ArticlePDF Available

Risk of cardiac death among cancer survivors in the United States; a SEER database analysis

Authors:

Abstract

Purpose: Population-based data on the risk of cardiac death among cancer survivors are needed. This scenario was evaluated in cancer survivors (>5 years) registered within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Methods: The SEER database was queried using the SEER*Stat program to determine the frequency of cardiac death compared to other causes of death and to determine heart disease-specific and cancer-specific survival rates in each of the 10 most common cancers in men and women in the SEER database (including colorectal, lung, breast, prostate, uterine corpus, urinary bladder, kidney, thyroid cancers, cutaneous melanoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma). Associations were ascertained with Chi-squared tests and multivariate analyses were conducted through Cox-proportional hazard models. Results: For the frequency and survival sessions 2513716 patients (diagnosed between 1973 and 2008) were assessed, while for the case listing session 2146496 patients (diagnosed between 1988 and 2008) were assessed. For survivors of all 10 cancers combined, the 10-year cancer specific survival rate was 91.4% while 10-year heart disease-specific survival rate was 94.6%. For cancer-specific survival rates, the highest rates were related to thyroid cancer survivors while the lowest rates were related to lung cancer survivors. For heart disease-specific survival rates, the highest rates were related to thyroid cancer survivors while the lowest rates were related to both lung cancer survivors and urinary bladder cancer survivors. The following factors were associated with a higher likelihood of cardiac death: male gender, old age at diagnosis, black race and local treatment with radiotherapy rather than surgery (P<0.0001 for all parameters). Conclusion: Among cancer survivors (>5 years), cardiac death is a significant cause of death and there is a wide variability among different cancers in the relative importance of cardiac death vs. cancer-related death
Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=iery20
Download by: [Omar Abdel-Rahman] Date: 18 June 2017, At: 08:48
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy
ISSN: 1473-7140 (Print) 1744-8328 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/iery20
Risk of cardiac death among cancer survivors in
the United States; a SEER database analysis
Omar Abdel-Rahman
To cite this article: Omar Abdel-Rahman (2017): Risk of cardiac death among cancer survivors
in the United States; a SEER database analysis, Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy, DOI:
10.1080/14737140.2017.1344099
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2017.1344099
Accepted author version posted online: 16
Jun 2017.
Submit your article to this journal
View related articles
View Crossmark data
Accepted Manuscript
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Journal: Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy
DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2017.1344099
Original Research
Risk of cardiac death among cancer survivors in the United States; a SEER
database analysis
Omar Abdel-Rahman
Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo,
Egypt.
Corresponding author:
Omar Abdel-Rahman (omar.abdelrhman@med.asu.edu.eg)
Accepted Manuscript
Abstract:
Purpose: Population-based data on the risk of cardiac death among cancer survivors
are needed. This scenario was evaluated in cancer survivors (>5 years) registered
within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database.
Methods: The SEER database was queried using the SEER*Stat program to determine
the frequency of cardiac death compared to other causes of death and to determine
heart disease-specific and cancer-specific survival rates in each of the 10 most common
cancers in men and women in the SEER database (including colorectal, lung, breast,
prostate, uterine corpus, urinary bladder, kidney, thyroid cancers, cutaneous melanoma
and non-Hodgkin lymphoma). Associations were ascertained with Chi-squared tests
and multivariate analyses were conducted through Cox-proportional hazard models.
Results: For the frequency and survival sessions 2513716 patients (diagnosed between
1973 and 2008) were assessed, while for the case listing session 2146496 patients
(diagnosed between 1988 and 2008) were assessed. For survivors of all 10 cancers
combined, the 10-year cancer specific survival rate was 91.4% while 10-year heart
disease-specific survival rate was 94.6%. For cancer-specific survival rates, the highest
rates were related to thyroid cancer survivors while the lowest rates were related to lung
cancer survivors. For heart disease-specific survival rates, the highest rates were
related to thyroid cancer survivors while the lowest rates were related to both lung
cancer survivors and urinary bladder cancer survivors. The following factors were
associated with a higher likelihood of cardiac death: male gender, old age at diagnosis,
black race and local treatment with radiotherapy rather than surgery (P<0.0001 for all
parameters).
Conclusion: Among cancer survivors (>5 years), cardiac death is a significant cause of
death and there is a wide variability among different cancers in the relative importance
of cardiac death vs. cancer-related death.
Keywords: Cancer; cardiac disease; cardiac death; lung cancer; breast cancer.
Accepted Manuscript
1. Introduction:
Cancer and cardiac disease are the two global epidemics of our age. Cancer has
claimed the lives of approximately 8.2 million humans worldwide in 2012 [1]. Moreover,
the number of new cases of cancer is expected to increase by approximately 70% in the
coming 2 decades [2]. On the other hand, cardiovascular disease is the number one
cause of death worldwide; with more people dying from it than from any other cause of
death and it has claimed the lives of 17.5 million humans worldwide in 2012 [3].
Cancer management intersects with cardiac health at many points. Etiologically, many
factors predispose to both cancer and heart disease (e.g. tobacco smoking, obesity and
excess alcohol consumption) [4-7]. Thus, many patients with cancer are already at a
higher risk for cardiac disease because of background medical conditions. Moreover,
many anti-cancer treatments (including chemotherapy, radiotherapy and targeted
therapy) may cause cardiac injury as a side effect [8]. This may contribute further to the
risk of cardiac events in cancer patients. The majority of treatment-associated adverse
cardiac effects develop latently years after administration of anticancer treatment [9].
Thus, long-term cancer survivors are at a particularly high risk for developing cardiac
disease and cardiac death [10]. This risk of course varies according to the co-
morbidities, administered anti-cancer treatments as well as underlying cancer diagnosis.
Currently, there are scarce population-based data describing the real weight of cardiac
death in long term cancer survivors compared to other competing causes of death (both
cancer- and non cancer-related). These data are fundamental in guiding the cardiac-
sparing interventions while treating our patients as well as in planning appropriate follow
up strategies for the long-term survivors.
The objective of this analysis was to review the risk of cardiac death among cancer
survivors (>5 years since the initial diagnosis) who were diagnosed initially with any of
the 10 most common cancers in women and men in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and
End Results (SEER) database.
Accepted Manuscript
2. Methodology:
The data for this study were extracted from the SEER-18 registry of the US National
Cancer Institute[11]. Data were retrieved utilizing the SEER*Stat software Version 8.3.2.
2.1. Selection of the study cohort:
To identify eligible patients diagnosed with one the 10 cancers, the following parameters
were selected in the selection tab of the SEER*Stat:
(Site and Morphology.Site recode ICD-O-3/WHO 2008) = ' Colon and Rectum','
Lung and Bronchus',' Melanoma of the Skin',' Breast',' Corpus Uteri',' Prostate','
Urinary Bladder',' Kidney and Renal Pelvis',' Thyroid',' Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma' )
The included patients were further restricted to those surviving more than 5 years (60
months).
Cardiac death was considered when “diseases of the heart” was mentioned as the
cause of death in cause-specific death classification. Cancer registries within the SEER
database use algorithms to process causes of death from death certificate in order to
identify a single, disease-specific, cause of death. However, in some cases,
misattribution may occur in some cases (e.g. a death may be attributed to the site of
metastasis rather than the primary site).
The above parameters have been utilized in the three types of assessments (known as
sessions within the SEER*Stat); namely: frequency session, survival session and case
listing session. For frequency and survival sessions, the search was limited to SEER
database (1973-2008) ; while for case listing session, the search was limited to SEER
database (1988-2008) because AJCC staging information were not available before
1988.
2.2. Data collection:
For the case listing session, covariates extracted for each case included site of the
primary tumor, age at diagnosis, gender, race, stage, laterality (if applicable), surgery or
radiotherapy and cause-specific death classification. Data regarding systemic therapy
and co-morbidities were not available in the SEER database.
Accepted Manuscript
2.3. Statistical analysis:
In this study, baseline clinico-pathological features for patients who did or did not
develop cardiac death were evaluated and compared. Chi-Squared test was used to
compare the features of patients who did or did not develop cardiac death. Cox
proportional hazards model was used to conduct multivariate analyses of factors
affecting cardiac-specific mortality among different evaluated cancers (factors evaluated
include age diagnosis, race, AJCC stage at diagnosis, local treatment modality and
laterality if applicable). Statistical significance was declared with a two-sided p value <
0.05.
Survival sessions in the SEER*Stat were utilized to calculate heart disease-specific
survival rates and cancer specific survival rates for each of the evaluated cancers
across different years following the initial diagnosis. For the survival analysis, it was
restricted to cases in the research database, with known age and who were actively
followed. The following cases were excluded from the survival analysis: Death
certificate-only and autopsy-only diagnoses, cases with unknown/missing cause of
death and alive cases with no survival time.
All of the statistical analyses were conducted with SPSS Statistics 20.0 (IBM, NY) as
well as the Seer*stat program; Microsoft excel was also utilized to produce figures
regarding the frequency of cardiac death, cancer-specific survival rate and heart
disease-specific survival rate among the evaluated cancers. The study cutoff is the date
of submission of most recent SEER data (December 2013).
3. Results:
3.1. Frequency session results:
The vital status of all evaluated patients in the frequency session (evaluating 2513716
patients diagnosed 1973-2008) has been assessed up to the study cutoff; and among
them, 70% were alive, 6% died because of cardiac disease, 7% died because of the
primary cancer and 17% died because of other causes of death (among which
approximately 6% died of second primary cancer). Stratification of the cause of death
according to the duration since diagnosis revealed that with more time since the initial
diagnosis, the role of cardiac death increased, while the role of cancer-specific death
Accepted Manuscript
decreased (figure-1). An additional detailed analysis of vital status as well as
stratification of the cause of death according to duration since diagnosis has been
conducted for each of the evaluated 10 cancers (supplementary figures 1-10). This
analysis showed wide variation among the evaluated cancers; while in some cancers
(lung cancer) the role of cancer-related death is far more important among cancer
survivors even up to 19 years post diagnosis, in other cancers (urinary bladder cancer)
the role of cardiac death is more significant starting from 5 years post diagnosis.
3.2. Survival session results:
The cancer-specific survival rate and heart disease-specific survival rate of all patients
(2513716 patients diagnosed 1973-2008) have been evaluated stratifying the outcomes
according to the site of the primary tumor and according to the duration since the year
of diagnosis (figures 2a-2b). For survivors of the evaluated 10 cancers combined, 10-
year cancer-specific survival rate was: 91.4% and 15-year cancer–specific survival rate
was: 85.5%. On the other hand for survivors of the evaluated 10 cancers, 10-year heart
disease-specific survival rate was: 94.6% and 15-year heart disease-specific survival
rate was: 88.4%.
For cancer-specific survival rate, the highest rates were related to thyroid cancer
survivors; while the lowest rates were related to lung cancer survivors. For heart
disease-specific survival rate, the highest rates were related to thyroid cancer survivors;
while the lowest rates were related to both lung cancer survivors and urinary bladder
cancer survivors.
3.3. Case listing session results:
C.1. Clinico-pathological characteristics of patients with or without cardiac death:
A total of 2146496 cancer survivors diagnosed (1988-2008) were identified and included
in this session. Table-1 summarizes the clinico-pathological characteristics of cancer
survivors who did or did not develop cardiac death. Overall, the following characteristics
were associated with a higher likelihood of cardiac death, including: male gender, old
age at diagnosis, black race, and local treatment with radiotherapy rather than surgery
(P<0.0001 for all parameters). The reason for the comparison displayed in table-1 is to
Accepted Manuscript
showcase the baseline characteristics of patients who developed a cardiac death
compared to the overall patient population.
C.2. Multivariate analysis of factors affecting cardiac-specific mortality:
An additional multivariate analysis assessing the factors affecting cardiac-specific
mortality among different cancers is detailed in supplementary tables 1-10. Overall,
factors associated with worse cardiac-specific mortality among different cancers
included older age at diagnosis, male gender, black race and local treatment with
surgery (P<0.05 for all parameters). Local treatment with radiotherapy was associated
with worse cardiac-specific mortality in lung cancer survivors only. It has however to be
acknowledged that treatment data in SEER are available only for the first course of
therapy.
4. Discussion:
The most notable findings of this study are: (1) Cardiac death is a more important cause
of death than cancer itself 10 years following the diagnosis of cancer; (2) there is a wide
variability among different cancers in the relative importance of cardiac death vs.
cancer-related death among cancer survivors; and (3) five years should not be taken as
the universal limit for cancer cure because cancer-related death continue to occur
beyond this limit.
In this study, patients at highest risk for the development of cardiac death are those with
a higher baseline risk for cardiac disease. This analysis showed that male patients are
more likely to experience cardiac death and in multivariate analysis they have a worse
cardiac-specific mortality; this is in line with data showing a higher baseline risk of
cardiovascular disease among men compared to women[12,13]. This analysis also
showed that African Americans are more likely to suffer from cardiac deaths compared
to other race categories. This is explained by data suggesting a higher background
cardiac risk among African Americans [14]. Additionally, this analysis showed that
elderly people are more prone to cardiac death events. This is expected given the
higher probability of co-morbidities in this age group which may predispose to a higher
cardiac events risk.
Accepted Manuscript
Moreover, patients who were treated with surgery generally have a lower risk of cardiac
death compared to those who were not. This may be explained by the fact that cardiac
co-morbidity is an important reason for exclusion from radical cancer surgery; thus, the
association of surgery with lower cardiac death risk may actually be a form of selection
bias. Lung cancer patients receiving radiotherapy have a shorter time to cardiac death
in multivariate analysis, this is in line with previous population-based data suggesting
enhanced cardiac risk following thoracic radiotherapy for lung cancer as well as for
other thoracic cancers [15,16]. The same finding was not replicated with breast cancer;
probably because of the fact that both right and left sided breast cancer patients were
collectively grouped in the analysis which may have ameliorated the risk expected
essentially with left-sided tumors[17]. For non Hodgkin lymphoma survivors, the
administration of radiotherapy was associated with better cardiac-specific mortality in
multivariate analysis. This is in line with previous data and may be explained by the
increased exposure to anthracyclines in patients not treated with radiotherapy [18].
Looking again at the heart disease-specific survival rates of different cancers (Figure 2-
b), it is interesting to note that the lower rates are probably linked to tobacco-related
cancers (e.g. lung cancer, urinary bladder cancer and kidney/renal pelvis cancer). This
underlines the important role of background smoking history in assessing the cardiac
risk of cancer survivors.
Looking further at the cancer-specific survival curves of different cancers (Figure 2-a) as
well as distribution of causes of death according to the duration since diagnosis, it is
interesting to note that cancer-related death continued to occur without a plateau even
19 years after diagnosis in the majority of cancers. This finding challenges the common
rule of thumb of considering 5 years survival as the arbitrary cutoff after which the
patient may be considered cured from cancer. This finding is also in line with previously
published population-based data [19].
The results of this analysis should be interpreted with caution given the absence of
information about other potential risk factors for cardiac disease such as smoking,
alcohol consumption, and co-morbidities in the SEER database. Moreover, details of
potentially cardiotoxic systemic therapy as well as technical details/doses of
radiotherapy were not available. Additionally, the exact cardiac disease/events which
Accepted Manuscript
led to death were not mentioned which may compromise our understanding of the true
correlation between cancer diagnosis/treatment and cardiac death.
The staging of patients included in the current analysis includes 2 different editions of
the AJCC system (3rd edition for those diagnosed from 1988-2003; and 6th edition for
those diagnosed from 2004-2008). This may have partly confounded the assessment of
the impact of the stage on survival.
Another important caveat for the interpretation of these results is the dependence of the
current analysis on the cause of death recorded within death certificates and /or hospital
records. Although the SEER database itself has a rigorous quality assurance program,
similar quality cannot be guaranteed of every medical registrar who recorded the cause
of death for each patient, particularly in the presence of some data casting doubt about
the level of accuracy of the cause of death reported in death certificates [20]. It is also
thought that a certifier is more likely to invoke cancer as a cause of death if it was
recently diagnosed, even if the patient died of something else [21,22]. However, this is
less of a concern here given the fact that all evaluated patients have been diagnosed
since 5 years at least.
It has also to be noted that given the study cutoff of 2013, some recently diagnosed
patients have been censored and did not have sufficient follow up time. This caveat is
relevant when interpreting different supplementary figures for each tumor site.
Moreover, statements made in the results should take into account the fact that the
analysis was conditional on surviving at least 5 years.
The practical implications of the current analysis indicate the need to: (1) pay more
attention to potentially cardiotoxic therapies that are administered to our patients; (2)
tailor follow up strategies of cancer survivors not only according to the risks of cancer
relapse but also according to the risk of cardiac events.
5. Conclusions:
Within the stated limitations of the above analysis, cardiac death is a more important
cause of death than cancer itself 10 years following the diagnosis of cancer and there is
a wide variability among different cancers in the relative importance of cardiac death vs.
cancer-related death among cancer survivors. These data are supportive of a more
Accepted Manuscript
meticulous cardiac-sparing treatment planning as well as tailored follow up strategies for
cardiac disease among cancer survivors.
Funding
This manuscript has not received any funding.
Declaration of interest
The author has no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or
entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials
discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock
ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or
royalties.
Accepted Manuscript
References
Reference annotations
* Of interest
** Of considerable interest
1. http://publications.iarc.fr/Non-Series-Publications/World-Cancer-Reports/World-
Cancer-Report-2014. last accessed on 17/11/2016
2. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs297/en/. last accessed on
17/11/2016
3. http://www.who.int/nmh/publications/ncd-status-report-2014/en/ last accessed on
17/11/2016
4. Simmons VN, Pineiro B, Hooper MW et al. Tobacco-Related Health Disparities
Across the Cancer Care Continuum. Cancer Control, 23, 434-41 (2016)
5. Carroll AJ, Labarthe DR, Huffman MD et al. Global tobacco prevention and
control in relation to a cardiovascular health promotion and disease prevention
framework: A narrative review. Prev Med, 93, 189-97 (2016)
6. O'Keefe JH, Bhatti SK, Bajwa A et al. Alcohol and cardiovascular health: the
dose makes the poison...or the remedy. Mayo Clin Proc, 89, 382-93 (2014)
7. Simon TG, Corey KE, Chung RT et al. Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in Patients
with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: The Potential Role of Ezetimibe. Dig Dis
Sci, 61, 3425-35 (2016)
8. Ahmed SH, Moussa Sherif DE, Fouad Y et al. Principles of a risk evaluation and
mitigation strategy (REMS) for breast cancer patients receiving potentially
cardiotoxic adjuvant treatments. Expert Opin Drug Saf, 15, 911-23 (2016)
9. Abdel-Rahman O, Alorabi M. Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in
the prophylaxis of anthracycline or trastuzumab-related cardiac dysfunction:
preclinical and clinical considerations. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther, 15, 829-37
(2015)
10. Abdel-Rahman O. Causes of death in long-term lung cancer survivors: a SEER
database analysis. Curr Med Res Opin, 1-16 (2017)
11. *Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program. About the SEER
Program. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/about. Accessed 25th June 2016.
This is the website for accessing SEER database.
12. **Maas A, Appelman YEA. Gender differences in coronary heart disease. Neth
Heart J, 18, 598-602 (2010). This study evaluated gender differences in coronary
heart disease.
13. Rivera MP. Lung cancer in women: differences in epidemiology, biology,
histology, and treatment outcomes. Semin Respir Crit Care Med, 34, 792-801
(2013)
14. Jolly S, Vittinghoff E, Chattopadhyay A et al. Higher cardiovascular disease
prevalence and mortality among younger blacks compared to whites. Am J Med,
123, 811-8 (2010)
Accepted Manuscript
15. Lin SH, Zhang N, Godby J et al. Radiation modality use and cardiopulmonary
mortality risk in elderly patients with esophageal cancer. Cancer, 122, 917-28
(2016)
16. Park HS, Harder EM, Mancini BR et al. Central versus Peripheral Tumor
Location: Influence on Survival, Local Control, and Toxicity Following
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Primary Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J
Thorac Oncol, 10, 832-7 (2015)
17. Ye JC, Yan W, Christos P et al. Second cancer, breast cancer, and cardiac
mortality in stage T1aN0 breast cancer patients with or without external beam
radiation therapy: a national registry study. Clin Breast Cancer, 15, 54-9 (2015)
18. *Pugh TJ, Ballonoff A, Rusthoven KE et al. Cardiac mortality in patients with
stage I and II diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with and without radiation: a
surveillance, epidemiology, and end-results analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol
Phys, 76, 845-9 (2010). This study evaluated cardiac mortality in large cell
lymphomas.
19. Hubbard MO, Fu P, Margevicius S et al. Five-year survival does not equal cure in
non&#x2013;small cell lung cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End
Results&#x2013;based analysis of variables affecting 10- to 18-year survival.
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 143, 1307-13)
20. Halanych JH, Shuaib F, Parmar G et al. Agreement on Cause of Death Between
Proxies, Death Certificates, and Clinician Adjudicators in the Reasons for
Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study. Am J
Epidemiol, 173, 1319-26 (2011)
21. Asnaes S, Frederiksen V, Fenger C. The value of the hospital autopsy. A study
of causes and modes of death estimated before and after autopsy. Forensic Sci
Int, 21, 23-32 (1983)
22. Masocco M, Kodra Y, Vichi M et al. Mortality associated with neurofibromatosis
type 1: a study based on Italian death certificates (1995-2006). Orphanet J Rare
Dis, 6, 11 (2011)
Accepted Manuscript
Table-1: baseline characteristics of cancer survivors included in the analysis (N.= 2146496) (Case listing session was limited to patients diagnosed
between 1988-2008):
Parameter Patients with cardiac death (N.= 138557) Patients without cardiac death (N.= 2007939) P value
Cancer type
Colorectal
Lung
Breast
Prostate
Endometrium
Melanoma
Thyroid
Urinary bladder
Kidney/renal
pelvis
Non Hodgkin
lymphoma
23812 (17.2%)
6053 (4.4%)
27955 (20.2%)
46886 (33.8%)
5536 (4%)
5576 (4%)
1121 (0.8%)
11809 (8.5%)
4205 (3%)
5604 (4.1%)
240880 (12.1%)
80737 (4%)
538794 (26.8%)
544999 (27.1%)
91077 (4.5%)
145030 (7.2%)
80566 (4%)
114190 (5.7%)
71344 (3.6%)
100322 (5%)
<0.0001
Age
< 40 years
40-70 years
>70 years
402 (0.3%)
41699 (30.1%)
96456 (69.6%)
121431 (6%)
1279681 (63.7%)
606827 (30.2%)
<0.0001
Gender
Male
Female
81252 (58.6%)
57305 (41.4%)
984226 (49%)
1023713 (51%)
<0.0001
Race
White
Black
Others
119775 (86.4%)
11850 (8.6%)
6923 (5%)
1692658 (84.3%)
171214 (8.5%)
144067 (7.1%)
<0.0001
Histology
Adenocarcinoma
SCC
Others
7907 (57.2%)
2487 (1.8%)
56863 (41%)
1008195 (50.2%)
38548 (1.9%)
957196 (47.9%)
<0.0001
AJCC stage
0
2596 (1.9%)
42562 (2.1%)
<0.0001
Accepted Manuscript
I
II
III
Unknown
38731 (28%)
26099 (18.8%)
10304 (7.4%)
60827 (43.9%)
626314 (31.2%)
521318 (26%)
176776 (8.8%)
640969 (31.9%)
Surgery
Yes
No
Unknown
64831 (46.8%)
73345 (52.9%)
381 (0.3%)
1063282 (53%)
937828 (46.7%)
6829 (0.3%)
<0.0001
Radiation
therapy
Yes
No
Unknown
30696 (22.2%)
103022 (74.4%)
4839 (3.5%)
499621 (24.9%)
1378133(68.6%)
130185 (6.5%)
<0.0001
Accepted Manuscript
Figure
-
cutoff.
time fr
-
-
1: (a) Pie
c
(
b) Bar ch
a
o
m diagno
s
c
hart of th
e
a
rt of the v
i
s
is.
e
vital stat
u
i
tal status
o
u
s of canc
e
o
f cancer
s
e
r survivor
s
s
urvivors (
1
s
(1973-2
0
1
973-2008
0
08) at the
) stratified
study
by the
Accepted Manuscript
Figure
2: (a) Can
c
c
er-specifi
c
c
survival
r
r
ates for the 10 canc
e
e
rs evalua
t
t
ed in the
a
a
nalysis.
Accepted Manuscript
Figure
analysi
2: (b) Hea
r
s.
r
t disease-
-
specific s
u
u
rvival rate
s
s
for the 1
0
0
cancers
e
e
valuated in the
Accepted Manuscript
S. figure
-
S. figure
-
from dia
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
-
1a: Pie char
-
1b: Bar cha
gnosis; y-ax
i
Vit
a
Alive
Death
5-7
years
7-9
year
t of the vital
rt of the vit
a
i
s: number o
f
9%
8%
a
l statu
s
due to prima
r
s
9-11
years
11-
1
yea
r
status of co
l
a
l status of c
o
f
patients/
x
-
6
21%
s
of col
o
surviv
o
C
a
r
y cancer O
t
1
3
r
s
13-15
years
15-
1
yea
r
l
orectal can
c
o
lorectal can
-
axis: years
a
6
2%
o
rectal
c
o
rs
a
rdiac death
t
her causes o
f
1
7
r
s
17-19
years
c
er survivors
cer survivor
s
a
fter diagnos
c
ancer
f
death
Alive
Cardiac dea
t
Death due t
o
cancer
Other caus
e
(1973-2008
)
s
(1973-200
8
is.
t
h
o primary
e
s of death
)
at the stud
y
8
) stratified
b
y
cutoff.
b
y the time
Accepted Manuscript
S. figure
-
S. figure
-
diagnosi
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
-
2a: Pie char
-
2b: Bar cha
s; y-axis: nu
m
Vital
s
Alive
Death
5-7
years
7-9
year
t of the vital
rt of the vit
a
m
ber of pati
e
1
9
2
s
tatus o
due to prima
r
s
9-11
years
11-
1
yea
r
status of lu
n
a
l status of l
u
e
nts/ x-axis:
y
7%
9
%
2
4%
f lung c
a
C
a
r
y cancer O
t
1
3
r
s
13-15
years
15-
1
yea
r
n
g cancer su
r
u
ng cancer s
u
y
ears after
d
50%
a
ncer s
u
a
rdiac death
t
her causes o
f
1
7
r
s
17-19
years
r
vivors (197
3
u
rvivors (19
7
d
iagnosis.
u
rvivor
s
f
death
Alive
Cardiac dea
t
Death due t
o
cancer
Other caus
e
3
-2008) at th
e
7
3-2008) stra
s
t
h
o primary
e
s of death
e study cuto
f
tified by the
ff.
time from
Accepted Manuscript
S. figure
-
S. figure
-
from dia
0
1000
0
2000
0
3000
0
4000
0
5000
0
6000
0
7000
0
8000
0
9000
0
10000
0
-
3a: Pie char
-
3b: Bar cha
gnosis; y-ax
i
Vital s
t
Alive
Death
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5-7
years
7-
9
yea
t of the vital
rt of the vit
a
i
s: number o
f
5%
8%
t
atus of
due to prima
r
9
rs
9-11
years
11-
1
yea
status of br
e
a
l status of b
r
f
patients/
x
-
14%
breast
c
C
a
r
y cancer O
t
1
3
rs
13-15
years
15-
1
yea
e
ast cancer
s
r
east cancer
-
axis: years
a
73%
c
ancer
s
a
rdiac death
t
her causes o
f
1
7
rs
17-19
years
s
urvivors (19
survivors (1
9
a
fter diagnos
s
urvivo
r
f
death
Alive
Cardiac dea
t
Death due t
o
cancer
Other caus
e
73-2008) at
t
9
73-2008) st
is.
r
s
t
h
o primary
e
s of death
t
he study cu
t
ratified by t
h
t
off.
h
e time
Accepted Manuscript
S. figure
-
S. figure
-
from dia
0
2000
0
4000
0
6000
0
8000
0
10000
0
12000
0
-
4a: Pie char
-
4b: Bar cha
gnosis; y-ax
i
Vit
Alive
Death
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5-7
years
7-
9
yea
t of the vital
rt of the vit
a
i
s: number o
f
8%
7%
al statu
due to prima
r
9
rs
9-11
years
11-
1
yea
status of pr
o
a
l status of p
r
f
patients/
x
-
6
18%
s of pr
o
surviv
o
C
a
r
y cancer O
t
1
3
rs
13-15
years
15-
1
yea
o
state cance
r
ostate canc
e
-
axis: years
a
6
7%
o
state c
a
o
rs
a
rdiac death
t
her causes o
f
1
7
rs
17-19
years
r survivors (
1
e
r survivors
(
a
fter diagnos
a
ncer
f
death
Alive
Cardiac dea
t
Death due t
o
cancer
Other caus
e
1
973-2008)
a
(
1973-2008)
is.
t
h
o primary
e
s of death
a
t the study
c
stratified b
y
c
utoff.
y
the time
Accepted Manuscript
S. figure
-
cutoff.
S. figure
-
time fro
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
-
5a: Pie char
-
5b: Bar cha
m
diagnosis;
Vital
s
Alive
Death
5-7
years
7-9
year
t of the vital
rt of the vit
a
y-axis: num
b
4%
3%
s
tatus o
f
due to prima
r
s
9-11
years
11-
1
yea
r
status of m
a
a
l status of
m
b
er of patie
n
82
%
11%
f
malig
n
surviv
o
C
a
r
y cancer O
t
1
3
r
s
13-15
years
15-
1
yea
r
a
lignant mel
a
m
alignant me
n
ts/
x
-axis: y
e
%
n
ant m
e
o
rs
a
rdiac death
t
her causes o
f
1
7
r
s
17-19
years
a
noma survi
v
lanoma surv
e
ars after di
a
e
lanom
a
f
death
Alive
Cardiac dea
t
Death due t
o
cancer
Other caus
e
v
ors (1973-2
0
ivors (1973-
2
a
gnosis.
a
t
h
o primary
e
s of death
008) at the
s
2
008) stratif
i
s
tudy
i
ed by the
Accepted Manuscript
S. figure
-
cutoff.
S. figure
-
the tim
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
-
6a: Pie char
-
6b: Bar cha
e
from diagn
o
V
Alive
Death
5-7
years
7-9
year
t of the vital
rt of the vit
a
o
sis; y-axis:
n
5%
11%
1
V
ital sta
t
lymp
h
due to prima
r
s
9-11
years
11-
1
yea
r
status of no
a
l status of n
o
n
umber of p
a
7
1
4%
t
us of n
o
h
oma s
u
C
a
r
y cancer O
t
1
3
r
s
13-15
years
15-
1
yea
r
n Hodgkin l
y
o
n Hodgkin l
a
tients/
x
-a
x
i
s
0%
o
n hod
g
u
rvivor
s
a
rdiac death
t
her causes o
f
1
7
r
s
17-19
years
y
mphoma su
r
ymphoma s
u
s
: years afte
r
g
kin
s
f
death
Alive
Cardiac dea
t
Death due t
o
cancer
Other caus
e
r
vivors (197
3
u
rvivors (19
7
r
diagnosis.
t
h
o primary
e
s of death
3
-2008) at th
7
3-2008) str
a
e study
a
tified by
Accepted Manuscript
S. figure
-
cutoff.
S. figure
-
the tim
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
-
7a: Pie char
-
7b: Bar cha
e
from diagn
o
Vital s
t
Alive
Death
5-7
years
7-9
year
t of the vital
rt of the vit
a
o
sis; y-axis:
n
9%
6%
t
atus o
f
due to prima
r
s
9-11
years
11-
1
yea
r
status of ur
i
a
l status of u
r
n
umber of p
a
6
24%
f
urinar
y
surviv
o
C
a
r
y cancer O
t
1
3
r
s
13-15
years
15-
1
yea
r
i
nary bladde
r
r
inary bladd
e
a
tients/
x
-axi
s
6
1%
y
bladd
e
o
rs
a
rdiac death
t
her causes o
f
1
7
r
s
17-19
years
r
cancer sur
v
e
r cancer su
r
s
: years afte
r
e
r canc
e
f
death
Alive
Cardiac dea
t
Death due t
o
cancer
Other caus
e
v
ivors (1973-
r
vivors (197
3
r
diagnosis.
e
r
t
h
o primary
e
s of death
2008) at the
3
-2008) strat
i
study
i
fied by
Accepted Manuscript
S. figure
-
S. figure
-
from dia
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
-
8a: Pie char
-
8b: Bar cha
gnosis; y-ax
i
Vital s
t
Alive
Death
5-7
years
7-9
year
t of the vital
rt of the vit
a
i
s: number o
f
6%
7%
t
atus of
due to prima
r
s
9-11
years
11-
1
yea
r
status of ki
d
a
l status of ki
f
patients/
x
-
15%
kidney
C
a
r
y cancer O
t
1
3
r
s
13-15
years
15-
1
yea
r
d
ney cancer
s
dney cancer
-
axis: years
a
72%
cancer
s
a
rdiac death
t
her causes o
f
1
7
r
s
17-19
years
s
urvivors (1
9
survivors (1
a
fter diagnos
s
urvivo
r
f
death
Alive
Cardiac dea
t
Death due t
o
cancer
Other caus
e
9
73-2008) at
973-2008) s
t
is.
r
s
t
h
o primary
e
s of death
the study cu
t
ratified by t
h
toff.
h
e time
Accepted Manuscript
S. figure
-
S. figure
-
from dia
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
-
9a: Pie char
-
9b: Bar cha
gnosis; y-ax
i
Alive
5-7
years
7-9
year
t of the vital
rt of the vit
a
i
s: number o
f
Vital st
a
Cardiac d
e
s
9-11
years
11-
1
yea
r
status of th
y
a
l status of t
h
f
patients/
x
-
1%
2
%
a
tus of
t
e
ath De
a
1
3
r
s
13-15
years
15-
1
yea
r
y
roid cancer
h
yroid cance
r
-
axis: years
a
9
2
%
5%
t
hyroid
a
th due to pri
m
1
7
r
s
17-19
years
survivors (1
9
r
survivors (
1
a
fter diagnos
2
%
cancer
m
ary cancer
Alive
Cardiac dea
t
Death due t
o
cancer
Other caus
e
9
73-2008) a
t
1
973-2008) s
is.
survivo
Other ca
u
t
h
o primary
e
s of death
t
the study c
u
s
tratified by
t
rs
u
ses of death
u
toff.
t
he time
Accepted Manuscript
S. figure
-
cutoff.
S. figure
-
the tim
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
-
10a: Pie ch
a
-
10b: Bar c
h
e
from diagn
o
Vital
s
Alive
Death
5-7
years
7-9
year
a
rt of the vit
a
h
art of the vi
t
o
sis; y-axis:
n
6%
3%
1
s
tatus o
f
due to prima
r
s
9-11
years
11-
1
yea
r
a
l status of u
t
al status of
u
n
umber of p
a
7
6
1
5%
f
uterin
e
surviv
o
C
a
r
y cancer O
t
1
3
r
s
13-15
years
15-
1
yea
r
terine corpu
u
terine corp
u
a
tients/
x
-axi
s
6
%
e
corpu
o
rs
a
rdiac death
t
her causes o
f
1
7
r
s
17-19
years
s cancer sur
v
u
s cancer su
r
s
: years afte
r
s cance
f
death
Alive
Cardiac dea
t
Death due t
o
cancer
Other caus
e
v
ivors (1973
-
rvivors (197
3
r
diagnosis.
r
t
h
o primary
e
s of death
-
2008) at th
e
3
-2008) stra
t
e
study
t
ified by
Accepted Manuscript
Supplementary table-1: Multivariate analysis of factors affecting cardiac-specific mortality among
colorectal cancer survivors (1988-2008):
Variable Hazard ratio (95% CI)
P value
Age
40-69 years
Ref. (1.00)
<40 years 0.095 (0.066-0.135) <0.0001
>70 6.092 (5.906-6.284) <0.0001
Race
White
Ref. (1.00)
Black 1.096 (1.019-1.122) 0.006
Others 0.664 (0.628-0.702) <0.0001
Gender
Male
Ref. (1.00)
Female 0.794 (0.774-0.815) <0.0001
Surgery
Yes
Ref. (1.00)
No 1.057 (1.009-1.107) 0.019
Radiation
yes
Ref. (1.00)
No 1.250 (1.187-1.317) <0.0001
AJCC stage
Stage o
Ref. (1.00)
Stage I 1.025 (0.942-1.117) 0.563
Stage II 1.086 (1.001-1.178) 0.047
Stage III 1.188 (1.094-1.290) <0.0001
Supplementary table-2: Multivariate analysis of factors affecting cardiac-specific mortality among lung
cancer survivors (1988-2008):
Variable Hazard ratio (95% CI)
P value
Age
40-69 years
Ref. (1.00)
<40 years 0.090 (0.050-0.163) <0.0001
>70 3.461 (3.282-3.650) <0.0001
Accepted Manuscript
Race
White
Ref. (1.00)
Black 1.264 (1.161-1.377) <0.0001
Others 0.608 (0.535-0.691) <0.0001
Gender
Male
Ref. (1.00)
Female 0.660 (0.627-0.695) <0.0001
Surgery
Yes
Ref. (1.00)
No 1.390 (1.308-1.477) <0.0001
Radiation
yes
Ref. (1.00)
No 0.771 (0.718-0.827) <0.0001
AJCC stage
Stage III
Ref. (1.00)
Stage II 0.955 (0.875-1.042) 0.298
Stage I 1.084 (0.996-1.181) 0.063
Laterality
Left
Ref. (1.00)
Right 0.901 (0.856-0.949) <0.0001
Supplementary table-3: Multivariate analysis of factors affecting cardiac-specific mortality among breast
cancer survivors (1988-2008):
Variable Hazard ratio (95% CI)
P value
Age
40-69 years
Ref. (1.00)
<40 years 0.132 (0.107-0.163) <0.0001
>70 9.519 (9.248-9.798) <0.0001
Race
White
Ref. (1.00)
Black 1.365 (1.302-1.431) <0.0001
Others 0.607 (0.568-0.649) <0.0001
Gender
Male
Ref. (1.00)
Female 0.702 (0.612-0.804) <0.0001
Surgery
Yes
Ref. (1.00)
Accepted Manuscript
No 1.050 (1.014-1.088) 0.006
Radiation
yes
Ref. (1.00)
No 1.477 (1.425-1.531) <0.0001
AJCC stage
Stage III
Ref. (1.00)
Stage II 0.721 (0.677-0.768) <0.0001
Stage I 0.773 (0.726-0.824) <0.0001
Laterality
Left
Ref. (1.00)
Right 0.987 (0.963-1.012) 0.318
Supplementary table-4: Multivariate analysis of factors affecting cardiac-specific mortality among
cutaneous malignant melanoma survivors(1988-2008):
Variable Hazard ratio (95% CI)
P value
Age
40-69 years
Ref. (1.00)
<40 years 0.070 (0.052-0.094) <0.0001
>70 11.004 (10.366-11.681) <0.0001
Race
White
Ref. (1.00)
Black 1.453 (1.037-2.036) 0.030
Others 0.833 (0.585-1.186) 0.311
Gender
Male
Ref. (1.00)
Female 0.684 (0.648-0.723) <0.0001
Surgery
Yes
Ref. (1.00)
No 1.050 (0.986-1.119) 0.130
Radiation
yes
Ref. (1.00)
No 0.942 (0.665-1.335) 0.737
Year of diagnosis
2000-2008
Ref. (1.00)
1988-2000 1.182 (1.108-1.261) <0.0001
AJCC stage
Accepted Manuscript
Stage III
Ref. (1.00)
Stage II 0.900 (0.792-1.022) 0.103
Stage I 1.026 (0.910-1.158) 0.672
Supplementary table-5: Multivariate analysis of factors affecting cardiac-specific mortality among
uterine corpus cancer survivors (1988-2008):
Variable Hazard ratio (95% CI)
P value
Age
40-69 years
Ref. (1.00)
<40 years 0.237 (0.158-0.355) <0.0001
>70 6.559 (6.166-6.978) <0.0001
Race
White
Ref. (1.00)
Black 1.397 (1.221-1.598) <0.0001
Others 0.663 (0.568-0.775) <0.0001
Surgery
Yes
Ref. (1.00)
No 1.938 (1.599-2.350) <0.0001
Radiation
yes
Ref. (1.00)
No 0. 986 (0.915-1.062) 0. 712
Year of diagnosis
2000-2008
Ref. (1.00)
1988-2000 1.269 (1.182-1.362) <0.0001
AJCC stage
Stage III
Ref. (1.00)
Stage II 0.947 (0.897-1.000) 0.049
Stage I 1.114 (1.022-1.214) 0.014
Supplementary table-6: Multivariate analysis of factors affecting cardiac-specific mortality among
prostate cancer survivors (1988-2008):
Accepted Manuscript
Variable Hazard ratio (95% CI)
P value
Age
40-69 years
Ref. (1.00)
<40 years 0.354 (0.050-2.510) 0.298
>70 3.445 (3.307-3.588) <0.0001
Race
White
Ref. (1.00)
Black 1.250 (1.181-1.323) <0.0001
Others 0.725 (0.661-0.796) <0.0001
Surgery
Yes
Ref. (1.00)
No 2.828 (2.680-2.983) <0.0001
Radiation
yes
Ref. (1.00)
No 1.280 (1.221-1.341) <0.0001
Year of diagnosis
2000-2008
Ref. (1.00)
1988-2000 1.555 (1.482-1.632) <0.0001
AJCC stage
Stage III
Ref. (1.00)
Stage II 0.938 (0.869-1.012) 0.098
Stage I 0.907 (0.868-0.947) <0.0001
Supplementary table-7: Multivariate analysis of factors affecting cardiac-specific mortality among
urinary bladder cancer survivors (1988-2008):
Variable Hazard ratio (95% CI)
P value
Age
40-69 years
Ref. (1.00)
<40 years 0. 065 (0.050-0.157) 0.101
>70 5.151 (4.940-5.371) <0.0001
Race
White
Ref. (1.00)
Accepted Manuscript
Black 1.102 (1.000-1.213) 0.050
Others 0.676 (0.609-0.752) <0.0001
Surgery
Yes
Ref. (1.00)
No 1.215 (1.110-1.329) <0.0001
Radiation
yes
Ref. (1.00)
No 0.694 (0.607-0.793) <0.0001
Year of diagnosis
2000-2008
Ref. (1.00)
1988-2000 1.242 (1.193-1.294) <0.0001
Gender
Male
Ref. (1.00)
Female 0.753 (0.720-0.786) <0.0001
AJCC stage
Stage III
Ref. (1.00)
Stage II 0.894 (0.779-1.027) 0.113
Stage I 0.936 (0.815-1.075) 0.350
Supplementary table-8: Multivariate analysis of factors affecting cardiac-specific mortality among kidney
cancer survivors (1988-2008):
Variable Hazard ratio (95% CI)
P value
Age
40-69 years
Ref. (1.00)
<40 years 0.113 (0.080-0.161) <0.0001
>70 4.722 (4.434-5.030) <0.0001
Race
White
Ref. (1.00)
Black 1.381 (1.254-1.522) <0.0001
Others 0.759 (0.650-0.886) <0.0001
Gender
Male
Ref. (1.00)
Female 0.821 (0.771-0.874) <0.0001
Surgery
Yes
Ref. (1.00)
No 1.292 (1.191-1.402) <0.0001
Accepted Manuscript
Radiation
yes
Ref. (1.00)
No 1.294 (0.883-1.896) 0.186
Year of diagnosis
2000-2008
Ref. (1.00)
1988-2000
1.231 (1.143-1.326)
<0.0001
AJCC stage
Stage III
Ref. (1.00)
Stage II 0.914 (0.756-0.932) 0.353
Stage I 0.839 (0.756-0.932) 0.001
Laterality
Left
Ref. (1.00)
Right 0.994 (0.935-1.056) 0.842
Supplementary table-9: Multivariate analysis of factors affecting cardiac-specific mortality among
thyroid cancer survivors (1988-2008):
Variable Hazard ratio (95% CI)
P value
Age
40-69 years
Ref. (1.00)
<40 years 0.299 (0.126-0.708) 0.006
>70 12.096 (8.227-17.784) <0.0001
Race
White
Ref. (1.00)
Black 2.641 (1.593-4.377) <0.0001
Others 0.587 (0.239-1.445) 0.247
Gender
Male
Ref. (1.00)
Female 0.529 (0.364-0.768) 0.001
Surgery
Yes
Ref. (1.00)
No 1.126 (0.979-1.294) 0.095
Radiation
yes
Ref. (1.00)
No 0.816 (0.609-1.093) 0.173
Year of diagnosis
2000-2008
Ref. (1.00)
Accepted Manuscript
1988-2000
1.071 (0.924-1.241)
0.361
AJCC stage
Stage III
Ref. (1.00)
Stage II 0.942 (0.664-1.336) 0.738
Stage I 0.895 (0.713-1.124) 0.340
Supplementary table-10: Multivariate analysis of factors affecting cardiac-specific mortality among non
Hodgkin lymphoma survivors (1988-2008):
Variable Hazard ratio (95% CI)
P value
Age
40-69 years
Ref. (1.00)
<40 years 0.128 (0.101-0.162) <0.0001
>70 6.513 (6.148-6.899) <0.0001
Race
White
Ref. (1.00)
Black 1.216 (1.084-1.363) 0.001
Others 0.737 (0.651-0.836) <0.0001
Gender
Male
Ref. (1.00)
Female 0.813 (0.771-0.857) <0.0001
Surgery
Yes
Ref. (1.00)
No 0.989 (0.685-1.427) 0.951
Radiation
yes
Ref. (1.00)
No 1.066 (1.000-1.137) 0.049
Year of diagnosis
2000-2008
Ref. (1.00)
1988-2000
1.164 (1.095-1.238)
<0.0001
AJCC stage
Stage III
Ref. (1.00)
Stage II 1.134 (0.881-1.460) 0.329
Accepted Manuscript
Stage I 1.097 (0.882-1.364) 0.504
... Ранняя диагностика ОЗ и применение современных методов лечения позволили улучшить онкологический прогноз больных, однако сердечно-сосудистые осложнения (ССО) противоопухолевой терапии по-прежнему представляют значимую клиническую проблему [3]. Сердечнососудистые заболевания занимают лидирующие позиции в структуре причин смерти у пациентов, успешно пролеченных по поводу ОЗ [4]. Одним из наиболее опасных ССО противоопухолевого лечения (ПОЛ) является хроническая сердечная недостаточность (ХСН), которая может развиваться как в процессе лечения, так и после его окончания, снижая качество жизни и ухудшая прогноз больных [5]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Aim. To evaluate the effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan (S/V) on the functional status, systolic and diastolic function of the left ventricle (LV), tolerability of therapy and to determine predictors of its effectiveness in patients with cancer therapy-related heart failure (СTRHF). Materials and methods. Forty patients 58 [46; 65.5] years of age with HF associated with anthracycline-containing cancer therapy were enrolled. Clinical examination, echocardiography, and assessment of potassium and creatinine levels were performed at baseline and after 6 months of S/V therapy. Results. NYHA functional class (FC) improvement was observed in 22 (64.7%) patients. Radiation therapy (RT) decreased (OR 0.091; 95% CI 0.010.83; p=0.03) while baseline low LV EF increased (OR 9.0; 95% CI 1.7845.33; p=0.008) the odds of FC improvement. LV EF increased from 37.3 [30; 42.5] % to 45 [38; 48] % (p0.0001) and exceeded 50% in 7 (20.6%) patients. The odds of LV EF recovery increased when S/V therapy was initiated 1 year after anthracycline therapy (OR 10.67; 95% CI 1.5772.67; p=0.0016) and decreased in patients with the history of RT (OR 0.14; 95% CI 0.020.89; p=0.0037) and in patients over 58 years (OR 0.07; 95% CI 0.010.68; p=0.022). LV diastolic function improvement included E/e descent from 13.6 [10; 18.3] to 8.9 [6.9; 13.7] (p=0.0005), and decrease in diastolic dysfunction grade in 18 (45%) patients (p=0.0001). No significant change in serum potassium (4.45 [4.2; 4.8] versus 4.5 [4.3; 4.8]; p=0.5) and creatinine (75.4 [67.6; 85.1] versus 75.5 [68.2; 98.3]; p=0.08) levels were observed. Conclusion. S/V therapy is associated with improvement of EF, systolic and diastolic LV function, demonstrates a favorable tolerability profile in patients with СTRHF. Lack of RT and low baseline LV EF increased the odds of LV EF improvement; lack of RT, early (1 year) start of treatment after discontinuation of anthracycline therapy, and age 58 years increased the odds of LV EF recovery.
... Studies have shown that non-cancer diseases such as heart disease are the leading cause of non-cancer mortality in cancer patients. In most cancer patients, the mortality rate from non-cancer diseases even exceeds that from primary cancer (Siegel et al. 2021;Abdel-Rahman 2017;Sturgeon et al. 2019). ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose The objective of this study was to investigate non-cancer causes of death and associated risk factors after bladder cancer (BC) diagnosis. Methods Eligible BC patients were obtained from the SEER database. SEER*Stat software 8.3.9.2 was used to calculate the standardized mortality ratios (SMRs). The proportions of different non-cancer cause of death were calculated and analyzed in different follow-up periods. Multivariate competing risk model was used to analyze the risk factors for death of BC and non-cancer diseases. Results In total, 240,954 BC patients were included and 106,092 patients experienced death, with 37,205 (35.07%), 13,208 (12.45%) and 55,679 (52.48%) patients experienced BC, other cancer and non-cancer disease-related deaths, respectively. Overall SMR for BC patients who died from non-cancer diseases was 2.42 (95% CI [2.40–2.44]). Cardiovascular diseases were the most common non-cancer cause of death, followed by respiratory diseases, diabetes mellitus, and infectious diseases. Multivariate competing risk analysis identified the following high-risk factors for non-cancer mortality: age > 60 years, male, whites, in situ stage, pathological type of transitional cell carcinoma, not receiving treatment (including surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation), and widowed. Conclusions Cardiovascular diseases are the leading non-cancer cause of death in BC patients, followed by respiratory disease, diabetes mellitus and infectious diseases. Physicians should pay attention to the risk of death from these non-cancer diseases. Also, physicians should encourage patients to engage in more proactive self-surveillance and follow up.
... This study clarified the long-term characteristics of the cause of death other than cancer in Japanese patients with cancer. While few studies have examined the cause of death by cancer site, previous studies that were limited to breast cancer patients or those that examined survival rates only, without limiting the cause of death by cancer site, have reported results that were similar to those of this study [11,12,[18][19][20][21][22]. In Japan, there is scarce research on the cause of death among patients with cancer and, to the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first large-scale study to examine the characteristics of the cause of death of patients with cancer in Japan. ...
Article
Full-text available
Survival information for Japanese patients with cancer is based only on survival status and the cause of death among these patients remains unclear. In this study, Osaka Cancer Registry data (1985–2014) and vital statistics data (1985–2016) were linked to create a database, permitting the extraction of data on the causes of death. In total, 522,566 subjects diagnosed with cancer between 1995 and 2011 were analyzed. Follow-up for vital status was conducted 5 and 10 years after cancer diagnosis. To evaluate the three causes of death (index cancer, non-index cancer, and non-cancer death), cause-specific hazard and cumulative incidence functions were estimated using a life table and Gray’s methods. The number of deaths owing to any of the causes in the observation period (median: 3.51 years, mean: 4.90 years) was 394,146. The 5- and 10-year cancer-specific survival rate was 48.56% and 39.92%, respectively. Immediately after cancer onset, the hazard of index cancer death was high. The proportion of non-index cancer deaths was high in patients with mouth and pharynx cancers. The hazard of index cancer death remained constant for breast and liver cancers. In prostate, breast, and laryngeal cancers with good prognosis, the hazard of non-index cancer and non-cancer death constantly increased.
... A study of the California Cancer Registry reported longer survival in IV NSCLC patients treated with surgery compared to those who refused surgery (9.4-28 vs 2-10) months in various treatment options, [33] our study results also confirm this idea, It may be related to patients with serious comorbidities that cannot tolerate surgery, such as heart disease. [34] The prognosis is also related to the surgical methods, with local tumor destruction (hazard ratio [HR] 0.91, P = .599), wedge resection (HR 0.68, P < .001), ...
Article
Full-text available
The prognosis of metastatic lung adenocarcinoma (MLUAD) varies greatly. At present, no studies have constructed a satisfactory prognostic model for MLUAD. We identified 44,878 patients with MLUAD. The patients were randomized into the training and validation cohorts. Cox regression models were performed to identify independent prognostic factors. Then, R software was employed to construct a new nomogram for predicting overall survival (OS) of patients with MLUAD. Accuracy was assessed by the concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic curves and calibration plots. Finally, clinical practicability was examined via decision curve analysis. The OS time range for the included populations was 0 to 107 months, and the median OS was 7.00 months. Nineteen variables were significantly associated with the prognosis, and the top 5 prognostic factors were chemotherapy, grade, age, race and surgery. The nomogram has excellent predictive accuracy and clinical applicability compared to the TNM system (C-index: 0.723 vs 0.534). The C-index values were 0.723 (95% confidence interval: 0.719-0.726) and 0.723 (95% confidence interval: 0.718-0.729) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The area under the curve for 6-, 12-, and 18-month OS was 0.799, 0.764, and 0.750, respectively, in the training cohort and 0.799, 0.762, and 0.746, respectively, in the validation cohort. The calibration plots show good accuracy, and the decision curve analysis values indicate good clinical applicability and effectiveness. The nomogram model constructed with the above 19 prognostic factors is suitable for predicting the OS of MLUAD and has good predictive accuracy and clinical applicability.
... The SEER database found that cardiovascular event is a major cause of death among cancer survivors (4). Cardiovascular complications of cancer treatment, especially cardiomyopathy and heart failure, lead to the discontinuity of therapeutic regimens and affect the survival prognosis of patients (5). ...
Preprint
Cardiotoxicity is the most dramatic complications of cancer therapies, leading to halt in potentially life-saving anti-tumor treatment regimens and a poor survival prognosis in a non-negligible percentage of patients. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and β-blockers are effective in the treatment of the cancer therapy–related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD), while their roles in the prevention of cardiotoxicity are unclear. Sacubitril/valsartan was advantageous over ACEI in heart failure patients for further reduction of cardiovascular death or heart failure re-hospitalization. However, there is short of well-established testimony of its efficacy and safety in the prevention and treatment of CTRCD in the cardio-oncology setting. Although some small observational studies found a good performance of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with CTRCD, large-scale prospective clinical studies are required to confirm its excellent results. In this paper, we review the potential benefit of sacubitril/valsartan in human subjects with CTRCD.
Article
Aims: With improving cancer survivorship, cardiovascular disease (CVD) has become a leading cause of death in breast cancer (BC) survivors. At present, there is no prospectively validated, contemporary risk assessment tool specific to this patient cohort. Accordingly, we sought to investigate long-term cardiovascular outcomes in early-stage BC patients utilising a well characterised database at a quaternary referral centre. With the assembly of this cohort, we have derived a BC cardiovascular risk index titled the 'CRIB (Cardiovascular Risk Index in Breast Cancer)' to estimate the risk of a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) in women undergoing treatment for BC. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted examining all female patients aged ≥18 years of age who underwent treatment for early-stage BC at a cancer centre in Melbourne, Australia, between 2009 and 2019. The primary aim of this study was to assess causes and predictors of MACE. Results: A total of 1,173 women with early-stage BC were included. During a median follow-up of 4.4 (1.8-6.7) years, 80 (6.8%) women experienced a MACE. These women were more likely to be older, with a high burden of cardiovascular risk factors and were more likely to have a history of established coronary artery disease (CAD) (p≤0.001 for all). A CRIB ≥3 (2 points: renal impairment, 1 point: age ≥65 years, body mass index [BMI]>27, diabetes, hypertension, history of smoking) demonstrated moderate discrimination (c-statistic 0.75) with appropriate calibration. A CRIB ≥3, which represented 23.9% of our cohort, was associated with a high risk of MACE (odds ratio [OR] 17.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.36-50.05; p<0.001). A total of 138 (11.8%) women died during the study period. Mortality was significantly higher in patients who experienced a MACE (HR 2.72, 95%CI 1.75-4.23; p<0.001). Conclusion: Cardiovascular risk stratification at the time of BC diagnosis using the novel CRIB may help guide surveillance and the use of cardioprotective therapies as well as identify those who require long-term cardiac follow-up.
Article
Cardiotoxicity is the most dramatic complication of cancer therapies, and it results in the cessation of potentially life-saving antitumor treatment regimens and a poor survival prognosis in a nonnegligible proportion of patients. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and β-blockers are effective in the treatment of cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD), whereas their roles in the prevention of cardiotoxicity are unclear. Sacubitril/valsartan, which is an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, has been shown to be advantageous over ACEIs in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction for further the reduction of cardiovascular death or rehospitalization. However, patients with CTRCD were excluded from pivotal trials involving sacubitril/valsartan. Although several small observational studies have observed excellent performance in improving cardiac structure and function in patients with CTRCD, large-scale prospective clinical studies are required to confirm these results. In this review, we described the contemporary literature concerning the potential benefit of sacubitril/valsartan in the cardio-oncology setting.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the most common subtype of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of our study was to determine prognostic risk factors and establish a novel nomogram for lung adenocarcinoma patients. Methods: This retrospective cohort study is based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and the Chinese multicenter lung cancer database. We selected 22,368 eligible LUAD patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 from the SEER database and screened them based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Subsequently, the patients were randomly divided into the training cohort (n = 15,657) and the testing cohort (n = 6711), with a ratio of 7:3. Meanwhile, 736 eligible LUAD patients from the Chinese multicenter lung cancer database diagnosed between 2011 and 2021 were considered as the validation cohort. Results: We established a nomogram based on each independent prognostic factor analysis for 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) . For the training cohort, the area under the curves (AUCs) for predicting the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 0.806, 0.856, and 0.886. For the testing cohort, AUCs for predicting the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 0.804, 0.849, and 0.873. For the validation cohort, AUCs for predicting the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 0.86, 0.874, and 0.861. The calibration curves were observed to be closer to the ideal 45° dotted line with regard to 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS in the training cohort, the testing cohort, and the validation cohort. The decision curve analysis (DCA) plots indicated that the established nomogram had greater net benefits in comparison with the Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) staging system for predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS of lung adenocarcinoma patients. The Kaplan–Meier curves indicated that patients’ survival in the low-risk group was better than that in the high-risk group ( P
Article
Full-text available
Radiation therapy (RT) is one of the common and widely used treatment method for thyroid tumors. Considering that the thyroid is located close to the heart, the radiation generated during the treatment of thyroid tumors may have an adverse greater impact on the heart. This study is to explore the influencing factors, especially additional effects of RT, on cardiac-specific death among patients with malignant thyroid tumors. Collecting information from the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database using SEER*Stat. Patients with malignant thyroid tumors were searched, whether receiving RT or not. Ultimately, 201, 346 eligible patients were included. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was used to minimize bias of baseline characteristics by adjusting for confounding factors. COX (proportional hazards) and fine-gray (competing risk) model regression analysis were used to explore the effects of various influencing factors on cardiac-specific death. The present analysis showed that, compared with non-RT, RT based upon radioactive implants and beam radiation were associated with lower risk of cardiac-specific death in patients with thyroid malignancy, beam radiation therapy may had a similar effect. Besides, the remaining RT methods did not significantly increase the risk of cardiac-specific death. In addition, Asian or Pacific Islander ethnicity, female sex, marital status, combined summary stage (localized, regional, and distant), high-income, and later year of diagnosis were associated with lower risk of cardiac-specific death. While older age of diagnosis, African ethnicity, non-Hispanic ancestry, and derived AJCC stage (IV) were risk factors for cardiac-specific death. These results help to identify the factors influencing cardiac-specific death among patients with thyroid malignancies. Furthermore, it may helps to improve the clinical application of RT without too much concern about adverse cardiac effects.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Use of tobacco is the leading preventable cause of death in the United States. Racial/ethnic minorities and individuals of low socioeconomic status disproportionately experience tobacco-related disease and illness. Unique challenges and circumstances exist at each point in the cancer care continuum that may contribute to the greater cancer burden experienced by these groups. Methods: We reviewed tobacco-related disparities from cancer prevention to cancer survivorship. We also describe research that seeks to reduce tobacco-related disparities. Results: Racial/ethnic minorities and low-income individuals experience unique social and environmental contextual challenges such as greater environmental cues to smoke and greater levels of perceived stress and social discrimination. Clinical practice guidelines support the effectiveness of pharmacotherapy and behavioral counseling for racial and ethnic minorities, yet smoking cessation rates are lower in this group when compared with non-Hispanic whites. Superior efficacy for culturally adapted interventions has not yet been established. Conclusions: To reduce health disparities in this population, a comprehensive strategy is needed with efforts directed at each point along the cancer care continuum. Strategies are needed to reduce the impact of contextual factors such as targeted tobacco marketing and social discrimination on smoking initiation and maintenance. Future efforts should focus on increasing the use of evidence-based cessation treatment methods and studying its effectiveness in these populations. Attention must also be focused on improving treatment outcomes by reducing smoking in diverse racial and ethnic patient populations.
Article
Full-text available
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is widely considered to be the hepatic manifestation of the metabolic syndrome and is closely linked to dyslipidemia, obesity, and insulin resistance. Patients with NAFLD have increased mortality when compared to the general population, primarily related to cardiovascular disease or malignancy. The biologic mechanisms that link NAFLD to cardiovascular disease include expansion of visceral adipose tissue, atherogenic dyslipidemia, impaired insulin signaling, systemic inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction. Currently, there are no approved therapies for NAFLD. It has recently been hypothesized that reducing the delivery of dietary cholesterol using the hypolipidemic agent, ezetimibe, could benefit patients with NAFLD. By potently inhibiting the Niemann-Pick C1-Like 1 (NPC1L1) sterol receptor on intestinal enterocytes and within the liver, ezetimibe blocks exogenous cholesterol absorption and has been shown to improve biochemical markers of NAFLD, improve insulin sensitivity and decrease hepatic steatosis. This review summarizes the clinical and epidemiological evidence for the relationship between NAFLD and cardiovascular risk and examines the potential therapeutic role of ezetimibe.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: The number of breast cancer long survivors has increased in the last few years. However, this increase in survival may be affected by the side effects of adjuvant breast cancer therapies. In this context cardiovascular toxicity is considered one of the most clinically important toxicities. Areas Covered: In this work we review the published clinical trials of adjuvant treatment on breast cancer, focusing on the trials which accurately mentioned the cardiotoxicity of the adjuvant treatments and those which underwent long term follow up of cardiac function. This article tries to summarize and evaluate the risk of cardiac toxicities associated with different adjuvant treatments for breast cancer (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, endocrine therapy and trastuzumab). Expert Opinion: In our opinion, each individual breast cancer patient should be meticulously evaluated before starting her adjuvant treatment in order to basically asses their cardiac function and to manage any predisposing risk factor which may increase the probability of treatment induced cardiotoxicity. Rigorous and frequent reassessment of cardiac function along with providing different mitigation strategies that can prevent or decrease the risk of such cardiovascular toxicities are inevitable methods to protect the patient from cardiac events which can mask the survival benefit associated with different adjuvant treatments.
Article
Full-text available
Cardiac toxicity is one of the most important long-term toxicities experienced by cancer survivors so that survival rate due to anticancer therapy may be negatively affected due to cardiac complications. Thus, the search for novel methods to lower the incidence of treatment-related cardiotoxicity is a priority for all cancer-related disciplines. In this review, we provide an overview of the available preclinical and clinical data evaluating the role of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in the prophylaxis of cardiac dysfunction secondary to anthracyclines and trastuzumab use. The available clinical data suggest some degree of protective utility for the use of some angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors against anthracycline-related cardiotoxicity while the data are scarce with regard to a similar role for patients receiving trastuzumab.
Article
Background: Long-term (>5 years) lung cancer survivors represent a small but distinct subgroup of lung cancer patients and information about the causes of death of this subgroup is scarce. Methods: Surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER) database (1988-2008) has been utilized to determine the causes of death of long-term survivors of lung cancer. Survival analysis has been conducted through Kaplan Meier analysis and multivariate analysis has been conducted through a Cox proportional hazard model. Clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes were assessed for the whole cohort. Results: A total of 78,701 lung cancer patients with >5 years survival were identified. This cohort included 54488 patients surviving 5-10 years and 24213 patients surviving >10 years. Among patients surviving 5-10 years, 21.8% were dead because of primary lung cancer, 10.2% were dead because of other cancers, 6.8% were dead because of cardiac disease and 5.3% were dead because of non-malignant pulmonary disease. Among patients surviving >10 years, 12% were dead because of primary lung cancer, 6% were dead because of other cancers, 6.9% were dead because of cardiac disease and 5.6% were dead because of non-malignant pulmonary disease. On multivariate analysis, factors associated with longer cardiac disease-specific survival in multivariate analysis include younger age at diagnosis (P < 0.0001), white race (vs. African American race) (P = 0.005), female gender (P < 0.0001), right-sided disease (P = 0.003), adenocarcinoma (vs. large cell or small cell carcinoma) histology and receiving local treatment by surgery rather than radiotherapy (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: The probability of death from primary lung cancer is still significant among other causes of death even 20 years after diagnosis of lung cancer. Moreover, cardiac as well as non-malignant pulmonary causes contribute a considerable proportion of deaths in long-term lung cancer survivors.
Article
The purpose of this review is to emphasize the role of tobacco prevention and control in cardiovascular health (CVH) promotion and cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention, including the importance of these endpoints for measuring the full impact of tobacco-related policies, programs, and practices. In this review, we describe an overview of tobacco control interventions that have led to substantial declines in tobacco use and the relationship between these declines with CVH and CVD. We review interventions that have had success in high-income countries (HICs) as well as those that are gaining traction in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We emphasize the challenges to comprehensive tobacco prevention and control strategies faced by LMICs, and highlight the special role of cardiovascular health professionals in achieving CVH promotion and CVD prevention endpoints through tobacco control. Tobacco prevention and control strategies have a strong scientific basis, yet a distinct gap remains between this evidence and implementation of tobacco control policies, particularly in LMICs. Health professionals can contribute to tobacco control efforts, especially through patient-level clinical interventions, when supported by a health care system and government that recognize and support tobacco control as a critical strategy for CVH promotion and CVD prevention. Understanding, supporting, and applying current and evolving policies, programs, and practices in tobacco prevention and control is the province of all health professionals, especially those concerned with CVH promotion and CVD prevention. A new tobacco control roadmap from the World Heart Federation provides a strong impetus to the needed interdisciplinary collaboration.
Article
Background: It is currently unclear whether the superior normal organ-sparing effect of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) compared with 3-dimensional radiotherapy (3D) has a clinical impact on survival and cardiopulmonary mortality in patients with esophageal cancer (EC). Methods: The authors identified 2553 patients aged > 65 years from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare and Texas Cancer Registry-Medicare databases who had nonmetastatic EC diagnosed between 2002 and 2009 and were treated with either 3D (2240 patients) or IMRT (313 patients) within 6 months of diagnosis. The outcomes of the 2 cohorts were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment. Results: Except for marital status, year of diagnosis, and SEER region, both radiation cohorts were well balanced with regard to various patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, including the use of IMRT versus 3D in urban/metropolitan or rural areas. IMRT use increased from 2.6% in 2002 to 30% in 2009, whereas the use of 3D decreased from 97.4% in 2002 to 70% in 2009. On propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted multivariate analysis, IMRT was not found to be associated with EC-specific mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.80-1.10) or pulmonary mortality (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.37-3.36), but was significantly associated with lower all-cause mortality (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.72-0.95), cardiac mortality (HR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.06-0.54), and other-cause mortality (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.35-0.84). Similar associations were noted after adjusting for the type of chemotherapy, physician experience, and sensitivity analysis removing hybrid radiation claims. Conclusions: In this population-based analysis, the use of IMRT was found to be significantly associated with lower all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, and other-cause mortality in patients with EC. Cancer 2015. © 2015 American Cancer Society.
Article
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been increasingly utilized for medically inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, a lower biological equivalent dose (BED) is often used for central tumors given toxicity concerns, potentially leading to decreased local control. We compared survival, local control, and toxicity outcomes for SBRT patients with centrally vs. peripherally located tumors. We included patients with primary cT1-2N0M0 NSCLC treated with SBRT at our institution from September 2007 to August 2013 with follow-up through August 2014. Central tumor location was defined as within 2 cm of the proximal bronchial tree, heart, great vessels, trachea, or other mediastinal structures. Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox regression modeling were used for overall survival and local control, and the Chi-squared test and multivariable logistic regression modeling were used for toxicity. We included 251 patients (111 central, 140 peripheral) with median follow-up of 31.2 months. Patients with central tumors were more likely to be older (mean 75.8 vs. 73.5 years, p=0.04), have larger tumors (mean 2.5 cm vs. 1.9 cm, p<0.001), and be treated with a lower BED (mean 120.2 Gy vs. 143.5 Gy, p<0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that tumor location was not associated with worse overall survival, local control, or toxicity. Patients with central tumors were less likely to have acute grade ≥3 toxicity than those with peripheral tumors (odds ratio 0.24, p=0.02). Central tumor location did not predict for inferior overall survival, local control, or toxicity following SBRT when a lower mean BED was utilized.
Article
Introduction /Background: With improved breast cancer (BC) screening and treatment, the risk for long term toxicities of treatments must be considered, especially in good prognosis patients. This study examined the outcome, risks of second cancers, and cardiac mortality with radiation therapy (RT) for early stage BC from recent years. Materials and Methods Analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was conducted for women who had Stage T1aN0 BC as their first primary malignancy between 1990-1997 treated with partial or complete mastectomy ± external beam radiation. The overall survival (OS), breast cancer specific survival (BCSS), cardiac cause specific survival (CCS) and deaths from second cancers in the chest area were compared between the RT and no-RT groups. Results Of the 6515 women identified, 2796 received RT and 3719 did not. The median age group (60-64 years) and follow up lengths (∼15 years) were similar. Compared to the RT group, the no-RT group was associated with lower 10-year OS (85.5% vs. 79.3%, p<0.0001), BCSS (97.3% vs. 96.4%, p=0.04), and CCS (97.0% vs. 93.8%, p<0.0001). In the RT group, left sided BC was not associated with higher cardiac mortality. There were no statistically significant incidences in mortality due to subsequent cancers. The most common second cancer mortality included 114 (2%) lung, 25 (0.4%) lymphoma, 19 (0.3%) leukemia, 3 (0.05%) soft tissue, and 2 (0.03%) esophagus. Conclusions This review of SEER data suggests that secondary malignancy in the chest area and cardiac mortality are rare after RT in the 1990’s for T1aN0 BC.
Article
Habitual light to moderate alcohol intake (up to 1 drink per day for women and 1 or 2 drinks per day for men) is associated with decreased risks for total mortality, coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, and stroke. However, higher levels of alcohol consumption are associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Indeed, behind only smoking and obesity, excessive alcohol consumption is the third leading cause of premature death in the United States. Heavy alcohol use (1) is one of the most common causes of reversible hypertension, (2) accounts for about one-third of all cases of nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, (3) is a frequent cause of atrial fibrillation, and (4) markedly increases risks of stroke—both ischemic and hemorrhagic. The risk-to-benefit ratio of drinking appears higher in younger individuals, who also have higher rates of excessive or binge drinking and more frequently have adverse consequences of acute intoxication (for example, accidents, violence, and social strife). In fact, among males aged 15 to 59 years, alcohol abuse is the leading risk factor for premature death. Of the various drinking patterns, daily low- to moderate-dose alcohol intake, ideally red wine before or during the evening meal, is associated with the strongest reduction in adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Health care professionals should not recommend alcohol to nondrinkers because of the paucity of randomized outcome data and the potential for problem drinking even among individuals at apparently low risk. The findings in this review were based on a literature search of PubMed for the 15-year period 1997 through 2012 using the search terms alcohol, ethanol, cardiovascular disease, coronary artery disease, heart failure, hypertension, stroke, and mortality. Studies were considered if they were deemed to be of high quality, objective, and methodologically sound.