Content uploaded by Malik Muneeb Abid
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Malik Muneeb Abid on Nov 11, 2022
Content may be subject to copyright.
International Journal of Advance Research, IJOAR .org
ISSN 2320-9100 32
IJOAR© 2013
http://www.ijoar.org
International Journal of Advance Research, IJOAR .org
Volume 1, Issue 3, March 2013, Online: ISSN 2320-9100
DEVELOPMENT OF A FRAMEWORK FOR IMPLEMENTING
SAFETY ON CONSTRUCTION SITES
Waqas Ahmed¹; Malik Muneeb Abid 2
Abstract:
Safety management on construction sites had always been a major issue in the construction industry of
Pakistan. The safety conditions on construction sites vary depending upon the nature of work and
management commitment towards implementing safety on construction projects. There was no
requirement for implementing safety management system from the government in the country.
Construction companies were lacking a framework to follow for implementing safety on construction
projects. The safety framework can help construction professionals to implement and improve
construction safety practices on their project sites. This study presents the development of a
framework for implementing safety on construction sites. Extensive literature review was carried out
to design a suitable safety framework. Questionnaires items were adopted from previous studies and
modified through pilot survey for collecting data from construction project. In addition to
questionnaire survey, ten safety management interviews were conducted. These interviews were
conducted from the representatives of contractors to obtain insights about the safety management
practices in the construction industry of Pakistan. Safety management survey was conducted on
seventy construction sites in different cities of Pakistan with the help of an instrument covering seven
aspects of construction safety management, which are health and safety policy, safety organization,
safety training, safety inspections, safety promotion, personal protection program, and documentation
and accident prevention. The collected data was analyzed by using software SPSS 17. The results
reveal that top management of construction companies needs to show commitment for developing and
implementing safety management systems to improve safety conditions on construction sites. Results
emphasize the requirement of competent staff which need to be appointed to implement safety on
construction sites. Interviewees agreed that at the government level, it was imperative to establish a
International Journal of Advance Research, IJOAR .org
ISSN 2320-9100 33
IJOAR© 2013
http://www.ijoar.org
government agency to supervise and control the implementation of safety on construction sites in the
construction industry. Finally, a safety framework was presented which the companies can adopt and
embrace. The findings of this research will help Pakistani construction companies to improve safety
on construction sites.
DOI:
CE Database subject headings: Safety management; Construction sites; Construction companies;
Construction Industry; Safety framework; Pakistan
¹ Post Graduate Student, Dept. of Construction Engineering and Management, National University of Sciences and Technology,
Islamabad, Pakistan. E-mail: waqasahmed987@gmail.com
International Journal of Advance Research, IJOAR .org
ISSN 2320-9100 34
² Post Graduate Student, Dept. of Transportation Engineering, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan.
E-mail: muneeb_abid_2005@yahoo.com
Introduction
The safety of workers on construction sites is a complex phenomenon. Construction is always risky
because of outdoor operations, work-at-heights, complicated on-site plants and equipment operation
coupled with workers attitudes and behaviors towards safety (Wilson, 1989; Choudhry, 2008).
Concerning the safety aspects within the construction industry, it is apparent that the implementation
of safety best practices is still far from good. Even when the industry has improved, not only in
number but also in their scale and which sometimes involves overseas companies where international
safety regulations should be applied. Safety management system needs to be considered as the basis
for safely managing site operations. It consists all the requirements i.e policies, objectives, roles,
responsibilities, accountabilities, codes, standards, communications, processes, procedures, tools, data
and documents that are necessary for imparting safety on construction sites. In developing countries
like Pakistan, safety rules usually do not exist; if any exist, the regulatory authority is usually very
weak in implementing such rules effectively. The relevant regulations are outdated and irrelevant in
day-to-day construction operations (Ali, T. H., 2006). Developing countries like Pakistan have yet to
respond to recent technological improvements. Lack of response to technology, however, has not
resulted in safer construction sites. In fact, a larger share of construction work being performed by
human resources had led to increased number of site accidents. In Pakistan, roughly 6-7% labour is
directly attached with the construction industry. Informal assessments have identified a few major
reasons for safety non-performance which include: lack of development of construction sector in the
shape of mechanization and industrialization; lack of professional construction management practices
which has not only led to unsafe project sites but also resulted in construction delays, cost overruns,
poor productivity and poor product and process quality; inadequate safety provisions laid by the
existing regulatory environment which has failed to establish safety as a major industry objective;
insufficient and incentive less insurance mechanisms which have failed to establish safety as a
business survival issue; and unfavorable business environment which has led to adversarial business
relationships among stakeholders resulting in controversies, conflicts, claims and litigation and hence
diverting the focus away from issues like safety (Farooqui et al., 2008).
Workplace safety is a complex phenomenon and the subject of attitudes and safety performance in the
construction industry is even more complex. It is not only the workers who suffer from an accident
but, directly or indirectly the employer, contractor and the public in general also suffers. The
economic effects of an accident can be devastating, apart from human cost of suffering. Accidents at
work place occurs either due to lack of knowledge or training, a lack of supervision, or a lack of
International Journal of Advance Research, IJOAR .org
ISSN 2320-9100 35
means to carry out the task safely, or alternatively, due to an error of judgement, carelessness, or
apathy. Studies have shown that hazards can be controlled and accidents can be prevented through the
implementation of basic safety practices leading to a sound safety program (Sawacha, et al., 1999;
Baig, 2001).
Hale et al. (1997) in the study shows that safety management has become a topic of increasing
interest. These trends have produced a dramatic growth in the development and use of
management system audits to assess whether an SMS is adequate and how it can be
improved. Many construction companies around the world are implementing safety, health and
environmental management system to reduce injuries, eliminate illness, and to provide a safe work
environment in their construction sites. A typical site-specific safety plan was utilized to provide
safety guidance throughout the construction project (Choudhry et al., 2008). The term safety
management is used for convenience and for brevity, and wherever it is used be taken or refer the
management of occupational health and environment as well as safety. Safety management is
concerned with, and achieved by, all the techniques, which promote the subject. Safety management
is also concerned with influencing human behavior, and with limiting opportunities for mistakes to be
made which result in harm and loss. To do this, safety management should take into account the ways
in which people fail (Armstrong, 1980; Permana, 2007).
Methodology
It is a research study based on the findings of the safety management questionnaire survey and top
management interviews of the good construction company
‟
s representatives working on construction
sites in the construction industry of Pakistan, for the development of construction safety framework,
which is a useful tool for implementing safety on construction sites.
The research was divided in to four phases: preliminary study, data collection, data analysis and
construction safety framework development.
In the preliminary study phase, literature had been searched in order to gather background data. A
questionnaire and interview guide questions had been developed for conducting safety management
survey and interviews, by which safety related information were obtained from the construction sites
in Pakistan.
In the data collection phase, a safety management survey and interviews were carried out. A
questionnaire used for safety management survey was distributed by face to face meetings and
through email to top management representatives of the construction companies including project
directors, project managers, safety managers, safety officers, site engineers. While safety management
interviews were conducted by face to face meetings of the above mentioned company
‟
s top
management representatives.
International Journal of Advance Research, IJOAR .org
ISSN 2320-9100 36
In the data analysis phase, the collected data was entered in the statistical analysis software package
SPSS 17.0 and analyzed. Qualitative method was used for analysis of management interviews and
quantitative method was used for analysis of safety management survey. For this purpose, literature
was reviewed for learning of statistical tools and to interpret the results obtained from SPSS 17.0.
Based on the results of data analysis, conclusions and recommendations were made.
In the last phase, efforts were made to develop a construction safety framework model for
implementing safety on construction sites. For this purpose, literature review was carried out on
existing safety framework in developed and developing countries. Based on this literature review and
the results obtained from above phases, construction safety framework is proposed for implementation
of safety on construction sites by local construction companies.
The analysis of management survey was conducted by Statistical Package for the Social Sciences
(SPSS 17.0). Available Formal safety management systems and also incident and accidents
investigation reports were studied of the construction project sites provided by safety representatives
on construction sites. Safety management survey was designed and hard copies were distributed for
feedback. The collected data from valid responses were entered in SPSS 17.0 for analysis. Detailed
analysis and results will be reported later in the upcoming chapter.
Ten interviews were conducted with top management particularly with people responsible for
construction safety in the company
Development of Questionnaire
From literature review, Choudhry et al. (2008) questionnaire covering 56 questions and eight aspects
of site safety management was chosen as the principle survey method and some amendments are
made to it. Initially a pilot survey was conducted to check the applicability of questionnaire in local
construction environment. Three construction projects were selected for pilot testing of questionnaire,
followed by the interviews. The respondents of the pilot study had an experience of more than five
years in the construction safety management on sites. This exercise was conducted face to face,
ensuring 100 per cent response. From their feedback, the questionnaire was amended and redistributed
to same individuals, and a final questionnaire (See Appendix I) consisting of consists of 25 questions
covering seven aspects of safety management was developed from the feedback of these experts to
suit local environments. Final questionnaire has a general information section which includes two
parts. First part is about personal details, which includes the respondent covering his / her name
(optional), age, gender, name of the project, position organization, address, working experience in
construction industry, education obtained. While the second part is about personal details which are
optional and includes telephone and email details. This section is followed by safety management
system survey seven sections as under: first; Health and Safety Policy, second; Safety Organization,
third; Safety Training, fourth; Safety Inspections, fifth; Safety Promotion, sixth; Personal Protection
International Journal of Advance Research, IJOAR .org
ISSN 2320-9100 37
Pecent of respondents
Program and seventh; Documentation and Accident Prevention. In these sections, questions are asked
and the respondents have to answer either
„yes‟
or
„no‟
against each question.
Selection of Construction Sites and Firms for Safety Management Survey
70 construction sites were selected for safety management survey and the main respondents were
contractors working on these construction sites and registered with PEC under categories C-A, C-B,
C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4, C-5 and C-6. Questionnaires were distributed through email and by face-to-face
meetings with the respondents at construction sites.
Total 70 questionnaires were distributed out of which 55 (78.6 percent) valid responses were received.
All respondents were approached personally on telephone or e-mail. The fieldwork approach was
used to distribute and collect the questionnaire followed by an interview. The respondent
‟
s age
percentage distribution is shown in Figure 1, while the respondent
‟
s experience percentage
distribution is shown in Figure 2.
60
50
40
30 55%
20 29%
10 13%
0% 4%
0 Under 18 18-25 25-35 35-50 50+
Respondent's age
Fig. 1.
Respondent‟s
Age Percentage Distribution Chart
International Journal of Advance Research, IJOAR .org
ISSN 2320-9100 38
Percent of
respondents
30
25
20
15
20%
10
5
29%
24%
9%
18%
0 0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 20+
Respondent's
experience
Fig. 2.
Respondent‟s
Experience Percentage Distribution Chart
Safety Management Interviews
10 safety management interviews were conducted from top management of construction companies.
Management interviews were conducted with the purpose of gaining a deeper knowledge of safety
management practices and issues in construction sites. The interviews conducted with management
lasting between 15 to 20 minutes included people responsible for construction safety i.e. Deputy
Project Directors, Project Managers, Safety Managers, and Safety Officers. These people were
selected from different project sites that have a expertise in safety related issues. The initial approach
was made by telephone follow-up for an appointment, followed by a face-to-face interview. The in-
depth interviews yielded rich data about the construction industry of Pakistan and its safety situation
including operational safety management system.
Results and Analysis
Safety Management Survey Results and Analysis
The safety management survey was conducted in seventy construction sites in different cities of
Pakistan. The response rate was good (78.6 %) with 55 valid responses, 7 invalid responses (10 %)
and 8 no responses (11.43 %), with a target of one questionnaire to be filled from one construction
site. The collected data from 55 valid responses were entered into the Statistical Package for the
International Journal of Advance Research, IJOAR .org
ISSN 2320-9100 39
Social Sciences (SPSS 17.0) for analysis of answers to each question. The answers to the 25 questions
are summarized in Table 1. The respondents were required to tick “Yes” coded as “1” in SPSS or
“No” coded as “0” in SPSS against the question. Positive responses in percentage terms (Yes %) from
all respondents were calculated and are shown in Table 1. From all positive responses, a control chart
is drawn as shown in Figure 3. From statistical analysis, the mean (40.72), standard deviation (15.87),
minimum (3.6), maximum (67.3), upper control limit (88.32), and lower control limit (-6.89), values
were determined. The upper and lower control limits were established at +3σ and -3σ standard
deviation from the central line (Deming, 1986; Choudhry, 2007). While the upper warning limit
(72.45) and lower warning limit (8.98) were established at +2σ and -2σ standard deviation from the
central line. In the Table 1, numbers from 1.1 to 7.3 refer to question numbers in the questionnaire.
Table 1. Safety Management Questionnaire Results
Question
Yes
No
Yes (%)
1.1
35
20
63.6
1.2 34 21 61.8
1.3 24 31 43.6
1.4 28 27 50.9
1.5 34 21 61.8
1.6 32 23 58.2
2.1 18 37 32.7
2.2 25 30 45.5
2.3 17 38 30.9
2.4 11 44 20
3.1 21 34 38.2
3.2 16 39 29.1
3.3 18 37 32.7
3.4 24 31 43.6
4.1 22 33 40
4.2 18 37 32.7
5.1 19 36 34.5
5.2 23 32 41.8
5.3 8 47 14.5
6.1 37 18 67.3
International Journal of Advance Research, IJOAR .org
ISSN 2320-9100 40
Yes (%)
6.2 31 24 56.4
6.3 18 37 32.7
7.1 28 27 50.9
7.2 2 53 3.6
7.3 17 38 30.9
Positive Response Rate
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1
Question
Fig. 3. Control Chart for Positive Response Rate
The control chart given as output is the chart for the mean as shown in Figure 3. This chart, which is
pretty much self-explanatory, shows that 40% of the construction companies have safety management
system in practice at their construction sites. According to Deming (1986), the two basic uses of
control charts are; a) as a judgement tool; we look at a control chart to observe whether the process
that made a particular batch of product was in statistical control. If yes, then we know, for the quality
characteristic that was plotted on the chart, the distribution of this quality characteristic for individual
items. b) as an operation (ongoing); a control chart can also be used to attain and maintain statistical
control during production. Here the process has already been brought into statistical control / or nearly
so, with only rare evidence of a special cause.
International Journal of Advance Research, IJOAR .org
ISSN 2320-9100 41
Yes (%)
Positive Response Rate
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1
Question
Fig. 4. Control Chart for C-A Category Companies
From the positive response rate of C-A Category companies sites, a control chart is drawn as shown in
Figure 4. From statistical analysis, the mean (63.77), standard deviation (19.56), minimum (11.8), and
maximum (88.2) values were determined.
From Figure 4, it is clear that 64% of the PEC recognized, C-A category (No Limit), construction
companies are practicing safety management system on their construction sites, which shows that top
construction companies are taking steps to implement workplace safety to avoid serious accidents
from taking place on the project sites. This condition can be made better by involvement of top
management of the construction companies.
From the results shown in Table 1, the following consideration of the seven aspects of safety
management was investigated by the questionnaire survey.
i) Health and Safety Policy
The survey results for the questions regarding safety policy are numbered from 1.1 to 1.6 as shown in
questionnaire in appendix. The results for question # 1.1 shows the valid positive response rate of 63.6
%, which indicates that on most the construction sites visited, contractors give importance to the
development and implementation of HSE policy. 61.8 % is the valid positive response rate for
question # 1.2., showing that the HSE policy developed by construction companies for their projects
clearly state that decisions on other priorities should give due regard to construction safety
requirements. For question # 1.3, 43.6 % is the positive response rate for the surveyed construction
sites; which shows that the policy developed by fewer companies meets the safety standards such as
OSHA etc. The valid yes response rate for question # 1.4 of 50.9 % and no response rate of 49.1 %,
International Journal of Advance Research, IJOAR .org
ISSN 2320-9100 42
giving us a clear picture that the at least on half (50 %) of the construction sites surveyed, the policy
implemented set targets for health and safety performance including a commitment to progressive
improvement. For the question # 1.5, the valid positive response rate is 61.8 %; which clearly
indicates that policy identify top management key senior personnel for overall coordination and
implementation of the policy for the execution of activities on construction sites. For question # 1.6, it
is clear that 32 (58.2 %) out of 55 construction companies allocate financial budget to safety in their
BOQ, including the provision of safety amount in their contract documents, mostly in highly funded
projects like The Centaurus Project, PTET Tower, FFCL Tower etc.
ii) Safety Organization
On each construction project, it is necessary to display charts on the notice boards indicating the
responsible safety advisor for every section of the project (Choudhry, 2007). The valid response rate
(32.7 %) for question 2.1 clearly tells us that out of 55 construction sites surveyed, only 18 have an
organization chart showing the names and positions with responsibility lines for safety performance
management. For question # 2.2, the valid positive response rate is 45.5 %, which is above the mean
figure (40.72); indicating that the individual health and safety responsibilities of all employees were
clearly defined on most of the projects surveyed, by PEC recognised No Limit (CA Category)
companies. The valid positive response rate for question # 2.3 was 30.9 %; the results shows that only
17 out of 55 construction companies working on the construction projects surveyed appointed
competent officers and safety supervisors having qualification and degree in safety and also
experience of working on local construction sites and abroad. While the score for question # 2.4 was
20 % which was below the mean figure (40.72). It reveals that it is the area where construction
companies needs to pay more attention as most of the work is performed entirely by subcontractors.
The subcontractors should prepare and submit the site specific safety plans for each of their
construction activities.
iii) Safety Training
The valid positive response rate for question # 3.1 was 38.2 %, which is below the mean figure
(40.72); indicating that there is a need for a health and safety training plan by construction companies
on their projects. It should be submitted along with the other documents at the time of bidding and
should be a part of contract documents. Question # 3.2 valid positive response rate was 29.1 % ,
which shows that training of new employees were not given importance by construction companies
working on construction sites i.e 39 out of 55. Top management involvement is required for training
to be made compulsory to every new employee inducted in the company. The results for question #
3.3 were giving the valid response rate of 32.7 % which was far below the mean figure (40.72). It
shows that there is still a need to incorporate safety training as a compulsory item within budget of the
company
‟
s project. However the valid positive response rate was 43.6 % for question 3.4, which was
International Journal of Advance Research, IJOAR .org
ISSN 2320-9100 43
above the mean figure (40.72); indicating that there is a trend present within construction companies
to train their in service employees by introducing different courses related to their trades or to depute
them to other places for training purposes. So from the results of questions 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4, it is
suggested that the construction companies have to take steps in safety training of their staff , save
their precious life and to be more competent to remain in this dynamic business of construction.
iv) Safety Inspections
Results of questions 4.1 and 4.2 were showing valid positive response rates of 40 % and 32.7 %
respectively. The result of question # 4.1 shows that safety officers and safety supervisors carry out
safety inspections at regular intervals within a week or within a month. While result from question #
4.2 indicates that on fewer of the surveyed projects i.e 18 out of 55, safety performance is measured
by conducting safety audits for project execution on a monthly or yearly basis. Safety audit is the best
tool for measurement of safety performance on a construction project to check whether safety is
implemented according to site safety plan or not and to improve it by having a record of previous
safety performance.
v) Safety Promotion
Results for question # 5.1 indicate that on 19 out of 55 construction sites, safety bulletin boards are
provided and located so that every employee will see them during working days. The valid positive
response rate was 34.5 % which was below the mean (40.72); so safety bulletin boards easily
understandable by workers, working on construction sites, have to be provided by construction
companies working on different projects in local language or English language and by providing signs
on boards so that those workers can easily understand the signs, who are illiterate. The results for
question # 5.2 show the valid positive response rate of safety signs and posters prominently displayed
on site was 41.8%, which was slightly above the mean value (40.72). Safety signs and posters should
be prominently displayed on site, so that every employee working on the site can see them and work
safely. It is good practice that company displays signs and posters near work areas to enhance
precautionary measures (Choudhry, 2007). A valid positive response rate of 14.5 % for question # 5.3
indicates that there is a need for safety awards to be meted out on a regular basis with recognition
given for good safety performance by individuals of the company working on a specific project. For
promotion of safety on site, different schemes like Best Safe Site Competition, Best Safe Foremen
Competition, Best Safe Worker Competition etc. are needed to be organized.
vi) Personal Protection Program
Results for question # 6.1 gives the valid positive response rate of 67.3 % i.e 37 out of 55 construction
sites surveyed, had the requirements for the provision of personal protective equipment (PPE) been
indicated in the contract agreement / safety plan. The results of question # 6.2, showing the valid
positive response rate of 56.4 %. On construction sites surveyed, there was a increased trend to obtain
International Journal of Advance Research, IJOAR .org
ISSN 2320-9100 44
a sufficient stock of carefully selected and appropriate Personal Protective Equipment either provided
in BOQ or purchased by construction companies for their workers in their own expenses. The valid
positive response rate for question # 6.3 was 32.7 %, which is below mean value of 40.72 %. There is
a need for an effective system for the issuance, recording, and inspection of PPE and its replacement
been established by the construction companies.
vii) Documentation and Accident Prevention
Results of question # 7.1 shows that 28 (50.9%) out of 55 construction companies working on the
projects surveyed had an arrangement to keep record of accidents occurring during execution of
project activities. The valid positive response rate for question # 7.2 was 3.6 %, which was far below
the mean figure (40.72). This shows clearly that there was no staff hired to keep the proper
documentation of accidents occurring and updating of this record on the construction sites surveyed.
The valid positive response rate was 30.9 % for question # 7.3, which was again below the mean
value (40.72). It is the responsibility of the senior key personnel of the organization working a
construction project to develop and implement a policy / plan for accident prevention on construction
site during execution of construction activities. So the overall results from questions 7.1, 7.2 and 7.3
indicates the need on priority basis for construction companies to have proper documentation for all
the activities executed on the project and to have a accident prevention plan to ensure safety on
project site and to avoid any unforeseen event or accident.
Safety Management Interviews Results and Analysis
The descriptive interview questions are given in Table 2.
Table 2. Descriptive Questions for Interview
Sr.#
Interview Questions
1.
Would you like to throw some light on the salient features of the Pakistani
construction industry in the context of safety?
2. Please express your views on safety situation in general on construction projects
of the company.
3. Please express your views on safety, health, and environmental management
system of the company. How they were developed, implemented, monitored,
audited, and reviewed continuously?
4. To what extent is the management investigating recordable incidents?
5. On each project, who is responsible to prepare the site safety plan? How is being
updated?
6. Please express your views on education and training of workers and supervisors.
International Journal of Advance Research, IJOAR .org
ISSN 2320-9100 45
7. Is the policy explained to new employees as part of their training and orientation
prior to the commencement of work?
8. Does any process exist on construction sites that operatives should learn from
incidents to avoid resulting serious accidents?
9. A short question is, “are plants and equipment used on site suitable for the jobs
and those using these were trained?”
10. How is the safety of
subcontractors‟
workers managed on-site? Do they practice
safety management systems? How they use and follow safety standard as well as
procedures on-site?
Interviews Results and Analysis
From the interviews conducted, following results are concluded;
1) There was a concept of safety within top management of construction companies. They were also
aware of the safety practices being followed in outside world and within Pakistan. Indeed, most of the
participants had international exposure of working on different construction sites in developed and
developing countries.
2) The safety situation in general on construction projects of the company varies a great deal
depending on the nature of the construction project. If the project in hand had high funding like a high
rise building, then safety cost was also high. The result was that the contractor required to develop and
submit the site safety plan at the time of bidding and if contract was awarded then it had to implement
the site safety plan. Also sufficient PPE can be purchased, maintained and replaced as funding was
provided by the client. Whereas on the other hand, on a lower funded projects, contractors purchased
limited stock of PPE on their own expense as no funding was provided by the client, for safety of their
workers like helmets and safety shoes.
3) Participants know about the document named as
„
safety, health and environmental management
system
‟
developed by their respective companies and implemented on their construction projects.
4) The reputable companies had adopted themselves to the latest technologies and also started to give
importance to safety related issues on their projects. These companies appointed competent field
safety staff, who were investigating and documenting the recordable incidents on their construction
sites in proper format and templates.
5) The site safety plan was provided by the contractor as demanded by the client as part of the
contract documents. The updating of site safety plan was not in practice by the companies, which
required attention by the management.
6) The construction companies were taking steps to educate and train their workers and supervisors
working on site to improve safety conditions on sites.
International Journal of Advance Research, IJOAR .org
ISSN 2320-9100 46
7) Most of the top companies in Pakistan had the policy explained to new employees as part of their
training and orientation prior to the commencement of work to ensure that their workers were safe
from all kinds of injuries and ultimately fatalities.
8) There was a need to introduce the process by which operatives can learn from incidents to avoid
serious accidents by the top management of the company by carrying out the case studies and by
establishing Research and Development section in their companies.
9) All participants give positive response that “plants and equipment used on site suitable for the jobs
and those using these were trained”. Mostly the operators operating on plants and equipments on site
are experienced and had passed the trade test from the respective department.
10) The
„
sub contractor
‟
s workers safety on site and guidelines for them to implement safety as far as
their work was concerned was very important matter, that needs attention by all the companies as
most of the works on a construction project were executed by these specialty contractors. It is the
responsibility of the safety officer in charge on site to educate its own company workers as well as the
workers of the sub contractor as most of the dangerous works were performed by them and also they
were involved in great number of injuries on site. According to the research findings of Choudhry
(2007), unstable job nature in the subcontracting system is creating problems in implementing site
safety measures. On-site subcontractor
‟
s workers do not seem to be involved in the site safety process.
He postulated that communication of safety related information is an important issue between the
project management team and the site workforce.
Construction Site Safety Implementation Framework
The construction site safety implementation developed in this research consists of 6 parts as shown in
Figure 5.
The first part is about the management commitment towards implementing safety on construction site
and it is the first safety best practice identified, and one which was essential to any good safety
program, was a management commitment to safety as “Management Support is Key to Safety
Commitment”. The second part is about the implementation of safety policy, safety rules, safety
organization chart, assigning of safety responsibilities to personnel on site, safety management
system, compliance of safety rules with legislation, safe working environment, safety induction and
performance monitoring for subcontractors on site and selection of subcontractors based on safety
policy. The third part consists of safety training of contractor
‟
s workers on site. The training includes
induction training of persons at site, providing updated safety information to all the workers on site
and to promote safety on construction site by displaying proper sign boards and by introducing
different award schemes on site. The fourth part consists of Emergency response procedures, which
are plans for handling emergencies that may occur on the construction site, including, but not limited
to, injuries resulting from falls, fires, explosions and releases of hazardous materials. Accident
International Journal of Advance Research, IJOAR .org
ISSN 2320-9100 47
CONSTRUCTION SITE SAFETY IMPLEMENTATION
investigation including accident recording and accident analysis is the fifth part. Last part is about the
safety review to evaluate safety features of completed projects and identify any site conditions that
may negatively affect safety in an effort to implement the necessary changes to improve safety of the
ongoing project and for the future projects of the company. Safety review may include safety hazard
review, site safety policy review and the safety audit for the construction site.
Management Commitment
o
Safety
Responsibility
o
Safety
Committee
Site Safety
Implementation
o
Safety Policy,
Rules
o
Organization,
Responsibility
and
Safety
Management
System
o
Compliance
with Safety
Legislations
o
Safe
Working Environment
o
Safety
Induction
and
Performance
Monitoring
of
Contractors
o
Safety of
Subcontractors
Safety
Training
o
Safety
Training
o
Updated
Safety
Information
o
Safety
Promotion
Emergency Response Procedures
o
Emergency Response
Plan and
Procedures
Accident Investigation
o
Accident Recording
o
Accident Analysis
Safety
Review
o
Safety Hazard
Review
o
Site Safety Policy
Review
o
Safety
Audit
Fig. 4.6
Construction
site safety
implementation
framework
International Journal of Advance Research, IJOAR .org
ISSN 2320-9100 48
Fig. 5. Construction Site Safety Implementation Framework
Conclusions
Safety management survey explored seven aspects of construction site safety including (1) health and
safety policy; (2) safety organization; (3) safety training; (4) safety inspections; (5) safety promotion;
(6) personal protection program and (7) documentation and accident prevention. Conclusions made
from the statistical analysis of safety management survey are shown as below:
1) The construction company
‟
s top management needs to consider the development and
implementation of safety, health and environmental management systems.
Safety organizational chart needs to be displayed on site.
2) Competent safety staff be appointed responsible for implementation of safety practices on site.
3) The concept of submission of specific safety plan by the subcontractor needs to be introduced in
the construction industry.
4) Health and safety training plan, training to new employees and financial budget to safety are the
issues that needs attention by management of the company.
5) Safety inspections need to be made at regular intervals from the client.
6) Safety performance needs to be checked at regular intervals at management level by means of
conducting safety audits.
7) Safety bulletins needs to be provided and different awards schemes need to be introduced to
motivate and increase the safety performance level of workers at project site.
8) The documentation of safety record and accident prevention policy/plan also requires top
management attention.
Based on the qualitative analysis of safety management interviews conducted, following conclusions
were made:
1) Trends of safety in construction industry of Pakistan had started improving from last 5 years.
Previously the concept of safety by the staff during construction rarely seen on sites however people
do care of safety at that time as well but not given the name.
2) Safety is there where quality work is present and proper funds are provided for the project safety
provisions. Due to funding problems, it is impossible to include safety in BOQ and to give importance
to safety issues.
3) The conditions in the construction industry of Pakistan are changing like EIA report is necessary
for every project from the environmental point of view.
4) In Pakistan, as most of the contractors have no awareness of any safety policy/program and has no
education in this matter, that
‟
s why implementation of the same is difficult.
International Journal of Advance Research, IJOAR .org
ISSN 2320-9100 49
5) Although the Safety clauses inducted in the contract but implementation and monitoring from
client is not adequate.
6) There was no proper policy been made in construction industry in Pakistan because of the necessity
of safety is not justified from higher authorities at national level.
7) Safety related literature and handbooks were mostly kept at the head offices of the construction
companies and only oral trainings were given to the workers at the construction sites.
Recommendations
1. Provision of funds needs be allocated/included in the contract, so that contractor can implement
the safety more efficiently.
2. On construction sites, it is the responsibility of the client to give positive response to the
consultant
‟
s instructions conveyed through letters and memos and take measures against the
contractor
‟
s violations of safety policy on site.
3. Follow up of Safety Measures at site have minimized the accidents to the lowest level.
4. On the government level, it is imperative to establish a Government Agency to supervise and
control the implementation of safety practices in construction industry. Such Agency have bigger
authority to take stern measures and give sanctions to contractor companies violating the rules,
had never been established. The controlling agency should be organized under the Ministry of
Manpower in order to ensure the implementation of safety control of both government and private
construction projects. This controlling agency should be given the authority to put penalties and
sanctions upon contracting companies for its disobedience to safety practices.
Acknowledgements
Authors are mainly thankful to National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan,
for provision of funds to carry out this study and also to all participants of survey for positively
responding to questionnaire and for taking the interviews patiently.
International Journal of Advance Research, IJOAR .org
ISSN 2320-9100 50
References
Ali, T. H. (2006). "Influence of National Culture on Construction Safety Climate in Pakistan." Doctor
of Philosophy, Griffith University, Gold Coast campus.
Ayomoh, M. K. O., and Oke, S. A. (2005). "A framework for measuring safety level for production
environments." Safety Science, 44(3), 221-239.
Baig, M. M. (2001). "Safety Assessment in Industrial Construction Projects in Saudi Arabia." Master
of Science in Construction Engineering and Management, King Fahad University of
Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
Choudhry, R. M. (2007). "Exploratory Study of the Safety Culture in Construction " Doctor of
Engineering Dissertation, Tsinghua University
Choudhry, R. M., and Fang, D. (2008). "Why operatives engage in unsafe work behavior:
Investigating factors on construction sites." Safety Science, 46(4), 566-584.
Choudhry, R. M., Fang, D., and Ahmed, S. M. (2008). "Safety Management in Construction: Best
Practices in Hong Kong." J. Prof. Iss. Eng. Educ. Prac., 134(1), 20-32.
Choudhry, R. M., Fang, D., and Lingard, H. (2009). "Measuring Safety Climate of a Construction
Company." J. Constr. Eng.Manage., 135(9), 890-899.
Choudhry, R. M., Fang, D., and Mohamed, S. (2006). "The nature of safety culture: A survey of the
state-of-the-art." Safety Science, 45(10), 993-1012.
Choudhry, R. M., Fang, D., and Rowlinson, S. (2008). "Challenging and Enforcing Safety
Management in Developing Countries: A Strategy." Intern. J. Constr. Manage., 87-101.
(Typescript)
Cooper, M. (2000). "Safety Management in the Emergency Response Services " Risk Management:
Intern. J., 2(2), 39-49.
Dorji, K., and Hadikusumo, B. H. W. (2006). "Safety Management Practices in the Bhutanese
Construction Industry." J. Constr. Deve. Count., 11(2), 53-75.
Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crises, Center for Advanced Engineering Study, MIT, Cambridge,
Mass.
International Journal of Advance Research, IJOAR .org
ISSN 2320-9100 51
Fadier, E., and Garza, C. D. l. (2005). "Safety design: Towards a new philosophy." Safety Science,
44(1), 55-73.
Fang, D. P., Huang, X. Y., and Hinze, J. (2004). "Benchmarking Studies on Construction Safety
Management in China." J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 130(3), 424-432.
Fang, D. P., Xie, F., Huang, X. Y., and H. Li. (2003). "Factor analysis-based studies on construction
workplace safety management in China." Int. J. Proj. Manage., 22(1), 43-49.
Farooqui, R. U., Arif, F., and Rafeeqi, S. F. A. (2008). “Advancing and Integrating Construction
Education, Research & Practice.” First international conference on construction in
developing countries (ICCIDC–I), Karachi, Pakistan.
Hale, A. R., Heming, B. H. J., Catfhey, J., and Kirwan, B. (1997). "Modelling of Safety Management
Systems." Safety Science 26(1-2), 121-140.
Hinze, J. W. (1997). Construction Safety, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
Ng, S. T., Chenga, K. P., and Skitmore, R. M. (2004). "A framework for evaluating the safety
performance of construction contractors." Build. Environ., 40(10), 1347-1355.
Permana, I. E. (2007). "Construction Safety Practices in Batam, Indonesia." Master of Construction
Engineering , University of Technology, Malaysia.
Tam, C. M., Zeng, S. X., and Deng, Z. M. (2004). "Identifying elements of poor construction safety
management in China." Safety Science, 42(7), 569–586.
Teo, E. A. L., and Ling, F. Y. Y. (2005). "Developing a model to measure the effectiveness of safety
management systems of construction sites." Build. Environ., 41(11), 1584–1592.
Teo, E. A. L., Ling, F. Y. Y., and Chong, A. F. W. (2004). "Framework for project managers to
manage construction safety." Int. J. Proj. Manage., 23(4), 329–341.
International Journal of Advance Research, IJOAR .org
ISSN 2320-9100 52
Appendix I. Safety Management Questionnaire
General Information
a. Personal Details: (Details will be kept confidential)
Name (Optional):
Age in years:
Under 18 18-25 25-35 35-50 50+
Gender:
1. Male 2. Female
Name of Project:
Position:
Organization:
Address:
Working Experience in
Construction Industry:
0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 20+
Education Obtained:
b. Contact Details: (Details will be kept confidential)
Telephone (Optional):
Email (Optional):
International Journal of Advance Research, IJOAR .org
ISSN 2320-9100 53
Safety Management System
Please complete the questionnaire by ticking / filling either “Yes” or “No” against each question for
which the confidentiality is assured.
1.0 Health and Safety Policy
Statement Yes No
1.1 Has your company developed Health, Safety & Environmental policy?
1.2 Does the policy clearly state that decisions on other priorities should give due regard
to construction safety requirements?
1.3 Does the policy commit the organization to full compliance with all relevant health
and safety standards?
1.4 Does the policy set targets for health and safety performance including a
commitment to progressive improvement?
1.5 Does the policy identify key senior personnel for overall coordination and
implementation of the policy?
1.6 Does your company allocate any financial budget to safety?
2.0 Safety Organization
2.1 Is there an organization chart showing the names and positions with responsibility
lines for safety performance management?
2.2 Has the individual health and safety responsibilities of all employees been clearly
defined?
2.3 Have sufficient competent safety officers and safety supervisors been appointed and
engaged for the site?
International Journal of Advance Research, IJOAR .org
ISSN 2320-9100
54
2.4 Are subcontractors required to submit site-specific safety plans?
3.0 Safety Training
3.1 Is there a health and safety training plan?
3.2 Is any training given to new employees?
3.3 Is safety training a compulsory item within the budget?
3.4 Are trainings given to in service employees?
4.0 Safety Inspections
4.1 Do safety officers and safety supervisors carry out safety inspections at regular
intervals?
4.2 Does your company conduct safety audits for project execution?
5.0 Safety Promotion
5.1 Are safety bulletin boards provided and located so that every employee will see
them during working days?
5.2 Are safety signs and posters prominently displayed on site?
5.3 Are safety awards meted out on a regular basis with recognition given for good
safety performance by individuals?
6.0 Personal Protection Program
(Safety helmet, safety shoes, safety goggles, safety gloves, ear muffs)
6.1 Has the requirements for the provision of personal protective equipment (PPE) been
indicated in the contract agreement / safety plan?
6.2 Has a sufficient stock of carefully selected and appropriate PPE been obtained?
6.3 Has an effective system for the issuance, recording, and inspection of PPE and its
replacement been established?
7.0 Documentation and Accident Prevention
7.1 Has any arrangement made by your company to keep record of accidents occurring
during execution of project activities?
7.2 Is there any staff hired to keep the proper documentation of accidents occurring and
updating of this record?
7.3 Is any policy / plan developed for accident prevention on construction site?
International Journal of Advance Research, IJOAR .org
ISSN 2320-9100
55
Thanks for your co-operation
