ArticlePDF Available

COVID-19 prevention and health promotion for the whole community

Authors:

Abstract

As our understanding of Covid-19 has grown, numerous techniques for preventing its spread have emerged. Scholars and practitioners in public health have focused on four important Covid-19 prevention strategies: behavioural, technical, biomedical, and structural/community-level interventions. Recent material in these areas provides an overview of current Covid-19 preventive breakthroughs. Current COVID-19 prevention models, which build on traditional techniques, use intimate partners, families, social media, emerging technology, prescription therapy, immunization, and regulatory changes to influence change. Despite significant success, more action is required to meet the national goal of stopping the COVID-19 epidemic. Government and non-governmental organizations are uniquely positioned to promote prevention science in collaboration with cross-disciplinary professionals from other domains.
Journal of Public Health and Diseases
Volume 6(2), pages 31-38, December 2023
Article Number: F1BFB0EF2
ISSN: 2705-2214
https://doi.org/10.31248/JPHD2023.131
https://integrityresjournals.org/journal/JPHD
Review Article
COVID-19 prevention and health promotion for the
whole community
Mohammed, M.1* and Umar, A. Y.2
1Department of Biological Sciences, Federal University Gusau Zamfara, Nigeria.
2Department of Biological Sciences, Nigerian Defence Academy, Kaduna State, Nigeria.
*Corresponding author. Email: mmohammed@fugusau.edu.ng; Tel: +2348069737482.
Copyright © 2023 Mohammed and Umar. This article remains permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received 16th September 2023; Accepted 12th December, 2023
ABSTRACT: As our understanding of Covid-19 has grown, numerous techniques for preventing its spread have emerged.
Scholars and practitioners in public health have focused on four important Covid-19 prevention strategies: behavioural,
technical, biomedical, and structural/community-level interventions. Recent material in these areas provides an overview
of current Covid-19 preventive breakthroughs. Current COVID-19 prevention models, which build on traditional
techniques, use intimate partners, families, social media, emerging technology, prescription therapy, immunization, and
regulatory changes to influence change. Despite significant success, more action is required to meet the national goal of
stopping the COVID-19 epidemic. Government and non-governmental organizations are uniquely positioned to promote
prevention science in collaboration with cross-disciplinary professionals from other domains.
Keywords: Community, COVID-19 prevention, epidemic, health promotion.
INTRODUCTION
Although global commitment to control covid-19 has
increased significantly in recent years, most people
continue to recover without hospital treatment (WHO,
2023). More than 760 million cases of covid-19 have been
reported in more than 214 countries and territories,
resulting in 6.9 million deaths have been documented from
December 2019 (WHO, 2023). United States of America
remains the country most affected by COVID-19, however,
the virus continues to spread rapidly all over the world
(JHU, 2020).
Despite the rapid spread of COVID-19, several countries
have achieved important success in curbing its
transmission through various infection prevention and
control (IPC) guidelines, which include immunization,
frequent hand washing, maintenance of physical distance
from others, quarantine, covering coughs, and keeping
unwashed hands away from face (He et al., 2023;
Nussbaumer et al., 2020; WHO, 2020a).
Successes include developing a highly sensitive and
standard COVID-19 diagnostic test such as real-time
reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-
PCR) and CT scans in individuals with high clinical
suspicion (Alafeef and Pan, 2022; Pradana et al., 2022;
Vogel, 2020; Salehi et al., 2020). Although, as of June
2023, more than 13 billion COVID-19 vaccines have been
administered while most people recover without drug
treatment (WHO, 2023). Management involves treating the
symptoms and seven trials were evaluated and approved
for treatment including chloroquine, vasodilators,
corticosteroids, immune therapies, lipoic acid,
bevacizumab, and recombinant angiotensin-converting
enzyme (Barletta et al., 2023; Olukosi et al., 2023; Hawks
et al., 2020).
OBSTACLES TO COVID-19 PREVENTION AND CONTROL
Obstacles to effective COVID-19 prevention and control
include misinformation about the disease on social media,
difficulties in implementing lockdown, stigmatization, social
hostility, lack of testing and other medical facilities, myths,
perceptions and beliefs, and social and religious factors
32 J. Public Health Dis.
which are discussed below (Klabbers et al., 2023; Khan et
al., 2022).
Misinformation about the disease in the social media
Social media also known as social network help people
spread misleading information that poses a serious
problem for public health information as fast as possible to
a wide range of viewers all over the globe (Sule et al.,
2023; Kim et al., 2019), but this effort is being defeated by
many of those who abuse this medium. Myriads of
information and incident that surge from rumours, hoaxes,
and misinformation regarding COVID-19 aetiology,
prevention, symptoms, and management were circulated
all over the globe. During the pandemic, Twitter,
Facebook, and other platforms have engaged in efforts to
combat misinformation still appearing in prominent pages
and groups (Broniatowski et al., 2023; Kousy et al., 2020)
This misinformation masked healthy behaviours in
preventing the disease and promoting erroneous
behaviours which have been generally accepted by the
population (Tasnim et al., 2020).
Lockdown challenges
COVID-19 lockdown was first implemented in Wuhan
helping to bring the epidemic in China under control rapidly
(WHO, 2020a). The lockdown is necessary to prevent the
health system from being overwhelmed and to bring the
disease under control requires the population to remain
indoors except for the sectors carrying out essential
activities such as health and security (Mockshell and
Ritter, 2023; Mboera et al., 2020). This approach has not
seemed to be successful due to setbacks in its effective
implementation (Altman, 2020). This lockdown faces
serious setbacks in low-income countries due to low
livelihood, lack of shelter, and other basic needs
(O’Connor et al., 2023; Torales et al., 2020).
Stigmatization
No person or group of people is more likely than others to
spread COVID-19 (WHO, 2020b), therefore, maintaining
the privacy and confidentiality of those seeking healthcare
and those who may be part of any contact investigation is
necessary (Gill et al., 2023; CDC, 2020). Due to fear of
stigma, potential contact has refused to report themselves
for testing which leads to isolation by the patient to avoid
discrimination which reduces the patient's possibility of
seeking medical care (Spruijt et al., 2023; Torales et al.,
2020). This reduces the possibility of diagnosing, treating,
and controlling the disease which leads to widespread
infection among those that harbour the virus unknowingly
(Malas and Malas, 2023).
Lack of diagnostics, testing kits, and trained
manpower
The most effective disease control is early diagnosis. Early
detection of infectious disease outbreaks can lead to a
decreased impact on the population (Lindsay and Petra,
2016). The infrastructure, equipment, and manpower
needed to detect COVID-19 that complies with WHO
guidelines is lacking in many low-income and developing
countries thereby narrowing the number of individuals to
be tested (Chong et al., 2023; Giri and Rana, 2020). With
the global shortage of medical masks, ventilators,
intensive care unit beds, and adequate quarantine
facilities, most developing countries rely on locally made
masks which may not be effective in preventing
transmission and insufficient ventilators result in a high
mortality rate (WHO, 2020a). In addition, lack of trained
manpower capable of performing molecular diagnosis
such as PCR required to test for COVID-19, and doctors
on the frontline come down with the disease due to a lack
of protective equipment to protect themselves (Gonete et
al., 2023; Giri and Rana, 2020).
Social and religious factors
The WHO outline practical consideration and
recommendations for religious leaders and faith-based
communities in the context of COVID-19. Religious
leaders play an important role in passing the
information to their members which may not be more
likely accepted from other sources (Nche et al., 2023;
WHO, 2020c). Gatherings have proven to be effective
in the transmission of COVID-19. Religious gathering
that does not comply with national and local should be
cancelled (Khalek and Dollah, 2023; WHO, 2020c). This
is because some communities especially in developing
countries believe religion is the cure for the coronavirus. In
some localities, lockdown and social distancing rules have
been ignored by religious groups who perform activities
regardless of the COVID-19 threat (Dauda, 2023;
Kolifarhood et al., 2020).
Burden of COVID-19
As a result of the implementation of large-scale data
collection methods for examination worldwide and
enhanced methods of validating data, COVID-19 is the
most documented pandemic in history (JHU, 2020).
Improvement in several data sources can contribute to
reasonably accurate estimates and understanding of the
pandemic trends (Wolkewitz and Schumacher, 2017). This
results in an accurate picture of where the pandemic and
the factors that explain its spread. About 214 countries
have reported 19.1 million COVID-19 cases and 715,000
deaths since China reported its first case to the World
Health Organization. The United States leads the world in
confirmed coronavirus cases. Among the 45 countries with
more than 50,000 COVID-19 cases, it has the eighth
highest number of deaths per 100,000 people: 47.93
deaths from the coronavirus 100,000 are Americans. But
in the case of fertility ratio, the United States is significantly
better than many countries. The country's case fatality
ratio is 3.3%, meaning that for every 100 people with
COVID-19, only about three die (JHU, 2020).
RISK FACTORS FOR COVID-19
These risk factors include age, diabetes, heart disease
and hypertension, smoking, blood type and obesity.
Age
COVID-19 can affect any age group, and the risk of dying
from the disease is more common among older people
with associated medical conditions requiring hospitalize-
tion which increases significantly with age (Zsichla and
Müller, 2023; Amitava et al., 2020). The tendency is
because many elderly people have chronic medical
conditions, such as heart disease and diabetes, that can
exacerbate the symptoms of COVID-19 (Haybar et al.,
2020). The ability of the immune system to fight off
pathogens also declines with age, leaving elderly people
vulnerable to severe viral infections (Zhang et al., 2023a;
Subramaniam and Usha., 2011).
Diabetes
Diabetes mellitus is a disease that results in high blood
sugar levels linked to the risk of more severe COVID-19
infections (Khunti et al., 2023; Matteo et al., 2020). People
with type-2 diabetes were more likely to have a critical
case of COVID-19 or to die from the disease compared
with those patients without any underlying health
conditions such as hypertension, heart disease, or
respiratory disease (Shi et al., 2020). This link could also
play a role in poorer outcomes in a person with diabetes
exposed to COVID-19 (Fukushima et al., 2023; Kumar et
al., 2020).
Heart disease and hypertension
Conditions that affect the cardiovascular system, such as
heart disease and hypertension, generally worsen the
complications of COVID-19 (Dele et al., 2023; Huang et
al., 2020). Attacking the lungs directly by the virus might
deplete the body's supply of oxygen to the point that the
heart must work harder to pump oxygenated blood through
Mohammed and Umar 33
the body. The virus might also attack the heart directly, as
cardiac tissue contains angiotensin-converting enzyme 2
(ACE2) a molecule that the virus plugs into to infect cells
(Xiong et al., 2020). COVID-19 can also initiate an
overblown immune response known as a cytokine storm,
wherein the body becomes severely inflamed and the
heart could suffer damage as a result (Adair et al., 2023;
Zhang et al., 2023b; Susanna et al., 2020).
Smoking
Smoking cigarettes is associated with heightened adverse
disease prognosis(Tonnesen et al., 2019). Suffering organ
damage and requiring breathing support are prone to
severe COVID-19 infections (Park et al., 2018). Smokers
may be vulnerable to catching viral infections because
smoke exposure dampens the immune system over time,
damages tissues of the respiratory tract, and triggers
chronic inflammation (Patanavanich et al., 2023;
Constantine and Katerina., 2020). Smoking is also
associated with a multitude of medical conditions, such as
emphysema and atherosclerosis, which could exacerbate
the symptoms of COVID-19 (Klein et al., 2023; CDC,
2020).
Obesity
Obesity is generally a risk factor for increased risk of
mortality among COVID-19 patients. Obesity increased
food intake, and nutrient/energy imbalance affect immune
deficiency, especially in vulnerable populations (Adair et
al., 2023; Bornstein et al., 2020). Lung and chest capacity
are altered significantly due to fat deposits in the
mediastinum and abdominal cavities. These alterations
reduce lung compliance, chest wall, and the entire
respiratory system, and likely contribute to the respiratory
symptoms of obesity such as wheezing, dyspnea, and
orthopnea (Schachter et al., 2001; Sin et al., 2002). Obese
patients might also have reduced lung capacity or
increased inflammation in the body (Tong et al., 2023,
Adair et al., 2023; Pelosi et al., 1998).
Blood type
Blood type is associated with susceptibility to contracting
COVID-19 (Lu et al., 2020). Individuals with blood types in
the A group (A-positive, A-negative, AB-positive, AB-
negative) were at a higher risk of contracting the disease
compared with non-A-group types. People with an O blood
type had a lower risk of getting the infection compared with
non-O blood types (Moslemi et al., 2023; Cheng et al.,
2005). A person's blood type indicates what kind of certain
antigens cover the surfaces of their blood cells. These
34 J. Public Health Dis.
antigens produce certain antibodies to help fight off a
pathogen (Svensson et al., 2013). COVID-19 SARS
coronavirus (SARS-CoV), anti-A antibodies helped to
inhibit the virus; that could be the same mechanism with
SARS-CoV-2, helping blood group O individuals to keep
out the virus (Ergoren et al., 2023; Guillon et al., 2008;
Cheng et al., 2005).
MODE OF TRANSMISSION
The possible mode of transmission for COVID-19 includes
respiratory, contact, droplet, and fomites.
Respiratory transmission
Coronavirus is a respiratory virus, and as such, the
infectious agent is mainly transmitted through respiratory
droplets of different sizes (aerosols) through coughing and
sneezing that remain suspended in the air when
symptomatic people sneeze or cough. Large droplets
(which are bigger than about 0.0002 inches, or 5 microns,
in size) of virus-laden mucus are the primary mode of
transmission, fine particles that can stay suspended in the
air for hours and can travel with air currents (WHO, 2020d).
It can also occur during medical procedures that generate
aerosols (El-Kassas et al., 2023; Han et al., 2023).
Contact and droplet transmission
COVID-19 can be transmitted directly through infected
secretions such as saliva when an infected person coughs,
sneezes, talks, or sings. In that situation, viral particles
emitted from the respiratory tract of an infected individual
land on a surface. Respiratory droplet transmission can
also occur when a person is in close contact with an
infected person who has respiratory symptoms (e.g.
coughing or sneezing) or who is talking or singing; in these
circumstances, respiratory droplets that include the virus
can reach the mouth, nose or eyes of a susceptible person
and can result in infection (Ali et al., 2023; Ong et al.,
2020). The virus then sneaks into the body via the mucous
membranes, infecting the susceptible person. Indirect
contact transmission involving contact of a susceptible
host with a contaminated object or surface (fomite
transmission) may also be possible (Bahramian et al.,
2023; Zhang et al., 2020).
Fomites transmission
Respiratory secretions or droplets expelled by infected
individuals can contaminate surfaces and objects, creating
fomites (Gharehchahi et al., 2023). Therefore, transmission
may also occur indirectly through touching surfaces in the
immediate environment or objects contaminated with the
virus from an infected person, followed by touching the
mouth, nose, or eyes (Short et al., 2023; Ong et al., 2020).
GENERAL PREVENTION OF COVID-19
The following are general methods of prevention and
control of COVID-19 infection (BMJ, 2020). People should
be recommended to wash their hands often with soap and
water for at least 20 seconds or an alcohol-based hand
sanitizer (containing at least 60% alcohol), especially after
being in public, blowing their nose, or coughing/sneezing
(Begum, 2020; Rundle et al., 2020). Unwashed hands
should not be used to touch the eyes, nose, or mouth
(Jones et al., 2020; Dewangan et al., 2020). Avoid close
contact with others (at least 1 meter, including shaking
hands, especially those who are sick, have a fever, or are
coughing or sneezing (Jamali et al., 2023; Taufik et al.,
2022). Avoid travelling to congested areas (Vichiensan et
al., 2023; Hara and Yamaguchi, 2021). Use respiratory
hygiene such as covering your mouth and nose while
coughing or sneezing, disposing of tissues in a closed bin
quickly, and washing your hands (Adegbite and Ijah, 2023;
Maijama’a et al., 2020). Seek medical attention as soon as
possible if they have a fever, cough, or difficulty breathing.
In some countries or situations, wearing a mask in public
is required (Bogale et al., 2023; Sehatpour et al., 2023;
BMJ, 2020).
People going from high-risk areas may be checked using
questions regarding their journey, interaction with ill
people, signs of infection, and/or temperature testing
(Taggart et al., 2022. Zafri et al., 2022) Shielding is a
protective method used to safeguard vulnerable persons
(including children) who are at extremely high risk of
severe sickness from COVID-19 due to an underlying
health condition (Cowley et al., 2023; Ward et al., 2022).
Shielding entails reducing all encounters between
particularly vulnerable persons and other people to protect
them from virus contact (Sujarwoto and Maharani, 2022).
CONCLUSION/ RECOMMENDATION
The synergy of immunization, face mask-wearing, hand
washing, social distancing, health promotion and
community engagement form a strong framework for
preventing COVID-19. The commitment of public health
and the adoption of evidence-based preventive measures
are fundamental to overcoming the challenges posted by
the disease. Government and non governmental
organization should incorporate the use of intimate
partners, families, social media, emerging technology,
prescription therapy, and regulatory changes to stop
COVID-19. More action are required to meet the national
goal of stopping the COVID-19 epidemic.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
Adair, T. (2023). Premature cardiovascular disease mortality with
overweight and obesity as a risk factor: Estimating excess
mortality in the United States during the COVID-19
pandemic. International Journal of Obesity, 47(4), 273-279.
Adegbite, S. N., & Ijah, C. N. (2023). Effects of socio-cultural
behaviour on COVID-19 protocol among rural dwellers in
Rivers State, Nigeria. KIU Journal of Humanities, 8(1), 131-
139.
Alafeef, M., & Pan, D. (2022). Diagnostic approaches for COVID-
19: lessons learned and the path forward. ACS nano, 16(18),
11545-11576.
Ali, S. A., Pathak, D., & Mandal, S. (2023). A review of current
knowledge on airborne transmission of covid-19 and their
relationship with environment. International Journal of Pharma
Professional’s Research, 14(1), 1-5.
Altman, M. (2020). Smart thinking, lockdown and Covid-19:
Implications for public policy. Journal of Behavioral Economics
for Policy, 4(COVID-19 Special Issue), 23-33.
Bahramian, A. (2023). Influence of indoor environmental
conditions on airborne transmission and lifetime of sneeze
droplets in a confined space: a way to reduce COVID-19
spread. Environmental Science and Pollution
Research, 30(15), 44067-44085.
Barletta, A. M., Marino, G., Spagnolo, B., Bianchi, F. P.,
FAlappone, P. C. F., Sagnolo, L., Gatti P. (2023). Conenzyme
Q10+ alpha lipoic acid for chronic COVID-19 syndrome.
Clinical and Expiramental Medcine, 23(3),667-678.
Begum, F. (2020). Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards
COVID-19 among B. Sc. Nursing students in selected nursing
institutions in Saudi Arabia during COVID-19 outbreak: an
online survey. Saudi Journal of Nursing and Health Care, 3(7),
194-198.
BMJ (2020). Corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19); BMJ best
practice. BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2020.
Bogale, K. A., Zeru, T., Tarkegn, M., Balew, M., Worku, M., Asrat,
A., Adamu, A., Mulu, Y., Getachew, A., & Ambaw, F. (2023).
Awareness and care seeking for long COVID symptoms
among Coronavirus disease survivors in Bahir Dar City,
Northwest Ethiopia: Phenomenological study. BMC Public
Health, 23(1), 1-9.
Bornstein, S. R., Dalan, R., Hopkins, D., Mingrone, G., & Boehm,
B. O. (2020). Endocrine and metabolic link to coronavirus
infection. Nature Reviews Endocrinology, 16(6), 297-298.
Broniatowski, D. A., Kerchner, D., Farooq, F., Huang, X.,
Jamison, A. M., Dredze, M., Quinn, S.C., & Ayers, J. W. (2022).
Twitter and Facebook posts about COVID-19 are less likely to
spread misinformation compared to other health topics. PLoS
One, 17(1), e0261768.
Cheng, Y., Cheng, G., Chui, C. H., Lau, F. Y., Chan, P. K., Ng,
M. H., Sung, J. J., & Wong, R. S. (2005). ABO blood group and
susceptibility to severe acute respiratory syndrome. JAMA,
293(12), 1447-1451.
Chong, Y. P., Choy, K. W., Doerig, C., & Lim, C. X. (2023). SARS-
CoV-2 Testing Strategies in the Diagnosis and Management of
COVID-19 Patients in Low-Income Countries: A scoping
Mohammed and Umar 35
Review. Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy, 1-18.
Cowley, L. E., Hodgson, K., Song, J., Whiffen, T., Tan, J., John,
A., Bandyopadhyay, A., & Davies, A. R. (2023). Effects of the
COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of clinically
extremely vulnerable children and children living with clinically
extremely vulnerable people in Wales: a data linkage
study. BMJ Open, 13(6), e067882.
Dauda, K. O. (2023). Religious leaders and COVID-19 guidelines
enforcement in rural communities of Nigeria. Islamic Review:
Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Keislaman, 12(2), 37-60.
Dewangan, V., Sahu, R., Satapathy, T., & Roy, A. (2020). The
Exploring of Current Development status and the unusual
Symptoms of coronavirus Pandemic (Covid-19). Research
Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics, 12(4), 172-
176.
El-Kassas, M., Alboraie, M., Elbadry, M., El Sheemy, R.,
Abdellah, M., Afify, S., Madkour, A., Zaghloul, M., Awad, A.,
Wifi, M. N., & Eltabbakh, M. (2023). Non-pulmonary
involvement in COVID-19: A systemic disease rather than a
pure respiratory infection. World Journal of Clinical
Cases, 11(3), 493- 505.
Ergoren, M. C., Akan, G., Guler, E., Tuncel, G., Akovalı, D.,
Evren, E. U., Suer, H. K., & Sanlidag, T. (2023). Sex and ABO
blood differences in SARS-CoV-2 infection susceptibility.
Global Medical Genetics, 10(01), 22-26.
European Center for Disease Control (CDC) (2020). COVID-19.
European Center for Disease Control.
Fukushima, T., Chubachi, S., Namkoong, H., Asakura, T.,
Tanaka, H., Lee, H., Azekawa, S., Okada, Y., Koike, R.,
Kimura, A., & Japan COVID19 Task Force. (2023). Clinical
significance of prediabetes, undiagnosed diabetes and
diagnosed diabetes on critical outcomes in COVID19:
Integrative analysis from the Japan COVID19 task
force. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 25(1), 144-155.
Gharehchahi, E., Dehghani, F., Rafiee, A., Jamalidoust, M., &
Hoseini, M. (2023). Investigating the Presence of SARS-CoV-
2 on the Surfaces, Fomites, and in Indoor Air of a Referral
COVID-19 Hospital, Shiraz, Iran. Journal of Health Sciences &
Surveillance System, 11(1 (Supplement)), 241-251.
Gill, N., Garg, J., & Garg, R. (2023). An exploratory cross-
sectional study on public stigma against coronavirus disease
2019 from Punjab. Indian Journal of Social Psychiatry, 10,
4103.
Giri, A. K., & Rana, D. R. (2020). Charting the challenges behind
the testing of COVID-19 in developing countries: Nepal as a
case study. Biosafety and Health, 2(02), 53-56.
Gonete, T. Z., Asseffa, N. A., Gashu, K. D., Tilahun, B., Angaw,
D. A., Jisso, M., amiso, A., Alemayehu, A., Fikre, R., Abdisa,
B., & Endehabtu, B. F. (2023). Communicable and non-
communicable diseases diagnosis and treatment service
availability at primary health care Units during COVID-19
outbreak in Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Health
Sciences, 33(2), 95-104.
Guillon, P., Clément, M., Sébille, V., Rivain, J. G., Chou, C. F.,
Ruvoën-Clouet, N., & Le Pendu, J. (2008). Inhibition of the
interaction between the SARS-CoV spike protein and its
cellular receptor by anti-histo-blood group antibodies.
Glycobiology, 18(12), 1085-1093.
Han, J., He, S., Shao, W., Wang, C., Qiao, L., Zhang, J., & Yang,
L. (2023). Municipal solid waste, an overlooked route of
transmission for the severe acute respiratory syndrome
coronavirus 2: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters,
36 J. Public Health Dis.
21(1), 81-95.
Hara, Y., & Yamaguchi, H. (2021). Japanese travel behaviour
trends and change under COVID-19 state-of-emergency
declaration: Nationwide observation by mobile phone location
data. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives,
9, 100288.
Hawks, L., Woolhandler, S., & McCormick, D. (2020). COVID-19
in prisons and jails in the United States. JAMA Internal
Medicine, 180(8), 1041-1042.
Haybar, H., Kazemnia, K., & Rahim, F. (2020). Underlying
chronic disease and COVID-19 infection: a state-of-the-art
review. Jundishapur Journal of Chronic Disease Care, 9(2),
e103452.
He, X., Chen, X., Wang, H., Du, G., & Sun, X. (2023). Recent
advances in respiratory immunization: A focus on COVID-19
vaccines. Journal of Controlled Release, 355, 655-674.
Huang C., Wang Y., Li X., Ren L., Zhao J., HuY., Zhang L., Fan
G., Xu J., Gu X., Cheng Z., Yu T., Xia J., Wei Y., Wu W., Xie
X., Yin W., Li H., Liu M., Xiao Y., Gao L., Xie J., Wang G., Jiang
R., Gao Z., Jiang R., Gao Z., Jin Q., Wang J., & Cao, B. (2020).
Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel
coronavirus in Wuhan, China. The Lancet, 395(10223), 497-
506.
Jamali, Y. A., Soomro, S., Kumar, A., Soomro, P., Shah, H.,
Ahmed, S., & Khuhro, A. B. (2023). Knowledge, risk
perceptions and preventive behaviors regarding to COVID-19
pandemic in general population of Sindh, Pakistan. Pakistan
Journal of Medical & Health Sciences, 17(01), 554-554.
Johns Hopkins University(JHU) (2020). COVID-19 Dashboard by
the centre for system science and engineering (CSSE) at
Johns Hopkins University(JHU). Retrieved 05 August 2020
from https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html.
Jones, L., Walsh, K., Willcox, M., Morgan, P., & Nichols, J.
(2020). The COVID-19 pandemic: Important considerations for
contact lens practitioners. Contact Lens and Anterior
Eye, 43(3), 196-203.
Khalek, A. A., & Dollah, S. R. (2023). Mosques as Islamic
religious spaces during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A discourse
on the Malaysian and Bruneian experiences. International
Journal of Islam and Contemporary Affairs, 3(2), 57-71.
Khan, M. L., Malik, A., Ruhi, U., & Al-Busaidi, A. (2022).
Conflicting attitudes: Analyzing social media data to
understand the early discourse on COVID-19 passports.
Technology in Society, 68, 101830.
Khunti, K., Feldman, E. L., Laiteerapong, N., Parker, W., Routen,
A., & Peek, M. (2023). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic
on ethnic minority groups with diabetes. Diabetes Care, 46(2),
228-236.
Kim, L., Fast, S. M., & Markuzon, N. (2019). Incorporating media
data into model of infectious disease transmission. Plos One.
14(2), eo197646.
Klabbers, R. E., Muwonge, T. R., Ajidru, S., Borthakur, S.,
Mujugira, A., Sharma, M., & O’laughlin, K. N. (2023).
Understanding the barriers and facilitators of COVID-19
rsikmitigation strategy adoption and COVID-19 vaccination in
refugee settlements in Uganda: a qualitative study. BMC
Public Health, 23, Article number 1401.
Klein, J. D., Resnick, E. A., Chamberlin, M. E., & Kress, E. A.
(2023). Second-hand smoke surveillance and COVID-19: a
missed opportunity. Tobacco Control, 32(2), 265-266.
Kolifarhood, G., Aghaali, M., Saadati, H. M., Taherpour, N.,
Rahimi, S., Izadi, N., & Nazari, S. S. H. (2020). Epidemiological
and clinical aspects of COVID-19; a narrative review. Archives
of Academic Emergency Medicine, 8(1), e41.
Kousy, R., Joude, J. A., Kraitem, A., Elanam, M. B., Karam, B.,
Adib, E., Zarka, J., Traboulsi, C., Akl, E, W., & Baddour, K.
(2020). Corona virus goes viral: quantifying the covid-19
misinformation Epidemic on Twitter. Cureus, 12(3), e7255.
Lindsay, S., & Petra, D. (2016). Drivers of earlier infectious
disease outbreak detection: a systematic literature review, 53,
15-20.
Maijama’a, R., Musa, K. S., Isah, A. A., & Adamu, S. (2020).
Analysis of the impact of coronavirus outbreak on the Nigerian
economy. American Journal of Environmental and Resource
Economics, 5(2), 39-43.
Malas, E. M., & Malas, H. S. (2023). Evaluation of stigmatization
and perception of stigmatization regarding COVID-19 in
society. International Journal of Social Humanities Sciences
Research, 10(94), 831-842.
Matteo A., Maria C, C., Michele M., Laura M., Alberto C., Stefano
D (2020). Coid-19 in people with diabetes: understanding the
reason for the worse outcomes. The Lancet Diabetes and
Endocrinology, 8, 782-792.
Mboera, L. E., Akipede, G. O., Banerjee, A., Cuevas, L. E.,
Czypionka, T., Khan, M., Kock, R., McCoy, D., Mmbaga, B.T.,
Misinzo, G., & Urassa, M. (2020). Mitigating lockdown
challenges in response to COVID-19 in Sub-Saharan
Africa. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 96, 308-
310.
Mockshell, J., & Ritter, T. N. (2023). Applying the six-dimensional
food security framework to examine a fresh fruit and vegetable
program implemented by self-help groups during the COVID-
19 lockdown in India. World Development, 175, 106486.
Moslemi, C., Sækmose, S., Larsen, R., Brodersen, T., Didriksen,
M., Hjalgrim, H., Banasik, K., Nielsen, K.R., Bruun, M.T.,
Dowsett, J. & Pedersen, O. B. (2023). A large cohort study of
the effects of Lewis, ABO, 13 other blood groups, and secretor
status on COVID19 susceptibility, severity, and long COVID
19. Transfusion, 63(1), 47-58.
Nche, G. C., Agbo, U. M., & Okwueze, M. I. (2023). Church
leader’s Interpretation of COVID-19 in Nigeria: Science,
Conspiracies, and Spiritualization. Journal of Religion and
Health, 1-24.
Nussbaumer-Streit, B., Mayr, V., Dobrescu, A. I., Chapman, A.,
Persad, E., Klerings, I., Wagner, G., Siebert, U., Ledinger, D.,
Zachariah, C., & Gartlehner, G. (2020). Quarantine alone or in
combination with other public health measures to control
COVID19: a rapid review. Cochrane Database of Systematic
Reviews, 4, CD13574.
O’Connor, J., Ludgate, S., Le, Q. V., Le, H. T., & Huynh, P. D. P.
(2023). Lessons from the pandemic: Teacher educators’ use
of digital technologies and pedagogies in Vietnam before,
during and after the Covid-19 lockdown. International Journal
of Educational Development, 103, 102942.
Olukosi, A. Y., Fowora, M., Adeneye, A. K., Chukwu, E., Aina, O.,
Ajibaye, O., Salako, B. L. (2023). A Survey of chloroquine use
for COVID-19 in Nigeria. African Health Sciences, 23(1), 83-92
Ong, S. W., Tan, Y. K., Chia, P. Y., Lee, T. H., Ng, O. T., &Wong
M. S (2020). Surface environmental and personal equipment
contamination by severe acute respiratory syndrome corona
virus 2 (SARS-Cov-2) from a symptomatic patient. JAMA,
323(16), 1610-1612.
Park, J. E., Jung, S., Kim, A., & Park, J. E. (2018). MERS
transmission and risk factors: A systematic review. BMC Public
Health, 18, Article number 574.
Patanavanich, R., Siripoon, T., Amponnavarat, S., & Glantz, S.
A. (2023). Active smokers are at higher risk of COVID-19
death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nicotine and
Tobacco Research, 25(2), 177-184.
Pelosi, P., Croci, M., Ravagnan, I., Tredici, S., Pedoto, A.,
Lissoni, A., & Gattinoni, L. (1998). The effects of body mass on
lung volumes, respiratory mechanics, and gas exchange
during general anesthesia. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 87(3),
654-660.
Pradana, F. K., Sriatmi, A., & Kartini, A. (2022). The CIPP Model
of stunting management program during Covid-19 pandemic in
Semarang City, Jurnal Gizi Indonesia.The Indonesian Journal
of Nutrition), 10(2), 150-160.
Rundle, C. W., Presley, C. L., Militello, M., Barber, C., Powell, D.
L., Jacob, S. E., Atwater, A.R., Watsky, K. L., Yu, J., & Dunnick,
C. A. (2020). Hand hygiene during COVID-19: recommend-
dations from the American Contact Dermatitis Society. Journal
of the American Academy of Dermatology, 83(6), 1730-1737.
Salehi, S., Abedi, A., Balakrishan, S.,Gholamrezanezhad, A
(2020). Corona virus disease (COVID-19): A systematic
reviewof imaging findings in 919 covid-19patients. American
Journal of Raentgenology, 215(1), 87-93.
Schachter, L. M., Salome, C. M., & Peat, J. K. (2001). Obesity
risk of asthma and wheeze but not airways hyper-
responsiveness. Thorax, 56(1), 4-8.
Sehatpour, A., Jahanbin, M., Fatemi, A., Parviz, N., & Sajedi, S.
M. (2023). systematic investigation of dental, heart and lung
diseases in patients with covid-19 and hospitalized in ICU
based on radiology stereotypes. Journal of Pharmaceutical
Negative Results, 4(2), 2717-2733.
Shi, Q., Zhang, X., & Jiang, F. (2020). Clinical characteristics and
risk factors for mortality of covid-19 patients with diabetes in
Wuhan, China: a two centre, retrospective study. Diabetes
Care, 43,1382-1391.
Short, K. R., & Cowling, B. J. (2023). Assessing the potential for
fomite transmission of SARS-CoV-2. The Lancet Microbe,
4(6), e380-e381.
Sin, D. D., Jones, R. L., & Man, S. P. (2002). Obesity is a risk
factor for dyspnea but not for airflow obstruction. Archives of
Internal Medicine, 162(13), 1477-1481.
Spruijt, I., Cronin, A., Udeorji, F., Nazir, M., Shehu, S., Poix, S.,
Villanueva, A., Jansen, N., Huitema, I., Suurmond, J., &
Fiekert, K. (2023). Respected but stigmatized: Healthcare
workers caring for COVID-19 patients. Plos One, 18(7),
e0288609.
Subramaniam, P., & Usha, P. (2011). Aging and immune
function: molecular mechanism to intervention. Antioxidant and
Redox Signalling,14(8),1551-1585.
Sujarwoto, S., & Maharani, A. (2022). Sociodemographic
characteristics and health access associated with COVID-19
infection and death: a cross-sectional study in Malang District,
Indonesia. BMJ Open, 12(5), e052042.
Sule, S., DaCosta, M. C., DeCou, E., Gilson, C., Wallace, K., &
Goff, S. L. (2023). Communication of COVID-19 misinforma-
tion on social media by physicians in the US. JAMA Network
Open, 6(8), e2328928-e2328928.
Susanna, F., Jenny, A. H., Paul, S. M., & Christian, M. (2020).
Covid-19: Immunology and treatment options. Clinical
Immunology, 215, 108448.
Svensson, L., Hult, A. K.,Stamps, R., Angstrom, J., Teneberg, S.,
Storry, J. R., Jorgensen, R., Rydberg, L., Henry, S. M., Olsson,
Mohammed and Umar 37
M. L(2013). Forssman expression on human erythrocytes:
biochemical and genetic evidence of a new histo-blood group
system. Blood, 121, 1459-1468.
Taggart, L., Mulhall, P., Kelly, R., Trip, H., Sullivan, B., & Wallén,
E. F. (2022). Preventing, mitigating, and managing future
pandemics for people with an intellectual and developmental
disabilityLearnings from COVID19: A scoping review. Journal
of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 19(1), 4-34.
Tasnim, S., Hossain, M. M., & Mazumder, H. (2020). Impact of
rumors and misinformation on COVID-19 in social
media. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public
Health, 53(3), 171-174.
Taufik, A., Harahap, S., Siregar, K. W., Hasibuan, Y. A.,
Hasibuan, N. F., & Siregar, Y. H. (2022). Prevention behavior
of COVID-19 transmission in productive age. Contagion:
Scientific Periodical Journal of Public Health and Coastal
Health, 4(2), 87-99.
Tong, L., Khani, M., Lu, Q., Taylor, B., Osinski, K., & Luo, J.
(2023). Association between body-mass index, patient
characteristics, and obesity-related comorbidities among
COVID-19 patients: A prospective cohort study. Obesity
Research & Clinical Practice, 17(1), 47-57.
Tonnesen, P., Marott, J. L., Nordestgaard, B., Bojesen, S. E., &
Lange, P. (2019). Secular trends in smoking in relation to
prevalent and incident smoking-related disease: A prospective
population-based study. Tobacco Induced Diseases, 1-8.
Torales, J., O’Higgins, M., Castaldelli-Maia, J. M., & Ventriglio, A.
(2020). The outbreak of COVID-19 coronavirus and its impact
on global mental health. International Journal of Social
Psychiatry, 66(4), 317-320.
Vichiensan, V., Hayashi, Y., & Kamnerdsap, S. (2023).
Passengers’ perception of COVID-19 countermeasures on
urban railway in Bangkok. In: Transportation amid
pandemics (pp. 293-307). Elsevier.
Vogel, G. (2020). New blood tests for antibodies could show true
scale of coronavirus pandemic. World Health Organisation.
Retrieved from https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/global-literature-
on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov/resource/pt/covidwho-9938.
Ward, J. L., Harwood, R., Smith, C., Kenny, S., Clark, M., Davis,
P. J., Draper, E.S., Hargreaves, D., Ladhani, S., Linney, M., &
Viner, R. M. (2022). Risk factors for PICU admission and death
among children and young people hospitalized with COVID-19
and PIMS-TS in England during the first pandemic
year. Nature Medicine, 28(1), 193-200.
WHO (2020a). Best practices for infection prevention and control,
with a spotlight on covid-19: countries share experiances.
World Healh Organization, Europe. Retrieved 16 June, 2020
from https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-
nCoV-policy_brief-IPC-2020.
WHO (2020b). Global atlas of medical devices technical series.
2017. Retrieved 5th August, 2020 from
http://apps.who.int.bookorders.
WHO (2020c). Practical considerations and recommendations
for religious leaders and faith based communities in the context
of covid-19.
WHO (2020d). World Health Organization report of the WHO-
China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (covid-19).
WHO (2023). World Health Organization fact sheet on covid 19.
Retrieved December, 2023. who.int/news-room/fact-
sheet/detail/coronavirus-diseases-(covid-19).
Wolkewitz, M., & Schumacher, M. (2017). Survival biases lead
to flawed conclusions in observational treatment studies of
38 J. Public Health Dis.
influenza patients. Journal of clinical Epidemiology, 84,121-
129.
Xiong, T. Y., Redwood, S., Prendergast, B., & Chen, M. (2020).
Corona virus and the cardiovascular system: acute and long
term implication. European Heart Journal, 14(19), 1798-1800.
Zafri, N. M., Khan, A., Jamal, S., & Alam, B. M. (2022). Risk
perceptions of COVID-19 transmission in different travel
modes. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary
Perspectives, 13, 100548.
Zhang, J. J., Dong, X., Liu, G. H., & Gao, Y. D. (2023). Risk and
protective factors for COVID-19 morbidity, severity, and
mortality. Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, 64(1), 90-
107.
Zhang, V., Fisher, M., Hou, W., Zhang, L., & Duong, T. Q.
(2023a). Incidence of new-onset hypertension postCOVID-
19: comparison with influenza. Hypertension, 80(10), 2135-
2148.
Zhang, Z., Zhang, L., & Wang, Y. (2020b). COVID19 indirect
contact transmission through the oral mucosa must not be
ignored. Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine, 49(5), 450-
451.
Zsichla, L., & Müller, V. (2023). Risk factors of severe COVID-19:
A review of host, viral and environmental factors. Viruses, 15,
175.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
To alleviate impacts of novel coronavirus lockdowns on food security and agri-food value chains, governments implemented various policy responses, yet there is limited evidence as to their effectiveness to build resilience in food systems and improve food security. One of these programs was implemented by self-help groups (SHGs) in Odisha, India, linking fresh fruit and vegetable (FFV) producers to consumers. This study integrates the concept of resilience into the six-dimensional food security framework (food availability, access, utilization, and stability, agency, and sustainability) and applies the framework to examine whether a FFV procurement program affected all six dimensions of food security and helped build resilience in food systems. Based on qualitative data from semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions, the results show that by enabling SHGs to fulfill the role of value chain actors prohibited from operating during the lockdown, the program had positive effects on availability, accessibility, utilization, and stability, with mixed effects on agency and sustainability. Applying the six-dimensional food security framework allowed us to show that despite some tradeoffs both across and within the dimensions for various actors, overall the program was able to build more resilient food systems. Activating preexisting organizations to reestablish fractured value chains can provide a model to replicate in times of crisis, such as pandemics and extreme climate events, when both rural and urban value chain actors can operate only at limited capacity and the public sector is overwhelmed. To accelerate the transformation of food systems towards healthier diets and greater resilience to shocks and crises, we recommend strengthening existing and establishing new organizations to help respond to crises and future shocks. A multifaceted approach will help ensure that the most vulnerable will not be left behind.
Article
Full-text available
The need for governments across the globe to collaborate with religious leaders in the fight against COVID-19 has been emphasized by international organizations including the World Health Organization (WHO). However, there has not been much discernible scholarly effort to know what religious leaders think of COVID-19. The present study, therefore, explored the interpretations church leaders have about COVID-19 in Nigeria. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eighteen leaders from Catholic, Anglican and Pentecostal churches in Nigeria. Using a thematic analytical approach, the study found that only few church leaders interpreted COVID-19 as a medical problem in line with science (33%). The rest interpreted the virus as a tool of conspiracies/political manoeuvrings (27%) and as a spiritual event (39%). The study discussed the implications of the findings for policy and research as well as how to address some of the harmful interpretations.
Article
Full-text available
Background Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) pose a substantial global health challenge, resulting in an annual death toll of over 15 million individuals aged 30 to 69. Ethiopia, categorized as COVID-19 vulnerable, grapples with NCD treatment challenges. This study aims to assess disease service availability at primary health units in Ethiopia during the pandemic. Methods A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted from October to December 2021 across regions, encompassing 452 facilities: 92 health centers, 16 primary hospitals, 344 health posts, and 43 districts. Facility selection, based on consultation with regional health bureaus, included high, medium, and low performing establishments. The study employed the WHO tool for COVID-19 capacity assessment and evaluated services for various diseases using descriptive analysis. Results Results reveal service disruptions in the past year: hospitals (55.6%), health centers (21.7%), districts (30.2%), and health posts (17.4%). Main reasons were equipment shortages (42%), lack of skilled personnel (24%), and insufficient infection prevention supplies (18.8%). While tuberculosis treatment was fully available in 23% of health posts and malaria services in 65.7%, some health centers lacked HIV/AIDS, cardiovascular, mental health, and cervical cancer services. Most communicable and non-communicable disease diagnoses and treatments were fully accessible at primary hospitals, except for cervical cancer (56.3%) and mental health (62.5%) services. Conclusion Significant gaps exist in expected services at primary health units. Improving disease care accessibility necessitates strengthening the supply chain, resource management, capacity building, and monitoring systems.
Article
Full-text available
Importance: Approximately one-third of the more than 1 100 000 confirmed COVID-19-related deaths as of January 18, 2023, were considered preventable if public health recommendations had been followed. Physicians' propagation of misinformation about COVID-19 on social media and other internet-based platforms has raised professional, public health, and ethical concerns. Objective: To characterize (1) the types of COVID-19 misinformation propagated by US physicians after vaccines became available, (2) the online platforms used, and (3) the characteristics of the physicians spreading misinformation. Design, setting, and participants: Using US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 infection during the study window to define misinformation, structured searches of high-use social media platforms (Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Parler, and YouTube) and news sources (The New York Times, National Public Radio) were conducted to identify COVID-19 misinformation communicated by US-based physicians between January 2021 and December 2022. Physicians' state of licensure and medical specialty were identified. The number of followers for each physician on 4 major platforms was extracted to estimate reach and qualitative content analysis of the messages was performed. Main outcomes and measures: Outcome measures included categories of COVID-19 misinformation propagated, the number and traits of physicians engaged in misinformation propagation, and the type of online media channels used to propagate misinformation and potential reach. Results: The propagation of COVID-19 misinformation was attributed to 52 physicians in 28 different specialties across all regions of the country. General misinformation categories included vaccines, medication, masks, and other (ie, conspiracy theories). Forty-two physicians (80.8%) posted vaccine misinformation, 40 (76.9%) propagated information in more than 1 category, and 20 (38.5%) posted misinformation on 5 or more platforms. Major themes identified included (1) disputing vaccine safety and effectiveness, (2) promoting medical treatments lacking scientific evidence and/or US Food and Drug Administration approval, (3) disputing mask-wearing effectiveness, and (4) other (unsubstantiated claims, eg, virus origin, government lies, and other conspiracy theories). Conclusions and relevance: In this mixed-methods study of US physician propagation of COVID-19 misinformation on social media, results suggest widespread, inaccurate, and potentially harmful assertions made by physicians across the country who represented a range of subspecialties. Further research is needed to assess the extent of the potential harms associated with physician propagation of misinformation, the motivations for these behaviors, and potential legal and professional recourse to improve accountability for misinformation propagation.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Healthcare workers (HCWs) caring for Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients are at increased risk of being stigmatized, which compromises their individual mental well-being and the quality of care they deliver. Stigma-reduction interventions may (partly) prevent this. However, there is a lack of in-depth understanding of the experiences and underlying causes of COVID-19 stigma among HCWs, which is needed to design such interventions. We conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews to assess COVID-19 stigma among COVID-19 HCWs in Ireland, Nigeria, The Netherlands, Pakistan, and The Philippines. Methods: We used a purposive and snowball sampling to recruit a total of 53 HCWs for online interviews (13 in Ireland; 15 in Nigeria; 6 in The Netherlands; 6 in Pakistan; and 13 in The Philippines (2021). After verbatim transcribing interviews, we used a thematic approach for data analysis. Results: In all countries, stigmatization of COVID-19 HCWs is driven by fear of infection and the perception of HCWs being carriers of the disease amplified by them wearing of scrubs and personal protective equipment. There were differences between countries in the way stigma manifested in self- anticipated and experienced stigma like scolding, discrimination, avoidance, (self-) isolation, and exclusion in public, in the community, at work, and in the household. The stigma resulted in feelings of depression, loneliness, isolation, and the desire to quit one's job. Discussion: COVID-19 HCWs from all countries experienced all forms of stigmatization related to their work as a COVID-19 frontliner. This affected their mental well-being, which in turn affects job performance and quality of care, there is a high need to develop stigma reduction tools for HCWs.
Article
Full-text available
Background Perspectives on COVID-19 risk and the willingness and ability of persons living in refugee settlements to adopt COVID-19 prevention strategies have not been rigorously evaluated. The realities of living conditions in Ugandan refugee settlements may limit the extent to which refugees can uptake strategies to mitigate COVID-19 risk. Methods In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted between April 2021 and April 2022 to assess COVID-19 knowledge, risk perception, prevention strategy adoption including COVID-19 vaccination, and COVID-19 impact on living conditions in refugee settlements in Uganda. Interview participants included 28 purposively selected refugees who called into “Dial-COVID”, a free telephone COVID-19 information collection and dissemination platform that was advertised in refugee settlements by community health workers. Interviews were analyzed using a combination of deductive and inductive content analysis. Emerging themes were mapped onto the Theoretical Domains Framework to identify domains influencing prevention behavior. Results were synthesized to provide intervention and policy recommendations for risk mitigation in refugee settlements for COVID-19 and future infectious disease outbreaks. Results The COVID-19 pandemic detrimentally impacted economic and food security as well as social interactions in refugee settlements. Youth were considered especially impacted, and participants reported incidents of child marriage and teenage pregnancy following school closures. Participants displayed general knowledge of COVID-19 and expressed willingness to protect themselves and others from contracting COVID-19. Risk mitigation strategy uptake including COVID-19 vaccination was influenced by COVID-19 knowledge, emotions surrounding COVID-19, the environmental context and resources, personal goals, beliefs about the consequences of (non)adoption, social influences, and behavior reinforcement. Resource constraints, housing conditions, and competing survival needs challenged the adoption of prevention strategies and compliance decreased over time. Conclusions Contextual challenges impact the feasibility of COVID-19 risk mitigation strategy uptake in refugee settlements. Pre-existing hardships in this setting were amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic and related lockdowns. Targeted dispelling of myths, alignment of information across communication mediums, supporting survival needs and leveraging of respected role models are strategies that may hold potential to mitigate risk of infectious diseases in this setting. Registration details World Pandemic Research Network – 490,652.
Article
Full-text available
Objectives To determine whether clinically extremely vulnerable (CEV) children or children living with a CEV person in Wales were at greater risk of presenting with anxiety or depression in primary or secondary care during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with children in the general population and to compare patterns of anxiety and depression during the pandemic (23 March 2020–31 January 2021, referred to as 2020/2021) and before the pandemic (23 March 2019–31 January 2020, referred to as 2019/2020), between CEV children and the general population. Design Population-based cross-sectional cohort study using anonymised, linked, routinely collected health and administrative data held in the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage Databank. CEV individuals were identified using the COVID-19 shielded patient list. Setting Primary and secondary healthcare settings covering 80% of the population of Wales. Participants Children aged 2–17 in Wales: CEV (3769); living with a CEV person (20 033); or neither (415 009). Primary outcome measure First record of anxiety or depression in primary or secondary healthcare in 2019/2020 and 2020/2021, identified using Read and International Classification of Diseases V.10 codes. Results A Cox regression model adjusted for demographics and history of anxiety or depression revealed that only CEV children were at greater risk of presenting with anxiety or depression during the pandemic compared with the general population (HR=2.27, 95% CI=1.94 to 2.66, p<0.001). Compared with the general population, the risk among CEV children was higher in 2020/2021 (risk ratio 3.04) compared with 2019/2020 (risk ratio 1.90). In 2020/2021, the period prevalence of anxiety or depression increased slightly among CEV children, but declined among the general population. Conclusions Differences in the period prevalence of recorded anxiety or depression in healthcare between CEV children and the general population were largely driven by a reduction in presentations to healthcare services by children in the general population during the pandemic.
Article
Background Stigma perceived by persons affected with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and their family members has been reported in the literature. This study aimed to evaluate COVID-19-related public stigma in detail in a regional area of Punjab, North India. Materials and Methods It was a cross-sectional, hospital-based, descriptive study. Four hundred and eighty-eight participants were recruited and administered Explanatory Model Interview Catalogue-Stigma Scale to measure public stigma against COVID-19. The data were analyzed using Mann–Whitney test and Spearman correlation coefficient. Results >78.68% participants believed that people in their community avoided a person affected by COVID-19, 76.6% believed that COVID-19 caused problems for family. More than 70% participants responded that people refused to visit the home of an affected person and it created difficulties for an affected person to find work. Nearly 70% responded that people dislike buying food from an affected person. 60% participants responded that sufferers would have concerns related to disclosure of illness. On the positive side, majority participants responded that COVID-19 would not lead to difficulties in finding match for the sufferer’s marriage (57.8%) or relative’s marriage (80.3%) or would not lead to problems in ongoing marriage (61.7%). Nearly 60% also responded that people would not think less of themselves if a family member had COVID-19 and it would not cause shame and embarrassment in community (58.8%). Conclusion Public stigma for COVID-19 was high in some forms (avoidance, disclosure concerns, difficulty in finding work, etc.) and low in some other forms (like marriage-related issues, shame, and embarrassment in community).
Article
Background: SARS-CoV-2 may trigger new-onset persistent hypertension. This study investigated the incidence and risk factors associated with new-onset persistent hypertension during COVID-19 hospitalization and at ≈6-month follow-up compared with influenza. Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted in a major academic health system in New York City. Participants included 45 398 patients with COVID-19 (March 2020 to August 2022) and 13 864 influenza patients (January 2018 to August 2022) without a history of hypertension. Results: At 6-month follow-up, new-onset persistent hypertension was seen in 20.6% of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and 10.85% of nonhospitalized patients with COVID-19. Persistent hypertension incidence among hospitalized patients did not vary across the pandemic, whereas that of among hospitalized patients decreased from 20% in March 2020 to ≈10% in October 2020 (R2=0.79, P=0.003) and then plateaued thereafter. Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were 2.23 ([95% CI, 1.48-3.54]; P<0.001) times and nonhospitalized patients with COVID-19 were 1.52 ([95% CI, 1.22-1.90]; P<0.01) times more likely to develop persistent hypertension than influenza counterparts. Persistent hypertension was more common among older adults, males, patients with preexisting comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease), and those who were treated with pressor and corticosteroid medications. Mathematical models predicted persistent hypertension with 79% to 86% accuracy. In addition, 21.0% of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 with no prior hypertension developed hypertension during COVID-19 hospitalization. Conclusions: Incidence of new-onset persistent hypertension in patients with COVID-19 is higher than those with influenza, likely constituting a major health burden given the sheer number of patients with COVID-19. Screening at-risk patients for hypertension following COVID-19 illness may be warranted.