ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

Abstract

Delirium is a common complication after cardiac surgery, being associated with significant mortality and morbidity. The pathogenesis of postoperative delirium (POD) is complex and multifactorial, involving an interaction of multiple predisposing and precipitating factors. There are several hypothesis regarding the underlying mechanisms of POD, and the most recent emerging one involves neuroinflammation, which is exacerbated by the cardiopulmonary bypass-induced systemic inflammatory response. Experimental and clinical studies have re- cently documented improved perioperative central neural protection exerted by statins because of their anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and antithrombotic properties. The present review will focused on the possible protective effect exerted by preoperative statin adminis- tration on delirium following cardiac surgery.
Psychiatr. Pol. 2015; 49(6): 1359–1370
PL ISSN 0033-2674 (PRINT), ISSN 2391-5854 (ONLINE)
www.psychiatriapolska.pl
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12740/PP/60139
The study was not sponsored.
Effects of statins on delirium following cardiac surgery
– evidence from literature
Giovanni Mariscalco1, Silvia Ma ria n i1, Fausto Bi a nca r i2, Maciej Ba nach 3
1 Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Gleneld Hospital,
Leicester, United Kingdom
2 Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
3 Department of Hypertension, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
Summary
Delirium is a common complication after cardiac surgery, being associated with signicant
mortality and morbidity. The pathogenesis of postoperative delirium (POD) is complex and
multifactorial, involving an interaction of multiple predisposing and precipitating factors.
There are several hypotheses regarding the underlying mechanisms of POD, and the most
recent emerging one involves neuroinammation, which is exacerbated by the cardiopul-
monary bypass-induced systemic inammatory response. Experimental and clinical studies
have recently documented improved perioperative central neural protection exerted by statins
because of their anti-inammatory, immunomodulatory, and antithrombotic properties. The
present review will focused on the possible protective effect exerted by preoperative statin
administration on delirium following cardiac surgery.
Key words: delirium, cardiac surgery, complications
Diagnosis and epidemiology
Despite renements in surgical and anaesthesiological techniques, delirium remains
a frequent complication following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) [1–10].
The incidence of postoperative delirium (POD) largely varies among studies, ranging
from 1% to 50% [1–10]. Plausible explanations of this variation refer to the adopted
denition, the mode of its detection and the clinical prole of patient populations [1–10].
Several denitions of POD have been proposed along with different diagnostic tools
[10]. POD is generally dened as an acute deterioration of brain function characterised
Giovanni Mariscalco et al.
1360
by uctuating mental status with inattention and disturbances in consciousness and
presents clinically different subtypes, with or without accompanying agitation [11,
12]. Hyperactive delirium is characterised by active symptoms such as agitation and
restlessness, characterised by excessive motor or verbal behaviour that interfere with
patient care, patient or staff safety, and medical therapy [6, 11]. Conversely, hypoac-
tive delirium is characterised by unresponsiveness and motionlessness [11]. However,
POD is often confounded with postoperative cognition dysfunction [9, 13]. Patients
affected by POD immediately report an impaired recent memory but an intact remote
memory, while in patients affected by postoperative cognitive dysfunction it is not
associated with a change in consciousness that requires sensitive test methods to be
diagnosed [13]. Although there are several tools to diagnose and classify delirium,
the most widely used tools in intensive care units (ICU) are the confusion assessment
method-ICU (CAM-ICU) and the intensive care delirium screening checklist (ICDSC)
[14, 15] (Table 1).
Pathogenesis of postoperative delirium
The pathogenesis of POD is complex and multifactorial, involving an interaction of
multiple predisposing and precipitating factors [1–10] (Table 2). Among predisposing
factors, older age, history of stroke and peripheral vascular disease are the most impor-
tant ones, being mainly related to increased cerebral atherosclerosis, with a consequent
inhibition of the cerebral blood ow, exacerbation of inhibition of ow, and increased
cerebral embolisation risk [2, 4, 9, 16–18]. In addition, older age is associated with
lack of cholinergic reserve, predisposing patient to delirium [2, 4–6, 19–21]. Earlier
meta-analyses [10] showed that every one year increase of age was associated with
an increase in the chance of POD by 8%. Several POD precipitating factors has also
been reported, including duration of surgery, type of surgery, prolonged intubation,
and red blood cell transfusion (RBC) [1–10].
Afonso et al. [22] evaluated 112 adult postoperative cardiac surgical patients, ob-
serving a 30% increase in delirium per 30 minutes of CPB (cardiopulmonary bypass).
On the other hand, Kazmierski et al. [4] reported a vefold increase of delirium when
intubation was prolonged over 24 hours in a population of 846 consecutive cardiac
surgery subjects. The same group observed a fourfold increase risk of POD in patients
receiving more than 4 RBC units [4].
Table 1. The Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU)a
Delirium is diagnosed when both features: 1 and 2 are positive, along with either feature 3 or 4.
Feature 1. Acute onset of mental status changes or uctuating course
Is there evidence of an acute change in mental status from the baseline?
Did the (abnormal) behaviour uctuate during the past 24 hrs, that is, tend to come and go or
increase and decrease in severity?
a Adapted from Ely EW et.al. Evaluation of delirium in critically ill patients: Validation of the Confusion
Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). Crit Care Med 2001; 29:1370-1379.
1361
Effects of statins on delirium following cardiac surgery – evidence from literature
Sources of information: Serial Glasgow Coma Scale or sedation score ratings over 24 hrs as well as
readily available input from the patient’s bedside critical care nurse or family.
Feature 2. Inattention
Did the patient have difculty focusing attention?
Is there a reduced ability to maintain and shift attention?
Sources of information: Attention screening examinations by using either picture recognition or
Vigilance random letter test. Neither of these tests requires verbal response, and thus they are ideally
suited for mechanically ventilated patients.
Feature 3. Disorganised Thinking
Was the patient’s thinking disorganised or incoherent, such as rambling or irrelevant conversation,
unclear or illogical ow of ideas, or unpredictable switching from subject to subject?
Was the patient able to follow questions and commands throughout the assessment?
1. “Are you having any unclear thinking?”;
2. “Hold up this many ngers.” (examiner holds two ngers in front of the patient);
3. “Now, do the same thing with the other hand.” (not repeating the number of ngers).
Feature 4. Altered Level of Consciousness
Any level of consciousness other than “alert”;
Alert – normal, spontaneously fully aware of environment and interacts appropriately;
Vigilant – hyperalert;
Lethargic – drowsy but easily aroused, unaware of some elements in the environment, or not
spontaneously interacting appropriately with the interviewer; becomes fully aware and appropriately
interactive when prodded minimally;
Stupor – difcult to arouse, unaware of some or all elements in the environment, or not spontaneously
interacting with the interviewer; becomes incompletely aware and inappropriately interactive when
prodded strongly;
Coma – unarousable, unaware of all elements in the environment, with no spontaneous interaction
or awareness of the interviewer, so that the interview is difcult or impossible even with maximal
prodding.
Table 2. Predisposing and precipitating factors of delirium following cardiac surgery
Predisposing factors Precipitating factors
Age Urgent surgery
Acute myocardial infarction Intraoperative intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP)
Left ventricular ejection function CPB duration
Preoperative atrial brillation Aortic cross clamp time duration
Hypertension Hypoperfusion
Diabetes Anaemia
Renal function Hypoxia
Peripheral vascular disease Low cardiac output
Cognitive impairment Valve surgery
Dementia Red blood cells transfusion
Depression Respiratory failure
table continued on the next page
Giovanni Mariscalco et al.
1362
MOTOR ACTIVITY
THOUGHT AND
PERCEPTION
ATTENTION
LEVEL OF AROUSAL
SLEEP
LEARNING AND MEMORY
INLAMMATION
STRESS
↕↓
TRAUMA
DELIRIUM
CARDIAC SURGERY
↕↑
Figure 1. Simplied pathways of delirium following cardiac surgery
(adapted from Hall et al. [23])
Prior delirium Postoperative atrial brillation
Functional impairment Postoperative acute kidney injury
Previous stroke Infection/sepsis
Table 3. Published studies with reference to the effect of statins
on delirium after cardiac surgery
First Author
Mariscalco [1] Katznelson [2]
Year of Study 2004–2011 2005–2006
Type of study Retrospective (PM) Retrospective
Number of Patients 4,079 1,059
Age (years) 67.8 ± 7.2 64%a
Female (%) 21% 29%
Elective (%) 92% n.a.
Statins (%) 39% 64%
Type of surgery
Isolated CABG (%) 75% 83%
CABG + Valve (%) 25% 17%
Hospital mortality (%) 2% n.a.
POD incidence (%) 3% 11.5%
table continued on the next page
1363
Effects of statins on delirium following cardiac surgery – evidence from literature
POD assessment CAM-ICU CAM-ICU
POD predictors CABG + Valve RBC (> 5Units)
Postop AKI Intraop IABP
LVEF Preop depression
Postop AF Preop Creat > 150 µm
Hypertension Age ≥ 60 years
Age CABG + Valve
COPD Preop Statins
History of CVA
Statins effect on POD None Protective
(OR 1.49, 95%CI, 0.97–2.29) (OR0.54, 95%CI 0.35–0.84)
AF – atrial brillation; AKI – acute kidney injury; CABG – coronary artery bypass grafting; CAM
confusion assessment method; COPD – chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CVA cerebrovascular
accident; IABP – intra-aortic balloon pump; ICU – intensive care unit; LVEF – left ventricular
ejection fraction; PM – propensity matching score; POD – postoperative delirium; RBC – red blood
cell; n.a. – not available
a percentage of patients ≥ 60 years
Inammation and delirium
Although there are several hypotheses of the pathophysiology of POD, the most
recent one involves neuroinammation [23, 24]. This is caused by the hyper-respon-
siveness of brain immune cells to stimulation from peripheral inammation, making
the brain susceptible to the consequences of systemic inammation [23, 24]. In a sys-
tematic review, Hall et al. [23] investigated the correlation between cerebrospinal uid
biomarkers and delirium, including 235 patients from 8 prospective studies. Delirium
was associated with elevated levels of pro-inammatory markers such as inteleukin-8
(IL-8), and neuronspecic enolase. Kazmierski et al. [25] conducted a prospective
study enrolling 113 patients undergoing CABG surgery with CPB, investigating
whether increased levels of IL-2 and TNF-α were associated with POD. An increased
concentration of pro-inammatory cytokines was independently associated with POD,
and related to advancing age along with duration of CPB [25]. Peripheral cytokines
can act directly through neurodegeneration, or indirectly through neurotransmission
[26, 27]. Interleukins in human and animal models have been demonstrated to induce
symptoms of delirium, also mediating exotoxic neurodegeneration [28–30]. Cytokine
dysregulation possibly causes neuronal injury through altered neurotransmission, apop-
tosis, and activation of brain immune cells which leads to production of free radicals,
complement factors, and nitric oxide [25]. Cytokine dysregulation has been observed to
be related with aging as well as infection, trauma and (surgical) stress [26]. Therefore,
the CPB-induced systemic inammatory response should be considered as one of the
Giovanni Mariscalco et al.
1364
most relevant determinants of POD, leading to and exacerbating the afore-mentioned
neuroinammation [25]. Cardiac surgery with CPB is associated with a profound
systemic inammatory response due to surgical trauma, and the interaction between
blood and articial circuit surfaces, leading to blood barrier dysfunction, cerebral in-
ammation, and glial cell injury [31, 32]. The CPB-related inammation may cause
neuronal damage through microglia activation, oedema, microvascular thrombosis and
alterations in local blood ow [33–35]. However, other mechanisms of delirium fol-
lowing cardiac surgery should be mentioned such as direct brain insults due to hypoxia,
ischemia, and metabolic derangement [23, 24], which are not mutually exclusive with
neuroinammation [23, 24].
Impact of delirium on outcomes
POD is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, prolonging the ICU
and hospital stay, at considerable expense of resources [1–8, 36]. In a cohort of 4,659
patients undergoing CABG, our group demonstrated that POD was associated with
a ten-fold increased risk of hospital mortality, and with three-day increase in hospital
stay [1]. POD is also accompanied by increased late mortality, as well as poorer cog-
nitive and functional outcomes [19]. Koster et al. [19] by prospectively enrolling 112
patients undergoing cardiac surgery observed that POD patients had a higher rate of
follow-up mortality (13% in patients with delirium versus 5% in patients without it),
readmissions to the hospital (48% vs. 33%), dysfunction in memory (32% vs. 23%),
concentration problems (37% vs. 20%), and sleep disturbance (47% vs. 24%). More
importantly, POD severely contributes to the development of post-discharge cognitive
decline [37].
Effects of statins on delirium
Due to the relevant prognostic impact of POD, its prevention is of utmost im-
portance. Experimental and clinical studies have proved that statins (3-hydroxy-
3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors) have the potential to improve
perioperative central neuronal protection [38–40]. Statins have important pleiotropic
effects, including anti-inammatory, immunomodulatory, and antithrombotic proper-
ties [38–40]. Wang et al. [41] demonstrated that statin treatment markedly reduced
functional neurological decits after traumatic brain injury in mice. In addition, histo-
logical reduction in degenerating hippocampal neurons and suppression of inamma-
tory cytokine mRNA expression in brain parenchyma was observed; Statin treatment
also improved cerebral hemodynamics following the head injury [41]. Similarly, in
a mouse model of cerebral ischemia, acute termination of statin administration resulted
in a rapid loss of cerebral protection [42]. Statins prevent inammation by interfering
with multiple steps of leukocyte recruitment and migration into the central nervous
system, including decreasing circulating monocyte expression of cytokines and inhib-
iting chemokine production in endothelial cells [43, 44]. Statins may also upregulate
eNOS, leading to decreased leukocyte adhesion [45].
1365
Effects of statins on delirium following cardiac surgery – evidence from literature
Statins and delirium following cardiac surgery
Based on these substantiations, it has been suggested that the administration of
statins may represent a viable therapeutic and preventing strategy against POD. Aboy-
ans et al. [46] recognised the protective effects exerted by statins on stroke as rst in
a prospective cohort of 810 patients undergoing CABG. Moreover, intensive cholesterol
lowering with statins after CABG has been shown to decrease the long-term incidence
of stroke [47]. However, data on the protective statin effects on stroke following cardiac
surgery have not been subsequently conrmed [16, 48]. Conversely, statin administra-
tion in the critically ill patients has been shown to confer protection against delirium
[49, 50]. Page et al. [49] conducted a prospective study on 470 consecutive critical
care patients with 2,927 person/days follow-up. Statin administration in the previous
evening was associated with a reduction in incidence of delirium (odds ratio (OR),
2.28; 95% condence intervals (CIs), 1.01–5.13) [49]. Morandi et al. [50] performed
a multicentre, prospective cohort study enrolling 763 patients with acute respiratory
failure and shock, demonstrating that ICU statin users had a reduced incidence of
delirium, especially in early stages of sepsis, while discontinuation of statins was
associated with increased delirium. However, results of the statin effect on delirium
occurrence after cardiac surgery are markedly controversial [1, 2, 16, 51] (Table 3).
Only the observational study of Katznelson et al. [2], demonstrated that preoperative
administration of statins was associated with a reduce risk of POD by analysing 1,059
patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB. In addition, the protective POD effect
exerted by statins was more evident in patients with age ≥ 60 years [2]. Mathew et al.
[51], retrospectively enrolling 440 patients undergoing CABG, investigated the effect
of preoperative statin administration on cognitive dysfunction following CPB. They
documented that cytokines (IL-1 and TNF-α) and C-reactive protein did not differ in
patients affected by cognitive dysfunction independently of preoperative statin therapy
[51]. Our data were also in consonance with those presented by Mathew et al. [1, 51].
In the largest study to date, we retrospectively examined 4,569 CABG patients, founding
no association between POD and preoperative statin administration [1]. Interestingly,
although cardiac surgery population accounted for 9.7% of the entire study popula-
tion (9,272 out of 264,657 patients), Redelmeier et al. [16] retrospectively observed
that the rate of POD was higher among patients taking statins than among those not
taking them (OR: 1.28; 95% CI 1.12–1.46). Different plausible explanations for this
controversial statin effect on POD have been advocated, especially with reference to
the different and complex events that occur during cardiac surgery with CPB [1, 4, 6,
9, 48, 51]. Embolic events, postoperative cardiac output along with hypoperfusion and
hypoxia phenomena, and prolonged ICU stay can overcome the protective statin effects
on POD [1, 4, 6, 9, 48, 51]. In addition, the relevant pro-inammatory effects of CPB,
especially in complex and prolonged surgeries, may overwhelm the anti-inammatory
properties of statins [1, 51]. The sudden withdrawal of statins, especially in the rst
hours after surgery, may also reduce the protective statin effect [42]. Moreover, patient
selection, statin type, and administered doses could explain the different effect of
statins on POD, underlying the complex multifactorial pathophysiology of delirium
Giovanni Mariscalco et al.
1366
after cardiac surgery [1, 2, 16, 51]. Finally, possible effects of omega-3 polyunsaturated
fatty acids on delirium after cardiac surgery have not been investigated yet.
Conclusions
Delirium is a common complication after cardiac surgery, correlating with an in-
creased morbidity and mortality, at considerable expenses of resources [1–10, 48, 51].
Although several efforts have attempted to determine its exact pathogenesis, POD is
the consequence of interplay of different pathophysiologic mechanisms [9–11]. Among
these, neuroinammation is one of the most emerging causative hypotheses related to
POD occurrence [23, 24]. Experimental and clinical studies have documented neuro-
logical protective effect of statin administration because of their anti-inammatory,
immunomodulatory, and anti-thrombotic properties [38–40]. Although, statin admin-
istration has been associated with a reduction of POD in critically ill patients [49, 50],
conict results have been observed after cardiac surgery [1, 2, 16, 51]. The multifactorial
and complex pathogenesis of POD may explain this discrepancy [51–58]. Therefore,
no denitive conclusions on the protective effects of statins on POD can be determined
in the cardiac surgery setting. Randomised trials are required to clarify the effect of
preoperative statin administration and delirium following cardiac surgery.
Acknowledgements. The authors thank the Fondazione Cesare Bartorelli (Milan, Italy) for
support.
References
1. Mariscalco G, Cottrini M, Zanobini M, Salis S, Dominici C, Banach M. et al. Preoperative statin
therapy is not associated with a decrease in the incidence of delirium after cardiac operations.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2012; 93: 1439–1448.
2. Katznelson R, Djaiani GN, Borger MA, Friedman Z, Abbey SE, Fedorko L. et al. Preoperative
use of statins is associated with reduced early delirium rates after cardiac operations. Anes-
thesiology 2009; 110: 67–73.
3. Rudolph JL, Jones RN, Levkoff SE, Rockett C, Inouye SK, Sellke FW. et al. Derivation and
validation of a preoperative prediction rule for delirium after cardiac surgery. Circulation
2009; 119: 229–236.
4. Kazmierski J, Kowman M, Banach M, Fendler W, Okonski P, Banys A. et al. Incidence and
predictors of delirium after cardiac surgery: Results from The IPDACS Study. J. Psychosom.
Res. 2010; 69: 179–185.
5. Kazmierski J, Kowman M, Banach M, Fendler W, Okonski P, Banys A. et al. The use of DSM-IV
and ICD-10 criteria and diagnostic scales for delirium among cardiac surgery patients: results
from the IPDACS study. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2010; 22: 426–432.
1367
Effects of statins on delirium following cardiac surgery – evidence from literature
6. Kazmierski J, Kowman M, Banach M, Pawelczyk T, Okonski P, Iwaszkiewicz A. et al. Preop-
erative predictors of delirium after cardiac surgery: a preliminary study. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry
2006; 28: 536–538.
7. Norkiene I, Ringaitiene D, Misiuriene I, Samalavicius R, Bubulis R, Baublys A. et al. Incidence
and precipitating factors of delirium after coronary artery bypass grafting. Scand. Cardiovasc.
J. 2007; 41: 180–185.
8. Loponen P, Luther M, Wistbacka JO, Nissinen J, Sintonen H, Huhtala H. et al. Postoperative
delirium and health related quality of life after coronary artery bypass grafting. Scand. Car-
diovasc. J. 2008; 42: 337–344
9. Koster S, Hensens AG, Schuurmans MJ, van der Palen J. Risk factors of delirium after cardiac
surgery A systematic review. Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs. 2011; 10: 197–204.
10. Lin Y, Chen J, Wang Z. Meta-analysis of cators which inuence delirium following cardiac
surgery. J. Card. Surg. 2012; 27: 481–492.
11. Trabold B, Metterlein T. Postoperative delirium: risk factors, prevention, and treatment. J.
Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2014; 28: 1352–1360.
12. First MB. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th edition. Washington, DC:
American Psychiatric Association Press; 2000: 136–139.
13. Funder KS, Steinmetz J, Rasmussen LS. Cognitive dysfunction after cardiovascular surgery.
Minerva Anestesiol. 2009; 75: 329–332.
14. Plaschke K, von Haken R, Scholz M, Engelhardt R, Brobeil A, Martin E. et al. Comparison of
the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (cam-icu) with the Intensive Care
Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) for delirium in critical care patients gives high agree-
ment rate(s). Intensive Care Med. 2008; 34: 431–436.
15. Stransky M, Schmidt C, Ganslmeier P, Grossmann E, Haneya A, Moritz S. et al. Hypoactive
delirium after cardiac surgery as an independent risk factor for prolonged mechanical ventila-
tion. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2011; 25: 968–974.
16. Redelmeier DA, Thiruchelvam D, Daneman N. Delirium after elective surgery among elderly
patients taking statins. CMAJ 2008; 179: 645–652.
17. Bucerius J, Gummert JF, Borger MA, Walther T, Doll N, Falk V. et al. Predictors of delirium
after cardiac surgery: effect of beating-heart (off-pump) surgery. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.
2004; 127: 57–64.
18. Banach M, Kazmierski J, Kowman M, Okonski PK, Sobow T, Kloszewska I. et al. Atrial bril-
lation as a nonpsychiatric predictor of delirium after cardiac surgery: a pilot study. Med. Sci.
Monit. 2008; 14(5): CR286–CR291.
19. Koster S, Hensens AG, van der Palen J. The long-term cognitive and functional outcomes of
postoperative delirium after cardiac surgery. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2009; 87: 1469–1474.
20. Koening MA, Grega MA, Bailey MM, Pham LD, Zeger SL, Baumgartner WA. et al. Statin use
and neurologic morbidity after coronary artery bypass grafting. Neurology 2009; 73: 2099–2106.
21. Flacker JM, Cummings V, Mach JR, Bettin K, Kiely DK, Wei J. The association of serum
anticholinergic activity with delirium in elderly medical patients. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry
1998; 6: 31–41.
22. Afonso A, Scurlock C, Reich D, Raikhelkar J, Hossain S, Bodian C. et al. Predictive model for
postoperative delirium in cardiac surgical patients. Semin. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2010;
14: 212–217.
Giovanni Mariscalco et al.
1368
23. Hall RJ, Shenkin SD, MacLullich AMJ. A systematic literature review of cerebrospinal uid
biomarkers in delirium. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 2011; 32: 79–93.
24. Simone MJ, Tan ZS. The role of inammation in the pathogenesis of delirium and dementia in
older adults: a review. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2011; 17: 506–513.
25. Kazmierski J, Banys A, Latek J, Bourke J, Jaszewski R. Raised IL-2 and TNF-α concentrations
are associated with postoperative delirium in patients undergoing coronary-artery bypass graft
surgery. Int. Psychogeriatr. 2014; 26: 845–855.
26. Wilson C, Finch C, Cohen H. Cytokines and cognition the case for a head-to-toe inammatory
paradigm. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2002; 50: 2041–2056.
27. Maclullich AM, Ferguson KJ, Miller T, de Rooij SE, Cunningham C. Unravelling the patho-
physiology of delirium: A focus on the role of aberrant stress responses. J. Psychosom. Res.
2008; 65: 229–238.
28. Renault PF, Hoofnagle JH, Park Y, Mullen KD, Peters M, Jones DB. et al. Psychiatric complica-
tions of long-term interferon alfa therapy. Arch. Intern. Med. 1987; 147: 1577–1580.
29. Van Steijn J, Nieboer P, Hospers G, de Vries E, Mulder N. Delirium after interleukin-2 and
alpha-interferon therapy for renal cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2001; 21: 3699–3700.
30. Huang T, O’Banion M. Interleukin-1 beta and tumor necrosis factor-alpha suppress dexametha-
sone induction of glutamine synthetase in primary mouse astrocytes. J. Neurochem. 1998; 71:
1436–1442.
31. Reinsfelt B, Ricksten SE, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Fredén-Lindqvist J, Westerlind A. Cer-
ebrospinal uid markers of brain injury, inammation, and blood-brain barrier dysfunction in
cardiac surgery. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2012; 94: 549–555.
32. Newman MF, Mathew JP, Grocott HP, Mackensen GB, Monk T, Welsh-Bohmer KA. et al.
Central nervous system injury associated with cardiac surgery. Lancet 2006; 368: 694–703.
33. Blauth CI. Macroemboli and microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann. Thorac. Surg.
1995; 59: 1300–1303.
34. Ranucci M, Ballotta A, Kunkl A, De Benedetti D, Kandil H, Conti D. et al. Inuence of the
timing of cardiac catheterization and the amount of contrast media on acute renal failure after
cardiac surgery. Am. J. Cardiol. 2008; 101: 1112–1118.
35. Bakris GL, Weir MR. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-associated elevations in serum
creatinine: is this a cause for concern? Arch. Intern. Med. 2000; 160: 685–693.
36. Ely EW, Gautam S, Margolin R, Francis J, May L, Speroff T. et al. The impact of delirium in
the intensive care unit on hospital length of stay. Intensive Care Med. 2001; 27: 1892–1900.
37. Saczynski JS, Marcantonio ER, Quach L, Fong TG, Gross A, Inouye SK. et al. Cognitive tra-
jectories after postoperative delirium. N. Eng. J. Med. 2012; 5: 30–39.
38. Sironi L, Cimino M, Guerrini U, Calvio AM, Lodetti B, Asdente M. et al. Treatment with statins
after induction of focal ischemia in rats reduces the extent of brain damage. Arterioscler. Thromb.
Vasc. Biol. 2003; 23: 322–327.
39. Stepien K, Tomaszewski M, Czuczwar SJ. Neuroprotective properties of statins. Pharmacol.
Rep. 2005; 57: 561–569.
40. Blanco-Colio LM, Tunon J, Martin-Ventura JL, Egido J. Anti-inammatory and immunomodula-
tory effects of statins. Kidney Int. 2003; 63: 12–23.
1369
Effects of statins on delirium following cardiac surgery – evidence from literature
41. Wang H, Lynch JR, Song P, Yang HJ, Yates RB, Mace B. et al. Simvastatin and atorvastatin
improve behavioral outcome, reduce hippocampal degeneration, and improve cerebral blood
ow after experimental traumatic brain injury. Exp. Neurol. 2007; 206: 59–69.
42. Gertz K, Laufs U, Lindauer U et al. Withdrawal of statin treatment abrogates stroke protection
in mice. Stroke 2003; 34: 551–557.
43. Rezaie-Majd A, Maca T, Bucek RA, Valent P, Müller MR, Husslein P. et al. Simvastatin reduces
expression of cytokines interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1
in circulating monocytes from hypercholesterolemic patients. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
2002; 22: 1194–1199.
44. Rezaie-Majd A, Prager GW, Bucek RA, Schernthaner GH, Maca T, Kress HG. et al. Simvastatin
reduces the expression of adhesion molecules in circulating monocytes from hypercholesterolemic
patients. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2003; 23: 397–403.
45. Rikitake Y, Liao JK. Rho GT. Pases, statins, and nitric oxide. Circ. Res. 2005; 97: 1232–1235.
46. Aboyans V, Labrousse L, Lacroix P, Guilloux J, Sekkal S, Le Guyader A. et al. Predictive fac-
tors of stroke in patients undergoing coronary bypass grafting: statins are protective. Eur. J.
Cardiothorac. Surg. 2006; 30: 300–304.
47. Shah SJ, Waters DD, Barter P, Kastelein JJ, Shepherd J, Wenger NK. et al. Intensive lipid lower-
ing with atorvastatin for secondary prevention in patients after coronary artery bypass surgery.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008; 51: 1938–1943.
48. Koenig MA, Grega MA, Bailey MM, Pham LD, Zeger SL, Baumgartner WA. et al. Statin use
and neurologic morbidity after coronary artery bypass grafting. A cohort study. Neurology
2009; 73: 2099–2106.
49. Page VJ, Davis D, Zhao XB, Norton S, Casarin A, Brown T. et al. Statin use and risk of delirium
in the critically ill. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2014; 189: 666–673.
50. Morandi A, Hughes CG, Thompson JL, Pandharipande PP, Shintani AK, Vasilevskis EE. et al.
Statins and delirium during critical illness: a multicenter, prospective cohort study. Crit. Care
Med. 2014; 42: 1899–1909.
51. Mathew JP, Grocott HP, McCurdy JR, Ti LK, Davis RD, Laskowitz DT. et al. Preoperative statin
therapy does not reduce cognitive dysfunction after cardiopulmonary bypass. J. Cardiothorac.
Vasc. Anesth. 2005; 19: 294–299.
52. Piffaretti G, Mariscalco G, Riva F, Fontana F, Carraello G, Castelli P. Abdominal aortic an-
eurysm repair: long-term follow-up of endovascular versus open repair. Arch. Med. Sci. 2014;
10(2): 273–282
53. Kośmider A, Jaszewski R, Marcinkiewicz A, Bartczak K, Knopik J, Ostrowski S. 23-year ex-
perience on diagnosis and surgical treatment of benign and malignant cardiac tumors. Arch.
Med. Sci. 2013; 9(5): 826–830.
54. Mariscalco G, Biancari F, Zanobini M, Cottini M, Piffaretti G, Saccocci M. et al. Bedside tool
for predicting the risk of postoperative atrial brillation after cardiac surgery: the POAF score.
J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2014; 3(2): e000752.
55. Piao G, Wu J. Systematic assessment of dexmedetomidine as an anesthetic agent: a meta-analysis
of randomized controlled trials. Arch. Med. Sci. 2014; 10(1): 19–24.
56. Mariscalco G, Musumeci F, Banach M. Factors inuencing post-coronary artery bypass grafting
atrial brillation episodes. Kardiol. Pol. 2013; 71(11): 1115–1120.
Giovanni Mariscalco et al.
1370
57. Ostrowski S, Marcinkiewicz A, Kośmider A, Jaszewski R. Sarcomas of the heart as a difcult
interdisciplinary problem. Arch. Med. Sci. 2014; 10(1): 135–148.
58. Gosselt AN, Slooter AJ, Boere PR, Zaal IJ. Risk factors for delirium after on-pump cardiac
surgery: a systematic review. Crit. Care 2015; 19(1): 346.
Address: Giovanni Mariscalco
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences
University of Leicester
Clinical Sciences Wing
Gleneld Hospital
Leicester, LE3 9QP United Kingdom
... An observational study by Katznelson et al. (127) found that preoperative administration of statins was associated with a reduced risk of POD by analyzing 1059 patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB, and the protective effect on POD was more pronounced in patients ≥60 years of age. However, some studies (128,129) found no association between preoperative statin administration and POD after CPB by analyzing IL-1, T-α and C-reactive protein levels in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. To account for this controversial effect of statins on POD, some researchers proposed multifactorial and complex pathogenic mechanisms that cause POD (e.g., embolic events occurring in CPB, cardiac output and hypoperfusion and hypoxic events, and prolonged postoperative ICU stay can inhibit the anti-inflammatory effects of statins) (8,(129)(130)(131)(132). ...
... However, some studies (128,129) found no association between preoperative statin administration and POD after CPB by analyzing IL-1, T-α and C-reactive protein levels in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. To account for this controversial effect of statins on POD, some researchers proposed multifactorial and complex pathogenic mechanisms that cause POD (e.g., embolic events occurring in CPB, cardiac output and hypoperfusion and hypoxic events, and prolonged postoperative ICU stay can inhibit the anti-inflammatory effects of statins) (8,(129)(130)(131)(132). Therefore, the protective effect of statins on POD in cardiac surgery has not been clearly defined, emphasizing the need for more studies. ...
Article
Full-text available
The past decade has witnessed unprecedented medical progress, which has translated into cardiac surgery being increasingly common and safe. However, complications such as postoperative delirium remain a major concern. Although the pathophysiological changes of delirium after cardiac surgery remain poorly understood, it is widely thought that inflammation and oxidative stress may be potential triggers of delirium. The development of delirium following cardiac surgery is associated with perioperative risk factors. Multiple interventions are being explored to prevent and treat delirium. Therefore, research on the potential role of biomarkers in delirium as well as identification of perioperative risk factors and pharmacological interventions are necessary to mitigate the development of delirium.
... These pleiotropic effects may contribute to the prevention or mitigation of delirium in critically ill and surgical patients by modifying the process of neuroinflammation and the activation of proinflammatory microglia. [40][41][42] The results of the present subgroup analysis focusing on studies published before 2015 indicated that statin use was not associated with the risk of delirium (pooled OR, 1$07; 95% CI, 0$86-1$33; P 5 0$543; see Figure S6A, Supplemental Digital Content, http:// links.lww.com/AJT/A137). This result is the same as that of a previous meta-analysis, 17 suggesting that statins may not reduce the occurrence of delirium in critically ill and cardiac surgery patients. ...
Article
Background: Findings on the association of statin use with delirium risk are inconsistent. The study question: Is statin use associated with delirium risk? Study design: We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the EMBASE database, limiting the search to human patients and articles in English published until December 31, 2021. The effect size and 95% confidence interval (CI) were defined as the odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI, respectively, to indicate the difference in the incidence of delirium between statin use and nonuse groups. A random-effects model was selected in the case of high heterogeneity of study populations. We used funnel plots, Egger test, Duval and Tweedie trim-and-fill approach, and the classic fail-safe N to assess publication bias. Results: Of a total of 264 identified studies, 13 were selected for the qualitative review-4 RCTs and 9 observational cohort studies. Statin use was not associated with low delirium risk (pooled OR, 0·82; 95% CI, 0·64-1·04; P = 0·09). Substantial statistical heterogeneity was observed (I2, 90%). Visual inspection of the funnel plot of ORs from the studies revealed symmetry. Using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach, we assigned the evidence a rating of C and a weak recommendation for this review. Conclusions: Statin use is not associated with delirium risk. More comprehensive RCTs are required to confirm the results.
... Activated peripheral T cells express adhesion molecules and chemokine receptors that enable them to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and infiltrate brain tissue (Ransohoff and Engelhardt, 2012;Sambucci et al., 2019). The hyper-responsiveness of brain immune cells to stimulation from peripheral inflammation makes the brain susceptible to the consequences of systemic inflammation (Mariscalco et al., 2015), which leads to cognitive impairment and delirium (Simone and Tan, 2011). CD4 + T cells play a central role in the body's defense system because of their impact on the function of B cells and cells in the innate immune system (Wu et al., 2012). ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective There is a high incidence of delirium among patients with organ dysfunction undergoing cardiac surgery who need critical care. This study aimed to explore the risk factors for delirium in critically ill patients undergoing cardiac surgery and the predictive value of related risk factors. Methods We conducted a prospective observational study on adult critically ill patients who underwent cardiac surgery between January 2019 and August 2021. Patients were consecutively assigned to delirium and non-delirium groups. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic analysis were used to determine the risk factors for delirium. Receiver operating characteristic curves and a nomogram were used to identify the predictive value of related risk factors. Results Delirium developed in 242 of 379 (63.9%) participants. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores were 14.2 ± 5.6 and 18 ± 8.4, respectively. Patients with delirium had longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (149.6 ± 59.1 vs. 126.7 ± 48.5 min, p < 0.001) and aortic cross-clamp time (98.7 ± 51.5 vs. 86.1 ± 41.6 min, p = 0.010) compared with the non-delirium group. The area under the curve was 0.824 for CD4 ⁺ T cell count and 0.862 for CD4/CD8 ratio. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age [odds ratio (OR) 1.030, p = 0.038], duration of physical restraint (OR 1.030, p < 0.001), interleukin-6 (OR 1.001, p = 0.025), CD19 ⁺ B cell count (OR 0.996, p = 0.016), CD4 ⁺ T cell count (OR 1.005, p < 0.001) and CD4/CD8 ratio (OR 5.314, p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for delirium. A nomogram revealed that age, cardiopulmonary bypass duration, CD4 ⁺ T cell count and CD4/CD8 ratio were independent predictors of delirium. Conclusion Age, duration of physical restraint, CD4 ⁺ T cell count and CD4/CD8 ratio were reliable factors for predicting delirium in critically ill patients after cardiac surgery. The receiver operating characteristic curves and nomogram suggested a potential role for CD4 ⁺ T cells in mediating potential neuroinflammation of delirium.
... Activated microglia and inflammatory mediators released by them modulate cholinergic, β-adrenergic and GABA-ergic neurotransmission, as well as secretion of vasopressin, corticotropin-releasing factor and adrenocorticotropic hormone, leading in turn to non-traumatic neuronal injury in the brain [37]. Significant reduction in the risk of postoperative delirium in patients treated with anti-inflammatory medications seems to confirm this hypothesis [38,39]. Interestingly, statins also reduce the neuroinflammatory response following systemic inflammation and/or ischemia-related brain dysfunction. ...
Article
Full-text available
Delirium, an acute alteration in mental status characterized by confusion, inattention and a fluctuating level of arousal, is a common problem in critically ill patients. Delirium prolongs hospital stay and is associated with higher mortality. The pathophysiology of delirium has not been fully elucidated. Neuroinflammation and neurotransmitter imbalance seem to be the most important factors for delirium development. In this review, we present the most important pathomechanisms of delirium in critically ill patients, such as neuroinflammation, neurotransmitter imbalance, hypoxia and hyperoxia, tryptophan pathway disorders, and gut microbiota imbalance. A thorough understanding of delirium pathomechanisms is essential for effective prevention and treatment of this underestimated pathology in critically ill patients.
... [11] Further, statins exert pleiotropic properties, including anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and antithrombotic effects. [11][12][13] These pleiotropic effects may contribute to prevent or mitigate delirium in critically ill and surgical patients by modifying the process of neuroinflammation and activation of proinflammatory microglia. [8,10,[14][15][16][17] Over recent years, an increasing number of studies have investigated the efficacy of statins on the prophylaxis of delirium in critically ill and surgical patients. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: The critically ill and surgical patients are at significant risk of delirium, which is associated with a high morbidity and mortality. The association between statin use and the incidence of delirium is still controversial. In this article, we will perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies to evaluate the effectiveness of statins for the prophylaxis of delirium among critically ill and surgical patients. Methods: We will conduct a systematic literature search in EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library from inception date to October 2018 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (either cohort or case-control studies) investigating the association between use of statins and delirium risk. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for evaluating the risk of bias and Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) will be used to assess the methodological quality of RCTs and observational studies, separately. The primary outcome will be the risk of incident delirium associated with statin use. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) will be calculated by a random-effects or fixed-effects model according to heterogeneity among included studies. Subgroup analyses, meta-regression method, and assessment of publication bias will be also performed. Statistical analyses will be conducted with RevMan (version 5.3.5) and Stata (version 14.0) software. In addition, the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) approach will be applied to evaluate the quality of evidence. Results: The study will provide a high-quality synthesis and evaluate the effectiveness of statins for delirium prevention among critically ill and surgical patients. Conclusions: The systematic review and meta-analysis will provide convincing evidence concerning the effect of statins against delirium in critically ill and surgical patients.
Chapter
Cognitive dysfunction after cardiac surgery is a highly prevalent phenomenon with an immense impact on postoperative trajectory. As a dynamic and evolving field of study, recent changes in nomenclature have been proposed to standardize diagnosis and subsequent management. Postoperative delirium, delayed neurocognitive recovery, postoperative neurocognitive disorder, and neurocognitive disorders are all currently recognized as perioperative neurocognitive disorders. The clinical presentation is widely variable because of the multiple etiologies. Different modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors have been well established. The key to improving outcomes is correcting such factors considered modifiable prior to surgery, during surgery, and in the postoperative period.
Preprint
Full-text available
Purpose: Findings on the association of statin use with delirium risk are inconsistent. We performed an up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis to elucidate this association among critically ill and surgical patients. Materials and Methods: We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the EMBASE database, limiting the search to human patients and articles in English published until December 31, 2021. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to indicate the difference in the incidence of delirium between statin use and nonuse groups. A random-effects model was selected in the case of high heterogeneity of study populations. We used funnel plots, Egger’s test, Duval and Tweedie’s trim-and-fill approach, and the classic fail-safe N to assess publication bias. Findings: Of a total of 264 identified studies, 13 were selected for the qualitative review—4 RCTs and 9 observational cohort studies. Statin use was not associated with low delirium risk (pooled OR, 0·82; 95% CI, 0·64 to 1·04; p = 0·09). Substantial statistical heterogeneity was observed (I2, 90%). Visual inspection of the funnel plot of ORs from the studies revealed symmetry. Conclusions: Statin use is not associated with delirium risk. More comprehensive RCTs are required to confirm the results.
Article
Background Delirium is a cognitive disorder that commonly occurs during hospitalization in acute cardiac care units (ACCU), but its effect after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has not been well evaluated. The objective of this study is to determine the incidence, predictive factors and prognostic impact of delirium following TAVR. Methods A total of 501 consecutive patients admitted to an ACCU after TAVR were included. The Confusion Assessment Method was used to evaluate delirium during ACCU stay. Risk factors, preventive pharmacological treatment, peri-procedural characteristics and complications were assessed. Clinical events were recorded with a median follow-up of 24 months. Results The incidence of delirium after TAVR was 22.0% (n = 110). Previous cognitive impairment (OR 4.17; 95% CI 1.11–15.71; p = 0.035), peripheral arterial disease (OR 4.54; 95% CI 1.79–11.54; p = 0.001), the use of general anaesthesia (OR 2.55; 95% CI 1.32–4.90; p = 0.005), and prolonged mechanical ventilation (OR 18.86; 95% CI 1.85–192.58; p = 0.013) were significantly associated with the development of delirium. Patients with delirium had a greater hospital length of stay (7.5 [5.5–13.5] vs 5.6 [4.6–8.2] days, mean difference − 3.49; 95% CI -5.45 to −1.52; p < 0.001), and higher in-hospital (OR 2.68; 95% CI 1.02–6.99; p = 0.045), 1-year (HR 2.09; 95% CI 1.13–3.87; p = 0.018) and 2-year mortality (HR 1.94; 95% CI 1.12–3.34; p = 0.017). Conclusions Delirium is a frequent complication in patients admitted to ACCU after TAVR, and is associated with prolonged hospital stay and higher in-hospital and mid-term mortality.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: As evidence-based effective treatment protocols for delirium after cardiac surgery are lacking, efforts should be made to identify risk factors for preventive interventions. Moreover, knowledge of these risk factors could increase validity of etiological studies in which adjustments need to be made for confounding variables. This review aims to systematically identify risk factors for delirium after cardiac surgery and to grade the evidence supporting these associations. Method: A prior registered systematic review was performed using EMBASE, CINAHL, MEDLINE and Cochrane from 1990 till January 2015 ( http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42014007371 ). All studies evaluating patients for delirium after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) using either randomization or multivariable data analyses were included. Data was extracted and quality was scored in duplicate. Heterogeneity impaired pooling of the data; instead a semi-quantitative approach was used in which the strength of the evidence was graded based on the number of investigations, the quality of studies, and the consistency of the association reported across studies. Results: In total 1462 unique references were screened and 34 were included in this review, of which 16 (47 %) were graded as high quality. A strong level of evidence for an association with the occurrence of postoperative delirium was found for age, previous psychiatric conditions, cerebrovascular disease, pre-existent cognitive impairment, type of surgery, peri-operative blood product transfusion, administration of risperidone, postoperative atrial fibrillation and mechanical ventilation time. Postoperative oxygen saturation and renal insufficiency were supported by a moderate level of evidence, and there is no evidence that gender, education, CPB duration, pre-existent cardiac disease or heart failure are risk factors. Conclusion: Of many potential risk factors for delirium after cardiac surgery, for only 11 there is a strong or moderate level of evidence. These risk factors should be taken in consideration when designing future delirium prevention strategies trials or when controlling for confounding in future etiological studies.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction To compare early and long-term outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) versus open repair (OPEN). Design: Prospective observational, per protocol, non-randomized, with retrospective analyses. Material and methods Between 2000 and 2005, a total of 311 patients having EVAR or OPEN repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms were identified and included in this prospective single-center observational study. A propensity score-based optimal-matching algorithm was employed, and 138 patients undergoing EVAR procedures were matched (1: 1) to OPEN repair. Results Open repair showed higher hospital mortality (17% vs. 6%, p = 0.004), respiratory failure (p < 0.026), transfusion requirement (p < 0.001), and intensive care unit admission (27% vs. 7%, p < 0.001), and longer hospitalization (p < 0.001). Median follow-up was 70 months (25th to 75th percentile, 24 to 101). Actuarial survival estimates at 1, 5 and 10 years were 93%, 74%, 49% for the OPEN group compared to 89%, 69%, 59% for the EVAR group (p = 0.465). A significant difference between groups was observed in younger patients (< 75 years) only (p < 0.044). Late complication and re-intervention rates were significantly higher in EVAR patients (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). Freedom from late complications at 1, 5 and 10 years was 96%, 92%, 86%, and 84%, 70%, 64% for OPEN and EVAR procedures, respectively. Conclusions Our experience confirms the excellent results of the EVAR procedures, offering excellent early and long-term results in terms of safety and reduction of mortality. Patients < 75 years seem to benefit from EVAR not only in the immediate postoperative period but even in a long-term perspective.
Article
Full-text available
Here we aimed to study the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine as an anesthetic adjunct in surgery. A systematic evaluation was performed on published clinical trials. Major databases such as Medline database were employed to search and identify relevant studies and then Rev.Man 5 was used for meta-analysis as well as forest plots. Mean difference (MD) was chosen as the effect size for measurement data, while odds ratio (OR) was calculated for enumeration data. A total of 18 studies met the inclusion criteria. The postoperative heart rate and mean arterial pressure for the dexmedetomidine group were significantly lower than the control group (combined MDs were -14.12 and -9.96). The incidence rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting, chills, and shivering of the dexmedetomidine group were lower than the control group (pooled ORs were 0.41, 0.21 and 0.14, respectively). However, the occurrence rates of bradycardia and hypotension in the dexmedetomidine group were higher than the control group (pooled ORs were 5.14 and 3.00). Dexmedetomidine can stabilize blood pressure and heart rate, and prevent postoperative adverse reactions. However, patients with original hypovolemia or heart block should be cautious. Besides, the quality of such studies should be improved in methodology to evaluate their efficacy and safety comprehensively.
Article
Full-text available
Cardiac tumors are assumed to be a rare entity. Metastases to the heart are more frequent than primary lesions. Sarcomas make up the majority of cardiac malignant neoplasms. Among them angiosarcoma is the most common and associated with the worst prognosis. Malignant fibrous histiocytoma comprises the minority of cardiac sarcomas and has uncertain etiology as well as pathogenesis. Transthoracic echocardiography remains the widely available screening examination for the initial diagnosis of a cardiac tumor. The clinical presentation is non-specific and the diagnosis is established usually at an advanced stage of the disease. Sarcomas spread preferentially through blood due to their immature vessels without endothelial lining. Surgery remains the method of choice for treatment. Radicalness of the excision is still the most valuable prognostic factor. Adjuvant therapy is unlikely to be effective. The management of cardiac sarcomas must be individualized due to their rarity and significant differences in the course of disease.
Article
Full-text available
Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains the most common complication after cardiac surgery. The present study aim was to derive an effective bedside tool to predict postoperative AF and its related complications. Data of 17 262 patients undergoing adult cardiac surgery were retrieved at 3 European university hospitals. A risk score for postoperative AF (POAF score) was derived and validated. In the overall series, 4561 patients (26.4%) developed postoperative AF. In the derivation cohort age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emergency operation, preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump, left ventricular ejection fraction <30%, estimated glomerular filtration rate <15 mL/min per m(2) or dialysis, and any heart valve surgery were independent AF predictors. POAF score was calculated by summing weighting points for each independent AF predictor. According to the prediction model, the incidences of postoperative AF in the derivation cohort were 0, 11.1%; 1, 20.1%; 2, 28.7%; and ≥3, 40.9% (P<0.001), and in the validation cohort they were 0, 13.2%; 1, 19.5%; 2, 29.9%; and ≥3, 42.5% (P<0.001). Patients with a POAF score ≥3, compared with those without arrhythmia, revealed an increased risk of hospital mortality (5.5% versus 3.2%, P=0.001), death after the first postoperative day (5.1% versus 2.6%, P<0.001), cerebrovascular accident (7.8% versus 4.2%, P<0.001), acute kidney injury (15.1% versus 7.1%, P<0.001), renal replacement therapy (3.8% versus 1.4%, P<0.001), and length of hospital stay (mean 13.2 versus 10.2 days, P<0.001). The POAF score is a simple, accurate bedside tool to predict postoperative AF and its related or accompanying complications.
Article
Since statins have pleiotropic effects on inflammation and coagulation that may interrupt delirium pathogenesis, we tested the hypotheses that statin exposure is associated with reduced delirium during critical illness, whereas discontinuation of statin therapy is associated with increased delirium. Multicenter, prospective cohort study. Medical and surgical ICUs in two large tertiary care hospitals in the United States. Patients with acute respiratory failure or shock. None. We measured statin exposure prior to hospitalization and daily during the ICU stay, and we assessed patients for delirium twice daily using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU. Of 763 patients included, whose median (interquartile range) age was 61 years (51-70 yr) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II was 25 (19-31), 257 (34%) were prehospital statin users and 197 (26%) were ICU statin users. Overall, delirium developed in 588 patients (77%). After adjusting for covariates, ICU statin use was associated with reduced delirium (p < 0.01). This association was modified by sepsis and study day; for example, statin use was associated with reduced delirium among patients with sepsis on study day 1 (odds ratio, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.10-0.49) but not among patients without sepsis on day 1 (odds ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.46-1.84) or among those with sepsis later, for example, on day 13 (odds ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.35-1.41). Prehospital statin use was not associated with delirium (odds ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.44-1.66; p = 0.18), yet the longer a prehospital statin user's statin was held in the ICU, the higher the odds of delirium (overall p < 0.001 with the odds ratio depending on sepsis status and study day due to significant interactions). In critically ill patients, ICU statin use was associated with reduced delirium, especially early during sepsis; discontinuation of a previously used statin was associated with increased delirium.