Content uploaded by Mostafa Payandeh
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Mostafa Payandeh on Jun 18, 2020
Content may be subject to copyright.
Comparison of vertical ground reaction force during walking in children with
flat foot and a normal foot
Mostafa Payandeh *1 , Nahid Khoshraftar Yazdi 2 , Ahmad Ebrahimi Atri 3 , Mohsen Damavandi 4
1. MSc student of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (Physical Education) (corresponding author)
paradise.gheshm2011@gmail.com
2. Assistant Professor of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (Physical Education)
3. Assistant Professor of FerdowsiUniversity of Mashhad (Physical Education)
4. Assistant Professor of Hakim University of Sabzevari( Physical Education
Article received on: 2014.3.22 Article accepted on: 2015.1.16
ABSTRACT
Background and Aim: Foot arch will always be known as absorbing the force from the ground
to foot. The purpose of this study was to investigate the vertical ground reaction force subject
with flat foot and a normal foot.
Materials and Methods: Fifteen subjects were randomly selected from between children with
flexible flat foot, and 15 subjects were randomly selected to the control group from the
population with normal feet that were homogeneous with group flat foot of the height, age and
weight. And KISTLER force plate were used to measure vertical ground reaction force
component both groups at three times; weight transfer on heel, midstance and weight transfer on
the toe, during the Stance phase. Data analysis using SPSS 21 software and was performed
independent t-test (p< 0/05).
Results: There was a significant difference in the weight transfer on heel and midstance phase
between flat foot and a normal foot. But no significant difference between the two groups at the
weight transfer on the toe.
Conclusion: The results of this study showed that in the subject flat foot at time, transfer of
weight on the heel and transfer of weight on the toe, enters more ground reaction force then
individuals normal foot. This could be a major factor for foot injuries in the subjects flat foot.
According to research findings, shoes Makers can use the information obtained and measures the
toes and shoe heel to include for subjects flat foot, able to absorb amount of the ground reaction
force and this will prevent subjects from injury.
Key Words: Flat foot , Vertical ground reaction force, Force plate, Child
Cite this article as: Mostafa Payandeh, Nahid Khoshraftar Yazdi, Ahmad Ebrahimi Atri, Mohsen Damavandi.
Comparison of vertical ground reaction force during walking in children with flat foot and a normal foot. J Rehab
Med. 2015; 4(1): 33-41.
Stance
tSPSS 21p.
p=
p=
Force plate
paradise.gheshm2011@gmail.com
]
[
]
[
]
[
]
[
]
[
]
[
]
[
]
[
]
[
]
[
]
[
Midfoot
]
[
]
[
]
[
]
[
Garee
]
[
]
[
Jong Sung Changa
]
[
]
[
]
[
]
[
]
[
±±
±
:
.
]
[
Flexible flat foot
.
:
C
]
[
]
[
]
[
(7.10.0.499.R 2010 B)Matlab
Stance
Independent T Test
±±±
±±±
Stance
p
pStance
.
n=
%B.W.
Stance
%B.W.
%B.W.
%B.W.
p=
Khodadadeh
]
[
p=ArastoeeSadeghi
]
[
ArastoeeSchaefer
]
[
]
[
.
]
[
Stance
]
[
Bertani Yavuzer
]
[
Yavuzer
Gait
Bertani
1 Farahani A, kayvan Sh M. Exercise therapy with emphasis The flat foot and spinal deformities.1nd ed.Tehran
Asre Entezar; 2011.p.28.[ In Persian].
2 Sokhanguee Y, Sokhanguee M. Flat foot. 3nd ed. TehranHarkat Now;2006. p.45 [In Persian].
3. Lin LK, Kuan TS, Chou YL. Correlation factors and clinical significance of flexible flatfoot in preschool
children. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 2001; (2)21:378-382.
4. Queen RM, Nam JA, Nunley B. Chuckpai W. Differences in plantar loading between flat and normal feet during
different athletic tasks. Gait&Posture. 2009; (3)29: 582-586.
5. Hrysmomallis C. A review of resistance exercise and posture realignment. Journal of Strength and Conditioning
Research. 2001; 15(3): 385 - 390.
6. Young M. A reviewon postural realignment and its muscular and neural components. British Jojrnal of Sports
Medicine; 2002; 9(12): 51 -76
7. Tachdjian`s JA. pediatric orthopaedics. 3rd ed philadelphia : WB saunders company. 2002; 14(2) 84-85.
8 Magee ZJ, Quillen WS. Pathology and intervention in musculoskeletal rehabilitation St. Louis, Missouri, USA:
Saunders Elsevier Inc: 2009; 10(5):799.
9 Arastoee M, Zahednezhad SH, Arastoee A, Negahban H, Goharpay SH Measurement of ground reaction forces
during walking toward the front and rear of the students with flexible flat foot. modern rehabilitation School of
Medical Sciences. 2012; 5(2).23-24. [In Persian]
10. Khodadeh WE. Gait studies of patients with flat feet. Elsevier. 1993;9(3):189-93
11. Jong Sung Ch, Yong Hyun K, Chung Sun K, Sang-Ho A, So Hyun P. Differences of ground reaction forces
andkinematics of lower extremity according tolanding height between flat and normal feet. Journal of Back and
Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation. 2012; 25(2):21-26
12. Jam Jenkins CE. Using Ground Reaction Forces from Gait Analysis. Body Mass as a Weak Biometric. Lecture
Notes in Computer Science. 2007;2(5): 251-257.
13. Letafatkar A, Abdolvahabi Z. Corrective Exercise. 1nd ed. Tehran: Awaye Zohour; 2012. p. 209. [In Persian].
14. Pauk J, Griskevicius L. Ground reaction force and support moment in typical and flat-feet children. Journal of
MECHANIKA. 2011;17(1): 93-96.
15 Eslami M, Damavandi M. Biomechanics and Motion Analysis principles. 1nd ed.Tehran: Pezhoheshkadeh
Tarbeyat Badani; (2012).p.144-145 [In Persian].
16.Sadeghi H, Mousavi S KH, Ghasempoor H, Nbavinik H. Comparison of the vertical ground reaction force
during forward and backward walking In athletes with ankle sprain. Tavnbakhshi Novin. 2013;7(1): 7-11
17 Schaefer S, Birgit W, Ulman L. Cognitive performance is improved while walking :Differences in cognitive–
sensorimotor couplings between children and young adults EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL
PSYCHOLOGY. 2010;7 (3): 371–389
18 Twomeya D, Simon J, Lowe D, Wolf C. Kinematic differences between normal and low arched feet in children
using the Heidelberg foot measurement method. Gait & Posture. 2010;32(5): 1–5.
19. Bertani A, Benedetti M, Simoncini L, Catani F. Flat foot functional evaluation using pattern recognition of
ground reaction data. Clinical Biomechanics. 1999;14(2): 484-493.
20. Yavuzer G SS, Ergin S. Gait deviation of subjects with flexible flatfeet. Ankara University Medical School,
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2001;3(2):4-6.