ArticlePDF Available

Comorbid personality disorders in subjects with bipolar I disorder

Authors:

Abstract

Unlabelled: Objective. The purpose of this study was to present the frequencies of personality disorders in a sample of bipolar I patients and to investigate whether the presence of comorbid personality disorders affect the course of bipolar illness. Methods: Seventy euthymic bipolar I patients were assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders (SCID II). Bipolar patients with comorbid personality disorder were compared with those of without personality disorder comorbidity on demographic and clinical variables. Results: Forty bipolar I patients (57%) had at least one comorbid personality disorder. The most common personality disorder cluster was cluster C (36%), followed by cluster B (17%) and cluster A (17%) personality disorders. The most prevalent personality disorder in the whole group was obsessive-compulsive personality disorder (21%). Patients with comorbid personality disorders had an earlier age of onset than those of without comorbidity. Conclusion: Although the rates of comorbid personality disorders are high in bipolar I patients, the presence of comorbidity has no relevant impact on the course of bipolar I patients except for earlier age of onset of bipolar I disorder.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Comorbid personality disorders in subjects with bipolar I disorder
ABDURRAHMAN ALTINDAG, MEDAIM YANIK & MELIKE NEBIOGLU
Department of Psychiatry, Harran University Faculty of Medicine, Sanliurfa, Turkey
Abstract
Objective. The purpose of this study was to present the frequencies of personality disorders in a sample of bipolar I patients
and to investigate whether the presence of comorbid personality disorders affect the course of bipolar illness. Methods.Seventy
euthymic bipolar I patients were assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders
(SCID II). Bipolar patients with comorbid personality disorder were compared with those of without personality disorder
comorbidity on demographic and clinical variables. Results. Forty bipolar I patients (57%) had at least one comorbid
personality disorder. The most common personality disorder cluster was cluster C (36%), followed by cluster B (17%) and
cluster A (17%) personality disorders. The most prevalent personality disorder in the whole group was obsessive-compulsive
personality disorder (21%). Patients with comorbid personality disorders had an earlier age of onset than those of without
comorbidity. Conclusion. Although the rates of comorbid personality disorders are high in bipolar I patients, the presence of
comorbidity has no relevant impact on the course of bipolar I patients except for earlier age of onset of bipolar I disorder.
Key Words: Bipolar, comorbidity, personality disorders, prevalence, age of onset
Introduction
The comorbidity of personality disorders is a com-
mon phenomenon among bipolar patients. There
have been many studies examining the prevalence of
personality disorder in patients with bipolar disorder
[1/7]. In these studies, the co-occurrence of person-
ality disorder and bipolar disorder has ranged from
9 to 89% of patients [6,7]. The variability in
prevalence rates may be related to methodological
differences with regard to population assessed, the
measures used and the patients’ symptomatic states
at the time of personality disorder assessment.
Impact of comorbid personality disorders on the
course of bipolar disorder has received considerable
attention in recent years [2,3,8 /11]. In these stu-
dies, personality disorders were associated with
noncompliance with treatment, decreased response
to lithium treatment, poor treatment outcome,
increased rates of alcohol and substance abuse, and
increased severity of residual mood symptoms.
Bipolar patients with comorbid personality disorders
also spend more days in the hospital in a given year
[12], are more likely to have suicidal ideation and
behavior [4,13], and have more severe mood dis-
order symptoms and function at a lower level [14]
than those without comorbid personality disorders.
The purpose of this study was to present the
frequencies of personality disorders in a sample of
bipolar I patients and to investigate whether the
presence of comorbid personality disorders affect the
course of bipolar illness. This study provides a view
on personality disorder comorbidity in bipolar I
patients in Sanliurfa, Turkey. To avoid potential
overlap between the symptoms of acute episodes of
bipolar illness and comorbid personality disorders
we examined patients in states of clinical remission.
Methods
Participants
All patients presenting at the Bipolar Disorder Out-
patients Clinics of the Harran University, located in
Sanliurfa, Southeastern Turkey between 2002 and
2004 were considered for inclusion in the present
study. Patients diagnosed with bipolar disorder in
the psychiatry clinics of Harran University Research
Hospital (a tertiary level health institute which
receives referrals from the southeastern part of
Turkey) were recruited for the study. Among
patients enrolled in this unit, the ones who met the
following criteria were included in the study: (1) age
at least 18 years; (2) DSM-IV diagnosis of bipolar I
Correspondence: Dr Abdurrahman Altindag, Harran Universitesi Tip Fakultesi, Psikiyatri AD Arastirma Hastanesi, 63100 Sanliurfa, Turkey. Tel: /90 414
3128456 2319. Fax:
/90 414 3139615. E-mail: aaltindag@yahoo.com
International Jour nal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice, 2006; 10(1): 33 /37
(Received 8 March 2005; accepted 18 July 2005)
ISSN 1365-1501 print/ISSN 1471-1788 online #2006 Taylor & Francis
DOI: 10.1080/13651500500305481
disorder; (3) being clinically in remission for at least
1 month before inclusion in this study as corrobo-
rated with routinely administered scales during
follow-up visits (17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for
Depression score of B
/7 and Young Mania Rating
Scale score of B
/5 for at least 1 month in two
consecutive visits were used as confirmative scores
for remission); and (4) written informed consent
obtained before participation in the study. The
diagnosis of bipolar I disorder was made clinically
according to DSM-IV criteria on admission of the
patient to the follow-up routine of outpatient clinics
and later confirmed by interviews conducted by the
first and the second authors. Exclusion criteria were:
(1) history of seizure, head injury with loss of
consciousness, or other neurological disorder; (2)
concurrent active medical disorder; (3) unwilling-
ness to cooperate with investigators; and (4) contact
loss.
Among 116 cases who were enrolled in our bipolar
disorder outpatient clinic, 70 patients (30 females,
and 40 males), aged between 18 and 59 years,
fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the study. Out of
116 patients, 17 had other subtypes of bipolar
disorder (i.e. bipolar II disorder, bipolar disorder
not otherwise specified and schizoaffective disorder,
bipolar type), four had a history of seizure, head
injury with loss of consciousness, or other neurolo-
gical disorders, two had concurrent active medical
disorders, 19 did not wish to be interviewed, and
four were later out of reach. These cases, therefore,
were excluded from the study.
Measures
1. Sociodemographic and clinical variables of the
subjects including previous hospitalizations,
number and type of previous episodes, presence
of psychotic features, suicide attempts and age
at onset of the disorder were obtained from
inpatient and outpatient medical records of the
cases, patient interviews, and from first-degree
relatives when available.
2. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV
Axis II Personality Disorders (SCID-II) [15]
was used to diagnose comorbidities of person-
ality disorders. All patients were interviewed by
the first author, trained in the use of the SCID-
II. A complete interview was done for all
patients in SCID-II interview. Individuals who
were found to present at least one personality
disorder were included in the group ‘‘with
comorbid personality disorder’’, and those
without any comorbid personality disorder,
in the group ‘‘without comorbid personality
disorder’’.
3. Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D),
a 17-item clinician-rated instrument [16,17],
was used to determine the level of depression.
4. Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) is a clinical
rating scale containing 11 items assessing manic
symptoms [18]. Reliability ratings have been
high in Turkish version [19].
Statistical analysis
The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS
11.5, SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL) was used for all
statistical analyses. Mann /Whitney test, Chi-
squared test and Fisher’s exact test were used to
examine the statistical differences between bipolar
patients with an axis II diagnosis (n
/40) and those
without an axis II diagnosis (n
/30) on demo-
graphic, clinical and course of illness variables. The
two-tailed significance level was set at 0.05.
Results
Table I shows the personality disorder comorbidity
of the sample. Of the 70 bipolar I patients, 40 (57%)
had at least one comorbid personality disorder.
Fourteen patients (20%) were diagnosed with two
comorbid personality disorders, and two (3%) with
three personality disorders. The most common
personality disorder cluster was cluster C (36%),
followed by cluster B (17%) and cluster A (17%)
personality disorders. Two (3%) bipolar I patients
met criteria for a personality disorder in both cluster
A and B, two (3%) for a disorder in cluster B and C,
and five (7%) for a disorder in cluster A and C. The
most prevalent personality disorder in the whole
group was obsessive-compulsive personality disorder
(21%). Avoidant (17%), paranoid (17%), and his-
trionic (10%) followed in decreasing order.
Tables II and III show the comparisons of patients
with and without comorbid personality disorder with
respect to demographic and clinical variables. Mean
age of bipolar I patients with comorbid personality
Table I. Prevalence of comorbid personality disorders in bipolar I
patients.
Personality disorder n%
Any personality disorder 40 57
Cluster A 12 17
Paranoid 12 17
Schizoid //
Schizotypal //
Cluster B 12 17
Histrionic 7 10
Narcissistic 1 1
Borderline 5 7
Antisocial 1 1
Cluster C 25 36
Avoidant 12 17
Dependent 3 4
Obsessive /compulsive 15 21
Cluster A
/B23
Cluster B/C23
Cluster A/C57
34 A. Altindag et al.
disorders was significantly lower than those of with-
out comorbidity (P
/0.02). Neither were there
significant differences regarding most clinical vari-
ables such as psychotic symptoms, rapid cycling,
seasonality, familial psychiatric history, suicidal idea-
tion and behavior, and total number of episodes.
Patients with comorbid personality disorder had an
earlier age of onset than those of without personality
disorder comorbidity (P
/0.04).
Discussion
This study examined the prevalence of comorbid
personality disorders in a sample of bipolar I
patients. It also examined the clinical correlates of
personality disorder comorbidity. It appears that
comorbid personality disorder occurs in more than
half of the subject with bipolar I disorder (57%).
This prevalence rate is comparable with rates found
in other studies that used structured interviews
Table II. Differential quantitative features between bipolar I patients with and without personality disorder comorbidity.
BD with personality
disorder comorbidity
(n
/40)
BD without personality
disorder comorbidity
(n/30) Analysis
Mean (SD) Mean (SD) U
a
P
Age 31.8 (8.7) 37.1(10.0)
/2.12 0.03
Age of onset 21.9 (6.6) 25.7 (8.6)
/1.97 0.04
Total number of episodes 7.9 (5.7) 5.7 (15.9)
/1.22 NS
Number of manic episodes 5.4 (6.5) 4.8 (7.1)
/0.72 NS
Number of depressive episodes 4.3 (8.7) 4.0 (9.0) /0.76 NS
Number of hospitalizations 1.4 (2.1) 1.3 (1.6)
/0.12 NS
BD, bipolar I disorder; SD, standard deviation.
a
Mann /Whitney test. NS, not significant.
Table III. Differential qualitative features between bipolar I patients with and without personality disorder comorbidity.
BD with personality
disorder comorbidity
(n
/40)
BD without personality
disorder comorbidity
(n/30)
n(%) n(%) df x2P
Sex 1 1.94 NS
Female 20 (50) 10 (33)
Male 20 (50) 20 (67)
First episode 1 0.26 NS
Manic 25 (63) 21 (70)
Depressive 14 (35) 9 (30)
Rapid cycling **NS
Present 1 (3) 2 (7)
Absent 39 (97) 28 (93)
Seasonal pattern 1 0.13 NS
Present 13 (33) 11 (37)
Absent 27 (67) 19 (63)
Psychotic symptoms 1 2.04 NS
Yes 28 (70) 16 (53)
No 12 (30) 14 (47)
Suicidal ideation 1 0.32 NS
Yes 16 (40) 10 (33)
No 24 (60) 20 (67)
Suicide attempts 1 0.21 NS
Yes 10 (25) 9 (30)
No 30 (75) 21 (70)
Family history of suicide 1 0.78 NS
Yes 7 (16) 3 (14)
No 33 (84) 27 (86)
Affective disorder in first-degree relatives 1 0.49 NS
Yes 18 (45) 11 (37)
No 22 (55) 19 (63)
Treatment 1 3.14 NS
Mood-stabilizer monotherapy 13 (33) 15 (50)
Polymedicated 24 (60) 11 (37)
BD, bipolar I disorder; NS, not significant.
*Fisher’s exact test.
Comorbid personality disorders in bipolar I patients 35
[4,5,12,20,21]. In two of the recent studies with
similar methodology and sample structure, Tamam
et al [5] found that 62% of bipolar I patients in
remission have at least one comorbid personality
disorder, whereas Ucok et al [6] reported a person-
ality disorder comorbidity rate of 48% among
euthymic bipolar I patients.
In the present study, we found that the majority of
bipolar I patients with axis II comorbidity had cluster
C personality disorders. This finding is consistent
with results of several recent studies [3 /5,21,22].
However, previous studies found that cluster B
diagnoses, specifically borderline personality disor-
der, are the most common comorbid axis II condi-
tions in subjects with bipolar disorder [23,24].
In this study, obsessive-compulsive personality
disorder (21%) was the most frequent comorbid
personality disorder in bipolar I patients. Similar
results have been reported in four studies conducted
in Europe [4,5,22,25]. One might speculate that
social factors such as cultural differences between
different societies (e.g., Turkey or Europe versus
North America) from which the result stem may
have exerted an influence, but we are not aware
of any empirical study testing such a hypothesis
adequately.
In our study group, we observed that bipolar
patients with personality disorder comorbidity have
earlier age of onset of bipolar disorder than those of
without comorbidity. It has been suggested that
personality disorders could lead patients to be
more vulnerable to affective disorders [5,24].
In the present contribution, we found that
younger bipolar I patients had more comorbid
personality disorders than those of older patients.
Brieger et al [25] reported that a longer duration of
affective disorders led to a lower frequency of
personality disorders. They suggested that a longer
duration of an affective illness makes it more difficult
to decide whether a patient has a personality
disorder or not may be clinically justified: a long-
standing affective illness may lead to ‘‘residual’’
personality changes in the form of ‘‘persisting
alterations’’ [26] which may be phemonenologically
different from the ‘‘standard’’ personality disorder
diagnoses, while in first-episode patients such per-
sonality disorder diagnoses may be easier to make.
This might lead to the seemingly paradoxical con-
sequence that patients with a chronic affective
disorder may exhibit more personality pathology
than first-episode patients, but at the same time
they do not fulfill the DSM-IV criteria for a
diagnosis of personality disorder as often as first
episode patients.
There is discussion that the mere presence of a
personality disorder is not highly relevant for course
and outcome, while the presence of specific person-
ality disorders is important. Bieling et al [9] reported
that Cluster A personality disorders were the stron-
gest predictor of poor outcome. The Cluster B
comorbidity was found to be associated with sig-
nificantly more lifetime suicide attempts and current
depression in bipolar patients [27]. The sample size
of this study was too small to test such a hypothesis.
It should be noted that our findings may not be
generalizable to all bipolar patients. First, the sample
size of this study is relatively small. Second, we
screened only a given sample in a tertiary level
university hospital. Another limitation of this study
lays on the retrospective recall of some variables,
which may certainly bias some results.
In summary, personality disorders are prevalent in
patients with bipolar I disorder. Besides, the pre-
sence of comorbidity has no relevant impact on the
course of bipolar I patients except for earlier age of
onset of bipolar I disorder. Future studies with larger
number of subjects will be needed to identify the
relationship between personality disorders and bipo-
lar disorders, and to help develop treatment strate-
gies for subjects who have comorbid bipolar and
personality disorders.
Key points
.Comorbid personality disorders are prevalent in
patients with bipolar I disorder
.Patients with comorbid personality disorders
had an earlier age of onset than those of without
comorbidity
.The presence of personality disorder comorbid-
ity has no relevant impact on the course of
bipolar I patients except for earlier age of onset
of bipolar I disorder
Statement of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest with any
commercial or other associations in connection with
the submitted article.
References
[1] Vieta E, Colom F, Corbella B, et al. Clinical correlates of
psychiatric comorbidity in bipolar I patients. Bipolar Disord
2001;/3:/253 /8.
[2] George EL, Miklowitz DJ, Richards JA, et al. The comor-
bidity of bipolar disorder and axis II personality disorders:
prevalence and clinical correlates. Bipolar Disord 2003;/5:/
115 /22.
[3] Kay JH, Altshuler LL, Ventura J, Mintz J. Impact of axis II
comorbidity on the course of bipolar illness in men: A
retrospective chart review. Bipolar Disord 2002;/4:/237/42.
[4] Ucok A, Karaveli D, Kundakci T, Yazici O. Comorbidity of
personality disorders with bipolar mood disorders. Compr
Psychiatry 1998;/39:/72 /4.
[5] Tamam L, Ozpoyraz N, Karatas G. Personality disorder
comorbidity among patients with bipolar I disorder in
remission. Acta Neuropsychiatr 2004;/16:/175 /80.
[6] Koenigsberg HW, Kaplan RD, Gilmore MM, Cooper AM.
The relationship between syndrome and personality disorder
36 A. Altindag et al.
in DSM-III: experience with 2,462 patients. Am J Psychiatry
1985;/142:/207 /12.
[7] Turley B, Bates GW, Edwards J, Jackson HJ. MCMI-II
personality disorders in recent-onset bipolar disorders. J Clin
Psychol 1992;/48:/320/9.
[8] Dunayevich E, Sax KW, Keck PE Jr, et al. Twelve-month
outcome in bipolar patients with and without personality
disorders. J Clin Psychiatry 2000;/61:/134 /9.
[9] Bieling PJ, MacQueen GM, Marriot MJ, et al. Longitudinal
outcome in patients with bipolar disorder assessed by life-
charting is influenced by DSM-IV personality disorder
symptoms. Bipolar Disord 2003;/5:/14 /21.
[10] Gasperini M, Scherillo P, Manfredonia MG, et al. A study of
relapses in subjects with mood disorder on lithium treat-
ment. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 1993;/3:/103 /10.
[11] Solomon DA, Keitner GI, Miller IW, et al. Course of illness
and maintenance treatments for patients with bipolar dis-
order. J Clin Psychiatry 1995;/56:/5/13.
[12] Barbato N, Hafner RJ. Comorbidity of bipolar and person-
ality disorder. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 1998;/32:/276 /80.
[13] Vieta E, Colom F, Martinez-Aran A, et al. Bipolar II disorder
and comorbidity. Compr Psychiatry 2000;/41:/339/43.
[14] Carpenter D, Clarkin JF, Glick ID, Wilner PJ. Personality
pathology among married adults with bipolar disorder. J
Affect Disord 1995;/34:/269/74.
[15] First MB, Gibbon M, Spitzer RL, et al. User’s Guide for the
Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Person-
ality Disorders (SCID-II). Washington, DC: American
Psychiatric Press; 1997.
[16] Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol
Neurosurg Psychiatry 1960;/23:/56 /62.
[17] Hamilton M. Development of a rating scale for primary
depressive illness. Br J Soc Clin Psychol 1967;/6:/278 /96.
[18] Young RC, Biggs JT, Ziegler VE, Meyer DA. A rating scale
for mania: Reliability, validity and sensitivity. Br J Psychiatry
1978;/133:/429 /35.
[19] Karadag F, Oral T, Yalcin FA, Erten E. Reliability and
validity of Turkish translation of Young Mania Rating Scale.
Turk Psikiyatri Derg 2002;/13:/107 /14.
[20] Pica S, Edwards J, Jackson HJ, et al. Personality disorders in
recent-onset bipolar disorder. Compr Psychiatry 1990;/31:/
499/510.
[21] Kay JH, Altshuler LL, Ventura J, Mintz J. Prevalence of axis
II comorbidity in bipolar patients with and without alcohol
use disorders. Ann Clin Psychiatry 1999;/11:/187 /95.
[22] Rossi A, Marinangeli MG, Butti G, et al. Personality
disorders in bipolar and depressive disorders. J Affect Disord
2001;/65:/3/8.
[23] Peselow ED, Sanfilipo MP, Fieve RR. Relationship between
hypomania and personality disorders before and after
successful treatment. Am J Psychiatry 1995;/152:/232 /8.
[24] Dunayevich E, Strakowski SM, Sax KW, et al. Personality
disorders in first- and multiple-episode mania. Psychiatry
Res 1996;/64:/69 /75.
[25] Brieger P, Ehrt U, Marneros A. Frequency of comorbid
personality disorders in bipolar and unipolar affective
disorders. Compr Psychiatry 2003;/44:/28 /34.
[26] Marneros A, Rohde A. ‘‘Residual states’’ in affective,
schizoaffective and schizophrenic disorders. In: Akiskal HS,
Cassano GB, editors. Dysthymia and the spectrum of
chronic depression. New York: Guilford; 1997. p 75 /86.
[27] Garno JL, Goldberg JF, Ramirez PM, Ritzler BA. Bipolar
disorder with comorbid cluster B personality disorder
features: impact on suicidality. J Clin Psychiatry 2005;/66:/
339/45.
Comorbid personality disorders in bipolar I patients 37
... Asian studies reveal that comorbid personality disorders are more prevalent in BD patients than the general population and are associated with mood dysregulation (Fan and Hassell, 2008). Personality disorder (PD) traits belonging to Cluster B and Cluster C are more frequent and they lead to frequent suicide attempts (Altindag et al., 2006b;Uçok et al., 1998). ...
Article
Background: Epidemiological studies analysing the course of Bipolar Disorder (BD) are relatively rare in the Asian context, contributing to the uncertainty regarding the prevalent course patterns and factors influencing such patterns. The current review identifies the regional characteristics of BD course patterns and the associated factors. Methods: A review of the existing literature was done using 'PubMed' and 'Cochrane' databases which yielded 145 studies including those from all 48 Asian countries. Relevant discussions from the Western literature were incorporated. Results: Regional and cross-national studies reveal a mania-predominant course in BD in Asian countries. Prolonged depressive episodes and comorbid anxiety disorders worsen the course of BD-II. Certain risk factors such as the young age of onset and greater episode frequency are useful predictors of bipolar diatheses. Substance use disorder comorbidity is more prevalent in males whereas depression and suicidal behaviours are more frequent in females with BD. Comorbid anxiety and personality disorders also encumber the illness course. Logistic reasons and ignorance of side-effects were specifically associated with poor adherence. An 'eveningness' chronotype and poor sleep quality were associated with frequent recurrences. Seasonal patterns vary among men and women, especially for depressive episodes. Limitations: The effects of treatment and childhood BD course features were not discussed. Conclusions: There are region-specific characteristics in bipolar illness course and factors influencing such course patterns compared to the rest of the World. Future research from Asia shall attempt to study the neurobiological underpinnings of such characteristics and plan appropriate strategies to address the same.
... Two-thirds of studies on BD subjects showed greater rates of OPDs than BPD (Brieger et al., 2003; George et al., 7 2003; Rossi et al., 2001; Rosso et al., 2009; Skodol et al., 1999). These findings were more consistent in BD-I than in BD-II (Altindag et al., 2006; Rosso et al., 2009; Skodol et al., 1999; Uçok et al., 1998) and were also more frequent in outpatient than in inpatient settings (Garno et al., 2005; Mantere et al., 2006; Schiavone et al., 2004). Specifically, obsessive-compulsive personality disorder was more prevalent than BPD in those BD samples with higher rates of OPDs (Brieger et al., 2003; George et al., 2003; Rossi et al., 2001; Rosso et al., 2009; Skodol et al., 1999). ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: The relationship between bipolar disorder (BD) and borderline personality disorder (BPD) has been controversial and widely debated. Specifically, the comorbidity between both disorders has yielded a plethora of research, but there are no comprehensive reviews on this issue. Objective: To determine the empirical evidence regarding the comorbidity between BD and BPD based on prevalence data, explanatory theories for their co-occurrence, and clinical impact of one disorder in the other. Method: A comprehensive search of databases (PubMed and PsycINFO) was performed. Published manuscripts between January 1985 and August 2015 were identified. Overall, 70 studies fulfilled inclusion criteria. Results: Over a fifth of subjects showed comorbidity between BPD and BD. Empirical evidence from common underlying factors was inconclusive, but BPD appears to be a risk factor for BD. Data also indicated that the negative impact of BPD in BD (e.g., suicidality, worse mood course) was greater than vice verse. Conclusions: Given the high prevalence of comorbidity between BD and BPD and the negative effects of BPD in subjects with BD, further studies are needed to clarify the factor associated with the comorbidity between these two disorders. This information is important to develop appropriate treatments for subjects with both disorders, improve their clinical course, and prevent the increased risk of suicidality commonly found in these subjects.
... Previous studies did not report that bipolar disorder and specific phobia prevalence tend to be increased in OCD patients with OCPD. Nevertheless, there is some evidence that OCPD may be the most common PD diagnosed in bipolar disorder samples (Altindag, Yanik, & Nebioglu, 2006;Casas-Barquero, Garcia-Lopez, Fernandez-Arguelles, & Camacho-Larana, 2007). One study suggested that OCPD patients who were admitted to day or day-night units were at an increased risk of developing bipolar in the long-term (Thomsen & Jensen, 1994). ...
Article
We assessed correlates of obsessive-compulsive (OCPD), schizotypal (SPD) and borderline (BPD) personality disorders in 110 obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) patients. We found OCD patients with OCPD (20.9%) to exhibit higher rates of hoarding and bipolar disorders, increased severity of hoarding and symmetry, lower prevalence of unacceptable thoughts involving sex and religion and less non-planning impulsivity. Conversely, OCD patients with SPD (13.6%) displayed more frequently bipolar disorder, increased severity of depression and OCD neutralization, greater prevalence of "low-order" behaviors (i.e., touching), lower low-planning impulsivity and greater "behavioral" compulsivity. Finally, in exploratory analyses, OCD patients with BPD (21.8%) exhibited lower education, higher rates of several comorbid psychiatric disorders, greater frequency of compulsions involving interpersonal domains (e.g. reassurance seeking), increased severity of depression, anxiety and OCD dimensions other than symmetry and hoarding, more motor and non-planning impulsivity, and greater "cognitive" compulsivity. These findings highlight the importance of assessing personality disorders in OCD samples. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
... OCPD has also been found to be the most frequent personality disorder co-occurring with anorexia nervosa-restricting type, binge eating disorder, 100 and bipolar disorder. 101,102 OCPD also co-occurs in 31% of cases of major depressive disorder 101,103 and17% of cases of panic disorder. 18 All these disorders also show high levels of comorbidity with OCD. ...
Article
Full-text available
Obsessive-compulsive personality disorder (OCPD) is an early-onset disorder characterized by perfectionism, need for control, and cognitive rigidity. Its nosological status is currently under review. Historically, OCPD has been conceptualized as bearing a close relationship with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). In this article, we discuss the diagnosis of OCPD in anticipation of its review for the ICD-11, from the perspective of clinical utility, global applicability, and research planning. Considering the recent establishment of an obsessive-compulsive and related disorders (OCRD) category in DSM-5, we focus on the relationship between OCPD and the disorders that are currently thought to bear a close relationship with OCD, including DSM-5 OCRD, and other compulsive disorders such as eating disorder and autistic spectrum disorder (that were not included in the DSM-5 OCRD category), as well as with the personality disorders, focusing on nosological determinants such as phenomenology, course of illness, heritability, environmental risk factors, comorbidity, neurocognitive endophenotypes, and treatment response. Based on this analysis, we attempt to draw conclusions as to its optimal placement in diagnostic systems and draw attention to key research questions that could be explored in field trials.
... Tab lo 1: Hasta ve kontrol gruplarının sosyodemografik özellikleri SS: Standart sapma, İUB: İki uçlu bozukluk, TAS: Total antioksidan seviye, TOS: Total oksidan seviye, OSİ: Oksidatif stres indeksi rasında arada anlamlı farklılık olmayacak düzeye gerilemiştir. İki uçlu bozukluk depresif dönemde ise EKT ile kombine ilaç tedavisi ile EKT öncesi kontrol grubundan anlamlı derecede düşük olan TAS düzeyleri arada anlamlı faklılık olmayacak bir düzeye yükselmiştir (Tablo 3).Çalışmamızdaki İUB olguları antipsikotikleri, antidepresanları, benzodiazepinleri ve duygudurum düzenleyicilerini tek başına ve/veya kombine olarak kullanmaktaydılar.İki uçlu depresyon hastaları üzerinde yapılan çalışma-da artmış NO'nun artışının tedavi ile normalleştiği saptanmıştır(23). Bir başka çalışmada, major depresif bozuklukta NO'nun anlamlı olmasa da yüksek olduğu ve tedavi ile anlamlı olarak düştüğü belirtilmiştir(28). ...
Article
Full-text available
Electroconvulsive (ECT) is one of the most efficacious choice in the treatment of bipolar disorder. There is no study conducted on human being investigating the effect of ECT on oxidative balance in bipolar disorder. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the oxidative parameters on bipolar inpatients who is treated with ECT and pharmacotherapy. 31 bipolar inpatients in psychiatry department of Gaziantep University and 35 healty volunteeers were included in the study. Total Antioxidant Status (TAS), Total Oxidant Status (TOS) of serum samples were measured and Oxidative Stress Index (OSI) were counted in Harran University Biochemistry Laboratory. In all patient group, bipolar manic episode and depressive episode patients; before ECT and after ECT there was no significant difference for oxidative parameters. Before ECT, TAS levels in bipolar depressive episode patients were significantly lower than the control group (z=-2.614, p=0.009). But after ECT, there was no difference between these two groups (z=-1.558, p>0.05). Before ECT, TOS levels in bipolar manic episode patients were significantly higher than the control group (z=-2.598, p=0.009); after ECT, there was no difference between these two groups (z=-0.910, p>0.05). Finally, when compared with controls, in bipolar depressive episode patients TAS levels were increased with ECT and pharmacotheraphy and in bipolar manic episode patients TOS levels were decreased. For more comprehensive results new studies are needed.
... Tab lo 1: Hasta ve kontrol gruplarının sosyodemografik özellikleri SS: Standart sapma, İUB: İki uçlu bozukluk, TAS: Total antioksidan seviye, TOS: Total oksidan seviye, OSİ: Oksidatif stres indeksi rasında arada anlamlı farklılık olmayacak düzeye gerilemiştir. İki uçlu bozukluk depresif dönemde ise EKT ile kombine ilaç tedavisi ile EKT öncesi kontrol grubundan anlamlı derecede düşük olan TAS düzeyleri arada anlamlı faklılık olmayacak bir düzeye yükselmiştir (Tablo 3).Çalışmamızdaki İUB olguları antipsikotikleri, antidepresanları, benzodiazepinleri ve duygudurum düzenleyicilerini tek başına ve/veya kombine olarak kullanmaktaydılar.İki uçlu depresyon hastaları üzerinde yapılan çalışma-da artmış NO'nun artışının tedavi ile normalleştiği saptanmıştır(23). Bir başka çalışmada, major depresif bozuklukta NO'nun anlamlı olmasa da yüksek olduğu ve tedavi ile anlamlı olarak düştüğü belirtilmiştir(28). ...
Article
Accession Number: 90529014; Bulut, Mahmut 1; Email Address: drmahmutbulut@yahoo.com Altındağ, Abdurrahman 2 Deveci, Zeliha 3 Kaya, M. Cemal 1 Bülbül, Feridun 2 Taşkın, Abdullah 4 Kocamer, Şengül 2 Savaş, Haluk A. 2; Affiliation: 1: Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Ruh Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı, Diyarbakır-Türkiye 2: Gaziantep Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Ruh Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı, Gaziantep-Türkiye 3: Diyarbakır Bölge Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Ruh Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Kliniği, Diyarbakır-Türkiye 4: Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Biyokimya Anabilim Dalı, Şanlıurfa-Türkiye; Source Info: 2013, Vol. 3 Issue 3, p93; Subject Term: ELECTROCONVULSIVE therapy; Subject Term: RESEARCH; Subject Term: BIPOLAR disorder -- Treatment; Subject Term: MENTALLY ill; Subject Term: OXIDATIVE stress; Subject Term: PSYCHIATRIC research; Author-Supplied Keyword: bipolar disorder; Author-Supplied Keyword: combined treatment; Author-Supp
Article
Full-text available
Objective: To review and summarize data on the prevalence of overall personality disorder extracted from SCID-II (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III Axis II Disorders) studies conducted in Turkey with samples consisting of mental health consumers, and also to elaborate on the level and sources of heterogeneity. Method: MEDLINE, WOS, PsycINFO, ScienceDirect databases as well as the Turkish Psychiatric Database have been systematically searched. Relevant studies conducted with samples composed of psychiatric inpatients or outpatients receiving psychiatric treatment were included. The diagnostic rate of any personality disorder was regarded as the valid indicator of the overall personality disorder prevalence; therefore, papers presenting data not conducive to this goal were excluded. Results: A total of 311 papers were identified, and 55 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Following a critical appraisal of the quality of the data involving point prevalence rates ranging from 20% to 100%, we decided to include 35 studies in the quantitative synthesis. A random-effects meta-analysis followed by a subgroup analysis yielded a summary estimate of 52% [46 - 58%] for the prevalence of overall personality disorder. A high level of overall heterogeneity 84.8 % [80.0 - 88.4] was found to persist in each diagnostic subgroup with a particular primary diagnosis. Conclusion: The prevalence estimates derived from the meta-analysis of the SCID-II studies conducted in Turkey support the notion that personality disorder is present in nearly half of the mental health service consumers. That the level of heterogeneity across studies originating from Turkey alone was as high as those observed in previous reviews covering studies originating from various countries suggests that the very source of such heterogeneity might be questionable validity and reliability of SCID-II diagnoses.
Chapter
Objective: To carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis of age of onset (AoO) of bipolar disorder (BD).
Article
Full-text available
Objective: The effect of the presence of cluster B personality disorders which are frequent comorbidities with bipolar I disorder on the coping strategies was investigated and also it was studied whether there was a different profile. Methods: The patients who were in remission period and had bipolar disorder were included in the study. All things considered, we included 50 male and 50 female patients who had bipolar I disorder in remission period with cluster B personality disorder, and 50 male and 50 female patients without cluster B personality disorder. SCID-I and SCID-II were used respectively. The COPE scale was also given to determine patients' coping styles. Results: In terms of coping styles, the patients with cluster B personality disorder had higher dysfunctional coping styles scores. There were no significant differences for problem-focused coping scores, and emotion-focused coping scores among those patients. When the subscales were examined, the scores of focusing on emotions and expressing emotions, denial, retraining, and substance use subscales were higher among the patients with cluster B personality disorder. Conclusion: When the coping styles of bipolar patient groups those were divided according to having cluster B personality disorder or not were compared, it was seen that the group with cluster B personality disorder were using more dysfunctional coping styles. These findings can be important with regards to psychosocial interventions. Our findings must be replicated with larger and different comorbidity groups.
Article
Objective: The reliability and validity of the Turkish translation of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) were determined in this study, since it is the most common scale used in clinical studies of mood disorders. Method: Fifteen male and 15 female inpatients who were diagnosed as having "Bipolar Mood Disorder--Recent Episode Mania", were given YMRS by two experienced psychiatrists, while another experienced psychiatrist gave the Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Scale (BRMS) simultaneously to the same patient population hospitalized in Bakirköy State Hospital for Psychiatric and Neurological Diseases, Psychiatry and Mood Disorders Inpatient Unit 5. The internal consistency of the Turkish version of YMRS was evaluated by the Cronbach's Alpha test, while item/item, item/total, and cross validity correlations were evaluated by the Pearson correlation test. Inter-rater agreement and consistency was evaluated by weighted kappa analysis. Results: The internal consistency coefficient (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.79 for both researchers. Correlations of the items individually with the YMRS total scores were between 0.407 and 0.847. Agreement of the interviewers for the items was between 63.3%-95% and kappa values for the items were between 0.114 and 0.849. Correlation coefficients of YMRS and BRMS of the researchers were 0.72 for the first researcher and 0.71 for the second researcher. Conclusion: The Turkish translation of YMRS was found to be valid and reliable.
Article
The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R [Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Revised] (SCID) is a semistructured interview for making the major Axis I and Axis II diagnoses. It is administered by a clinician or trained mental health professional who is familiar with the DSM-III-R classification and diagnostic criteria (1). The subjects may be either psychiatric or general medical patients or individuals who do not identify themselves as patients, such as subjects in a community survey of mental illness or family members of psychiatric patients. The language and diagnostic coverage make the SCID most appropriate for use with adults (age 18 or over), but with slight modification, it may be used with adolescents. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
Background: Comorbid personality disorders have been shown to be a prominent factor affecting symptom severity and course in bipolar disorder (BD) patients. Bipolar patients with personality disorder had more relapses, poorer prognosis and worse treatment response than those without an axis II diagnosis. Objective: We evaluated the prevalence rate of comorbid personality disorder in 74 bipolar I disorder cases who were in remission and tried to elucidate the possible relationship between comorbid axis II disorders and prognosis, severity and treatment features of BD cases. Methods: Diagnosis of all personality disorder comorbidities was evaluated using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Axis-II Disorders (SCID-II), while the general psychopathology level was assessed using the Symptom Check List (SCL-90-R). A questionnaire for acquiring sociodemographic and clinical variables was also used. Results: Sixty-two per cent of bipolar I patients in this sample had at least one comorbid axis II disorder. The most common comorbid cluster of personality disorder was cluster C (48.6%), followed by cluster A (25.7%) and cluster B (20.3%) personality disorders. Assessment of demographic and clinical variables revealed that bipolar patients with comorbid personality disorder were mainly female, had multiple affective episodes, and had attempted suicide more often than patients without personality disorder. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that comorbid personality disorder might alter the course of BD and result in a poorer prognosis and more severe psychopathology. Further prospective controlled studies minimizing the bias of interviewers and other confounding factors would help us to understand the pure impact of personality disorder on the course of BD, its prognosis and response to treatment.
Article
The association of mood disorders with personality disorders (PDs) is relevant from a clinical, therapeutic and prognostic point of view. To examine this issue, we compared the prevalence of DSM-III-R personality disorders assessed with SCID-II in patients with depressive (n 5 117) and bipolar (n 5 71) disorders both recovered from a major depressive index episode that needed hospital admission. PDs prevalence and comorbidity with axis I were calculated. Avoidant PD (31.6%) (O.R. 5 1.7, C.I. 5 1.06–2.9, P , 0.01), borderline PD (30.8%) and obsessive–compulsive PD (30.8%) were the most prevalent axis II diagnoses among patients with depressive disorder. In bipolar disorder group, patients showed more frequently obsessive–compulsive PD (32.4%), followed by borderline PD (29.6%) and avoidant PD (19.7%). Avoidant PD showed a trend toward being significantly more prevalent among depressives (P , 0.07). A different pattern of PDs emerges between depressive and bipolar patients. © 2001 Elsevier Science B. V. All rights reserved.
Article
We compared rates of DSM-III-R personality disorders in 33 first-episode and 26 multiple-episode bipolar patients. Patients were evaluated with the patient and personality disorders versions of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R. Significantly more multiple-episode patients (65%) met DSM-III-R criteria for a personality disorder than did first-episode patients (33%). Race was also associated with a diagnosis of a personality disorder. Personality disorders may be associated with multiple affective episodes in bipolar patients.
Article
The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of personality disorders in a group of outpatients with bipolar I disorder. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Personality Disorders (SCID-II) was administered to 90 bipolar outpatients who met the DSM-III-R criteria and 58 control subjects. Of the patients and controls, 47.7% and 15.5%, respectively, had at least one personality disorder. At least one personality disorder in clusters A, B, and C and obsessive-compulsive, paranoid, histrionic, and borderline personality disorders were significantly more prevalent in bipolars. Suicide attempts were more frequent in patients with a history of personality disorder.
Article
An eleven item clinician-administered Mania Rating Scale (MRS) is introduced, and its reliability, validity and sensitivity are examined. There was a high correlation between the scores of two independent clinicians on both the total score (0.93) and the individual item scores (0.66 to 0.92). The MRS score correlated highly with an independent global rating, and with scores of two other mania rating scales administered concurrently. The score also correlated with the number of days of subsequent stay in hospital. It was able to differentiate statistically patients before and after two weeks of treatment and to distinguish levels of severity based on the global rating.
Article
This study investigated the personality disorders of 21 recent-onset Bipolar Disorder patients using the revised Million Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI-II; Millon, 1987). Personality disorder assessments, conducted after patients' clinical symptoms had settled, indicated that 17 patients received at least one MCMI-II personality disorder diagnosis with a trend toward multiple diagnoses. Narcissistic, Antisocial, and Histrionic personality disorders were diagnosed most frequently and were the scales most elevated. Schizoid and Compulsive personality disorders were the scales least elevated. Diagnostic concordance between the MCMI-II and the Structured Interview for DSM-III Personality (SIDP; Pfohl, Stangl, & Zimmerman, 1983) was poor; the MCMI-II made more multiple diagnoses. Implications of the discrepancies between these instruments and suggestions for future research are discussed.