ResearchPDF Available

Occupational Exposure to Needlestick and Sharp Injuries among Hospital Waste Handlers in Selected Government Health Facilities of Bhopal District

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Introduction-Percutaneous injuries, caused by needle sticks and other sharps, are also a serious concern for waste handlers in hospitals and pose a significant risk of occupational transmission of blood borne pathogens. Objectives-1.To study prevalence and responses to needle stick and sharp injuries among waste handlers in selected government hospitals.2. To assess the risk factors among waste handlers leading to needle stick and sharp injuries in the above hospitals. Materials and Methods: It was a hospital based cross sectional study of 2 months duration i.e. from July-Aug 2014. 89 waste handlers were selected through random sampling and interviewed about their knowledge regarding waste handling from the selected government primary, secondary & tertiary health care institutions in Bhopal district. Results-out of the total 71.1 % of the waste handlers had a needle stick or sharps related injuries in last 6 months. Knowledge about the universal precaution in hospital waste handlers was minimal at all the three levels of health care institutions. On asking about the responses after needle sticks and sharps related injuries 28.5 % of the Waste handler had done nothing after injury.38.7 % of the waste handler said they washed their hand with water and the other 30.8 % of the Waster handler used soap with water. Hepatitis B vaccination was absent in the waste handlers of primary health care while the status of hepatitis B vaccination was minimal in the waste handlers of secondary and tertiary health care facility. Conclusion: needle sticks and sharp related injuries often get unnoticed in the waste handlers in hospitals. Some of the waste handlers even did not report it to their superior which is a matter of apprehension and need immediate awareness among the waste handlers about needle stick injuries.
Content may be subject to copyright.
International Journal of Health Sciences & Research (www.ijhsr.org) 37
Vol.5; Issue: 5; May 2015
International Journal of Health Sciences and Research
www.ijhsr.org ISSN: 2249-9571
Original Research Article
Occupational Exposure to Needlestick and Sharp Injuries among Hospital
Waste Handlers in Selected Government Health Facilities of Bhopal District
Aditya Thakur1, Manju Toppo2, D.K.Pal3
1P.G.Resident, 2Associate Professor, 3Professor & Head,
Department of Community Medicine, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal.
Corresponding Author: Aditya Thakur
Received: 30/03/2015 Revised: 21/04/2015 Accepted: 22/04/2015
ABSTRACT
Introduction- Percutaneous injuries, caused by needle sticks and other sharps, are also a serious concern
for waste handlers in hospitals and pose a significant risk of occupational transmission of blood borne
pathogens.
Objectives- 1.To study prevalence and responses to needle stick and sharp injuries among waste handlers
in selected government hospitals.2. To assess the risk factors among waste handlers leading to needle
stick and sharp injuries in the above hospitals.
Materials and Methods: It was a hospital based cross sectional study of 2 months duration i.e. from
July Aug 2014. 89 waste handlers were selected through random sampling and interviewed about their
knowledge regarding waste handling from the selected government primary, secondary & tertiary health
care institutions in Bhopal district.
Results- out of the total 71.1 % of the waste handlers had a needle stick or sharps related injuries in last 6
months. Knowledge about the universal precaution in hospital waste handlers was minimal at all the three
levels of health care institutions. On asking about the responses after needle sticks and sharps related
injuries 28.5 % of the Waste handler had done nothing after injury.38.7 % of the waste handler said they
washed their hand with water and the other 30.8 % of the Waster handler used soap with water. Hepatitis
B vaccination was absent in the waste handlers of primary health care while the status of hepatitis B
vaccination was minimal in the waste handlers of secondary and tertiary health care facility.
Conclusion: needle sticks and sharp related injuries often get unnoticed in the waste handlers in
hospitals. Some of the waste handlers even did not report it to their superior which is a matter of
apprehension and need immediate awareness among the waste handlers about needle stick injuries.
Keywords: Injuries, waste handlers, Primary health centre, Hepatitis B, Vaccination etc.
INTRODUCTION
Occupational safety and health
including the performance of safe injections
and waste management are important
concerns to protect healthcare workers,
patients, and the community. Hospital waste
handlers (HWHs) often considered as the
ancillary group or often given secondary
status in health care provision but proper
sanitation greatly improves the success of
medical intervention and plays a critical role
in prevention, especially for the sick. The
International Journal of Health Sciences & Research (www.ijhsr.org) 38
Vol.5; Issue: 5; May 2015
role of HWHs in ensuring safe environment
is irrefutable and utterly essential because
the environments for care are part of care. [1]
The collection, segregation and
disposal of injection waste entails labor
intensive operations, involving many
possibilities of direct contact with the waste
increasing the risk of infections to the
HWHs. [2,3]
Sharps or needle stick injury, a cut or
puncture wound resulting in penetration of
the skin by a hypodermic needle, surgical
blade, fragment of glass or metal or other
sharp item including rigid plastic, is the
primary hazard for those working with
healthcare wastes. Though much attention is
paid to the safety of healthcare workers and
their protection from sharps injury, the
welfare and safety of those in the waste
disposal sector has received very little
attention. []
Percutaneous injuries, caused by
needle sticks and other sharps, are a serious
concern for HWH in hospitals and pose a
significant risk of occupational transmission
of blood borne pathogens. Needle stick
injuries that occur immediately after an
injection are more likely to spread disease
caused by blood-borne pathogens, but
needle sticks from trash piles may cause
injury and infection from germs in the
environment. [5]
According to official statistics from
World Health Organization, in 2000, 5% of
the global HIV incidence was estimated to
occur because of poor waste handling and
contaminated injections (WHO, 2007). [6]
The segregation of infectious from non-
infectious waste is essential, and containers
should be used for sharps and not be
overfilled to avoid exposure to infections,
injuries, and toxic material. [7] Improper
disposal of waste, can lead to resale of
medical equipment on the black market.
Objectives
1. To study prevalence and responses to
needle stick and sharp injuries among
hospital waste handlers in selected
government hospitals.
2. To assess the risk factors among hospital
waste handlers leading to needle stick and
sharp injuries in the above hospitals.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
It was a hospital based cross
sectional study of 2 months duration i.e.
from July - Aug 2014. 11 government
health facilities were selected through
cluster sampling. HWHs those were working
in the above facilities were randomly
selected. Thus a total of 89 HWHs were
selected and interviewed about their
knowledge regarding waste handling from
the selected government primary, secondary
& tertiary health care institutions in Bhopal
district. The Data were coded and validated.
Data entry and analysis were using EPI info
(version 7) and MS Excel software.
Generation of descriptive Statistics was
done. Fisher exact probability test was used
to identify potential risk factor of needle
stick and other sharp related injuries. P value
of < 0.05 was considered statistically
significant.
The study was done according to
world Helsinki declaration and verbal
consent were obtained from the participants
before administrating questionnaire.
Anonymity of participants was maintained
by avoiding any information revealing the
identity of the participants in the
questionnaire.
RESULTS
Baseline characteristics of HWHs are
shown in table.1. The age of the HWHs
enrolled in the study ranged from 20 - 59
years with a mean age of 38.5 ± 7.85. It is
observed that majority of HWHs were aged
above 35 years followed the age group of
26-35 years. Male and female distribution in
International Journal of Health Sciences & Research (www.ijhsr.org) 39
Vol.5; Issue: 5; May 2015
the entire 3 tier of government health
facilities was almost equal. While analyzing
the experience of the waste handlers it was
observed that Majority of the HWHs had the
experience of more than 5 years in waste
handling. The work experience of the study
participants ranged between 1 and 15 years
(mean work experience of 5.67 ± 2.69
years). Majority of the HWHs in all the 3
tier of government health care facilities had
a primary education.
Table.1. Baseline Characteristics of healthcare waste handlers
When the exposure to needle stick
injuries was analyzed based on practice of
wearing gloves at the time of NSI exposure
it was noticed that only 28.5 % of the HWHs
was wearing gloves at the time of NSI while
71.5 % was not wearing gloves. However
this difference was not found statistically
significant. While on the other hand
comparing exposure to NSI and Knowledge
of universal precaution was also not found
statistically significant. When comparing the
training of injection waste handling and
Needle stick injuries in waste handlers it
was observed that 61.9 % of the waste
handlers who had NSI in past 6 month do
not had training on injection waste handling.
While 73 .1 % of the trained waste handlers
do not had any exposure of NSI in last 6
months. This difference was found to be
statistically significant (P= <0.005).
Table.2. Relationship between certain variables and needle stick injuries.
NSI
No NSI
P value *
Wearing gloves at the time of NSI
Yes
18 (28.5)
12(46.1)
NS
no
45(71.5)
14(53.9)
Knowledge of universal precautions
Yes
12 (19.1)
5 (19.2)
NS
no
51(80.9)
21(80.8)
Training of injection waste handling
Yes
24(38.1)
19(73.1)
P= 0.005*
No
39(61.9)
7(26.9)
Experience
<5
18 (28.5)
7 (26.9)
NS
≥5
45(71.5)
19(73.1)
Education
Primary
38 (60.3)
12 (46.1)
P = 0.010*
High school
7(11.1)
10(38.5)
No primary school
18(28.6)
4(15.4)
Total
63 (100)
26(100)
*Fisher exact probability test was performed.
Primary Health
care facilities (%)
Secondary Health
care facilities (%)
Tertiary Health care
facility (%) y h).
Age groups (Years)
<25
4 (23.5)
5 (12.2)
2(12.2)
26-35
5(29.5)
11(26.9)
8(26.9)
>35
8(47.0)
25(60.9)
21(60.9)
Sex
Male
9 (53)
22(53.6)
14(45.1)
Female
8(47)
19(46.4)
17(54.9)
Work experience (Years)
<5
6(35.2)
12 (29.2)
7(22.5)
≥5
11(64.8)
29(70.8)
24(77.5)
Education Status
Primary
5 ( 29.6)
26 ( 63.4)
19 (61.3)
High School
6(35.2)
8(19.5)
3(9.6)
No primary education
6(35.2)
7(17.1)
9(29.1)
Total
17(100)
41(100)
31(100)
International Journal of Health Sciences & Research (www.ijhsr.org) 40
Vol.5; Issue: 5; May 2015
Association between the years of
experience and exposure to needle stick
injuries was found to be statistically
insignificant in waste handlers. On
analyzing the education status with exposure
to needle stick injuries it was noticed that
the HWHs whose education status was of
primary school or above were less exposed
to needle stick injuries in the past 6 months.
This difference was found to be statistically
significant (P = 0.010). Relationship
between above variables with needle stick
injuries is shown in Table 2.
Fig.1. Responses of healthcare waste handlers after Needle
Stick injury.
Fig.2. Hepatitis B vaccination amongst Waste handlers in
different government health facilities.
Fig.1. shows the various responses of
HWHs after the needle stick injuries they
suffered in last 6 months. Majority of the
waste handlers 38.7 % only washed their
hands with water while 30.8 % of the
HWH’swashedwithsoapandwater.Matter
ofconcernisthe28.5%oftheHWH’swho
did nothing after the NSI. Post exposure
prophylaxis after NSI was not taken by any
of the waste handlers.
Fig.2. shows the Hepatitis B
vaccination status in the HWH’s in the all
the 3 tier of the government health facilities.
Itwasnoticed that32.1%oftheHWH’s in
the tertiary health care facility had complete
3 dose vaccination of hepatitis B while only
13.8 % of the HWH’s are completely
vaccinated against Hepatitis B in secondary
health care facilities.  No HWH’s in the
primary health care facilities was completely
vaccinated against hepatitis B which is
matter of concern.
DISCUSSION
The present study describe the
prevalence of NSI among Hospital waste
handlers of different government health
facilities involved in BMW handling but
also highlights the awareness of universal
precaution and responses at the time of
NSI’s. The prevalence of NSI’s in the
hospital waste handlers was found to be 70.7
% (N=63) in the present study.
Hospital waste handlers are consider
as ancillary group of the health care workers
which often remained obscure in many
studies done in the India about the
prevalence of NSI’s. Although sharps users
like doctors, Nurses etc are at greatest risk,
HWH and other support staff involved in
early stages of the disposal chain features as
the next most frequent group reporting
injury. [8] Whereas studies done in tertiary
health care center in south India and rural
North India among doctors, nurses and lab
technician has shown similar results to the
International Journal of Health Sciences & Research (www.ijhsr.org) 41
Vol.5; Issue: 5; May 2015
present study i.e. 71.9 % and 73%
respectively therefore not much difference
was found in the Prevalence of NSI’s. [9,10]
A study done in IRAN among Hospital
waste handlers in government hospital
shown proportion of NSI to be 31.3 %
which is very less when compared to the
present study it may be most likely due to
lack of awareness and knowledge in our
study population. [11]
In present study many hospital
facilities do not had a infection committee
while those who had, received very minimal
reporting on NSI’s and in  many hospital
waste handlers were not aware of such
committee. According to NHS policy in the
UK, it is compulsory when staff sustain a
NSI to report the incident. [12]
The education status of the most
hospital waste handlers (56.5 %) in present
study was up to primary school. A study
done in Coimbatore, India showed that most
of hospital waste handlers (61%) in their
study population had no primary education.
[13] The association between education status
and NSI’s prevalence was statistically
significant (p =<0.01) in present study.
Higher the education status lower the
prevalence in NSI’s in hospital waste
handlers. Whereas the training status of the
hospital waste handlers was 48.4 % in the
present study. A similar study done in
Nigeria showed that 65.8 % of the hospital
waste handlers received training before
commencing on the job. [14] The association
between training status and NSI’s
prevalence was statistically significant (p =
<0.005) in present study. This shows that
training and re-training of the health workers
is important and should be encouraged.
This study has demonstrated that the
inadequate reporting of NSSIs to medical
staff was a common occurrence amongst
Hospital waste handlers. As many as 28.5
% of the hospital waste handlers did nothing
after an injury, which is a similar finding to
studies carried out elsewhere. [15-17] For the
most part the common reasons for this may
be scarce knowledge and meager practices.
While none of the waste handlers
approached for PEP in the present study.
The observed high level of under-reporting
suggests that workers need education on
prevention, especially focusing on the
importance of reporting all NSSI's and the
possibilities of prophylaxis after exposure to
BBV. [18-20]
Vaccination is one of the best ways
to protect hospital waste handlers from
infection, but vaccination is only available
for HBV and tetanus. In the present study,
the number of HBV vaccinated waste
handlers in the tertiary health care center
was 32.1 % and in secondary health care
centers it was 13.8 % while none of the
waste handlers in the primary health care
centers had a complete hepatitis B
vaccination. This figure would suggest that a
greater awareness of the requirement of the
HBV vaccination is required.
CONCLUSION
Needle stick injuries have been
recognized as common occupational hazards
among health care workers. The present
studyrevealedthehigh proportion of NSI’s
among the hospital waste handlers in the
government health institutions. Despite the
proper guidelines of safe injection practices
and unambiguous legislation of waste
management by hospital administrations,
there is a need for training and retraining of
waste handlers by hospital administrations.
All the waste handlers should have pre-
employment immunization against hepatitis
B. The result of the study should be
interpreted with caution as the present study
was done only in selected government health
institutions and has not taken into account
thesitesofNSI’s and the circumstance that
ledtoNSI’s.
International Journal of Health Sciences & Research (www.ijhsr.org) 42
Vol.5; Issue: 5; May 2015
REFERENCES
1. Armstrong P, Armstrong H, Scott-Dixon
K. Who Counts as a Health Care
Worker? Canadian Women’s Health
Network 2006 March 8: 3.
2. Hossain, M.S, Santhanam A, Nik
Norulaini N.A, Mohd Omar, A.K.
Clinical solid waste management
practices and its impact on human health
and environmentA review. Waste
Management 2011, 31: 754766.
3. Brent AC, Rogers DEC, Ramabitsa-
Siimane TSM, Rohwer MB. Application
of the analytical hierarchy process to
establish health care waste management
systems that minimise infection risks in
developing countries. European Journal
of Operational Research. 2007 Aug
16;181(1):40324.
4. PATH. Preventing Needlestick Injuries.
Module 4. PATH: Driving
transformative innovation to save lives,
2013 August.
5. Blenkharn JI, Odd C. Sharps Injuries in
Healthcare Waste Handlers. Annals of
Occupational Hygiene. 2008 Jun
1;52(4):2816.
6. World Health Organization. Safe health-
care waste management-WHO core
principles for achieving safe and
sustainable management of health-care
waste. World Health Organization,
Geneva. 2007
7. Pruess, E., Giroult, P. & Rushbrook, P.
Safe Management of Wastes from
Health-Care Activities. World Health
Organization, Geneva. (1999)
8. Garner JS. Guidelines for isolation
precautions in hospitals. The Hospital
Infection Control Practices Advisory
Committee (HICPAC). Infect Control
Hosp Epidemiol. (1996), 17:5380.
9. Holla R, Unnikrishnan B, Ram P,
Thapar R, Mithra P, et al. Occupational
Exposure to Needle Stick Injuries
among Health Care Personnel in a
Tertiary Care Hospital: A Cross
Sectional Study. J Community Med
Health Educ 2014. S2: 004.
doi:10.4172/2161-0711.S2-004
10. Kermode M, Jolley D, Langkham B,
Thomas MS, Crofts N. Occupational
exposure to blood and risk of
bloodborne virus infection among health
care workers in rural north Indian health
care settings. Am J Infect Control 2005.
33: 34-41.
11. Lakbala P, Ebadiazar F, Kamali H.
Needlestick and sharps injuries among
housekeeping workers in hospitals of
Shiraz, Iran. BMC Research
Notes.2012; 5:276.
12. Adams S, Stojkovic G, Leveson SH:
Needlestick injuries during surgical
procedures: a multidisciplinary online
study. Occup Med 2010, 60(2):139144.
13. ManoRanjini.J. A study to assess the
knowledge on Biomedical Waste
Disposal among the Group D health
workers in Sri Ramakrishna Hospital,
Coimbatore. Asian Pac. J. Health Sci.,
2014; 1(4): 465-470.
14. Olaitan PB, Odu OO, Olaitan JO, Oseni
OG. Sharp injuries among hospital
waste handlers. Nig Q J Hosp
Med. 2012 Apr-Jun;22(2):134-7.
15. Kakizaki M, Ikeda N, Ali M, Enkhtuya
B, Tsolmon M, Shibuya K, Kuroiwa C.
Needlestick and sharps injuries among
health care workers at public tertiary
hospitals in an urban community in
Mongolia. BMC Res Notes 2011,
14(4):184.9.
16. Smith DR, Mihashi M, Adachi,
Shouyama Y, Mouri F, Ishibashi N,
Ishitake T. Organizational climate and
its relationship with needlestick and
sharps injuries among Japanese nurses.
Am J Infect Control 2009, 37(7):545
550.
17. Makary MA, Al-Attar A, Holzmueller
CG, Sexton JB, Syin D, Gilson MM,
Sulkowski MS, Pronovost PJ.
Needlestick injuries among surgeons in
training. N Engl J Med 2007,
356(26):26932699.
18. Kohn WG, Collins AS, Cleveland JL,
Harte JA, Eklund KJ, Malvitz DM.
Guidelines for infection control in dental
International Journal of Health Sciences & Research (www.ijhsr.org) 43
Vol.5; Issue: 5; May 2015
health-care settings-2003. MMWR
Recomm Rep 2003, 52:161.
19. Hutin YJ, Hauri AM, Armstrong GL.
Use of injections in healthcare settings
worldwide, 2000: Literature review and
regional estimates. BMJ 2003,
327:1075.
20. Askarian M, Ghavanini AA. Survey on
adoption of measures to prevent
nosocomial infection by anaesthesia
personnel. East Mediterr Health J 2002,
8:416421.
*******************
How to cite this article: Thakur A, Toppo M, Pal DK. Occupational exposure to needlestick and sharp
injuries among hospital waste handlers in selected government health facilities of Bhopal district. Int
J Health Sci Res. 2015; 5(5):37-43.
International Journal of Health Sciences & Research (IJHSR)
Publish your work in this journal
The International Journal of Health Sciences & Research is a multidisciplinary indexed open access double-blind peer-
reviewed international journal that publishes original research articles from all areas of health sciences and allied branches.
This monthly journal is characterised by rapid publication of reviews, original research and case reports across all the fields
of health sciences. The details of journal are available on its official website (www.ijhsr.org).
Submit your manuscript by email: editor.ijhsr@gmail.com OR editor.ijhsr@yahoo.com
... To prevent occupational health risks for people who handle medical waste, strict adherence to universal precautions, as well as appropriate segregation, collection, storage, transportation, treatment, and disposal of healthcare waste, is needed [2]. The Centre for Disease Prevention and Control recommends that everyone in a healthcare facility adhere to universal precautions consistently and correctly [3]. These precautions include proper hand washing, and the wearing of face masks, protective eye shields, hand gloves, aprons and/or gowns, and safety boots, as well as other safety measures such the proper segregation and disposal of medical waste to prevent occupational diseases and injuries in the workplace [4,5]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Occupational safety is a critical concern for disease prevention and control at healthcare facilities. Medical waste handlers, in particular, are those most exposed to occupational hazards among healthcare workers. Therefore, this cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate safety practices and associated factors among healthcare waste handlers in four public hospitals, southwest Ethiopia from 15 March to 30 May 2022. The study included 203 healthcare waste handlers. The data were collected using an interviewer-administered questionnaire and observational checklists. The overall performance of occupational safety practices among healthcare waste handlers was 47.3% (95%CI; 40.3, 54.2). Waste handlers with an educational status of secondary and above (AOR 4.95; 95%CI 2.13, 11.50), good knowledge of infection prevention and safety practices (AOR 4.95; 95%CI 2.13, 11.50), training in infection prevention and safety practices (AOR 2.57; 95%CI 1.25, 5.29), and adequate access to safety materials (AOR 3.45; 95%CI 1.57, 7.60) had significantly better occupational safety practices than their counterparts. In general, medical waste handlers’ occupational safety practices were found to be inadequate. Waste handlers’ knowledge of safety measures and training, educational level, and availability of safety materials were predictors of safe occupational practices. Therefore, appropriate strategies and actions are needed to ensure the safe occupational practices of healthcare waste handlers.
... In addition, the findings of this study showed that there is no significant relationship between work experience and NSI rate, which is consistent with the results of Thakur et al. study. [31] The result showed that the performance of majority of the participants was relatively suitable regarding the first action after NSI. In this study, most participants mentioned washing the hands with soap and water (45.8%) and washing the hands with alcohol and betadine (24%) as the first action after NSI. ...
Article
Full-text available
Context: Blood-borne infections are a serious problem of health systems. Most of these infections are caused by sharp injuries. Aims: This study was conducted to determine the frequency of sharp injuries and its related factors among high-risk wards staff. Setting and Design: This cross-sectional study was conducted on high-risk wards staff at educational hospitals of sari in 2018. Materials and Methods: In this study, 306 high-risk wards staff who were working in educational hospitals of sari district for more than 1 year completed a self-administered questionnaire. Statistical Analysis Used: Data were analyzed using descriptive statics, independent T- test and Chi –square. Results: All participants had a history of sharp injuries during their work experience, and in the last year, from the 306 participants in this study, 250 (81.7%) had at least one Needle Stick Injuries (NSI) event. in 66.7% of cases in the surgical technologists, suture needles were reported to cause NSI. While, 61.1% of nurses, 61.4% of anesthesia personnel and 45.5% of physicians, reported syringe needles as the main cause of injury. Suture and stitch needle was the most important cause of injury. The result shows that there is no significant relationship between work experience and gender with NSI rate. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate a high prevalence of NSI in personnel of high-risk wards, especially in the operating room. Due to the excessive use of needles and needle stitches in these areas, the incidence of them is high. It is recommended that safety measures be taken in the use of sharp equipment to reduce the complications in case of an accident.
Article
Full-text available
Background:Healthcare settings pose a major occupational hazard to their employees. Needlestick and sharps injuries (NSSIs) are one of the major risk factors for blood-borne infection among healthcare workers. Materials and Method: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was carried out in a tertiary healthcare hospital in Lucknow district with the objectives of assessing the prevalence of sharp injury among staff nurses and the safety precautions taken after the occurrence of sharp injury. The study participants included the staff nurses at various departments of the hospital who were randomly selected for the study. Thus a total of 85 staff nurses were selected and interviewed after taking verbal consent. Results and Discussion: The majority (54.1%) of the staff nurses were in the age group of 26-35 years. Out of the total, 32.9% had an incident of sharp injury. Needle (67.9%) accounted for the maximum injury. Of the total that got injured, injury occurred during the use of sharp item (82.1%) and of the total that got injured, only 28.6% took post-exposure prophylaxis as injection TT. Conclusion: In the present study almost half of the participants had an occurrence of sharp injury over the past one year. And poor post exposure prophylaxis practices were observed.
Article
Full-text available
Background Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a highly contagious pathogen that has become a severe public health problem and a major cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly in developing countries. Medical students are at high occupational risk during their training. However, no facility-based studies were found among medical students in eastern Ethiopia. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the seroprevalence of Hepatitis B Virus and associated factors among medical students in eastern Ethiopia. Methods A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 407 randomly selected medical students from March to June 2018. A pretested and structured questionnaire was used to collect data on socio-demographic characteristics and other risk factors. A 5ml blood was collected, and the serum was analyzed for Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) using the Instant Hepatitis B surface antigen kit. Data were entered using Epidata version 3.1 and analyzed using SPSS statistical packages version 22. Outcome and explanatory variables were described using descriptive summary measures. Binary and multivariable logistic regression was conducted at 95% CI and an association at P-value < 0.05 was declared statistically significant. Results The seroprevalence of hepatitis B virus surface antigen was 11.5% (95%CI = 8.6, 14.7). Poor knowledge of universal precaution guideline (AOR = 2.58; 95% CI = [1.35–4.93]), history of needle stick injury (AOR = 2.11; 95% CI = [1.07–4.18]) and never been vaccinated for HBV (AOR = 2.34; 95% CI = [1.17–4.69]) were found statistically significantly associated with HBsAg positivity after multivariate analysis. Conclusion Hepatitis B virus infection rate is high among health care trainees in eastern Ethiopia. Improvement at health care practice centers safety through training on universal precaution guidelines, and scaling up HBV vaccination is mandatory.
Article
Full-text available
Needlestick and sharps injuries (NSSIs) are one of the major risk factors for blood-borne infections (BBPs) at healthcare facilities. This study examines the current prevalence of NSSIs among housekeeping workers engaged in the handling and disposal of biomedical waste (BMW) at government and private hospitals in Shiraz, Iran, and furthermore, explores strategies for preventing these injuries. Using a cross-sectional study design, NSSI's and associated protective measures for housekeeping workers throughout hospitals in Shiraz were evaluated from 2009 onwards. Using a questionnaire, data was collected for 92 workers who had engaged directly with BMW. Data was analyzed using Chi-square, student t-test and where appropriate, SPSS version 12. 90.2 % of housekeeping workers were warned of the dangers associated with waste, 87.5 % in government and 93.2 % in private hospitals (P = 0.0444). 83.7 % had attended educational programs on biomedical waste (BMW) management and injury prevention at their hospital in the preceding year. 16.3 % had not been trained in biomedical waste management (P = 0.0379) and 88.9 % had a sufficient supply of safety wear. NSSIs are a common risk factor for infection among health care workers within hospitals in Iran. For the effective prevention of these injuries, health boards and hospital trusts need to formulate strategies to improve the working conditions of health care workers, discourage the excessive use of injections, and increase their adherence to universal precautions.
Article
Full-text available
Needlestick and sharps injuries (NSSIs) are one of the major risk factors for blood-borne infections at healthcare facilities. This study examines the current situation of NSSIs among health care workers at public tertiary hospitals in an urban community in Mongolia and explores strategies for the prevention of these injuries. A survey of 621 health care workers was undertaken in two public tertiary hospitals in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, in July 2006. A semi-structured and self-administered questionnaire was distributed to study injection practices and the occurrence of NSSIs. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate factors associated with experiencing NSSIs. Among the 435 healthcare workers who returned a completed questionnaire, the incidence of NSSIs during the previous 3 months was 38.4%. Health care workers were more likely to report NSSIs if they worked longer than 35 hours per week (odds ratio, OR: 2.47; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.31-4.66) and administered more than 10 injections per day (OR: 4.76; 95% CI: 1.97-11.49). The likelihood of self-reporting NSSIs significantly decreased if health care workers adhered to universal precautions (OR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.17-0.68). NSSIs are a common public health problem at public tertiary hospitals in Mongolia. The promotion of adequate working conditions, elimination of excessive injection use, and adherence to universal precautions will be important for the future control of potential infections with blood-borne pathogens due to occupational exposures to sharps in this setting.
Article
Full-text available
Needlestick injuries are common during surgical procedures. Following such an injury, local protocols should be followed to minimize the risk of infection. To identify who sustains such injuries, under what circumstances and what actions are taken to minimize the risk and in response to intraoperative needlestick injuries. A questionnaire was submitted via e-mail to all staff in a National Health Service trust who took part in operations. The results were checked against occupational health department (OHD) records. One hundred and thirty-six of 255 appropriate responders completed the questionnaire (53%). Fifteen of 31 consultants (48%), 12/36 junior doctors (33%), 0/39 midwives (0%) and 8/30 theatre staff (27%) reported having had at least one intraoperative needlestick injury over the past year. Awareness of local protocols was significantly worse in the junior doctor group. Ninety-three percent of consultants, 67% of junior doctors and 13% of theatre staff did not comply with local protocols. The length of time it takes to do so (48%) and a perceived low infection risk of the patient (78%) were the commonest reasons for this. Hand dominance, role during surgery and double gloving were not significant risk factors; however, rare use of a no-touch technique was. Comparison with OHD records suggested that a maximum of 16% of intraoperative needlestick injuries were dealt with in accordance to local policy. Non-compliance with needlestick injury protocols is commonest among senior surgical staff. A revision of the protocol to reduce the time it takes to complete it may improve compliance.
Article
Full-text available
Surgeons in training are at high risk for needlestick injuries. The reporting of such injuries is a critical step in initiating early prophylaxis or treatment. We surveyed surgeons in training at 17 medical centers about previous needlestick injuries. Survey items inquired about whether the most recent injury was reported to an employee health service or involved a "high-risk" patient (i.e., one with a history of infection with human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B or hepatitis C, or injection-drug use); we also asked about the perceived cause of the injury and the surrounding circumstances. The overall response rate was 95%. Of 699 respondents, 582 (83%) had had a needlestick injury during training; the mean number of needlestick injuries during residency increased according to the postgraduate year (PGY): PGY-1, 1.5 injuries; PGY-2, 3.7; PGY-3, 4.1; PGY-4, 5.3; and PGY-5, 7.7. By their final year of training, 99% of residents had had a needlestick injury; for 53%, the injury had involved a high-risk patient. Of the most recent injuries, 297 of 578 (51%) were not reported to an employee health service, and 15 of 91 of those involving high-risk patients (16%) were not reported. Lack of time was the most common reason given for not reporting such injuries among 126 of 297 respondents (42%). If someone other than the respondent knew about an unreported injury, that person was most frequently the attending physician (51%) and least frequently a "significant other" (13%). Needlestick injuries are common among surgeons in training and are often not reported. Improved prevention and reporting strategies are needed to increase occupational safety for surgical providers.
Article
Background. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or CDC, is the lead federal agency for disease prevention in the United States. It has been 10 years since CDC infection control guidelines for dental health care settings were last published. During those 10 years, new technologies and issues have emerged, and other CDC infection control guidelines for health care settings have been updated. Results. In light of these developments, CDC collaborated with experts in infection control to revise its infection control recommendations for dental health care settings. Existing guidelines and published research pertinent to dental infection control principles and practices were reviewed. This article provides background information, describes the process used to create these guidelines, and lists the new recommendations. Clinical Implications. CDC believes that dental offices that follow these new recommendations will strengthen an already admirable record of safe dental practice. Patients and providers alike can be assured that oral health care can be delivered and received in a safe manner.
Article
Health care workers are generally predisposed to injuries from sharps as a health hazard. This is more pronounced among waste handlers. It is therefore important to assess these injuries among this group of people with a view to identifying the risk factors and suggesting preventive methods. Questionnaires were administered to People handling wastes in our hospital to assess their level of education on injury prevention, immunization status and preventive methods used by them to prevent these injuries and subsequent infections. Forty three waste handlers were interviewed. Twenty eight (65.8%) of them received training before commencing on the job while 14 (32.5%) never received any training. Only thirty nine (90.7%) of them always use hand gloves before carrying wastes. Only three (7.0%) of the respondents have been screened for Hepatitis B, 19 (44.2%) for HIV, while 10 (23.3%) were screened for Hepatitis B, C, and HIV. Eleven (25.6%) of them have been injured with sharps. The finger was the most injured in 7 (93%) of them. Training and re-training of health workers is important and should be encouraged. All health workers should have pre-employment immunization against Hepatitis B, C as well as other before commencing on their jobs. Workers should be screened for infective diseases that can be of legal problem while at the job and the workers should be effectively immunized.
Article
Although certain aspects of organizational climate have been shown to influence needlestick and sharps injuries (NSI) among nurses, this issue has not been adequately investigated in Japan. Our study involved a modified version of the Hospital Safety Climate Scale, which was distributed to a large cross section of nurses in a Japanese teaching hospital. Various aspects of safety climate were associated with a reduced NSI risk, such as being involved in health and safety matters (odds ratio [OR], 0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.02-0.65) and being properly trained in risk control procedures (OR, 0.32; 95% CI: 0.12-0.78). Nurses working in departments in which health and safety information was readily available were more likely to report any NSI they sustained (OR, 4.91; 95% CI: 1.30-18.51), whereas nurses working in departments with minimal conflict were less likely to underreport their NSI (OR, 0.45; 95% CI: 0.22-0.87). Overall, this study suggests that hospital safety climate has an important influence on NSI injury rates and reporting behavior among Japanese nurses. Given the multifaceted nature of identified risk, a comprehensive approach to infection control is clearly required and one that encompasses preventive strategies in both the cultural and physical domains.
Article
Approximately 3 million health care workers (HCWs) experience percutaneous exposure to bloodborne viruses (BBVs) each year. This results in an estimated 16,000 hepatitis C, 66,000 hepatitis B, and 200 to 5000 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections annually. More than 90% of these infections are occurring in low-income countries, and most are preventable. Several studies report the risks of occupational BBV infection for HCWs in high-income countries where a range of preventive interventions have been implemented. In contrast, the situation for HCWs in low-income countries is not well documented, and their health and safety remains a neglected issue. To describe the extent of occupational exposure to blood and the risk of BBV infection among a group of HCWs in rural north India. A cross-sectional survey of HCWs from 7 rural health settings gathered data pertaining to occupational exposure to blood and a range of other relevant variables (eg, demographic information, compliance with Universal Precautions, perception of risk, knowledge of BBVs). A mass action model was used to estimate the risk of occupational BBV infection for these HCWs over a 10-year period. A total of 266 HCWs returned questionnaires (response rate, 87%). Sixty-three percent reported at least 1 percutaneous injury (PI) in the last year (mean no. = 2.3) and 73% over their working lifetime (mean no. = 4.2). Predictors of PI during the last year were hospital site, job category, perception of risk, and compliance with Universal Precautions. The high level of occupational exposure to blood found among this group of rural north Indian HCWs highlights the urgent need for interventions to enhance their occupational safety to prevent unnecessary nosocomial transmission of BBVs.
Who Counts as a Health Care Worker? Canadian Women's Health Network
  • P Armstrong
  • H Armstrong
  • K Scott-Dixon
Armstrong P, Armstrong H, Scott-Dixon K. Who Counts as a Health Care Worker? Canadian Women's Health Network 2006 March 8: 3.