such as varenicline, bupropion and nicotine replacement therapy.21 Internationally, a
large body of evidence supports the delivery of smoking cessation interventions in all healthcare encounters.22-24
Currently in Ireland, national clinical guidelines for the identification and treatment of tobacco addiction are in
development and have been approved for prioritisation by the Department of Health’s National Clinical Effectiveness
Committee (NCEC). This guideline will utilise the Department of Health commissioned Health Technology
Assessment (HTA) of smoking cessation treatments available in Ireland by the Health Information & Quality
Authority (HIQA), 21 as well as other International guidelines on smoking cessation, with planned publication of the
guideline in late 2019. Evidence-based smoking cessation is key to Ireland becoming tobacco-free by 2025.
Winning the war on tobacco is a long game, and for health policy-makers and planners, continued focus on this area
competes with other priorities. Regular reporting of the burden of ill-health due to amenable risk factors,
highlighting the impact on health services and costs, can be an important way of sustaining engagement.25 The
utilisation of PAF methodology allows for comparisons internationally and provides robustness to the evidence; the
automation of such analysis would allow for more routine, timely reporting.
Some limitations to this study were noted by the authors: Firstly, only those conditions with a causal relationship
with smoking and exposure to SHS were included; secondly, attendances at outpatient clinics and emergency
departments were excluded as there are no reporting systems, and thirdly, only hospital admissions with a primary
diagnosis of these conditions was reported in this analysis; this is as per the methodology for this type of analysis,
and for comparison reasons, it is necessary to follow the same methodology as other organisations, internationally.
In conclusion, almost 1,000 hospital episodes each week in Irish hospitals are attributable to smoking and exposure
to SHS; with one-in-five admissions for respiratory diseases, circulatory diseases, and cancers potentially
preventable. This analysis highlights the impact of tobacco on Irish adults, especially males. For the health services,
this analysis highlights the potential savings if Ireland was tobacco-free and the significant opportunities to engage
with smokers with evidence-based smoking cessation.
We wish to acknowledge the Healthcare Pricing Office, HSE for providing access to the HIPE dataset and the
Department of Health for providing access to the Healthy Ireland Survey 2015 research file.
Declaration of Conflicts of Interest:
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Corresponding Author:
Aishling Sheridan,
HSE Tobacco Free Ireland Programme
Email: aishling.sheridan@hse.ie
References:
1. World Health Organization. WHO report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic 2017: Monitoring Tobacco Use &
Prevention Policies. ISBN 978-92-4-151282-4. World Health Organization. 2017.
2. Tobacco Free Ireland Programme, HSE. The State of Tobacco Control in Ireland. Health Service Executive (HSE)
2018.
3. Department of Health & IPSOS MRBI. Healthy Ireland Survey 2018 Summary of Findings. Dublin, 2018.
4. Department of Health. Tobacco Free Ireland Report of the Tobacco Policy Review Group. Department of
Health, Dublin, 2013.
5. U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service. Smoking and health: Report of the advisory
committee to the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service. Washington, US. 1964.
6. Doll R, Hill AB. Smoking and carcinoma of the lung. BMJ 1950; 221(ii): 73948.
7. US Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking: 50 Years of Progress. A
Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centre for Disease
Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on
Smoking and Health, 2014.
8. Mansournia Mohammad Ali, Altman Douglas G. Population attributable fraction BMJ 2018; 360 :k757
9. NHS Digital. Statistics on Smoking - England 2018. https://files.digital.nhs.uk/0C/95F481/stat-smok-eng-2018-
rep.pdf
10. Public Health England. Local Tobacco Control Profiles for England. 2018.
https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/profile/tobacco-control
11. Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash T. Measures of effect and measures of association. In:Rothman KJ, Greenland S,
Lash T, eds. Modern epidemiology.3rd ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2008: 51-70
12. Greenland S. Concepts and pitfalls in measuring and interpreting attributable fractions, prevented fractions, and
causation probabilities. Ann Epidemiol2015;25:155-61
13. ICF International for the Department of Health. An Assessment of the Economic Cost of Smoking in Ireland.
Dublin, 2015.
14. Department of Health & IPSOS MRBI. Healthy Ireland Survey 2015 Summary of Findings. Dublin, 2015.
15. The Health & Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC), 2014, Statistics on Smoking 2014.
16. Department of Health & IPSOS MRBI. Healthy Ireland Survey 2016 Summary of Findings. Dublin, 2016.
17. Healthcare Pricing Office. HIPE data accessed via HIPE Online Portal.
18. SLAN 2007 - Survey of Lifestyle, Attitudes & Nutrition in Ireland, Department of Health & Children. 2008.
19. Sheridan A, O’Farrell A, Evans D.S., Kavanagh P. Adult Smoking in Ireland: A Special Analysis of the Healthy
Ireland Survey and the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA). Health Service Executive May 2018. (978-1-
898098-83-6)
20. Quick Wins: the short-term benefits of stopping smoking. The National Centre for Smoking Cessation & Training.
2013. http://www.ncsct.co.uk/usr/pub/Quick%20_wins_full_report.pdf
21. HIQA. Health Technology Assessment (HTA) of smoking cessation interventions. Dublin. 2017.
22. NICE (2018) NG92 Stop smoking interventions and services. Available from www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng92
23. Ministry of Health. 2014. The New Zealand Guidelines for Helping People to Stop Smoking. Wellington: Ministry
of Health
24. European Network for Smoking and Tobacco Prevention (ENSP). Guidelines for Treating Tobacco Dependence.
Belgium. March 2016.
25. Elliott H, Popay J: How are policy makers using evidence? Models of research utilisation and local NHS policy
making. J Epidemiol Community Health 2000, 54:461-468.
Article
Full-text available
While much progress has been made in reducing tobacco use in many countries, both active and passive smoking remain challenges. The benefits of smoking cessation are universally recognized, and the hospital setting is an ideal setting where smokers can access smoking cessation services as hospital admission can be a cue to action. Consistent delivery of good quality smoking cessation care across health services is an important focus for reducing the harm of tobacco use, especially among continued smokers. Our objective was to document the smoking cessation medication and support services provided by specialist adult cancer hospitals across Ireland, a country with a stated tobacco endgame goal. A cross-sectional survey based on recent national clinical guidelines was used to determine smoking cessation care delivery across eight specialist adult cancer tertiary referral university hospitals and one specialist radiotherapy center. Survey responses were collected using Qualtrics, a secure online survey software tool. The data was grouped, anonymized, and analyzed in Microsoft Excel. All responding hospitals demonstrated either some level of smoking cessation information or a service available to patients. However, there is substantial variation in the type and level of smoking cessation information offered, making access to smoking cessation services inconsistent and inequitable. The recently launched National Clinical Guideline for smoking cessation provides the template for all hospitals to ensure health services are in a position to contribute to Ireland’s tobacco endgame goal.
Article
Background: Smoking continues to cause harm on a huge scale in Ireland. Doctors can help this harm through providing safe, effective and clinically sound stop smoking care, but the needs of Irish doctors in this area are largely uncharted. Aims: We assessed the knowledge, attitudes and practices of Irish doctors regarding stop smoking care and electronic cigarettes. Methods: An Internet-based cross-sectional survey was administered to members of the Royal College of Physicians in Ireland and the Irish College of General Practitioners. Descriptive statistics for key parameters were derived and factors associated with more consistent practice of brief intervention, a key component of stop smoking care, were analysed using chi-square testing. Results: There were 250 responses (58.7% female, 53.0% aged under 45 years, 55.1% graduated in medicine before 2000 and 57.2% worked in general practice). Most (84.9%) reported often or always asking about patient’s smoking behaviour, and most (86.1%) reported often or always advising patients to stop. However, providing or arranging effective stop smoking care was weak and less consistently practised, and while most (91.4%) saw it as a responsibility, few doctors (28.5%) agreed they were sufficiently trained in this area of clinical care. Confidence in the knowledge of e-cigarettes was poor. Conclusions: While there is a strong reservoir support and areas of good reported practice in stop smoking care among doctors in Ireland, the development of their knowledge and skills in arranging effective care should be supported if doctors are to fulfil their huge potential role in tackling the harm caused by smoking.
Technical Report
Full-text available
The progress made in tackling smoking in Ireland lead to complacency and the false belief that the fight against the tobacco epidemic has been won. The reality is that the continuing toll of smoking-related disease is stark and there is still much to do, especially for high-burden population groups; furthermore, the face of the epidemic is changing and the context becoming more complex. Achieving each incremental step in the decline in smoking has become more and more challenging. The challenge is changing utterly given the commitment in Ireland to bring the tobacco epidemic to an endgame through Tobacco Free Ireland. The step change from tobacco control to tobacco elimination will require innovation and new solutions. Research and information are key to achieving this step change. Making best use of existing information through secondary analysis of large datasets is a good starting place. This is well-demonstrated by this report. A better understanding of the demographic factors independently associated with current smoking enables us to adopt more targeted approaches to tackling smoking. For people who currently smoke and for policy-makers, the health impacts of smoking can appear remote and depersonalised. While the international evidence base is extensive, through comprehensively describing the relationship between smoking and health in the Irish population, this work provides a catalyst for greater focus. Finally, insights into the factors associated with quitting and remaining smoke-free will provide further motivation to the many people who smoke interested in quitting, and underscores the need to ensure continuing access to effective supports for everyone. Put simply, better research and information lead to better decisions and a better chance of bringing the tobacco epidemic to an end. We are grateful to the Department of Health and the team at TILDA, Trinity College Dublin, for enabling access to the datasets used in this analysis. I would like to acknowledge and thank members of the HSE Tobacco Research Group for their commitment in taking forward this work: David Evans, Anne O’Farrell and Aishling Sheridan. The insights they have developed on the significant continuing challenge of tackling smoking in Ireland inform and support the HSE Tobacco Free Ireland Programme priorities in the short and medium term. We are pleased to share these results with partners for their consideration and hope that the discussion it generates will enable us to build broad-based action for a Tobacco Free Ireland.
Article
Full-text available
This paper is based on a qualitative study that aimed to identify factors that facilitate or impede evidence-based policy making at a local level in the UK National Health Service (NHS). It considers how models of research utilisation drawn from the social sciences map onto empirical evidence from this study. A literature review and case studies of social research projects that were initiated by NHS health authority managers or GP fundholders in one region of the NHS. In depth interviews and document analysis were used. One NHS region in England. Policy makers, GPs and researchers working on each of the social research projects selected as case studies. The direct influence of research evidence on decision making was tempered by factors such as financial constraints, shifting timescales and decision makers' own experiential knowledge. Research was more likely to impact on policy in indirect ways, including shaping policy debate and mediating dialogue between service providers and users. The study highlights the role of sustained dialogue between researchers and the users of research in improving the utilisation of research-based evidence in the policy process.
Article
Measures of causal attribution and preventive potential appear deceptively simple to define, yet have many subtle variations and are subject to numerous pitfalls in conceptualization, interpretation and application. This paper reviews basic concepts, measures, and problems to serve as an introduction to more detailed literature. Allowing for validity and generalization (projection) issues, epidemiologic attribution measures can serve as useful policy inputs for contrasting expected caseloads or survival times under different well-defined interventions. Nonetheless, their application in these settings requires attention to effects of the interventions besides those on the study outcome. Their use as estimates of etiologic attribution requires assumptions beyond the usual validity and statistical assumptions; these further assumptions will usually have little support or plausibility when the mechanisms of action are unknown.
Tobacco Free Ireland Programme, HSE. The State of Tobacco Control in Ireland
Tobacco Free Ireland Programme, HSE. The State of Tobacco Control in Ireland. Health Service Executive (HSE) 2018.
Smoking and health: Report of the advisory committee to the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service
  • U S Dept
U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service. Smoking and health: Report of the advisory committee to the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service. Washington, US. 1964.
US Department of Health and Human Services, Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
US Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking: 50 Years of Progress. A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 2014.
Local Tobacco Control Profiles for England
  • Public Health England
Public Health England. Local Tobacco Control Profiles for England. 2018. https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/profile/tobacco-control