Content uploaded by Michael Johnson
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Michael Johnson on Mar 29, 2023
Content may be subject to copyright.
Sexual development and reproductive seasonality of
hogfish (Labridae: Lachnolaimus maximus),
an hermaphroditic reef fish
R. S. MCBRIDE*AND M. R. JOHNSON†
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, 100 8th Avenue SE,
St Petersburg, FL 33701-5095, U.S.A.
(Received 11 August 2006, Accepted 15 May 2007)
The seasonality, size, age, colour phases and sexual dimorphism of 13 reproductive classes of
hogfish Lachnolaimus maximus are described. Analysis of histological sections of gonads (n¼
1662) confirmed earlier conclusions that L. maximus is a monandric, protogynous hermaphro-
dite. Sex change was initiated at the end of the spawning season and over a broad range of sizes
and ages. It occurred after a functional female phase (postmaturation) and proceeded more
slowly (months) than previously believed. Eventually all individuals changed sex to a terminal
male phase. Females were batch spawners, spawning as often as every day during winter and
spring. There was no evidence of precocious sperm crypts in active females, sperm competition
or other alternative male sexual strategies. Mating has been reported elsewhere to be haremic.
The sexual development of L. maximus appears to be adaptive in terms of Ghiselin’s size-
advantage model, which links monandric protogyny and polygyny. The slow rate of sex change,
however, poses problems when fishing pressure is high because harvest of a single male has the
potential to reduce the reproductive output of an entire harem. #2007 The Authors
Journal compilation #2007 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles
Key words: dichromatism; dimorphism; monandry; postmaturation; protogynous; sexuality.
INTRODUCTION
Hermaphroditism is widespread and takes on many forms among teleosts, having
been reported for >350 species in 34 families in eight orders (Kuwamura &
Nakashima, 1998). The most common type is protogyny, when at least some in-
dividuals in a population change sex sequentially from female to male. Rarer
types are protandry (male to female), simultaneous hermaphroditism and
two-way sex change. Among protogynous hermaphrodites, there are two par-
allel patterns of sexual development: monandry, when all males present in a
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed at present address: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), Northeast Fisheries Science Center, 166 Water Street, Woods Hole, MA 02543-1026,
U.S.A. Tel.: þ1 508 495 2244; fax: þ1 508 495 2258; email: richard.mcbride@noaa.gov
†Present address: NMFS, Northeast Regional Office, 1 Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930,
U.S.A.
Journal of Fish Biology (2007) 71, 1270–1292
doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01580.x, available online at http://www.blackwell-synergy.com
1270
#2007 The Authors
Journal compilation #2007 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles
population have changed sex (i.e. secondary males) and diandry, when gon-
ochoristic males (i.e. primary males) are present with secondary males. Sex
change can proceed along two serial pathways relative to maturation: prematu-
ration, when an individual initiates female development but changes sex prior
to maturing as a female (i.e. functional analog to primary males) and postmatu-
ration, when an individual matures first as a female and changes sex later.
Finally, adults of many hermaphroditic species are dichromatic, dimorphic or
both (Robertson & Warner, 1978; Warner & Robertson, 1978).
Much of the comparative research of hermaphroditic species has concerned
wrasses (Labridae) worldwide (Yamamoto, 1969; Reinboth, 1970, 1975; Dipper
& Pullin, 1979; Charnov, 1982; Hoffman, 1983; Warner, 1984; Warner &
Lejeune, 1985; Moyer, 1991). This should not be surprising because Labridae
is a large family, with nearly 600 species distributed in tropical and temperate
waters (Gomon, 1997; Parenti & Randall, 2000). In a single study, Warner &
Robertson (1978) compared the sexual patterns of nine western North Atlantic
wrasses, and further comparative work has been published since (Robertson,
1981). Conspicuously absent from this body of work are comparative data
for hogfish Lachnolaimus maximus (Walbaum), the largest and most economi-
cally valuable wrasse in the western North Atlantic Ocean (McBride &
Murphy, 2003). In Florida, L. maximus are most commonly associated with
reef edges, but uncommon among reef-fish fauna in general (Starck, 1968;
Smith, 1976). Several hundred specimens were collected over several years
and with a variety of sampling gears; an otolith method was used to age
these fish, and a histological method was used to determine their sex and
spawning condition. In the present study, the monandric, protogynous nature
of L. maximus (Davis, 1976; Claro et al., 1989) is investigated, as is the juvenile
period, postmaturative sex change, rate of sex change, lack of sperm competi-
tion, the eventual change of all individuals into secondary males, and the
appearance of dichromatic characters and dimorphism.
These data are also ‘confronted’ with Moe’s life-history model for a monan-
dric, protogynous hermaphrodite. Moe (1969) first developed this model for
Epinephelus morio (Valenciennes) (Serranidae), when he defined 10 classes to
integrate both sexual development (a linear process of first maturation, transfor-
mation and a second maturation) and reproductive seasonality (a cyclic process:
first as a female, then as a male). Moe’s (1969) paper is commonly cited, but few
papers rigorously test Moe’s life-history model with data from new species.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Specimens of L. maximus were collected from November 1995 to April 2001 in two
geographic regions along Florida’s coast: the eastern Gulf of Mexico (within the
boundaries of 255°to 300°N; 815°to 845°W) and south Florida (within 240°to
255°N; 805°to 835°W). Specimens were collected from both regions during
all months of the year. The majority of fish were collected by spear, from fishery-
dependent sources in both regions, and fishery-independent collections in south Florida.
Other notable sources included a commercial trap fishery in 20–30 m depths, offshore
of the Suwannee River, two fishery-independent, otter-trawl surveys in the eastern Gulf
of Mexico and a fishery-independent otter-trawl survey in south Florida; a few miscel-
laneous samples (hook & line or unknown gear) were recorded as well.
HOGFISH SEX CHANGE AND REPRODUCTION 1271
#2007 The Authors
Journal compilation #2007 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles, Journal of Fish Biology 2007, 71, 1270–1292
10958649, 2007, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01580.x by Noaa Department Of Commerce, Wiley Online Library on [29/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
These diverse sampling methods collected the complete, known size and age spectra.
Fish <305 mm fork length (L
F
)(c. age 3 years) are smaller than the minimum size
regulation, but were collected by fishery-independent methods. Fish as large as previous
reports of maximum size (11 kg; Randall & Warmke, 1967), and fish older than reports
of maximum age (age 11 years; Claro et al., 1989), were made available from the fish-
ery. In this study, L
F
was measured to the nearest mm, and whole body mass (M
B
) and
gonad mass (M
G
) were measured to the nearest 10 and 01 g, respectively. The gonado-
somatic index (I
G
) was calculated as I
G
¼100M
G
(M
B
M
G
)
1
. Fish ages were deter-
mined by a validated otolith method (McBride & Richardson, 2007).
The sexual development of 1662 fish (1191 of which were aged) was determined from
histological preparations of gonad tissue. Fish were kept on ice in the field, and they
were processed in the laboratory within hours of collection. A small piece of tissue
was excised and fixed in 10% buffered formalin. Rinsed and dehydrated in ethanol,
tissue samples were embedded in glycol methacrylate, sectioned along the transverse
plane and stained in periodic acid Schiff’s haematoxylin and counterstained with meta-
nil yellow (Quintero-Hunter et al., 1991). Anterior, middle and posterior tissue sections
from 14 L. maximus (including female, transitional and male classes) were examined for
germ cell development, appearance of the tunica albuginea and the formation of atretic
bodies. No effect of sub-sample location was evident, so a single sample from the
middle of the gonad was used for characterizing an individual’s sex and development.
At least one whole section of tissue was scanned per fish by two independent readers
at 100–200 magnification.
The most advanced oocyte stage was noted, ordered in sequence, as perinucleolar,
cortical alveoli formation, vitellogenesis, germinal vesicle (¼nucleus) migration and
germinal vesicle breakdown. Perinucleolar oocytes represent an early stage of meiotic
development, namely the ascension to the diplotene part of prophase I. As an oocyte
develops, cortical alveoli emerge in the cytoplasm, which is recognized as a separate
stage (historically called the yolk vesicle stage; West, 1990). Vitellogenic oocytes, those
cells with yolk globules that accumulate vitellogenin, indicate a specific hormonal
response to spawning readiness (Wallace & Selman, 1978). The end of vitellogenesis
is marked by the diakinesis part of prophase I, which is followed by three steps of final
oocyte maturation: nucleus migration, oocyte hydration and nucleus breakdown.
Postovulatory follicles (POFs) and atretic germ cells were also noted. POFs appear
following release of the egg into the lumen. They were identified as POFs if they were
no more than partially collapsed, so the theca and granulosa layers were still evident,
which is postulated to indicate that these POFs were <24 h old; this assumption seemed
reasonable because the frequency of occurrence of such POFs was very similar to the
occurrence rate of hydrated oocytes (McBride et al., 2002; McBride & Thurman,
2003; unpubl. data). The presence of atretic oocytes was also noted to aid in the iden-
tification of postspawning females and transitional fish.
Stages of spermatogenesis were noted in the following order: spermatogonia, sperma-
tocytes, spermatids and spermatozoa. Later stages were typically observed, in varying
amounts in all of the different male classes. Therefore, males were classified by (1)
the dominant stage of spermatogenesis evident in spermatocysts and (2) by the amount
of spermatozoa in discontinuous lobules and in the tunica sinuses. The extent of infil-
tration of the seminiferous tissue, into the ovigerous lamellae and away from the tunica,
was also noted, which aided in identifying transitional, immature and other first-year
males.
Initially, L. maximus gonads were sorted into the 10 developmental classes (Table I)
defined by Moe (1969). These data were tested against Moe’s (1969) model for a monan-
dric, postmaturative, protogynous hermaphrodite (Fig. 1); ‘testing’ is used here to refer
to a process of ‘confronting’ the data with specific model predictions. This model pre-
dicts that: female maturation, sex change and male maturation occur in an orderly
sequence with respect to age; no primary males exist; spawning activity is synchronized
between mature females and mature males; sex change occurs after at least one spawn-
ing season as a female. Modifications to Moe’s (1969) model are tabulated in Table I
and described in the text for each class.
1272 R. S. MCBRIDE AND M. R. JOHNSON
#2007 The Authors
Journal compilation #2007 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles, Journal of Fish Biology 2007, 71, 1270–1292
10958649, 2007, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01580.x by Noaa Department Of Commerce, Wiley Online Library on [29/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
TABLE I. Tabulation of reproductive classes used in this study, including histological descriptions of each class’s gonad tissue as summarized
for Epinephelus morio by Moe (1969), and as modified for Lachnolaimus maximus. Changes in class names, differing from those used
specifically by Moe (1969), are in italics. All mature classes are identified here as active or inactive to identify them as ready to spawn at time of
capture (or within days) or not
Class Moe (1969) This study
1 Immature female ‘gonad shows no signs of prior
[vitellogenin] activity’
Moe (1969) included in class 1 those individuals with
cortical alveoli present in some oocytes, referring to
this as ‘limited’ vitellogenesis. Here, such individuals
were advanced into class 2, which conservatively
limits class 1 to virgin fish with no immediate prospect
of spawning
2 Mature recrudescing
(inactive) female
‘vitellogenesis absent but atretic bodies and
sometimes expanded tunica indicate prior
oocyte maturation and spawning’
Moe (1969) labelled this class a ‘mature resting female’;
here, the term ‘recrudescing’ was used to indicate that
while active spawning was not occurring, the gonad
was ‘busy’ preparing for a new spawning season.
This class included those fish with proliferating nests
of oogonia and previtellogenic oocytes (see above)
3 Mature (active) female ‘vitellogenesis present with [gonad]
developing towards spawning condition’
This class was not modified in relation to Moe (1969).
It included actively spawning fish as well:
females undergoing final oocyte maturation or with
postovulatory follicles <24h old
4 Mature postspawning
(inactive) female
‘degenerate [vitellogenic] oocytes present,
tunica expanded and loose and atretic
bodies forming’
Moe (1969) labelled this class as ‘spent female’, which
may be misleading because, although advanced oocytes
are degenerating, nests of proliferating oogonia can be
frequently observed. It was often difficult to distinguish
class 4 from class 2 because of post mortem atresia,
common in fishery-dependent collections; ‘suspicious’ fish
were classified as class 2
HOGFISH SEX CHANGE AND REPRODUCTION 1273
#2007 The Authors
Journal compilation #2007 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles, Journal of Fish Biology 2007, 71, 1270–1292
10958649, 2007, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01580.x by Noaa Department Of Commerce, Wiley Online Library on [29/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
TABLE I. Continued
Class Moe (1969) This study
5 Transitional female–male Similar to a class 4 fish ‘but crypts of
spermatogonia and spermatocytes
also present in the epithelium
at the periphery of the lamella’
This class was narrowly defined here as only exhibiting
a small number of seminiferous crypts along the tunica,
or spermatogenesis within only a small number of tunica
sinuses. Thus, class 5 is the earliest and most discrete
point of sex change
6 Immature male ‘similar to the transitional [class], but
spermatogenesis spread throughout
the lamellae, and oocyte nuclei are
pycnotic’
A fish was a class 6 once seminiferous crypts formed
a continuous strip along the tunica and for as long as
clusters of ovigerous tissue (more than just isolated
oocytes) were present in the lamellae
7*, 8*, 9* Maturing,
first-year male
Not recognized as separate classes by
Moe (1969) (Fig. 1)
These first-year males were observed as a regular, seasonal
progression between class 6 and 9 (Fig. 3) and thereby
warranted specific status as classes (Fig. 10). The
seminiferous tissue of classes 7*, 8* and 9* had the same
appearance as classes 7, 8 and 9, respectively, but isolated
oocytes were still present in the former classes
7 Mature, recrudescing
(inactive) male
Gonad ‘dominated by early stages
of spermatogenesis’
The present observations indicated that class 7*, and not
class 7, followed class 6 (see above and Fig. 10). The term
recrudescing was added to the label to indicate active
meiosis in this class
8 Mature, ripening (active) male Gonad ‘dominated by the later stages
of spermatogenesis’
This class was not modified in relation to Moe (1969)
9 Mature, ripe (active) male Gonad ‘fully developed and distended with
tailed sperm’
This class was not modified in relation to Moe (1969)
10 Mature, postspawning
(inactive) male
Gonad ‘dominated by stromal tissue
and rapidly developing crypts of
spermatogonia, tunica
somewhat extended and loose’
This class was not modified in relation to Moe (1969)
1274 R. S. MCBRIDE AND M. R. JOHNSON
#2007 The Authors
Journal compilation #2007 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles, Journal of Fish Biology 2007, 71, 1270–1292
10958649, 2007, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01580.x by Noaa Department Of Commerce, Wiley Online Library on [29/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
Sexual development was also examined based on external characteristics. Colin
(1982) stated that males, but not females, have dark reddish-brown markings about
the head (i.e. appearing as a mask) and along the base of the medial fins, and a pigment
patch posterior to the pectoral fin. Morphologically, males have a longer snout, and
some fin elements are more elongated than those of females. The following attributes
were recorded for a sub-set of 329 individuals: pigmentation along the forehead and
nape area, along the medial fins and on the body (i.e. as a dash behind the pectoral
fin). Upper jaw length, as defined in Hubbs & Lagler (1947), was also recorded. Meas-
urements of (elongated) dorsal fin spines and caudal fin rays were attempted but aban-
doned because these elements were frequently broken.
RESULTS
Histological sections of L. maximus gonads were initially classified into 10
reproductive classes consistent with Moe’s (1969) scheme (Table I and Fig. 1).
A female phase consisted of an immature class (1) and three mature classes
(2–4). A male phase was categorized into transitional and immature classes
(5–6) and four mature classes (7–10). All males had a vestigial lumen, along
with sperm sinuses in the tunica, which confirmed their secondary nature.
Many fish had ovo-testes. Those that still exhibited extensive fields of ovi-
gerous tissue adjacent to seminiferous tissue were assigned to class 5 or 6. Those
that exhibited only isolated oocytes embedded within seminiferous tissue were
initially assigned as class 7, 8 or 9, depending on the extent of spermatogenesis
(and no class 10 fish had isolated oocytes). It was apparent, however, that the
seasonal occurrence of males with isolated oocytes was different than the sea-
sonal occurrence of males without isolated oocytes. Thus, individuals with iso-
lated oocytes were put into three new classes (7*, 8* and 9*), a departure from
Moe’s (1969) original scheme. Size and age within these new classes were not
1
2
4
5
8
9
10 7
First maturation
Sex change
Final
oocyte
maturation
Recrudesence
Recrudesence
Regression
Regression
3
6
Spawning
period
Spawning period
Non-spawning period
Non-spawning
period
Second maturation
FIG. 1. The sexual and reproductive development of a protogynous grouper (Serranidae: Epinephelus
morio) as proposed by Moe (1969). Reproductive classes 1–4 are female and classes 7–10 are male.
Classes 5 and 6 represent transitional and immature males. The classification of Lachnolaimus
maximus gonads was compared to this scheme (see Table I for class names, histological criteria for
each class and deviations used in this study).
HOGFISH SEX CHANGE AND REPRODUCTION 1275
#2007 The Authors
Journal compilation #2007 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles, Journal of Fish Biology 2007, 71, 1270–1292
10958649, 2007, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01580.x by Noaa Department Of Commerce, Wiley Online Library on [29/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
significantly different than class 6; in addition, class 7*, 8* and 9* followed
class 6 in an orderly seasonal progression. Thus, the hypothesis that males with
isolated oocytes occurred randomly, by month, size or age, is rejected. Instead,
it is postulated that classes 7*, 8* and 9* were still first-year males, identifiable
because oocyte degeneration occurs slowly.
The histology, seasonal appearance, fish size and age, and I
G
of each class
(1–10) and including the three new classes (7*, 8* and 9*) are described in
sequence and summarized in Tables I and II.
FEMALE CLASSES
Class 1 immature female
Histological sections of immature females displayed only perinucleolar oocytes,
a thin tunica and few, if any, atretic oocytes [Table I and Fig. 2(b)]. Class 1
females were most frequently collected during autumn (Fig. 3). They were the
smallest and youngest fish observed (Table II and Figs 4 and 5). Class 1 gonads
were small relative to other female classes: I
G
<04 throughout the year (Fig. 6).
TABLE II. Descriptive statistics for (a) fork length (L
F
) and (b) age for each reproductive
class of Lachnolaimus maximus. Classes 6, 7*, 8* and 9* are pooled (6þ) because neither
size nor age differed significantly among these classes. Letters signify size or age
groupings as identified by a Duncan’s multiple range test; different upper case letters
are in significantly different groups (P<005). Sample size (n) are different between
(a) and (b) because not all fish were aged
Class Group Mean 95% CL Median Range n
(a) L
F
(mm)
1 A 192 8 185 80–368 197
2 B 299 8 275 121–640 491
3 C 269 7 254 147–571 408
4 BC 287 24 288 136–541 53
5 D 381 33 345 280–694 41
6þD 369 19 341 213–692 92
7 E 417 23 392 150–737 88
8 E 416 17 380 245–820 174
9 D 380 20 358 230–765 79
10 D 389 37 352 265–720 39
(b) Age (years)
1A 0
902 1 0–9* 135
2B 3
402 3 0–12 359
3B 3
002 3 0–9 283
4B 3
007 2 0–11 41
5C 4
810 5 1–11 24
6þC4
606 4 1–13 72
7D 6
407 6 0–13 57
8D 6
306 6 2–21 118
9D 5
906 5 1–15 66
10 D 6411 6 2–15 36
*There was one age 9 years fish among class 1 fish; the next oldest class 1 fish was age 4 years.
1276 R. S. MCBRIDE AND M. R. JOHNSON
#2007 The Authors
Journal compilation #2007 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles, Journal of Fish Biology 2007, 71, 1270–1292
10958649, 2007, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01580.x by Noaa Department Of Commerce, Wiley Online Library on [29/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
Class 2 mature recrudescing (inactive) female
Perinucleolar oocytes dominated the lamellae, but cortical alveolar stages
arose and became common during recrudescence of the ovary [Table I and
Fig. 2(d)]. These females were either first-time spawners undergoing their first
maturation [indicated by no atresia; Fig. 2(d)] or they were already mature,
HOGFISH SEX CHANGE AND REPRODUCTION 1277
#2007 The Authors
Journal compilation #2007 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles, Journal of Fish Biology 2007, 71, 1270–1292
10958649, 2007, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01580.x by Noaa Department Of Commerce, Wiley Online Library on [29/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
repeat spawners [indicated by the presence of atretic cells; Fig. 2(j)]. Although
considered mature, they exhibited only previtellogenic oocytes and were not
considered capable of spawning at time of capture. Class 2 females, like class
1 females, were more frequent in autumn (Fig. 3). Class 2 females were sig-
nificantly larger and older than class 1 females (Table II and Figs 4 and 5).
Class 2 gonads were larger than class 1 gonads; I
G
c.0
4–06 throughout the
year (Fig. 6).
Class 3 mature active female
These ready to spawn, often actively spawning, females were identified by the
presence of vitellogenic oocytes [Table I and Fig. 2(e)–(h)]. The cyclic fre-
quency of class 3 females indicated that spawning was concentrated during
winter and spring (December to May), peaking in April. There were some,
but relatively few, spawning individuals during summer and autumn (June to
November; Fig. 3). Class 3 females were significantly larger but not older than
class 2 fish (Table II and Figs 4 and 5). Class 3 gonads were much larger than
gonads of all other classes: mean 95% CL I
G
3102(n¼350) during
December to May (Fig. 6).
Class 4 mature postspawning (inactive) female
Perinucleolar oocytes were dominant in this class. Key features to diagnose
this class were the additional presence of more advanced but degenerating
oocytes, and a high degree of vascularization by blood cells throughout the
ovigerous lamellae [Table I and Fig. 2(i)]. Class 4 females began to arise in
March, but most were observed in June (Fig. 3), which reconnects the seasonal
spawning cycle of females (i.e. class 2, 3, 4, then 2, 3, 4 and so on until the fish
change sex). Class 4 females were not larger or older than class 3 females, but
they were significantly smaller and younger than any male class (Table II
and Figs 4 and 5). Class 4 gonads were similar in size to class 2 gonads: I
G
c. 04–05 (Fig. 6).
FIG. 2. Whole female Lachnolaimus maximus and histological images of ovarian tissue for classes 1–4 (see
Table I). (a) Class 1 female (65 mm fork length, L
F
, age 0 years) collected in February, (b) class 1
female (207 mm L
F
, age 1 years, June), (c) class 2 female (263 mm L
F
, age 5 years, April), (d) class 2
female with signs of recrudescence (240 mm L
F
, no age, September), (e) class 3 female with oocytes in
an early phase of vitellogenesis (248 mm L
F
, age 2 years, January), (f) class 3 female with vitellogenic
oocytes (267 mm L
F
, age 2 years, April), (g) class 3 female with a hydrated oocyte (445 mm L
F
, age 7
years, April), (h) class 3 female with a postovulatory follicle adjacent to an oocyte with a migrating
nucleus (285 mm L
F
, age 3 years, March), (i) class 4 female with signs of regression (193 mm L
F
, age
1 years, April) and (j) class 2 female with evidence of prior spawning (239 mm L
F
, age 2 years, April).
The major stages of oocyte development are indicated by upper case letters: P, perinucleolar; C,
cortical alveolar (yolk vesicle); V, vitellogenic (yolk) and H, hydrated (H). Other features include A,
an atretic oocyte; ch, the chorion; cy, cytoplasm; bv, blood vessels; fo, follicle; lu, lumen; nu, nucleus;
pasþ, periodic acid-Schiff reaction-positive bodies; pof, postovulatory follicle; tu, tunica (¼gonad
wall); yo, yolk formation; yv, yolk vesicles. (b) The scale bar ¼100 mm; all histology images are
scaled to this bar.
1278 R. S. MCBRIDE AND M. R. JOHNSON
#2007 The Authors
Journal compilation #2007 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles, Journal of Fish Biology 2007, 71, 1270–1292
10958649, 2007, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01580.x by Noaa Department Of Commerce, Wiley Online Library on [29/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
0
10
20
30
40
0
10
20
30
40
50
0
10
20
30
40
50
Frequency
0
10
20
30
40
50
0
10
20
30
40
50
50
0
10
20
30
40
50
J FMAM J J A S ON D
Month
Class 1 (n = 197)
Class 2 (n = 491)
Class 3 (n = 408)
Class 4 (n = 53)
Class 5 (n = 41)
Class 6 (n = 51)
Class 7 (n = 88)
Class 7* (n = 11)
Class 8 (n = 174)
Class 8* (n = 23)
Class 9 (n = 79)
Class 9* (n = 7)
Class 10 (n = 39)
FIG. 3. Monthly frequency of occurrence of Lachnolaimus maximus reproductive classes. All classes,
including first-year males (5, 6, 7*, 8* and 9*) are depicted separately. n, number of fish per class.
HOGFISH SEX CHANGE AND REPRODUCTION 1279
#2007 The Authors
Journal compilation #2007 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles, Journal of Fish Biology 2007, 71, 1270–1292
10958649, 2007, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01580.x by Noaa Department Of Commerce, Wiley Online Library on [29/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
SEX CHANGE AND MALE CLASSES
Class 5 transitional female–male
Ovigerous lamellae were still dominated by perinucleolar oocyte stages in
this class. If cortical alveolar or vitellogenic oocyte stages were present, then
they were atretic. This class was defined narrowly as having isolated male germ
cells within tunica sinuses or within crypts along the edge of the tunica [Table I
and Fig. 7(b)]. Although the seminiferous tissue in a class 5 gonad was limited
in area, it typically contained all stages of male germ cells, from spermatogonia
to spermatozoa. The frequency of this class peaked in July and was observed
for only a short period (Fig. 3). Class 5 fish ranged in age from 1 to 11 years,
but most individuals in this class were larger and older than those in class 4
(Table II and Figs 4 and 5). The average I
G
for this class (c. 04) was only
slightly less than that of postspawning females, indicating that little change
in the gonad structure had occurred (Fig. 6).
Class 6 immature male
As sex change proceeded, seminiferous tissue infiltrated ovigerous tissue
medially from the periphery [Table I and Fig. 7(c)]. A fish was no longer con-
sidered class 5, and was instead categorized as class 6, once seminiferous tissue
extended more than halfway around the gonad wall. This class also occurred
for only a relatively short period, peaking in abundance in September (Fig. 3).
Sizes and ages of class 6 males were not significantly different than those
assigned as class 7*, 8* or 9* (ANOVA, L
F
: d.f. ¼3, 88, P>005; age:
d.f. ¼3, 68, P>005), so data for these classes were pooled together in
Table II and Figs 4 and 5. The average I
G
for class 6 males was 02 during
June to November, demonstrating a continued shrinking of the gonad after
class 5, as the gonad reorganizes from a functioning ovary to a testis (Fig. 6).
Classes 7* and 7 maturing (7*) or mature (7), recrudescing (inactive) male
The seminiferous tissue of both class 7* and 7 is dominated by the early
stages of spermatogenesis (spermatogonia and spermatocytes) (Table I).
Spermatozoa were conspicuously absent or rare. Class 7* males had isolated
perinucleolar oocytes throughout the gonad [Fig. 7(d)], whereas class 7 males
did not [Fig. 7(g)]. Class 7* males were most abundant during September to
October, whereas class 7 males were most common during the summer (Fig. 3).
The tunica sinuses were small, empty or collapsed. Class 7 males were distinc-
tively larger and older than fish in classes 6 or 7* (Table II and Figs 4 and 5).
The I
G
of class 7 males during June to November was among the lowest
measured for any class (005–006; Fig. 6); the average I
G
was 015 during
December to May, for those few class 7 males collected during this period.
Classes 8* and 8 maturing (8*) or mature (8), ripening (active) male
Crypts of spermatocytes, spermatids and spermatozoa were assembled in
a mosaic (Table I). Isolated perinucleolar oocytes were found in class 8*
[Fig. 7(e)] but not in class 8 males [Fig. 7(h)]. Class 8* males were present
briefly, mostly during October to December, whereas class 8 males were found
1280 R. S. MCBRIDE AND M. R. JOHNSON
#2007 The Authors
Journal compilation #2007 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles, Journal of Fish Biology 2007, 71, 1270–1292
10958649, 2007, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01580.x by Noaa Department Of Commerce, Wiley Online Library on [29/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
0
5
10 Class 1
0
5
10
15 Class 2
0
5
10
15 Class 3
0
5
10
15 Class 4
0
5
10
15 Class 5
0
5
10
15 Class 6+
0
5
10
15 Class 7
0
5
10
15 Class 8
0
5
10
15 Class 9
15
0
5
10
15
60 160 260 360 460 560 660 760 860
LF (mm)
Class 10
Frequency
FIG. 4. Fork length (L
F
) frequency of Lachnolaimus maximus reproductive classes. Classes 6, 7*, 8* and 9*
are pooled (6þ) because L
F
did not differ between these classes (see Table II for sample sizes).
HOGFISH SEX CHANGE AND REPRODUCTION 1281
#2007 The Authors
Journal compilation #2007 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles, Journal of Fish Biology 2007, 71, 1270–1292
10958649, 2007, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01580.x by Noaa Department Of Commerce, Wiley Online Library on [29/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
0
20
40 Class 1
0
20
40
60
Class 2
0
20
40
60
Class 3
0
20
40
60
Class 4
0
20
40
60 Class 5
0
20
40
60
Class 6+
0
20
40
60 Class 7
0
20
40
60
Class 8
0
20
40
60 Class 9
60
0
20
40
60
0246810121416182022
A
g
e (
y
ears)
Class 10
Frequency
FIG. 5. Age frequency of Lachnolaimus maximus reproductive classes. Classes 6, 7*, 8* and 9* are pooled
(6þ) because age did not differ between these classes (see Table II for sample sizes).
1282 R. S. MCBRIDE AND M. R. JOHNSON
#2007 The Authors
Journal compilation #2007 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles, Journal of Fish Biology 2007, 71, 1270–1292
10958649, 2007, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01580.x by Noaa Department Of Commerce, Wiley Online Library on [29/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
nearly year-round but were most abundant during winter and spring (Fig. 3).
Variable amounts of spermatozoa were present in tunica sinuses. Class 8 males
were not different in size and age than class 7 males (Table II and Figs 4 and 5).
The average I
G
increased 50–90% between June to November and December to
May (class 8*: from 008 to 012; class 8: from 012 to 022; Fig. 6).
Classes 9* and 9 maturing (9*) or mature (9), ripe (active) male
Spermiation was the defining feature of this class, with spermatozoa packed
into discontinuous lobules and greatly expanded tunica sinuses (Table I). Iso-
lated perinucleolar oocytes were still observable in class 9* [Fig. 7(f)] but not
in class 9 males [Fig. 7(i)]. Class 9* males were observed from November until
April; class 9 males were observed from November to June. Class 9 males were
significantly smaller than class 8 males, but they were not significantly different
in age (Table II and Figs 4 and 5). The average I
G
for class 9 males was the
highest for any male class and was very consistent (c. 023) between June to
November and December to May; the average I
G
during the December to May
was also relatively high for class 9* males (019; Fig. 6).
Class 10 mature, postspawning (inactive) male
This class exhibited either spermatozoa within collapsed lobules or a bimodal
mix of spermatogonia and spermatozoa [Table I and Fig. 7(j)]. The seasonal
frequency of class 10 overlaps, but falls between, that of class 9 and 7 (Fig. 3),
reconnecting the seasonal spawning cycle of males (i.e. classes 7, 8, 9, 10, and
then 7, 8, 9, 10 and so on). The amount of germ cells in the tunica sinuses was
variable. Class 10 males were not different in L
F
and age than class 9 males
(Table II and Figs 4 and 5). The average I
G
was relatively high for those
few class 10 males collected during December to May (020) but very low during
June to November (005; Fig. 6).
GONAD MORPHOLOGY
A vestigial lumen was evident in all transitional and male L. maximus (Fig. 7;
i.e. no primary male-type gonad tissue was observed). Relative gonad size (I
G
)
0·0
0·5
1·0
1·5
2·0
2·5
3·0
3·5
4·0
123456 789107*8*9*
Re
p
roductive class
IG
nd nd
FIG. 6. Mean 95% CL gonado-somatic indicies (I
G
) for each class of Lachnolaimus maximus during two
alternating periods: a central component of the spawning season ( , December to May) and the rest
of the year when spawning is infrequent ( , June to November). nd, no data (<5 females).
HOGFISH SEX CHANGE AND REPRODUCTION 1283
#2007 The Authors
Journal compilation #2007 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles, Journal of Fish Biology 2007, 71, 1270–1292
10958649, 2007, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01580.x by Noaa Department Of Commerce, Wiley Online Library on [29/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
FIG. 7. A whole male Lachnolaimus maximus and histological images of gonad tissue for classes 5–10 (see
Table I). (a) Class 10 male (326 mm fork length, L
F
, age 6 years) collected in April, (b) class 5 male with
isolated pockets of seminiferous tissue forming along the gonad wall (box; 302 mm L
F
, age 5 years,
July), (c) class 6 male with ovarian tissue (top) and seminiferous tissue (bottom), both extensive and
adjacent to each other (326 mm L
F
, no age, January), (d) class 7* male (345 mm L
F
, no age, October),
(e) class 8* male (290 mm L
F
, no age, October), (f) class 9* male (340 mm L
F
, age 7, November),
(g) class 7 male (517 mm L
F
, no age, July), (h) class 8 male (359 mm L
F
, no age, April), (i) class 9 male
(457 mm L
F
, age 6 years, May) and (j) class 10 male (300 mm L
F
, no age, June). Stages of spermatogenesis
are indicated: sg, spermatogonia; sc, spermatocytes; sz, spermatozoa. Other labels are the same as in
Fig. 2. Each scale bar ¼100 mm. *, ‘first-year’ male; note presence of isolated perinucleolar oocytes.
1284 R. S. MCBRIDE AND M. R. JOHNSON
#2007 The Authors
Journal compilation #2007 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles, Journal of Fish Biology 2007, 71, 1270–1292
10958649, 2007, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01580.x by Noaa Department Of Commerce, Wiley Online Library on [29/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
decreased from class 3 to 7*, as ovaries became restructured into functioning
testes (Fig. 6). Even though males grew to a much larger size than females,
whole ovaries were still much heavier (maximum ¼93 g) than whole ‘testes’
(maximum ¼14 g).
There was no indication of a sub-group of males with larger testes, which
would be indicative of sperm competition or an alternative male mating strat-
egy. Specifically, the frequency distribution of I
G
for classes 8 and 9 was not
significantly different than a log-normal distribution (Shapiro–Wilk test for
normality, n¼141, P>005); nor did male size correlate with I
G
of class 8
and 9 fish; r
2
¼01, n¼141, P>005.
DICHROMATISM AND DIMORPHISM
Three colour phases of L.maximus were observed. Juvenile phase colouration
appeared on immature females as a dense, mottled pattern of rusty brown,
although the exact colour or intensity could vary depending on the environ-
ment [Fig. 2(a)]. The initial phase colouration appeared on mature females as
a solid reddish orange [Fig. 2(c)]. The terminal phase colouration appeared
on mature males as whitish or pale pink [Fig. 7(a)].
There were additional dichromatic characters in mature fish. Mature females
had a light brown mask covering their snout; mature males had a dark brown
mask. Males also had a continuous strip of reddish-brown pigment along the
medial fins and a dash behind their pectoral fins (Fig. 8). Based on laboratory
observations of dead fish, many fish of classes 5, 6, 7*, 8* and 7 did not have
all the pigmentation characteristic of a terminal male.
The snout became longer relative to L
F
as L. maximus changed from female
to male (Fig. 9). This character was not completely diagnostic, because the
snouts of smaller (<300 mm L
F
) males, and some larger males as well, were
not typically longer than those of females.
DISCUSSION
Lachnolaimus maximus are protogynous hermaphrodites, which was evident
from earlier reports of males with degenerating oocytes (Davis, 1976; Claro
et al., 1989). In the present study, a clear linear progression of sex development
was evident, with major transitions in L
F
and age occurring between: immature
(class 1) and mature females (classes 2–4); females and the first year of
sex change (classes 5, 6, 7*, 8* and 9*); and first-year males and older males
(classes 7–10).
Lachnolaimus maximus are monandric, which was evident from earlier reports
of testes with a central lumen (Davis, 1976; Claro et al., 1989). No alternative
male types were observed in this study. The male I
G
measured (i.e. c. 02 during
the spawning season) was similar to that measured for male L. maximus in the
Florida Keys, Puerto Rico and Cuba (Davis, 1976; Colin, 1982; Claro et al.,
1989), demonstrating geographic consistency. Similarly low I
G
values are re-
ported for secondary males of other labrids (Warner & Robertson, 1978).
Habitat migration was associated with female maturation. Class 1 females
were principally composed of age 0 year fish that grew to a size by autumn that
HOGFISH SEX CHANGE AND REPRODUCTION 1285
#2007 The Authors
Journal compilation #2007 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles, Journal of Fish Biology 2007, 71, 1270–1292
10958649, 2007, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01580.x by Noaa Department Of Commerce, Wiley Online Library on [29/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
was effectively collected by the small trawls towed in shallow, inshore habitats
(McBride & Richardson, 2007). Class 2 females, particularly those ranging in
size from 250 to 299 mm L
F
, were developing juveniles of a size known to move
from inshore seagrass beds or patch reefs to deeper, more offshore reefs during
autumn (Davis, 1976); this migratory behaviour may make class 2 vulnerable
to capture during this time of year.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
123456 910787*8*9*
Re
p
roductive class
Frequency
FIG. 8. Percentage of Lachnolaimus maximus in 13 reproductive classes, with different pigment patterns
(, head mask; , caudal band; , pectoral’ dash; , dorsal band) that are hypothesized
to be characteristic of terminal phase colouration. Classes are presented in the order of sexual
development and reproductive seasonality. The number of fish examined (n) are: 55 (class 1), 62
(class 2), 68 (class 3), 13 (class 4), 1 (class 5), 10 (class 6), 4 (class 7*), 7 (class 8*), 3 (class 9*), 15
(class 7), 41 (class 8), 36 (class 9) and 14 (class 10).
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
LF (mm)
Upper jaw length (mm)
FIG. 9. Relationship between head morphology (upper jaw length) and fork length (L
F
) for different
sexual phases of Lachnolaimus maximus: immature females ( ; class 1), mature females ( ; classes
2–4), first-year males ( ; classes 5, 6, 7*, 8* and 9*) and mature males ( ; classes 7–10) (see Fig. 8
for sample sizes).
1286 R. S. MCBRIDE AND M. R. JOHNSON
#2007 The Authors
Journal compilation #2007 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles, Journal of Fish Biology 2007, 71, 1270–1292
10958649, 2007, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01580.x by Noaa Department Of Commerce, Wiley Online Library on [29/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
Spawning by female L. maximus is seasonal, prolonged and frequent. Batch
spawning was evident from the presence of postovulatory follicles in all months
except August and September. Oocytes in final maturation were commonly
found together with postovulatory follicles [in 210 of 408 class 3 females
(51%)], which indicated that spawning frequency may be quite high, even daily,
during the spawning period. Spawning by L. maximus was observed during
winter and spring in the Florida Keys (September to April; Davis, 1976), in Puerto
Rico (December to April; Colin, 1982) and south-western Cuba (November
to January; Claro et al., 1989). Protracted spawning periods are typical of
tropical wrasses (Gillanders, 1995). Daily spawning frequencies have been noted
for other fishes (Matsuyama et al., 1990), even other wrasses (Warner, 1998), but
such high spawning rates are not common for other large coral reef fish species
(Petersen & Warner, 2002).
Spawning by male L. maximus is also seasonal, prolonged and frequent. Class
8* males may have been capable of spawning, but female spawning activity was
low during October to December, whereas class 8 males were found nearly year-
round and were most abundant during winter and spring, when females were
spawning. At least some of the class 9* males appeared to transform into class
9 before regressing into class 10 (Fig. 10). This suggested that class 9* males
were capable of fertilizing eggs (as first-year males), although it is unknown if
they would have been as effective at fertilizing eggs as older, more experienced
males. Colin (1982) estimated that male L. maximus spawn daily and that they
successfully engage in as many as 50–100 spawning rushes in an afternoon.
Sex change by L. maximus is postmaturation. Sex change (¼class 5 and 6)
initiated principally among individuals 300–400 mm L
F
(or 3–5 years-old)
but was also observed in fish as large as 694 mm L
F
(and as old as 13 years).
Most males, including transitional fish and first-year males, were larger and
older than the modal size and age of mature females (c. 275 mm L
F
, age 2
years). Transitional fish (class 5) arose seasonally after peak seasonal occur-
rence of both class 3 and 4. Thus, sex change occurred after one or more
spawning (as a female) seasons. Postmaturation sex change is common among
wrasses (Warner & Robertson, 1978) and was noted by Claro et al. (1989) for
L. maximus in Cuba.
Sex change by L. maximus requires several months to complete. This was
demonstrated by the orderly progression from a mature, postspawning female,
class 4 (peaking in June), to class 5 (July), to class 6 (September), to class 7*
(September to October), to class 8* (November), to a mature and probably
active male, class 9* (November to December), and then possibly becoming
indistinguishable with class 9 (April) before regressing into an inactive male
class 10 (April). Rate of sex change may be related to social system. Rapid
replacement of harvested terminal males, usually by the largest females, is com-
mon in fishes with permanent social groups (Robertson, 1972; Shapiro, 1980;
Ross, 1990). In contrast, Davis (1976) noted that aggregations of L. maximus
are more common during the spawning season. The seasonal patterns of sex
change and social structure of L. maximus are likely to be similar to those of larger
sea basses, such as Mycteroperca microlepis (Goode & Bean), which initiate sex
change after the spawning season, when males and females separate into different
habitats until the following spawning season (McGovern et al., 1998).
HOGFISH SEX CHANGE AND REPRODUCTION 1287
#2007 The Authors
Journal compilation #2007 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles, Journal of Fish Biology 2007, 71, 1270–1292
10958649, 2007, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01580.x by Noaa Department Of Commerce, Wiley Online Library on [29/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
Lachnolaimus maximus conformed generally to Moe’s (1969) life-history
model (Fig. 1), but the data fit better when the model was expanded to include
three additional first-year male classes 7*, 8* and 9*, between class 6 and 9
(Fig. 10). This is the first study to specifically include such first-year classes,
even though Moe (1969) foresaw this possibility when he noted that ‘Early
and old males can be separated by the presence or absence of early oocytes
in the testicular tissue’. Moe (1969) believed that E. morio could spawn as
a female, change sex and spawn as a male all within a single season. He did
not document the rate of sex change for E. morio, however, so this remains
as an untested hypothesis for this serranid. In contrast, L. maximus began to
change sex at the end of the spawning season, and the process unfolded over
several weeks (from class 5 to 6) or months (from class 5 to 9* or 9). Such
a slow rate of sex change is not unusual for protogynous species (Sadovy &
Shapiro, 1987), and although there is probably some individual variability in
the rate of sex change, these findings do not agree with those of Claro et al.
(1989), who concluded that the rate of sex change by L. maximus was rapid
(days) and occurred primarily during the spawning season. Like Moe (1969),
Claro et al. (1989) did not present specific evidence to support their conclusion.
The present recognition of the special first-year male classes (7*, 8* and 9*)
aided in identifying the rate of sex change in L. maximus, and this approach
may be useful for doing so in other sequential hermaphrodites.
All females change sex if they live long enough. The largest individuals with
diagnostic histology were all males (645–820 mm L
F
;n¼27). The oldest
known male (class 8) was age 21 years (670 mm L
F
). The oldest and largest
known female (class 2) was age 12 years (640 mm L
F
). Altogether, such evi-
dence does not suggest that size- or age-dependent processes are completely
1
2
4
5
6
10
7
89
First maturation
Sex change
Final
oocyte
maturation
Second maturation
Recrudesence
Recrudesence
Regression
Regression
3
7*
8*
9*
Recrudesence
First-spawning as a male
(winter–spring)
(winter–spring)
(summer–autumn)
(summer–autumn)
FIG. 10. The sexual and reproductive development of Lachnolaimus maximus as observed in this study.
Reproductive classes 1–4 are female, classes 7–10 are male and classes 5–9* represent transitional,
immature and other first-year males (see Table I).
1288 R. S. MCBRIDE AND M. R. JOHNSON
#2007 The Authors
Journal compilation #2007 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles, Journal of Fish Biology 2007, 71, 1270–1292
10958649, 2007, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01580.x by Noaa Department Of Commerce, Wiley Online Library on [29/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
controlling L. maximus sex change. This is notable because sex change over
a wide size range is more related to group spawners (Petersen & Warner,
2002), whereas L. maximus is a harem spawner (Colin, 1982).
Male L. maximus have long been noted to have more conspicuous pigmenta-
tion than females (Longley & Hildebrand, 1941), but changes in pigmentation
associated with sex change have not been rigorously tested in terms of specific
gonad classes. Colin (1982) identified juvenile colouration as early as 13 days
post-hatch, at c. 7mmL
F
. This juvenile colouration persisted among the much
larger but still immature females observed in this study. Among mature fish,
pigment changes were rapid in association with sex change. Class 6, 7* and 8*
males had a mix of the initial (female) and terminal (male) colour phases (Davis,
1976; present data), which suggested that these first-year males may be difficult
to distinguish from mature females in the field, at least without careful inspec-
tion. This was true also for class 7 males. Otherwise, pigmentation should be
a simple and accurate way to distinguish female from male L. maximus.
The elongated snout of male L. maximus has also been long noted (Catesby,
1754; Breder & Rosen, 1966; Colin, 1982). As associated with sex change,
snout growth proceeded more slowly than changes in pigmentation. The dis-
tinctive snout morphology of males appears to take 1–2 years to develop fully;
this is reasonable considering that new bone growth will be required to achieve
this dimorphic character state. Claro et al. (1989) suggested that L. maximus’
sexual dimorphism diminishes by the time fish are 500–550 mm L
F
, but this
was not observed in the present study.
This detailed account of sexual development of L. maximus provides informa-
tion comparable with accounts available for other sympatric, co-familial species
(Warner & Robertson, 1978). Evolutionary mechanisms are often evident in
such comparisons because phylogenetic relationships of hermaphroditic genera
are congruent with sexuality and mating patterns (Streelman et al., 2002). The
widely varying patterns of sexual development and mating systems of wrasses
in the western North Atlantic were largely unified by Ghiselin’s size-advantage
hypothesis (Ghiselin, 1969; Warner, 1975; Warner & Robertson, 1978), and this
appears to be true for L. maximus as well. Davis (1976), Claro et al. (1989) and
the present study demonstrate that L. maximus is a monandric, protogynous
hermaphrodite. Observations of L. maximus spawning behaviour demonstrate
a polygynic mating system, although considerable variations in aggregate size
and sex ratio have been noted: Parker (2000) observed a single male courting
a single female in North Carolina; Davis (1976) observed that males occurred
alone more often than single females when densities were low, and at the other
extreme, he observed an aggregation of c. 100 L. maximus, including several
males, within a 30 m diameter area. Nonetheless, Davis (1976) and Colin (1982)
concluded that typically one male maintains a harem of up to 15 females.
Thus, according to Ghiselin’s (1969) size-advantage hypothesis, monandric pro-
togyny by L. maximus should be adaptive because a single terminal male can
monopolize a harem of several females (Warner, 1984).
These findings also have implications for the management of this fishery
species. Males are larger than females, and sex change arises mostly in the
range of 300–400 L
F
, which is at or only slightly larger than the minimum size
limit (305 mm L
F
) allowed by fishing regulations. Thus, in areas of high fishing
HOGFISH SEX CHANGE AND REPRODUCTION 1289
#2007 The Authors
Journal compilation #2007 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles, Journal of Fish Biology 2007, 71, 1270–1292
10958649, 2007, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01580.x by Noaa Department Of Commerce, Wiley Online Library on [29/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
mortality, there is the potential to repeatedly remove the single, terminal male
from a spawning group of several females (McBride & Murphy, 2003). If sex
changes initiated around the end of the spawning season take several months
to complete, then there are three probable outcomes when a male is removed
from a spawning harem: (1) a new, lone male invades the undefended territory
to re-establish the harem, (2) the females disperse and join a nearby harem or
(3) the females remain in the territory until one of them changes sex and re-
establishes the harem. There are examples of lone males persisting among other
harem-spawning fishes (Mun
˜oz & Warner, 2003). The existence of such ‘bach-
elor males’ or the rapid dispersal of females, however, is not documented for
L. maximus. Thus, reproduction by the entire harem may be interrupted when
a male is harvested or otherwise dies, seriously reducing reproductive output
(i.e. up to 15 remaining females stop spawning, at least temporarily). A further
option may be: a female within the harem changes sex and spawning resumes
the following year. If this female is the largest (and most fecund) female, then
the reproductive output of the harem may actually decline as a function of the
size-fecundity relationship of the remaining females; if this new male is har-
vested again and again, then this would serve as a mechanism to serially reduce
reproductive output of a harem. Future behavioural research of L. maximus’s
spawning harems, particularly in response to instances where a terminal male
is removed, is necessary to examine this process and its application for manage-
ment of this valuable, but vulnerable, fishery species.
Samples were obtained with the assistance of L. Bullock, J. Colvocoresses, D. DeMaria,
K. DeMaria, T. Dunmire, J. Hunt, M. Larkin, D. Merryman, D. Murie, D. Snodgrass,
P. Steele and J. Styer. P. Nagle, C. Plybon, F. Stengard and P. Thurman assisted in the
laboratory. R. Ruiz-Carus assisted in translation of Cuban hogfish research. A. Collins
and J. Colvocoresses provided helpful comments to improve the manuscript. Funding
for sampling and life-history research was provided by Marine Fisheries Initiative
[MARFIN, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)] Grant No.
NA87FF0422. Collections were also made as part of sampling funded by Florida
Saltwater Fishing License sales, as well as by award NA36FI0125 from NOAA to the
Florida Department of Natural Resources. Administration of this latter award and its
study products was subsequently transferred to the Florida Department of Environment
Protection and then to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. The
statements, findings, conclusions and recommendations are those of the authors and
do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Commerce or NOAA or any
of its subagencies. We are grateful for everyone’s help in this study.
References
Breder, C. M. Jr & Rosen, D. E. (1966). Modes of Reproduction in Fishes. Garden City,
NY: The Natural History Press.
Catesby, M. (1754). The Natural History of Carolina, Florida and the Bahama Islands:
Containing the Figures of Birds, Beasts, Fishes, Serpents, Insects, and Plants, Vol. II.
London: C. Marsh.
Charnov, E. L. (1982). The Theory of Sex Allocation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Claro, R., Garcia-Cagide, A. & Fern ´
andez de Alaiza, R. (1989). Caracteristicas bio-
lo
´gicas del pez perro, Lachnolaimus maximus (Walbaum), en el golfo de Batabano
´,
Cuba. Revista Investigaciones Marinas 10, 239–252.
Colin, P. L. (1982). Spawning and larval development of the hogfish, Lachnolaimus
maximus (Pisces: Labridae). Fishery Bulletin U.S.80, 853–862.
1290 R. S. MCBRIDE AND M. R. JOHNSON
#2007 The Authors
Journal compilation #2007 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles, Journal of Fish Biology 2007, 71, 1270–1292
10958649, 2007, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01580.x by Noaa Department Of Commerce, Wiley Online Library on [29/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
Davis, J. C. (1976). Biology of the hogfish, Lachnolaimus maximus (Walbaum), in the
Florida Keys. MSc Thesis, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL.
Dipper, F. A. & Pullin, R. S. V. (1979). Gonochorism and sex-inversion in British
Labridae (Pisces). Journal of Zoology, London 187, 97–112.
Ghiselin, M. T. (1969). The evolution of hermaphroditism among animals. The Quarterly
Review of Biology 44, 189–208.
Gillanders, B. M. (1995). Reproductive biology of the protogynous hermaphrodite
Achoerodus viridis (Labridae) from south-eastern Australia. Marine and Freshwater
Research 46, 999–1008.
Gomon, M. F. (1997). Relationships of fishes of the labrid tribe Hypsigenyini. Bulletin of
Marine Science 60, 789–871.
Hoffman, S. G. (1983). Sex-related foraging behavior in sequentially hermaphroditic
hogfishes (Bodianus spp.). Ecology 64, 798–808.
Hubbs, C. L. & Lagler, K. F. (1947). Fishes of the Great Lakes Region. Bloomfield Hills,
MI: Cranbrook Institute of Science.
Kuwamura, T. & Nakashima, Y. (1998). New aspects of sex change among reef fishes:
recent studies in Japan. Environmental Biology of Fishes 52, 125–135.
Longley, W. H. & Hildebrand, S. F. (1941). Systematic catalogue of the fishes of
Tortugas, Florida, with observations on color, habits and local distribution. Papers
from Tortugas Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington (Publication 535)34,
187–205.
Matsuyama, M., Adachi, S., Nagahama, Y., Maruyama, K. & Matsura, S. (1990). Diurnal
rhythm of serum steroid hormone levels in the Japanese whiting, Sillago japonica,
a daily-spawning teleost. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry 8, 329–338.
McBride, R. S. & Murphy, M. D. (2003). Current and potential yield per recruit of
hogfish, Lachnolaimus maximus, in Florida. Proceedings of the Gulf and Caribbean
Fisheries Institute 54, 513–525.
McBride, R. S. & Richardson, A. K. (2007). Evidence of size-selective fishing mortality
from an age and growth study of hogfish (Labridae: Lachnolaimus maximus),
a hermaphroditic reef fish. Bulletin of Marine Science 80, 401–417.
McBride, R. S. & Thurman, P. E. (2003). Reproductive biology of Hemiramphus
brasiliensis and H. balao (Hemiramphidae): maturation, spawning frequency,
and fecundity. Biological Bulletin 204, 57–67.
McBride, R. S., Stengard, F. J. & Mahmoudi, B. (2002). Maturation and diel reprodu-
ctive periodicity of round scad (Carangidae: Decapterus punctatus). Marine Biology
140, 713–722.
McGovern, J. C., Wyanski, D. M., Pashuk, O., Manooch, C. S., II & Sedberry, G. R.
(1998). Changes in the sex ratio and size at maturity of gag, Mycteroperca
microlepis, from the Atlantic coast of the southeastern United States during
1976–1995. Fishery Bulletin U.S.96, 797–807.
Moe, M. A. Jr (1969). Biology of the red grouper Epinephelus morio (Valenciennes) from
the eastern Gulf of Mexico. Florida Department of Natural Resources Professional
Papers Series 10, 1–95.
Moyer, J. T. (1991). Comparative mating strategies of labrid fishes. Watanabe Ichthyo-
logical Institute, Tokyo Monographs 1, 1–90.
Mun
˜oz, R. C. & Warner, R. R. (2003). A new version of the size-advantage hypothesis
for sex change: incorporating sperm competition and size-fecundity skew. The
American Naturalist 161, 749–761.
Parenti, P. & Randall, J. E. (2000). An annotated checklist of the species of the Labroid
fish families Labridae and Scaridae. Ichthyological Bulletin of the JLB Smith Institute
of Ichthyology 68, 1–97.
Parker, R. O. (2000). Courtship in hogfish, Lachnolaimus maximus, and other behavior of
reef fishes off Beaufort, North Carolina. The Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific
Society 116, 260–261.
Petersen, C. W. & Warner, R. R. (2002). The ecological context of reproductive behavior.
In Coral Reef Fishes: Dynamics and Diversity in a Complex Ecosystem (Sale, P. F.,
ed.), pp. 103–118. Amsterdam: Academic Press.
HOGFISH SEX CHANGE AND REPRODUCTION 1291
#2007 The Authors
Journal compilation #2007 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles, Journal of Fish Biology 2007, 71, 1270–1292
10958649, 2007, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01580.x by Noaa Department Of Commerce, Wiley Online Library on [29/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
Quintero-Hunter, I., Grier, H. & Muscato, M. (1991). Enhancement of histological detail
using metanil yellow as counterstain in periodic acid Schiff ’s hemotoxylin staining
of glycol methacrylate tissue sections. Biotechnic & Histochemistry 66, 169–172.
Randall, J. E. & Warmke, G. L. (1967). The food habits of the hogfish (Lachnolaimus
maximus), a labrid fish from the western Atlantic. Caribbean Journal of Science
7, 141–144.
Reinboth, R. (1970). Intersexuality in fishes. Memoirs of the Society for Endocrinology
18, 515–544.
Reinboth, R. (1975). Spontaneous and hormone-induced sex-inversion in wrasses
(Labridae). Pubblicazioni della Stazione zoologica di Napoli 39, 550–573.
Robertson, D. R. (1972). Social control of sex reversal in a coral reef fish. Science 1977,
1007–1009.
Robertson, D. R. (1981). The social and mating systems of two labrid fishes, Halichoeres
maculipinna and H. garnoti, off the Caribbean coast of Panama. Marine Biology
64, 327–340.
Robertson, D. R. & Warner, R. R. (1978). Sexual patterns in the labroid fishes of the
western Caribbean, II: the parrotfishes (Scaridae). Smithsonian Contributions to
Zoology 255, 1–26.
Ross, R. M. (1990). The evolution of sex-change mechanisms in fishes. Environmental
Biology of Fishes 29, 81–93.
Sadovy, Y. & Shapiro, D. Y. (1987). Criteria for the diagnosis of hermaphroditism in
fishes. Copeia 1987, 136–155.
Shapiro, D. Y. (1980). Serial female sex changes after simultaneous removal of males
from social groups of a coral reef fish. Science 209, 1136–1137.
Smith, G. B. (1976). Ecology and distribution of eastern Gulf of Mexico reef fishes.
Florida Marine Research Publications 19, 1–78.
Starck, W. A. Jr (1968). A list of fishes of Alligator Reef, Florida, with comments on the
nature of the Florida reef fish fauna. Undersea Biology 1, 4–40.
Streelman, J. T., Alfaro, M., Westneat, M. W., Bellwood, D. R. & Karl, S. A. (2002).
Evolutionary history of the parrotfishes: biogeography, ecomorphology, and
comparative diversity. Evolution 56, 961–971.
Wallace, R. & Selman, K. (1978). Oogenesis in Fundulus heteroclitus.Developmental
Biology 62, 354–369.
Warner, R. R. (1975). The adaptive significance of sequential hermaphroditism in
animals. The American Naturalist 109, 61–82.
Warner, R. R. (1984). Mating behavior and hermaphroditism in coral reef fishes.
American Scientist 72, 128–136.
Warner, R. R. (1998). The role of extreme iteroparity and risk avoidance in the evolution
of mating systems. Journal of Fish Biology 53, 82–93.
Warner, R. R. & Lejeune, P. (1985). Sex change limited by paternal care: a test using four
Mediterranean labrid fishes, genus Symphodus.Marine Biology 87, 88–99.
Warner, R. R. & Robertson, D. R. (1978). Sexual patterns in the labroid fishes of the
western Caribbean, I: the wrasses (Labridae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology
254, 1–27.
West, G. (1990). Methods of assessing ovarian development in fishes: a review. Australian
Journal of Marine & Freshwater Research 41, 199–222.
Yamamoto, T.-O. (1969). Sex differentiation. In Fish Physiology, Vol. III (Hoar, W. S. &
Randall, D. J., eds), pp. 117–175. New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc.
1292 R. S. MCBRIDE AND M. R. JOHNSON
#2007 The Authors
Journal compilation #2007 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles, Journal of Fish Biology 2007, 71, 1270–1292
10958649, 2007, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01580.x by Noaa Department Of Commerce, Wiley Online Library on [29/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License