ArticlePDF Available

Executive Succession, Strategic Reorientation and Performance Growth: A Longitudinal Study in the U.S. Cement Industry

Authors:

Abstract

This research explores the performance consequences of CEO succession, executive team change, and strategic reorientation in different contexts. Based on team demography and organization learning ideas, we argue that CEO succession or executive team change enhances incremental organization change, while either strategic reorientation or the combination of CEO succession with executive team change triggers discontinuous organization change. We hypothesize that these contrasting intervention modes are appropriate in different contexts. A longitudinal study of the U.S. cement industry from 1918--1986 demonstrates that simple CEO succession is positively associated with subsequent performance when context is stable, but significantly more negatively associated with subsequent performance in turbulent contexts. Executive team change has significant effects on organization adaptation in both stable and turbulent contexts. Strategic reorientations are negatively associated with subsequent performance in stable contexts, but significantly more positively associated with subsequent performance in turbulent contexts. As a set, these results reinforce a demographic approach to succession research and indicate that CEO succession, executive team change, and reorientation are each distinct and important levers shaping organization adaptation. The impacts of these levers are contingent on organization context.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
... By employing expectation states theory logic, we theorize how each type of CEO succession with gender change influences strategic change, and ultimately, long-term firm performance by interacting with the characteristics of the environment (e.g., Triana, Richard, and Su, 2019). In environmental contexts in which men are favored by gender inequality, a femaleto-male CEO succession could be expected to elicit support for the newly appointed CEO to adapt to the organization quite easily and direct strategy (Helmich and Brown, 1972;Tushman and Rosenkopf, 1996). Then, pertaining to environmental contexts characterized by greater gender parity (Post and Byron, 2015), we propose that such contexts may mitigate the societal disadvantages hampering female CEOs and facilitate a setting in which they will be willing and able to change firm strategy. ...
... Although previous studies have made great efforts to establish the relationship between CEO succession-especially male-to-female-and firm performance (Bilimoria, 2006;Carter et al., 2003;Erhardt et al., 2003;Stets and Burke, 2000), some found a positive relationship (Abdullah, Ismail, and Nachum, 2016;Tushman and Rosenkopf, 1996), others a negative one (Shen and Cannella, 2002;Zhang and Qu, 2016), and others still mixed results (Georgakakis and Ruigrok, 2017;Lyngsie and Foss, 2017). Further, almost no effort has been devoted to understanding how CEO succession affects firm performance via intervening processes, which may resolve the confusing findings (Baron and Kenny, 1986;Miller and Triana, 2009;Schepker et al., 2017). ...
... Moreover, top management team (TMT) size has been shown to affect firm strategic change, as it influences the communication among and perspectives of its members (Tushman and Rosenkopf, 1996). We therefore controlled for TMT size, which we measured as the natural logarithm of the number of each firm's TMT members (Chatterjee, 2017). ...
Article
Full-text available
Prior research highlights the disruptive and detrimental effects of chief executive officer (CEO) successions that involve a change of gender, i.e., from a male CEO to a female CEO and vice versa. In contrast, we contend that the effects of CEO successions with gender change depend on the context in which they take place. Drawing on expectation states theory, we identify contexts in which each type of CEO succession with gender change can have positive effects on strategic change and subsequent firm performance, depending on whether the degree of gender parity in the context is sufficient for the new CEO to enact strategic changes. Consistent with our arguments, we report findings from Chinese and U.S. samples showing that in the presence of high environmental dynamism female-to-male CEO succession yields greater strategic change. Conversely, when environmental dynamism is low, it is male-to-female CEO succession that brings about greater strategic change. Furthermore, in the Chinese context, we found that female-to-male CEO succession in state-owned companies results in greater strategic change, whereas male-to-female CEO succession has the same effect in privately-owned settings. Moderated mediation analysis showed that the significant interaction effects on strategic change affect long-term downstream performance (i.e., Tobin's Q). We discuss implications for theory and practice related to CEO successions.
... We hypothesize AD functional experience to be positively associated with organizational outcomes. Support for this relationship is common in the business literature in a variety of industries including American cement (Tushman and Rosenkopf, 1996), Silicon Valley technology (Beckman et al., 2007), and in Standard and Poor's 1500 index companies (Chen and Hambrick, 2012). In the current study, functional experience refers to the amount of accumulated intercollegiate athletic administrative experience. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose Using the lens of upper echelons theory, this study examines the degree to which National Collegiate Athletic Association athletic department performance outcomes are associated with the personal characteristics and experiences of the athletic director leading the organization. Design/methodology/approach The authors match organizational performance data with athletic director and institutional characteristics to form a robust data set spanning 16 years from the 2003–04 to 2018–19 seasons. The sample contains 811 observations representing 136 unique athletic directors. Fixed effects panel regressions are used to analyze organizational performance and quantile regression is used to analyze organizational revenues. Findings The authors fail to uncover statistically significant evidence that athletic director personal characteristics, functional experience and technical experience are associated with organizational performance. Rather, the empirical modeling indicates organizational performance is primarily driven by differentiation in the ability to acquire human capital (i.e. playing talent). The results also indicate that on average, women are more likely to lead lower revenue organizations, however, prior industry-specific technical experience offsets this relationship. Originality/value In opposition to upper echelons research in numerous settings, the modeling indicates the personal characteristics and experiences of the organization's lead executive are not an economically relevant determinant of organizational performance. This may indicate college athletics is a boundary condition in the applicability of upper echelons theory.
Article
Digital technologies have rapidly pervaded firms, industries, and economic networks. This development has raised expectations that a firm’s chief information officer (CIO) will take a more strategic role, including innovation leadership and digital exploration. In this study, we argue from an upper echelons perspective that CIOs’ career variety and role tenure are critical in shaping the extent to which firms explore digital technologies in their patent portfolio, that is, digital exploration. We expect a U-shaped relationship between CIO career variety and digital exploration, and an inverted U-shaped relationship between CIO role tenure and digital exploration. We test our conceptual model using a cross-industry panel of U.S. firms. As predicted, the results show high digital exploration for low and high career variety, and low digital exploration for moderate career variety, that is, a U-shape. Conversely, they show low digital exploration for low and high role tenure, and high digital exploration for moderate role tenure, that is, an inverted U-shape. These insights indicate that CIOs do become strategic leaders in exploring and shaping digital innovation.
Article
This paper uses novel, firm-level communication measures derived from communications metadata several months before and after a CEO transition for 102 firms to study whether and how this organizational event is reflected in employees’ communication flows. We find that CEO turnover is associated with an initial decrease in intrafirm communication (−20% relative to the pre-CEO transition period), followed by a significant increase approximately five months after the CEO turnover (+20% relative to the pre-CEO transition period). The increase in communication is driven primarily by interdepartmental (i.e., communication involving employees of different functional departments) and vertical (i.e., communication among managers and employees) communication flows. This study suggests that communications metadata are a useful tool to examine how organizational change and related uncertainty impact information flows within firms. This paper was accepted by Alfonso Gambardella, business strategy. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.02719 .
Article
This study examines whether digital transformation can reduce research and development (R&D) investment disruption during the top executive transition period. Using panel data of A‐listed firms in China from 2007 to 2021, we find that top executive turnover (TET) generally leads to a remarkable reduction in R&D investment, while digital transformation can significantly mitigate the negative impact of TET on R&D investment. Moreover, the smooth management transition effect of digital transformation is more pronounced for firms with outside succession and high organizational complexity. We further divide R&D investments into exploratory and exploitative R&D investments. Compared to exploitative R&D investment, exploratory R&D investment is more adversely affected by TET, and digital transformation has a positive moderating effect on the relationship between them. Our findings suggest that digital transformation enables companies to maintain continuous R&D investment during the top executive transition by improving communication efficiency and enhancing organizational learning.
Article
We provide large-scale empirical evidence of how much chief executive officers (CEOs) change corporate culture. To do this, we use employee reviews to measure corporate cultural change in S&P 1500 firms. In a variance decomposition analysis, we find a modest effect of CEOs on corporate cultural change. The effect of CEOs on cultural change is larger than industry effect but smaller than firm effect. Regression analysis in the context of CEO succession further shows consistent evidence of a modest effect of CEO succession on corporate cultural change. In addition, the relationship between CEOs and cultural change is not likely to be fully explained by time trend, reverse causality, sample selection bias, and omitted variable bias. An investigation into the contextual contingencies of the CEO-cultural change relationship suggests that succession characteristics, such as predecessor influence and turnaround situation, weaken postsuccession cultural change, but industry task environment has a weak moderation effect. Overall, our study contributes to the literature on strategic leadership and corporate culture. Funding: X. Li acknowledges financial support from the Ian Potter (‘93D) PhD Award. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.17210 .
Article
Full-text available
There are few theories explaining how firms can persist through large‐scale changes. Extending Penrose's maxim that the firm can continue to grow or exist by exiting unprofitable markets and entering higher‐growth areas, we explicate a theory of how firm resources affect the success of this transformational phenomenon, which we call strategic transition . We propose that resource redeployability, relatedness of industries, and slack resources enable firms to transform themselves such that they operate in an entirely new domain. Furthermore, we point to the equifinality of strategic transition and produce a typology of the paths firms may take to achieve it. Key Points We extend Penrose's maxim that the firm can continue to grow or exist by exiting unprofitable markets and entering higher‐growth areas. We explicate a theory of how firm resources affect this transformational phenomenon, which we call strategic transition . We propose that resource redeployability, the relatedness between the old and new industry, and slack resources affect the ability of firms to transform themselves such that they operate in an entirely new domain. We also illustrate to the equifinality of strategic transition and produce a typology of the paths firms may take to achieve it.
Article
Full-text available
This paper examines the proposition that change is detrimental to organizational performance and survival chances. I propose that organizational change may benefit organizational performance and survival chances if it occurs in response to dramatic restructuring of environmental conditions and if it builds on established routines and competences. These propositions are tested on the savings and loan industry in California, which has experienced technological, economic, and regulatory shifts that have forced savings and loan associations to change or die. Findings indicate that most changes enhance financial performance, one is harmful to performance, and three diminish failure rates. These results support the model developed here and suggest that the question of whether change is hazardous should be replaced by the questions of under what conditions change may be hazardous or helpful and whether the direction of change affects its impact on performance and survival.
Article
Full-text available
This study examined the relationship between the demography of top management teams and corporate strategic change, measured as absolute change in diversification level, within a sample of Fortune 500 companies. Controlling for prior firm performance, organizational size, top team size, and industry structure, we found that the firms most likely to undergo changes in corporate strategy had top management teams characterized by lower average age, shorter organizational tenure, higher team tenure, higher educational level, higher educational specialization heterogeneity, and higher academic training in the sciences than other teams. The results suggest that top managers' cognitive perspectives, as reflected in a team's demographic characteristics, are linked to the team's propensity to change corporate strategy.
Article
Full-text available
A critical challenge facing organizations is the dilemma of maintaining the capabilities of both efficiency and flexibility. Recent evolutionary perspectives have suggested that patterns of organizational stability and change can be characterized as punctuated equilibria (Tushman and Romanelli 1985). This paper argues that a learning model of organizational change can account for a pattern of punctuated equilibria and uses a learning framework to model the tension between organizational stability and change. A simulation methodology is used to create a population of organizations whose activities are governed by a process of experiential learning. A set of propositions is examined that predict how patterns of organizational change are affected by environmental conditions, levels of ambiguity, organizational size, search rules, and organizational performance. Implications of this learning model of convergence and reorientation for theory and research are discussed.
Article
This study examines turnover from 1976 to 1980 for 599 top-management group members in a sample of 31 Fortune 500 companies. A measure of demographic distance was defined on the basis of both age and date-of-entry similarity. The proportion of the top-management group turning over was inversely related to the firm's financial performance and positively related to the coefficient of variation of the distance among managers. At the individual level of analysis, managers who were older, were in firms that performed worse, and were more dissimilar in terms of age were more likely to turn over. The results suggest that it may be possible both to predict and manage turnover by considering the compositional characteristics of groups.
Article
Drawing on an upper-echelons framework to study the effects of top-management-team tenure and modeling managerial discretion as a moderating variable, this study examined the relationship between managerial tenure and such organizational outcomes as strategic persistence and conformity in strategy and performance with other firms in an industry. In a sample of 100 organizations in the computer, chemical, and natural-gas distribution industries, executive-team tenure was found to have a significant effect on strategy and performance, with long-tenured managerial teams following more persistent strategies, strategies that conformed to central tendencies of the industry, and exhibiting performance that closely adhered to industry averages. Consistent with the theory, results differed depending on the level of managerial discretion, with the strongest results occurring in contexts that allowed managers high discretion.
Article
The impact of personnel turnover on an organization's ability to learn, and hence on its ultimate performance, is explored for organizations with different structures and different tasks. A model of organizational decision making is presented where: (1) the organization is faced with a continuous sequence of similar but not identical problems; (2) each problem is so complex that no one person has access to all of the information nor the skill to comprehend all of the information necessary to make the decision; (3) individual decision makers base their decisions on their own previous experience; and (4) there is personnel turnover. Using simulation the impact of turnover on the rate and level of learning for hierarchies and teams is examined. This research suggests that while teams in general learn faster and better than hierarchies, hierarchies are less affected by high turnover rates particularly when the task is nondecomposable. Institutionalized memory, as embodied in the memories of distributed individuals and in the advisory relationships between individuals, determines the consequences of personnel turnover.
Article
This paper proposes that the inconsistent findings in previous studies of the relationship between corporate performance and CEO turnover may be due to insufficient attention to the type of performance indicator used by the individuals responsible for making CEO turnover decisions, namely, the board of directors. We argue that the board develops expectations of corporate performance, which it then uses to judge the CEO's performance. The study reported here analyzes financial analysts' forecasts of corporate performance, as a surrogate for the expectations board members could be expected to have, and then examines the relationship of forecasts to turnover. The principal finding is that turnover occurs when reported annual earnings per share fall short of expectations. For a sample of 408 CEOs under the age of retirement, this measure of corporate performance is a predictor of CEO turnover, whereas mechanical algorithms of abnormal security returns and historical accounting ratios are not.