Content uploaded by Michael Makris
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Michael Makris
Content may be subject to copyright.
doi:10.1182/blood-2009-02-203281
2009 113: 5038-5039
Michael Makris
Thrombophilia: grading the risk
http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/content/113/21/5038.full.html
Updated information and services can be found at:
http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/site/misc/rights.xhtml#repub_requests
Information about reproducing this article in parts or in its entirety may be found online at:
http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/site/misc/rights.xhtml#reprints
Information about ordering reprints may be found online at:
http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/site/subscriptions/index.xhtml
Information about subscriptions and ASH membership may be found online at:
Copyright 2011 by The American Society of Hematology; all rights reserved.
Washington DC 20036.
by the American Society of Hematology, 2021 L St, NW, Suite 900,
Blood (print ISSN 0006-4971, online ISSN 1528-0020), is published weekly
For personal use only. by guest on December 31, 2011. bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.orgFrom
clearance. It also remains to be seen whether
Vav3 mediates inside to outside signaling to-
ward other integrins that tether apoptotic
cells. Interestingly, the Vav3⫺/⫺KO macro-
phages also showed decreased binding to ␣v3
integrin, this latter integrin having been
clearly shown to recognize MFG-E8 on the
surface of apoptotic cells and promote phago-
cytic clearance.5Recent studies suggest that
␣v integrins also stimulate TGF-production
during physiological clearance.6
Finally, these studies raise the provocative
possibility that Vav3 may be a selective target
to alter macrophage responses in pathologic
conditions. Although in the current study the
authors showed the importance of phagocyte-
derived TGF-for controlling the wound
healing microenvironment, TGF-produced
in the microenvironment of tumors, possible
via the same clearance mechanisms described
within, promotes tumor progression and ex-
travasation of tumor cells from blood vessels,
an essential stage for metastasis.7In broader
terms, strategies to target Vav3 may open up
an important avenue of therapeutic medicine
that harnesses phagocytic responsivity to apo-
ptotic cells.
Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors
declare no competing financial interests. ■
REFERENCES
1. Savill JS, Wyllie AH, Henson JE, et al. Macrophage
phagocytosis of aging neutrophils in inflammation. Pro-
grammed cell death in the neutrophil leads to its recognition
by macrophages. J Clin Invest. 1989;83:865-875.
2. Sindrilaru A, Peters T, Schymeinsky J, et al. Wound
healing defect of Vav3⫺/⫺mice due to impaired 2-integrin–
dependent macrophage phagocytosis of apoptotic neutro-
phils. Blood. 2009;113:5266-5276.
3. Peters T, Sindrilaru A, Hinz B, Hinrichs R, et al.
Wound-healing defect of CD18(⫺/⫺) mice due to a decrease
in TGF-beta1 and myofibroblast differentiation. EMBO J.
2005;24:3400-3410.
4. Gumienny TL, Brugnera E, Tosello-Trampont AC, et
al. CED-12/ELMO, a novel member of the CrkII/
Dock180/Rac pathway, is required for phagocytosis and
cell migration. Cell. 2001;107:27-41.
5. Hanayama R, Tanaka M, Miwa K, et al. Identification of
a factor that links apoptotic cells to phagocytes. Nature.
2002;417:182-187.
6. Lacy-Hulbert A, Smith AM, Tissire H, et al. Ulcerative
colitis and autoimmunity induced by loss of myeloid alphav
integrins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:15823-15828.
7. Padua D, Zhang XH, Wang Q, et al. TGFbeta primes
breast tumors for lung metastasis seeding through
angiopoietin-like 4. Cell. 2008;133:66-77.
●●●THROMBOSIS & HEMOSTASIS
Comment on Lijfering et al, page 5314
Thrombophilia: grading the risk
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Makris UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD
In this issue of Blood, Lijfering and colleagues provide data on the absolute risk for
both initial and recurrent venous thromboses in persons with thrombophilia. Based
on these data, they subgroup thrombophilic defects into high- and low-risk disor-
ders. They also conclude that some defects are not independent risk factors.
Ever since the first description of antithrom-
bin deficiency as a cause of familial throm-
bophilia by Egeberg in 1965,1the number of
reported inherited risk factors for venous throm-
bosis has been increasing, especially in the past
15 years.2Most previous studies have reported
on relative rather than absolute risks and dealt
with single defects. It is clear that thrombophilia
is multi-factorial due to gene-gene and gene-
environment interactions. While relative risk is
useful in terms of learning about the pathophysi-
ology of the disease, the clinician requires abso-
lute risk information to help make decisions
about patient management.
In this study involving 3 Dutch hospitals,
Lijfering et al investigate 2479 relatives of
877 probands with thrombosis.3To avoid bias,
probands were excluded from the analysis. The
risk for a first deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was
1.52% to 1.90% per year for those with deficien-
cies of antithrombin, protein C or protein S, and
0.34% to 0.49% per year for those with factor V
Leiden, the prothrombin mutation or elevated
FVIII. Within these 2 groups, the thrombotic
risk was similar for each of the individual defects,
and in the paper, the 2 groups were classified as
high- and low-risk thrombophilias, respectively.
The risk of recurrence was 55% at 10 years for
defects in the first group, 25% for the second (see
table). Although elevated levels of FIX, XI,
TAFI, and homocysteine appeared to be associ-
ated with an increased thrombotic risk, all were
closely linked to concomitant elevated FVIII and
were not risk factors in isolation.
In analyzing the risk of venous thrombosis,
the authors assume that the risk in persons with
antithrombin, protein C, or protein S deficiency
is the same, irrespective of the severity of the
deficiency or mutation causing the defect. How-
ever, as they have recently shown in protein S
deficiency,4this may not be the case, and one
would logically expect an inverse relationship
between deficiency and risk.
Whether or not to test for thrombophilia is
controversial because the clinical utility of doing
so has not yet been proven.5For FIX, XI, TAFI,
and homocysteine, this study suggests the an-
swer is a definitive no, since elevated levels are
not associated with increased thrombotic risk
independent of elevated levels of FVIII. In the
case of heterozygosity for factor V Leiden, or the
prothrombin mutation, or for elevated FVIII,
the answer is also probably no because the risk of
a first DVT at under 0.5% per year is not high
enough to warrant primary warfarin prophylaxis
and the recurrence risk is no different from that
reported for patients with first DVT who have
not been tested for thrombophilia.6
More difficult is the issue of the higher risk
thrombophilias represented by the deficiencies
of the natural anticoagulants antithrombin, pro-
tein C, and protein S. The authors suggest that
these are conditions with a much higher risk of
first and recurrent thrombosis and should be
managed differently from the commoner throm-
bophilias. Although based on these data alone
Based on the annual risk of first venous thrombosis and recurrence risk, thrombophilic defects can be
subdivided into 3 groups.
5038 21 MAY 2009 IVOLUME 113, NUMBER 21 blood
For personal use only. by guest on December 31, 2011. bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.orgFrom
there would be reluctance to advocate long-term
primary prophylaxis, this should certainly be
offered at times of additional high risk, such as
after surgery, immobility, or pregnancy.
Clinically, the issue of thrombophilia testing
and management is more relevant in the setting
of patients who have experienced an event al-
ready. If testing has been performed and high-
risk thrombophilia has been identified, this
should certainly be taken into account when de-
ciding on extended anticoagulation, especially
for spontaneous events. The issue of whether all
patients with a DVT should be screened for
high-risk thrombophilia is unresolved7but, for
those with a spontaneous event at a young age
and a positive family history, this should be con-
sidered. Definition of a positive family history is
difficult, but the suggestion offered in this paper
of more than 20% of relatives affected is not
evidence-based and would be dependent on
relatives being available for study.8
Any decision on whether to offer long-term
anticoagulation will depend on the risk of bleed-
ing while on anticoagulants as well as the throm-
botic risk. This study reports a very low annual
bleeding risk at 0.29% but with wide confidence
intervals, because it is based on only 2 events.
The authors speculate that this may be because
the thrombophilic defect reduces the bleeding
risk, and this observation certainly requires con-
firmation. Alternative explanations are the young
age of the cohort, the fact that the patients are
cared for by expert centers, and the small num-
ber of events.
Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The author
declares no competing financial interests. ■
REFERENCES
1. Egeberg O. Inherited antithrombin deficiency caus-
ing thrombophilia. Thromb Diath Haemorrh. 1965;13:
516-530.
2. Raffini L. Thrombophilia in children: Who to test, how,
when and why? Hematology Am Soc Hematology Educ
Program. 2008;2008:228-235.
3. Lijfering WM, Brouwer J-LP, Veeger NJGM, et al.
Selective testing for thrombophilia in patients with first
venous thrombosis: results from a retrospective family
cohort study on absolute thrombotic risk for currently
known thrombophilic defects in 2479 relatives. Blood.
2009;113:5314-5322.
4. Lijfering WM, Mudler R, ten Kate MK, et al. Clinical
relevance of decreased protein S levels: results from a retro-
spective family cohort involving 1143 relatives. Blood.
2009;113:1225-1230.
5. Simpson EL, Stevenson MD, Rawdin A, et al. Throm-
bophilia testing in people with venous thromboembolism:
systematic review and cost effectiveness analysis. Health
Technology Assessment. 2009;13:1-91.
6. Prandoni P, Lensing AWA, Cogo A, et al. The long
term clinical course of acute deep vein thrombosis. Ann
Intern Med. 1996;125:1-7.
7. Cohn D, Vansenne F, de Borgie C, et al. Thrombophilia
testing for prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009;1. Art.
No.: CD007069. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007069.
pub2
8. Cosmi B, Legnani C, Bernardi F, et al. Role of family
history in identifying women with thrombophilia
and higher risk of venous thromboembolism during
oral contraception. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:
1105-1109.
●●● THROMBOSIS & HEMOSTASIS
Comment on Banno et al, page 5323
ADAMTS13’s tail tale
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Karen Vanhoorelbeke, Hendrik B. Feys, and Simon F. De Meyer KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT LEUVEN,
CAMPUS KORTRIJK
In mice, a long form and a short form of the VWF-cleaving protease ADAMTS13
have been identified, the latter lacking the 4 distal carboxyl-terminal domains.
While these are not strictly required for regulating normal size distribution of
VWF multimers, in this issue of Blood, Banno and colleagues reveal the role of
these domains in down-regulating thrombogenesis in vivo.
Since the discovery of ADAMTS13 as a
metalloprotease with a multi-domain
structure, numerous studies have attempted to
shed light on the specific roles of each of the
ADAMTS13 domains in digesting large
von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimers into
smaller, less reactive ones. ADAMTS13 is com-
posed of a signal peptide, propeptide, metallo-
protease domain, central TSR (thrombospondin
type 1 repeat), Cys-rich region, spacer domain,
7 additional TSRs, and 2 CUB domains. The
active site of this enzyme is situated in the metal-
loprotease domain while the spacer domain plays
a crucial role in substrate binding by interacting
with a VWF exosite located at the C-terminus of
the A2 domain. The exact physiologic signifi-
cance of the carboxyl-terminal TSRs and the
2 CUB domains still remains unclear, in particu-
lar due to the use of different types of in vitro
tests, often performed under nonphysiological
conditions.
To unravel the in vivo role of the carboxyl-
terminal domains of ADAMTS13, Banno and
coworkers elegantly take advantage of the pres-
ence of 2 kinds of Adamts13 genes in laboratory
mouse strains.1The 129/Sv strain has the
Adamts13 gene encoding full-length ADAMTS13
while several other strains, including C57BL/6,
harbor an Adamts13 gene that expresses a trun-
cated form of the enzyme, lacking the 2 C-
terminal TSRs and CUB domains due to the
insertion of an intracisternal A-particle retro-
transposon. By introgressing the C57BL/6-
Adamts13 gene onto the 129/Sv genetic back-
ground, the authors generate congenic mice
that had the distal C-terminally truncated
ADAMTS13 on a 129/Sv genetic background
(Adamts13S/S) and use wild-type mice that have
full-length ADAMTS13 (Adamts13L/L) and
ADAMTS13⫺/⫺mice on the same 129/Sv ge-
netic background for comparison.
The most obvious role of ADAMTS13 is to
regulate VWF multimer size. Indeed,
ADAMTS13 digests unusually large VWF mul-
timers into smaller less thrombogenic forms,2
hence preventing the spontaneous intravascular
platelet aggregation seen in patients with
ADAMTS13 deficiency. Interestingly, Banno et
al showed that both Adamts13L/L and
Adamts13S/S mice do not have ultra large VWF
multimers in their plasma, implying that the
C-terminal domains are not strictly needed for
maintaining normal VWF size. Consequently,
the 2 C-terminal TSRS and CUB domains are
not essential for the removal of ultralarge VWF
multimers from the plasma.
Following VWF size regulation, a fascinating
role of ADAMTS13 in attenuating thrombus
growth has been described, possibly by cleaving
VWF multimers that are peripheral to or incor-
porated in platelet rich thrombi.3In this study,
Banno et al used the congenic mice to demon-
strate that the 2 C-terminal TSRs and CUB do-
mains play a role in the down-regulation of
thrombogenesis under high shear conditions.
Both in vitro flow chamber experiments at high
shear rates and in vivo thrombosis models show
that blood from Adamts13S/S mice is more
thrombogenic. This is evidenced by accelerated
thrombus formation and decreased time to oc-
clusion respectively when compared with blood
from Adamts13L/L mice. Whether this would
blood 21 MAY 2009 IVOLUME 113, NUMBER 21 5039
For personal use only. by guest on December 31, 2011. bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.orgFrom