ChapterPDF Available

Healthy Stress Management (from ACSM's Resources for the Exercise Physiologist, 2nd edition)

Authors:

Abstract

Chapter 13 of ACSM's Resources for the Exercise Physiologist. Health Stress Management.
1
OBJECTIVES
Healthy Stress
Management
John B. Bartholomew and Matthew Stults-Kolehmainen •AQ1•
CHAPTER
13
To examine the effects of stress on health behaviors
(including physical activity), well-being, and physical
health.
To evaluate the role of exercise and how it may be uti-
lized effectively to manage acute and chronic stress.
To identify the role of other techniques and resources in
effective stress management.
ACSM-RCEP2_CH13.indd 1 1/31/17 2:41 PM
2
ACSM’s Resources for the Certified Exercise Physiologist www.acsm.org
INTRODUCTION
Psychological stress is an enduring and relevant issue for the health care and fitness
professional. For instance, a wide swath of society reports being stressed, as deter-
mined by the Stress in America investigation (6). This report, published annually by
the American Psychological Association, found that during the financial crisis of
the late 2000s, this score was greater than 6 (on a 1–10 scale, with 10 being “a great
deal of stress”) (6). Although the average score has dropped to just under 5 in 2014
— indicating improving conditions — it remains a reasonably high level of stress.
This report also corroborates a large literature that has generally found stress to
negatively impact health. Specifically, stress has been linked with the common cold,
development of chronic illness, including cardiovascular disease and stroke, and
worsening of autonomic diseases, such as multiple sclerosis (MS), and premature
death (31). How stress and health are connected is complex, but likely involves the
effects of stress on motivation for and practice of health behaviors, both positive
(e.g., exercise and physical activity) and negative (e.g., illicit drug use). Exercise, on the
other hand, is typically a productive way to cope with stress, and a growing literature
indicates that exercise programs have a positive impact on perceptions of stress.
Many other stress management techniques have also been successfully utilized,
such as mindfulness meditation, biofeedback and massage. Lastly, it goes without
saying that this concept is also personally relevant because exercise professionals —
like anyone else — are not immune to the effects of stress.
Definition and Characteristics of Stress
Stress is a popular term in today’s vocabulary, used in regular, everyday language (109). People often
use the word stress to express uncomfortable situations in life, with phrases such as “I feel stressed
out” or “my job is stressful,” and the word is often used to refer to pressure or tension (109). In fact,
if you search books for these terms (https://books.google.com/ngrams; used January 13, 2017), it
is clear that use of the words “stressful” and “stressed out” are still exponentially increasing, indi-
cating a clear and continued relevance for today’s society. Likewise, “stress” ranks in the top 2,100
of English words currently used, more common than words like “actions,“improved,“milk,” and
“spot” (http://www.wordcount.org; used January 13, 2017).
From a scientific perspective, however, stress is defined as the process by which one responds to
an environmental demand that is perceived as threatening (109). Understanding the interaction
between the environment and the person is important — essentially, stress occurs whenever an en-
vironmental demand taxes one’s resources (68). This discrepancy between demands and resources
elicits a physiological response that compensates for the disturbance and restores equilibrium (ho-
meostasis). The specific pattern of responses may be physical (e.g., increased heart rate or blood
pressure), behavioral (e.g., increased movement, such as pacing), psychological (e.g., emotional
distress), or a combination of these reactions (109). If demands exceed resources over a long period
of time one’s well-being may be endangered, and the inability of the body to cope properly and
restore homeostasis after exposure to a stressor can result in biological or psychological damage
(119). Stress encompasses this full process — from demand to response and recovery. As such, it is
important to consider the component parts.
ACSM-RCEP2_CH13.indd 2 1/31/17 2:42 PM
3Chapter 13 Healthy Stress Management
The stimulus, or environmental demand, is known as a stressor. Stressors have a diverse set
of sources and characteristics. To start, the source of a stressor can come from within the person
(e.g., a health problem), the family (e.g., divorce), the community (e.g., crime, traffic), or the society
(e.g., civil unrest). Stressors vary in intensity, from mild (e.g., waiting in a long line) to severe (e.g.,
witnessing the 911 tragedy). Stressors differ in their time course, from infrequently to very often.
For example, chronic stress is often thought of as the steady accumulation of minor, everyday chal-
lenges, such as daily demands from clients or patients at work (90). Chronic stress could also be
described as the long-term grinding kind of stress, and some examples of this might be: poverty,
demanding jobs with long work hours, or poor relationships (133). The duration of a stressor can
also be acute, as in an immediate “fight or flight” response (e.g., seeing a snake). The duration of
the stressor is not always easy to determine. For example, a major life event, such as experiencing a
car wreck, may in itself only last seconds, but the repercussions may be long-lasting. Stressors that
are severe, occur often, and of longer duration are considered to be the most impactful and poten-
tially damaging. However, even small incidents in everyday life (i.e., daily hassles) such as giving
a speech, encountering heavy traffic, or misplacing keys can be perceived as stressful and possibly
have a larger effect as they occur consistently over time. That is, recent minor life events, major life
events, and traumatic events can add up to form cumulative adversity. Thus, any single stressor or
event may not be considered a significant disturbance in isolation, but the additive effect of these
may be damaging (130).
Importantly, not all stressors are perceived as negative; indeed, some stress is considered favor-
able and adaptive. Good stress, or eustress, is considered to be a pleasant and stimulating experi-
ence that promotes growth, development, and improvement in performance (93). An example of
this type of stress might be a marriage, addition to the family, or a job promotion (109). Conversely,
bad stress or distress is negative and more likely to be disruptive. An example of this type of stress
could include being diagnosed with an incurable illness or loss of employment. However, the
perception that an event is stressful depends entirely on the individual and his or her appraisal
process and resources needed to meet the demand. These will be addressed in the next section on
the appraisal of stress.
Appraisal of Stress
According to the transactional model of stress and coping, the impact of a stressor is largely based
on one’s cognitive appraisal of two components, namely the event’s threat (primary appraisal) and
availability of resources (secondary appraisal) (28,67,68). In primary appraisal, individuals gauge
both their susceptibility to and the severity of the threat by asking questions such as “What does
this mean to me?” and “Will I be in trouble?” The significance of a stressor is further refined by one’s
expectations of future harm and potential for achieving growth, mastery, and additional resources.
These appraisals may, therefore, result in perceptions of positive challenge instead of negative threat
(113). For example, a sedentary person starting a new exercise routine may perceive a bout of exer-
cise as unsafe and thus injurious, or he may think of it as fairly benign, fun, and challenging. With
secondary appraisal, one evaluates their resources to control and cope with the stressor to either
alter the situation or at least manage the emotional reaction. For secondary appraisal, individuals
evaluate (a) their resources available to cope with the stressor (perceived control over the threat),
(b) their emotional reaction (perceived control over feelings), and finally, (c) their ability to deal ef-
fectively with the resources concerning the burden of stress (coping self-efficacy) (51). For example,
exercise may be less threatening if a new exerciser perceives that she has adequate resources to deal
with the experience (e.g., plenty of water, time to take breaks, someone to ask for help), the ability
to manage these resources (e.g., use of a smartphone application, ability to approach someone for
guidance) and the ability to manage emotions (e.g., minimize feelings of hurt or pain). Each of
these is a part of the coping process — a process that is critical for understanding the impact of a
given demand on each persons response.
ACSM-RCEP2_CH13.indd 3 1/31/17 2:42 PM
4
ACSM’s Resources for the Certified Exercise Physiologist www.acsm.org
Coping
Coping is what people do to alleviate, eliminate, or manage stress, and this term has as many
meanings as the term stress. Coping activities are geared toward decreasing the person’s appraisal
of (or concern of) the discrepancy between the demands of the situation and the resources of
the person (113). Coping is an ongoing, dynamic process that involves continuous appraisals and
reappraisals of the shifting person–environment relationship (68). That means that coping reflects
our efforts to both manage the demands of a situation as well as our response to those demands.
In general, to neutralize or reduce stress, a person will attempt to change the environment, their
perception of it, or the meaning of the stressor. The transactional model of stress and coping
suggests that appraisals influence and predict the specific coping processes implemented during
a stressful event (68). According to the original model, coping efforts were conceptualized in two
dimensions, problem management (i.e., problem-focused coping) and emotional regulation (i.e.,
emotion-focused coping).
Problem-Focused Coping
In problem-focused coping, the person attempts to modify the nature of the stressor by either
reducing the demands of the stressful situation or expanding his or her resources to deal with it
(113). This type of coping may include actively seeking out information, talking with a profes-
sional or friend to get advice on how to handle the problem, or drawing from previous experience
and knowledge to brainstorm, weigh alternatives, and make plans — all in an attempt to resolve
the problem (51). Examples of problem-focused coping in everyday life would be negotiating an
extension on an assignment, learning a new skill (e.g., time management, assertiveness training),
making a new relationship with someone who has expertise in the problem area, or seeking out a
less stressful job (113). This type of coping is most often used when people believe that either the
personal resources or the demands of the situation are changeable (68), thereby resulting in the
perception of control and self-efficacy (51).
Emotion-Focused Coping
Emotional regulation is a more passive coping effort where the person attempts to control or
manage the emotional response to a stressful event, particularly one that is difficult to change.
In this type of coping, people engage in behaviors to distract their attention from the problem
or to simply make themselves feel better. In the 2015 Stress in America report, nearly one-half of
respondents endorsed exercise/walking to deal with stress. Respondents also endorsed listening to
music, watching TV, surfing the Internet, napping/sleeping, eating, drinking alcohol, and smoking
to manage stress (in that order). As can be seen in this list, not all emotion-focused coping would
be considered unproductive or negative. Some are positive pursuits which help a person endure a
temporary period of emotional distress. The key difference from problem-focused coping is that
the person is trying to modify their emotional response rather than dealing with the challenge.
People tend to use emotion-focused coping when they believe that the circumstances they are
facing are fixed and they cannot change their stressful condition (68). When a stressor is appraised
as uncontrollable and highly threatening, individuals often adopt disengaging or passive coping
strategies (134). One may attempt to alter thoughts about the stressful situation; denying, distanc-
ing, and avoiding the situation (51). Unfortunately, escape-avoidance behavior (e.g., hiding feelings,
refusing to think about illness or situation) has been associated with higher levels of psychological
distress and poorer quality of life (10,138). Accepting responsibility (which involves acknowledging
the role one has played in the situation and trying to make things right) and positive reappraisal
(which involves choosing to create a positive meaning from the situation, rather than a negative
meaning) are more effective techniques. Recent evidence indicates that suppressing thoughts about
One common stressor in the health and fitness setting is the stress of receiving a fitness or body
composition assessment. For some, this may be a time of excitement (e.g., eustress) about start-
ing (or completing) a training regimen. For others, facing objective data about their lack of phys-
ical conditioning may elicit feelings of threat and dread (e.g., distress). Feedback about one’s
fitness and performance may be most intimidating for individuals lacking adequate baseline
fitness and training experience. In a study investigating the response to body composition testing
with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), all participants responded with a decline in positive
affect (e.g., enthusiasm, high energy, alertness) (44). Clearly, seeing an image that depicts your
body fat may create a sense of displeasure for anyone. However, an increase in negative affect
(e.g., distress, anger, guilt), was only observed for overweight and obese individuals, for whom
feedback about body fat may have been a particularly threatening experience. Later research
(45) suggests that this negative emotional response may actually undermine future motivation
for exercise and diet. Specifically, those with a negative response reported eating significantly
greater amounts calorically dense and highly palatable foods in the week following testing (i.e.,
ice cream) (45). This suggests that fitness professionals must be aware of the potential of their
feedback to clients to increase stress and undermine their goals of an active, healthy lifestyle.
Sometimes, negative feedback is important, but it is just as important to help the client cope
with this information through problem-focused (e.g., choosing an appropriate exercise program)
and emotion-focused (e.g., encouragement, comparison to former clients who improved) efforts.
•AQ2•
ACSM-RCEP2_CH13.indd 4 1/31/17 2:42 PM
5Chapter 13 Healthy Stress Management
the stressful event and the experience of the event have no positive impact on coping with feelings
(142). Conversely, reappraising the emotional stimulus and using cognitive techniques like per-
spective taking are the most effective (142).
Depending on the individual and the situation, a person may be more inclined to engage either
in problem-focused or in emotion-focused coping (47,48). However, both may be necessary and
therefore will be used in combination with each other to manage emotions in the short term but
also engage in active, problem solving. Exercise, such as a short walk around the block, is an excel-
lent way to help temporarily manage distress (41). Once the person is more calm and focused, it is
easier to initiate efforts to deal with the challenge.
The Response to Stress
Stress has a combined and interrelated impact on the physiological and psychological aspects of
a person, including bodily systems, mental processes (e.g., distress, negative affect), and behaviors.
The physiological and psychological response of a person to a stressor is called strain. Strain, if
severe or prolonged, can negatively affect the functioning and health of a person, increase illness
vulnerability, and worsen disease progression and activity (90).
When an event or stimulus exceeds one’s capacity (e.g., is stressful), the body elicits an immedi-
ate response to counteract the disturbance and restore homeostatic balance. The stress response is
similar across species and is, therefore, often referred to as the general adaptation syndrome. This
response has three main stages of varied and undefined duration, although the specific response
depends on the characteristics of the individual (e.g., fitness, personality) and their appraisal,
amongst other factors. If stressors begin to accumulate — and recovery is inadequate — a person
may begin to experience excessive wear and tear or allostatic load where stress responses become
dysregulated and ineffective. The next sections will describe both the general adaptation syndrome
and allostatic load model in more detail (92).
One common stressor in the health and fitness setting is the stress of receiving a fitness or body
composition assessment. For some, this may be a time of excitement (e.g., eustress) about start-
ing (or completing) a training regimen. For others, facing objective data about their lack of phys-
ical conditioning may elicit feelings of threat and dread (e.g., distress). Feedback about one’s
fitness and performance may be most intimidating for individuals lacking adequate baseline
fitness and training experience. In a study investigating the response to body composition testing
with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), all participants responded with a decline in positive
affect (e.g., enthusiasm, high energy, alertness) (44). Clearly, seeing an image that depicts your
body fat may create a sense of displeasure for anyone. However, an increase in negative affect
(e.g., distress, anger, guilt), was only observed for overweight and obese individuals, for whom
feedback about body fat may have been a particularly threatening experience. Later research
(45) suggests that this negative emotional response may actually undermine future motivation
for exercise and diet. Specifically, those with a negative response reported eating significantly
greater amounts calorically dense and highly palatable foods in the week following testing (i.e.,
ice cream) (45). This suggests that fitness professionals must be aware of the potential of their
feedback to clients to increase stress and undermine their goals of an active, healthy lifestyle.
Sometimes, negative feedback is important, but it is just as important to help the client cope
with this information through problem-focused (e.g., choosing an appropriate exercise program)
and emotion-focused (e.g., encouragement, comparison to former clients who improved) efforts.
•AQ2•
HOW TO The Experience of Stress and Coping Associated with
Fitness Testing
ACSM-RCEP2_CH13.indd 5 1/31/17 2:42 PM
6
ACSM’s Resources for the Certified Exercise Physiologist www.acsm.org
General Adaptation Syndrome
The physiologic stress response of the body was first theorized by Hans Selye (188), who later
became known as the father of stress research. Selye conducted experiments that exposed animals
to various and diverse homeostatic challenges such as heat, cold, infection, and toxic substances
and objectively measured physiological changes. The reaction to each stressor varied respectively
according to its unique characteristics, but his primary finding was an underlying nonspecific re-
sponse pattern that was consistent across the different stressors. This stereotypical response pattern
of stress was coined the general adaptation syndrome (GAS).
The GAS consists of three broad stages, each with a wide variety of nonspecific and specific re-
sponses, all working together to restore homeostasis and ensure the survival of the organism. The
first stage is called the alarm reaction, where the stressor is first recognized by the system and a fight-
or-flight response is initiated (118). The second stage is that of resistance, where a cascade of cardio-
vascular, metabolic, hormonal, and immune changes is generated as a compensatory stress reaction
(113). During this stage, some compensatory reactions may include the release of glucocorticoids (e.g.,
cortisol), the activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis, and changes in autonomic
neurotransmitters and inflammatory cytokines (92). The last stage is that of exhaustion, when the or-
ganism has depleted all biochemical substrates and additional resources and is no longer able to mount
a defense to the stressor (118). If the stressor continues and activation of these systems is extended for
a long period, the bodily systems can eventually break down and result in dysfunction of major organs
(e.g., heart or brain). In extreme situations, stress-related exhaustion has the capacity to result in death
(118). On the basis of GAS, the impact of repeated stress exposure can be problematic because indi-
viduals who remain in the resistance phase have difficulty withstanding additional challenges (118).
For example, there is evidence that those experiencing higher levels of chronic, unremitting stress have
difficulty recovering from strenuous resistance exercise, taking two to four times as long to recover as
those reporting lower levels of chronic stress (125,126) (see Exercise is Medicine Connection).
Stress and Recovery, Implications for Exercise and Adaptation
How people respond to a bout of exercise is also impacted by the
experience of stress in their lives. The stress response can essen-
tially be divided into two phases, reactivity and recovery (return to
homeostasis). The physical and metabolic stress of exercise results
in decrements of function initially. For instance, after completing a vigorous bout of resistance
training muscles that have been exercised will be fatigued and unable to generate high force. Such
a response is typically followed by quick rebound and adaptation, but these processes and the
speed of recovery can vary greatly between individuals, from 24 to 96 hours for recovery. Chronic
psychological stress includes things like changing jobs, poor performance in a class, and ending a
relationship. College students who reported higher chronic stress also had much slower recovery
from heavy resistance training (125,126). That is, even though they did the same challenging bout
of exercise — multiple repetitions on a leg press machine — they needed almost 4 days to fully
recover from the activity. In contrast, a person reporting lower stress recovered in about 1 day.
Such an effect may help to account for why some individuals respond to exercise with positive
adaptations, while others have little to no change (83). Indeed, those reporting higher chronic
stress have been shown to gain less strength over a multi-month resistance training program (16).
Some of this may be due to interference from the stress response. That is, higher cortisol levels
may undermine recovery. It may also be due to how these people cope with stress (e.g., problems
with sleep, or change in diet). Regardless, it is important for fitness professionals to be aware of the
stress of their clients and how this might impact their training.
EXERCISE IS MEDICINE CONNECTION
ACSM-RCEP2_CH13.indd 6 1/31/17 2:42 PM
7Chapter 13 Healthy Stress Management
Allostasis and Allostatic Load Model
Allostasis is the ability to achieve stability through change, and the allostatic load model refers to
the rapid activation of bodily systems to cope with a stressor and restore homeostasis as effectively
and efficiently as possible (90). In regard to allostasis, all of the systems in the body are involved,
including the autonomic nervous system and HPA axis along with the cardiovascular, immune, and
metabolic systems (90). However, if the body does not compensate well and the wear and tear of
repeated stressors on the body accumulates (i.e., allostatic load), then there is an increased risk of
the development of physical ailments (91). Overactivity of the allostatic systems, where there is lim-
ited time for rest and restoration, can increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (75). Sometimes,
the body is unable to stop or shut off the stress response even after the stressor has ended. When
this occurs, the systems can be driven to exhaustion resulting in the breakdown of feedback mech-
anisms and overexposure to stress hormones such as cortisol (75). Stress, chronic and acute, minor
and severe, can have an impact on the functioning of an individual. Likewise, any accumulation of
a certain type of stressor or combination of various stressors can be damaging to one’s health (104).
This explains the link between stress and health outcomes, which are detailed in the following text.
The Effects of Stress on Health
Stress has consistently been related to poor physical and mental health (93,130). The physical changes
in response to chronic or intense stress can lead to, contribute to, or worsen life-threatening and
life-altering conditions such as myocardial infarction, stroke, cancer, or autonomic diseases. In the
Stress in America report, respondents disclosed that stress was impacting their health to such a degree
that the report was entitled “Paying with Our Health” (6). The American Institute of Stress (3) has
compiled a list of several signs and symptoms of excessive stress (Table 13.1), and this list includes
physical, emotional, and behavioral responses and conditions. Some of these symptoms are relatively
mild, such as blushing and headaches, while others are serious, such as social isolation and excessive
drug use. The American Psychological Association (4) notes that there are not always symptoms
associated with the experience of stress. For instance, some symptoms may be camouflaged by med-
ications. The following sections describe some of the most common stress-related health problems.
Digestive Issues
Ulcers, inflammatory bowel disease, and irritable bowel syndrome are all disorders in the digestive
tract that are influenced by stress (113). Ulcers are due to an increase in gastric juices and erosion of
the lining of the stomach or upper small intestine. Inflammatory bowel disease may involve inflam-
mation of the colon and small intestine, whereas irritable bowel syndrome may involve diarrhea,
constipation, and abdominal pain (113). The connection between stress and digestive tract prob-
lems has been linked to alternations in bacterial growth in the gut, but many other mechanisms
likely play a role (89).
Headaches
Intense headaches can also be a physical disorder that results from exposure to chronic stress.
The two most common recurrent headaches are migraines and tension-type headaches (72,105).
Migraines are typified by intense throbbing and pulsating sensations in the head, often accom-
panied by sensations of nausea and sensitivity to stimuli. Stress is the most common trigger for
the development of migraines but may also magnify the effects of migraines (114). Tension-type
headaches are the result of the contraction and tightening of muscles in the neck and head, which
is a common reaction of persons under stress (113). In both cases, the strain of the headache itself
is a stressor, necessitating a coping response, the selection of which may have effects on choices to
be physically active or sedentary (66).
ACSM-RCEP2_CH13.indd 7 1/31/17 2:42 PM
8
ACSM’s Resources for the Certified Exercise Physiologist www.acsm.org
Cardiovascular, Metabolic Diseases and the Role of Cortisol
Unresolved, chronic stress profoundly affects the cardiovascular system, including the heart, blood
vessels, and blood itself (124). High levels of stress have been associated with abnormally enlarged
hearts and hypertension (115). These changes in the heart and blood vessels can increase cardio-
vascular reactivity to a stressor, which is considered a risk factor for the development of coronary
heart disease (84,121). Persons under stress have higher concentrations of activated platelets
(82,100) and more triglycerides, free fatty acids, and lipoproteins in the blood (76,99,141), which
promote the development of plaques in the arteries, or atherosclerosis leading to increased blood
pressure and increased likelihood of myocardial infarction and stroke (113). Corticosteroids,
specifically cortisol, are released in response to a stressful event (especially social stressors), and
1. Frequent headaches, jaw clenching, or pain 26. Insomnia, nightmares, disturbing dreams
2. Gritting, grinding teeth 27. Difficulty concentrating, racing thoughts
3. Stuttering or stammering 28. Trouble learning new information
4. Tremors, trembling of lips, hands 29. Forgetfulness, disorganization, confusion
5. Neck ache, back pain, muscle spasms 30. Difficulty in making decisions
6. Light-headedness, faintness, dizziness 31. Feeling overloaded or overwhelmed
7. Ringing, buzzing, or popping sounds 32. Frequent crying spells or suicidal thoughts
8. Frequent blushing, sweating 33. Feelings of loneliness or worthlessness
9. Cold or sweaty hands, feet 34. Little interest in appearance, punctuality
10. Dry mouth, problems swallowing 35. Nervous habits, fidgeting, feet tapping
11. Frequent colds, infections, herpes sores 36. Increased frustration, irritability, edginess
12. Rashes, itching, hives, “goose bumps” 37. Overreaction to petty annoyances
13. Unexplained or frequent “allergy” attacks 38. Increased number of minor accidents
14. Heartburn, stomach pain, nausea 39. Obsessive or compulsive behavior
15. Excess belching, flatulence 40. Reduced work efficiency or productivity
16. Constipation, diarrhea 41. Lies or excuses to cover up poor work
17. Difficulty breathing, sighing 42. Rapid or mumbled speech
18. Sudden attacks of panic 43. Excessive defensiveness or suspiciousness
19. Chest pain, palpitations 44. Problems in communication, sharing
20. Frequent urination 45. Social withdrawal and isolation
21. Poor sexual desire or performance 46. Constant tiredness, weakness, fatigue
22. Excess anxiety, worry, guilt, nervousness 47. Frequent use of over-the-counter drugs
23. Increased anger, frustration, hostility 48. Weight gain or loss without diet
24. Depression, frequent, or wild mood swings 49. Increased smoking, alcohol, or drug use
25. Increased or decreased appetite 50. Excessive gambling or impulse buying
Table 13.1 Signs and Symptoms of Excessive Stress
Source: Adapted with permission from http://www.stress.org/stress-effects/.
ACSM-RCEP2_CH13.indd 8 1/31/17 2:42 PM
9Chapter 13 Healthy Stress Management
high concentrations of cortisol in the blood over time can increase the risks of cardiovascular
disease (75,76). In addition, by blocking the uptake of glucose from the cells, high levels of corti-
sol increase insulin resistance and can lead to the development of Type 2 diabetes (76). Cortisol
also contributes to the accumulation of fat in the abdominal region, and this visceral fat is readily
released into the bloodstream. Overall, stress can have a major impact on the functioning of the
cardiovascular and metabolic systems and can lead to the development and progression of cardio-
vascular pathologies.
Immune Suppression, Cancer, and Multiple Sclerosis
The immune systems of persons exposed to chronic, severe stress are often suppressed, rendering
a person more vulnerable to infections and susceptible to contracting a disease (29). In fact, Selye
observed that animals exposed to a stressor had a reduction in the size of immune system organs,
such as the thymus gland (74,118). The sympathetic nervous system activity and the release of
cortisol after a stressful event suppress the immune system, which limits the number of lympho-
cytes that are activated in response to a viral challenge (74). For example, among mice exposed
to repeated restraint stress, there was a decrease in the production of antibodies and activation of
T cells in response to the influenza virus (120). Among humans who were exposed to the com-
mon cold virus, those who had high stress developed cold symptoms at nearly twice the rate of
who had low stress (33). Similarly, psychological stress has been correlated with a reduction in
and activity of natural killer (NK) cells, which combat cancerous tumor cells and monitor neo-
plastic (new and abnormal) growth (52,55,73). NK cell activity is considered to be important to
survival rates in certain types of cancers, specifically breast cancer (70). Experiencing major social
stressors in the previous 5 years, such as marital divorce, infidelity, quarreling, and financial prob-
lems, has been associated with an increased risk or likelihood of being diagnosed with cervical
cancer (36). There is a lack of evidence in well-controlled studies linking stress with the onset of
cancer; however, specific stressors — such as loss of social support — have been found to influ-
ence the course of cancer (133). Depression, stress, and trauma have all adversely affected disease
progression in patients with HIV, and negative beliefs and expectations about the disease and
one’s future are associated with declines in helper T cells (CD4) and the onset of AIDS (69,117).
Finally, there is a significant association between stressful life events and relapse incidence of
multiple sclerosis (MS) (96). In one study, the majority of MS relapses were associated with one
or more stressful life events occurring in the 6 weeks prior (1). Overall, the functioning of the
immune system in fighting off viruses, infections, cancer, and autonomic diseases can be severely
compromised because of stress.
Stress and Psychological Functioning
The impact of stress is not limited to the physical body. Stress can affect psychological well-being,
cognitive function, emotion (e.g., distress, negative moods), social involvement, and behavior, such
as physical activity and sedentarism (129). There are several psychological conditions that can be
influenced by chronic stress such as anxiety, depression, fatigue, insomnia, and burnout, and these
conditions can have a profound negative impact on quality of life.
Psychological Distress, Depression, and Burnout
Chronic stress has been shown to promote psychological distress and the development of psy-
chological disorders (64,133). Research studies have shown that people who report exposure to
chronic stress in their marriage, household functioning, parenting, or jobs have an increased
likelihood of being psychologically distressed (101). Chronic stress is a greater predictor of
depressive symptoms than acute stress, and if it is experienced over 2 years or more, it may lead
ACSM-RCEP2_CH13.indd 9 1/31/17 2:42 PM
10
ACSM’s Resources for the Certified Exercise Physiologist www.acsm.org
to the development of depression (94). In addition, chronic stress of any type can magnify the
impact of even minimal life events on clinical depression (23). Persons who continually deal
with exposure to high levels of occupational stress can develop a psychological response called
burnout. Burnout is characterized by physical, mental, and emotional exhaustion (109). Burnout
is defined as a debilitating psychological condition brought about by unrelieved work stress,
which results in (a) depleted energy reserves, (b) lowered resistance to illness, (c) increased
dissatisfactions and pessimism, and (d) increased absenteeism and inefficiency at work (109).
Employees who experience burnout may develop a variety of symptoms, including overall job
dissatisfaction, lack of energy and insomnia, tension headaches, ulcers, and dysregulated cortisol
responses (107,109).
Cognition
High levels of cortisol associated with long or extreme exposure to stress have been related to cogni-
tive impairment, specifically in spatial memory tasks (20,76,110). This may be because the elevated
levels of glucocorticoids (i.e., cortisol) are associated with shrinkage and toxic degeneration of the
brains memory center, the hippocampus, in which loss of neurons and their connectivity occurs
(77–79,85,112). Burnout symptoms (described earlier) have been associated with cognitive failures
in everyday life, increased inhibition errors, and variability in performance on attention tasks (140).
Fortunately, exercise has the opposite effect, promoting memory and cognitive performance and
delaying the onset of dementia (56).
Healthy Stress Management
Although stressful events are unavoidable in daily life, the majority of people would prefer to limit
or manage the amount of exposure to stress. Currently, there is no drug that can be taken or ritual
that can be performed to make people “immune” to stress and stressors, but there are several strate-
gies for coping and managing stress. Both cognitive and behavioral approaches exist for decreasing
the negative impact of stress. Not all strategies work for everyone, but all play a role in preventing
or reducing stress and stress reactivity.
Exercise: Breaking the Link between Stress and Health Problems
Although the bulk of this chapter has focused on the negative impact of stress, it is encouraging
that the majority of studies demonstrate that exercise may neutralize this impact (26,49,130).
For example, men who report increased levels of exercise behavior also reported fewer health
problems across all levels of reported lifetime exposure to stress (130). Likewise, a study of
college students with high stress and low levels of leisure physical activity experienced more
physical symptoms and anxiety than did those students engaging in high levels of physical
activity (47). Given this, it is important to more fully explore the relationship between exercise
and stress.
Exercise
Physical exercise is one of the most cited means of managing stress (135). This recommendation
is found in any number of news reports, magazine articles, and blogs. Why would exercise be so
effective at managing stress? As was illustrated in the earlier discussion of the GAS and the alarm
reaction, the stress response is a set of physiological changes that disrupt homeostasis as it readies
the body for action — fight or flight. Unfortunately, most stress is psychological in nature (e.g.,
ACSM-RCEP2_CH13.indd 10 1/31/17 2:42 PM
11Chapter 13 Healthy Stress Management
exams, relational problems). Not only are these generally not reduced through physical action —
they can be made worse if the action is misplaced. This mismatch between the form of stress and
the body’s reaction can lead to a long-duration disruption of homeostasis that undermines physical
and mental health. Thus, one way to think about coping with stress is to find a physical action that
can make use of the alarm reaction.
Acute bouts of exercise have been shown to effectively serve this role and reduce the stress
response. One of the best examples of this is the ability of a single bout of exercise to reduce
feelings of anxiety and other negative moods. The benefit of exercise for state anxiety is very
consistent, and occurs with nearly all forms of activity — especially those of moderate to low
intensity (43,102). Although the benefit of exercise to improve mood and reduce stress also ap-
plies to resistance exercise (14), one should be cautious with high-intensity resistance exercise.
Continuous exercise above lactate threshold has consistently been shown to reduce mood during
exercise (42), which may serve to undermine its effectiveness for stress management. A closer
examination of this effect has revealed that high-intensity exercise may increase somatic anxi-
ety during exercise, but cognitive aspects of anxiety remain unaltered and both reduce during
recovery (19).
What is especially interesting is that exercise may also be of benefit to those who are living with
chronic mental health conditions. For example, exercise is sufficient to help manage anxiety and
mood in those who are clinically depressed (15). In fact, for those with a history of depression,
as little as 15 minutes of self-selected cycle exercise was enough to improve mood (88). In addi-
tion, exercise training has been associated with reductions in clinical levels of ongoing stress (7).
Studies have shown a significant reduction in stress across a range of conditions, from panic dis-
order (22) to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (40), and in a variety of populations, including
methadone-maintained drug abusers (38). Chronic occupational stress (49) and perceived stress
(98) also improve with several months of aerobic training.
Although there is no well-accepted mechanism to explain this effect, it has been suggested
that the improvement in managing stress may be due to the ability of exercise to improve pos-
itive emotions, which in turn are reduced by sedentary behaviors (57). This, in turn, allows for
the development of other psychological resources to combat the experience of stress (57). For
example, 20 minutes of low- to moderate-intensity treadmill exercise appears to be sufficient to
reduce sensitivity to anxiety (21). Moreover, a bout of exercise, especially higher doses of activity
(either high intensity or long duration) can actually reduce a person’s physiological response
to a later stressor (53). That is, on the days that a person completes a bout of exercise, they can
expect to have less physiological response to stress for the next hour or two than if they had
been sedentary.
Interestingly, despite the benefits of exercise on perceptions of stress, the experience of stressors
impedes efforts to be physically active (129). For example, those reporting high levels of chronic
stress experience dampened responses to exercise — lower pleasure and arousal but higher rat-
ings of perceived exertion (RPE) and pain, which may be a signal of dysregulation (80,128). Not
surprisingly, those who are less habitual in their exercise routines respond to periods of stress
with less physical activity (80). In contrast, those who have strong exercise habits appear to be
resilient in the face of stress and maintain their levels of activity (80). This may be due to the use
of exercise as a form of coping. Regardless, those who are inconsistently active — and are likely to
need help from an exercise professional the most — appear to be the least likely to adhere to an
exercise program. This may impact how the exercise prescription should be presented to these in-
dividuals. For example, among highly active individuals, enjoyment is the primary motive behind
exercise, whereas only a small percentage of highly active individuals report stress management
as a reason they exercise (127). Branding exercise for its ability to enhance fun, enjoyment and
challenge may be more important than advocating its therapeutic effects on mental and physical
health (116).
ACSM-RCEP2_CH13.indd 11 1/31/17 2:42 PM
12
ACSM’s Resources for the Certified Exercise Physiologist www.acsm.org
The most common instrument used to assess perception of chronic stress is the 10-item version
of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), which measures stress perceptions over the previous
month (30,32,34).
Brief Instructions and Tips
1. The questions in this scale ask you about your feelings and thoughts during the last month.
2. Beside each item, indicate the frequency of these feelings and thoughts (0 never, 1 almost
never, 2 sometimes, 3 fairly often, and 4 very often).
3. The best approach is to answer fairly quickly. That is, don’t try to count up the number of
times you felt a particular way that month but rather choose the option that seems like a
reasonable estimate.
4. After completing the questions, use the table called “Perceived Stress Scale Scoring” to
determine your score.
Question Never
Almost
Never Sometimes
Fairly
Often Very Often
1. How often have you been
upset because of something
that happened unexpectedly?
01234
2. How often have you felt that
you were unable to control the
important things in your life?
01234
3. How often have you felt ner-
vous and “stressed”?
01234
4. How often have you felt
confident about your ability
to handle your personal
problems?
01234
5. How often have you felt that
things were going your way?
01234
6. How often have you found that
you could not cope with all the
things that you had to do?
01234
7. How often have you been
able to control irritations in
your life?
01234
8. How often have you felt that
you were on top of things?
01234
9. How often have you been an-
gered because of things that
happened that were outside
of your control?
01234
10. How often have you felt diffi-
culties were piling up so high
that you could not overcome
them?
01234
HOW TO Rate Chronic Perceived Stress
ACSM-RCEP2_CH13.indd 12 1/31/17 2:42 PM
13Chapter 13 Healthy Stress Management
Other Modifiers or Buffers of Stress
Enhancing Social Support
Stress is typically perceived when demands outweigh resources. A key resource is social support.
When social resources are low, stressors may be particularly dire. In contrast, evidence indicates
that social support has a buffering effect on the harmful physical and mental effects of stress expo-
sure (136). It also enhances well-being and health, regardless of stress levels (18). People typically
seek out and rely on help and comfort from friends, neighbors, classmates, coworkers, significant
others, and health professionals, including fitness professionals (123,139).
Four types or functions of social support exist (59):
Emotional support — the provision of empathy, love, trust, and caring (e.g., actively listening to
concerns)
Instrumental support — the provision of tangible aid and services that directly meet a need (e.g.,
providing services at no additional cost to client when they are experiencing a traumatic stressor)
Informational support — the provision of advice and information concerning the problem (e.g.,
understanding why an issue is causing significant stress)
Appraisal support — the provision of information useful for self-evaluation purposes such as
constructive feedback and affirmation (e.g., helping client brainstorm possible solutions to a
problem)
Perceived Stress Scale Scoring
PSS scores are obtained by reversing responses (e.g., 0 4, 1 3, 2 2, 3 1 and 4 0) to
the four positively stated items (items 4, 5, 7, and 8) and then summing across all scale items.
Item Your response (0–4) Reverse score needed? Final item score
1 No
2 No
3 No
4 Yes
5 Yes
6 No
7 Yes
8 Yes
9 No
10 No
Grand total score
Interpretation and Normative Values
The scores can range from 0 to 40, and higher scores reflect a higher level of perceived
stress. High scores on the PSS-10 questionnaire have been associated with increased dif-
ficulty in making lifestyle changes, such as adopting physical activity, and increased sus-
ceptibility to stress-induced illness (129). Men in the United States have an average score
of about 12 and women have an average of about 14, but scores significantly vary by
race or ethnicity (i.e., African Americans average about 15), age (i.e., people 29 years and
younger have the highest reported stress) and education (i.e., less educated people are
more stressed) (30,34).
ACSM-RCEP2_CH13.indd 13 1/31/17 2:42 PM
14
ACSM’s Resources for the Certified Exercise Physiologist www.acsm.org
All types of support may be offered by a fitness professional. However, given the situation and
client, some types of support are more important and appropriate than others. The matching
hypothesis suggests that social support is most beneficial when it meets the needs caused by a
stressful event (35). Consider this real life scenario. A patient of a clinical exercise physiologist
(CEP) experienced traumatic flooding of his home midway through a training phase. The CEP
provided an ideal amount of social support; expressing empathy and genuine concern, placing the
training sessions on hold (with no penalty) and providing tips on maintaining fitness when stay-
ing out of town. Social aspects of exercise (e.g., walking with a friend) were emphasized. Later, the
CEP provided feedback on reinitiating a serious routine once the client was ready. A referral was
also made to a social worker, who provided additional assistance, helped the client to strengthen
existing relationships, expand their social network and develop new relationships, and get in-
volved in a self-help group. All of these actions improved social support resources (54,59,113,132)
and helped the client to manage their experience of a stressful event without sacrificing their
health goals.
The mechanism for how social support improves health and well-being is not clear. Social
support may improve coping responses by reducing uncertainty and unpredictability about a
stressful situation. This would, in turn, promote a greater sense of personal control and the use of
problem-focused coping methods (54). It may also be that social support merely relieves some of
the stressor-related demands through a sharing of the burden. Regardless, the many forms of social
support are an important contributor to the ability of people to cope with stress.
Improving Personal Control and Self-Efficacy
As alluded to earlier, another psychosocial factor that modifies the evaluation of stress is personal
control (9,95,137). There is evidence that people who have a strong sense of personal control
experience less of a negative response, or strain, with stressors, compared with those who feel they
have no control over their lives (93,131). Individuals who believe that they personally have control
over their lives are considered to have an internal locus of control. On the other hand, individuals
who believe that their lives are dictated by forces outside of themselves, such as destiny, fate, or
faith, have an external locus of control (107,111). These two areas of control have a major impact
on health and health practices. For instance, those with a more internal sense of control are more
persistent in their exercise behavior. Based on how it may impact health, sense of personal control
may be further divided into four different types (113):
1. Informational control — when a person can glean knowledge about the stressful event and the
potential consequences of the situation
2. Cognitive control — when a person can use thought processes and strategies to manipulate and
modify the impact of the stressor
3. Decisional control — when a person can choose between different courses of action
4. Behavioral control — when a person can take concrete action to reduce the impact of stress
When people perceive that they have a good sense of control they feel like they are able
to effectively make decisions and execute a plan of action to produce the outcome desired
(86,113). This points to another aspect of personal control, self-efficacy, which is the belief or
conviction that one can successfully execute the behavior required to produce the outcomes
desired (11). When encountering a challenging situation, a person will actively evaluate his or
her ability (i.e., efficacy) to properly execute behaviors and determine if they think that they
can be successful in handling an activity (108). Generally speaking, people who are highly
efficacious show less psychological and physiological strain in the face of a stressor than
those who are less efficacious (12,13,58). Goal setting and preplanning for stressors are use-
ful strategies help to boost self-efficacy to regulate ones behaviors in the face of demanding
situations (50).
ACSM-RCEP2_CH13.indd 14 1/31/17 2:42 PM
15Chapter 13 Healthy Stress Management
Nonexercise Techniques for Reducing Stress
Although it is critical for the exercise professional to understand the role of exercise as a stress man-
agement tool, there are numerous nonexercise techniques that are also successful in helping people
cope with stress, reduce arousal and promote relaxation (103). These include progressive muscle
relaxation, deep breathing, biofeedback, meditation, mindfulness, and massage (among many oth-
ers). Each of these areas takes months to years of persistent practice to master, and several, such as
massage, have their own certifications and credentialing. However, aspects of each technique may
be learned within a short period of time, and thus has utility for the exercise professional. Various
techniques may also be combined to suit different people and needs (61). To incorporate stress
management techniques into a fitness program, one might begin with time during the cool down
and stretching period after exercise when the focus is on relaxation and recovery (87,124).
Diaphragmatic Breathing and Body Scans
Breathing exercises are the easiest and fastest methods to induce the relaxation response, with capability
to relieve symptoms of stress and anxiety, including headaches, muscle tension, irritability, and fatigue
(39). Diaphragmatic breathing, or breathing from the stomach (as opposed to the chest) is superior for
the experience of these benefits. This consists of deep breaths into the lungs and exhaling as the dia-
gram contracts and relaxes. Beginners to this practice first must become aware of their normal breath-
ing habits, often while lying down with one hand on the abdomen and another on the chest. Usually
a body scan is also employed, where a person consciously examines the entire body, usually starting at
the toes and upward toward the scalp. Once awareness has been achieved, the practitioner can assume a
dead man” pose, lying with arms and legs spread and palms facing upward, scanning the body for ten-
sion and relaxing. Then one may focus the attention on the breath, breathing in through the nose and
out through the mouth slowly and in a rhythmic fashion. Even short bouts of diaphragmatic breathing
can provide immediately stress relief. Practice over a longer period (i.e., 30–60 minutes) in the recovery
period of exercise has even been shown to decrease free radical production and cortisol (87).
Progressive Muscle Relaxation
Progressive muscle relaxation is a technique that teaches people how to focus on certain muscle
groups and alternatively contract and relax these muscles, focusing on the sensation of relaxation
(39,60). This helps the individual to identify areas of the body that tighten and hold tension when
they are under stress (e.g., jaw clamps shut, shoulders tighten up, and fingers cramp). Once iden-
tified, feelings of tension can be targeted and neutralized. With practice, whenever a person feels
tension rising in these areas, they can stop what they are doing for 5–10 minutes, breathe deeply,
tighten (5–7 s) and relax the affected muscles (20–30 s), repeat systematically, and then return to
their work (39,133). Researchers have postulated that progressive muscle relaxation may addition-
ally promote feelings of calmness and generate pleasant thoughts in the individual, which counter-
act negative feelings and thoughts associated with stress (103).
Biofeedback
Biofeedback is a method of increasing control over bodily processes, such as heart rate, muscle
tension, or sweating, in response to a stressor (37,133). Biofeedback has been useful in treating
stress-related health problems, such as chronic muscle tension headaches (25). The procedure
involves attaching sensors to the body that provide immediate biophysiological feedback on how
a person’s body is responding to a stressor (i.e., seeing fluctuations in heart rate or electrodermal
activity). This process helps patients to recognize when their body is engaged in a stress response.
Individuals are then encouraged to modify their bodily response to the stressor. For instance, one
ACSM-RCEP2_CH13.indd 15 1/31/17 2:42 PM
16
ACSM’s Resources for the Certified Exercise Physiologist www.acsm.org
may be asked to slow down a speeding heart rate by blocking out all sounds and breathing deeply
until the heart rate reduces and returns to normal. This practice helps individuals gain awareness
of and attain voluntary control over their bodily response to a stressor.
Massage
Massage is the external application of pressure to muscles and tendons that can range from smooth, light
pressure to deep kneading motion, depending on technique, the purpose of the massage and individuals
preference. Deep tissue massage has been an effective method for reducing stress, muscle tension, pain,
and asthma symptoms, and has been shown to boost immune function (46,113). The deep tissue massage
is the application of forceful, penetrating pressure that is applied to the muscles and joints by a trained
massage therapist. Breast cancer patients in the earlier stages of the disease have shown positive results
after 3 weeks of massage therapy, such as a decrease in anxiety, depression, and anger and an improvement
in mood (55). These patients also showed a boost in their dopamine and serotonin levels and number of
NK immune cells and lymphocytes, which could potentially promote a better and faster recovery (55).
Meditation and Prayer
Meditation is an exercise of the mind in which the individual actively focuses on calming and quieting
the body while keeping the mind alert (109). There are several forms of meditation: (a) mantra med-
itation focuses on sounds and phrases, and the same word or verse is repeated over and over again
to promote concentration; (b) yantra meditation uses a visual image, and the person focuses on that
image to eradicate distracting thoughts from the mind; and (c) transcendental meditation incorporates
breathing, visualization, relaxation, and repetition (109). Transcendental meditation has been shown to
reduce stress and improve mental and physical health by decreasing blood pressure, heart rate, respira-
tory response, and stress hormone production (17,81). Use of meditation has also been associated with
improved lactate recovery after exercise (122). An alternative to meditation is the practice of prayer,
which has been associated with facets of recovery from illness and improved health outcomes (2).
Mindfulness
Mindfulness is the discipline of paying attention to the present moment in a deliberate (purposeful)
and nonjudgmental manner (63). It is especially useful during periods of stress, when the mind often
dwells on and is clouded by past experiences, current frustrations and hurts, and potential dire con-
sequences. The practice of mindfulness is useful for restoring the mind-body connection, bolstering
emotional balance, and enhancing functioning at work and in relationships (24). By being in the
present moment, without worry about the future or preoccupation with the past, one may observe
automatic emotions and behaviors with greater clarity and perspective. This permits development
of a deeper awareness about thoughts and feelings, body sensations, and habitual stress reactions,
which in turn encourages more healthy choices about health behaviors (63). Mindfulness is more
effective than relaxation practices for reducing ruminations and distracting thoughts, enhancing
positive states of mind (61), and increasing sense of control (8). To facilitate these changes, practi-
tioners practice acceptance, trust, patience, nonjudgment, having a beginner’s mind (i.e., curiosity),
nonstriving, and letting go (63) even during daily activities like putting on one’s workout clothes,
walking into the gym, and preparing the postworkout meal. Mindfulness can also be performed
during physical exercise, such as walking, by focusing more on (a) the present-moment experience
of moving, (b) bodily sensations (such as sweating, the heart rate, breathing), and (c) emotional re-
actions to such perceptions (such as excitement, fear, pain) (106). Some of these exercise sensations
and emotions are uncomfortable, but these would be observed and approached with openness and
self-compassion and not judged or avoided. Furthermore, attention is not paid to goals, striving and
competition, which can detract from the experience and render exercise less enjoyable.
ACSM-RCEP2_CH13.indd 16 1/31/17 2:42 PM
17Chapter 13 Healthy Stress Management
Yoga and Martial Arts
Some individuals may experience greater stress management with exercise programs that incorpo-
rate breath control, mindful movements and meditative practices. Yoga and martial arts, such as tai
chi and qigong incorporate all of these elements. Mindful exercise practices have been shown to
promote numerous health benefits, such as increases in positive emotions, dampened cortisol and
cardiovascular reactivity, and lower inflammatory responses to stress (27,62,71,97). Research indi-
cates that those who regularly practice yoga have substantially reduced serum interleukin 6 levels
(one of the primary inflammatory cytokines) compared with novice yoga attendees (65). Sessions
of yoga, tai chi, or other martial arts performed routinely are effective for reducing symptoms of
stress and improving sense of well-being (27,71,97).
Referring a Client or Patient to a Psychologist (Reviewed by Lydia R. Malcolm,
PhD, University of Miami)
Exercise professionals, such as personal trainers, often find themselves as confidants to their
clientele. Consequently, conversations about stressful experiences are quite common. Although
these are to be expected, occasionally a client may deal with stress poorly or in an inappropriate
manner. They may (a) display a number of symptoms, such as those in Table 13.1; (b) communi-
cate feelings of distress, worry, anxiety or other mental health problems; or (c) verbally expresses
a need for support. Under such conditions, referral to a mental health professional may be advis-
able. When referring a client make sure to be empathetic. Consider using language outlined in
Table 13.2. The American Psychological Association provides a number of resources, including
a mental health professional locator (http://locator.apa.org/), if a referral is accepted. Most im-
portantly, if a person is suicidal or discuss hurting themselves in any way, get professional help
immediately.
Step Action Suggested Remark
1 Start by broaching the topic with a
general observation.
“You seem to have a lot of stress.”
2 Normalize the context. “I see a lot of people who are dealing with ______ [fill in the
blank].”
3 Emphasize strengths. “It’s good that you are doing some healthy things, such as exer-
cising [and anything else you know they are doing] to help you
manage this situation”
4 Suggest that they seek out addi-
tional support.
“I know some of my clients have found that getting some extra
support to help with [stress, sadness, anxiety, grief, etc.] has
been helpful.”
5 Obtain permission to make a
referral.
“Would you like me to make a recommendation?”
6 If they deny needing additional help
keep the option available for future
need.
“It sounds like now might not be a good time for you to go
to therapy. You can always contact me at a later date for the
information.”
Table 13.2 Suggested Remarks When Making a Referral to a Mental
Health Professional
ACSM-RCEP2_CH13.indd 17 1/31/17 2:42 PM
18
ACSM’s Resources for the Certified Exercise Physiologist www.acsm.org
The Case of Terry
Narrative
Terry is a 55-year-old African American woman was referred to an integrated health center in a mid-sized urban
city by her primary care physician. She is in the obese category for body mass index (BMI) even after numerous
attempts to lose weight. She also continues to smoke 5–6 times a day, despite repeated warnings from her doctor.
She works full time and teaches elementary students at a local urban magnet school. Her job requires long hours at
work, grading on the weekends, and can be very stressful. She suffers from mild depression (diagnosis is depressive
disorder not otherwise specified), which has minimally improved since her husband died 3 years ago. In particular,
she reports that she has difficulty experiencing pleasure from things she used to enjoy. She has a good relationship
with her adult daughter, who lives locally.
Before her husband became sick, she reported that she and her husband were very active hikers and walked
daily. During her last attempt to be physically active, she maintained a personal training program (mostly resistance
training, 2 times a week) for 8 weeks until her apartment was broken into, disrupting her routine. She finished a
12-week program, but with great struggle. She has been inactive for about a year. Fortunately, she is metabolically
healthy (e.g., normal cholesterol and blood sugar), and her only other complaint is some mild symptoms of arthritis.
She has no family history of cardiovascular disease.
Based on her clinical intake and interest to lose weight and increase fitness, she was assigned to a licensed psy-
chologist and exercise physiologist (ACSM EP-C) for further evaluation, risk stratification and treatment. At intake,
she reported that her goals were to lose 15 pounds (returning to weight 3 years ago; approximately 165 lb), increase
fitness, improve her mental well-being, and maintain independence going into retirement.
Health Fitness Examination
Screening Tools and Outcome Measures:
PSS-10: Terry scored 20 (see box earlier for an interpretation)
Centers for Epidemiology Depression Scale (Revised): Terry scored 19 and did not meet or exceed the cut-off for
major depression based on other criteria.
Risk Stratification: Moderate (i.e., obesity, smoking, sedentarism, age)
Vitals
Age: 55 years; resting HR: 64 bpm; 66 bmp (second visit); resting BP: 119/63 mm Hg; 124/64 mm Hg (second
visit); height: 64 inches; weight: 178.5; 180.8 (second visit); BMI: 30.6; 31.0 (second visit)
Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Body Composition
YMCA Submaximal Cycle Ergometer Test predicted aerobic capacity 29 mL kg1 min1, 45th percentile for
age and gender.
Body fat estimated with bioelectrical impedance (Tanita model TBF 300 WA) 40.0%; 39.8% (second visit)
Waist circumference 99.5 cm; 99.0 cm (second visit)
Hip circumference 110.4 cm; 109.5 cm (second visit)
Submitted by Karyn Gunnet-Shoval, PHD
Terry is a middle-aged woman attempting to lose weight. Her chief complaint
is chronic stress, and she has a history of mild depression. She was referred to
an integrated health center by her primary care physician (PCP) to meet with
a licensed psychologist and an American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM)
Certified Exercise PhysiologistSM (EP-C).
•AQ3•
FPO
ACSM-RCEP2_CH13.indd 18 1/31/17 2:42 PM
19Chapter 13 Healthy Stress Management
References
1. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 9th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins; 2014.
2. Carek PJ, Laibstain SE, Carek SM. Exercise for the treatment of depression and anxiety. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2011;41(1):15–28.
3. Lavie CJ, Milani RV, O’Keefe JH, Lavie TJ. Impact of exercise training on psychological risk factors. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2011;53(6):464–70.
4. Stults-Kolehmainen M, Malcolm LR, DiLoreto J, Gunnet-Shoval K, Rathbun EI. Psychological interventions for weight management: a
primer for the allied health professional. ACSM Health Fitness J. 2015.
QUESTIONS
What testing and outcome measures may be appropriate in this case besides health fitness testing?
Are there indications for use of exercise in clients with chronic stress and mild depression?
How might an exercise program be structured and what resources may be needed for a client, such as Terry?
SUMMARY
The APA’s Stress in America reports from 2007 and 2015 demonstrate that stress continues
to be a problem in American society (5,60). Whether a person feels stressed or not, stress
is an everyday facet of life that must be managed. The perception of an event as stressful
greatly depends on the person and his or her perceived resources to deal with the stressors.
Situations that are perceived to be stressful may result in a variety of physical and mental
symptoms, including burnout, fatigue, headaches, gastrointestinal problems, muscular pain,
and greater risk for infections. Long-term chronic stressors can increase the risk of cardio-
vascular disease, heart attacks, stroke, and cancer. Contrary to popular belief, stress is not
always negative. Stress can act as a positive challenge that encourages individuals to rise to
the occasion and possibly even face their fears or anxieties. This chapter has offered and ex-
plained a wide variety of methods for buffering and decreasing the negative impact of stress
on the individual. Some tactics and strategies focus on changing the psychological percep-
tion of a stressor, and others on decreasing the physiological response to a stressor. Exercise
interventions are primarily an example of the latter, and only 10–15 minutes of moderate
aerobic activity, such as a brisk walk, may provide stress-relieving benefits (41). A challenge
for the health and fitness professional is to minimize the psychological toll of exercise itself,
which may be perceived as yet another task added to an already full plate. Indeed psycholog-
ical stress is associated with impaired efforts to be physically active (129). Perhaps by focus-
ing on an individual’s preferences and maximizing their exercise enjoyment, the full benefits
of exercise may be realized. Another strategy would be prescribing exercise regimens with
additional meditative qualities, such as mindful walking, yoga, or tai chi (97). A multifaceted
approach to stress and exercise may magnify results but does require the exercise practi-
tioner to be more mindful of the complex attributes of the stress experience.
ACSM-RCEP2_CH13.indd 19 1/31/17 2:42 PM
20
ACSM’s Resources for the Certified Exercise Physiologist www.acsm.org
STUDY QUESTIONS
1. Understanding stress: What is stress? How is stress different from stressors? Are all stressors bad?
What are some examples of good stress? What is the feeling of being stressed out and how does
it relate to distress?
2. Why are some people apparently immune to stress when they encounter a demanding situation?
Explain the two coping mechanisms that can be implemented to minimize the impact of stress.
Exercise is which of these?
3. Discuss the consequences of stress on the development and progression of disease and evidence
that exercise may buffer this relationship.
4. Before encountering a stressful event, how can a person can prepare himself or herself to ideally
handle the event and avoid becoming stressed? Discuss some of the strategies for weakening the
impact of stress.
5. What are examples of healthy stress management? Discuss three techniques or approaches for
handling and decreasing perceived stress, the potential benefits of each, and how they might be
integrated into a fitness program.
ACSM-RCEP2_CH13.indd 20 1/31/17 2:42 PM
21Chapter 13 Healthy Stress Management
REFERENCES
1. Ackerman KD, Heyman R, Rabin BS, et al. Stressful life events
precede exacerbations of multiple sclerosis. Psychosom Med.
2002;64(6):916–20. doi:10.1097/01.psy.0000038941.33335.40.
2. Ai AL, Dunkle RE, Peterson C, Bolling SF. The role of private
prayer in psychological recovery among midlife and aged
patients following cardiac surgery. Gerontologist. 1998;38(5):
591–601.
3. American Institute of Stress. 50 common signs and symp-
toms of stress. Fort Worth, TX: American Institute of Stress;
[cited 2015 Sept 29]. Available from: http://www.stress.org/
stress-effects/
4. American Psychological Association. Six myths about stress
[Internet]. Washington, (DC): American Psychological
Association; [cited 2015 Sept 29]. Available from: http://
www.apa.org/helpcenter/stress-myths.aspx
5. American Psychological Association. Stress in America
[Internet]. Washington (DC): American Psychological
Association; [cited 2013 Nov 7]. Available from: www.stressin
america.org
6. American Psychological Association. Stress in America:
paying with our health 2015 [Internet]. Washington (DC):
American Psychological Association; [cited 2015 Jun 29].
Available from: www.stressinamerica.org
7. Asmundson GJG, Fetzner MG, DeBoer LB, Powers MB, Otto
MW, Smits JAJ. Let’s get physical: a contemporary review of
the anxiolytic effects of exercise for anxiety and its disorders.
Depress Anxiety. 2013;30(4):362–73. doi:10.1002/da.22043.
8. Astin JA. Stress reduction through mindfulness meditation.
Effects on psychological symptomatology, sense of control, and
spiritual experiences. Psychother Psychosom. 1997;66(2):97–106.
9. Averill JR. Personal control over aversive stimuli and its
relationship to stress. Psychol Bull. 1973;80(4):286–303.
doi:10.1037/h0034845.
10. Baider L, Perry S, Sison A, Holland J, Uziely B, DeNour AK.
The role of psychological variables in a group of melanoma
patients: an Israeli sample. Psychosomatics. 1997;38(1):45–53.
11. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behav-
ioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191–215. doi:10.1037
/0033-295x.84.2.191.
12. Bandura A, Reese L, Adams NE. Microanalysis of action
and fear arousal as a function of differential levels of per-
ceived self-efficacy. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1982;43(1):5–21.
doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.1.5.
13. Bandura A, Taylor CB, Williams SL, Mefford IN, Barchas
JD. Catecholamine secretion as a function of perceived cop-
ing self-efficacy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1985;53(3):406–14.
doi:10.1037/0022-006x.53.3.406.
14. Bartholomew JB, Moore J, Todd J, Todd T, Elrod CC.
Psychological states following resistance exercise of differ-
ent workloads. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2001;13(4):399–410.
doi:10.1080/104132001753226265.
15. Bartholomew JB, Morrison D, Ciccolo JT. Effects of acute
exercise on mood and well-being in patients with major de-
pressive disorder. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(12):2032–7.
doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000178101.78322.dd.
16. Bartholomew JB, Stults-Kolehmainen MA, Elrod CC, Todd
JS. Strength gains after resistance training: the effect of
stressful, negative life events. J Strength Cond Res. 2008;22(4)
:1215–21. doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e318173d0bf.
17. Benson H, Rosner BA, Marzetta BR, Klemchuk HP. Decreased
blood-pressure in borderline hypertensive subjects who prac-
ticed meditation. J Chronic Dis. 1974;27(3):163–9. doi:10.1016
/0021-9681(74)90083-6.
18. Berkman LF, Glass T. Social integration, social networks,
social support, and health. In: Berman LF, Kawachi I, editors.
Social Epidemiology. New York (NY): Oxford University
Press; 2000.
19. Bixby WR, Hatfield BD. A dimensional investigation of the
State Anxiety Inventory (SAI) in an exercise setting: cogni-
tive vs. somat ic. J Sport Behav. 2011;34(4):307–24.
20. Borcela E, Perez-Alvarez L, Herreroa AI, Brionne T, Varea
E, Berezin V, et al. Chronic stress in adulthood followed by
intermittent stress impairs spatial memory and the survival
of newborn hippocampal cells in aging animals: prevention
by FGL, a peptide mimetic of neural cell adhesion molecule.
Behav Pharmacol. 2008;19(1):41–9.
21. Broman-Fulks JJ, Berman ME, Rabian BA, Webster MJ. Effects
of aerobic exercise on anxiety sensitivity. Behav Res Ther.
2004;42(2):125–36. doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(03)00103-7.
22. Broocks A, Bandelow B, Pekrun G, et al. Comparison of aer-
obic exercise, clomipramine, and placebo in the treatment of
panic disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 1998;155(5):603–9.
23. Brown GW, Harris T. Social origins of depression: a study of
psychiatric disorder in women. New York: Free Press; 1978.
24. Brown KW, Ryan RA, Creswell JD. Mindfulness: theoretical
foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychol Inq.
2007;18(4):211–37.
25. Budzynsk T, Stoyva JM, Adler CS, Mullaney DJ. EMG bio-
feedback and tension headache: controlled outcome study.
Psychosom Med. 1973;35(6):484–96.
26. Carmack CL, Boudreaux E, Amaral-Melendez M, Brantley
PJ, de Moor C. Aerobic fitness and leisure physical activity
as moderators of the stress-illness relation. Ann Behav Med.
1999;21(3):251–7. doi:10.1007/bf02884842.
27. Chong CSM, Tsunaka M, Tsang HWH, Chan EP, Cheung
WM. Effects of yoga on stress management in healthy adults:
a systematic review. Altern Ther Health Med. 2011;17(1):32–8.
28. Cohen F, Lazarus RS. Coping and adaptation in health and ill-
ness. In: Me chanic D, editor. Handbook of Health, Health Care,
and the Health Professions. New York (NY): Free Press; 1983.
29. Cohen S, Frank E, Doyle WJ, Skoner DP, Rabin BS, Gwaltney
JM. Types of stressors that increase susceptibility to the com-
mon cold in healthy adults. Health Psychol. 1998;17(3):214–23.
30. Cohen S, Janicki-Deverts D. Who’s stressed? Distributions
of psychological stress in the United States in probability
samples from 1983, 2006, and 2009. J App Soc Psychol.
2012;42(6):1320–34. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00900.x.
31. Cohen S, Janicki-Deverts D, Miller GE. Psychological stress
and disease. JAMA. 2007;298(14):1685–7.
32. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of
perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24(4):385–96.
33. Cohen S, Tyrrell DAJ, Smith AP. Psychological stress and
susceptibility to the common cold. N Engl J Med. 1991;
325(9):606–12.
ACSM-RCEP2_CH13.indd 21 1/31/17 2:42 PM
22
ACSM’s Resources for the Certified Exercise Physiologist www.acsm.org
34. Cohen S, Williamson G. Perceived stress in a probability sample
of the United States. In: Spacapam S, Oskamp S, editors. The
Social Psychology of Health: Claremont Symposium on Applied
Social Psychology. Newbury Park (CA): Sage; 1988. p. 31–67.
35. Cohen S, Wills TA. Stress, social support, and the buffering
hypothesis. Psychol Bull. 1985;98:310–57.
36. Coker AL, Bond S, Madeleine MM, Luchok K, Pirisi L.
Psychosocial stress and cervical neoplasia risk. Psychosom
Med. 2003;65(4):644–51.
37. Critchley HD, Melmed RN, Featherstone E, Mathias CJ, Dolan
RJ. Brain activity during biofeedback relaxation: a func-
tional neuroimaging investigation. Brain. 2001;124:1003–12.
doi:10.1093/brain/124.5.1003.
38. Cutter CJ, Schottenfeld RS, Moore BA, et al. A pilot trial of
a videogame-based exercise program for methadone main-
tained patients. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2014;47(4):299–305.
doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2014.05.007.
39. Davis M, Eshelman ER, McKay M. The Relaxation and
Stress Reduction Workbook. Oakland (CA): New Harbinger
Publications; 2008.
40. Diaz AB, Motta R. The effects of an aerobic exercise program
on posttraumatic stress disorder symptom severity in ado-
lescents. Int J Emerg Ment Health. 2008;10(1):49–59.
41. Ekkekakis P, Hall EE, VanLanduyt LM, Petruzzello SJ. Walking
in (affective) circles: can short walks enhance affect? J Behav
Med. 2000;23(3):245–75. doi:10.1023/a:1005558025163.
42. Ekkekakis P, Parfitt G, Petruzzello SJ. The pleasure and dis-
pleasure people feel when they exercise at different intensities:
decennial update and progress towards a tripartite rationale
for exercise intensity prescription. Sports Med. 2011;41(8):
641–71. doi:10.2165/11590680-000000000-00000.
43. Ensari I, Greenlee TA, Motl RW, Petruzzello SJ. Meta-analysis
of acute exercise effects on state anxiety: an update of ran-
domized controlled trials over the past 25 years. Depress
Anxiety. 2015;32(8):624–34. doi:10.1002/da.22370.
44. Faries MD, Boroff CS, Stults-Kolehmainen M, Bartholomew
JB. Does a visual representation impact the affective re-
sponse to body composition testing? Pers Individ Dif. 2011;
50(4):502–5.
45. Faries MD, Kephart W, Jones EJ. Approach, avoidance and
weight-related testing: an investigation of frontal EEG asym-
me try. Psychol Health Med. 2015;20(7):790–801. doi:10.1080/
13548506.2014.959530.
46. Field TM. Massage therapy effects. Am Psychol. 1998;53(12):
1270–81.
47. Folkman S, Lazarus RS. Coping as a mediator of emotion. J
Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54(3):466–75. doi:10.1037/0022-3514
.54.3.466.
48. Folkman S, Lazarus RS, Dunkelschetter C, Delongis A,
Gruen RJ. Dynamics of a stressful encounter: cognitive ap-
praisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. J Pers Soc Psychol.
1986;50(5):992–1003. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.992.
49. Gerber M, Pühse U. Do exercise and fitness protect against
stress-induced health complaints? A review of the liter-
atu re. Scand J Public Health. 2009;37(8):801–19. doi:10
.1177/1403494809350522.
50. Gilson TA, Heller EA, Stults-Kolehmainen MA. The rela-
tionship between an effort goal and self-regulatory efficacy
beliefs for Division I football players. J Strength Cond Res.
2013;27(10):2806–15. doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e31828151ca.
51. Glanz K Schwartz MD. Stress, coping, and health behavior.
In: Glanz K, Rimer B, Viswanath K, editors. Health Behavior
and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. 4th ed .
San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; 2008. p. 211–36.
52. Glaser R, Rice J, Stout JC, Speicher CE, Kiecoltglaser JK. Stress
depresses interferon production by leukocytes concomitant
with a decrease in natural killer cell activity. Behav Neurosci.
1986;100(5):675–8. doi:10.1037/0735-7044.100.5.675.
53. Hamer M, Taylor A, Steptoe A. The effect of acute aerobic
exercise on stress related blood pressure responses: a system-
atic review and meta-analysis. Biol Psychol. 2006;71(2):183–
90. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.04.004.
54. Heaney CA, Israel BA. Social networks and social support.
In: Glanz K Rimer BK, Viswanath K, editors. Health Behavior
and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. 4th ed .
San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; 2008. p. 189–210.
55. Hernandez-Reif M, Ironson G, Field T, et al. Breast can-
cer patients have improved immune and neuroendocrine
functions following massage therapy. J Psychosom Res.
2004;57(1):45–52. doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(03)00500-2.
56. Hillman CH, Erickson KI, Kramer AF. Be smart, exercise
your heart: exercise effects on brain and cognition. Nat Rev
Neurosci. 2008;9(1):58–65. doi:10.1038/nrn2298.
57. Hogan CL, Catalino LI, Mata J, Fredrickson BL. Beyond emo-
tional benefits: physical activity and sedentary behaviour af-
fect psychosocial resources through emotions. Psychol Health.
2015;30(3):354–69. doi:10.1080/08870446.2014.973410.
58. Holahan CK, Holahan CJ, Belk SS. Adjustment in aging: the
roles of life stress, hassles, and self-efficacy. Health Psychol.
1984;3(4):315–28. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.3.4.315.
59. House JS. Work Stress and Social Support. Reading (MA):
Addison-Wesley; 1981.
60. Jacobson EJ. Progressive Relaxation. Chicago (IL): University
of Chicago Press; 1938.
61. Jain S, Shapiro SL, Swanick S, et al. A randomized controlled
trial of mindfulness meditation versus relaxation training:
effects on distress, positive states of mind, rumination, and
distraction. Ann Behav Med. 2007;33(1):11–21. doi:10.1207/
s15324796abm3301_2.
62. Jin PT. Efficacy of tai chi, brisk walking, meditation, and read-
ing in reducing mental and emotional-stress. J Psychosom
Res. 1992;36(4):361–70. doi:10.1016/0022-3999(92)90072-a.
63. Kabat-Zinn J. Mindfulness-based interventions in con-
text: past, present, and future. Clin Psychol Sci Pract.
2003;10(2):144–56. doi:10.1093/clipsy/bpg016.
64. Kahn JR, Pearlin LI. Financial strain over the life course and
health among older adults. J Health Soc Behav. 2006;47(1):17–31.
65. Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Christian L, Preston H, et al. Stress, inflam-
mation, and yoga practice. Psychosom Med. 2010;72(2):113–
21. doi:10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181cb9377.
66. Lake AE. Headache as a stressor: dysfunctional versus adaptive
coping styles. Headache. 2009;49(9):1369–77. doi:10.1111/j
.1526-4610.2009.01516.x.
67. Lazarus RS. Stress and Emotion: A New Synthesis. New York
(NY): Springer; 1999.
68. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal and Coping. New
York (NY): Springer; 1984.
69. Leserman J. Role of depression, stress, and trauma in HIV
disease progression. Psychosom Med. 2008;70(5):539–45.
doi:10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181777a5f.
ACSM-RCEP2_CH13.indd 22 1/31/17 2:42 PM
23Chapter 13 Healthy Stress Management
70. Levy SM, Herberman RB, Lippman M, D’Angelo T, Lee
J. Immunological and psychosocial predictors of disease
recurrence in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Behav
Med. 1991;17(2):67–75.
71. Li AW, Goldsmith CAW. The effects of yoga on anxiety and
stress. Altern Med Rev. 2012;17(1):21–35.
72. Lipton RB, Silberstein SD, Stewart WF. An update on the
epidemiology of migraine. Headache. 1994;34(6):319–28.
doi:10.1111/j.1526-4610.1994.hed3406319.x.
73. Locke SE, Kraus L, Leserman J, Hurst MW, Heisel JS, Williams
RM. Life change stress, psychiatric symptoms, and natural
killer cell activity. Psychosom Med. 1984;46(5):441–53.
74. Lovallo WR. Stress & Health: Biological and Psychological
Interactions. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications;
2005. p 35–8.
75. Lundberg U. Coping with stress: neuroendocrine reac-
tions and implications for health. Noise Health. 1999;1(4):
67–74.
76. Lundberg U. Stress hormones in health and illness: the roles
of work and gender. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2005;30(10):
1017–21. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.03.014.
77. Lupien SJ, de Leon M, de Santi S, et al. Cortisol levels during
human aging predict hippocampal atrophy and memory
deficits. Nat Neurosci. 1998;1(1):69–73. doi:10.1038/271.
78. Lupien SJ, Evans A, Lord C, et al. Hippocampal volume is
as variable in young as in older adults: implications for the
notion of hippocampal atrophy in humans. Neuroimage.
2007;34(2):479–85. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.041.
79. Lupien SJ, Lecours AR, Lussier I, Schwartz G, Nair NPV,
Meaney MJ. Basal cortisol-levels and cognitive deficits in
human aging. J Neurosci. 1994;14(5):2893–903.
80. Lutz RS, Stults-Kolehmainen MA, Bartholomew JB. Exercise
caution when stressed: stages of change and the stress-exercise
participation relationship. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2010;11(6):
560–7. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2010.06.005.
81. MacLean CRK, Walton KG, Wenneberg SR, et al. Effects
of the transcendental meditation program on adaptive
mechanisms: changes in hormone levels and responses to
stress after 4 months of practice. Psychoneuroendocrinology.
1997;22(4):277–95. doi:10.1016/s0306-4530(97)00003-6.
82. Malkoff SB, Muldoon MF, Zeigler ZR, Manuck SB. Blood-
platelet responsivity to acute mental stress. Psychosom Med.
1993;55(6):477–82.
83. Mann TN, Lamberts RP, Lambert MI. High responders
and low responders: factors associated with individual
variation in response to standardized training. Sports Med.
2014;44(8):1113–24. doi:10.1007/s40279-014-0197-3.
84. Manuck SB. Cardiovascular reactivity in cardiovascular
disease: “once more unto the breach.Int J Behav Med.
1994;1(1):4–31. doi:10.1207/s15327558ijbm0101_2.
85. Marin MF, Lord C, Andrews J, et al. Chronic stress, cogni-
tive functioning and mental health. Neurobiol Learn Mem.
2011;96(4):583–95. doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2011.02.016.
86. Marshall GN. A multidimensional analysis of internal health
locus of control beliefs: separating the wheat from the chaff?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991;61(3):483–91.
87. Martarelli D, Cocchioni M, Scuri S, Pompei P. Diaphragmatic
breathing reduces postprandial oxidative stress. J
AlternComplement Med. 2011;17(7):623–8. doi:10.1089/
acm.2010.0666.
88. Mata J, Hogan CL, Joormann J, Waugh CE, Gotlib IH. Acute
exercise attenuates negative affect following repeated sad
mood inductions in persons who have recovered from de-
pression. J Abnorm Psychol. 2013;122(1):45–50. doi:10.1037
/a0029881.
89. Mayer EA. The neurobiology of stress and gastrointestinal
disease. Gut. 2000;47(6):861–9. doi:10.1136/gut.47.6.861.
90. McEwen BS. Protective and damaging effects of stress me-
diators. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(3):171–9.
91. McEwen BS, Stellar E. Stress and the individual. Mechanisms
leading to disease. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153(18):2093–101.
doi:10.1001/archinte.153.18.2093.
92. McEwen BS, Wingfield JC. The concept of allostasis in
biology and biomedicine. Horm Behav. 2003;43(1):2–15.
doi:10.1016/s0018-506x(02)00024-7.
93. McFarlane AH, Norman GR, Streiner DL, Roy RG. The
process of social stress: stable, reciprocal, and mediat-
ing relationships. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24(2):160–73.
doi:10.2307/2136642.
94. McGonagle KA, Kessler RC. Chronic stress, acute stress,
and depressive symptoms. Am J Community Psychol.
1990;18(5):681–706. doi:10.1007/bf00931237.
95. Miller SM. Controllability and human stress: method,
evidence and theory. Behav Res Ther. 1979;17(4):287–304.
doi:10.1016/0005-7967(79)90001-9.
96. Mohr DC, Hart SL, Julian L, Cox D, Pelletier D. Association
between stressful life events and exacerbation in multiple
sclerosis: a meta-analysis. Br Med J. 2004;328(7442):731–3.
doi:10.1136/bmj.38041.724421.55.
97. Naves-Bittencourt W, Mendonça-de-Sousa A, Stults-
Kolehmainen M, Fontes E, Córdova C, Demarzo M,
Boullosa, D. Martial arts: mindful exercise to combat stress.
Eur J Hum Mov. 2015;34:34–51.
98. Norris R, Carroll D, Cochrane R. The effects of physical
activity and exercise training on psychological stress and
well-being in an adolescent population. J Psychosom Res.
1992;36(1):55–65. doi:10.1016/0022-3999(92)90114-h.
99. Patterson SM, Matthews KA, Allen MT, Owens JF. Stress-
induced hemoconcentration of blood-cells and lip-
ids in healthy women during acute psychological stress.
Health Psychol. 1995;14(4):319–24. doi:10.1037/0278-
6133.14.4.319.
100. Patterson SM, Zakowski SG, Hall MH, Cohen L, Wollman
K, Baum A. Psychological stress and platelet activation:
differences in platelet reactivity in healthy-men during ac-
tive and passive stressors. Health Psychol. 1994;13(1):34–8.
doi:10.1037/0278-6133.13.1.34.
101. Pearlin LI, Schooler C. Structure of coping. J Health Soc
Behav. 1978;19(1):2–21. doi:10.2307/2136319.
102. Petruzzello SJ, Landers DM, Hatfield BD, Kubitz KA,
Salazar W. A meta-analysis on the anxiety-reducing effects
of acute and chronic exercise. Outcomes and mechanisms.
Sports Med. 1991;11(3):143–82.
103. Peveler RC, Johnston DW. Subjective and cognitive ef-
fects of relaxation. Behav Res Ther. 1986;24(4):413–9.
doi:10.1016/0005-7967(86)90006-9.
104. Pike JL, Smith TL, Hauger RL, et al. Chronic stress alters
sympathetic, neuroendocrine, and immune responsivity to
an acute psychological stressor in humans. Psychosom Med.
1997;59(4):447–57.
ACSM-RCEP2_CH13.indd 23 1/31/17 2:42 PM
24
ACSM’s Resources for the Certified Exercise Physiologist www.acsm.org
105. Pothmann R, Frankenberg SV, Muller B, Sartory G,
Hellmeier W. Epidemiology of headache in children and ad-
olescents: evidence of high prevalence of migraine. Int J Beh
Med. 1994;1(1):76–89. doi:10.1207/s15327558ijbm0101_5.
106. Prakhinkit S, Suppapitiporn S, Tanaka H, Suksom D. Effects
of Buddhism walking meditation on depression, functional
fitness, and endothelium-dependent vasodilation in de-
pressed elderly. J Altern Complement Med. 2014;20(5):411–
6. doi:10.1089/acm.2013.0205.
107. Pruessner JC, Hellhammer DH, Kirschbaum C. Burnout,
perceived stress, and cortisol responses to awakening.
Psychosom Med. 1999;61(2):197–204.
108. Rodgers WM, Sullivan MJL. Task, coping, and sched-
uling self-efficacy in relation to frequency of physical
ac tiv ity. J App Soc Psychol. 2001;31(4):741–53. doi:10.1111
/j.1559-1816.2001.tb01411.x.
109. Rout UR, Rout JK. Stress Management for Primary Health
Care Professionals. New York (NY): Kluwer Academic;
2002.
110. Sandi C, Davies HA, Cordero MI, Rodriguez JJ, Popov
VI, Stewart MG. Rapid reversal of stress induced loss of
synapses in CA3 of rat hippocampus following water maze
training. Eur J Neurosci. 2003;17(11):2447–56. doi:10.1046/
j.1460-9568.2003.02675.x.
111. Sandler IN, Lakey B. Locus of control as a stress moder-
ator: the role of control perceptions and social support.
Am J Community Psychol. 1982;10(1):65–80. doi:10.1007
/bf00903305.
112. Sapolsky RM, Krey LC, McEwen BS. The neuroendocrinol-
ogy of stress and aging: the glucocorticoid cascade hypoth-
esis. Endocr Rev. 1986;7(3):284–301
113. Sarafino EP. Health Psychology: Biopsychosocial Interactions.
4th ed. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 2002.
114. Sauro KM, Becker WJ. The stress and migraine interaction.
Headache. 2009;49(9):1378–86.
115. Schnall PL, Pieper C, Schwartz JE, et al. The relationship
between ‘job strain,’ workplace diastolic blood-pressure,
and left-ventricular mass index: results of a case-con-
tr ol st ud y. JAMA. 1990;263(14):1929–35. doi:10.1001/
jama.263.14.1929.
116. Segar ML, Eccles JS, Richardson CR. Rebranding exercise:
closing the gap between values and behavior. Int J Behav
Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:14. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-8-94.
117. Segerstrom SC, Taylor SE, Kemeny ME, Reed GM, Visscher
BR. Causal attributions predict rate of immune decline in
HIV-seropositive gay men. Health Psychol. 1996;15(6):485–
93. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.15.6.485.
118. Selye H. The Stress of Life. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill;
1956.
119. Selye H. The Stress of Life. 2nd ed. New York (NY): McGraw-
Hill; 1976.
120. Sheridan JF, Dobbs CM. Stress, viral pathogenesis, and
immunity. In: Glaser R, Kiecolt-Glaser J, editors. Handbook
of Human Stress and Immunity. San Diego (CA): Academic
Press; 1994. p. 101–23.
121. Sherwood A, Turner JR. Hemodynamic responses during
psychological stress: implications for studying disease pro-
cesses. Int J Behav Med. 1995;2(3):193–218. doi:10.1207/
s15327558ijbm0203_1.
122. Solberg EE, Ingjer F, Holen A, Sundgot-Borgen J, Nilsson
S, Holme I. Stress reactivity to and recovery from a
standardised exercise bout: a study of 31 runners prac-
tising relaxation techniques. Br J Sports Med. 2000;34(4):
268–72.
123. Stetler CA, Miller GE. Social integration of daily activ-
ities and cortisol secretion: a laboratory based manip-
ulation. J Behav Med. 2008;31(3):249–57. doi:10.1007
/s10865-007-9143–2.
124. Stults-Kolehmainen MA. The interplay between stress and
physical activity in the prevention and treatment of car-
diovascular disease. Front Physiol. 2013;4:346. doi:10.3389/
fphys.2013.00346.
125. Stults-Kolehmainen MA, Bartholomew JB. Psychological
stress impairs short-term muscular recovery from resis-
tance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(11):2220–7.
doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e31825f67a0.
126. Stults-Kolehmainen MA, Bartholomew JB, Sinha R.
Chronic psychological stress impairs recovery of muscular
function and somatic sensations over a 96-hour period.
J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(7):2007–17. doi:10.1519/
JSC.0000000000000335.
127. Stults-Kolehmainen MA, Ciccolo JT, Bartholomew JB,
Seifert J, Portman RS. Age and gender-related changes in
exercise motivation among highly active individuals. Athl
Insight. 2013;5(1):45–63.
128. Stults-Kolehmainen MA, Lu T, Ciccolo JT, Bartholomew JB,
Brotnow L, Sinha R. Higher chronic psychological stress
is associated with blunted affective responses to strenuous
resistance exercise: RPE, pleasure, pain. Psychol Sport Exerc.
2016;22:27–36.
129. Stults-Kolehmainen MA, Sinha R. The effects of stress on
physical activity and exercise: a systematic review. Sports
Med. 2014;44(1):81–121. doi:10.1007/s40279-013-0090-5.
130. Stults-Kolehmainen MA, Tuit K, Sinha R. Lower cumulative
stress is associated with better health for physically active
adults in the community. Stress. 2014;17(2):157–68. doi:10.
3109/10253890.2013.878329.
131. Suls J, Mullen B. Life change and psychological distress:
the role of perceived control and desirability. J App Soc
Psychol. 1981;11(5):379–89. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1981
.tb00830.x.
132. Taylor RL, Lam DJ, Roppel CE, Barter JT. Friends can be
good medicine: an excursion into mental health promotion.
Community Ment Health J. 1984;20(4):294–303. doi:10.1007/
bf00757078.
133. Taylor SE. Health Psychology. 8th ed. New York (NY):
McGraw-Hill; 2012.
134. Taylor SE, Kemeny ME, Aspinwall LG, Schneider SG,
Rodriguez R, Herbert M. Optimism, coping, psychological
distress, and high-risk sexual-behavior among men at risk
for acquired-immunodeficiency-syndrome (AIDS). J Pers Soc
Psychol. 1992;63(3):460–73. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.460.
135. Thayer RE, Newman JR, McClain TM. Self-regulation of
mood: strategies for changing a bad mood, raising energy,
and reducing tension. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994;67(5):910–25.
doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.5.910.
136. Thoits PA. Mechanisms linking social ties and sup-
port to physical and mental health. J Health Soc Behav.
2011;52(2):145–61. doi:10.1177/0022146510395592.
137. Thompson SC. Will it hurt less if I can control it? A complex
answer to a simple question. Psychol Bull. 1981;90(1):89–
101. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.90.1.89.
ACSM-RCEP2_CH13.indd 24 1/31/17 2:42 PM
25Chapter 13 Healthy Stress Management
138. Trask PC, Paterson AG, Hayasaka S, Dunn RL, Riba M,
Johnson T. Psychosocial characteristics of individuals
with non-stage IV melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(11):
2844–50.
139. Umberson D. Family status and health behaviors: social
control as a dimension of social integration. J Health Soc
Behav. 1987;28(3):306–19. doi:10.2307/2136848.
140. Van der Linden D, Keijsers GPJ, Eling P, Van Schaijk R.
Work stress and attentional difficulties: an initial study on
burnout and cognitive failures. Work Stress. 2005;19(1):23–
36. doi:10.1080/0267837050065275.
141. Vitaliano PP, Russo J, Niaura R. Plasma-lipids and their
relationships with psychosocial factors in older adults. J
Gerontol Ser B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1995;50(1):P18–P24.
142. Webb TL, Miles E, Sheeran P. Dealing with feeling: a me-
ta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies derived from
the process model of emotion regulation. Psychol Bull.
2012;138(4):775–808. doi:10.1037/a0027600.
ACSM-RCEP2_CH13.indd 25 1/31/17 2:42 PM
ACSM-RCEP2_CH13.indd 26 1/31/17 2:42 PM
QUERIES:
AQ1: Please confirm author names and correct order.
AQ2: Please confirm if changing “dual emission x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)” to dual-energy
x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)” is correct as per web search.
AQ3: Please confirm if the supplied expanded form of the abbreviation used is correct.
ACSM-RCEP2_CH13.indd 1 1/31/17 2:42 PM
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Research has suggested that attributions—the perceived causes of events—may affect psychological and physical health and the immune system. The authors hypothesized that attributions reflecting negative beliefs about the self, the future, and control would affect helper T cell (CD4) decline and onset of AIDS in individuals with HIV, either directly or through associations with psychological states such as depression. HIV+ gay men (N = 86) participated in a structured interview from which causal attributions were extracted and coded. Attributing negative events to aspects of the self significantly predicted faster CD4 decline over 18 months following the interview, controlling for potential psychological, behavioral, social, and health mediators such as depression and health behavior. However, attributions did not predict AIDS diagnosis during the study period. The results support the idea that causal attributions related to beliefs about the self may have an influence on the immune system.
Article
Full-text available
In a cohort of gay men responding to the threat of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), dispositional optimism was associated with less distress, less avoidant coping, positive attitudes as a coping strategy, and fewer AIDS-related concerns. Men who knew they were seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) were significantly more optimistic about not developing AIDS than men who knew they were seronegative for HIV. This AIDS-specific optimism was related to higher perceived control over AIDS and to active coping among seropositive men only and to health behaviors in both serostatus groups. There was no relation of optimism to risk-related sexual behavior. It is concluded that optimism is psychologically adaptive without necessarily compromising health behavior. It is also concluded that it is useful to distinguish between event-based optimistic expectations and dispositional optimism.
Article
Full-text available
The present research tested the hypothesis that perceived coping self-efficacy mediates the effects of environmental events on catecholamine secretion. Differential levels of perceived self-efficacy were induced in phobic subjects through modeling. Their level of catecholamine secretion was then measured as they were presented coping tasks in their high, medium, and low ranges of perceived self-efficacy. High perceived self-efficacy was accompanied by low levels of plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine during interaction with a phobic object, whereas moderate perceived self-inefficacy gave rise to substantial increases in plasma catecholamines. Both catecholamines dropped sharply when phobics declined tasks for which they judged themselves completely inefficacious. In contrast, dopac was released maximally by mere apperception of task demands that phobics regarded as overwhelming their coping capabilities. After perceived self-efficacy was strengthened to the maximal level by participant modeling, all of the tasks were performed without any differential catecholamine responses.
Article
Full-text available
Presents an integrative theoretical framework to explain and to predict psychological changes achieved by different modes of treatment. This theory states that psychological procedures, whatever their form, alter the level and strength of self-efficacy. It is hypothesized that expectations of personal efficacy determine whether coping behavior will be initiated, how much effort will be expended, and how long it will be sustained in the face of obstacles and aversive experiences. Persistence in activities that are subjectively threatening but in fact relatively safe produces, through experiences of mastery, further enhancement of self-efficacy and corresponding reductions in defensive behavior. In the proposed model, expectations of personal efficacy are derived from 4 principal sources of information: performance accomplishments, vicarious experience, verbal persuasion, and physiological states. Factors influencing the cognitive processing of efficacy information arise from enactive, vicarious, exhortative, and emotive sources. The differential power of diverse therapeutic procedures is analyzed in terms of the postulated cognitive mechanism of operation. Findings are reported from microanalyses of enactive, vicarious, and emotive modes of treatment that support the hypothesized relationship between perceived self-efficacy and behavioral changes. (21/2 p ref)
Article
Full-text available
It is not known whether psychological stress suppresses host resistance to infection. To investigate this issue, we prospectively studied the relation between psychological stress and the frequency of documented clinical colds among subjects intentionally exposed to respiratory viruses. After completing questionnaires assessing degrees of psychological stress, 394 healthy subjects were given nasal drops containing one of five respiratory viruses (rhinovirus type 2, 9, or 14, respiratory syncytial virus, or coronavirus type 229E), and an additional 26 were given saline nasal drops. The subjects were then quarantined and monitored for the development of evidence of infection and symptoms. Clinical colds were defined as clinical symptoms in the presence of an infection verified by the isolation of virus or by an increase in the virus-specific antibody titer. The rates of both respiratory infection (P less than 0.005) and clinical colds (P less than 0.02) increased in a dose-response manner with increases in the degree of psychological stress. Infection rates ranged from approximately 74 percent to approximately 90 percent, according to levels of psychological stress, and the incidence of clinical colds ranged from approximately 27 percent to 47 percent. These effects were not altered when we controlled for age, sex, education, allergic status, weight, the season, the number of subjects housed together, the infectious status of subjects sharing the same housing, and virus-specific antibody status at base line (before challenge). Moreover, the associations observed were similar for all five challenge viruses. Several potential stress-illness mediators, including smoking, alcohol consumption, exercise, diet, quality of sleep, white-cell counts, and total immunoglobulin levels, did not explain the association between stress and illness. Similarly, controls for personality variables (self-esteem, personal control, and introversion-extraversion) failed to alter our findings. Psychological stress was associated in a dose-response manner with an increased risk of acute infectious respiratory illness, and this risk was attributable to increased rates of infection rather than to an increased frequency of symptoms after infection.