ArticlePDF Available

Impact of cardiovascular diseases and their therapy on mortality of ICU patients with COVID-19

Authors:
  • Federal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology

Abstract and Figures

There are various data on negative impact of comorbidities on treatment outcomes in patients with novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19). However, the impact of cardiovascular diseases and especially their therapy on the course of infectious process and unfavorable outcomes in COVID-19patients has not been sufficiently studied. Objective. To assess the impact of concomitant cardiovascular diseases and chronic drug intake for their treatment on in-hospi- tal mortality in ICU patients with COVID-19. Material and methods. A single-center retrospective cohort study of ICU patients with COVID-19 was carried out between March 6, 2020 and June 3, 2020 at the Demikhov Moscow City Clinical Hospital. We analyzed the following data: age, gender, previous comorbidities, Charlson comorbidity index, therapy of chronic cardiovascular diseases, severity of COVID-19, NEWS and SOFA scores. Univariate analysis included assessment of relative risk (RR). Multivariate analysis was carried out using regression model. Results. We analyzed medical records of 403 patients (231 (57.3%) men). Mean age of patients was 62.4±15.3 years. Over- all 30-day mortality rate was 44.9% (n=181). Multivariate analysis showed that coronary artery disease (adj. OR 2.459, 95% CI 1.589—3.806, p<0.001) and hypertension (adj. OR 2.893, 95% CI 1.667—5.019, p<0.001) were independent predictors of mor- tality in ICU patients with COVID-19. Conclusion. Coronary artery disease and hypertension are independent predictors of poor outcomes. Long-term use of angioten- sin-converting enzyme inhibitors, β-blockers, acetylsalicylic acid or statins for cardiovascular diseases does not significantly affect clinical outcomes in ICU patients with COVID-19.
Content may be subject to copyright.
36 RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND REANIMATOLOGY, 1, 2022
Original articles
Impact of cardiovascular diseases and their therapy on mortality of ICU
patients with COVID-19
© L.V. ERMOKHINA1, 2, L.B. BERIKASHVILI1, M.YA. YADGAROV1, N.I. CHAUS2, A.A. BAEVA1,
N.S. MELNIKOVA2, S.N. PEREKHODOV2, A.N. KUZOVLEV1
1Federal Research and Clinical Center of Reanimatology and Rehabilitation, Moscow, Russia;
2Demikhov Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow, Russia
ABSTRACT
There are various data on negative impact of comorbidities on treatment outcomes in patients with novel coronavirus infection
(COVID-19). However, the impact of cardiovascular diseases and especially their therapy on the course of infectious process
and unfavorable outcomes in COVID-19patients has not been sufficiently studied.
Objective. To assess the impact of concomitant cardiovascular diseases and chronic drug intake for their treatment on in-hospi-
tal mortality in ICU patients with COVID-19.
Material and methods. A single-center retrospective cohort study of ICU patients with COVID-19 was carried out between March
6, 2020 and June 3, 2020 at the Demikhov Moscow City Clinical Hospital. We analyzed the following data: age, gender, previous
comorbidities, Charlson comorbidity index, therapy of chronic cardiovascular diseases, severity of COVID-19, NEWS and SOFA
scores. Univariate analysis included assessment of relative risk (RR). Multivariate analysis was carried out using regression model.
Results. We analyzed medical records of 403 patients (231 (57.3%) men). Mean age of patients was 62.4±15.3 years. Over-
all 30-day mortality rate was 44.9% (n=181). Multivariate analysis showed that coronary artery disease (adj. OR 2.459, 95% CI
1.589—3.806, p<0.001) and hypertension (adj. OR 2.893, 95% CI 1.667—5.019, p<0.001) were independent predictors of mor-
tality in ICU patients with COVID-19.
Conclusion. Coronary artery disease and hypertension are independent predictors of poor outcomes. Long-term use of angioten-
sin-converting enzyme inhibitors, β-blockers, acetylsalicylic acid or statins for cardiovascular diseases does not significantly affect
clinical outcomes in ICU patients with COVID-19.
Keywords: COVID-19, cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, β-blockers, acetylsali-
cylic acid, statins.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE AUTHORS:
Ermokhina L.V. — https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0891-4937; e-mail: ermokhina_92@mail.ru
Berikashvili L.B. — https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9267-3664
Yadgarov M.Ya. — https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3792-1682
Chaus N.I. — https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5891-3417
Baeva A.A. — https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5189-8602
Melnikova N.S. — https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6671-8467
Perekhodov S.N. — https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6276-2305
Kuzovlev A.N. — https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5930-0118
Corresponding author: Ermokhina L.V. — e-mail: ermokhina_92@mail.ru
TO CITE THIS ARTICLE:
Ermokhina LV, Berikashvili LB, Yadgarov MYa, Chaus NI, Baeva AA, Melnikova NS, Perekhodov SN, Kuzovlev AN. Impact of cardiovascular
diseases and their therapy on mortality of ICU patients with COVID-19. Russian Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimatology = Anesteziologiya
i Reanimatologiya. 2022;1:36–43. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/anaesthesiology202201136
Introduction
The COVID-19 pandemic has posed many problems
for modern medical science. We cannot hope for significant
progress in searching for an effective therapy of this serious in-
fectious disease without solution of these issues [1-3]. In partic-
ular, today we know that COVID-19 is especially severe in elder-
ly patients [4-6], and comorbidity is one of the most significant
predictors of an unfavorable outcome [7, 8].
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are an important medi-
co-social problem regardless of the pandemic [9]. Therefore,
it is not surprisingly that patients with concomitant CVD con-
stitute a significant group of patients with COVID-19. Ac-
cording to a retrospective analysis of 575 Chinese hospitals
for COVID-19 management (n=1,590), hypertension was ob-
served in 16.9% of patients, other CVDs — 53.7%, diabetes
mellitus (DM) — in 8.2% of patients [4]. In an Italian cohort
of patients with COVID-19 (n = 22 512), coronary artery dis-
ease (CAD) was found in 30% of patients, atrial fibrillation
(AF) — 24.5%, DM — 35.5% of patients [7]. Another anal-
ysis of 5,700 COVID-19 patients at 12 hospitals in New York
revealed hypertension in 56.6% of patients, CAD — 11.1%,
obesity — 41.7%, DM — 33.8% of patients [8]. Russian da-
ta are closer to the findings of North American colleagues. In-
deed, concomitant CVDs were detected in 61.4% of patients
among 1.007 ones with COVID-19 admitted to intensive care
units. Incidence of hypertension was 56.3%, CAD — 16.3%,
AF — 9.3% [10].
Russian Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimatology
2022, No. 1, pp. 36–43
https://doi.org/10.17116/anaesthesiology202201136
37
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND REANIMATOLOGY, 1, 2022
Original articles
Most researchers emphasize higher incidence of ad-
verse outcomes in patients with concomitant CVDs. Analysis
of 44,672 patients with COVID-19 and CVDs in the Chinese
Center for Disease Control and Prevention revealed mortality
up to 10.5%, while in general population this value was 2.3% [5].
Inciardi R.M. et al. [6] reported 2.4-fold higher risk of mortality
in patients with concomitant CVDs (p = 0.019).
Apparently, a viral infection contributes to additional dam-
age to cardiovascular system and increases the risk of mortality
in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular diseases [11]. Thus,
course of COVID-19 in patients with concomitant CVDs de-
serves a special attention.
However, correlation and interdependence of CVD
and course of COVID-19 are not limited to this. Soon after
identification of pathogen, an evidence appeared that angioten-
sin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) was involved into intracellular
penetration of the virus [12-14]. In this regard, it was hypothe-
sized that ACE inhibitor intake may be associated with unfavor-
able outcomes of COVID-19 [12, 13, 15].
However, research of etiology, pathogenesis and clini-
cal manifestations of COVID-19 resulted an opposite opinion
about positive effect of drugs influencing renin-angiotensin-al-
dosterone system (RAAS) [13, 14, 16-19]. Sarzani R. et al. [20]
found more severe destructive effect of coronavirus following
the binding of the virus to ACE2 and RAAS hyperactivation.
Accordingly, the drugs inhibiting RAAS will weaken this ef-
fect [9, 21, 22].
There are equally contradictory ideas about prescription
of antiplatelet agents (acetylsalicylic acid, clopidogrel, etc.) [9,
13, 23]. There is still no consensus on feasibility and effectiveness
of additional intake of antiplatelet agents. Advisability of statins
in patients with COVID-19 is also unclear. Virani S.S. et al. [24]
and Kollias A. et al. [25] suggest that these drugs can reduce se-
verity of virus-induced myocardial damage and intensity of cyto-
kine storm. Therefore, they recommend continuing statin thera-
py in patients with COVID-19. Russian colleagues support this
opinion [26].
It is difficult to overestimate this problem considering an im-
portance of analysis of COVID-19 course in patients with con-
comitant CVDs and contradictory data on the effect of cardio-
vascular therapy in these patients.
The purpose of the study was to assess the impact
of concomitant cardiovascular diseases and chronic drug in-
take for their treatment on in-hospital mortality in ICU patients
with COVID-19.
Material and methods
Study design and patients
A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed.
We analyzed medical records of patients admitted to inten-
sive care unit of the Demikhov Moscow City Clinical Hospital
for the period from March 6, 2020 to June 3, 2020.
Inclusion criteria: age ≥ 18 years, ICU patients with diagno-
ses of "COVID-19, virus identified" (U07.1), “COVID-19 sus-
pected, no virus identified” (U07.2). Exclusion criteria: trans-
ferring to any other hospital for further treatment, clinical death
at admission to ICU, admission to ICU for the period of resolv-
ing the issue of transferring to a specialized department without
specific treatment of COVID-19.
The ethical committee of the Federal Research and Clinical
Center of Reanimatology approved this study (No. 2/21/1 dat-
ed 04.16.2021).
Data collection
We have systematized and analyzed the following data: age,
gender, concomitant diseases with assessment of Charlson comor-
bidity index, therapy of chronic CVDs (angiotensin-converting
enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, β-blockers,
statins, antiplatelet agents), development of major adverse cardio-
vascular events (non-fatal cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction,
myocardial revascularization, heart failure and heart rhythm dis-
turbances de novo) and major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascu-
lar events (MACE + ischemic stroke) [11]. We also assessed se-
verity of COVID-19 infection [1], NEWS [27] and SOFA scores
at admission to ICU [1], length of ICU-stay and hospital-stay.
The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality (within
30 days after admission to the hospital for any reason). The sec-
ondary endpoints were length of ICU-stay and hospital-stay,
MACE + MACCE.
Statistical analysis
All data were collected from paper and electronic versions
of the Everest case history into an electronic database using Excel
tables (Microsoft Corp., USA). We applied maximum standard-
ization of all values for a qualitative analysis. All statistical proce-
dures were performed using SPSS® version 25 and MedCalc®
version 19.5.6. Differences were significant at p-value < 0.05.
Distribution normality was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk
test. Quantitative variables were presented as mean and stan-
dard deviation, in case of abnormal distribution — median (Me)
and interquartile range [IQR]. Categorical variables were de-
scribed using absolute values and percentages. We analyzed
between-group differences (dead patients / survivors) us-
ing the Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous variables (with
U and Z values). Categorical variables in between-group analysis
were compared using the Fisher's exact test. To analyze the rela-
tionship between baseline cardiovascular therapy and incidence
of poor outcomes in ICU patients with COVID-19, we used
univariate and multivariate analysis. Risk of adverse outcomes
in univariate analysis was assessed using the OR (odds ratio)
and its 95% confidence interval (CI) for each predictor. In mul-
tivariate analysis, we used a regression model with adjusted haz-
ard ratio (HR) and its 95% CI.
Results
According to inclusion/exclusion criteria, we enrolled
403 out of 4,645 patients admitted with COVID-19 (Figure).
Mean age of patients was 62.4 ± 15.3 years (range 21 — 97). There
were 231 (57.3%) men. Moderate severity of COVID-19 was ob-
served in 149 (37.0%) patients, severe infection — in 254 (63.0%)
patients. Overall mortality in intensive care unit was 44.91%
(n=181).
Characteristics of survivors and dead patients with
COVID-19 are summarized in Table 1.
The most common comorbidities were hypertension (74.2%,
n = 299), cerebrovascular insufficiency (57.6%, n = 232), cor-
onary artery disease (41.4%, n = 167), chronic kidney disease
(40.2%, n = 162), obesity (37.2%, n = 150) and diabetes mel-
litus type 2 (25.8%, n = 104). Incidence of various comorbidi-
ties in the entire sample, as well as in survivors and dead patients
is presented in Table 2 (univariate analysis).
According to gender- and age-adjusted multivariate anal-
ysis, independent cardiovascular predictors of mortality were
coronary artery disease (adj. OR = 2.459, 95% CI 1.589-3.806,
p <0.001) and hypertension (adj. OR = 2.893, 95 % CI 1.667 —
5.019, p <0.001).
38 RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND REANIMATOLOGY, 1, 2022
Original articles
Univariate analysis of patients with/without therapy (ACE
inhibitors, β-blockers, antiplatelet agents, statins) for chronic
cardiovascular diseases is presented in Table 3. Intake of these
drugs had no effect on the risk of mortality. Similarly, multivar-
iate analysis found no significant relationships.
Multivariate analysis of the effect of CVDs and appropriate
therapy on the length of hospital-stay or ICU-stay in patients
with COVID-19 revealed no significant relationships.
Univariate analysis revealed no significant between-group
differences in the incidence of composite outcome (MACE +
MACCE) in patients without therapy and those taking drugs
for concomitant CVDs (Table 4).
Discussion
Hypertension (adj. OR = 2.893, 95% CI 1.667-5.019,
p <0.001) and coronary artery disease (adj.OR = 2.459, 95%
CI 1.589-3.806, p <0.001) significantly worsen the progno-
sis in ICU patients with COVID-19. These data do not contra-
dict the results of other studies. Indeed, Noor F.M. and Islam
M.M. [28] performed a meta-analysis of 58 studies (122,191 pa-
tients) and found a significant correlation between mortality
in patients with COVID-19 and pre-existing hypertension (RR =
2.08, 95% CI 1.79 — 2.43, p <0.001) and other CVDs (RR 2.51,
95% CI 1.20 — 5.26, p <0.05).
Zhou F. et al. [29] performed a retrospective study (n = 191)
and found previous coronary artery disease as a significant pre-
dictor of poor outcomes in patients with COVID-19 (OR = 2.14,
95% CI 0.26-17.79, p = 0.48). Higher mortality rates in our study
may be explained by analysis of the most severe patients requir-
ing intensive care.
We found no significant effect of baseline cardiovascular
therapy on mortality in ICU patients with COVID-19. Thus,
we cannot confirm the positive effect of ACE inhibitors, statins
or antiplatelet agents previously discovered by some research-
ers [13, 14, 16-19]. At the same time, these drugs had no nega-
tive effect on the outcomes of COVID-19. Currently, the Amer
-
ican College of Cardiology, the European Society of Cardiology
and the Russian Society of Cardiology recommend continu-
ing therapy with RAAS blockers previously prescribed for cer-
Overall number of patients admitted to the Demikhov
Moscow City Clinical Hospital (n=4645)
Overall number of patients admitted to intensive care
unit (12.3%, 571/4645)
ICU patients enrolled in the study (70.6%,403/571)
Discharged from intensive care unit (55.1%, 222/403) Dead in intensive care unit (44.9%, 181/403)
Clinical death at admission to intensive
care unit (7,7%, 13/168)
Transferring to other hospitals for any
reason (52.4%, 88/168)
COVID-19 was no confirmed after
examination (39.3%, 66/168)
Te mporary follow-up in intensive care unit without specific
therapy of SARS-CoV-2 (0.6%, 1/168)
Excluded from the study
(29.4%, 168/571)
Exclusion criteria.
ICU — intensive care unit
Table 1. Characteristics of patients with COVID‑19 and concomitant therapy
Variable Survivors, n=222 Dead patients, n=181 p-value
Demographic characteristics and comorbidity:
Gender (men/women) 127/95 104/77 1.000
Age, years 57.0 [IQR: 48.0—66.0] 68.0 [IQR: 60.0—79.0] <0.001*
BMI, kg/m228.0 [IQR: 24.9—32.9] 29.1 [IQR: 24.4—34.0] 0.827
Charlson Comorbidity Index 2 [IQR: 1—5] range 0 — 11 6 [IQR: 4—8] range 0 — 14 <0.001*
Clinical severity at admission:
SOFA score 1.0 [IQR: 1.0—2.0] 3.0 [IQR: 2.0—4.0] <0.001*
NEWS score 7.0 [IQR: 5.0—8.0] 8.0 [IQR: 7.0—10.5] <0.001*
Course of COVID-19 at admission (moderate/severe) 209/13 45/136 <0.001*
Length of stay, days:
Hospital-stay 16.0 [IQR: 12.0—21.0] 9.0 [IQR: 5.5—14.5] <0.001*
ICU-stay 4.0 [IQR: 3.0—7.0] 5.0 [IQR: 3.0—9.0] 0.023*
Note. p-value — level of statistical significance; * — significant differences. BMI — body mass index.
39
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND REANIMATOLOGY, 1, 2022
Original articles
tain indications (hypertension, coronary artery disease, heart
failure) to reduce cardiovascular risk (myocardial infarction,
stroke) [9, 11]. Moreover, further intake of acetylsalicylic acid,
clopidogrel or ticagrelor is advisable because the risk of discon-
tinuation of antiplatelet therapy may be associated with signifi-
cant risk of cardiovascular events [9].
Considering own findings, we cannot support these rec-
ommendations. However, they are clearly not enough to call
for a change in attitude towards drug therapy of concomitant
CVDs in ICU patients with COVID-19. The authors found
no effect of statins on COVID-19-associated mortality and can-
not confirm the guidelines on prescription of these drugs in pa-
tients with COVID-19.
Study limitations
Our study has certain limitations. First, retrospective analy-
sis imposes certain limitations on validity of conclusions and rec-
ommendations.
Secondly, our cohort of patients was recruited within the first
wave of the pandemic. On the one hand, this fact allowed tradi-
tional CVD treatment regardless potential (but at that time un-
known) effect on the course of the underlying infectious disease.
On the other hand, attending physicians resolved various issues
at own discretion due to unavailable clinical guidelines. This as-
pect explains several treatment regimens for the same condition
in one hospital.
Conclusion
According to sex- and age-adjusted multivariate analysis,
coronary artery disease and hypertension are independent pre-
dictors of mortality in ICU patients with COVID-19.
There were no significant between-group differences in mor-
tality among ICU patients with COVID-19 taking angioten-
sin-converting enzyme inhibitors, β-blockers, acetylsalicylic acid
or statins for chronic cardiovascular diseases and those without
similar therapy. Cardiovascular diseases in COVID-19 patients
Table 4. Incidence of MACE and MACCE depending on drug intake for cardiovascular diseases in patients with COVID‑19
Drugs MACE MACCE
RR 95% CI p-value RR 95% CI p-value
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors 1.267 0.643—2.497 0.498 1.379 0.776—2.449 0.283
Beta blockers 0.986 0.460—2.114 0.283 0.80 4 0.381—1.699 0.563
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors + beta blockers 1.220 0.662—2.249 0.526 1.410 0.850—2.341 0.19 0
Statins 0.789 0.451—1.380 0.493 1.143 0.735—1.779 0.654
Note: RR [95% CI] — relative risk [95% confidence interval], p-value — level of statistical significance.
Table 2. Mortality rate depending on comorbidity index in patients with COVID‑19
Comorbidity Dead/patients with
pre-existing comorbidity, n (%)
Dead/patients without
pre-existing comorbidity, n (%) RR: [95% CI] p-value
Hypertension 159/299 (53.2) 22/104 (21.2) 2.514 [1.709—3.698] <0.001*
Previous myocardial infarction 79/134 (58.9) 102/269 (37.9) 1.555 [1.263—1.915] <0.001*
Atrial fibrillation 49/77 (63.6) 132/326 (40.5) 1.572 [1.269—1.9 47] <0.001*
Coronary artery disease 103/167 (61.7) 78/236 (33.1) 1.866 [1.501—2.319] <0.001*
Chronic heart failure 90/143 (62.9) 91/260 (35.0) 1.798 [1.461—2.214] <0.001*
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 42/66 (63.6) 139/337 (41.2) 1.543 [1.235—1.927] 0.001*
Cerebrovascular insufficiency 143/232 (61.6) 38/171 (22.2) 2.774 [2.058—3.737] <0.001*
Peripheral artery disease 175/334 (52.4) 6/69 (8.7) 6.025 [2.786—13.032] <0.001*
Diabetes mellitus type 2 56/104 (53.8) 125/299 (41.8) 1.288 [1.031—1.609] 0.039*
Chronic kidney disease 103/162 (63.6) 78/241 (32.4) 1.964 [1.582—2.439] <0.001*
Liver failure 13/20 (65.0) 168/383 (43.9) 1.482 [1.054—2.084] 0.070
Gastric and duodenal ulcer 18/32 (56.3) 163/371 (43.9) 1.280 [0.924—1.775] 0.198
Hemiplegia 15/22 (68.2) 166/381 (43.6) 1.565 [1.151—2.128] 0.028*
Cancer 22/39 (56.4) 159/364 (43.7) 1.291 [0.957—1.742] 0.209
Obesity 61/150 (40.7) 120/253 (47.4) 0.857 [0.679—1.082] 0.214
Note. RR: [95% CI] — relative risk [95% confidence interval], p-value — level of statistical significance; * — significant differences (univariate analysis).
Table 3. Mortality rate depending on drug intake for cardiovascular diseases in patients with COVID‑19
Drugs Dead/patients taking
the drug, n (%)
Dead/patients not taking
the drug, n (%) RR: [95% CI] p-value
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors 55/124 (44.4) 126/279 (45.2) 0.982 [0.776—1.243] 0.914
Beta blockers 55/124 (44.4) 126/279 (45.2) 0.982 [0.776—1.243] 0.914
Statins 43/114 (37.7) 138/289 (47.8) 0.790 [0.606—1.030] 0.076
Antiplatelet agents (except for acetylsalicylic acid) 7/19 (36.8) 174/384 (45.3) 0.813 [0.447—1.480] 0.638
Acetylsalicylic acid 25/64 (39) 156/339 (46) 0.849 [0.612—1.177] 0.339
Note. RR [95% CI] — relative risk [95% confidence interval], p-value — level of statistical significance.
40 RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND REANIMATOLOGY, 1, 2022
Original articles
and appropriate therapy do not increase the length of hospi-
tal-stay and ICU-stay.
Author contribution:
Concept and design of the study — A.N. Kuzovlev.
Collection and analysis of data — Ermokhina L.V., Yad-
garov M.Ya., Baeva A.A., Perekhodov S.N., Chaus N.I., Mel-
nikova N.S.
Statistical analysis — Berikashvili L.B., Yadgarov M.Ya.
Writing the text — Ermokhina L.V., Berikashvili L.B., Yad-
garov M.Ya.
Editing — A. N. Kuzovlev
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
1. Vremennye metodicheskie rekomendacii. Profilaktika, diagnostika i lechenie no-
voj koronavirusnoj infekcii (COVID-19). Versiya 11 (07.05.2021). Ministerstvo
zdravoohraneniya Rossijskoj Federacii. Accessed June 01, 2021. (In Russ.).
https://static-0.minzdrav.gov.ru/system/attachments/attaches/000/055/735/
original/B%D0%9C%D0%A0_COVID-19.pdf
2. Beloborodova NV, Zuev EV, Zamyatin MN, Gusarov VG. Causal Therapy
of COVID-19: Critical Review and Prospects. Obshchaya reanimatologiya.
2020;16(6):65-90. (In Russ.).
https://doi.org/10.15360/1813-9779-2020-4-0-1
3. Hariyanto T, Hardyson W, Kurniawan A. Efficacy and Safety of Tocilizum-
ab for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) Patients: A Systematic Review
and Meta-analysis. Drug Research. 2021;71(5):265-274.
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1336-2371
4. Guan WJ, Liang WH, Zhao Y, Liang HR, Chen ZS, Li YM, Liu XQ, Chen
RC, Tang CL, Wang T, Ou CQ, Li L, Chen PY, Sang L, Wang W, Li JF,
Li CC, Ou LM, Cheng B, Xiong S, Ni ZY, Xiang J, Hu Y, Liu L, Shan H,
Lei CL, Peng YX, Wei L, Liu Y, Hu YH, Peng P, Wang JM, Liu JY, Chen
Z, Li G, Zheng ZJ, Qiu SQ, Luo J, Ye CJ, Zhu SY, Cheng LL, Ye F, Li SY,
Zheng JP, Zhang NF, Zhong NS, He JX; China Medical Treatment Expert
Group for COVID-19. Comorbidity and its impact on 159 0 patients with
COVID-19 in China: A Nationwide analysis. The European Respiratory Jour-
nal. 2020;55(5):2000547.
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00547-2020
5. Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the
coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: Summary of a
report of 72314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Pre
-
vention. JAMA. 2020;323(13):1239-1242.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.26 48
6. Inciardi RM, Adamo M, Lupi L, Cani DS, Di Pasquale M, Tomasoni D,
Italia L, Zaccone G, Tedino C, Fabbricatore D, Curni s A, Faggiano P, Gor-
ga E, Lombardi CM, Milesi G, Vizzardi E, Volpini M, Nodari S, Specchia
C, Maroldi R, Bezzi M, Metra M. Characteristics and outcomes of patients
hospitalized for COVID-19 and cardiac disease in Northern Italy. European
Heart Journal. 2020;41(19):1821-1829.
https://doi.org/10.10 93/eurheartj/ehaa388
7. Onder G, Rezza G, Brusaferro S. Case-fatality rate and characteristics of pa-
tients dying in relation to COVID-19 in Italy. JAMA. 2020;323(18):1775-1776.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.4683
8. Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, Crawford JM, McGinn T, Da-
vidson KW; the Northwell COVID-19 Research Consortium, Barnaby DP,
Becker LB, Chelico JD, Cohen SL, Cookingham J, Coppa K, Diefenbach
MA, Dominello AJ, Duer-Hefele J, Falzon L, Gitlin J, Hajizadeh N, Har-
vin TG, Hirschwerk DA, Kim EJ, Kozel ZM, Marrast LM, Mogavero JN,
Osorio GA, Qiu M, Zanos TP. Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and
outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the New York
City area. JAMA. 2020;323(20):2052-2059.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.6775
9. Shlyahto EV, Konradi AO, Arutyunov GP, Arutyunov AG, Bautin AE, Boj-
cov SA, Villeval’de SV, Grigor’eva NYu, Duplyakov DV, Zvartau NE, Kozi-
olova NA, Lebedev DS, Mal’chikova SV, Medvedeva EA, Mihajlov EN,
Moiseeva OM, Orlova Ya A, Pavlova TV, Pevzner DV, Petrova MM, Rebrov
AP, Sitnikova MYu, Solov’eva AE, Tarlovskaya EI, Trukshina MA, Fedo-
tov PA, Fomin IV, Hripun AV, Chesnikova AI, Shaposhnik II, Yavelov IS,
Yakovlev AN. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of circulatory dis-
eases in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Rossijskij kardiologicheskij
zhurnal. 2020;25(3):129-148. (In Russ.).
https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2020-3-3801
10. Glybochko PV, Fomin VV, Avdeev SN, Moiseev SV, Yavorovskij AG, Brovko
MYu, Umbetova KT, Aliev VA, Bulanova EL, Bondarenko IB, Volkova OS,
Gajnitdinova VV, Gn eusheva TYu, Dubrovin KV, Kapustina VA, Kraeva VV,
Merzhoeva ZM, Nuralieva GS, Nogtev PV, Panasyuk VV, Politov ME, Pop-
ov AM, Popova EN, Raspopina NA, Royuk VV, Sorokin YuD, Trushenko
NV, Halikova EYu, Careva NA, Chikina SYu, Chichkova NV, Akulkina LA,
Bulanov NM, Ermolova LA, Zykova AS, Kitbalyan AA, Moiseev AS, Po-
tapov PP, Tao EA , Sholomova VI, Shchepalina AA, Yakovleva AA. Clinical
characteristics of 1007 intensive care unit patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneu-
monia. Klinicheskaya farmakologiya i terapiya. 2020;29(2):21-29. (In Russ.).
https://doi.org/10.32756/0869-5490-2020-2-21-29
11. ESC European Society of Cardiology. ESC guidance for the diagnosis and
management of CV disease during the COVID-19 pandemic. Accessed June
01, 2021.
https://www.escardio.org/Education/COVID-19-and-Cardiology/ESC-
COVID-19-Guidance
12. Diaz JH. Hypothesis: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angio-
tensin receptor blockers may increase the risk of severe COVID-19. Journal
of Travel Medicine. 2020;27(2):taaa041.
https://doi.org/10.10 93/jtm/taaa041
13. Kuster GM, Pfister O, Burkard T, Zhou Q, Twerenbold R, Haaf P, Wid-
mer AF, Osswald S. SARS-CoV2: should inhibitors of the renin-angioten-
sin system be withdrawn in patients with COVID-19? European Heart Jour-
nal. 2020;41(19):1801-1803.
https://doi.org/10.10 93/eurheartj/ehaa235
14. Imai Y, Kuba K, Rao S, Huan Y, Guo F, Guan B, Yang P, Sarao R, Wada
T, Leong-Poi H, Crackower MA, Fukamizu A, Hui CC, Hein L, Uhlig S,
Slutsky AS, Jiang C, Penninger JM. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 pro-
tects from severe acute lung failure. Nature. 2005;436(7047):112-116.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03712
15. Feng Y, Ling Y, Bai T, Xie Y, Huang J, Li J, Xiong W, Yang D, Chen R, Lu
F, Lu Y, Liu X, Chen Y, Li X, Li Y, Summah HD, Lin H, Yan J, Zhou M,
Lu H, Qu J. COVID-19 with Different Severities: A Multicenter Study of
Clinical Features. American Journal of Respiratory Critical Care Medicine.
2020;201(11):1380-1388.
https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202002-0445OC
16. Remuzzi A, Remuzzi G. COVID-19 and Italy: what next? Lancet.
2020;395(10231):1225-1228.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30627-9
17. Sparks MA, South A , Welling P, Luther JM, Cohen J, Byrd JB, Burrell LM,
Batlle D, Tomlinson L, Bhalla V, Rheault MN, Soler MJ, Swaminathan S,
Hiremath S. Sound Science before Quick Judgement Regarding RAS Block-
ade in COVID-19. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology:
CJASN. 2020;15(5):714-716.
https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.03530320
18. Zab olotskikh IB, Kirov MYu, Lebedinsky KM, Protsenko DN, Avdeev SN,
Andrenko AA, Arsent’ev LV, Afonchikov VS, Afukov II, Belkin AA, Boeva
EA, Bulanov AYu, Vasiliev YaI, Vlasenko AV, Gorbachev VI, Grigoriev EV,
Grigoriev EV, Gritsan AI, Eremenko AA, Ershov EN, Zamyatin MN, Iva-
nova GE, Kuzovlev AN, Kulikov AV, L akhin RE, Leiderman IN, Lenkin
AI, Mazurok VA, Musaeva TS, Nikolaenko EM, Orlov YuP, Petrikov SS,
Roitman EV, Ronenson AM, Smetkin AA, Sokolov AA, Stepanenko SM,
Subbotin VV, Ushakova ND, Khoronenko VE, Tsarenko SV, Shifman EM,
Shukevich DL, Shchegolev AV, Yaroshetskiy AI, Yarustovskiy MB. Anesthet-
ic and resuscitation services for patients with the new coronavirus infection
COVID-19. Methodical recommendations of the All-Russian public orga-
nization «Federation of anesthesiologists and resuscitators». Vestnik Inten-
sivnoj Terapii im. A.I. Saltanova. 2021;S1:9-143. (In Russ.).
https://doi.org/10.21320/1818-474X-2021-S1-9-143
19. Dans er AHJ, Ep stein M, Batlle D. Renin-Angiotensin System Blockers and
the COVID-19 Pandemic: at present there is no evidence to abandon re-
nin-angiotensin system blockers. Hypertension. 2020;75(6):1382-1385.
https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA .120.15082
20. Sarzani R. Relationship between COVID-19 and rennin-angiotens in-aldo-
sterone-system blockers: hasty speculations may be dangerous. British Med-
ical Journal. 2020;368:m810.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m810
41
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND REANIMATOLOGY, 1, 2022
Original articles
21. Zabolotskikh IB, Bautin AE, Zamyatin MN, Lebedinsky KM, Potievskaya
VI, Trembach NV. Perioperative management of patients with chronic heart
failure. Anesteziologiya i reanimatologiya. 2021;3:6-27. (In Russ.).
https://doi.org/10.17116/anaesthesiology20210316
22. Barbarash OL, Karetnikova VN, Kashtalap VV, Zvereva TN, Kochergi-
na AM. New coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and cardiovascular disease.
Kompleksnye problemy serdechno-sosudistyh zabolevanij. 2020;9(2):17-28. (In
Russ.).
https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2020-9-2-17-28
23. Libby P, Simon DL. Inflammation and thrombosis: the clot thickens. Cir-
culation. 2001;103(13):1718-1720.
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.103.13.1718
24. Virani SS. Is There a Role For Statin Therapy in Acute Viral Infections? Ac-
cessed June 01, 2021.
https://www.acc.org/latest-incardiology/articles/2020/03/18/15/09/is-
there-a-role-for-statintherapy-in-acute-viral-infections-covid-19.
25. Kollias A, Kyriakoulis KG, Kyriakoulis IG, Nitsotolis T, Poulakou G, Ster-
giou GS, Syrigos K. Statin use and mortality in COVID-19 patients: Updat-
ed systematic review and meta-analysis. Atherosclerosis. 2021;330:114-121.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2021.06.911
26. Gareeva DF, Musin TI, Pavlov VN, Davtyan PA, Ishmetov VSh, Plotnikova
MR, Pavlov AV, Benzhi C, Stricker P, Carvalho K, Zagidullin NSh. Statins:
unexpected help in COVID-19. Arterial’naya gipertenziya. 2020;26(5):509-
517. (In Russ.).
https://doi.org/10.18705/1607-419X-2020-26-5-509-517
27. Royal College of Physicians. National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2 2020.
Accessed June 01, 2021.
https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/projects/outputs/national-early-warning-
score-news-2 Accessed 2021-06-01
28. Noor FM, Islam MM. Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Mortality
among COVID-19 Patients: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Community Health.
2020;45(6):1270-1282.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s109 00-020-00920-x
29. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, Xiang J, Wang Y, Song B, Gu X,
Guan L, Wei Y, Li H, Wu X, Xu J, Tu S, Zhang Y, Chen H, Cao B. Clini-
cal course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19
in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):
1054-1062.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3
Received 10.08.2021
Accepted 08.11.2021
Article
Dentists are always in quest of new methods for the treatment of periodontal diseases, and photodynamic therapy (PDT) is considered one of the most effective methods. A significant improvement in the clinical pic-ture was obtained in all patients throughout the control period of observation of the patients as a result of the treatment with the use of PDT. According to the data from research study it can be said that photodynamic therapy is an effective and gentle method of antibacterial treatment of inflammatory periodontal diseases, which can be effectively used to prevent exacerbations of chronic inflammatory periodontal diseases, to achieve a long-term positive effect and to refuse, in some cases, from surgical methods of treatment. There is a signifi-cant increase in the duration of remission of the disease, improvement of microcirculatory blood circulation in per-iodontal tissues and a small microbial contamination of periodontal pockets of patients treated with photodynam-ic therapy in the long term compared with groups of patients treated with only antiseptic and antibacterial drugs.
Article
Full-text available
The article provides the main statements of the guidelines for the anesthesia and intensive care of patients with the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), developed by the Federation of Anesthesiologists and Reanimatologists of Russia. In the process of developing the recommendations, the publications of the official websites of the Russian Federation, the electronic databases of the RSCI, PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were analyzed by the developers independently of each other. The date of the last search query was February 01, 2021. To develop the recommendations for the Guidelines, were used documents directly describing the features of the management of patients with NCI COVID-19 (guidelines - 34; randomized clinical trials and Cochrane Reviews - 13; observational and comparative studies - 107; other documents, notes and comments - 64), and documents describing anesthesia and intensive care in the general population of patients. Compared to the previous 4th version of the guidelines, the recommendations in 8 sections have been corrected; new subsections “Chronic kidney disease”, “Rehabilitation treatment of patients with COVID-19 in the intensive care unit”, “Routing of patients with COVID-19 to the stages of rehabilitation” were created; revised 1 Appendix, additionally developed 7 Appendices; the section “Quality criteria” has been supplemented. The provisions of the current version of the guidelines highlight the specifics of anesthesia, intensive care, rehabilitation, resuscitation measures, manipulation, transportation, prevention of the spread of COVID-19 in the implementation of these activities. Methods of protecting personnel from infection with COVID-19 during manipulations, anesthesia and intensive care are considered. The features of respiratory support, extracorporeal detoxification, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, thromboprophylaxis, drug interactions are described. The features of management of pregnant women, children of different age groups, patients with concomitant diseases, the principles of the formation of stocks of drugs and consumables are considered.
Article
Full-text available
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a huge impact on the health of millions of people around the world on an unprecedented scale. Unfortunately, the process of creating effective antiviral drugs and vaccines is being delayed. Therefore, drugs that are already available and may have an effect on COVID-19 are being investigated. Due to the fact that viral infection often affects the cardiovascular system, causing myocardial infarction, viral myocarditis, tachyarrhythmias and stress cardiomyopathies, a theory was put forward that HMG-CoA reductase (3-hydroxy-3methyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase) inhibitors (statins) can reduce the risk of cardiovascular complications in these patients. In recent years, this class of drugs has been proposed, including for viral infections, such as the influenza virus or MERS-CoV. The review discusses both the latest clinical data on the efficacy of statins in COVID-19 and the pleotropic mechanisms of statins that can limit the pathogenic effect of viruses. In particular, statins can act on lipid cell rafts (subdomains of the plasma membrane), decreasing their lipid concentration; limiting the interaction of the virus with the receptors of angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 and CD-147. Statins have an antiinflammatory effect (blocking the molecular mechanisms of inflammation, including NF-κB and NLRP3), limit the development of a “cytokine storm” in severe patients with COVID-19; can inhibit SARS-CoV-2 basic protease; influence coagulation, limit sympathetic activity and have other effects. In two large cohort observational studies (n = 96032 and n = 13981), hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who were taking statins showed a decrease in hospital mortality and mortality 28 days after the admission to the hospital. Thus, statins can play a role in the treatment of COVID-19. Keywords statins, pleotropic effects, COVID-19, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, CD 147, mortality, lipid rafts, inflammation
Article
Full-text available
Objectives: The main aim of this study was to find the prevalence of mortality among hospitalized COVID-19 infected patients and associated risk factors for death. Methods: Three electronic databases including PubMed, Science Direct and Google Scholar were searched to identify relevant cohort studies of COVID-19 disease from January 1, 2020, to August 11, 2020. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled prevalence rate (PR), risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for both effect measures. Cochrane chi-square test statistic Q, [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] tests were used to measure the presence of heterogeneity. Publication bias and sensitivity of the included studies were also tested. Results: In this meta-analysis, a total of 58 studies with 122,191 patients were analyzed. The pooled prevalence rate of mortality among the hospitalized COVID-19 patients was 18.88%, 95% CI (16.46-21.30), p < 0.001. Highest mortality was found in Europe [PR 26.85%, 95% CI (19.41-34.29), p < 0.001] followed by North America [PR 21.47%, 95% CI (16.27-26.68), p < 0.001] and Asia [PR 14.83%, 95% CI (12.46- 17.21), p < 0.001]. An significant association were found between mortality among COVID-19 infected patients and older age (> 65 years vs. < 65 years) [RR 3.59, 95% CI (1.87-6.90), p < 0.001], gender (male vs. female) [RR 1.63, 95% CI (1.43-1.87), p < 0.001], ICU admitted patients [RR 3.72, 95% CI (2.70-5.13), p < 0.001], obesity [RR 2.18, 95% CI (1.10-4.34), p < 0.05], hypertension [RR 2.08,95% CI (1.79-2.43) p < 0.001], diabetes [RR 1.87, 95% CI (1.23-2.84), p < 0.001], cardiovascular disease [RR 2.51, 95% CI (1.20-5.26), p < 0.05], and cancer [RR 2.31, 95% CI (1.80-2.97), p < 0.001]. In addition, significant association for high risk of mortality were also found for cerebrovascular disease, COPD, coronary heart disease, chronic renal disease, chronic liver disease, chronic lung disease and chronic kidney disease. Conclusion: This meta-analysis revealed that the mortality rate among COVID-19 patients was highest in the European region and older age, gender, ICU patients, patients with comorbidity had a high risk for case fatality. Those findings would help the health care providers to reduce the mortality rate and combat this pandemic to save lives using limited resources.
Article
Full-text available
The management of these patients requires healthcare professionals to have specific knowledge on the characteristics of the viral infection, its clinical signs and symptoms combined with cardiovascular diseases, as well as individual and collective prevention measures. The safety of healthcare professionals and favorable prognosis of patients are of the top priority for the modern healthcare system. The review discusses current challenges associated with the novel coronavirus disease COVID-19 and cardiovascular diseases. The results of few clinical trials and individual case reports have shown the presence of certain problems in treating patients with comorbidity and viral infection. The new data on the drug interactions are reported. Common patterns of typical cardiovascular diseases and COVID-19 are presented. The risk groups with the need for timely diagnosis and intensive cardiac care are identified to prevent adverse outcomes in patients with this comorbidity.
Article
Full-text available
The COVID-19 outbreak that started in December 2019 in China has spread over all countries of the world within few months acquiring a pandemic nature, the incident population counting millions. The pathogenic mechanisms of the new coronaviral infection caused by never-before-seen virus SARS-CoV2 are yet to be studied. Drugs of different groups are used for COVID-19 treatment and guidelines are continuously revised as the new experience is accumulated. In the current pandemic situation, it is important to provide specialists with latest information concerning efficacy and safety drugs for COVID-19 patients and promising research in this field. The purpose of the review is to analyze critically the published outcomes of COVID-19 treatment using different groups of drugs for selection the most promising candidate drugs. The search has been carried out through such databases as PubMed, Scopus, Cyberleninka, Clinical Trials, Cochrane Library, etc. Randomized clinical trials and papers mostly published in 2020 and dedicated to candidate drugs have been considered. The review is structured on the base of the drug’s action mechanism and contains parts dedicated to antiviral, immunomodulatory, and antibacterial therapies. Looking for a new promising target in COVID-19 treatment, the authors focus their attention on matrix metalloproteinases (MMP), which abundance results in the destruction of extracellular matrix, epithelial and endothelial basal membranes and leads to secondary lung tissue injury. The paper gives a theoretic justification of MMP inhibitor use by an example of doxycycline and offers an efficacy study protocol for the new approach to COVID-19 therapy. Conclusion : as of now, there are no drugs, which efficacy for COVID-19 has been for sure proven. Drug with different mechanisms of action are commonly employed in combination due to various specified indications. Because of summation of drug effects, the adverse complications can hardly be avoided. Therapeutic efficacy of the drugs should become clear only when clinical trials are finished, analysis is performed and findings with recommendations for most COVID-19 patients are issued.
Article
Full-text available
Цель Анализ клинико-демографических показателей у пациентов с SARS-CoV-2 пневмонией, госпитализированных в отделения реанимации и интенсивной терапии (ОРИТ) для респираторной поддержки в стационарах Российской Федерации (РФ). Материалы и методы В ретроспективное исследование, которое проводилось в Федеральном дистанционном консультативном центре анестезиологии и реаниматологии для взрослых, созданном по приказу Минздрава РФ на базе Первого МГМУ им. И.М. Сеченова, включали всех пациентов, проконсультированных до 30 апреля 2020 г. Диагноз COVID-19 устанавливали на основании выделения РНК вируса или наличия признаков респираторной инфекции, осложнившейся острой дыхательной недостаточностью, в сочетании с характерными данными компьютерной томографии органов грудной клетки. Анализ сопутствующих заболеваний проводили на основании заявок на консультацию, поступивших из лечебных учреждений. Результаты В исследование были включены 1007 пациентов с острым респираторным дистресс синдромом (ОРДС), вызванным SARS-CoV-2, в том числе 572 мужчины и 435 женщин в среднем возрасте 60,7±13,7 лет. Большин ство больных (92,5%) были возрасте старше 40 лет. 625 (62,1%) пациентов находились на лечении в стационарах Москвы и Московской области и 382 (37,9%) – в лечебных учреждениях 58 регионов РФ. У 780 (77,5%) больных проводилась инвазивная вентиляция легких (ИВЛ). У 619 (61,4%) пациентов с ОРДС имелись сердечно-сосудистые заболевания, среди которых чаще всего встречались артериальная гипертония (56,3%) и ИБС (16,3%), реже – инсульт (7,1%) и фибрилляция предсердий (9,3%). У 263 (26,1%) пациентов было выявлено ожирение, у 252 (25,0%) – сахарный диабет 2 типа. Частота сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний и сахарного диабета была выше у женщин и увеличивалась с возрастом. У 280 (27,8%) пациентов отсутствовали сердечно-сосудистые заболевания, сахарный диабет или ожирение. Частота бронхиальной астмы (2,3%), ХОБЛ (5,0%), солидных опухолей (3,5%), гемобластозов (0,7%), ревматических аутоиммунных заболеваний (1,2%) и ВИЧ-инфекции (0,4%) в исследованной когорте была низкой. Заключение ОРДС при SARS-CoV-2 инфекции чаще развивается у лиц старше 40 лет при наличии сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний, сахарного диабета 2 типа и/или ожирения, хотя частота артериальной гипертонии и ожирения (в отличие от сахарного диабета) в исследованной когорте не превышала таковую в общей популяции.
Article
Background and aims Statin therapy is administered to patients with high cardiovascular risk. These patients are also at risk for severe course of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Statins exhibit not only cardioprotective but also immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects. This study performed a systematic review of published evidence regarding statin treatment and COVID-19 related mortality. Methods A systematic PubMed/Embase search was performed from February 10, 2020 until March 05, 2021 for studies in COVID-19 patients that reported adjusted hazard or odds ratio for death in statin users versus non-users. Results 22 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. Meta-analysis of 10 studies (n = 41,807, weighted age 56 ± 8 years, men 51%, hypertension 34%, diabetes 21%, statin users 14%) that reported adjusted hazard ratios for mortality in statin users versus non-users showed pooled estimate at 0.65 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.53, 0.81). Meta-analysis of 6 studies that reported continuation of statin therapy during hospitalization (58–100% of patients) revealed a pooled hazard ratio of 0.54 (95% CI 0.47, 0.62). Meta-analysis of 12 studies (n = 72,881, weighted age 65 ± 2 years, men 54%, hypertension 66%, diabetes 43%, statin users 30%) that reported adjusted odds ratios for mortality showed pooled estimate at 0.65 (95% CI 0.55, 0.78). Multivariable meta-regression analysis did not reveal any significant association of hazard or odds ratios with anthropometric characteristics or comorbidities. Conclusions This meta-analysis of retrospective observational studies showed that statin therapy was associated with an about 35% decrease in the adjusted risk of mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
Article
Background Currently, the data regarding the effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab as treatment for COVID-19 infection is still conflicting. This study aims to give clear evidence regarding the potential benefit and safety of tocilizumab in improving the outcome of COVID-19 patients. Methods We systematically searched the PubMed and Europe PMC database using specific keywords related to our aims until November 1st, 2020. All articles published on COVID-19 and tocilizumab were retrieved. Statistical analysis was done using Review Manager 5.4 software. Results A total of 38 studies with a total of 13 412 COVID-19 patients were included in our analysis. Our meta-analysis showed that tocilizumab treatment is associated with reduction of mortality rate from COVID-19 [OR 0.54 (95% CI 0.42–0.71), p<0.00001, I 2=79%, random-effect modelling], but did not alter the severity of COVID-19 [OR 1.05 (95% CI 0.92–1.20), p=0.47, I 2=84%, random-effect modelling] and length of hospital stay [Mean Difference 1.77 days (95% CI −0.61–4.14 days), p=0.15, I 2=97%, random-effect modelling]. Tocilizumab also does not associated with serious adverse events compared with standard of care treatment [OR 0.91 (95% CI 0.71–1.15), p=0.42, I 2=46%, random-effect modelling]. Conclusion Our study does not support the routine use of tocilizumab for COVID-19 patients. Future studies should focus more on other potential therapies for COVID-19 patients.
Article
Aims: To compare demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, and outcomes of patients with and without concomitant cardiac disease, hospitalized for COVID-19 in Brescia, Lombardy, Italy. Methods and results: The study population includes 99 consecutive patients with COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to our hospital between 4 March and 25 March 2020. Fifty-three patients with a history of cardiac disease were compared with 46 without cardiac disease. Among cardiac patients, 40% had a history of heart failure, 36% had atrial fibrillation, and 30% had coronary artery disease. Mean age was 67 ± 12 years, and 80 (81%) patients were males. No differences were found between cardiac and non-cardiac patients except for higher values of serum creatinine, N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide, and high sensitivity troponin T in cardiac patients. During hospitalization, 26% patients died, 15% developed thrombo-embolic events, 19% had acute respiratory distress syndrome, and 6% had septic shock. Mortality was higher in patients with cardiac disease compared with the others (36% vs. 15%, log-rank P = 0.019; relative risk 2.35; 95% confidence interval 1.08-5.09). The rate of thrombo-embolic events and septic shock during the hospitalization was also higher in cardiac patients (23% vs. 6% and 11% vs. 0%, respectively). Conclusions: Hospitalized patients with concomitant cardiac disease and COVID-19 have an extremely poor prognosis compared with subjects without a history of cardiac disease, with higher mortality, thrombo-embolic events, and septic shock rates.