ArticlePDF Available

Clinical Outcomes and Disease Burden in Amyloidosis Patients with and Without Atrial Fibrillation—Insight from the National Inpatient Sample Database

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Amyloidosis is a systemic illness that affects multiple organ systems, including the cardiovascular, renal, gastrointestinal, and pulmonary systems. Common manifestations include restrictive cardiomyopathy, arrhythmias, nephrotic syndrome, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage. It is unknown whether coexisting atrial fibrillation (AF) worsens the disease burden and outcomes in patients with systemic amyloidosis. In this study, those with a diagnosis of amyloidosis with and without coexisting AF were identified by querying the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-specifically, the National Inpatient Sample for the year 2016-based on International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification codes. During 2016, a total of 2,997 patients were admitted with a diagnosis of amyloidosis, including 918 with concurrent AF. Greater rates of mortality (7.4% vs. 5.6%); heart block (6.8% vs. 2.8%); cardiogenic shock (5% vs. 1.6%); placement of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, cardiac resynchronization therapy device, or permanent pacemaker (14.5% vs. 4.5%); renal failure (29% vs. 21%); heart failure (66% vs. 30%); and bleeding complications (5.7% vs. 2.8%) were observed in patients with a diagnosis of amyloidosis and coexisting AF when compared with in patients without AF. Interestingly, patients with amyloidosis without comorbid AF had greater odds of associated stroke relative to those with concurrent AF (7.9% vs. 3.4%).
Content may be subject to copyright.
J Innov Cardiac Rhythm Manage. 2021;12(6):1–7
ATRIAL FIBRILLATION
DOI: 10.19102/icrm.2021.120605
AMYLOIDOSIS
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Clinical Outcomes and Disease Burden in
Amyloidosis Patients with and Without Atrial
Fibrillation—Insight from the National Inpatient
Sample Database
SHAKEEL JAMAL, md,1 ASIM KICHLOO, md,1 BETH BAILEY, phd,1 JAGMEET SINGH, md,2
HAFEEZ VIRK, md,3 RONAK SONI, md,4 FARAH WANI, md,5 MUHAMMAD AJMAL, md,6
SINDHURA ANANTHANENI, md,1 EHIZOGIE EDIGIN, md,7 RAJEEV SUDHAKAR, md,8
and KHALIL KANJWAL, md, facc, fhrs, ccds, ceps(p)9
1Central Michigan University, College of Medicine, Saginaw, MI, USA
2Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, PA, USA
3Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
4University of Toledo, College of Medicine, Toledo, OH, USA
5Samaritan Medical Center, Watertown, NY, USA
6University of Arizona, College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA
7John H Stroger Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL, USA
8Ascension Medical Group, Central Michigan University, Saginaw, MI, USA
9McLaren Greater Lansing Hospital, Michigan State University, Lansing, MI, USA
Q1
ABSTRACT. Amyloidosis is a systemic illness that affects multiple organ systems, including the
cardiovascular, renal, gastrointestinal, and pulmonary systems. Common manifestations include
restrictive cardiomyopathy, arrhythmias, nephrotic syndrome, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage.
It is unknown whether coexisting atrial fibrillation (AF) worsens the disease burden and out-
comes in patients with systemic amyloidosis. In this study, those with a diagnosis of amyloidosis
with and without coexisting AF were identified by querying the Healthcare Cost and Utilization
Project—specifically, the National Inpatient Sample for the year 2016—based on International
Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification codes. During 2016, a total of
2,997 patients were admitted with a diagnosis of amyloidosis, including 918 with concurrent
AF. Greater rates of mortality (7.4% vs. 5.6%); heart block (6.8% vs. 2.8%); cardiogenic shock
(5% vs. 1.6%); placement of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, cardiac resynchronization
therapy device, or permanent pacemaker (14.5% vs. 4.5%); renal failure (29% vs. 21%); heart
failure (66% vs. 30%); and bleeding complications (5.7% vs. 2.8%) were observed in patients
with a diagnosis of amyloidosis and coexisting AF when compared with in patients without AF.
Interestingly, patients with amyloidosis without comorbid AF had greater odds of associated stroke
relative to those with concurrent AF (7.9% vs. 3.4%).
KEYWORDS.
ISSN 2156-3977 (print)
ISSN 2156-3993 (online)
CC BY 4.0 license
© 2021 Innovations in Cardiac
Rhythm Management
The Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management, June 2021 1
Introduction
Amyloidosis is a heterogeneous group of inherited or
acquired diseases that results from extracellular systemic
deposition of amyloid, which constitutes 20 different
insoluble fibrillary proteins assembled in an abnormal
β-sheet conformation.1,2 Amyloidosis can result in the
deposition of these proteins in various organ systems,
including the heart, kidneys, central nervous system,
blood vessels, pancreas, and liver, disrupting organ
integrity, structure, and function. This process can lead
to multiple organ system involvement and can manifest
either in the form of a serious illness or just an inciden-
tal finding.3 Treatment strategies are aimed at destabiliz-
ing these fibrillary deposits.4 Systemic amyloidosis can
manifest in the form of amyloid A (AA) amyloidosis and
amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis (most common).
AL amyloidosis results from the accumulation of fibrils
derived from monoclonal immunoglobulin light chains,
which can involve any organ system in the body directly,
excluding the brain, and the most common causes of
death in patients with the condition are heart failure,
uremia, and autonomic neuropathy.5,6 AA amyloidosis is
also known as reactive amyloidosis as it is a consequence
of persistent inflammatory, neoplastic, and infective dis-
orders. Hereditary systemic amyloidosis is an autosomal
dominant condition in which amyloid fibrils are formed
from genetic variants of apolipoproteins, transthyretin,
lysozyme, and fibrinogen A-α.7 Amyloidosis is known to
affect any organ system in the body; the purpose of this
study was to understand the outcomes on the cardiovas-
cular system in general and in concert with atrial fibril-
lation (AF) specifically. Cardiac involvement is thought
to be the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in
amyloidosis.8 Fifty percent of patients with AL amyloi-
dosis have an underlying cardiac involvement, which
depends on the type of amyloid.9 Amyloid deposits cause
myocardial cell toxicity by the deposition of amyloid
fibrils in the extracellular space of cardiac myocytes in
the atria, the ventricles, around the coronaries, and in the
valves,10 which leads to restrictive cardiomyopathy, con-
tinuing further to diastolic dysfunction and manifesting
during physical examinations as edema, congestive hepa-
tomegaly, and jugular venous distension, while patients
with progression to advanced forms of the disease pres-
ent with hypotension.11 Atrial arrhythmias occur most
commonly in up to 10% to 15% of patients. AF is known
to be the most common atrial arrhythmia in amyloidosis.8
Deposition of amyloid in the atrial issue leads to altered
conduction, which increases the likelihood of triggering
AF, while AF increases the likelihood of the deposition of
amyloid, creating a vicious cycle.12 Sanchis et al. reported
238 cases of cardiac amyloidosis in a study where 48%
had AL amyloidosis and 52% had transthyretin amy-
loid (ATTR) cardiomyopathy. Forty-two percent of the
238 study participants had AF, 60% had permanent AF,
and 40% had nonpermanent AF.13 Another study looked
at 382 patients with ATTR cardiomyopathy, in which 69%
were found to have AF (stratified as 45% with paroxys-
mal, 27% with persistent, 15% with longstanding persis-
tent, and 13% with permanent AF).14 Krishnappa et al.
studied the cardiac biopsies of 1,083 patients with AF
and found that 3.1% had subclinical cardiac amyloido-
sis.15 Röcken et al. found an association between isolated
atrial amyloidosis and AF irrespective of age and sex
based on biopsies of the right atrial appendage collected
during open-heart surgeries.12 AL amyloidosis can have
a spectrum ranging from no involvement of the heart at
all to a severe form of cardiovascular disease.16 Cardiac
amyloidosis presents with restrictive cardiomyopathic
symptoms (exercise intolerance) followed by systolic
dysfunction, atrial/ ventricular arrhythmias [amyloid
deposits in the sinoatrial/atrioventricular (AV) node
and conduction tissue], myocardial infarction (deposi-
tion of amyloid deposits in coronaries), and outflow tract
obstruction due to asymmetric deposition of amyloid
fibrils in the interventricular septum.8,17–19 Pericardial
and pleural effusion have also been reported.20,21
We queried the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to
answer the hypothesis that coexisting AF worsens the
clinical outcomes and associated disease burden in
patients with amyloidosis and that appropriate manage-
ment of AF may improve the clinical outcomes and dis-
ease burden. To evaluate our hypothesis, we conducted a
cross- sectional analysis.
Methods
Data source
The NIS has been elaborated on in detail in prior studies.22
The NIS is the largest publicly available database in the
United States (US), which falls under the Healthcare Cost
and Utilization Project (HCUP) and is maintained by the
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. It is one of
the most useful databases available to study the outcomes
and trends of various procedures and diseases. It includes
deidentified data collected from 20% of community hos-
pitals of 46 states in the US. Each hospitalization is rep-
resentative of one primary diagnosis, up to 29 secondary
diagnoses, and 15 procedures using the international
Clinical Modification codes [International Classification
of Diseases, ninth revision and 10th revision (ICD-10)].
The available data include admission status, demograph-
ics, admitting diagnosis, comorbidities, health care facility
(whether rural or urban), discharge diagnosis, outcomes,
length of stay, and costs during hospitalization. It is
important to mention here the inherent limitations of NIS,
including a lack of distinction between acute and chronic
diagnoses and between comorbidities and complications;
however, we evaluated the disease burden and inpatient
mortality and length of stay as outcomes.23,24
Q2
Dr. Kanjwal is a consultant for Abbott, Johnson and Johnson, and
Biosense Webster. The other authors report no conflicts of interest
for the published content.
Manuscript received January 1, 2021. Final version accepted
February 5, 2021.
Address correspondence to: Khalil Kanjwal MD, FACC, FHRS,
CCDS, CEPS(P), Michigan State University, McLaren Greater
Lansing Hospital, Lansing, MI 48901, USA. Email: khalil.kanjwal@
mclaren.org.
Clinical Outcomes and Disease Burden in Amyloidosis Patients with and Without AF
2 The Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management, June 2021
We examined all adult patients who were hospitalized in
the US during the year 2016 with the diagnosis of amy-
loidosis and with comorbid AF using the NIS. Patients
were filtered using ICD-10 Clinical Modification codes.
We identified all adult patients aged 18 years or more
who were admitted with amyloidosis with and without
a concomitant primary or secondary diagnosis with AF
during the year 2016. We excluded any hospitalizations
with missing demographics (ie, age, sex, admission or
discharge diagnosis, and mortality data). We utilized
NIS variables to identify patients’ age, sex, race, county
location, county income, hospital bed size, and alcohol
abuse. Race was divided into two categories, white and
nonwhite.
Primary outcomes and comorbid conditions
Our objectives were to assess the comorbidities and inpa-
tient outcomes in patients with a diagnosis of amyloidosis
with and without coexisting AF. The primary outcomes
analyzed were inpatient mortality and length of the
hospital stay of all patients admitted with amyloidosis
with and without coexisting AF. Comorbidities associ-
ated with amyloidosis and AF were stroke; heart failure;
bleeding; supraventricular tachycardia; ventricular tach-
ycardia; heart block; cardiac arrest; cardiogenic shock;
implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), permanent
pacemaker (PPM), or cardiac resynchronization therapy
(CRT) placement; and renal and respiratory failure.
Statistical analysis
We used survey analyses for stratifying and clustering
encounters for all continuous and categorical variables.
The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software
program (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) was used
to perform statistical analyses. We used the chi-squared
test or analysis of variance approach to identify differ-
ences in categorical variables and the two-sample t-test
for the analysis of continuous variables, respectively.
Logistic regression modeling was used to calculate the
odds ratio (OR) for outcomes between the two study
groups. This was followed by multivariate analyses to
account for any confounders in the form of comorbidities
between the two groups. A p-value of less than 0.05 was
considered to be statistically significant. We audited the
analyses using the checklist provided by the NIS to assess
and confirm the data analyses were done according to the
rules recommended by the NIS (https://www.hcupus.
ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/nischecklist.jsp).
Results
We identified a total of 7,135,090 inpatient hospitaliza-
tions in the year 2016. Among these, we further identified
patients (n = 2,997) with a diagnosis of amyloidosis using
the ICD-10 codes E850, E851, E852, E853, E854, E8581,
E8582, E8589, and E859. We also identified patients (n =
984) with concomitant AF using the ICD-10 codes I48.0,
I48.1, I48.2, I48.3, I48.4, I48.91, and I48.92. The ICD-10
codes for secondary outcomes are presented in supple-
mental documents. Thus, our final sample had two study
groups: patients with amyloidosis without AF (n = 2,013)
and patients with amyloidosis and AF (n = 984). Table 1
presents the background characteristics by study group.
Patients with amyloidosis and AF were significantly
older, with a mean age of 76.3 ± 9.7 years (p < 0.001), and
included a greater proportion of men (66.2% vs. 52.8%;
p < 0.001).
Table 2 summarizes the results of logistic regression
analyses used for adjusted OR calculations to control for
variables in Table 1. Patients with amyloidosis and AF
had a higher inpatient mortality rate [adjusted OR: 1.39,
95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01–1.91]. Patients with
amyloidosis and AF had a greater odds of heart failure
(adjusted OR: 4.61, 95% CI: 3.88–5.47), bleeding compli-
cations (adjusted OR: 2.31, 95% CI: 1.55–3.42), supraven-
tricular tachycardia (adjusted OR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.31–
3.12), ventricular tachycardia (adjusted OR: 2.40, 95% CI:
1.68–3.41), heart block (adjusted OR: 2.36, 95% CI: 1.61–
3.46), restrictive cardiomyopathy (adjusted OR: 2.66, 95%
CI: 1.77–4.00), renal failure (adjusted OR: 1.59, 95% CI:
1.33–1.91), cardiogenic shock (adjusted OR: 3.77, 95% CI:
2.34–6.09), and ICD/CRT/PPM placement (adjusted OR:
3.30, 95% CI: 2.47–4.40). After controlling for confounding
Q3
Q4
Q5
Table 1: Background Characteristics by Study Group
Amyloidosis
Alone (n = 2,013)
Amyloidosis
with AF (n = 984)
p-value
Age (years) 71.3 ± 12.1 76.3 ± 9.7 < 0.001
Sex (% male) 52.8% 66.2% < 0.001
Race (% non-white) 35.5% 33.3% 0.469
County location* (% completely rural) 5.1% 4.5% 0.268
County income (% lowest quartile) 27.5% 36.3% 0.036
Hospital bed size** (% small) 11.1% 13.0% 0.322
AF: atrial fibrillation.
*Based on the National Center for Health Statistics Urban–Rural Code; % non-
metropolitan, non-micropolitan.
**Definitions of hospital bed size categories vary by geographic region of the
country, rural or urban setting, and whether the facility is a teaching hospital.
S. Jamal, A. Kichloo, B. Bailey, et al.
The Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management, June 2021 3
variables, disease severity was significantly higher in the
amyloidosis with AF population, with the exceptions of
stroke (adjusted OR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.23–0.50), respiratory
failure (adjusted OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.82–1.41), and cardiac
arrest (adjusted OR: 1.57, 95% CI: 0.80–3.07). Figures 1
and 2 present comparisons of outcomes of amyloidosis
in terms of percentage of population subset in two series.
Discussion
The principal findings of this study were as follows: (1)
there was a greater associated inpatient mortality rate in
patients with amyloidosis and coexisting AF; (2) there
was a higher associated cardiovascular morbidity burden
in patients with amyloidosis and AF; (3) patients with
amyloidosis and AF had a significantly increased odds
of bleeding, but the prevalence of ischemic stroke was
significantly higher in patients with amyloidosis without
AF; (4) coexisting AF was associated with renal failure in
patients who had compromised renal functions at base-
line; (5) patients with amyloidosis and AF were found to
have a higher prevalence of heart block and ICD/CRT/
PPM placement when compared to patients without AF;
and (6) age and male sex are important and significant
predictors of outcomes in patients with amyloidosis and
AF.
Morbidity and mortality rates in systemic amyloidosis
depend upon the extent and type of amyloid fibril dep-
osition in the organ systems and vary from milder forms
of disease to very severe forms of nephrotic syndrome,
infiltrative cardiomyopathies, autonomic neuropathies
leading to hypotension and diarrhea, soft tissue infiltra-
tion resulting in carpal tunnel syndrome, macroglossia,
bleeding (gastrointestinal), malnutrition, and pulmo-
nary involvement.25–27 AF, in general, is known to lead
to a fourfold increased risk of mortality when compared
to the general population after adjusting for cardiovas-
cular comorbidities.28,29 AF is known to increase the risk
Figure 2: AF: atrial fibrillation.
Table 2: Outcomes and Comorbidities of Amyloidosis with and Without AF
Amyloidosis
Alone (n = 2,013)
Amyloidosis
with AF (n = 984)
OR (95% CI) aOR* (95% CI)
Stroke 7.9% 3.4% 0.39 (0.27–0.58) 0.34 (0.23–0.50)
Heart failure 30.4% 66.0% 4.47 (3.80–5.27) 4.61 (3.88–5.47)
Bleeding 2.8% 5.7% 2.10 (1.44–3.07) 2.31 (1.55–3.42)
Ventricular tachycardia 3.5% 7.5% 2.28 (1.63–3.20) 2.40 (1.68–3.41)
Heart block 2.8% 6.8% 2.60 (1.80–3.75) 2.36 (1.61–3.46)
Cardiac arrest 1.1% 1.6% 1.42 (0.75–2.71) 1.57 (0.80–3.07)
Restrictive cardiomyopathy 2.6% 5.6% 2.22 (1.51–3.27) 2.66 (1.77–4.00)
Cardiogenic shock 1.6% 5.0% 3.16 (2.01–4.98) 3.77 (2.34–6.09)
ICD/CRT/PPM placement 4.5% 14.5% 3.59 (2.71–4.74) 3.30 (2.47–4.40)
Renal failure 20.8% 29.1% 1.59 (1.33–1.90) 1.59 (1.33–1.91)
Respiratory failure 9.5% 9.8% 1.03 (0.80–1.34) 1.08 (0.82–1.41)
Inpatient mortality 5.6% 7.4% 1.34 (0.99–1.83) 1.39 (1.01–1.91)
Length of stay (includes only those
patients who survived to discharge)
7.4 ± 9.2 days 7.8 ± 12.9 days
AF: atrial fibrillation; aOR: adjusted odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; CRT: cardiac resynchronization
therapy; ICD: implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; OR: odds ratio; PPM: permanent pacemaker.
*Adjusted for age, sex, and county income.
Continuous variable; t-test nonsignificant (p = 0.301).
Figure 1: AF: atrial fibrillation; CRT: cardiac resynchronization
therapy; ICD: implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; PPM:
permanent pacemaker.
Q6
Clinical Outcomes and Disease Burden in Amyloidosis Patients with and Without AF
4 The Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management, June 2021
of thromboembolism and stroke, the risk of congestive
heart failure and pulmonary/renal complications, and
the health care costs and to affect the quality of life.30–34
We found a higher inpatient mortality with an adjusted
OR of 1.39 in patients with amyloidosis and coexisting
AF. This observation is thought to be due to the cumula-
tive effects on adverse outcomes like heart failure, heart
block, renal failure, respiratory failure, and bleeding com-
plications. The overall length of stay was not statistically
different between the groups.
Age is considered an independent risk factor for amy-
loidosis and AF.16 Amyloid deposits in the atria with
increasing age are considered a triggering factor for atrial
arrhythmias and AF.12 These trends are consistent with
our study results, as age contributed to an increased
prevalence of AF in patients with amyloidosis. In previ-
ous studies, female sex was found to be protective against
myocardial involvement in transthyretin-related amyloi-
dosis.35 This is consistent with our study results, with an
increased propensity for male sex among patients with
cardiovascular involvement.
Our analyses revealed statistically significant increased
prevalence rates of heart failure (66% vs. 30%; adjusted
OR: 4.61, 95% CI: 3.88–5.47), restrictive cardiomyopathy
(5.6% vs. 2.6%; adjusted OR: 2.66, 95% CI: 1.77–4.00),
supraventricular tachycardia (4.4% vs. 2.5%; adjusted
OR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.31–3.12), ventricular tachycardia
(7.5% vs. 3.5%; adjusted OR: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.68–3.41),
heart block (6.8% vs. 2.8%; adjusted OR: 2.36, 95% CI:
1.61–3.46), requirement for ICD/CRT/PPM placement
(14.5% vs. 4.5%; adjusted OR: 3.30, 95% CI: 2.47–4.40),
and cardiogenic shock (5% vs. 1.6%; adjusted OR: 3.77,
95% CI: 2.34–6.09) in patients with amyloidosis and coex-
isting AF.
AF is the most common arrhythmia seen in patients
with amyloidosis. An increased prevalence of ischemic
stroke was recorded in patients with amyloidosis with-
out AF; however, the association of bleeding complica-
tions was higher in patients with coexisting AF. Cardiac
thrombi have been reported in cardiac amyloidosis even
before the development of AF, which could be because of
changes in both systolic and diastolic dynamics due to
amyloid deposits.36 These deposits can embolize, result-
ing in stroke as an initial manifestation of the disease.37
Anticoagulation can be challenging in these patients
and patients with systemic amyloidosis as they are at
an increased risk of bleeding (eg, gastrointestinal hem-
orrhage, factor X deficiency).38 Patients with amyloidosis
without concurrent AF had a higher prevalence of stroke
(combined ischemic and hemorrhagic shock) relative to
patients with coexisting AF.
Patients with amyloidosis without concurrent AF had
a greater prevalence of stroke (combined ischemic and
hemorrhagic shock) as compared with patients with coex-
isting AF. Amyloidosis increases the risk of intra-atrial
and intracardiac thrombi, even without coexisting AF.36,37
This could possibly explain the increased prevalence
of stroke in patients without concurrent AF. Moreover,
patients with amyloidosis and coexisting AF, irrespec-
tive of their CHADS2VASc score, are supposed to be on
anticoagulation; this could very well explain the reduced
risk of stroke in this group, who are likely receiving anti-
coagulation, in our study. Patients with amyloidosis are
at an increased risk of bleeding, including mainly gastro-
intestinal bleeding and factor X deficiency.39 Moreover,
patients with coexisting AF were also found to exhibit
an increased risk of bleeding as they were on anticoagu-
lation for thromboembolic prevention. This could possi-
bly explain the increased risk of bleeding in amyloidosis
patients with coexisting AF.
Cardiac involvement in amyloidosis can cause infiltra-
tion of the conduction system and result in heart blocks
requiring ICD/CRT/PPM placement as evident from our
results; however, concurrent refractory AF can worsen
the prevalence of ICD/CRT/PPM implantation due to
procedures such as AV nodal ablation, making patients
PPM-dependent and resulting in cardiomyopathies,
heart failure, and increased mortality rates.8,9,40–42
Renal amyloid deposition manifests as albuminuria
and progresses to nephrotic-range proteinuria, which
is almost always diagnosed in advanced forms of the
disease. Amyloidosis manifesting clinically with renal
involvement is considered very rare.26,43–25 AF with a
loss of atrial kick, which contributes to 20% to 25% of
the cardiac output, can lead to a fall in blood pressure
and decreased perfusion to the kidneys, further worsen-
ing the renal dysfunction.45 Our analyses showed that
coexisting AF is associated with worse renal outcomes in
patients with amyloidosis (29% vs. 20.8%) as compared
with in those without coexisting AF.
Limitations
The inherent nature of a cross-sectional study did not
allow us to calculate incidence and rate ratios. Reliance
on the HCUP database can also have limitations of its
own, eg, due to the select group of patients in the data-
base. It could not be determined whether the patients
had paroxysmal versus persistent AF. Moreover, antico-
agulation status in both the groups could not be deter-
mined either. Another limitation to the study was that
there was not a single case with a primary diagnosis of
transthyretin cardiomyopathy during the years 2016 and
2017 and this resulted in the limitation of not being able
to conduct a subgroup analysis of patients with transthy-
retin cardiomyopathy. Additionally, we took a composite
of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, but it would have
been ideal to have considered them as separate entities.
Moreover, the NIS has inherent limitations of a lack of
distinction between new and chronic diagnoses and
between comorbidities and complications.22,23 Still, the
increased mortality rates and significant trend toward
other outcomes in the AF and amyloidosis groups can
serve as a platform for further research. Given the under-
diagnosed nature of amyloidosis, new ideas and man-
agement strategies should be formulated to enhance
future practice.
Q7
S. Jamal, A. Kichloo, B. Bailey, et al.
The Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management, June 2021 5
Conclusion
Amyloidosis with AF is associated with a higher inpa-
tient mortality rate and other adverse clinical outcomes.
Optimizing the management of AF in patients with amy-
loidosis may help to improve outcomes. Further studies
in the future can help us to understand the underlying
pathogenesis of these outcomes and also help devise
strategies to improve outcomes.
References
1. Wechalekar AD, Gillmore JD, Hawkins PN. Systemic amy-
loidosis. Lancet. 2016;387(10038):2641–2654.
2. Lachmann HJ, Hawkins PN. Systemic amyloidosis. Curr
Opin Pharmacol. 2006;6(2):214–220.
3. Gillmore JD, Lovat LB, Persey MR, et al. Cumulative SAA
production and outcome of AA amyloidosis. In: Kyle RA,
Gertz MA, eds. Amyloid and Amyloidosis 1998. Nashville, TN:
Parthenon Publishing; 1999:402–404.
4. Lachmann HJ, Gallimore R, Gillmore JD, et al. Outcome in
systemic AL amyloidosis in relation to changes in concentra-
tion of circulating free immunoglobulin light chains follow-
ing chemotherapy. Br J Haematol. 2003;122(1):78–84.
5. Comenzo RL, Zhang Y, Martinez C, Osman K, Herrera GA.
The tropism of organ involvement in primary systemic amy-
loidosis: contributions of Ig V(L) germ line gene use and
clonal plasma cell burden. Blood. 2001;98(3):714–720.
6. Gertz MA, Lacy MQ, Dispenzieri A, Hayman SR.
Amyloidosis. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2005;18(4):709–727.
7. Benson MD. Ostertag revisited: the inherited systemic amy-
loidoses without neuropathy. Amyloid. 2005;12(2):75–87.
8. Falk RH. Diagnosis and management of the cardiac amyloi-
doses. Circulation. 2005;112(13):2047–2060.
9. Merlini G. CyBorD: stellar response rates in AL amyloidosis.
Blood. 2012;119(19):4343–4345.
10. Smith TJ, Kyle RA, Lie JT. Clinical significance of histo-
pathologic patterns of cardiac amyloidosis. Mayo Clin Proc.
1984;59(8):547–555.
11. Shi J, Guan J, Jiang B, et al. Amyloidogenic light chains
induce cardiomyocyte contractile dysfunction and apopto-
sis via a non-canonical p38alpha MAPK pathway. Proc Natl
Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(9):4188–4193.
12. Röcken C, Peters B, Juenemann G, et al. Atrial amyloidosis:
an arrhythmogenic substrate for persistent atrial fibrillation.
Circulation. 2002;106(16):2091–2097.
13. Sanchis K, Cariou E, Colombat M, et al. Atrial fibrillation
and subtype of atrial fibrillation in cardiac amyloidosis: clin-
ical and echocardiographic features, impact on mortality.
Amyloid. 2019;26(3):128–138.
14. Donnellan E, Wazni OM, Hanna M, et al. Atrial fibrillation
in transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis: predictors, preva-
lence, and efficacy of rhythm control strategies. JACC Clin
Electrophysiol. 2020;6(9):1118–1127.
15. Krishnappa D, Dykoski R, Can I, et al. Atrial fibrillation in
the elderly: the role of sub-clinical isolated cardiac amyloi-
dosis. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):16584.
16. Goette A, Röcken C. Atrial amyloidosis and atrial fibrilla-
tion: a gender-dependent “arrhythmogenic substrate”? Eur
Heart J. 2004;25(14):1185–1186.
17. Padfield GJ, Maclay JD. Macroglossia and complete
heart block in a woman with multiple myeloma. QJM.
2010;103(4):271–272.
18. Payne CE, Usher BW. Atrioventicular block in famil-
ial amyloidosis; revisiting an old debate. J S C Med Assoc.
2007;103(5):119–122.
19. Dinwoodey DL, Skinner M, Maron MS, Davidoff R, Ruberg
FL. Light-chain amyloidosis with echocardiographic
features of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol.
2008;101(5):674–676.
20. Brodarick S, Paine R, Higa E, Carmichael KA. Pericardial
tamponade, a new complication of amyloid heart disease.
Am J Med. 1982;73(1):133–135.
21. Navarro JF, Rivera M, Ortuño J. Cardiac tamponade
as presentation of systemic amyloidosis. Int J Cardiol.
1992;36(1):107–108.
22. Voruganti DC, Shantha G, Dugyala S, et al. Temporal trends
and factors associated with increased mortality among
atrial fibrillation weekend hospitalizations: an insight
from National Inpatient Sample 2005-2014. BMC Res Notes.
2019;12(1):398.
23. Mori M, Brown KJ, Geirsson A. Understanding limitations
of the National Inpatient Sample to facilitate its proper use.
JAMA Surg. 2019;154(9):881–882.
24. Chouairi F, Mercier MR, Alperovich M. Interpreting
complications from database research: limitations
of the national inpatient sample. Plast Reconstr Surg.
2019;144(5):943e.
25. Gertz MA, Comenzo R, Falk RH, et al. Definition of organ
involvement and treatment response in immunoglob-
ulin light chain amyloidosis (AL): a consensus opinion
from the 10th International Symposium on Amyloid and
Amyloidosis, Tours, France, 18-22 April 2004. Am J Hematol.
2005;79(4):319–328.
26. Fogo AB, Lusco MA, Najafian B, Alpers CE. AJKD Atlas
of renal pathology: AL amyloidosis. Am J Kidney Dis.
2015;66(6):e43–e45.
27. Falk RH, Alexander KM, Liao R, Dorbala S. AL (light-chain)
cardiac amyloidosis: a review of diagnosis and therapy. J Am
Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(12):1323–1341.
28. Lee E, Choi EK, Han KD, et al. Mortality and causes of death
in patients with atrial fibrillation: a nationwide popula-
tion-based study. PLoS One. 2018;13(12):e0209687.
29. Benjamin EJ, Wolf PA, D’Agostino RB, Silbershatz H,
Kannel WB, Levy D. Impact of atrial fibrillation on the
risk of death: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation.
1998;98(10):946–952.
30. European Heart Rhythm Association; European
Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Camm AJ, et al.
Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the
Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the
European Society of Cardiology (ESC) [published correc-
tion appears in Eur Heart J. 2011 May;32(9):1172]. Eur Heart
J. 2010;31(19):2369–2429.
31. Lip GY, Tse HF. Management of atrial fibrillation. Lancet.
2007;370(9587):604–618.
32. Christian SA, Schorr C, Ferchau L, Jarbrink ME, Parrillo JE,
Gerber DR. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of sep-
tic patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation. J Crit Care.
2008;23(4):532–536.
33. Meierhenrich R, Steinhilber E, Eggermann C, et al. Incidence
and prognostic impact of new-onset atrial fibrillation in
patients with septic shock: a prospective observational
study. Crit Care. 2010;14(3):R108.
34. Lai SW, Lin CL, Liao KF. Atrial fibrillation associated with
acute pancreatitis: a retrospective cohort study in Taiwan. J
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2016;23(4):242–247.
Clinical Outcomes and Disease Burden in Amyloidosis Patients with and Without AF
6 The Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management, June 2021
35. Rapezzi C, Riva L, Quarta CC, et al. Gender-related risk of
myocardial involvement in systemic amyloidosis. Amyloid.
2008;15(1):40–48.
36. Feng D, Syed IS, Martinez M, et al. Intracardiac thrombo-
sis and anticoagulation therapy in cardiac amyloidosis.
Circulation. 2009;119(18):2490–2497.
37. Zubkov AY, Rabinstein AA, Dispenzieri A, Wijdicks EF.
Primary systemic amyloidosis with ischemic stroke as a
presenting complication. Neurology. 2007;69(11):1136–1141.
38. Poels MM, Ikram MA, van der Lugt A, et al. Incidence of cer-
ebral microbleeds in the general population: the Rotterdam
Scan Study. Stroke. 2011;42(3):656–661.
39. Giancaterino S, Urey MA, Darden D, Hsu JC. Management of
arrhythmias in cardiac amyloidosis. JACC Clin Electrophysiol.
2020;6(4):351–361.
40. Black-Maier E, Rehorn M, Loungani R, et al. Catheter abla-
tion of atrial fibrillation in cardiac amyloidosis [published
online ahead of print, 2020 Jun 23]. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol.
2020;43(9):913–921.
41. Tan NY, Mohsin Y, Hodge DO, et al. Catheter ablation for
atrial arrhythmias in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. J
Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27(10):1167–1173.
42. Barbhaiya CR, Kumar S, Baldinger SH, et al.
Electrophysiologic assessment of conduction abnormalities
and atrial arrhythmias associated with amyloid cardiomyo-
pathy. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13(2):383–390.
43. Lachmann HJ, Goodman HJ, Gilbertson JA, et al. Natural
history and outcome in systemic AA amyloidosis. N Engl J
Med. 2007;356(23):2361–2371.
44. Gillmore JD, Lachmann HJ, Rowczenio D, et al. Diagnosis,
pathogenesis, treatment, and prognosis of hereditary
fibrinogen A alpha-chain amyloidosis. J Am Soc Nephrol.
2009;20(2):444–451.
45. Crijns HJ, Tjeerdsma G, de Kam PJ, et al. Prognostic value
of the presence and development of atrial fibrillation in
patients with advanced chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J.
2000;21(15):1238–1245.
S. Jamal, A. Kichloo, B. Bailey, et al.
The Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management, June 2021 7
QUERY FORM
CRM
Manuscript ID
Author
Editor
Publisher
Journal: CRM
The following queries have arisen during the editing of your manuscript. Please answer queries by making the requisite
corrections at the appropriate positions in the text.
Query
No.
Description Author’s Response
1 Please provide department/division details for all the authors where
appropriate.
2 Please check and confirm the edits made to “transthyretin amyloid (ATTR)
cardiomyopathy”.
3 The URL is not active. Please check and amend the URL
4Please provide the supplemental documents mentioned
5 Please confirm number ranges are 95% CIs
6 Please provide captions for Figures 1 and 2
7 Please check if reference citations “43–25” should be “43–45” in the sentence
“Amyloidosis manifesting…”
Article
Full-text available
Amyloidosis is a disease characterized by the deposition of protein fibrils. Cardiac involvement is a significant factor in determining prognosis. This study aimed to examine the clinical profile, outcomes, and long-term mortality rates in patients with transthyretin (ATTR) and amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis. The retrospective cohort study included 94 patients with amyloidosis (69 with AL and 25 with ATTR amyloidosis) diagnosed between 2010 and 2022. The study involved multimodality imaging (ECG, echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) data and survival analyses. Patients with ATTR amyloidosis were older and had a higher proportion of males compared to those with AL amyloidosis. Cardiac involvement was more prevalent in the ATTR group, including atrial fibrillation (AF), while pleural and pericardial effusion were more frequent in the AL group. Biomarkers such as NT-proBNP and troponin T were significantly elevated in both groups and were associated with all-cause mortality only in univariate analyses. CMR data, especially typical late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was not associated with increased mortality, while pleural effusion and left atrial dilatation on echocardiography were identified as powerful predictors of mortality. In conclusion, both AL and ATTR amyloidosis exhibited poor outcomes. Cardiac involvement, particularly dilated left atrium and pleural effusion on echocardiography were associated with an increased risk of mortality, while typical LGE on CMR was not.
Article
Background: Cardiac amyloidosis is caused by abnormal extracellular deposition of insoluble fibrils in cardiac tissue. It can be fatal when untreated and is often underdiagnosed. Understanding the ethnic/racial differences in risk factors is critical for early diagnosis and treatment to improve clinical outcomes. Methods: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study utilizing the National Inpatient Sample database from 2015 to 2018 using ICD-10-CM codes. The primary variables of interest were race/ethnicity and amyloidosis subtypes, while the primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, gastrointestinal bleeding, renal failure, and hospital length-of-stay. Results: Amyloidosis was reported in 0.17% of all hospitalizations (N=19,678,415). Of these, 0.09% were non-Hispanic whites, 0.04% were non-Hispanic blacks, and 0.02% were Hispanic. Hospitalizations with ATTR amyloidosis subtype were frequently observed in older individuals and males with coronary artery disease, whereas AL amyloidosis subtype was associated with non-Hispanic whites, congestive heart failure, and longer hospital length of stay. Renal failure was associated with non-Hispanic blacks (adjusted relative risk [RR]=1.31, p<0.001), Hispanics (RR=1.08, p=0.028) and had an increased risk of mortality. Similarly, the hospital length of stay was longer with non-Hispanic blacks (RR=1.19, p<0.001) and Hispanics (RR=1.05, p=0.03) compared to non-Hispanic whites. Hispanics had a reduced risk of mortality (RR=0.77, p=0.028) compared to non-Hispanic whites and non-Hispanic blacks, and no significant difference in mortality was seen between non-Hispanic whites and non-Hispanic blacks (RR=1.00, p=0.963). Conclusions: Our findings highlight significant ethnic/racial differences in risk factors and outcomes among amyloidosis-related US hospitalizations that can possibly be used for early detection, treatment, and better clinical outcomes.
Article
This study aimed to compare outcomes of systemic sclerosis (SSc) hospitalizations with and without lung involvement. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality while secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay (LOS) and total hospital charge. Data were abstracted from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2016 and 2017 database. This database is the largest collection of inpatient hospitalization data in the USA. The NIS was searched for SSc hospitalizations with and without lung involvement as principal or secondary diagnosis using International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes. SSc hospitalizations for patients aged ≥18 years from the above groups were identified. Multivariate logistic and linear regression analysis was used to adjust for possible confounders for the primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. There were over 71 million discharges included in the combined 2016 and 2017 NIS database. 62,930 hospitalizations were for adult patients who had either a principal or secondary ICD-10 code for SSc. 5095 (8.10%) of these hospitalizations had lung involvement. Lung involvement group had greater inpatient mortality (9.04% vs 4.36%, adjusted OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.61 to 2.73, p<0.0001), increase in mean adjusted LOS of 1.81 days (95% CI 0.98 to 2.64, p<0.0001), and increase in mean adjusted total hospital charge of $31,807 (95% CI 14,779 to 48,834, p<0.0001), compared with those without lung involvement. Hospitalizations for SSc with lung involvement have increased inpatient mortality, LOS and total hospital charge compared with those without lung involvement. Collaboration between the pulmonologist and the rheumatologist is important in optimizing outcomes of SSc hospitalizations with lung involvement.
Article
This study compares outcomes of patients admitted for atrial fibrillation (AF) with and without coexisting systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The primary outcome was inpatient mortality. Hospital length of stay (LOS), total hospital charges, odds of undergoing ablation, pharmacologic cardioversion and electrical cardioversion were secondary outcomes of interest. Data were abstracted from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2016 and 2017 database. The NIS was searched for adult hospitalizations with AF as principal diagnosis with and without SLE as secondary diagnosis using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Multivariate logistic and linear regression analysis was used accordingly to adjust for confounders. There were over 71 million discharges included in the combined 2016 and 2017 NIS database. 821,630 hospitalizations were for adult patients, who had a principal diagnosis of AF, out of which, 2645 (0.3%) had SLE as secondary diagnosis. Hospitalizations for AF with SLE had similar inpatient mortality (1.5% vs 0.91%, adjusted OR (AOR): 1.0, 95% CI 0.47 to 2.14, p=0.991), LOS (4.2 vs 3.4 days, p=0.525), total hospital charges ($51,351 vs $39,121, p=0.056), odds of undergoing pharmacologic cardioversion (0.38% vs 0.38%, AOR: 0.90, 95% CI 0.22 to 3.69, p=0.880) and electrical cardioversion (12.9% vs 17.5%, AOR 0.87, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.15, p=0.324) compared with those without SLE. However, SLE group had increased odds of undergoing ablation (6.8% vs 4.2%, AOR: 1.9, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.7, p<0.0001). Patients admitted for AF with SLE had similar inpatient mortality, LOS, total hospital charges, likelihood of undergoing pharmacologic and electrical cardioversion compared with those without SLE. However, SLE group had greater odds of undergoing ablation.
Article
Full-text available
Amyloid infiltration of the atrium is described in patients with valvular heart disease and is associated with an increased risk for atrial fibrillation(AF) while amyloid deposits in the ventricles is increasingly being diagnosed in patients with HFpEF. The role of amyloid deposits in patients with AF without valvular heart disease, which represents the most common form of AF globally, is undefined. In this study, we sought to assess the prevalence of sub-clinical isolated cardiac amyloidosis (ICA) at autopsy and the odds of AF in these patients. A total of 1083 patients were included in the study and 3.1% of patients were found to have asymptomatic ICA. Patients with ICA were older and had a higher odds of AF independent of age and CHA2DS2VASc score. Amongst patients with AF, those with ICA were more likely to have persistent forms of AF and had a lower sinus rhythm P-wave amplitude. Further studies are required to further define this entity, identify imaging modalities to aid in antemortem diagnosis of ICA and to establish the optimal management strategies in these patients.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: Atrial fibrillation (AF) weekend hospitalizations were reported to have poor outcomes compared to weekday hospitalizations. The relatively poor outcomes on the weekends are usually referred to as 'weekend effect'. We aim to understand trends and outcomes among weekend AF hospitalizations. The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the trends for weekend AF hospitalizations using Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2005-2014. Hospitalizations with AF as the primary diagnosis, in-hospital mortality, length of stay, co-morbidities and cardioversion procedures have been identified using the international classification of diseases 9 codes. Results: Since 2005, the weekend AF hospitalizations increased by 27% (72,216 in 2005 to 92,220 in 2014), mortality decreased by 29% (1.32% in 2005 to 0.94% in 2014), increase in urban teaching hospitalizations by 72% (33.32% in 2005 to 57.64% in 2014), twofold increase in depression and a threefold increase in the prevalence of renal failure were noted over the period of 10 years. After adjusting for significant covariates, weekend hospitalizations were observed to have higher odds of in-hospital mortality OR 1.17 (95% CI 1.108-1.235, P < 0.0001). Weekend AF hospitalizations appear to be associated with higher in-hospital mortality. Opportunities to improve care in weekend AF hospitalizations need to be explored.
Article
Full-text available
Background Patients with atrial fibrillation are known to have a high risk of mortality. There is a paucity of population-based studies about the impact of atrial fibrillation on the mortality risk stratified by age, sex, and detailed causes of death. Methods A total of 15,411 patients with atrial fibrillation from the Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort were enrolled, and causes of death were identified according to codes of the 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases. Results From 2002 to 2013, a total of 4,479 (29%) deaths were confirmed, and the crude mortality rate for all-cause death was 63.3 per 1,000 patient-years. Patients with atrial fibrillation had a 3.7-fold increased risk of all-cause death compared with the general population. The standardized mortality ratio for all-cause death was the highest in young patients and decreased with increasing age (standardized mortality ratio 21.93, 95% confidence interval 7.60–26.26 in patients aged <20 years; standardized mortality ratio 2.77, 95% confidence interval 2.63–2.91 in patients aged ≥80 years). Women with atrial fibrillation exhibited a greater excess mortality risk than men (standardized mortality ratio 3.81, 95% confidence interval 3.65–3.98 in women; standardized mortality ratio 3.35, 95% confidence interval 3.21–3.48 in men). Cardiovascular disease was the leading cause of death (38.5%), and cerebral infarction was the most common specific disease. Patients with atrial fibrillation had an about 5 times increased risk of death due to cardiovascular disease compared with the general population. Conclusions Patients with atrial fibrillation had a 4 times increased risk of mortality compared with the general population. However, the impact of atrial fibrillation on mortality decreased with age and in men. Cerebral infarction was the most common cause of death, and more attention should be paid to reducing the risk of stroke.
Article
Objectives This study sought to determine the incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA); to study the factors associated with the development of AF in this population; to study the prognostic implications of AF and maintenance of normal sinus rhythm (NSR) in patients with ATTR-CA; and to determine the impact of ATTR-CA stage on AF prevalence, outcomes, and efficacy of rhythm control strategies.. Background AF is common in patients with ATTR-CA. The aim of this study was to determine the predictors, prevalence, and outcomes of AF in patients with ATTR-CA in addition to the efficacy of rhythm control strategies. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of 382 patients with ATTR-CA diagnosed at our institution between January 2004 and January 2018. Means testing, and univariable and multivariable models were used. Results AF occurred in 265 (69%) patients. Factors associated with the development of AF included older age, advanced ATTR-CA stage, and higher left atrial volume index. Antiarrhythmic therapy (AAT) was used in 35% of patients with AF; cardioversion was performed in 45%, and 5% underwent AF ablation. Rhythm control strategies were substantially more effective when performed earlier in the disease course. During a mean follow-up of 35 months, no difference in mortality between patients with AF and those without AF was observed (65% vs. 49%, p = 0.76). On Cox proportional hazards analyses, maintenance of normal sinus rhythm and tafamidis use were associated with improved survival, whereas advanced ATTR-CA stage and higher New York Heart Association functional class were associated with increased mortality. Conclusions With advancing ATTR-CA stage, AF became more prevalent, occurring in 69% of our entire study cohort. Rhythm control strategies including AAT, direct-current cardioversion, and AF ablation were substantially more effective when performed earlier during the disease course.
Article
Background Cardiac amyloidosis is a progressive infiltrative disease involving deposition of amyloid fibrils in the myocardium and cardiac conduction system that frequently manifests with heart failure (HF) and arrhythmias, most frequently atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial flutter (AFL), and atrial tachycardia (AT). Methods We performed an observational retrospective study of patients with a diagnosis of cardiac amyloid who underwent catheter ablation at our institution between January 1, 2011 and December 1, 2018. Patient demographics, procedural characteristics and outcomes were determined by manual chart review. Results A total of 13 catheter ablations were performed over the study period in patients with cardiac amyloidosis, including 10 AT/AF/AFL ablations and 3 atrioventricular nodal ablations. Left ventricular ejection fraction was lower at the time of AV node ablation than catheter ablation of AT/AF/AFL (23% vs. 40%, p = 0.003). Cardiac amyloid was diagnosed based on the results of pre‐ablation cardiac MRI results in the majority of patients (n = 7, 70%). The HV interval was prolonged at 60±15 ms and did not differ significantly between AV nodal ablation patients and AT/AF/AFL ablation patients (69±18 ms vs. 57±14 ms, p = 0.36). The majority of patients undergoing AT/AF/AFL ablation had persistent AF (n = 7, 70%) and NYHA class II (n = 5, 50%) or III (n = 5, 50%) HF symptoms, while patients undergoing AV node ablation were more likely to have class IV HF (n = 2, 66%, p = 0.014). Arrhythmia‐free survival in CA patients after catheter ablation of AT/AF/AFL was 40% at one year and 20% at two years. Conclusions Catheter ablation of AT/AF/AFL may be a feasible strategy for appropriately selected patients with early to mid‐stage CA, whereas AV node ablation may be more appropriate in patients with advanced stage CA. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
Article
Cardiac amyloidosis is characterized by extracellular protein fibril deposition in the myocardium leading to restrictive heart failure. Both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, along with conduction disease, are common in cardiac amyloidosis, and are often highly symptomatic and poorly tolerated. Many commonly used therapeutics such as beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, and digoxin may be poorly tolerated and lead to clinical decompensation in this population, adding complexity to the co-management of these conditions. In addition, studies have shown that atrial fibrillation with cardiac amyloidosis carries a high risk of stroke and systemic embolism, making anticoagulation indicated in all patients regardless of CHA2DS2-VASc score. Ventricular arrhythmias are common, whereas an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator has not been shown to improve survival. Conduction disease is also common and permanent pacemaker placement is often needed. High-quality evidence and guideline recommendations are limited with regard to the management of arrhythmias in cardiac amyloidosis. Providers are often left to clinical experience and expert consensus to aid in decision-making. In this focused review, we outline current guideline recommendations, summarize both historical and contemporary data, and describe evidence-based strategies for managing arrhythmias and their sequelae in patients with cardiac amyloidosis.
Article
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) commonly affects patients with cardiac amyloidosis (CA). Amyloid deposition within the left atrium may be responsible for the subtype of AF in either permanent or non-permanent form. The prognostic implications of AF and its clinical subtype according to the type of CA are still controversial in this population. This study sought to investigate the prevalence, incidence and prognostic implications of AF and the clinical subtype of AF (permanent or non-permanent) in patients with CA. Methods: Two hundred and thirty-eight patients with CA and full medical records were retrospectively enrolled in the study: About 115 (48%) with light chain (AL) amyloidosis and 123 (52%) with transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR). Patient’s medical records were reviewed to establish baseline prevalence, incidence and impact on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality during follow-up of AF. Results: One hundred and four (44%) patients had history of AF at the time of diagnosis: 62 (60%) permanent and 42 (40%) non-permanent. There were 30 (26%) and 74 (60%) patients with history of AF among patients with AL and ATTR (including 5 hereditary and 69 wild-type), respectively (p<.0001). During the follow-up, 48 new patients developed AF (29, 12 and 7 among patients with AL, wild-type ATTR and hereditary ATTR). After adjustment for age, survival was similar in patients with or without history of AF (HR 0.87 (95% CI, 0.60 to 1.27; p = .467). AF had no impact on cardiovascular mortality. Among the 152 patients with history of AF included in the whole study, there were 75 (49%) patients with permanent AF. After adjustment for age, survival was similar in patients with permanent and non-permanent AF: HR 1.29 (95% CI, 0.84 to 1.99; p = .251). The results were the same among patients with AL or wild-type amyloidosis. Subtype of AF had no impact on cardiovascular mortality. Conclusions: AF is common in patients with CA. However, AF and clinical subtype of AF have no impact on all-cause mortality, whatever the type of amyloidosis.
Article
To the Editor Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) data, Dewan et al¹ studied cardiac surgery hospitalizations related to opioid use disorder, with complication as one of the main outcomes. Although a powerful tool, the NIS data lacks a present-on-admission flag, not allowing for discrimination between conditions that were present on admission (ie, a comorbidities) and new conditions acquired during hospitalization (ie, complications).² Therefore, it is imperative for researchers using the NIS data set to carefully devise a set of comorbidities and complications that are unlikely to overlap during the index hospitalization for the specific condition of interest. In studying hospitalizations related to cardiac surgery with NIS data, we argue that the Elixhauser comorbidity index,³ a diagnosis classification system used by the authors, is of limited utility.
Article
The amyloidoses are a group of protein-folding disorders in which ≥1 organ is infiltrated by proteinaceous deposits known as amyloid. The deposits are derived from 1 of several amyloidogenic precursor proteins, and the prognosis of the disease is determined both by the organ(s) involved and the type of amyloid. Amyloid involvement of the heart (cardiac amyloidosis) carries the worst prognosis of any involved organ, and light-chain (AL) amyloidosis is the most serious form of the disease. The last decade has seen considerable progress in understanding the amyloidoses. In this review, current and novel approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac amyloidosis are discussed, with particular reference to AL amyloidosis in the heart.