Abstract,The process of selecting the right set of requirements,for a product,release is dependent,on how,well the organisation,succeeds,in prioritising the requirements candidates. This paper,describes,two,consecutive,controlled,experiments,comparing different requirements,prioritisation techniques,with the objective,of understanding differences in time-consumption, ease of use and accuracy. The first experiment evaluates,Pair-wise comparisons,and,a variation,of the,Planning,game.,As the Planning game turned out as superior, the second experiment was designed to compare,the Planning,game,to Tool-supported,pair-wise comparisons.,The results indicate,that the manual,pair-wise comparisons,is the most,time-consuming,of the techniques, and also the least easy to use. Tool-supported pair-wise comparisons is the fastest technique,and,it is as easy to use as the Planning,game. The techniques do not differ significantly regarding,accuracy. Keywords,Requirements,engineering,. Requirements,prioritisation .