Phytotoxins Produced by Fungi Associated with Grapevine Trunk Diseases

Abstract

Up to 60 species of fungi in the Botryosphaeriaceae family, genera Cadophora, Cryptovalsa, Cylindrocarpon, Diatrype, Diatrypella, Eutypa, Eutypella, Fomitiporella, Fomitiporia, Inocutis, Phaeoacremonium and Phaeomoniella have been isolated from decline-affected grapevines all around the World. The main grapevine trunk diseases of mature vines are Eutypa dieback, the esca complex and cankers caused by the Botryospheriaceae, while in young vines the main diseases are Petri and black foot diseases. To understand the mechanism of these decline-associated diseases and the symptoms associated with them, the toxins produced by the pathogens involved in these diseases were isolated and characterised chemically and biologically. So far the toxins of only a small number of these decline fungi have been studied. This paper presents an overview of the toxins produced by the most serious of these vine wood pathogens: Eutypa lata, Phaeomoniella chlamydospora, Phaeoacremonium aleophilum and some taxa in the Botryosphaeriaceae family, and examines how these toxins produce decline symptoms. The chemical structure of these metabolites and in some cases their vivotoxin nature are also discussed.

Full text

Toxins 2011, 3, 1569-1605; doi:10.3390/toxins3121569
toxins
ISSN 2072-6651
www.mdpi.com/journal/toxins
Review
Phytotoxins Produced by Fungi Associated with Grapevine
Trunk Diseases
Anna Andolfi 1,*, Laura Mugnai 2,*, Jordi Luque 3, Giuseppe Surico 2, Alessio Cimmino 1 and
Antonio Evidente 1
1 Dipartimento di Scienze del Suolo, della Pianta, dell’Ambiente e delle Produzioni Animali,
Università di Napoli Federico II, Via Università 100, Portici I-80055, Italy;
E-Mails: alessio.cimmino@unina.it (A.C.); evidente@unina.it (A.E.)
2 Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Agrarie, Sezione Protezione delle piante, Università degli Studi di
Firenze, P.le delle Cascine 28, Firenze I-50144, Italy; E-Mail: giuseppe.surico@unifi.it
3 Departament de Patologia Vegetal, IRTA, Ctra. de Cabrils km 2, Cabrils E-08348, Spain;
E-Mail: jordi.luque@irta.cat
* Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mails: andolfi@unina.it (A.A.);
laura.mugnai@unifi.it (L.M.); Tel.: +39-081-2539-179 (A.A.); +39-055-3288-274 (L.M.);
Fax: +39-081-2539-186 (A.A.); +39-055-3288-273 (L.M.).
Received: 8 November 2011; in revised form: 29 November 2011 / Accepted: 30 November 2011 /
Published: 20 December 2011
Abstract: Up to 60 species of fungi in the Botryosphaeriaceae family, genera Cadophora,
Cryptovalsa, Cylindrocarpon, Diatrype, Diatrypella, Eutypa, Eutypella, Fomitiporella,
Fomitiporia, Inocutis, Phaeoacremonium and Phaeomoniella have been isolated from
decline-affected grapevines all around the World. The main grapevine trunk diseases of
mature vines are Eutypa dieback, the esca complex and cankers caused by the
Botryospheriaceae, while in young vines the main diseases are Petri and black foot
diseases. To understand the mechanism of these decline-associated diseases and the
symptoms associated with them, the toxins produced by the pathogens involved in these
diseases were isolated and characterised chemically and biologically. So far the toxins of
only a small number of these decline fungi have been studied. This paper presents an
overview of the toxins produced by the most serious of these vine wood pathogens: Eutypa
lata, Phaeomoniella chlamydospora, Phaeoacremonium aleophilum and some taxa in the
Botryosphaeriaceae family, and examines how these toxins produce decline symptoms.
The chemical structure of these metabolites and in some cases their vivotoxin nature are
also discussed.
OPEN ACCESS

Toxins 2011, 3
1570
Keywords: black dead arm; Botryosphaeria canker; esca; Eutypa dieback; eutypiosis;
grapevine trunk diseases; phytotoxins; Phaeomoniella; Phaeoacremonium; Fomitiporia
1. Introduction
Grapevine trunk diseases cause a slow decline and yield loss in grapevines at all stages of growth.
The symptoms of these diseases include the death of spurs, arms, and cordons, and the eventual death
of the vines due to a progressive wood necrosis and decay of plant tissue [1–6]. Besides causing
various types of wood necrosis and decay, most of these diseases also produce leaf symptoms, which
include chlorosis, necrosis, deformation, and stunting.
Many fungi are involved in grapevine trunk diseases. They include species in the Botryosphaeriaceae,
which cause dieback and canker, Eutypa lata, the agent of Eutypa dieback or eutypiosis, species of
Cylindrocarpon and Campylocarpon, causing black foot disease, Phaeomoniella chlamydospora and
Phaeoacremonium aleophilum, the main agents of the vascular diseases within the esca complex,
including Petri disease, and species of Fomitiporia, Fomitiporella, Inocutis and other basidiomycetes,
causing wood decay [1,3–7]. Recent research has established that, besides E. lata, some other species
also in the family Diatrypaceae likewise cause trunk diseases of grapevine. These are Eutypa
leptoplaca, Cryptovalsa ampelina, Cryptosphaeria pullmanensis, and some further species in the
genera Diatrype, Diatrypella and Eutypa [8,9]. Most of these fungi grow slowly in the vine wood, and
foliar symptoms do not appear until several years after the onset of infection, so that by the time the
symptoms become visible the fungi are well-established [2,6,10].
In addition, pathogenicity has been confirmed recently for some less well-known fungi such as
Cadophora luteo-olivacea [11,12], but many characteristic factors regarding the pathogenicity of these
fungi and their mechanism of action remain to be investigated.
There is no effective cure for grapevine trunk diseases, but some remedial practices on affected
vines are possible; these include the removal of dead vine parts, and re-training or re-grafting affected
vines [13,14]. Moreover, the application of chemical and biological protectants on pruning wounds has
been recommended to reduce the spread of these diseases [15–19]. Some grapevine trunk pathogens
can also infect the grapevine material used in the propagation process of vines. An integrated
management program including hot water treatment of vine propagation material, and the application
of chemical pesticides and/or biocontrol agents at different growth stages of new vines have shown
some interesting results in controlling these diseases [20–22].
Several pathogens involved in grapevine trunk diseases produce toxic metabolites. Many of these
metabolites have been chemically characterised and tested for their toxicity on the protoplasts, calli
and leaves of various Vitis species and on V. vinifera cultivars. The mode of action of some of these
metabolites is well documented. This review examines the role of these toxic metabolites, the factors
that ensure their virulence and their mode of action.

Toxins 2011, 3
1571
2. Eutypa Dieback
Eutypa lata causes Eutypa dieback, a serious disease that has been known for over 60 years.
It causes losses in older vineyards. Its most recognised symptoms are: stunting of new shoots early in
the growing season, small, cupped, chlorotic and tattered leaves, and short internodes (Figure 1A,B).
Internal wood symptoms when arms and trunks are cross-sectioned include characteristic V-shaped
necrosis (Figure 1C). External cankers developing from old pruning wounds also occur [1,23].
Figure 1. Symptoms of Eutypa dieback in (A) vine leaves and (B) new vine shoots;
(C) Characteristic V-shaped necrosis of a vine trunk.
(C)

Toxins 2011, 3
1572
2.1. Toxins Produced by Eutypa lata
Eutypa lata produces a number of structurally related secondary metabolites, mainly acetylenic
phenols and their heterocyclic analogues. Eutypine (1, Figure 2), or 4-hydroxy-3-(3-methylbut-3-ene-
1-ynyl)-benzaldehyde, is the most toxic. It was isolated from the cultures of an unspecified strain of
E. lata and characterised [24,25]. It has an unusual five-carbon acetylenic side chain. Some other,
structurally related metabolites were isolated from organic extracts of the same fungal culture such as
eutypinol, O-methyleutypin, O-methyleutypinol, eutypin carboxylic acid analogue (2–5, Figure 2), as
well as the compounds produced by hydroxylation of the terminal vinyl group of eutypine, eutypinol
and the carboxylic anologue (6–8, Figure 2) [25–27]. Under low acidic conditions, eutypine is
converted into 2-iso-propenyl-5-formylbenzofuran (9, Figure 2). This bicyclic product was also
detected in E. lata culture filtrates [26].
Figure 2. Chemical structures of Eutypa lata metabolites and derivatives: eutypine,
eutypinol, O-methyleutypine, O-methyleutypinol, eutypin carboxylic acid analogue (1–5),
3-(3,4-dihydroxy-3-methyl-1-butynyl)-4-hydroxy-benzaldehyde, 2-(3,4-dihydroxy-3-methyl-
1-butynyl)-4-hydroxymethyl-phenol, 3-(3,4-dihydroxy-3-methyl-1-butynyl)-4-hydroxy-benzoic
acid (6–8), 2-iso-propenyl-5-formylbenzofuran, siccayne, eulatinol (9–11), eulatachromene
and its derivatives (12 and 17–19), epoxidised chromanones (13–14), eutypoxide B and
allenic epoxycyclohexane (15–16).
R
1
R
2
O
R
O
OHC
1 R
1
=CHO, R
2
=OH
2 R
1
=CH
2
OH, R
2
=OH
3 R
1
=CHO, R
2
=OCH
3
4 R
1
=CH
2
OH, R
2
=OCH
3
5 R
1
=COOH, R
2
=OH
O
OH
O
O
O
O
O
HO
OH
O
O
OH
O
OH
OH
R
1
OH
6 R
1
=CHO
7 R
1
=CH
2
OH
8 R
1
=COOH
OH
OH
9
OH
R
10 R= OH
11 R= OCH
3
12 R=CH
2
OH
17 R=CHO
18 R=COOH
19 R=COOCH
3
13
14 15 16
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
77a
3a
1
2
3
4
4a
5
6
7
88a

Toxins 2011, 3
1573
Biological assays on excised tomato plants and vine leaves have shown that of all these metabolites
eutypine is the most phytotoxic [26]. A comparative study was carried out on the metabolites from
three strains of E. lata: strain E120 from grapevine in California, strain E125 from grapevine in Italy,
and isolate E178 from oak in California. The metabolites were grown on malt yeast broth (MYB) and
on potato dextrose broth (PDB) [27]. Eutypine, occurred in only one of the strains but the main
metabolite was eutypinol, which is a detoxification product of 1 (Figure 2) [27]. A novel metabolite,
named eulatinol (11, Figure 2) was isolated from the Italian strain E125, together with its
O-demethyl derivate, siccayene (10, Figure 2). The chromene analogue, 6-hydroxymethyl-2,2-
dimethyl-2H-chromene, named eulatachromene (12, Figure 2) as well as 1 and 2 (Figure 2) were
isolated from the California strain E120 [18]. As previously reported, eutypine was readily cyclised
into benzofuran (9, Figure 2) in the presence of traces of acid, and eutypinol was the main metabolite
under most culture conditions [27].
The phytotoxicity of E. lata metabolites was tested in a leaf disk bioassay on “Cabernet Sauvignon”
leaves (Figure 3A) [28]. Activity at 50 μg/mL of metabolites 1, 2, and 9–12 (Figure 2) indicated
that neither eutypinol nor siccayne were phytotoxic; while eutypine, benzofuran, eulatinol, and
eulatacromene (1, 9, 11 and 12, Figure 2) had a toxic effect, producing necrotic spots on the leaves
(Figure 3A). Eulatacromene and benzofuran were more toxic than the acetylenic phenols. However
eulatachromene (12, Figure 2) was also examined for toxicity at various concentrations from 10 to
100 μg/mL. At its lowest concentration, 12 (Figure 2) caused necrosis on some disks, and at its highest
concentration it caused necrosis on all disks (Figure 3B) [28].
Two highly oxygenated cyclohexene oxides were also isolated from E. lata: eutypoxide B [29] and
the novel allenic epoxycyclohexane (13 and 14, Figure 2) [25].
Figure 3. (A) Comparison, after 24 h and at 50 μg/mL, of the toxicity of the methanol
control (C) and of the primary metabolites eutypine 1, eutypinol 2, 2-iso-propenyl-5-
formylbenzofuran 9, siccayene 10, eulatinol 11, and eulatachromene 12, in a grape leaf
bioassay; (B) comparison, after 24 h and at 10, 25, 50 and 100 μg/mL, of phytotoxicity of
the methanol control (C) and eulatachromene (12) (redrawn with modifications from
Figure 5 in [28]).
To elucidate the biochemistry of E. lata, both its sterol composition and its total sterol content were
investigated in solid and in liquid culture [30]. The total amount of sterols was 1.58 and 1.12 μg/mg

Toxins 2011, 3
1574
dry weight mycelium in solid and liquid cultures respectively. The major sterol was identified as
ergosterol. This accounted for 88% of the total sterols in a solid medium and 78% when the fungus was
grown in a liquid medium. In addition to ergosterol, four minor sterols, ergosta-5,7,9(11),22-tetraen-
3β-ol, ergosta-7,22-dien-3β-ol, fecosterol and episterol also occurred. They accounted for 1–4% and
1.8–13% in solid and liquid culture respectively. These results suggest that the sterol biosynthesis
pathway of E. lata is very similar to that of other pathogenic filamentous fungi [30].
2.2. Structure-Toxicity Relationship Studies
Preliminary studies on the structure-toxicity relationship, carried out on the acetylenic phenols,
showed that the occurrence of the aldehydic group and a free OH group in para-position were
important for phytotoxic activity [26].
Smith et al. [31] in their study of the structure-phytotoxicity relationships compared the activity of
metabolites from various strains of E. lata and from their chromene analogues, such as the corresponding
aldehyde, acid and methyl esters (17–19, Figure 2) [31]. They synthesised the chromene analogue in
quantities sufficient for evaluation, and carried out a rapid quantitative bioassay, involving the topical
application of individual compounds to culture disks of grape leaves with subsequent measurement of
chlorophyll loss to measure tissue damage (Figure 4A,B) [31]. In this assay, eulatachromene was more
phytotoxic than eutypine (Figure 4A). The bicyclic product 9 (Figure 2) was also quite toxic, while the
reduction product eutypinol, as well as the quinol siccayne (Figure 4A), were not toxic [31]. When
eulatachromene was compared with its three synthetic analogues 17–19 (Figure 2) only the
corresponding aldehyde 17 (Figure 2) had a toxicity similar to 12 (Figure 2), while 18 and 19 (Figure 2)
were not toxic (Figure 4B) [31]. Consequently the active chromenes 12 and 17, along with benzofuran 9
(Figure 2), were more toxic than eutypine and eutypinol [31].
Figure 4. Toxicity of metabolites of Eutypa lata and their synthetic analogues measured in
the grapeleaf disk bioassay as a per-cent reduction in chlorophyll relative to the control.
(A) E. lata metabolites eutypine, eutypinol, 2-iso-propenyl-5-formylbenzofuran, siccayne
and eulatachromene (1, 2, 9, 10 and 12, Figure 2). (B) Eulatachromene and its synthetic
analogues 6-carboxymethylchromene, 6-formylchromene, and 6-carboxychromene (12,
17–19, Figure 2) (redrawn with modifications from Figure 5 in [31]).

Toxins 2011, 3
1575
2.3. Mechanism of Action of Eutypa lata Toxins
The biological action of eutypine (1, Figure 2) in grapevines has been extensively studied [32].
Eutypine is synthesised by the fungus in the trunk and is thought to be transported by the sap to the
herbaceous parts of the plant, where it spreads through the leaves and inflorescences to participate in
the expression of disease symptoms [33]. Eutypine has weak acid properties and a marked lipophilic
character. It penetrates the vine cells by passive diffusion and accumulates in the cytoplasm due to an
ion-trapping mechanism related to the ionisation state of the compound [33]. In this case the experiments
were carried out on the plasmalemma of three models: V. vinifera, Beta vulgaris and Minosa pudica.
These biological models were suitable for particular physiological processes. The observations obtained
from these studies showed that eutypine was unspecific since it indifferently acted on all three plant
cell models used [33] (Table 1).
Table 1. Metabolites isolated from Eutypa lata and phytotoxicity assays.
Metabolite (Figure 2) Plant matrix used for phytotoxicity assays References
Eutypine (1)
Grapevine leaves, tomato leaves, grapevine,
mimosa and sugar beet membranes, mitochondria [26–28,31,33–35]
Eutypinol (2) Grapevine and tomato leaves [26–28,31]
O-Methyleutypine (3) Grapevine and tomato leaves, mitochondria [26,34–36]
O-Methyleutypinol (4) Grapevine leaves, tomato leaves [26]
Eutypin carboxylic acid anologue (5) Grapevine leaves, tomato leaves [26]
3-(3,4-Dihydroxy-3-methyl-1-butynyl)-4-hydroxy-benzaldehyde (6) Grapevine leaves, tomato leaves [26]
2-(3,4-Dihydroxy-3-methyl-1-butynyl)-4-hydroxymethyl-phenol (7) Grapevine and tomato leaves [26]
3-(3,4-Dihydroxy-3-methyl-1-butynyl)-4-hydroxy-benzoic acid (8) Grapevine leaves, tomato leaves [26]
2-iso-Propenyl-5-formylbenzofuran (9) Grapevine and tomato leaves [26,28,31]
Siccayne (10) Grapevine leaves [28,31]
Eulatinol (11) Grapevine leaves [28]
Eulatachromene (12) Grapevine leaves [28,31]
Epoxidised chromanones (13, 14) Grapevine leaves [26]
Eutypoxide B (15) Grapevine leaves [29]
Allenic epoxycyclohexane (16) Grapevine leaves [29]
That eutypine targets the mitochondria is suggested by the fact that it modifies the rate of
respiration of the grapevine cell and its energy balance [34–36].
The molecular mode of action of eutypine at the mitochondrial level, and of O-methyleutypine (3,
Figure 2), the non-deprotonatable derivative of 1 (Figure 2), was investigated [34]. The effects of these
molecules on mitochondrial respiration and on the membrane potential were compared using isolated
mitochondria from grapevine cells in suspension cultures. Eutypine caused marked stimulation of
oxygen consumption and had a depolarising effect, while methyleutypine had a very slight effect on
both the rate of oxygen uptake and membrane potential. High eutypine concentrations had a mixed
effect, with a direct inhibition of electron transport and uncoupling. At concentrations below 200 mM,
eutypine displayed a linear relationship between the oxidation rate and the membrane potential, similar
to that of the traditional protonophore carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP). But unlike
CCCP, eutypine induced a potential-dependent proton conductance, which was probably due to a

Toxins 2011, 3
1576
potential-dependent migration of the dissociated form of the toxin across the membrane. It was thus
concluded that eutypine uncouples mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and decreases the ADP/O
ratio in grapevine cells by increasing proton leaks, which it accomplishes by means of a cyclic
protonophore mechanism [35,36].
A further study of five mutant strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae showed that eutypinol and
eulatachromene (2 and 12, Figure 2) inhibited mitochondrial respiration in wild-type yeast, and that
2-iso-prenyl-5-formyl-benzofuran and siccayne (9 and 10, Figure 2) inhibited respiration in the strain
lacking in mitochondrial respiration and vacuolar acidification. These effects of eutypinol and
eulatachromene were confirmed using a strain with mitochondrial dysfunction and hypersensitivity to
oxidative stress [32]. This study was not conducted on grapevine cells (Table 1).
2.4. Eutyta lata Toxins as Virulence Factors
Eutypa lata toxins are non-specific and appear to be important virulence factors in causing the
symptoms of Eutypa dieback [35]. However, a lack of toxin-deficient mutants of the fungus, as well as
the long time the fungus needs to incubate in the trunk before symptoms appeared, prevented a
much-needed critical study of these toxins in grapevine. Nevertheless, it was confirmed that eutypine
in grapevine cells is metabolised into the corresponding alcohol, eutypinol (2, Figure 2), through the
enzymatic reduction of eutypine by a NADPH-dependent enzyme [37,38]. Eutypinol was not toxic to
grapevine and had no protonophoric activity. The high affinity of the eutypine reductase enzyme
(ERE) for eutypine indicated that ERE may play an important role in the detoxification of eutypine.
It was also found that eutypinol did not have any uncoupling activity in the mitochondria [39] unlike
what was seen with S. cerevisiae [32]. When the detoxification of leaf tissue by two genotypes of
V. vinifera is compared, there seems to be a relationship between the susceptibility of vine cultivars
to Eutypa dieback and the degree to which these vines deactivate eutypine [40]. Novel
NADPH-dependent aldehyde reductase genes conferring resistance to eutypine have been reported
from Vigna radiata [40,41]. This suggests that detoxification enhances the resistance of the vines to
the toxin [39].
2.5. Analytical Detection of Eutypa lata Toxins in Vitro and in Planta
Eutypa lata synthesises a variety of metabolites, whose role in causing dieback is quite unclear.
This role needs to be elucidated before any attempt can be made to apply these metabolites in order to
diagnose E. lata dieback. Some studies have been carried out to determine the best growing conditions
for E. lata, and to optimise its production of toxic metabolites in an artificial environment, especially
on grapevine wood and wood extracts. Molyneux et al. [27] studied in vitro variations in the
metabolite production of three E. lata isolates, using two growth media [malt yeast broth (MYB) and
potato dextrose broth (PDB)], and a longer term, than previously reported. These researchers examined
three representative strains of E. lata, two from grapevine (E120 and E125), and one strain from oak in
California, to serve as a representative non-grapevine host species (E178). Metabolite composition and
yield differed significantly between strains and between growth media, but yield usually peaked after
24–30 days [27]. Metabolites were identified by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry of their
trimethylsilyl ether derivatives and analysed. This method proved to be generally applicable to all the

Toxins 2011, 3
1577
metabolites subsequently isolated, with the trimethylsilyl derivatives well resolved [27]. Eutypine,
eutypinol, siccayene and eulatinol (1, 2, 10, 11, Figure 2) were quantified by high-performance liquid
chromatography (HPLC) in the three strains on MYB and PDB. Eutypine (1) was detected in only
one of the strains (E125) on both media. The primary metabolite was the detoxification product
eutypinol (2). This metabolite was produced in large quantities by one of the strains grown on PDB,
but it was detected in all strains [18]. Strain E178 from oak did not produce these metabolites [27].
Subsequently, the HPLC procedure was optimised to establish the phenolic metabolite profiles of
eleven E. lata strains grown on four growth media and to determine how the growth of these strains in
these media differed from their growth on “Cabernet Sauvignon” vine wood and wood extracts [28].
The same technique was used to evaluate secondary metabolite production of 30 isolates of E. lata
grown on media derived from the canes of three grapevine cultivars, two of which (Merlot and
Semillom) were tolerant to E. lata, and one (Shiraz) susceptible [10]. Eutypine, eutypinol,
O-methyl-eutypinol, 2-iso-propenyl-5-formylbenzofuran, eulatinol and eulatachromene (1, 2, 4, 9, 11
and 12, Figure 2) were detected in all culture filtrates. The most abundant metabolites were eutypinol
and O-methyl-eutypinol, which were produced by 97 and 83% of isolates respectively. No correlation
was found between secondary metabolite levels in the media containing ground canes from the three
grapevine cultivars, and the tolerance/susceptibility of these cultivars to Eutypa dieback. In addition,
no secondary metabolites of E. lata were detected from any isolates of other fungi commonly isolated
from grapevine trunks in Australia such as Cryptovalsa ampelina, Libertella sp., Pa. chlamydospora,
Pm. aleophilum, and various species of Botryosphaeriaceae and Fomitiporia that were grown on
ground canes. This suggests that these metabolites are specific to E. lata [10]. To detect the secondary
metabolites in planta, micropropagated grapevine plantlets were treated with purified and crude
culture filtrates of nine E. lata isolates grown on MYB. The secondary metabolites 1, 2, 4, 9, 11 and 12
(Figure 2) were identified in some of the treated plantlets, but no single metabolite was detected
consistently in all plantlets. Eutypinol was detected in micropropagated grapevine plantlets inoculated
with E. lata mycelium; however, no metabolites were detected in the sap of plotted vines that had been
mechanically inoculated with the pathogen [10].
As mentioned above, eutypinol is not toxic when applied to grapevine leaf disks [19,23]. However,
this lack of toxicity does not preclude the use of this metabolite as a chemical marker, since the
pathogenicity of E. lata is not due solely to the phenolic metabolites it produces, but also to the fact
that it colonises grapevine wood and degrades the xylem. Consequently, whenever a non-toxic
metabolite of E. lata such as eutypinol is detected in a vine, it is a positive indication of the occurrence
of E. lata itself [28].
DNA-based markers to identify E. lata in infected vine wood have been developed [42,43].
Although identification techniques based on DNA analysis are sensitive enough, they are destructive
and the particular vine portion sampled must actually contain E. lata; if healthy tissues from an
infected vine are sampled, a false negative reading may result. However, the metabolites of E. lata are
likely to be distributed throughout the vascular tissue and foliage of infected vines, especially in spring
when the foliar symptoms are most evident. A diagnosis based on identifying such specific metabolites
of E. lata in planta can therefore be carried out early in the season, even before the pathogen itself has
spread throughout the vine. False negatives are in any case possible since foliar symptoms, and hence

Toxins 2011, 3
1578
also toxin translocation, fluctuate from year to year on infected spurs or branches, as is common in leaf
stripe disease [44].
3. Esca, A Complex of Diseases
The term esca complex was introduced at the end of the last century [45,46] and has more recently
been redefined. The esca complex is a complex of two diseases, which may co-occur in the same vine:
a wood rot (also called esca, in its redefined sense), and a vascular disease [2,47–52]. The vascular
disease in turn comprises three syndromes, all of which are caused by Pa. chlamydospora and
Pm. aleophilum. Pm. aleophilum is by far the most common [2,52] of the twenty-four Phaeoacremonium
species that have been isolated from both symptomatic and asymptomatic grapevine wood in different
parts of the world [7,48]. The three vascular syndromes are: brown wood streaking, Petri disease, and
grapevine leaf-stripe disease, previously known as young esca [2,47]. Brown wood streaking is an
infection of pre-planting propagation material, and produces wood discolouration and necrosis of the
vessels, occurring at a stage where the vine has not yet got any leaves. Petri disease is a decline occurring
in young vineyards, in which some individual vines lose their vigour and exhibit weak growth, with
thin stems and a faint aspecific chlorosis or marginal necrosis of the leaves [48–51]. These symptoms
are more severe in grafted than in self-rooted cuttings. The internal symptoms of visibly declining
vines but also of vines that are still asymptomatic, show up as brown-black streaking of the wood in
cross-section (just like brown streaking in diseased vine cuttings). Streaks often form a black ring
around the pith, or appear as scattered black dots [2,52]. The symptoms of leaf stripe disease are wood
necrosis (but not wood rot), brown-red discolouration, and vascular necrosis or black streaking with
black gummy exudates. These symptoms are linked to the typical foliar interveinal necrosis, were the
leaf blade is necrotic and is surrounded by yellow or red margins, but the area immediately surrounding
the main veins remains fully green, thus giving the leaf a typical tiger-stripe pattern (Figure 5).
In the Mediterranean area wood decay is caused almost exclusively by Fomitiporia mediterranea,
while elsewhere it is caused by other basidiomycete species (other species of Fomitiporia, species of
Fomitiporella, Inocutis and others) [1,3]. Symptoms are internal white decay or wood rot on
artificially or naturally infected vines, but no association with any type of foliar symptom has
been found.
Lastly, since two of the diseases of the esca complex, white decay and the vascular disease, are very
often found on the same vine in the field, the term esca proper also denotes a vine (especially an older
vine) affected with both these diseases.
The terms chronic (or mild) esca and acute esca should therefore be abandoned. The acute form of
esca indicated an apoplexy or sudden death of a vine and appears to be related to white decay, while
chronic esca referred to vines showing tiger like symptoms on the leaves, which is the equivalent of
what is now termed leaf-stripe disease.

Toxins 2011, 3
1579
Figure 5. (A) Vine leaf showing leaf stripe disease (previously young esca) and an affected
grape cluster; (B) leaves showing the initial interveinal chlorotic spots; (C) black gummy
material from Phaeomoniella chlamydospora infected wood, brown red wood and white
decay caused by Fomitiporia mediterranea.
This complex of diseases causes serious losses especially in all European wine-growing countries
and in the USA. While the leaf-stripe symptoms appear to be linked to the vascular disease, a sudden

Toxins 2011, 3
1580
wilt (known as apoplexy) also occurs, which eventually leads to the death of the vine. Apoplexy occurs
both in vines affected with the leaf-stripe symptoms and in vines with white rot which is itself the
combined effect of on the one hand extensive wood deterioration caused by the rot fungi, and on the
other hand certain toxins produced by Pa. chlamydospora and/or Pm. aleophilum [53]. The shoots,
leaves, and berries also become affected (Figure 5).
To simplify the reading of this review, only the term esca will be used from now on to refer to the
esca complex in general.
3.1. Toxins Produced by Phaeomoniella chlamydospora and Phaeoacremonium aleophilum, Main
Causal Agents of Leaf Stripe Disease
3.1.1. Lipophilic Low-Molecular Weight Metabolites
Various metabolites, representing different classes of natural compounds, have been isolated and
identified from culture filtrates of Pm. aleophilum and Pa. chlamydospora. They include
naphthalenone pentaketides. From liquid culture of Pm. aleophilum were isolated scytalone,
isosclerone [54,55], cis-4-hydroxy-scytalone, 1,3,8-trihydroxynaphtalene (1,3,8-THN),
2,4,8-trihydroxytetralone (2,4,8-THT), 3,4,8-trihydroxytetralone (3,4,8-THT), flavioline,
2-hydroxyjuglone (2-HJ, traces), and 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde (20–28, Figure 6) [55]. Liquid cultures
of Pa. chlamydospora, have yielded, besides scytalone, isosclerone and 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde
already mentioned (compounds 20, 21, 28, Figure 7) [55], also tyrosol, 1-O-methylemodine,
3-hydroxy-5-decanolide, (S)-4-hydroxyphenyllactic acid and 4-hydroxy-3-(3-methyl-2-butenyloxy)-
benzoic acid (29–33, Figure 7) [55].
Figure 6. Chemical structures of Phaeoacremonium aleophilum metabolites: scytalone,
isosclerone, cis-4-hydroxyscytalone, 1,3,8-trihydroxynaphtalene, 2,4,8-trihydroxytetralone,
3,4,8-trihydroxytetralone, flavioline, 2-hydroyjuglone and 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde 20–28.
OH
HO OH
O
OH O
OH
CHO
OH
OH OH
HO
20 21
28
23
26
22
2524
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
88a
4a
OH O
OH
OH
OH
OH
O
OH
OH
OH
O
OH
HO
OH
OH
O
O
HO
27
O
O
OH
OH

Toxins 2011, 3
1581
Figure 7. Chemical structures of Phaeomoniella chlamydospora metabolites: scytalone,
isosclerone (20–21), 4-hydroxybenzaldeide, tyrosol, 1-O-methylemodine, 3-hydroxy-5-
decanolide, (S)-4-hydroxyphenyllactic acid, 3-(3-methyl-2-butenyloxy)-4-hydroxybenzoic
acid (28–33).
OH
HO OH
OOH O
OH
HO
C
HO
OH
OH
HO
O
O
OCH
3
O
OH
O
OH
COOH
OH
O
20 21
29
28
30 31
32 33
HO
COOH
OH
The biological activity of metabolites produced by Pm. aleophilum and Pa. chlamydospora were
evaluated against grapevine leaves, calli and living protoplasts (Table 2).
Table 2. Metabolites isolated from Phaeoacremonium aleophilum and Phaeomoniella
chlamydospora and phytotoxicity assays.
Metabolite (Figures 6 and 7) Plant matrix used for phytotoxicity assays References
Scytalone (20) Grapevine leaves Grapevine callus and
protoplasts Arabidopsis thaliana [54–57]
Isosclerone (21) Grapevine leaves Grapevine callus and
protoplasts Arabidopsis thaliana [54–57]
cis-4-Hydroxyscytalone (22) Grapevine callus and protoplasts [57]
1,3,8-Trihydroxynaphthalene (1,3,8-THN) (23) Grapevine callus [57]
2,4,8-Trihydroxy-tetralone (2,4,8-THT) (24) Grapevine callus Arabidopsis thaliana [57]
3,4,8-Trihydroxytetralone (3,4,8-THT) (25) Grapevine callus Arabidopsis thaliana [57]
Flavioline (26) Grapevine callus Arabidopsis thaliana [55]
2-Hydroyjuglone (27) Grapevine callus [57]
4-Hydroxybenzaldehyde (28) Grapevine callus and protoplasts [55,57]
(S)-4-Hydroxy-phenyllatic acid (32) Grapevine callus and protoplasts [55]
3-(3-Methyl-2-butenyloxy)-4-
hydroxybenzoic acid (33) Grapevine callus and protoplasts [55]
Other metabolite activities, usually related to the natural ageing of the leaves (loss of cell membrane
semipermeability—causing ion leakage—and membrane-lipid peroxidase) were also examined.
Scytalone (20, Figures 6 and 7) assayed at 0.05 mg/mL on grapevine cv. Italia leaves, produced spots

Toxins 2011, 3
1582
that were light-green to chlorotic, round to irregular, and that became coalescent or remained spread
out over the leaf blade (Figure 8A). Isosclerone (21, Figure 6 and 7), assayed at 0.1 mg/mL, caused
large yellowish spots that slowly became coalescent and necrotic, and that were followed by distortion
and withering of the leaf lamina (Figure 8B) [54]. In a number of in vitro tests, leaf cultures from
grapevine cv. Thompson absorbing 0.1 and 0.05 mg/mL solutions containing scytalone or isosclerone
only showed some marginal browning, slightly stronger at the higher concentration [56]. Scytalone
was tested for factors relating to leaf ageing, but no real effect was seen (scytalone caused higher
peroxidation, but only in the first 30 min). On the other hand both scytalone and isosclerone increased
ion leakage, and when leaf disks were soaked in a scytalone solution at a concentration of 0.05 μg/mL,
membrane semipermeability was impaired.
Figure 8. Absorption of (A) 3 mL of 0.05 mg mL−1 scytalone and (B) 0.1 mg mL−1
isoslerone by detached leaves of grapevine cv. Italia exposed to these solutions for a few
hours .(Reproduced with permission from the authors of [54]).
Scytalone and isosclerone (20–21, Figures 6 and 7) increased growth in vitro of calli of V. vinifera
cv. Gamay at the lowest concentrations, 0.1 and 0.25 mM respectively. Similar increases in callus
growth were achieved with 3,4,8-THT (25, Figure 6) at 0.1 mM. On the other hand, the naphthoquinones
such as juglone, 2-hydroxyjuglone (2-HJ) and 3-hydroxyjuglone (3-HJ) inhibited callus growth at
0.1 nM, and flaviolin (26, Figure 6) inhibited callus growth at 0.25 mM [57]. These results differed
slightly from the trials on calli from cv. Thompson and cv. Cabernet. When callus cultures from these
cultivars were grown on a medium containing scytalone and isosclerone solutions at concentration

Toxins 2011, 3
1583
increasing from 0.02 to 0.05 and 0.1 mg/mL, the callus cultures became increasingly brown going
from light brown to black; however, callus discolouration did not stop or reduce callus growth on either
cv. Thompson seedless or cv. Cabernet [56].
The biological activity of 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde, (S)-4-hydroxyphenyllactic acid and 4-hydroxy-
3-(3-methyl-2-butenyloxy)-benzoic acid (28, 32–33, Figure 7) was determined on living protoplasts,
from a hydroponic culture of Vitis vinifera cvs. Cabernet Sauvignon and Ugni blanc, by calculating the
percentage of surviving protoplasts after growing them for 24 h together with the compounds at
concentrations of from 10−5 to 10−6 M. 4-Hydroxybenzaldehyde (28, Figure 6 and 7) caused 20%
mortality of protoplasts at 100 nM and 100% mortality at 1 mM. Metabolites 32 and 33 (Figure 7)
were active on the protoplasts even at a concentration of 1 mM [57] (Table 2).
3.1.2. Hydrophilic High-Molecular Weight Metabolites
3.1.2.1. Polysaccharides
When Pa. chlamydospora and Pm. aleophilum were grown in liquid culture, they produced
exopolysaccharides (EPSs) in some tests [58]. In recent years, the structure of a large number of EPSs
has been determined due to advances in ways to purify and chemically characterise these compounds [59].
That EPSs are involved in bacterial and fungal diseases has been reported by Hogdson et al. (1949);
Harborne (1983) and Denny (1995) [60–61], but their activity as phytotoxins still remains to be
clarified [62,63]. A number of phytopathogenic fungi produced EPSs toxic to plants. These fungi are
Cephalosporium [64], Ceratocystis fagacearum [65], Ophiostoma ulmi [66], Fusarium solani [67], and
several species of Phytophthora, including P. cinnamomi, P. megasperma var. sojae and P. palmivora,
pathogens of forest, ornamental and agrarian plants such as oak, juniper and soybean [67]. Moreover,
EPSs from the culture filtrates of P. cinnamomi, P. cryptogea and P. nicotianae cause severe wilting
on several hosts [68]. It is thought that these macromolecules interfere with water movement in the
plant tissues by plugging the vessels, and that this causes the wilt symptoms [69]. The wilting seems to
be related to the size of the molecules and their viscosity rather than to their structure [70].
However some other experimental findings on host specificity suggest that the EPSs differently act.
In fact, EPSs produced by some bacteria induced leaf spot diseases only on the host plants [71].
Furthermore, EPSs recently isolated from Cryphonectria parasitica [72], Phomopsis foeniculi [73] and
Neofusicoccum parvum [74], were toxic to both hosts and non-host plants, and this suggests that they
have non-specific phytoxicity.
Preliminary investigations, essentially using HPLC, molecular analysis and infrared spectroscopy,
have revealed that Pa. chlamydospora and Pm. aleophilum produce pullulan [58]. Pullulan is a
polysaccharide polymer consisting of maltotriose units, also known as α-(1→4)-; α-(1→6)-glucan.
Three glucose units in maltotriose are connected by an α-(1→4)- glycosidic bond, whereas consecutive
maltotriose units are connected to each other by an α-(1→6) glycosidic bond. Commercially pullulan
is usually produced by the fungus Aureobasidium pullulans [75,76].
To establish the role of EPSs in esca, the EPSs were characterised biologically and their occurrence
in infected vines was determined. It was found that when EPSs produced by Pm. aleophilum and
Pa. chlamydospora were absorbed at very low doses by detached grapevine leaves, or when they were

Toxins 2011, 3
1584
injected into the woody tissue of the shoots and branches of standing grapevines, they caused foliar
symptoms similar to those shown by vines with esca. The same symptoms were produced when the
vine leaves were treated with pullulan extracted from the discoloured wood of a grapevine infected
with Pa. chlamydospora, and with commercial pullulan [58].
When culture filtrates of Pa. chlamydospora, or weak solutions of purified preparations of scytalone,
isosclerone or pullulan, were absorbed by detached leaves and berries they caused symptoms similar to
those of vines affected with esca in the field [77].
3.1.2.2. Polypeptide Toxic Metabolites
Luini et al. [78] also reported on the toxic activity of polypeptides secreted by Pa. chlamydospora
and Pm. aleophilum in their culture medium. The structures of these polypeptides have not yet
been determined.
Even though the electrophoretic patterns of the polypeptides differed from those of the EPSs, their
biological activity was very similar. They produced anthocyanins on grapevine leaves and, when
applied to grapevine cells in culture, they modified proton fluxes, depolarised the cell membrane,
inhibited the transport of sucrose and glutamine and, lastly, caused the death of the cells. Moreover,
polypeptides can now be traced by immunological methods, as reported by Fleurat-Lessard et al. [79],
and this has confirmed that these compounds have a significant role in the disease, and one that
deserves further investigation.
3.2. Toxins Produced by Fomitiporia mediterranea, a Causal Agent of Wood Rot in Grapevine.
The toxic metabolites produced by F. mediterranea, the basidiomycetous fungus which, in Europe,
is most frequently associated with grapevine white rot, were also investigated. Tabacchi et al. [55]
reported that the culture filtrate of F. punctata (current nomenclature: F. mediterranea) produced
4-hydroxy-benzaldehyde (28, Figure 9), dihydroactinolide and a novel chromanone, called
6-formyl-2,2-dimethyl-4-chromanone, and biogenetically related to eutypine (34–35, Figure 9).
Figure 9. Chemical structures of Fomitiporia mediterranea metabolites: 4-hydroxybenzaldeide
(28), dihydroactinolide (34) and 6-formyl-2,2-methyl-4-chromanone (35).
C
HO
OH
28
O
H
OO
O
O
34 35
White [80] reported that ten basidiomycetes isolated from grapevine in South Africa (8 novel
species in the genera Fomitiporella, Fomitiporia, Inonotus, Inocutis, and Phellinus, and two species in
an undetermined genus) produced in vitro 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde at fairly low concentrations ranging
from 0.005 to 0.06 mg/L. The level of 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde was not related to a specific taxon and
varied within each taxon [80].

Toxins 2011, 3
1585
3.3. Mechanism of Action of Toxins Involved in the Esca Complex (Vascular Disease and Wood Rot)
The mode of action of the toxins, essentially naphthoquinones, produced by the fungi involved in
esca may be related to their oxidant property. The quinones are extensively used in studies of oxidative
stress because of the important role they play in plant defence [81]. Scytalone levels in particular may
be related to the intensity of the brown-black colour of infected vine wood and to the occurrence of
dark material in the xylem vessels.
Figure 10. The pentaketide pathway of melanin synthesis with flavioline and
2-hydroxyjuglone (2-HJ). 1,3,6,8-tetrahydroxynaphthalene (1,3,6,8-THN); 1,3,8-tri-
hydroxynaphthalene (1,3,8-THN); 1,2,4,5,7-pentahydroxynaphthalene (1,2,4,5,7-PHN);
5-hydroxyscytalone (5-HS); cis-4-hydroxyscytalone (4-HS); 1,2,4,5-tetrahydroxy-
naphthalene (1,2,4,5-THN); 3,4,8-trihydroxytetralone (3,4,8-THT); 2,4,8-trihydroxy-
tetralone (2,4,8-THT). (Reproduced with permission from the authors of [56])
OH
HO OH
O
OH O
OH
scytalone
isosclerone
OH OH
HO
1,3,8-THN
OH
OH
O
HO
O
flaviolin
O
OHO
HO
OH
3,4,8-THT
OHO
OH
2,4,8-THT
HO
OH OH
HO
1,3,6,8-THN
OH
OHO
HO
vermelone
OH OH
HO
1,2,4,5,7-PHN
OH
OH
OH
OH
O
HO
OH
OH OH
HO
1,2,4,5,THN
OH
OH OH
O
HO
O
OH
2-HJ
O
O
OH
juglone
O
O
OH
3-HJ
HO
OH
HO
OH
OH
OH OH
Melanine
OH
OH
HO
OH
OH
4-HS
5-HS
DHN
[O]
[H] -H
2
O[H]
-H
2
O
[O]
[O]
[O]
[O] [O]
-H
2
O
-H
2
O
[H]
[H]
[H]
[H]
[H] [H]
Scytalone and the naphthoquinones produced by Pa. chlamydospora and Pm. aleophilum are
intermediate metabolites resulting from the biosyntesis of dihydroxynaphthale (DHN) melanins. Some
studies examined the pentaketide pathway of melanin synthesis in some black fungi pathogenic to

Toxins 2011, 3
1586
humans and plants [82,83]. As shown in Figure 10, scytalone may be produced by the oxidation
of 1,3,8-THN.
Melanins are dark pigments of a phenolic nature with a high molecular weight, which occur in
animals, plants and micro-organisms. The structure of these pigments is unknown, and they probably
are not necessary for the life of the producing organism, but they increase the capacity of that organism
to survive under certain conditions. For example the occurrence of melanins in the cell wall of some
fungi [84–86] increases the resistance of these fungi to physical agents such as UV radiation [86,87].
The role of melanins in virulence in may be due to various factors. Bürki et al. [88] reported that the
naphthoquinones are cytotoxic, and they are thought to act by forming a covalent adduct through a
Michael 1,4 addition between the quinone and a protein thiol or amino group [89]. Of these compounds,
the most widely studied is juglone, which is highly toxic to plants and animals [61]. In fungal cells,
juglone generates superoxide radicals, diminishing the cellular pool of reduced pyridine nucleotides
which are particularly necessary for cells exposed to oxidative stress. It is well known that one of the
main ways of plants to respond to phytopathogenic invasion is by generating O2− and H2O2 [90,91].
Many plants also produce auto-oxidisable quinone defence compounds, which oxidise NAD(P)H in
plant and pathogenic cells, leading to the formation of superoxide radicals and hydrogen peroxide [92].
In response to these attempts of the plant to defend itself, the pathogenic fungi synthesise the
naphthoquinones, which are toxic and suppress the defence reaction [93].
The naphthoquinones lower the resistance of plants to pathogenic fungi and hence enhance the
virulence of those fungi. The production of naphthoquinone pigments appears to be an important
component of the disease process as these pigments act as non-specific virulence factors inhibiting the
plant defence reaction, resulting in plant hypersensitivity [94].
It has been reported that actively melanising cell-like appressoria of P. oryzae produce higher levels
of melanin intermediates or their derivatives (phenols and quinones) in the presence of agents blocking
melanin biosynthesis such as Tricyclazole® or Carpropamide® [95]. As phenols and quinones are
highly toxic to living cells, an abnormal accumulation of metabolites such as 2-HJ probably prevents
the appressoria from functioning [96].
Not much is known about how these metabolites act in the vine cells or tissues. The physiological
changes that occur in the chlorotic portion of leaves with tiger-stripes, in the surrounding green portion
of these leaves, and in the asymptomatic leaves of vine arms that also bear tiger-striped leaves,
indirectly suggest that these changes are caused by toxic metabolites. Physiological changes include
alterations in the rate of gas exchange, chlorophyll concentration, net photosynthesis, stomatic
conductance, intercellular concentration of CO2, and transpiration rate [97,98]. Tiger-striped leaves
also show higher levels of fructose and glucose and lower levels of sucrose. Starch goes down while
abscissic acid goes up, as do the free amino-acids, especially proline [98,99]. The mechanism whereby
these disorders are produced has not yet been elucidated, but the changes may be an indirect effect of
the toxins produced by the fungi colonising the vine wood, and perhaps even by some non-pathogenic
fungi which also abundantly colonise the vine wood. In that case these changes would be a response of
the vine to the disease. For example, the increase of abcissic acid in the leaves, as also the increase
in soluble sugars and amino-acids, appears to be a stress-response to an impairment of the
conducting vessels [100].

Toxins 2011, 3
1587
Scytalone and isosclerone also cause peroxidation of the membrane lipids, and this is known to be
related to leaf senescence [56]. Toxic polypeptides could also be involved in this early senescence
process, since they cause an increase in the anthocyanin levels of vine leaves [78].
3.4. Chemical and Immunological Detection of Esca-Related Metabolites
As a rule, esca is first detected by visual inspection of the foliar symptoms. Visual inspection is
completed by isolating on a growth medium the fungal colonies growing out of a piece of infected
wood tissue and by identifying the growing fungus using microscopic inspection of the mycelium and
the conidia, and/or by molecular methods.
A new means of detection is to employ HPLC or immunological techniques to identify the
secondary metabolites secreted by the pathogen that is to be detected. Studies based on these
techniques have established that secondary metabolites have a role as vivotoxins [101]
3.4.1. HPLC Technique
The role of fungal metabolites in causing symptoms on esca-affected vine leaves and berries was
studied in a vineyard of V. vinifera cv. Italia located in southern Italy [102]. During early spring, two
to four branches per vine were pruned and samples of xylem sap were collected. Vine bleeding,
assessed as mL day−1 vine−1, peaked at bud burst and stopped within 28 days. During this period, the
leaf water potential of diseased vines progressively increased (i.e., values became less negative),
indicating a dysfunction in the supply of water and nutrients to the new growth. Fungi were isolated
both from the xylem sap and from the woody tissue of the branches and trunks of diseased vines.
Conidia isolated from the sap showed a high germination rate (>90%). Bioactive concentrations of the
two pentaketides were detected in the xylem sap, leaves and berries at various stages of seasonal
growth [58,103]. Exopolysaccharides, including pullulan, were found in the xylem sap.
3.4.2. Immunological Techniques: Flow Cytometry
A study has recently been carried out to develop a rapid and specific method for the production of
polyclonal antibodies against the EPSs produced by Pa. chlamydospora and to detect these EPSs in the
leaves of esca-affected grapevines [103]. The Pa. chlamydospora EPSs were unequivocally identified
in diseased vines using flow cytometry. Antibodies raised against Pa. chlamydospora EPSs were used
as an antigen to immunise rats. Their specificity was also tested against other Pa. chlamydospora
strains (Figure 11A). The antibodies did not recognise control EPSs from P. foeniculi or from
P. exigua var. heteromorpha, nor EPSs from Pm. aleophilum, Neofusicoccum luteum or
Neofusicoccum parvum, indicating that these antibodies were specific to the EPSs of
Pa. chlamydsopora [103]. Flow cytometry used in planta positively detected Pa. chlamydospora
EPSs from esca-affected leaves showing interveinal and marginal discolouration, and necrosis
(Figure 12) [103].

Toxins 2011, 3
1588
Figure 11. (A) Cytofluorimetric profiles of Phaeomoniella chlamydospora extracts from
strains CBS 229.95, 7, 31, 135, 551 and 606. (B) Cytofluorimetric profile of leaf extracts
of asymptomatic vine leaves from asymptomatic vine no. 61 (AAA) and from symptomatic
vine no. 58. The position on the x-axis clearly indicates no recognition by the antibody-
labelled beads of the extracts from leaves from asymptomatic vines, and from
asymptomatic leaves from asymptomatic shoots (ADD), not even when the leaves were
close (ACD) or distal (AFD) to a symptomatic leaf in a symptomatic shoot (ADD). In
contrast when the extracts of leaves with incipient chlorotic symptoms or leaves with fully
developed symptoms from a diseased vine were tested (samples D and S, respectively), the
position of the profiles on the x-axis indicated there was strong recognition by the
antibodies. Axis of abscissa is FL-1og height; axis of ordinate is number of particles.
(Reproduced with permission from the authors of [103]).
Figure 12. Esca-diseased grapevine leaves with tiger-stripe discoloration: a shoot showing
the acropetal symptom gradient. (Reproduced with permission from the authors of [103])
3.4.3. Immunological Techniques: Serological Test
Phaeomoniella chlamydospora in a culture medium secretes a variety of polypeptides [104,105],
the biochemical nature of which made it possible to devise a serological test to detect them [79].

Toxins 2011, 3
1589
Polyclonal antibodies raised in rabbit against the polypeptide fraction produced by a Pa. chlamydospora
culture medium recognised small amounts of the secreted fungal proteins (commonly 1 ng). These
antibodies had a valuable specificity because they cross-reacted with the polypeptides secreted by
various strains of Pa. chlamydospora but not with polypeptides secreted by any of the many other
fungal pathogens commonly found in fungus-infected vine wood. Importantly, as shown by the
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and by immunolocalisation on ultrathin sections, they
did not cross-react with the polypeptides secreted by fungi causing other types of wood decay such as
E. lata, or fungi causing cankers such as the Botryosphaeriaceae D. seriata and N. parvum.
Pa. chlamydospora was detected serologically in canes of mechanically infected cuttings [79]. The
specificity of the antibodies was tested against fungal proteins from four strains of Pa. chlamydospora,
since it is essential that the antibodies raised towards one strain should also be selective towards other
strains of the same fungus. Western blot analysis confirmed that the antibodies directed towards the
secreted proteins of strain PC-PC37 also recognised the other strains, although the response intensity
differed between strains in some areas of the transferred bands (e.g., see the 98 kDa bands). The global
response measured by ELISA showed that the intensity of the reaction presented slight variations
depending on the origin of the secreted antigen [79]. This made it possible to detect Pa. chlamydospora
in grapevine with a dot blot method that was simple, rapid, reliable and non-destructive of the
vines tested [79].
3.5. NMR Metabolomics of Esca
To study the metabolic changes in grapevine plants affected with esca, leaves were analysed from
both symptomatic and non-symptomatic cordons of V. vinifera cv. Alvarinho, collected in the Vinho
Verde region, Portugal. The metabolite composition of leaves from infected cordons with visible
symptoms [diseased leaves (DL)] and from asymptomatic cordons [healthy leaves (HL)] was evaluated
by 1D and 2D 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy [106].
Principal component analysis (PCA) of the NMR spectra showed a clear separation between DL
and HL leaves, indicating that the compounds produced by these two types of leaves differed.
NMR/PCA analysis identified the compounds belonging to each of the groups.
Altogether, levels of phenolic compounds were significantly higher in DL leaves than in HL leaves,
and carbohydrate levels were significantly less, suggesting that the diseased leaves were rerouting
carbon and energy from primary to secondary metabolism. The diseased leaves also had higher levels
of methanol, alanine, and γ-aminobutyric acid, which may have been caused by the activation of other
defence mechanisms [106]
4. Botryosphaeriaceae Species Involved in Grapevine Trunk Diseases
In recent years an increasing number of Botryosphaeriaceae species have been associated with
grapevine decline worldwide [6,107,108]. Several diseases caused by these pathogens in grapevines
are known, or have been known in the past, under a variety of names such as black dead arm (BDA),
Botryosphaeria canker, excoriose, Diplodia cane dieback and bunch rot [6,109–112]. External symptoms
of these diseases include death of the cordons, canes, shoots and buds, canker formation, stunting,
delayed bud burst, bud necrosis, bleached canes, reduced bunch set and bunch rots, all of which have

Toxins 2011, 3
1590
been extensively documented [6,109–116]. Internal symptoms on the trunks or canes of declining
vines such as brown wood streaking and wedge-shaped discolourations are commonly associated with
Botryosphaeriaceae species [6,111–113,116]. Some of the symptoms, both external and internal, are
shown in Figure 13.
Figure 13. Symptoms of grapevine affected with various species of Botryosphaeriaceae.
(A) Stunting early in the season; (B) Foliar chlorosis; (C) wedge-shaped necrosis in a trunk
cross-section.
4.1. Phytotoxic Metabolites from Botryosphaeriaceae Species
Five species isolated from declining grapevines in Spain, Botryosphaeria dothidea, Diplodia
seriata, Dothiorella viticola, Neofusicoccum luteum and N. parvum were examined for toxin
production in liquid cultures of Czapek-Dox broth for different lengths of time [74]. All fungi
produced high-molecular weight hydrophilic compounds with toxic properties (Figure 14).

Toxins 2011, 3
1591
Figure 14. Toxic activity of organic extracts and related acqueous phases obtained from
culture filtrates of Botryosphaeria dothidea, Diplodia seriata, Dothiorella viticola,
Neofusicoccum luteum and N. parvum assayed on tomato plants. (Reproduced with
permission from the authors of [74])
Toxin production of D. seriata and N. parvum peaked after 14 days in culture, while that of other
species peaked after 21 days. The effect of 14 day-old N. parvum culture filtrate on grapevine leaves
cv. Tempranillo is shown in Figure 15.
Figure 15. Symptoms caused on grapevine leaves of the cv. Tempranillo by 14-day-old
culture filtrates of Neofusicoccum parvum: (A) severe withering; (B) partial withering with
necrotic spots (arrows); (C) symptomless leaf (control immersed in distilled water).
(Reproduced with permission from the authors of [74])
The high-molecular weight hydrophilic toxic compounds produced by N. parvum, which were later
identified as EPSs, were further tested. GC-MS analysis of the acetylated O-methyl glycosides of these
EPSs revealed that these compounds consisted mainly of glucose, mannose and galactose, and that
they differed from the botryosphaerans [70]. The botryosphaerans are branched β-(1→3; 1→6)-D-glucans
produced by B. rhodina[117] and by an unidentified ligninolytic Botryosphaeria sp. [70]. The role of
EPSs in bacterial and fungal diseases has been revised in depth [118]. In addition, N. luteum and
0
20
40
60
80
100
pH 2 pH CF pH 10 pH 2 pH CF pH 10
Organic Aqueous
Phytotoxic activity (%
)
B. dothidea D. seriata D. viticola N. luteum N. parvum

Toxins 2011, 3
1592
N. parvum produce low molecular weight lipophilic phytotoxins (Figure 14), that do not invariably
occur in all the remaining species [74].
The sections following deal with the toxins produced by the most familiar Botryosphaeriaceae
species associated with grapevine, N. parvum and D. seriata. However, further investigation, such as
that into the toxins produced by other botryosphaeriaceous fungi and that into the toxic compounds of
infected grapevines, is needed to better understand the role that these and other toxic compounds play
in symptom expression.
4.2. Toxins Produced by Neofusicoccum parvum
In a recent study has isolated the metabolites produced by N. parvum (strain CBS 121486) in
optimised culture condition and characterised them chemically and biologically [119]. Four toxic
metabolites were isolated from the organic extract and identified by spectroscopic and physical
examination as (3R,4R)-(-)-4-hydroxy- and (3R,4S)-(-)-4-hydroxy-mellein, isosclerone, and tyrosol
(36, 37, 21, 29, Figure 16), which were reported as being produced by N. parvum [119] for the first time.
When assayed on tomato cuttings all four metabolites (21, 29, 36, 37, Figure 16) were toxic,
producing symptoms ranging from slight to severe leaf wilting (Table 3). (3R,4R)-(-)-4-hydroxymellein
and isosclerone were the most toxic. All these toxins have already been reported as being produced by
many phytopathogenic fungi [54,120–127].
Moreover, isosclerone (21, Figure 16) was reported for the first time as produced by a
Botryosphaeriaceae species [119]. (3R,4R)-(-)-4-hydroxymellein (36, Figure 16) is produced, together
with other melleins and tyrosol (29, Figure 16), by a strain of B. obtusa (syn. D. seriata) that causes
frogeye leaf spot and black rot of apple [125,128]. The same 4-hydroxymellein as well as its
steroisomer (3R,4S)-(-)-4-hydroxymellein and mellein are also produced by Diplodia pinea (Desm.)
Kickx, another Botryosphaeriaceae species, which causes decline of Pinus radiata D. Don in
Sardinia, Italy [127].
Figure 16. Structures of (3R,4R)-(-)-4-hydroxymellein, (3R,4S)-(-)-4-hydroxymellein,
isosclerone and tyrosol (36, 37, 21, 29).
O
R
2
R
1
H
OH O
36 R
1
=H, R
2
=OH
37 R
1
=OH, R
2
=H
OHO
OH
OH
OH
21
29

Toxins 2011, 3
1593
Table 3. Metabolites isolated from Neofusicoccum parvum and their toxicity assayed on
tomato plants. (Reproduced with permission from the authors of [118])
Metabolite Concentration
(M)
Toxicity rating a Mean toxicity
rating ± S.E. Rep 1 Rep 2 Rep 3
(3R,4R)-(-)-4-Hydroxymellein (36)
0.26 × 10−3 2 2 3 2.3 ± 0.33
0.13 × 10−3 1 1 3 1.7 ± 0.67
0.26 × 10−4 1 1 2 1.3 ± 0.33
(3R,4S)-(-)-4-Hydroxymellein (37)
0.26 × 10−3 0 1 2 1.0 ± 0.58
0.13 × 10−3 0 1 1 0.7 ± 0.33
0.26 × 10−4 0 1 0 0.3 ± 0.33
Isosclerone (21) 0.31 × 10−3 2 3 1 2.0 ± 0.57
Tyrosol (29) 1.60 × 10−3 2 2 1 1.7 ± 0.33
Control/Czapek-Dox 0 0 0 0.0 ± 0.00
Control/H2O 0 1 0 0.3 ± 0.33
a Lesion symptoms were evaluated using a 0–3 scale: (0) no symptoms; (1) slight wilting in one
leaf; (2) moderate wilting on some leaves; (3) severe wilting on leaves (with necrotic spots on
leaves occurring occasionally). Three plants (Rep 1 to Rep 3) were used for each sample tested.
Botryosphaeriaceae species were reported by Larignon et al. [95] to cause foliar symptoms (i.e.,
tiger-striped chlorosis and necrosis) but these cannot be clearly distinguished from the symptoms of
grapevine leaf stripe (previously young esca). Those symptoms were described as belonging to a
disease called black dead arm (BDA) which was attributed to several species of Botryosphaeriaceae.
The difficulty encountered in distinguishing between different diseases having basically the same
symptoms has been commented on by several authors [5,53,129]. Since isosclerone (21, Figure 16) and
EPS are both produced by esca-associated fungi such as Pa. chlamydospora, Pm. aleophilum [54,55,58],
N. parvum [74,119], and possibly other Botryosphaeriaceae species as well, it is necessary to clarify
whether these toxins are related to the foliar symptoms of leaf stripe disease (young esca) or to BDA,
if this disease is confirmed. If the symptoms cannot be distinguished, it would explain the confusion
about how to diagnose these diseases if the diagnosis is based solely on the foliar symptoms. Although
the cause of the chloro-necrotic foliar symptoms of esca still needs to be fully elucidated [5], it is
possible to hypothesise that the foliar symptoms are the result of the synergistic action of the toxic
metabolites produced by these pathogens, all of which colonise grapevine.
While isosclerone is produced by both the pathogenic botryosphaeriaceous fungi and the fungi
causing esca, the melleins and their derivatives appear to be produced only by the botryosphaeriaceous
fungi [125,127,130]. Tyrosol (29, Figure 16) is another toxic metabolite produced by plants and fungi,
including B. obtusa [123,125,131].
The fact that N. parvum produce isosclerone and exopolysaccharides is very interesting not only
because these compounds are also produced by Pa. chlamydospora but because they are also involved
in causing foliar symptoms of young esca and grapevine leaf-stripe disease [58,103]. Although the
exact cause of these chloro-necrotic foliar symptoms is still unclear [5], they could be the result,
wholly or in part, of the synergistic action of the toxic metabolites produced by species of
Botryosphaeriaceae and Pa. chlamydospora [132].

Toxins 2011, 3
1594
4.3. Toxins Produced by Diplodia Seriata
Diplodia seriata (teleomorph: Botryosphaeria obtusa) is frequently associated with wood cankers
of grapevine, sometimes named black dead arm or BDA [112,133], although this disease was initially
reported by Lehoczky [134] as being caused not by D. seriata but by D. mutila. D. seriata also causes
black rot of apple fruit, and produces several phenolic dihydroisocoumarins, such as mellein,
cis-(3R,4R)-4-hydroxymellin and 5-hydroxymellein [125,128]. However, Djoukeng et al. [130]
identified four phytotoxic compounds from a culture filtrate of D. seriata strain F-99-2, isolated from
the vine cv. Cabernet Sauvignon. From an organic extract of the culture filtrates they isolated three
known melleins, which on the basis of their spectroscopic data were identified as mellein,
(3R,4R)-4-hydroxymellein, (3R)-7-hydroxymellein and (3R,4R)-4,7-dihydroxymellein (38, 36 and 39,
Figure 17). Using the same technique they further isolated a unknown mellein, characterised as
(3R,4R)-4,7-dihydroxymellein (40, Figure 17). A bioassay of vine cv. Gamay leaves found that
(3R,4R)-4,7-dihydroxy-mellein was the most active metabolite, causing full leaf necrosis with a
minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 2 μg mL−1, although compounds 36, 38, and 39 (Figure 17)
had a similar degree of toxicity with a MIC of 3 μg mL−1 [130]. These authors using a HPLC
DAD-MS analysis found that mellein (38, Figure 17) also occurred in infected vine wood inoculated
with D. seriata. In that case, mellein would be a good diagnostic marker for D. seriata in diseased
vines, and could be used to differentiate between esca and BDA at an early stage, since the melleins
and their derivatives are not produced by esca-associated pathogens such as Pa. chlamydospora,
Pm. aleophilum or F. mediterranea [130]. Mellein and its derivatives are also produced by many other
non-botryosphaeriaceous fungi, including the genera Aspergillus, Cercospora, Cryptosporiopsis,
Hypoxylon, Phoma, Pezicula, Plectophomella, Septoria and Xylaria, and they have phytotoxic,
zootoxic and moderate antifungal activities [124,127].
Figure 17. Structures of mellein, of (3R,4R)-(-)-4-hydroxymellein, of
(3R)-7-hydroxymellein and of (3R, 4R)-cis-4,7-dihydroxymellein (38, 36, 39, 40),
produced by Botryosphaeria obtusa.
O
R
1
H
H
OH O
38 R
1
=H, R
2
=H
36 R
1
=OH, R
2
=H
39 R
1
=H, R
2
=OH
40 R
1
=OH, R
2
=OH
R
2
As regards other toxins of D. seriata, it has been reported that tyrosol and p-hydroxybenzaldehyde
were also produced by this pathogen, but only from an isolate obtained from apple [125,128]. Recently
tyrosol has further been detected from N. parvum [119], and it cannot be excluded that some day
D. seriata isolates will also be found to produce this toxin.

Toxins 2011, 3
1595
5. Grouping in Different Chemical Families of Phytoxins Produced by Different Fungi
Frequently fungi produced toxins belonging to different classes of natural compounds and some of
them are also produced by other fungi. However, a single toxin could be synthesized by one species
and it would represents a taxonomical mark. A breakdown of the fungi and the toxins they produce is
as follows:
Pm. aleophilum produces naphthalenone pentaketides and polyphenols; Pa. chlamydospora:
naphthalenone pentaketides, polyphenols and anthraquinones; E. lata: acetylenic polyphenols,
heterocyclic analogues and dihydro-γ-pyrones; and the Botryosphaeria species: naphthalenone
pentaketides, melleins and polyphenols.
In these groupings the naphthalenone pentaketides and polyphenols are common to Pm. aleophilum,
Pa. chlamydospora and Botryosphaeria species. Toxins produced (among others) by only one fungus,
and which may serve to detect that fungus, are: the anthraquinones, found only in Pa. chlamydospora,
the acetylenic phenols and dihydro-γ-pyrones, both specific to E. lata, and the melleins exclusive to
the Botryosphaeriaceous species.
6. Conclusions
Of the several diseases affecting grapevine, trunk diseases caused by fungi are important since they
cause devastating epidemics and also considerable annual yield losses. Studies on toxins produced by
grapevine trunk pathogens have become more frequent in the last two decades, and one of the findings
has been that most of these pathogens produce secondary metabolites that are toxic to plants.
These phytotoxic substances have been at least in part chemically characterised, but their mode of
action remains mostly to be elucidated. They have not yet been made the subject of particular study,
except for eutypine, eutypinol, eulatinol and other metabolites produced by E. lata [32–35,38]. The
toxicity of E. lata is probably due to a number of metabolites that are structurally related, each having
a different level of toxicity and different molecular targets within the vine cell [32]. Of the toxins
produced by the other trunk pathogens we know little that is significant (something is known only
about the action of the naphthalenones, whose toxicity is thought to be linked to their oxidant properties).
All the bioactive substances produced by Pa. chlamydospora, Pm. aleophilum, and the
botryosphaeriaceous species were toxic to vines and other plants in toxicity tests on the leaves,
calli or protoplasts of the host plants; when tested on the leaves of healthy plants at least some
of these substances reproduced to a certain extent the original symptoms of the disease they
caused [24,33,55,56,58,60,74,78]. These findings, though significant, are not generally thought to be
sufficient to prove that these substances have a role in the diseases caused by the fungal pathogens;
for now, such a conclusion would be mere speculation.
Some phytotoxic metabolites, such as the EPSs, the naphtalenone pentaketides and the polyphenols
are common to more than one fungus, whereas other metabolites (the anthraquinones, the acetylenic
polyphenols and dihydro-γ-pyrones and the mulleins) are specific to an individual fungus. Since the
main pathogens examined in this review produce both localised symptoms in the wood and also in
some cases symptoms on the leaves, it can be hypothesised that the metabolites first act at the place in
the wood where they are produced, causing darkening of the tissues, necrosis of the parenchyma cells

Toxins 2011, 3
1596
surrounding the vessels, exudation of dark gum into the vessels, and occlusion of the xylem vessels,
and that subsequently some of these metabolites also act at a distance from the place of production,
since they accumulate in the leaves.
As regards the leaves, it has been mentioned that in vines affected with grapevine leaf stripe (one of
the vascular syndromes in the esca complex), significant physiological changes take place in both the
chlorotic portion and the surrounding green portion of the leaves with tiger-stripes, and even in the
(still) asymptomatic leaves of those vine arms that also bear tiger-striped leaves. These physiological
changes mainly impair photosynthesis, so that it seems reasonable to assume that one or more of the
metabolites, including the EPSs, act directly or indirectly on the plant metabolism and on the
functionality of the chloroplasts. As for the mode of action of EPSs, it has been hypothesised that their
main effect is to plug the xylem vessels, but, since the EPSs also accumulate in the leaf mesophyll,
a direct effect of these macromolecules on the chloroplasts cannot be excluded, either by the EPSs in
their original form, or after they have been partially degraded, a process which reduces their molecular
weight but increases their mobility.
As stated above, the chlorosis and necrosis of esca-affected leaves can also be interpreted as a
premature senescence resulting, at least in part, from the peroxidation of the membrane lipids [56],
as shown by the increase in anthocyanin levels caused by the toxic polypeptides produced by
Pa. chlamydospora [78]. An increase in the anthocyanin levels of vine leaves is also a first stage in the
formation of tiger stripes, and it is clear that the fully formed leaf stripe symptoms resemble senescent
leaves about to fall.
Toxin levels and the rate of increase of these levels in the leaves may also explain some other
characteristics of grapevine trunk diseases, particularly why leaf symptoms vary over time and over
space. It is well known that vines affected with esca do not all begin to show foliar symptoms at the
same time in a growing season. Foliar symptoms generally appear in June-July, but they can also
appear in May, or in August-September, and in some infected vines they do not appear at all, or not on
all leaves, for one or even more growing seasons. With these infected but temporarily asymptomatic
vines it is not possible to predict in what growing season any of these vines, or any portion of their
vine crown, will again begin to show leaf symptoms. E. lata dieback and Botryosphaeriaceae species
share some of the same peculiarities. While all biological phenomena are naturally subjected to
variation, it seems that with these diseases, at least some of the reactions recorded were due to the type
and the particular mixture of the toxins that accumulated in the leaves, and this in turn was partly the
result of the physiological status of the vine and the environmental conditions.
As regards the basidiomycetes, common agents of wood rot in grapevine (F. mediterranea in
Europe and the Mediterranean area; other basidiomycetes in other vine growing areas), the main
virulence factors of these fungi consist in their degrading enzymes. However, recent studies have
shown that these fungi also produce toxic metabolites in vitro. The role of these toxins in planta during
symptom development remains to be elucidated [80].
In conclusion, some of the studies discussed in this review suggest that toxic metabolites have a
notable role in causing the symptoms of grapevine trunk diseases. However, the exact mode of
operation of these toxins, and the way in which they contribute, individually or jointly, to the expression
of symptoms, is still not well understood. Further research is needed to elucidate the interaction

Toxins 2011, 3
1597
between the phytotoxins and other abiotic factors which are involved in disease development, such as
rainfall and the temperature regime [44,135].
References
1. Carter, M.V. The Status of Eutypa Lata as a Pathogen; Phytopathological Paper No. 32; CAB
International: Wallingford, Oxon, UK, 1991.
2. Mugnai, L.; Graniti, A.; Surico, G. Esca (black measles) and brown wood-streaking: Two old
and elusive diseases of grapevines. Plant Dis. 1999, 83, 404–418.
3. Fischer, M. Biodiversity and geographic distribution of basidiomycetes causing esca-associated
white rot in grapevine: A worldwide perspective. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2006, 45, S30–S42.
4. Halleen, F.; Fourie, P.H.; Crous, P.W. A review of black foot disease of grapevine. Phytopathol.
Mediterr. 2006, 45, S55–S67.
5. Surico, G.; Mugnai, L.; Marchi, G. Older and more recent observations on esca: A critical
overview. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2006, 45, S68–S86.
6. Van Niekerk, J.M.; Fourie, P.H.; Halleen, F.; Crous, P.W. Botryosphaeria spp. as grapevine
trunk pathogens. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2006, 45, S43–S54.
7. Mostert, L.; Halleen, F.; Fourie, P.; Crous, P.W. A review of Phaeoacremonium species involved
in Petri disease and esca of grapevines. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2006, 45, S12–S29.
8. Trouillas, F.P.; Gubler, W.D. Pathogenicity of Diatrypaceae species in grapevines in California.
Plant Dis. 2010, 94, 867–872.
9. Trouillas, F.P.; Úrbez-Torres, J.R.; Gubler, W.D. Diversity of diatrypaceous fungi associated
with grapevine canker diseases in California. Mycologia 2010, 102, 319–336.
10. Lardner, R.; Mahoney, N.; Zanker, T.P.; Molyneux, R.J.; Scott, E.S. Secondary metabolite
production by the fungal pathogen Eutypa lata: Analysis of the extracts from grapevine cultures
and detection of those metabolites in planta. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2006, 12, 107–114.
11. Halleen, F.; Mostert, L.; Crous, P.W. Pathogenicity testing of lesser-known vascular fungi of
grapevines. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2007, 36, 277–285.
12. Gramaje, D.; Mostert, L.; Armengol, J. Characterization of Cadophora luteo-olivacea and
C. melinii isolates obtained from grapevines and environmental samples from grapevine
nurseries in Spain. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2011, 50, S112-S126.
13. Sosnowski, M.R.; Wicks, T.W.; Scott, E.S. Control of Eutypa dieback in grapevines using
remedial surgery Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2011, 50, S277-S284.
14. Herche, R. Control Strategies for Trunk Diseases of Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). M.Agr. Thesis,
University of California-Davis, CA, USA, 2009; p. 56.
15. Rolshausen, P.E.; Gubler, W.D. Use of boron for the control of Eutypa dieback of grapevines.
Plant Dis. 2005, 89, 734–738.
16. John, S.; Wicks, T.J.; Hunt, J.S.; Lorimer, M.F.; Oakey, H.; Scott, E.S. Protection of grapevine
pruning wounds from infection by Eutypa lata using Trichoderma harzianum and Fusarium
lateritium. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2005, 34, 569–575.
17. Bester, W.; Crous, P.W.; Fourie, P.H. Evaluation of fungicides as potential grapevine pruning
wound protectants against Botryosphaeria species. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2007, 36, 73–77.

Toxins 2011, 3
1598
18. Sosnowski, M.R.; Creaser, M.L.; Wicks, T.J.; Lardner, R.; Scott, E.S. Protection of grapevine
pruning wounds from infection by Eutypa lata. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2008, 14, 134–142.
19. Kotze, C.; Van Niekerk, J.; Mostert, L.; Halleen, F.; Fourie, P. Evaluation of biocontrol agents
for grapevine pruning wound protection against trunk pathogen infection. Phytopathol. Mediterr.
2011, 50, S247–S263.
20. Fourie, P.H.; Halleen, F. Proactive control of Petri disease of grapevine through treatment of
propagation material. Plant Dis. 2004, 88, 1241–1245.
21. Fourie, P.H.; Halleen, F. Chemical and biological protection of grapevine propagation material
from trunk disease pathogens. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2006, 116, 255–265.
22. Gramaje, D.; Armengol, J. Fungal trunk pathogens in the grapevine propagation process:
Potential inoculum sources, detection, identification, and management strategies. Plant Dis.
2011, 95, 1040–1055.
23. Carter, M.V. Eutypa Dieback. In Compendium of Grape Diseases; Pearson, R.C., Goheen, A.C.,
Eds.; APS Press: St. Paul, MN, USA, 1988; pp. 32–34.
24. Tsoupras, G.; de Angelis, P.; Zesiger, T.; Renoud, J.M.; Tabacchi, R. Biologically-active natural
acetylenes from the culture medium of Eutypa lata. Bioact. Mol. 1988, 93–100.
25. Renoud, J.M.; Tsoupras, G.; Stoeckli-Evans, H.; Tabacchi, R. A novel allenic epoxycyclohexane
and related compounds from Eutypa lata (Pers:F.) Tul. Helv.Chim. Acta 1989, 72, 1262–1267.
26. Renoud, J.M.; Tsoupras, G.; Tabacchi, R. Biologically active natural acetylenic compounds from
Eutypa lata (Pers:F.) Tul. Helv. Chim. Acta 1989, 72, 929–932.
27. Molyneux, R.J.; Mahoney, N.; Bayman, P.; Wong, R.Y.; Meyer, K.; Irelan, N. Eutypa dieback in
grapevines: Differential production of acetylenic phenol metabolites by strains of Eutypa lata.
J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 1393–1399.
28. Mahoney, N.; Lardner, R.; Molyneux, R.J.; Scott, E.S.; Smith, L.R.; Schoch, T.K. Phenolic and
heterocyclic metabolite profiles of the grapevine pathogen Eutypa lata. Phytochemistry 2003,
64, 475–484.
29. Defrancq, E.; Gordon, J.; Brodard, A.; Tabacchi, R. The synthesis of a novel epoxycyclohexane
from the fungus Eutypa lata (Pers:F) Tul. Helv. Chim. Acta 1992, 75, 276–281.
30. Chapuis, L.; Corio-Costet, M.F.; Malosse, C. Sterol composition of the woody plant pathogenic
fungus Eutypa lata. Phytochemistry 1996, 42, 1599–1601.
31. Smith, L.R.; Mahoney, N.; Molyneux, R.J. Synthesis and structure-phytotoxicity relationships of
acetylenic phenols and chromene metabolites, and their analogues, from the grapevine pathogen
Eutypa lata. J. Nat. Prod. 2003, 66, 169–176.
32. Kim, J.H.; Mahoney, N.; Chan, K.L.; Molyneux, R.J.; Campbell, B.C. Secondary metabolites of
the grapevine pathogen Eutypa lata inhibit mitochondrial respiration, based on a model bioassay
using the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Microbiol. 2004, 49, 282–287.
33. Amborabé, B.E.; Fleurat-Lessard, P.; Bonmort, J.; Roustan, J.P.; Roblin, G. Effects of eutypine,
a toxin from Eutypa lata, on plant cell plasma membrane: Possible subsequent implication in
disease development. Plant Physiol. Biochem. (Paris) 2001, 39, 51–58.
34. Deswarte, C.; Eychenne, J.; Davy de Virville, J.; Roustan, J.; Moreau, F.; Fallot, J. Protonophoric
activity of eutypine, a toxin from Eutypa lata, in plant mitochondria. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
1996, 334, 200–205.

Toxins 2011, 3
1599
35. Deswarte, C.; Canut, H.; Klaebe, A.; Roustain, J.P.; Fallot, J. Transport, cytoplasmatic
accumulation, and mechanism of action of the toxic eutypine in Vitis vinifera cells. J. Plant Pathol.
1996, 149, 336–342.
36. Fallot, J.; Deswarte, C.; Dalmayrac, S.; Colrat, S.; Roustan, J.P. L’Eutypiose de la vigne:
Isolement d’une molécule synthétisée par Eutypa lata et toxique pour la vigne. Comptes Rendus
Acad. Sci. Ser. III 1997, 320, 149–158.
37. Colrat, S.; Deswarte, C.; Latché, A.; Klaebe, A.; Bouzayen, M.; Fallot, J.; Roustan, J.P. Enzymic
detoxification of eutypine, a toxin from Eutypa lata, by Vitis vinifera cells. Partial purification of
an NADPH-dependent aldehyde reductase. Planta 1999, 207, 544–550.
38. Afifi, M.; Monje, M.C.; Legrand, V.; Roustan, J.P. Metabolisation of eutypine by plant tissues:
An HPLC determination. Anal. Chim. Acta 2004, 513, 21–27.
39. Colrat, S.; Latché, A.; Guis, M.; Pech, J.C.; Bouzayen, M.; Fallot, J.; Roustan, J.P. Purification
and characterization of a NADPH-dependent aldehyde reductase from mung bean that detoxifies
eutypine, a toxin from Eutypa lata. Plant Physiol. 1999, 119, 621–626.
40. Legrand, V.; Dalmayrac, S.; Latché, A.; Pech, J.C.; Bouzayen, M.; Fallot, J.; Torregrosa, L.;
Bouquet, A.; Roustan, J.P. Constitutive expression of Vr-ERE gene in transformed grapevines
confers enhanced resistance to eutypine, a toxin from Eutypa lata. Plant Sci. 2003, 164, 809–814.
41. Guillen, P.; Guis, M.; Martínez-Reina, G.; Colrat, S.; Dalmayrac, S.; Deswarte, C.; Bouzayen, M.;
Roustan, J.P.; Fallot, J.; Pech, J.C.; et al. A novel NADPH-dependent aldehyde reductase gene
from Vigna radiata confers resistance to the grapevine fungal toxin eutypine. Plant J. 1998,
16, 335–343.
42. Lecomte, P.; Péros, J.P.; Blancard, D.; Bastien, N.; Délye, C. PCR assays that identify the
grapevine dieback fungus Eutypa lata. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 4475–4480.
43. Lardner, R.; Stummer, B.E.; Sosnowski, M.R.; Scott, E.S. Molecular identification and detection
of Eutypa lata in grapevine. Mycol. Res. 2005, 109, 799–808.
44. Sosnowski, M.R.; Shtienberg, D.; Creaser, M.L.; Wicks, T.J.; Lardner, R.; Scott, E.S. The
influence of climate on foliar symptoms of eutypa dieback in grapevines. Phytopathology 2007,
97, 1284–1289.
45. Viala, P. Recherches sur les maladies de la vigne. Esca. Annales des Epiphyties 1926, 12, 5–108.
46. Marsais, P. Maladie de l’esca. Rev. de Vit. 1923, 59, 8–14.
47. Surico, G. Towards a redefinition of the diseases within the esca complex of grapevine.
Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2009, 48, S487–S490.
48. Mostert, L.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Summerbell, R.C.; Gams, W.; Crous, P.W. Taxonomy and
pathology of Togninia (Diaporthales) and its Phaeoacremonium anamorphs. Stud. Mycol. 2006,
54, 1–115.
49. Essakhi, S.; Mugnai, L.; Crous, P.W.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Surico, G. Molecular and phenotypic
characterisation of novel Phaeoacremonium species isolated from esca diseased grapevines.
Persoonia 2008, 21, 119–134.
50. Graham, A.B.; Johnston, P.R.; Weir, B.S. Three new Phaeoacremonium species on grapevines in
New Zealand. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2009, 38, 505–513.

Toxins 2011, 3
1600
51. Gramaje, D.; Armengol, J.; Mohammadi, H.; Banihashemi, Z.; Mostert, L. Novel Phaeoacremonium
species associated with Petri disease and esca of grapevine in Iran and Spain. Mycologia 2009,
101, 920–929.
52. Surico, G.; Mugnai, L.; Marchi, G. The Esca Disease Complex. In Integrated Management of
Diseases Caused by Fungi, Phytoplasma and Bacteria; Springer: Heidelberg, Germany, 2008;
pp. 119–136.
53. Luque, J.; Martos, S.; Aroca, A.; Raposo, R.; Garcia-Figueres, F. Symptoms and fungi associated
with declining mature grapevine plants in northeast Spain. J. Plant Pathol. 2009, 91, 381–390.
54. Evidente, A.; Sparapano, L.; Andolfi, A.; Bruno, G. Two naphthalenone pentaketides from liquid
cultures of Phaeoacremonium aleophilum, a fungus associated with esca of grapevine.
Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2000, 39, 162–168.
55. Tabacchi, R.; Fkyerat, A.; Poliart, C.; Dubin, G.M. Phytotoxins from fungi of esca of grapevine.
Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2000, 39, 156–161.
56. Evidente, A.; Peduto, F.; Andolfi, A.; Marchi, G.; Mugnai, L.; Surico, G. Fattori di Virulenza dei
Funghi Dell’esca. Fitotossine da Phaeomoniella chlamydospora, Phaeoacremonium aleophilum
e Fomitiporia mediterranea: Produzione e Attività Biologica. In Il Mal dell’Esca della Vite:
Interventi di ricerca e Sperimentazione per il Contenimento Della Malattia. Progetto MesVit;
Surico, G., Mugnai, L., Eds.; Arsia Regione Toscana: Firenze, Italy, 2010; pp. 214–231.
57. Abou-Mansour, E.; Couche, E.; Tabacchi, R. Do fungal naphthalenones have a role in the
development of esca symptoms? Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2004, 43, 75–82.
58. Sparapano, L.; Bruno, G.; Graniti, A. Effects on plants of metabolites produced in culture by
Phaeoacremonium chlamydosporum, P. aleophilum and Fomitiporia punctata. Phytopathol.
Mediterr. 2000, 39, 169–177.
59. Seviour, T.; Lambert, L.K.; Pijuan, M.; Yuan, Z. Structural determination of a key
exopolysaccharide in mixed culture aerobic sludge granules using NMR spectroscopy, Environ.
Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 8964–8970.
60. Hogdson, R.; Peterson, W.H.; Riker, A.J. The toxicity of polysaccharides and other large
molecules to tomato cuttings. Phytopathology 1949, 39, 47–62.
61. Harborne, J.B. Toxins of Plant-Fungal Interaction. In Handbook of Natural Toxins: Plant and
Fungal Toxins; Keelr, R.F., Tu, A., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 1983;
Volume 1, pp. 743–782.
62. Denny, T.P. Involvement of bacterial polysaccharides in plant pathogenesis. Ann. Rev.
Phytopathol. 1995, 33, 173–197.
63. van Alfen, N.K. Reassessment of plant wilt toxins. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 1989, 27, 533–550.
64. Spalding, D.H.; Bruehl, G.W.; Foster, R.J. Possible role of pectinolytic enzymes and
polysaccharide in pathogenesis by Cephalosporium gramineum in wheat. Phytopathology 1961,
51, 227–235.
65. McWain, P.; Gregory, G.F. A neutral mannan from Ceratocystis fagacearum culture filtrate.
Phytochemistry 1972, 11, 2609–2612.
66. Strobel, G.A.; van Alfen, N.; Hapner, K.D.; McNeil, M.; Albersheim, P. Some phytotoxic
glycopeptides from Ceratocystis ulmi, the Dutch Elm Disease pathogen. Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1978, 538, 60–75.

Toxins 2011, 3
1601
67. Thomas, C.A. A wilt-inducing polysaccharide from Fusarium solani f. eumartii. Phytopathology
1949, 39, 572–579.
68. Keen, N.T.; Wang, M.C.; Bartnicki-Garcia, S.; Zentmeyer, G.A. Phytotoxicity of
myco-laminarans-β-l,3-glucans from Phytophthora spp. Physiol. Plant Pathol. 1975, 7, 91–97.
69. Woodward, J.R.; Keane, P.J.; Stone, B.A. Structures and properties of wilt-inducing
polysaccharides from Phytophthora spp. Physiol. Plant Pathol. 1980, 16, 439–454.
70. Barbosa, A.M.; Steluti, R.M.; Dekker, R.F.H.; Cardoso, M.S.; Corradi da Silva, M.L. Structural
characterization of Botryosphaeran: A (1→3;1→6)-β-D-glucan produced by the ascomyceteous
fungus, Botryosphaeria sp. Carbohyd. Res. 2003, 338, 1691–1698.
71. Rudolph, K.W.E.; Gross, M.; Neugebauer, M.; Hokawat, S.; Zachowski, A.; Wanddra, K.;
Klement, Z. Extracellular Polysaccharides as Determinants of Leaf Spot Diseases Caused by
Pseudomonads and Xanthomonads. In Phytotoxins and Plant Pathogenesis, NATO ASI Series,
Series H: Cell Biology; Graniti, A., Durbin, R.D., Ballio, A., Eds.; Springer Verlag: Berlin,
Germany, 1989; pp. 177–218.
72. Corsaro, M.M.; de Castro, C.; Evidente, A.; Lanzetta, R.; Molinaro, A.; Parrilli, M.; Sparapano, L.
Phytotoxic extracellular polysaccharide fractions from Cryphonectria parasitica (Murr.) Barr.
Carbohyd. Polym. 1998, 37, 167–172.
73. Corsaro, M.M.; de Castro, C.; Evidente, A.; Lanzetta, R.; Molinaro, A.; Mugnai, L.;
Parrilli, M.; Surico, G. Chemical structure of two phytotoxic exopolysaccharides produced by
Phomopsis foeniculi. Carbohydr. Res. 1998, 308, 349–357.
74. Martos, S.; Andolfi, A.; Luque, J.; Mugnai, L.; Surico, G.; Evidente, A. Production of phytotoxic
metabolites by five species of Botryosphaeriaceae causing decline on grapevine, with special
interest in the species Neofusicoccum luteum and N. parvum. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2008,
121, 451–461.
75. Leathers, T.D. Pullulan. In Polysaccharides II: Polysaccharides from Eukaryotes;
Vandamme, E.J., de Baets, S., Steinbuchel, A., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2002;
Volume 6, pp. 1–35.
76. Campbell, B.S.; Siddique, A.B.M.; McDougall, B.M.; Seviour, R.J. Which morphological forms
of the fungus Aureobasidium pullulans are responsible for pullulan production? FEMS Microb.
Lett. 2004, 232, 225–228.
77. Bruno, G.; Sparapano, L.; Graniti, A.A. Effects of three esca-associated fungi on Vitis vinifera
L.: IV. Diffusion through the xylem of metabolites produced by two tracheiphilous fungi in the
woody tissue of grapevine leads to esca-like symptoms on leaves and berries. Physiol. Mol. Plant
Pathol. 2007, 71, 106–124.
78. Luini, E.; Fleurat-Lessard, P.; Rousseau, L.; Roblin, G.; Berjeaud, J. Inhibitory effects of
polypeptides secreted by the grapevine pathogens Phaeomoniella chlamydospora and
Phaeoacremonium aleophilum on plant cell activities. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2010,
74, 403–411.
79. Fleurat-Lessard, P.; Luini, E.; Berjeaud, J.M.; Roblin, G. Diagnosis of grapevine esca disease by
immunological detection of Phaeomoniella chlamydospora. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2010,
16, 455–463.

Toxins 2011, 3
1602
80. White, C.L. The Characterization of the Basidiomycetes and Other Fungi Associated with Esca
of Grapevines in South Africa. Master Thesis, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South
Africa, 2010.
81. Castro, F.A.V.; Mariani, D.; Panek, A.D.; Eleutherio, E.C.A.; Pereira, M.D. Cytotoxicity
mechanism of two naphthoquinones (menadione and plumbagin) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
PLoS One 2008, 3, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003999.
82. Butler, M.; Gardiner, R.; Day, A. Melanin synthesis by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Mycologia
2009, 101, 296–304.
83. Wheeler, M.H.; Abramczyk, D.; Puckhaber, L.S.; Naruse M.; Ebizuka, Y.; Fujii, I.; Szaniszlo, P.J.
New biosynthetic step in the melanin pathway of Wangiella (Exophiala) dermatitidis:
Evidence for 2-acetyl-1,3,6,8-tetrahydroxynaphthalene as a novel precursor. Eukaryot. Cell
2008, 7, 1699–1711.
84. Kwon-Chung, K.J.; Polacheck, I. Melanin-lacking mutants of Cryptococcus neoformans and
their virulence for mice. J. Bacteriol. 1982, 150, 1414–1421.
85. Geis, P.A.; Wheeler, M.H.; Szaniszlo, P.J. Pentaketide metabolites of melanin synthesis in the
dematiaceous fungus Wangiella dermatitidis. Arch. Microbiol. 1984, 137, 324–328.
86. Dixon, D.M.; Szaniszlo, P.J.; Polak, A. Dihydroxynaphthalene (DHN) Melanin and its
Relationship with Virulence in the Early Stages of Phaeohyphomycosis. In The Fungal Spore
and Disease Initiation in Plants and Animals; Cole, G.T., Hock, H.C., Eds.; Plenum Press: New
York, NY, USA, 1991; pp. 297–318.
87. Durrell, L.W. The composition and structure of walls of dark fungus spores. Mycopathol. Mycol.
Appl. 1964, 23, 339–345.
88. Bürki, N.; Michel, A.; Tabacchi, R. Naphthalenones and isocoumarins of the fungus Ceratocystis
fimbriata sp. platani. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2003, 42, 191–198.
89. Oberth, C.H.; Jones, A.D.; Shibamoto, T. Retro-Michael Fragmentation in Tandem Mass
Spectrometry of Modified Peptides. In Proceedings of the 40th ASMS Conference on Mass
Spectrometry, Washington, DC, USA, 31 May–5 June 1992; p. 1715.
90. Scandalios, J.G. Response of plant antioxidant defense genes to environment stress. Adv. Genet.
1990, 28, 2–35.
91. Dangl, J.L.; Deetrich, R.A.; Richberg, M.H. Death don’t have no mercy: Cell death programs in
plant-microbe interactions. Plant Cell 1996, 8, 1793–1807.
92. Thomson, R.H. Naturally Occuring Quinones; Academic Press: London, UK, 1971; pp. 39–92.
93. Medentsev, A.G.; Akimenko, V.K. Naphthoquinone metabolites of the fungi. Phytochemistry
1998, 47, 933–959.
94. Lattanzio, V.; Lattanzio, V.M.T.; Cardinali, A. Role of Phenolics in the Resistance Mechanisms
of Plants Against Fungal Pathogens and Insects. In Phytochemistry: Advances in Research;
Imperato, F., Ed.; Research Signpost: Kerala, India, 2006; pp. 23–67.
95. Kurahashi, Y.; Sakawa, S.; Kinbara, T.; Tanaka, K.; Kagabu, S. Biological activity of carpropamid
(KTU 3616): A new fungicide for rice blast disease. J. Pest. Sci. 1997, 22, 108–112.
96. Yumita, T.; Shojiand, A.; Yamamoto, I. Metabolism of mepronil (basitac) in rice plants. J. Pest.
Sci. 1983, 5, 347–349.

Toxins 2011, 3
1603
97. Petit, A.N.; Vaillant, N.; Boulay, M.; Clement, C.; Fontaine, F. Alteration of photosynthesis in
grapevines affected by esca. Phytopathology 2006, 96, 1060–1066.
98. Mattii, G.B.; Bardi, E.; Calabrese, C.; Giorgini, A. Alterazioni Degli Scambi Gassosi Causati dal
Mal Dell’esca—Misurazioni su Foglia Singola e SULL’INTERA Chioma di Piante di Vite in
Vaso. 2010. In Il mal Dell’esca Della Vite: Interventi di Ricerca e Sperimentazione per il
Contenimento Della Malattia. Progetto MesVit; Surico, G., Mugnai, L., Eds.; Arsia Regione
Toscana: Firenze, Italy, 2010; pp. 241–260.
99. Calamai, L.; Mattii, G.; Mugnai, L.; Surico, G. Physiological alterations in esca-diseased vines
and the detection of scytalone and isosclerone in the tiger-striped vine leaves. Phytopathol.
Mediterr. 2009, 48, 168–169.
100. Calamai, L.; Zini, E.; Cantalupo, L.; Comparini, C. Monitoraggio di Marcatori Chimici di Stress
Idrico in Foglie di Vite Con Sintomi di Esca. In Il Mal dell’esca Della Vite: Interventi di Ricerca
e Sperimentazione per il Contenimento Della Malattia. Progetto MesVit; Surico, G., Mugnai, L.,
Eds.; Arsia Regione Toscana: Firenze, Italy, 2010; pp. 232–240.
101. Dimond, A.E.; Waggoner, P.E. On the nature and role of vivotoxins in plant diseases.
Phytopathology 1953, 43, 229–235.
102. Bruno, G.; Sparapano, L. Effects of three esca-associated fungi on Vitis vinifera L. II.
Characterization of biomolecules in xylem sap and leaves of healthy and diseased vines. Physiol.
Mol. Plant Pathology 2007, 69, 195–208.
103. Andolfi, A.; Cimmino, A.; Evidente, A.; Iannacone, M.; Capparelli, R.; Mugnai, L.; Surico, G.
A new flow cytometry technique to identify Phaeomoniella chlamydospora exopolysaccharides
and study mechanisms of esca grapevine foliar symptoms. Plant Dis. 2009, 93, 680–684.
104. Santos, C.; Fragoeiro, S.; Valentim, H.; Phillips, A. Phenotypic characterisation of
Phaeacremonium and Phaemoniella strains isolated from grapevines: Enzyme production and
virulence of extra-cellular filtrate on grapevine callus. Sci. Hortic. 2006, 107, 123–130.
105. Bruno, G.; Sparapano, L. Effects of three esca associated fungi on Vitis vinifera L.: III. Enzymes
produced by the pathogens and their role in fungus-to-plant or in fungus-to-fungus interactions.
Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2006, 69, 182–194.
106. Lima, M.R.M.; Felgueiras, M.L.; Graça, G.; João, E.A.R.; Barros, A.; Gil, G.; Dias, A.C.P.
NMR metabolomics of esca disease-affected Vitis vinifera cv. Alvarinho leaves. J. Exp. Bot.
2010, 61, 4033–4042.
107. Úrbez-Torres, J.R.; Gubler, W.D.; Luque, J. First report of Botryosphaeria iberica and
Botryosphaeria viticola associated with grapevine decline in California. Plant Dis. 2007, 91,
doi:10.1094/PDIS-91-6-0772C.
108. Úrbez-Torres, J.R. The status of Botryosphaeriaceae species infecting grapevines. Phytopathol.
Mediterr. 2011, 50, S5–S45.
109. Hewitt, R.D. Diplodia Cane Dieback and Bunch Rot. In Compendium of Grape Diseases;
The American Phytopathological Society (APS) Press: St. Paul, MN, USA, 1988; pp. 25–26.
110. Phillips, A.J.L. Botryosphaeria dothidea and other fungi associated with excoriose and dieback
of grapevines in Portugal. J. Phytopathol. 1998, 146, 327–332.
111. Phillips, A.J.L. Botryosphaeria species associated with diseases of grapevines in Portugal.
Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2002, 41, 3–18.

Toxins 2011, 3
1604
112. Larignon, P.; Fulchic, R.; Cere, L.; Dubos, B. Observation on black dead arm in French
vineyards. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2001, 40, S336–S342.
113. Castillo-Pando, M.; Somers, A.; Green, C.D.; Priest, M.; Sriskanthades, M. Fungi associated
with dieback of Semillon grapevines in the Hunter Valley of New South Wales. Australas. Plant
Pathol. 2001, 30, 59–63.
114. Taylor, A.; Hardy, G.E.S.; Wood, P.; Burgess, T. Identification and pathogenicity of
Botryosphaeria species associated with grapevine decline in Western Australia. Australas. Plant
Pathol. 2005, 34, 187–195.
115. Wunderlich, N.; Steel, C.C.; Ash, G.; Raman, H.; Savocchia, S. Identification of Botryosphaeria
spp. and First Report of Dothiorella Viticola (“Botryosphaeria” Viticola) Associated with Bunch
Rot in Australia. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Grapevine Trunk
Diseases, Florence, Italy, 1–3 September 2008.
116. Savocchia, S.; Steel, C.C.; Stodart, B.J.; Somers, A. Pathogenicity of Botryosphaeria species
isolated from declining grapevines in sub-tropical regions of eastern Australia. Vitis 2007,
46, 27–32.
117. Corradi da Silva, M.L.; Izeli, N.L.; Martinez, P.F.; Silva, I.R.; Costantino, C.J.L.; Cardoso, M.S.;
Barbosa, A.M.; Dekker, R.F.H.; da Silva, G.V.J. Purification and structural characterisation of
(1→3;1→6)-β-D-glucans (botryosphaerans) from Botryosphaeria rhodina grown on sucrose and
fructose as carbon sources. a comparative study. Carbohyd. Polym. 2005, 61, 10–17.
118. Evidente, A.; Motta, A. Phytotoxins from Fungi Pathogenic for Agrarian, Forestal and Weedy
Plants. In Bioactive Compounds from Natural Sources: Isolation, Characterization, and
Biological Properties; Taylor & Francis Group: London, UK, 2001; pp. 473–525.
119. Evidente, A.; Punzo, B.; Andolfi, A.; Cimmino, A.; Melck, D.; Luque, J. Lipophilic phytotoxins
produced by Neofusicoccum parvum, a grapevine canker agent. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2010,
49, 74–79.
120. Aldridge, D.C.; Galt, S.; Giles, D.; Turner, W.B. Metabolites of Lasiodiplodia theobromae.
J. Chem. Soc. 1971, 1623–1627.
121. Kimura, Y.; Tamura, S. Isolation of l-β-phenyllactic acid and tyrosol as plant-growth regulators
from Gloeosporium laeticolor. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1973, 37, 2925–2925.
122. Morita, T.; Aoki, H. Isosclerone, a new metabolite of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) De Bary.
Agric. Biol. Chem. 1974, 38, 1501–1504.
123. Cole, R.J.; Cox, R.H. Handbook of Toxic Fungal Metabolites; Academic Press: New York, NY,
USA, 1981; volume 3, pp. 623–624.
124. Turner, W.B.; Aldridge, D.C. Fungal Metabolites II; Academic Press: London, UK, 1983;
pp. 82–109.
125. Venkatasubbaiah, P.; Chilton, W.S. Phytotoxins of Botryosphaeria obtusa. J. Nat. Prod. 1990,
53, 1628–1630.
126. Devys, M.; Barbier, M.; Bousquet, J.F.; Kollmann, A. Isolation of the new (-)-(3R,4S)-4-
hydroxymellein from the fungus Septoria nodorum Berk. Z. Naturforsch. B. 1992, 47, 779–881.
127. Cabras, A.; Mannoni, M.A.; Serra, S.; Andolfi, A.; Fiore, M. Occurrence, isolation and biological
activity of phytotoxic metabolites produced in vitro by Sphaeropsis sapinea, pathogenic of
Pinus radiata. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2006, 115, 187–193.

Toxins 2011, 3
1605
128. Venkatasubbaiah, P.; Sutton, T.B.; Chilton, W.S. Effect of phytotoxins produced by
Botryosphaeria obtusa, the cause of black rot of apple fruit and frogeye leaf spot.
Phytopathology 1991, 81, 243–247.
129. Lecomte, P.; Leyo, M.; Louvet, G.; Corio-Costet, M.F.; Gaudillère, J.P.; Blancard, D. Le Black
Dead Arm, genèse des symptômes. Phytoma La Défense des Végetaux 2005, 587, 29–37.
130. Djoukeng, J.D.; Polli, S.; Larignon, P.; Mansour, E.A. Identification of phytotoxins from
Botryosphaeria obtusa, a pathogen of black dead arm disease of grapevine. Eur. J. Plant Pathol.
2009, 124, 303–308.
131. Capasso, R.; Cristinzio, G.; Evidente, A.; Scognamiglio, F. Isolation, spectroscopy and
selective phytotoxic effects of polyphenols from vegetable waste waters. Phytochemistry 1992,
31, 4125–4128.
132. Spagnolo, A.; Marchi, G.; Peduto, F.; Phillips, A.J.L.; Surico, G. Detection of Botryosphaeriaceae
species within grapevine woody tissues by nested PCR, with particular emphasis on the
Neofusicoccum parvum/N. ribis complex. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2011, 129, 485–500.
133. Cristinzio, G. Gravi attacchi di Botryosphaeria obtusa su vite in provincia di Isernia. Inf.
Fitopatol. 1978, 6, 21–23.
134. Lehoczky, J. Black Dead Arm. In Compendium of Grape Diseases; Pearson, R.C., Goheen, A.C.,
Eds.; The American Phytopathological Society (APS) Press: St. Paul, MN, USA, 1988; p. 35.
135. Marchi, G.; Peduto, F.; Mugnai, L.; di Marco, S.; Calzarano, F.; Surico, G. Some observations
on the relationship of manifest and hidden esca to rainfall. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2006,
45, 117–126.
© 2011 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).