ArticlePDF Available

Marine plastics in the Philippines: a call for research

Authors:
  • Mapua Malayan Colleges Mindanao
Philippine Science Letters Vol. 11 | No. 01 | 2018
18
Marine plastics in the Philippines: a
call for research
Neil Angelo S. Abreo1,2
1Regional Integrated Coastal Resource Management Center (RIC-XI), Davao Oriental State
College of Science and Technology, Mati City, Davao Oriental, Philippines
2Institute of Aquatic and Applied Sciences, Davao del Norte State College,
Panabo City, 1015, Philippines
lastics in the marine environment, aptly named
“marine plastics,are considered as a global threat to
marine biodiversity. A plethora of species has been
reported to have succumbed to the harmful effects of
these marine pollutants (Kühn et al. 2015). The
number of affected marine species is expected to rise as research
on this topic increases (Ryan 2015). For example, Abreo et al.
(2016a) provided the first evidence of plastic ingestion by
Deriniyagala’s beaked whale (Mesoplodon hotaula). Minimum
estimates on the number of marine plastics in the world’s oceans
are currently placed at 5.25 trillion pieces (Eriksen et al. 2014).
Moreover, Jambeck et al. (2015) estimate the global input of
marine plastic at 4.8 to 12.7 million metric tons per year. This
increasing number of plastic in the marine environment through
the years could also mean an increase in interactions with
different marine species. Overlap in the distribution of marine
debris, including marine plastics, and the foraging habitats of
marine species will result as marine plastics become more
ubiquitous.
Previous studies have implicated the Philippines as one of the
highest contributors of plastics to the marine environment
(Jambeck et al. 2015; Lebreton et al. 2017). The country is said
to contribute 0.280.75 million metric tons of marine plastic per
year (Jambeck et al. 2015). Pasig River alone is estimated to
KEYWORDS
plastic, marine debris, marine pollution, Philippines
contribute 3.21 x 104 tons of plastic per year to the marine
environment (Lebreton et al. 2017). With the Philippines hosting
a very high marine biodiversity, the interaction between marine
plastics and marine species is inevitable. Published scientific
literature on marine plastic in the country is surprisingly scarce.
LITTERBASE, a database which creates an inventory of
scientific publications focusing on marine plastic, shows that out
of 1,756 scientific articles published on marine plastic
worldwide, only three (see Abreo et al. 2016a, 2016b; Aloy et al.
2011) were from the Philippines (Tekman et al. 2017). Although
other publications stating occurrences of marine plastic are
present (e.g., Obusan et al. 2016; Orale and Fabillar 2011), these
studies did not focus on the problem. Nevertheless, even if these
studies are included, the number remains minimal.
A more daunting problem is the discovery of microplastics
(plastics <5mm in size) and its role in increasing the
bioavailability of toxins (e.g., heavy metals, PCBs
(polychlorinated biphenyls), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons,
among others) in the marine environment (e.g., Avio et al. 2016,
2015). Note that studies on microplastic and their interaction
with toxins are still in their infancy. However, biomagnification
and bioaccumulation of toxins through ingestion of
microplastics have already been documented (Tanaka et al.
2013; Teuten et al. 2009). This development will have
implications for food safety and may compromise food security
in the future as more and more seafood species are found to
ingest marine plastics (Rochman et al. 2015). Currently there are
no studies of this nature published from the Philippines. This is
a great source of concern, given that marine fisheries
significantly contribute to fish production in the country and fish
is considered as the main source of protein for most of the
population (Macusi et al. 2011). Bioaccumulation of toxins
through consumption of marine species tainted with
microplastics may lead to adverse effects in large parts of the
population in the country. No studies have explored the
P
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
*Corresponding author
Email Address: nas.abreo@gmail.com
Date received: March 2, 2018
Date revised: March 15, 2018
Date accepted: March 26, 2018
Vol. 11 | No. 01 | 2018 Philippine Science Letters
19
possibility of toxic loading in humans through this pathway and
the possible effects of this on human physiology.
The need for research on marine plastic in the Philippines is of
utmost importance since the country is heavily dependent on the
marine environment and the ecosystem services that it provides.
Moreover, since the Philippines is a significant contributor of
plastics in the marine environment, development of
methodologies or strategies to address the problem will be a
substantial contribution to the global community. The lack of
data impedes the understanding of the problem and results in
failure to recognize its gravity. This would, in turn, affect the
attitudes and efforts toward addressing the issue. In simple terms,
solving a problem is hard if one does not understand the extent
of the problem.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
Abreo NAS, Macusi ED, Blatchley DD, Cuenca-Ocay G. First
evidence of plastic ingestion by the rare deraniyagala’s
beaked whale (Mesoplodon hotaula). IAMURE Int J Ecol
Conserv 2016a; 19:1636.
Abreo NAS, Macusi ED, Blatchley DD, Cuenca GC. Ingestion
of marine plastic debris by green turtle (Chelonia mydas) in
Davao Gulf , Mindanao, Philippines. Philipp J Sci 2016b;
145:1723.
Aloy AB, Vallejo BM, Juinio-meñez MA. Increased plastic litter
cover affects the foraging activity of the sandy intertidal
gastropod Nassarius pullus. Mar Pollut Bull 2011; 62:1772
79.
Avio CG, Gorbi S, Milan M, Benedetti M, Fattorini D, D’Errico
G, Pauletto M, Bargelloni L, Regoli F. Pollutants
bioavailability and toxicological risk from microplastics to
marine mussels. Environ Pollut 2015; 198:21122.
Avio CG, Gorbi S, Regoli F. Plastics and microplastics in the
oceans: From emerging pollutants to emerged threat. Mar
Environ Res 2017; 128:211.
Eriksen M, Lebreton LCM, Carson HS, Thiel M, Moore CJ,
Borerro JC, Galgani F, Ryan PG, Reisser J. Plastic pollution
in the world’s oceans: More than 5 trillion plastic pieces
weighing over 250,000 tons afloat at sea. PLOS One 2014;
9(12):115.
Jambeck JR, Geyer R, Wilcox C, Siegler TR, Perryman M,
Andrady A, Narayan R, Law KL. Plastic waste inputs from
land into the ocean. Science 2015; 347: 76871.
Kühn S, Rebolledo ELB, van Franeker JA. Deleterious effects
of litter on marine life. In: Bergmann M, Gutow L, Klages
M, eds. Marine Anthropogenic Litter. London: Springer
International Publishing, 2015:75116.
Lebreton LCM, van der Zwet J, Damsteeg J, Slat B, Andrady A,
Reisser J. River plastic emissions to the world’s oceans. Nat
Commun 2017; 8:110.
Macusi E, Katikiro RE, Deepananda KHMA, Jimenez LA,
Conte AR, Nur F. Human induced degradation of coastal
resources in Asia Pacific and implications on management
and food security. J Nat Stud 2011; 9:1328.
Obusan MCM, Rivera WL, Siringan MAT, Aragones LV.
Stranding events in the Philippines provide evidence for
impacts of human interactions on cetaceans. Ocean Coast
Manag 2016; 134:4151.
Orale RL, Fabillar LA. Coastal waste transport in Catbalogan
City, Philippines, and nearby towns. Iran J Energy Environ
2011; 2:92103.
Rochman CM, Tahir A, Williams SL, Baxa DV, Lam R, Miller
JT, Teh F, Werorilangi S, Teh SJ. Anthropogenic debris in
seafood : Plastic debris and fibers from textiles in fish and
bivalves sold for human consumption. Sci Rep 2015; 5:1
10.
Ryan PG. A brief history of marine litter research. In: Bergmann
M, Gutow L, Klages M, eds. Marine Anthropogenic Litter.
London: Springer International Publishing, 2015:125.
Tanaka K, Takada H, Yamashita R, Mizukawa K, Fukuwaka
MA, Watanuki Y. Accumulation of plastic-derived
chemicals in tissues of seabirds ingesting marine plastics.
Mar Pollut Bull 2013; 69:21922.
Tekman MB, Gutow L, Macario A, Haas A, Walter A,
Bergmann M. LITTERBASE: Alfred Wegener Institute
Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research. Retrieved
from litterbase.awi.de 2017.
Teuten EL, Saquing JM, Knappe DRU, Barlaz MA, Jonsson S,
Björn A, Rowland SJ, Thompson RC, Galloway TS,
Yamashita R, Ochi D, Watanuki Y, Moore C, Viet PH, Tana
TS, Prudente M, Boonyatumanond R, Zakaria MP,
Akkhavong K, Ogata Y, Hirai H, Iwasa S, Mizukawa K,
Hagino Y, Imamura A, Saha M, Takada H. Transport and
release of chemicals from plastics to the environment and to
wildlife. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2009;
364:202745.
... It consists of items that have been made or used by people and deliberately discarded into the sea, rivers, and discharged to the open sea; which is 6% of the total estimated marine plastics pollution to the world's oceans [3]. Despite being identified as a major plastics pollution contributor, there are limited research efforts in trying to define the marine plastics problem in the country; aside from the early reports of the presence of macroplastics in the environment and microplastics in marine biota and with the first call for marine plastics research that has been made in 2018 [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. As the marine litter 1 problem has been deemed significant, that it needs to be addressed on a national level, the government has adopted the National Plan of Action for the Prevention, Reduction, and Management of Marine beaches; brought indirectly to the sea with rivers, sewage, storm water or winds; or accidentally lost, including materials lost at sea in bad weather. ...
... As such, there is a need to collectively focus research efforts in generating baseline data as this is the first step in science-based policymaking processes. 4 Although marine litter encompasses a variety of solid waste in the environment, this study however focuses on marine plastic litter (MPL) as local literature and research efforts are currently lacking and that it is highly relevant to the recently passed 'Extended Producers Responsibility (EPR) 5 legislation [2]. Thus, with the aim to provide guidance on defining the marine plastics pollution problem in the country, this study attempts to present a framework for the digital transformation of current plastics baseline data as 'marine environmental protection,' and 'digital transformation' have been considered as top priorities in the research and development agenda of the Philippine Maritime Sector [14]. ...
... Prior to the research call initiated by Abreo [4] last 2018, plastics ingestion by marine biotagreen sea turtle [15], beaked whales [16], and sardines [17] has been reported in the literature. Then came studies that highlight efforts regarding the characterization of plastics (both macro and micro) in the environmentbeaches (i.e., Macajalar Bay in Cagayan de Oro [18], Talim Bay in Batangas [13], Mayo Bay in Davao Oriental [19]), rivers (i.e., Pasig River in Manila [20], Matina River in Davao City [21]), seagrass beds in Iligan City [22], and mangrove forests (i.e., Pujada Bay in Davao Oriental [12], coastal areas of Puerto Princesa Palawan [23], and coastal mangrove areas around Cebu Island [24]). ...
Article
Full-text available
As one of the top contributors of marine plastic litter in the world's oceans, the Philippines, having recognized the seriousness of this problem has adopted a National Plan of Action for the Prevention, Reduction, and Management of Marine Litter (NPOA-ML). One of the initial steps of the NPOA-ML is to perform marine litter baselining in identifying the extent of the plastics pollution problem in the environment. Further, recent stakeholder engagements have identified that two of the priority research areas-'marine environmental protection,' and 'digital transformation'-in the Philippine maritime sector are aligned with the establishment of baseline data for marine litter. Provided that there are local initiatives in consolidating the available plastics data, this study presents a framework for the digital transformation of plastics data in defining the extent of marine plastics pollution in the country. Briefly, the framework considers the digitization of plastics data from land and sea-based sources, then coupled with the appropriate mechanistic model (i.e., process models) that serves as a backbone for digitalization. Consequently, the direction towards the development of a technological artifact, when using the said framework as a basis, can serve as a holistic risk-assessment tool for the crafting of reduction, control, and mitigation strategies by stakeholders at various levels in the national government.
... Marine plastic litter is a pressing environmental issue globally [1,2]. As studies on this matter develop, more evidence on the threats of MPs is being discovered, thus requiring more research focus [3]. ...
... Although studies on MPs and their interaction with toxins are still in their infancy, biomagnification and bioaccumulation of toxins through the ingestion of MPs have already been documented [12,13]. Although the Philippines is one of the top contributors of plastics in the ocean globally, studies on MPs in the country are still at an early stage [1] and limited [14][15][16][17][18]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Microplastics (MPs) have become an emerging threat to the marine environment and biota. This study was conducted to determine the occurrence of MPs on the beach sand of Puerto Princesa, Philippines. Microplastics were extracted from the beach sand through the flotation method and preliminarily identified using a stereomicroscope. A total of 47 MPs were extracted from beach sand. Among the 21 sampling sites, the beach sands from 15 sites were contaminated with MPs. The east coast of Puerto Princesa (0.023 particles/g) has significantly higher MP abundance than the west coast (0.006 particles/g). The shapes of MPs were predominantly fiber (79%), and the majority were blue. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis identified polymer types of mainly polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polypropylene (PP). Overall, 71% of the sampling sites showed the presence of MPs. Future studies should consider the presence and effects of MPs in the food chain, particularly on seafood.
... Evidence suggests that even remote and protected areas are not immune to plastic pollution (Fagiano et al., 2022), and it is essential to identify marine macro-plastics that have washed up on beaches to determine the source of the pollution and develop the best cleanup plans (Giugliano et al., 2022). Additionally, marine plastic research is critical in the Philippines because the country is heavily reliant on the marine environment and the ecosystem services it provides (Abreo, 2018). ...
Article
Full-text available
This study focused on the characterisation of macro-plastic waste in terms of types and quantities along the Philippines' longest coastal boulevard, considering density and cleanliness as a basis for solid waste management and policy formulation. Macro-plastic identification and counting were conducted in four (4) municipalities and eight (8) barangays using the standing stock survey method. There were six (6) types of macro-plastic waste, with the highest quantity consisting of beverage (37.2%) and food packaging (30.5%), followed by fishing gear (17.0%), plastic utensils (9.2%), toiletries (4.8%) and household wastes (1.4%). The computed overall density from a total of 3,978 macro-plastic waste items over 12,000 m 2 of beach area sampled was 0.3 (CM), meaning there were 0.3 litter items of plastic per m 2 throughout the whole boulevard. The computed overall beach cleanliness was 6.6, which means that the cleanliness status is moderate. Overall, most macro-plastic waste is generated by locals or visitors. In conclusion, a policy regulating the use, littering, and carrying of plastic along boulevards is recommended to prevent plastic pollution considering the province's growing ecotourism and the future expansion of the coastal boulevard.
... Recent studies mainly involve the effects of microplastics on fishes and small crustaceans (de Sá et al 2018), leaving invertebrates such as gastropods underrepresented. To add, there is insufficient data regarding bioaccumulation of microplastics in marine life published in the Philippines (Abreo 2018). Gastropods such as snails, which are easy prey for larger organisms, are potentially transferred in the food webs, which may bring implications in food safety (Rochman et al 2016). ...
Article
Full-text available
Microplastics are of major environmental concern because they are not biodegradable and can persist in the environment for hundreds of years. These microparticles have now found its way inside the gastrointestinal system of many vertebrate and invertebrate organisms. This study focuses on detection and identification of microplastic ingestion by Echinolittorina snails. The two stations established in Barangay Buru-un, Iligan City, Philippines were observed to be littered with plastics and other materials which may also indicate microplastic pollution. The processes involve visual identification for isolation and utilization of Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) analysis for polymer identification. Two isolated materials from the samples were subjected to FTIR testing. The results were compared to the database's accessible spectra and it was found out that only the suspected microfiber sample was identified as a microplastic, where it exhibits a strong spectral similarity to polyethylene. The findings support that microplastics were ingested by the Echinolittorina snails. This would imply that microplastics are indeed present in the area and may cause of stress to the marine life and its environment. It is strongly recommended that additional studies be conducted in terms of microplastic abundance in the area that would become supplementary data for establishing proper waste management.
... However, studies regarding the ingestion of microplastics by bivalves for human consumption in the Philippines are still limited (Galarpe et al. 2021). With the country being a top contributor to marine plastic debris and the ecosystem services provided by marine environments, research regarding microplastic pollution is needed (Abreo 2018). This study was conducted to measure the size and quantity of the microplastics ingested by three commercially important bivalve species, oysters (C. ...
Article
Full-text available
An increasing number of studies have reported the presence of microplastics in marine organisms such as bivalves. Ingestion of microplastics can affect organisms and transport pollutants such as organic chemicals and heavy metals. In this study, the presence, quantity, and size of microplastics ingested by the three commercially important bivalve species Perna viridis, Crassostrea iredalei, and Venerupis philippinarum harvested from Bacoor Bay, Philippines, were investigated. The microplastics were extracted from the soft tissues of the bivalves using base digestion, recovered by filtration using 150 µm wire mesh, and analyzed microscopically. The results demonstrated that the quantity of recovered microplastics from the soft tissues of mussels, oysters, and clams are 0.93±0.12 items/g, 0.42±0.07 items/g, and 1.71±0.34 items/g, respectively. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) shows that the quantity of microplastics ingested by the three bivalve species was significantly different (α = 0.05, p =0.0031). The average size of microplastics ingested by mussels, oysters, and clams was 1.72±0.13 mm, 1.26±0.18 mm, and 1.21±0.1 mm, respectively. A slightly significant difference between the sizes of microplastics ingested by the three bivalve species (α = 0.05, p =0.049) was observed. This study presents preliminary data on the quantity and size of microplastics ingested by bivalves in Bacoor Bay. The results of this study further proved the necessity of determining programs and projects to reduce the potential risks of microplastics on the environment, economy, and, more importantly, on the safety of human food consumption. Further studies are needed to identify the specific polymers of plastics ingested by the three bivalve species harvested in Bacoor Bay.
... In the year 2010, the Philippines, a coastal country, ranked 3rd with the most mismanaged plastic waste, producing 1.88 million metric tons per year and contributing around 0.28-0.75 million metric tons of plastic marine debris per year [8]. One of the contributors is the Pasig River with its 3.21 x 104 tons of plastics delivered to the marine environment annually [14]. Furthermore, it was reported that 4,319,981 anthropogenic litter were collected from land, underwater, and watercraft cleanups last 2017, wherein mostly were plastic debris [15] which indicated that the Philippines was no exception from the presence of microplastics. ...
Article
Full-text available
Microplastics are synthetic polymer particles with a length of 5 mm or less with no well-defined lower boundary. These debris particles are known to affect marine and aquatic organisms which poses a threat to biodiversity and marine resources. In this study, the isolated microplastic from the coastal and lagoon surface waters of Sitio Pulo is described. Sitio Pulo is a barrier island mangrove sanctuary located at Brgy. Tanza I, Navotas City surrounded by Manila Bay. The samples collected last July 4 and 25, 2019, were isolated, profiled, and analyzed. A total of four hundred forty-nine (449) microplastic fragments were isolated from the surface water samples with a median length of 1.096 (IQR 0.809–1.578) mm. The isolated microplastics exhibit roundness, whiteness, and yellowing indicating signs of mechanical, chemical and photodegradation. It is also noted the putative effects of the weather disturbances in accelerating the discharge of nascent microplastics in Manila Bay. The isolated microplastic composition includes the commodity polymers polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP). The presence of microplastics in the surface waters of Sitio Pulo reflects the worsening plastic pollution problem in Metro Manila.
... Despite the Philippines being a major producer of plastics to the marine environment, only a few studies have been undertaken to evaluate the scope of the problem Paler et al. 2019;Esquinas et al. 2020;Bucol et al. 2020;Inocente and Bacosa, 2022). According to Abreo (2018), the importance of baseline studies on marine plastic litter in varied coastal ecosystems cannot be overstated. ...
Article
Plastic pollution is an arising problem of our generation. Tons of plastics are globally produced affecting different coastal ecosystems. Plastics pile and end up in coastal areas, at the ocean surface, and in the coastal seabed. Almost 70% of plastics made are known to eventually sink in water, and it is suspected that ever-increasing amounts of plastics are accumulating in seabed sediments. However, there are limited studies on macroplastics in coastal seabeds in the different coastal ecosystems in the Philippines. This study aims to determine the prevalence, types, and density of macroplastic litters in the coastal seabed of Sultan Naga Dimaporo (SND), Lanao del Norte. A 100-m transect line with four quadrats measuring 5 m x 5 m, was delineated parallel to the seabed at the beaches of Barangay Pikalawag, Dabliston, Koreo and Sugod. Results revealed that all four sites were contaminated with plastic litter in which 55% were from Pikalawag, a residential area, 16% from Dabliston, a mangrove area, 15% from Sugod, a beach/tourism area, and 14% from Koreo, a non-residential area. The plastic density was 1.32 items/m2 for Pikalawag, and 0.32 to 0.37 items/m2 for the other areas. The waste collected was primarily food packaging (17%), plastic fragments (16%), and plastic bags (11%). The highest polymer type was LDPE (40%) followed by both multilayers (13%) and PET (13%). Based on the clean coast-index, Pikalawag can be categorized as extremely dirty while the other three sites were moderately clean. Overall, this study showed how the prevalence and composition of plastic litter vary in different coastal seabeds in SND, Lanao del Norte.
... Issues concerning maritime safety, security and environmental protection are too broad, which cannot be addressed by S&T alone. Specifically for the part of marine plastic litter pollution, the lack of baseline data to define the extent of the problem is concerning; here S&T interventions (i.e., basic research) are needed for science-based policymaking (Abreo, 2018;Paler, 2020;Omeyer, et al., 2022;Paler, et al., 2022). However, given that some of these issues can be tackled by S&T, Table 4 lists possible programs and S&T interventions/initiatives for research and development related to this theme as identified by the stakeholders. ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
The objective of the study is to identify the most critical Science and Technology (S&T) interventions or solutions that need to be developed and prioritized to advance and transform maritime transport in the Philippines. We present the results of our consultations with 42 stakeholders, representing a total of 16 organizations from the government agencies, academe, private sector and maritime associations. We group the responses of our stakeholders into topics and identify three R&D themes: development of fleet and facilities, digital transformation of the maritime sector, and maritime security/safety and environmental protection. Our stakeholders rank the protection of marine environment as the most important, while the development of autonomous ships as the least important. We recommend that the results of our study be used by relevant agencies and institutions as basis for the identification and prioritization of maritime-related transport projects.
... Lesions in the liver of the studied fish were recorded less often and in a smaller number of specimens. The identified histopathologies could be caused by cyanides, arsenides, and other toxicants that are found in significant amounts in the waters of the archipelago [4,17]. ...
... Although the Philippines is one of the foremost contributors of plastics in the marine environment, limited studies have been conducted to determine the extent of plastic pollution in the country (Kalnasa et al., 2019;Paler et al., 2019;Esquiñas et al., 2020;Bucol et al., 2020). A baseline study on marine plastic litter in various coastal environments has of utmost significance (Abreo, 2018). ...
Article
Marine plastic litter pollution has become an emerging threat to the Philippines, especially in Palawan. This study was conducted to investigate the macroplastic litter and determine the clean-coast index (CCI) of the residential and non-residential sites on the coasts of Puerto Princesa, Palawan. Plastic litters were sampled from 21 coastal barangays by delineating a 50-m-long transect line with three 4 m × 4 m quadrats. The litter sampled were counted and sorted into categories. The results showed that 17 sites were contaminated with plastic litters. In terms of residential and non-residential sites, the east coast has thrice as much plastic, 2.61 items/m2 and 1.26 items/m2 compared to west coast with only 1.57 items/m2 and 0.14 items/m2, respectively. The plastics sampled were predominantly fishing line (nylon), food packaging, and fragments. The calculated CCI revealed that 76% of the sites sampled were categorized as dirty and extremely dirty.
Article
Full-text available
Plastics in the marine environment have become a major concern because of their persistence at sea, and adverse consequences to marine life and potentially human health. Implementing mitigation strategies requires an understanding and quantification of marine plastic sources, taking spatial and temporal variability into account. Here we present a global model of plastic inputs from rivers into oceans based on waste management, population density and hydrological information. Our model is calibrated against measurements available in the literature. We estimate that between 1.15 and 2.41 million tonnes of plastic waste currently enters the ocean every year from rivers, with over 74% of emissions occurring between May and October. The top 20 polluting rivers, mostly located in Asia, account for 67% of the global total. The findings of this study provide baseline data for ocean plastic mass balance exercises, and assist in prioritizing future plastic debris monitoring and mitigation strategies.
Article
Full-text available
Marine plastic pollution has adversely affected different species through entanglement and ingestion. Globally, 66% (81 of 123 species) of marine mammals are reported to have interacted with plastic in the marine environment, suffering negative effects. The number of marine organisms affected is expected to rise as a function of the increasing amount of plastic in the marine environment. With the high contribution of the Philippines to marine plastic pollution, this study aimed to record plastic ingestion by cetaceans found in the country. Post-mortem gastrointestinal (GI) tract examination was performed in the Deraniyagala’s beaked whale (Mesoplodon hotaula) beached in Maco, Compostela Valley, Philippines. A piece of coal and a 133 cm black polypropylene rope was suspected to have caused blockage in the GI tract of the specimen. Occlusion of GI tract by plastic is often implicated to mortality of organisms found to have ingested the material. This study provides the first evidence of plastic ingestion by M. hotaula and confirms the susceptibility of cetaceans to plastic ingestion in the Philippines.
Article
Full-text available
Marine plastic debris is a global problem that is threatening marine biodiversity. Different marine organisms have been exposed to the lethal and sub-lethal effects of this problem. Sub-lethal effects include reduced fitness due to reduced feeding, reduced reproductive output, limb amputation, and exposure to diseases and toxic materials, while lethal effects include drowning, gastro-intestinal blockage, and stomach rupture. Marine turtles are very vulnerable to these effects since these organisms actively ingest plastic mistaking it as prey. This adds stress to the declining population of marine turtles. On 17 April 2015, a dead adult female green turtle was recovered in Brgy. Lapu-lapu, Agdao, Davao City, Philippines. Necropsy showed that several plastic materials caused blockage in the pyloric end of the stomach which may have caused the turtle’s mortality.
Article
Full-text available
The ubiquity of anthropogenic debris in hundreds of species of wildlife and the toxicity of chemicals associated with it has begun to raise concerns regarding the presence of anthropogenic debris in seafood. We assessed the presence of anthropogenic debris in fishes and shellfish on sale for human consumption. We sampled from markets in Makassar, Indonesia, and from California, USA. All fish and shellfish were identified to species where possible. Anthropogenic debris was extracted from the digestive tracts of fish and whole shellfish using a 10% KOH solution and quantified under a dissecting microscope. In Indonesia, anthropogenic debris was found in 28% of individual fish and in 55% of all species. Similarly, in the USA, anthropogenic debris was found in 25% of individual fish and in 67% of all species. Anthropogenic debris was also found in 33% of individual shellfish sampled. All of the anthropogenic debris recovered from fish in Indonesia was plastic, whereas anthropogenic debris recovered from fish in the USA was primarily fibers. Variations in debris types likely reflect different sources and waste management strategies between countries. We report some of the first findings of plastic debris in fishes directly sold for human consumption raising concerns regarding human health.
Chapter
Full-text available
In this review we report new findings concerning interaction between marine debris and wildlife. Deleterious effects and consequences of entangle-ment, consumption and smothering are highlighted and discussed. The number of species known to have been affected by either entanglement or ingestion of plastic debris has doubled since 1997, from 267 to 557 species among all groups of wildlife. For marine turtles the number of affected species increased from 86 to 100 % (now 7 of 7 species), for marine mammals from 43 to 66 % (now 81 of 123 species) and for seabirds from 44 to 50 % of species (now 203 of 406 species). Strong increases in records were also listed for fish and invertebrates, groups that were previously not considered in detail. In future records of interactions between marine debris and wildlife we recommend to focus on standardized data on frequency of occurrence and quantities of debris ingested. In combination with dedicated impact studies in the wild or experiments, this will allow more detailed assessments of the deleterious effects of marine debris on individuals and populations.
Article
This chapter traces the history of marine litter research from anecdotal reports of entanglement and plastic ingestion in the 1960s to the current focus on microplastics and their role in the transfer of persistent organic pollutants to marine food webs. The reports in Science of large numbers of plastic pellets in the North Atlantic in the early 1970s stimulated research interest in plastic litter at sea, with papers reporting plastics on the seafloor and impacting a variety of marine animals. The focus then shifted to high concentrations of plastic litter in the North Pacific, where novel studies reported the dynamics of stranded beach litter, the factors influencing plastic ingestion by seabirds, and trends in fur seal entanglement. By the early 1980s, growing concern about the potential impacts of marine litter resulted in a series of meetings on marine debris. The first two international conferences held in Honolulu by the US National Marine Fisheries Service played a key role in setting the research agenda for the next decade. By the end of the 1980s, most impacts of marine litter were reasonably well understood, and attention shifted to seeking effective solutions to tackle the marine litter problem. Research was largely restricted to monitoring trends in litter to assess the effectiveness of mitigation measures, until the last decade, when concern about microplastics coupled with the discovery of alarming densities of small plastic particles in the North Pacific ‘garbage patch’ (and other mid-ocean gyres) stimulated the current wave of research. © 2015, Springer International Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
Article
Plastic debris in the marine environment is widely documented, but the quantity of plastic entering the ocean from waste generated on land is unknown. By linking worldwide data on solid waste, population density, and economic status, we estimated the mass of land-based plastic waste entering the ocean. We calculate that 275 million metric tons (MT) of plastic waste was generated in 192 coastal countries in 2010, with 4.8 to 12.7 million MT entering the ocean. Population size and the quality of waste management systems largely determine which countries contribute the greatest mass of uncaptured waste available to become plastic marine debris. Without waste management infrastructure improvements, the cumulative quantity of plastic waste available to enter the ocean from land is predicted to increase by an order of magnitude by 2025. Copyright © 2015, American Association for the Advancement of Science.