Content uploaded by Krishnamurthi Periyasamy
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Krishnamurthi Periyasamy on Mar 08, 2016
Content may be subject to copyright.
Available online at www.pelagiaresearchlibrary.com
Pelagia Research Library
Advances in Applied Science Research, 2016, 7(2):183-187
ISSN: 0976-8610
CODEN (USA): AASRFC
183
Pelagia Research Library
Acoustical studies of binary (butanol+benzene), ternary (butanol+methyl
benzoate+benzene) mixtures at 303 K
H. B. Ramaliggam, P. Krishnamurthi and A. Muthukkaruppaiya
Government Arts College, Udumalpet, Tamilnadu, India
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
ABSTRACT
The ultrasonic measurements like ultrasonic velocity, density, and viscosity of the ternary system butanol with
methyl benzoate in benzene systems have been measured the whole range of mole fraction at 303K. From the
measured values evaluate ultrasonic parameter such as adiabatic compressibility (β), free length (L
f
), free volume
(V
f
) using standard relations also predict the excess parameter. The ultrasonic measurements, acoustical parameter
and related excess parameter give the results of the molecular interaction between liquids. These values indicate
the specific interaction of the liquid mixtures. The presence of strong dipole- dipole- type interaction was confirmed
in theses system.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
INTRODUCTION
The ultrasonic studies are important to understand the nature molecular interactions exist in liquid mixtures [1-3].
The molecular interactions of the liquids and liquid mixtures has been investigated through the ultrasonic
measurements and related acoustical parameter. Ultrasonic velocity is related to inter molecular forces between the
atoms or the molecules [3-5]. The study of molecular interaction of butanol with methyl benzoate in benzene
mixtures has been important due to butanol as one of the components. A methyl benzoate highly polar liquid seems
to be better among the industrial and chemical process [5-6]. The association of methyl benzoate investigated using
various methods [6-10]. Our research group investigated nature of interactions are identified using various
techniques including refractive index, FT-IR, dielectric measurements [11-16]. Benzene is a non-polar being
aromatic and methyl benzoate also aromatic with carbonyl group act as electron donors. Though the carbonyl group
is comparatively a strong proton - acceptor, the oxygen atoms in the carbonyl group can also play the important role
for proton acceptor; hence butanol with its hydroxyl groups can interact with carbonyl components. The present
work reports the results of ultrasonic measurements and related ultrasonic parameters at 303K in the ternary system
of butanol + methyl benzoate +benzene.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
AR grade butanol , methyl benzoate and benzene liquids were used. It is purified by standard procedure
with purity
>99%. The ultrasonic velocities of the liquid mixtures were measured using a single crystal ultrasonic
interferometer (Mittal type, Model F-80) operated at 2 MHz The temperature of the cell was controlled by
circulating water through the liquid cell from thermostatically controlled constant temperature water bath. The
densities of pure liquids and liquid mixtures were measured by using a 5 ml specific gravity bottle with an accuracy
of ± 0.5%. The viscosities were measured using Ostwald’s viscometer with an accuracy ± 0.5%. The measured
valued of ultrasonic velocity, density and viscosity and related ultrasonic parameter at 303 K for the pure liquids
are shown in table 1.
H. B. Ramaliggam et al Adv. Appl. Sci. Res., 2016, 7(2):183-187
_____________________________________________________________________________
184
Pelagia Research Library
Table 1 The experimental values of pure liquids at 303 K
Chemical Name Ultrasonic velocity (u)
m/s Density (ρ)
Kg/m
3
Viscosity (η)
Nsm
-2
Butanol 1233 796 0.563
Methyl benzoate 1404 1030 0.175
Benzene 1276 870 2.07
THEORY AND CALCULATIONS
From the experimental values, the acoustical parameter such as adiabatic compressibility (β), free length (L
f
), and
free volume (V
f
), and their excess parameter have been evaluated using the following standard relations. The
relations discussed given below
Adiabatic compressibility
Adiabatic compressibility has been calculated from the speed of sound (u) and density () of the medium using the
relation as =
(1)
Intermolecular free length
Intermolecular free length (L
f
) has been evaluated using the standard relation as:
=
/
(2)
Where K
T
is a temperature dependent constant known as Jacobson’s constant.
Free volume (V
f
)
The relation for free volume in terms of ultrasonic velocity (u) and viscosity () of the liquid as:
=
/
(3)
Here M
eff
is the effective molecular weight
=∑
which m
i
and x
i
are the molecular weight and mole
fraction of the individual components respectively. K is a temperature independent constant which is equal to
4.28x10
9
for all liquids.
Excess parameter
The excess parameter like ultrasonic velocity (u
E
), adiabatic compressibility (β
E
), intermolecular free length (L
fE
)
and free volume (V
E
) evaluated using relations as
A
E
= A
Exp
- A
ideal
(4)
A
Ideal
=A
1
X
1
+ A
2
X
2
(5)
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Ultrasonic velocity (u), density () and viscosity () for the binary (Butanol with benzene) and ternary (Butanol with
methyl benzoate in benzene) mixtures at 301 K are shown in table 2 to 3 also present ultrasonic parameter like
adiabatic compressibility (β), intermolecular free length (L
f
) and free volume (V
f
) and related excess parameter
(ultrasonic velocity (u
E
), adiabatic compressibility (β
E
), intermolecular free length (L
fE
) and free volume (V
E
) . The
variations of ultrasonic velocity, adiabatic compressibility, inter molecular free length and free volume with mole
fractions of butanol for the binary and ternary mixtures shown in figure 1 to 4. The excess parameters like ultrasonic
velocity, adiabatic compressibility, inter molecular free length and free volume plotted against mole fraction butanol
given in figure 5 to 8.
In the case of binary (butanol with benzene) mixtures ultrasonic velocity and density decreases with increasing
concentration of butanol also ultrasonic velocity and density decreases with increasing concentration of butanol for
the ternary mixtures (butanol + methyl benzoate + benzene). Reverse trend observed in the variation of viscosity
with the concentration of butanol both binary and ternary mixtures.
Further the adiabatic compressibility, free length shows reverse trend both the binary and ternary mixtures to the
ultrasonic velocity as shown in figures 1 to 3. The variation of adiabatic compressibility due to change in ultrasonic
velocity also interacting molecules bond broken due to the releasing dipoles of inter molecular interactions. In view
of strong force of attraction between the molecules there will be an increase in cohesive force and the phenomenon
H. B. Ramaliggam et al Adv. Appl. Sci. Res., 2016, 7(2):183-187
_____________________________________________________________________________
185
Pelagia Research Library
of structural changes takes place due to the existence of electrostatic field. Thus structural rearrangement of
molecules results in change adiabatic compressibility thereby performance increasingly intermolecular interactions.
Many researchers report the similar results in some binary and liquid mixtures [7].
Table 2 Variation of experimental values, related acoustical parameter and excess values with the concentration of butanol for the binary
and ternary mixtures at 303 K
X
1
u ρ
β V
f
L
f
u
E
β
E
V
f
E
L
f
E
Butanol+ benzene
0.1 1275 863 0.697 7.13 6.05 66.26 6 -0.08 -0.001 -0.03
0.2 1274 857 0.851 7.19 4.45 81.58 11 -0.17 -0.006 -0.06
0.3 1274 850 1.026 7.25 3.33 99.18 18 -0.27 -0.010 -0.09
0.4 1273 844 1.224 7.31 2.54 119.30 23 -0.36 -0.013 -0.13
0.5 1272 837 1.445 7.38 1.96 142.19 29 -0.44 -0.016 -0.16
0.6 1271 831 1.692 7.45 1.53 168.07 35 -0.52 -0.019 -0.19
0.7 1270 824 1.965 7.52 1.21 197.02 40 -0.60 -0.021 -0.22
0.8 1270 818 2.266 7.58 0.97 229.02 47 -0.70 -0.024 -0.26
0.9 1269 811 2.597 7.66 0.78 265.24 52 -0.77 -0.026 -0.28
Butanol+ methyl benzoate + benzene
0.05 0.45 1337 970 0.393 5.77 5.26 30.235 4.54 -0.33 -0.02
0.10 0.40 1334 966 0.453 5.82 4.07 35.153 5.59 -0.36 -0.02
0.15 0.35 1332 962 0.518 5.86 3.19 40.473 6.66 -0.39 -0.03
0.20 0.3 1330 958 0.590 5.9 2.51 46.413 7.72 -0.42 -0.03
0.25 0.25 1328 954 0.668 5.94 1.99 52.906 8.78 -0.45 -0.03
0.30 0.20 1326 950 0.753 5.99 1.59 60.14 9.85 -0.49 -0.03
0.35 0.15 1323 946 0.844 6.04 1.27 67.97 10.92 -0.51 -0.04
0.40 0.10 1321 942 0.943 6.08 1.02 76.446 12.00 -0.55 -0.04
0.45 0.05 1319 938 1.049 6.13 0.83 85.738 13.07 -0.57 -0.04
. .
Figure 1 plots u Vs X
2
Figure 2 plots β Vs X
2
The ultrasonic velocity (u m/s), density ( ρ gm/cm
3
) , viscosity (!x10
-3
Nsm
-2
), adiabatic compressibility (β 10
10
kg
-1
ms
-2
), free volume (V
f
10
3
m
3
), and inter molecular free length (L
f
10
-10
m ) and also excess values of u
E
, β
E
V
fE
and L
fE
for the butanol with benzene , butanol with methyl benzoate in benzene systems.
From tables 2, it was observed that as the concentration of butanol increases, free volume decreases due to the
closed packing of molecules inside the cavity. These behaviors indicate highly associative nature between the
components of liquid mixture. The magnitude of the ultrasonic parameter indicate solute – solvent interaction
(butanol – benzene) smaller than the dipole – dipole (butanol – methyl benzoate). But it is essential to discuss about
the excess parameters rather than the real values. They can give an idea about the nature of association or other type
of interactions. The variations of excess parameters versus mole fraction of butanol have been shown in figure 5 to
8. The sign of u
E,
β
E
,
V
fE
and L
fE
indicate weaker type (dipole- induced dipole ) f interactions occurs in the binary
mixtures and strong type (dipole – dipole) interactions occurs in the ternary mixtures. Many investigations
suggested that the negative excess compressibility has been due to closed packed molecules and positive excess
values are due to weak interaction between the unlike molecules. Similar reports were reported by many authors
[14].
1250
1300
1350
0 0.5 1
u
X2
Benzene Methyl benzoate
5
6
7
8
0 0.5 1
β
X2
Benzene Methyl benzoate
H. B. Ramaliggam et al Adv. Appl. Sci. Res., 2016, 7(2):183-187
_____________________________________________________________________________
186
Pelagia Research Library
.
Figure 3 plots L
f
Vs X
2
Figure 4 plots V
f
Vs X
2
. .
Figure 5 plots u
E
Vs X
2
Figure 6 plots β
E
Vs X
2
. .
Figure 7 plots L
fE
Vs X
2
Figure 8 plots β
E
Vs X
2
5
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
5.7
5.8
5.9
6
0 0.5 1
Lf
X2
Benzene Methyl benzoate
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 0.5 1
Vf
X2
Benzene Methyl benzoate
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
uE
X2
Benzene Methyl benzoate
-0.9
-0.8
-0.7
-0.6
-0.5
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0
0 0.5 1
βE
X2
Benzene Methyl benzoate
-0.3
-0.25
-0.2
-0.15
-0.1
-0.05
0
0 0.5 1
LfE
X2
Benzene Methyl benzoate
-0.045
-0.04
-0.035
-0.03
-0.025
-0.02
-0.015
-0.01
-0.005
0
0 0.5 1
VfE
X2
Benzene Methyl benzoate
H. B. Ramaliggam et al Adv. Appl. Sci. Res., 2016, 7(2):183-187
_____________________________________________________________________________
187
Pelagia Research Library
The value of excess inter molecular free length follows the same trend as that of excess adiabatic compressibility.
The value of excess inter molecular free length are negative. The negative deviations of excess free volume have
been suggested strong interaction between components confirmed.
CONCLUSION
The present report indicates that the ultrasonic parameters understand to the molecular interaction present in liquid
mixtures. From Ultrasonic velocity and related acoustical parameters for binary (butanol in benzene) and ternary
(butanol with methyl benzoate in benzene) mixtures by the various concentrations, it is expert that there exists a
weak interaction due to dipole – induced dipole between the binary components and strong association between the
ternary components due to hydrogen bonding.
REFERENCES
[1] Madhu Rastogi, Aashees Awasthi, Manisha Gupta Shukla J.P., Indian J. Pure and Appl. Phys., 2002, 40 , 256.
[2] Rita Mehra Aashish Gupta, J. Pure & Appli. Ultrasonics, 2003, 25, 130.
[3] Rama Rao G.V., Viswanatha Sarma A., Ramababu C., Indian J. Chem., 2004, 3A , 752.
[4] Prabhavati C.L., Sivakumar K., Venkateswarlu P., Raman G.K., Indian J. Chem., 2004 , 43A , 294.
[5] Isht Vibhu, Amit Misra, Manisha Guptha Shukla J.P., Ind. Academy of Science, 2004 , 62(5), 1147.
[6] Siva Prassad V., SivaKumar K.V., Rajagopal E. Monohara Murthy, J. Pure & Appl. Ultrasonics, 2005 , 27, 8.
[7] Nikam P.S., Miss Mc. Indhar Mehdimhasan, J. Pure and Appl. Phys., 1995, 33, 398.
[8] Mehdi Hasan P.S. Nikam Kapada V.M., Indian J. Pure & Appli. Phys.,, 2000, 38 , 170 .
[9] Nikam B.S., Jayadale, Swat A.B., Mehdimhasan, Indian J. Pure & Appli. Phys., 1998, 39 , 433.
[10] Wankhede M.K., Lainde and B.R., Arbad , Indian J. Pure & Appli. Phys., 2006, 44. 909..
[11] Maragathavel P., Raju K., Krishnamurthi P., Rasayan J. of Chem., 2015, 8(2), 227.
[12] Thenmozhi P.A., Krishnamurthi P., Rasayan J. of Chem., 2015, 8 (1) , 24.
[13] Meenachi M., Krishnamurthi P., Mechanica Confab, 2013, 2(2), 85-92.
[14] Krishnamurthi P., Ramalingam H. B., Raju K., Adv. in Appl. Sci. Res., 2015, 6(12), 44.
[15] Krishnamurthi P., Balamuralikrishnan S., Asian J. of Chem., 2010, 22 (7), 5144, 2010.
[16] Krishnamurthi P., Ramalingam H. B., Raju K., Arch.of Appl.Sci. Res., 2015, 7 (11), 5.