ArticlePDF Available

SARS-CoV-2 infection and gastrointestinal involvement knowledge: The tip of the Iceberg

Authors:
  • Keralty Hospital Miami

Abstract

Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research
Copyright@ Maria T Bertoli | Biomed J Sci & Tech Res | BJSTR. MS.ID.007041. 35447
Mini Review
ISSN: 2574 -1241 DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2022.44.007041
SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Gastrointestinal
Involvement The Tip of the Iceberg
Yen Flores Pazos1, Maria Cabreja-Castillo2, Katherine Martinez2 and Maria T Bertoli2*
1Family Medicine Residency Program, Keralty Hospital Miami, USA
2Keralty Research Center, Keralty Hospital Miami, USA
*Corresponding author: Maria T Bertoli, Keralty Research Center, Keralty Hospital Miami, USA
ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT
Received: May 25, 2022
Published: June 07, 2022
Citation: Yen Flores Pazos, Maria Cabreja-Castillo, Katherine Martinez, Maria T Ber-
toli. SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Gastrointestinal Involvement The Tip of the Iceberg.
Biomed J Sci & Tech Res 44(3)-2022. BJSTR. MS.ID.007041.
Introduction
The outbreak of the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19),
which evolved into a pandemic, is a life-threatening condition
        
the United States as of May 2022 [1]. In the last two years, a lot
 
treatments. COVID-19 is the cause of an enveloped, non-segmented,
single-strand RNA virus known as severe acute respiratory
syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that attacks the body cells
to cause infection in the respiratory system [2]. The SARS-CoV-2
spike protein binds to the cell’s angiotensin converting enzyme
2 (ACE2) receptors. ACE2 receptors are widespread in human
tissues, explaining the multiorgan dysfunction reported in patients
[2]. ACE2 receptors are highly abundant in the gastrointestinal (GI)
       
response to the GI infection have been reported in COVID-19
patients [2]. Additionally, COVID-19 vaccinated people develop
multisystemic symptoms that could be associated with the diversity
of the immune response to the viral protein [3]. The pathogenesis
of SARS-CoV-2 infection is not totally understood. It is not clear
the role of the viral replication in the GI tract and the effects of
the immune response against the cells infected with SARS-CoV-2.
This article explores the current knowledge about the GI system
involvement in the COVID-19, the post-acute COVID-19 syndrome
(PACS) and the COVID 19 vaccine side effects that lead to diverse
gastrointestinal manifestation and disease severity outcomes.
The acute period or COVID-19, that lasts approximately four
weeks [4], is driven initially by replication of SARS-CoV-2 in the
cells, that seems to last longer in GI tract cells [5], and then by an
      
damages tissues [2,6], COVID-19 is a primary respiratory transmitted
illness that presents with fever, fatigue, cough, shortness of breath,
muscle or body aches, headache, sore throat, congestion or runny
nose, loss of taste or smell, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea [7]. GI
manifestations are reported in 11.4-61.1% of individuals with
COVID-19(6), and are different across the literature reviewed in
frequency, presentation [8,9], onset time [10] and clinical outcome
[9]. The majority of COVID-19-associated GI symptoms are mild and
self-limiting. Also, acute pancreatitis, acute appendicitis, intestinal
obstruction, bowel ischemia, abdominal compartment syndrome
are described with less frequency [8]. The presence of viral

GI lumen, such as gastric, duodenal and rectal glandular epithelial
cells, apart from the esophagus [2,5,6] and the high prevalence of
viral shedding in stool, particularly after viral RNA negativity in
respiratory specimens, have led to the idea of a possible viral fecal-
oral transmission [5]. Only interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and
Copyright@ Maria T Bertoli | Biomed J Sci & Tech Res | BJSTR. MS.ID.007041.
Volume 44- Issue 3 DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2022.44.007039
35448
ACE2 receptors might be enough to disrupt the normal function
         
but the pathophysiology of the infection in the GI tract seems to
be more complex. One study reported that fecal calprotectin (FC)
and serum calprotectin (SC) might have the potency to assess
the prognosis in COVID-19 patients, but increased FC and SC did
not feature GI symptoms or even diarrhea in COVID-19(9). Also,

  
tract the microbiota that colonizes it plays a variety of important
physiological roles in the body, through multiple recognized axes
(brain, lung, estrogen) [4,13], and is altered during SARS-CoV-2
      

pathogens (Streptococcus, Rothia, Veillonella and Actinomyces),
       
compared to non-infected [10,14]. The persistent dysbiosis
produces barrier dysfunction, translocation of bacterial products,
     
       
cause of autoimmune response and has been described in other viral
infections and autoimmune disorders [13,15,16]. After the acute
period and during at least one year post infection, some individuals
develop long-term sequelae or post-acute COVID-19 syndrome
(PACS) [17]. PACS also known as long-COVID is part of the post-
acute infection syndromes group, characterized by an unexplained
failure to recover from an infectious disease [15]. The majority
of manifestations in PACS are systemic, neurological, cardio-
respiratory, and gastrointestinal [4]. The gastrointestinal-related
symptoms in these patients include loss of appetite, nausea, weight
loss, abdominal pain, heartburn, dysphagia, altered bowel motility
and irritable bowel syndrome [4]. The syndrome may develop not
only in COVID-19 hospitalized patients and evidence indicates that
it can develop regardless of the severity of the original symptoms.
Common features are viral persistence, a continuous dysbiosis, and
    
that can lead to autoimmunity [4,15,16].
        
control of the pandemic, the immune response to the virus antigen
and autoimmunity have been linked to some rare serious adverse
events [3]. Sides effects are usually less serious than developing
COVID-19 or complications associated with coronavirus infections,
mostly being mild to moderate and have lasted no longer than a
few days [18]. Typically, pain at the injection site, fever, fatigue,
headache, muscle pain, chills, nauseous and diarrhea are the
most frequently reported [18,19]. It is not clear if the side effects
observed after vaccination are due to the produced antibodies
against the viral spike protein (more studied antibodies) or anti-
idiotype antibodies that resemble the spike protein structure
[3]. This same mechanism that could be involved in the off-target
vaccine effects could also explain the autoimmune response during
the acute period of the infection [3].
Currently the main therapeutic effort for COVID 19, such as
antiviral and vaccines, have their main effect early in the viral
    
therapies focus on targeting later stages of COVID-19 have been
centered in the pulmonary manifestations [8]. The GI tract plays a

has recently prompted the exploration of several therapies directed
to the control in the GI tract of SARS CoV-2 infection, the immune
response and the microbial dysbiosis. [10]. A recent trial explored
the possibility of oral-fecal transmission and oropharyngeal tissues
as reservoirs for SARS-CoV-2, by testing the effects of Niclosamide
treatment on fecal shedding of the virus, but the results were not
    
that acts inhibiting key factors in cell signal transduction on
intestinal function in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection,
          
response by balancing the intestinal microenvironment during

between intestinal microbiota and COVID-19, recommend including
probiotics and prebiotics in the patient’s therapy regimen, which
       
modulating the immune system, infected patients [10].
     
XX century to demand an urgent global healthcare response, that
disrupted everyday life on earth in 2019. Since this moment, a lot
of effort has been put into getting the knowledge to develop the
required tools to control the coronavirus pandemic worldwide, but
our knowledge of the disease is still limited because it is an evolving
situation that continues to challenge healthcare professionals and
societies. There is still controversy in most of the aspects related
to this viral infection in the GI tract that therefore requires further
research.
References
1. Schreiber M (2022) What One Million COVID Dead Mean for the U.S.&

2.           
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2): a
Systemic Infection. Clin Microbiol Rev 34(2).
3. 
in SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Vaccination. N Engl J Med 386(4): 394-396.
4. Meringer H, Mehandru S (2022) Gastrointestinal post-acute COVID-19
syndrome. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol.
Copyright@ Maria T Bertoli | Biomed J Sci & Tech Res | BJSTR. MS.ID.007041.
Volume 44- Issue 3 DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2022.44.007041
35449
Submission Link: https://biomedres.us/submit-manuscript.php
Assets of Publishing with us
Global archiving of articles
Immediate, unrestricted online access
Rigorous Peer Review Process
Authors Retain Copyrights
Unique DOI for all articles
https://biomedres.us/
This work is licensed under Creative
Commons
ISSN: 2574-1241
DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2022.44.007041
Maria T Bertoli. Biomed J Sci & Tech Res
5.   
of Niclosamide vs Placebo in SARS-CoV-2 Respiratory Viral Clearance,
Viral Shedding, and Duration of Symptoms Among Patients With Mild to
Moderate COVID-19: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw
Open 5(2): e2144942.
6. Galanopoulos M, Gkeros F, Doukatas A, Karianakis G, Pontas C, et al.
(2020) COVID-19 pandemic: Pathophysiology and manifestations from
the gastrointestinal tract. World J Gastroenterol 26(31): 4579-4588.
7. (2022) CDC. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)-Symptoms. Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention.
8.          
(2021) Gastrointestinal manifestations in COVID-19. Trans R Soc Trop
Med Hyg 115(12): 1362-1388.
9. Shokri-Afra H, Alikhani A, Moradipoodeh B, Noorbakhsh F, Fakheri H,
et al. (2021) Elevated fecal and serum calprotectin in COVID-19 are not
consistent with gastrointestinal symptoms. Sci Rep 11(1): 22001.
10. Zhang J, Garrett S, Sun J (2022) Gastrointestinal symptoms,
pathophysiology, and treatment in COVID-19. Genes Dis 8(4): 385-400.
11. 
in patients with COVID-19. J Chin Med Assoc 83(6): 521-523.
12. 
     
69(8): 1543-1544.
13. Katz-Agranov N, Zandman-Goddard G (2021) Autoimmunity and COVID-
19-The microbiotal connection. Autoimmun Rev 20(8): 102865.
14. Gu S, Chen Y, Wu Z, Chen Y, Gao H, et al. (2020) Alterations of the
Gut Microbiota in Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 or H1N1

15.               
microbiota of patients with COVID-19: potential mechanisms and
therapeutic interventions. Signal Transduct Target Ther 7(1): 1-15.
16. Choutka J, Jansari V, Hornig M, Iwasaki A (2022) Unexplained post-acute
infection syndromes. Nat Med 28(5): 911-923.
17. (2020) CDC. Healthcare Workers [Internet]. Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention.
18. (2022) Side effects of the coronavirus vaccines.
19. (2022) Selected Adverse Events Reported after COVID-19 Vaccination
| CDC.
20. Zhang BY, Chen M, Chen XC, Cao K, You Y, et al. (2021) Berberine reduces
   
Br J Surg 108(1): e9-11.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
SARS-CoV-2 is not unique in its ability to cause post-acute sequelae; certain acute infections have long been associated with an unexplained chronic disability in a minority of patients. These post-acute infection syndromes (PAISs) represent a substantial healthcare burden, but there is a lack of understanding of the underlying mechanisms, representing a significant blind spot in the field of medicine. The relatively similar symptom profiles of individual PAISs, irrespective of the infectious agent, as well as the overlap of clinical features with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), suggest the potential involvement of a common etiopathogenesis. In this Review, we summarize what is known about unexplained PAISs, provide context for post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), and delineate the need for basic biomedical research into the underlying mechanisms behind this group of enigmatic chronic illnesses. Certain acute infections (including SARS-CoV-2) are associated with an unexplained chronic disability in a minority of patients; this Review summarizes what is known about these understudied and complex illnesses.
Article
Full-text available
The global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is currently ongoing. It is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). A high proportion of COVID-19 patients exhibit gastrointestinal manifestations such as diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. Moreover, the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts are the primary habitats of human microbiota and targets for SARS-CoV-2 infection as they express angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) and transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) at high levels. There is accumulating evidence that the microbiota are significantly altered in patients with COVID-19 and post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS). Microbiota are powerful immunomodulatory factors in various human diseases, such as diabetes, obesity, cancers, ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease, and certain viral infections. In the present review, we explore the associations between host microbiota and COVID-19 in terms of their clinical relevance. Microbiota-derived metabolites or components are the main mediators of microbiota-host interactions that influence host immunity. Hence, we discuss the potential mechanisms by which microbiota-derived metabolites or components modulate the host immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Finally, we review and discuss a variety of possible microbiota-based prophylaxes and therapies for COVID-19 and PACS, including fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), probiotics, prebiotics, microbiota-derived metabolites, and engineered symbiotic bacteria. This treatment strategy could modulate host microbiota and mitigate virus-induced inflammation.
Article
Full-text available
Importance: Oral anthelmintic niclosamide has potent in vitro antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2. Repurposed niclosamide could be a safe and efficacious COVID-19 therapy. Objective: To investigate whether niclosamide decreased SARS-CoV-2 shedding and duration of symptoms among patients with mild to moderate COVID-19. Design, setting, and participants: This randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial enrolled individuals testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase chain reaction with mild to moderate symptoms of COVID. All trial participants, investigators, staff, and laboratory personnel were kept blind to participant assignments. Enrollment was among individuals reporting at Tufts Medical Center and Wellforce Network in Massachusetts for outpatient COVID-19 testing. The trial opened to accrual on October 1, 2020; the last participant enrolled on April 20, 2021. Trial exclusion criteria included hospitalization at time of enrollment or use of any experimental treatment for COVID-19, including vaccination. Enrollment was stopped before attaining the planned sample size when COVID-19 diagnoses decreased precipitously in Massachusetts. Data were analyzed from July through September 2021. Interventions: In addition to receiving current standard of care, participants were randomly assigned on a 1:1 basis to receive niclosamide 2 g by mouth daily for 7 days or identically labeled placebo at the same dosing schedule. Main outcomes and measures: Oropharyngeal and fecal samples were self-collected for viral shedding measured by reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction on days 3, 7, 10, and 14, and an additional fecal sample was collected on day 21. A telehealth platform was developed to conduct remote study visits, monitor symptoms, and coordinate sample collection via couriers. The primary end point was the proportion of participants with viral clearance in respiratory samples at day 3 based on the intention-to-treat sample. Mean times to viral clearance and symptom resolution were calculated as restricted mean survival times and accounted for censored observations. Results: Among 73 participants, 36 individuals were enrolled and randomized to niclosamide and 37 individuals to placebo. Participant characteristics were similar across treatment groups; among 34 patients receiving placebo and 33 patients receiving niclosamide in the intention-to-treat sample, mean (SD) age was 36.0 (13.3) years vs 36.8 (12.9) years and there were 21 (61.8%) men vs 20 (60.6%) men. The overall mean (SD) age was 36.4 (13.0) years. For the primary end point, 66.67% (95% CI, 50.74% to 81.81%) of participants receiving niclosamide and 55.88% (95% CI, 40.27% to 72.73%) of participants receiving placebo had oropharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 clearance at day 3 (P = .37). Among 63 participants with symptoms, niclosamide did not significantly shorten symptom duration, which was 12.01 (95% CI, 8.82 to 15.2) days in the niclosamide group vs 14.61 (95% CI, 11.25 to 17.96) days in the placebo group (mean difference, -2.6 [95% CI, -7.23 to 2.03] days). Niclosamide was well-tolerated; the most commonly reported adverse events in the placebo and niclosamide groups were headaches (11 patients [32.4%] vs 7 patients [21.2%]; P = .31) and cough (8 patients [23.5%] vs 7 patients [21.2%]; P = .82). Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, there was no significant difference in oropharyngeal clearance of SARS-CoV-2 at day 3 between placebo and niclosamide groups. Confirmation in larger studies is warranted. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04399356.
Article
Full-text available
Intestinal epithelial cell damage caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection was thought to be associated with gastrointestinal symptoms and decreased fecal consistency. The association of the gastrointestinal symptoms with the COVID-19-mediated inflammatory response triggered by the gastrointestinal immune system was investigated in this paper. Intestinal inflammation marker fecal calprotectin along with serum calprotectin and other inflammatory markers were measured in COVID-19 cases with and without GI manifestations as well as healthy individuals. Analyses were performed to compare COVID-19 patient subgroups and healthy controls and examine the relationship between fecal and serum calprotectin levels with gastrointestinal symptoms and disease severity. COVID-19 patients (n = 70) were found to have markedly elevated median levels of fecal (124.3 vs. 25.0 µg/g; P < 0/0001) and serum calprotectin (3500 vs. 1060 ng/mL; P < 0/0001) compared with uninfected controls. Fecal and serum calprotectin levels were not significantly different between COVID-19 patients who displayed GI symptoms and those who did not. Compared with other acute phase markers, both fecal and serum calprotectin were superior in identifying COVID-19 patients who progressed to severe illness. Although the progression of COVID-19 disease is marked by an elevation of fecal and serum calprotectin, gastrointestinal symptoms or diarrhea were not correlated with calprotectin increase level.
Article
Full-text available
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a respiratory viral infection, has affected more than 78 million individuals worldwide as of the end of December 2020. Previous studies reported that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 1 and Middle East respiratory syndrome–related coronavirus infections may affect the gastrointestinal (GI) system. In this review we outline the important GI manifestations of COVID-19 and discuss the possible underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and their diagnosis and management. GI manifestations are reported in 11.4–61.1% of individuals with COVID-19, with variable onset and severity. The majority of COVID-19-associated GI symptoms are mild and self-limiting and include anorexia, diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain/discomfort. A minority of patients present with an acute abdomen with aetiologies such as acute pancreatitis, acute appendicitis, intestinal obstruction, bowel ischaemia, haemoperitoneum or abdominal compartment syndrome. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 RNA has been found in biopsies from all parts of the alimentary canal. Involvement of the GI tract may be due to direct viral injury and/or an inflammatory immune response and may lead to malabsorption, an imbalance in intestinal secretions and gut mucosal integrity and activation of the enteric nervous system. Supportive and symptomatic care is the mainstay of therapy. However, a minority may require surgical or endoscopic treatment for acute abdomen and GI bleeding.
Article
Full-text available
The novel coronavirus Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has emerged and is responsible for the Coronavirus Disease 2019 global pandemic. Coronaviruses, including SARS-CoV-2, are strongly associated with respiratory symptoms during infection, but gastrointestinal symptoms, such as diarrhea, vomiting, nausea, and abdominal pain, have been identified in subsets of COVID-19 patients. This article focuses on gastrointestinal symptoms and pathophysiology in COVID-19 disease. Evidence suggests that the gastrointestinal tract could be a viral target for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Not only is the SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 highly expressed in the GI tract and is associated with digestive symptoms, but bleeding and inflammation are observed in the intestine of COVID-19 patients. We further systemically summarize the correlation between COVID-19 disease, gastrointestinal symptoms and intestinal microbiota. The potential oral-fecal transmission of COVID-19 was supported by viral RNA and live virus detection in the feces of COVID-19 patients. Additionally, the viral balance in the GI tract could be disordered during SARS-CoV-2 infection which could further impact the homeostasis of the gut microbial flora. Finally, we discuss the clinical and ongoing trials of treatments/therapies, including antiviral drugs, plasma transfusion and immunoglobulins, and diet supplementations for COVID-19. By reviewing the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 virus, and understanding the correlation among COVID-19, inflammation, intestinal microbiota, and lung microbiota, we provide perspective in prevention and control, as well as diagnosis and treatment of the COVID-19 disease.
Article
Full-text available
The pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by a newly identified β-coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) has emerged as a dire health problem, causing a massive crisis for global health. Primary method of transmission was firstly thought to be animal to human transmission. However, it has been observed that the virus is transmitted from human to human via respiratory droplets. Interestingly, SARS-CoV-2 ribonucleic acid (RNA) has been isolated from patient stools, suggesting a possible gastrointestinal (GI) involvement. Most commonly reported clinical manifestations are fever, fatigue and dry cough. Interestingly, a small percentage of patients experience GI symptoms with the most common being anorexia, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting. The presence of viral RNA in stools is also common and fecal tests can be positive even after negative respiratory samples. The exact incidence of digestive symptoms is a matter of debate. The distribution of Angiotensin converting enzyme type 2 receptors in multiple organs in the body provides a possible explanation for the digestive symptoms' mechanism. Cases with solely GI symptoms have been reported in both adults and children. Viral RNA has also been detected in stool and blood samples, indicating the possibility of liver damage, which has been reported in COVID-19 patients. The presence of chronic liver disease appears to be a risk factor for severe complications and a poorer prognosis, however data from these cases is lacking. The aim of this review is firstly, to briefly update what is known about the origin and the transmission of SARS-CoV-2, but mainly to focus on the manifestations of the GI tract and their pathophysiological background, so that physicians on the one hand, not to underestimate or disregard digestive symptoms due to the small number of patients exhibiting exclusively this symptomatology and on the other, to have SARS-CoV-2 on their mind when the "gastroenteritis" type symptoms predominate.
Article
Background and aims The novel SARS-CoV-2 has been rattling the world since its outbreak in December 2019, leading to the COVID-19 pandemic. The learning curve of this new virus has been steep, with a global scientific community desperate to learn how the virus is transmitted, how it replicates, what cause such a wide spectrum of disease manifestations, causing none or few symptoms in some. Others are burdened by an intense immune response that resembles the cytokine storm syndrome (CSS), which leads to severe disease manifestations, often complicated by fatal acute respiratory distress syndrome and death. Research efforts have been focusing on finding effective cures and vaccinations for this virus. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, represented by several GI manifestations, has led to its investigation as a target for the virus and as an indicator of disease severity. The response of the microbiome (which is heavily linked to immunity) to the novel SARS-CoV-2 virus, and its role in igniting the exaggerated immune response has therefore become a focus of interest. The objective of our study was to gather the data connecting between the microbiome, the GI tract and COVID-19 and to investigate whether these reported alterations in the gut microbiome bear any resemblance to those seen in lupus, the prototypical autoimmune disease. Confirming such changes may become the steppingstone to potential therapies that may prevent transmission, progression and immune related manifestations of COVID-19, via manipulation of the gut microbiota. Methods We performed an extensive literature review, utilizing the Pubmed search engine and Google Scholar for studies evaluating the microbiome in COVID-19 patients and compared results with studies evaluating the microbiome in lupus. We searched for the terms: microbiome, dysbiosis, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, gastrointestinal as well as lupus and autoimmune. While there were hundreds of articles which referred to gastrointestinal manifestations in COVID-19, to date only 4 studies investigated the gastrointestinal microbiome in this setting. We compared the similarities between microbiome of COVID-19 patients and lupus patients. Results We found that there are several similar processes of immune dysregulation in patients with COVID-19 and in those with lupus, with several other alterations seen in other pathological states. Some of these similarities include loss of microbiota biodiversity, increased representation of pathobionts, which are microbes associated with inflammation and disease (i.e Proteobacteria) and a relative decrease of symbionts, which are protective microbes, associated with anti-inflammatory properties (i.e Lactobacillus). Compromise to the intestinal barrier has also been reported in both. Conclusions We conclude that the gastrointestinal tract contributes to the disease manifestations in COVID-19. Whether gastrointestinal dysbiosis is the cause or effect of gastrointestinal manifestations and several severe systemic manifestations, which may be the response to an increased pro-inflammatory environment, is still debatable and warrants further investigation. Given the resemblance of the microbiome in COVID-19 patients to that seen in lupus patients, it becomes clearer why several therapies used in autoimmune conditions are currently under investigation for the treatment of COVID-19 patients. Moreover, these findings should promote further investigating the utility of manipulation of the microbiome, via nutritional supplementation or even fecal transplantations, interventions that may alter the course of the disease, and potentially prevent disease transmission at low cost and low risk.