Content uploaded by Mahde Assafi
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Mahde Assafi on Aug 15, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
Journal of Microbiology Research 2015, 5(4): 123-127
DOI: 10.5923/j.microbiology.20150504.01
Nasal Carriage Rates of Staphylococcus aureus
and CA-Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
among University Students
Mahde S. Assafi1,*, Reem Qasim Mohammed1, Nawfal R. Hussein2
1Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Zakho, Zakho, Kurdistan region, Iraq
2Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Duhok, Duhok, Kurdistan region, Iraq
Abstract The treatment of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection is challenging because of their
high resistance to different antibiotics. The objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence of S. aureus and MRSA
nasal carriers among healthy students in Zakho University and to study their resistance pattern to vancomycin. During
December 2013 to July 2014, a total of 405 nasal swabs were collected from healthy students and screened for S. aureus. The
microorganisms were identified based on morphology and biochemical tests. Then, antibiotic susceptibility to methicillin and
vancomycin was determined. The nasal carriage rate of S. aureus and MRSA among participated students were 17.5%
(71/405) and 4.2% (17/405), respectively. The highest nasal carriage rate of S. aureus was found in third year students (24.7%,
p =0.04). The nasal carriage rate of S. aureus was more common in males than females (20.6% and 14.8%, respectively,
p = 0.14). However, the nasal carriage rate of MRSA was more common in females than males (5% and 3% respectively,
p = 0.45). All isolates were sensitive to vancomycin. S. aureus and MRSA nasal carriage rates observed amongst university
students were comparable to other studies. The transmission of S. aureus and MRSA colonization, infection, and treatment
should be explained to the students in order to prevent the spread and control their infections.
Keywords Nasal carriage, S. aureus, MRSA, Iraq
1. Introduction
Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most successful and
adaptable human pathogens and responsible for difficult
infections [1]. Overuse and misuse of antibiotics have led to
increased levels of antibiotics-resistance. Methicillin was
invented for the treatmentof pencillin-resistnat S. aureus [1].
However, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) emerged
and at the beginning such strains were a challenge in
hospitals and health care units. Then, MRSA turned into the
public-health problem affecting healthy individuals and has
become the most frequent cause of skin and soft-tissue
infections in the community [2-4]. As a result and to
discriminate between community and healthcare facility
strains, community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) and
health care-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA) have been used.
Several studies have examined the prevalence of MRSA
nasal carriage among health workers, outpatient settings,
injection drug users and medical students [5-8]. Also,
researchers have investigated the CA-MRSA carriage rates
* Corresponding author:
mahdy.assafi@yahoo.co.uk (Mahde S. Assafi)
Published online at http://journal.sapub.org/microbiology
Copyright © 2015 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved
in a general population [9, 10]. The aims of this paper were
to study the prevalence of S. aureus and MRSA in the
anterior nares of healthy students and to study their
susceptibility to vancomycin at Zakho university, Kurdistan
region, Iraq.
2. Materials and Methods
Setting and sample collection
A cross-sectional study was conducted in University of
Zakho, Zakho city, Kurdistan region-Iraq. The study was
conducted with the approval of ethics committee in the
University of Zakho. A total of 432 students aged 19 to 25
years were participated in this study from December 2013 to
July 2014. Nasal swabs (moistened with sterile distilled
water) were taken from anterior nares of the participants. The
swab was inserted about 2 cm into the naris and directly
transported for specimen processing.
Laboratory analysis of S. aureus and MRSA isolates
Nasal swabs were screened for S. aureus and MRSA.
Samples were directly cultured on Mannitol Salt Agar
(Oxoid) and incubated at 35ºC for 24 hours. Positive
colonies on mannitol salt agar were identified as S. aureus
strains based on morphology, Gram stain and biochemical
124 Mahde S. Assafi et al.: Nasal Carriage Rates of Staphylococcus aureus and CA-Methicillin
Resistant Staphylococcus aureus among University Students
tests including catalase and coagulase.
The bacterial suspension was adjusted to the concentration
of 0.5 McFarland and then 10μl inoculum was spread on the
agar plate (final concentration = 106 CFU/ml). Antimicrobial
susceptibility testing to oxacillin was carried out according
to Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)
recommendations using Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion and agar
dilution assay methods using Muller-Hinton agar (Oxoid
Limited, Hampshire, England). BHI agar plates
supplemented with 6 μg/ml vancomycin were used for
testing of strains for vancomycin resistance [11].
Data analysis
Statistical analysis of data was performed by using the
chi-squared test with significance set at a p value of <0.05
using Minitab 15 software (Minitab Ltd., Coventry, UK).
3. Results
Because hospitalization and admission to healthcare
facilities increase the risk of MRSA colonization, we
excluded every student with history of hospitalization,
surgery, dialysis or residence in a long-term care facility
within one year of the MRSA culture date, the presence of an
indwelling catheter or a percutaneous device at the time of
culture and history of previous isolation of MRSA. A total of
432 participants volunteered in this study, 27 students
(6.25%) were excluded because of the above mentioned
factors. The included students (405) were examined for
presence of S. aureus and MRSA. The male and female
participants were 47% (189/405) and 53% (216/405)
respectively. A total of 71 S. aureus and 17 MRSA were
isolated from 405 participants, giving an overall positivity
rate of 17.5% and 4.2%, respectively (Table 1). With regard
to the year of study, prevalence of S. aureus rate was higher
in the 3rd stage students 24.7% (24/97) than students in other
stages (p=0.045) (Table 1).
Table 1. Distribution of S. aureus and MRSA nasal carriage among
students
Year of
study Participants S. aureus
positive (%)
MRSA
positive (%)
1st 104 16 (15.4) 5 (4.8)
2nd 101 13 (12.8) 3 (3)
3rd 97 24 (24.7)* 5 (5.2)
4th 103 18 (17.5) 4 (3.9)
Total 405 71 (17.5) 17 (4.2)
* p value = 0.045
Among the 189 males screened, 39 (20.6%) and 6 (3%)
were positive for S. aureus and MRSA respectively,
compared to 32 (14.8%) and 11 (5%) of the 216 females.
However, there were no significant differences of the
prevalence of S. aureus and MRSA among students as regard
to their gender (p > 0.05) (Table 2). Fortunately, all isolates
were sensitive to vancomycin antibiotics.
Table 2. Distribution of S. aureus and MRSA nasal carriage the different
genders
Year of
study
Participants S. aureus
MRSA
M*
F*
M (%)
F (%)
M (%)
F (%)
1st 48
56
7 (14.6)
9 (16)
2 (4.2)
3 (5.3)
2nd 39
62
6 (15.4)
7 (11.3)
1 (2.6)
2 (3.2)
3rd 51
46
15 (29.4)
9 (19.6)
2 (4)
3 (6.5)
4th 51
52
11 (21.6)
7 (13.5)
1 (2)
3 (5.8)
Total 189
216
39 (20.6)
32 (14.8)
6 (3)
11 (5)
*M refers to males and F refers to females.
4. Discussion
S. aureus is a normal commensal in the nose of about
25-30% of healthy people [12]. Different factors contribute
to the transmission of this microorganism such as crowded
living conditions, and poor hygiene [13, 14]. The presence of
S. aureus on the skin appears to play a key role in the
pathogenesis of infection with S. aureus [15, 16].
Eradication of S. aureus from the nose reduced the incidence
of invasive infection [16, 17]. In this study, the prevalence of
S. aureus nasal carriage among students was 17.5%. This
result is comparable with other studies from Iraq, Iran and
Turkey [9, 18-20] and is lower than those reported in Nigeria,
Ethiopia and India [21-25]. S. aureus nasal carriage rate was
significantly higher among third year students. Outbreaks
have been reported among different groups such as athletes,
military recruits, prisons detainees, livestock handlers, pet
owners, intravenous drug users, students [14, 26, 27]. There
are different factors contributing to spread of S. aureus and
MRSA including crowded living conditions, poor hygiene
habits, close skin-to-skin contact, sharing of personal items,
frequent antibiotic exposure, hospitalization and intravenous
drug abuse [28]. It was found that the carriage rate of S.
aureus was higher on participants who had been hospitalized
within the past 1 year than those who had not [7]. One factor
that could assist to distribute S. aureus among third year
students is that the colonization of these bacteria among
household members is shown to be higher than rates reported
among the general population [4]. Member of this group of
students may live in shared houses or accommodate internal
departments of the university. More study is needed to
explore this result.
MRSA was identified as a nosocomial pathogen which is
one of the causative agents of healthcare associated
infections worldwide. MRSA has traditionally considered as
Journal of Microbiology Research 2015, 5(4): 123-127 125
associated with healthcare settings. However, new strains
have emerged in the community and an increasing numbers
were observed in people who have not been hospitalized or
had a medical procedure [29, 30]. Different studies showed
variable rate (0.8 - 36%) of MRSA nasal colonization
[7, 31-34]. In our region, the nasal carriage rate of MRSA
was 4.2%. Combination of factors could contribute to the
nasal carriage of S. aureus and MRSA among population
including host, geographical, environmental and bacterial
factors.
Epidemiological evidence supports that the mechanism
for transmission S. aureus and MRSA usually via direct
contact with patients and other close contacts [35]. In our
study, male students had a highest prevalence of S. aureus
nasal carriage. This is in agreement with other studies that
found that S. aureus nasal carriage rate is higher in males
than females [7, 36, 37]. In agreement with other study, it
was found that the prevalence of MRSA was more common
in females than males [38, 39]. A similar result was abstained
by Braga et al. [28] who showed that the prevalence of S.
aureus are more common in males and MRSA are more
prevalence in females. It is observed that females harbour a
greater diversity of bacteria on their hands than males, but it
is not obvious whether this is due to physiological factors or
differences in hygiene and cosmetic usage [40]. Furthermore,
the microbial differences between male and female could be
due to the physiological and anatomical differences between
genders cutaneous environments such as sweat, sebum and
hormone production [41].
Vancomycin is considered one of the last options of
treatment for S. aureus infections that are resistant to other
antibiotics. Analysis of different studies revealed the
emergence of Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
(VRSA) from different parts of the neighboring countries
[42-45]. Fortunately, no vancomycin-resistant S. aureus
(VRSA) isolates was found in this study.
In conclusion, the nasal carriage rate of S. aureus and
MRSA observed in this study was relatively low and
comparable to other studies in surrounding area. No
vancomycin-resistant S. aureus was observed in our study.
The implications of S. aureus and MRSA colonization,
infection, and treatment should be explained to the students
in order to prevent the spread and control their infections.
REFERENCES
[1] Gerard JT, Berdell RF, and Christine LC. Microbiology: An
Introduction with MasteringMicrobiology. 10th ed San
Francisco: Pearson Benjamin Cummings 2010.
[2] Yan M, Pamp SJ, Fukuyama J, Hwang PH, Cho DY, Holmes
S, and Relman DA. Nasal microenvironments and
interspecific interactions influence nasal microbiota
complexity and S. aureus carriage. Cell Host Microbe 2013;
14:631-40. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.11.005.
[3] Zetola N, Francis JS, Nuermberger EL, and Bishai WR.
Community-acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus
aureus: an emerging threat. Lancet Infect Dis 2005; 5:275-86.
doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70112-2.
[4] Zafar U, Johnson LB, Hanna M, Riederer K, Sharma M,
Fakih MG, Thirumoorthi MC, Farjo R, and Khatib R.
Prevalence of nasal colonization among patients with
community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus
aureus infection and their household contacts. Infect Control
Hosp Epidemiol 2007; 28:966-9. doi:10.1086/518965.
[5] Lari AR, Pourmand MR, Ohadian MS, Abdossamadi Z,
Namvar AE, and Asghari B. Prevalence of PVL-Containing
MRSA Isolates Among Hospital Staff Nasal Carriers. Lab
Medicine 2011; 42:283-286. doi:10.1309/lman7hr6vjea3nmr.
[6] Amorim ML, Vasconcelos C, Oliveira DC, Azevedo A,
Calado E, Faria NA, Pereira M, Castro AP, Moreira A, Aires
E, et al. Epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus
aureus (MRSA) nasal colonization among patients and
healthcare workers in a Portuguese hospital: a
pre-intervention study toward the control of MRSA. Microb
Drug Resist 2009; 15:19 - 26.
[7] Chen CS, Chen CY, and Huang YC. Nasal carriage rate and
molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus among medical students at a
Taiwanese university. International Journal of Infectious
Diseases 2012; 16:799-803. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2012.07.004.
[8] Kaminski A, Kammler J, Wick M, Muhr G, and Kutscha LF.
Transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
among hospital staff in a German trauma centre: a problem
without a current solution? J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89:642
- 645.
[9] Habeeb A, Hussein NR, Assafi MS, and Al-Dabbagh SA.
Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal
colonization among secondary school students at Duhok
City-Iraq. J Microbiol Infect Dis 2014; 4:59-63.
doi:10.5799/ahinjs.02.2014.02.0128.
[10] Lindenmayer JM, Schoenfeld S, O'Grady R, and Carney JK.
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a high school
wrestling team and the surrounding community. Arch Intern
Med 1998; 158:895-9. doi:10.1001/archinte.158.8.895.
[11] CLSI. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods
for Broth Dilution Susceptibility Testing of Bacteria Isolated
from Aquatic Animals, Approved Guideline. Document
M49-A CLSI, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087-1898, USA.
2006b;.
[12] CDC. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Workplace
Safety & Health Topics. MRSA and the Workplace. Last
updated September 19, 2014, Accessed 11 April 2015., 2014;.
[13] Shibabaw A, Abebe T, and Mihret A. Nasal carriage rate of
methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus among Dessie
Referral Hospital Health Care Workers; Dessie, Northeast
Ethiopia. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2013; 2:25.
doi:10.1186/2047-2994-2-25.
[14] David MZ and Daum RS. Community-associated
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology
and clinical consequences of an emerging epidemic. Clin
Microbiol Rev 2010; 23:616-87. doi:10.1128/CMR.00081-09
126 Mahde S. Assafi et al.: Nasal Carriage Rates of Staphylococcus aureus and CA-Methicillin
Resistant Staphylococcus aureus among University Students
[15] Casewell MW and Hill RL. Elimination of nasal carriage of
Staphylococcus aureus with mupirocin ('pseudomonic acid') a
controlled trial. J Antimicrob Chemother 1986; 17:365-72.
doi:10.1093/jac/17.3.365.
[16] Wertheim HFL, Melles DC, Vos MC, van Leeuwen W, van
Belkum A, Verbrugh HA, and Nouwen JL. The role of nasal
carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections. The Lancet
Infectious Diseases 2005; 5:751-762.doi:10.1016/s1473-309
9(05)70295-4.
[17] von Eiff C, Becker K, Machka K, Stammer H, and Peters G.
Nasal Carriage as a Source of Staphylococcus aureus
Bacteremia. New England Journal of Medicine 2001;
344:11-16. doi:10.1056/NEJM200101043440102.
[18] Shehabi AA, Abu-Yousef R, Badran E, Al-Bakri AG,
Abu-Qatouseh LF, and Becker K. Major characteristics of
Staphylococcus aureus colonizing Jordanian infants. Pediatr
Int 2013; 55:300-4. doi:10.1111/ped.12060.
[19] Oguzkaya-Artan M, Baykan Z, and Artan C. Nasal carriage of
Staphylococcus aureus in healthy preschool children. Jpn J
Infect Dis 2008; 61:70-2.
[20] Hussein NR, Basharat Z, Muhammed AH, and Al-Dabbagh
SA. Comparative evaluation of MRSA nasal colonization
epidemiology in the urban and rural secondary school
community of kurdistan, iraq. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0124920.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124920.
[21] Onanuga A and Temedie TC. Nasal carriage of multi-drug
resistant Staphylococcus aureus in healthy inhabitants of
Amassoma in Niger delta region of Nigeria. Afr Health Sci
2011; 11:176-81.
[22] Erami M, Soltani B, Taghavi Ardakani A, Moravveji A, Haji
Rezaei M, Soltani S, and Moniri R. Nasal Carriage and
Resistance Pattern of Multidrug Resistant Staphylococcus
aureus Among Healthy Children in Kashan, Iran. Iran Red
Crescent Med J 2014; 16:e21346. doi:10.5812/ircmj.21346.
[23] Motamedifar M, Hassanzadeh P, and Ghafari N. Relative
frequency of Staphylococcal carriage and antibiotic
sensitivity of isolated Staphylococci in hemodialysis patients
in Shiraz, Iran. Med Princ Pract 2010; 19:379-83.
doi:10.1159/000316377.
[24] Chatterjee SS, Ray P, Aggarwal A, Das A, and Sharma M. A
community-based study on nasal carriage of Staphylococcus
aureus. Indian J Med Res 2009; 130:742-8.
[25] Shibabaw A, Abebe T, and Mihret A. Nasal carriage rate of
methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus among Dessie
Referral Hospital Health Care Workers; Dessie, Northeast
Ethiopia. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
2013; 2:doi:10.1186/2047-2994-2-25.
[26] Lowy FD, Aiello AE, Bhat M, Johnson-Lawrence VD, Lee
MH, Burrell E, Wright LN, Vasquez G, and Larson EL.
Staphylococcus aureus colonization and infection in New
York State prisons. J Infect Dis 2007; 196:911-8.
doi:10.1086/520933.
[27] Zinderman CE, Conner B, Malakooti MA, LaMar JE,
Armstrong A, and Bohnker BK. Community-acquired
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among military
recruits. Emerg Infect Dis 2004; 10:941-4.
doi:10.3201/eid1005.030604.
[28] Braga ED, Aguiar-Alves F, de Freitas Mde F, de e Silva MO,
Correa TV, Snyder RE, de Araujo VA, Marlow MA, Riley
LW, Setubal S, et al. High prevalence of Staphylococcus
aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus colonization among
healthy children attending public daycare centers in informal
settlements in a large urban center in Brazil. BMC Infect Dis
2014; 14: 538. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-14-5381471-2334-14
-538 [pii].
[29] Naimi TS, LeDell KH, Como-Sabetti K, and et al.
Comparison of community- and health care–associated
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. JAMA
2003; 290:2976-2984. doi:10.1001/jama.290.22.2976.
[30] David MZ, Cadilla A, Boyle-Vavra S, and Daum RS.
Replacement of HA-MRSA by CA-MRSA infections at an
academic medical center in the midwestern United States,
2004-5 to 2008. PLoS One 2014; 9:92760.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0092760.
[31] Fatholahzadeh B, Emaneini M, Gilbert G, Udo E, Aligholi M,
Modarressi MH, Nouri K, Sedaghat H, and Feizabadi MM.
Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) analysis
and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates
in Tehran, Iran. Microb Drug Resist 2008; 14:217-20.
doi:10.1089/mdr.2008.0822.
[32] Kuehnert MJ, Kruszon-Moran D, Hill HA, McQuillan G,
McAllister SK, Fosheim G, McDougal LK, Chaitram J,
Jensen B, Fridkin SK, et al. Prevalence of Staphylococcus
aureus nasal colonization in the United States, 2001-2002. J
Infect Dis 2006; 193:172-9. doi:10.1086/499632.
[33] Akhtar N. Staphylococcal nasal carriage of health care
workers. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2010; 20:439-43.
doi:07.2010/JCPSP.439443.
[34] Fritz SA, Garbutt J, Elward A, Shannon W, and Storch GA.
Prevalence of and risk factors for community-acquired
methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus
aureus colonization in children seen in a practice-based
research network. Pediatrics 2008; 121:1090-8.
doi:10.1542/peds.2007-2104.
[35] Skov R, Christiansen K, Dancer SJ, Daum RS, Dryden M,
Huang YC, and Lowy FD. Update on the prevention and
control of community-acquired meticillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA). Int J Antimicrob Agents
2012; 39:193-200. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.09.029.
[36] Olsen K, Sangvik M, Simonsen GS, Sollid JU, Sundsfjord A,
Thune I, and Furberg AS. Prevalence and population structure
of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage in healthcare
workers in a general population. The Tromso Staph and Skin
Study. Epidemiol Infect 2013; 141: 143-52.
doi:10.1017/S0950268812000465.
[37] Sangvik M, Olsen RS, Olsen K, Simonsen GS, Furberg AS,
and Sollid JU. Age- and gender-associated Staphylococcus
aureus spa types found among nasal carriers in a general
population: the Tromso Staph and Skin Study. J Clin
Microbiol 2011; 49:4213-8. doi:10.1128/JCM.05290-11.
[38] Shakya B, Shrestha S, and Mitra T. Nasal carriage rate of
methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus among at
National Medical College Teaching Hospital, Birgunj, Nepal.
Nepal Med Coll J 2010; 12:26-9.
Journal of Microbiology Research 2015, 5(4): 123-127 127
[39] Mainous AG, 3rd, Hueston WJ, Everett CJ, and Diaz VA.
Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus and
methicillin-resistant S. aureus in the United States,
2001-2002. Ann Fam Med 2006; 4:132-7.
doi:10.1370/afm.526.
[40] Fierer N, Hamady M, Lauber CL, and Knight R. The
influence of sex, handedness, and washing on the diversity of
hand surface bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;
105:17994-9. doi:10.1073/pnas.0807920105.
[41] Giacomoni PU, Mammone T, and Teri M. Gender-linked
differences in human skin. J Dermatol Sci 2009; 55:144-9.
doi:10.1016/j.jdermsci.2009.06.001.
[42] Zarifian AR, Askari E, Pourmand MR, and Nasab MN.
High-Level Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
(VRSA) in Iran: A Systematic Review. Journal of Medical
Bacteriology 2012; 1:53-61.
[43] Tiwari HK and Sen MR. Emergence of vancomycin resistant
Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) from a tertiary care hospital
from northern part of India. BMC Infect Dis 2006; 6:156.
doi:10.1186/1471-2334-6-156.
[44] Cesur S, Irmak H, Simsek H, Coplu N, Kilic H, Arslan U,
Bayramoglu G, Baysan BO, Gulay Z, Hosoglu S, et al.
Evaluation of antibiotic susceptibilities and VISA-VRSA
rates among MRSA strains isolated from hospitalized patients
in intensive care units of hospitals in seven provinces of
Turkey. Mikrobiyol Bul 2012; 46:352-8.
[45] Alzolibani AA, Al Robaee AA, Al Shobaili HA, Bilal JA, Issa
Ahmad M, and Bin Saif G. Documentation of
vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) among
children with atopic dermatitis in the Qassim region, Saudi
Arabia. Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat 2012;
21:51-3. doi:10.2478/v10162-012-0015-2.