Content uploaded by Nicolas R Robles
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Nicolas R Robles on Nov 22, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
A preview of the PDF is not available
Calcium Acetate versus Calcium Carbonate as Phosphate Binders in Hemodialysis Patients
Abstract
We conducted a randomized unblinded parallel clinical trial to compare the effectiveness, side effects and tolerance between calcium acetate (CA) and calcium carbonate (CC) in 80 stable chronic hemodialysis patients selected on the basis of their acceptable control of serum phosphorus (P) levels with aluminum hydroxide (AH). All patients were dialyzed against the same calcium dialyzate (1.62 mmol/l). The serum analytical tests included: calcium corrected to total protein, P, PTH (intact molecule) and bicarbonate. The study was divided into the following periods: P0: baseline measurements; P1: washout (withdrawal of AH for 15 days); P2: random allocation to CA and CC treatment at doses equivalent to 75 mEq of elemental calcium, stratified according to previous doses of AH (2 months); P3: adjustment of doses until control P (2 months). CA was poorly tolerated in 7 patients and CC in 2 (NS). The changes in serum P levels between P0 and P2 periods were lower in the CA group (1.73 +/- 0.25 vs. 1.80 +/- 0.50 mmol/l; p = 0.26) than in the CC group (1.77 +/- 0.35 vs. 1.93 +/- 0.48 mmol/l; p = 0.03, paired t test). Serum calcium was hardly modified by CA (2.42 +/- 0.20 vs. 2.47 +/- 0.17 mmol/l; NS) while in the CC group, it rose significantly (2.40 +/- 0.12 vs. 2.55 +/- 0.22 mmol/l; p = 0.0004). There were no differences in the control of PTH or bicarbonate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
... Calcium-containing phosphate binders include calcium carbonate and calcium acetate [26]. Calcium acetate may be a more efficient phosphate binder than calcium carbonate [27,28]. The choice between individual calcium-containing phosphate binders is largely dependent upon availability and clinician and patient preference. ...
... As of today, only nicotidamide, niacin, and tenapanor does not rely on this mechanism but their efficacy is still under evaluation and the information now available seems not very exciting [77,78] • The prescription of high doses of calcium-based phosphate binders should be avoided, because of recent evidence from three randomized, controlled trials showing that excess exposure to calcium through diet, medications, or dialysate may be harmful in patients with CKD [16]. Calcium-containing phosphate binders may cause hypercalcemia or covert calcium overloading, occasionally in the setting of persistent hyperphosphatemia, which may lead to extra-skeletal calcium phosphate deposition [27]. Combined hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia is a particular problem among patients who are on both calcium-containing phosphate binders and active vitamin D or analogs. ...
... Albeit starting phosphate binder use in early CKD stages can slightly reduce phosphate retention, it remains uncertain whether this translates into clinical benefit [27,33,64]. ...
Introduction: Hyperphosphatemia is common in late stages of chronic kidney disease and is often associated with elevated parathormone levels, abnormal bone mineralization, extra-osseous calcification, and increased risk of cardiovascular events and death. Several classes of oral phosphate binders are available to help control plasma phosphorus levels. Although effective at lowering serum phosphorus, they all have safety, tolerability, and compliance issues that need to be considered when selecting which one to use.
Areas covered: This paper reviews the most established treatment options for hyperphosphatemia, in patients with chronic kidney disease, focusing on the new inhibitors of active phosphate absorption.
Expert opinion: The prevention and the treatment of hyperphosphatemia is today far to be satisfactory. Nonetheless, an extending range of phosphate binders are now available. Aluminum has potentially serious toxic risks. Calcium-based binders are very effective but can lead to hypercalcemia and/or positive calcium balance and progression of cardiovascular calcification. No long-term data are available for the new calcium acetate/magnesium combination product. Lanthanum is an effective phosphate binder, and long-term effects of tissue deposition seem clinically irrelevant. Sevelamer, appear to have profiles that would lead to pleiotropic effects and reduced progression of vascular calcification, and the main adverse events seen with these agents are gastrointestinal. Iron has a powerful capability of binding phosphate, thus numerous preparations are available, both with and without significant systemic absorption of the iron component. The inhibitors of active intestinal phosphate transport, with their very selective mechanism of action and low pill burden seem the most interesting approach; however, do not seem at present to be effective alone, in reducing serum phosphorus levels.
... 18 There were insufficient data available to guide the choice of which calcium-based binder to prescribe. No differences in serum albumin-corrected calcium levels were detected between different calcium-based binders in 10 studies, [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] although calcium carbonate administration was associated with more frequent occurrence of hypercalcaemia when compared with other phosphate binders, particularly calcium acetate. Gastrointestinal side-effects were less common with calcium carbonate than with other binders, although the effect size was small and imprecise, such that definitive conclusions could not be drawn. ...
Chronic kidney disease mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD), characterized by disturbances of calcium/phosphate/parathyroid hormone, bone abnormalities and vascular and soft tissue calcification, is highly prevalent in CKD and is a strong, independent predictor of bone fracture, cardiovascular disease and death. Clinical practice guidelines, such as the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) and Caring for Australasians with Renal Insufficiency (CARI), support the use of phosphate binders, vitamin D compounds and calcimimetics for treatment of CKD-MBD and recommend stringent targets for serum calcium, phosphate and parathyroid hormone. However, these recommendations are based primarily on the results of observational cohort studies and randomized controlled trials employing surrogate outcome measures. The aim of this paper is to review the available evidence addressing whether therapeutic strategies targeting CKD-MBD and its surrogate outcome measures appreciably influence patient-level outcomes ('hard' clinical end-points).
... It is clear from several studies that less elemental calcium is required with calcium acetate than with calcium carbonate for comparable binding of phosphate. Some studies reported a higher serum calcium concentration and/or a higher frequency of hypercalcaemia with calcium carbonate than with calcium acetate [25,26] while two other studies, as Bonne et al. [1] pointed out, found no difference. In that respect, it remains to be shown if the average serum calcium concentration and the incidence of hypercalcaemia fully reflect calcium balance in dialysis patients [27]. ...
Mineral and bone disorders (MBD) are common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), contributing to significant morbidity and mortality. For several decades, the first-line approach to control hyperparathyroidism in CKD was by exogenous calcium loading. Since the turn of the millennium, however, a growing awareness of vascular calcification risk has led to a paradigm shift in management and a move away from calcium-based phosphate binders. As a consequence, contemporary CKD patients may be at risk of a negative calcium balance, which, in turn, may compromise bone health, contributing to renal bone disease and increased fracture risk. A calcium intake below a certain threshold may be as problematic as a high intake, worsening the MBD syndrome of CKD, but is not addressed in current clinical practice guidelines. The CKD-MBD and European Renal Nutrition working groups of the European Renal Association (ERA), together with the CKD-MBD and Dialysis working groups of the European Society for Pediatric Nephrology (ESPN) developed key evidence points and clinical practice points on calcium management in children and adults with CKD across stages of disease. These were reviewed by a Delphi panel consisting of ERA and ESPN working groups members. Main clinical practice points include a suggested total calcium intake from diet and medications of 800-1000 mg/d and not exceeding 1500 mg/d to maintain a neutral calcium balance in adults with CKD. In children with CKD, total calcium intake should be kept within the age-appropriate normal range. These statements provide information and may assist in decision-making, but in the absence of high-level evidence must be carefully considered and adapted to individual patient needs.
Introduction:
Hyperphosphatemia is an inevitable complication for patients undergoing dialysis, as is the resulting need for treatment with phosphate binders. Currently, various phosphate binders are clinically available. In addition to their phosphate-lowering activity, individual phosphate binders have differing safety profiles and off-target actions.
Areas covered:
This paper reviews the safety of phosphate binders and issues to be resolved.
Expert opinion:
Calcium-based phosphate binders are well tolerated but may increase calcium overload risk. Sevelamer reduces serum cholesterol levels and exerts anti-inflammatory effects. Compared to sevelamer, bixalomer is associated with fewer gastrointestinal symptoms. Aluminum-containing binders, lanthanum carbonate, and sucroferric oxyhydroxide exhibit strong phosphate-lowering activity. Although ferric citrate reduces erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and intravenous iron doses, its use requires monitoring of iron metabolic markers to avoid overload. Occasionally, combined use of multiple phosphate binders can offer the advantages of each phosphate binder while minimizing their drawbacks; thus, this may be desirable according to individual patients' conditions and comorbidities. However, increased pill burden and nonadherence to phosphate binders emerge as new problems. We expect that novel therapeutic strategies will be developed to resolve these issues.
Background:
Phosphate binders are used to reduce positive phosphate balance and to lower serum phosphate levels for people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) with the aim to prevent progression of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD). This is an update of a review first published in 2011.
Objectives:
The aim of this review was to assess the benefits and harms of phosphate binders for people with CKD with particular reference to relevant biochemical end-points, musculoskeletal and cardiovascular morbidity, hospitalisation, and death.
Search methods:
We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 12 July 2018 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.
Selection criteria:
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs of adults with CKD of any GFR category comparing a phosphate binder to another phosphate binder, placebo or usual care to lower serum phosphate. Outcomes included all-cause and cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, adverse events, vascular calcification and bone fracture, and surrogates for such outcomes including serum phosphate, parathyroid hormone (PTH), and FGF23.
Data collection and analysis:
Two authors independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted study data. We applied the Cochrane 'Risk of Bias' tool and used the GRADE process to assess evidence certainty. We estimated treatment effects using random-effects meta-analysis. Results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes together with 95% confidence intervals (CI) or mean differences (MD) or standardised MD (SMD) for continuous outcomes.
Main results:
We included 104 studies involving 13,744 adults. Sixty-nine new studies were added to this 2018 update.Most placebo or usual care controlled studies were among participants with CKD G2 to G5 not requiring dialysis (15/25 studies involving 1467 participants) while most head to head studies involved participants with CKD G5D treated with dialysis (74/81 studies involving 10,364 participants). Overall, seven studies compared sevelamer with placebo or usual care (667 participants), seven compared lanthanum to placebo or usual care (515 participants), three compared iron to placebo or usual care (422 participants), and four compared calcium to placebo or usual care (278 participants). Thirty studies compared sevelamer to calcium (5424 participants), and fourteen studies compared lanthanum to calcium (1690 participants). No study compared iron-based binders to calcium. The remaining studies evaluated comparisons between sevelamer (hydrochloride or carbonate), sevelamer plus calcium, lanthanum, iron (ferric citrate, sucroferric oxyhydroxide, stabilised polynuclear iron(III)-oxyhydroxide), calcium (acetate, ketoglutarate, carbonate), bixalomer, colestilan, magnesium (carbonate), magnesium plus calcium, aluminium hydroxide, sucralfate, the inhibitor of phosphate absorption nicotinamide, placebo, or usual care without binder. In 82 studies, treatment was evaluated among adults with CKD G5D treated with haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis, while in 22 studies, treatment was evaluated among participants with CKD G2 to G5. The duration of study follow-up ranged from 8 weeks to 36 months (median 3.7 months). The sample size ranged from 8 to 2103 participants (median 69). The mean age ranged between 42.6 and 68.9 years.Random sequence generation and allocation concealment were low risk in 25 and 15 studies, respectively. Twenty-seven studies reported low risk methods for blinding of participants, investigators, and outcome assessors. Thirty-one studies were at low risk of attrition bias and 69 studies were at low risk of selective reporting bias.In CKD G2 to G5, compared with placebo or usual care, sevelamer, lanthanum, iron and calcium-based phosphate binders had uncertain or inestimable effects on death (all causes), cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, fracture, or coronary artery calcification. Sevelamer may lead to constipation (RR 6.92, CI 2.24 to 21.4; low certainty) and lanthanum (RR 2.98, CI 1.21 to 7.30, moderate certainty) and iron-based binders (RR 2.66, CI 1.15 to 6.12, moderate certainty) probably increased constipation compared with placebo or usual care. Lanthanum may result in vomiting (RR 3.72, CI 1.36 to 10.18, low certainty). Iron-based binders probably result in diarrhoea (RR 2.81, CI 1.18 to 6.68, high certainty), while the risks of other adverse events for all binders were uncertain.In CKD G5D sevelamer may lead to lower death (all causes) (RR 0.53, CI 0.30 to 0.91, low certainty) and induce less hypercalcaemia (RR 0.30, CI 0.20 to 0.43, low certainty) when compared with calcium-based binders, and has uncertain or inestimable effects on cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, fracture, or coronary artery calcification. The finding of lower death with sevelamer compared with calcium was present when the analysis was restricted to studies at low risk of bias (RR 0.50, CI 0.32 to 0.77). In absolute terms, sevelamer may lower risk of death (all causes) from 210 per 1000 to 105 per 1000 over a follow-up of up to 36 months, compared to calcium-based binders. Compared with calcium-based binders, lanthanum had uncertain effects with respect to all-cause or cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, fracture, or coronary artery calcification and probably had reduced risks of treatment-related hypercalcaemia (RR 0.16, CI 0.06 to 0.43, low certainty). There were no head-to-head studies of iron-based binders compared with calcium. The paucity of placebo-controlled studies in CKD G5D has led to uncertainty about the effects of phosphate binders on patient-important outcomes compared with placebo.It is uncertain whether the effects of binders on clinically-relevant outcomes were different for patients who were and were not treated with dialysis in subgroup analyses.
Authors' conclusions:
In studies of adults with CKD G5D treated with dialysis, sevelamer may lower death (all causes) compared to calcium-based binders and incur less treatment-related hypercalcaemia, while we found no clinically important benefits of any phosphate binder on cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, fracture or coronary artery calcification. The effects of binders on patient-important outcomes compared to placebo are uncertain. In patients with CKD G2 to G5, the effects of sevelamer, lanthanum, and iron-based phosphate binders on cardiovascular, vascular calcification, and bone outcomes compared to placebo or usual care, are also uncertain and they may incur constipation, while iron-based binders may lead to diarrhoea.
Renal osteodystrophy is the term used to describe the complex abnormalities of bone that may occur, to variable extents, in many patients with renal disease. The spectrum of disorders of the skeleton in these patients is broad and extends from states of accelerated bone turnover with increased bone resorption due to excessive levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH) (osteitis fibrosa) to disorders of bone mineralization (osteomalacia) and other states of decreased bone turnover (adynamic bone). In addition, osteosclerosis, bone cysts, loss of bone mineral, and skeletal fractures may occur. The pathogenesis of these abnormalities has been the subject of intense investigation for the past two decades; the consequences of decreased renal function that give rise to these disorders of bone have been characterized and serve as the basis for a rational approach to the prevention and therapy of the skeletal abnormalities of renal dysfunction.
Introduction: The hyperphosphatemia, hypocalcemia and low calcitriol levels are pathogenic factors for secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic renal failure. The phosphorus control is essential to prevent secondary hyperparathyroidism. There are not comparatives studies to test the efficacy of control of phosphorus binders in predialysis patients. Aim: To compare the efficacy of calcium carbonate vs calcium acetate as phosphate binder in predialysis patients. Material and methods: The present study includes 28 patients with chronic renal failure (mean clearance of creatinine 21 ml/min). Patients were separated into two groups: Group 1: (n = 14) received calcium carbonate 2,500 mg/day (1,000 mg of calcium); Group 2: (n = 14) receives calcium acetate 1,000 mg (254 mg of calcium). Calcium and phosphorus were determined every 4 months; i-PTH, alkaline fosfatase and clearance of creatinine were determined every six months. Results: Both groups were comparable regarding age, renal function, calcium, phosphorus, alkaline fosfatase and i-PTH on basal situation and the end of study were not different. The serum calcium increased, not significantly in the calcium carbonate group (group 1) [from 9.2 to 9.8 mg/dl (p = 0.05)], however it was not modified in the calcium acetate group (group 2). The serum phosphorus decreased significantly (p ( 0.05) in both groups, independently of the calcium levels. Alkaline fosfatase and i-PTH not was modified during the study period. Conclusions: 1) Both calcium carbonate and calcium acetate are similarly effective as phosphate binder. 2) The carbonate group required four fold greater doses of calcium that acetate group. 3) The calcium acetate has less hypercalcemic effect than calcium carbonate.
The reintroduction of calcium compounds for the treatment of hyperphosphoremia has prevented aluminum complications, but patients treated with these calcium-compounds have a high risk of hypercalcemia, mainly those with severe hyperparathyroidism needing high doses of calcitriol. These risk of hypercalcemia has also been described in patients with low bone turnover. A review of the literature seems to assess that calcium acetate produces less hypercalcemia than calcium carbonate. The aim of our study is to compare the efficacy of calcium acetate versus calcium carbonate in order to control hyperphosphoremia, in patients on long-term hemodialysis therapy with hypercalcemia and different degrees of secondary hyperparathyroidism. We have studied 24 patients with serum calcium levels between 2.6 and 2.9 mmol/l randomly distributed in 2 groups. One group maintained the same doses of calcium carbonate than before and the second group was transfered to equivalent doses of calcium acetate. Serum calcium, phosphorus and i-PTH were measured in all patients at the beggining of the study and 3 months later. They were no significant differences in i-PTH levels. Calcium and phosphorus decreased significantly in patients receiving calcium acetate and remained unchanged in the calcium carbonate group. From these data we agree with other autors that calcium acetate could be the first choice for the treatment of hyperphosphoremia, in patients on long term hemodialysis theraphy and high risk of hypercalcemia.
Calcium salts are increasingly used as phosphorus binders in patients with chronic renal failure. Calcium carbonate is the principal salt presently utilized, however, other calcium salts may be more effective and safer phosphorus binders. Theoretical calculations, in vitro experiments, and in vivo studies in normal subjects have shown calcium acetate to be a more effective phosphorus binder than other calcium salts. This salt has not previously been studied in patients with chronic renal failure. We used a one-meal gastrointestinal balance technique to measure phosphorus absorption, calcium absorption and phosphorus binding in six patients with chronic renal failure. Calcium acetate was compared with calcium carbonate and placebo. Equivalent doses (50 mEq Ca++) of calcium acetate bound more than twice as much phosphorus (106 +/- 23 mg) as calcium carbonate (43 +/- 39 mg) P less than 0.05. When phosphorus binding was factored for calcium absorption, calcium acetate bound 0.44 mEq HPO4 =/mEq absorbed Ca++ compared with 0.16 mEq HPO4 = bound/mEq Ca++ absorbed with calcium carbonate. More efficient phosphorus binding permits serum phosphorus concentration to be controlled with lower doses of calcium salts. The higher phosphorus binding/calcium absorption ratio coupled with a lower dose indicates that less calcium will be absorbed when calcium acetate is used for phosphorus control. Markedly positive calcium balance, hypercalcemia and ectopic calcification should be less likely to occur with this drug than other calcium salts.
Antacids used to decrease phosphorus absorption in patients with renal failure may be toxic. To find more efficient or less toxic binders, a three-part study was conducted. First, theoretical calculations showed that phosphorus binding occurs in the following order of avidity: Al3+ greater than H+ greater than Ca2+ greater than Mg2+. In the presence of acid (as in the stomach), aluminum can therefore bind phosphorus better than calcium or magnesium. Second, in vitro studies showed that the time required to reach equilibrium varied from 10 min to 3 wk among different compounds, depending upon solubility in acid and neutral solutions. Third, the relative order of effectiveness of binders in vivo was accurately predicted from theoretical and in vitro results; specifically, calcium acetate and aluminum carbonate gel were superior to calcium carbonate or calcium citrate in inhibiting dietary phosphorus absorption in normal subjects. We concluded that: (a) inhibition of phosphorus absorption by binders involves a complex interplay between chemical reactions and ion transport processes in the stomach and small intestine; (b) theoretical and in vitro studies can identify potentially better in vivo phosphorus binders; and (c) calcium acetate, not previously used for medical purposes, is approximately as efficient as aluminum carbonate gel and more efficient as a phosphorus binder than other currently used calcium salts.
Many investigators have shown that calcium carbonate (CaCO3) is an effective phosphate binder which also prevents the potential disabling effects of aluminum (Al) accumulation. However, hypercalcemia may develop in a substantial numbers of patients. Thus, to control serum phosphate (PO4) and prevent hypercalcemia, we performed studies in 21 patients on maintenance hemodialysis in which, in addition to the oral administration of CaCO3, the concentration of calcium (Ca) in the dialysate was reduced from 3.25 to 2.5 mEq/liter. The studies were divided in three periods: I. control, on Al-binders (one month); II. no Al-binders (one month); III. CaCO3 (seven months). Blood was obtained three times/week before dialysis for the first five months of the study and once a week for the remaining four months. During the control period, the mean serum calcium was 8.86 +/- 0.08 mg/dl. The value decreased to 8.65 +/- 0.07 mg/dl when phosphate binders containing aluminum were discontinued, and increased to 9.19 +/- 0.07 mg/dl (P less than 0.001 compared to period II) during oral supplementation with calcium carbonate. The mean serum phosphorus was 5.03 +/- 0.07 mg/dl during the control period, and increased to 7.29 +/- 0.91 mg/dl (P less than 0.001) after phosphate binders were discontinued. It decreased to 4.95 +/- 0.06 mg/dl (P less than 0.001) with the administration of calcium carbonate. During CaCO3 administration, serum Al decreased from 64.2 +/- 8.5 to 37.1 +/- 3.6 and 25.1 +/- 3.0 micrograms/liter (P less than 0.001) at three and seven months, respectively. Serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) decreased by 20%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Aluminum-containing phosphate binders have been widely employed in the past in the management of uremic hyperphosphatemia. However, an increasing number of reports on aluminum toxicity has stimulated efforts to replace this therapy by safer methods. The aim of the present review is to critically evaluate other treatment strategies. It appears that aluminum-containing phosphate binders should no longer be considered the treatment of choice for controlling uremic hyperphosphatemia. Calcium carbonate, calcium citrate, magnesium carbonate and a mixture of ketoanalogues and amino acids present important therapeutical alternatives which could replace aluminum-containing phosphate binders in the majority of patients. However, it is mandatory, as these therapies also carry some risks, that side effects are detected early.
Phosphate binders that contain aluminum are frequently prescribed to treat hyperphosphatemia in patients with chronic renal failure, but an accumulation of aluminum can lead to osteomalacia. To evaluate the efficacy of calcium carbonate as an alternative phosphate binder, we studied 20 patients maintained on dialysis during three consecutive periods. In period 1, the patients took aluminum hydroxide for a month (mean dose, 5.6 g per day; range, 1.5 to 14.0). In period 2, they took no phosphate binders for a month, and in period 3, they took calcium carbonate (Os-Cal) for two months (mean dose, 8.5 g per day; range, 2.5 to 17). The mean (+/- SE) serum calcium level during period 1 was 9.6 +/- 0.2 mg per deciliter; this decreased slightly (to 9.3 +/- 0.1) during period 2 and increased to 10.0 +/- 0.2 during period 3. The mean (+/- SE) serum phosphorus level during period 1 was 4.8 +/- 0.1 mg per deciliter; this increased to 7.3 +/- 0.3 during period 2, but returned to the control value (4.8 +/- 0.2) during period 3. Six of the 20 patients continued to need aluminum hydroxide during period 3 for satisfactory control of hyperphosphatemia. Calcium carbonate successfully lowered serum phosphorus levels and raised serum calcium levels in the majority of our patients, thereby confirming that this agent may be a satisfactory substitute for traditional phosphate binders that contain aluminum. The possibility that long-term treatment could cause such side effects as metastatic calcification will require further investigation.
Bone disease is one of the most common features of protracted uremia. It is due to a host of metabolic derangements, including an acquired defect in vitamin D metabolism, hypersecretion of parathyroid hormone, abnormalities in the renal handling of phosphate and chronic acidosis. The influence of maintenance hemodialysis on uremic osteodystrophy is still a matter of controversy regarding the rate of progression and the severity of skeletal disease, and the distribution of calcium and phosphate in the body following long-term treatment. This is especially true of the therapeutic policy of increasing the serum calcium concentration and thus inhibiting the secretion of parathyroid hormone.
This study was undertaken to compare bone disease in two groups of patients, one treated with a dialysate calcium fixed at 6 mg/100 ml (which corresponds to the normal value for ultrafilterable calcium), and a second group that was treated additionally with a large daily intake of calcium carbonate in an attempt to increase the intestinal absorption of this ion. The results indicate that a) the latter regimen was capable of significantly reducing the rate of bone resorption and recalcifying osteomalacic lesions, and b) since serum calcium concentrations did not significantly differ in the two groups, the patients treated by dialysis alone presumably maintained their serum calcium concentration at the expense of their skeleton calcium stores.