ArticlePDF Available

Restoring Speech to Tracheostomy Patients

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Tracheostomies may be established as part of an acute or chronic illness, and intensive care nurses can take an active role in helping restore speech in patients with tracheostomies, with focused nursing assessments and interventions. Several different methods are used to restore speech, whether a patient is spontaneously breathing, ventilator dependent, or using intermittent mechanical ventilation. Restoring vocal communication allows patients to fully express themselves and their needs, enhancing patient satisfaction and quality of life.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Cover
www.ccnonline.org
CriticalCareNurse
Vol 35, No. 6, DECEMBER 2015 13
©2015 American Association of Critical-Care Nurses doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4037/ccn2015401
CE Continuing Education
Linda L. Morris, PhD, APN, CCNS
Ana M. Bedon, MSN, APN, AGCNS-BC, CWON
Erik McIntosh, RN, MSN, ACNP-BC
Andrea Whitmer, RN, MSN, ACNP-BC
Restoring Speech to
Tracheostomy Patients
Tracheostomies may be established as part of an acute or chronic illness, and intensive care nurses can take
an active role in helping restore speech in patients with tracheostomies, with focused nursing assessments
and interventions. Several different methods are used to restore speech, whether a patient is spontaneously
breathing, ventilator dependent, or using intermittent mechanical ventilation. Restoring vocal commu-
nication allows patients to fully express themselves and their needs, enhancing patient satisfaction and
quality of life. (Critical Care Nurse. 2015;35[6]:13-28)
This article has been designated for CE credit. A closed-book, multiple-choice examination follows this article,
which tests your knowledge of the following objectives:
1. Identify the potential effects of the inability to communicate for a patient with a tracheostomy
2. Examine methods to restore phonation for patients with a tracheostomy
3. Discuss the role of critical care nurses in restoring phonation
Tracheostomy is one of the most common procedures performed in critically ill patients
and is becoming more commonplace in the intensive care unit (ICU).1 Indications for
tracheostomy include prolonged intubation with unsuccessful weaning, management of
bronchial hygiene, obstruction of the upper airway, and airway protection.1,2 Patients
with head and neck trauma and/or surgery or those who have airways that cannot be
managed via endotracheal intubation may also require a tracheostomy. When the tracheostomy tube is
initially placed, the cuff at the distal end of the tube is infl ated to protect the airway and provide effective
ventilation.2 Because infl ation of the cuff does not permit the passage of air up through the larynx, the
patient cannot phonate (ie, produce speech sounds).3 The inability to communicate via speech places a
great amount of stress on an already critically ill patient. Patients with tracheostomies report feelings of
frustration, fear, anxiety, and powerlessness related to the loss of voice.3-5 Donnelly and Wiechula6 have
described how patients experience the loss of voice as a form of torture, more so than the physical dis-
comfort the patients feel from the tracheostomy or other procedures performed in the ICU.
Morris12_15pgs.indd 13 11/9/15 4:46 PM
14
CriticalCareNurse
Vol 35, No. 6, DECEMBER 2015 www.ccnonline.org
For patients in the ICU, the inability to express them-
selves and to actively participate in their plan of care
can lead to depression, disengagement in their recovery,
and nonadherence with their therapeutic plan.4,7-9 A tra-
cheostomy tube, however, does not prevent phonation.
Phonation can enhance the ability of patients with a tra-
cheostomy to express their needs and wishes fully and
effectively, allowing the patients to participate in their
plan of care and converse with their loved ones.7, 9 Criti-
cal care nurses are in an ideal position to coach and guide
tracheostomy patients to phonate, but nurses may not be
aware of all the options available. In this article, we pro-
vide infor-
mation that
will enable
nurses to take
an active role in restoring phonation in these patients. We
review the different approaches to restore phonation in
patients with a tracheostomy, including patients who
are spontaneously breathing, are being treated with
intermittent mechanical ventilation, or are ventilator
dependent. An essential component of successful com-
munication is to determine what option or options are
most appropriate for a particular patient.
Forms of communication such as lipreading, writ-
ing, hand signals, and picture boards can be useful for
enabling patients to express basic needs but do not fully
encompass the reciprocal nature of human communica-
tion.4,7 Visual acuity, language barriers, literacy, physical
immobility or weakness, and cognitive deficit can impair
the effectiveness of these other forms of communication.3,5
Ideally, critical care nurses can facilitate nonverbal forms
of communication. Lipreading is a specialized skill and
may be difficult for many nurses to master.9 Coded eye
blinking, head and hand gestures, and nodding answers
to yes-no questions require collaboration with patients
and must be effectively communicated to other caregivers
in order to be consistent9; however, these activities can be
time-consuming and can cause efficiency problems in
caring for critically ill patients. A patient-specific commu-
nication plan should be made available to everyone inter-
acting with a patient; preferably the plan should be at
the patient’s bedside or in another centralized location.9
Even with the best intentions, lapses in care may occur,
causing patients distress and frustration with caregivers.
Methods to Restore Phonation for
Patients With a Tracheostomy
Sound is produced as air passes through the vocal
cords, causing the cords to vibrate.10 Medical complica-
tions of the pharyngeal, laryngeal, and tracheal struc-
tures, including glottic or subglottic edema, ulceration of
the vocal fold, vocal cord paralysis, tracheal stenosis, and
tracheomalacia, can affect the ability to create sound.
The tracheostomy tube itself can markedly obstruct the
trachea, causing poor airflow, increased airway resis-
tance, and increased work of breathing and can lead to
an inability to produce speech. Therefore, the ability
to create sound with a tracheostomy tube depends on
having an adequate supply of air reach the vocal cords
with a minimum of resistance. The diameter, length,
and type of tracheostomy tube play important roles in
avoiding complications and leading to greater success
in phonation. Changing one or all of these components
of the tracheostomy tube can lead to less airway resis-
tance and prevent respiratory distress and unsuccess-
ful phonation trials. Methods to restore phonation for a
patient with a tracheostomy will also vary, depending on
whether or not the patient is ventilator dependent, and,
if so, whether the patient is fully or partially dependent
on ventilator support. Methods of restoring phonation
for patients who are spontaneously breathing, are being
treated with intermittent mechanical ventilation, or are
fully ventilator dependent are summarized in Table 1.
Authors
Linda L. Morris is a tracheostomy specialist/consultant and an associate professor of clinical anesthesiology, Feinberg School of Medicine,
Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois. She is also a member of the board of directors for the Global Tracheostomy Collaborative, an
international group of specialists dedicated to research and quality outcomes of patients with tracheostomies.
Ana M. Bedon is a certified wound and ostomy care nurse with a background in critical care. She is currently working as the advanced
practice nurse for the Digestive Health Institute at Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Erik McIntosh is an acute care nurse practitioner on an inpatient internal medicine unit, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Andrea Whitmer is the acute care nurse practitioner for the intensivist program in the critical care unit at Elkhart General Hospital, Elkhart, Indiana.
Corresponding author: Linda L. Morris, PhD, APN, CCNS, FCCM (e-mail: lmorris@lindamorrisphd.com).
To purchase electronic or print reprints, contact the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, 101 Columbia, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656. Phone, (800) 899-1712 or
(949) 362-2050 (ext 532); fax, (949) 362-2049; e-mail, reprints@aacn.org.
Inability to speak can lead to depression,
disengagement, and nonadherence to
the therapeutic plan.
Morris12_15pgs.indd 14 11/9/15 4:46 PM
www.ccnonline.org
CriticalCareNurse
Vol 35, No. 6, DECEMBER 2015 15
Technique
Spontaneously breathing patient
Cuff defl ation
with digital
occlusion
Capping trials
Speaking
valve
Tracheostomy
button
Cuffl ess
fenestrated
tracheostomy
tube
Table 1 Methods of phonation
Cons
Bulkiness of the defl ated cuff
may cause marked airway
obstruction and resistance
Possible airway obstruction,
with mucus buildup around or
within the tube; therefore,
frequent monitoring is essential
See Table 2 for full list of
contraindications
If patients need positive
pressure ventilation and/or
need suctioning, button should
be replaced with a standard
tracheostomy tube
If tube does not fi t properly,
granulation tissue may grow
within the fenestration, making
removal a surgical problem
Pros
Used for assessment of the
patient’s ability to tolerate
capping or use of a speaking
valve
May be an option for patients
who may not be completely
alert and who may not tolerate
capping
Capping the tracheostomy tube
allows air to be inhaled and
exhaled through the natural
airway
Can be used with fully defl ated
cuff or cuffl ess tube
Fits within the stoma and does
not require tracheostomy ties
The tracheostomy button is a
stent to keep the stoma open
for a prescribed period of time
A fenestrated tracheostomy tube
allows air to travel through the
fenestration, which decreases
airway resistance, improves
airfl ow in the trachea, and
facilitates speech
Special considerations
Before the cuff is defl ated, subglottic
suctioning should be performed to
prevent aspiration of secretions from
above the cuff
Cuff must be completely defl ated
before digital occlusion
Thorough suctioning before and
after cuff defl ation can help prevent
aspiration, coughing, respiratory
distress, which may lead to an
unsuccessful digital occlusion trial
Ideally, heated aerosol via tracheostomy
collar should be used if supplemental
oxygen is needed
Capping should be attempted only with
a cuffl ess tube or tight-to-shaft (TTS)
tracheostomy tube of appropriate
size; external tube diameter should
be minimized as appropriate
Nasal cannula or face mask should
be used if supplemental oxygen is
needed while cap is in place
Thorough suctioning before and after
capping trials can help prevent
aspiration, coughing, respiratory
distress, which may lead to an
unsuccessful capping trial
Anxiety may be a factor in unsuc-
cessful capping trials: the unfamiliar
feeling of air moving through the
upper part of the airway may lead to
tachypnea
Ideally, heated aerosol via tracheostomy
collar should be used if supplemental
oxygen is needed
Cuff must be completely defl ated when
speaking valve is used
Thorough suctioning before cuff
defl ation can help prevent aspiration,
coughing, and respiratory distress,
which may lead to an unsuccessful
trial of the speaking valve
Not usually used in critical care but
may be an option for patients after
discharge
Requires an evaluation by a specialist
to fi t the tube to ensure that the
fenestration lies centrally within the
trachea; otherwise, granulation tissue
may grow into the fenestration
Secretions can also collect in the
fenestration, so the patient should
have optimal humidifi cation with
heated aerosol
Continued
Morris12_15pgs.indd 15 11/9/15 4:46 PM
16
CriticalCareNurse
Vol 35, No. 6, DECEMBER 2015 www.ccnonline.org
Table 1 Continued
Technique
Spontaneously breathing patient
Speak EZ
tracheal
cannula
Intermittently ventilator dependent
Intermittent
phonation
Ventilator dependent
Leak speech
Talking
tracheostomy
tubes
Cons
If patients need positive pres-
sure ventilation and/or need
suctioning, cannula should be
replaced with a standard
tracheostomy tube
These TTS tubes are single-
cannula tubes and may become
clogged with secretions
Patient must be coached to
speak on inspiration and may
require practice in timing
vocalization
Speech depends on having
patient or caregiver occlude
the port
Accumulation of secretions
above the cuff can clog the
air supply line, resulting in
no airfl ow for speech
Discomfort and drying of
mucous membranes can occur
with high airfl ows
Pros
Low profi le, does not require
tracheostomy ties
Fits only within the stoma,
thereby providing no tracheal
irritation
Because the cuff essentially
disappears on defl ation, the
TTS tube can be safely capped
When capped, the natural func-
tion of the glottis is restored,
and this return to natural func-
tion often allows patients to
remain free from the ventilator
Bivona TTS cuff can be infl ated
to deliver positive pressure
ventilation and then defl ated
for capping
Allows speech even though
patient cannot be liberated
from mechanical ventilation
Used for patients who require
continuous cuff infl ation
The air used for speech is
completely separate from
the air used for breathing
Does not require adjustment of
ventilator settings; tidal
volume is constant
Special considerations
Most often used for patients who
initially received a tracheostomy for
vocal cord paralysis or sleep apnea
Not commonly used in critical care, but
may be an option for patients after
discharge
Cuff must be completely defl ated when
providing intermittent phonation
Only sterile water should be used to
infl ate the Bivona TTS cuff; saline
should NOT be used because it dam-
ages the cuff; air should not be used
because it diffuses through the cuff,
causing cuff defl ation over time
Thorough suctioning before and
after cuff defl ation can help prevent
aspiration, coughing, and respira-
tory distress, which may lead to an
unsuccessful trial
Supplemental oxygen should be pro-
vided if needed, via nasal cannula
when the tube is capped
When cuff is infl ated, minimal leak
technique should be used to prevent
complications associated with the
high-pressure TTS cuffs
Leak speech can be used in a patient
who can tolerate cuff defl ation
Ventilator settings can be adjusted to
compensate for tidal volume loss and
to improve speech quality
Thorough suctioning before and
after cuff defl ation can help prevent
aspiration, coughing, respiratory
distress, which may lead to an
unsuccessful leak speech trial
Tube has a port attached to an air
source located above the cuff
Secretions may pool above cuff;
suctioning of secretions from air
port should be done as needed to
maintain patent airway and facilitate
good speech quality
Voice is adjusted by increasing airfl ow,
often 5-15 L/min, to achieve optimal
vocalization; humidifi ed airfl ow
should be provided to mitigate
against discomfort with higher
airfl ows
Continued
Morris12_15pgs.indd 16 11/9/15 4:46 PM
www.ccnonline.org
CriticalCareNurse
Vol 35, No. 6, DECEMBER 2015 17
Phonation in Patients Who Are
Breathing Spontaneously
For patients with tracheostomies who are breathing
spontaneously and do not require mechanical ventila-
tion, 3 primary methods of phonation can be used:
cuff defl ation with digital occlusion of the tracheos-
tomy tube; capping; and use of a speaking valve. Before
any method of phonation is started, the patient’s phys-
ical and mental condition should be assessed to deter-
mine which method would be the most appropriate.
The patient must be attempting to communicate ver-
bally and must have intact cognitive function.8 The
ability to follow instructions and communicate any
diffi culty with breathing or phonation is important to
success.11 With any of the following methods, nurses
should closely monitor patients for signs and symp-
toms of respiratory distress, including breathing dis-
comfort, increased respiratory rate, use of accessory
muscles, inadequate chest infl ation or defl ation, and
diffi culty with air exchange.9 Assessing the work of
breathing is a better method to determine tolerance of
cuff defl ation, capping, or use of a speaking valve than
is measuring oxygen saturation.
Cuff Defl ation. Generally, a patient must be able
to tolerate cuff defl ation or have a cuffl ess tube in order
to phonate via any of the 3 primary methods.8,11 Defl a-
tion of the cuff causes air ow to be redirected around
the tracheostomy tube and up through the upper part
of the airway and may require a period of adjustment
for the patient. Pooled secretions above the cuff and
movement of the tube during cuff defl ation can cause
airway irritation, coughing, obstruction of secretions,
increased work of breathing, and shortness of breath,
which may lead to cardiorespiratory deterioration.
Therefore, verifying that emergency equipment is avail-
able, including suction equipment and a manual resus-
citation bag, is important.
Cuff defl ation can be an anxiety-fi lled experience for
a patient if it causes respiratory discomfort and distress.
Therefore, it is essential to provide adequate assessments
as well as proper coaching and preparation of the patient
before, during, and after cuff defl ation. The following
steps can help facilitate a successful cuff defl ation trial:
First, explain to the patient the steps that go into cuff
defl ation and the feelings that might occur. Second, ensure
the correct position of the patient and the tracheostomy
Table 1 Continued
Technique
Ventilator dependent
Cuffed
fenestrated
tracheostomy
tube
Blom
tracheostomy
tube system
Cons
Risk for aspirating secretions is
high; tube may not be tolerated
because of small diameter of
fenestration, which may mark-
edly increase airway resistance
and result in diffi culty exhaling,
air trapping (auto-PEEP), and
decompensation
Tube is not tolerated in patients
with increased respiratory rate
and minute ventilation because
of anxiety and respiratory
distress due to uncomfortable
breathing during attempted
speech
System requires greater knowl-
edge and assessment skills
by staff in order to maximize
success and minimize patient’s
respiratory discomfort, anxiety,
and distress
Pros
A fenestrated tracheostomy tube
allows air to travel through the
fenestration above the cuff,
decreasing airway resistance,
improving airfl ow in the tra-
chea, and facilitating speech
The Blom tube has a fenestra-
tion just above the cuff to min-
imize risk of granulation tissue
Special considerations
Volumes may need to be adjusted on
the ventilator for exhaled volumes
lost through the upper part of the
airway
Fit requires an evaluation by a spe-
cialist to ensure that the fenestration
lies centrally within the trachea;
otherwise, granulation tissue may
grow into the fenestration
Secretions can also collect in the fen-
estration, so patient should receive
optimal humidifi cation with heated
aerosol
System uses a special speech cannula
with 2 valves; upon inhalation, the
ap valve opens, allowing air through
the tube; upon exhalation, the fl ap
valve closes and air moves through
the fenestration and through a bubble
valve
A special exhaled volume reservoir can
be used to minimize alarms indicat-
ing low exhaled volume
Abbreviation: PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure.
Morris12_15pgs.indd 17 11/9/15 4:46 PM
18
CriticalCareNurse
Vol 35, No. 6, DECEMBER 2015 www.ccnonline.org
Proper clearance of secretions will
prevent triggers of airway irritation
and cough, which can initiate
bronchospasm.
tube, with the head of the bed elevated to the best level
for breathing comfort and neutral position of the tra-
cheostomy tube to prevent airway irritation, coughing,
and obstruction.9 Third, explain to the patient the need
to suction the back of the throat to clear secretions that
may have pooled above the cuff. Of note, deep subglot-
tic suctioning will not always ensure complete removal
of secretions once the cuff is defl ated, and suctioning of
the mouth and the posterior part of the pharynx may
still be required. If the patient is able, have him or her
perform this step. Fourth, before the cuff is defl ated,
have the patient take a deep breath in to maximize air in
the lungs to promote a forceful cough if needed to clear
any secretions. Just after the patient takes a deep breath
in, and as he or she begins to exhale, completely defl ate
the cuff. After the cuff is defl ated, immediately suction
as needed through the tracheostomy tube and/or mouth
to clear the secretions that might have remained above
the cuff. While the cuff is defl ated, closely observe the
patient for any signs or symptoms of respiratory dis-
tress. Increase the fraction of inspired oxygen as needed;
cuff defl ation causes admixture of room air in patients
receiving oxygen therapy. Secretions and coughing also
may lower
oxygenation.
Continu-
ally reassure
the patient
through this
process to decrease anxiety. Proper clearance of secre-
tions is crucial to successful cuff defl ation and will pre-
vent triggers of airway irritation and cough, which can
initiate bronchospasm. A manual resuscitation bag
and suction devices should be at hand to stabilize the
patient’s condition if needed.
If cuff defl ation is not initially tolerated, despite
meticulous attention to proper procedure, another trial
with slow defl ation of the cuff, perhaps up to several
minutes, is recommended.12,13 If respiratory distress,
dyspnea, or shortness of breath occurs with cuff defl a-
tion, the cuff should be reinfl ated, and cuff defl ation
trials can be repeated at another time. Working side
by side with speech language pathologists and respi-
ratory therapists can ensure patients’ comfort, toler-
ability of cuff defl ation trials, and quality outcomes.11
After successful cuff defl ation, digital occlusion can be
attempted for vocalization.
Digital Occlusion. Digital occlusion of the tra-
cheostomy tube is used for patients who have a cuffl ess
tube or a cuffed tube with a fully defl ated cuff (Figure
1). When the cuff is infl ated, the only exit for air from
the lungs is out the tracheostomy tube. If the cuff is
infl ated and the tube is occluded, air cannot move in
or out of the lungs. Therefore, digital occlusion should
be performed only with the cuff completely defl ated. A
potential complication with a cuffed tube is the bulki-
ness of the defl ated cuff, which may cause an obstruc-
tion while the patient is attempting to breathe around
the tube.8 In this case, a smaller diameter tracheostomy
tube or a cuffl ess tube, if appropriate, can be used to
facilitate speech.7,8 After cuff defl ation, a gloved nger
of the caregiver or patient is placed over the opening of
the tube. This procedure will redirect air to the upper
part of the airway and allow the air to pass through
the vocal cords. Many patients lack the dexterity that
this method requires,12 but digital occlusion may be an
option for patients who may not be completely alert
and who may not tolerate capping. Before digital occlu-
sion, a patient’s ability to inhale and exhale around
the defl ated cuff must be assessed. If the patient has
any diffi culty, teaching him or her intermittent dig-
ital occlusion during the exhalation phase can facili-
tate speech.9 If a patient is unable to speak or exhale or
complains of shortness of breath or trouble breathing,
digital occlusion should be stopped.9
Capping. Occluding the opening of the tracheos-
tomy tube with a cap, plug, or cork is another means
of producing speech.8 The goal of capping is to prevent
Figure 1 Cuffed tube with defl ated cuff versus cuffl ess
tube. Note bulk of defl ated cuff on left, compared with
cuffl ess tube on right.
Reproduced from Morris,14 with the permission of Springer Publishing
Company, LLC, New York, New York.
Morris12_15pgs.indd 18 11/9/15 4:46 PM
www.ccnonline.org
CriticalCareNurse
Vol 35, No. 6, DECEMBER 2015 19
air from entering and exiting through the tracheostomy
itself; all the airfl ow is redirected around the tube and
up to the vocal cords. When a tracheostomy tube is
capped, the patient is not breathing through the tube
at all, but completely around the tube (Figure 2). This
method requires the ability to tolerate cuff defl ation and
necessitates maximizing airfl ow around the tube. With
2 exceptions, cuffed tracheostomy tubes with defl ated
cuffs should never be capped.8,13 The bulk of the defl ated
cuff on most tracheostomy tubes creates a great deal of
resistance around the tube, potentially interfering with
optimal ventilation. The only cuffed tracheostomy tubes
that can be safely capped when defl ated are a properly fi t
fenestrated tube or a tight-to-shaft (TTS) tracheostomy
tube (Figure 3). With the TTS tube, the defl ated cuff at-
tens completely against the shaft of the tube and mimics
a cuffl ess tracheostomy tube.8,13 The safety implications
of both types of tubes are discussed later in this article.
Ensuring that the tube is an appropriate size, one that
easily allows airfl ow around it and through the upper
part of the airway is important,8 although ease of air-
ow may not be obvious initially. Tubes that have a large
outer diameter should be exchanged for ones with a
smaller diameter to allow easy airfl ow around the tube.
The increased resistance caused by a large tracheostomy
tube in the airway or one with a bulky defl ated cuff can
cause anxiety and respiratory distress, which can lead
to respiratory compromise.9 One serious complication
of capping is obstruction, with mucus buildup around
or within the tube; therefore, frequent monitoring is
essential, especially during the initial capping trials.8
The strength of a patient’s cough and ability to clear the
airway of secretions should be assessed before capping
is used. A patient with a strong cough might not be able
to fully clear the airway of secretions, especially if the
secretions are thick and tenacious, because they may be
“hanging up” around the tube. Assessment of respiratory
rate, oxygen saturation, color, and breathing pattern
during a trial are necessary. If any signs of distress or
desaturation are noted, the cap should be immediately
removed and the patient returned to the humidifi ed tra-
cheostomy collar or mask. Because the patient is breath-
ing around the tube when it is capped, oxygen should
be provided as needed by nasal cannula or face mask.8,13
These potential complications reinforce the need to
adequately assess a patient’s cognitive status in order
for the nurse to detect respiratory distress quickly.
Speaking Valve. Use of a speaking valve (Figure 4)
is different than capping because the device is a 1-way
valve that allows air to enter into the tracheostomy tube
but prevents air from being exhaled through it.7,8 A
speaking valve can only be used by patients who are able
to tolerate total cuff defl ation, or ideally have a cuffl ess
tube. While using the valve, the patient inspires through
the tube but exhales around it (Figure 5).8 Most speaking
valves are fl ap valves that are placed over the opening to
the tracheostomy tube. The fl ap opens during inhalation
Figure 2 Airfl ow with cuffl ess tube, capped. Both inspi-
ration and expiration are around the outside of the tube.
Reproduced from Morris,8 with the permission of Springer Publishing
Company, LLC, New York, New York.
Inspiration
Vocal
cords
Vocal
cords
Expiration
Figure 3 Bivona tight-to-shaft (TTS) tracheostomy tube.
Note that defl ated cuff lies tight to the shaft of the tube,
essentially disappearing.
Photo courtesy of Smiths Medical, Norwell, Massachusetts.
Morris12_15pgs.indd 19 11/9/15 4:46 PM
20
CriticalCareNurse
Vol 35, No. 6, DECEMBER 2015 www.ccnonline.org
and closes during exhalation. Closure of the fl ap on
exhalation allows the exhaled air to be directed through
the vocal cords, the upper part of the airway, and out the
mouth and nose. Because of this path, any supplemental
oxygen that is required should be delivered via a humid-
ifi ed tracheostomy collar when a speaking valve is used.8
If the tube or cuff diameter creates a marked obstruc-
tion in the trachea, the patient will be unable to exhale
freely, and the inability to exhale completely can create
adverse effects such as air trapping, lung hyperinfl ation,
and respiratory distress. Speaking valves should never
be placed on a tube with an infl ated cuff because infl a-
tion of the cuff prevents exhalation, potentially causing
barotrauma and other possibly fatal complications.1,9 A
wide range of speaking valves is available, each with its
own level of resistance and potential to increase work of
breathing.15
Table 2 lists several contraindications8,9,16-18 to use of a
speaking valve. Patients with poor pulmonary reserve and
severe lung disease may not be able to completely inhale
and exhale, and hypercarbia can develop; use of a valve
may not be appropriate for these patients. Also, patients
who have an unstable hemodynamic status, received a
total laryngectomy, have an infl ated cuff, or have a foam-
cuffed tube are not candidates for a speaking valve.18
Patients with copious thick secretions or with obstruction
of the upper part of the airway should not use a speaking
valve.11 Speech language pathologists or respiratory thera-
pists can be resources for determining when a patient may
be ready for trials with a speaking valve. Maintaining
effective communication between various care providers
is important to optimize speaking valve trials.11
Monitoring Patients Who Have a Cap or
Speaking Valve. During the initiation of use of a cap
Figure 4 Shiley Phonate speaking valve with additional
oxygen port.
Copyright ©2013 Covidien. All rights reserved. Used with permission of
Covidien, Boulder, Colorado.
Figure 5 Air ow with cuffl ess tube and speaking valve.
Inspiration is through the tube, but expiration is around
the tube.
Reproduced from Morris,8 with the permission of Springer Publishing
Company, LLC, New York, New York.
Table 2 Contraindications to use of a speaking valve
Unstable medical status8,9
Requires signifi cant ventilator support9
Unstable hemodynamic status8
Unconsciousness18
Infl ated cuff8,9,18
Total laryngectomy8,9
Severe laryngeal or tracheal obstruction
Foam-cuffed (default-infl ated) tracheostomy tube8,9,18
Severe risk of aspiration8,18
Nonpatency of upper part of airway (above tracheostomy)
Upper airway stenosis with no voice
Craniofacial anomalies that prevent oral or pharyngeal airfl ow
Absence of swallow refl ex
Reactive airway disease, such as bronchospasm, requiring
frequent treatments
Paralysis of lips, tongue, and other muscles involved in
speech9
Unmanageable secretions that are copious, excessive, or
thick9
Morris12_15pgs.indd 20 11/9/15 4:46 PM
www.ccnonline.org
CriticalCareNurse
Vol 35, No. 6, DECEMBER 2015 21
or speaking valve, patients should be under close obser-
vation to detect signs or symptoms of respiratory dis-
tress. If respiratory distress or desaturation occurs, a
nurse should immediately remove the cap or valve, suc-
tion secretions as needed, and return the patient to use
of a high-humidity tracheostomy collar. The patient may
need to begin with short sessions of capping or using a
speaking valve (as short as 5 or 10 minutes), then gradu-
ally increase the duration, and progress toward continu-
ous use. However, overnight use of the Passy-Muir valve
is not recommended.8,18 Members of the health care team
should be aware of factors that can lead to a patient’s
inability to tolerate capping trials, such as inattention to
optimum positioning, accumulation of secretions, fail-
ure of the valve to open freely on inspiration, and/or
patient anxiety related to capping trials.
During use of a valve or a cap, promotion of effec-
tive coughing and mobility of secretions is important.
Some patients do not have an effective cough because of
neuromuscular disease or paralysis. With these patients,
optimal positioning such as elevating the head of bed are
important to maximize breathing comfort and respira-
tory muscle function. Nurses must be cognizant of any
clinical worsening in the patient’s overall status, includ-
ing during any capping periods. Any new indication of
respiratory distress should lead to immediate discontin-
uation of a capping trial. Proper humidifi cation with a
heated aerosol may be necessary to keep secretions thin-
ner and easier to cough out. Patients can be evaluated
for use of a smaller tube or decannulation when they can
tolerate continuous capping for at least 24 to 48 hours
and achieve an acceptable cough strength so that they
are able to cough out all their secretions.8,13
Alternative Methods of Phonation. Two other
methods of phonation in spontaneously breathing
patients may be used by long-term tracheostomy patients
in subacute care, home, or rehabilitation settings: the tra-
cheostomy button and the Speak EZ tracheal cannula.
Both of these devices eliminate the bulk of a tube within
the airway and maintain the patency of the stoma. Nei-
ther of these devices requires ties to secure it; therefore,
they both require custom fi tting to determine the exact
length of the stoma.
A tracheostomy button (Figure 6) is a device that
maintains the patency of the stoma in patients who may
require repeated tracheostomies or may need rehabili-
tation to improve overall strength and meet criteria for
decannulation. The tracheostomy button is a stent that
maintains patency of the stoma for a prescribed time,
after which the button can be removed, allowing closure
of the stoma. If frequent access to the airway is required
(eg, for suctioning), the button should be replaced with
a tracheostomy tube. The tracheostomy button consists
of 3 parts: the tracheal cannula, the closure plug, and
spacer rings (Figure 7) that are added to fi t the length
and width of the stoma exactly. When the closure plug is
placed into the cannula, the petals at the distal end splay
out to maintain secure position of the cannula within
the stoma. Removing the tracheostomy button requires
removing the closure plug fi rst, releasing the tension at
the distal end of the petals. Then the tracheal cannula
can be easily removed.
The Speak EZ tracheal cannula (Figure 8) is another
stoma maintenance device. This tracheal cannula has the
added feature of a built-in speaking valve on the proxi-
mal end. The cannula is made of soft silicone and can be
used for patients who have vocal cord paralysis or sleep
apnea or to maintain the stoma after removal of a tra-
cheostomy tube or T-tube (eg, the Montgomery T-tube).
Both the tracheostomy button and the Speak EZ tra-
cheal cannula may be options for spontaneously breathing
patients who wish to speak but cannot tolerate capping
because of obstruction or resistance to airfl ow. However,
Figure 6 Tracheostomy button in place. The button
provides a stent for the stoma with no obstruction within
the airway.
Image courtesy of Natus Medical Incorporated, Middleton, Wisconsin.
Morris12_15pgs.indd 21 11/17/15 10:07 AM
22
CriticalCareNurse
Vol 35, No. 6, DECEMBER 2015 www.ccnonline.org
if a patient requires positive pressure ventilation or fre-
quent suctioning, both the tracheostomy button and the
tracheal cannula should be removed and replaced with a
standard tracheostomy tube.
Phonation in Patients Who Require
Intermittent Mechanical Ventilation
When a patient requires intermittent mechanical ven-
tilation, an optimal time to begin phonation attempts is
when the patient is free from mechanical ventilation. One
way to accomplish this freedom is to completely defl ate
the cuff and use nger occlusion or a speaking valve for
phonation. Most often, however, a tube change to a TTS
tube is recommended to allow better airfl ow around
the tube. As discussed in a previous article,13 the cuff of
the TTS tube infl ates to seal the airway and allow the
patient to successfully return to mechanical ventilation,
but when defl ated, the cuff essentially disappears.8 With
the cuff defl ated, the TTS tracheostomy tube can also
be safely capped, allowing air to pass through the vocal
cords, producing speech. An added benefi t is that when
the tube is capped, the natural function of the glottis is
restored, and this return to natural function may allow
patients to remain free from mechanical ventilation.8
When a patient is returned to mechanical ventilation,
the cuff of the TTS tracheostomy tube should be infl ated
with sterile water, not physiological saline or air.1,19 Ster-
ile water will distribute pressure evenly and prevent loss of
cuff volume that occurs when the cuff is infl ated with air,
because air diffuses out of the cuff. Also, use of minimal
leak technique is important when the cuff of the TTS tube
is infl ated because the high-pressure cuff will create ele-
vated direct measurements of cuff pressure.8,13,19 Of note,
the TTS tracheostomy tube is a single-cannula tube. If a
patient has large amounts of thick secretions, he or she
may be at risk for obstruction. Therefore, frequent pul-
monary hygiene, with suctioning, methods to mobilize
secretions, proper humidifi cation, and coughing exercises,
are extremely important. These methods include use of a
heated aerosol, positioning the patient sitting up or with
the head of the bed elevated, optimal fl uids to keep secre-
tions thin, and suctioning as needed. If diffi culty insert-
ing a suction catheter or mucus plugging occur with an
TTS tube, changing to a tube with an inner cannula may
be advisable.
Phonation in Patients Who Are
Ventilator Dependent
Restoring speech in patients who are ventilator
dependent can be challenging. Approaches vary accord-
ing to whether or not a patient can tolerate cuff defl a-
tion. Ventilator-dependent patients who can tolerate cuff
defl ation can use leak speech for phonation; those who
cannot protect their airway will require approaches that
maintain cuff infl ation.12 The available devices include
talking tracheostomy tubes, cuffed fenestrated trache-
ostomy tubes, and the Blom tracheostomy tube system.
With all of these methods, manipulation of ventilator
parameters can facilitate speech in a patient who is
ventilator dependent.20
Figure 7 Olympic tracheostomy button, with closure
plug (top), cannula (middle), and spacers (bottom).
Image courtesy of Natus Medical Incorporated, Middleton, Wisconsin.
Figure 8 Speak EZ tracheal cannula with built-in
speaking valve.
Photo courtesy of Technical Products Inc of Georgia, Lawrenceville,
Georgia (www.tpi-ga.com).
Morris12_15pgs.indd 22 11/17/15 10:07 AM
www.ccnonline.org
CriticalCareNurse
Vol 35, No. 6, DECEMBER 2015 23
Leak Speech. Leak speech can be an effective aid
in communication for patients who are ventilator depen-
dent; however, it cannot be used in patients who cannot
tolerate cuff defl ation.20 Leak speech is appropriate only
for patients who can tolerate cuff defl ation or have a
cuffl ess tube. To provide leak speech, the cuff is defl ated
and the ventilator settings are adjusted to accommodate
the air leak that results. Tidal volume delivery can be
increased to compensate for the loss of volume during
inspiration through the upper part of the airway.20
Humans naturally speak on exhalation, but leak speech
is the opposite of normal speech: it occurs on inhalation.
The leak during the inspiratory phase allows for phona-
tion, so the patient must be coached to speak on inspira-
tion, as the breath is delivered.19 Leak speech generally
results in short phrases followed by long pauses, so
increasing the inspiratory time on the ventilator can
allow for more syllables per minute.20,21
Some patients have reported anxiety or discomfort
with the use of leak speech because of an unfamiliar
feeling of airfl ow through the upper part of the airway.
These patients can be taught to push down, hold their
breath, or tighten their throat to increase or decrease
the volume delivered to the lungs.22
A respiratory therapist can adjust the positive end-
expiratory pressure (PEEP) to improve the quality of
leak speech and allow phonation during the expiratory
phase.20,23 The exhaled air exits through the ventilator
circuit instead of the upper part of the airway if the PEEP
setting is zero.12 The addition of PEEP can direct exhaled
air to pass through the upper part of the airway so that
the patient can use 60% to 80% of the breathing cycle for
phonation.12 PEEP can also be added to improve voice
quality and comfort.20,23 At the end of a leak speech trial,
and before cuff reinfl ation, additional PEEP should be
turned off to prevent lung hyperinfl ation and related
adverse effects. Obtaining optimal voice quality is usu-
ally a matter of trial and error, so adjustments based on
appropriate evaluations by a health care provider can
limit or obviate interventions that can cause a patient
anxiety or respiratory distress and affect future trials.
Patients frequently become frustrated with this method
of speech, so practice and patience are essential.20
When the cuff is defl ated, supplementing leak speech
with the addition of a speaking valve can be benefi cial in
allowing exhaled air to pass through the upper part of the
airway instead of through the ventilator circuit.12 Figure 9
shows a patient using a Passy-Muir speaking valve within
the ventilator circuit. Egbers et al23 have reported success-
ful phonation with use of bilevel positive airway pressure
and a speaking valve. Some newer ventilator models have
speaking modes that can adjust for the change in airfl ow.8
A speaking valve can improve speech ow and volume
in addition to improving voice quality and intelligibility
of speech.20,23 Hoit et al21 reported that the most helpful
adjustment was increasing the inspiratory time.
Patients who use a speaking valve during mechanical
ventilation, like their spontaneously breathing counter-
parts, should be closely monitored. If exhalation is dif-
cult with this method, the patient will not be able to
phonate and may not be a good candidate for a speak-
ing valve.9 The valve should be removed immediately if
the patient experiences any breathing discomfort. The
patient should be assessed for evidence of air trapping, an
increased respiratory rate, use of accessory muscles, and
other indications of increased work of breathing.9 The
speaking valve should be removed for suctioning so that
secretions do not occlude the airway during exhalation.9
Talking Tracheostomy Tubes. The most chal-
lenging patients for restoration of speech are those
who are ventilator dependent and who cannot toler-
ate cuff defl ation. In these patients, one method to con-
sider for speech restoration is the talking tracheostomy
tube. A talking tracheostomy tube has an extra port that
Figure 9 Photo of Offi cer James Mullen who uses leak
speech with a ventilator. (He sustained a gunshot wound to
the spinal cord in 1996, resulting in complete paralysis at
the level of C1-C2.) Passy-Muir speaking valve is attached
within the ventilator circuit and the cuff is defl ated. Speech
occurs on inspiration as the breath is delivered.
Passy-Muir speaking
valve
Morris12_15pgs.indd 23 11/9/15 4:47 PM
24
CriticalCareNurse
Vol 35, No. 6, DECEMBER 2015 www.ccnonline.org
distributes airfl ow above the infl ated cuff (Figure 10).
When this port is attached to an airfl ow source, the air
ows through the tubing, and with occlusion of the port,
air is directed toward the vocal cords, thereby producing
phonation. Voice quality is adjusted by increasing air-
ow, usually from 5 to 15 L/min for optimal voice qual-
ity; variability depends on the individual patient’s needs.
Signifi cant increases in voice quality are detectable as air-
ow increases from 5 L/min to 15 L/min; but even with
this system, voice quality can be a whisper, at best.12,24 The
advantages of this method are that the air used for speech
is completely separate from the air used for breathing and
that it does not require manipulation of the ventilator set-
tings.9 Disadvantages of this method include the need for
the patient or a caregiver to occlude the port for speech;
accumulation of secretions above the cuff, which can clog
the air supply line; poor voice quality; and discomfort and
drying of mucous membranes with high airfl ows.8 Also,
the port might not be properly fi tted in the trachea and
may lead to ineffectiveness of the talking tracheostomy
tube. Patients also need time and practice to perfect the
use of this type of speech.
Cuffed Fenestrated Tracheostomy Tubes.
Another method to restore speech in patients who
require an infl ated cuff is use of a fenestrated trache-
ostomy tube. A fenestration is an opening on the dor-
sal side of the shaft of the tube; it is usually placed
one-third of the distance down the shaft. This opening
allows air to move through the tube and up through
the vocal cords.9 When the cuff on a fenestrated tube
is infl ated, inspiration and expiration occur primar-
ily through
the tube via
the venti-
lator, but a
small amount of air moves through the upper part of
the airway and past the vocal cords via the fenestra-
tion (Figure 11). As with leak speech, ventilator alarms
and settings must be adjusted to accommodate for the
exhaled volume lost through the upper part of
the airway.
An important consideration with the use of a fenes-
trated tracheostomy tube is that the fenestration must
t perfectly in the center of the trachea so that it does
not come in contact with the tracheal wall. Block-
age of the fenestration affects breathing, and granula-
tion tissue may form at the fenestration site, causing an
occlusion of the aperture and trauma on removal of the
tube. Because an off-the-shelf fenestrated tube might
not fi t properly, fenestrated tubes may require a custom
order. The anterior and posterior tracheal depths must
be measured and compared with the position of the fen-
estration. If these measurements do not match, a cus-
tom tube should be ordered.8,25 A simple assessment of
proper fi t can be done by removing the inner cannula
Figure 10 Illustration of airfl ow with talking tracheos-
tomy tube. Note that when the air port is occluded, air
is directed through the lumen above the cuff, and up to
the larynx.
Used with permission of Pat Thomas Medical Illustration, East Troy,
Wisconsin.
Air control port Larynx
Infl ated
cuff
Pilot balloon
to Lungs
Air line to
compressed
air source
Figure 11 Cuffed fenestrated tube with cuff infl ated.
Inspiration and expiration is through (but not around) the
tube. A small amount of air is directed to the vocal cords
on expiration.
Reproduced from Morris,8 with the permission of Springer Publishing
Company, LLC, New York, New York.
Fenestration must fi t perfectly in the
center of the trachea so that it does not
come in contact with the tracheal wall.
Morris12_15pgs.indd 24 11/9/15 4:47 PM
www.ccnonline.org
CriticalCareNurse
Vol 35, No. 6, DECEMBER 2015 25
and shining a light into the tube to observe for an open
versus a blocked fenestration.8,9 Proper placement of
the tube can also be ensured by using bronchoscopy.9 A
blockage of the fenestration affects breathing, and gran-
ulation tissue may form at the fenestration site, causing
occlusion of the aperture and trauma on removal of the
tube. Nurses should also be mindful that secretions can
occlude the fenestration and cause complications as well
as impede optimal phonation.
For the fenestrated tube to work properly, the fenes-
trated inner cannula should be in place when the patient
is attempting to phonate. This fenestrated inner cannula
is usually identifi ed in some way. For example, the 15-mm
connector of the fenestrated inner cannula of the Shiley
tracheostomy tube is colored green. However, if a patient
with a fenestrated tube requires suctioning, the nonfenes-
trated inner cannula must be used so that the suction
catheter does not get lodged within the fenestration.8
Blom Tracheostomy Tube System. The Blom tra-
cheostomy tube system (Figure 12) was designed for
ventilator-dependent patients with no cognitive impair-
ment who require continuous cuff infl ation and who
desire to speak. The system is a relatively new device
that has a fenestrated outer cannula lying just above the
cuff; the position is intended to prevent contact with the
tracheal mucosa. A total of 4 different types of inner can-
nulas can be used with the Blom tube: a standard inner
cannula, an inner cannula with a subglottic suctioning
port, a speech cannula, and a low-profi le inner cannula
that can be used for patients who do not require ventila-
tor support or who can tolerate cuff defl ation. These can-
nulas have a unique locking mechanism that can be used
only with the Blom tube system.26 When phonation is
desired with a Blom tube for a patient receiving mechan-
ical ventilation, the uniquely designed speech cannula
should be used. This cannula has 2 valves on its soft and
exible shaft. On inhalation, air is delivered to the lungs
through a fl ap valve that opens at the tip of the tube
(Figure 13). Upon exhalation, the fl ap valve closes, and
air passes through the fenestration and through a bub-
ble valve along the shaft of the speech cannula. Before
the speech cannula is inserted, the patient should be
assessed to ensure that he or she is breathing comfort-
ably and that the airway is clear of secretions. After the
speech cannula is placed, airfl ow through the upper part
of the airway should be assessed. If the patient has any
indications of respiratory distress, the speech cannula
should be immediately removed and replaced with the
standard cannula.26 Patients with thick or copious secre-
tions should not use this type of tube.26
Another unique feature of the Blom system is the
exhaled volume reservoir. This small bellows system
expands and traps air during the inspiratory phase and
then returns that air to the ventilator during the expi-
ratory phase so that the air can be measured as exhaled
volume.26,27 This reservoir should be used only while the
speech cannula is in place; it should be removed when
the speech cannula is not in use.26,27
Conclusion
Many different methods can be used to restore pho-
nation in patients who have a tracheostomy, and criti-
cal care nurses are the ideal members of the health care
team to facilitate a planned and systematic approach to
achieving phonation. Coordination of the interdisciplin-
ary team, which includes critical care nurses, respira-
tory therapists, speech pathologists, advanced practice
nurses, and physicians, is essential to the goal of voice
restoration. Early involvement of this team can improve
clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction by reducing
the time needed for phonation.28
Nurses who provide care for patients with tracheos-
tomies need not only focus on the tasks associated with
care but also acknowledge that patients with trache-
ostomies can struggle with loss of the voice. The team
must be sensitive to this loss and explore the anger and
frustration that can overwhelm patients.5 Nurses can
Figure 12 Blom tracheostomy tube system. From left
to right, outer cannula with fenestration above the cuff,
speech cannula, and inner cannula with subglottic
suctioning port.
Reprinted with permission of Pulmodyne, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Morris12_15pgs.indd 25 11/9/15 4:47 PM
facilitate a method of communication that is ideal for
the patient and can be consistent in its implementation
until the patient’s voice is restored.5 Patients need a
way to communicate their feelings as well as their phys-
ical and emotional needs, and in turn, they are grateful
to nurses who take the time to be patient, who are cre-
ative with methods of communication, and who pro-
vide reliable quality care.4 CCN
Financial Disclosures
Dr Morris is a coeditor/author of the 2010 edition of Tracheostomies: The
Complete Guide. She has been a consultant for Covidien and was the recipient
of research funding for a study of outcome evaluation of a structured program
of deep breathing and arm exercises for patients with new tracheostomies,
funded by an Eleanor Wood-Prince Grant: A Project of the Woman’s Board
of Northwestern Memorial Hospital.
References
1. Mitchell RB, Hussey HM, Setzen G, et al. Clinical consensus statement:
tracheostomy care. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;148(1):6-20.
2. Bove MJ, Afi MS. Tracheotomy procedure. In: Morris LL, Afi MS, eds.
Tracheostomies: The Complete Guide. New York, NY: Springer Publishing
Co; 2010:7-40.
3. Freeman S. Care of adult patients with a temporary tracheostomy. Nurs
Stand. 2011;26(2):49-56.
4. Carroll SM. Silent, slow lifeworld: the communication experience of
nonvocal ventilated patients. Qual Health Res. 2007;17(9):1165-1177.
5. Foster A. More than nothing: the lived experience of tracheostomy while
acutely ill. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2010;26(1):33-43.
6. Donnelly F, Wiechula R. The lived experience of a tracheostomy tube
change: a phenomenological study. J Clin Nurs. 2006;15(9):1115-1122.
7. Batty S. Communication, swallowing and feeding in the intensive care
unit patient. Nurs Crit Care. 2009;14(4):175-179.
8. Morris LL. Phonation with a tracheostomy. In: Morris LL, Afi MS, eds.
Tracheostomies: The Complete Guide. New York, NY: Springer Publishing
Co, 2010:181-209.
9. Grossbach I, Stranberg S, Chlan L. Promoting effective communication for
patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Nurse. 2011; 31(3): 46-60.
10. Ahmad M, Dargaud J, Morin A, Cotton F. Dynamic MRI of larynx and
vocal fold vibrations in normal phonation. J Voice. 2009;23(2):235-239.
11. Baumgartner CA, Bewyer E, Bruner D. Management of communication
and swallowing in intensive care: the role of the speech pathologist.
AACN Adv Crit Care. 2008;19(4):433-443.
12. Hess DR. Facilitating speech in the patient with a tracheostomy. Respir Care.
2005;50(4):519-525.
13. Morris LL, McIntosh E, Whitmer A. The importance of tracheostomy
progression in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Nurse. 2014;34(1):40-48.
14. Morris L. Downsizing and decannulation. In: Morris LL, Afi MS, eds.
Tracheostomies: The Complete Guide. New York, NY: Springer Publishing
Co; 2010:303-322.
15. Prigent H, Orlikowski D, Blumen MB, et al. Characteristics of tracheosto-
my phonation valves. Eur Respir J. 2006;27(5):992-996.
16. Kazandjian MS, Dikeman KJ. Communication options for tracheostomy
and ventilator-dependent patients. In: Myers EN, Johnson JT, eds. Trache-
ostomy: Airway Management, Communication, and Swallowing. San Diego,
CA: Plural Publishing; 2008:187-214.
26
CriticalCareNurse
Vol 35, No. 6, DECEMBER 2015 www.ccnonline.org
Now that you’ve read the article, create or contribute to an online discussion about
this topic using eLetters. Just visit www.ccnonline.org and select the article you want
to comment on. In the full-text or PDF view of the article, click “Responses” in the
middle column and then “Submit a response.”
d tmore
To learn more about patients with a tracheostomy, read “Comparison
of Respiratory Infections Before and After Percutaneous Tracheostomy”
by Sole et al in the American Journal of Critical Care, November
2014;23:e80-e87. Available at www.ajcconline.org.
Figure 13 Airfl ow with the Blom tracheostomy tube system. On inspiration, air fl ows through the speech cannula, expanding
the bubble valve to cover the fenestration and opening the fl ap valve at the tip. On expiration, the fl ap valve closes and air fl ows
around it, collapsing the bubble valve, allowing air to fl ow through the fenestration to the vocal cords.
Reprinted with permission of Pulmodyne, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Fenestration
Infl ated cuff
Open fl ap valve
Bubble valve expanded
Bubble valve collapsed
Flap valve closed
Air
Air to larynx
Inhalation
No air escapes past the cuff,
allowing all of the air to fi ll the lungs
Exhalation
Exhaled air fl ow is available for phonation
Air
Morris12_15pgs.indd 26 11/17/15 10:08 AM
www.ccnonline.org
CriticalCareNurse
Vol 35, No. 6, DECEMBER 2015 27
17. Woodnorth G. Assessing and managing medically fragile children:
tracheostomy and ventilator support. Lang Speech Hear Serv Schools.
2004,35(4):363-372.
18. Passy-Muir Inc. Passy-Muir Tracheostomy and Ventilator Speaking Valve
Resource Guide. Irvine, CA: Passy-Muir Inc; 2003.
19. Bivona TTS Adult Tracheostomy Tube [package insert]. Gary Indiana:
Smiths Medical; 2010.
20. MacBean N, Ward E, Murdoch B, et al. Optimizing speech production in
the ventilator-assisted individual following cervical spinal cord injury: a
preliminary investigation. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2009;44(3):382-393.
21. Hoit JD, Banzett RB, Lohmeier HL, HIxon TJ, Brown R. Clinical ventilator
adjustments that improve speech. Chest. 2003;124:1512-1521.
22. Tippett DC, Vogelman L. Communication, tracheostomy and ventilator-
dependency. In: Tippett DC, ed. Tracheostomy and Ventilator Dependenc y.
New York, NY: Thieme; 2000:93-142.
23. Egbers PH, Bultsma R, Middelkamp H, Boerma EC. Enabling speech in
ICU patients during mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2014;
40(7):1057-1058.
24. Leder SB. Verbal communication for the ventilator-dependent patient:
voice intensity with the Portex Talk tracheostomy tube. Laryngoscope.
1990;100(10, pt 1):1116-1121.
25. Morris LL. Fitting and changing a tracheostomy tube. In: Morris LL,
Afifi MS, eds. Tracheostomies: The Complete Guide. New York, NY:
Springer Publishing Co; 2010:115-158.
26. Kunduk M, Appel K, Tunc M, et al. Preliminary report of laryngeal
phonation during mechanical ventilation via a new cuffed tracheostomy
tube. Respir Care. 2010;55(12):1661-1670.
27. Leder SB, Pauloski BR, Rademaker AW, et al. Verbal communication for
the ventilator-dependent patient requiring an inflated tracheotomy tube
cuff: a prospective, multicenter study on the Blom tracheotomy tube with
speech inner cannula. Head Neck. 2013;35(4):505-510.
28. Freeman-Sanderson A, Togher L, Phipps P, Elkins M. A clinical audit of
the management of patients with a tracheostomy in an Australian tertiary
hospital intensive care unit: focus on speech-language pathology. Int J
Speech Lang Pathol. 2011;13(6):518-525.
Morris12_15pgs.indd 27 11/10/15 11:58 AM
CE Test Test ID C1562: Restoring Speech to Tracheostomy Patients
Learning objectives: 1. Identify the potential effects of the inability to communicate for a patient with a tracheostomy 2. Examine methods to restore phonation
for patients with a tracheostomy 3. Discuss the role of critical care nurses in restoring phonation
The American Association of Critical-Care Nurses is accredited as a provider of continuing nursing education by the American Nurses Credentialing Center’s Commission on Accreditation.
AACN has been approved as a provider of continuing education in nursing by the State Boards of Nursing of California (#01036) and Louisiana (#LSBN12). AACN programming meets the
standards for most other states requiring mandatory continuing education credit for relicensure.
Name Member #
Address
City State ZIP
Country Phone
E-mail
RN Lic. 1/St RN Lic. 2/St
Payment by: Visa M/C AMEX Discover Check
Card # Expiration Date
Signature
Program evaluation
Yes No
Objective 1 was met
Objective 2 was met
Objective 3 was met
Content was relevant to my
nursing practice
My expectations were met
This method of CNE is effective
for this content
The level of difficulty of this test was:
easy medium difficult
To complete this program,
it took me hours/minutes.
For faster processing,
take this CE test online
at www.ccnonline.org
or mail this entire page to:
AACN, 101 Columbia
Aliso Viejo, CA 92656.
Test ID: C1562 Form expires: December 1, 2018 Contact hours: 1.0 Pharma hours: 0.0 Fee: AACN members, $0; nonmembers, $10 Passing score: 9 correct (75%)
Synergy CERP Category A Test writer: Jodi Berndt, PhD, RN, CCRN, PCCN, CNE
Test answers: Mark only one box for your answer to each question. You may photocopy this form.
1. a
b
c
d
2. a
b
c
d
3. a
b
c
d
4. a
b
c
d
5. a
b
c
d
6. a
b
c
d
7. a
b
c
d
8. a
b
c
d
9. a
b
c
d
10. a
b
c
d
11. a
b
c
d
12. a
b
c
d
1. Which of the following are indications for tracheostomy placement?
a. Confirmed ventilator-associated pneumonia
b. Prolonged intubation with unsuccessful weaning
c. Prolonged need for vasoactive medications
d. Two or more self-extubations
2. Which of the following statements best describes the difference between capping
a tracheostomy and using a speaking valve?
a. For a cuffless tube, a speaking valve should not be used and only a cap is appropriate.
b. Capping a tracheostomy should never be done on a fenestrated tube while a speak-
ing valve can be used on any tube.
c. A speaking valve will allow air to enter into the tracheostomy tube while capping
will not.
d. There is no difference between capping a tube and using a speaking valve.
3. Which of the following devices should be used to provide supplemental oxygen
for a patient with a speaking valve?
a. Nasal cannula
b. High-flow nasal cannula
c. Venturi mask
d. Humidified tracheostomy collar
4. Which of the following statements do the authors suggest as rationale for avoid-
ing the use of a speaking valve on an inflated cuffed tube?
a. The cuffed tube will not allow for air to escape during exhalation, which could lead
to barotrauma.
b. The rate of inhalation of air through the speaking valve may damage the cuff.
c. The speaking valve can prevent the expectoration of mucus when the cuff is inflated.
d. The cuffed tube may prevent adequate inhalation of supplemental oxygen through
the speaking valve.
5. Which of the following do the authors suggest as contraindications for the use of
a speaking valve?
a. Previous failed attempt at using a speaking valve
b. Total laryngectomy
c. Supplemental oxygen requirements
d. Acute delirium
6. Advantages to using the tracheostomy button and the Speak EZ tracheal cannula
include which of the following?
a. Having the ability to custom fit the tracheostomy ties
b. Reducing the need for mechanical ventilation
c. Eliminating the bulk of the tube in the air way
d. Decreasing the supplemental oxygen requirement
7. Leak speech is most appropriate for which of the following patients?
a. Those who no longer require mechanical ventilation
b. Those who require mechanical ventilation at night
c. Those who can tolerate cuff deflation without signs of distress
d. Those who have thick secretions that can be expelled easily
8. Which of the following adjustments to a mechanical ventilator can improve leak
speech quality?
a. Decreasing tidal volume c. Decreasing inspiratory time
b. Increasing positive end-expiratory pressure d. Increasing oxygen
9. Which of the following statements describes the differences between normal speech
and leak speech?
a. Normal speech often is comprised of short phrases whereas leak speech generally
has long phrases with pauses.
b. here is no difference in quality between normal speech and leak speech.
c. The use of leak speech often requires supplemental oxygen while the oxygen demands do
not increase with normal speech.
d. Leak speech occurs during inhalation while normal speech occurs during exhalation.
10. The role of critical care nurses in restoring phonation in patients with
a tracheostomy includes which of the following?
a. Deferring the decisions regarding devices to a speech therapist
b. Monitoring for complications of respiratory distress exclusively
c. Reporting patient frustrations of inability to communicate to the health care provider
d. Serving as a member of the interdisciplinary health care team to assist in the coordination
of care
11. Proper steps involved in cuff deflation include which of the following?
a. Prior coaching and prepping of the patient, deep oropharyngeal suctioning, cuff
deflation, observe for symptoms of respiratory distress
b. Ask patient to take deep breath, cuff deflation, deep subglottic suctioning, increase
fraction of inspired oxygen
c. Slow cuff deflation over several minutes, increase fraction of inspired oxygen, reassure
patient, deep oropharyngeal suctioning
d. Deep subglottic suctioning, cuff deflation, ask patient to take a deep breath, observe
for respiratory distress
12. Considerations for safe capping of a tracheostomy tube include which of the
following?
a. Use of a standard cuffed tube with the cuff deflated
b. Use of a cuffless, tight-to-shaft, or fenestrated tube of appropriate size
c. Use of a Speak EZ tracheal cannula
d. Use of humidified tracheostomy collar
Morris12_15pgs.indd 28 11/9/15 4:47 PM
... 6 Verbal communication interventions for patients on mechanical ventilation and with a tracheostomy tube include above cuff vocalization, fenestrated tubes, a one-way valve in-line with the ventilator, and ventilator-adjusted leak speech. Earlier works outline the various verbal communication interventions, [7][8][9] and published studies since have examined one [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] or two 19 interventions with promising findings. In recent years, these communication methods have been systematically reviewed for their effectiveness, [20][21][22] feasibility, utility, and safety in the critical care setting, although many studies have low quality of evidence. ...
Article
There is developing evidence with regard to the feasibility, utility, and safety of verbal communication interventions with patients with tracheostomy who are invasively ventilated. In the past 2 decades , research efforts have focused on establishing evidence for communication interventions, including introducing an intentional leak into the ventilatory circuit such as with a fenestrated tube, leak speech or ventilator-adjusted leak speech, the use of a one-way valve in-line with the ventilator, and above cuff vocalization. This narrative review describes the benefits of a multidisciplinary approach, summarizes verbal communication interventions, and provides guidance on the indications , contraindications and considerations for patient selection. Our clinical procedures based on collective clinical experience are shared. A multidisciplinary team approach enables holistic management across acuity, ventilation, airway, communication, and swallowing parameters. This collaborative approach is recommended to maximize the chance of successful opportunities for patients to communicate safely and effectively.
... In the current study (CS), the researcher identified different patterns of communicating caring between nurses, nurse-patients/ families, nurse-unit managers and nurse colleagues. In a hermeneutic study, in other studies (Flinterud & Andershed, 2015;Morris et al., 2015;Pina et al., 2020;Shiber et al., 2016;Ull et al., 2020). The use of such devices, however, is predicated on the ability of the patient to be able to use them. ...
Article
Full-text available
Aim To explore the perceptions and experiences of nurses in communicating the care and caring in the intensive care unit (ICU). Design A focused ethnography. Methods This study was conducted in an Australian metropolitan hospital, in which data were gathered from multiple sources: participant observations, document reviews, interviews, and participant's additional written information - over six months (April-September, 2014). The data were analysed thematically. Findings This study addressed inclusively communicating care and caring to patients, families, nurses and other health professionals in ICU. The findings identified main themes concerning the changing patterns of communicating the care and caring in ICU, various patterns of communication used, enablers and barriers of communicating care and caring, and significant issues in communicating care and caring in ICU. Documentation of patients’ psychological and emotional needs, and nurses’ caring behaviours are crucial. These findings need further consideration from all stakeholders.
... La angustia psicológica relacionada con la comunicación deficiente debido a la ventilación mecánica (VM) en la UCI está bien documentada, lo que precede a la reducida capacidad para relacionarse con los demás, aumentando el riesgo de desarrollar un trastorno de estrés postraumático tras el alta de la UCI . De hecho, las personas despiertas con VM clasifican al habla como primera prioridad después de la respiración y la incomodidad física de la TQT (Morris et al., 2015). ...
Article
Full-text available
La enfermedad COVID-19 fue declarada pandemia por la Organización Mundial de la Salud. Su presentación más severa genera una condición que requiere tratamiento en unidades de cuidados intensivos, condición que al prolongarse en el tiempo requiere la implementación de una traqueostomía para facilitar la entrega de soporte ventilatorio invasivo. Si bien este dispositivo posee importantes ventajas que favorecen la recuperación y rehabilitación, también es cierto que genera diversas complicaciones en la comunicación de las personas, condición que se suma a los efectos propios del COVID-19 y la frecuente historia de intubación endotraqueal previa. El objetivo de este artículo es proveer orientaciones y herramientas clínicas para el tratamiento de la fonación para la comunicación en personas con traqueostomía y COVID-19. Se considera para ello las recomendaciones de la literatura existentes a la fecha, bajo un análisis pragmático y basado en nuestra experiencia de atender a más de 561 personas con esta condición. Se exponen las características de la comunicación en esta población, su tratamiento, consideraciones para el uso de técnicas específicas y orientaciones para la mejora de la calidad de vida. Siempre con un enfoque orientado al cuidado y protección de las/os usuarias/os y el equipo de salud, en particular fonoaudiólogas y fonoaudiólogos del país.
... Diversos estudios indican que la rehabilitación temprana de personas con VM puede acortar la duración de la hospitalización y mejorar su funcionalidad al alta (Pincherle et al., 2020;Watanabe et al., 2018). Según lo anterior, un número creciente de centros está promoviendo la rehabilitación de personas desde la etapa inicial en UCI (Burtin et al., 2009;Hwang et al., 2007), confirmando la seguridad y efectividad de la rehabilitación temprana (Morris et al., 2015); reduciendo la incidencia de delirium y disminuyendo la duración de VM (Watanabe et al., 2018). ...
Article
Full-text available
A la fecha de redacción de este artículo, más de 500 mil personas han sido afectadas por el virus SARS-CoV-2 en Chile, manifestando diferentes grados de la enfermedad COVID-19. Aquellas que sobrellevan condiciones más severas generan una condición que requiere soporte ventilatorio invasivo y tratamiento en unidades de cuidados intensivos, que de prolongarse en el tiempo deriva en la necesidad de una traqueostomía. A pesar de los beneficios que posee esta en la recuperación de personas con dificultades respiratorias, su implementación se asocia a alteraciones deglutorias que se suman a las generadas por COVID-19. Condición que supone un desafío para los/as fonoaudiólogos/as, quienes están expuestos/as al virus debido a su proceder en estructuras del tracto aerodigestivo y la realización de procedimientos potencialmente generadores de aerosol. El objetivo de este artículo es entregar orientaciones y herramientas clínicas para la intervención en la deglución de personas con traqueostomía y COVID-19. Estas emanan de un análisis pragmático de la evidencia disponible a la fecha, interpretadas bajo nuestra experiencia de atender a más de 561 personas con dicha condición. Se espera contribuir a la rehabilitación de la deglución en personas con COVID-19 y traqueostomía. Para ello se expone sobre las características de la deglución en esta población, su tratamiento, consideraciones para el uso de técnicas específicas, y orientaciones para la mejora de la calidad de vida mediante la mantención y/o recuperación de la funcionalidad deglutoria. Siempre bajo un esquema centrado en el cuidado y protección de las personas hospitalizadas y el equipo de salud.
... La habilidad de crear un sonido con la cánula de TQT depende de generar un flujo de aire adecuado que llegue a las cuerdas vocales con un mínimo de resistencia. El diámetro, longitud, y el tipo de tubo de traqueotomía juegan un papel importante y muchas veces es necesario cambiar la cánula para lograr una menor resistencia en la vía aérea superior, prevenir la dificultad respiratoria y conseguir un flujo de aire adecuado para lograr la producción de la voz 18 . ...
Article
Full-text available
1 Coordinador en la clínica de la Deglución vía aérea superior y rehabilitación deglutoria en pacientes neurológicos adultos. FLENI Sede Escobar, Buenos Aires, Argentina Coordinador de kinesiología aérea internación. FLENI sede Belgrano, CABA, Argentina. 2 Kinesióloga de planta, evaluación y tratamiento de disfagia orofaríngea. Hospital J. A. Fernández, CABA, Argentina. Kinesióloga de guardia. Hospital J. A. Posadas. El Palomar, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Resumen Los sistemas respiratorio, fonatorio y deglutorio actúan de manera coordinada y sincrónica permitiendo el accionar independiente de cada uno de ellos; la cánula de traqueostomía interrumpe la coordinación de este proceso. El motivo por el cual el paciente fue traqueostomizado, las patologías previas del mismo y los diferentes tipos de cánula de traqueostomía hace que no todos los pacientes traqueostomizados se comporten de la misma manera, lo que nos lleva a organizar la rehabilitación desde diferentes puntos de vista: el estructural (cánula de traqueostomía) y el clínico (disfunción en la encrucijada aerodigestiva). Se realizó una revisión narrativa, con el objetivo de conocer la evidencia disponible de las complicaciones por el uso prolongado de la cánula de traqueostomía sobre la función de la vía aérea superior y su posterior rehabilitación. Es considerado de importancia comenzar la rehabilitación de la deglución de manera precoz, siempre que sea posible, para no perder la función deglutoria. Abstract The respiratory, phonatory and deglutitive systems function in a coordinated and synchronized manner, allowing each one of them to operate independently. The tracheostomy cannula interrupts the coordination of this process. Not all tracheostomized patients behave in the same way, it depends on the reason for which they were tracheostomized, their previous diseases and the different types of tra-cheostomy cannulas, that is why we have to plan their rehabilitation according to different points of view: the structural (tracheostomy cannula) and the clinical (aerodigestive junction dysfunction). A narrative review was carried out for the purpose of studying available evidence about complications in the upper airway caused by prolonged use of tracheostomy cannula, and subsequent rehabilitation. It is important to begin the rehabilitation of deglutition as soon as possible so as not to lose the deglutitive function.
Article
Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of hospital-wide implementation of an above-cuff vocalization (ACV) protocol using ACV-capable tracheostomy tubes and its impact on patient speech in four intensive care unit (ICU) patient populations. Method This research was an observational pre–post study that was conducted over a 26-month period and included 323 critically ill adult ICU patients who underwent tracheostomy in a 365-bed academic tertiary care hospital. ACV was assessed using a protocol developed by a multidisciplinary team. Presence of speech was defined as at least one comprehensible word spoken during a speech-language pathologist evaluation. Results Median time-to-speech was 13 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 8–20 days) before the intervention, compared to 9 days (IQR: 6–16 days) after the intervention ( p = .0017). In the pre-intervention group, 101 out of 167 (60.5%) patients achieved speech within 60 days, compared to 83 out of 133 (62.4%) patients in the post-intervention group ( p = .12). Of the 83 patients who achieved speech in the post-intervention group, 24 (28.9%) did so via ACV, with the remainder using a speaking valve or digital occlusion. Of those 24 patients, seven did not progress to using a speaking valve within the follow-up period. The median number of speech days gained by using ACV was 8 (IQR: 5–18 days). ACV was successful in facilitating speech in 24 out of 29 (82.8%) patients trialed, with no major complications. Conclusions Routine implementation of ACV after tracheostomy is feasible, safe, and associated with earlier speech in a diverse population of critically ill patients. ACV is an important method to facilitate communication in patients requiring mechanical ventilation with tracheostomy cuff inflation.
Article
Rationale: The standardization, individualization, and rationalization of intensive care and treatment for severe patients have improved. However, the combination of corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and cerebral infarction presents new challenges beyond routine nursing care. Patient concerns and diagnoses: This paper examines the rehabilitation nursing of patients with both COVID-19 and cerebral infarction as an example. It is necessary to develop a nursing plan for COVID-19 patients and implement early rehabilitation nursing for cerebral infarction patients. Interventions: Timely rehabilitation nursing intervention is essential to enhance treatment outcomes and promote patient rehabilitation. After 20 days of rehabilitation nursing treatment, patients showed significant improvement in visual analogue scale score, drinking test, and upper and lower limb muscle strength. Outcomes: Treatment outcomes for complications, motor function, and daily activities also improved significantly. Lessons: Critical care and rehabilitation specialist care play a positive role in ensuring patient safety and improving their quality of life by adapting measures to local conditions and the timing of care.
Article
Full-text available
Objective The benefits of tracheostomy are well documented and include improved comfort and a reduction in sedative requirements that may facilitate more rapid ventilation weaning. A stable airway established with tracheostomy allows pulmonary toilet that may help in addressing aspiration. It is postulated that it may also increase translargyngeal airflow and allow phonation. We hypothesized that taper‐shaped cuffed tracheostomy tubes have less bulk upon cuff deflation, and on this basis, gas flow past the deflated tapered cuff is better than non‐tapered barrel cuffs and equal to gas flow in equivalent‐sized fenestrated versions. Methods This comparative bench study measured exhaled gas flow of Shiley™ Flexible taper‐cuffed tracheostomy and Fenestrated Shiley™ FEN tubes of equivalent sizes. Three sizes of Shiley™ tracheostomy tubes were used in printed 3D model tracheas, Jackson sizes 4, 6, and 10 (6.5, 7.5, and 10 mm ISO sizes). A standard ventilator provided tidal volumes to mechanical lungs. Because expiratory volume was the focus, the mechanical lungs exhaled through the model trachea and only the air exiting the model trachea, representing exhalation, was measured. Results Across three sizes, the Shiley™ Flexible tracheostomy tube allowed significantly more translaryngeal airflow compared to the tracheostomy tube with fenestrations. Conclusion This bench study showed significantly improved air flow past the cuff compared to fenestrated tubes. Improved airflow may help the phonation ability of patients. Clinical studies are required to elucidate use of this cuff design to allow phonation in patients with a tracheostomy. Level of evidence: NA.
Article
Background: Inability to communicate in a manner that can be understood causes extreme distress for people requiring an artificial airway and has implications for care quality and patient safety. Options for aided communication include non-vocal, speech-generating, and voice-enabling aids. Objectives: To assess effectiveness of communication aids for people requiring an artificial airway (endotracheal or tracheostomy tube), defined as the proportion of people able to: use a non-vocal communication aid to communicate at least one symptom, need, or preference; or use a voice-enabling communication aid to phonate to produce at least one intelligible word. To assess time to communication/phonation; perceptions of communication; communication quality/success; quality of life; psychological distress; length of stay and costs; and adverse events. Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Library (Wiley version), MEDLINE (OvidSP), Embase (OvidSP), three other databases, and grey literature from inception to 30 July 2020. Selection criteria: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, cluster-RCTs, controlled non-randomised parallel group, and before-after studies evaluating communication aids used in adults with an artificial airway. Data collection and analysis: We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane. Two review authors independently performed data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. Main results: We included 11 studies (1931 participants) conducted in intensive care units (ICUs). Eight evaluated non-vocal communication aids and three voice-enabling aids. Usual care was the comparator for all. For six studies, this comprised no aid; usual care in the remaining five studies comprised use of various communication aids. Overall, our confidence in results regarding effectiveness of communication interventions was very low due to imprecision, measurement heterogeneity, inconsistency in results, and most studies at high or unclear risk of bias across multiple domains. No non-vocal aid studies reported our primary outcome. We are uncertain of the effects of early use of a voice-enabling aid compared to routine use on ability to phonate at least one intelligible word (risk ratio (RR) 3.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18 to 50.08; 2 studies; very low-certainty evidence). Compared to usual care without aids, we are uncertain about effects of a non-vocal aid (communication board) on patient satisfaction (standardised mean difference (SMD) 2.92, 95% CI 1.52 to 4.33; 4 studies; very low-certainty evidence). No studies of non-vocal aids reported quality of life. Low-certainty evidence from two studies suggests early use of a voice-enabling aid may have no effect on quality of life (MD 2.27, 95% CI -7.21 to 11.75). Conceptual differences in measures of psychological distress precluded data pooling; however, intervention arm participants reported less distress suggesting there might be benefit, but our certainty in the evidence is very low. Low-certainty evidence suggest voice-enabling aids have little or no effect on ICU length of stay; we were unable to determine effects of non-vocal aids. Three studies reported different adverse events (physical restraint use, bleeding following tracheostomy, and respiratory parameters indicating respiratory decompensation). Adverse event rates were similar between arms in all three studies. However, uncertainty remains as to any harm associated with communication aids. Authors' conclusions: Due to a lack of high-quality studies, imprecision, inconsistency of results, and measurement heterogeneity, the evidence provides insufficient information to guide practice as to which communication aid is more appropriate and when to use them. Understanding effectiveness of communication aids would benefit from development of a core outcome measurement set.
Article
Full-text available
A plan to progress a tracheostomy toward decannulation should be initiated unless the tracheostomy has been placed for irreversible conditions. In most cases, tracheostomy progression can begin once a patient is free from ventilator dependence. Progression often begins with cuff deflation, which frequently results in the patient's ability to phonate. A systematic approach to tracheostomy progression involves assessing (1) hemodynamic stability, (2) whether the patient has been free from ventilator support for at least 24 hours, (3) swallowing, cough strength, and aspiration risk, (4) management of secretions, and (5) toleration of cuff deflation, followed by (6) changing to a cuffless tube, (7) capping trials, (8) functional decannulation trials, (9) measuring cough strength, and (10) decannulation. Critical care nurses can facilitate the process and avoid unnecessary delays and complications.
Article
Full-text available
Objective This clinical consensus statement (CCS) aims to improve care for pediatric and adult patients with a tracheostomy tube. Approaches to tracheostomy care are currently inconsistent among clinicians and between different institutions. The goal is to reduce variations in practice when managing patients with a tracheostomy to minimize complications.MethodsA formal literature search was conducted to identify evidence gaps and refine the scope of this consensus statement. The modified Delphi method was used to refine expert opinion and facilitate a consensus position. Panel members were asked to complete 2 scale-based surveys addressing different aspects of pediatric and adult tracheostomy care. Each survey was followed by a conference call during which results were presented and statements discussed.ResultsThe panel achieved consensus on 77 statements; another 39 were dropped because of lack of consensus. Consensus was reached on statements that address initial tracheostomy tube change, management of emergencies and complications, prerequisites for decannulation, management of tube cuffs and communication devices, and specific patient and caregiver education needs.Conclusion The consensus panel agreed on statements that address the continuum of care, from initial tube management to complications in children and adults with a tracheostomy. The panel also highlighted areas where consensus could not be reached and where more research is needed. This consensus statement should be used by physicians, nurses, and other stakeholders caring for patients with a tracheostomy.
Article
Full-text available
To study the safety, efficacy, patient tolerance, and patient satisfaction of the Blom Tracheostomy Tube and Speech Cannula (Pulmodyne, Indianapolis, Indiana), a new device that allows the patient to speak while the tracheostomy tube cuff is fully inflated. With 10 tracheostomized mechanically ventilated patients we recorded ventilator settings and physiologic variables at baseline with patient's usual tracheostomy tube, then with the Blom Tracheostomy Tube and the Blom standard (non-speech) cannula, and then during three 30-min trials of the Blom Speech Cannula. During the Blom Speech Cannula trials we assessed the subjects' success in phonation (eg, sentence length and volume). Nine of the 10 subjects achieved sustained audible phonation and were very satisfied with the device. The Blom Speech Cannula appears to be safe, effective, and well tolerated in tracheostomized mechanically ventilated patients while maintaining full cuff inflation.
Article
The insertion of a temporary tracheostomy is a common procedure in the critical care environment. This article aims to explore the evidence relating to the nursing care required for a patient with a temporary tracheostomy in a critical care or acute ward setting. The article focuses on the insertion of a tracheostomy as a planned intervention to improve or enable patient recovery, rather than an emergency procedure for airway obstruction. The procedure is not without risk and aftercare is vital to ensure the patient remains safe and the procedure aids recovery and promotes comfort.
Article
Over the past decade, there has been an increase in premature births. Children born prematurely often present with complex medical conditions; some require a tracheostomy. Although many children with tracheostomies require assistance to achieve effective communication, speech-language pathologists may have limited information with respect to the medical issues and communication needs of this population. The purpose of this article is twofold. First, a review of basic information on tracheostomy and ventilatory support in the pediatric population is provided. Second, information on the assessment of communication skills and intervention specific to voice for the child with a tracheostomy is detailed. Two case studies are presented. The case studies illustrate the diversity and medical complexity common to this population and provide practical information for the clinical working with a child with a tracheostomy.
Article
The purpose of this study was to present our findings on the impact of the Blom tracheotomy tube with speech inner cannula on voice production abilities and speech intelligibility scores of ventilator-dependent patients requiring a fully inflated tracheotomy tube cuff. Prospective single group case-series design permitted consecutive accrual of 23 adult inpatients from acute care and rehabilitation settings. Maximum ambient room noise, voice intensity, phonation duration of vowel /a/, and speech intelligibility scores were determined over 3 sessions. All participants achieved audible voicing with the Blom tracheotomy tube. Voice intensity was significantly greater than ambient room noise by >10 dB SPL (p = .003). Speech intelligibility scores improved significantly from 80% to 85% (p = .03). Phonation duration averaged from 3.30 to 3.45 seconds. There were no significant changes in oxygen saturation (p > .05), and no significant complications occurred. The Blom tracheotomy tube with speech inner cannula permitted individuals requiring mechanical ventilation with a fully inflated tracheotomy tube cuff to produce excellent speech intelligibility for verbal communication. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2013
Article
The insertion of a temporary tracheostomy is a common procedure in the critical care environment. This article aims to explore the evidence relating to the nursing care required for a patient with a temporary tracheostomy in a critical care or acute ward setting. The article focuses on the insertion of a tracheostomy as a planned intervention to improve or enable patient recovery, rather than an emergency procedure for airway obstruction. The procedure is not without risk and aftercare is vital to ensure the patient remains safe and the procedure aids recovery and promotes comfort.
Article
Speech-language pathologists manage communication and swallowing disorders, both of which can occur in patients after tracheostomy insertion. An audit on the incidence and timing of speech-language pathology intervention for adults with tracheostomies has not previously been published. Data were retrospectively extracted from the medical records of all patients who were tracheostomized at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, NSW, Australia, from October 2007 for 1 year. Extracted data included diagnosis, date and type of tracheostomy, time to speech-language pathologist involvement, time to phonation, and time to oral intake. Among the 140 patients (mean age 58 years, range 16-85), diagnoses were neurological (32%), head and neck (25%), cardiothoracic (24%), respiratory (6%), and other (13%). Speech-language pathology was involved with 78% of patients, with initial assessment on average 14 days after tracheostomy insertion (14 days to 166 days). Median time from tracheostomy insertion to phonation was 12 days (range 1-103). Median time from tracheostomy insertion to oral intake was 15 days (range 1-142). Only 20% of patients returned to verbal communication within 1 week after tracheostomy insertion. Further research into access to and timing of speech-language pathology intervention in the critical care setting is warranted.